Generalized periodic discharges in the critically ill: a case-control study of 200 patients

[Utility of EEG in neurological emergencies and critical care]

EEG is useful for evaluation of pathophysiology and prognostication of neurocritically ill patients, as it provides non-invasive, real-time monitoring of cerebral function. There have been recently a lot of advances in research on critical care EEG according to the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology. Based on the latest knowledge, this review discusses clinical utilization of EEG in neurocritically ill patients, including critical care continuous EEG monitoring, and key points of interpretation of critical care EEG, classifying main purposes into three points: detection of electrographic and electroclinical seizures, consideration of special encephalopathies, and evaluation and prognostication of cerebral function. Neurologists should have fundamental ability to read and interpret critical care EEG and support treating physicians in terms of therapeutic strategy.

Automated quantification of periodic discharges in human electroencephalogram

Periodic discharges (PDs) are pathologic patterns of epileptiform discharges repeating at regular intervals, commonly detected in the human electroencephalogram (EEG) signals in patients who are critically ill. The frequency and spatial extent of PDs are associated with the tendency of PDs to cause brain injury, existing automated algorithms do not quantify the frequency and spatial extent of PDs. The present study presents an algorithm for quantifying frequency and spatial extent of PDs. The algorithm quantifies the evolution of these parameters within a short (10-14 second) window, with a focus on lateralized and generalized periodic discharges. We test our algorithm on 300 'easy', 300 'medium', and 240 'hard' examples (840 total epochs) of periodic discharges as quantified by interrater consensus from human experts when analyzing the given EEG epochs. We observe 95.0% agreement with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of [94.9%, 95.1%] between algorithm outputs with reviewer clincal judgement for easy examples, 92.0% agreement (95% CI [91.9%, 92.2%]) for medium examples, and 90.4% agreement (95% CI [90.3%, 90.6%]) for hard examples. The algorithm is also computationally efficient and is able to run in 0.385 ± 0.038 seconds for a single epoch using our provided implementation of the algorithm. The results demonstrate the algorithm's effectiveness in quantifying these discharges and provide a standardized and efficient approach for PD quantification as compared to existing manual approaches.

Relationship between continuous EEG monitoring findings and prognostic factors in patients with status epilepticus

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Little information is available regarding the use of continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring findings to predict the prognosis of patients with status epilepticus, which could aid in prognostication. This study investigated the relationship between cEEG monitoring findings and various prognostic indicators in patients with status epilepticus.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical profiles and cEEG monitoring data of 28 patients with status epilepticus over a ten-year period. Patient demographics, etiology, EEG features, duration of hospital stay, number of antiseizure medications, and outcome measures were analyzed. Functional outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), which evaluates the degree of daily living impairment and dependence on others resulting from neurological injury.

RESULTS

Patients exhibiting electrographic status epilepticus (ESE) demonstrated significantly longer duration of status epilepticus (77.75 ± 58.25 vs. 39.86 ± 29.81 h, p = 0.024) and total length of hospital stay (13.00 ± 6.14 vs. 8.14 ± 5.66 days, p = 0.038) when compared to those with ictal-interictal continuum (IIC). Individuals who displayed any increase in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score between their premorbid state and discharge also had significantly longer duration of status epilepticus (74.09 ± 34.94 vs. 51.56 ± 54.25 h, p = 0.041) and total length of hospital stay (15.89 ± 6.05 vs. 8.05 ± 4.80 days, p = 0.004) when compared to those who showed no difference. The most prevalent etiology of status epilepticus in our study was chronic structural brain lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

This suggests that ESE may serve as a predictor of prolonged duration of status epilepticus and increased hospitalization among patients with status epilepticus.

Incidence of seizures in ICU patients with diffuse encephalopathy and its predictors

Encephalopathy is a diffuse brain dysfunction that results from systemic disorder. Patients with diffuse encephalopathy are at risk of developing clinical and electrographic seizures. The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of electrographic seizures in a setting of encephalopathy and the clinical and electroencephalogram predictors. We retrospectively reviewed all continuous electroencephalograms done between 2019 and 2022. Continuous electroencephalograms with diffuse encephalopathy were included in the study. A total of 128 patients with diffuse encephalopathy were included in this study. Patients' ages ranged from 18 to 96 years old with a mean age of 55.3 ± 19.2 years old. Nine out of 128 patients had seizures with an incidence of 7%. Sixty-six point six percent were nonconvulsive electrographic seizures. Fourteen point three percent of the female patients with diffuse encephalopathy had seizures as compared to none of the male patients (P = .002). Also, 12% of patients with a history of epilepsy experienced seizures versus 5.8% of patients without this history (P = .049). Among electrographic features, 25% of patients with delta background had seizures versus 2.3% of the other patients (P = .048). Likewise, 90% of patients with periodic discharges developed seizures in comparison with none of the patients without (P = .001). Seizures are seen in 7% of patients with diffuse encephalopathy. Female gender, past history of epilepsy, delta background and periodic discharges are significant predictors of seizure development in patients with diffuse encephalopathy.

Periodic discharges and status epilepticus: A critical reappraisal

OBJECTIVE

Periodic Discharges (PDs) in Status Epilepticus (SE) are historically related to negative outcome, and the Epidemiology-based Mortality Score in SE (EMSE) identifies PDs as an EEG feature associated with unfavorable prognosis. However, supportive evidence is conflicting. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic significance of interictal PDs during and following SE.

METHODS

All 2020-2023 non-hypoxic-ischemic SE patients with available EEG during SE were retrospectively assessed. Interictal PDs during SE (SE-PDs) and PDs occurring 24-72 h after SE resolution (post-SE-PDs) were examined. In-hospital death was defined as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

189 SE patients were finally included. SE-PDs were not related to outcome, while post-SE-PDs were related to poor prognosis confirmed after multiple regression analysis. EMSE global AUC was 0.751 (95%CI:0.680-0.823) and for EMSE-64 cutoff sensitivity was 0.85, specificity 0.52, accuracy 63%. We recalculated EMSE score including only post-SE-PDs. Modified EMSE (mEMSE) global AUC was 0.803 (95%CI:0.734-0.872) and for mEMSE-64 cutoff sensitivity was 0.84, specificity 0.68, accuracy 73%.

CONCLUSION

Interictal PDs during SE were not related to outcome whereas PDs persisting or appearing > 24 h after SE resolution were strongly associated to unfavorable prognosis. EMSE performed well in our cohort but considering only post-SE-PDs raised specificity and accuracy for mEMSE64 cutoff.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study supports the utility of differentiating between interictal PDs during and after SE for prognostic assessment.

EEG power spectra parameterization and adaptive channel selection towards semi-supervised seizure prediction

BACKGROUND

The seizure prediction algorithms have demonstrated their potential in mitigating epilepsy risks by detecting the pre-ictal state using ongoing electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. However, most of them require high-density EEG, which is burdensome to the patients for daily monitoring. Moreover, prevailing seizure models require extensive training with significant labeled data which is very time-consuming and demanding for the epileptologists.

METHOD

To address these challenges, here we propose an adaptive channel selection strategy and a semi-supervised deep learning model respectively to reduce the number of EEG channels and to limit the amount of labeled data required for accurate seizure prediction. Our channel selection module is centered on features from EEG power spectra parameterization that precisely characterize the epileptic activities to identify the seizure-associated channels for each patient. The semi-supervised model integrates generative adversarial networks and bidirectional long short-term memory networks to enhance seizure prediction.

RESULTS

Our approach is evaluated on the CHB-MIT and Siena epilepsy datasets. With utilizing only 4 channels, the method demonstrates outstanding performance with an AUC of 93.15% on the CHB-MIT dataset and an AUC of 88.98% on the Siena dataset. Experimental results also demonstrate that our selection approach reduces the model parameters and training time.

CONCLUSIONS

Adaptive channel selection coupled with semi-supervised learning can offer the possible bases for a light weight and computationally efficient seizure prediction system, making the daily monitoring practical to improve patients' quality of life.

Periodic Discharges in Critically Ill Children: Predictors and Outcome

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to identify clinical and EEG monitoring characteristics associated with generalized, lateralized, and bilateral-independent periodic discharges (GPDs, LPDs, and BIPDs) and to determine which patterns were associated with outcomes in critically ill children.

