Effects of teriparatide, alendronate, or both on bone turnover in osteoporotic men

Alendronate for Effective Treatment of Male Osteoporosis: An Insight

Osteoporosis is a major global health problem. The increase in the incidence of osteoporosis in the elderly poses a challenge to treat and also results in an economic burden for the nation. Osteoporosis has been given more importance in females, and there is an urgent need to address this disease in males. Various drugs, such as nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates, RANK ligand inhibitors, parathormones, and alendronate, have been used for effective treatment of osteoporosis. Alendronate (alendronic acid), a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate that inhibits bone resorption by osteoclasts, was synthesized during the 1970s. In the present review, we discuss the pharmacokinetics, mechanism of action, adverse effects, contraindications, and toxicity monitoring of alendronate. The drug may be effectively used for the treatment of male osteoporosis in order to increase bone mineral density and prevent fractures.

Treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis with concurrent denosumab and romosozumab: a case report

Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disorder for which treatment options include antiresorptive therapies (e.g., bisphosphonates, denosumab); anabolics (e.g., teriparatide, abaloparatide); and dual mechanisms (e.g., romosozumab). Management of osteoporosis with concurrent antiresorptive and anabolic agents may be superior to monotherapy, as demonstrated in the DATA trial with the combination of denosumab and teriparatide. However, there is limited experience with the combination of denosumab and romosozumab, which may be an alternative antiresorptive/anabolic regimen for individuals who are not candidates for PTH receptor agonists. In this case, we present a young man with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis who could not tolerate a daily injectable anabolic and who experienced improvement in bone mineral density with concurrent denosumab and off-label romosozumab administration.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Romosozumab and Teriparatide for the Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Romosozumab is increasingly employed to manage osteoporosis. However, no studies have analyzed its effects on recent osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of romosozumab compared with teriparatide in managing OVCFs.

METHODS

The electronic medical records of postmenopausal patients with recent OVCFs who were administered romosozumab or teriparatide for one year from March 2018 to August 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. We compared the 2 groups for demographics, radiological outcomes (compression ratio, Cobb angle, and bone mineral density [BMD]), and clinical outcomes (Numerical Rating Scale [NRS] for back pain).

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients with OVCFs, 32 patients treated with romosozumab and 23 with teriparatide, were included in this study. The change of BMD (g/cm2) values was significantly higher (p = 0.016) in the romosozumab (0.04 ± 0.06) than in the teriparatide group (0.00 ± 0.08) in the femur total. Furthermore, in subgroup analysis, the change of BMD (g/cm2) values in the lumbar spine was significantly higher (p = 0.016) in the romosozumab (0.12 ± 0.06) than in the teriparatide group (0.07 ± 0.06) in the lumbar spine. The decrease in NRS was significantly higher (p = 0.013) in the romosozumab (6.6 ± 2.0) than in the teriparatide group (5.5 ± 2.1). However, there was no significant difference in radiologic outcomes between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that romosozumab may be more effective than teriparatide in treating OVCFs in postmenopausal females, particularly in improving BMD and reducing back pain as measured by NRS.

Combination Therapy of Denosumab and Teriparatide in Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a chronic disease that often requires long-term treatment for many years. The clinician should know about all the drugs that are currently being used for treatment in osteoporosis and their mechanism of action, efficacy, safety profile, mode of administration and number of years they can be given safely without causing significant adverse effects. The categories of drugs that are currently being used for osteoporosis are antiresorptives such as oral and intravenous bisphosphonates, denosumab, and anabolics like teriparatide. This article will focus on the combination therapy of denosumab and teriparatide and will discuss how this combination is better than other class of drugs when given alone or in combination in osteoporosis patients especially those who are at high risk of fragility fractures.

Evaluation of Vitamin D isolated or Associated with Teriparatide in Peri-Implant Bone Repair in Tibia of Orchiectomized Rats

(1) Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the morphometry of peri-implant bone tissue in orchiectomized rats, treated with vitamin D isolated or associated with teriparatide. (2) Methods: 24 rats were divided into 4 groups: ORQ-orchiectomy, without drug treatment, ORQ+D-orchiectomy, treated with vitamin D, ORQTERI-orchiectomy, treated with teriparatide and ORQTERI+D-orchiectomy, treated with teriparatide + vitamin D. Each animal received an implant in the tibial metaphysis. Euthanasia occurred 60 days after implant surgery. Computed microtomography (micro-CT) was performed to evaluate the parameters of volume and percentage of bone volume (BV, BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), number and separation of trabeculae (Tb.N, Tb.Sp) and percentage of total porosity (Po-tot). Data were subjected to 1-way ANOVA and Tukey post-test, with a significance level of 5%. (3) Results: For the parameters BV, BV/TV, Tb.Th, the ORQTERI+D group showed the highest values in relation to the other groups and for Po-tot, the lowest values were for ORQTERI+D. For Tb.Sp and Tb.N, there was no statistically significant difference when comparing intragroup results (p > 0.05). (4) Conclusions: It was possible to conclude that treatment with vitamin D associated with teriparatide increases bone volume and improves bone quality.

Advances in bone turnover markers

Bone fragility fractures remain an important worldwide health and economic problem due to increased morbidity and mortality. The current methods for predicting fractures are largely based on the measurement of bone mineral density and the utilization of mathematical risk calculators based on clinical risk factors for bone fragility. Despite these approaches, many bone fractures remain undiagnosed. Therefore, current research is focused on the identification of new factors such as bone turnover markers (BTM) for risk calculation. BTM are a group of proteins and peptides released during bone remodeling that can be found in serum or urine. They derive from bone resorptive and formative processes mediated by osteoclasts and osteoblasts, respectively. Potential use of BTM in monitoring these phenomenon and therefore bone fracture risk is limited by physiologic and pathophysiologic factors that influence BTM. These limitations in predicting fractures explain why their inclusion in clinical guidelines remains limited despite the large number of studies examining BTM.

Safety and efficacy of teriparatide treatment for severe osteoporosis in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Osteoporosis is a major concern in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. In this novel study of teriparatide treatment in 6 patients with severe osteoporosis, bone health (fractures, vertebral morphometry, and DXA) remained stable, with no adverse events. These findings will help inform future osteoporosis research in this challenging population.

INTRODUCTION

Despite standard therapy with vitamin D and bisphosphonates (BP), many patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) continue to sustain fragility fractures due to long-term glucocorticoid treatment and limited mobility. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of teriparatide for the treatment of severe osteoporosis in adolescent and young adult patients with DMD.

METHODS

We prospectively treated 6 patients with DMD who had severe osteoporosis with teriparatide 20 mcg subcutaneously daily for 1-2 years. Inclusion criteria were long-term glucocorticoid therapy, and severe osteoporosis despite treatment with BP, or intolerance to BP. We examined long bone and vertebral fracture outcomes, including vertebral morphometry measures, bone mineral density and content, bone formation markers, safety indices, and adverse events.

RESULTS

The mean age at teriparatide start was 17.9 years (range 13.9-22.1 years). All 6 patients were on daily glucocorticoids (mean ± SD; duration 10.9 ± 2.5 years) and 5 were non-ambulatory. Five patients had been treated with BP for 7.9 ± 4.2 years. All had vertebral and a history of long bone fragility fractures at baseline. Vertebral heights and Genant fracture grading remained stable. Long bone fracture rate appeared to decrease (from 0.84/year to 0.09/year); one patient sustained a long bone fracture at 6 months of treatment. Trajectories for change in bone mineral density and content were not different post- vs. pre-teriparatide. Procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP) increased, while laboratory safety indices remained stable and non-concerning. No adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

In six patients with DMD treated with teriparatide for severe osteoporosis, we observed stable bone health and modest increases in P1NP, without safety concerns. Further studies are needed to better understand teriparatide efficacy for treatment of osteoporosis in patients with DMD.

