Agonist and antagonists induce homodimerization and mixed ligand heterodimerization of human progesterone receptors in vivo by a mammalian two-hybrid assay

Membrane Progesterone Receptors (mPRs/PAQRs) Are Going beyond Its Initial Definitions

Progesterone (PRG) is a key cyclical reproductive hormone that has a significant impact on female organs in vertebrates. It is mainly produced by the corpus luteum of the ovaries, but can also be generated from other sources such as the adrenal cortex, Leydig cells of the testes and neuronal and glial cells. PRG has wide-ranging physiological effects, including impacts on metabolic systems, central nervous systems and reproductive systems in both genders. It was first purified as an ovarian steroid with hormonal function for pregnancy, and is known to play a role in pro-gestational proliferation during pregnancy. The main function of PRG is exerted through its binding to progesterone receptors (nPRs, mPRs/PAQRs) to evoke cellular responses through genomic or non-genomic signaling cascades. Most of the existing research on PRG focuses on classic PRG-nPR-paired actions such as nuclear transcriptional factors, but new evidence suggests that PRG also exerts a wide range of PRG actions through non-classic membrane PRG receptors, which can be divided into two sub-classes: mPRs/PAQRs and PGRMCs. The review will concentrate on recently found non-classical membrane progesterone receptors (mainly mPRs/PAQRs) and speculate their connections, utilizing the present comprehension of progesterone receptors.

Chemical Screening of Nuclear Receptor Modulators

Nuclear receptors are ligand-inducible transcriptional factors that control multiple biological phenomena, including proliferation, differentiation, reproduction, metabolism, and the maintenance of homeostasis. Members of the nuclear receptor superfamily have marked structural and functional similarities, and their domain functionalities and regulatory mechanisms have been well studied. Various modulators of nuclear receptors, including agonists and antagonists, have been developed as tools for elucidating nuclear receptor functions and also as drug candidates or lead compounds. Many assay systems are currently available to evaluate the modulation of nuclear receptor functions, and are useful as screening tools in the discovery and development of new modulators. In this review, we cover the chemical screening methods for nuclear receptor modulators, focusing on assay methods and chemical libraries for screening. We include some recent examples of the discovery of nuclear receptor modulators.

Mechanism of Telapristone Acetate (CDB4124) on Progesterone Receptor Action in Breast Cancer Cells

Progesterone is a steroid hormone that plays an important role in the breast. Progesterone exerts its action through binding to progesterone receptor (PR), a transcription factor. Deregulation of the progesterone signaling pathway is implicated in the formation, development, and progression of breast cancer. Next-generation selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) have potent antiprogestin activity and are selective for PR, reducing the off-target effects on other nuclear receptors. To date, there is limited information on how the newer generation of SPRMs, specifically telapristone acetate (TPA), affect PR function at the molecular level. In this study, T47D breast cancer cells were used to investigate the molecular mechanism by which TPA antagonizes PR action. Global profiling of the PR cistrome and interactome was done with chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) and rapid immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry. Validation studies were done on key genes and interactions. Our results demonstrate that treatment with the progestin (R5020) alone resulted in robust PR recruitment to the chromatin, and addition of TPA reduced PR recruitment globally. TPA significantly changed coregulator recruitment to PR compared with R5020. Upon conservative analysis, three proteins (TRPS1, LASP1, and AP1G1) were identified in the R5020+TPA-treated group. Silencing TRPS1 with small interfering RNA increased PR occupancy to the known PR regulatory regions and attenuated the inhibition of gene expression after TPA treatment. TRPS1 silencing alleviated the inhibition of proliferation by TPA. In conclusion, TPA decreases PR occupancy on chromatin and recruits coregulators such as TRPS1 to the PR complex, thereby regulating PR target gene expression and associated cellular responses.

