Neoadjuvant Atezolizumab With Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial

Neoadjuvant gemcitabine-cisplatin plus tislelizumab in persons with resectable muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial

Programmed death 1 blockade (tislelizumab) has been approved for metastatic urothelial carcinoma but not as part of neoadjuvant therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). In this multicenter single-arm trial (ChiCTR2000037670), 65 participants with cT2-4aN0M0 MIBC received neoadjuvant gemcitabine-cisplatin plus tislelizumab; 57 of them underwent radical cystectomy (RC). The primary endpoint of pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 50.9% (29/57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 37.3-64.4%) and the pathologic downstaging (secondary endpoint) rate was 75.4% (43/57, 95% CI 62.2-85.9%) in participants undergoing RC. Genomic and transcriptomic analyses revealed three MIBC molecular subtypes (S): S1 (immune-desert) with activated cell-cycle pathway, S2 (immune-excluded) with activated transforming growth factor-β pathway and S3 (immune-inflamed) with upregulated interferon-α and interferon-γ response. Post hoc analysis showed pCR rates of 16% (3/19, S1), 77% (10/13, S2) and 80% (12/15, S3) (P = 0.006). In conclusion, neoadjuvant gemcitabine-cisplatin plus tislelizumab for MIBC was compatible with an enhanced pCR rate.

First Results of NURE-Combo: A Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Nivolumab and Nab-Paclitaxel, Followed by Postsurgical Adjuvant Nivolumab, for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the activity and safety of nivolumab with nab-paclitaxel as neoadjuvant therapy, followed by radical cystectomy (RC) and postsurgical adjuvant nivolumab in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤1 and a T2-4aN0-1M0 stage with >50% urothelial carcinoma histology and were ineligible for or refused cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Patients received four cycles of nivolumab 360 mg once every 3 weeks + nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 once on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks, followed by RC, and then adjuvant nivolumab 360 mg once every 3 weeks × 13 cycles. The primary end point was the pathologic complete response (CR) rate (ypT0N0). Secondary end points were major pathologic response (ypT≤1N0), safety, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were enrolled from December 2021 to June 2023; 19 (61.3%) had a cT2 stage, two (6.5%) had N1 stage, and 16 (51.6%) had a variant histology. Five patients (16.1%) received less than four full courses of neoadjuvant treatment because of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in eight patients (25.8%). Twenty-eight patients underwent RC, and three refused RC after evidence of clinical CR and received a redo transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (reTURBT). The trial met its primary end point: 10 patients (32.3%; 95% CI, 16.7 to 51.4) achieved an ypT0N0 response. By including those who underwent reTURBT, 22 (70.9%; 95% CI, 55 to 87) achieved an ypT≤1N0-x response. After a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 5-22), two patients had a disease relapse after surgery. The 12-month EFS was 89.8% (95% CI, 79.5 to 100).

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, the first results from NURE-Combo trial suggest that this combination could expand the therapeutic opportunities of immune-chemotherapy in patients with MIBC.

Safety and quality of cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant durvalumab and cisplatin/gemcitabine

OBJECTIVE

To report on the surgical safety and quality of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) and PLND for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) after neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) 06/17 was an open-label single-arm phase II trial including 61 cisplatin-fit patients with clinical stage (c)T2-T4a cN0-1 operable urothelial MIBC or upper urinary tract cancer. Patients received neoadjuvant cisplatin/gemcitabine and durvalumab followed by surgery. Prospective quality assessment of surgeries was performed via central review of intraoperative photographs. Postoperative complications were assessed using the Clavien-Dindo Classification. Data were analysed descriptively.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients received RC and PLND. All patients received neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy. The median (interquartile range) number of lymph nodes removed was 29 (23-38). No intraoperative complications were registered. Grade ≥III postoperative complications were reported in 12 patients (24%). Complete nodal dissection (100%) was performed at the level of the obturator fossa (bilaterally) and of the left external iliac region; in 49 patients (98%) at the internal iliac region and at the right external iliac region; in 39 (78%) and 38 (76%) patients at the right and left presacral level, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the surgical safety of RC and PLND following neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in patients with MIBC. The extent and completeness of protocol-defined PLND varies between patients, highlighting the need to communicate and monitor the surgical template.

Perioperative chemotherapy and immunotherapy to optimize cystectomy outcomes in the curative intent of non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Perioperative systemic treatments play a crucial role in the comprehensive management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. While neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy has a proven efficacy, administering adjuvant chemotherapy can be challenging in patients with multiple comorbidities. Although immunotherapy has shown success in metastatic settings, its effectiveness in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings remains under investigation. This study aims to conduct a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy in neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant settings.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by consulting the PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrial.gov databases for the period from 1994 to 2023. The analysis utilized Forest Plots for key points of interest: overall survival/pathologic response for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and overall survival/disease-free survival for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), employing random or fixed models.

RESULTS

The systematic review included 26 articles, and 14 were incorporated into the meta-analysis. For NAC, five studies assessed overall survival, yielding an overall hazard ratio (HR) of 0.84 [0.75-0.94]; P=0.002. Pathologic response under NAC was evaluated in five studies, resulting in an overall odds ratio (OR) of 0.3 [0.2-0.4]; P<0.001 compared to cystectomy and 0.86 [0.65-1.13]; P=0.28 for MVAC vs. GC. Regarding AC, six studies investigated overall survival, revealing an overall HR of 0.93 [0.77-1.12]; P=0.46. Disease-free survival under AC was examined in seven studies, with an overall OR of 0.58 [0.44-0.78]; P<0.001. Meta-analysis was not conducted for immunotherapy due to limited phase II studies in the neoadjuvant setting and only two available studies in the adjuvant setting.

CONCLUSION

This study reaffirms the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in neoadjuvant and adjuvant scenarios, enhancing overall survival in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients. Immunotherapy exhibits promising outcomes in tumor downstaging in the neoadjuvant setting and in disease-free survival, in the adjuvant setting.

PrECOG PrE0807: A Phase 1b Feasibility Trial of Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Without and with Lirilumab in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Ineligible for or Refusing Cisplatin-based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy (RC) improves overall survival (OS) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, many patients are cisplatin ineligible; therefore, new treatment options are needed. Nivolumab without/with lirilumab prior to RC was investigated in cisplatin-ineligible patients in this phase 1b trial (NCT03532451) to determine its safety/feasibility.

METHODS

Patients with localized MIBC received two doses of nivolumab (480 mg) alone (cohort 1) or with lirilumab (240 mg; cohort 2) prior to RC. Cohorts were enrolled sequentially. The key eligibility criteria were cT2-4aN0-1M0 stage and cisplatin ineligibility/refusal. The primary endpoint was the rate of grade (G) ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The key secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients who underwent RC >6 wk after the last dose, CD8+ T-cell density change between pretreatment transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and post-treatment RC, ypT0N0,

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Among 43 patients enrolled (n = 13, cohort 1; n = 30, cohort 2), 13 and 29 completed intended neoadjuvant therapy, respectively, in cohorts 1 and 2, and 41 underwent RC. The median time from the last dose to RC was 4 wk. The G3 TRAEs occurred in 0% (90% confidence interval [CI] 0-21%) of patients in cohort 1 and 7% (90% CI 1-20%) in cohort 2; all these TRAEs resolved and no G4/5 TRAEs occurred. No patient had delayed RC for >6 wk. In cohorts 1 and 2, ypT0N0 rates for patients with MIBC and RC were 17% and 21%,

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Neoadjuvant nivolumab-based immunotherapy was safe, feasible, and well tolerated in cisplatin-ineligible patients with MIBC. Although ypT0N0 rates were lower than expected, 2-yr survival rates seem to be comparable with those of other neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials. Nivolumab is being evaluated in the CA-017-078 trial (NCT03661320).

