1
|
Patel V, Chavda V. Intraoperative glioblastoma surgery-current challenges and clinical trials: An update. CANCER PATHOGENESIS AND THERAPY 2024; 2:256-267. [PMID: 39371095 PMCID: PMC11447313 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpt.2023.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2024]
Abstract
Surgical excision is an important part of the multimodal therapy strategy for patients with glioblastoma, a very aggressive and invasive brain tumor. While major advances in surgical methods and technology have been accomplished, numerous hurdles remain in the field of glioblastoma surgery. The purpose of this literature review is to offer a thorough overview of the current challenges in glioblastoma surgery. We reviewed the difficulties associated with tumor identification and visualization, resection extent, neurological function preservation, tumor margin evaluation, and inclusion of sophisticated imaging and navigation technology. Understanding and resolving these challenges is critical in order to improve surgical results and, ultimately, patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vimal Patel
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Anand Pharmacy College, Anand, Gujarat 388001, India
| | - Vishal Chavda
- Department of Pathology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Department of Medicine, Multispecialty, Trauma and ICCU Center, Sardar Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 382350, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kwak S, Akbari H, Garcia JA, Mohan S, Dicker Y, Sako C, Matsumoto Y, Nasrallah MP, Shalaby M, O’Rourke DM, Shinohara RT, Liu F, Badve C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Sloan AE, Lee M, Jain R, Cepeda S, Chakravarti A, Palmer JD, Dicker AP, Shukla G, Flanders AE, Shi W, Woodworth GF, Davatzikos C. Predicting peritumoral glioblastoma infiltration and subsequent recurrence using deep-learning-based analysis of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2024; 11:054001. [PMID: 39220048 PMCID: PMC11363410 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.11.5.054001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Revised: 07/16/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary adult brain tumor. The standard treatment approach is surgical resection to target the enhancing tumor mass, followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. However, malignant cells often extend beyond the enhancing tumor boundaries and infiltrate the peritumoral edema. Traditional supervised machine learning techniques hold potential in predicting tumor infiltration extent but are hindered by the extensive resources needed to generate expertly delineated regions of interest (ROIs) for training models on tissue most and least likely to be infiltrated. Approach We developed a method combining expert knowledge and training-based data augmentation to automatically generate numerous training examples, enhancing the accuracy of our model for predicting tumor infiltration through predictive maps. Such maps can be used for targeted supra-total surgical resection and other therapies that might benefit from intensive yet well-targeted treatment of infiltrated tissue. We apply our method to preoperative multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scans from a subset of 229 patients of a multi-institutional consortium (Radiomics Signatures for Precision Diagnostics) and test the model on subsequent scans with pathology-proven recurrence. Results Leave-one-site-out cross-validation was used to train and evaluate the tumor infiltration prediction model using initial pre-surgical scans, comparing the generated prediction maps with follow-up mpMRI scans confirming recurrence through post-resection tissue analysis. Performance was measured by voxel-wised odds ratios (ORs) across six institutions: University of Pennsylvania (OR: 9.97), Ohio State University (OR: 14.03), Case Western Reserve University (OR: 8.13), New York University (OR: 16.43), Thomas Jefferson University (OR: 8.22), and Rio Hortega (OR: 19.48). Conclusions The proposed model demonstrates that mpMRI analysis using deep learning can predict infiltration in the peri-tumoral brain region for GBM patients without needing to train a model using expert ROI drawings. Results for each institution demonstrate the model's generalizability and reproducibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunwoo Kwak
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Santa Clara University, School of Engineering, Department of Bioengineering, Santa Clara, California, United States
| | - Jose A. Garcia
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Suyash Mohan
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Yehuda Dicker
- Columbia University, School of Engineering, Department of Computer Science, New York, United States
| | - Chiharu Sako
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Yuji Matsumoto
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - MacLean P. Nasrallah
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Mahmoud Shalaby
- Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Donald M. O’Rourke
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Russel T. Shinohara
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Fang Liu
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Chaitra Badve
- Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan
- National Cancer Institute, Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| | - Andrew E. Sloan
- Piedmont Healthcare, Division of Neuroscience, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| | - Matthew Lee
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, New York, United States
| | - Rajan Jain
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, New York, United States
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, New York, United States
| | | | - Arnab Chakravarti
- Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Joshua D. Palmer
- Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Adam P. Dicker
- Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Gaurav Shukla
- Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Adam E. Flanders
- Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Wenyin Shi
- Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Graeme F. Woodworth
- University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gagnon L, Gupta D, Mastorakos G, White N, Goodwill V, McDonald CR, Beaumont T, Conlin C, Seibert TM, Nguyen U, Hattangadi-Gluth J, Kesari S, Schulte JD, Piccioni D, Schmainda KM, Farid N, Dale AM, Rudie JD. Deep Learning Segmentation of Infiltrative and Enhancing Cellular Tumor at Pre- and Posttreatment Multishell Diffusion MRI of Glioblastoma. Radiol Artif Intell 2024; 6:e230489. [PMID: 39166970 PMCID: PMC11427928 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.230489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
Purpose To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) method to detect and segment enhancing and nonenhancing cellular tumor on pre- and posttreatment MRI scans in patients with glioblastoma and to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 1397 MRI scans in 1297 patients with glioblastoma, including an internal set of 243 MRI scans (January 2010 to June 2022) for model training and cross-validation and four external test cohorts. Cellular tumor maps were segmented by two radiologists on the basis of imaging, clinical history, and pathologic findings. Multimodal MRI data with perfusion and multishell diffusion imaging were inputted into a nnU-Net DL model to segment cellular tumor. Segmentation performance (Dice score) and performance in distinguishing recurrent tumor from posttreatment changes (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]) were quantified. Model performance in predicting OS and PFS was assessed using Cox multivariable analysis. Results A cohort of 178 patients (mean age, 56 years ± 13 [SD]; 116 male, 62 female) with 243 MRI timepoints, as well as four external datasets with 55, 70, 610, and 419 MRI timepoints, respectively, were evaluated. The median Dice score was 0.79 (IQR, 0.53-0.89), and the AUC for detecting residual or recurrent tumor was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.89). In the internal test set, estimated cellular tumor volume was significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.04 per milliliter; P < .001) and PFS (HR = 1.04 per milliliter; P < .001) after adjustment for age, sex, and gross total resection (GTR) status. In the external test sets, estimated cellular tumor volume was significantly associated with OS (HR = 1.01 per milliliter; P < .001) after adjustment for age, sex, and GTR status. Conclusion A DL model incorporating advanced imaging could accurately segment enhancing and nonenhancing cellular tumor, distinguish recurrent or residual tumor from posttreatment changes, and predict OS and PFS in patients with glioblastoma. Keywords: Segmentation, Glioblastoma, Multishell Diffusion MRI Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Gagnon
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Diviya Gupta
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - George Mastorakos
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Nathan White
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Vanessa Goodwill
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Carrie R McDonald
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Thomas Beaumont
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Christopher Conlin
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Tyler M Seibert
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Uyen Nguyen
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Jona Hattangadi-Gluth
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Santosh Kesari
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Jessica D Schulte
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - David Piccioni
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Kathleen M Schmainda
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Nikdokht Farid
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Anders M Dale
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Jeffrey D Rudie
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Detchou D, Barrie U. Circulating biomarkers literature in glioma patient populations. Neurosurg Rev 2024; 47:484. [PMID: 39187709 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-02738-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2024] [Revised: 08/21/2024] [Accepted: 08/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024]
Abstract
Liquid biopsy, the process of identifying circulating biomarkers in patients with cancer, has emerged as clinically significant in population screening, tumor status & subclassification, and individualized patient treatment from tumor genotyping. While advances in genome sequencing and mass spectrometry have yielded large datasets available for mining and identified promising biomarkers in breast, melanoma, and lung cancers, among others, challenges persist in identifying biomarkers in neuro-oncology. Despite growing efforts in biomarker research and promise in their emergent clinical potential, there presently exists no validated circulating biomarker test for patients presenting with gliomas, the most common primary brain cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald Detchou
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Umaru Barrie
- Department of Neurosurgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, NYC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kersch CN, Kim M, Stoller J, Barajas RF, Park JE. Imaging Genomics of Glioma Revisited: Analytic Methods to Understand Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2024; 45:537-548. [PMID: 38548303 PMCID: PMC11288537 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a8148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
An improved understanding of the cellular and molecular biologic processes responsible for brain tumor development, growth, and resistance to therapy is fundamental to improving clinical outcomes. Imaging genomics is the study of the relationships between microscopic, genetic, and molecular biologic features and macroscopic imaging features. Imaging genomics is beginning to shift clinical paradigms for diagnosing and treating brain tumors. This article provides an overview of imaging genomics in gliomas, in which imaging data including hallmarks such as IDH-mutation, MGMT methylation, and EGFR-mutation status can provide critical insights into the pretreatment and posttreatment stages. This article will accomplish the following: 1) review the methods used in imaging genomics, including visual analysis, quantitative analysis, and radiomics analysis; 2) recommend suitable analytic methods for imaging genomics according to biologic characteristics; 3) discuss the clinical applicability of imaging genomics; and 4) introduce subregional tumor habitat analysis with the goal of guiding future radiogenetics research endeavors toward translation into critically needed clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cymon N Kersch
- From the Department of Radiation Medicine (C.N.K.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Minjae Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology (M.K., J.E.P.), Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jared Stoller
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.S., R.F.B.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Ramon F Barajas
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.S., R.F.B.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
- Knight Cancer Institute (R.F.B.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
- Advanced Imaging Research Center (R.F.B.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Ji Eun Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology (M.K., J.E.P.), Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
He L, Zhang H, Li T, Yang J, Zhou Y, Wang J, Saidaer T, Liu X, Wang L, Wang Y. Distinguishing Tumor Cell Infiltration and Vasogenic Edema in the Peritumoral Region of Glioblastoma at the Voxel Level via Conventional MRI Sequences. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:1082-1090. [PMID: 37689557 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The peritumoral region of glioblastoma (GBM) is composed of infiltrating tumor cells and vasogenic edema, which are difficult to distinguish manually on MRI. To distinguish tumor cell infiltration and vasogenic edema in GBM peritumoral regions, it is crucial to develop a method that is precise, effective, and widely applicable. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrieved the image characteristics of 379,730 voxels (marker of tumor infiltration) from 28 non-enhanced gliomas and 365,262 voxels (marker of edema) from the peritumoral edema region of 14 meningiomas on conventional MRI sequences (T1-weighted image, the contrast-enhancing T1-weighted image, the T2-weighted image, the T2-fluid attenuated inversion recovery image, and the apparent diffusion coefficient map). Using the SVM classifier, a model for predicting tumor cell infiltration and vasogenic edema at the voxel level was developed. The accuracy of the model's predictions was then evaluated using 15 GBM patients who underwent stereotactic biopsies. RESULTS The area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the prediction model were 0.93, 0.84, 0.83, and 0.85 in the training set, and 0.90, 0.82, 0.83, and 0.83 in the test set (704,992 voxels), respectively. The pathology verification of 28 biopsy points with an accuracy of 0.79. CONCLUSION At the voxel level, it seems possible to forecast tumor cell infiltration and vasogenic edema in the peritumoral region of GBM based on conventional MRI sequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei He
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (L.H., H.Z., T.L., J.Y., Y.Z., J.W., T.S., L.W., Y.W.)
