Racial disparities in the use of surgical treatment for intractable temporal lobe epilepsy

Discriminating factors in access to video-EEG for epilepsy surgery in a French tertiary epilepsy center

Equitable access to care and management is a priority for patients with epilepsy and may vary depending on each country's healthcare system. As this issue has not been specifically addressed in France, we conducted a retrospective study to identify discriminating factors in access to surgery at a French tertiary epilepsy center. Initially, we examined factors previously identified in other countries as influential in surgery access, including age at diagnosis, affected side, gender, years of education, socio-professional categories, and density of general practitioners in the residential area, in 293 consecutive French-native patients with refractory medial temporal lobe epilepsy and hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-HS). Subsequently, we conducted a case-control study comparing patients born in France with 22 patients born abroad to specifically explore migratory status. The analysis revealed that the only three factors statistically influencing the delay between the onset of epilepsy and entry into video-EEG were early age at onset (associated with a longer delay), pensioner status (associated with a longer delay), and student status (associated with a shorter delay). Migratory status, gender, and socio-economic level (indirectly reflected by the level of education and socio-professional category) were not found to be discriminatory factors in access to video-EEG. Discrepancies between our study and foreign studies may be attributed to differences in healthcare systems and medical coverage among countries. Efforts in France to improve access to surgery should focus on enhancing communication among practitioners to promptly refer any MTLE-HS patient to an epilepsy surgery center, regardless of their age.

Health insurance and transportation barriers impact access to epilepsy care in the United States

PURPOSE

Inconsistent access to healthcare for people with epilepsy results in reduced adherence to antiseizure medications, increased seizure frequency, and fewer appropriate referrals for epilepsy surgery. Identifying and addressing factors that impede access to care should consequently improve patient outcomes. We hypothesized that health insurance and transportation affect access to outpatient neurology care for adults living with epilepsy in the United States (US).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of US adults with active epilepsy surveyed via the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) in 2015 and 2017. We established whether patients reported seeing a neurologist in the past year and used multiple logistic regression to determine whether health insurance status and transportation access were associated with this outcome.

RESULTS

We identified 735 respondents from 2015 and 2017, representing an estimated 2.98 million US adults with active epilepsy. After adjusting for socioeconomic and seizure-related co-variates, we found that a lack of health insurance coverage was associated with no epilepsy care in the past year (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.22; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.09 - 0.54). Delayed care due to inadequate transportation (aOR 0.42; 95 % CI: 0.19 - 0.93) also resulted in reduced patient access to a neurologist.

CONCLUSION

Due to the inherent nature of their condition, people with epilepsy are less likely to have employer-sponsored health insurance or consistent driving privileges. Yet, these factors also impact patient access to neurological care. We must address transportation and insurance barriers through long-term investment and partnership between community, healthcare, and government stakeholders.

Health care disparities in morbidity and mortality in adults with acute and remote status epilepticus: A national study

OBJECTIVE

Although disparities have been described in epilepsy care, their contribution to status epilepticus (SE) and associated outcomes remains understudied.

METHODS

We used the 2010-2019 National Inpatient Sample to identify SE hospitalizations using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM)/ICD-10-CM codes. SE prevalence was stratified by demographics. Logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring, intubation, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, and mortality.

RESULTS

There were 486 861 SE hospitalizations (2010-2019), primarily at urban teaching hospitals (71.3%). SE prevalence per 10 000 admissions was 27.3 for non-Hispanic (NH)-Blacks, 16.1 for NH-Others, 15.8 for Hispanics, and 13.7 for NH-Whites (p < .01). SE prevalence was higher in the lowest (18.7) compared to highest income quartile (18.7 vs. 14, p < .01). Older age was associated with intubation, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, and in-hospital mortality. Those ≥80 years old had the highest odds of intubation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.43-1.58), tracheostomy (OR = 2, 95% CI = 1.75-2.27), gastrostomy (OR = 3.37, 95% CI = 2.97-3.83), and in-hospital mortality (OR = 6.51, 95% CI = 5.95-7.13). Minority populations (NH-Black, NH-Other, and Hispanic) had higher odds of tracheostomy and gastrostomy compared to NH-White populations. NH-Black people had the highest odds of tracheostomy (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.57-1.86) and gastrostomy (OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.65-1.92). The odds of receiving EEG monitoring rose progressively with higher income quartile (OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.34-1.62 for the highest income quartile) and was higher for those in urban teaching compared to rural hospitals (OR = 12.72, 95% CI = 8.92-18.14). Odds of mortality were lower (compared to NH-Whites) in NH-Blacks (OR = .71, 95% CI = .67-.75), Hispanics (OR = .82, 95% CI = .76-.89), and those in the highest income quartiles (OR = .9, 95% CI = .84-.97).

SIGNIFICANCE

Disparities exist in SE prevalence, tracheostomy, and gastrostomy utilization across age, race/ethnicity, and income. Older age and lower income are also associated with mortality. Access to EEG monitoring is modulated by income and urban teaching hospital status. Older adults, racial/ethnic minorities, and populations of lower income or rural location may represent vulnerable populations meriting increased attention to improve health outcomes and reduce disparities.

Disparities in Teleneurology Use in Medicaid Beneficiaries With Epilepsy by Practice Setting: Promoting Health Equity in Academic Centers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Medicaid beneficiaries in many American academic medical centers can receive care in a separate facility than those not covered by Medicaid. We aimed to identify possible disparities in care by evaluating the association between facility type (integrated faculty practice or Medicaid-only outpatient clinic) and telehealth utilization in people with epilepsy.

METHODS

We performed retrospective analyses using structured data from the Mount Sinai Health System electronic medical record data from January 2003 to August 2021. We identified people of all ages with epilepsy who were followed by an epileptologist after January 3, 2018, using a validated ICD-9-CM/10-CM coded case definition. We evaluated associations between practice setting and telehealth utilization, an outcome measure that captures the evolving delivery of neurologic care in a post-coronavirus disease 2019 era, using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

We identified 4,586 people with epilepsy seen by an epileptologist, including Medicaid beneficiaries in the Medicaid outpatient clinic (N = 387), Medicaid beneficiaries in the faculty practice after integration (N = 723), and non-Medicaid beneficiaries (N = 3,476). Patients not insured by Medicaid were significantly older (average age 40 years vs 29 in persons seen in Medicaid-only outpatient clinic and 28.5 in persons insured with Medicaid seen in faculty practice [p < 0.0001]). Medicaid beneficiaries were more likely to have drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), with 51.94% of people seen in Medicaid-only outpatient clinic, 41.63% of Medicaid beneficiaries seen in faculty practice, and 37.2% of non-Medicaid beneficiaries having DRE (p < 0.0001). Medicaid outpatient clinic patients were less likely to have telehealth visits (phone or video); 81.65% of patients in the Medicaid outpatient clinic having no telehealth visits vs 71.78% of Medicaid beneficiaries in the faculty practice and 70.89% of non-Medicaid beneficiaries (p < 0.0001). In an adjusted logistic regression analysis, Medicaid beneficiaries had lower odds (0.61; 95% CI 0.46-0.81) of using teleneurology compared with all patients seen in faculty practice (p = 0.0005).

DISCUSSION

Compared with the Medicaid-only outpatient clinic, we found higher telehealth utilization in the integrated faculty practice with no difference by insurance status (Medicaid vs other). Integrated care may be associated with better health care delivery in people with epilepsy; thus, future research should examine its impact on other epilepsy-related outcomes.