METHODS

We performed a prospective observational study of consecutive critically ill children undergoing continuous EEG monitoring, including standardized scoring of GPDs, LPDs, and BIPDs. We identified variables associated with GPDs, LPDs, and BIPDs and assessed whether each pattern was associated with hospital discharge outcomes including the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended Pediatric version (GOS-E-Peds), Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC), and mortality.

RESULTS

PDs occurred in 7% (91/1,399) of subjects. Multivariable logistic regression indicated that patients with coma (odds ratio [OR], 3.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.55, 7.68) and abnormal EEG background category (OR, 6.85; 95% CI: 3.37, 13.94) were at increased risk for GPDs. GPDs were associated with mortality (OR, 3.34; 95% CI: 1.24, 9.02) but not unfavorable GOS-E-Peds (OR, 1.93; 95% CI: 0.88, 4.23) or PCPC (OR, 1.64; 95% CI: 0.75, 3.58). Patients with acute nonstructural encephalopathy did not experience LPDs, and LPDs were not associated with mortality or unfavorable outcomes. BIPDs were associated with mortality (OR, 3.68; 95% CI: 1.14, 11.92), unfavorable GOS-E-Peds (OR, 5.00; 95% CI: 1.39, 18.00), and unfavorable PCPC (OR, 5.96; 95% CI: 1.65, 21.46).

SIGNIFICANCE

Patients with coma or more abnormal EEG background category had an increased risk for GPDs and BIPDs, and no patients with an acute nonstructural encephalopathy experienced LPDs. GPDs were associated with mortality and BIPDs were associated with mortality and unfavorable outcomes, but LPDs were not associated with unfavorable outcomes.

The incidence and predictors of antibiotic-associated encephalopathy: a multicenter hospital-based study

This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and likelihood of antibiotic-associated encephalopathy (AAE), comparing rates among the classes of antibiotics in monotherapy or in combination therapy. We also investigated the associations between the incidence of AAE and the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and electroencephalogram features. Consecutive admissions that used any kind of antibiotics to treat infectious diseases were identified from six hospitals. We classified antibiotics according to three distinct pathophysiologic mechanisms and clinical subtypes. We searched for the incidence of AAE as the primary outcome. A total of 97,433 admission cases among 56,038 patients was identified. Cases that received type 1 antibiotics had significantly more frequent AAE compared to those that received type 2 antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-5.95; P = 0.021). Combined use of type 1 + 2 antibiotics was associated with a significantly higher incidence of AAE compared to the use of type 2 antibiotics alone (adjusted OR, 3.44; 95% CI 1.49-7.93; P = 0.004). Groups with GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 had significantly higher incidence rates of AAE compared to those with GFRs ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 among cases that received type 1 + 2 antibiotics. Detection of spike-and-wave or sharp-and-wave patterns on electroencephalogram was significantly more common in the combination therapy group. Combination use of antibiotics was associated with a higher incidence of AAE compared to monotherapy. The incidence of AAE significantly increased as renal function decreased, and epileptiform discharges were more likely to be detected in cases receiving combined antibiotics.

Pitfalls in scalp EEG: Current obstacles and future directions

Although electroencephalography (EEG) serves a critical role in the evaluation and management of seizure disorders, it is commonly misinterpreted, resulting in avoidable medical, social, and financial burdens to patients and health care systems. Overinterpretation of sharply contoured transient waveforms as being representative of interictal epileptiform abnormalities lies at the core of this problem. However, the magnitude of these errors is amplified by the high prevalence of paroxysmal events exhibited in clinical practice that compel investigation with EEG. Neurology training programs, which vary considerably both in the degree of exposure to EEG and the composition of EEG didactics, have not effectively addressed this widespread issue. Implementation of competency-based curricula in lieu of traditional educational approaches may enhance proficiency in EEG interpretation amongst general neurologists in the absence of formal subspecialty training. Efforts in this regard have led to the development of a systematic, high-fidelity approach to the interpretation of epileptiform discharges that is readily employable across medical centers. Additionally, machine learning techniques hold promise for accelerating accurate and reliable EEG interpretation, particularly in settings where subspecialty interpretive EEG services are not readily available. This review highlights common diagnostic errors in EEG interpretation, limitations in current educational paradigms, and initiatives aimed at resolving these challenges.

The association between the presence and burden of periodic discharges and outcome in septic patients: an observational prospective study

BACKGROUND

Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is frequent in septic patients. Electroencephalography (EEG) is very sensitive to detect early epileptic abnormalities, such as seizures and periodic discharges (PDs), and to quantify their duration (the so-called burden). However, the prevalence of these EEG abnormalities in septic patients, as well as their effect on morbidity and mortality, are still unclear. The aims of this study were to assess whether the presence of electrographic abnormalities (i.e. the absence of reactivity, the presence and burden of seizures and PDs) was associated with functional outcome and mortality in septic patients and whether these abnormalities were associated with sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE).

METHODS

We prospectively included septic patients, without known chronic or acute intracranial disease or pre-existing acute encephalopathy, requiring ICU admission in a tertiary academic centre. Continuous EEG monitoring was started within 72 h after inclusion and performed for up to 7 days. A comprehensive assessment of consciousness and delirium was performed twice daily by a trained neuropsychologist. Primary endpoints were unfavourable functional outcome (UO, defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended-GOSE-score < 5), and mortality collected at hospital discharge and secondary endpoint was the association of PDs with SAE. Mann-Whitney, Fisher's exact and χ2 tests were used to assess differences in variables between groups, as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression analysis with in-hospital mortality, functional outcome, SAE or PDs as the dependent variables were performed.

RESULTS

We included 92 patients. No seizures were identified. Nearly 25% of patients had PDs. The presence of PDs and PDs burden was associated with UO in univariate (n = 15 [41%], p = 0.005 and p = 0.008, respectively) and, for PDs presence, also in multivariate analysis after correcting for disease severity (OR 3.82, IC 95% [1.27-11.49], p = 0.02). The PDs burden negatively correlated with GOSE (Spearman's coefficient ρ = - 0.2, p = 0.047). The presence of PDs was also independently associated with SAE (OR 8.98 [1.11-72.8], p = 0.04). Reactivity was observed in the majority of patients and was associated with outcomes (p = 0.044 for both functional outcome and mortality).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that PDs and PDs burden are associated with SAE and might affect outcome in septic patients.

Indications for continuous electroencephalographic (cEEG) monitoring: What do they tell us?

OBJECTIVE

While studies have explored clinical and EEG predictors of seizures on continuous EEG (cEEG), the role of cEEG indications as predictors of seizures has not been studied. Our study aims to fill this knowledge gap.

METHODS

We used the prospective cEEG database at Cleveland Clinic for the 2016 calendar year. Patients ≥ 18 years who underwent cEEG for the indication of altered mental status (AMS) and seizure-like events (SLE: motor or patient-reported events) were included. Baseline characteristics and EEG findings were compared between the two groups. Multivariable regression was used to compare the two groups and identify seizure detection risk factors.

RESULTS

Of 2227 patients (mean age 59.4 years) who met the inclusion criteria, 882 (50% females) underwent cEEG for AMS and 1345(51% females) for SLE. SLE patients were younger(OR: 0.988, CI: 0.98-0.99, p < 0.001), had longer monitoring(OR:1.04, CI:1.00-1.07, p = 0.033), were more likely to have epilepsy-related-breakthrough seizures(OR:25.9, CI:0.5.89-115, p < 0.001), psychogenic non-epileptic spells (OR:6.85, CI:1.60-29.3, p = 0.008), were more awake (p < 0.001) and more likely to be on anti-seizure medications(OR:1.60, CI:1.29-1.98, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, SLE was an independent predictor of seizure detection (OR: 2.60, CI: 1.77-3.88, p < 0.001).

SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings highlight the differences in patients undergoing cEEG for AMS vs. SLE. SLE as a cEEG indication represents an independent predictor of seizures on cEEG and, therefore, deserves special attention. Future multicenter studies are needed to validate our findings.