Inhibiting Nuclear Phospho-Progesterone Receptor Enhances Antitumor Activity of Onapristone in Uterine Cancer

Although progesterone receptor (PR)-targeted therapies are modestly active in patients with uterine cancer, their underlying molecular mechanisms are not well understood. The clinical use of such therapies is limited because of the lack of biomarkers that predict response to PR agonists (progestins) or PR antagonists (onapristone). Thus, understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms of action will provide an advance in developing novel combination therapies for cancer patients. Nuclear translocation of PR has been reported to be ligand-dependent or -independent. Here, we identified that onapristone, a PR antagonist, inhibited nuclear translocation of ligand-dependent or -independent (EGF) phospho-PR (S294), whereas trametinib inhibited nuclear translocation of EGF-induced phospho-PR (S294). Using orthotopic mouse models of uterine cancer, we demonstrated that the combination of onapristone and trametinib results in superior antitumor effects in uterine cancer models compared with either monotherapy. These synergistic effects are, in part, mediated through inhibiting the nuclear translocation of EGF-induced PR phosphorylation in uterine cancer cells. Targeting MAPK-dependent PR activation with onapristone and trametinib significantly inhibited tumor growth in preclinical uterine cancer models and is worthy of further clinical investigation. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(2); 464-73. ©2017 AACR.

Onapristone (ZK299) and mifepristone (RU486) regulate the messenger RNA and protein expression levels of the progesterone receptor isoforms A and B in the bovine endometrium

The aim of this study was to examine whether progesterone (P(4)) and its antagonists, onapristone (ZK299) and mifepristone (RU486), affect the levels of PGRA and PGRB messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein in the cow uterus which may be important in understanding whether the final physiological effect evoked by an antagonist depends on PGR isoform bound to the antagonist. Endometrial slices on Days 6 to 10 and 17 to 20 of the estrous cycle were treated for 6 or 24 hours for mRNA and protein expression analysis, respectively, with P4, ZK299, or RU486 at a dose of 10(-4), 10(-5), or 10(-6) M. In the samples on Days 6 to 10 of the estrous cycle, PGRAB mRNA was stimulated by P(4) (10(-4) M; P < 0.01) and RU486 (10(-6); P < 0.001) and was decreased by ZK299 (10(-5); P < 0.05). In contrast, PGRB mRNA was decreased by the all P(4) (P < 0.01) and ZK299 (P < 0.001) doses and by two of the RU486 doses (10(-4) M; P < 0.01 and 10(-5) M; P < 0.01). In samples on Days 17 to 20 of the estrous cycle, PGRAB mRNA was stimulated by RU486 (10(-5) M; P < 0.001). PGRB mRNA was decreased by P(4) (10(-4) and 10(-5) M; P < 0.001), ZK299 (10(-4) and 10(-5) M; P < 0.001), and RU486 (10(-4) M; P < 0.01 and 10(-6) M; P < 0.001) and was increased by ZK299 (10(-6) M; P < 0.001) and RU486 (10(-5) M; P < 0.001). In samples on Days 6 to 10 of the estrous cycle, PGRB protein levels were decreased (P < 0.05) by all three ZK299 doses and by two of the RU486 doses (10(-4) M; P < 0.05 and 10(-5) M; P < 0.01). In contrast, in samples on Days 17 to 20, both PGRA and PGRB protein levels were decreased by ZK299 stimulation (10(-5) M; P < 0.05 and 10(-5) M; P < 0.01, respectively), whereas only PGRA protein levels were increased by RU486 (10(-5) M; P < 0.01). Both ZK299 and RU486 may exhibit both agonist and antagonist properties depending on which receptor isoform they affect. As a result, an increase or decrease in the expression of a particular PGR isoform will be observed.

The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14: nuclear hormone receptors

The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14 provides concise overviews of the key properties of over 2000 human drug targets with their pharmacology, plus links to an open access knowledgebase of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. The full contents can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.12444/full.

Nuclear hormone receptors are one of the seven major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being G protein-coupled receptors, ligand-gated ion channels, ion channels, catalytic receptors, transporters and enzymes. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading. A new landscape format has easy to use tables comparing related targets.