PATIENT SUMMARY

For patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer unable to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy, treatment with nivolumab without and with lirilumab prior to radical cystectomy was safe, feasible, and well tolerated. Nivolumab-based immunotherapy showed lower pathologic response rates than but similar survival rates to other neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials.

Collapse

Key Words

• Anti-KIR antibody
• Bladder cancer
• Immune checkpoint inhibitors
• Neoadjuvant therapy
• Urothelial carcinoma

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality
• Male
• Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods
• Female
• Aged
• Cisplatin/therapeutic use
• Cisplatin/administration & dosage
• Feasibility Studies
• Nivolumab/therapeutic use
• Middle Aged
• Neoplasm Invasiveness
• Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
• Cystectomy/methods

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Petros Grivas Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Vadim S Koshkin Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
Xiangying Chu Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
Suzanne Cole University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
Rohit K Jain H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
Robert Dreicer University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
Jeremy P Cetnar Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
Debasish Sundi Department of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
Benjamin A Gartrell Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
Matthew D Galsky Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Brianna Woo Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Elsa Li-Ning-Tapia University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Noah M Hahn Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Michael A Carducci Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

Collapse

Bladder-sparing treatment using tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine/cisplatin in selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a real-world study

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate the tislelizumab-based chemoimmunotherapy combined with gemcitabine/cisplatin for bladder-sparing in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

METHODS

Forty-five patients who received bladder-sparing treatment or radical cystectomy (RC) for MIBC (cT2-T4a, NxM0) were retrospectively enrolled. All patients received maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor (mTURBT), followed by four cycles of chemo-immunotherapy with tislelizumab (PD-L1 inhibitor), gemcitabine, and cisplatin. Clinical efficacy was evaluated to compare the benefit of bladder-sparing treatment on clinical CR (cCR) and RC for non-cCR patients. The primary outcomes were bladder intact disease-free survival (BIDFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were adverse effects. The PD-L1 status and molecular subtypes of tumors were analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall survival rate was 88.8% (95%CI: 79.6%, 98.0%) at 12 months, 85.7% (95%CI: 74.9%, 96.5%) at 18 months, and 66.6% (95%CI: 45.2%, 88.0%) at 24 months. Twenty-nine patients (64.4%) achieved cCR and their OS rate was 96.6% (95%CI: 89.9%, 100%). Sixteen patients were in the non-cCR group, and their OS rate was 75.0% (95%CI: 53.8%, 96.2%) at 12 months, 65.6% (95%CI: 40.3%, 90.9%) at 18 months, and 52.5% (95%CI: 21.9%, 83.1%) at 24 months. The BIDFS rate for patients who received bladder-sparing treatment was 96.0% (95%CI: 88.4%, 100%) from 12 to 24 months. Four patients (8.8%) were PD-L1 positive and 41 patients (91.2%) were PD-L1 negative.

CONCLUSIONS

Our retrospective study of patients with MIBC suggests that tislelizumab-based neoadjuvant therapy was a safe and effective bladder-sparing treatment.

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates in the treatment of urogenital tumors: a review insights from phase 2 and 3 studies

With the high incidence of urogenital tumors worldwide, urinary system tumors are among the top 10 most common tumors in men, with prostate cancer ranking first and bladder cancer fourth. Patients with resistant urogenital tumors often have poor prognosis. In recent years, researchers have discovered numerous specific cancer antigens, which has led to the development of several new anti-cancer drugs. Using protein analysis techniques, researchers developed immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antibody-conjugated drugs (ADCs) for the treatment of advanced urogenital tumors. However, tumor resistance often leads to the failure of monotherapy. Therefore, clinical trials of the combination of ICIs and ADCs have been carried out in numerous centers around the world. This article reviewed phase 2 and 3 clinical studies of ICIs, ADCs, and their combination in the treatment of urogenital tumors to highlight safe and effective methods for selecting individualized therapeutic strategies for patients. ICIs activate the immune system, whereas ADCs link monoclonal antibodies to toxins, which can achieve a synergistic effect when the two drugs are combined. This synergistic effect provides multiple advantages for the treatment of urogenital tumors.

Management of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer with clinical evidence of pelvic lymph node metastases

Identification of clinically positive pelvic lymph node metastases (cN+) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer is currently challenging, as the diagnostic accuracy of available imaging modalities is limited. Conventional CT is still considered the gold-standard approach to diagnose lymph node metastases in these patients. The development of innovative diagnostic methods including radiomics, artificial intelligence-based models and molecular biomarkers might offer new perspectives for the diagnosis of cN+ disease. With regard to the treatment of these patients, multimodal strategies are likely to provide the best oncological outcomes, especially using induction chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in responders to chemotherapy. Additionally, the use of adjuvant nivolumab has been shown to decrease the risk of recurrence in patients who still harbour ypT2-T4a and/or ypN+ disease after surgery. Alternatively, the use of avelumab maintenance therapy can be offered to patients with unresectable cN+ tumours who have at least stable disease after induction chemotherapy alone. Lastly, patients with cN+ tumours who are not responding to induction chemotherapy are potential candidates for receiving second-line treatment with pembrolizumab.

Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab Versus Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy or Upfront Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Muscle-invasive Urothelial Bladder Cancer

BACKGROUND

Recent progresses in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) have challenged the therapeutic standards in patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIBC).

OBJECTIVE

To compare neoadjuvant pembrolizumab followed by radical cystectomy (RC) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and RC or upfront RC, according to cisplatin eligibility.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We conducted two separate analyses for cisplatin-eligible and cisplatin-ineligible cT2-4N0M0 MIBC patients. We used a propensity score adjustment that relied on inverse probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW).

INTERVENTION

Pembrolizumab within the PURE-01 trial, and NAC and RC or upfront RC from a high-volume tertiary care referral center.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary endpoint in both analyses was event-free survival (EFS), defined as freedom from recurrence, and/or death from any cause indexed from the date of treatment initiation or RC. The secondary endpoints included EFS in propensity score-matched patients, pathologic response rate, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after RC.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 458 patients who underwent RC, with or without NAC, at Moffitt Cancer Center between October 2005 and October 2020, and 146 patients enrolled in PURE-01 were analyzed. In cisplatin-ineligible patients, EFS was superior in those receiving pembrolizumab (p < 0.001). The estimated 3-yr EFS was 77.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 63.5-95.2) for pembrolizumab and RC, and 36.1% (95% CI: 28.6-45.5) for upfront RC. EFS remained superior in those receiving neoadjuvant ICI (NICI) following IPTW (p < 0.001). In cisplatin-eligible patients, EFS was superior in those receiving pembrolizumab and RC (p < 0.001). The estimated 3-yr EFS was 86.9% (95% CI: 80.9-93.3) for pembrolizumab and 63.5% (95% CI: 56.5-71.4) for NAC. EFS remained superior in those receiving NICI following IPTW (p < 0.001). Pathologic responses and RFS in pembrolizumab-treated patients were also superior to those in NAC-treated patients. Results are limited by the retrospective nature of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

In the first ever reported comprehensive comparison of outcomes between neoadjuvant ICI and NAC, followed by RC, or upfront RC, we report increased responses and improved oncologic outcomes with neoadjuvant ICI in patients with MIBC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We compared the results obtained from the use of pembrolizumab and radical cystectomy with standard-of-care treatments in patients with bladder carcinoma infiltrating the muscle layer. We reported increased response and survival rates possibilities with the use of immunotherapy, anticipating the possibility to set new therapeutic standards in these patients, pending the results of ongoing randomized studies.