Periodic discharges in veterinary electroencephalography-A visual review

First described in human EEG over 60 years ago, there are very few examples of periodic discharges in the veterinary literature. They are associated with a wide variety of etiologies, both intracranial and systemic, making interpretation challenging. Whether these patterns are indicative of ictal, interictal, or postictal activity is a matter of debate and may vary depending on the clinical features in an individual patient. Periodic discharges have a repeated waveform occurring at nearly regular intervals, with varying morphology of individual discharges from simple sharp waves or slow waves to more complex events. Amplitudes, frequencies, and morphologies of the discharges can fluctuate, occasionally evolving, or resolving over time. This study presents a visual review of several veterinary cases with periodic discharges on EEG similar to those described in human EEG, and discusses the current known pathophysiology of these discharges.

Implications of stimulus-induced, rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs) in hospitalized patients

Background

Stimulus-induced electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns are commonly seen in acutely ill patients undergoing continuous EEG monitoring. Despite ongoing investigations, the pathophysiology, therapeutic and prognostic significance of stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs) and how it applies to specific pathologies remain unclear. We aimed to investigate the clinical implications of SIRPIDs in hospitalized patients.

Methods

This is a retrospective single-center study of hospitalized patients from May 2016 to August 2017. We included patients above the age of 18 years who underwent >16 h of EEG monitoring during a single admission. We excluded patients with cardiac arrest and anoxic brain injury. Demographic data were obtained as well as admission GCS, and discharge modified Rankin Score (mRS). EEGs were reviewed for background activity in addition to epileptiform, periodic, and rhythmic patterns. The presence or absence of SIRPIDs was recorded. Our outcome was discharge mRS defined as good outcome, mRS 0-4, and poor outcome mRS, 5-6.

Results

A total of 351 patients were included in the final analysis. The median age was 63 years and 175 (50%) were women. SIRPIDs were identified in 82 patients (23.4%). Patients with SIRPIDs had a median initial GCS of 12 (IQR, 6-15) and a length of stay of 12 days (IQR, 6-15). They were more likely to have absent posterior dominant rhythm, decreased reactivity, and more likely to have spontaneous periodic and rhythmic patterns and higher frequency of burst suppression. After adjusting for baseline clinical variables, underlying disease type and severity, and EEG background features, the presence of SIRPIDs was also associated with poor outcomes classified as MRS 5 or 6 (OR 4.75 [2.74-8.24] p ≤ 0.0001).

Conclusion

In our cohort of hospitalized patients excluding anoxic brain injury, SIRPIDs were identified in 23.4% and were seen most commonly in patients with primary systemic illness. We found SIRPIDs were independently associated with poor neurologic outcomes. Several studies are indicated to validate these findings and determine the risks vs. benefits of anti-seizure treatment.

Continuous EEG monitoring detects nonconvulsive seizure and Ictal-Interictal Continuum abnormalities in moderate to severe ICANS following systemic CAR-T therapy

Background and Purpose

Immune Cell Effector Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS) is common amongst patients receiving CD19 targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. The purpose of this study is to characterize the incidence of seizures and ictal-interictal continuum (IIC) abnormalities in patients with ICANS.

Methods

Retrospective review of consecutive patients treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) for recurrent high-grade systemic lymphoma at Stanford Medical Center between 2/2016-6/2019. Electronic medical records (EMR) were reviewed for clinical features, treatment information, EEG data, CRS (cytokine release syndrome)/ICANS severity, and clinical outcomes.

Results

Fifty-six patients met inclusion criteria. 85.7% of patients developed CRS, and 58.9% developed ICANS. Twenty-eight patients had EEG monitoring, of whom 26 had ICANS. Median duration of EEG monitoring was 30 hours (range .5-126 hours). Four patients (7.1%) had seizures (1 patient had a clinical generalized seizure, 2 patients had clinical and nonconvulsive seizures, and 1 patient had an isolated non-convulsive seizure). Ictal-interictal continuum abnormalities were common, of which generalized periodic discharges (GPDs) with triphasic morphology and GPDs with epileptiform morphology were most frequently seen. Generalized periodic discharges with triphasic wave morphology were found across Grade 2-3 peak ICANS severity, however the majority (86%) of patients with epileptiform GPDs had Grade 3 peak ICANS severity.

Conclusions

Among patients receiving axi-cel, seizure occurred in 7.1% of the total cohort, representing 12% of patients with ICANS. Ictal-interictal continuum abnormalities are also seen in patients with ICANS, most commonly GPDs. 75% of patients with seizures had nonconvulsive seizures supporting the use of continuous video EEG monitoring in this population.

Rapid response EEG with needle electrodes in an intensive care unit with limited resources

Objective

Continuous EEG (cEEG) is the gold standard for detecting seizures and rhythmic and periodic patterns (RPPs) in critically ill patients but is often not available in health systems with limited resources. The current study aims to determine the feasibility and utility of low-cost, practical, limited montage, sub-dermal needle electrode EEG in a setting where otherwise no EEG would be available.

Methods

The study included all adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit of a single center over a 24-month period. Members of the existing ICU care team, mostly nurses, were trained to place 8 sub-dermal needle EEG electrodes to achieve rapid, limited montage-EEG recording. Clinical outcomes were recorded, including any reported major complications; and the EEG findings documented, including background characterization, RPPs, and seizures.

Results

One hundred twenty-three patients, mean age 68 years, underwent an average of 15.6 min of EEG recording. There were no complications of electrode placement. Overall, 13.0% had seizures (8.1% qualifying as status epilepticus [SE]), 18.7 % had generalized periodic discharges (GPDs), 4.9% had lateralized periodic discharges (LPDs), and 11.4 % sporadic epileptiform discharges (sEDs). Greater mortality was observed in patients with worse background EEGs, seizures, LPDs, or sEDs.

Conclusions

Rapid, limited montage EEG could be achieved safely and inexpensively in a broad population of critically ill patients following minimal training of existing care teams.

Significance

For resource poor centers or centers outside of major metropolitan areas who otherwise have no access to EEG, this may prove a useful method for screening for non-convulsive seizures and status epilepticus.

Electrographic Seizures in the Critically Ill

Identifying and treating critically ill patients with seizures can be challenging. In this article, the authors review the available data on patient populations at risk, seizure prognostication with tools such as 2HELPS2B, electrographic seizures and the various ictal-interictal continuum patterns with their latest definitions and associated risks, ancillary testing such as imaging studies, serum biomarkers, and invasive multimodal monitoring. They also illustrate 5 different patient scenarios, their treatment and outcomes, and propose recommendations for targeted treatment of electrographic seizures in critically ill patients.

The Role of Electroencephalography in the Prognostication of Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Children: A Review

Electroencephalography (EEG) is a neurologic monitoring modality that allows for the identification of seizures and the understanding of cerebral function. Not only can EEG data provide real-time information about a patient’s clinical status, but providers are increasingly using these results to understand short and long-term prognosis in critical illnesses. Adult studies have explored these associations for many years, and now the focus has turned to applying these concepts to the pediatric literature. The aim of this review is to characterize how EEG can be utilized clinically in pediatric intensive care settings and to highlight the current data available to understand EEG features in association with functional outcomes in children after critical illness. In the evaluation of seizures and seizure burden in children, there is abundant data to suggest that the presence of status epilepticus during illness is associated with poorer outcomes and a higher risk of mortality. There is also emerging evidence indicating that poorly organized EEG backgrounds, lack of normal sleep features and lack of electrographic reactivity to clinical exams portend worse outcomes in this population. Prognostication in pediatric critical illness must be informed by the comprehensive evaluation of a patient’s clinical status but the utilization of EEG may help contribute to this assessment in a meaningful way.

High incidence of epileptiform activity in adults undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of seizures and other types of epileptiform brain activity in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is unknown. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of seizures and ictal-interictal continuum patterns in patients undergoing electroencephalography (EEG) during ECMO.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a prospective ECMO registry from 2011-2018 in a university-affiliated academic hospital. Adult subjects who had decreased level of consciousness and underwent EEG monitoring for seizure screening were included. EEG classification followed the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society criteria. Poor neurological outcome was defined as a Cerebral Performance Category of 3-5 at hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Three hundred and ninety-five subjects had ECMO, and one hundred and thirteen (28.6%) had EEG monitoring. Ninety-two (23.3%) subjects had EEG performed during ECMO and were included in the study (average EEG duration 54 h). Veno-arterial ECMO was the most common cannulation strategy (83%) and 26 (28%) subjects had extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Fifty-eight subjects (63%) had epileptiform activity or ictal-interictal continuum patterns on EEG, including three (3%) subjects with nonconvulsive status epilepticus, 33 (36%) generalized periodic discharges, and 4 (5%) lateralized periodic discharges. Comparison between subjects with or without epileptiform activity showed comparable in-hospital mortality (57% vs. 47%, p = 0.38) and poor neurological outcome (and 56% and 36%, p = 0.23). Twenty-seven subjects (33%) had acute neuroimaging abnormalities (stroke N = 21).

