Aspirin resistance is associated with increased stroke severity and infarct volume

Analysis of Platelet Function Testing in Children Receiving Aspirin for Antiplatelet Effects

Aspirin (ASA) remains the most common antiplatelet agent used in children. VerifyNow Aspirin Test® (VN) assesses platelet response to ASA, with therapeutic effect defined by the manufacturer as ≤ 549 aspirin reaction units (ARU). Single-center, observational, analysis of 195 children (< 18 years-old) who underwent first VN between 2015 and 2020. Primary outcome was proportion of patients with ASA biochemical resistance (> 549 ARU). Secondary outcomes included incidence of new clinical thrombotic and bleeding events during ≤ 6 months from VN in those who received ASA monotherapy (n = 113). Median age was 1.8 years. Common indications for ASA included cardiac anomalies or dysfunction (74.8%) and ischemic stroke (22.6%). Median ASA dose before VN was 4.6 mg/kg/day. Mean VN was 471 ARU. ASA biochemical resistance was detected in 14.4% (n = 28). Of 113 patients receiving ASA monotherapy, 14 (12.4%) had a thrombotic event and 2 (1.8%) had a bleeding event. Mean VN was significantly higher at initial testing in patients experiencing thrombotic event compared to those without thrombosis (516 vs 465 ARU, [95% CI: 9.8, 92.2], p = 0.02). Multivariable analysis identified initial VN ASA result ≥ 500 ARU at initial testing as the only significant independent risk factor for thrombosis (p < 0.01). VN testing identifies ASA biochemical resistance in 14.4% of children. VN ASA ≥ 500 ARU rather than ≥ 550 ARU at initial testing was independently associated with increased odds of thrombosis. Designated cut-off of 550 ARU for detecting platelet dysfunction by ASA may need reconsideration in children.

Analysis and Regulatory Mechanisms of Platelet-Related Genes in Patients with Ischemic Stroke

It was found that ischemic stroke (IS) was associated with abnormal platelet activity and thrombosis. However, the potential significance of platelet-related genes (PRGs) in IS still needs to be more thorough. This study extracted IS-related transcriptome datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The target genes were obtained by intersecting the differentially expressed genes (DEGs), the module genes related to IS, and PRGs, where the key genes of IS were screened by two machine learning algorithms. The key genes-based diagnostic model was constructed. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and the immune microenvironment analyses were analyzed targeting key genes in IS. The co-expression, TF-mRNA, and competitive endogenous RNAs (ceRNA) regulatory networks were constructed to reveal the potential regulation of key genes. Potential drugs targeting key genes were predicted as well. Totals of eight target genes were obtained and were associated with immune-related functions. Four platelet-related key genes were acquired, which were related to immunity and energy metabolism. The abnormal expressions of DOCK8, GIMAP5, ICOS were determined by the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), and the significant correlations among these key genes were identified. Notably, hsa-miR-17-3p, hsa-miR-3158-3p, hsa-miR-423-3p, and hsa-miR-193a-8p could regulate all key genes at the same time. In addition, Caffeine, Carboplatin, and Vopratelimab were the targeted drugs of these key genes. This study identified four platelet-related key genes of IS, which might help to deepen the understanding of the role of platelet-related genes in the molecular mechanism of IS.

Genetic Association Study and Machine Learning to Investigate Differences in Platelet Reactivity in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated with Aspirin

Aspirin resistance (AR) is a pressing problem in current ischemic stroke care. Although the role of genetic variations is widely considered, the data still remain controversial. Our aim was to investigate the contribution of genetic features to laboratory AR measured through platelet aggregation with arachidonic acid (AA) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) in ischemic stroke patients. A total of 461 patients were enrolled. Platelet aggregation was measured via light transmission aggregometry. Eighteen single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in ITGB3, GPIBA, TBXA2R, ITGA2, PLA2G7, HMOX1, PTGS1, PTGS2, ADRA2A, ABCB1 and PEAR1 genes and the intergenic 9p21.3 region were determined using low-density biochips. We found an association of rs1330344 in the PTGS1 gene with AR and AA-induced platelet aggregation. Rs4311994 in ADRA2A gene also affected AA-induced aggregation, and rs4523 in the TBXA2R gene and rs12041331 in the PEAR1 gene influenced ADP-induced aggregation. Furthermore, the effect of rs1062535 in the ITGA2 gene on NIHSS dynamics during 10 days of treatment was found. The best machine learning (ML) model for AR based on clinical and genetic factors was characterized by AUC = 0.665 and F1-score = 0.628. In conclusion, the association study showed that PTGS1, ADRA2A, TBXA2R and PEAR1 polymorphisms may affect laboratory AR. However, the ML model demonstrated the predominant influence of clinical features.

