Overall Survival and Biomarker Analysis of Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy in Operable Stage IIIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NADIM phase II trial)

Overview of the Role of Liquid Biopsy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Solid tumour tissue has traditionally been used for cancer molecular diagnostics. Recently, biomarker assessment in blood or liquid biopsies has become relevant because it allows genotyping in a less invasive and costly manner. In addition, it is a very useful technique in cases with insufficient tumour samples. Recent data have shown that this method can provide the baseline molecular characteristics of the tumour and resistance changes that emerge during cancer treatment. In terms of diagnostic application, the platforms available for clinical use in lung cancer focus on the isolation and detection of circulating DNA (ctDNA) and generally cover a limited number of mutations in genes such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) and BRAF, as well as anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements. In parallel, there are plasma genotyping platforms based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques, which are much broader in scope, allowing multiple genes to be studied simultaneously in a more efficient manner. More recently, promising research scenarios for liquid biopsy have emerged, such as its utility for early diagnosis and evaluation of minimal residual disease after oncological treatment. In light of these advances, knowledge of the benefits and limitations of liquid biopsy, as well as awareness of emerging information on new indications for this technique in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), are of paramount importance in developing more effective management strategies for patients with this neoplasm.

Modern era systemic therapies: Expanding concepts of cure in early and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Cure of cancer is a sensitive and multidimensional concept that is challenging to define, difficult to assert at the individual patient level, and often surrounded by controversy. The notion of cure in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has changed and continues to evolve with improvements in diagnosis and treatment. Targeted and immune therapies have recently entered the treatment landscape of stage I-III NSCLC. While some initial pivotal trials of such agents failed to improve survival, recently approved epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors (in EGFR-mutated NSCLC) and immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown delays in disease recurrence or progression and unprecedented survival gains compared to previous standards of care. Additional data is now emerging supporting the benefit of treatment strategies based on alternation-matched targeting (anaplastic lymphoma kinase [ALK] inhibition in ALK-altered disease) and immune checkpoint inhibition in stage I-III NSCLC. Similar to previous developments in the treatment of early and locally advanced NSCLC, it is expected that statistically significant and clinically meaningful trial-level benefits will translate into real-world benefits, including improvements in cure measures. Parallel advances in molecular testing (e.g., circulating tumor DNA analyses) are also allowing for a deeper and more comprehensive characterization of disease status and treatment response. Given the impact that curative-intent treatments have on survival, it is critical that various stakeholders, including clinicians and patients, are aware of new opportunities to pursue cure in stage I-III NSCLC.

Does circulating tumor DNA apply as a reliable biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma?

Oral cavity cancer is the most common type of head and neck cancer. There is no definitive standard diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment response biomarker panel based on simple, specific, non-invasive, and reliable methods for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. On the other hand, the frequent post-treatment biopsies make it challenging to discriminate residual disease or recurrent tumors following postoperative reparative and post-radiation changes. Saliva, blood plasma, and serum samples were commonly used to monitor HNSCC through liquid biopsies. Based on the evidence, the most prominent molecular-based fluid biomarker, such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), has potential applications for early cancer diagnosis, screening, patient management, and surveillance. ctDNA showed genomic and epigenomic changes and the status of human papillomavirus (HPV) with the real-time monitoring of tumor status through cancer therapy. Due to the intra and inter-tumor heterogeneity of tumor cells like cancer stem cells (CSCs) and tumor microenvironment (TME) in HNSCC, the tiny tissue biopsy cannot reflect all genomic and transcriptomic abnormality. Most liquid biopsies are applied to detect circulating molecular biomarkers consisting of cell-free DNA (cfDNA), ctDNA, microRNA, mRNA, and exosome for monitoring tumor progression. Based on the results of previous studies, liquid biopsy can be applied for comprehensive multi-omic discovery by assessing the predictive value of ctDNA in both early and advanced cancers. Liquid biopsy can be used to evaluate molecular signature profiles in HNSCC patients, with great potential to help in early diagnosis, prognosis, surveillance, and treatment monitoring of tumors. These happen by designing longitudinal extensive cohort studies and the utility of organoid technology that promotes the context of personalized and precision cancer medicine.

MDT-BRIDGE: Neoadjuvant Durvalumab Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Either Surgery and Adjuvant Durvalumab or Chemoradiotherapy and Consolidation Durvalumab in Resectable or Borderline-resectable Stage IIB-IIIB NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

In the AEGEAN trial, neoadjuvant durvalumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (D+CT) followed by adjuvant durvalumab, versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, significantly improved pathological complete response (pCR) rate and event-free survival (EFS) in patients with resectable NSCLC. In the PACIFIC trial, consolidation durvalumab significantly improved progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC after chemoradiotherapy. Strong pathological and clinical outcomes with chemoimmunotherapy have generated interest in its use to enable patients with borderline-resectable NSCLC to undergo surgery. Additionally, for patients initially deemed resectable but who later become unresectable/inoperable during neoadjuvant treatment, consolidation immunotherapy after chemoradiotherapy should be explored.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MDT-BRIDGE (NCT05925530) is a multicenter, phase II, non-randomized study in ∼140 patients with EGFR/ALK wild-type, stage IIB-IIIB (N2) NSCLC. Following baseline multidisciplinary team (MDT) assessment to determine resectable/borderline-resectable status, all patients receive 2 cycles of neoadjuvant D+CT every 3 weeks, followed by MDT reassessment of resectability. Patients deemed resectable receive 1-2 additional cycles of D+CT followed by surgery (Cohort 1). Patients deemed unresectable receive standard-of-care chemoradiotherapy (Cohort 2). Cohort 1 patients who become ineligible for surgery can enter Cohort 2. Following surgery or chemoradiotherapy, patients receive adjuvant or consolidation durvalumab for 1 year. The primary endpoint is resection rate in all patients. Additional endpoints include resection rates by baseline resectable/borderline-resectable status, resection outcomes, EFS/PFS, OS, pCR rate, circulating tumor DNA dynamics pre- and post-surgery (including correlation with clinical outcomes), and safety.

CONCLUSION

Enrollment began in February 2024; primary completion is anticipated in April 2026.

Clinical Outcomes and Histologic Findings of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Durable Partial Response or Durable Stable Disease After Receiving Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab

PURPOSE

Durable partial response (PR) and durable stable disease (SD) are often seen in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (atezo-bev). This study investigates the outcome of these patients and the histopathology of the residual tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The IMbrave150 study's atezo-bev group was analyzed. PR or SD per RECIST v1.1 lasting more than 6 months was defined as durable. For histologic analysis, a comparable real-world group of patients from Japan and Taiwan who had undergone resection of residual tumors after atezo-bev was investigated.

RESULTS

In the IMbrave150 study, 56 (77.8%) of the 72 PRs and 41 (28.5%) of the 144 SDs were considered durable. The median overall survival was not estimable for patients with durable PR and 23.7 months for those with durable SD. The median progression-free survival was 23.2 months for patients with durable PR and 13.2 months for those with durable SD. In the real-world setting, a total of 38 tumors were resected from 32 patients (23 PRs and nine SDs) receiving atezo-bev. Pathologic complete responses (PCRs) were more frequent in PR tumors than SD tumors (57.7% v 16.7%, P = .034). PCR rate correlated with time from atezo-bev initiation to resection and was 55.6% (5 of 9) for PR tumors resected beyond 8 months after starting atezo-bev, a time practically corresponding to the durable PR definition used for IMbrave150. We found no reliable radiologic features to predict PCR of the residual tumors.

CONCLUSION

Durable PR patients from the atezo-bev group showed a favorable outcome, which may be partly explained by the high rate of PCR lesions. Early recognition of PCR lesions may help subsequent treatment decision.