| | - Hong Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (L.H., H.Z., T.L., J.Y., Y.Z., J.W., T.S., L.W., Y.W.)
| | - Tianshi Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (L.H., H.Z., T.L., J.Y., Y.Z., J.W., T.S., L.W., Y.W.)
| | - Jianing Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (L.H., H.Z., T.L., J.Y., Y.Z., J.W., T.S., L.W., Y.W.)
| | - Yanpeng Zhou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (L.H., H.Z., T.L., J.Y., Y.Z., J.W., T.S., L.W., Y.W.)
| | - Jiaxiang Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (L.H., H.Z., T.L., J.Y., Y.Z., J.W., T.S., L.W., Y.W.)
| | - Tuerhong Saidaer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (L.H., H.Z., T.L., J.Y., Y.Z., J.W., T.S., L.W., Y.W.)
| | - Xing Liu
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (X.L.)
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (L.H., H.Z., T.L., J.Y., Y.Z., J.W., T.S., L.W., Y.W.); Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (L.W., Y.W.).
| | - Yinyan Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (L.H., H.Z., T.L., J.Y., Y.Z., J.W., T.S., L.W., Y.W.); Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (L.W., Y.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shahzadi I, Seidlitz A, Beuthien-Baumann B, Zwanenburg A, Platzek I, Kotzerke J, Baumann M, Krause M, Troost EGC, Löck S. Radiomics for residual tumour detection and prognosis in newly diagnosed glioblastoma based on postoperative [ 11C] methionine PET and T1c-w MRI. Sci Rep 2024; 14:4576. [PMID: 38403632 PMCID: PMC10894870 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55092-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Personalized treatment strategies based on non-invasive biomarkers have potential to improve patient management in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). The residual tumour burden after surgery in GBM patients is a prognostic imaging biomarker. However, in clinical patient management, its assessment is a manual and time-consuming process that is at risk of inter-rater variability. Furthermore, the prediction of patient outcome prior to radiotherapy may identify patient subgroups that could benefit from escalated radiotherapy doses. Therefore, in this study, we investigate the capabilities of traditional radiomics and 3D convolutional neural networks for automatic detection of the residual tumour status and to prognosticate time-to-recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) in GBM using postoperative [11C] methionine positron emission tomography (MET-PET) and gadolinium-enhanced T1-w magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). On the independent test data, the 3D-DenseNet model based on MET-PET achieved the best performance for residual tumour detection, while the logistic regression model with conventional radiomics features performed best for T1c-w MRI (AUC: MET-PET 0.95, T1c-w MRI 0.78). For the prognosis of TTR and OS, the 3D-DenseNet model based on MET-PET integrated with age and MGMT status achieved the best performance (Concordance-Index: TTR 0.68, OS 0.65). In conclusion, we showed that both deep-learning and conventional radiomics have potential value for supporting image-based assessment and prognosis in GBM. After prospective validation, these models may be considered for treatment personalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iram Shahzadi
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Dresden, Germany, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Annekatrin Seidlitz
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Dresden, Germany, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Bettina Beuthien-Baumann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alex Zwanenburg
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Dresden, Germany, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Ivan Platzek
- Institute of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Division of Radiooncology/Radiobiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Dresden, Germany, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Dresden, Germany, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Dresden, Germany, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yu F, Wang R, Chaudhari P, Davatzikos C. Investigating Causal Genetic Effects on Overall Survival of Glioblastoma Patients using Normalizing Flow and Structural Causal Model. PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE--THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR OPTICAL ENGINEERING 2024; 12927:129271F. [PMID: 38650741 PMCID: PMC11034818 DOI: 10.1117/12.3005434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive brain tumor with short overall survival (OS) of about 15 months. Understanding the causal factors affecting the patient survival is crucial for disease prognosis and treatment planning. Although previous efforts on survival prediction using multi-omics data has yielded useful predictive models, the causation of the correlated genetic risk factors has not been addressed. Recent advances in causal deep learning models enable the study of causality from complex dataset. In this paper, we leverage the recently proposed structural causal model (SCM) with normalizing flows parameterized by deep networks to perform the counterfactual query to investigate the causal relationship between gene mutation and OS with the presence of other confounders including sex, age and radiomics features. The query amounts to the question that what the survival days will be if the gene mutation status has been changed, i.e., from mutant to non-mutant and vice versa. The trained causal model will infer the counterfactual outcome given the intervention on specific gene mutation. We apply multivariate Cox-PH model to find the genes associated with survival, and investigate the causal genetic effect by comparing the original and counterfactual survival days in a bi-directional fashion. Particularly, the following two scenarios are considered: (1) intervention on a specific gene with non-mutant status to generate the counterfactual survival days as if the gene is mutant, with which the original survival days of the subjects with that mutant gene will be compared; (2) intervention on the gene with mutant status and perform the comparison with survival days of subjects with that non-mutant gene. Our experimental results show that no causation of two correlated genes (NF1, RB1) was revealed in the cohort (n=181), while their genetic effects on OS in terms of prolonging or shortening are generally in accordance with clinical findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fanyang Yu
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Rongguang Wang
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Pratik Chaudhari
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kwak S, Akbari H, Garcia JA, Mohan S, Davatzikos C. Fully automatic mpMRI analysis using deep learning predicts peritumoral glioblastoma infiltration and subsequent recurrence. PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE--THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR OPTICAL ENGINEERING 2024; 12926:129261N. [PMID: 38742150 PMCID: PMC11089715 DOI: 10.1117/12.3001752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is most aggressive and common adult brain tumor. The standard treatments typically include maximal surgical resection, followed adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy. However, the efficacy of these treatment is often limited, as tumor often infiltrate into the surrounding brain tissue, often extending beyond the radiologically defined margins. This infiltration contributes to the high recurrence rate and poor prognosis associated with GBM patients, necessitating advanced methods for early and accurate detection of tumor infiltration. Despite the great promise traditional supervised machine learning shows in predicting tumor infiltration beyond resectable margins, these methods are heavily reliant on expert-drawn Regions of Interest (ROIs), which are used to construct multi-variate models of different Magnetic Resonance (MR) signal characteristics associated with tumor infiltration. This process is both time consuming and resource intensive. Addressing this limitation, our study proposes a novel integration of fully automatic methods for generating ROIs with deep learning algorithms to create predictive maps of tumor infiltration. This approach uses pre-operative multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) scans, encompassing T1, T1Gd, T2, T2-FLAIR, and ADC sequences, to fully leverage the knowledge from previously drawn ROIs. Subsequently, a patch based Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model is trained on these automatically generated ROIs to predict areas of potential tumor infiltration. The performance of this model was evaluated using a leave-one-out cross-validation approach. Generated predictive maps binarized for comparison against post-recurrence mpMRI scans. The model demonstrates robust predictive capability, evidenced by the average cross-validated accuracy of 0.87, specificity of 0.88, and sensitivity of 0.90. Notably, the odds ratio of 8.62 indicates that regions identified as high-risk on the predictive map were significantly more likely to exhibit tumor recurrence than low-risk regions. The proposed method demonstrates that a fully automatic mpMRI analysis using deep learning can successfully predict tumor infiltration in peritumoral region for GBM patients while bypassing the intensive requirement for expert-drawn ROIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunwoo Kwak
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 19104
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Department of Bioengineering, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, USA 95053
| | - Jose A Garcia
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 19104
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 19104
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 19104
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Alongi P, Arnone A, Vultaggio V, Fraternali A, Versari A, Casali C, Arnone G, DiMeco F, Vetrano IG. Artificial Intelligence Analysis Using MRI and PET Imaging in Gliomas: A Narrative Review. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:407. [PMID: 38254896 PMCID: PMC10814838 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
The lack of early detection and a high rate of recurrence/progression after surgery are defined as the most common causes of a very poor prognosis of Gliomas. The developments of quantification systems with special regards to artificial intelligence (AI) on medical images (CT, MRI, PET) are under evaluation in the clinical and research context in view of several applications providing different information related to the reconstruction of imaging, the segmentation of tissues acquired, the selection of features, and the proper data analyses. Different approaches of AI have been proposed as the machine and deep learning, which utilize artificial neural networks inspired by neuronal architectures. In addition, new systems have been developed using AI techniques to offer suggestions or make decisions in medical diagnosis, emulating the judgment of radiologist experts. The potential clinical role of AI focuses on the prediction of disease progression in more aggressive forms in gliomas, differential diagnosis (pseudoprogression vs. proper progression), and the follow-up of aggressive gliomas. This narrative Review will focus on the available applications of AI in brain tumor diagnosis, mainly related to malignant gliomas, with particular attention to the postoperative application of MRI and PET imaging, considering the current state of technical approach and the evaluation after treatment (including surgery, radiotherapy/chemotherapy, and prognostic stratification).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierpaolo Alongi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ARNAS Ospedali Civico, Di Cristina e Benfratelli, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (P.A.); (V.V.); (G.A.)
| | - Annachiara Arnone
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale IRCCS, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.A.); (A.F.); (A.V.)
| | - Viola Vultaggio
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ARNAS Ospedali Civico, Di Cristina e Benfratelli, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (P.A.); (V.V.); (G.A.)
| | - Alessandro Fraternali
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale IRCCS, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.A.); (A.F.); (A.V.)
| | - Annibale Versari
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale IRCCS, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.A.); (A.F.); (A.V.)
| | - Cecilia Casali
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.C.); (F.D.)
| | - Gaspare Arnone
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ARNAS Ospedali Civico, Di Cristina e Benfratelli, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (P.A.); (V.V.); (G.A.)
| | - Francesco DiMeco
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.C.); (F.D.)
