Rituximab as treatment for anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis: Multicenter blinded prospective review

Therapeutic challenges and unmet needs in the management of myasthenia gravis: an Italian expert opinion

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare, autoimmune, neurological disorder. Most MG patients have autoantibodies against acetylcholine receptors (AChRs). Some have autoantibodies against muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) or lipoprotein-receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4), and some are seronegative. Standard of care, which includes anti-cholinesterase drugs, thymectomy, corticosteroids (CS), and off-label use of non-steroidal immunosuppressive drugs (NSISTs), is bounded by potential side effects and limited efficacy in refractory generalized MG (gMG) patients. This highlights the need for new therapeutic approaches for MG. Eculizumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits the complement system, has been recently approved in Italy for refractory gMG. A panel of 11 experts met to discuss unmet therapeutic needs in the acute and chronic phases of the disease, as well as the standard of care for refractory patients. Survival was emphasized as an acute phase outcome. In the chronic phase, persistent remission and early recognition of exacerbations to prevent myasthenic crisis and respiratory failure were considered crucial. Refractory patients require treatments with fast onset of action, improved tolerability, and the ability to slow disease progression and increase life expectancy. The Panel agreed that eculizumab would presumably meet the therapeutic needs of many refractory gMG patients. The panel concluded that the unmet needs of current standard of care treatments for gMG are significant. Evaluating new therapeutic options accurately is essential to find the best balance between efficacy and tolerability for each patient. Collecting real-world data on novel molecules in routine clinical practice is necessary to address unmet needs.

New treatment strategies in Myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune neuromuscular disorder characterized by muscle weakness and fatigue. The disease is primarily caused by antibodies targeting acetylcholine receptors (AChR) and muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) proteins at the neuromuscular junction. Traditional treatments for MG, such as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, corticosteroids, and immunosuppressants, have shown efficacy but are often associated with significant long-term side effects and variable patient response rates. Notably, approximately 15% of patients exhibit inadequate responses to these standard therapies. Recent advancements in molecular therapies, including monoclonal antibodies, B cell-depleting agents, complement inhibitors, Fc receptor antagonists, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell-based therapies, have introduced promising alternatives for MG treatment. These novel therapeutic approaches offer potential improvements in targeting specific immune pathways involved in MG pathogenesis. This review highlights the progress and challenges in developing and implementing these molecular therapies. It discusses their mechanisms, efficacy, and the potential for personalized medicine in managing MG. The integration of new molecular therapies into clinical practice could significantly transform the treatment landscape of MG, offering more effective and tailored therapeutic options for patients who do not respond adequately to traditional treatments. These innovations underscore the importance of ongoing research and clinical trials to optimize therapeutic strategies and improve the quality of life for individuals with MG.

Serological Markers of Clinical Improvement in MuSK Myasthenia Gravis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In this retrospective longitudinal study, we aimed at exploring the role of (a) MuSK-immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels, (b) predominant MuSK-IgG subclasses, and (c) antibody affinity as candidate biomarkers of severity and outcomes in MuSK-MG, using and comparing different antibody testing techniques.

METHODS

Total MuSK-IgGs were quantified with radioimmunoassay (RIA), ELISA, flow cytometry, and cell-based assay (CBA) serial dilutions using HEK293 cells transfected with MuSK-eGFP. MuSK-IgG subclasses were measured by flow cytometry. SAffCon assay was used for determining MuSK-IgG affinity.

RESULTS

Forty-three serum samples were obtained at different time points from 20 patients with MuSK-MG (median age at onset: 48 years, interquartile range = 27.5-72.5; women, 16/20), with 9 of 20 (45%) treated with rituximab. A strong correlation between MuSK-IgG levels measured by flow cytometry and RIA titers was found (rs = 0.74, 95% CI 0.41-0.89, p = 0.0003), as well as a moderate correlation between CBA end-point titers and RIA titers (rs = 0.47, 95% CI 0.01-0.77, p = 0.0414). A significant correlation was found between MuSK-IgG flow cytometry levels and disease severity (rs = 0.39, 95% CI 0.06-0.64, p = 0.0175; mixed-effects model estimate: 2.296e-06, std. error: 1.024e-06, t = 2.243, p = 0.032). In individual patients, clinical improvement was associated with decrease in MuSK-IgG levels, as measured by either flow cytometry or CBA end-point titration. In all samples, MuSK-IgG4 was the most frequent isotype (mean ± SD: 90.95% ± 13.89). A significant reduction of MuSK-IgG4 and, to a lesser extent, of MuSK-IgG2, was seen in patients with favorable clinical outcomes. A similar trend was confirmed in the subgroup of rituximab-treated patients. In a single patient, MuSK-IgG affinity increased during symptom exacerbation (KD values: 62 nM vs 0.6 nM) while total MuSK-IgG and IgG4 levels remained stable, suggesting that affinity maturation may be a driver of clinical worsening.

DISCUSSION

Our data support the quantification of MuSK antibodies by flow cytometry. Through a multimodal investigational approach, we showed that total MuSK-IgG levels, MuSK-IgG4 and MuSK-IgG2 levels, and MuSK-IgG affinity may represent promising biomarkers of disease outcomes in MuSK-MG.

Efgartigimod treatment for generalized myasthenia gravis: a single-center case series of 16 patients

Background

Efgartigimod was approved in Japan in January 2022 for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), regardless of antibody status. This case series describes a real-world experience in Japan of efgartigimod treatment for gMG patients with diverse backgrounds.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 16 Japanese patients (11 females and five males, mean age 40.4 years) with gMG who received efgartigimod at the Kumamoto University Hospital between August 2022 and September 2023. The outcomes were Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) responders (≥ 3 point reduction), IgG levels, and change in prednisolone dose, in the first cycle of efgartigimod.

Results

Fifteen patients completed one cycle of efgartigimod. Of the 14 patients for whom QMG scores were obtained, 10 patients were QMG responders. Four of the five patients with Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America class V were QMG responders. Improvement in QMG after efgartigimod treatment was observed in one patient with myasthenic crisis and in one refractory patient who had unsuccessful eculizumab treatment. The mean reductions from baseline in IgG levels at weeks 1, 2, 3, and follow-up were 38.3, 56.1, 63.1, and 43.9%, respectively. A decrease in prednisolone dose was observed in seven patients. The most common adverse events were headache (three patients) and diarrhea (two patients). One patient discontinued efgartigimod treatment due to a treatment-related adverse event of rash.

Conclusion

Improvements in the outcomes of patients with gMG, including patients with severe gMG, myasthenic crisis, and refractory to anti-complementary therapy, were observed after the first cycle of efgartigimod treatment. Our real-world experience in Japan suggests the future possibilities for the treatment with efgartigimod for gMG with diverse backgrounds.

[Peripheral neuroimmunological diseases - Neuropathological insights and clinical perspectives]

This article deals with peripheral neuroimmunological diseases and briefly outlines the currently most important aspects and treatment developments. Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies have different mechanisms of development, manifestations and prognoses. New classification systems and more specific treatment concepts have been developed. The IIMs include different subgroups. These entities can have specific autoantibodies. Diagnostically, a muscle biopsy is generally desirable for a precise diagnosis and is essential in unclear cases. Primary systemic vasculitides can be divided into different groups based on the predominant pattern of involvement, while secondary vasculitides and single organ vasculitides are also differentiated. Vasculitic myopathy cannot be equated with myositis and a reliable distinction is currently only possible by a muscle biopsy. Treatment concepts should be developed on an interdisciplinary basis. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy is the most frequent immune-mediated neuropathy and is characterized by a predominant demyelination of the motor and sensory nerves. The disease course runs in phases or is progressive and leads to significant disability and reduction in quality of life, despite current standard treatment. Novel treatment approaches are currently undergoing clinical trials. Myasthenia gravis, with the leading symptom of exercise-induced muscle weakness, is caused by autoantibodies against structures of the neuromuscular endplate. Autoantibody testing is the most important pillar in the diagnosis and is now also increasingly guiding treatment decisions. Overall, peripheral neuroimmunological diseases represent a heterogeneous group. Increasing knowledge of the pathophysiology is the key to numerous developments in diagnostics and treatment, which could lead to far-reaching practical changes in the future.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose rituximab in the treatment of myasthenia gravis: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Background

Rituximab (RTX) is a monoclonal antibody that has been increasingly used in the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG). In most studies, the therapeutic protocol of RTX has been similar to that adopted for B cell lymphoma, with an increasing number of studies aimed at exploring the efficacy of low-dose RTX in MG. However, the beneficial effects of low-dose RTX in MG remain a subject of critical debate.