CONCLUSIONS

Seizures and ictal-interictal continuum patterns are commonly observed in patients managed with ECMO. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether epileptiform activity is an actionable target for interventions.

SIGNIFICANCE

Epileptiform and ictal-interictal continuum abnormalities are frequently observed in patients supported with ECMO undergoing EEG monitoring.

Adult Critical Care Electroencephalography Monitoring for Seizures: A Narrative Review

Electroencephalography (EEG) is an important and relatively inexpensive tool that allows intensivists to monitor cerebral activity of critically ill patients in real time. Seizure detection in patients with and without acute brain injury is the primary reason to obtain an EEG in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). In response to the increased demand of EEG, advances in quantitative EEG (qEEG) created an approach to review large amounts of data instantly. Finally, rapid response EEG is now available to reduce the time to detect electrographic seizures in limited-resource settings. This review article provides a concise overview of the technical aspects of EEG monitoring for seizures, clinical indications for EEG, the various available modalities of EEG, common and challenging EEG patterns, and barriers to EEG monitoring in the ICU.

Risk factors that predict delayed seizure detection on continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) in a large sample size of critically ill patients

OBJECTIVE

Majority of seizures are detected within 24 hours on continuous EEG (cEEG). Some patients have delayed seizure detection after 24 hours. The purpose of this research was to identify risk factors that predict delayed seizure detection and to determine optimal cEEG duration for various patient subpopulations.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified all patients ≥18 years of age who underwent cEEG at Cleveland clinic during calendar year 2016. Clinical and EEG data for all patients and time to seizure detection for seizure patients were collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-four hundred and two patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 316 (13.2%) had subclinical seizures. Sixty-five (20.6%) patients had delayed seizures detection after 24 hours. Seizure detection increased linearly till 36 hours of monitoring, and odds of seizure detection increased by 46% for every additional day of monitoring. Delayed seizure risk factors included stupor (13.2% after 48 hours, P = .031), lethargy (25.9%, P = .013), lateralized (LPDs) (27.7%, P = .029) or generalized periodic discharges (GPDs) (33.3%, P = .022), acute brain insults (25.5%, P = .036), brain bleeds (32.8%, P = .014), especially multiple concomitant bleeds (61.1%, P < .001), altered mental status (34.7%, P = .001) as primary cEEG indication, and use of antiseizure medications (27.8%, P < .001) at cEEG initiation.

SIGNIFICANCE

Given the linear seizure detection trend, 36 hours of standard monitoring appears more optimal than 24 hours especially for high-risk patients. For awake patients without epileptiform discharges, <24 hours of monitoring appears sufficient. Previous studies have shown that coma and LPDs predict delayed seizure detection. We found that stupor and lethargy were also associated with delayed seizure detection. LPDs and GPDs were associated with delayed seizures. Other delayed seizure risk factors included acute brain insults, brain bleeds especially multiple concomitant bleeds, altered mental status as primary cEEG indication, and use of ASMs at cEEG initiation. Longer cEEG (≥48 hours) is suggested for these high-risk patients.

Neuropsychological Outcome of Critically Ill Patients with Severe Infection

Sepsis and septic shock represent important burdens of disease around the world. Sepsis-associated neurological consequences have a great impact on patients, both in the acute phase and in the long term. Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a severe brain dysfunction that may contribute to long-term cognitive impairment. Its pathophysiology recognizes the following two main mechanisms: neuroinflammation and hemodynamic impairment. Clinical manifestations include different forms of altered mental status, from agitation and restlessness to delirium and deep coma. A definite diagnosis is difficult because of the absence of specific radiological and biological criteria; clinical management is restricted to the treatment of sepsis, focusing on early detection of the infection source, maintenance of hemodynamic homeostasis, and avoidance of metabolic disturbances or neurotoxic drugs.

Periodic and rhythmic patterns in critically ill children: Incidence, interrater agreement, and seizures

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine the incidence of periodic and rhythmic patterns (PRP), assess the interrater agreement between electroencephalographers scoring PRP using standardized terminology, and analyze associations between PRP and electrographic seizures (ES) in critically ill children.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of consecutive critically ill children undergoing continuous electroencephalographic monitoring (CEEG). PRP were identified by one electroencephalographer, and then two pediatric electroencephalographers independently scored the first 1-h epoch that contained PRP using standardized terminology. We determined the incidence of PRPs, evaluated interrater agreement between electroencephalographers scoring PRP, and evaluated associations between PRP and ES.

RESULTS

One thousand three hundred ninety-nine patients underwent CEEG. ES occurred in 345 (25%) subjects. PRP, ES + PRP, and ictal-interictal continuum (IIC) patterns occurred in 142 (10%), 81 (6%), and 93 (7%) subjects, respectively. The most common PRP were generalized periodic discharges (GPD; 43, 30%), lateralized periodic discharges (LPD; 34, 24%), generalized rhythmic delta activity (GRDA; 34, 24%), bilateral independent periodic discharges (BIPD; 14, 10%), and lateralized rhythmic delta activity (LRDA; 11, 8%). ES risk varied by PRP type (p < .01). ES occurrence was associated with GPD (odds ratio [OR] = 6.35, p < .01), LPD (OR = 10.45, p < .01), BIPD (OR = 6.77, p < .01), and LRDA (OR = 6.58, p < .01). Some modifying features increased the risk of ES for each of those PRP. GRDA was not significantly associated with ES (OR = 1.34, p = .44). Each of the IIC patterns was associated with ES (OR = 6.83-8.81, p < .01). ES and PRP occurred within 6 h (before or after) in 45 (56%) subjects.

SIGNIFICANCE

PRP occurred in 10% of critically ill children who underwent CEEG. The most common patterns were GPD, LPD, GRDA, BIPD, and LRDA. The GPD, LPD, BIPD, LRDA, and IIC patterns were associated with ES. GRDA was not associated with ES.

Clinical predictors of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy neurotoxicity: a single-center study

Aims: Neurotoxicity (NT) is a common complication of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Data on early clinical identifiers for impending severe NT are lacking. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective study on 26 adult relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients treated with commercial CAR T-cell therapy (December 2017 - September 2018). Results: NT of any grade and severe NT occurred in 88 and 31% of patients, respectively. Dysgraphia (p < 0.01), disorientation (p = 0.01) and inattention (p = 0.018) were associated with severe NT, with positive predictive values of 100, 87.5 and 87.5%, respectively. Dysnomia was not associated with severe NT. Conclusion: In the authors' limited cohort, the dysgraphia, disorientation and inattention components of the CAR T-cell therapy-associated toxicity 10 scoring system were significantly associated with and predictive of impending severe NT.

Status Triphasicus Versus Status Epilepticus?

SUMMARY

Generalized periodic patterns with triphasic wave morphology, long referred to as triphasic waves [TWs], had been associated with metabolic encephalopathies, although other neurologic and systemic causes have since been identified. In a recent classification of periodic patterns, TWs were formally grouped with the generalized periodic discharges, which are often associated with ictal activity. The interpretation of generalized periodic patterns with TWs as nonictal can have significant implications in the management of comatose patients in nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Electrographic characteristics that help distinguish nonictal periodic patterns with TWs from generalized periodic discharge ictal patterns include (1) TWs in long runs of periodic bilaterally synchronous and symmetric discharges, maximal in frontocentral or posterior head regions with and without a frontal-to-occipital lag or posterior-to-anterior lag, respectively; (2) recurrent spontaneous and/or low-dose benzodiazepine-induced attenuation and/or suppression of the periodic pattern and replacement with a diffuse slow wave activity throughout a prolonged EEG recording; and (3) stimulation-induced activation and/or increase in frequency and/or organization of TWs. We coined the term of status triphasicus to describe the electrographic periodic pattern of TWs with these three distinct characteristics. In this article, we discuss the advantages and limitations of keeping the status triphasicus pattern as a distinct electrographic entity different from periodic ictal generalized periodic discharge patterns. We discuss the circumstances in which a status triphasicus pattern can be associated with ictal activity and propose a simple pragmatic classification of status triphasicus that encompasses the different clinical scenarios it can be associated with.