- Department of Oncology and Onco-Hematology, Università di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical School, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Ignazio Gaspare Vetrano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.C.); (F.D.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Levy AS, Bhatia S, Merenzon MA, Andryski AL, Rivera CA, Daggubati LC, Di L, Shah AH, Komotar RJ, Ivan ME. Exploring the Landscape of Machine Learning Applications in Neurosurgery: A Bibliometric Analysis and Narrative Review of Trends and Future Directions. World Neurosurg 2024; 181:108-115. [PMID: 37839564 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The field of neurosurgery has consistently represented an area of innovation and integration of technology since its inception. As such, machine learning (ML) has found its way into applications within neurosurgery relatively rapidly. Through this bibliometric review and cluster analysis, we seek to identify trends and emerging applications of ML within neurosurgery. METHODS A bibliometric analysis was carried out in the Web of Science database on publications from January 2000 to March 2023. The full data set of the 200 most cited publications including title, author information, journal, citation count, keywords, and abstracts for each publication was evaluated in CiteSpace. CiteSpace was used to elucidate publication characteristics, trends, and topic clusters via collaborate network analysis using the Kamada-Kawai algorithm. RESULTS The 25 most cited titles were included in our analysis. Harvard University and its affiliates represented the top institution, contributing nearly 25% of publications in the literature. WORLD NEUROSURGERY was the journal with the highest net citation count of 747 (29%). Collaborative network analysis generated 12 unique clusters, the largest of which was machine learning, followed by feature importance and deep brain stimulation. CONCLUSION This review highlights the most impactful articles pertaining to ML in the field of neurosurgery. ML has been applied into several sub-specialties within neurosurgery to optimize patient care, with special attention to outcome predictors, patient selection, and surgical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam S Levy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
| | - Shovan Bhatia
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Martin A Merenzon
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Allie L Andryski
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Cameron A Rivera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Lekhaj C Daggubati
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Long Di
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Ashish H Shah
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Ricardo J Komotar
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA; Sylvester Cancer Center, University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Michael E Ivan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA; Sylvester Cancer Center, University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lewis EM, Mao L, Wang L, Swanson KR, Barajas RF, Li J, Tran NL, Hu LS, Plaisier CL. Revealing the biology behind MRI signatures in high grade glioma. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.12.08.23299733. [PMID: 38168377 PMCID: PMC10760280 DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.08.23299733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements are routinely collected during the treatment of high-grade gliomas (HGGs) to characterize tumor boundaries and guide surgical tumor resection. Using spatially matched MRI and transcriptomics we discovered HGG tumor biology captured by MRI measurements. We strategically overlaid the spatially matched omics characterizations onto a pre-existing transcriptional map of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) to enhance the robustness of our analyses. We discovered that T1+C measurements, designed to capture vasculature and blood brain barrier (BBB) breakdown and subsequent contrast extravasation, also indirectly reveal immune cell infiltration. The disruption of the vasculature and BBB within the tumor creates a permissive infiltrative environment that enables the transmigration of anti-inflammatory macrophages into tumors. These relationships were validated through histology and enrichment of genes associated with immune cell transmigration and proliferation. Additionally, T2-weighted (T2W) and mean diffusivity (MD) measurements were associated with angiogenesis and validated using histology and enrichment of genes involved in neovascularization. Furthermore, we establish an unbiased approach for identifying additional linkages between MRI measurements and tumor biology in future studies, particularly with the integration of novel MRI techniques. Lastly, we illustrated how noninvasive MRI can be used to map HGG biology spatially across a tumor, and this provides a platform to develop diagnostics, prognostics, or treatment efficacy biomarkers to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika M Lewis
- School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA
| | - Lingchao Mao
- H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA
| | - Lujia Wang
- H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA
| | - Kristin R Swanson
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Lab, Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Ramon F Barajas
- Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Sciences University, USA
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Section, Oregon Health & Sciences University, USA
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Sciences University, USA
| | - Jing Li
- H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA
| | - Nhan L Tran
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Leland S Hu
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Lab, Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
- School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA
| | - Christopher L Plaisier
- School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pan I, Huang RY. Artificial intelligence in neuroimaging of brain tumors: reality or still promise? Curr Opin Neurol 2023; 36:549-556. [PMID: 37973024 DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000001213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide an updated overview of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in neuro-oncologic imaging and discuss current barriers to wider clinical adoption. RECENT FINDINGS A wide variety of AI applications in neuro-oncologic imaging have been developed and researched, spanning tasks from pretreatment brain tumor classification and segmentation, preoperative planning, radiogenomics, prognostication and survival prediction, posttreatment surveillance, and differentiating between pseudoprogression and true disease progression. While earlier studies were largely based on data from a single institution, more recent studies have demonstrated that the performance of these algorithms are also effective on external data from other institutions. Nevertheless, most of these algorithms have yet to see widespread clinical adoption, given the lack of prospective studies demonstrating their efficacy and the logistical difficulties involved in clinical implementation. SUMMARY While there has been significant progress in AI and neuro-oncologic imaging, clinical utility remains to be demonstrated. The next wave of progress in this area will be driven by prospective studies measuring outcomes relevant to clinical practice and go beyond retrospective studies which primarily aim to demonstrate high performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Pan
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tragaris T, Benetos IS, Vlamis J, Pneumaticos S. Machine Learning Applications in Spine Surgery. Cureus 2023; 15:e48078. [PMID: 38046496 PMCID: PMC10689893 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
This literature review sought to identify and evaluate the current applications of artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) in spine surgery that can effectively guide clinical decision-making and surgical planning. By using specific keywords to maximize search sensitivity, a thorough literature research was conducted in several online databases: Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar, and the findings were filtered according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 46 studies met the requirements and were included in this review. According to this study, AI/ML models were sufficiently accurate with a mean overall value of 74.9%, and performed best at preoperative patient selection, cost prediction, and length of stay. Performance was also good at predicting functional outcomes and postoperative mortality. Regression analysis was the most frequently utilized application whereas deep learning/artificial neural networks had the highest sensitivity score (81.5%). Despite the relatively brief history of engagement with AI/ML, as evidenced by the fact that 77.5% of studies were published after 2018, the outcomes have been promising. In light of the Big Data era, the increasing prevalence of National Registries, and the wide-ranging applications of AI, such as exemplified by ChatGPT (OpenAI, San Francisco, California), it is highly likely that the field of spine surgery will gradually adopt and integrate AI/ML into its clinical practices. Consequently, it is of great significance for spine surgeons to acquaint themselves with the fundamental principles of AI/ML, as these technologies hold the potential for substantial improvements in overall patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Themistoklis Tragaris
- 1st Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, KAT Hospital, Athens, GRC
| | - Ioannis S Benetos
- 3rd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, KAT Hospital, Athens, GRC
| | - John Vlamis
- 3rd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, KAT Hospital, Athens, GRC
| | - Spyridon Pneumaticos
- 3rd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, KAT Hospital, Athens, GRC
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Phillips KA, Kamson DO, Schiff D. Disease Assessments in Patients with Glioblastoma. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:1057-1069. [PMID: 37470973 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01440-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The neuro-oncology team faces a unique challenge when assessing treatment response in patients diagnosed with glioblastoma. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the standard imaging modality for measuring therapeutic response in both clinical practice and clinical trials. However, even for the neuroradiologist, MRI interpretations are not straightforward because of tumor heterogeneity, as evidenced by varying degrees of enhancement, infiltrating tumor patterns, cellular densities, and vasogenic edema. The situation is even more perplexing following therapy since treatment-related changes can mimic viable tumor. Additionally, antiangiogenic therapies can dramatically decrease contrast enhancement giving the false impression of decreasing tumor burden. Over the past few decades, several approaches have emerged to augment and improve visual interpretation of glioblastoma response to therapeutics. Herein, we summarize the state of the art for evaluating the response of glioblastoma to standard therapies and investigational agents as well as challenges and future directions for assessing treatment response in neuro-oncology. RECENT FINDINGS Monitoring glioblastoma responses to standard therapy and novel agents has been fraught with many challenges and limitations over the past decade. Excitingly, new promising methods are emerging to help address these challenges. Recently, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group proposed an updated response criteria (RANO 2.0) for the evaluation of all grades of glial tumors regardless of IDH status or therapies being evaluated. In addition, advanced neuroimaging techniques, such as histogram analysis, parametric response maps, morphometric segmentation, radio pharmacodynamics approaches, and the integrating of amino acid radiotracers in the tumor evaluation algorithm may help resolve equivocal lesion interpretations without operative intervention. Moreover, the introduction of other techniques, such as liquid biopsy and artificial intelligence could complement conventional visual assessment of glioblastoma response to therapies. Neuro-oncology has evolved over the past decade and has achieved significant milestones, including the establishment of new standards of care, emerging therapeutic options, and novel clinical, translational, and basic research. More recently, the integration of histopathology with molecular features for tumor classification has marked an important paradigm shift in brain tumor diagnosis. In a similar manner, treatment response monitoring in neuro-oncology has made considerable progress. While most techniques are still in their inception, there is an emerging body of evidence for clinical application. Further research will be critically important for the development of impactful breakthroughs in this area of the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kester A Phillips
- The Ben and Catherine Ivy Center for Advanced Brain Tumor Treatment at Swedish Neuroscience Institute, 550 17Th Ave Suite 540, Seattle, WA, 98122, USA
| | - David O Kamson
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, 201 North Broadway, Skip Viragh Outpatient Cancer Building, 9Th Floor, Room 9177, Mailbox #3, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| | - David Schiff