Advances in clinical trials on perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitors for resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A comprehensive review

The reduction in lung cancer mortality rates over the past decade can be partially ascribed to advancements in immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the therapeutic landscape for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and have recently been evaluated in multiple clinical trials to confirm their safety and efficacy in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant and perioperative settings for patients with resectable NSCLC. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted approval for adjuvant atezolizumab following platinum-doublet chemotherapy, neoadjuvant nivolumab and platinum-doublet chemotherapy, adjuvant pembrolizumab after platinum-doublet chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant/adjuvant pembrolizumab for resectable NSCLC, with potential forthcoming approvals for additional agents or indications. Novel data, approvals, and emerging research findings are dramatically shifting the accepted standards of care over just a few years. Despite these advances, the optimal application of these treatments is not entirely straightforward. This article summarizes the biological rationale for immunotherapy and the important clinical trials regarding perioperative ICIs. We also further outline the controversies and future directions to better guide the individualized treatment of NSCLC patients.

Peripheral CD8+PD-1+ T cells as novel biomarker for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in humanized mice of non-small cell lung cancer

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown promising clinical activity in the treatment of early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, further clarification of the specific mechanism and identification of biomarkers are imperative prior to implementing it as a daily practice. The study investigated the reprogramming of T cells in both tumor and peripheral blood following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in a preclinical NSCLC mouse model engrafted with a human immune system. Samples were also collected from 21 NSCLC patients (Stage IA-IIIB) who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, and the dynamics of potential biomarkers within these samples were measured and further subjected to correlation analysis with prognosis. Further, we initially investigated the sources of the potential biomarkers. We observed in the humanized mouse model, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy could prevent postoperative recurrence and metastasis by increasing the frequency and cytotoxicity of CD8+ T cells in both peripheral blood (p < 0.001) and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) (p < 0.001). The kinetics of peripheral CD8+PD-1+ T cells reflected the changes in the TIME and pathological responses, ultimately predicting survival outcome of mice. In the clinical cohort, patients exhibiting an increase in these T cells post-treatment had a higher rate of complete or major pathological response (p < 0.05) and increased immune infiltration (p = 0.0012, r = 0.792). We identified these T cells originating from tumor draining lymph nodes and subsequently entering the TIME. In conclusion, the kinetics of peripheral CD8+PD-1+ T cells can serve as a predictor for changes in TIME and optimal timing for surgery, ultimately reflecting the outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in both preclinical and clinical setting.

BRAF mutational status is associated with survival outcomes in locally advanced resectable and metastatic NSCLC

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy-based treatments have demonstrated high efficacy in patients with advanced and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). BRAF mutations affect a small but significant fraction of NSCLC. The efficacy of these therapies in this subgroup of patients is unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasma and tissue samples from 116 resectable stage IIIA/B NSCLC patients, included in NADIM and NADIM II clinical trials (NADIM cohort), and from a prospective academic cohort with 84 stage IV NSCLC patients (BLI-O cohort), were analyzed by next-generation sequencing.

RESULTS

The p.G464E, p.G466R, p.G466V, p.G469V, p.L597Q, p.T599I, p.V600E (n = 2) BRAF mutations, were identified in four (3.45 %) samples from the NADIM cohort, all of which were cases treated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (CH-IO), and four (4.76 %) samples from the BLI-O cohort, corresponding to cases treated with first-line immunotherapy (n = 2) or CH-IO (n = 2). All these patients were alive and had no evidence of disease at data cut-off. Conversely, patients with BRAF wild-type (wt) tumors in the BLI-O cohort had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.49 months and a median overall survival (OS) of 12.00 months (P-LogRank = 0.013 and 0.046, respectively). Likewise, PFS and OS probabilities at 36 months were 60.5 % and 76.1 % for patients with BRAF-wt tumors in the NADIM cohort. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate after neoadjuvant CH-IO in patients with BRAF-positive tumors (n = 4) was 100 %, whereas the pCR rate in the BRAF-wt population was 44.3 % (RR: 2.26; 95 % CI: 1.78-2.85; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

BRAF mutations may be a good prognostic factor for advanced and locally advanced NSCLC patients undergoing immunotherapy-based treatments.

[Perioperative Immunotherapy for Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Evidence and New Standard of Care]

Immunotherapy has drastically changed the treatment of lung cancer not only in systemic disease but also in the perioperative setting in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. In particular, the neoadjuvant and perioperative therapy regimes of the CheckMate 816 and KEYNOTE-671 studies as well as the adjuvant therapy according to the IMPower010 and the PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091 protocols have already been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of selected cases. Other therapy protocols and combination therapies with varying drug classes and therapy modalities are currently being examined for their effectiveness and tolerance. The new treatment landscape creates new opportunities but also challenges for the treating disciplines. This article will focus on the current evidence for perioperative immunotherapy for resectable lung cancer and the resulting therapy standards, especially with regard to patient selection for both neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy, as well as current research efforts.

Values of circulating tumor DNA for non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy, progress and challenges: a narrative review

Background and Objective

The value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for lung cancer remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a review to further investigate the role of ctDNA in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing NAT for individualized management.

Methods

A search of online databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library) was conducted to evaluate the value of ctDNA in predicting relapse, risk stratification, and efficacy of NAT in NSCLC. Only articles published in English within the last 25 years, between January 1st, 1998 and November 30th, 2023, were included. Additionally, the application of ctDNA in NSCLC is briefly reviewed.

Key Content and Findings

ctDNA is a non-invasive and dynamic method that plays an important role in future treatment guidance. Additionally, ctDNA successfully predicted the effect of neoadjuvant immunotherapy before surgery, and positive testing was strongly correlated with a lower major pathological response or complete pathological response rate. Sequential testing of ctDNA may serve as a secondary indicator to guide the adjustment of treatment programs. However, the application of this method has been limited by false negative results, a lack of objective indicators, and high costs. These issues must be addressed by researchers.

Conclusions

ctDNA has strong potential in NAT, based on positive preliminary studies. However, its widespread use is limited by the high cost of testing. Further research is needed to explore its value in risk stratification and treatment guidance in the future.

Clinical application of ctDNA in early diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) being the most common type. As understanding of precise treatment options for NSCLC deepens, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a potential biomarker that has become a research hotspot and may represent a new approach for the individualized diagnosis and treatment of NSCLC. This article reviews the applications of ctDNA for the early screening of patients with NSCLC, guiding targeted therapy and immunotherapy, evaluating chemotherapy and postoperative efficacy, assessing prognosis and monitoring recurrence. With the in-depth study of the pathogenesis of NSCLC, plasma ctDNA may become an indispensable part of the precise treatment of NSCLC, which has great clinical application prospects.

Mature tertiary lymphoid structures: important contributors to anti-tumor immune efficacy

Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) represent the ectopic aggregations of immune cells arising during chronic inflammation or tumor progression. In cancer, TLS are often associated with beneficial clinical outcomes in patients undergoing immunotherapy, underscoring their prognostic and predictive significance. Mature TLS, characterized by germinal centers and areas of T-cell and B-cell aggregation, are considered primary locations for activating and maintaining both humoral and cellular anti-tumor immune effects. Despite their recognized importance, the mechanisms driving the formation of mature TLS in cancer and their influence on the immune response within tumors remain insufficiently understood. Therefore, this review aims to comprehensively explore the structural composition, development mechanisms, maturity impact factors, immunological function, and innovative therapeutic strategies of mature TLS within the tumor microenvironment. The research summarized herein offers novel insights and considerations for therapeutic approaches to promote TLS generation and maturation in patients with cancer, representing a promising avenue for future cancer therapies.

The role of immunotherapy in early-stage and metastatic NSCLC

In the past decade we have seen new advances and thus remarkable progress in the therapeutic options for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Among cytostatic therapies with new approaches in molecularly targeted therapies, we see new developments in a wide range of applications for immunotherapies. In this review we discuss the new potential modalities for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the frontlines, including in early-stage (perioperative) and metastatic settings. The perioperative use of ICIs in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings may show benefits for patients. In early-stage NSCLC (from stage IIB and above) a multimodality approach is recommended as the gold standard for the treatment. After surgical resection platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy has been the standard of care for many years. Based on the benefit of disease-free survival, the approval of adjuvant atezolizumab and adjuvant pembrolizumab was a significant breakthrough. In the metastatic setting, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy, regardless of PD-L1 expression or ICI alone (PD-L1 expression equal to or greater than 50%) also improves overall survival and progression-free survival.