Racial disparities in the utilization of invasive neuromodulation devices for the treatment of drug-resistant focal epilepsy

Racial disparities affect multiple dimensions of epilepsy care including epilepsy surgery. This study aims to further explore these disparities by determining the utilization of invasive neuromodulation devices according to race and ethnicity in a multicenter study of patients living with focal drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). We performed a post hoc analysis of the Human Epilepsy Project 2 (HEP2) data. HEP2 is a prospective study of patients living with focal DRE involving 10 sites distributed across the United States. There were no statistical differences in the racial distribution of the study population compared to the US population using census data except for patients reporting more than one race. Of 154 patients enrolled in HEP2, 55 (36%) underwent invasive neuromodulation for DRE management at some point in the course of their epilepsy. Of those, 36 (71%) were patients who identified as White. Patients were significantly less likely to have a device if they identified solely as Black/African American than if they did not (odds ratio = .21, 95% confidence interval = .05-.96, p = .03). Invasive neuromodulation for management of DRE is underutilized in the Black/African American population, indicating a new facet of racial disparities in epilepsy care.

Building an ethnically and racially diverse neurology workforce

As diversity among patient populations continues to grow, racial and ethnic diversity in the neurology workforce is increasingly essential to the delivery of culturally competent care and for enabling inclusive, generalizable clinical research. Unfortunately, diversity in the workforce is an area in which the field of neurology has historically lagged and faces formidable challenges, including an inadequate number of trainees entering the field, bias experienced by trainees and faculty from minoritized racial and ethnic backgrounds, and 'diversity tax', the disproportionate burden of service work placed on minoritized people in many professions. Although neurology departments, professional organizations and relevant industry partners have come to realize the importance of diversity to the field and have taken steps to promote careers in neurology for people from minoritized backgrounds, additional steps are needed. Such steps include the continued creation of diversity leadership roles in neurology departments and organizations, the creation of robust pipeline programmes, aggressive recruitment and retention efforts, the elevation of health equity research and engagement with minoritized communities. Overall, what is needed is a shift in culture in which diversity is adopted as a core value in the field.

Effect of Race and Insurance Type on Access to, and Outcomes of, Epilepsy Surgery: A Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Despite higher rates of seizure freedom, a large proportion of patients with medically refractory seizures who could benefit from epilepsy surgery do not receive surgical treatment. This literature review describes the association of race and insurance status with epilepsy surgery access and outcomes.

METHODS

Searches in Scopus and PubMed databases related to disparities in epilepsy surgery were conducted. The inclusion criteria consisted of data that could be used to compare epilepsy surgery patient access and outcomes by insurance or race in the United States. Two independent reviewers determined article eligibility.

RESULTS

Of the 289 studies reviewed, 26 were included. Most of the studies were retrospective cohort studies (23 of 26) and national admissions database studies (13 of 26). Of the 17 studies that evaluated epilepsy surgery patient demographics, 11 showed that Black patients were less likely to receive surgery than were White patients or had an increased time to surgery from seizure onset. Nine studies showed that patients with private insurance were more likely to undergo epilepsy surgery and have shorter time to surgery compared with patients with public insurance. No significant association was found between the seizure recurrence rate after surgery with insurance or race.

CONCLUSIONS

Black patients and patients with public insurance are receiving epilepsy surgery at lower rates after a prolonged waiting period compared with other patients with medically refractory epilepsy. These results are consistent across the current reported literature. Future efforts should focus on additional characterization and potential causes of these disparities to develop successful interventions.

Disparities in adherence and emergency department utilization among people with epilepsy: A machine learning approach

PURPOSE

We used a machine learning approach to identify the combinations of factors that contribute to lower adherence and high emergency department (ED) utilization.

METHODS

Using Medicaid claims, we identified adherence to anti-seizure medications and the number of ED visits for people with epilepsy in a 2-year follow up period. We used three years of baseline data to identify demographics, disease severity and management, comorbidities, and county-level social factors. Using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) and random forest analyses we identified combinations of baseline factors that predicted lower adherence and ED visits. We further stratified these models by race and ethnicity.

RESULTS

From 52,175 people with epilepsy, the CART model identified developmental disabilities, age, race and ethnicity, and utilization as top predictors of adherence. When stratified by race and ethnicity, there was variation in the combinations of comorbidities including developmental disabilities, hypertension, and psychiatric comorbidities. Our CART model for ED utilization included a primary split among those with previous injuries, followed by anxiety and mood disorders, headache, back problems, and urinary tract infections. When stratified by race and ethnicity we saw that for Black individuals headache was a top predictor of future ED utilization although this did not appear in other racial and ethnic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

ASM adherence differed by race and ethnicity, with different combinations of comorbidities predicting lower adherence across racial and ethnic groups. While there were not differences in ED use across races and ethnicity, we observed different combinations of comorbidities that predicted high ED utilization.

Establishing the cross-cultural applicability of a harmonized approach to cognitive diagnostics in epilepsy: Initial results of the International Classification of Cognitive Disorders in Epilepsy in a Spanish-speaking sample

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to evaluate the cross-cultural application of the International Classification of Cognitive Disorders in Epilepsy (IC-CoDE) to a cohort of Spanish-speaking patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) living in the United States.

METHODS

Eighty-four Spanish-speaking patients with TLE completed neuropsychological measures of memory, language, executive function, visuospatial functioning, and attention/processing speed as part of the Neuropsychological Screening Battery for Hispanics. The contribution of demographic and clinical variables to cognitive performance was evaluated. A sensitivity analysis was conducted by examining the base rates of impairment across several impairment thresholds. The IC-CoDE taxonomy was then applied, and the base rate of cognitive phenotypes for each cutoff was calculated. The distribution of phenotypes was compared to the published IC-CoDE taxonomy data, which utilized a large, multicenter cohort of English-speaking patients with TLE.

RESULTS

Across the different impairment cutoffs, memory was the most impaired cognitive domain, with impairments in list learning ranging from 50% to 78%. Application of the IC-CoDE taxonomy utilizing a -1.5-SD cutoff revealed an intact cognitive profile in 47.6% of patients, single-domain impairment in 23.8% of patients, bidomain impairment in 14.3% of patients, and generalized impairment in 14.3% of the sample. This distribution was comparable to the phenotype distribution observed in the IC-CoDE validation sample.

SIGNIFICANCE

We demonstrate a similar pattern and distribution of cognitive phenotypes in a Spanish-speaking epilepsy cohort compared to an English-speaking sample. This suggests stability in the underlying phenotypes associated with TLE and applicability of the IC-CoDE for guiding cognitive diagnostics in epilepsy research that can be applied to culturally and linguistically diverse samples.

A framework for health equity in people living with epilepsy

Epilepsy is a disease where disparities and inequities in risk and outcomes are complex and multifactorial. While most epilepsy research to date has identified several key areas of disparities, we set out to provide a multilevel life course model of epilepsy development, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes to highlight how these disparities represent true inequities. Our piece also presents three hypothetical cases that highlight how the solutions to address inequities may vary across the lifespan. We then identify four key domains (structural, socio-cultural, health care, and physiological) that contribute to the persistence of inequities in epilepsy risk and outcomes in the United States. Each of these domains, and their core components in the context of epilepsy, are reviewed and discussed. Further, we highlight the connection between domains and key areas of intervention to strive towards health equity. The goal of this work is to highlight these domains while also providing epilepsy researchers and clinicians with broader context of how their work fits into health equity.