Methods

This study was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. Two reviewers (Xishuai Yang and Bingxia Li) independently conducted searches across multiple databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). A meta-analysis, utilizing representative forest plots, was performed to assess "Improved clinical status" and changes in the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score before and after treatment.

Results

A total of 17 studies involving 292 patients were included in the meta-analysis. A noticeable improvement in clinical status was observed in 91% of patients at the final follow-up after therapy (95% CI: 84-96%, P < 0.001). The QMG score showed a significant reduction following the treatment, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -1.69 (95% CI: -2.21 to -1.16, Z = 6.29, P < 0.001). In the acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive myasthenia gravis (AChR-MG) group, 90% of patients achieved improved clinical status (95% CI: 80-97%, P < 0.001) and the QMG score significantly decreased after low-dose RTX treatment, with an SMD of -1.51 (95% CI: -0.80 to -2.21, Z = 4.50, P < 0.001). In the muscle-specific kinase antibody-positive myasthenia gravis (MuSK-MG) group, 97% of patients achieved improved clinical status (95% CI: 89-100%, P < 0.001). The QMG score also significantly decreased following low-dose RTX treatment, with an SMD of -2.31 (95% CI: -2.99 to -1.62, Z = 6.60, P < 0.001). Adverse effects were reported in 29 out of 207 patients (14%, including infusion reactions in 22 patients (10.1%), infections in three patients (1.45%), cytopenia in two patients (0.96%), eosinophilia in one patient (0.48%), and hemiplegia in one patient (0.48%). Additionally, one patient (0.48%) succumbed to complications from invasive thymoma.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis shows that low-dose RTX is both effective and safe for treating MG.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42024509951.

Clinical and laboratory remission with rituximab in anti-MuSK-positive myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

Increasing data are available on the use and efficacy of rituximab (RTX) in patients with anti-muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK)-positive myasthenia gravis (MG), especially those steroid-dependent or unresponsive to traditional immunotherapies.

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment responses of adult patients with generalized anti-MuSK-positive MG treated with RTX.

METHODS

We retrospectively recruited 16 patients who were on RTX, between January 2010 and September 2023. RTX was given 1000 mg/day intravenously twice, two weeks apart. Maintenance treatment was administered at intervals of 3-6 months based on clinical evaluation. The outcome was assessed by Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) and Myasthenia Gravis Status and Treatment Intensity (MGSTI) scores. Additionally, anti-MuSK antibody levels were retested after treatment in all patients except one.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were female. The mean age at disease onset was 35.3 ± 17.3 years. The median duration between disease onset and RTX administration was 2.4 years (min-max: 0.5-36.5 years). The worst MGFA class before RTX was between IIIb-V. After RTX treatment, 81.3% of patients achieved MGFA minimal manifestations or better and MGSTI level 1 or better. Anti-MuSK antibodies became negative in 12 patients, while they remained positive in three. The changes in antibody levels seemed associated with clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

RTX is an effective treatment in anti-MuSK-positive MG. Furthermore, our results support the inhibition of antibody production by RTX and we recommend monitoring anti-MuSK antibody titers to follow disease progression and treatment response.

Rituximab alone is as effective as associated with steroids on naive patients with generalized myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

Rituximab (RTX) has been proven effective in managing refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (MG), and its use is increasing worldwide. MG stabilization may initially require oral corticosteroid (CS) therapy, but its long-term side effects require the shortest duration of treatment. We studied the clinical effectiveness and usefulness of corticosteroids associated with RTX compared to RTX alone on MG remission.

METHODS

In a monocentric retrospective cohort in the Nice University Hospital, we compared naïve MG patients treated with RTX as first-line therapy alone (G1) or associated with CS (G2). After the RTX induction, we evaluated efficacy with the Osserman score (OS) and the requirement for any rescue therapy (IVIg or plasmapheresis).

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were treated with RTX, of which 19 (27.94%) benefited from an association with at least 0.5 mg/kg of corticosteroids. RTX-CS patients were more severe than RTX alone (OS for G1: 74.1 and G2: 64.94, p = 0.044). However, OS at 3 (83.44 and 83.12, p = 0.993), 6 (88.69 and 86.36, p = 0.545), 9 (82.91 and 85.73, p = 0.563), and 12 months (86.6 and 88.69, p = 0.761) from the treatment induction were similar. Rescue therapy following RTX induction was significantly higher for the RTX-CS (20.41% and 47.37%, p = 0.037). Regarding safety, adverse event rates were similar in the two groups (0% and 14.29%, p = 0.178).

CONCLUSION

We suggest that RTX alone is as effective as RTX-CS in MG patients, indicating that avoiding steroids could reduce side effects, decrease rescue therapies, and not affect MG outcomes.

Treating myasthenia gravis beyond the eye clinic

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is one of the most well characterised autoimmune disorders affecting the neuromuscular junction with autoantibodies targeting the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) complex. The vast majority of patients present with ocular symptoms including double vision and ptosis, but may progress on to develop generalised fatiguable muscle weakness. Severe involvement of the bulbar muscles can lead to dysphagia, dysarthria and breathing difficulties which can progress to myasthenic crisis needing ventilatory support. Given the predominant ocular onset of the disease, it is important that ophthalmologists are aware of the differential diagnosis, investigations and management including evolving therapies. When the disease remains localised to the extraocular muscles (ocular MG) IgG1 and IgG3 antibodies against the AChR (including clustered AChR) are present in nearly 50% of patients. In generalised MG this is seen in nearly 90% patients. Other antibodies include those against muscle specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) and lipoprotein receptor related protein 4 (LRP4). Even though decremental response on repetitive nerve stimulation is the most well recognised neurophysiological abnormality, single fibre electromyogram (SFEMG) in experienced hands is the most sensitive test which helps in the diagnosis. Initial treatment should be using cholinesterase inhibitors and then proceeding to immunosuppression using corticosteroids and steroid sparing drugs. Patients requiring bulbar muscle support may need rescue therapies including plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). Newer therapeutic targets include those against the B lymphocytes, complement system, neonatal Fc receptors (FcRn) and various other elements of the immune system.

Myasthenia gravis: the future is here

Myasthenia gravis (MG) stands as a prototypical antibody-mediated autoimmune disease: it is dependent on T cells and characterized by the presence of autoantibodies targeting proteins located on the postsynaptic surface of skeletal muscle, known as the neuromuscular junction. Patients with MG exhibit a spectrum of weakness, ranging from limited ocular muscle involvement to life-threatening respiratory failure. Recent decades have witnessed substantial progress in understanding the underlying pathophysiology, leading to the delineation of distinct subcategories within MG, including MG linked to AChR or MuSK antibodies as well as age-based distinction, thymoma-associated, and immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced MG. This heightened understanding has paved the way for the development of more precise and targeted therapeutic interventions. Notably, the FDA has recently approved therapeutic inhibitors of complement and the IgG receptor FcRn, a testament to our improved comprehension of autoantibody effector mechanisms in MG. In this Review, we delve into the various subgroups of MG, stratified by age, autoantibody type, and histology of the thymus with neoplasms. Furthermore, we explore both current and potential emerging therapeutic strategies, shedding light on the evolving landscape of MG treatment.