Association of PeriOPerative Aspirin-ResisTance and CardioVascular Outcome (POPART- CVO) - a prospective non-interventional cohort study

OBJECTIVES

New onset of aspirin-resistance during surgery, known as perioperative aspirin-resistance, is observed in up to 30% of vascular surgery patients and is associated with post-OP myocardial damage; questioning aspirin effectiveness towards perioperative cardiovascular events. The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate whether perioperative aspirin-resistance in vascular surgery is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcome.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Based on a sample size calculation, 194 adult elective vascular or endovascular surgery patients receiving aspirin were analyzed in this prospective, single-centered, non-interventional cohort study. Platelet function was measured before surgery, one hour after incision, four hours postoperatively, and on the morning of the first and second postoperative days using the Multiplate® analyzer. The primary outcome was Myocardial Injury after Non-Cardiac Surgery (MINS). Secondary outcomes included major bleeding, admission to intensive care unit, length of hospital stay, and Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with different cardiovascular risk and for patients who underwent endovascular surgery.

RESULTS

Perioperative aspirin-resistance was observed in 27.8% of patients but was not associated with MINS (27.8% vs. 32.1%, aspirin-resistance vs. no aspirin-resistance, OR 0.812, 95% CI [0.406;1.624], p=.555) or with any of the secondary endpoints (all p>.05). In nine of the ten subgroup analyses, aspirin-resistance was not associated with a difference in MINS rate. However, in patients with a low cardiovascular risk profile (RCRI 0-2), MINS occurred more frequently in patients without aspirin-resistance (p=.049).

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed previous reports demonstrating that perioperative aspirin-resistance is frequent in patients undergoing vascular or endovascular surgery. However, in patients who continue aspirin throughout the perioperative period, aspirin-resistance is a phenomenon, that does not appear to be related to MINS. Measuring perioperative platelet function using the Multiplate® analyzer with the intention to identify and potentially prevent or treat perioperative aspirin-resistance seems to be dispensable.

Effects of Momordica charantia exosomes on platelet activation, adhesion, and aggregation

The platelets play a crucial role in the progression of multiple medical conditions, such as stroke and tumor metastasis, where antiplatelet therapy may be a boon for treating these diseases. In this study, we have attempted to study the effects of extracted Momordica charantia exosomes (MCEs) on platelet activation, adhesion, and aggregation. Adult platelets isolated from healthy individuals were dose-dependently treated with MCEs (0.1, 40, and 200 μg/ml). We performed flow cytometry to detect the expression of platelet activation protein marker-activated GP IIb/IIIa (PAC-1) and P-selectin (CD62P). Platelet adhesion was analyzed through fluorescence labeling assays. The effect of MCEs on platelet-mediated cell migration of HCT116 cells was observed by transwell. Furthermore, the MCAO model of Sprague-Dawley rats was used to observe the effect of MCEs (200, 400, and 800 μg/kg) on platelet aggregation and maximum thrombotic agglutination in vivo. The results showed that 200 μg/ml MCEs exerted the most pronounced effect on platelet activation, adhesion, and aggregation. Experiments on animals showed that MCEs significantly inhibited platelet aggregation and attenuated the maximum thrombus agglutination. We concluded that MCEs inhibited platelet activation, adhesion, aggregation, and platelet-mediated migration of HCT116 cells, indicating the potential role MCEs may play in the treatment of stroke and tumor metastasis.

High on-treatment platelet reactivity is associated with poor outcomes after ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) determined by platelet function assays is present in certain patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). However, it is unclear whether HTPR is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Our study aimed to investigate the relationship of HTPR with recurrent vascular events in ischemic stroke or TIA.

METHODS

Pubmed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies from inception to January 1, 2022. Stata 17.0 software was used to calculate the risk ratio (RR). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the source of heterogeneity. A random-effects model was used when heterogeneity was present. Primary endpoint of the meta-analysis was the risk ratio of recurrent vascular events in HTPR Patients. While stroke and TIA, all-cause death, early neurological deterioration, early new ischemic lesions, and stroke severity measured by National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at admission were also pooled.

RESULTS

Thirty articles (7995 patients) were eligible including 28 cohort studies and 2 prospective case-control studies. The prevalence of HTPR varied from 5.9% to 60%. HTPR was associated with an increased risk of recurrent vascular events (RR = 2.94, 95% CI 2.04-4.23), stroke recurrence (RR = 2.05; 95% CI 1.43-2.95), and all-cause mortality (RR = 2.43; 95% CI 1.83-3.22). Subgroup analysis showed that HTPR determined by optical aggregometry, Verify-Now system and 11dh TXB2 is related to a higher risk of recurrent vascular events (RR = 3.53, 95% CI 1.51-9.40; RR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.02-4.56; RR = 3.76, 95% CI 1.51-9.40, respectively). Moreover, patients with HTPR had an increased incidence of early neurological deterioration (RR = 2.75; 95% CI 1.76-4.30) and higher NIHSS scores at admission (Mean difference 0.19, 95% CI 0.01-0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrates HTPR is associated with higher risk of recurrent vascular events, early neurological deterioration and increased severity in patients with ischemic stroke and TIA. HTPR measured by platelet function assays may guide the use of antiplatelet agents in ischemic stroke and TIA.