Impact of platinum-based chemotherapy on the tumor mutational burden and immune microenvironment in non-small cell lung cancer with postoperative recurrence

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy on the immunotherapeutic biomarkers of postoperative recurrent tumors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This study involved twenty-two cases of NSCLC, all of which underwent postoperative platinum-based chemotherapy, with matched surgical samples obtained from both their primary tumors (PTs) and recurrent tumors (RTs). Multiplex immunofluorescence was performed to assess the tumor proportion score (TPS) and immune cells (IC) on whole sections. Whole exon sequencing (WES) was conducted to investigate the tumor mutational burden (TMB) and tumor neoantigen burden (TNB).

RESULTS

Compared to paired PTs, RTs exhibited higher PD-L1 expression, along with a slightly elevated density of intratumoral PD-L1+ cells (p = 0.082) and an increased tumor proportion score (mean TPS: 40.51% vs. 28.56%, p = 0.046). Regarding IC infiltration, RTs generally demonstrated significantly lower CD8+  cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) density (p = 0.011) and lower CD68+  macrophage density (p = 0.005), with a loss of tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS). The comparison between RTs and PTs revealed no significant differences in TMB (p = 0.795), whereas the count of TNB in RTs was notably increased compared to PTs (p = 0.033). Prognosis analysis indicated that a higher density of CD8+  CTLs in RTs was positively correlated with improved overall survival (OS).

CONCLUSIONS

In NSCLC patients with a history of postoperative platinum-based chemotherapy, the RTs demonstrated a trend towards increased PD-L1 expression and TMB/TNB, but a state of immunosuppression characterized by decreased ICs and loss of TLS, which may potentially impact the therapeutic benefits of immunotherapy.

Multidisciplinary approach for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): 2023 expert consensus of the Spanish Lung Cancer Group GECP

INTRODUCTION

Recent advances in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC have led to changes in the standard of care for this disease. For the selection of the best approach strategy for each patient, it is necessary the homogenization of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, as well as the promotion of the evaluation of patients by a multidisciplinary oncology team.

OBJECTIVE

Development of an expert consensus document with suggestions for the approach and treatment of locally advanced NSCLC leaded by Spanish Lung Cancer Group GECP.

METHODS

Between March and July 2023, a panel of 28 experts was formed. Using a mixed technique (Delphi/nominal group) under the guidance of a coordinating group, consensus was reached in 4 phases: 1. Literature review and definition of discussion topics 2. First round of voting 3. Communicating the results and second round of voting 4. Definition of conclusions in nominal group meeting. Responses were consolidated using medians and interquartile ranges. The threshold for agreement was defined as 85% of the votes.

RESULTS

New and controversial situations regarding the diagnosis and management of locally advanced NSCLC were analyzed and reconciled based on evidence and clinical experience. Discussion issues included: molecular diagnosis and biomarkers, radiologic and surgical diagnosis, mediastinal staging, role of the multidisciplinary thoracic committee, neoadjuvant treatment indications, evaluation of response to neoadjuvant treatment, postoperative evaluation, and follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus clinical suggestions were generated on the most relevant scenarios such as diagnosis, staging and treatment of locally advanced lung cancer, which will serve to support decision-making in daily practice.

Implementing circulating tumor DNA as a prognostic biomarker in resectable non-small cell lung cancer

Systemic treatment of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is evolving with emerging neoadjuvant, perioperative, and adjuvant immunotherapy approaches. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection at clinical diagnosis, during neoadjuvant therapy, or after resection may discern high-risk patients who might benefit from therapy escalation or switch. This Review summarizes translational implications of data supporting ctDNA-based risk determination in NSCLC and outstanding questions regarding ctDNA validity/utility as a prognostic biomarker. We discuss emerging ctDNA capabilities to refine clinical tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging in lung adenocarcinoma, ctDNA dynamics during neoadjuvant therapy for identifying patients deriving suboptimal benefit, and postoperative molecular residual disease (MRD) detection to escalate systemic therapy. Considering differential relapse characteristics in landmark MRD-negative/MRD-positive patients, we propose how ctDNA might integrate with pathological response data for optimal postoperative risk stratification.

The Emerging Role of Immunotherapy in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite surgical resection, long-term survival of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains poor. Adjuvant chemotherapy, the standard of care for locally advanced NSCLC, provides a marginal 5.4% benefit in survival. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown a significant survival benefit in some patients with advanced NSCLC and are being evaluated for perioperative use in resectable NSCLC.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search using the PubMed online database to identify clinical trials of immunotherapy in resectable NSCLC and studies analyzing biomarkers and immune priming strategies.

RESULTS

Building on previous phase I and II trials, randomized phase III trials have shown efficacy of neoadjuvant nivolumab, perioperative pembrolizumab, adjuvant atezolizumab, and adjuvant pembrolizumab in the treatment of NSCLC with improvement of event-free/disease-free survival of 24% to 42%, leading to United States Food and Drug Administration approval of these drugs in the treatment of resectable NSCLC. Three additional phase III trials have also recently reported the use of immunotherapy both before and after surgery, with pathologic complete response rates of 17% to 25%, significantly better than chemotherapy alone. Perioperative ICI therapy has comparable perioperative morbidity to chemotherapy alone and does not impair surgical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative immunotherapy, in combination with chemotherapy, is safe and improves outcomes in patients with resectable NSCLC. Questions regarding patient selection, the need for adjuvant ICI therapy after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, and the duration of perioperative immunotherapy remain to be answered by future trials.

Integrated management of stage III in nonsmall cell lung cancer: where do perioperative chemotherapy and immunotherapy fit?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 30% of the total NSCLC, being the stage III a heterogeneous disease that represents a challenge in the management of these patients. Multidisciplinary approach is essential for an adequate treatment strategy, with surgery being the only curative treatment. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy has been the standard of care for a long period, with modest results.

RECENT FINDINGS

Combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy has revolutionized the neoadjuvant setting of resectable NSCLC, improving pathologic complete responses and survival outcomes in this scenario. Furthermore, perioperative treatment with immunotherapy has also recently shown promising results in several phase III trials.

SUMMARY

The landscape of early-stage resectable NSCLC has evolved in recent years, with an improvement in the survival of these patients since the incorporation of immunotherapy in this scenario.

Major pathological response obtained after neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with dual immunotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a case report

Background

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare thoracic malignancy with high morbidity and mortality. A combination of systemic therapy and surgery may be a promising modality for the treatment of MPM, but evidence-based medicine is still lacking.

Case Description

Here we report a case of MPM. The patient presented to hospital with cough and sputum. After ineffective symptomatic treatment, computed tomography (CT) examination suggested a malignant tumor of pleural origin. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) examination suggested no lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis. The pathologic diagnosis of MPM was confirmed after CT-guided puncture biopsy. Next, she underwent 3 courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with dual immunotherapy (carboplatin and pemetrexed combined with anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD-1), resulting in significant tumor shrinkage. After obtaining the patient's consent and completing a preoperative evaluation, we modified the extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) by performing a lower lobe resection and partial pleurectomy of the left lung. Intraoperative rapid frozen pathology suggested that the margins of the tumor were negative and complete resection was achieved. The postoperative pathology report showed 10% residual viable tumor, so the major pathological response (MPR) was achieved after treatment.

Conclusions

MPM might respond well to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and dual immunotherapy, improving the probability of complete surgical resection and attaining an encouraging pathologic response.

Neoadjuvant therapy bridging percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy: a retrospective study

Background

Currently, there is no unified standard for the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the treatments have their own advantages and disadvantages. Thus, this study aimed to analyze the safety and feasibility of neoadjuvant therapy during the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) period before surgery in patients with NSCLC coexisting with CAD after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treatment.

Methods

We retrospectively included 13 patients with T2aN0M0 (stage IB) NSCLC who also had concomitant CAD. After PCI treatment, neoadjuvant targeted or immunotherapy was administered based on the type of lung cancer, and the effects on treatment and impact on surgery were observed.