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors are ineffective in MuSK-antibody positive myasthenia gravis: Results of a study on 202 patients

BACKGROUND

Myasthenia gravis (MG) with MuSK antibodies (MuSK-MG) represents a distinct subtype with different responses to treatments compared to patients with AChR antibodies, especially in terms of tolerance to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEI). However, AChEI are often used as first line symptomatic treatment in MuSK-MG, despite reports that they are poorly tolerated, seldom effective or even deleterious.

METHODS

We analyzed demographic, clinical and therapeutic responses and side-effects in the large cohort of 202 MuSK-MG patients cared for at the MG Clinic of Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana.

RESULTS

165 patients had received AChEI at first evaluation. Only 7/165 patients (4.2%) reported an initial clinical benefit. Conversely, 76.9% of patients reported at least one side effect, most commonly neuromuscular hyperexcitability (68.4%), gastrointestinal (53.9%) and neurovegetative (35.8%) disturbances. 56 (33.9%) patients reported a concomitant worsening of muscle weakness and twelve patients (7.3%) suffered a cholinergic crisis. According to these patients, the severity of cholinergic side effects was greater at higher doses of AChEI, but side effects occurred regardless of the dose administered and ceased once the drug was discontinued.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest population of MuSK-MG patients reported for perceived responsiveness and tolerance to AChEI treatment. Our obervations strongly suggest avoiding this treatment in MuSK-MG.

Refocusing generalized myasthenia gravis: Patient burden, disease profiles, and the role of evolving therapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) continues to present significant challenges for clinical management due to an unpredictable disease course, frequent disease fluctuations, and varying response to therapy. The recent availability of new pharmacologic therapies presents a valuable opportunity to reevaluate how this disease is classified, assessed, and managed and identify new ways to improve the clinical care of patients with gMG.

METHODS

Narrative review was made of publications identified via searches of PubMed and selected congresses (January 2000-September 2022).

RESULTS

New consensus definitions are required to ensure consistency, to better characterize patients, and to identify patients who will benefit from specific drugs and earlier use of these agents. There is a need for more frequent, standardized patient assessment to identify the cause of motor function deficits, provide a clearer picture of the disease burden and its impact on daily living and quality of life (QoL), and better support treatment decision-making. Novel approaches that target different components of the immune system will play a role in more precise treatment of patients with gMG, alongside the development of new algorithms to guide individualized patient management.

CONCLUSIONS

gMG has a physical, mental, and social impact, resulting in a considerable burden of disease and substantially decreased QoL, despite standard treatments. The availability of novel, targeted treatments that influence key pathological mediators of gMG, together with new biomarkers, offers the potential to optimize patient management and ultimately enables a greater number of patients to achieve minimal manifestation status and a reduced burden of disease.

Advancements and prospects of novel biologicals for myasthenia gravis: toward personalized treatment based on autoantibody specificities

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an antibody-mediated autoimmune disease with a prevalence of 150-250 cases per million individuals. Autoantibodies include long-lived antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR), mainly of the IgG1 subclass, and IgG4, produced almost exclusively by short-lived plasmablasts, which are prevalent in muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) myasthenia gravis. Numerous investigations have demonstrated that MG patients receiving conventional medication today still do not possess satisfactory symptom control, indicating a substantial disease burden. Subsequently, based on the type of the autoantibody and the pathogenesis, we synthesized the published material to date and reached a conclusion regarding the literature related to personalized targeted therapy for MG. Novel agents for AChR MG have shown their efficacy in clinical research, such as complement inhibitors, FcRn receptor antagonists, and B-cell activating factor (BAFF) inhibitors. Rituximab, a representative drug of anti-CD20 therapy, has demonstrated benefits in treatment of MuSK MG patients. Due to the existence of low-affinity antibodies or unidentified antibodies that are inaccessible by existing methods, the treatment for seronegative MG remains complicated; thus, special testing and therapy considerations are necessary. It may be advantageous to initiate the application of novel biologicals at an early stage of the disease. Currently, therapies can also be combined and individualized according to different types of antibodies. With such a wide range of drugs, how to tailor treatment strategies to patients with various conditions and find the most suitable solution for each MG profile are our necessary and urgent aims.

Effectiveness and safety of telitacicept for refractory generalized myasthenia gravis: a retrospective study

Background

Refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (GMG) remains a substantial therapeutic challenge. Telitacicept, a recombinant human B-lymphocyte stimulator receptor-antibody fusion protein, holds promise for interrupting the immunopathology of this condition.

Objectives

This study retrospectively assessed the effectiveness and safety of telitacicept in patients with refractory GMG.

Design

A single-center retrospective study.

Methods

Patients with refractory GMG receiving telitacicept (160 mg/week or biweekly) from January to September in 2023 were included. We assessed effectiveness using Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America post-intervention status (MGFA-PIS), myasthenia gravis treatment status and intensity (MGSTI), quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG), and MG-activity of daily living (ADL) scores, alongside reductions in prednisone dosage at 3- and 6-month intervals. Safety profiles were also evaluated.

Results

Sixteen patients with MGFA class II-V refractory GMG were included, with eight females and eight males. All patients were followed up for at least 3 months, and 11 patients reached 6 months follow-up. At the 3-month evaluation, 75% (12/16) demonstrated clinical improvement with MGFA-PIS. One patient achieved pharmacological remission, two attained minimal manifestation status, and nine showed functional improvement; three remained unchanged, and one deteriorated. By the 6-month visit, 90.1% (10/11) sustained significant symptomatic improvement. MGSTI scores and prednisone dosages significantly reduced at both follow-ups (p < 0.05). MG-ADL and QMG scores showed marked improvement at 6 months (p < 0.05). The treatment was well tolerated, with no severe adverse events such as allergy or infection reported.

Conclusion

Our exploratory investigation suggests that telitacicept is a feasible and well-tolerated add-on therapy for refractory GMG, offering valuable clinical evidence for this novel treatment option.

Generalized myasthenia gravis with acetylcholine receptor antibodies: A guidance for treatment

BACKGROUND

Generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) with antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor is a chronic disease causing muscle weakness. Access to novel treatments warrants authoritative treatment recommendations. The Nordic countries have similar, comprehensive health systems, mandatory health registers, and extensive MG research.

METHODS

MG experts and patient representatives from the five Nordic countries formed a working group to prepare treatment guidance for MG based on a systematic literature search and consensus meetings.

RESULTS

Pyridostigmine represents the first-line symptomatic treatment, while ambenonium and beta adrenergic agonists are second-line options. Early thymectomy should be undertaken if a thymoma, and in non-thymoma patients up to the age of 50-65 years if not obtaining remission on symptomatic treatment. Most patients need immunosuppressive drug treatment. Combining corticosteroids at the lowest possible dose with azathioprine is recommended, rituximab being an alternative first-line option. Mycophenolate, methotrexate, and tacrolimus represent second-line immunosuppression. Plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin are used for myasthenic crises and acute exacerbations. Novel complement inhibitors and FcRn blockers are effective and fast-acting treatments with promising safety profiles. Their use depends on local availability, refunding policies, and cost-benefit analyses. Adapted physical training is recommended. Planning of pregnancies with optimal treatment, information, and awareness of neonatal MG is necessary. Social support and adaptation of work and daily life activities are recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful treatment of MG rests on timely combination of different interventions. Due to spontaneous disease fluctuations, comorbidities, and changes in life conditions, regular long-term specialized follow-up is needed. Most patients do reasonably well but there is room for further improvement. Novel treatments are promising, though subject to restricted access due to costs.