Differences in elective epilepsy monitoring unit admission rates by race/ethnicity and primary payer in New Jersey

Elective admission to the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) is an essential service provided by epilepsy centers, particularly for those with drug-resistant epilepsy. Given previously characterized racial and socioeconomic healthcare disparities in the management of epilepsy, we sought to understand access and utilization of this service in New Jersey (NJ). We examined epilepsy hospitalizations in NJ between 2014 and 2016 using state inpatient and emergency department (ED) databases. We stratified admissions by race/ethnicity and primary payer and used these to estimate and compare (1) admission rates per capita in NJ, as well as (2) admission rates per number of ED visits for each group. Patients without insurance underwent elective EMU admission at the lowest rates across all racial/ethnic groups and payer types studied. Black patients with Medicaid and private insurance were admitted at disproportionately low rates relative to their number of ED visits. Hispanic/Latino and Asian/Pacific Islanders with private insurance, Hispanic/Latinos with Medicaid, and Asian/Pacific Islanders with Medicare were also admitted at low rates per capita within each respective payer category. Future studies should focus on addressing causal factors driving healthcare disparities in epilepsy, particularly for patients without adequate health insurance coverage and those who have been historically underserved by the healthcare system.

Racial and socioeconomic disparities in the advanced treatment of medically intractable pediatric epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare have gained significant importance since the Institute of Medicine published its report on disparities in healthcare. There is a lack of evidence on how race and ethnicity affect access to advanced treatment of pediatric medically intractable epilepsy. In this context, the authors analyzed the latest Kids’ Inpatient Database (KID) for racial/ethnic disparities in access to surgical treatment of epilepsy.

METHODS

The authors queried the KID for the years 2016 and 2019 for the diagnosis of medically intractable epilepsy.

RESULTS

A total of 29,292 patients were included in the sample. Of these patients, 8.9% (n = 2610) underwent surgical treatment/invasive monitoring. The mean ages in the surgical treatment and nonsurgical treatment groups were 11.73 years (SD 5.75 years) and 9.5 years (SD 6.16 years), respectively. The most common insurance in the surgical group was private/commercial (55.9%) and Medicaid in the nonsurgical group (47.7%) (p < 0.001). White patients accounted for the most common population in both groups, followed by Hispanic patients. African American patients made up 7.9% in the surgical treatment group compared with 12.9% in the nonsurgical group. African American (41.1%) and Hispanic (29.9%) patients had higher rates of emergency department (ED) utilization compared with the White population (24.6%). After adjusting for all covariates, the odds of surgical treatment increased with increasing age (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.053–1.067; p < 0.001). African American race (OR 0.513, 95% CI 0.443–0.605; p < 0.001), Hispanic ethnicity (OR 0.681, 95% CI 0.612–0.758; p < 0.001), and other races (OR 0.789, 95% CI 0.689–0.903; p = 0.006) had lower surgical treatment odds compared with the White population. Medicaid/Medicare was associated with lower surgical treatment odds than private/commercial insurance (OR 0.603, 0.554–0.657; p < 0.001). Interaction analysis revealed that African American (OR 0.708, 95% CI 0.569–0.880; p = 0.001) and Hispanic (OR 0.671, 95% CI 0.556–0.809; p < 0.001) populations with private insurance had lower surgical treatment odds than White populations with private insurance. Similarly, African American patients, Hispanic patients, and patients of other races with nonprivate insurance also had lower surgical treatment odds than their White counterparts after adjusting for all other covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the KID, African American and Hispanic populations had lower surgical treatment rates than their White counterparts, with higher utilization of the ED for pediatric medically intractable epilepsy.

Hospital Case-Volume and Patient Outcomes Following Pediatric Brain Tumor Surgery in the Pediatric Health Information System

BACKGROUND

Markers of quality of care in various surgical specialties have been shown to correlate with hospital volumes. This study investigates the effect of hospital volume and patient-related factors on the outcomes of children undergoing brain tumor resection.

METHODS

We examined the data within the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) for children aged zero to 17 years undergoing brain tumor resection between 2016 and 2020. Length of hospital stay (LOS), costs, and reoperation rates were analyzed for associations with hospital case-volume, patient factors, and other hospital-related factors.

RESULTS

A total of 2568 patients were included in this PHIS analysis. After adjusting for covariates, care provided by high-case-volume hospitals led to shorter LOS (P = 0.01). The effect of hospital case-volume on median cost was present on univariate analysis (US $63,845 at low-volume hospital versus US $54,909 at high-volume hospital, P = 0.002); this finding was attenuated by LOS. A trend was observed between reoperation rates and hospital case-volume, with lowest quartile volume hospitals having higher odds of reoperation than hospitals with volumes in the highest quartile (P = 0.06). Racial and ethnic minorities, medical comorbidities, and other sociodemographic factors were associated with poorer outcomes following surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Centering care around high-case-volume hospitals can potentially lead to shorter hospital stays and decreased costs for children with brain tumors. This PHIS article highlights the association of the studied outcomes with certain sociodemographic factors and illustrates that inequalities in pediatric health care still exist. Further efforts are required to understand and eliminate these potentially harmful differences.

Feasibility and effectiveness appraisal of a neurology residency health equities curriculum

BACKGROUND

Despite increasing awareness of inequities in healthcare in neurology, health equity is not a core competency of neurology training. To meet this need, we implemented a health equities curriculum for neurology residents at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania.

METHODS

A seven-lecture health equities curriculum was implemented during the 2019-2020 academic year. Surveys were distributed pre-and post-curriculum to assess resident demographics, previous training in health equities, curriculum effectiveness addressing health equities topics, and resident appraisal of the curriculum.

RESULTS

On average, residents attended 2-3 lectures. Most of the residents who participated were White-Non Latinx women. Residents who did not participate in the curriculum listed clinical responsibilities as the main reason for absenteeism. Residents who participated felt the curriculum was at least somewhat effective in addressing health disparities, cultural competency, and implicit bias. 64% of the residents felt the curriculum was effective in improving their preparedness in caring for underserved patients.

CONCLUSION

Implementing a health equities curriculum in neurology residency programs is feasible and well-received by residents. Given inconsistent attendance and a small sample size, we are unable to assess its true effectiveness. Nonetheless, residents felt it prepared them in addressing disparities in neurological care. A longer curriculum will help in assessing the effectiveness of this curriculum intervention. A standard health equities curriculum should be implemented across neurology residency programs, and health equities should be considered a core competency topic for the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology (ABPN) certification.

Utilization of epilepsy surgery in the United States: A study of the National Inpatient Sample investigating the roles of race, socioeconomic status, and insurance

Background:

Epilepsy is estimated to affect 70 million people worldwide and is medically refractory in 30% of cases.

Methods:

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study using a US database from 2012 to 2014 to identify patients aged ≥18 years admitted to the hospital with epilepsy as the primary diagnosis. The sampled population was weighted using Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project guidelines. Procedural ICD-9 codes were utilized to stratify the sampled population into two cohorts: resective surgery and implantation or stimulation procedure.

Results:

Query of the database yielded 152,925 inpatients, of which 8535 patients underwent surgical intervention. The nonprocedural group consisted of 76,000 White patients (52.6%) and 28,390 Black patients (19.7%) while the procedural group comprised 5550 White patients (64%) and 730 Black patients (8.6%) (P < 0.001). Patients with Medicare were half as likely to receive a surgical procedure (14.8% vs. 28.4%) while patients with private insurance were twice as likely to receive a procedure (53.4% vs. 29.3%), both were statistically significant (P < 0.01). Those in the lowest median household income quartile by zip code (<$40,000) were 68% less likely to receive a procedure (21.5% vs. 31.4%) while the highest income quartile was 133% more likely to receive a procedure (26.1% vs. 19.5%). Patients from rural and urban nonteaching hospitals were, by a wide margin, less likely to receive a surgical procedure.