Results

The objective response rate (ORR) after neoadjuvant treatment in 13 patients was 53.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 25.1-80.8%], and the disease control rate (DCR) reached 100%. Ten patients (76.9%) experienced adverse events (AEs) ≤ grade 2. All patients underwent standard VATS lobectomy with lymph node dissection. One case (7.7%) required conversion to open thoracotomy, and all cases achieved R0 resection. The median operative time was 150 [interquartile range (IQR) 125-250] minutes, median intraoperative blood loss was 180 (IQR 150-235) mL, median postoperative drainage tube placement time was 4 (IQR 3-5) days, median total drainage volume was 1,310 (IQR 780-1,705) mL, and the median postoperative hospitalization was 7 (IQR 7-8) days. One patient (7.7%) experienced rapid atrial fibrillation. No deaths occurred. Postoperative pathological evaluation in three cases achieved major pathological response (MPR) (23.1%, 95% CI: 5-53.8%), with two cases achieving pathological complete response (pCR) (15.4%, 95% CI: 1.9-45.4%).

Conclusions

The study presents initial evidence suggesting for the safety and feasibility of performing PCI treatment followed by neoadjuvant therapy during the DAPT period for patients with T2aN0M0 (IB) stage NSCLC coexisting with CAD. This approach presents a potential treatment option to control the disease while eliminating concerns about tumor progression and metastasis.

Identification and Application of Emerging Biomarkers in Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises approximately 85% of all lung cancer cases, often diagnosed at advanced stages, which diminishes the effective treatment options and survival rates. This systematic review assesses the utility of emerging biomarkers-circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), microRNAs (miRNAs), and the blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB)-enhanced by next-generation sequencing (NGS) to improve the diagnostic accuracy, prognostic evaluation, and treatment strategies in NSCLC. Analyzing data from 37 studies involving 10,332 patients from 2020 to 2024, the review highlights how biomarkers like ctDNA and PD-L1 expression critically inform the selection of personalized therapies, particularly beneficial in the advanced stages of NSCLC. These biomarkers are critical for prognostic assessments and in dynamically adapting treatment plans, where high PD-L1 expression and specific genetic mutations (e.g., ALK fusions, EGFR mutations) significantly guide the use of targeted therapies and immunotherapies. The findings recommend integrating these biomarkers into standardized clinical pathways to maximize their potential in enhancing the treatment precision, ultimately fostering significant advancements in oncology and improving patient outcomes and quality of life. This review substantiates the prognostic and predictive value of these biomarkers and emphasizes the need for ongoing innovation in biomarker research.

Values of a novel comprehensive prognostic nutritional index (FIDA) in the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer

Background

This study focuses on determining the prognostic and predictive value of the comprehensive prognostic nutrition index (FIDA) in individuals undergoing treatment for Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC).

Methods

This retrospective analysis encompassed 474 of NSCLC patients treated from January 2010 through December 2019. Employing the Lasso-COX regression approach, eight blood parameters were identified as significant prognostic indicators. These parameters contributed to the formulation of the comprehensive prognostic nutrition index FIDA. Utilizing X-tile software, the patient cohort was categorized into either a high or low FIDA group based on an established optimal threshold. The cohort was then randomly segmented into a training set and a validation set using SPSS software. Subsequent steps involved conducting univariate and multivariate regression analyze to develop a prognostic nomogram. The effectiveness of this nomogram was evaluated by calculating the AUC.

Results

Analysis of survival curves for both the training and validation sets revealed a poorer prognosis in the high FIDA group compared to the low FIDA group. This trend persisted across various subgroups, including gender, age, and smoking history, with a statistical significance (p<0.05). Time-dependent ROC and diagnostic ROC analyses affirmed that FIDA serves as an effective diagnostic and prognostic marker in NSCLC. Moreover, Cox regression multivariate analysis established FIDA as an independent prognostic factor for NSCLC. The prognostic nomogram, integrating FIDA and clinical data, demonstrated substantial prognostic utility and outperformed the traditional TNM staging systemin predicting overall survival (OS).

Conclusion

FIDA emerges as a dependable predictor of outcomes for patients with NSCLC. It offers a practical, cost-effective tool for prognostication in regular clinical applications.

Advancing neoadjuvant therapies in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: implications for novel treatment strategies and biomarker discovery

The delivery of neoadjuvant and perioperative therapies for non-small cell lung cancer has been radically altered by significant advances and by the incorporation of targeted therapies as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors alone or alongside conventional chemotherapy. This evolution has been particularly notable in the incorporation of immunotherapy and targeted therapy into the treatment of resectable NSCLC, where recent FDA approvals of drugs such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab, in combination with platinum doublet chemotherapy, have led to considerable improvements in pathological complete response rates and the potential for enhanced long-term survival outcomes. This review emphasizes the growing importance of biomarkers in optimizing treatment selection and explores the impact of emerging studies that challenge existing treatment paradigms and investigate novel therapeutic combinations poised to redefine standard of care practices. Furthermore, the discussion extends to the unmet needs within perioperative treatment assessment and prognostication, highlighting the prospective value of biomarkers in evaluating treatment responses and prognosis.

A current comprehensive role of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A narrative review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article is to review the efficacy, safety, and evidence for current use and potential future uses of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the management of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

DATA SOURCES

A literature review was carried out through PubMed to identify completed and ongoing clinical trials evaluating the use, efficacy, and safety of ICIs in the management of resectable NSCLC.

DATA SUMMARY

To date, four phase 3 trials have emerged that have changed our treatment practice concerning the utilization of ICIs during the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. The IMpower010 and KEYNOTE-091 trials examined the application of adjuvant atezolizumab and pembrolizumab, respectively, following surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. In the CheckMate 816 trial, the combination of nivolumab and chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant therapy received approval for patients with resectable NSCLC. Also, for patients with resectable NSCLC, the use of a pembrolizumab and chemotherapy combination as a perioperative therapy received approval based on the results of the KEYNOTE-671 trial. Apart from these trials, there are numerous phase 2 and phase 3 trials, some of which have been published while others are still in progress.

CONCLUSION

Despite the promising outcomes from these trials there remain several unanswered questions. In this review, we will assess clinical trials involving adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and perioperative ICIs, aiming to address the unresolved questions related to these therapeutic approaches.

Optimizing perioperative treatment for potentially resectable stage III squamous cell lung carcinoma: promising results of a condensed four-cycle regimen with tislelizumaband chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The standard care for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involves perioperative therapy combining chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, typically lasting 6 to 12 months. However, the optimal treatment strategies for potentially resectable squamous cell lung carcinoma (SCC) remain unclear. This Phase 2 trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a condensed four-cycle perioperative treatment regimen with tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable stage III SCC.

METHODS

Patients with potentially resectable stage IIIA-IIIB (N2) SCC received intravenous tislelizumab, albumin-bound paclitaxel, and carboplatin for up to four cycles. The primary endpoints were major pathologic response (MPR) and incidence of treatment-related adverse events. Safety and potential biomarkers for efficacy prediction were also assessed.

RESULTS

Among 35 enrolled patients, 32 underwent surgery with R0 resection achieved in all cases. MPR was achieved in 24 patients and pathological complete response (pCR) in 14 patients. Radiographic objective response was observed in 31 patients. The 12-month and 24-month event-free survival rate was 85.7 and 61.0%, respectively. Four patients experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Tumor tissue based next-generation sequencing revealed the potential associations between several biomarkers and pathological response, including tumor neoantigen burden score, 18-gene expression profile score, CD8 + T cells, M1/M2 macrophages ratio and interferon-gamma expression level. Besides, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics and concentration were also associated with pathological response and the presence of ctDNA at postoperative month 1 was a strong predictor for disease relapse. Furthermore, metagenomic sequencing in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid demonstrated Streptococcus was the most abundant genus in the pCR group.

CONCLUSIONS

A condensed four-cycle perioperative treatment regimen of tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable toxicities in potentially resectable stage III SCC. Specific biomarkers showed potential for predicting treatment efficacy and the mechanism of superior antitumor response of pCR patients was preliminarily and indirectly explored.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05024266. Registered August 27, 2021.