It is a condensed version of material contemporary to late 2013, which is presented in greater detail and constantly updated on the website www.guidetopharmacology.org, superseding data presented in previous Guides to Receptors and Channels. It is produced in conjunction with NC-IUPHAR and provides the official IUPHAR classification and nomenclature for human drug targets, where appropriate. It consolidates information previously curated and displayed separately in IUPHAR-DB and the Guide to Receptors and Channels, providing a permanent, citable, point-in-time record that will survive database updates.

Endometrial progesterone resistance and PCOS

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a state of altered steroid hormone production and activity. Chronic estrogen exposure or lack of progesterone due to ovarian dysfunction can result in endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. A key contributor to our understanding of progesterone as a critical regulator for normal uterine function has been the elucidation of progesterone receptor (PR) expression, regulation, and signaling pathways. Several human studies indicate that PR-mediated signaling pathways in the nucleus are associated with progesterone resistance in women with PCOS. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of endometrial progesterone resistance in women with PCOS; to present the PR structure, its different isoforms, and their expression in the endometrium; to illustrate the possible regulation of PR and PR-mediated signaling in progesterone resistance in women with PCOS; and to discuss current clinical treatments for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma in women with PCOS and accompanying progesterone resistance.

Progesterone receptor isoforms A and B: new insights into the mechanism of progesterone resistance for the treatment of endometrial carcinoma

Progesterone therapy is an effective treatment for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial carcinoma (EC). However, progesterone resistance is the main obstacle to the success of conservative treatment in women with type I EC and remains a major clinical challenge. Studies indicate that progesterone and progesterone receptors (PRs) play a significant role in both normal and neoplastic endometria. Most EC arises in the epithelial cells of the endometrial glands, and a large body of in vitro evidence suggests that the absence or reduced expression of PR isoform B might result in the failure of progesterone treatment and lead to aberrant PRB-mediated signalling in EC cells. A recently developed in vivo knockout mouse model suggests that enhanced DNA methylation decreases the level of stromal PR isoform A and that this is also a main contributor to progesterone resistance in EC cells. The endometrial stroma within the EC might create a microenvironment that determines how epithelial-derived cancer cells respond to progesterone. This novel study opened a new avenue for research seeking to clarify the mechanisms that regulate the specific PR isoforms that are associated with the stromal cell responses to progesterone and has led to new understanding of both endometrial cell-specific and mechanical contributions of the stroma to EC development.

Differential regulation of breast cancer-associated genes by progesterone receptor isoforms PRA and PRB in a new bi-inducible breast cancer cell line

Progesterone receptor isoforms (PRA and PRB) are expressed at equal levels in normal mammary cells. However, alteration in PRA/PRB expression is often observed in aggressive breast cancer suggesting differential contribution of PR isoforms in carcinogenesis. The mechanisms underlying such processes remain to be established mainly due to paucity of appropriate cellular models. To investigate the role of PR isoforms and the impact of imbalanced PRA/PRB ratio in transcriptional regulation, we have generated an original human breast cancer cell line conditionally expressing PRA and/or PRB in dose-dependence of non-steroid inducers. We first focused on PR-dependent transcriptional regulation of the paracrine growth factor gene amphiregulin (AREG) playing important role in cancer. Interestingly, unliganded PRA increases AREG expression, independently of estrogen receptor, yet inhibitable by antiprogestins. We show that functional outcome of epidermal growth factor (EGF) on such regulation is highly dependent on PRA/PRB ratio. Using this valuable model, genome-wide transcriptomic studies allowed us to determine the differential effects of PRA and PRB as a function of hormonal status. We identified a large number of novel PR-regulated genes notably implicated in breast cancer and metastasis and demonstrated that imbalanced PRA/PRB ratio strongly impact their expression predicting poor outcome in breast cancer. In sum, our unique cell-based system strongly suggests that PRA/PRB ratio is a critical determinant of PR target gene selectivity and responses to hormonal/growth factor stimuli. These findings provide molecular support for the aggressive phenotype of breast cancers with impaired expression of PRA or PRB.