Conclusion:

We demonstrate an area of need and significant improvement at institutions that have the resources and capability to perform epilepsy surgery. The data show that institutions may not be performing enough epilepsy surgery as a result of racial and socioeconomic bias. Admissions for epilepsy continue to increase without a similar trend for epilepsy surgery despite its documented effectiveness. Race, socioeconomic status, and insurance all represent significant barriers in access to epilepsy surgery. The barriers can be remedied by improving referral patterns and implementing cost-effective measures to improve inpatient epilepsy services in rural and nonteaching hospitals.

Underrepresented Populations in Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery

As awareness of pediatric epilepsy increases, accompanied by advancements in technology and research, it is important to identify certain types of patients that are overlooked for surgical management of epilepsy. Identifying these populations will allow us to study and elucidate the factors contributing to the underutilization and/or delayed application of surgical interventions. Demographically, African-American and Hispanic patients, as well as patients of certain Asian ethnicities, have relatively lower rates of undergoing epilepsy surgery than non-Hispanic and white patients. Among patients with epilepsy, those with higher odds of seizure-freedom following surgery are more likely to be referred for surgical evaluation by their neurologists, with the most common diagnosis being lesional focal epilepsy. However, patients with multifocal or generalized epilepsy, genetic etiologies, or normal (non-lesional) brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are less likely be to referred for evaluation for resective surgery. With an increasing number of high-quality imaging modalities to help localize the epileptogenic zone as well as new techniques for both curative and palliative epilepsy surgery, there are very few populations of patients and/or types of epilepsy that should be precluded from evaluation to determine the suitability of epilepsy surgery. Ultimately, a clearer understanding of the populations who are underrepresented among those considered for epilepsy surgery, coupled with further study of the underlying reasons for this trend, will lead to less disparity in access to this critical treatment among patients with epilepsy.

Persistent racial and ethnic disparities as a potential source of epilepsy surgery underutilization: Analysis of large national datasets from 2006-2016

OBJECTIVE

High volume surgical epilepsy centers have reported a decrease in surgical resections and an increase in intracranial monitoring. Despite this increase in complexity, epilepsy surgery remains significantly underutilized. The goal of this study is to examine the utilization of and access to epilepsy surgery in the United States from 2006 to 2016.

METHODS

We used administrative datasets from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to report national estimates of epilepsy surgery and changes in surgery types. We also examined disparities and barriers in access to epilepsy surgery.

RESULTS

Inpatient epilepsy admissions increased from 2.41 to 5.78 per 100,000 between 2006 and 2016, while surgical epilepsy admissions plateaued after 2011. Open resections comprised 75 % of all surgical cases from 2006 to 2011 then decreased each year to 50 % in 2016 with both temporal and extratemporal resections decreasing proportionally. Intracranial monitoring increased in the last two years of the study due to an increase in SEEG/depth electrode cases. The multivariate analysis showed that patients with Medicaid (OR 0.75, 95 % CI 0.67-0.83) and Medicare (OR 0.62, 95 % CI 0.54-0.70) were significantly less likely to undergo epilepsy surgery compared to those with private insurance. Black patients were less likely to undergo epilepsy surgery than White or Hispanic patients (OR 0.57, 95 % CI 0.49-0.67). No significant difference was found in epilepsy surgery rates after implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2014.

CONCLUSION

This study identifies recent trends in epilepsy surgical approaches and suggests that improving access to care does not necessarily address disparities present in the treatment of epilepsy patients who need surgical care.

Factors associated with patients not proceeding with proposed resective epilepsy surgery

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the association between eligible patients not proceeding with resective epilepsy surgery and various demographic, disease-specific, and epilepsy-evaluation variables.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study included patients identified as candidates for resective epilepsy surgery at the Montefiore Medical Center between January 1, 2009 and June 30, 2017. Chi-squared, two-tailed, independent sample t-test, Mann-Whitney U test and logistic regression were utilized to identify variables associated with patients not proceeding with surgery.

RESULTS

Among the 159 potential surgical candidates reviewed over the 8.5-year study period, only 53 ultimately proceeded with surgery (33%). Eighty-seven (55%) out of these 159 patients were identified as appropriate for resective epilepsy surgery during the study period. Thirty-four (39%) of these 87 patients did not proceed with surgery. Variables independently correlated (either positively or negatively) with the patient not proceeding with surgery were: being employed [Odds Ratio (OR) 4.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-15.73], temporal lobe lesion on MRI (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.14-0.84), temporal lobe EEG ictal onsets (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.07-0.62), and temporal lobe epileptogenic zone (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.55).

CONCLUSION

The novel finding in this study is the association between employment status and whether the patient had epilepsy surgery: employed patients were 4.2 times more likely to not proceed with surgery compared to unemployed patients. In addition, patients with a temporal lobe lesion on MRI, temporal lobe EEG ictal onsets, and/or a temporal epileptogenic zone were more likely to proceed with surgery. Future work will be needed to evaluate these findings prospectively, determine if they generalize to other patient populations, explore the decision whether or not to proceed with epilepsy surgery from a patient-centered perspective, and suggest strategies to reduce barriers to this underutilized treatment.

Underutilization of epilepsy surgery: Part I: A scoping review of barriers

One-third of persons with epilepsy have seizures despite appropriate medical therapy. Drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) is associated with neurocognitive and psychological decline, poor quality of life, increased risk of premature death, and greater economic burden. Epilepsy surgery is an effective and safe treatment for a subset of people with DRE but remains one of the most underutilized evidence-based treatments in modern medicine. The reasons for this quality gap are insufficiently understood. In this comprehensive review, we compile known significant barriers to epilepsy surgery, originating from both patient/family-related factors and physician/health system components. Important patient-related factors include individual and epilepsy characteristics which bias towards continued preferential use of poorly effective medications, as well as patient perspectives and misconceptions of surgical risks and benefits. Health system and physician-related barriers include demonstrable knowledge gaps among physicians, inadequate access to comprehensive epilepsy centers, complex presurgical evaluations, insufficient research, and socioeconomic bias when choosing appropriate surgical candidates.

Underutilization of epilepsy surgery: Part II: Strategies to overcome barriers

Interventions focused on utilization of epilepsy surgery can be divided into groups: those that improve patients' access to surgical evaluation and those that facilitate completion of the surgical evaluation and treatment. Educational intervention, technological innovation, and effective coordination and communication can significantly improve patients' access to surgery. Patient and public facing, individualized (analog and/or digital) communication can raise awareness and acceptance of epilepsy surgery. Educational interventions aimed at providers may mitigate knowledge gaps using practical and concise consensus statements and guidelines, while specific training can improve awareness around implicit bias. Innovative technology, such as clinical decision-making toolkits within the electronic medical record (EMR), machine learning techniques, online decision-support tools, nomograms, and scoring algorithms can facilitate timely identification of appropriate candidates for epilepsy surgery with individualized guidance regarding referral appropriateness, postoperative seizure freedom rate, and risks of complication after surgery. There are specific strategies applicable for epilepsy centers' success: building a multidisciplinary setup, maintaining/tracking volume and complexity of cases, collaborating with other centers, improving surgical outcome with reduced complications, utilizing advanced diagnostics tools, and considering minimally invasive surgical techniques. Established centers may use other strategies, such as multi-stage procedures for multifocal epilepsy, advanced functional mapping with tailored surgery for epilepsy involving the eloquent cortex, and generation of fresh hypotheses in cases of surgical failure. Finally, improved access to epilepsy surgery can be accomplished with policy changes (e.g., anti-discrimination policy, exemption in transportation cost, telehealth reimbursement policy, patient-centered epilepsy care models, pay-per-performance models, affordability and access to insurance, and increased funding for research). Every intervention should receive regular evaluation and feedback-driven modification to ensure appropriate utilization of epilepsy surgery.