Site-Specific Response and Resistance Patterns in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with First-Line Systemic Therapy

Patients with advanced NSCLC have heterogenous responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with or without chemotherapy. In NSCLC, the impact of the distribution of metastatic sites and the response to systemic therapy combinations remain poorly understood. In a retrospective cohort study of patients with unresectable stage III/IV NSCLC who received first-line systemic therapy, we sought to assess the association between the site of metastases with patterns of response and progression. Data regarding demographics, tumour characteristics (including site, size, and volume of metastases), treatment, and outcomes were examined at two cancer care centres. The endpoints included organ site-specific response rate, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Two-hundred and eighty-five patients were included in the analysis. In a multivariate analysis, patients with bone metastases had a reduced ORR, PFS, and OS. Primary resistance was also more likely in patients with bone metastases. Patients with bone or liver metastases had a shorter OS when receiving ICIs with or without chemotherapy, but not with chemotherapy alone, suggesting an immunological basis for therapeutic resistance. A directed assessment of the tumour microenvironment in these locations and a deeper understanding of the drivers of organ-specific resistance to immunotherapy are critical to optimise novel combination therapies and sequencing in these patients.

Induction chemoimmunotherapy with surgery versus concurrent chemoradiation followed by immunotherapy for stage III-N2 non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Despite the growing relevance of immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there is limited consensus on the optimal treatment strategy for locally advanced NSCLC. This study evaluated the overall survival of patients with stage III-N2 NSCLC undergoing induction chemoimmunotherapy with surgery (CT/IO+Surgery) and definitive concurrent chemoradiation followed by immunotherapy (cCRT+IO).

METHODS

Patients with cT1-3, N2, M0 NSCLC in the National Cancer Database (2013 to 2019) were included and stratified by treatment regimen: CT/IO+Surgery or cCRT+IO. Overall survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazards modeling, and propensity score matching on 10 prognostic variables.

RESULTS

Of the 3382 patients who met the study eligibility criteria, 3289 (97.3%) received cCRT+IO and 93 (2.8%) received CT/IO+Surgery. The 3-year overall survival of the entire cohort was 58.2% (95% CI, 56.2% to 60.1%). Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards modeling demonstrated better survival after CT/IO+Surgery than after cCRT+IO (hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32 to 0.84; P = .007). In a 3:1 variable ratio propensity score-matched analysis of 223 patients who received cCRT+IO and 76 patients who received CT/IO+Surgery, 3-year overall survival was 63.2% (95% CI, 55.9% to 70.2%) after cCRT+IO and 77.2% (95% CI, 64.6% to 85.7%) after CT/IO+Surgery (P = .029).

CONCLUSIONS

In this national analysis, multimodal treatment including immunotherapy was associated with a 3-year overall survival rate of 58.2% for all patients with stage III-N2 NSCLC and 77.2% for patients who underwent chemoimmunotherapy followed by surgery. These results should be considered hypothesis-generating and demonstrate the importance of developing a randomized trial to evaluate the role of surgery versus chemoradiation for locally advanced NSCLC in the modern immunotherapy era.

A case report of cStage IIIB squamous cell lung carcinoma completely resected after downstaging with neoadjuvant therapy

Background

The most effective method and length of time for administering adjuvant immunotherapy after surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are still unknown. Various clinical trials have utilized diverse strategies for adjuvant treatment. In this case, we explore the potential benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in managing locally advanced lung squamous carcinoma, which often poses challenges for treatment. This multimodal approach aims to downstage tumors and optimize surgical outcomes.

Case Description

Following a diagnosis of stage IIIB lung cancer, the patient underwent three cycles of neoadjuvant therapy using sintilimab, Abraxane, and Lobaplatin, resulting in a significant 45% reduction in tumor size. Subsequently, a right lower lobe lobectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy were performed using a uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) approach. Postoperative analysis revealed negative lymph nodes, with only a 5-mm residual tumor in the tumor bed, downstaging the cancer to IA1. Remarkably, the patient experienced a smooth recovery without any postoperative complications. One cycle of adjuvant therapy was administered following the operation to further support the patient's recovery and minimize the risk of disease recurrence. This comprehensive treatment approach underscores the importance of neoadjuvant therapy in optimizing surgical outcomes and improving long-term prognosis for patients with locally advanced lung cancer.

Conclusions

For patients with stage III locally advanced lung squamous carcinoma, the combination of Sintilimab and Platinum-based drugs can be used as a neoadjuvant therapy which can reduce the difficulty of the operation.

Potential predictors of the pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NACI) is the standard of care for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although the pathological complete response (pCR) after NACI reportedly exceeds 20%, an optimal predictor of pCR is yet to be established. This review aims to examine the possible predictors of pCR after NACI.

Methods

We identified research article published between 2018 and 2022 in English by the PubMed database. Fifty research studies were considered as relevant article, and were examined to edit information for this narrative review.

Key Content and Findings

Recently, several studies have explored potential biomarkers for the pathological response after NACI. For example, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) imaging, tumor microenvironment (TME), genetic alternation such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and clinical markers such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and smoking signature were assessed in patients with resectable NSCLC to predict the pathological response after NACI. Based on the PET response criteria, the complete metabolic response (CMR) achieved a positive predictive value (PPV) of 71.4% for predicting pCR, and the decreasing rate of post-therapy maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) after NACI substantially correlated with the major pathological response (MPR). TME, as a significant marker for MPR in tumor specimens, was identified as an increase in CD8+ T cells and decrease in CD3+ T cells or Foxp3 T cells. Considering blood samples, TME comprised an increase in CD4+PD-1+ cells or natural killer cells and a decrease in CD3+CD56+CTLA4+ cells, total T cells, Th cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), or regulatory T cells. Although low pretreatment levels of ctDNA and undetectable ctDNA levels after NACI were markedly associated with survival, the relationship between ctDNA levels and pCR remains elusive. Moreover, the patients with a high baseline NLR had a low incidence of pCR. Heavy smoking (>40 pack-years) was favorable for predicting pathological response.

Conclusions

A reduced rate of 18F-FDG uptake post-NACI and TME-related surface markers on lymphocytes could be optimal predictors for pCR. However, the role of these pCR predictors for NACI remains poorly validated, warranting further investigations. This review focuses on predictive biomarkers for pathological response after NACI in patients with resectable NSCLC.

Association of pathological response with long-term survival outcomes after neoadjuvant immunotherapy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Complete pathological response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) have been proven to have a close association with improved event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients accepting chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. However, further study focusing on neoadjuvant immunotherapy is limited. Here we provided an updated and comprehensive evaluation of the association between pathological response and long-term survival outcomes at patient level and trial level for neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

METHODS

We systematically searched and assessed studies in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and relevant conference abstracts from inception to June 1, 2023. Studies reported EFS/OS results by pCR/MPR status were eligible.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies comprising a total of 4100 patients were eligible for the analysis, which included 39 studies for the patient-level analysis and 5 randomized controlled trials for the trial-level analysis. Our results highlighted that pCR was associated with improved EFS (HR, 0.48 [95 % CI, 0.39-0.60]) and OS (HR, 0.55 [95 % CI, 0.41-0.74]). The magnitude of HRs by MPR status were similar to the results by pCR status (EFS HR, 0.31 [95 % CI, 0.18-0.53]) and OS HR, 0.43 [95 % CI, 0.19-0.96]). However, no association between pCR and EFS at trial level was found (P = 0.8, R2 = 0).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis demonstrates a strong association between pathological response and long-term survival outcomes at patient level across studies applying neoadjuvant immunotherapy in most solid tumors but we fail to validate the relationship at trial level. Therefore, an accepted surrogate endpoint applied to both patient and trial levels are waited for further search.