Management of stroke in patients on antithrombotic therapy: Practical issues in the era of direct oral anticoagulants

Antithrombotic drugs (ADs) are the mainstay of secondary prevention of thrombotic vascular diseases. Management of patients under long-term treatment with ADs admitted for acute cerebrovascular disease, either ischemic stroke (IS) or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), has become a frequent situation that might influence decision-making processes from diagnosis to therapeutic strategies. The aim of this review is to summarize current data from the literature to help clinicians in their decisions for stroke care in patients taking ADs. While a large body of data have made it possible to codify the management of patients presenting IS or ICH under antiplatelet drugs and vitamin K antagonists, the increasing use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAs) and future development of new antiplatelet drugs raise new problems. Development of rapid assessment tools measuring specific biological activity and reversion agents dedicated to each class of DOAs should make it possible to optimize individual therapeutic strategies. This review highlights the main steps of IS and ICH management from early identification of ADs, and use of dedicated biological assays, to the stepwise strategy to apply revascularization or reversal therapies and finally the resumption of ADs with a focus on individual clinical and radiological characteristics for more personalized care.

High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity as Predictor of Long-term Clinical Outcomes in Stroke Patients with Antiplatelet Agents

The purpose was to explore the value of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in predicting long-term clinical outcomes for stroke patients. The platelet reactivity was assayed after being treated with either 75 mg clopidogrel or 100 mg aspirin daily with VerifyNow System in stroke patients. HTPR for clopidogrel was defined as PRU ≥ 208, and that for aspirin was defined as ARU ≥ 550. CYP2C19 genotyping was performed using the Sequenom MassARRAY iPLEX platform. The primary endpoint was a composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, or ischemic vascular death. The safety endpoint was bleeding. In the clopidogrel group, among 345 patients recruited, 174 of them were categorized as HTPR. A total of 270 patients were followed up for 54 months. There was a significant association between HTPR and the primary endpoint (HR_adj 2.13 [95% CI, 1.43-3.15], p < 0.001). Among the 314 participants genotyped for CYP2C19, 187 (59.6%) were classified as CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele carriers. Patients with at least 1 loss-of-function allele were more likely to present with HTPR (OR_adj 2.61 [95%CI, 1.43-4.77], p = 0.008), and had a higher risk of the primary endpoint (HR_adj 2.05 [95% CI, 1.30, 3.25], p = 0.002). In the aspirin group, among 140 patients recruited, 28 of them were categorized as HTPR. A total of 121 patients were followed up for 30 months. Similarly, there was a significant association between HTPR and the primary endpoint (HR_adj 3.28 [95% CI, 1.52-7.71], p = 0.002). HTPR is an independent risk factor for ischemic events during long-term follow-up in stroke patients. Platelet function testing is helpful to evaluate the effect of antiplatelet therapy for stroke patients.

Impact of Prior Antiplatelet Therapy on Outcomes After Endovascular Therapy for Acute Stroke: Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke Registry Results

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The influence of prior antiplatelet therapy (APT) uses on the outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular therapy is unclear. We compared procedural and clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy in patients on APT or not before stroke onset.

METHODS

We analyzed 2 groups from the ongoing prospective multicenter Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke registry in France: patients on prior APT (APT+) and patients without prior APT (APT-) treated by endovascular therapy, with and without intravenous thrombolysis. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic models including center as random effect were used to compare angiographic (rates of reperfusion at the end of procedure, procedural complications) and clinical (favorable and excellent outcome, 90-day all-cause mortality, and hemorrhagic complications) outcomes according to APT subgroups. Comparisons were adjusted for prespecified confounders (age, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, intravenous thrombolysis, and time from onset to puncture), as well as for meaningful baseline between-group differences.

RESULTS

A total of 2939 patients were analyzed, of whom 877 (29.8%) were on prior APT. Patients with prior APT were older, had more frequent vascular risk factors, cardioembolic stroke mechanism, and prestroke disability. Rates of complete reperfusion (37.9% in the APT- group versus 42.7 % in the APT+ group; aOR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.88-1.34]; P=0.41) and periprocedural complication (16.9% versus 13.3%; aOR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.7-1.2]; P=0.66) did not differ between the two groups. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (aOR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.63-1.37]; P=0.73), 3 months favorable clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2; aOR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.77-1.25]; P=0.89), and mortality (aOR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.72-1.26]; P=0.76) at 90 days did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior APT does not influence angiographic and functional outcomes following endovascular therapy and should not be taken into account for acute revascularization strategies.

Relation of Pre-Stroke Aspirin Use With Cerebral Infarct Volume and Functional Outcomes

Objective

We investigated (1) the associations of pre‐stroke aspirin use with thrombus burden, infarct volume, hemorrhagic transformation, early neurological deterioration (END), and functional outcome, and (2) whether stroke subtypes modify these associations in first‐ever ischemic stroke.