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, 1300 Jefferson Park Avenue, West Complex, Room 6225, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Heo D, Lee J, Yoo RE, Choi SH, Kim TM, Park CK, Park SH, Won JK, Lee JH, Lee ST, Choi KS, Lee JY, Hwang I, Kang KM, Yun TJ. Deep learning based on dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging for prediction of local progression in adult-type diffuse glioma (grade 4). Sci Rep 2023; 13:13864. [PMID: 37620555 PMCID: PMC10449894 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41171-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Adult-type diffuse glioma (grade 4) has infiltrating nature, and therefore local progression is likely to occur within surrounding non-enhancing T2 hyperintense areas even after gross total resection of contrast-enhancing lesions. Cerebral blood volume (CBV) obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted imaging (DSC-PWI) is a parameter that is well-known to be a surrogate marker of both histologic and angiographic vascularity in tumors. We built two nnU-Net deep learning models for prediction of early local progression in adult-type diffuse glioma (grade 4), one using conventional MRI alone and one using multiparametric MRI, including conventional MRI and DSC-PWI. Local progression areas were annotated in a non-enhancing T2 hyperintense lesion on preoperative T2 FLAIR images, using the follow-up contrast-enhanced (CE) T1-weighted (T1W) images as the reference standard. The sensitivity was doubled with the addition of nCBV (80% vs. 40%, P = 0.02) while the specificity was decreased nonsignificantly (29% vs. 48%, P = 0.39), suggesting that fewer cases of early local progression would be missed with the addition of nCBV. While the diagnostic performance of CBV model is still poor and needs improving, the multiparametric deep learning model, which presumably learned from the subtle difference in vascularity between early local progression and non-progression voxels within perilesional T2 hyperintensity, may facilitate risk-adapted radiotherapy planning in adult-type diffuse glioma (grade 4) patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donggeon Heo
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jisoo Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Roh-Eul Yoo
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehangno, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
| | - Seung Hong Choi
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehangno, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
- Center for Nanoparticle Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University, 1, Gwanak-Ro, Gwanak-Gu, Seoul, 302-909, Republic of Korea.
| | - Tae Min Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chul-Kee Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Hye Park
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Kyung Won
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joo Ho Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soon Tae Lee
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyu Sung Choi
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehangno, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Ye Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehangno, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Inpyeong Hwang
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehangno, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Koung Mi Kang
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehangno, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Jin Yun
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehangno, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tabassum M, Suman AA, Suero Molina E, Pan E, Di Ieva A, Liu S. Radiomics and Machine Learning in Brain Tumors and Their Habitat: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3845. [PMID: 37568660 PMCID: PMC10417709 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiomics is a rapidly evolving field that involves extracting and analysing quantitative features from medical images, such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance images. Radiomics has shown promise in brain tumor diagnosis and patient-prognosis prediction by providing more detailed and objective information about tumors' features than can be obtained from the visual inspection of the images alone. Radiomics data can be analyzed to determine their correlation with a tumor's genetic status and grade, as well as in the assessment of its recurrence vs. therapeutic response, among other features. In consideration of the multi-parametric and high-dimensional space of features extracted by radiomics, machine learning can further improve tumor diagnosis, treatment response, and patients' prognoses. There is a growing recognition that tumors and their microenvironments (habitats) mutually influence each other-tumor cells can alter the microenvironment to increase their growth and survival. At the same time, habitats can also influence the behavior of tumor cells. In this systematic review, we investigate the current limitations and future developments in radiomics and machine learning in analysing brain tumors and their habitats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehnaz Tabassum
- Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia;
- Computational NeuroSurgery (CNS) Lab, Macquarie Medical School, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia; (A.A.S.); (E.S.M.); (E.P.)
| | - Abdulla Al Suman
- Computational NeuroSurgery (CNS) Lab, Macquarie Medical School, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia; (A.A.S.); (E.S.M.); (E.P.)
| | - Eric Suero Molina
- Computational NeuroSurgery (CNS) Lab, Macquarie Medical School, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia; (A.A.S.); (E.S.M.); (E.P.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Elizabeth Pan
- Computational NeuroSurgery (CNS) Lab, Macquarie Medical School, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia; (A.A.S.); (E.S.M.); (E.P.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Antonio Di Ieva
- Computational NeuroSurgery (CNS) Lab, Macquarie Medical School, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia; (A.A.S.); (E.S.M.); (E.P.)
| | - Sidong Liu
- Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia;
- Computational NeuroSurgery (CNS) Lab, Macquarie Medical School, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia; (A.A.S.); (E.S.M.); (E.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Schregel K, Heinz L, Hunger J, Pan C, Bode J, Fischer M, Sturm V, Venkataramani V, Karimian-Jazi K, Agardy DA, Streibel Y, Zerelles R, Wick W, Heiland S, Bunse T, Tews B, Platten M, Winkler F, Bendszus M, Breckwoldt MO. A Cellular Ground Truth to Develop MRI Signatures in Glioma Models by Correlative Light Sheet Microscopy and Atlas-Based Coregistration. J Neurosci 2023; 43:5574-5587. [PMID: 37429718 PMCID: PMC10376935 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1470-22.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumor with poor overall survival. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the main imaging modality for glioblastoma but has inherent shortcomings. The molecular and cellular basis of MR signals is incompletely understood. We established a ground truth-based image analysis platform to coregister MRI and light sheet microscopy (LSM) data to each other and to an anatomic reference atlas for quantification of 20 predefined anatomic subregions. Our pipeline also includes a segmentation and quantification approach for single myeloid cells in entire LSM datasets. This method was applied to three preclinical glioma models in male and female mice (GL261, U87MG, and S24), which exhibit different key features of the human glioma. Multiparametric MR data including T2-weighted sequences, diffusion tensor imaging, T2 and T2* relaxometry were acquired. Following tissue clearing, LSM focused on the analysis of tumor cell density, microvasculature, and innate immune cell infiltration. Correlated analysis revealed differences in quantitative MRI metrics between the tumor-bearing and the contralateral hemisphere. LSM identified tumor subregions that differed in their MRI characteristics, indicating tumor heterogeneity. Interestingly, MRI signatures, defined as unique combinations of different MRI parameters, differed greatly between the models. The direct correlation of MRI and LSM allows an in-depth characterization of preclinical glioma and can be used to decipher the structural, cellular, and, likely, molecular basis of tumoral MRI biomarkers. Our approach may be applied in other preclinical brain tumor or neurologic disease models, and the derived MRI signatures could ultimately inform image interpretation in a clinical setting.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We established a histologic ground truth-based approach for MR image analyses and tested this method in three preclinical glioma models exhibiting different features of glioblastoma. Coregistration of light sheet microscopy to MRI allowed for an evaluation of quantitative MRI data in histologically distinct tumor subregions. Coregistration to a mouse brain atlas enabled a regional comparison of MRI parameters with a histologically informed interpretation of the results. Our approach is transferable to other preclinical models of brain tumors and further neurologic disorders. The method can be used to decipher the structural, cellular, and molecular basis of MRI signal characteristics. Ultimately, information derived from such analyses could strengthen the neuroradiological evaluation of glioblastoma as they enhance the interpretation of MRI data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Schregel
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lennart Heinz
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jessica Hunger
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Chenchen Pan
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julia Bode
- Molecular Mechanisms of Tumor Invasion, Schaller Research Group at the University of Heidelberg and the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manuel Fischer
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Sturm
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Varun Venkataramani
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Functional Neuroanatomy, Institute for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kianush Karimian-Jazi
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dennis A Agardy
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Yannik Streibel
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Roland Zerelles
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sabine Heiland
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Theresa Bunse
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Björn Tews
- Molecular Mechanisms of Tumor Invasion, Schaller Research Group at the University of Heidelberg and the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Platten
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Frank Winkler
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Bendszus
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael O Breckwoldt
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tangsrivimol JA, Schonfeld E, Zhang M, Veeravagu A, Smith TR, Härtl R, Lawton MT, El-Sherbini AH, Prevedello DM, Glicksberg BS, Krittanawong C. Artificial Intelligence in Neurosurgery: A State-of-the-Art Review from Past to Future. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2429. [PMID: 37510174 PMCID: PMC10378231 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13142429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a significant surge in discussions surrounding artificial intelligence (AI), along with a corresponding increase in its practical applications in various facets of everyday life, including the medical industry. Notably, even in the highly specialized realm of neurosurgery, AI has been utilized for differential diagnosis, pre-operative evaluation, and improving surgical precision. Many of these applications have begun to mitigate risks of intraoperative and postoperative complications and post-operative care. This article aims to present an overview of the principal published papers on the significant themes of tumor, spine, epilepsy, and vascular issues, wherein AI has been applied to assess its potential applications within neurosurgery. The method involved identifying high-cited seminal papers using PubMed and Google Scholar, conducting a comprehensive review of various study types, and summarizing machine learning applications to enhance understanding among clinicians for future utilization. Recent studies demonstrate that machine learning (ML) holds significant potential in neuro-oncological care, spine surgery, epilepsy management, and other neurosurgical applications. ML techniques have proven effective in tumor identification, surgical outcomes prediction, seizure outcome prediction, aneurysm prediction, and more, highlighting its broad impact and potential in improving patient management and outcomes in neurosurgery. This review will encompass the current state of research, as well as predictions for the future of AI within neurosurgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan A Tangsrivimol
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok 10210, Thailand
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and Jame Cancer Institute, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Ethan Schonfeld
- Department Biomedical Informatics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA
| | - Michael Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA
| | - Anand Veeravagu
- Stanford Neurosurgical Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Timothy R Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center (CNOC), Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Roger Härtl
- Weill Cornell Medicine Brain and Spine Center, New York, NY 10022, USA
| | - Michael T Lawton
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI), Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA
| | - Adham H El-Sherbini
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Daniel M Prevedello
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and Jame Cancer Institute, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Benjamin S Glicksberg
- Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Chayakrit Krittanawong