Comparison between teriparatide and bisphosphonates for improving bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of teriparatide and bisphosphonates in managing postmenopausal osteoporosis.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials that were published before April 2018 and compared teriparatide and bisphosphonates in treating postmenopausal osteoporosis. Stata 12.0 was used for the meta-analysis. The pooled risk ratio (RR) or weighted mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a fixed effects or random effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 14 randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. The teriparatide group was associated with a lower total occurrence of vertebral fractures (RR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.40-0.77; P = .001) and nonvertebral fractures (RR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46-0.90; P = .009) than the bisphosphonate group. Moreover, compared with the bisphosphonate group, the teriparatide group had improved bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and femoral neck at the final follow-up (P < .05). There was no significant difference between the teriparatide and bisphosphonate groups in terms of complications (RR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.90, 1.22, P = .516).

CONCLUSIONS

Teriparatide significantly reduced the occurrence of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in osteoporosis patients. More studies should focus on the quality of life of patients using these 2 drugs.

Position Statement on the Use of Bone Turnover Markers for Osteoporosis Treatment

Current evidences continue to support the clinical application of bone turnover markers (BTMs) in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The limitations of bone mineral density measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiomet especially emphasize the beneficial roles of BTMs, such as serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen and serum procollagen type I N-propeptide, as monitoring tools to assess the responses to treatment. Therefore, the proper application and assessment of BTM in clinical practice is very important. However, their use in Korea is still insufficient. Therefore, the BTM committee has set up by the Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research have been constituted and provided a position statement which will suggest on the clinical application of BTM for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Korea.

Combination denosumab and high dose teriparatide for postmenopausal osteoporosis (DATA-HD): a randomised, controlled phase 4 trial

BACKGROUND

In the Denosumab and Teriparatide Administration (DATA) study, we showed that denosumab fully inhibits teriparatide-induced bone resorption while allowing for continued teriparatide-induced bone formation, resulting in larger increases in hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD) than with either drug alone. We aimed to assess whether administration of denosumab with high dose teriparatide would stimulate larger increases in bone mass than those observed in the DATA study.

METHODS

DATA-HD was an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 4 trial done at Massachusetts General Hospital. Eligible women were postmenopausal women (at least 36 months since last menses or since hysterectomy with a follicle-stimulating hormone concentration of ≥40 U/L) with osteoporosis. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive teriparatide 20 μg (standard dose) or 40 μg (high dose) daily via subcutaneous injection for 9 months. At 3 months, both groups were started on denosumab 60 mg every 6 months via subcutaneous injection for 12 months. Areal BMD (aBMD) was measured at 0, 3, 9, and 15 months. Treatment was given open label, but outcome assessors were masked. The primary endpoint was percentage change from baseline in spine areal BMD (aBMD) at 15 months. Women who completed at least one study visit after baseline were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned participants. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02176382.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 15, 2014, and June 10, 2016, 269 women were assessed for eligibility. 76 participants were randomly assigned to 20 μg teriparatide (n=39) or 40 μg teriparatide (n=37), of whom 69 completed at least one post-baseline visit. At 15 months, mean spine aBMD had increased to a significantly greater extent in the 40 μg group (17·5% [SD 6·0] increase) than the 20 μg group (9·5% [3·2]; difference 8·1%, 95% CI 5·5 to 10·6, p<0·0001). Mean femoral neck aBMD had also increased to a greater extent in the 40 μg group (6·8% [SD 4·1] increase) than the 20 μg group (4·3% [3·7]; difference 2·5%, 0·5 to 4·5, p=0·04), as did mean total hip aBMD (40 μg group, 6·1% [3·4] increase; 20 μg group, 3·9% [2·9] increase; difference 2·2%, 0·6 to 3·8, p<0·0001). 30 (77%) of 39 participants in the 20 μg group and 29 (78%) of 37 participants in the 40 μg group had an adverse event, and seven (18%) and two (5%) patients had serious adverse events. The most frequent adverse events were joint pain (15 [38%]), muscle cramp (15 [38%]), and fatigue (12 [31%]) in the 20 μg group group and fatigue (14 [38%]), nausea (16 [43%]), and joint pain (17 [46%]) in the 40 μg group. No deaths were reported.

INTERPRETATION

Combined treatment with teriparatide 40 μg and denosumab increases spine and hip BMD more than standard combination therapy. This large and rapid increase in bone mass suggest that this high dose regimen might provide a method of restoring skeletal integrity in patients with osteoporosis.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health and the Dart Foundation.

Urinary N-Telopeptide Can Predict Pseudarthrosis After Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion: A Prospective Study

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To examine preoperative urinary cross-linked n-telopeptide (uNTx) and assess for association with fusion rates in patients undergoing single and multi-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although high rates of fusion have been reported for ACDF, the risk of pseudarthrosis remains substantial. An established marker of bone turnover, uNTx may prove useful as a predictor of fusion.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary ACDF with allograft/plating technique from 2015 to 2017 by a single surgeon were consecutively enrolled and preoperative uNTx was collected. Patients undergoing revision, with creatinine >1.2, and with improperly-collected uNTx were excluded. Demographics, laboratory values, and fusion status were assessed at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Of the 97 patients enrolled, 69 met inclusion criteria. Of included cases, 41%, 33%, 18%, and 8% underwent 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-level ACDF, respectively. Overall, fusion rates were 37.3%, 70.9%, and 95.3% at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. uNTx was higher in the fusion group (31.1 vs. 22.2, P = 0.001) at 6 months and 1 year (30.0 vs. 21.0, P = 0.006), with no difference at 2 years. No differences were identified in the proportion of smokers, immunomodulatory agents, corpectomies, or fusion levels between groups. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that uNTx is an independent predictor of fusion (odds ratio, OR, 1.124, P = 0.003). Both groups experienced improvements in NDI and VAS neck pain at 6 months with no significant differences noted between groups. Of 16 patients with pseudarthrosis at 1 year, 2 underwent posterior cervical fusion for symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative uNTx was greater in patients with successful ACDF fusion compared with patients with pseudarthrosis at 6 months and 1 year. A negative correlation was found between preoperative uNTx and motion on dynamic imaging. These results suggest that uNTx could serve to identify patients at risk for pseudarthrosis after ACDF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Wrist Fractures and Osteoporosis

Distal radial fractures account for up to 18% of all fractures in patients over 65 years of age, and osteoporosis is a predominant factor in these fractures. Fracture treatment may include closed reduction and casting/splinting, external fixation, and open reduction and internal fixation.

Once-Weekly Teriparatide Treatment Prevents Microdamage Accumulation in the Lumbar Vertebral Trabecular Bone of Ovariectomized Cynomolgus Monkeys

The effect of teriparatide treatment on microdamage accumulation has yet to be examined in animal studies. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of once-weekly teriparatide treatment on bone microdamage accumulation and the relationship between microdamage parameters and bone mass, architecture, turnover, and collagen cross-linking in the lumbar vertebral trabecular bone of ovariectomized (OVX) cynomolgus monkeys. Female monkeys were divided into four groups (n = 18-20 per group): (1) SHAM group, (2) OVX group, (3) OVX with 1.2 µg/kg once-weekly teriparatide group (LOW group), (4) OVX with 6.0 µg/kg once-weekly teriparatide group (HIGH group). After 18 months, all animals were double-labeled with calcein for histomorphometry. L3 and L7 lumbar vertebrae were harvested and analyzed for differences in histomorphometry, microdamage, and collagen cross-linking. The iliac crest was also analyzed for differences in bone turnover. In the OVX group, cancellous bone mass was reduced and microdamage accumulation was increased as compared with the SHAM control. Once-weekly teriparatide at both doses prevented the decrease in bone mass and increase in microdamage accumulation, and improved the distribution of collagen cross-linkage types. Regression analyses indicated that decreased microdamage accumulation was associated with reduced non-enzymatic cross-link pentosidine rather than increased cancellous bone mass or enzymatic cross-links. These findings suggest that once-weekly teriparatide treatment decreases microdamage accumulation by recovering the balance in collagen cross-links.