Can We Distinguish Triphasic Waves From Other Generalized Periodic Discharges? Do We Need to?

SUMMARY

Triphasic waves are intuitively distinctive waveforms that fall under the umbrella of generalized periodic discharges. The ability to distinguish these waveforms consistently could be helpful if a specific underlying pathophysiology could be identified. However, scalp EEG and clinical observation have been limited in their ability to elucidate the underlying cortical physiology that leads to triphasic waves. Evidence from intracranial physiologic data and computational modeling suggest that these and other periodic discharges should be viewed not as strictly ictal nor non-ictal but rather on the spectrum between these two. Triphasic waves in particular appear to result from an abnormal balance between cortical excitation and synaptic transmission with input from functionally connected brain networks, such as the thalamocortical pathways involved in arousal. The practical implication of triphasic waves begins with acknowledgement of uncertainty and a rational approach should ask whether the pattern-or its treatment-might be creating harm.

Do Triphasic Waves and Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus Arise From Similar Mechanisms? A Computational Model

PURPOSE

Triphasic waves arising in patients with toxic metabolic encephalopathy (TME) are often considered different from generalized periodic discharges (GPDs) in patients with generalized nonconvulsive status epilepticus (GNCSE). The primary objective of this study was to investigate whether a common mechanism can explain key aspects of both triphasic waves in TME and GPDs in GNCSE.

METHOD

A neural mass model was used for the simulation of EEG patterns in patients with acute hepatic encephalopathy, a common etiology of TME. Increased neuronal excitability and impaired synaptic transmission because of elevated ammonia levels in acute hepatic encephalopathy patients were used to explain how triphasic waves and GNCSE arise. The effect of gamma-aminobutyric acid-ergic drugs on epileptiform activity, simulated with a prolonged duration of the inhibitory postsynaptic potential, was also studied.

RESULTS

The simulations show that a model that includes increased neuronal excitability and impaired synaptic transmission can account for both the emergence of GPDs and GNCSE and their suppression by gamma-aminobutyric acid-ergic drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study add to evidence from other studies calling into question the dichotomy between triphasic waves in TME and GPDs in GNCSE and support the hypothesis that all GPDs, including those arising in TME patients, occur via a common mechanism.

[S2k guidelines: status epilepticus in adulthood : Guidelines of the German Society for Neurology]

This S2k guideline on diagnosis and treatment of status epilepticus (SE) in adults is based on the last published version from 2021. New definitions and evidence were included in the guideline and the clinical pathway. A seizures lasting longer than 5 minutes (or ≥ 2 seizures over more than 5 mins without intermittend recovery to the preictal neurological state. Initial diagnosis should include a cCT or, if possible, an MRI. The EEG is highly relevant for diagnosis and treatment-monitoring of non-convulsive SE and for the exclusion or diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures. As the increasing evidence supports the relevance of inflammatory comorbidities (e.g. pneumonia) related clinical chemistry should be obtained and repeated over the course of a SE treatment, and antibiotic therapy initiated if indicated.Treatment is applied on four levels: 1. Initial SE: An adequate dose of benzodiazepine is given i.v., i.m., or i.n.; 2. Benzodiazepine-refractory SE: I.v. drugs of 1st choice are levetiracetam or valproate; 3. Refractory SE (RSE) or 4. Super-refractory SE (SRSE): I.v. propofol or midazolam alone or in combination or thiopental in anaesthetic doses are given. In focal non-convulsive RSE the induction of a therapeutic coma depends on the circumstances and is not mandatory. In SRSE the ketogenic diet should be given. I.v. ketamine or inhalative isoflorane can be considered. In selected cased electroconvulsive therapy or, if a resectable epileptogenic zone can be defined epilepsy surgery can be applied. I.v. allopregnanolone or systemic hypothermia should not be used.

Seizures and Sepsis: A Narrative Review

Patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) can develop convulsive or nonconvulsive seizures. The cytokine storm and the overwhelming systemic inflammation trigger the electric circuits that promote seizures. Several neurologic symptoms, associated with this disease, range from mild consciousness impairment to coma. Focal or generalized convulsive seizures are frequent in sepsis, although nonconvulsive seizures (NCS) are often misdiagnosed and prevalent in SAE. In order to map the trigger zone in all patients that present focal or generalized seizures and also to detect NCS, EEG is indicated but continuous EEG (cEEG) is not very widespread; timing, duration, and efficacy of this tool are still unknown. The long-term risk of seizures in survivors is increased. The typical stepwise approach of seizures management begins with benzodiazepines and follows with anticonvulsants up to anesthetic drugs such as propofol or thiopental, which are able to induce burst suppression and interrupt the pathological electrical circuits. This narrative review discusses pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment of seizures in sepsis.

Continuous EEG monitoring in the follow-up of convulsive status epilepticus patients: A proposal and preliminary validation of an EEG-based seizure build-up score (EaSiBUSSEs)

Continuous electroencephalography (EEG) is a major tool for monitoring patients admitted to the intensive care unit after refractory convulsive status epilepticus, following control of convulsive movements. We review the values of different EEG patterns observed in critically ill patients for prognosis and seizure risk, together with proposed criteria for non-convulsive status epilepticus diagnosis (Salzburg Criteria), the EEG scores for prognosis (Epidemiology-based Mortality score in Status Epilepticus, EMSE) and for seizure risk (2HELPS2B). These criteria and scores, based partially on continuous EEG, are not tailored to repetitively monitor the progressive build-up leading to seizure or status epilepticus recurrence. Therefore, we propose a new EEG-based seizure build-up score in status epilepticus (EaSiBUSSEs), based on the morphology and the prevalence of the EEG patterns observed in the follow-up of convulsive status epilepticus patients. It displays subscores from the least (no interictal activity) to the most associated with seizures (focal or generalized status epilepticus). We then evaluated the performance of the EaSiBUSSEs in a cohort of eleven patients who were admitted to intensive care unit for convulsive status epilepticus and who underwent continuous EEG recording. The receiver operating curve revealed good accuracy in identifying patients who would have seizures in the next 24 h, with excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability. We believe that this score is simple to perform, and suitable for repeated monitoring of EEG following refractory convulsive status epilepticus, with quantitative description of major EEG changes leading to seizures.

ICU-cEEG Monitoring

The neurological application of long-term electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been implemented in many healthcare institutions. The use of EEG as a monitoring tool in the ICU affords many potential benefits. Uses include the identification of seizures, vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), the assessment of coma and the determination of brain death. Neurologic critical care is focused on recognition and treatment of secondary insults. Often treatment is withheld because these insults are not recognized early enough until an irreversible deficit manifest. Continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring provides a unique potential to recognize these insults and offers an opportunity for early intervention. Why should we continuously monitor the brain with EEG in the ICU? Nonconvulsive seizures (NCS) are common in comatose patients. Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus (NCSE) and NCS ¹ are damaging to brain tissue; thus, rapid control of seizures is essential to preserving brain function. With the increased use of cEEG in critical care areas, the purpose of this paper is to examine the use and benefits of EEG monitoring of ICU patients, review the indications for the use of cEEG and discuss technical issues and concerns when performing cEEG monitoring. This article has been divided into six distinct sections: (1) Seizures, NCS, and NCSE (2) Periodic Discharges ² and Patterns on the Ictal-interictal Continuum, (3) Cerebral Ischemia, SAH, and Delayed Cerebral Ischemia (DCI), (4) Encephalopathy and Coma (5) ECI and Brain Death, and (6) ICU-cEEG Monitoring Techniques.

Presence of generalized periodic discharges and hospital mortality

BACKGROUND

Generalized periodic discharges (GPDs) are rare patterns that can be found in long-term electroencephalographic monitoring in critical patients. These patterns have been correlated with non-seizure crisis and non-convulsive status epilepticus, associated with poor prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcome between patients who developed GPDs and patients with other abnormalities in long-term electroencephalographic monitoring.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed by analyzing the medical records of 112 patients over 18 years who developed GPDs during long-term electroencephalographic monitoring (12‒16 hours of monitoring) in the intensive care unit of a general hospital, compared with a group that had only nonspecific abnormalities in the monitoring.