- Cardiology Division, New York University Langone Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Scola E, Del Vecchio G, Busto G, Bianchi A, Desideri I, Gadda D, Mancini S, Carlesi E, Moretti M, Desideri I, Muscas G, Della Puppa A, Fainardi E. Conventional and Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Non-Enhancing Peritumoral Area in Brain Tumor. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15112992. [PMID: 37296953 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15112992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The non-enhancing peritumoral area (NEPA) is defined as the hyperintense region in T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images surrounding a brain tumor. The NEPA corresponds to different pathological processes, including vasogenic edema and infiltrative edema. The analysis of the NEPA with conventional and advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was proposed in the differential diagnosis of solid brain tumors, showing higher accuracy than MRI evaluation of the enhancing part of the tumor. In particular, MRI assessment of the NEPA was demonstrated to be a promising tool for distinguishing high-grade gliomas from primary lymphoma and brain metastases. Additionally, the MRI characteristics of the NEPA were found to correlate with prognosis and treatment response. The purpose of this narrative review was to describe MRI features of the NEPA obtained with conventional and advanced MRI techniques to better understand their potential in identifying the different characteristics of high-grade gliomas, primary lymphoma and brain metastases and in predicting clinical outcome and response to surgery and chemo-irradiation. Diffusion and perfusion techniques, such as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI), dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced (DSC) perfusion imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) perfusion imaging, arterial spin labeling (ASL), spectroscopy and amide proton transfer (APT), were the advanced MRI procedures we reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Scola
- Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Guido Del Vecchio
- Radiodiagnostic Unit N. 2, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy
| | - Giorgio Busto
- Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Bianchi
- Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Ilaria Desideri
- Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Davide Gadda
- Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Sara Mancini
- Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Edoardo Carlesi
- Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Moretti
- Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Radiation Oncology, Oncology Department, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy
| | - Giovanni Muscas
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandro Della Puppa
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy
| | - Enrico Fainardi
- Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zakharova NE, Batalov AI, Pogosbekian EL, Chekhonin IV, Goryaynov SA, Bykanov AE, Tyurina AN, Galstyan SA, Nikitin PV, Fadeeva LM, Usachev DY, Pronin IN. Perifocal Zone of Brain Gliomas: Application of Diffusion Kurtosis and Perfusion MRI Values for Tumor Invasion Border Determination. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2760. [PMID: 37345097 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15102760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Purpose: To determine the borders of malignant gliomas with diffusion kurtosis and perfusion MRI biomarkers. (2) Methods: In 50 high-grade glioma patients, diffusion kurtosis and pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL) cerebral blood flow (CBF) values were determined in contrast-enhancing area, in perifocal infiltrative edema zone, in the normal-appearing peritumoral white matter of the affected cerebral hemisphere, and in the unaffected contralateral hemisphere. Neuronavigation-guided biopsy was performed from all affected hemisphere regions. (3) Results: We showed significant differences between the DKI values in normal-appearing peritumoral white matter and unaffected contralateral hemisphere white matter. We also established significant (p < 0.05) correlations of DKI with Ki-67 labeling index and Bcl-2 expression activity in highly perfused enhancing tumor core and in perifocal infiltrative edema zone. CBF correlated with Ki-67 LI in highly perfused enhancing tumor core. One hundred percent of perifocal infiltrative edema tissue samples contained tumor cells. All glioblastoma samples expressed CD133. In the glioblastoma group, several normal-appearing white matter specimens were infiltrated by tumor cells and expressed CD133. (4) Conclusions: DKI parameters reveal changes in brain microstructure invisible on conventional MRI, e.g., possible infiltration of normal-appearing peritumoral white matter by glioma cells. Our results may be useful for plotting individual tumor invasion maps for brain glioma surgery or radiotherapy planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia E Zakharova
- Federal State Autonomous Institution "N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian, 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya Str. 16, Moscow 125047, Russia
| | - Artem I Batalov
- Federal State Autonomous Institution "N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian, 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya Str. 16, Moscow 125047, Russia
| | - Eduard L Pogosbekian
- Federal State Autonomous Institution "N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian, 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya Str. 16, Moscow 125047, Russia
| | - Ivan V Chekhonin
- Federal State Autonomous Institution "N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian, 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya Str. 16, Moscow 125047, Russia
| | - Sergey A Goryaynov
- Federal State Autonomous Institution "N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian, 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya Str. 16, Moscow 125047, Russia
| | - Andrey E Bykanov
- Federal State Autonomous Institution "N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian, 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya Str. 16, Moscow 125047, Russia
| | - Anastasia N Tyurina
- Federal State Autonomous Institution "N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian, 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya Str. 16, Moscow 125047, Russia
| | - Suzanna A Galstyan
- Federal State Autonomous Institution "N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian, 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya Str. 16, Moscow 125047, Russia
| | - Pavel V Nikitin
- Federal State Autonomous Institution "N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian, 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya Str. 16, Moscow 125047, Russia
| | - Lyudmila M Fadeeva
- Federal State Autonomous Institution "N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian, 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya Str. 16, Moscow 125047, Russia
| | - Dmitry Yu Usachev
- Federal State Autonomous Institution "N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian, 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya Str. 16, Moscow 125047, Russia
| | - Igor N Pronin
- Federal State Autonomous Institution "N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian, 4th Tverskaya-Yamskaya Str. 16, Moscow 125047, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cepeda S, Luppino LT, Pérez-Núñez A, Solheim O, García-García S, Velasco-Casares M, Karlberg A, Eikenes L, Sarabia R, Arrese I, Zamora T, Gonzalez P, Jiménez-Roldán L, Kuttner S. Predicting Regions of Local Recurrence in Glioblastomas Using Voxel-Based Radiomic Features of Multiparametric Postoperative MRI. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:1894. [PMID: 36980783 PMCID: PMC10047582 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The globally accepted surgical strategy in glioblastomas is removing the enhancing tumor. However, the peritumoral region harbors infiltration areas responsible for future tumor recurrence. This study aimed to evaluate a predictive model that identifies areas of future recurrence using a voxel-based radiomics analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. This multi-institutional study included a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with glioblastoma who underwent surgery with complete resection of the enhancing tumor. Fifty-five patients met the selection criteria. The study sample was split into training (N = 40) and testing (N = 15) datasets. Follow-up MRI was used for ground truth definition, and postoperative structural multiparametric MRI was used to extract voxel-based radiomic features. Deformable coregistration was used to register the MRI sequences for each patient, followed by segmentation of the peritumoral region in the postoperative scan and the enhancing tumor in the follow-up scan. Peritumoral voxels overlapping with enhancing tumor voxels were labeled as recurrence, while non-overlapping voxels were labeled as nonrecurrence. Voxel-based radiomic features were extracted from the peritumoral region. Four machine learning-based classifiers were trained for recurrence prediction. A region-based evaluation approach was used for model evaluation. The Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) classifier obtained the best performance on the testing dataset with an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 ± 0.09 and an accuracy of 0.84 ± 0.06, using region-based evaluation. There was a clear visual correspondence between predicted and actual recurrence regions. We have developed a method that accurately predicts the region of future tumor recurrence in MRI scans of glioblastoma patients. This could enable the adaptation of surgical and radiotherapy treatment to these areas to potentially prolong the survival of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago Cepeda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Río Hortega University Hospital, 47014 Valladolid, Spain
| | - Luigi Tommaso Luppino
- Department of Physics and Technology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9019 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Angel Pérez-Núñez
- Department of Neurosurgery, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (i+12), 28041 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (i+12), 28041 Madrid, Spain
| | - Ole Solheim
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olavs University Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7034 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Sergio García-García
- Department of Neurosurgery, Río Hortega University Hospital, 47014 Valladolid, Spain
| | | | - Anna Karlberg
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7034 Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Live Eikenes
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7034 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Rosario Sarabia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Río Hortega University Hospital, 47014 Valladolid, Spain
| | - Ignacio Arrese
- Department of Neurosurgery, Río Hortega University Hospital, 47014 Valladolid, Spain
| | - Tomás Zamora
- Department of Pathology, Río Hortega University Hospital, 47014 Valladolid, Spain
| | - Pedro Gonzalez
- Department of Neurosurgery, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (i+12), 28041 Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Jiménez-Roldán
- Department of Neurosurgery, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (i+12), 28041 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (i+12), 28041 Madrid, Spain
| | - Samuel Kuttner
- Department of Physics and Technology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9019 Tromsø, Norway
- The PET Imaging Center, University Hospital of North Norway, 9019 Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Iglesias JE, Billot B, Balbastre Y, Magdamo C, Arnold SE, Das S, Edlow BL, Alexander DC, Golland P, Fischl B. SynthSR: A public AI tool to turn heterogeneous clinical brain scans into high-resolution T1-weighted images for 3D morphometry. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2023; 9:eadd3607. [PMID: 36724222 PMCID: PMC9891693 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.add3607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Every year, millions of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are acquired in hospitals across the world. These have the potential to revolutionize our understanding of many neurological diseases, but their morphometric analysis has not yet been possible due to their anisotropic resolution. We present an artificial intelligence technique, "SynthSR," that takes clinical brain MRI scans with any MR contrast (T1, T2, etc.), orientation (axial/coronal/sagittal), and resolution and turns them into high-resolution T1 scans that are usable by virtually all existing human neuroimaging tools. We present results on segmentation, registration, and atlasing of >10,000 scans of controls and patients with brain tumors, strokes, and Alzheimer's disease. SynthSR yields morphometric results that are very highly correlated with what one would have obtained with high-resolution T1 scans. SynthSR allows sample sizes that have the potential to overcome the power limitations of prospective research studies and shed new light on the healthy and diseased human brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan E. Iglesias
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin Billot
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Yaël Balbastre
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Colin Magdamo
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven E. Arnold
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sudeshna Das
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brian L. Edlow
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel C. Alexander
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Polina Golland
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Bruce Fischl
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Riahi Samani Z, Parker D, Akbari H, Wolf RL, Brem S, Bakas S, Verma R. Artificial intelligence-based locoregional markers of brain peritumoral microenvironment. Sci Rep 2023; 13:963. [PMID: 36653382 PMCID: PMC9849348 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-26448-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