Methods

This multicenter magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐based study included 5,700 consecutive patients with acute first‐ever ischemic stroke, who did not undergo intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy, from May 2011 through February 2014. Propensity score‐based augmented inverse probability weighting was performed to estimate adjusted effects of pre‐stroke aspirin use.

Results

The mean age was 67 years (41% women), and 15.9% (n = 907) were taking aspirin before stroke. Pre‐stroke aspirin use (vs nonuse) was significantly related to a reduced infarct volume (by 30%), particularly in large artery atherosclerosis stroke (by 45%). In cardioembolic stroke, pre‐stroke aspirin use was associated with a ~50% lower incidence of END (adjusted difference = −5.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −8.9 to −1.9). Thus, pre‐stroke aspirin use was associated with ~30% higher likelihood of favorable outcome (3‐month modified Rankin Scale score < 3), particularly in large artery atherosclerosis stroke and cardioembolic stroke (adjusted difference = 7.2%, 95% CI = 1.8 to 12.5 and adjusted difference = 6.4%, 95% CI = 1.7 to 11.1, respectively). Pre‐stroke aspirin use (vs nonuse) was associated with 85% less frequent cerebral thrombus‐related susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) in large artery atherosclerosis stroke (adjusted difference = −1.4%, 95% CI = −2.1 to −0.8, p < 0.001) and was associated with ~40% lower SVS volumes, particularly in cardioembolic stroke (adjusted difference = −0.16 cm³, 95% CI = −0.29 to −0.02, p = 0.03). Moreover, pre‐stroke aspirin use was not significantly associated with hemorrhagic transformation (adjusted difference = −1.1%, p = 0.09).

Interpretation

Pre‐stroke aspirin use associates with improved functional independence in patients with first‐ever ischemic large arterial stroke by reducing infarct volume and/or END, likely by decreasing thrombus burden, without increased risk of hemorrhagic transformation. ANN NEUROL 2021;90:763–776

Unfavorable Changes of Platelet Reactivity on Clopidogrel Therapy Assessed by Impedance Aggregometry Affect a Larger Volume of Acute Ischemic Lesions in Stroke

Background: High on-treatment platelet reactivity or its equivalent—resistance to the antiplatelet agent—significantly reduces the efficacy of the therapy, contributing to a negative impact on stroke course. Previous studies demonstrated that aspirin resistance is associated with a larger size of acute ischemic infarct. Due to the increasing use of clopidogrel in the secondary prevention of stroke, we aimed to assess the impact of clopidogrel resistance on the size and extent of ischemic lesions, both acute and chronic. Methods: This prospective, single-center and observational study involved 74 ischemic stroke subjects, treated with 75 mg of clopidogrel. We used impedance aggregometry to determine platelet reactivity 6–12 h after a dose of clopidogrel as a first assessment and 48 h later as the second measurement. A favorable dynamics of platelet reactivity over time was the decrease in the minimum value equal to the median in the entire study. The volume of acute ischemic infarct was estimated within 48 h after onset in diffusion-weighted imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences of magnetic resonance and the severity of chronic vascular lesions by Fazekas scale. Results: Subjects with mild severity of chronic vascular lesions (Fazekas 1) exhibited a significant decrease of platelet reactivity over time (p = 0.035). Dynamics of platelet reactivity over time differed between subjects with large, moderate, mild and insignificant size of acute ischemic lesion (Kruskall-Wallis H = 3.2576; p = 0.048). In multivariate regression models, we reported unfavorable dynamics of platelet reactivity alone and combined with a high initial value of platelet reactivity as independent predictors of higher risk of a significant ischemic infarct volume (OR 7.16 95%CI 1.69–30.31, p = 0.008 and 26.49 95%CI 1.88–372.4, p = 0.015, respectively). Conclusions: We emphasized that unfavorable dynamics of platelet reactivity over time during clopidogrel therapy in acute phase of stroke affect the volume of acute infarct and the severity of chronic vascular lesions.

Unfavorable Dynamics of Platelet Reactivity during Clopidogrel Treatment Predict Severe Course and Poor Clinical Outcome of Ischemic Stroke

Background: Previous studies have revealed that high platelet reactivity while on clopidogrel may affect the severe course and worse prognosis of ischemic stroke. However, the above findings were based on a single measurement of platelet function. We aimed to investigate whether the dynamics of platelet reactivity over time would more accurately determine its actual impact on clinical outcome. Methods: We enrolled 74 ischemic stroke subjects, taking a dose of 75 mg a day of clopidogrel to this prospective, single-center, and observational study. The determination of platelet function was based on the impedance aggregometry 6–12 h after the first dose of clopidogrel and 48 h later. We defined a favorable dynamics of platelet reactivity as a decrease in values at least equal to the median obtained in the entire study. The clinical condition was assessed by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale on the first, third, and ninetieth days and the functional status by modified Rankin Scale, respectively. Results: A favorable dynamics of platelet reactivity was associated with the mild clinical condition and favorable functional status, both early and late. Early neurological deterioration was related to unfavorable dynamics of platelet reactivity over time. In multivariate regression models, we found that unfavorable dynamics of platelet reactivity, alone and combined with a high baseline value of platelet reactivity, is an independent predictor of a severe clinical condition, the risk of deterioration, and poor early and late prognosis. Conclusion: We highlighted that dynamics of platelet reactivity over time predict the clinical course and prognosis of stroke better than a single value.