Advances in the Surgical Management of Epilepsy: Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy in the Adult Patient

Pharmacoresistant seizures occur in nearly one-third of people with epilepsy. Medial temporal lobe and lesional epilepsy are the most favorable surgically remediable epileptic syndromes. Successful surgery may render the patient seizure-free, reduce antiseizure drug(s) adverse effects, improve quality of life, and decrease mortality. Surgical management should not be considered a procedure of "last resort." Despite the results of randomized controlled trials, surgery remains an underutilized treatment modality for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Important disparities affect patient referral and selection for surgical treatment. This article discusses the advances in surgical treatment of DRE in adults with focal seizures.

Delays and disparities in diagnosis for adults with epilepsy: Findings from U.S. Medicaid data

OBJECTIVE

To identify disparities in care pathways and time from first seizure to epilepsy diagnosis, we examined 2010-2014 Medicaid claims (including pharmacy) data from 16 States for individuals with incident epilepsy.

METHODS

We identified adults (18-64) with an incident epilepsy diagnosis from 1/2012 through 6/2014. These individuals were enrolled in Medicaid for the entire study period and had no history of anti-epileptic drug (AED) use before their first seizure claim. We identified care pathways and calculated the duration from initial seizure to epilepsy diagnosis. We tested associations between these pathways and race/ethnicity, as well as time differences between care pathways using a Chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

RESULTS

The 14,337 adults followed five different care pathways. Their overall median duration from first seizure code to epilepsy diagnosis code was 19.0 months (interquartile range: 4.6, 30.4), and 56.0% filled an AED prescription. Some minorities were more likely to follow pathways with increased durations and delay to diagnosis, and the duration to diagnosis varied significantly across the care pathways.

SIGNIFICANCE

The many different care pathways seen in people with epilepsy show substantial and significant time delays between first seizure diagnosis and epilepsy diagnosis, including significant racial/ethnic disparities that warrant attention.

Deciphering the surgical treatment gap for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE): A literature review

Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) rarely achieve seizure freedom with medical therapy alone. Despite being safe and effective for select patients with DRE, epilepsy surgery remains heavily underutilized. Multiple studies have indicated that the overall rates of surgery in patients with DRE have stagnated in recent years and may be decreasing, even when hospitalizations for epilepsy-related problems are on the rise. Ultimately, many patients with DRE who might otherwise benefit from surgery continue to have intractable seizures, lacking access to the full spectrum of available treatment options. In this article, we review the various factors accounting for the persistent underutilization of epilepsy surgery and uncover several key themes, including the persistent knowledge gap among physicians in identifying potential surgical candidates, lack of coordinated patient care, patient misconceptions of surgery, and socioeconomic disparities impeding access to care. Moreover, factors such as the cost and complexity of the preoperative evaluation, a lack of federal resource allocation for the research of surgical therapies for epilepsy, and difficulties recruiting patients to clinical trials all contribute to this multifaceted dilemma.

Insurance transitions and healthcare utilization for children with refractory epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study is to investigate the association between insurance transitions and healthcare utilization among children with refractory epilepsy.

METHODS

We applied published algorithms to identify the study cohort of children with a diagnosis of refractory epilepsy who were treated between 10/1/2013 and 9/30/2014 at 36 children's hospitals in the United States. Insurance transition was defined as having any change in the type of primary payer from the first date of diagnosis to the date of the last visit at the same hospital. Univariate and multilevel multivariable analytical methods were used in the study.

RESULTS

Among 3488 children hospitalized with refractory epilepsy, rates of insurance transitions at 1, 2, and 5 years of refractory epilepsy diagnosis were 8.1%, 14%, and 29.9%, respectively. Patients whose primary payer at diagnosis was Private or Others were more likely to experience insurance transitions than patients whose primary payer was Medicaid. Younger children were associated with a higher risk of insurance transitions than older children. The high intensity of insurance transitions was associated with a higher number of emergency department and inpatient visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Insurance transitions interrupted the continuity of medical care for children with refractory epilepsy and were associated with more frequent hospitalizations and emergency department visits, which then translated to higher healthcare costs. Medicaid provided stable insurance coverage and is critically important for these patients and should be the main focus for policies aiming to minimize insurance transitions and optimize healthcare delivery.

FACETS of health disparities in epilepsy surgery and gaps that need to be addressed

Purpose of review

Disparities in treatment and outcomes of patients with epilepsy have been identified in several distinct patient populations. The purpose of this review is to organize the literature and establish clear pathways as to why certain patient populations are not receiving epilepsy surgery. By establishing the acronym FACETS (fear of treatment, access to care, communication barriers, education, trust between patient and physician, and social support), we set up a pathway to further study this area in an organized fashion, hopefully leading to objective solutions.

Recent findings

Studies revealed that African American, Hispanic, and non-English-speaking patients underwent surgical treatment for epilepsy at rates significantly lower compared to white patients.

Summary

This article explains possible reasons outlined by FACETS for the health disparities in epilepsy surgery that exist in patients of a certain race, socioeconomic status, and language proficiency.

Quality of Antiepileptic Treatment Among Older Medicare Beneficiaries With Epilepsy: A Retrospective Claims Data Analysis

BACKGROUND

Enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EI-AEDs) are not recommended for older adults with epilepsy. Quality Indicator for Epilepsy Treatment 9 (QUIET-9) states that new patients should not receive EI-AEDs as first line of treatment. In light of reported racial/ethnic disparities in epilepsy care, we investigated EI-AED use and QUIET-9 concordance across major racial/ethnic groups of Medicare beneficiaries.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Retrospective analyses of 2008-2010 Medicare claims for a 5% random sample of beneficiaries 67 years old and above in 2009 augmented for minority representation. Logistic regressions examined QUIET-9 concordance differences by race/ethnicity adjusting for individual, socioeconomic, and geography factors.

SUBJECTS

Epilepsy prevalent (≥1 International Classification of Disease-version 9 code 345.x or ≥2 International Classification of Disease-version 9 code 780.3x, ≥1 AED), and new (same as prevalent+no seizure/epilepsy events nor AEDs in 365 d before index event) cases.

MEASURES

Use of EI-AEDs and QUIET-9 concordance (no EI-AEDs for the first 2 AEDs).

RESULTS

Cases were 21% white, 58% African American, 12% Hispanic, 6% Asian, 2% American Indian/Alaskan Native. About 65% of prevalent, 43.6% of new cases, used EI-AEDs. QUIET-9 concordance was found for 71% Asian, 65% white, 61% Hispanic, 57% African American, 55% American Indian/Alaskan new cases: racial/ethnic differences were not significant in adjusted model. Beneficiaries without neurology care, in deductible drug benefit phase, or in high poverty areas were less likely to have QUIET-9 concordant care.

CONCLUSIONS

EI-AED use is high, and concordance with recommendations low, among all racial/ethnic groups of older adults with epilepsy. Potential socioeconomic disparities and drug coverage plans may affect treatment quality and opportunities to live well with epilepsy.