Development of new techniques and clinical applications of liquid biopsy in lung cancer management

Lung cancer is an exceedingly malignant tumor reported as having the highest morbidity and mortality of any cancer worldwide, thus posing a great threat to global health. Despite the growing demand for precision medicine, current methods for early clinical detection, treatment and prognosis monitoring in lung cancer are hampered by certain bottlenecks. Studies have found that during the formation and development of a tumor, molecular substances carrying tumor-related genetic information can be released into body fluids. Liquid biopsy (LB), a method for detecting these tumor-related markers in body fluids, maybe a way to make progress in these bottlenecks. In recent years, LB technology has undergone rapid advancements. Therefore, this review will provide information on technical updates to LB and its potential clinical applications, evaluate its effectiveness for specific applications, discuss the existing limitations of LB, and present a look forward to possible future clinical applications. Specifically, this paper will introduce technical updates from the prospectives of engineering breakthroughs in the detection of membrane-based LB biomarkers and other improvements in sequencing technology. Additionally, it will summarize the latest applications of liquid biopsy for the early detection, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of lung cancer. We will present the interconnectedness of clinical and laboratory issues and the interplay of technology and application in LB today.

Predicting therapeutic response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy based on an integration model in resectable stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Accurately predicting response during neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer remains clinically challenging. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of blood-based tumor mutational burden (bTMB) and a deep learning (DL) model in predicting major pathologic response (MPR) and survival from a phase 2 trial.

METHODS

Blood samples were prospectively collected from 45 patients with stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. An integrated model, combining the computed tomography-based DL score, bTMB, and clinical factors, was developed to predict tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

RESULTS

At baseline, bTMB were detected in 77.8% (35 of 45) of patients. Baseline bTMB ≥11 mutations/megabase was associated with significantly greater MPR rates (77.8% vs 38.5%, P = .042), and longer disease-free survival (P = .043), but not overall survival (P = .131), compared with bTMB <11 mutations/megabase in 35 patients with bTMB available. The developed DL model achieved an area under the curve of 0.703 in all patients. Importantly, the predictive performance of the integrated model improved to an area under the curve of 0.820 when combining the DL score with bTMB and clinical factors. Baseline circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status was not associated with pathologic response and survival. Compared with ctDNA residual, ctDNA clearance before surgery was associated with significantly greater MPR rates (88.2% vs 11.1%, P < .001) and improved disease-free survival (P = .010).

CONCLUSIONS

The integrated model shows promise as a predictor of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. Serial ctDNA dynamics provide a reliable tool for monitoring tumor response.

Perioperative Nivolumab in Resectable Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Standard treatment with neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy significantly improves outcomes in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Perioperative treatment (i.e., neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy) with nivolumab may further improve clinical outcomes.

METHODS

In this phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned adults with resectable stage IIA to IIIB NSCLC to receive neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus placebo every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by surgery and adjuvant nivolumab or placebo every 4 weeks for 1 year. The primary outcome was event-free survival according to blinded independent review. Secondary outcomes were pathological complete response and major pathological response according to blinded independent review, overall survival, and safety.

RESULTS

At this prespecified interim analysis (median follow-up, 25.4 months), the percentage of patients with 18-month event-free survival was 70.2% in the nivolumab group and 50.0% in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for disease progression or recurrence, abandoned surgery, or death, 0.58; 97.36% confidence interval [CI], 0.42 to 0.81; P<0.001). A pathological complete response occurred in 25.3% of the patients in the nivolumab group and in 4.7% of those in the chemotherapy group (odds ratio, 6.64; 95% CI, 3.40 to 12.97); a major pathological response occurred in 35.4% and 12.1%, respectively (odds ratio, 4.01; 95% CI, 2.48 to 6.49). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 32.5% of the patients in the nivolumab group and in 25.2% of those in the chemotherapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative treatment with nivolumab resulted in significantly longer event-free survival than chemotherapy in patients with resectable NSCLC. No new safety signals were observed. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb; CheckMate 77T ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04025879.).

Predictive value of pre-operative prognostic nutritional index and systemic immune-inflammation index for efficacy and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To explore the predictive value of preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and systemic immune inflammation index (SII) in relation to the efficacy and prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

METHODS

Data of patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC who received NACT in the 910th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army from January 2017 to April 2020 were retrospectively analysed. Patients undergoing NACT were divided into the pCR group (80 cases with complete remission or partial remission) and the non-pCR group (46 cases with stable disease or progressive disease) in accordance with their treatment outcome. The pathologic and clinical data of the patients were collected and analysed to identify the factors affecting efficacy of NACT for stage IIIa-N2 NSCLC, and to evaluate the predictive value of PNI and SII in determining the efficacy of NACT. The patients were followed up for 3 years to observe the overall survival, and Cox regression analysis was employed to identify the risk factors affecting patient survival. Furthermore, the effect of PNI and SII on the survival time was analysed.

RESULTS

Multivariate regression analysis showed that tumor diameter, PNI, and SII were influencing factors for poor efficacy of NACT in patients with stage IIIa-N2 NSCLC. The non-pCR group exhibited a higher mortality within 3 years, thus a lower 3-year overall survival rate than the pCR group (P<0.05). Cox regression analysis revealed that both PNI and SII were risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with stage IIIa-N2 NSCLC undergoing NACT. Further analysis found a lower 3-year survival rate in patients with low PNI and high SII than in counterparts (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Tumor diameter, PNI and SII are risk factors for poor efficacy in patients with stage IIIa-N2 NSCLC undergoing NACT. Low PNI and high SII can indicate a poor prognosis in these patients.

Circulating biomarkers as predictors of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC: Are we on the right path?

Immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) have markedly improved the therapeutic management of advanced NSCLC and, more recently, they have demonstrated efficacy also in the early-stage disease. Despite better survival outcomes with ICIs compared to standard chemotherapy, a large proportion of patients can derive limited clinical benefit from these agents. So far, few predictive biomarkers, including the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), have been introduced in clinical practice. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify novel biomarkers to select patients for immunotherapy, to improve efficacy and avoid unnecessary toxicity. A deeper understanding of the mechanisms involved in antitumor immunity and advances in the field of liquid biopsy have led to the identification of a wide range of circulating biomarkers that could potentially predict response to immunotherapy. Herein, we provide an updated overview of these circulating biomarkers, focusing on emerging data from clinical studies and describing modern technologies used for their detection.

Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

To date, no meta-analyses have comprehensively assessed the association of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in randomized and nonrandomized settings. In addition, there exists controversy concerning the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for patients with NSCLC with programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels less than 1%.

Objective

To compare neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with chemotherapy by adverse events and surgical, pathological, and efficacy outcomes using recently published randomized clinical trials and nonrandomized trials.

Data Sources

MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched from January 1, 2013, to October 25, 2023, for all clinical trials of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and chemotherapy that included at least 10 patients.

Study Selection

Observational studies and trials reporting the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy, including chemoradiotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, or immunotherapy monotherapy, were excluded.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Surgical, pathological, and efficacy end points and adverse events were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis.

Results

Among 43 eligible trials comprising 5431 patients (4020 males [74.0%]; median age range, 55-70 years), there were 8 randomized clinical trials with 3387 patients. For randomized clinical trials, pooled overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.54-0.79; I2 = 0%), event-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.52-0.67; I2 = 14.9%), major pathological response (risk ratio, 3.42; 95% CI, 2.83-4.15; I2 = 31.2%), and complete pathological response (risk ratio, 5.52; 95% CI, 4.25-7.15; I2 = 27.4%) favored neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy over neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For patients with baseline tumor PD-L1 levels less than 1%, there was a significant benefit in event-free survival for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.89; I2 = 0%).