Advances and Unmet Needs in the Therapeutics of Bone Fragility

The prevalence of fragility fractures increases as longevity increases the proportion of the elderly in the community. Until recently, the majority of studies have targeted women with osteoporosis defined as a bone mineral density (BMD) T score of < -2.5 SD, despite evidence that the population burden of fractures arises from women with osteopenia. Antiresorptive agents reduce vertebral and hip fracture risk by ~50 percent during 3 years but efficacy against non-vertebral fractures, 80% of all fractures in the community, is reported in few studies, and of those, the risk reduction is only 20-30%. Recent advances in the use of antiresorptives and anabolic agents has addressed some of these unmet needs. Zoledronic acid is now reported to reduce vertebral and non-vertebral fractures rates in women with osteopenia. Studies using teriparatide demonstrate better vertebral and clinical (symptomatic vertebral and non-vertebral) antifracture efficacy than risedronate. Abaloparatide, a peptide sharing amino acid sequences with teriparatide, reduces vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. Romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody suppressing sclerostin, reduces vertebral and non-vertebral fractures within a year of starting treatment, and does so more greatly than alendronate. Some recent studies signal undesirable effects of therapy but provide essential cautionary insights into long term management. Cessation of denosumab is associated with a rapid increase in bone remodeling and the uncommon but clinically important observation of increased multiple vertebral fractures suggesting the need to start alternative anti-resorptive therapy around the time of stopping denosumab. Antiresorptives like bisphosphonates and denosumab suppress remodeling but not completely. Antifracture efficacy may be limited, in part, as a consequence of continued unsuppressed remodeling, particularly in cortical bone. Bisphosphonates may not distribute in deeper cortical bone, so unbalanced intracortical remodeling continues to cause microstructural deterioration. In addition, suppressed remodeling may compromise the material composition by increasing matrix mineral density and glycosylation of collagen. As antiresorptive agents do not restore microstructural deterioration existing at the time of starting treatment, under some circumstances, anabolic therapy may be more appropriate first line treatment. Combining antiresorptive and anabolic therapy is an alternative but whether anti-fracture efficacy is greater than that achieved by either treatment alone is not known.

A Phase III Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Romosozumab in Men With Osteoporosis

CONTEXT

Globally, one in five men aged >50 years is predicted to experience an osteoporotic fracture. Because of the treatment gap in osteoporosis and the paucity of bone-forming agents for men, new osteoporosis treatments are needed.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of romosozumab in men with osteoporosis.

DESIGN

Phase III randomized BRIDGE study (placebo-controlled double-blind study evaluating the efficacy and safety of romosozumab in treating men with osteoporosis; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02186171) for 12 months.

SETTING

Thirty-one centers in Europe, Latin America, Japan, and North America.

PATIENTS

Men aged 55 to 90 years with a baseline bone mineral density (BMD) T-score at the lumbar spine (LS), total hip (TH), or femoral neck of ≤-2.5 or ≤-1.5 with a history of a fragility nonvertebral or vertebral fracture.

INTERVENTIONS

The subjects were randomized 2:1 to receive romosozumab 210 mg subcutaneously monthly or placebo for 12 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change from baseline in LS BMD at month 12.

RESULTS

In 245 subjects (163 romosozumab, 82 placebo), at month 12, the mean percentage change from baseline in the LS and TH BMD was significantly greater for the romosozumab group than for the placebo group (LS, 12.1% vs 1.2%; TH, 2.5% vs -0.5%; P < 0.001). Adverse events and serious adverse events were balanced between the two groups, with a numerical imbalance in the positively adjudicated cardiovascular serious adverse events [romosozumab, 8 (4.9%) vs placebo, 2 (2.5%)].

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with romosozumab for 12 months increased the spine and hip BMD compared with placebo and was well tolerated in men with osteoporosis.

Regulation of Bone Remodeling by Parathyroid Hormone

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) exerts profound effects on skeletal homeostasis through multiple cellular and molecular mechanisms. Continuous hyperparathyroidism causes net loss of bone mass, despite accelerating bone formation by osteoblasts. Intermittent treatment with PTH analogs represents the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved bone anabolic osteoporosis treatment strategy. Functional PTH receptors are present on cells of the osteoblast lineage, ranging from early skeletal stem cells to matrix-embedded osteocytes. In addition, bone remodeling by osteoclasts liberates latent growth factors present within bone matrix. Here, we will provide an overview of the multiple cellular and molecular mechanisms through which PTH influences bone homeostasis. Notably, net skeletal effects of continuous versus intermittent can differ significantly. Where possible, we will highlight mechanisms through which continuous hyperparathyroidism leads to bone loss, and through which intermittent hyperparathyroidism boosts bone mass. Given the therapeutic usage of intermittent PTH (iPTH) treatment for osteoporosis, particular attention will be paid toward mechanisms underlying the bone anabolic effects of once daily PTH administration.

Combination therapy of anabolic agents and bisphosphonates on bone mineral density in patients with osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine whether the concomitant combination therapy of anabolic agents and bisphosphonates produces more effects on bone mineral density (BMD) than anabolic agents alone in patients with osteoporosis.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library for publications from 1 January 1980 to 1 August 2016 to identify all the randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. The primary outcome was the mean per cent changes in BMD at the lumbar spine, the total hip and the femoral neck with an optimal period of treatment (6 to 12 months). The secondary outcome was the mean per cent changes in BMD at the same sites with the full period of recommendation (18 to 24 months). A random-effects model was used to estimate the standardised mean differences (SMDs) and the 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Seven studies, with 747 patients, were included. With the optimal period, the concomitant combination therapy demonstrated a significant advantage over a monotherapy in BMD improvement at the total hip (SMD 0.42; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.58) and the femoral neck (SMD 0.30; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.46), but not for the spine BMD (SMD 0.13; 95% CI -0.17 to 0.43). With the full period, the concomitant combination therapy did not improve the BMD at the lumbar spine (SMD -0.06; 95% CI -0.71 to 0.59), the total hip (SMD 0.05; 95% CI -0.71 to 0.82) and the femoral neck (SMD -0.32; 95% CI -1.15 to 0.50).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with anabolic monotherapy, the concomitant combination therapy of anabolic agents and bisphosphonates significantly improved the BMD at the total hip and femoral neck with a shorter term (6 to 12 months) and produced similar benefits on BMD for the longer term (18 to 24 months). Also, the effect of concomitant combination therapy might be affected by the dose of anabolic agents.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42016041335.

Anabolic treatment for osteoporosis: teriparatide

Teriparatide is a safe and effective anabolic treatment for osteoporosis. In postmenopausal women, it increases BMD and decreases vertebral fractures by about 70% and non-vertebral fractures by about 45% (although there is no evidence that it prevents hip fractures). The current evidence indicates that it should be administered for a single course of 24 months, and followed with an anti-resorptive agent to maintain the BMD gain. There is no clear benefit to repeated or cyclical treatment. Combination treatment, particularly with denosumab achieves greater BMD increase than either agent alone, but there are no available fracture data for combination treatment. There are some unknowns; most fundamentally why daily PTH administration is anabolic to bone when continuous high PTH is catabolic. Also, a better understanding of why the anabolic action declines with time and why there is a poor response to repeated treatment may help us to use teriparatide more effectively, and increase our understanding of bone biology and osteoporosis pathophysiology.