Racial differences in Emergency Department visits for seizures

PURPOSE

Seizures are a common reason for visiting the Emergency Department (ED). There is a growing body of literature highlighting disparities in seizure care related to race and ethnicity. Our goal was to identify racial and clinical characteristics of patients presenting to the ED with seizures and to determine factors associated with repeat ED visits for seizure.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study evaluating patients presenting with seizure as the primary reason for their ED visit between 01/01/2008 and 12/31/2008. Clinical data were collected from the electronic medical record (EMR) and compared between black and white patients and between patients with single and repeat ED seizure visits. Statistically significant variables were introduced in a logistic regression analysis with repeat ED visits as outcome.

RESULTS

Of 38, 879 ED visits, 559 recorded 'seizure' as the primary reason for the visit. Compared to white patients (N=266), black patients (N=102) were more likely to have non-private insurance (p=0.005), less likely to have evidence of regular ambulatory care (p=0.02) and were more likely to have multiple visits within the calendar year (p=0.005). Black patient visits were more likely to have missed or ran out of antiepileptic drugs (AED) as the precipitant for their ED visit (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Clinical factors differed between black and white patients presenting to the ED for seizure care. Black patients were more likely to have multiple seizure visits to the ED when compared to white patients. This may suggest a disparity in access to care related to race between these two groups.

Recognizing and preventing epilepsy-related mortality: A call for action

Epilepsy is associated with a high rate of premature mortality from direct and indirect effects of seizures, epilepsy, and antiseizure therapies. Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is the second leading neurologic cause of total lost potential life-years after stroke, yet SUDEP may account for less than half of all epilepsy-related deaths. Some epilepsy groups are especially vulnerable: individuals from low socioeconomic status groups and those with comorbid psychiatric illness die more often than controls. Despite clear evidence of an important public health problem, efforts to assess and prevent epilepsy-related deaths remain inadequate. We discuss factors contributing to the underestimation of SUDEP and other epilepsy-related causes of death. We suggest the need for a systematic classification of deaths directly due to epilepsy (e.g., SUDEP, drowning), due to acute symptomatic seizures, and indirectly due to epilepsy (e.g., suicide, chronic effects of antiseizure medications). Accurately estimating the frequency of epilepsy-related mortality is essential to support the development and assessment of preventive interventions. We propose that educational interventions and public health campaigns targeting medication adherence, psychiatric comorbidity, and other modifiable risk factors may reduce epilepsy-related mortality. Educational campaigns regarding sudden infant death syndrome and fires, which kill far fewer Americans than epilepsy, have been widely implemented. We have done too little to prevent epilepsy-related deaths. Everyone with epilepsy and everyone who treats people with epilepsy need to know that controlling seizures will save lives.

National trends and complication rates for invasive extraoperative electrocorticography in the USA

Invasive electrocorticography (ECoG) is used in patients when it is difficult to localize epileptogenic foci for potential surgical resection. As MR neuroimaging has improved over the past decade, we hypothesized the utilization of ECoG diminishing over time. Using the USA Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we collected demographic and complication data on patients receiving ECoG over the years 1988-2008 and compared this to patients with medically refractory epilepsy during the same time period. A total of 695 cases using extraoperative ECoG were identified, corresponding to 3528 cases nationwide and accounting for 1.1% of patients with refractory epilepsy from 1988-2008. African Americans were less likely to receive ECoG than whites, as were patients with government insurance in comparison to those with private insurance. Large, urban, and academic hospitals were significantly more likely to perform ECoG than smaller, rural, and private practice institutions. The most frequent complication was cerebrospinal fluid leak (11.7%) and only one death was reported from the entire cohort, corresponding to an estimated six patients nationally. Invasive ECoG is a relatively safe procedure offered to a growing number of patients with refractory epilepsy each year. However, these data suggest the presence of demographic disparities in those patients receiving ECoG, possibly reflecting barriers due to race and socioeconomic status. Among patients with nonlocalized seizures, ECoG often represents their only hope for surgical treatment. We therefore must further examine the indications and efficacy of ECoG, and more work must be done to understand if and why ECoG is preferentially performed in select socioeconomic groups.

"A journey around the world": Parent narratives of the journey to pediatric resective epilepsy surgery and beyond

OBJECTIVE

Although shorter time to pediatric resective epilepsy surgery is strongly associated with greater disease severity, other nonclinical diagnostic and sociodemographic factors also play a role. We aimed to examine parent-reported barriers to timely receipt of pediatric epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

We conducted 37 interviews of parents of children who previously had resective epilepsy surgery at University of California Los Angeles (UCLA; 2006-2011). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and systematically coded using thematic analysis by two independent coders, and subsequently checked for agreement. Clinical data, including "time to surgery" (age of epilepsy onset to surgery) were abstracted from medical records.

RESULTS

The mean time to surgery was 5.3 years (standard deviation [SD] 3.8); surgery types included 32% hemispherectomy, 43% lobar/focal, and 24% multilobar. At surgery, parents were on average 38.4 years (SD 6.6) and children were on average 8.2 years (SD 4.7). The more arduous and longer aspect of the journey to surgery was perceived by parents to be experienced prior to presurgical referral. The time from second antiepileptic drug failure to presurgical referral was ≥ 1 year in 64% of children. Thematic analysis revealed four themes (with subthemes) along the journey to surgery and beyond: (1) recognition--"something is wrong" (unfamiliarity with epilepsy, identification of medical emergency); (2) searching and finding--"a circuitous journey" (information seeking, finding the right doctors, multiple medications, insurance obstacles, parental stress); (3) surgery is a viable option--"the right spot" (surgery as last resort, surgery as best option, hoping for candidacy); and (4) life now--"we took the steps we needed to" (a new life, giving back).

SIGNIFICANCE

Multipronged interventions targeting parent-, provider-, and system-based barriers should focus on the critical presurgical referral period; such interventions are needed to remediate delays and improve access to subspecialty care for children with medically refractory epilepsy and potentially eligible for surgery.

Increasing utilization of pediatric epilepsy surgery in the United States between 1997 and 2009

OBJECTIVE

To examine national trends of pediatric epilepsy surgery usage in the United States between 1997 and 2009.

METHODS

We performed a serial cross-sectional study of pediatric epilepsy surgery using triennial data from the Kids' Inpatient Database from 1997 to 2009. The rates of epilepsy surgery for lobectomies, partial lobectomies, and hemispherectomies in each study year were calculated based on the number of prevalent epilepsy cases in the corresponding year. The age-race-sex adjusted rates of surgeries were also estimated. Mann-Kendall trend test was used to test for changes in the rates of surgeries over time. Multivariable regression analysis was also performed to estimate the effect of time, age, race, and sex on the annual incidence of epilepsy surgery.

RESULTS

The rates of pediatric epilepsy surgery increased significantly from 0.85 epilepsy surgeries per 1,000 children with epilepsy in 1997 to 1.44 epilepsy surgeries per 1,000 children with epilepsy in 2009. An increment in the rates of epilepsy surgeries was noted across all age groups, in boys and girls, all races, and all payer types. The rate of increase was lowest in blacks and in children with public insurance. The overall number of surgical cases for each study year was lower than 35% of children who were expected to have surgery, based on the estimates from the Connecticut Study of Epilepsy.

SIGNIFICANCE

In contrast to adults, pediatric epilepsy surgery numbers have increased significantly in the past decade. However, epilepsy surgery remains an underutilized treatment for children with epilepsy. In addition, black children and those with public insurance continue to face disparities in the receipt of epilepsy surgery.