High-throughput mammalian two-hybrid screening for protein-protein interactions using transfected cell arrays

Background

Most of the biological processes rely on the formation of protein complexes. Investigation of protein-protein interactions (PPI) is therefore essential for understanding of cellular functions. It is advantageous to perform mammalian PPI analysis in mammalian cells because the expressed proteins can then be subjected to essential post-translational modifications. Until now mammalian two-hybrid assays have been performed on individual gene scale. We here describe a new and cost-effective method for the high-throughput detection of protein-protein interactions in mammalian cells that combines the advantages of mammalian two-hybrid systems with those of DNA microarrays.

Results

In this cell array protein-protein interaction assay (CAPPIA), mixtures of bait and prey expression plasmids together with an auto-fluorescent reporter are immobilized on glass slides in defined array formats. Adherent cells that grow on top of the micro-array will become fluorescent only if the expressed proteins interact and subsequently trans-activate the reporter. Using known interaction partners and by screening 160 different combinations of prey and bait proteins associated with the human androgen receptor we demonstrate that this assay allows the quantitative detection of specific protein interactions in different types of mammalian cells and under the influence of different compounds. Moreover, different strategies in respect to bait-prey combinations are presented.

Conclusion

We demonstrate that the CAPPIA assay allows the quantitative detection of specific protein interactions in different types of mammalian cells and under the influence of different compounds. The high number of preys that can be tested per slide together with the flexibility to interrogate any bait of interest and the small amounts of reagents that are required makes this assay currently one of the most economical high-throughput detection assays for protein-protein interactions in mammalian cells.

Dosage-sensitive sex reversal adrenal hypoplasia congenita critical region on the X chromosome, gene 1 (DAX1) (NR0B1) and small heterodimer partner (SHP) (NR0B2) form homodimers individually, as well as DAX1-SHP heterodimers

Dosage-sensitive sex reversal adrenal hypoplasia congenita critical region on the X chromosome, gene 1 (DAX1) (NR0B1), and small heterodimer partner (SHP) (NR0B2) are atypical nuclear receptor superfamily members that function primarily as corepressors through heterodimeric interactions with other nuclear receptors. Mutations in DAX1 cause adrenal hypoplasia congenita, and mutations in SHP lead to mild obesity and insulin resistance, but the mechanisms are unclear. We investigated the existence and subcellular localization of DAX1 and SHP homodimers and the dynamics of homodimerization. We demonstrated DAX1 homodimerization in the nucleus and cytoplasm, and dissociation of DAX1 homodimers upon heterodimerization with steroidogenic factor 1 (SF1) or ligand-activated estrogen receptor-alpha (ERalpha). DAX1 homodimerization involved an interaction between its amino and carboxy termini involving its LXXLL motifs and activation function (AF)-2 domain. We observed SHP homodimerization in the nucleus of mammalian cells and showed dissociation of SHP homodimers upon heterodimerization with ligand-activated ERalpha. We observed DAX1-SHP heterodimerization in the nucleus of mammalian cells and demonstrated the involvement of the LXXLL motifs and AF-2 domain of DAX1 in this interaction. We further demonstrate heterodimerization of DAX1 with its alternatively spliced isoform, DAX1A. This is the first evidence of homodimerization of individual members of the unusual NR0B nuclear receptor family and heterodimerization between its members. Our results suggest that DAX1 forms antiparallel homodimers through the LXXLL motifs and AF-2 domain. These homodimers may function as holding reservoirs in the absence of heterodimeric partners. The formation of DAX1 and SHP homodimers and DAX1-SHP and DAX1-DAX1A heterodimers suggests the possibility of novel functions independent of their coregulator roles, suggesting additional complexity in the molecular mechanisms of DAX1 and SHP action.