In malignant primary brain tumors, cancer cells infiltrate into the peritumoral brain structures which results in inevitable recurrence. Quantitative assessment of infiltrative heterogeneity in the peritumoral region, the area where biopsy or resection can be hazardous, is important for clinical decision making. Here, we derive a novel set of Artificial intelligence (AI)-based markers capturing the heterogeneity of tumor infiltration, by characterizing free water movement restriction in the peritumoral region using Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)-based free water volume fraction maps. We leverage the differences in the peritumoral region of metastasis and glioblastomas, the former consisting of vasogenic versus the latter containing infiltrative edema, to extract a voxel-wise deep learning-based peritumoral microenvironment index (PMI). Descriptive characteristics of locoregional hubs of uniformly high PMI values are then extracted as AI-based markers to capture distinct aspects of infiltrative heterogeneity. The proposed markers are utilized to stratify patients' survival and IDH1 mutation status on a population of 275 adult-type diffuse gliomas (CNS WHO grade 4). Our results show significant differences in the proposed markers between patients with different overall survival and IDH1 mutation status (t test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, linear regression; p < 0.01). Clustering of patients using the proposed markers reveals distinct survival groups (logrank; p < 10-5, Cox hazard ratio = 1.82; p < 0.005). Our findings provide a panel of markers as surrogates of infiltration that might capture novel insight about underlying biology of peritumoral microstructural heterogeneity, providing potential biomarkers of prognosis pertaining to survival and molecular stratification, with applicability in clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Riahi Samani
- Diffusion & Connectomics In Precision Healthcare Research (DiCIPHR) Lab, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | - Drew Parker
- Diffusion & Connectomics In Precision Healthcare Research (DiCIPHR) Lab, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Ronald L Wolf
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Steven Brem
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Ragini Verma
- Diffusion & Connectomics In Precision Healthcare Research (DiCIPHR) Lab, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Liao J, Li X, Gan Y, Han S, Rong P, Wang W, Li W, Zhou L. Artificial intelligence assists precision medicine in cancer treatment. Front Oncol 2023; 12:998222. [PMID: 36686757 PMCID: PMC9846804 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.998222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer is a major medical problem worldwide. Due to its high heterogeneity, the use of the same drugs or surgical methods in patients with the same tumor may have different curative effects, leading to the need for more accurate treatment methods for tumors and personalized treatments for patients. The precise treatment of tumors is essential, which renders obtaining an in-depth understanding of the changes that tumors undergo urgent, including changes in their genes, proteins and cancer cell phenotypes, in order to develop targeted treatment strategies for patients. Artificial intelligence (AI) based on big data can extract the hidden patterns, important information, and corresponding knowledge behind the enormous amount of data. For example, the ML and deep learning of subsets of AI can be used to mine the deep-level information in genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, radiomics, digital pathological images, and other data, which can make clinicians synthetically and comprehensively understand tumors. In addition, AI can find new biomarkers from data to assist tumor screening, detection, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis prediction, so as to providing the best treatment for individual patients and improving their clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinzhuang Liao
- Department of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Xiaoying Li
- Department of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yu Gan
- Department of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Shuangze Han
- Department of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Pengfei Rong
- Department of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Cell Transplantation and Gene Therapy Institute, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Cell Transplantation and Gene Therapy Institute, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Wei Li
- Department of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Cell Transplantation and Gene Therapy Institute, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Li Zhou
- Department of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Cell Transplantation and Gene Therapy Institute, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Department of Pathology, The Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Radiomics-Based Machine Learning to Predict Recurrence in Glioma Patients Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2023; 47:129-135. [PMID: 36194851 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Recurrence is a major factor in the poor prognosis of patients with glioma. The aim of this study was to predict glioma recurrence using machine learning based on radiomic features. METHODS We recruited 77 glioma patients, consisting of 57 newly diagnosed patients and 20 patients with recurrence. After extracting the radiomic features from T2-weighted images, the data set was randomly divided into training (58 patients) and testing (19 patients) cohorts. An automated machine learning method (the Tree-based Pipeline Optimization Tool) was applied to generate 10 independent recurrence prediction models. The final model was determined based on the area under the curve (AUC) and average specificity. Moreover, an independent validation set of 20 patients with glioma was used to verify the model performance. RESULTS Recurrence in glioma patients was successfully predicting by machine learning using radiomic features. Among the 10 recurrence prediction models, the best model achieved an accuracy of 0.81, an AUC value of 0.85, and a specificity of 0.69 in the testing cohort, but an accuracy of 0.75 and an AUC value of 0.87 in the independent validation set. CONCLUSIONS Our algorithm that is generated by machine learning exhibits promising power and may predict recurrence noninvasively, thereby offering potential value for the early development of interventions to delay or prevent recurrence in glioma patients.
Collapse
|
27
|
Pati S, Baid U, Edwards B, Sheller MJ, Foley P, Reina GA, Thakur S, Sako C, Bilello M, Davatzikos C, Martin J, Shah P, Menze B, Bakas S. The federated tumor segmentation (FeTS) tool: an open-source solution to further solid tumor research. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67:10.1088/1361-6560/ac9449. [PMID: 36137534 PMCID: PMC9592188 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac9449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Objective.De-centralized data analysis becomes an increasingly preferred option in the healthcare domain, as it alleviates the need for sharing primary patient data across collaborating institutions. This highlights the need for consistent harmonized data curation, pre-processing, and identification of regions of interest based on uniform criteria.Approach.Towards this end, this manuscript describes theFederatedTumorSegmentation (FeTS) tool, in terms of software architecture and functionality.Main results.The primary aim of the FeTS tool is to facilitate this harmonized processing and the generation of gold standard reference labels for tumor sub-compartments on brain magnetic resonance imaging, and further enable federated training of a tumor sub-compartment delineation model across numerous sites distributed across the globe, without the need to share patient data.Significance.Building upon existing open-source tools such as the Insight Toolkit and Qt, the FeTS tool is designed to enable training deep learning models targeting tumor delineation in either centralized or federated settings. The target audience of the FeTS tool is primarily the computational researcher interested in developing federated learning models, and interested in joining a global federation towards this effort. The tool is open sourced athttps://github.com/FETS-AI/Front-End.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarthak Pati
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ujjwal Baid
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Siddhesh Thakur
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Chiharu Sako
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michel Bilello
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Bjoern Menze
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lopez CD, Boddapati V, Lombardi JM, Lee NJ, Mathew J, Danford NC, Iyer RR, Dyrszka MD, Sardar ZM, Lenke LG, Lehman RA. Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Applications in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review. Global Spine J 2022; 12:1561-1572. [PMID: 35227128 PMCID: PMC9393994 DOI: 10.1177/21925682211049164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This current systematic review sought to identify and evaluate all current research-based spine surgery applications of AI/ML in optimizing preoperative patient selection, as well as predicting and managing postoperative outcomes and complications. METHODS A comprehensive search of publications was conducted through the EMBASE, Medline, and PubMed databases using relevant keywords to maximize the sensitivity of the search. No limits were placed on level of evidence or timing of the study. Findings were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 41 studies were included in this review. Bayesian networks had the highest average AUC (.80), and neural networks had the best accuracy (83.0%), sensitivity (81.5%), and specificity (71.8%). Preoperative planning/cost prediction models (.89,82.2%) and discharge/length of stay models (.80,78.0%) each reported significantly higher average AUC and accuracy compared to readmissions/reoperation prediction models (.67,70.2%) (P < .001, P = .005, respectively). Model performance also significantly varied across postoperative management applications for average AUC and accuracy values (P < .001, P < .027, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Generally, authors of the reviewed studies concluded that AI/ML offers a potentially beneficial tool for providers to optimize patient care and improve cost-efficiency. More specifically, AI/ML models performed best, on average, when optimizing preoperative patient selection and planning and predicting costs, hospital discharge, and length of stay. However, models were not as accurate in predicting postoperative complications, adverse events, and readmissions and reoperations. An understanding of AI/ML-based applications is becoming increasingly important, particularly in spine surgery, as the volume of reported literature, technology accessibility, and clinical applications continue to rapidly expand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesar D. Lopez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Venkat Boddapati
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA,Venkat Boddapati, MD, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W. 168th St., PH-11, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| | - Joseph M. Lombardi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nathan J. Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Justin Mathew
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicholas C. Danford
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rajiv R. Iyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc D. Dyrszka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zeeshan M. Sardar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lawrence G. Lenke
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ronald A. Lehman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bakas S, Sako C, Akbari H, Bilello M, Sotiras A, Shukla G, Rudie JD, Santamaría NF, Kazerooni AF, Pati S, Rathore S, Mamourian E, Ha SM, Parker W, Doshi J, Baid U, Bergman M, Binder ZA, Verma R, Lustig RA, Desai AS, Bagley SJ, Mourelatos Z, Morrissette J, Watt CD, Brem S, Wolf RL, Melhem ER, Nasrallah MP, Mohan S, O'Rourke DM, Davatzikos C. The University of Pennsylvania glioblastoma (UPenn-GBM) cohort: advanced MRI, clinical, genomics, & radiomics. Sci Data 2022; 9:453. [PMID: 35906241 PMCID: PMC9338035 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01560-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most common aggressive adult brain tumor. Numerous studies have reported results from either private institutional data or publicly available datasets. However, current public datasets are limited in terms of: a) number of subjects, b) lack of consistent acquisition protocol, c) data quality, or d) accompanying clinical, demographic, and molecular information. Toward alleviating these limitations, we contribute the "University of Pennsylvania Glioblastoma Imaging, Genomics, and Radiomics" (UPenn-GBM) dataset, which describes the currently largest publicly available comprehensive collection of 630 patients diagnosed with de novo glioblastoma. The UPenn-GBM dataset includes (a) advanced multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging scans acquired during routine clinical practice, at the University of Pennsylvania Health System, (b) accompanying clinical, demographic, and molecular information, (d) perfusion and diffusion derivative volumes, (e) computationally-derived and manually-revised expert annotations of tumor sub-regions, as well as (f) quantitative imaging (also known as radiomic) features corresponding to each of these regions. This collection describes our contribution towards repeatable, reproducible, and comparative quantitative studies leading to new predictive, prognostic, and diagnostic assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Chiharu Sako
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michel Bilello
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Aristeidis Sotiras
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology and Institute for Informatics, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Gaurav Shukla
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christiana Care Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jeffrey D Rudie
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Natali Flores Santamaría
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sarthak Pati
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Saima Rathore
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Mamourian
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sung Min Ha
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology and Institute for Informatics, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - William Parker
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jimit Doshi
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ujjwal Baid
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mark Bergman
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Zev A Binder
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ragini Verma