Clinical Features and Prognostic Analysis of MuSK-Antibody-Positive Myasthenia Gravis versus Double-Seropositive Myasthenia Gravis: A Single-Center Study from Central South China

Purpose

To decipher the discrepancies between muscle-specific kinase antibody-positive myasthenia gravis (MuSK-MG) and double-seropositive myasthenia gravis (DSP-MG), and to determine prognostic factors for minimal manifestation status (MMS) achievement in MG patients with MuSK autoantibodies (MuSK-Ab).

Patients and Methods

A total of 34 MG patients seropositive for MuSK-Ab were enrolled in this study. The demographic and clinical features were compared between MuSK-MG (n = 28) and DSP-MG (n = 6) patients, and factors affecting MMS induction in all patients with MuSK-Ab were identified using Cox regression analysis.

Results

Compared to MuSK-MG patients, those with DSP-MG had similar clinical characteristics, except that they had a lower frequency of bulbar muscle involvement at nadir (50% vs 92.9%; P = 0.029) and higher proportions of comorbidities with diabetes mellitus (33.3% vs 0%; P = 0.027) and thymic abnormalities (33.3% vs 0%; P = 0.027). Higher MG Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scores (HR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.037-0.7, P = 0.015) and axial muscle involvement at nadir (HR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.16-0.94, P = 0.035) were negative prognostic factors for MMS achievement in patients with MuSK-Ab regardless of acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR-Ab) positivity. Multivariable Cox regression analysis further established higher MG-ADL scores at the nadir (HR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.04-0.94; P = 0.042) as an independent risk factor for MMS achievement.

Conclusion

DSP-MG was comparable to MuSK-MG and could be considered a single entity in our cohort. In all MG patients with MuSK-Ab, a higher MG-ADL score at nadir may herald a lower chance of MMS achievement, with no observed potential effect of AChR-Ab presence.

Promising therapies for the treatment of myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune condition targeting the neuromuscular junction, which manifests with neuromuscular symptoms of varying severity and significant morbidity. The mainstay of treatment in MG is mitigation of the immune cascade with steroids and non-steroidal immunosuppressive therapies. The therapeutic strategies in MG are transitioning from broad and indiscriminate immunosuppression to novel agents targeting key steps in MG pathogenesis, including T cell activation, B cell proliferation, complement activation, maintenance of pathogenic antibody production, and proinflammatory cytokine production.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, an overview of the pathogenesis of MG and traditional MG therapies is presented, followed by a discussion of the novel MG drugs that have been evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials with an emphasis on those which have received regulatory approval.

EXPERT OPINION

Novel MG therapeutics belonging to the classes of complement inhibitors, neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibitors and B cell depletors, as well as the other emerging MG drugs in the pipeline constitute promising treatment strategies with potentially better efficacy and safety compared to the conventional MG treatments. However, further long-term research is needed in order to optimize the implementation of these new treatment options for the appropriate patient populations.

Rituximab as a sole steroid-sparing agent in generalized myasthenia gravis: Long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Rituximab, a B-cell depleting monoclonal antibody, represents an option for the treatment of refractory myasthenia gravis (MG). Its use is more established in muscle-specific tyrosine kinase positive (MuSK +) patients, while its role in managing acetylcholine receptor positive (AChR +), or double seronegative (DSN) patients, remains less clear. This study evaluates the long-term effectiveness and safety of rituximab in MG of various serotypes.

METHODS

We conducted an open-label study of MG patients receiving rituximab. Adults with generalized refractory MG, either anti-AChR + or DSN, and anti-MuSK + , refractory or not, who had follow-up > 12 months were selected. Change in quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG) score at last follow-up, compared with baseline was a primary outcome, as well as factors affecting response to treatment. Secondary outcomes included, long-term safety, the steroid-sparing effect and relapse rates post-rituximab.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (16 anti-AChR + , 6 anti-MuSK + , 8 DSN) followed for a mean of 33.3 months were included. Mean scores pre-rituximab compared to last follow-up significantly decreased (p < 0.001), from 11 ± 4.1 to 4.3 ± 3.8, and from 1.9 to 0.3 regarding QMG and relapse rate per patient/year, respectively, while in 93.1% a daily steroid dose ≤ 10 mg was achieved. Antibody status was the only factor independently influencing several endpoints. Throughout the study period no crises or deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

The present study supports that rituximab is an effective and well tolerated treatment for refractory anti-AChR + and DSN MG patients, while anti-MuSK + remains the group experiencing the greater benefits.

Respiratory failure as first presentation of myasthenia gravis: a case report

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is often complicated by respiratory failure, an exacerbation known as myasthenic crisis. However, most patients with MG develop respiratory symptoms during the late course of the disease. Respiratory failure as an exclusive initial and primary complaint in patients with MG is rare and seldom reported. We herein describe a woman in her late 50s who presented with respiratory failure and was diagnosed with obesity hypoventilation syndrome at a local hospital. Her condition gradually worsened during the next 4 months and became accompanied by dysphagia. After 1 year of medical investigation, she was diagnosed in our hospital. A high level of anti-muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase antibody was found in her serum, and stimulation and electromyography results suggested MG. The patient's symptoms were improved by intravenous immunoglobulin and hormone therapy. This case reminds physicians to consider MG when encountering a patient who initially presents with respiratory failure.

Myasthenia gravis: the changing treatment landscape in the era of molecular therapies

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder that affects the neuromuscular junction, leading to muscle weakness and fatigue. MG is caused by antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR), the muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) or other AChR-related proteins that are expressed in the postsynaptic muscle membrane. The standard therapeutic approach for MG has relied on acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, which have shown good efficacy in improving MG-related symptoms in most people with the disease; however, these therapies can carry a considerable burden of long-term adverse effects. Moreover, up to 15% of individuals with MG exhibit limited or no response to these standard therapies. The emergence of molecular therapies, including monoclonal antibodies, B cell-depleting agents and chimeric antigen receptor T cell-based therapies, has the potential to revolutionize the MG treatment landscape. This Review provides a comprehensive overview of the progress achieved in molecular therapies for MG associated with AChR antibodies and MuSK antibodies, elucidating both the challenges and the opportunities these therapies present to the field. The latest developments in MG treatment are described, exploring the potential for personalized medicine approaches.

Registered trials on novel therapies for myasthenia gravis: a cross-sectional study on ClinicalTrials.gov

Novel biologics in MG therapy research is on the rise. This research aimed to investigate the characteristics of registered trials on novel therapies for myasthenia gravis on ClinicalTrials.gov. This cross-sectional study used a descriptive approach to assess the features of the included trials on ClinicalTrials.gov. We found 62 registered trials from 2007 to 2023 on ClinicalTrials.gov. The results showed a yearly rise in the number of registered trials (r = 0.76, p < 0.001). Following 2017, more industry-sponsored trials were conducted (91.5% [43] vs. 60% [9], p = 0.009), fewer results were released (10.6% [5] vs. 60% [9], p = 0.001), and more trials entered phase 3 (67.4% [31] vs. 20% [2], p = 0.001). The most researched novel medications were neonatal Fc receptor inhibitors (51.2% [21]), complement inhibitors (39.0% [16]), and B cell depletors (14.6% [6]). According to the website's data, the neonatal Fc receptor inhibitors and complement inhibitors were effective in treating myasthenia gravis patients in three trials (NCT03315130, NCT03669588, and NCT00727194). This study provides valuable insights into the profile of registered trials on novel therapies for myasthenia gravis. More clinical studies are needed in the future to prove the value of its application.