Conclusion and Relevance

This study found that neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy across surgical, pathological, and efficacy outcomes. These findings suggest that patients with resectable NSCLC with tumor PD-L1 levels less than 1% may have an event-free survival benefit with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

Bridging horizons beyond CIRCULATE-Japan: a new paradigm in molecular residual disease detection via whole genome sequencing-based circulating tumor DNA assay

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is the fraction of cell-free DNA in patient blood that originates from a tumor. Advances in DNA sequencing technologies and our understanding of the molecular biology of tumors have increased interest in exploiting ctDNA to facilitate detection of molecular residual disease (MRD). Analysis of ctDNA as a promising MRD biomarker of solid malignancies has a central role in precision medicine initiatives exemplified by our CIRCULATE-Japan project involving patients with resectable colorectal cancer. Notably, the project underscores the prognostic significance of the ctDNA status at 4 weeks post-surgery and its correlation to adjuvant therapy efficacy at interim analysis. This substantiates the hypothesis that MRD is a critical prognostic indicator of relapse in patients with colorectal cancer. Despite remarkable advancements, challenges endure, primarily attributable to the exceedingly low ctDNA concentration in peripheral blood, particularly in scenarios involving low tumor shedding and the intrinsic error rates of current sequencing technologies. These complications necessitate more sensitive and sophisticated assays to verify the clinical utility of MRD across all solid tumors. Whole genome sequencing (WGS)-based tumor-informed MRD assays have recently demonstrated the ability to detect ctDNA in the parts-per-million range. This review delineates the current landscape of MRD assays, highlighting WGS-based approaches as the forefront technique in ctDNA analysis. Additionally, it introduces our upcoming endeavor, WGS-based pan-cancer MRD detection via ctDNA, in our forthcoming project, SCRUM-Japan MONSTAR-SCREEN-3.

Perioperative Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Practical Application of Emerging Data and New Challenges

Immune checkpoint inhibition, with or without chemotherapy, is an established standard of care for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For locally advanced NSCLC treated with chemoradiotherapy, consolidation immunotherapy has dramatically improved outcomes. Recently, immunotherapy has also been established as a valuable component of treatment for resectable NSCLC with pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and nivolumab all approved for use in this setting. As more results read out from ongoing perioperative clinical trials, navigating treatment options will likely become increasingly complex for the practicing oncologist. In this paper, we distill key outcomes from major perioperative trials and highlight current knowledge gaps. In addition, we provide practical considerations for incorporating perioperative immunotherapy into the clinical management of operable NSCLC.

Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world, multicenter, retrospective study

Background

Resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have a high risk of recurrence. Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy brings new hope for these patients. The study aims to evaluate the safety, surgery-related outcomes and oncological outcomes for neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in real-world setting with a large sample size and long-term follow-up.

Methods

Patients with clinical stage IB-IIIB NSCLC who received neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy at two Chinese institutions were included in this retrospective cohort study. Surgical and oncological outcomes of the enrolled NSCLC patients were collected and analyzed.

Results

There were 158 patients identified, of which 124 (78.5%) were at stage IIIA-IIIB and the remaining 34 (21.5%) were at stage IB-IIB. Forty-one patients (25.9%) received two cycles of neoadjuvant treatment, 80 (50.6%) had three cycles, and 37 (23.4%) had four cycles. Twenty-four patients (15.2%) experienced grade 3 or worse immune-related adverse events. The median interval time between the last neoadjuvant therapy and surgery was 37 [interquartile range (IQR), 31-43] days. Fifty-eight out of 96 (60.4%) central NSCLC patients who were expected to undergo complex surgery had the scope or the difficulty of operation reduced. Ninety-five (60.1%) patients achieved major pathologic response (MPR), including 62 (39.2%) patients with pathologic complete response (pCR). Multivariate regression analysis showed that no clinical factor other than programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was predictive of the pathological response. The median follow-up time from diagnosis was 27.1 months. MPR and pCR were significantly associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Neither stage nor PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with long-term survival.

Conclusions

The neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy is a feasible strategy for NSCLC with a favorable rate of pCR/MPR, modified resection and 2-year survival. No clinical factor other than PD-L1 expression was predictive of the pathological response. pCR/MPR may be effective surrogate endpoint for survival in NSCLC patients who received neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy.

Perioperative Immunotherapy for Node-Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-Current Evidence and Future Directions

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has gone from an idea to an indication in locally advanced lung cancer. Several phase III trials have demonstrated the superiority of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy compared with chemotherapy in this setting. Although such progress has revolutionized the treatment of locally advanced disease, the unmet needs of stage I and stage II patients without lymph node disease have largely been underrepresented in existing trials. Up-front resection with few patients going on to complete adjuvant therapy remains the norm for most stage I and II patients. Emerging evidence now supports the exploration of supplemental checkpoint blockade in well-selected early-stage, node-negative patients with large tumors and no actionable driver mutations. Although concerns surrounding safety and risk exist, patient selection could be substantially improved using novel biomarker approaches that leverage our understanding of the tumor immune microenvironment of lung cancer. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the opportunities and controversies of perioperative immunotherapy in node-negative lung cancer.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of phase 3 clinical trials

Objective

At present, several important trials have been published show that perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy can improve the prognosis of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer, which further optimizes treatment options. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

The following databases were searched for relevant studies: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library (updated 12 October 2023). All randomized trials comparing perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in resectable non-small cell lung cancer were eligible for inclusion. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4.1 (Cochrane collaboration software). Primary outcomes and measures included overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), R0 resection rate, rate of underwent surgery and adverse events (AEs).

Results

A total of 2912 patients (1453 receiving perioperative immunotherapy plus chemotherapy and 1459 receiving chemotherapy alone) were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The result showed that compared with chemotherapy alone, combined therapy significantly improved OS (HR = 0.68;95% CI: 0.56-0.83), EFS (HR = 0.58;95% CI: 0.51-0.65), pCR (OR = 7.53;95% CI: 4.63-12.26), MPR (OR = 5.03;95% CI: 3.40-7.44), R0 resection (OR = 1.58;95% CI: 1.152.18) and rate of underwent surgery (OR = 1.25;95% CI: 1.04-1.49). However, combination therapy was associated with higher risk of severe adverse event (OR = 1.46;95% CI: 1.19-1.78; P=0.0002), grade 3 and higher treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) (OR = 1.25;95% CI: 1.06-1.49; P=0.010), TRAE that led to interruption (OR = 1.90;95% CI: 1.34-2.68; P=0.0003) and immune-related adverse event (OR = 2.78;95% CI: 2.18-3.55; P<0.00001). Significant benefits were observed across most subgroups of EFS and pCR. However, no statistical differences were observed for EFS of never smoked (HR = 0.73;95% CI: 0.51-1.05) and EGFR-mutation positive (HR = 0.35;95% CI: 0.04-3.03).

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis found superior efficacy associated with perioperative immunotherapy plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone in both tumor regression and prolonged survival in resectable NSCLC, but increased the risk of TRAE, so monitoring for adverse events is warranted.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier (CRD42023476786).

Subsequent surgical treatment or maintenance immunotherapy in stage III lung cancer patients achieving a favorable response following neoadjuvant immunotherapy: A matched retrospective cohort study from the surgical perspective

BACKGROUND

Current treatment strategies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are highly individualized and subject to ongoing debates. In the era of immunotherapy, surgery assumes a critical role. The aim of this study was to investigate if subsequent surgical intervention, following a favorable response to immunotherapy and chemotherapy, could yield a more favorable prognosis for patients with advanced stage III NSCLC compared to the continuation of immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

METHODS

We included patients whose tumors exhibited a favorable response (including partial response [PR] and complete response [CR]) to immunotherapy and chemotherapy. These patients were categorized into two groups based on their subsequent treatment plans: surgical and nonsurgical (continuation of maintenance immunotherapy and chemotherapy). The efficacy and long-term prognosis of these groups were compared after matching them in a 1:1 ratio using propensity scores.

RESULTS

In total, 186 patients (93 in each group) were included in this study after matching via propensity scores. The 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 96.0%, 88.5%, and 93.1%, 80.7% in the surgical group, and 93.2%, 83.1%, and 57.7%, 50.4% in the nonsurgical group, respectively. Patients in the surgical group exhibited significantly superior PFS and OS compared to those in the nonsurgical group (p = 0.025 and p = 0.00086). Univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed ΔBMI, Δtumor size reduction, tumor response, earlier clinical stage (IIIb vs. IIIa), and surgery as independent protective factor for patient prognosis. We further selected 101 patients with CR (39 in the surgical group and 62 in the nonsurgical group) and found that patients in the surgical group were significantly better in both PFS and OS. Our subgroup analysis in postoperative patients demonstrated that different surgical strategies did not significantly affect the long-term prognosis of patients (PFS and OS) but could impact their perioperative experience.