The role of immunotherapy in urological cancers

Immunotherapy is defined as a therapeutic approach that targets or manipulates the immune system. A deeper understanding of the cellular and molecular composition of the tumour environment, as well as the mechanisms controlling the immune system, has made possible the development and clinical investigation of many innovative cancer therapies. Historically, immunotherapy has played an essential role in treating urologic malignancies, while in the modern era, the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been critical to urology. Urothelial carcinoma is a common type of cancer in the genitourinary system, and treatment strategies in this area are constantly evolving. Intravesical and systemic immunotherapeutic agents have begun to be used increasingly frequently in treating urothelial carcinoma. These agents increase the anti-tumour response by affecting the body's defence mechanisms. Immunotherapeutic agents used in urothelial carcinoma include various options such as BCG, interferon, anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) and anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab). Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been known for many years as a tumour with unique sensitivity to immunotherapies. The recent emergence of ICIs that block PD-1/PD-L1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab) or CTLA4 (ipilimumab) signalling pathways has reestablished systemic immunotherapy as central to the treatment of advanced RCC. In light of randomized clinical trials conducted with increasing interest in the application of immunotherapies in the adjuvant setting, combination therapies (nivolumab/ipilimumab, nivolumab/cabozantinib, pembrolizumab/ axitinib, pembrolizumab/lenvantinib) have become the standard first-line treatment of metastatic RCC. Prostate cancer is in the immunologically "cold" tumour category; on the contrary, in recent years, immunotherapeutic agents have come to the fore as an essential area in the treatment of this disease. Especially in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer, immunotherapeutic agents constitute an alternative treatment method besides androgen deprivation therapy and chemotherapy. Ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and Sipuleucel T (Vaccine-based) are promising alternative treatment options. Considering ongoing randomized clinical trials, immunotherapeutic agents promise to transform the uro-oncology field significantly. In this review, we aimed to summarize the role of immunotherapy in urothelial, renal and prostate cancer in the light of randomized clinical trials.

Performance of 18F-FDG PET/MRI and its parameters in staging and neoadjuvant therapy response evaluation in bladder cancer

18F-FDG PET/MRI shows potential efficacy in the diagnosis of bladder cancer (BLCA). However, the performance of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in staging and neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) response evaluation for BLCA patients remains elusive. Here, we conduct this study to evaluate the performance of 18F-FDG PET/MRI and its derived parameters for tumor staging and NAT response prediction in BLCA. Forty BLCA patients were retrospectively enrolled to evaluate the performance of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in staging and NAT response prediction in BLCA. The feasibility of using 18F-FDG PET/MRI-related parameters for tumor staging and NAT response evaluation was also analyzed. In conclusion, 18F-FDG PET/MRI is found to show good performance in the BLCA staging and NAT response prediction. Moreover, ΔSUVmean is an efficacious candidate parameter for NAT response prediction. This study highlights that 18F-FDG PET/MRI is a promising imaging approach in the clinical diagnosis and treatment for BLCA.

Phase 2 Study of Preoperative Tislelizumab in Combination with Low-dose Nab-Paclitaxel in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors and nab-paclitaxel have achieved significant therapeutic effects in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with low-dose nab-paclitaxel in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

METHODS

TRUCE-01 was a single-arm phase 2 study that included 62 patients with T2-4a N0/X M0 MIBC tumors with predominant urothelial carcinoma histology. Eligible patients received three 21-d cycles of intravenous 200 mg tislelizumab on day 1 plus intravenous 200 mg nab-paclitaxel on day 2, followed by surgical assessment. The primary study endpoint was a clinical complete response (cCR). Treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) profiles were recorded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

The safety analysis included all 62 patients and the efficacy analysis included 48 patients. The primary efficacy endpoint (cCR) was met by 25 patients (52%) patients. Among the 62 patients in the safety analysis, six (9.7%) had grade ≥3 TRAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Tislelizumab combined with low-dose nab-paclitaxel showed promising antitumor effectiveness and was generally well tolerated, which makes it an excellent preoperative therapy option for MIBC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We found that a combination of the drugs tislelizumab and low-dose nab-paclitaxel had satisfactory efficacy and safety for preoperative treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

How Immunotherapy Has Redefined the Treatment Paradigm of Metastatic or Locally Advanced Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma

In the past decade, the therapeutic arsenal for metastatic bladder cancer has expanded considerably, with the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody-drug conjugates such as enfortumab vedotin, and anti-fibroblast growth factor receptor agents. Clinical trials evaluating ICIs as neoadjuvants, adjuvants, or first- or second-line treatments have produced conflicting results. However, first-line therapeutic strategies have been redefined by the recent publication of results from two clinical trials: CheckMate-901, which demonstrated the superiority of combined treatment with nivolumab and chemotherapy in extending overall survival, and EV-302, which demonstrated that combined treatment with pembrolizumab and enfortumab vedotin reduced the risk of death by 53%. In this review, we discuss the role of ICIs, alone or in combination, in bladder cancer management in the metastatic and adjuvant settings in 2024, considering the latest published trials. The potential role of ICIs as neoadjuvants is also discussed.

Spatial Relationships in the Tumor Microenvironment Demonstrate Association with Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

BACKGROUND

Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is standard for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Pathologic response (complete: ypT0N0 and partial:

OBJECTIVE

Using the NanoString GeoMx platform, we performed proteomic digital spatial profiling (DSP) on transurethral resections of bladder tumors from 18 responders (

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Pretreatment tumor samples were stained by hematoxylin and eosin and immunofluorescence (panCK and CD45) to select four regions of interest (ROIs): tumor enriched (TE), immune enriched (IE), tumor/immune interface (tumor interface = TX and immune interface = IX).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

DSP was performed with 52 protein markers from immune cell profiling, immunotherapy drug target, immune activation status, immune cell typing, and pan-tumor panels.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Protein marker expression patterns were analyzed to determine their association with pathologic response, incorporating or agnostic of their ROI designation (TE/IE/TX/IX). Overall, DSP-based marker expression showed high intratumoral heterogeneity; however, response was associated with markers including PD-L1 (ROI agnostic), Ki-67 (ROI agnostic, TE, IE, and TX), HLA-DR (TX), and HER2 (TE). An elastic net model of response with ROI-inclusive markers demonstrated better validation set performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.827) than an ROI-agnostic model (AUC = 0.432). A model including DSP, tumor mutational burden, and clinical data performed no better (AUC = 0.821) than the DSP-only model.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite high intratumoral heterogeneity of DSP-based marker expression, we observed associations between pathologic response and specific DSP-based markers in a spatially dependent context. Further exploration of tumor region-specific biomarkers may help predict response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in MIBC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, we used the GeoMx platform to perform proteomic digital spatial profiling on transurethral resections of bladder tumors from 18 responders and 18 nonresponders from two studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (gemcitabine and cisplatin) plus immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (LCCC1520 [pembrolizumab] and BLASST-1 [nivolumab]). We found that assessing protein marker expression in the context of tumor architecture improved response prediction.