Effect of Sequential Treatment with Bisphosphonates After Teriparatide in Ovariectomized Rats: A Direct Comparison Between Risedronate and Alendronate

Teriparatide (TPTD), a recombinant human parathyroid hormone N-terminal fragment (1-34), is a widely used bone anabolic drug for osteoporosis. Sequential treatment with antiresorptives such as bisphosphonates after TPTD discontinuation is generally recommended. However, relative effects of bisphosphonates have not been determined. In the present study, we directly compared effects of risedronate (RIS) and alendronate (ALN) on bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover, structural property and strength in ovariectomized (OVX) rats, when administered after TPTD. Female Sprague Dawley rats were divided into one sham-operated and eight ovariectomized groups. TPTD, RIS, and ALN were given subcutaneously twice per week for 4 or 8 weeks after 4 week treatment with TPTD. TPTD significantly increased BMD (+9.6%) in OVX rats after 4 weeks of treatment. 8 weeks after TPTD withdrawal, vehicle-treated group showed a blunted BMD increase of +8.4% from the baseline. In contrast, 8 weeks of treatment with RIS and ALN significantly increased BMD to 17.4 and 21.8%, respectively. While ALN caused a consistently larger increase in BMD, sequential treatment with RIS resulted in lower Tb.Sp compared to ALN in the fourth lumbar vertebra as well as in greater stiffness in compression test. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that sequential therapy with ALN and RIS after TPTD both improved bone mass and structure. Our results further suggest that RIS may have a greater effect on improving bone quality and stiffness than ALN despite less prominent effect on BMD. Further studies are necessary to determine clinical relevance of these findings to fracture rate.

Bisphosphonate Pre-Treatment Diminishes the Therapeutic Benefits of Teriparatide in Japanese Osteoporotic Patients

Osteoporosis (OP) is the most common multifactorial metabolic bone disorder worldwide. It remains unclear whether bisphosphonate (BP) pre-treatment affects the anabolic bone metabolism in OP patients treated with teriparatide (TPTD), a recombinant form of parathyroid hormone 1-34. This study is the first to evaluate the clinical outcomes of daily TPTD administration in Japanese OP patients and aimed to clarify how BP pre-treatment influences the efficacy of TPTD. We enrolled 112 patients diagnosed as primary OP who received TPTD. Subjects were classified as OP treatment-naïve patients (TPTD alone group) or patients previously treated with BP (BP pre-treated group). We measured serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) as a bone formation marker, urinary cross-linked N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX) as a bone resorption marker, and bone mineral density (BMD) of lumbar vertebrae (L-BMD) and bilateral total hips (H-BMD). In both groups, BAP and NTX increased until 6 months and then decreased thereafter. The percent changes of both markers in BP pre-treated group were more increased than those in TPTD alone group. L-BMD increased significantly in both groups. The percent increase of L-BMD in the TPTD alone group was significantly higher than that in the BP pre-treated group. H-BMD rose significantly in the TPTD alone group, but not in BP pre-treated group. BP pre-treatment appears to diminish the degree of the TPTD-mediated increase in BMD. Thus, it is preferable to administer TPTD ahead of BP treatment in patients with severe OP.

Parathyroid Hormone and Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein Analogs in Osteoporosis Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose is to review the efficacy and optimal use of parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone-related protein analogs in osteoporosis treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

The parathyroid hormone analog teriparatide, a potent stimulator of bone remodeling, increases hip and spine bone mineral density and reduces the risk of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. The parathyroid hormone-related protein analog, abaloparatide, also reduces fracture incidence but has pharmacological effects that differ from teriparatide, particularly in cortical bone. These analogs provide maximal benefit when their use is followed by a potent antiresorptive medication. Moreover, studies have shown that the combination of teriparatide and the RANK-ligand inhibitor, denosumab, increase bone density and estimated strength more than monotherapy and more than any currently available regimen. Parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone-related protein analogs, whether as monotherapy, in combination with antiresorptive agents or in sequence with antiresorptive agents, will likely play an expanding role in osteoporosis management.

Bone Turnover Markers in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Metabolic Bone Disease

BACKGROUND

Disorders of bone metabolism, most notably osteoporosis, are highly prevalent and predispose to fractures, causing high patient morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis and monitoring of bone metabolic defects can present a major challenge as these disorders are largely asymptomatic and radiographic measures of bone mass respond slowly to changes in bone physiology.

CONTENT

Bone turnover markers (BTMs) are a series of protein or protein derivative biomarkers released during bone remodeling by osteoblasts or osteoclasts. BTMs can offer prognostic information on fracture risk that supplements radiographic measures of bone mass, but testing using BTMs has to take into account the large number of preanalytic factors and comorbid clinical conditions influencing BTM levels. BTMs respond rapidly to changes in bone physiology, therefore, they have utility in determining patient response to and compliance with therapies for osteoporosis.

SUMMARY

BTMs are a useful adjunct for the diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of bone metabolic disorders, but their use has to be tempered by the known limitations in their clinical utility and preanalytic variables complicating interpretation.

Bone modeling and remodeling: potential as therapeutic targets for the treatment of osteoporosis

The adult skeleton is renewed by remodeling throughout life. Bone remodeling is a process where osteoclasts and osteoblasts work sequentially in the same bone remodeling unit. After the attainment of peak bone mass, bone remodeling is balanced and bone mass is stable for one or two decades until age-related bone loss begins. Age-related bone loss is caused by increases in resorptive activity and reduced bone formation. The relative importance of cortical remodeling increases with age as cancellous bone is lost and remodeling activity in both compartments increases. Bone modeling describes the process whereby bones are shaped or reshaped by the independent action of osteoblast and osteoclasts. The activities of osteoblasts and osteoclasts are not necessarily coupled anatomically or temporally. Bone modeling defines skeletal development and growth but continues throughout life. Modeling-based bone formation contributes to the periosteal expansion, just as remodeling-based resorption is responsible for the medullary expansion seen at the long bones with aging. Existing and upcoming treatments affect remodeling as well as modeling. Teriparatide stimulates bone formation, 70% of which is remodeling based and 20-30% is modeling based. The vast majority of modeling represents overflow from remodeling units rather than de novo modeling. Denosumab inhibits bone remodeling but is permissive for modeling at cortex. Odanacatib inhibits bone resorption by inhibiting cathepsin K activity, whereas modeling-based bone formation is stimulated at periosteal surfaces. Inhibition of sclerostin stimulates bone formation and histomorphometric analysis demonstrated that bone formation is predominantly modeling based. The bone-mass response to some osteoporosis treatments in humans certainly suggests that nonremodeling mechanisms contribute to this response and bone modeling may be such a mechanism. To date, this has only been demonstrated for teriparatide, however, it is clear that rediscovering a phenomenon that was first observed more half a century ago will have an important impact on our understanding of how new antifracture treatments work.

Use of combination therapy in the treatment of primary osteoporosis: protocol for a network meta-analysis of randomised trials

INTRODUCTION

The existing medications approved for treatment of primary osteoporosis can be divided into antiresorptive drugs and anabolic drugs. According to the mechanisms of action, the combined therapy may produce a synergistic effect on bone mineral density (BMD) compared with monotherapy, and thus improves the efficacy of fracture resistance. This network meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacies of different combined methods for the treatment of primary osteoporosis.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases will be searched to identify all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that evaluate the effectiveness of combined therapy versus monotherapy for primary osteoporosis. The primary outcome will be the BMD changes at the lumbar spine and total hip, and the secondary outcome will be the risks of vertebral fracture and non-vertebral fracture. The efficacies of different combined methods will be compared via traditional pairwise meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane tool and the quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation for network meta-analysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required because this is a protocol for a systematic review without including confidential personal data or data on interventions on patients. Our results will be published in a peer-review journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42016038569.