Differential response of progesterone receptor isoforms in hormone-dependent and -independent facilitation of female sexual receptivity

Neurobehavioral effects of progesterone are mediated primarily by its interaction with neural progesterone receptors (PRs), expressed as PR-A and PR-B protein isoforms. Whereas the expression of two isoforms in the neural tissues is suggestive of their selective cellular responses and modulation of distinct subsets of PR-induced target genes, the role of individual isoforms in brain and behavior is unknown. We have previously demonstrated a critical role for PRs as transcriptional mediators of progesterone (ligand-dependent), and dopamine (ligand-independent)-facilitated female reproductive behavior in female mice lacking both the isoforms of PR. To further elucidate the selective contribution of the individual PR isoforms in female sexual receptive behavior, we used the recently generated PR-A and PR-B isoform-specific null mutant mice. We present evidence for differential responses of each isoform to progesterone and dopamine agonist, SKF 81297 (SKF), and demonstrate a key role for PR-A isoform in both hormone-dependent and -independent facilitation of sexual receptive behavior. Interestingly, whereas both the isoforms were essential for SKF-facilitated sexual behavior, PR-A appeared to play a more important role in the 8-bromo-cAMP-facilitated lordosis response, raising the possibility of distinct intracellular signaling pathways mediating the responses. Finally, we also demonstrate that antiprogestin, RU38486, was an effective inhibitor of PR-A-mediated, progesterone-dependent, but not SKF or 8-bromo-cAMP-dependent sexual receptivity. The data reveal the selective contributions of individual isoforms to the signaling pathways mediating female reproductive behavior.

The breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 regulates progesterone receptor signaling in mammary epithelial cells

The progesterone receptor (PR) plays roles in normal mammary development and breast cancer formation, where it may exert both stimulatory and inhibitory actions. Previously, the breast cancer susceptibility gene product BRCA1 was found to interact with and inhibit the transcriptional activity of estrogen receptor-alpha. In this study, we found that exogenous wild-type BRCA1 inhibited the activity of the PR in transient transfection assays utilizing a mouse mammary tumor virus-Luc reporter. Wild-type BRCA1 inhibited the activity of endogenous PR in human breast cancer cells (T47D and MCF-7) and inhibited the activity of exogenous PR-A, PR-B, and [PR-A plus PR-B] isoforms. On the other hand, knockdown of endogenous BRCA1 using small interfering RNA enhanced the progesterone-stimulated activity of the PR by about 4-fold. We documented an in vivo association of the endogenous BRCA1 with PR isoforms A and B and a direct in vitro interaction between BRCA1 and PR, which was partially mapped. Whereas down-regulation of the coactivator p300 contributes to the BRCA1-mediated repression of estrogen receptor-alpha, this mechanism does not contribute to inhibition of PR activity, because exogenous p300 did not rescue the BRCA1 repression of PR activity. The BRCA1-PR interaction has functional consequences. Thus, we showed that BRCA1 inhibits the expression of various endogenous progesterone-responsive genes and inhibits progesterone-stimulated proliferation of T47D cells. Finally, exogenous progesterone caused an exaggerated proliferative response in the mammary glands of mice harboring a mammary-targeted conditional deletion of the full-length isoform of Brca1. These findings suggest that BRCA1 regulates the activity of progesterone, a major hormone of pregnancy that may also participate in mammary carcinogenesis.

Subfertility, Uterine Hypoplasia, and Partial Progesterone Resistance in Mice Lacking the Krüppel-like Factor 9/Basic Transcription Element-binding Protein-1 (Bteb1) Gene

Progesterone receptor (PR), a ligand-activated transcription factor, is a key regulator of cellular proliferation and differentiation in reproductive tissues. The transcriptional activity of PR is influenced by co-regulatory proteins typically expressed in a tissue- and cell-specific fashion. We previously demonstrated that basic transcription element-binding protein-1 (BTEB1), a member of the Sp/Krüppel-like family of transcription factors, functionally interacts with the two PR isoforms, PR-A and PR-B, to mediate progestin sensitivity of target genes in endometrial epithelial cells in vitro. Here we report that ablation of the Bteb1 gene in female mice results in uterine hypoplasia, reduced litter size, and increased incidence of neonatal deaths in offspring. The reduced litter size is solely a maternal genotype effect and results from fewer numbers of implantation sites, rather than defects in ovulation. In the early pregnant uterus, Bteb1 expression in stromal cells temporally coincides with PR-A isoform-dependent decidual formation at the time of implantation. Expression of two implantation-specific genes, Hoxa10 and cyclin D3, was decreased in uteri of early pregnant Bteb1-null mutants, whereas that of Bteb3, a related family member, was increased, the latter possibly compensating for the loss of Bteb1. Progesterone responsiveness of several uterine genes was altered with Bteb1-null mutation. These results identify Bteb1 as a functionally relevant PR-interacting protein and suggest its selective modulation of cellular processes that are regulated by PR-A in the uterine stroma.