Myasthenia gravis-Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterized by dysfunction of the neuromuscular junction resulting in skeletal muscle weakness. It is equally prevalent in males and females, but debuts at a younger age in females and at an older age in males. Ptosis, diplopia, facial bulbar weakness, and limb weakness are the most common symptoms. MG can be classified based on the presence of serum autoantibodies. Acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies are found in 80%-85% of patients, muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) antibodies in 5%-8%, and <1% may have low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (Lrp4) antibodies. Approximately 10% of patients are seronegative for antibodies binding the known disease-related antigens. In patients with AChR MG, 10%-20% have a thymoma, which is usually detected at the onset of the disease. Important differences between clinical presentation, treatment responsiveness, and disease mechanisms have been observed between these different serologic MG classes. Besides the typical clinical features and serologic testing, the diagnosis can be established with additional tests, including repetitive nerve stimulation, single fiber EMG, and the ice pack test. Treatment options for MG consist of symptomatic treatment (such as pyridostigmine), immunosuppressive treatment, or thymectomy. Despite the treatment with symptomatic drugs, steroid-sparing immunosuppressants, intravenous immunoglobulins, plasmapheresis, and thymectomy, a large proportion of patients remain chronically dependent on corticosteroids (CS). In the past decade, the number of treatment options for MG has considerably increased. Advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology have led to new treatment options targeting B or T cells, the complement cascade, the neonatal Fc receptor or cytokines. In the future, these new treatments are likely to reduce the chronic use of CS, diminish side effects, and decrease the number of patients with refractory disease.

Promising efficacy of Low-Dose rituximab in Muscle specific kinase antibody positive Myasthenia Gravis

AIMS

The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of low dose rituximab (RTX) in patients with muscle-specific kinase antibody positive myasthenia gravis (MuSK-MG).

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective study. A total of 10 patients with MuSK-MG were admitted to the Department of Neurology, First Hospital, Shanxi Medical University, between April 2021 to April 2023. Of them, 9 patients had been treated with low dose RTX (500 mg every 6 month) and recruited in this study. The clinical information, including the severity before and after RTX treatment, were collected from the medical records. Clinical effectiveness was assessed by Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA)-postintervention status (PIS), MG-related activities of daily living (MG-ADL), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores, Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15-item revised (MG-QOL15r), dosage of steroid at the end of follow up.

RESULTS

All nine patients showed clinical improvement at the final follow-up after low-dose RTX treatment. The mean dose of prednisolone decreased significantly from 50 mg at baseline to 18.33 mg at the last follow-up (z = -3.417, p = 0.001). The administration of low-dose RTX treatment led to significant improvements in ADL levels (Z = -2.675, P < 0.01), QMG score levels (Z = -2.371, P < 0.05) and QOL-15r levels (Z = -2.547, P < 0.01) at last visit.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose RTX is effective for treating MuSK-MG patients. Longer-term follow-up and larger-scale studies are needed to provide further evidence.

Efficacy of innovative therapies in myasthenia gravis: A systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Therapy for myasthenia gravis (MG) is undergoing a profound change, with new treatments being tested. These include complement inhibitors and neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) blockers. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis and network meta-analysis of randomized and placebo-controlled trials of innovative therapies in MG with available efficacy data.

METHODS

We assessed statistical heterogeneity across trials based on the Cochrane Q test and I2 values, and mean differences were pooled using the random-effects model. Treatment efficacy was assessed after 26 weeks of eculizumab and ravulizumab, 28 days of efgartigimod, 43 days of rozanolixizumab, 12 weeks of zilucoplan, and 16, 24 or 52 weeks of rituximab treatment.

RESULTS

We observed an overall mean Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living scale (MG-ADL) score change of -2.17 points (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.67, -1.67; p < 0.001) as compared to placebo. No significant difference emerged between complement inhibitors and anti-FcRn treatment (p = 0.16). The change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis scale (QMG) score was -3.46 (95% CI -4.53, -2.39; p < 0.001), with a higher reduction with FcRns (-4.78 vs. -2.60; p < 0.001). Rituximab did not significantly improve the MG-ADL (-0.92 [95% CI -2.24, 0.39]; p = 0.17) or QMG scores (-1.9 [95% CI -3.97, 0.18]; p = 0.07). In the network meta-analysis, efgartigimod had the highest probability of being the best treatment, followed by rozanolixizumab.

CONCLUSION

Anti-complement and FcRn treatments both proved to be effective in MG patients, whereas rituximab did not show a significant benefit for patients. Within the limitations of this meta-analysis, including efficacy time points, FcRn treatments showed a greater effect on QMG score in the short term. Real-life studies with long-term measurements are needed to confirm our results.

Rituximab treatment in myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune disease mediated by antibodies against post-synaptic proteins of the neuromuscular junction. Up to 10%-30% of patients are refractory to conventional treatments. For these patients, rituximab has been used off-label in the recent decades. Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody against the CD20 protein that leads to B cell depletion and to the synthesis of new antibody-secreting plasma cells. Although rituximab was created to treat B-cell lymphoma, its use has widely increased to treat autoimmune diseases. In MG, the benefit of rituximab treatment in MuSK-positive patients seems clear, but a high variability in the results of observational studies and even clinical trials has been reported for AChR-positive patients. Moreover, few evidence has been reported in seronegative MG and juvenile MG and some questions about regimen of administration or monitoring strategies, remains open. In this review, we intend to revise the available literature on this topic and resume the current evidence of effectiveness of Rituximab in MG, with special attention to results on every MG subtype, as well as the administration protocols, monitoring strategies and safety profile of the drug.

Disease-Based Prognostication: Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an acquired autoimmune neuromuscular junction transmission disorder that clinically presents as fluctuating or persistent weakness in various skeletal muscle groups. Neuroprognostication in MG begins with some basic observations on the natural history of the disease and known treatment outcomes. Our objective is to provide a framework that can assist a clinician who encounters the MG patient for the first time and attempts to prognosticate probable outcomes in individual patients. In this review article, we explore clinical type, age of onset, antibody status, severity of disease, thymus pathology, autoimmune, and other comorbidities as prognostic factors in MG.

ALSUntangled #67: rituximab

ALSUntangled reviews alternative and off-label treatments on behalf of people with ALS who ask about them. Here we review rituximab, a drug which specifically depletes B lymphocytes. We show a current lack of evidence for a role of these cells in ALS progression. The one patient we found who described using Rituximab for their ALS found no benefit. Given all this, and the known serious risks of rituximab, we advise against its use as an ALS treatment.

Immunotherapies in MuSK-positive Myasthenia Gravis; an IgG4 antibody-mediated disease

Muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) Myasthenia Gravis (MG) represents a prototypical antibody-mediated disease characterized by predominantly focal muscle weakness (neck, facial, and bulbar muscles) and fatigability. The pathogenic antibodies mostly belong to the immunoglobulin subclass (Ig)G4, a feature which attributes them their specific properties and pathogenic profile. On the other hand, acetylcholine receptor (AChR) MG, the most prevalent form of MG, is characterized by immunoglobulin (Ig)G1 and IgG3 antibodies to the AChR. IgG4 class autoantibodies are impotent to fix complement and only weakly bind Fc-receptors expressed on immune cells and exert their pathogenicity via interfering with the interaction between their targets and binding partners (e.g. between MuSK and LRP4). Cardinal differences between AChR and MuSK-MG are the thymus involvement (not prominent in MuSK-MG), the distinct HLA alleles, and core immunopathological patterns of pathology in neuromuscular junction, structure, and function. In MuSK-MG, classical treatment options are usually less effective (e.g. IVIG) with the need for prolonged and high doses of steroids difficult to be tapered to control symptoms. Exceptional clinical response to plasmapheresis and rituximab has been particularly observed in these patients. Reduction of antibody titers follows the clinical efficacy of anti-CD20 therapies, a feature implying the role of short-lived plasma cells (SLPB) in autoantibody production. Novel therapeutic monoclonal against B cells at different stages of their maturation (like plasmablasts), or against molecules involved in B cell activation, represent promising therapeutic targets. A revolution in autoantibody-mediated diseases is pharmacological interference with the neonatal Fc receptor, leading to a rapid reduction of circulating IgGs (including autoantibodies), an approach already suitable for AChR-MG and promising for MuSK-MG. New precision medicine approaches involve Chimeric autoantibody receptor T (CAAR-T) cells that are engineered to target antigen-specific B cells in MuSK-MG and represent a milestone in the development of targeted immunotherapies. This review aims to provide a detailed update on the pathomechanisms involved in MuSK-MG (cellular and humoral aberrations), fostering the understanding of the latest indications regarding the efficacy of different treatment strategies.