Insulin Resistance is Significantly Related with Worse Clinical Outcomes in Non-Diabetic Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated with Intravenous Thrombolysis

OBJECTIVES

to investigate the relationship between insulin resistance (IR) and clinical outcomes in non-diabetic ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis.

METHODS

We recruited non-diabetic ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis prospectively. IR was defined as homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance index ≥2.80. Initial stroke severity was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, and infarct volume was measured using DWI. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by neurological improvement and hemorrhagic transformation at 24 hours, and favorable functional prognosis at 90 days.

RESULTS

232 patients were enrolled into this study. IR group was 67 patients, non-IR group was 165 patients. Compared with the non-IR group, the probability of neurological improvement at 24 h ours and favorable functional outcome at 90 days in IR group were all significantly lower (41.79% vs 63.03%, p<0.01; 73.13% vs 89.09%, p<0.01 respectively), whereas the ratio of hemorrhagic transformation was much higher (16.42% vs 4.85%, p<0.01). In multivariable logistic regression, IR was negatively associated with neurological improvement and favorable functional prognosis (OR=0.39, 95%CI, 0.20-0.76, p<0.01; OR= 0.26, 95%CI, 0.07-0.91, p=0.04, respectively), but was positively correlated with hemorrhagic transformation (OR=4.07, 95%CI, 1.13-14.59, p=0.03) after adjusting traditional risk factors. We analyzed 108 infarct volume data further, the median of volume in IR group was 2.27 cm³, higher than that in non-IR group (1.96 cm³), but no statistical difference (p=0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

In non-diabetic ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis, IR was related with worse clinical outcomes, but not with infarct volume.

Effectiveness of Platelet Function Analysis-Guided Aspirin and/or Clopidogrel Therapy in Preventing Secondary Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Antiplatelet medications such as aspirin and clopidogrel are used following thrombotic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) to prevent a recurrent stroke. However, the antiplatelet treatments fail frequently, and patients experience recurrent stroke. One approach to lower the rates of recurrence may be the individualized antiplatelet therapies (antiplatelet therapy modification (ATM)) based on the results of platelet function analysis (PFA). This review was undertaken to gather and analyze the evidence about the effectiveness of such approaches. Methods: We searched Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to 7 January 2020. Results: Two observational studies involving 1136 patients were included. The overall effects of PFA-based ATM on recurrent strokes (odds ratio (OR) 1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69 to 1.58), any bleeding risk (OR 1.39; 95% CI 0.92 to 2.10) or death hazard from any cause (OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.62 to 2.29) were not significantly different from the standard antiplatelet therapy without ATM. Conclusions: The two studies showed opposite effects of PFA-guided ATM on the recurrent strokes in aspirin non-responders, leading to an insignificant difference in the subgroup meta-analysis (OR 1.59; 95% CI 0.07 to 33.77), while the rates of any bleeding events (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.49 to 2.17) or death from any cause (OR 1.17; 95% CI 0.41 to 3.35) were not significantly different between aspirin non-responders with ATM and those without ATM. There is a need for large, randomized controlled trials which account for potential confounders such as ischemic stroke subtypes, technical variations in the testing protocols, patient adherence to therapy and pharmacogenetic differences.

The Prognostic Value of High Platelet Reactivity in Ischemic Stroke Depends on the Etiology: A Pilot Study

Background: Reduced aspirin response may result in a worse prognosis and a poor clinical outcome in ischemic stroke. The aim of this prospective pilot study was to assess the relationship between platelet reactivity and early and late prognosis, and the clinical and functional status in ischemic stroke, with the role of stroke etiology. Methods: The study involved 69 subjects with ischemic stroke, divided into large and small vessel etiological subgroups. Platelet function testing was performed with two aggregometric methods—impedance and optical—while the clinical condition was assessed using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the functional status was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) on the first and eighth day (early prognosis) and the 90th day of stroke (late prognosis). Results: The initial platelet reactivity was found to be higher in patients with severe neurological deficits on the 90th day after stroke, than in the group with mild neurological deficits (median, respectively, 40 area under the curve (AUC) units vs. 25 AUC units, p = 0.033). In the large vessel disease group, a significant correlation between the platelet reactivity and the functional status on the first day of stroke was found (correlation coefficient (R) = 0.4526; p = 0.0451), the platelet reactivity was higher in the subgroup with a severe clinical condition compared to a mild clinical condition on the first day of stroke (p = 0.0372), and patients resistant to acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) had a significantly greater possibility of a severe neurological deficit on the first day of stroke compared to those who were sensitive to aspirin (odds ratio (OR) = 14.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25–156.12, p = 0.0322). Conclusion: High on-treatment platelet reactivity in ischemic stroke was associated with a worse late prognosis regardless of the etiology. We demonstrated a significant relationship between high platelet reactivity and worse early prognosis and poor clinical and functional condition in the large vessel etiologic subgroup. However, due to the pilot nature of this study, its results should be interpreted with caution and further validation on a larger cohort is required.