Progesterone receptor deficient in chromatin binding has an altered cellular state

Our previous work has shown that the progesterone receptor (PR) can exist in two distinct functional states in mammary adenocarcinoma cells. The differences in function included the ability to activate a promoter in organized chromatin, sensitivity to ligand, and ligand-independent activation. To determine whether these functional differences were because of altered cellular processing, we carried out biochemical analyses of the functionally distinct PRs. Although the majority of PR is localized to the nucleus, biochemical partitioning resulted in a loosely bound (cytosolic) fraction, and a tightly bound (nuclear) fraction. In the absence of progestins, the functionally distinct PRs differed significantly in partitioning between the two fractions. To characterize these fractions further, we analyzed interactions of unliganded PR with chaperones by coimmunoprecipitation. We determined that PR in the cytosolic fraction associated with hsp90 and p23. In contrast, PR in the nuclear fraction consisted of complexes containing hsp90, p23, and FKBP51 as well as PR that was dimerized and highly phosphorylated. Hormone treatment significantly reduced the formation of all PR-chaperone complexes. The hsp90 inhibitor, geldanamycin, similarly blocked transcriptional activity of both functionally distinct receptors. However, the two forms of the PR differed in their ability to associate with the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter in organized chromatin. These findings provide new information about the composition and distribution of mature progesterone receptor complexes in mammary adenocarcinoma cells, and suggest that differences in receptor subcellular distribution have a significant impact on their function. These findings also reveal that transiently expressed steroid receptors may not always be processed like their endogenous counterparts.

Selective interactions of Kruppel-like factor 9/basic transcription element-binding protein with progesterone receptor isoforms A and B determine transcriptional activity of progesterone-responsive genes in endometrial epithelial cells

The Sp/KLF transcription factor basic transcription element-binding protein (BTEB1) regulates gene transcription by binding to GC-rich sequence motifs present in the promoters of numerous tissue-specific as well as housekeeping genes. Similar to other members of this family, BTEB1 can act as a transactivator or transrepressor depending on cell and promoter context, although the molecular mechanism underlying these distinct activities remains unclear. Here we report that BTEB1 can mediate signaling pathways involving the nuclear receptor for the steroid hormone progesterone in endometrial epithelial cells by its selective interaction with the progesterone receptor (PR) isoforms, PR-A and PR-B. Functional interaction with ligand-activated PR-B resulted in superactivation of PR-B transactivity, facilitated the recruitment of the transcriptional integrator CREB-binding protein within the PR-dimer, and was dependent on the structure of the ligand bound by PR-B. By contrast, BTEB1 did not influence agonist-bound PR-A transactivity, although it augmented PR-A inhibition of PR-B-mediated transactivation as well as potentiated ligand-independent PR-A transcriptional activity in the presence of CREB-binding protein. We also demonstrate similar positive modulatory actions of BTEB1-related family members Krüppel-like family (KLF) 13/FKLF2/BTEB3 and Sp1 on PR-B transactivity. Further, we provide support for the potential significance of the selective functional interactions of PR isoforms with BTEB1 in the peri-implantation uterus using mouse and pig models and in the breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and T47D. Our results suggest a novel mechanism for the divergent physiological consequences of PR-A and PR-B on progesterone-dependent gene transcription in the uterus involving select KLF members.