Sclerostin Antibody Therapy for the Treatment of Osteoporosis: Clinical Prospects and Challenges

It is estimated that over 200 million adults worldwide have osteoporosis, a disease that has increasing socioeconomic impact reflected by unsustainable costs associated with disability, fracture management, hospital stays, and treatment. Existing therapeutic treatments for osteoporosis are associated with a variety of issues relating to use, clinical predictability, and health risks. Consequently, additional novel therapeutic targets are increasingly sought. A promising therapeutic candidate is sclerostin, a Wnt pathway antagonist and, as such, a negative regulator of bone formation. Sclerostin antibody treatment has demonstrated efficacy and superiority compared to other anabolic treatments for increasing bone formation in both preclinical and clinical settings. Accordingly, it has been suggested that sclerostin antibody treatment is set to achieve market approval by 2017 and aggressively compete as the gold standard for osteoporotic treatment by 2021. In anticipation of phase III trial results which may potentially signify a significant step in achieving market approval here, we review the preclinical and clinical emergence of sclerostin antibody therapies for both osteoporosis and alternative applications. Potential clinical challenges are also explored as well as ongoing developments that may impact on the eventual clinical application of sclerostin antibodies as an effective treatment of osteoporosis.

Analysis of daily teriparatide treatment for osteoporosis in men

The percent and absolute lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral densities and absolute procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) increases following a 20-μg/day teriparatide treatment for 12 months were similar in men and women regardless of sex differences.

INTRODUCTION

Several placebo-controlled studies have measured the effects of daily teriparatide in men and postmenopausal women with osteoporosis but none have directly compared the effects between these groups. We retrospectively compared the effects of daily teriparatide therapy in men and postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and investigated biochemical markers of bone turnover to detect possible sex differences.

METHODS

Patients (563; 75 men and 488 women) with osteoporosis were retrospectively investigated. All patients were administered with teriparatide at 20 μg/day for 12 months. The primary efficacy measure was changed in lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) bone mineral density (BMD) after 12 months of treatment. The change in serum levels of procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) and urinary N-telopeptide (uNTX) excretion after 4, 8 and 12 months of treatment were also measured.

RESULTS

In men, the percent LS BMD significantly increased by 11.3 ± 9.9 % (mean ± standard deviation (SD)) and the FN BMD increased by 0.4 ± 6.4 % without a significant difference at 12 months. In postmenopausal women, the percent LS BMD significantly increased by 9.6 ± 8.1 % and the FN BMD significantly increased by 2.4 ± 7.8 % at 12 months. The percent and absolute BMD increases in LS and FN between men and women were similar. The absolute increases in PINP were similar in both groups at 4, 8 and 12 months. However, the absolute increases in uNTX were significantly lower in men than in women at 8 and 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Daily teriparatide treatment was as effective in men as in postmenopausal women regardless of sex differences.

Individual and combining effects of anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody and teriparatide in ovariectomized mice

We examined the individual and combined effects of teriparatide and anti-RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand) monoclonal antibody in ovariectomized mice. Three-month-old female C57BL/6 mice were ovariectomized (OVX) or sham operated. Four weeks after OVX, they were assigned to 3 different groups to receive anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody (Ab) alone (5 mg/kg single injection at 4 weeks after OVX, Ab group), teriparatide alone (80 μg/kg daily injection for 4 weeks from 4 weeks after OVX, PTH group), or mAb plus teriparatide (Ab + PTH group). Mice were sacrificed 8 weeks after OVX. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the femur and lumbar spine. Hind limbs were subjected to histological and histomorphometric analysis. Serum osteocalcin and CTX-I levels were measured to investigate the bone turnover. Compared with Ab group, Ab + PTH group showed a significant increase in BMD at distal femur and femoral shaft. Cortical bone volume was significantly increased in PTH and Ab + PTH groups compared with Ab group. Bone turnover in Ab + PTH group was suppressed to the same degree as in Ab group. The number of TRAP-positive multinucleated cells was markedly reduced in Ab and Ab + PTH groups. These results suggest that combined treatment of teriparatide with anti-RANKL antibody has additive effects on BMD in OVX mice compared with individual treatment.

•

The effects of anti-RANKL antibody and teriparitide in ovariectomized mice was studied.

•

Anti-RANKL antibody and teriparatide increased bone mass at the distinct regions.

•

Combination of anti-RANKL antibody and teriparatide had additive effects.

•

Teriparitide, but not anti-RANKL antibody, increased periosteal bone formation.

Current and future treatments of osteoporosis in men

One in three osteoporotic fractures occur in men and the consequences of a fracture in men tend to be more severe than in women. Still, only a small minority of men with high risk of fracture are detected and treated. Although there are gender differences in the pathophysiology of osteoporosis, such as in the pattern of bone loss, similarities predominate, which is also the case for clinical risk factors. It seems appropriate to consider treatment for men and women with a similar 10 year fracture risk. Drugs now approved for treatment of osteoporosis in men include the anti-resorptive bisphosphonates alendronate, residronate and zoledronic acid, the anti-resorptive drug denosumab, the bone-forming agent teriparatide, and (not in the US) strontium ranelate with mild opposite effects on resorption and formation. Although the evidence level for efficacy and safety of these drugs in men is still relatively limited, available data indicate that treatment effects in men are very similar to what has been observed in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Denosumab is also approved for treatment in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for non-metastatic prostate cancer; bisphosphonates and teriparatide are also available to clinicians for treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in men. Testosterone treatment may be indicated in men with documented symptomatic hypogonadism, but osteoporosis is neither a sufficient nor a specific indication for testosterone treatment. New compounds with well advanced clinical development include odanacatib, a selective inhibitor of the cysteine protease cathepsin-K, and romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody against sclerostin.

Bone quality: the determinants of bone strength and fragility

Bone fragility is a major health concern, as the increased risk of bone fractures has devastating outcomes in terms of mortality, decreased autonomy, and healthcare costs. Efforts made to address this problem have considerably increased our knowledge about the mechanisms that regulate bone formation and resorption. In particular, we now have a much better understanding of the cellular events that are triggered when bones are mechanically stimulated and how these events can lead to improvements in bone mass. Despite these findings at the molecular level, most exercise intervention studies reveal either no effects or only minor benefits of exercise programs in improving bone mineral density (BMD) in osteoporotic patients. Nevertheless, and despite that BMD is the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis, this measure is only able to provide insights regarding the quantity of bone tissue. In this article, we review the complex structure of bone tissue and highlight the concept that its mechanical strength stems from the interaction of several different features. We revisited the available data showing that bone mineralization degree, hydroxyapatite crystal size and heterogeneity, collagen properties, osteocyte density, trabecular and cortical microarchitecture, as well as whole bone geometry, are determinants of bone strength and that each one of these properties may independently contribute to the increased or decreased risk of fracture, even without meaningful changes in aBMD. Based on these findings, we emphasize that while osteoporosis (almost) always causes bone fragility, bone fragility is not always caused just by osteoporosis, as other important variables also play a major role in this etiology. Furthermore, the results of several studies showing compelling data that physical exercise has the potential to improve bone quality and to decrease fracture risk by influencing each one of these determinants are also reviewed. These findings have meaningful clinical repercussions as they emphasize the fact that, even without leading to improvements in BMD, exercise interventions in patients with osteoporosis may be beneficial by improving other determinants of bone strength.