Social determinants of health in epilepsy

Social factors have been identified as key drivers of epilepsy care, outcomes, and disparities, but there is a limited understanding of what these factors are and how they translate into disparities. This targeted review provides an overview of the social determinants of health framework and applies this perspective to the literature about social and psychosocial factors in epilepsy; a social determinants of health--epilepsy model is proposed. The key social determinants of health in epilepsy include socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, age, and gender. For example, low socioeconomic status and minority status have been associated with a higher risk of epilepsy, more hospitalizations and emergency room visits (versus neurology services), antiepileptic drug nonadherence, and a lower rate of epilepsy surgery. Such differences in care/treatment and outcomes translate into health disparities, many of which are considered unjust (inequitable) and modifiable through social action. Other social determinants of health include structural and sociocultural contextual conditions (e.g., health economy, policy, and social stigma/discrimination) and mediating mechanisms including material (e.g., housing), behavioral/biological (e.g., adherence), psychosocial (e.g., perceived stigma), and health system (e.g., access) factors. There are complex relationships among social determinants of health in epilepsy, which remain poorly understood and hamper efforts to address and eliminate disparities in epilepsy care and outcomes. Further empirical work grounded in sound theory and robust methodologies is needed to identify points of intervention and design effective and socially acceptable solutions to any pervasive disparities in epilepsy.

Priorities in pediatric epilepsy research: improving children's futures today

The Priorities in Pediatric Epilepsy Research workshop was held in the spirit of patient-centered and patient-driven mandates for developing best practices in care, particularly for epilepsy beginning under age 3 years. The workshop brought together parents, representatives of voluntary advocacy organizations, physicians, allied health professionals, researchers, and administrators to identify priority areas for pediatric epilepsy care and research including implementation and testing of interventions designed to improve care processes and outcomes. Priorities highlighted were 1) patient outcomes, especially seizure control but also behavioral, academic, and social functioning; 2) early and accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment; 3) role and involvement of parents (communication and shared decision-making); and 4) integration of school and community organizations with epilepsy care delivery. Key factors influencing pediatric epilepsy care included the child's impairments and seizure presentation, parents, providers, the health care system, and community systems. Care was represented as a sequential process from initial onset of seizures to referral for comprehensive evaluation when needed. We considered an alternative model in which comprehensive care would be utilized from onset, proactively, rather than reactively after pharmacoresistance became obvious. Barriers, including limited levels of evidence about many aspects of diagnosis and management, access to care--particularly epilepsy specialty and behavioral health care--and implementation, were identified. Progress hinges on coordinated research efforts that systematically address gaps in knowledge and overcoming barriers to access and implementation. The stakes are considerable, and the potential benefits for reduced burden of refractory epilepsy and lifelong disabilities may be enormous.

Distinguishing language and race disparities in epilepsy surgery

This study aimed to identify whether race/ethnicity and limited English proficiency impact the likelihood of pursuing surgical treatment for medically refractory epilepsy. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 213 patients with medically refractory epilepsy and mesial temporal sclerosis who were being considered for temporal lobectomy between January 1, 1993 and December 31, 2010 with follow-up through December 31, 2012. Demographic and clinical factors potentially associated with surgical utilization, including self-reported race/ethnicity and preferred language, were gathered from the medical record. Patients of Asian/Pacific Islander or African American race were significantly less likely to pursue surgical treatment of epilepsy compared with non-Hispanic whites in a multivariate logistic regression model (adjusted for nonconcordant ictal EEG, age, and limited English proficiency) (OR 0.20, p=0.003; OR 0.15, p=0.001, respectively). Limited English proficiency was also significantly associated with lower odds of surgery (OR 0.38, p=0.034). Both race and limited English proficiency contribute to disparities in the surgical management of medically refractory epilepsy, especially among Asian/Pacific Islanders and African Americans. Culturally sensitive patient-physician communication and patient education materials might aid in surgical decision-making among minority groups.

Patient perceptions and barriers to epilepsy surgery: evaluation in a large health region

PURPOSE

Despite evidence that carefully selected patients with refractory focal epilepsy benefit from epilepsy surgery, significant delays remain. We examined patient knowledge and perceptions regarding epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

A 5-minute questionnaire was administered to consecutive adults with focal epilepsy seen in the epilepsy clinic in a large Canadian health region. Survey items assessed the following: (1) knowledge of surgical options, (2) perceptions about the risks of surgery vs. ongoing seizures, (3) disease disability, (4) treatment goals, and (5) demographic and socioeconomic variables. Patient responses were compiled to calculate a "Barriers to Epilepsy Surgery Composite" (BESC) score.

RESULTS

Of 129 eligible patients, 107 completed the questionnaire (response rate: 83%). The average BESC score was 60/100. Apprehension about epilepsy surgery was less likely among patients who had previously undergone epilepsy surgery and those born in Canada.

DISCUSSION

People with epilepsy often have hindering perceptions that can contribute to delays in surgical care.

Evaluating racial/ethnic variations in outpatient epilepsy care

This study evaluated the quality of epilepsy care in an ambulatory population of a major medical center and determined if there were any racial/ethnic variations. The well-established 'Quality Indicators in Epilepsy Treatment (QUIET)' study dataset was used. Medical record, phone interview, and mail-out survey data of 311 patients with epilepsy were linked and analyzed. Evaluation of care from provider and patient perspectives was performed. Overall, the patients with epilepsy received 40.9% of QI recommended care. The black patients were more likely to receive 50% or more QI recommended care compared with non-Hispanic whites (odds ratio [OR]=2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-4.27). Black patients scored significantly worse than non-Hispanic whites for two patient-reported measures--perceived racial/ethnic disparities (OR=3.14, 95% CI 1.15-8.53) and difficulties getting follow-up appointments (OR=3.37, 95% CI 1.55-7.32). The results indicate the need to evaluate both provider- and patient-centered measures in quality-of-care studies in disparities research.

Time to pediatric epilepsy surgery is related to disease severity and nonclinical factors

OBJECTIVE

To identify clinical and nonclinical factors associated with time from epilepsy onset to surgical evaluation and treatment among a cohort of children having epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

Data were abstracted from records of 430 children (younger than 18 years) who had epilepsy neurosurgery at the University of California, Los Angeles from 1986 to 2010. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze unique associations of clinical severity, pre-referral brain MRI, and sociodemographic characteristics with time to surgery.

RESULTS

Shorter time to surgery was associated with active (hazard ratio [HR] 5.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.74-8.70) and successfully treated infantile spasms (HR 2.20, 95% CI 1.63-2.96); daily or more seizures (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.58-2.76); MRI before referral regardless of imaging findings (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.47-2.58); private insurance (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.14-2.09); and Hispanic ethnicity (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.01-1.87). There were race/ethnicity by insurance interactions (log-rank p = 0.049) with shortest time to surgery for Hispanic children with private insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

Shorter intervals to surgical treatment were associated with greater epilepsy severity and insurance type, consistent with existing literature. However, associations of shorter times to treatment with having a brain MRI before referral and Hispanic ethnicity were unexpected and warrant further investigation. More knowledgeable referring providers and parents with greater help-seeking capability may explain obtaining an MRI before referral. Shorter intervals to surgery among Hispanic children may relate to the same factors yielding an increased volume of Hispanic children receiving surgery at the University of California, Los Angeles since 2000.

Temporal trends in pre-surgical evaluations and epilepsy surgery in the U.S. from 1998 to 2009

OBJECTIVE

To analyze trends in utilization of pre-surgical evaluations including video-EEG (VEEG) monitoring, intracranial EEG (IEEG) monitoring, and epilepsy surgery from 1998 to 2009 in the U.S.