High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity Affects the Extent of Ischemic Lesions in Stroke Patients Due to Large-Vessel Disease

Background: Excessive platelet activation and aggregation plays an important role in the pathogenesis of ischemic stroke. Correlation between platelet reactivity and ischemic lesions in the brain shows contradictory results and there are not enough data about the potential role of stroke etiology and its relationships with chronic lesions. The aim of this study is to assess the relationship between platelet reactivity and the extent of ischemic lesions with the particular role of etiopathogenesis. Methods: The study involved 69 patients with ischemic stroke, including 20 patients with large-vessel disease and 49 patients with small-vessel disease. Evaluation of platelet reactivity was performed within 24 h after the onset of stroke using two aggregometric methods (impedance and optical), while ischemic volume measurement in the brain was performed using magnetic resonance imaging (in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences) at day 2–5 after the onset of stroke. Results: In the large-vessel disease subgroup, a correlation was found between platelet reactivity and acute ischemic focus volume (correlation coefficient (R) = 0.6858 and p = 0.0068 for DWI; R = 0.6064 and p = 0.0215 for FLAIR). Aspirin-resistant subjects were significantly more likely to have a large ischemic focus (Odds Ratio (OR) = 45.00, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.49–135.36, p = 0.0285 for DWI; OR = 28.00, 95% CI = 1.35–58.59, p = 0.0312 for FLAIR) than aspirin-sensitive subjects with large-vessel disease. Conclusion: In patients with ischemic stroke due to large-vessel disease, high on-treatment platelet reactivity affects the extent of acute and chronic ischemic lesions.

Factors Influencing Aspirin Hyporesponsiveness in Elderly Chinese Patients

Background

Aspirin hyporesponsiveness increases the risk of ischemic events. Therefore, it is important to investigate the factors influencing aspirin hyporesponsiveness.

Material/Methods

Patients aged 60 years or older who did not take aspirin before enrollment were included, with aspirin 100 mg/day administered after enrollment. The arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation rate (Ara) was measured by light transmission assay to evaluate aspirin responsiveness. Patients with Ara in the upper quartile after taking aspirin were assigned to the aspirin hyporesponsive group (Ara-Q4).

Results

A total of 292 elderly patients were included. The median value of Ara after taking aspirin was 5.87% (interquartile range 3.86–10.04%). Compared with the aspirin non-hyporesponsive group (Ara-Q1-3, Ara ≤10.04%, n=220), the level of uric acid (UA) (341.30 μmol/L vs. 299.10 μmol/L, p=0.027) and the ratios of β-blockers (9.72% vs. 2.27%, p=0.015) and diuretics (6.94% vs. 1.36%, p=0.036) were higher in the aspirin hyporesponsive group (Ara-Q4, Ara >10.04%, n=72). After multivariate adjustment, the results demonstrated baseline Ara (odds ratio [OR]: 1.030, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.004–1.056, p=0.021), UA level (OR: 1.003, 95% CI: 1.000–1.006, p=0.038), and β-blockers use (OR: 5.487, 95% CI: 1.515–19.870, p=0.010) were independently and positively associated with aspirin hyporesponsiveness.

Conclusions

This study found that baseline Ara, UA level, and β-blockers use were independently and positively associated with aspirin hyporesponsiveness in elderly Chinese patients, which needs to be validated in large-scale studies.

A Grading Scale for Pial Collaterals in Middle Cerebral Artery Total Occlusion Based on Time-of-flight MR Angiography Source Images

PURPOSE

To verify whether a new grading based on time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography source images (TOF-MRAsi) can reflect the abundance of pial collaterals, in patients with total occlusion of M1 segment of middle cerebral artery in the chronic stage.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, consecutive patients with total occlusion of M1 segment of middle cerebral artery, with both magnetic resonances angiography and digital subtraction angiography image were included. Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography source images were evaluated in a blinded fashion for pial collaterals (PCs) that were graded on a four-point scale. Good and poor PCs were defined as TOF-MRAsis grade <2 and ≥2, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was done to calculate the area under curve, sensitivity, and specificity.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients were included. The inter-reader agreement for time TOF-MRAsi and digital subtraction angiography images were 0.930 and 0.843, respectively. Compared with digital subtraction angiography grading, the area under curve of pial collateral grading based on TOF-MRAsi was 0.830 (0.636-1.000; P = 0.006). The sensitivity and specificity were 0.700 and 0.933, respectively. The modified Rankin Scale at follow-up was lower in patients with good PCs than in those with poor PCs (0[0, 1] vs. 1[1, 3], P = 0.055), although statistical significance was not reached.