Collapse

Key Words

• BLASST-1
• Bladder cancer
• Digital spatial profiling
• Elastic net regression
• GeoMx
• LCCC1520
• Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Cisplatin
• Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods
• Gemcitabine
• Nivolumab/therapeutic use
• Proteomics
• Tumor Microenvironment
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology
• Biomarkers, Tumor
• Muscles/pathology
• Immunotherapy
• Neoplasm Invasiveness
• Cystectomy

Collapse

Grants

• F30 CA278317 NCI NIH HHS
• P30 CA016086 NCI NIH HHS
• R01 CA241810 NCI NIH HHS
• T32 CA244125 NCI NIH HHS

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Wolfgang Beckabir Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Sara E Wobker Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Pathology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Jeffrey S Damrauer Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Bentley Midkiff Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Gabriela De la Cruz Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Vladmir Makarov Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
Leah Flick Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Mark G Woodcock Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Petros Grivas Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
Marc A Bjurlin Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Michael R Harrison Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
Benjamin G Vincent Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Computational Medicine Program, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Curriculum in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Tracy L Rose Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Shilpa Gupta Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
William Y Kim Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Matthew I Milowsky Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Collapse

Predictors of response to neoadjuvant therapy in urothelial cancer

Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NACC) followed by radical cystectomy is the standard treatment for localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Patients who achieve a complete pathological response following NACC have better overall survival than those with residual disease. However, a subset of patients does not derive benefit from NACC while experiencing chemotherapy-related side effects that may delay cystectomy, which can be detrimental. There is a need for predictive and prognostic biomarkers to better stratify patients who will derive benefits from NACC. This review summarizes the currently available literature on various predictors of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Covered predictors include clinical factors, treatment regimens (including chemotherapy and immunotherapy), histological predictors, and molecular predictors such as DNA repair genes, p53, FGFR3, ERBB2, Bcl-2, EMMPRIN, survivin, choline-phosphate cytidylyltransferase-α, epigenetic markers, immunological markers, other molecular predictors and gene expression profiling. Further, we elaborate on the potential role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and the correlative biomarkers of response.

UPP1 enhances bladder cancer progression and gemcitabine resistance through AKT

UPP1, a crucial pyrimidine metabolism-related enzyme, catalyzes the reversible phosphorylation of uridine to uracil and ribose-1-phosphate. However, the effects of UPP1 in bladder cancer (BLCA) have not been elucidated. AKT, which is activated mainly through dual phosphorylation (Thr308 and Ser473), promotes tumorigenesis by phosphorylating downstream substrates. This study demonstrated that UPP1 promotes BLCA cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and gemcitabine resistance by activating the AKT signaling pathway in vitro and in vivo. Additionally, UPP1 promoted AKT activation by facilitating the binding of AKT to PDK1 and PDK2 and the recruitment of phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate to AKT. Moreover, the beneficial effects of UPP1 on BLCA tumorigenesis were mitigated upon UPP1 mutation with Arg94 or MK2206 treatment (AKT-specific inhibitor). AKT overexpression or SC79 (AKT-specific activator) treatment restored tumor malignancy and drug resistance. Thus, this study revealed that UPP1 is a crucial oncogene and a potential therapeutic target for BLCA and that UPP1 activates the AKT signaling pathway and enhances tumorigenesis and drug resistance to gemcitabine.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors or PD-L1 inhibitors for muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors or PD-L1 inhibitors [PD-(L)1 inhibitors] for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC).

Materials and methods

Four databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and 21 CENTRAL) were searched for articles studying neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors for MIBC. The search time period was from the establishment of each database to 21 July 2023. Meta-analyses of pCR, pPR, Grade≥ 3 irAEs rate, RFS, and OS were performed.

Results

In total, 22 studies were included for meta-analysis. The overall pooled pCR of neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors was 0.36 (95%CI=0.30-0.42, p=0.00). In subgroup meta-analysis, the pooled PCR of PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone, PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus other ICI, and PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy was 0.27 (95%CI=0.19-0.35, p=0.1), 0.41 (95%CI=0.21-0.62, p=0.01), 0.43 (95%CI=0.35-0.50, p=0.06), respectively. The overall pooled pPR of neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors was 0.53 (95%CI=0.46-0.60, p=0.00). In subgroup meta-analysis, the pooled pPR of PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone, PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus other ICI, and PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy was 0.36 (95%CI=0.22-0.51, p=0.01), 0.51 (95%CI=0.39-0.62, p=0.43), and 0.61 (95%CI=0.53-0.69, p=0.01), respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves for OS and RFS were reconstructed, but there was no significant difference among three groups in terms of OS or RFS. The pooled result of Grade≥ 3 irAEs rate for neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors was 0.15 (95%CI=0.09-0.22, p=0.00%). In subgroup analysis, the pooled result of Grade≥ 3 irAEs rate for PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone, PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus other ICI, and PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy was 0.07 (95%CI=0.04-0.11, p=0.84), 0.31 (95%CI=0.16-0.47, p=0.06), and 0.17 (95%CI=0.06-0.31, I2 = 71.27%, p=0.01), respectively.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors were feasible and safe for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Compared with PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone, PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus other ICI and PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy were associated with higher pCR and pPR, but higher Grade≥3 irAEs. Kaplan-Meier curves for OS and RFS indicated that neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors had an acceptable long-term prognostic, but it was not possible to discern statistical differences between the three neoadjuvant subgroups.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023452437, identifier PROSPERO (CRD42023452437).

Electrocardiographic characteristics of bladder cancer patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy and immunotherapy for bladder cancer may be at increased risk of cardiotoxicity and electrophysiological abnormalities. This study aimed to analyze their electrocardiographic (ECG) alterations.

METHODS

Patients with bladder cancer who were hospitalized and receiving tislelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel (TnP) were enrolled prospectively. ECG, cardiac biomarkers, and echocardiography were performed at baseline and the end of TnP.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients (76.7% males), including 30 muscle-invasive and 30 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, received three or four cycles of TnP, respectively. Hypertension was the commonest comorbidity (41.7%), and 25 patients (41.7%) were prescribed cardiovascular drugs. In comparison with baseline characteristics, cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were within normal ranges after TnP. However, echocardiographic parameter of left ventricular ejection fraction slightly decreased after TnP (62.81 ± 3.81% to 61.10 ± 4.37%, p = .011). The incidence of abnormal ECG increased from 65.0% at baseline to 76.7%, of which only a higher prevalence of fragmented QRS (fQRS) was observed (33.3% to 50.0%, p = .013; mainly in inferior leads). ECG parameters of QT dispersion (QTd) were prolonged significantly after the regimen (39.50 ± 11.37 to 44.20 ± 15.85 ms, p = .019).

CONCLUSION

In bladder cancer patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy, the main ECG abnormality was fQRS and QTd, with relatively normal cardiac biomarkers and echocardiographic parameters. Regular ECG screening should be carried out carefully to detect potential cardiotoxicity in the long-term follow-up.

Immuno-Oncology Advances in Genitourinary Cancers

Immuno-oncology (IO) has made monumental gains in the past decade in the genitourinary space. In this review, we highlight advances with IO in renal cell carcinoma where it now has become standard-of-care frontline therapy in the metastatic setting but also discuss challenges with the initial approach. In urothelial carcinoma, we discuss the growing use of IO including exciting recent updates with IO-based regimens that may soon become the new standard of care. We further discuss difficulties with IO in prostate cancer, germ cell tumors, and penile squamous cell carcinoma. Finally, we highlight advances in IO approaches beyond checkpoint inhibition including the role of the gut microbiome and T-cell redirecting therapies.

Perioperative Chemoimmunotherapy With Durvalumab for Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma: Primary Analysis of the Single-Arm Phase II Trial SAKK 06/17

PURPOSE

The integration of immunotherapy in the perioperative setting of muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) appears promising. SAKK 06/17 investigated the addition of neoadjuvant durvalumab to gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy followed by radical surgery and adjuvant checkpoint inhibition with durvalumab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

SAKK 06/17 was an investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm phase II study including cisplatin-fit patients with stage cT2-T4a cN0-1 operable MIUC. Four cycles of neoadjuvant GC in combination with four cycles of durvalumab (start with GC cycle 2) were administered, followed by radical surgery. Adjuvant durvalumab was given for 10 cycles. The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS) at 2 years.