RESULTS

Age and cardiorespiratory arrest (CA) were risk factors for death - OR 1.04 (95% CI 1,02 - 1,07) and p<0.001; OR 3.00 (95% CI 1,01 - 8,92) and p=0.046, respectively. It was not possible to evaluate if GPDs alone were associated with an unfavorable outcome or would be a bias for the development of CA in these patients. However, of the six isolated GPDs cases, 2/3 evolved to death, showing a tendency to worse prognosis. A significant difference (p=0.031) was observed for a worse outcome when comparing the group of 28 patients who presented GPD or CA with the other group which did not present any of these variables; of these 28 patients, 20 (71.4%) died.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of post-CA GPDs was associated with worse prognosis, but it was not clear whether these patterns are independent factors of an unfavorable evolution.

Continuous electroencephalography characteristics and acute symptomatic seizures in COVID-19 patients

OBJECTIVE

As concerns regarding neurological manifestations in COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) patients increase, limited data exists on continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) findings in these patients. We present a retrospective cohort study of cEEG monitoring in COVID-19 patients to better explore this knowledge gap.

METHODS

Among 22 COVID-19 patients, 19 underwent cEEGs, and 3 underwent routine EEGs (<1 h). Demographic and clinical variables, including comorbid conditions, discharge disposition, survival and cEEG findings, were collected.

RESULTS

cEEG was performed for evaluation of altered mental status (n = 17) or seizure-like events (n = 5). Five patients, including 2 with epilepsy, had epileptiform abnormalities on cEEG. Two patients had electrographic seizures without a prior epilepsy history. There were no acute neuroimaging findings. Periodic discharges were noted in one-third of patients and encephalopathic EEG findings were not associated with IV anesthetic use.

CONCLUSIONS

Interictal epileptiform abnormalities in the absence of prior epilepsy history were rare. However, the discovery of asymptomatic seizures in two of twenty-two patients was higher than previously reported and is therefore of concern.

SIGNIFICANCE

cEEG monitoring in COVID-19 patients may aid in better understanding an epileptogenic potential of SARS-CoV2 infection. Nevertheless, larger studies utilizing cEEG are required to better examine acute epileptic risk in COVID-19 patients.

High-Frequency Oscillations in the Scalp EEG of Intensive Care Unit Patients With Altered Level of Consciousness

PURPOSE

In comatose patients, distinguishing between nonconvulsive status epilepticus and diffuse structural or metabolic encephalopathies is often challenging. Both conditions can generate periodic discharges on EEG with similar morphology and periodicity. We investigated the occurrence of high-frequency oscillations-potential biomarkers of epileptogenesis-on scalp EEG of comatose patients with periodic discharges in the EEG.

METHODS

Fifteen patients were included. Patients were divided into three groups, according to underlying etiology: Group 1, seizure related; group 2, structural; group 3, nonstructural. EEG recordings were compared with respect to the presence and rates of gamma (30-80 Hz) and ripples (80-250 Hz).

RESULTS

Patients were 23 to 106 years old (median, 68 years); 60% were female. 206 channels were eligible for analysis (median, 15 channels/patient). Overall, 43% of channels showed gamma, and 24% had ripples. Group 2 showed the highest proportion of channels with gamma (47%), followed by group 1 (38%) and group 3 (36%). Mean gamma rates were higher in group 2 (4.65 gamma/min/channel) than in group 1 (1.52) and group 3 (1.44) (P < 0.001). Group 2 showed the highest proportion of channels with ripples (29.2%), followed by group 1 (15%) and group 3 (24.2%). Mean ripple rates were higher in group 2 (5.09 ripple/min/channel) than in group 1 (0.96) and group 3 (0.83) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Fast oscillations, including high-frequency oscillations, can be detected in scalp EEG of patients with altered consciousness. High rates of fast activity may suggest an underlying structural brain lesion. Future studies are needed to determine whether fast oscillations in the setting of acute/subacute brain lesions are a biomarker of subsequent development of human epilepsy.

Markers in Status Epilepticus Prognosis

Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurologic emergency with high morbidity and mortality. The assessment of a patient's prognosis is crucial in making treatment decisions. In this review, we discuss various markers that have been used to prognosticate SE in terms of recurrence, mortality, and functional outcome. These markers include demographic, clinical, electrophysiological, biochemical, and structural data. The heterogeneity of SE etiology and semiology renders development of prognostic markers challenging. Currently, prognostication in SE is limited to a few clinical scores. Future research should integrate clinical, genetic and epigenetic, metabolic, inflammatory, and structural biomarkers into prognostication models to approach "personalized medicine" in prognostication of outcomes after SE.

Ictal-interictal continuum: a review of recent advancements

Continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) has become an indispensable technique in the management of critically ill patients for early detection and treatment of non-convulsive seizures (NCS) and non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). It has also brought about a renaissance in a wide range of rhythmic and periodic patterns with heterogeneous frequency and morphology. These patterns share the rhythmic and sharp appearances of electrographic seizures, but often lack the necessary frequency, spatiotemporal evolution and clinical accompaniments to meet the definitive criteria for ictal patterns. They may be associated with cerebral metabolic crisis and neuronal injury, therefore not clearly interictal either, but lie along an intervening spectrum referred to as ictal-interictal continuum (IIC). Generally speaking, rhythmic and periodic patterns are categorized as interictal patterns when occurring at a rate of <1Hz, and are categorized as NCS and NCSE when occurring at a rate of >2.5 Hz with spatiotemporal evolution. As such, IIC commonly includes the rhythmic and periodic patterns occurring at a rate of 1–2.5 Hz without spatiotemporal evolution and clinical correlates. Currently there are no evidence-based guidelines on when and if to treat patients with IIC patterns, and particularly how aggressively to treat, presenting a challenging electrophysiological and clinical conundrum. In practice, a diagnostic trial with preferably a non-sedative anti-seizure medication (ASM) can be considered with the end point being both clinical and electrographic improvement. When available and necessary, correlation of IIC with biomarkers of neuronal injury, such as neuronal specific enolase (NSE), neuroimaging, depth electrode recording, cerebral microdialysis and oxygen measurement, can be assessed for the consideration of ASM treatment. Here we review the recent advancements in their clinical significance, risk stratification and treatment algorithm.

Brain networks involved in generalized periodic discharges (GPD) in post-anoxic-ischemic encephalopathy

AIM

Generalized periodic discharge (GPD) is an EEG pattern of poor neurological outcome, frequently observed in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. The aim of our study was to identify the neuronal network generating ≤2.5 Hz GPD using EEG source localization and connectivity analysis.

METHODS

We analyzed 40 comatose adult patients with anoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, who had 19 channel-EEG recording. We computed electric source analysis based on distributed inverse solution (LAURA) and we estimated cortical activity in 82 atlas-based cortical brain regions. We applied directed connectivity analysis (Partial Directed Coherence) on these sources to estimate the main drivers.

RESULTS

Source analysis suggested that the GPD are generated in the cortex of the limbic system in the majority of patients (87.5%). Connectivity analysis revealed main drivers located in thalamus and hippocampus for the large majority of patients (80%), together with important activation also in amygdala (70%).

CONCLUSIONS

We hypothesize that the anoxic-ischemic dysfunction, leading to hyperactivity of the thalamo-cortical (limbic presumably) circuit, can result in an oscillatory thalamic activity capable of inducing periodic cortical (limbic, mostly medial-temporal and orbitofrontal) discharges, similarly to the case of generalized rhythmic spike-wave discharge in convulsive or non-convulsive status epilepticus.

Seizure Risk in Patients Undergoing 30-Day Readmission After Continuous EEG Monitoring

PURPOSE

The use of continuous electroencephalographic (cEEG) monitoring has improved the understanding of the seizure risk during acute hospitalization. However, the immediate posthospitalization seizure risk in these patients remains unknown. Patients undergoing 30-day readmission after initial cEEG monitoring were analyzed to fill this knowledge gap.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained cEEG database (January 1, 2015-December 31, 2015) was used to identify adults who underwent a repeat cEEG during their 30-day readmission after cEEG during their index hospitalization (index cEEG). Various demographical, clinical, and cEEG variables were extracted including indication for cEEG: altered mental status and clinical seizure-like events.