CONCLUSION

The grading scale based on TOF-MRAsi could be a new empirical approach for pial collateral evaluation. The clinical use of the proposed approach for identifying patients with total occlusion of middle cerebral artery with a high risk of poor outcome requires evaluation in further studies.

Association of Aspirin Resistance with Increased Mortality in Ischemic Stroke

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of aspirin resistance (AR) with mortality in a cohort of Chinese patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

METHODS

One hundred and ninety-six ischemic stroke patients who received at least 7 days of aspirin therapy prior to stroke onset were enrolled. The outcome measure was all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality at 1-year follow-up. The relation of AR with the two end points was investigated with the use of logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The median age of included patients was 65(IQR, 56-76) years and 82(41.8%) were female. Thirty-five patients were defined as AR; thus, the rate was 17.9% (95%CI, 12.5% to 23.2%). The median NIHSS score was significantly higher in patients with AR than those with AS [12 (IQR, 10-17) vs. 7 (IQR, 4-10); Z=5.188; P<0.001]. Similarly, the median infarct volume was also significantly higher in AR than in AS [18.8 (IQR, 4.3-25.2) ml vs. 13.2 (IQR, 3.3-18.7) ml; Z=3.322; P=0.008]. During follow-up there were 43 patients (21.9%) died, including 24 CVD mortality (12.2%). In univariate logistic regression analysis, we found that the rate of all-cause mortality and CVD mortality increased by 390% (OR=4.90; 95%CI:2.24-10.75) and 422% (OR=5.22; 95%CI, 2.10-12.98) in AR group. After adjusting for all other significant predictors, AR still associated with high mortality and the rate of all-cause mortality and CVD mortality increased by 215% (OR=3.15; 95%CI:1.88-4.93) and 231% (OR=3.31; 95%CI, 1.96-522), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that AR was a useful prognostic marker of all-cause or CVD mortality in Chinese patients with AIS.

The Impacts of Peptic Ulcer on Functional Outcomes of Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Studies have shown that peptic ulcer increased the risk of ischemic stroke and stroke recurrence. This study aimed to evaluate the impacts of peptic ulcer on functional outcomes of ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Patients with first-ever ischemic stroke were grouped as with and without history of peptic ulcer. Functional outcomes were evaluated with modified Rankin scale at 90 days after the index stroke. Favorable functional outcomes were defined as with a modified Rankin scale score of 0-2. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors for favorable functional outcomes at 90 days.

RESULTS

Among the 2577 enrolled patients with ischemic stroke, 129 (5.0%) had a history of peptic ulcer. The proportion of favorable outcome was higher in patients without peptic ulcer than those with (59.3% versus 42.6%, P < .001). Multivariate logistic analysis detected that history of peptic ulcer (odds ratio [OR] = 2.89, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-8.10, P = .043), National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score (OR = 2.11, 95% CI, 1.79-2.48, P < .001), and large-artery atherosclerosis stroke subtype (OR = 4.08, 95% CI, 1.11-15.03, P = .035) decreased the likelihood of favorable outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Ischemic stroke patients with peptic ulcer may have an increased risk of less favorable neurological outcome at 90 days after the index stroke.

Aspirin resistance predicts unfavorable functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prognostic value of aspirin reaction units (ARU) in a 3-month follow-up study in a cohort of Chinese patients with first-ever ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Prospective single-center survey of acute ischemic stroke patients receiving aspirin therapy. Two hundred and seventy-five Chinese patients with first-ever ischemic stroke who previously received aspirin therapy were enrolled. ARU was measured using the VerifyNow system. A cutoff of 550 ARU was used to determine the presence of aspirin resistance (AR).

RESULTS

Median age at study entry was 67 years (IQR: 59-75) and 142(51.6%) were male. A total of 52 of 275 enrolled patients (18.9%) were AR. Median regression estimated a statistically significant increase in NIHSS score of 0.033 point for every 1-point increase in ARU (95% CI, 0.024 to 0.068; P < 0.001). The unfavorable outcomes distribution across the ARU quartiles ranged between 11.8% (first quartile) to 64.8% (fourth quartile). After adjusting for other established risk factors, in multivariate models comparing the third and fourth quartiles against the first quartile of the ARU, levels of ARU were associated with unfavorable outcome, and the adjusted risk of unfavorable outcome increased by 145% (OR = 2.45 [95% CI 1.46-3.87], P = 0.011) and 317% (4.17[2.76-6.15], P < 0.001), respectively. Similarly, the adjusted risk of mortality increased by 215% (OR = 3.15 [95% CI 1.98-4.73], P = 0.008) and 429% (5.29[4.02-8.17], P < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that AR is a meaningful and independent marker to predict short-term functional outcome in patients with ischemic stroke.