RESULTS

Sixty one patients were accrued at 12 sites. The full analysis set consisted of 57 patients, 54 (95%) had bladder cancer. Median follow-up was 40 months. The primary end point was met, with EFS at 2 years of 76% (one-sided 90% CI [lower bound], 67%; two-sided 95% CI, 62 to 85). EFS at 3 years was 73% (95% CI, 59 to 83). Complete pathologic response in resected patients (N = 52) was achieved in 17 patients (33%), and 31 (60%) had pathologic response

CONCLUSION

The addition of perioperative durvalumab to the standard of care for patients with resectable MIUC results in a high EFS and OS at 2 years.

Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery
• Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy
• Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/surgery
• Cisplatin/adverse effects
• Deoxycytidine/adverse effects
• Muscles
• Immunotherapy
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
• Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Richard Cathomas Division of Oncology/Hematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
Sacha I. Rothschild Department of Medical Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland Department of Oncology/Hematology, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
Stefanie Hayoz Competence Center of SAKK, Bern, Switzerland
Lukas Bubendorf Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Berna C. Özdemir Department of Oncology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
Bernhard Kiss Department of Urology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
Andreas Erdmann Department of Oncology/Hematology, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
Stefanie Aeppli Department of Oncology, University Hospital HUG, Geneva, Switzerland
Nicolas Mach Department of Oncology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
Räto T. Strebel Division of Urology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
Boris Hadaschik Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
Dominik Berthold Department of Oncology, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
Hubert John Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
Deborah Zihler Department of Oncology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
Mathias Schmid Department of Oncology, Triemlispital, Zürich, Switzerland
Ilaria Alborelli Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Martina Schneider Competence Center of SAKK, Bern, Switzerland
Jana Musilova Competence Center of SAKK, Bern, Switzerland
Martin Spahn Department of Urology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland Hirslanden Klinik, Zürich, Switzerland Lindenhofspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Ulf Petrausch Onkozentrum Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

Collapse

Comparison of 3 and 4 cycles of neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with radical cystectomy (RC) is critical in reducing disease recurrence, with GC (gemcitabine and cisplatin) being one of the most commonly used NACs. Different GC schedules have been used, but the best neoadjuvant regimen is still unknown. The clinical outcomes of 3 and 4 cycles of neoadjuvant GC are compared in this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine which is best for patients with MIBC.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, WAN FANG DATA, and meeting abstracts to identify relevant studies up to March 2023. Studies that compared 3 and 4 cycles of neoadjuvant GC for MIBC were included. The primary outcomes were pCR, pDS, OS, and CSS. The secondary outcome was recurrence and SAEs.

RESULTS

A total of 3 studies, with 1091 patients, were included in the final analysis. Patients that received 4 cycles of GC had a higher pCR (OR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50-0.87; p = 0.003) and pDS (OR = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48-0.84; p = 0.002) than those who received 3 cycles. Regarding recurrence rate (OR = 1.23; 95% CI, 0.91-1.65; p = 0.18), there were no appreciable differences between the 3 and 4 cycles of GC. Survival parameters such as OS (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.86-2.12; p = 0.19) and CSS (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.82-1.38; p = 0.20) were similar. Only one trial reported on the outcomes of SAEs. And there were no statistically significant differences in thrombocytopenia, infection rate, neutropenic fever, anemia, or decreased renal function between patients. The neutropenia of patients was statistically different (OR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-0.99; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The 4-cycle GC regimen was superior to the 3-cycle regimen in only the pCR and pDS results. Survival and recurrence rates were similar between the two regimens. In both treatment regimes, the toxicity profile was manageable. However, due to the inherent drawbacks of retrospective research, this should be regarded with caution.

Checkpoint Inhibitors in Urothelial Carcinoma-Future Directions and Biomarker Selection

CONTEXT

Several recent phase 2 and 3 trials have evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy for urothelial carcinoma (UC) in the metastatic, localized muscle-invasive UC (MIUC), upper tract UC, and non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) disease state.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcomes and toxicity of CPIs across the treatment landscape of UC and contextualize their application to current real-world treatment.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We queried PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases and conference abstracts to identify prospective trials examining CPIs in UC. The primary endpoints included overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and toxicity (when available). A secondary analysis included biomarker evaluation of response.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We identified 21 trials, 12 phase 2 and nine phase 3 trials, in which a CPI was used for metastatic UC (seven), MIUC (nine), and NMIBC (five). For first-line (1L) metastatic UC, concurrent chemotherapy with CPIs failed to show superiority. Improved overall and progression-free survival for switch maintenance avelumab (after achieving stable disease or response with induction systemic chemotherapy) has established the current standard of care for 1L metastatic UC. A single-agent CPI is a consideration for patients unable to tolerate chemotherapy. CPIs in the perioperative setting are limited to only the adjuvant treatment with nivolumab after radical surgery for MIUC in patients at a higher risk of recurrence based on pathologic stage. Only pembrolizumab is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for carcinoma in situ unresponsive to bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in patients who are not fit for or who refuse radical cystectomy. Trials investigating CPIs in combination with multiple immune regulators, antibody drug conjugates, targeted therapies, antiangiogenic agents, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy are enrolling patients and may shape the future treatment of patients with UC.

CONCLUSIONS

CPIs have an established role across multiple states of UC, with broadened applications likely to occur in the future. Several combinations are being evaluated, while the development of predictive biomarkers and their validation may help identify patients who are most likely to respond.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Our findings highlight the broad activity of checkpoint inhibitors in urothelial carcinoma, noting the need for further investigation for the best application of combinations and patient selection to patient care.

Perioperative Immunotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

There is an acute unmet need to develop novel treatment regimens in the perioperative setting since many patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) are not eligible for the current standard of care (SOC) neoadjuvant treatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), both as monotherapy and in combination regimens with other ICIs, chemotherapy, or targeted drugs, may provide safe and clinically effective treatment options that could revolutionize current standard of care. In the neoadjuvant setting, compelling data from phase II clinical trials suggests that single-agent immunotherapy, as well as dual-checkpoint blockade, may emerge as reasonable alternatives to traditional cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Prospective studies combining ICIs with chemotherapy or with antibody-drug conjugates have also demonstrated robust outcomes. However, these studies are not yet practice changing and data from larger randomized studies are needed to confirm this benefit. In the adjuvant setting, nivolumab is the FDA-approved treatment based on a disease-free survival benefit relative to placebo in a randomized trial. However, it will be important to confirm an overall survival benefit of this treatment and to better identify patients who need additional adjuvant treatment based on novel biomarker data. The treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer is moving toward the individualization of treatment options based on specific tumor and patient characteristics and away from the one-size-fits-all approach that has dominated this space for the last couple of decades. Emerging biomarker data, such as with ctDNA, suggests that immunotherapy may confer greater benefit to selected patients. Identifying who those patients are will be of paramount importance since additional treatments always come with additional toxicities. On the other hand, the more favorable toxicity profiles of certain immunotherapy-based regimens may make them superior options for some patients who would otherwise be unable to tolerate other systemic regimens. In the near future, it is likely that subsets of patients with MIBC will be receiving treatments with predominantly immunotherapy-based regimens while many patients may still be treated with regimens containing a cisplatin-based chemotherapy backbone. Currently ongoing clinical trials will help to better define patient populations optimized for each treatment.