CONCLUSION

Patients with advanced stage III NSCLC, whose tumors achieved PR and CR after 2-4 cycles of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, experience a more promising prognosis with subsequent surgical intervention compared with the continued immunotherapy. Despite encountering formidable obstacles, such as protracted surgical procedures and associated trauma, we must rise to the challenge and unleash the power of surgery after immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC.

Feasibility and safety of EGFR-TKI neoadjuvant therapy for EGFR-mutated NSCLC: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of neoadjuvant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeted therapy for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. Previous studies have shown that EGFR-TKIs have excellent anti-tumor activity. However, almost all studies on neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI treatment for EGFR-mutated NSCLC have been non-randomized controlled trials with small sample sizes and different methods of statistical analysis, which may lead to a lack of valid metrics to assess the feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI treatment for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations.

METHODS

Relevant studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Results including objective response rate (ORR), complete resection rate (R0), downstaging rate, pathological complete response (PCR), major pathological response (MPR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were used for further analysis.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis ultimately included 11 studies involving 344 patients with EGFR-positive mutations in NSCLC. In terms of tumor response, the pooled ORR was 57% (95% CI: 42%-73%), and in the Osimertinib subgroup, the pooled ORR was 80% (95% CI: 63%-98%). Analysis of studies that reported a downstaging rate showed the pooled downstaging rate of 41% (95% CI: 9%-74%) and the pooled downstaging rate of 74% (95% CI: 22%-100%) in the Osimertinib subgroup. In terms of surgical outcomes, the pooled pCR rate was 3% (95% CI: 0%-7%), the pooled MPR rate was 11% (95% CI: 6%-17%), and the pooled R0 resection rate was 91% (95% CI: 85%-95%). The most common adverse events associated with neoadjuvant therapy were rash and diarrhea. The pooled incidence of any grade of rash was 47.1% (95% CI: 25.4%-69.3%), and the pooled incidence of grade ≥ 3 rash was 0.6% (95% CI: 0.0%-2.5%). The pooled incidence of diarrhea of any grade was 28.8% (95% CI: 14.4%-45.4%), with the pooled incidence of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea of 0.2% (95% CI: 0.0%-1.6%). The pooled incidence of ≥ grade 3 adverse events was significantly lower.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis confirmed the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant EGFR-TKIs for the treatment of NSCLC patients with EGFR-positive mutations and that third-generation EGFR-TKIs were superior to first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs in terms of shrinking tumor volume and lowering tumor stage; however, future large-scale and multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this conclusion.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023466731.

Comparison of different criteria for estimating major pathological response in resectable non-small cell lung cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Major pathological response (MPR) is proposed as a surrogate endpoint for survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. However, the criteria for estimating MPR differ between the recommendations of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) and the immune-related pathologic response criterion (irPRC). IASLC's criteria focus solely on evaluating the primary tumor, while irPRC's criteria encompass both the primary tumor and lymph node metastasis. Our objective is to compare the prognostic value of different criteria for estimating MPR.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on a cohort of 235 patients with NSCLC after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. The survival endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). The MPR status of each patient was evaluated using both IASLC's criteria and irPRC's criteria. The prognostic value was compared using the Area Under Curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The MPR rates were 63.4 % (149/235) and 57.4 % (135/235) according to IASLC's and irPRC's criteria, respectively. Inconsistent cases, characterized by MPR status according to IASLC's criteria but non-MPR status according to irPRC's criteria, constituted 6.0 % (14/235) of the overall cohort and 15.2 % (14/92) of patients with pretreatment N positive disease. Interestingly, all inconsistent patients showed no recurrence during the study period. Although both MPR statuses according to IASLC (p = 0.00039) and irPRC (p = 0.0094) were associated with improved EFS, IASLC's criteria (AUC = 0.65) were superior to irPRC's criteria (AUC = 0.62) with a higher AUC value.

CONCLUSION

IASLC's criteria for estimating MPR were superior to irPRC's criteria in predicting EFS for NSCLC after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

A review of perioperative treatment strategies with immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in resectable and stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer

Stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous group with different potential therapeutic approaches. Treatment is typically multimodal with either surgical resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation or concurrent chemotherapy and radiation if unresectable. Despite the multimodal treatment and early stage, cure rates have traditionally been low. The introduction of immunotherapy changed the treatment landscape for NSCLC in all stages, and the introduction of immunotherapy in early-stage lung cancer has improved event free survival and overall survival. Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have also improved outcomes in early-stage mutation-driven NSCLC. Optimal treatment choice and sequence is increasingly becoming based upon personalized factors including clinical characteristics, comorbidities, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) score, and the presence of targetable mutations. Despite encouraging data from multiple trials, the optimal multimodal sequence of stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC treatment remains unresolved and warrants further investigation. This review article summarizes recent major clinical trials of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment including stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC with a focus on immunotherapy and TKIs.

An Updated Review of Management of Resectable Stage III NSCLC in the Era of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have an established role in the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ICIs have now entered the paradigm of early-stage NSCLC. The recent evidence shows that the addition of ICI to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and survival rate in early-stage resectable NSCLC and is now a standard of care option in this setting. In this regard, stage III NSCLC merits special consideration, as it is heterogenous and requires a multidisciplinary approach to management. As the neoadjuvant approach is being adopted widely, new challenges have emerged and the boundaries for resectability are being re-examined. Consequently, it is ever more important to carefully individualize the treatment strategy for each patient with resectable stage III NSCLC. In this review, we discuss the recent literature in this field with particular focus on evolving definitions of resectability, T4 disease, N2 disease (single and multi-station), and nodal downstaging. We also highlight the controversy around adjuvant treatment in this setting and discuss the selection of patients for adjuvant treatment, options of salvage, and next line treatment in cases of progression on/after neoadjuvant treatment or after R2 resection. We will conclude with a brief discussion of predictive biomarkers, predictive models, ongoing studies, and directions for future research in this space.

Neoadjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer and esophageal cancer

As the major malignant tumors in the chest, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and esophageal cancer (EC) bring huge health burden to human beings worldwide. Currently, surgery is still the mainstay for comprehensive treatment for NSCLC and EC, but the prognosis is still poor as the results of cancer recurrence and distant metastasis. Neoadjuvant therapy refers to a single or combined treatment before surgery, aiming to improve the therapeutic effects of the traditional therapies. Unfortunately, the clinical outcomes and effects of neoadjuvant therapy are still controversial due to its apparent advantages and disadvantages, and different patients may respond differentially to the same scheme of neoadjuvant therapy, which makes it urgent and necessary to develop personalized scheme of neoadjuvant therapy for different individuals. Therefore, this review summarizes the novel schemes and strategies of neoadjuvant therapy, which may help to significantly improve of life quality of patients suffering from chest-related malignancies.

The Analysis of ceRNA Networks and Tumor Microenvironment in Endometrial Cancer

Background: Endometrial carcinoma is a life-threatening and aggressive tumor that affects women worldwide. ceRNAs and carcinoma-infiltrating immunocytes can be associated with tumor formation and progression. Therefore, investigating the unique mechanisms underlying endometrial carcinoma is crucial. Methods: Prognostic nomograms were constructed based on the differentially expressed genes between normal and tumor tissues. Twenty types of tumor immune infiltrating cells in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC) were examined using CIBERSORT. To identify the potential signaling pathways, the associations among essential ceRNA network genes and important immunocytes were investigated using the co-expression assay. Results: Differential analysis identified 3636 mRNAs, 249 miRNAs, and 252 lncRNAs unique to UCEC. The ceRNA network was constructed using the interplays between 19 lncRNA-miRNA pairs and 434 miRNA-mRNA pairs. Furthermore, CIBERSORT and ceRNA integration analysis revealed that immune cells, including dendritic cells and natural killer cells, and associated ceRNAs such as LRP8, HDGF, PPARGC1B, and TEAD1 can appropriately predict prognosis. A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to predict patient outcomes. Conclusions: Using a nomogram, we predicted the outcomes of patients with UCEC Furthermore, we revealed its significance in improving clinical management.