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robert A Lustig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Arati S Desai
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stephen J Bagley
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Zissimos Mourelatos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer Morrissette
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christopher D Watt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Steven Brem
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ronald L Wolf
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elias R Melhem
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - MacLean P Nasrallah
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Donald M O'Rourke
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
A Survey of Radiomics in Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Adult Gliomas. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11133802. [PMID: 35807084 PMCID: PMC9267404 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 06/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioma is the most common primary malignant tumor of the adult central nervous system (CNS), which mostly shows invasive growth. In most cases, surgery is often difficult to completely remove, and the recurrence rate and mortality of patients are high. With the continuous development of molecular genetics and the great progress of molecular biology technology, more and more molecular biomarkers have been proved to have important guiding significance in the individualized diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis evaluation of glioma. With the updates of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the CNS in 2021, the diagnosis and treatment of glioma has entered the era of precision medicine in the true sense. Due to its ability to non-invasively achieve accurate identification of glioma from other intracranial tumors, and to predict the grade, genotyping, treatment response, and prognosis of glioma, which provides a scientific basis for the clinical application of individualized diagnosis and treatment model of glioma, radiomics has become a research hotspot in the field of precision medicine. This paper reviewed the research related to radiomics of adult gliomas published in recent years and summarized the research proceedings of radiomics in differential diagnosis, preoperative grading and genotyping, treatment and efficacy evaluation, and survival prediction of adult gliomas.
Collapse
|
31
|
Non-invasive molecular diagnosis in gliomas with advanced imaging. Clin Transl Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-022-00501-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
32
|
Qing Z, Xiaoai K, Caiqiang X, Shenglin L, Xiaoyu H, Bin Z, Junlin Z. Nomogram for predicting early recurrence in patients with high-grade gliomas. World Neurosurg 2022; 164:e619-e628. [PMID: 35589036 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a nomogram to predict early recurrence of high-grade glioma (HGG) based on clinical pathology, genetic factors and MRI parameters. METHODS 154 patients with HGG were classified into recurrence and non-recurrence groups based on the pathological diagnosis and RANO criteria. Clinical pathology information included age, sex, preoperative Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scores,grade, and cell proliferation index (Ki-67). Gene information included P53, IDH1, MGMT, and TERT expression status. All patients underwent baseline MRIs before treatment, including T1WI, T2WI, T1C, Flair, and DWI examinations. Tumor location, single/multiple tumors, tumor diameter, peritumoral edema, necrotic cyst, hemorrhage, average apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) value, and minimum ADC values were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the predictors of early recurrence and build nomogram. RESULTS Univariate analysis showed that the number of tumors (OR, 0.258; 95% CI: 0.104, 0.639; P = 0.003) and peritumoral edema (OR, 0.965; 95% CI 0.942, 0.988; P = 0.003; mean in the recurrence group 22.04±17.21 mm; mean in the non-recurrence group 14.22±12.84 mm) were statistically significantly different in patients with early recurrence. Genetic factors associated with early recurrence included IDH1 (OR, 4.405; 95% CI 1.874, 10.353; P= 0.001), and MGMT (OR, 2.389; 95% CI 1.234, 4.628; P= 0.010). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the number of tumors (OR, 0.227; 95% CI 0.084, 0.616; P = 0.004), peritumoral edema (OR, 0.969; 95% CI 0.945, 0.993; P = 0.013), and IDH1 (OR, 4.200; 95% CI 1.602, 10.013; P= 0.004) were independent risk factors for early recurrence. The nomogram showed the highest net benefit when the threshold probability was less than 60%. CONCLUSION A nomogram prediction model can effectively aid in clinical treatment decisions for patients with newly diagnosed HGG .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhou Qing
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Gansu, China; Second Clinical School,Lanzhou University, China; Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, China; Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence,China
| | - Ke Xiaoai
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Gansu, China; Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, China; Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence,China
| | - Xue Caiqiang
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Gansu, China; Second Clinical School,Lanzhou University, China; Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, China; Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence,China
| | - Li Shenglin
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Gansu, China; Second Clinical School,Lanzhou University, China; Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, China; Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence,China
| | - Huang Xiaoyu
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Gansu, China; Second Clinical School,Lanzhou University, China; Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, China; Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence,China
| | - Zhang Bin
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Gansu, China; Second Clinical School,Lanzhou University, China; Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, China; Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence,China
| | - Zhou Junlin
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Gansu, China; Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, China; Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence,China.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Tang PLY, Méndez Romero A, Jaspers JPM, Warnert EAH. The potential of advanced MR techniques for precision radiotherapy of glioblastoma. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2022; 35:127-143. [PMID: 35129718 PMCID: PMC8901515 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-021-00997-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
As microscopic tumour infiltration of glioblastomas is not visible on conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, an isotropic expansion of 1-2 cm around the visible tumour is applied to define the clinical target volume for radiotherapy. An opportunity to visualize microscopic infiltration arises with advanced MR imaging. In this review, various advanced MR biomarkers are explored that could improve target volume delineation for radiotherapy of glioblastomas. Various physiological processes in glioblastomas can be visualized with different advanced MR techniques. Combining maps of oxygen metabolism (CMRO2), relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), vessel size imaging (VSI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) or amide proton transfer (APT) can provide early information on tumour infiltration and high-risk regions of future recurrence. Oxygen consumption is increased 6 months prior to tumour progression being visible on conventional MR imaging. However, presence of the Warburg effect, marking a switch from an infiltrative to a proliferative phenotype, could result in CMRO2 to appear unaltered in high-risk regions. Including information on biomarkers representing angiogenesis (rCBV and VSI) and hypercellularity (ADC) or protein concentration (APT) can omit misinterpretation due to the Warburg effect. Future research should evaluate these biomarkers in radiotherapy planning to explore the potential of advanced MR techniques to personalize target volume delineation with the aim to improve local tumour control and/or reduce radiation-induced toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick L Y Tang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Alejandra Méndez Romero
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap P M Jaspers
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther A H Warnert
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Aftab K, Aamir FB, Mallick S, Mubarak F, Pope WB, Mikkelsen T, Rock JP, Enam SA. Radiomics for precision medicine in glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2022; 156:217-231. [PMID: 35020109 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03933-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Being the most common primary brain tumor, glioblastoma presents as an extremely challenging malignancy to treat with dismal outcomes despite treatment. Varying molecular epidemiology of glioblastoma between patients and intra-tumoral heterogeneity explains the failure of current one-size-fits-all treatment modalities. Radiomics uses machine learning to identify salient features of the tumor on brain imaging and promises patient-specific management in glioblastoma patients. METHODS We performed a comprehensive review of the available literature on studies investigating the role of radiomics and radiogenomics models for the diagnosis, stratification, prognostication as well as treatment planning and monitoring of glioblastoma. RESULTS Classifiers based on a combination of various MRI sequences, genetic information and clinical data can predict non-invasive tumor diagnosis, overall survival and treatment response with reasonable accuracy. However, the use of radiomics for glioblastoma treatment remains in infancy as larger sample sizes, standardized image acquisition and data extraction techniques are needed to develop machine learning models that can be translated effectively into clinical practice. CONCLUSION Radiomics has the potential to transform the scope of glioblastoma management through personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiran Aftab
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Saad Mallick
- Medical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Fatima Mubarak
- Department of Radiology, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Whitney B Pope
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tom Mikkelsen
- Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jack P Rock
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Syed Ather Enam
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Güley O, Pati S, Bakas S. Classification of Infection and Ischemia in Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using VGG Architectures. DIABETIC FOOT ULCERS GRAND CHALLENGE : SECOND CHALLENGE, DFUC 2021, HELD IN CONJUNCTION WITH MICCAI 2021, STRASBOURG, FRANCE, SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 : PROCEEDINGS. DFUC (CONFERENCE) (2ND : 2021 : ONLINE) 2022; 13183:76-89. [PMID: 35465060 PMCID: PMC9026672 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-94907-5_6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) is a serious complication of diabetes, and a major challenge for healthcare systems around the world. Further infection and ischemia in DFU can significantly prolong treatment and often result in limb amputation, with more severe cases resulting in terminal illness. Thus, early identification and regular monitoring is necessary to improve care, and reduce the burden on healthcare systems. With that in mind, this study attempts to address the problem of infection and ischemia classification in diabetic food ulcers, in four distinct classes. We have evaluated a series of VGG architectures with different layers, following numerous training strategies, including k-fold cross validation, data pre-processing options, augmentation techniques, and weighted loss calculations. In favor of transparency and reproducibility, we make all the implementations available through the Generally Nuanced Deep Learning Framework (GaNDLF, github.com/CBICA/GaNDLF. Our best model was evaluated during the DFU Challenge 2021, and was ranked 2nd, 5th, and 7th based on the macro-averaged AUC (area under the curve), macro-averaged F1 score, and macro-averaged recall metrics, respectively. Our findings support that current state-of-the-art architectures provide good results for the DFU image classification task, and further experimentation is required to study the effects of pre-processing and augmentation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orhun Güley
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sarthak Pati
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Radiomic Features Associated with Extent of Resection in Glioma Surgery. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA. SUPPLEMENT 2021; 134:341-347. [PMID: 34862558 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-85292-4_38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Radiomics defines a set of techniques for extraction and quantification of digital medical data in an automated and reproducible way. Its goal is to detect features potentially related to a clinical task, like classification, diagnosis, prognosis, and response to treatment, going beyond the intrinsic limits of operator-dependency and qualitative description of conventional radiological evaluation on a mesoscopic scale. In the field of neuro-oncology, researchers have tried to create prognostic models for a better tumor diagnosis, histological and biomolecular classification, prediction of response to treatment, and identification of disease relapse. Concerning glioma surgery, the most significant aid that radiomics can give to surgery is to improve tumor extension detection and identify areas that are more prone to recurrence to increase the extent of tumor resection, thereby ameliorating the patients' prognosis. This chapter aims to review the fundamentals of radiomics models' creation, the latest advance of radiomics in neuro-oncology, and possible radiomic features associated with the extent of resection in the brain gliomas.