Systemtherapie des Urothelkarzinoms der Harnblase

Die Systemtherapie des Harnblasenkarzinoms hat durch die Integration immunonkologischer Strategien in die ­Therapiekonzepte bei muskelinvasiven Karzinomen und im metastasierten Stadium deutliche Fortschritte gemacht. Nach dem Versagen von platinbasierter Chemotherapie und Immuntherapie ergeben sich außerdem neue Optionen für die Therapie in späteren Linien. Neben den Inhibitoren des Fibroblasten-Wachstumsfaktor-Rezeptors (FGFR) sind hier vor allem Antikörper-Wirkstoff-Konjugate vielversprechend.

Urothelial Bladder Cancer: Genomic Alterations in Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Genomic alterations in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) genes have been linked to a reduced response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Some of the immune microenvironment of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) could be distorted because of the inhibition of interferon signaling pathways. We present a landscape of FGFR genomic alterations in distorted UBC to evaluate the immunogenomic mechanisms of resistance and response.

METHODS

There were 4035 UBCs that underwent hybrid, capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling. Tumor mutational burden was determined in up to 1.1 Mbp of sequenced DNA and microsatellite instability was determined in 114 loci. Programmed death ligand expression in tumor cells was assessed by immunohistochemistry (Dako 22C3).

RESULTS

The FGFR tyrosine kinases were altered in 894 (22%) UBCs. The highest frequency of alterations was in FGFR genomic alterations with FGFR3 at 17.4% followed by FGFR1 at 3.7% and FGFR2 at 1.1%. No FGFR4 genomic alterations were identified. The age and sex distribution were similar in all groups. Urothelial bladder cancers that featured FGFR3 genomic alterations were associated with lower driver genomic alterations/tumors. 14.7% of the FGFR3 genomic alterations were FGFR3 fusions. Other findings included a significantly higher frequency of ERBB2 amplification in FGFR1/2-altered UBCs compared with FGFR3-altered UBCs. Urothelial bladder cancers with FGFR3 genomic alterations also had the highest frequency of the activating mTOR pathway. FGFR3-altered UBCs also featured significantly higher frequencies of biomarkers associated with a lack of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors including a lower tumor mutational burden, lower programmed death-ligand 1 expression, and higher frequencies of genomic alterations in MDM2. Also linked to IO drug resistance, CDKN2A/B loss and MTAP loss were observed at a higher frequency in FGFR3-driven UBC.

CONCLUSIONS

An increased frequency of genomic alterations is observed in UBC FGFR. These have been linked to immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance. Clinical trials are needed to evaluate UBC FGFR-based biomarkers prognostic of an immune checkpoint inhibitor response. Only then can we successfully incorporate novel therapeutic strategies into the evolving landscape of UBC treatment.

Novel sequential treatment strategy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC): intravesical recombinant BCG, followed by neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, radical cystectomy plus pelvic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant immunotherapy - protocol of a multicentre, single arm phase 2 trial (SAKK 06/19)

INTRODUCTION

The combination of checkpoint inhibition and cisplatin-based chemotherapy is investigated in muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and results from phase 2 trials have been presented. Intravesical BCG has been used for non-MIBC (NMIBC) in patients with carcinoma in situ and high-grade Ta/T1 tumours. BCG induces innate and adapted immune response and upregulation of PD-L1 in preclinical models. The proposed trial is intended to implement a new immuno-immuno-chemotherapy induction therapy for MIBC. The combination of BCG and checkpoint inhibition with chemotherapy aims at higher intravesical responses and better local and systemic control of disease.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

SAKK 06/19 is an open-label single-arm phase II trial for patients with resectable MIBC T2-T4a cN0-1. Intravesical recombinant BCG (rBCG: VPM1002BC) is applied weekly for three instillations followed by four cycles of neoadjuvant cisplatin/gemcitabine every 3 weeks. Atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks is started together with rBCG and given for four cycles. All patients then undergo restaging and radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Atezolizumab is continued as maintenance therapy after surgery every 3 weeks for 13 cycles. Pathological complete remission is the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include pathological response rate (

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04630730.

Collapse

Key Words

• CHEMOTHERAPY
• IMMUNOLOGY
• ONCOLOGY
• Urological tumours

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Cisplatin/therapeutic use
• BCG Vaccine/therapeutic use
• Cystectomy
• Neoadjuvant Therapy
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology
• Immunotherapy
• Administration, Intravesical
• Muscles/pathology
• Lymph Node Excision
• Multicenter Studies as Topic
• Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic

Collapse

Grants

• F. Hoffmann–La Roche Ltd

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Ulf Petrausch OnkoZentrum, Zurich, Switzerland
Martin Spahn Lindenhof Group, Bern, Switzerland
Martina Schneider Competence Center, SAKK, Bern, Switzerland
Stefanie Hayoz Competence Center, SAKK, Bern, Switzerland
Cyrill A Rentsch Department of Urology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Sacha Rothschild Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital, Baden, Switzerland
Aurelius Omlin OnkoZentrum, Zurich, Switzerland
Richard Cathomas Division of Oncology/Hematology, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland

Collapse

Perioperative systemic therapy in muscle invasive bladder cancer: Current standard method, biomarkers and emerging strategies

Bladder cancer ranks as the 10th most common cancer type globally, and muscle-invasive disease accounts for approximately 25% of newly diagnosed bladder cancers. Despite definitive treatment, 50% of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) develop metastasis within 2 years, leading to death. Perioperative systemic therapy is generally recommended to control local relapse or distant metastasis after surgical resection for patients with MIBC. Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is the current standard treatment to improve oncologic control and survival outcomes. Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients with pathological T3-4 or positive lymph nodes after radical cystectomy if no neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given. Nonetheless, perioperative systemic therapy is not applied widely because of its toxicity, and less than 25% of patients receive cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, the development of predictive biomarkers for neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy and alternative effective regimens for cisplatin-ineligible patients are important. Furthermore, recently, novel anticancer agents such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates have proven survival benefits in the metastatic setting, thereby expanding their therapeutic applications to the perioperative setting for non-metastatic MIBC. Herein, we discuss the current status and future perspectives of perioperative systemic strategies for MIBC.

PD‑1/PD‑L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in neoadjuvant therapy for solid tumors (Review)

A comprehensive search regarding programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‑1)/programmed death‑ligand 1 (PD‑L1) inhibitor monotherapy or combination therapy in neoadjuvant settings of 11 types of solid cancer was performed using the PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases, and the abstracts of various conferences were screened. Data presented in 99 clinical trials indicated that preoperative treatment with PD‑1/PD‑L1 combined therapy, particularly immunotherapy plus chemotherapy, could achieve a higher objective response rate, a higher major pathologic response rate and a higher pathologic complete response rate, as well as a lower number of immune‑related adverse events compared with PD‑1/PD‑L1 monotherapy or dual immunotherapy. Although PD‑1/PD‑L1 inhibitor combination caused more treatment‑related adverse events (TRAEs) in patients, most of the TRAEs were acceptable and did not cause marked delays in operation. The data suggest that patients with pathological remission after neoadjuvant immunotherapy exhibit improved postoperative disease‑free survival compared with those without pathological remission. Further studies are still required to evaluate the long‑term survival benefit of neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Current Status of Perioperative Therapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer and Future Directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy has been a standard of care in the perioperative management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer for years, but several novel therapies are under active investigation. This review aims to provide an update on recent relevant literature and a forward look at the future landscape of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients who opt for radical cystectomy.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recent approval of nivolumab as adjuvant therapy established a new treatment option for high-risk patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer after radical cystectomy. Several phase II studies of chemo-immunotherapy combinations and immunotherapy alone have reported pathological complete responses in the 26-46% range, including studies in cisplatin-ineligible patients. Randomized studies of perioperative chemo-immunotherapy, immunotherapy alone, and enfortumab vedotin are ongoing. Muscle-invasive bladder cancer remains a challenging disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality; however, increasing options in systemic therapy and an increasingly personalized approach to cancer treatment suggest continued future improvements in patient care.