Novel Immunotherapies for Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG), a prototype autoimmune neurological disease, had its therapy centred on corticosteroids, non-steroidal broad-spectrum immunotherapy and cholinesterase inhibitors for several decades. Treatment-refractory MG and long-term toxicities of the medications have been major concerns with the conventional therapies. Advances in the immunology and pathogenesis of MG have ushered in an era of newer therapies which are more specific and efficacious. Complement inhibitors and neonatal Fc receptor blockers target disease-specific pathogenic mechanisms linked to myasthenia and have proven their efficacy in pivotal clinical studies. B cell-depleting agents, specifically rituximab, have also emerged as useful for the treatment of severe MG. Many more biologicals are in the pipeline and in diverse stages of development. This review discusses the evidence for the novel therapies and the specific issues related to their clinical use.

Effect of Thymectomy on Outcomes of Myasthenia Gravis Patients: A Case-Control Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital

Background and objective Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an acquired autoimmune disease mediated by antibodies affecting the neuro-muscular junction on the postsynaptic membrane, resulting in neuromuscular transmission obstruction and, consequently, muscle weakening. It is believed that the thymus gland plays a critical role in the production of these antibodies. Screening patients for thymoma and surgical excision of the thymus gland is a crucial part of the treatment. To compare the odds of good outcomes in Myasthenia Gravis patients with or without thymectomy. Material and methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted at the Department of Medicine and Neurology, Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan, from October 2020 to September 2021. A purposive sampling technique was employed. Thirty-two MG patients with thymectomy and 64 MG patients without thymectomy were selected for investigation. Controls and cases were matched on the basis of sex and age (1:2). A positive EMG study, acetylcholine receptor antibodies, and a pyridostigmine test were used to make the diagnosis of MG. Patients were called to the outpatient department for assessment of treatment outcomes. Primary outcome evaluation was done using the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Post-Intervention Status (MGFA-PIS) tool at the last follow-up after one year. Results A sample of 96 patients was evaluated, of which 63 (65%) were females and 33 (34%) were males. The mean age for Group 1 (cases) was 35 years ±8.9 and for Group 2 (controls) was 37± 11.1. Age and Osserman stages were shown to be the two most crucial prognostic factors in our study. However, there are several other factors in our study that are linked to a poor response, such as a greater BMI, dysphagia, thymoma, older age, and a longer duration of disease. Conclusions Our findings indicate that none of the analysed groups had significantly worse outcomes as a result of the current clinical practice of thymectomy patient selection.

Impact of Early Treatment with Intravenous High-Dose Methylprednisolone for Ocular Myasthenia Gravis

The efficacy of intravenous high-dose methylprednisolone (IVMP) in ocular myasthenia gravis (MG) has not been fully established. This study aimed to elucidate the effects of early intervention with IVMP for achieving the therapeutic targets (minimal manifestations [MM] or MM or better status with prednisolone ≤ 5 mg/day [MM5mg]) in ocular MG. In this observational study, we included a total of 1710 consecutive patients with MG enrolled in the Japan MG Registry in 2021. Of these, 204 patients with ocular MG who received immunotherapy were analyzed. The clinical course and time to first achieve MM or MM5mg after starting immunotherapy were compared between the early IVMP group (treated with IVMP within 3 months of treatment initiation) and the non-early IVMP group. Despite having greater clinical severity before immunotherapy and lower oral prednisolone doses throughout the course, the early IVMP group (n = 55) showed a higher rate of achievement of MM (P = 0.0040, log-rank test; hazard ratio 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-2.20, P < 0.0001) and MM5mg (P = 0.0005, log-rank test; hazard ratio 1.78, 95% CI 1.27-2.51, P < 0.0001) compared with the non-early IVMP group (n = 149). In conclusion, an early intervention with IVMP is likely to increase the probability of achieving a better long-term outcome and reducing the total dose of corticosteroids in ocular MG.

Effectiveness of early cycles of fast-acting treatment in generalised myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

Early fast-acting treatment (EFT) is the aggressive use of fast-acting therapies such as plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin and/or intravenous high-dose methylprednisolone (IVMP) from the early phases of treatment. EFT is reportedly beneficial for early achievement of minimal manifestations (MM) or better status with ≤5 mg/day prednisolone (MM5mg), a practical therapeutic target for myasthenia gravis (MG).

OBJECTIVE

The current study aimed to clarify which specific EFT regimen is efficacious and the patient characteristics that confer sensitivity to EFT.

METHODS

We recruited a total of 1710 consecutive patients with MG who enrolled in the Japan MG Registry for this large-cohort study. Among them, 1066 with generalised MG who had received immunotherapy were analysed. Prognostic background factors were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching analysis between patients treated with EFT (n=350) and those treated without EFT (n=350). The clinical course and time to first achieve MM5mg after starting immunotherapy was analysed in relation to treatment combinations and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that EFT had a significant effect on the achievement of MM5mg (p<0.0001, log-rank test; HR 1.82, p<0.0001). Notably, EFT was efficacious for any type of MG, and the inclusion of IVMP resulted in earlier and more frequent achievement of MM5mg (p=0.0352, log-rank test; HR 1.46, p=0.0380). In addition, early administration of calcineurin inhibitors also promoted MM5mg achievement.

CONCLUSION

Early cycles of intervention with EFT and early use of calcineurin inhibitors provides long-term benefits in terms of achieving therapeutic targets for generalised MG, regardless of clinical subtype.

Healthcare resource use in myasthenia gravis: a US health claims analysis

Background

There are limited data on the impact of myasthenia gravis (MG) on real-world healthcare resource use (HCRU) and patient burden in the United States.

Objectives

This study aims to assess HCRU in patients with MG using data from a US health claims database.

Design

A retrospective, database study of adult patients newly diagnosed with MG, using the IBM^® MarketScan^® Commercial Claims and Encounters and Medicare supplemental health insurance claims database.

Methods

Patients with ⩾2 MG International Classification of Disease diagnosis codes ⩾3 months apart were followed from the date of their first MG diagnosis record or start of treatment. HCRU and use of immunoglobulins and plasma exchange during follow-up was assessed, as well as comorbidities, hospitalizations, emergency room (ER) visits, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and specialist visits per year after diagnosis, and compared with age- and sex-matched non-MG controls.

Results

During 2010-2019, 7194 patients were followed for up to 10 years (median = 2.3 years). During follow-up, patients with MG were 2.6-fold more likely than controls to be hospitalized, and 4.5-fold more likely to be admitted to an ICU. Risk and numbers of ER admission, hospitalization, and ICU visits were the highest in the 12 months post-diagnosis of MG and were consistently higher than controls during follow-up. MG was the main cause for most hospitalizations.

Conclusion

Patients with MG have higher HCRU, compared with the age- and sex-matched non-MG controls. The early years after MG diagnosis are a period of particularly high healthcare burden, with many patients requiring hospitalization and ICU care to manage serious exacerbations.