Expression of progesterone receptor (PR) A and B isoforms in mouse granulosa cells: stage-dependent PR-mediated regulation of apoptosis and cell proliferation

The intracellular progesterone receptor (PR) in the mammalian ovary is a part of the physiological pathway that facilitates ovulation. Two PR isoforms (A and B) exist, with different molecular and biological functions. Previous studies have revealed that the cellular ratio of the PR isoforms is important for progesterone-responsive tissues and is under developmental control in different species. However, the relative expression of PR isoforms in the ovary is unknown. In this study we have demonstrated first that the expression of both PR isoforms in mouse granulosa cells was rapidly up-regulated by hCG treatment and dramatically down-regulated when the granulosa cells were undergoing luteinization. The relative level of protein expression of the A and B forms was 2:1 and the highest total PR protein expression was found after hCG stimulation. Second, we demonstrated that the expression of PR protein was specific to granulosa cells of periovulatory follicles and was absent in undifferentiated granulosa cells of growing follicles. It was not detected in other cell types (i.e., corpora lutea or any stage of follicles with features of apoptosis). Third, we demonstrated that treatment with the PR antagonist RU 486 in vivo resulted in down-regulation of both isoforms in parallel with increased activation of caspase-3, a decreased level of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and a reduced rate of ovulation. Fourth, we demonstrated, in vitro, that the PR antagonists RU 486 and Org 31710 increased internucleosomal DNA fragmentation parallel with a decrease in DNA synthesis in granulosa cells, which express PR. These results indicate that PR and its isoforms participate in regulation of ovulation, along with suppression of granulosa cell apoptosis and promotion of cell survival in the mouse ovary.

Mechanism of action of progesterone antagonists

The effects of progesterone on target tissues are mediated by progesterone receptors (PRs), which belong to a family of nuclear receptors and function as ligand-activated transcription factors to regulate the expression of specific sets of target genes. Progesterone antagonists repress the biological actions of progesterone by "actively" inhibiting PR activation. This work discusses the first clinically used progesterone antagonist RU486 and closely related compounds in terms of how these compounds inhibit progesterone action through heterodimerization and competition for DNA binding and by the recruitment of corepressors to promoters of target genes to repress transcription. We discuss cellular factors that may influence the activity of these compounds, such as the availability of coactivators and corepressors and the context of specific target promoters in any given cell type. We also discuss steroidal and nonsteroidal antagonist selectivity for PR versus other steroid hormone receptors and suggest that it may be possible to develop tissue/cell specific modulators of PR.

Control of retinoic acid receptor heterodimerization by ligand-induced structural transitions. A novel mechanism of action for retinoid antagonists

Heterodimerization of retinoic acid receptors (RARs) with 9-cis-retinoic receptors (RXRs) is a prerequisite for binding of RXR.RAR dimers to DNA and for retinoic acid-induced gene regulation. Whether retinoids control RXR/RAR solution interaction remains a debated question, and we have used in vitro and in vivo protein interaction assays to investigate the role of ligand in modulating RXR/RAR interaction in the absence of DNA. Two-hybrid assay in mammalian cells demonstrated that only RAR agonists were able to increase significantly RAR interaction with RXR, whereas RAR antagonists inhibited RXR binding to RAR. Quantitative glutathione S-transferase pull-down assays established that there was a strict correlation between agonist binding affinity for the RAR monomer and the affinity of RXR for liganded RAR, but RAR antagonists were inactive in inducing RXR recruitment to RAR in vitro. Alteration of coactivator- or corepressor-binding interfaces of RXR or RAR did not alter ligand-enhanced dimerization. In contrast, preventing the formation of a stable holoreceptor structure upon agonist binding strongly altered RXR.RAR dimerization. Finally, we observed that RAR interaction with RXR silenced RXR ligand-dependent activation function. We propose that ligand-controlled dimerization of RAR with RXR is an important step in the RXR.RAR activation process. This interaction is dependent upon adequate remodeling of the AF-2 structure and amenable to pharmacological inhibition by structurally modified retinoids.