[Value of immunotherapy in the perioperative treatment of localized muscle invasive bladder cancer]

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are standard of care in the treatment of metastatic and locally advanced urothelial cancer. Their use in perioperative treatment is currently under investigation as monotherapy as well as in combination with chemotherapy or radiation regimens. This article provides an overview of recent trials, current data as well as an outlook on future developments in the perioperative management of urothelial cancer.

Predictive value of radiological response, pathological response and relapse-free survival for overall survival in neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials: pooled analysis of 29 clinical trials

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of clinical trials are being conducted exploring the efficacy of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors. Surrogate end-points for overall survival (OS) are urgently needed.

METHODS

Phase II or III trials of neoadjuvant immunotherapy that reported data on OS and surrogate end-points were identified from January 1, 2000, to November 25, 2022. Individual patient data, and trial-level data were requested from corresponding authors or extracted from eligible trials. At the individual level, correlations between radiological and pathological response and OS were measured by the Cox model and quantified by hazard ratio (HR). C-statistic was used to quantify the predictive performance of radiological and pathological response for OS. The coefficient of determination (R²) between RFS and OS was evaluated by a bivariate survival model.

RESULTS

A total of 29 trials reporting 2901 patients were included. ORR correlated with improved OS (3-year OS: 87.0% versus 70.4% for ORR versus non-ORR, respectively; HR, 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.68). The HRs for OS in patients achieving MPR and pCR were 0.24 (95% CI, 0.12-0.46) and 0.13 (95% CI, 0.05-0.36). The survival benefit maintained after adjusting tumour type. C-statistics of ORR, MPR and pCR were 0.63, 0.63 and 0.65, respectively. The strength of association between RFS and OS was strong (R² = 0.88, 95% CI, 0.79-0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that ORR, MPR, pCR and RFS are valid predictors for OS when using neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors. Moreover, MPR, pCR and RFS may be the most optimal surrogates for OS.

Perspectives on the future of urothelial carcinoma therapy: chemotherapy and beyond

INTRODUCTION

Despite recent developments in the landscape of urothelial carcinoma (UC) treatment, platinum combination chemotherapy still remains a milestone. Recently immunotherapeutic agents have gained ever-growing attractivity, particularly in the metastatic setting. Novel chemotherapeutic strategies and agents, such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and powerful combination regimens have been developed to overcome the resistance of most UC to current therapies.

AREAS COVERED

Herein, we review the current standard-of-care chemotherapy, the development of ADCs, the rationale for combining therapy regimens with chemotherapy in current trials, and future directions in UC management.

EXPERT OPINION

Immunotherapy has prompted a revolution in the treatment paradigm of UC. However, only a few patients experience a long-term response when treated with single-agent immunotherapies. Combination treatments are necessary to bypass resistance mechanisms and broaden the clinical utility of current options. Current evidence supports the intensification of standard-of-care chemotherapy with maintenance immunotherapy. However, the optimal sequence, combination, and duration must be determined to achieve individual longevity with acceptable health-related quality of life. In that regard, ADCs appear as a promising alternative for single and combination strategies in UC, as they specifically target the tumor cells, thereby, theoretically improving treatment efficacy and avoiding extensive off-target toxicities.

Current and Future Landscape of Perioperative Treatment for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is the current standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, less than half of patients are candidates for this treatment, and 50% will develop metastatic disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy could be offered if neoadjuvant treatment has not been administered for suitable patients. It is important to reduce the risk of systemic recurrence and improve the prognosis of localized MIBC. Systemic therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma has evolved in recent years. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted agents, such as antibody-drug conjugates or FGFR inhibitors, are new therapeutic alternatives and have shown their benefit in advanced disease. Currently, several clinical trials are investigating the role of these drugs, as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy, in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings with promising outcomes. In addition, the development of predictive biomarkers could predict responses to neoadjuvant therapies.

Identification of cuproptosis-related long noncoding RNA signature for predicting prognosis and immunotherapy response in bladder cancer

Bladder cancer (BC) is the most common malignant tumour of the urinary system and one of the leading causes of cancer-related death. Cuproptosis is a novel form of programmed cell death, and its mechanism in tumours remains unclear. This study aimed to establish the prognostic signatures of cuproptosis-related lncRNAs and determine their clinical prognostic value. RNA sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas were used to detect the expression levels of cuproptosis-related genes in BC. Cuproptosis-related lncRNAs linked to survival were identified using co-expression and univariate Cox regression. Furthermore, consensus cluster analysis divided the lncRNAs into two subtypes. Subsequently, we established a signature model consisting of seven cuproptosis-related lncRNAs (AC073534.2, AC021321.1, HYI-AS1, PPP1R26-AS1, AC010328.1, AC012568.1 and MIR4435-2Hg) using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. Survival analysis based on risk score showed that the overall survival and progression-free survival of patients in the high-risk group were worse than those in the low-risk group. Multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated the independent prognostic potential of this signature model for patients with BC. Moreover, age and clinical stage were also significantly correlated with prognosis. The constructed nomogram plots revealed good predictive power for the prognosis of patients with BC and were validated using calibration plots. Additionally, enrichment analysis, Single sample gene set enrichment analysis and immune infiltration abundance analysis revealed significant differences in immune infiltration between the two risk groups, with high levels of immune cell subset infiltrations observed in the high-risk group accompanied by various immune pathway activation. Moreover, almost all the immune checkpoint genes showed high expression levels in the high-risk group. Moreover, TIDE analysis suggested that the high-risk group was more responsive to immunotherapy. Finally, eight drugs with low IC50 values were screened, which may prove to be beneficial for patients in the high-risk group.

Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab and Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Bladder Cancer: 3-Year Median Follow-Up Update of PURE-01 Trial

PURPOSE

The PURE-01 study (NCT02736266) pioneered the neoadjuvant immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy before radical cystectomy (RC) in patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIBC). We herein present the survival outcomes after a median follow-up of three years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The intention-to-treat (ITT) population included 155 patients. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time from pembrolizumab initiation until radiographic disease progression precluding RC, initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, recurrence after RC, or death. Further outcomes were recurrence-free survival (RFS) post-RC and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox regression analyses for EFS were performed. Kaplan-Meier analyses compared EFS outcomes according with baseline programmed cell-death-ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) and according to the molecular subtypes.

RESULTS

After a median (interquartile range, IQR) follow-up of 39 (30-47) months, 36-month EFS and OS were 74.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 67.8-81.7] and 83.8% (95% CI, 77.8-90.2) in the ITT population, respectively. Overall, 143 (92.3%) patients underwent RC. Within the cohort of patients who did not receive additional chemotherapy (N = 125), 36-month RFS was 96.3% (95% CI, 91.6-100) for patients achieving a ypT0N0, 96.1% (95% CI, 89-100) for ypT1/a/isN0, 74.9% (95% CI, 60.2-93) for ypT2-4N0, and 58.3% (95% CI, 36.2-94.1) for ypTanyN1-3 response. EFS was significantly stratified among PD-L1 tertiles (lower tertile: 59.7% vs. medium tertile: 76.7% vs. higher tertile: 89.8%, P = 0.0013). The claudin-low and basal/squamous subtypes displayed the lowest rates of events.