Current management of myasthenia gravis in Belgium: a single-center experience

INTRODUCTION

As new treatments are becoming available for patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), it is worth reflecting on the actual status of MG treatment to determine which patients would most likely benefit from the new treatments.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical files of all MG patients seen at the Department of Neurology of the Antwerp University Hospital during the years 2019, 2020 and 2021.

RESULTS

163 patients were included. Age at diagnosis varied from the first to the eighth decades, with a peak of incidence from 60 to 70 years for both genders, and an additional peak from 20 to 30 years in women. Diplopia and ptosis were by far the most common onset symptom. At maximum disease severity, 24% of the patients still had purely ocular symptoms and 4% needed mechanical ventilation. 97% of the patients received a treatment with pyridostigmine and 68% with corticosteroids, often in combination with immunosuppressants. More than half reported side effects. At the latest visit, 50% of the patients were symptom-free. Also, half of the symptomatic patients were fulltime at work or retired with no or mild limitations in daily living. The remaining patients were working part-time, on sick leave, or retired with severe limitations.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The majority of MG patients are doing well with currently available treatments, but often at the cost of side effects in the short and in the long term. A significant group is in need of better treatments.

Reduced quality of life in myasthenia gravis patients: A study on 185 patients from China

Aims

To explore the quality of life (QOL) in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) and factors associated with QOL.

Methods

This observational study included patients with MG diagnosed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University between January 2020 and March 2022. The QOL of patients was evaluated with the 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MG-QOL15). Current MG severity was evaluated with MGFA grade, MG-ADL score, MGC score, and MGFA Postintervention Status. The data about gender, age of onset, subgroup, antibodies, age, duration, education, employment state, marital status, skeletal muscle affected, thymic histology, and current treatment methods of the patient were collected.

Results

A total of 185 patients [72 males (38.9%), aged 45.2 years (14-77)] with MG were enrolled. Age at onset was 38.3 ± 17.9 years, and disease duration was 87.9 months (0-672). The median MG-QOL15 score was 12.5 (0-58). The item "have trouble using my eyes" was the highest scoring item in both ocular and generalized patients with MG. The MG-QOL15 score was significantly different among patients with OMG (9.2 ± 9.4, n = 63), GMG (9.0 ± 8.8, n = 22), and BMG (15.4 ± 14.2, n = 100) (P = 0.018). Patients with BMG had higher MG-QOL15 scores than OMG (P = 0.001) and GMG (P = 0.009), but there was no significant difference between OMG and GMG (P = 0.467). The MG-QOL15 score was significantly lower in patients who had undergone thymectomy (9.7 ± 9.8, n = 58) compared to those who had not (13.8 ± 13.4, n = 127, P = 0.022). MG-QOL15 score was significantly lower in patients who underwent thymectomy compared to those who did not (9.7 ± 9.8, n = 58 vs. 13.8 ± 13.4, n = 127, P = 0.022). MG-QOL15 score was different among MGFA grades (Remission: 5.2 ± 5.4, n = 41; I: 11.3 ± 10, n = 61; II: 11.6 ± 11.1, n = 40; III: 18.1 ± 12.1, n = 29; and IVa: 30.1 ± 20, n = 14, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between patients in MGFA grade I and II (P = 0.896), and there was no significant difference between patients in MGFA grade III and IVa (P = 0.052). MG-ADL (P < 0.001) and MGC (P < 0.001) were positively correlated with MG-QOL15. Men had higher MG-QOL15 than women (P = 0.094), and LOMG had higher MG-QOL15 than EOMG (P = 0.072). Multivariate linear regression identified that higher MG-ADL (P < 0.001), higher MGC (P = 0.02), and poor employment status (P = 0.045) were independently associated with higher MG-QOL15.

Conclusion

Having trouble using the eyes accounted for the highest score in MG-QOL15, eye symptoms affect QOL more than limb weakness in MG. Daily life activity, disease severity, and employment status were associated with patients' QOL. Adequate treatment should be applied to improve QOL, while mild symptoms can be accepted. Men and patients over the age of 50 years of onset may need more attention.

On the path to evidence-based therapy in neuromuscular disorders

Neuromuscular disorders encompass a diverse group of acquired and genetic diseases characterized by loss of motor functionality. Although cure is the goal, many therapeutic strategies have been envisioned and are being studied in randomized clinical trials and entered clinical practice. As in all scientific endeavors, the successful clinical translation depends on the quality and translatability of preclinical findings and on the predictive value and feasibility of the clinical models. This chapter focuses on five exemplary diseases: childhood spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disorders, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), acquired autoimmune myasthenia gravis (MG), and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), to illustrate the progress made on the path to evidenced-based therapy.

Efgartigimod for generalized myasthenia gravis with or without anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies: a worldwide and Japanese perspective

INTRODUCTION

The management of myasthenia gravis (MG) has been improved due to immunotherapy advances, but 20% of individuals with MG are refractory to the conventional therapy, and the need for novel biological drugs remains.

AREA COVERED

The Japanese clinical guidelines for MG published in May 2022 include the concept that treatment is often lifelong and should aim to maintain a sufficient quality of life and mental health. We provide an overview of the therapeutic strategy for generalized MG in Japan, in comparison with the international consensus. We summarize the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of efgartigimod, the first approved anti-neonatal Fc receptor inhibitor for MG. A phase III study showed that efgartigimod was well-tolerated and efficacious in patients with generalized MG.

EXPERT OPINION

Efgartigimod is a promising biological drug for patients with moderate to severe generalized MG with or without anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies in Japan.

Diagnosis and Management of Myasthenia Gravis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews updated diagnostic procedures and currently available treatment modalities for myasthenia gravis (MG).

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with MG can be classified based on antibody status and their clinical presentation; treatment responses may differ based on disease subtypes. Improved diagnostic methods and recognition of new antigenic targets such as lipoprotein-related protein 4 have led to improved diagnostic efficiencies. Corticosteroids remain the first-line immunotherapy, but there is a trend toward minimizing their use at high doses and for long durations. Oral immunosuppressants such as mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and tacrolimus remain useful. An international, multicenter randomized trial comparing thymectomy plus prednisone with prednisone alone demonstrated that thymectomy improves clinical outcomes in selected patients with nonthymomatous MG. Eculizumab, efgartigimod, and ravulizumab have recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for adult patients with generalized MG who are acetylcholine receptor-antibody positive. These drugs take advantage of novel mechanisms of action and expand treatment options for patients with MG. Data on rituximab suggest that it can be a good option, especially for patients with MG who are positive for antibodies against muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK). The number of clinical trials and drugs in development for MG is steadily increasing.

SUMMARY

The diagnosis of MG can generally be made from the patient's history, a neurologic examination, and laboratory and electrodiagnostic testing. Carefully selected treatment improves outcomes in MG. Additional treatment options for MG will likely be available in the near future.

New Targeted Agents in Myasthenia Gravis and Future Therapeutic Strategies

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune disease for which multiple immunomodulatory therapies are available. Nevertheless, MG has a significant impact on patient quality of life. In recent years, experts' main efforts have focused on optimizing treatment strategies, since disease burden is considerably affected by their safety and tolerability profiles, especially in patients with refractory phenotypes. This article aims to offer neurologists caring for MG patients an overview of the most innovative targeted drugs specifically designed for this disease and summarizes the recent literature and more recent evidence on agents targeting B cells and plasmablasts, complement inhibitors, and neonatal fragment crystallizable receptor (FcRn) antagonists. Positive clinical trial results have been reported, and other studies are ongoing. Finally, we briefly discuss how the introduction of these novel targeted immunological therapies in a changing management paradigm would affect not only clinical outcomes, disease burden, safety, and tolerability, but also health spending in a condition that is increasingly managed based on a patient-centred model.

Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab for New-Onset Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: The RINOMAX Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Rituximab is a third-line option for refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) based on empirical evidence, but its effect in new-onset disease is unknown.

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of rituximab compared with placebo as an add-on to standard of care for MG.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study took place throughout 48 weeks at 7 regional clinics in Sweden. Key inclusion criteria were age older than 18 years, onset of generalized symptoms within 12 months or less, and a Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score of 6 or more. Patients were screened from October 20, 2016, to March 2, 2020. Key exclusion criteria included pure ocular MG, suspected thymoma, previous thymectomy, and prior noncorticosteroid immunosuppressants or high doses of corticosteroids.

Interventions

Participants were randomized 1:1 without stratification to a single intravenous infusion of 500 mg of rituximab or matching placebo.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Minimal disease manifestations at 16 weeks defined as a QMG score of 4 or less with prednisolone, 10 mg or less daily, and no rescue treatment.

Results

Of 87 potentially eligible patients, 25 were randomized to rituximab (mean [SD] age, 67.4 [13.4] years; 7 [28%] female) and 22 to placebo (mean [SD] age, 58 [18.6] years; 7 [32%] female). Compared with placebo, a greater proportion with rituximab met the primary end point; 71% (17 of 24) in the rituximab group vs 29% (6 of 21) in the placebo group (Fisher exact test P = .007; probability ratio, 2.48 [95% CI, 1.20-5.11]). Secondary end points, comparing changes in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living and Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life at 16 weeks with QMG at 24 weeks did not differ between groups with censoring for rescue treatment (per-protocol analysis) but were in favor of active treatment when rescue treatment was taken into account by worst rank imputation (post hoc analysis). Rescue treatments were also more frequent in the placebo arm (rituximab: 1 [4%]; placebo, 8 [36%]). One patient in the placebo arm had a myocardial infarction with cardiac arrest and 1 patient in the active arm experienced a fatal cardiac event.

Conclusions and Relevance

A single dose of 500 mg of rituximab was associated with greater probability of minimal MG manifestations and reduced need of rescue medications compared with placebo. Further studies are needed to address long-term benefit-risk balance with this treatment.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02950155.

Long-Term Remission With Low-Dose Rituximab in Myasthenia Gravis: A Retrospective Study

OBJETIVE

Rituximab (RTX) is a therapeutic option, for patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) not responding to conventional immunosuppressive treatment. In this cohort, we evaluated long-term efficacy of RTX in the treatment of refractory generalized MG.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in adult patients with refractory generalized MG and at least 24 months of follow-up, between January/2015 and October/2021. The Myasthenia Gravis Status and Treatment Intensity Score was used to assess outcomes, and CD19/CD20+ B-cell counts were monitored.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients with MG (8 antiacetylcholine receptor+ and 8 muscle-specific antikinase+; mean age 45.5 ± 16.2 years) treated with low-dose RTX protocols were included. CD19/CD20 levels remained undetectable 12 months after induction, and no new relapses were observed during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose RTX infusions were sufficient to achieve undetectable CD19/20 cell counts and sustained clinical remission. In low and middle-income countries, the impact of low-dose RTX therapy represents a paradigm shift in decision-making for long-term treatment.

Rituximab in Myasthenia Gravis- Experience from a Low- and Middle-Income Country (LMIC) Setting

BACKGROUND

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an immune-mediated disorder of the neuromuscular junction. About 10% are refractory to immunosuppressive therapy.

AIMS

To analyze the response of patients with generalized MG to rituximab.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective review of patients with MG who received rituximab was carried out (n = 13, M:F = 6:7, mean age: 44.84 ± 15.73 years). Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA), MGFA post-intervention status (MGFA-PIS), and Myasthenia Gravis Status and Treatment Intensity (MGSTI) were assessed before and after rituximab.

RESULTS

The duration of MG was 104.07 ± 92.25 months. Before rituximab, the MGFA was IIA/IIB/IIIA/IIIB/IVB/V in 1/1/2/6/2/1 patients and MGSTI was four in eight patients and six in three patients. The mean duration of follow up was 20.92 ± 14.06 months (range, 4 to 42 months). Dose reduction or discontinuation of cholinesterase inhibitors could be achieved 12 patients. Complete stable remission (CSR) and pharmacologic remission (PR) were achieved in one and four patients respectively and five patients had minimal manifestations. Most patients attained level 0, 1 or 2 MGSTI at last follow up. No rituximab infusion-related adverse events were noted. Three patients had exacerbation of MG between one to five weeks after rituximab administration. Three patients died, one each due to a cardiac event unrelated to MG or treatment, complications related to myasthenic crisis, and coronavirus disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab was effective in bringing about remission in MG and can be considered as a first-line agent. However, it has to be administered under close supervision as some patients develop exacerbation of MG akin to steroid-induced worsening.

Safety of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in myasthenia gravis: A survey-based study

Background

Vaccination remains the most effective measure to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection and worse outcomes. However, many myasthenia gravis (MG) patients are hesitant to receive vaccine due to fear of worsening.

Methods

MG patients were consecutively enrolled in two MG centers in North China. The “worsening” after vaccination was self-reported by MG patients, and severity was measured with a single simple question. The general characteristics and disease status immediately prior to the first dose were compared between the worsening and non-worsening groups. Independent factors associated with worsening were explored with multivariate regression analysis.

Results

One hundred and seven patients were included. Eleven patients (10.3%) reported worsening after vaccination, including eight patients with mild or moderate worsening and three patients with severe worsening. Only one of them (0.9%) needed an escalation of immunosuppressive treatments. There were significant differences between the worsening and non-worsening groups in terms of Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America classes immediately before the first dose and intervals since the last aggravation. Precipitating factors might contribute to the worsening in some patients. Logistic regression revealed that only interval since the last aggravation ≤6 months was associated with worsening after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (P = 0.01, OR = 8.62, 95% CI: 1.93–38.46).

Conclusion

SARS-CoV-2 vaccines (an overwhelming majority were inactivated vaccines) were found safe in milder Chinese MG patients who finished two doses. Worsening after vaccination was more frequently seen in patients who were presumed as potentially unstable (intervals since last aggravation ≤6 months). However, mild worsening did occur in patients who were presumed to be stable. Precipitating factors should still be sought and treated for better outcome.

Role of complement, anti-complement therapeutics, and other targeted immunotherapies in myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

Several patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) do not adequately respond to available drugs or exhibit poor tolerance, necessitating the need for new therapies.

AREAS COVERED

The paper discusses the rapidly evolving target-specific immunotherapies that promise long-standing remissions in the management of MG. It is specifically focused on the role of complement, anti-complement therapeutics, and the anti-FcRn and B cell monoclonals.

EXPERT OPINION

Anti-AChR antibodies cause internalization of the receptors and activate complement leading to in situ MAC formation that damages the post-synaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction. Inhibiting MAC formation by antibodies targeting key complements subcomponents is a reasonable therapeutic goal. Indeed, the anti-C5 monoclonal antibodies, Eculizumab, Ravulizumab, and Zilucoplan, have been successfully tested in MG with Eculizumab first and now Ravulizumab FDA-approved for refractory MG based on sustained long-term benefits. Among the biologics that inhibit FcRn, Efgartigimod caused rapid reduction of the circulating IgG in the lysosomes, and induced sustained clinical remission with good safety profile leading to FDA-approved indication. Anti-B cell agents, like Rituximab, can induce sustained long-term remissions, especially in IgG4 antibody-mediated Musk-MG, by targeting short-lived antibody-secreting plasmablasts. These biologics offer effective targeted immunotherapies with good tolerance promising to change the therapeutic algorithm in the chronic MG management.