METHODS

Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample were used to identify admissions for pre-surgical evaluations and surgery. Surgical treatment of epilepsy was identified by the presence of primary ICD-9-CM procedure codes 01.52 (hemispherectomy), 01.53 (lobectomy), or 01.59 (other excision of the brain, including amygdalohippocampectomy). We calculated annual rates of pre-surgical evaluations and surgery based on published estimates of prevalence of epilepsy in the U.S. In addition, we examined variations by region and hospital characteristics, and conducted multivariable analysis to detect temporal trends, adjusting for changes in the population. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted using different algorithms to identify the study population and outcomes.

RESULTS

We detected an increase in the rate of hospitalizations related to intractable epilepsy. Similarly, we noted a significant increase in hospitalizations for VEEG monitoring, but not in IEEG monitoring or in surgery. Multivariable analysis and sensitivity analysis confirmed these results. In addition, there was a significant increase in the proportion of pre-surgical evaluations and surgery performed in non-teaching hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the increase in VEEG monitoring, the availability of guideline and evidences demonstrating benefits of epilepsy surgery was not associated with a greater employment of surgery over time. Nevertheless, access to pre-surgical evaluations and epilepsy surgery is no longer limited to large medical centers.

Differences in treatments and outcomes for idiopathic scoliosis patients treated in the United States from 1998 to 2007: impact of socioeconomic variables and ethnicity

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Scoliosis is a significant cause of disability and health-care resource utilization in the United States.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to evaluate potential disparities in the selection of treatments and outcomes for idiopathic scoliosis patients on a national level. To date, only one study has examined inpatient complications, discharge disposition, and mortality with respect to scoliosis treatment on a national scale.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective review of cases having a primary diagnosis of idiopathic scoliosis using the nationwide inpatient sample (NIS) administrative data from 1998 to 2007.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The NIS data were queried to identify patients with a primary diagnosis of idiopathic scoliosis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] diagnosis code: 737.30) admitted routinely. Surgically treated patients were identified as those patients who underwent a spinal fusion (ICD-9-Clinical Modification code: 81.08) as a principal procedure.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Rates of surgical versus nonsurgical treatments were measured as were inhospital complications and mortality rates.

METHODS

No external funding was received for this work. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated race, sex, socioeconomic factors, and hospital characteristics as predictors of surgical versus nonsurgical treatments, as well as inhospital complications and mortality rates.

RESULTS

The study analyzed 9,077 surgically and 1,098 nonsurgically treated patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Univariate analysis showed both patient- and hospital-level variables as strongly associated with surgical versus nonsurgical treatments and outcomes. Multivariate analysis revealed that Caucasians and private insurance patients were more likely to undergo surgical treatment (p<.05) even when controlling for comorbidities. Additionally, Caucasians had a reduced risk of nonroutine discharge compared with non-Caucasians (p=.03). Large hospitals had higher surgery rates (p=.08) than small- or medium-sized facilities and a lower risk of mortality (p=.04). Caucasians (65.1%) were more commonly admitted to large teaching hospitals than African American (59.8%) or Hispanic (41.8%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences were found in the selection of surgical versus nonsurgical treatments, as well as inhospital morbidity for hospitalized idiopathic scoliosis patients based on ethnic and socioeconomic variables. This may in part be because of differences in access to the resources of large teaching hospitals for different ethnic and socioeconomic groups or variability in severity of scoliosis among these groups that was not captured in this database.

Epilepsy across the spectrum: promoting health and understanding. A summary of the Institute of Medicine report

Approximately 1 in 26 people will develop epilepsy at some point in their lives. Although epilepsy is one of the nation's most common neurological disorders, public understanding is limited. A complex spectrum of disorders, epilepsy affects an estimated 2.2 million people in the United States. Living with epilepsy is about more than just seizures; it is often defined in practical terms, such as challenges, uncertainties, and limitations in school, social situations, employment, driving, and independent living. People with epilepsy are also faced with health and community services that are fragmented, uncoordinated, and difficult to obtain. The Institute of Medicine's report (2012) [1], Epilepsy across the spectrum: promoting health and understanding, examines the public health dimensions of epilepsy with a focus on (a) public health surveillance and data collection and integration; (b) population and public health research; (c) health policy, health care, and human services; and (d) education for providers, people with epilepsy and their families, and the public. The report's recommendations range from the expansion of collaborative epilepsy surveillance efforts to the independent accreditation of epilepsy centers, to the coordination of public awareness efforts, and to the engagement of people with epilepsy and their families in education, dissemination, and advocacy activities. Given the current gaps in epilepsy knowledge, care, and education, there is an urgent need to take action-across multiple dimensions-to improve the lives of people with epilepsy and their families. The realistic, feasible, and action-oriented recommendations in this report can help enable short- and long-term improvements for people with epilepsy.

Epilepsy surgery utilization: who, when, where, and why?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Using the most recent evidence, we provide an update on epilepsy surgery, focusing on its effectiveness, reasons for underutilization, considerations of candidacy and timing for referral for epilepsy surgery evaluation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The course of illness of epilepsy is being characterized. Well conducted studies describe the patterns of seizure remission and relapse with medical therapy and also in response to epilepsy surgery. Epilepsy surgery is highly effective in selected patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The risk-benefit of epilepsy surgery is well known and consistent around the world. However, epilepsy surgery remains underutilized. A randomized controlled trial and Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) supporting epilepsy surgery have had no discernible impact on referral rates for epilepsy surgery evaluation. Criteria and guidelines are being developed for identifying patients who need to be referred for epilepsy surgery evaluation. Quality indicators for epilepsy care now also include the need to consider surgical candidacy every 3 years in DRE. New developments in imaging and neurophysiology promise to help clinicians identify and treat patients more accurately.

SUMMARY

Surgery is effective but underused. Comprehensive interventions to translate evidence to practice in epilepsy surgery are urgently needed.

Health disparities in medication adherence between African-Americans and Caucasians with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to determine whether racial disparities exist with respect to adherence to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with epilepsy.

METHOD

We reviewed the pharmacy and clinical records of 108 patients with epilepsy who were part of the indigent care program at Shands-Jacksonville. We determined the medication possession ratio (MPR) for each patient and obtained other demographic and clinical variables. Using univariate analysis we determined which variables were associated with the MPR and used multiple linear regression to determine those that best predicted the MPR.

RESULTS

Compared with Caucasians, African-Americans had poorer (lower) MPRs (0.872 for Caucasians vs 0.796 for African-Americans, P=0.02). Age, gender, high school education, epilepsy classification, seizure freedom, number of AEDs, AED copayment scheme, and number of refills were not significantly affected by race. On stepwise multiple linear regression, race alone best predicted the MPR.

CONCLUSION

Compared with Caucasians, African-Americans have significantly poorer AED adherence, as measured by the MPR.

Standards for epidemiologic studies and surveillance of epilepsy

Worldwide, about 65 million people are estimated to have epilepsy. Epidemiologic studies are necessary to define the full public health burden of epilepsy; to set public health and health care priorities; to provide information needed for prevention, early detection, and treatment; to identify education and service needs; and to promote effective health care and support programs for people with epilepsy. However, different definitions and epidemiologic methods complicate the tasks of these studies and their interpretations and comparisons. The purpose of this document is to promote consistency in definitions and methods in an effort to enhance future population-based epidemiologic studies, facilitate comparison between populations, and encourage the collection of data useful for the promotion of public health. We discuss: (1) conceptual and operational definitions of epilepsy, (2) data resources and recommended data elements, and (3) methods and analyses appropriate for epidemiologic studies or the surveillance of epilepsy. Variations in these are considered, taking into account differing resource availability and needs among countries and differing purposes among studies.