Aspirin Resistance and Stroke

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Aspirin is the most commonly used antiplatelet drug in both primary and secondary prevention of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases. A proportion of patients may have stroke recurrence while they are on treatment with aspirin, giving rise to term aspirin resistance or aspirin failure. Studies have suggested that such recurrence could partly be attributed to biochemical aspirin resistance, with an estimated prevalence ranging between 5% and 65% among patients with ischemic stroke in the published studies. Common methods to evaluate laboratory aspirin resistance include light transmission aggregometry, PFA-100, VerifyNow-Aspirin assay, serum thromboxane B2, and urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B2. Aspirin resistance is multifactorial in origin and involves diverse environmental and genetic factors, including single-nucleotide polymorphisms, miRNAs, drug interactions, and co-morbid risk factors. The current review overviews the concept of aspirin resistance, its evaluation and relationship with stroke recurrence, its outcome, and its implications on stroke management in the future.

Clinical Significance of Acute and Serial Platelet Function Testing in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Background

We sought to investigate the clinical implications of platelet reactivity to aspirin and the variability in the platelet reactivity to aspirin during acute periods for the risk of vascular events in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Methods and Results

This was a single‐center, prospective, observational study. The aspirin reaction unit was blindly measured at the following two times: after 3 hours of aspirin loading and on the fifth day of aspirin administration. High on‐aspirin platelet reactivity (HAPR) was defined as an aspirin reaction unit ≥550 IU. The primary outcome measure was the 1‐year composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death. A total of 805 patients (aged 66±12 years, 61% male) were analyzed in this study. Ninety‐nine of 805 (12.3%) patients and 78 of 558 (14.0%) patients had HAPR at the time of the fifth day of aspirin administration and after 3 hours of aspirin loading measurements, respectively. Patients with HAPR than normal on‐aspirin platelet reactivity at the fifth day of aspirin administration measurement were more likely to have experienced 1‐year vascular event. HAPR at the fifth day of aspirin administration measurement was independently associated with a greater risk of experiencing 1‐year vascular event (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.07–3.19). Moreover, persistently HAPR substantially increased the risk of 1‐year vascular events (hazard ratio, 3.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.23–7.86).

Conclusions

These results suggest that HAPR during the acute stage of ischemic stroke increases the risk of subsequent vascular events and that serial aspirin reaction unit measurements may identify patients with acute ischemic stroke who are at a higher risk for vascular events. Additional studies are warranted to determine the appropriate treatments for patients with acute ischemic stroke with HAPR.

Biochemical aspirin resistance is associated with increased stroke severity and infarct volumes in ischemic stroke patients

To explore the correlation of aspirin resistance (AR) with clinical stroke severity and infarct volume using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in 224 Chinese ischemic stroke patients who were taking aspirin before stroke onset. In those patients, the median age was 64 years (IQR, 56-75 years), and males accounting for 54.9%(123)of the total subjects. Fifty of 224 enrolled patients (22.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 16.9% to 27.7%) showed AR. In the median regression model, significant increase was estimated in NIHSS score of 0.04 point for every 1-point increase in aspirin reaction units (ARU) (95% CI, 0.02 to 0.06; P<0.001). Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI)-measured infarct volume were significantly higher in patients with AR as compared with those with AS [13.21 (interquartile ranges [IQR], 8.51-23.88) vs.4.26 (IQR, 1.74-11.62); P<0.001). Furthermore, a statistically significant increase was also measured in NIHSS score of 0.05 point for every 1-point increase in ARU in the median regression model (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.08; P<0.001). The median DWI infarct volume was significantly larger in the highest ARU quartile when compared to that in the low 3 quartiles (P<0.001). In conclusion, stroke patients with AR indicated higher risk of severe strokes and large infarcts compared to patients in the aspirin-sensitive group.

Validation of aspirin response-related transcripts in patients with coronary artery disease and preliminary investigation on CMTM5 function

Aspirin is widely used in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases, but the antiplatelet responses vary from one patient to another. To validate aspirin response related transcripts and illustrate their roles in predicting cardiovascular events, we have quantified the relative expression of 14 transcripts previously identified as related to high on-aspirin platelet reactivity (HAPR) in 223 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) on regular aspirin treatment. All patients were followed up regularly for cardiovascular events (CVE). The mean age of our enrolled population was 75.80±8.57years. HAPR patients showed no significant differences in terms of co-morbidities and combined drugs. Besides, the relative expression of HLA-DQA1 was significantly lower in low on-aspirin platelet reactivity (LAPR) patients, when compared with HAPR and high normal (HN) group (p=0.028). What's more, the number of arteries involved, HAPR status and the relative expression of CLU, CMTM5 and SPARC were independent risk factors for CVE during follow up (p<0.05). In addition, overexpression of CMTM5 attenuated endothelial cells (ECs) migration and proliferation, with significantly decreased phosphorylated-Akt levels, while its inhibition promoted these processes in vitro (p<0.05).Our study provides evidence that circulating transcripts might be potential biomarkers in predicting cardiovascular events. CMTM5 might exert anti-atherosclerotic effects via suppressing migration and proliferation in the vessel wall. Nevertheless, larger-scale and long-term studies are still needed.