Early changes in biochemical markers of bone formation during teriparatide therapy correlate with improvements in vertebral strength in men with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Changes of the bone formation marker PINP correlated positively with improvements in vertebral strength in men with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) who received 18-month treatment with teriparatide, but not with risedronate. These results support the use of PINP as a surrogate marker of bone strength in GIO patients treated with teriparatide.

INTRODUCTION

To investigate the correlations between biochemical markers of bone turnover and vertebral strength estimated by finite element analysis (FEA) in men with GIO.

METHODS

A total of 92 men with GIO were included in an 18-month, randomized, open-label trial of teriparatide (20 μg/day, n = 45) and risedronate (35 mg/week, n = 47). High-resolution quantitative computed tomography images of the 12th thoracic vertebra obtained at baseline, 6 and 18 months were converted into digital nonlinear FE models and subjected to anterior bending, axial compression and torsion. Stiffness and strength were computed for each model and loading mode. Serum biochemical markers of bone formation (amino-terminal-propeptide of type I collagen [PINP]) and bone resorption (type I collagen cross-linked C-telopeptide degradation fragments [CTx]) were measured at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 18 months. A mixed-model of repeated measures analysed changes from baseline and between-group differences. Spearman correlations assessed the relationship between changes from baseline of bone markers with FEA variables.

RESULTS

PINP and CTx levels increased in the teriparatide group and decreased in the risedronate group. FEA-derived parameters increased in both groups, but were significantly higher at 18 months in the teriparatide group. Significant positive correlations were found between changes from baseline of PINP at 3, 6 and 18 months with changes in FE strength in the teriparatide-treated group, but not in the risedronate group.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive correlations between changes in a biochemical marker of bone formation and improvement of biomechanical properties support the use of PINP as a surrogate marker of bone strength in teriparatide-treated GIO patients.

Osteoporosis after stem cell transplantation

With long-term survival for recipients of autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) increasing, the recognition of late complications such as decreased bone mineral density leading to osteoporosis (OP) has also increased. With an incidence that is reported to affect as many 50 % of allo HCT recipients, studies continue to mount supporting the need and success in treatment of this HCT complication. In this review, we highlight the major pathological mechanisms behind the development of OP, its diagnosis, and the literature supporting consensus treatment recommendations while noting areas of uncertainty that need further research.

Causes, consequences, and treatment of osteoporosis in men

Men undergo gradual bone loss with aging, resulting in fragile bones. It is estimated that one in five men will suffer an osteoporotic fracture during their lifetime. The prognosis for men after a hip fracture is very grim. A major cause is reduction of free testosterone. Many other factors result in secondary osteoporosis, including treatment for other diseases such as cancer and diabetes. Patients should be screened not only for bone density but also assessed for their nutritional status, physical activity, and drug intake. Therapy should be chosen based on the type of osteoporosis. Available therapies include testosterone replacement, bisphosphonates, and nutritional supplementation with calcium, vitamin D, fatty acids, and isoflavones, as well as certain specific antibodies, like denosumab and odanacatib, and inhibitors of certain proteins.

Combination therapy with risedronate and teriparatide in male osteoporosis

Most studies of combination therapy with teriparatide and a bisphosphonate have not shown greater efficacy over monotherapy. The bisphosphonate risedronate, has not been studied in this context. The purpose of this proof-of-concept study was to assess whether combination risedronate and teriparatide increases bone mineral density (BMD) more than monotherapy with either drug alone. This was a randomized, double-blinded study of risedronate (35 mg weekly plus placebo injection), teriparatide (20 μg subcutaneously daily plus placebo tablet), or both risedronate plus teriparatide (combination) for 18 months in 29 men with low BMD. The primary endpoint was percentage change in lumbar spine (LS) BMD at 18 months. Secondary outcomes included changes in bone markers and BMD at other sites and interim time-points. All therapies increased LS BMD as compared with baseline (p < 0.05), but there were no between-group differences at 18 months. Total hip (TH) BMD increased to a greater extent in the combination group (mean ± SEM, 3.86 ± 1.1 %) versus teriparatide (0.29 ± 0.95 %) or risedronate (0.82 ± 0.95 %; p < 0.05 for both). Femoral neck (FN) BMD also increased more in the combination group (8.45 ± 1.8 %) versus risedronate (0.50 ± 1.7 %; p = 0.002), but was not different from teriparatide alone. In the combination group, P1NP and CTX increased rapidly, mirroring the teriparatide-alone arm. There were no between-group differences in adverse events. Combination teriparatide and risedronate increased BMD at the LS, TH as well as the FN and provided greater BMD increases at the TH than monotherapy. The results suggest combination risedronate and teriparatide therapy holds promise as a treatment for osteoporosis.

Is it time to combine osteoporosis therapies?

BACKGROUND

Setting up a clinical study can take more than 18 months and can cost millions of pounds. For many aspects of global health there is a dearth of research, yet evidence is urgently needed to address major challenges. Obtaining such data within a meaningful timeframe requires a fundamental change in the planning and setting up of research studies. Typically, protocols are developed in closed groups and often never shared. However, many operational processes in research are generic, irrespective of the disease or design. Thus, removal of duplication and sharing methods could speed up research. This research methodology project investigates whether researchers can be persuaded to share methods and if this will streamline research.

METHODS

The theory of communities of practice (in which distinct specialists working on a problem collaborate to solve it) guided this project. The Global Health Network was created to enable communities of practice to form to develop protocols, exchange research instruments, and share skills. We measured uptake, effect, and benefit of the Network through surveys, questionnaires, interviews with target audiences (research teams in low-income and middle-income countries), and analysis of digital access.

FINDINGS

Since 2011, more than 60 000 researchers, nurses, technicians, and scientists from almost all low-income and middle-income countries have used the project to share research methods, knowledge, and processes. 21 specialised communities of practice have formed collaborations that are actively exchanging methods. More than 250 research guidance notes have been shared that provide specific guidance for various research methods—eg, an international respiratory disease network has released three open-access novel coronavirus protocols and groups working in maternal health are listing the samples they have stored with the invitation for others to collaborate. These qualitative and quantitative data show that these exchanges are highly beneficial for guiding and improving research operations, and that there is a willingness to share.

INTERPRETATION

Scientists compete for funding and publication and therefore sharing methods and knowledge can be perceived as disadvantageous. However, if use of protocols and methods developed by wide and open consensus can help to quickly gain high quality data, then better progress could be made for all and disease research could be changed to improve health.

FUNDING

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Teriparatide and denosumab, alone or combined, in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: the DATA study randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis medications increase bone-mineral density (BMD) and lower but do not eliminate fracture risk. The combining of anabolic agents with bisphosphonates has not improved efficacy. We compared combined teriparatide and denosumab with both agents alone.

METHODS

From September, 2009, to January, 2011, we enrolled postmenopausal women with osteoporosis into this randomised, controlled trial. Patients were assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 20 μg teriparatide daily, 60 mg denosumab every 6 months, or both. BMD was measured at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months. Women who completed at least one study visit after baseline were assessed in a modified intention-to-treat analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00926380.

FINDINGS

94 (94%) of 100 eligible women completed at least one study visit after baseline. At 12 months, posterior-anterior lumbar spine BMD increased more in the combination group (9·1%, [SD 3·9]) than in the teriparatide (6·2% [4·6], p=0·0139) or denosumab (5·5% [3·3], p=0·0005) groups. Femoral-neck BMD also increased more in the combination group (4·2% [3·0]) than in the teriparatide (0·8% [4·1], p=0·0007) and denosumab (2·1% [3·8], p=0·0238) groups, as did total-hip BMD (combination, 4·9% [2·9]; teriparatide, 0·7% [2·7], p<0·0001; denosumab 2·5% [2·6], p=0·0011).