CONCLUSIONS

At a median follow-up of three years, PURE-01 results further confirm the sustained efficacy of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab before RC. PD-L1 expression was the strongest predictor of sustained response post-RC.

A Novel m7G-Related Genes-Based Signature with Prognostic Value and Predictive Ability to Select Patients Responsive to Personalized Treatment Strategies in Bladder Cancer

Although N7-methylguanosine (m7G) modification serves as a tumor promoter in bladder cancer (BLCA), the comprehensive role of m7G-related characterization in BLCA remains unclear. In this study, we systematically evaluated the m7G-related clusters of 760 BLCA patients through consensus unsupervised clustering analysis. Next, we investigated the underlying m7G-related genes among these m7G-related clusters. Univariate Cox and LASSO regressions were used for screening out prognostic genes and for reducing the dimension, respectively. Finally, we developed a novel m7G-related scoring system via the GSVA algorithm. The correlation between tumor microenvironment, prediction of personalized therapies and this m7G-related signature was gradually revealed. We first identified three m7G-related clusters and 1108 differentially expressed genes relevant to the three clusters. Based on the profile of 1108 genes, we divided BLCA patients into two clusters, which were quantified by our established m7G-related scoring system. Patients with higher m7G-related scores tended to have a better OS and more chances to benefit from immunotherapy. A significantly negative connection between sensitivity to classic chemotherapeutic drugs and m7G-related signature was uncovered. In summary, our data show that m7G-related characterization of BLCA patients can be of value for prognostic stratification and for patient-oriented therapeutic options, designing personalized treatment strategies in the preclinical setting.

Prognostic value of programmed cell death ligand-1 expression in patients with bladder urothelial carcinoma undergoing radical cystectomy: A meta-analysis

Background

Radical cystectomy and removal of pelvic lymph nodes (RC-PLND) is a recommended treatment for high-risk non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive non-metastatic bladder cancer (BC). However, 50% of patients relapse after RC-PLND. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) on the prognosis of bladder urothelial carcinoma (BUC) after RC-PLND.

Methods

We present this meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Guidelines. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of 3 and 5 years after RC-PLND.

Results

Overall, 11 studies and 1393 BUC cases were included in our meta-analysis. In tumor cells (TCs), the PD-L1 negative group had statistically significant advantage in 5-year OS (risk ratio [RR]: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74–0.97, P = 0.02), RFS (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.58–0.99, P = 0.04), and CSS (RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.58–0.92, P = 0.009) compared with the PD-L1 positive group. But, no statistically significant difference in 5-year OS and RFS was observed between the PD-L1 negative and positive groups in tumor-infiltrating immune cells.

Conclusions

Our study found that patients with BUC who tested positive for PD-L1 in TCs had a poor prognosis after RC-PLND. PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors could be used as a adjuvant medication for patients with BUC after RC-PLND who exhibit PD-L1 overexpression in TCs.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022301424.

Efficacy of long-term extended nursing services combined with atezolizumab in patients with bladder cancer after endoscopic bladder resection

BACKGROUND

Nursing has been reported to effectively ameliorate physical movement, significantly decrease postoperative complications, and markedly improve the quality of life in patients with bladder cancer after endoscopic bladder resection. Atezolizumab (ATZ) has been approved as effective therapy for patients with bladder cancer. This study was aimed to assess the efficacy of long-term extended nursing services combined with ATZ in patients with bladder cancer after endoscopic bladder resection.

METHODS

A total of one 126 patients diagnosed with bladder cancer underwent endoscopic bladder resection were recruited in this study. Patients were randomly allocated into the long-term conventional nursing plus atezolizumab (LTCN-ATZ) (n = 60) and long-term extended nursing services plus atezolizumab (LTENS-ATZ) groups (n = 66). The renal function, physical movement, postoperative complications, the quality of life, survival, and recurrence were examined in patients in LTCN-ATZ and LTENS-ATZ groups during 36-month follow up.

RESULTS

Data in the current study demonstrated that the renal function, quality of life, satisfaction anxiety and depression for LTENS-ATZ group was significantly improved compared with that of LTCN-ATZ group. The occurrence rate was significantly lower, and the length of hospital stay was shorter for LTENS-ATZ than that of LTCN-ATZ group. Outcomes demonstrated that LTENS-ATZ increased survival and decreased the occurrence compared to those patients in LTENS-ATZ group.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, outcomes in this study indicate that LTENS-ATZ improves renal function, and quality of life and prognosis in patients with bladder cancer after endoscopic bladder resection.

Neoadjuvant Treatment in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: From the Beginning to the Latest Developments

Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder is one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide, diagnosed as muscle invasive in 25% of cases. Although several studies have demonstrated an overall 5% absolute survival benefit at 5 years with cisplatin-based combination neoadjuvant treatment, administration of chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy (RC) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients is still a matter of debate. This may be due to the perceived modest survival benefit, cisplatin-based chemotherapy ineligibility, or fear of delaying potentially curative surgery in non-responders. However, immunotherapy and novel targeted therapies have shown to prolong survival in advanced disease and are under investigation in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings to reduce systemic relapse and improve cure rates. Genomic characterization of MIBC could help select the most effective chemotherapeutic regimen for the individual patient. Large cohort studies on neoadjuvant treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and molecular therapies, alone or combined with chemotherapy, are ongoing. In this review, we trace the development of neoadjuvant therapy in MIBC and explore recent advances that may soon change clinical practice.

Advances in Diagnosis and Therapy for Bladder Cancer

Bladder cancer (BCa) is one of the most common and expensive urinary system malignancies for its high recurrence and progression rate. In recent years, immense amounts of studies have been carried out to bring a more comprehensive cognition and numerous promising clinic approaches for BCa therapy. The development of innovative enhanced cystoscopy techniques (optical techniques, imaging systems) and tumor biomarkers-based non-invasive urine screening (DNA methylation-based urine test) would dramatically improve the accuracy of tumor detection, reducing the risk of recurrence and progression of BCa. Moreover, intravesical instillation and systemic therapeutic strategies (cocktail therapy, immunotherapy, vaccine therapy, targeted therapy) also provide plentiful measures to break the predicament of BCa. Several exploratory clinical studies, including novel surgical approaches, pharmaceutical compositions, and bladder preservation techniques, emerged continually, which are supposed to be promising candidates for BCa clinical treatment. Here, recent advances and prospects of diagnosis, intravesical or systemic treatment, and novel drug delivery systems for BCa therapy are reviewed in this paper.

Molecular Subtypes as a Basis for Stratified Use of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer-A Narrative Review

There are no established biomarkers to guide patient selection for neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Recent studies suggest that molecular subtype classification holds promise for predicting chemotherapy response and/or survival benefit in this setting. Here, we summarize and discuss the scientific literature examining transcriptomic or panel-based molecular subtyping applied to neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated patient cohorts. We find that there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the basal subtype of muscle-invasive bladder cancer responds well to chemotherapy, since only a minority of studies support this conclusion. More evidence indicates that luminal-like subtypes may have the most improved outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. There are also conflicting data concerning the association between biopsy stromal content and response. Subtypes indicative of high stromal infiltration responded well in some studies and poorly in others. Uncertainties when interpreting the current literature include a lack of reporting both response and survival outcomes and the inherent risk of bias in retrospective study designs. Taken together, available studies suggest a role for molecular subtyping in stratifying patients for receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The precise classification system that best captures such a predictive effect, and the exact subtypes for which other treatment options are more beneficial remains to be established, preferably in prospective studies.

Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma: Controversies and Dilemmas

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.