RESULTS

A total of 57 of the 2,485 (2.3%) adults undergoing index cEEG during the study period had concerns for seizures and underwent repeat cEEG during a 30-day readmission. These patients were almost three times more likely to have suffered electrographic seizure on the index admission (odds ratio, 2.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.54-5.15; P < 0.001) compared with non-readmitted patients. Seizure-like events led to the readmission of 40.4% patients. Close to one in five (19.3%) readmitted patients were found to have an electrographic seizure. Only variable predictive of seizure on readmission was seizure-like events (odds ratio, 6.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-33.0; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

A small percentage of patients have clinical presentation concerning for seizures with in 30 days after index cEEG. The risk of electrographic seizures in this patient population is higher than patients who have cEEG monitoring but do not undergo a 30-day readmission requiring repeat cEEG. Future research on early identification of patients at risk of 30-day readmission because of concerns for seizure is needed.

Clinical, Electroencephalographic Features and Prognostic Factors of Cefepime-Induced Neurotoxicity: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of cefepime-induced neurotoxicity (CIN) has been previously underestimated, and there have only been sporadic reports from critical neurological settings. The present study aimed to investigate the potential factors associated with disease development, electroencephalography (EEG) sub-classification, and outcome measures.

METHODS

The 10-year medical records of patients who underwent EEG between 2007 and 2016 at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan, and developed encephalopathy after cefepime therapy were retrospectively reviewed. Age- and sex-matched controls were included for further analysis. Demographic data, the occurrence of clinical seizures, non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), receiving maintenance or urgent hemodialysis, EEG findings, and functional outcomes were analyzed. The Chi-square test and a logistic regression model were applied to survey significant prognostic factors relating to mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 42 CIN patients were identified, including 25 patients from wards and 17 from intensive care units; their mean age was 75.8 ± 11.8 years. Twenty-one patients (50%) had chronic kidney disease, and 18 (43%) had acute kidney injury. Among these patients, 32 (76%) received appropriate cefepime dose adjustment. Three patients had a normal renal function at the time of CIN onset. The logistic regression model suggested that maintenance hemodialysis and longer duration of cefepime use were independently associated with the development of CIN, with odds ratios of 3.8 and 1.2, respectively. NCSE was frequently noted in the CIN patients (64%). Generalized periodic discharge with or without triphasic morphology was the most common EEG pattern (38%), followed by generalized rhythmic delta activity and generalized spike-and-waves. AEDs were administered to 86% of the patients. A total of 17 patients (40%) did not survive to hospital discharge. Adequate cefepime dose adjustment and early cefepime discontinuation led to a better prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

CIN was associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. Neurotoxic symptoms could still occur when the cefepime dose was adjusted, or in patients with normal renal function. Patients with maintenance hemodialysis or a longer duration of cefepime therapy tended to develop CIN. Early recognition of abnormal EEG findings allowed for the withdrawal of the offending agent, resulting in clinical improvements and a better prognosis at discharge.

Language dysfunction-associated EEG findings in patients with CAR-T related neurotoxicity

Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells (CAR-T) have emerged as a promising immunotherapeutic approach in relapsed/refractory haematolgical malignancies. Broader application is limited by unique toxicities, notably, neurotoxicity (NTX). Language dysfunction is among the most frequent symptoms of NTX, the underlying mechanisms of which remain to be elucidated. Electroencephalogram (EEG) is an important tool to monitor for NTX and may provide insights into language dysfunction.

Aim

We aimed to characterise language dysfunction and define electroencephalographic signatures after CAR-T cell therapy.

Methods

We reviewed the clinical presentation and EEG findings of 20 adult patients presenting with language dysfunction after CAR-T cell infusion. The cohort included a subset of patients treated with investigational CD19-directed CAR-T cells for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=17), acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (n=1), follicular lymphoma (n=1) and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (n=1).

Results

Language dysfunction presented within 14 days of CAR-T cell infusion in 16 (84%) patients. Ten (50%) patients had mild word-finding difficulties and 10 (50%) had marked dysphasia with profound word-finding difficulties; the latter were all associated with generalised rhythmic delta activity or generalised periodic discharges on EEG.

Conclusions

Language dysfunction after CAR-T cell therapy is associated with generalised EEG abnormalities.

Electrographic seizures and ictal-interictal continuum (IIC) patterns in critically ill patients

Critical care long-term continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring has expanded dramatically in the last several decades spurned by technological advances in EEG digitalization and several key clinical findings: 1-Seizures are relatively common in the critically ill-large recent observational studies suggest that around 20% of critically ill patients placed on cEEG have seizures. 2-The majority (~75%) of patients who have seizures have exclusively "electrographic seizures", that is, they have no overt ictal clinical signs. Along with the discovery of the unexpectedly high incidence of seizures was the high prevalence of EEG patterns that share some common features with archetypical electrographic seizures but are not uniformly considered to be "ictal". These EEG patterns include lateralized periodic discharges (LPDs) and generalized periodic discharges (GPDs)-patterns that at times exhibit ictal-like behavior and at other times behave more like an interictal finding. Dr. Hirsch and colleagues proposed a conceptual framework to describe this spectrum of patterns called the ictal-interictal continuum (IIC). In the following years, investigators began to answer some of the key pragmatic clinical concerns such as which patients are at risk of seizures and what is the optimal duration of cEEG use. At the same time, investigators have begun probing the core questions for critical care EEG-what is the underlying pathophysiology of these patterns, at what point do these patterns cause secondary brain injury, what are the optimal treatment strategies, and how do these patterns affect clinical outcomes such as neurological disability and the development of epilepsy. In this review, we cover recent advancements in both practical concerns regarding cEEG use, current treatment strategies, and review the evidence associating IIC/seizures with poor clinical outcomes.

Post-acute symptomatic seizure (PASS) clinic: A continuity of care model for patients impacted by continuous EEG monitoring

Objective

We present a model for the outpatient care of patients undergoing continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring during a hospitalization, named the post‐acute symptomatic seizure (PASS) clinic. We investigated whether establishing this clinic led to improved access to epileptologist care.

Methods

As part of the PASS clinic initiative, electronic health record (EHR) provides an automated alert to the inpatient care team discharging adults on first time antiepileptic drug (AED) after undergoing cEEG monitoring. The alert explains the rationale and facilitates scheduling for a PASS clinic appointment, three‐month after discharge, along with a same‐day extended (75 minutes) EEG. We compared the initial epilepsy clinic visits by patients undergoing cEEG in 2017, before (“Pre‐PASS” period and cohort) and after (“PASS” period and cohort) the alert went live in the EHR.

Results

Of the 170 patients included, 68 (40%) suffered a seizure during the mean follow‐up of 20.9 ± 10 months. AEDs were stopped or reduced in 66 out of 148 (44.6%) patients discharged on AEDs. Pre‐PASS cohort included 45 patients compared to 145 patients in the PASS cohort, accounting for 5.8% and 9.9% of patients, respectively, who underwent cEEG during the corresponding periods (odds ratio [OR] = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.26‐2.54, P = .001). The two cohorts did not differ in terms of electrographic or clinical seizures. The PASS cohort was significantly more likely to be followed up within 1‐6 months of discharge (OR = 4.6, 95% CI = 2.1‐10.1, P < .001) and have a pre‐clinic EEG (51.2% vs 11.1%; OR = 8.39, 95% CI = 3.1‐22.67, P < .001).

Significance

PASS clinic, a unique outpatient transition of care model for managing patients at risk of acute symptomatic seizure led to an almost twofold increase in access to an epileptologist. Future research should address the wide knowledge gap about the best post‐hospital discharge management practices for these patients.