INTERPRETATION

Combined teriparatide and denosumab increased BMD more than either agent alone and more than has been reported with approved therapies. Combination treatment might, therefore, be useful to treat patients at high risk of fracture.

FUNDING

Amgen, Eli Lilly, National Center for Research Resources.

Serum uric acid levels in relation to bone-related phenotypes in men and women

Serum uric acid levels have recently been found to be associated with bone mineral density (BMD) in elderly males. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between bone-related phenotypes and serum uric acid levels in young and middle-aged males and females. Subjects consisted of 1320 males and 485 females aged 25-54 yr. Bone densitometry and quantitative ultrasonometry (QUS) were performed on each subject. Serum uric acid and biochemical markers of bone turnover were measured in fasting serum samples. When adjusted for covariates including age, body weight, and serum creatinine in multiple linear regression models, it was found that there was a positive association between uric acid levels and BMD in males at the lumbar spine (p < 0.05). The association between uric acid levels and BMD was found in females after controlling for age, body weight, and serum creatinine at the femoral neck, but in the opposite direction (p < 0.05). Uric acid levels were related to the stiffness index (SI) as assessed by QUS in males, independent of age, body weight, and serum creatinine (p < 0.05). No association between uric acid and SI in females was found. The present study demonstrated a positive association in males between serum uric acid levels and BMD, and SI from QUS, suggesting a beneficial influence of uric acid on both the quantity and quality of bone in males.

Clinical Chemistry and Other Laboratory Tests on Mouse Plasma or Serum

Besides hematological analyses, many other parameters, including clinical chemistry and endocrinological values, can be determined from mouse blood samples. For most of these tests, plasma or serum samples are used. Data obtained by these investigations provide indications of genotype effects on metabolism and organ functions. Here we describe in detail the considerations that have to be taken into account to get adequate samples for plasma or serum analyses and the recommended sample processing for different investigations. Furthermore, we describe established methods used in the German Mouse Clinic (GMC) to determine clinical chemical parameters; for more in-depth analysis of specific classes of biomarkers, we provide instructions for ELISAs (sandwich and competitive) as well as LC-MS/MS, focusing on markers associated with bone or steroid metabolism in the mouse as working examples. Curr. Protoc. Mouse Biol. 3:69-100 © 2013 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

The effectiveness of teriparatide in the clinical practice--attenuation of the bone mineral density outcome by increasing age and bisphosphonate pretreatment

BACKGROUND

Teriparatide is a potent anabolic agent for severe osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVES

A primary objective of this retrospective study was to define the efficacy of teriparatide in terms of bone mineral density (BMD) changes and relief of back pain in clinical practice.

METHODS

The patient population comprises 119 osteoporotic patients treated with teriparatide for median 539 (range 179-926) days.

RESULTS

The mean BMD gain was 0.9% in the total hip (P = 0.0075), 2.1% in the femoral neck (P = 0.0006), and 8.5% in the lumbar spine (P = 0.0085). In the whole patient population age associated inversely with BMD changes in the total hip (P = 0.019) and in the femoral neck (P = 0.0036). A history of significant bisphosphonate pretreatment (n = 90) reduced BMD response in the total hip (P = 0.039). The total exposure of any prior bisphosphonate was negatively correlated with BMD response in the total hip (P = 0.0421). Half of the patients reported relief of back pain during the treatment. Leg pain, nausea, and dizziness were most frequent adverse concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

Teriparatide works in clinical practice as well as in clinical trials. Younger subjects benefited more than older patients from teriparatide in the total hip and in the femoral neck. Bisphosphonate pretreatment attenuated teriparatide-induced BMD gain.

Treatment of osteoporosis in men

SUMMARY

Aspects of osteoporosis in men, such as screening and identification strategies, definitions of diagnosis and intervention thresholds, and treatment options (both approved and in the pipeline) are discussed.

INTRODUCTION

Awareness of osteoporosis in men is improving, although it remains under-diagnosed and under-treated. A European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) workshop was convened to discuss osteoporosis in men and to provide a report by a panel of experts (the authors).

METHODS

A debate with an expert panel on preselected topics was conducted.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Although additional fracture data are needed to endorse the clinical care of osteoporosis in men, consensus views were reached on diagnostic criteria and intervention thresholds. Empirical data in men display similarities with data acquired in women, despite pathophysiological differences, which may not be clinically relevant. Men should receive treatment at a similar 10-year fracture probability as in women. The design of mixed studies may reduce the lag between comparable treatments for osteoporosis in women becoming available in men.

Anabolic therapies for osteoporosis

As the first FDA-approved anabolic agent for osteoporosis, teriparatide has proven effective for people at highest risk of fracture, despite limitations of expense, route of delivery, and length of treatment. Available data show that combination therapy with teriparatide and antiresorptive agents does not offer a therapeutic advantage. However, treatment with an antiresorptive agent after teriparatide discontinuation is essential to prevent the ensuing bone loss. Although pretreatment with bisphosphonates may somewhat attenuate the anabolic effect of teriparatide, significant gains in bone mineral density are still achieved and prior bisphosphonate use should not dissuade clinicians from using teriparatide in select patients.

Randomized Teriparatide [human parathyroid hormone (PTH) 1-34] Once-Weekly Efficacy Research (TOWER) trial for examining the reduction in new vertebral fractures in subjects with primary osteoporosis and high fracture risk

CONTEXT

Weekly teriparatide injection at a dose of 56.5 μg has been shown to increase bone mineral density.

OBJECTIVE

A phase 3 study was conducted to determine the efficacy of once-weekly teriparatide injection for reducing the incidence of vertebral fractures in patients with osteoporosis.

DESIGN AND SETTING

In this randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in Japan, the incidence of morphological vertebral fractures by radiographs was assessed.

PATIENTS

Subjects were 578 Japanese patients between the ages of 65 and 95 yr who had prevalent vertebral fracture.

INTERVENTION

Subjects were randomly assigned to receive once-weekly s.c. injections of teriparatide (56.5 μg) or placebo for 72 wk.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary endpoint was the incidence of new vertebral fracture.

RESULTS

Once-weekly injections of teriparatide reduced the risk of new vertebral fracture with a cumulative incidence of 3.1% in the teriparatide group, compared with 14.5% in the placebo group (P < 0.01), and a relative risk of 0.20 (95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.45). At 72 wk, teriparatide administration increased bone mineral density by 6.4, 3.0, and 2.3% at the lumbar spine, the total hip, and the femoral neck, respectively, compared with the placebo (P < 0.01). Adverse events (AE) and the dropout rates by AE were more frequently experienced in the teriparatide group, but AE were generally mild and tolerable.

CONCLUSION

Weekly s.c. administration of teriparatide at a dose of 56.5 μg may provide another option of anabolic treatments in patients with osteoporosis at higher fracture risk.

Combination anabolic and antiresorptive therapy for osteoporosis

Osteoanabolic agents directly stimulate bone formation to improve bone mass and skeletal microarchitecture. At present, parathyroid hormone (PTH), in the form of the full-length molecule (PTH(1-84)) and its fully active, but truncated amino-terminal fragment, PTH(1-34) (teriparatide), are the only medications that belong to the osteoanabolic class. It is appealing to consider simultaneous combination therapy with antiresorptive and osteoanabolic drugs as potentially more beneficial than monotherapy with either class, given that their mechanisms of action differ. This review focuses on the research that has been conducted on combination therapy with PTH and an antiresorptive drug.