New antiprogestins with partial agonist activity: potential selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) and probes for receptor- and coregulator-induced changes in progesterone receptor induction properties

A pharmacologically relevant property of steroid hormone-regulated gene induction is the partial agonist activity of antisteroid complexes. We now report that dexamethasone-mesylate (Dex-Mes) and dexamethasone-oxetanone (Dex-Ox), each a derivative of the glucocorticoid-selective steroid dexamethasone (Dex), are two new antiprogestins with significant amounts of agonist activity with both the A and B isoforms of progesterone receptor (PR), for different progesterone-responsive elements, and in several cell lines. These compounds continue to display activity under conditions where another partial antiprogestin (RTI-020) is inactive. These new antiprogestins were used to determine whether the partial agonist activity of PR complexes can be modified by changing concentrations of receptor or coregulator, as we have recently demonstrated for glucocorticoid receptors (GRs). Because GR and coregulator concentrations simultaneously altered the position of the physiologically relevant dose-response curve, and associated EC(50), of GR-agonist complexes, we also examined this phenomenon with PR. We find that elevated PR or transcriptional intermediary factor 2 (TIF2) concentrations increase the partial agonist activity of Dex-Mes and Dex-Ox, and the EC(50) of agonists, independently of changes in total gene transactivation. Furthermore, the corepressors SMRT (silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid receptors) and NCoR (nuclear receptor corepressor) each suppresses gene induction but NCoR acts opposite to SMRT and, like the coactivator TIF2, reduces the EC(50) and increases the partial agonist activity of antiprogestins. These comparable responses of GR and PR suggest that variations in receptor and coregulator concentrations may be a general mechanism for altering the induction properties of other steroid receptors. Finally, the magnitude of coregulator effects on PR induction properties are often not identical for agonists and the new antagonists, suggesting subtle mechanistic differences. These properties of Dex-Mes and Dex-Ox, plus the sensitivity of their activity to cellular differences in PR and coregulator concentrations, make these steroids potential new SPRMs (selective progesterone receptor modulators) that should prove useful as probes of PR induction properties.

The opposing transcriptional activities of the two isoforms of the human progesterone receptor are due to differential cofactor binding

The human progesterone receptor (PR) exists as two functionally distinct isoforms, hPRA and hPRB. hPRB functions as a transcriptional activator in most cell and promoter contexts, while hPRA is transcriptionally inactive and functions as a strong ligand-dependent transdominant repressor of steroid hormone receptor transcriptional activity. Although the precise mechanism of hPRA-mediated transrepression is not fully understood, an inhibitory domain (ID) within human PR, which is necessary for transrepression by hPRA, has been identified. Interestingly, although ID is present within both hPR isoforms, it is functionally active only in the context of hPRA, suggesting that the two receptors adopt distinct conformations within the cell which allow hPRA to interact with a set of cofactors that are different from those recognized by hPRB. In support of this hypothesis, we identified, using phage display technology, hPRA-selective peptides which differentially modulate hPRA and hPRB transcriptional activity. Furthermore, using a combination of in vitro and in vivo methodologies, we demonstrate that the two receptors exhibit different cofactor interactions. Specifically, it was determined that hPRA has a higher affinity for the corepressor SMRT than hPRB and that this interaction is facilitated by ID. Interestingly, inhibition of SMRT activity, by either a dominant negative mutant (C'SMRT) or histone deacetylase inhibitors, reverses hPRA-mediated transrepression but does not convert hPRA to a transcriptional activator. Together, these data indicate that the ability of hPRA to transrepress steroid hormone receptor transcriptional activity and its inability to activate progesterone-responsive promoters occur by distinct mechanisms. To this effect, we observed that hPRA, unlike hPRB, was unable to efficiently recruit the transcriptional coactivators GRIP1 and SRC-1 upon agonist binding. Thus, although both receptors contain sequences within their ligand-binding domains known to be required for coactivator binding, the ability of PR to interact with cofactors in a productive manner is regulated by sequences contained within the amino terminus of the receptors. We propose, therefore, that hPRA is transcriptionally inactive due to its inability to efficiently recruit coactivators. Furthermore, our experiments indicate that hPRA interacts efficiently with the corepressor SMRT and that this activity permits it to function as a transdominant repressor.