How and Whom to Monitor for Seizures in an ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To pool prevalence of nonconvulsive seizure, nonconvulsive status epilepticus, and epileptiform activity detected by different electroencephalography types in critically ills and to compare detection rates among them.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (via PubMed) and SCOPUS (via Scopus) STUDY SELECTION:: Any type of study was eligible if studies were done in adult critically ill, applied any type of electroencephalography, and reported seizure rates. Case reports and case series were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted independently by two investigators. Separated pooling of prevalence of nonconvulsive seizure/nonconvulsive status epilepticus/epileptiform activity and odds ratio of detecting outcomes among different types of electroencephalography was performed using random-effect models. This meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and also adhered to the Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Quality of evidence was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for observational studies and Cochrane methods for randomized controlled trial studies.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 78 (16,707 patients) and eight studies (4,894 patients) were eligible for pooling prevalence and odds ratios. For patients with mixed cause of admission, the pooled prevalence of nonconvulsive seizure, nonconvulsive status epilepticus, either nonconvulsive seizure or nonconvulsive status epilepticus detected by routine electroencephalography was 3.1%, 6.2%, and 6.3%, respectively. The corresponding prevalence detected by continuous electroencephalography monitoring was 17.9%, 9.1%, and 15.6%, respectively. In addition, the corresponding prevalence was high in post convulsive status epilepticus (33.5%, 20.2%, and 32.9%), CNS infection (23.9%, 18.1%, and 23.9%), and post cardiac arrest (20.0%, 17.3%, and 22.6%). The pooled conditional log odds ratios of nonconvulsive seizure/nonconvulsive status epilepticus detected by continuous electroencephalography versus routine electroencephalography from studies with paired data 2.57 (95% CI, 1.11-5.96) and pooled odds ratios from studies with independent data was 1.57 (95% CI, 1.00-2.47).

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of seizures detected by continuous electroencephalography was significantly higher than with routine electroencephalography. Prevalence was particularly high in post convulsive status epilepticus, CNS infection, and post cardiac arrest.

Continuous Electroencephalography After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

OBJECTIVES

After traumatic brain injury, continuous electroencephalography is widely used to detect electrographic seizures. With the development of standardized continuous electroencephalography terminology, we aimed to describe the prevalence and burden of ictal-interictal patterns, including electrographic seizures after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury and to correlate continuous electroencephalography features with functional outcome.

DESIGN

Post hoc analysis of the prospective, randomized controlled phase 2 multicenter INTREPID study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00805818). Continuous electroencephalography was initiated upon admission to the ICU. The primary outcome was the 3-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended. Consensus electroencephalography reviews were performed by raters certified in standardized continuous electroencephalography terminology blinded to clinical data. Rhythmic, periodic, or ictal patterns were referred to as "ictal-interictal continuum"; severe ictal-interictal continuum was defined as greater than or equal to 1.5 Hz lateralized rhythmic delta activity or generalized periodic discharges and any lateralized periodic discharges or electrographic seizures.

SETTING

Twenty U.S. level I trauma centers.

PATIENTS

Patients with nonpenetrating traumatic brain injury and postresuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale score of 4-12 were included.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Among 152 patients with continuous electroencephalography (age 34 ± 14 yr; 88% male), 22 (14%) had severe ictal-interictal continuum including electrographic seizures in four (2.6%). Severe ictal-interictal continuum burden correlated with initial prognostic scores, including the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury (r = 0.51; p = 0.01) and Injury Severity Score (r = 0.49; p = 0.01), but not with functional outcome. After controlling clinical covariates, unfavorable outcome was independently associated with absence of posterior dominant rhythm (common odds ratio, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.30-9.09), absence of N2 sleep transients (3.69; 1.69-8.20), predominant delta activity (2.82; 1.32-6.10), and discontinuous background (5.33; 2.28-12.96) within the first 72 hours of monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe ictal-interictal continuum patterns, including electrographic seizures, were associated with clinical markers of injury severity but not functional outcome in this prospective cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Importantly, continuous electroencephalography background features were independently associated with functional outcome and improved the area under the curve of existing, validated predictive models.

Determinants and outcome of repeat continuous electroencephalogram monitoring-A case-control study

OBJECTIVE

A retrospective, single-center study to analyze the determinants of a repeat continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring during hospitalization and its outcomes using a matched case-control study design.

METHODS

Adults with a repeat cEEG session (cases) were matched by age (±3 years), gender, and mental status to patients with a single cEEG (controls) during hospitalization. Several clinical and EEG characteristics were analyzed to identify predictors of repeat cEEG. Repeat cEEG outcomes were analyzed based on its yield of electrographic seizure. We investigated the predictors of finding increased epileptic potential (degree of association with electrographic seizures) on the repeat cEEG, a marker for possible anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) management change.

RESULTS

A total of 213 (8.6% of all unique cEEG patients) cases were included. A multivariable conditional logistic regression model comparing cases and controls showed that the presence of acute brain insult [odds ratio (OR) = 3.36, 95% CI = 1.26-8.94, P = .015], longer hospital admission (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.07-1.15, P < .001) and being on AEDs at the end of index cEEG (OR = 4.0, 95% CI = 1.8-8.87, P < .001) was determinants of a repeat cEEG. Among cases, 17 (8%) had electrographic seizures on repeat cEEG. Increased epileptic potential on repeat cEEG was noted in 34 (16%) cases. The latter is associated with change in etiology after the index cEEG (P = .03) and duration of repeat cEEG (P = .003) based on multivariable logistic regression model. AEDs were changed in 46 (21.6%) patients based on repeat cEEG findings.

SIGNIFICANCE

Repeat cEEG is not an uncommon practice. It leads to the diagnosis of electrographic seizures in a significant percentage of patients. With the potential of impacting AED management in 16%-21% patients, it should be considered in high-risk patients suffering acute brain insults undergoing prolonged hospitalization.

Electrographic seizure burden and outcomes following pediatric status epilepticus

Pediatric status epilepticus carries a substantial risk for morbidity and mortality, but the relationship between seizure burden, treatment, and outcome remains incompletely understood. This review summarizes the evidence linking seizure burden and outcomes among critically ill children in the intensive care unit (ICU), a population in whom accurate quantification of seizure burden is possible using continuous electroencephalographic monitoring. Several high-quality observational studies among critically ill children have reported an association between higher seizure burden and worse outcome, even after adjusting for potential confounders such as age, etiology, and illness severity. Although these studies support the hypothesis that seizures contribute to brain injury and worsen outcome, a causal link between seizures and outcome remains to be proven. The relationship between seizures and outcome is likely complex, and dependent on factors such as etiology, preexisting neurological disability, medication exposure, and possibly individual genetic factors. Studies attempting to define this complex relationship will need to measure and account for these factors in their analyses. This article is part of the Special Issue "Proceedings of the 7th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures".

Early Epileptiform Discharges and Clinical Signs Predict Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus on Continuous EEG

BACKGROUND

Critical care continuous electroencephalography (CCEEG) represents the gold standard for detection of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) in neurological critical care patients. It is unclear which findings on short-term routine EEG and which clinical parameters predict NCSE during subsequent CCEEG reliably. The aim of the present study was to assess the prognostic significance of changes within the first 30 min of EEG as well as of clinical parameters for the occurrence of NCSE during subsequent CCEEG.

METHODS

Systematic analysis of the first 30 min and the remaining segments of prospective CCEEG recordings according to the ACNS Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology and according to recently proposed NCSE criteria as well as review of clinical parameters of 85 consecutive neurological critical care patients. Logistic regression and binary classification tests were used to determine the most useful parameters within the first 30 min of EEG predicting subsequent NCSE.

RESULTS

The presence of early sporadic epileptiform discharges (SED) and early rhythmic or periodic EEG patterns of "ictal-interictal uncertainty" (RPPIIIU) (OR 15.51, 95% CI 2.83-84.84, p = 0.002) and clinical signs of NCS (OR 18.43, 95% CI 2.06-164.62, p = 0.009) predicted NCSE on subsequent CCEEG. Various combinations of early SED, early RPPIIIU, and clinical signs of NCS showed sensitivities of 79-100%, specificities of 49-89%, and negative predictive values of 95-100% regarding the incidence of subsequent NCSE (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early SED and early RPPIIIU within the first 30 min of EEG as well as clinical signs of NCS predict the occurrence of NCSE during subsequent CCEEG with high sensitivity and high negative predictive value and may be useful to select patients who should undergo CCEEG.

The Ictal-Interictal Continuum: To Treat or Not to Treat (and How)?

Continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring is becoming increasingly used in neurologic and non-neurologic intensive care units (ICUs). Non-convulsive seizures (NCSz) and periodic discharges (PDs) are commonly seen in critically ill patients. Some of these PD patterns, also known as the ictal-interictal continuum (IIC), are associated with an increased risk of seizures and poor outcome. However, we do not fully understand the significance of these periodic patterns and the decision of how aggressively to treat remains controversial. IIC patterns are associated with pathophysiologic changes that closely resemble those of seizures. Here we make the argument that, rather than feature description on EEG, associated changes in brain physiology should dictate management choices.