Osteoporosis in men: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to formulate practice guidelines for management of osteoporosis in men.

EVIDENCE

We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to describe the strength of recommendations and evidence quality.

CONSENSUS PROCESS

Consensus was guided by systematic evidence reviews, one in-person meeting, and multiple conference calls and e-mails. Task Force drafts were reviewed successively by The Endocrine Society's Clinical Guidelines Subcommittee and Clinical Affairs Core Committee; representatives of ASBMR, ECTS, ESE, ISCD; and members at large. At each stage, the Task Force received written comments and incorporated needed changes. The reviewed document was approved by The Endocrine Society Council before submission for peer review.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoporosis in men causes significant morbidity and mortality. We recommend testing higher risk men [aged ≥70 and men aged 50-69 who have risk factors (e.g. low body weight, prior fracture as an adult, smoking, etc.)] using central dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Laboratory testing should be done to detect contributing causes. Adequate calcium and vitamin D and weight-bearing exercise should be encouraged; smoking and excessive alcohol should be avoided. Pharmacological treatment is recommended for men aged 50 or older who have had spine or hip fractures, those with T-scores of -2.5 or below, and men at high risk of fracture based on low bone mineral density and/or clinical risk factors. Treatment should be monitored with serial dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry testing.

Measurement of aminoterminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) in serum

The aminoterminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) in serum is a sensitive indicator of the synthesis of type I collagen. Four assays are available for PINP, two of them (intact PINP assays) measure the intact propeptide and the other two (total PINP assays) also detect a smaller antigen in serum. In many clinical situations, these assays give similar information, but renal insufficiency increases the concentration of the smaller antigen, influencing both the apparent concentration of PINP and assay calibration. Serum PINP is mostly affected by changes in bone metabolism. In infants and children, the concentration is much higher than in adults. Serum PINP (s-PINP) is a useful indicator of disease activity in Paget's disease of bone, in bone metastases of osteoblastic nature, and in the follow-up of treatment of osteoporosis. The IFCC and IOF recently recommended the use of s-PINP as a reference marker for bone formation in studies concerning fracture risk assessment and treatment response.

Osteoinductivity of demineralized bone matrix is independent of donor bisphosphonate use

BACKGROUND

Demineralized bone matrix is commonly used as a bone graft substitute, either alone or to supplement an osteoconductive material, because of its osteoinductive properties. The aging of the population has led to an increase in the number of prospective donors of demineralized bone matrix who have taken bisphosphonates to prevent osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. The aim of this study was to determine whether oral bisphosphonate usage affects the osteoinductivity of demineralized bone matrix from donors.

METHODS

Sex-matched and age-matched pairs of samples were provided by four tissue banks (three or four pairs per bank). Demineralized bone matrix donors without bisphosphonate treatment had a mean age (and standard deviation) of 69.1 ± 2.5 years, and donors with bisphosphonate treatment had a mean age of 68.9 ± 2.0 years. Each pair included one donor known to have taken bisphosphonates and one who had not taken bisphosphonates. Demineralized bone matrix previously confirmed as osteoinductive was the positive control, and heat-inactivated demineralized bone matrix was the negative control. Demineralized bone matrix incubated with 1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline solution containing 0, 0.002, 2.0, or 2000 ng/mL of alendronate was also tested. Gelatin capsules containing 15 mg of demineralized bone matrix were implanted bilaterally in the gastrocnemius muscle of male nude mice (eight implants per group). The mice were killed thirty-five days after implantation, and hind limbs were recovered and processed for histological analysis. Osteoinductivity was measured with use of a qualitative score and by histomorphometry.

RESULTS

Nine of fifteen samples from donors who had had bisphosphonate treatment and ten of fifteen samples from patients who had not had bisphosphonate treatment were osteoinductive. Qualitative mean scores were comparable (1.7 ± 0.4 for those without bisphosphonates and 1.9 ± 0.7 for those with bisphosphonates). Osteoinductive demineralized bone matrix samples produced ossicles of comparable size, regardless of bisphosphonate usage. Histomorphometric measurements of the area of new bone formation and residual demineralized bone matrix were also comparable. The addition of alendronate to control demineralized bone matrix did not affect its osteoinductivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Demineralized bone matrix samples from donors treated with bisphosphonates and donors not treated with bisphosphonates have the same ability to induce bone formation. However, it is not known if the quality of the new bone is affected, with subsequent consequences affecting bone remodeling.

Effects of intermittent parathyroid hormone treatment on osteoprogenitor cells in postmenopausal women

Intermittent parathyroid hormone (PTH) 1-34 treatment stimulates bone formation, but the molecular mechanisms mediating this effect have not been previously studied in humans. Thus, we used magnetic activated cell sorting to isolate hematopoietic lineage negative (lin-)/alkaline phosphatase positive (AP+) osteoprogenitor cells from bone marrow of 20 postmenopausal women treated with PTH (1-34) for 14 days and 19 control subjects. Serum PINP and CTX increased in PTH-treated subjects (by 97% and 30%, respectively, P<0.001). Bone marrow lin-/AP+ cells from PTH-treated subjects showed an increase in the RANKL/OPG mRNA ratio (by 7.5-fold, P=0.011) and in the mRNAs for c-fos (a known PTH-responsive gene, by 42%, P=0.035) and VEGF-C (by 57%, P=0.046). Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA, testing for changes in pre-specified pathways) demonstrated that PTH had no effect on osteoblast proliferation, apoptosis, or differentiation markers. However, PTH treatment resulted in a significant decrease (GSEA P-value, 0.005) in a panel of BMP target genes in the lin-/AP+ cells. Our findings thus identify several future directions for studying mechanisms of PTH action in humans. First, given the increasing evidence that PTH induces angiogenesis, the role of increased VEGF-C production by bone marrow osteoprogenitor cells in mediating this effect and the anabolic response to PTH warrants further study. Second, while the observed inhibition of BMP target gene expression by PTH is not consistent with the anabolic effects of PTH on bone and requires further validation, these data do generate the hypothesis that an inhibition of BMP signaling by PTH may, over time, limit the availability of mature osteoblasts on bone surfaces and thereby contribute to the observed waning of the anabolic response to PTH.

ATF936, a novel oral calcilytic, increases bone mineral density in rats and transiently releases parathyroid hormone in humans

Parathyroid hormone (PTH), when injected daily as either the intact hormone PTH(1-84) or the active fragment PTH(1-34) (teriparatide), is an efficacious bone anabolic treatment option for osteoporosis patients. Injections lead to rapid and transient spikes in hormone exposure levels, a profile which is a prerequisite to effectively form bone. Oral antagonists of the calcium-sensing receptor (calcilytics) stimulate PTH secretion and represent thus an alternative approach to elevate hormone levels transiently. We report here on ATF936, a novel calcilytic, which triggered rapid, transient spikes in endogenous PTH levels when given orally in single doses of 10 and 30mg/kg to growing rats, and of 1mg/kg to dogs. Eight weeks daily oral application of 30mg/kg of ATF936 to aged female rats induced in the proximal tibia metaphysis increases in bone mineral density, cancellous bone volume and cortical and trabecular thickness as evaluated by computed tomography. In healthy humans, single oral doses of ATF936 produced peak PTH levels in plasma after a median time of 1h and levels returned to normal at 24-h post-dose. The average maximum PTH concentration increase from baseline was 1.9, 3.6, and 6.0-fold at doses of 40, 70, and 140mg. ATF936 was well tolerated. The sharp, transient increase in PTH levels produced by the oral calcilytic ATF936 was comparable to the PTH profile observed after subcutaneous administration of teriparatide. In conclusion, ATF936 might hold potential as an oral bone-forming osteoporosis therapy.