Collapse
|
37
|
A Brief History of Machine Learning in Neurosurgery. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA. SUPPLEMENT 2021; 134:245-250. [PMID: 34862547 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-85292-4_27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The history of machine learning in neurosurgery spans three decades and continues to develop at a rapid pace. The earliest applications of machine learning within neurosurgery were first published in the 1990s as researchers began developing artificial neural networks to analyze structured datasets and supervised tasks. By the turn of the millennium, machine learning had evolved beyond proof-of-concept; algorithms had success detecting tumors in unstructured clinical imaging, and unsupervised learning showed promise for tumor segmentation. Throughout the 2000s, the role of machine learning in neurosurgery was further refined. Well-trained models began to consistently best expert clinicians at brain tumor diagnosis. Additionally, the digitization of the healthcare industry provided ample data for analysis, both structured and unstructured. By the 2010s, the use of machine learning within neurosurgery had exploded. The rapid deployment of an exciting new toolset also led to the growing realization that it may offer marginal benefit at best over conventional logistical regression models for analyzing tabular datasets. Additionally, the widespread adoption of machine learning in neurosurgical clinical practice continues to lag until additional validation can ensure generalizability. Many exciting contemporary applications nonetheless continue to demonstrate the unprecedented potential of machine learning to revolutionize neurosurgery when applied to appropriate clinical challenges.
Collapse
|
38
|
Fathi Kazerooni A, Bagley SJ, Akbari H, Saxena S, Bagheri S, Guo J, Chawla S, Nabavizadeh A, Mohan S, Bakas S, Davatzikos C, Nasrallah MP. Applications of Radiomics and Radiogenomics in High-Grade Gliomas in the Era of Precision Medicine. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13235921. [PMID: 34885031 PMCID: PMC8656630 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13235921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiomics and radiogenomics offer new insight into high-grade glioma biology, as well as into glioma behavior in response to standard therapies. In this article, we provide neuro-oncology, neuropathology, and computational perspectives on the role of radiomics in providing more accurate diagnoses, prognostication, and surveillance of patients with high-grade glioma, and on the potential application of radiomics in clinical practice, with the overarching goal of advancing precision medicine for optimal patient care. Abstract Machine learning (ML) integrated with medical imaging has introduced new perspectives in precision diagnostics of high-grade gliomas, through radiomics and radiogenomics. This has raised hopes for characterizing noninvasive and in vivo biomarkers for prediction of patient survival, tumor recurrence, and genomics and therefore encouraging treatments tailored to individualized needs. Characterization of tumor infiltration based on pre-operative multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) scans may allow prediction of the loci of future tumor recurrence and thereby aid in planning the course of treatment for the patients, such as optimizing the extent of resection and the dose and target area of radiation. Imaging signatures of tumor genomics can help in identifying the patients who benefit from certain targeted therapies. Specifying molecular properties of gliomas and prediction of their changes over time and with treatment would allow optimization of treatment. In this article, we provide neuro-oncology, neuropathology, and computational perspectives on the promise of radiomics and radiogenomics for allowing personalized treatments of patients with gliomas and discuss the challenges and limitations of these methods in multi-institutional clinical trials and suggestions to mitigate the issues and the future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Stephen J. Bagley
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;
- Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Sanjay Saxena
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Sina Bagheri
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Jun Guo
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Sanjeev Chawla
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Ali Nabavizadeh
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - MacLean P. Nasrallah
- Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abdel Razek AAK, Alksas A, Shehata M, AbdelKhalek A, Abdel Baky K, El-Baz A, Helmy E. Clinical applications of artificial intelligence and radiomics in neuro-oncology imaging. Insights Imaging 2021; 12:152. [PMID: 34676470 PMCID: PMC8531173 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01102-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
This article is a comprehensive review of the basic background, technique, and clinical applications of artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics in the field of neuro-oncology. A variety of AI and radiomics utilized conventional and advanced techniques to differentiate brain tumors from non-neoplastic lesions such as inflammatory and demyelinating brain lesions. It is used in the diagnosis of gliomas and discrimination of gliomas from lymphomas and metastasis. Also, semiautomated and automated tumor segmentation has been developed for radiotherapy planning and follow-up. It has a role in the grading, prediction of treatment response, and prognosis of gliomas. Radiogenomics allowed the connection of the imaging phenotype of the tumor to its molecular environment. In addition, AI is applied for the assessment of extra-axial brain tumors and pediatric tumors with high performance in tumor detection, classification, and stratification of patient's prognoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ahmed Alksas
- Biomaging Lab, Department of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA
| | - Mohamed Shehata
- Biomaging Lab, Department of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA
| | - Amr AbdelKhalek
- Internship at Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Khaled Abdel Baky
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Port Said University, Port Said, Egypt
| | - Ayman El-Baz
- Biomaging Lab, Department of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA
| | - Eman Helmy
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Elgomheryia Street, Mansoura, 3512, Egypt.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Fiani B, Pasko KBD, Sarhadi K, Covarrubias C. Current uses, emerging applications, and clinical integration of artificial intelligence in neuroradiology. Rev Neurosci 2021; 33:383-395. [PMID: 34506699 DOI: 10.1515/revneuro-2021-0101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a branch of computer science with a variety of subfields and techniques, exploited to serve as a deductive tool that performs tasks originally requiring human cognition. AI tools and its subdomains are being incorporated into healthcare delivery for the improvement of medical data interpretation encompassing clinical management, diagnostics, and prognostic outcomes. In the field of neuroradiology, AI manifested through deep machine learning and connected neural networks (CNNs) has demonstrated incredible accuracy in identifying pathology and aiding in diagnosis and prognostication in several areas of neurology and neurosurgery. In this literature review, we survey the available clinical data highlighting the utilization of AI in the field of neuroradiology across multiple neurological and neurosurgical subspecialties. In addition, we discuss the emerging role of AI in neuroradiology, its strengths and limitations, as well as future needs in strengthening its role in clinical practice. Our review evaluated data across several subspecialties of neurology and neurosurgery including vascular neurology, spinal pathology, traumatic brain injury (TBI), neuro-oncology, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, and epilepsy. AI has established a strong presence within the realm of neuroradiology as a successful and largely supportive technology aiding in the interpretation, diagnosis, and even prognostication of various pathologies. More research is warranted to establish its full scientific validity and determine its maximum potential to aid in optimizing and providing the most accurate imaging interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Fiani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, 1150 N Indian Canyon Dr, Palm Springs, CA, 92262, USA
| | - Kory B Dylan Pasko
- School of Medicine, Georgetown University, 3900 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Kasra Sarhadi
- Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Main Hospital, 325 9th Ave, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA
| | - Claudia Covarrubias
- School of Medicine, Universidad Anáhuac Querétaro, Cto. Universidades I, Fracción 2, 76246 Qro., Querétaro, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Akbari H, Kazerooni AF, Ware JB, Mamourian E, Anderson H, Guiry S, Sako C, Raymond C, Yao J, Brem S, O'Rourke DM, Desai AS, Bagley SJ, Ellingson BM, Davatzikos C, Nabavizadeh A. Quantification of tumor microenvironment acidity in glioblastoma using principal component analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast enhanced MR imaging. Sci Rep 2021; 11:15011. [PMID: 34294864 PMCID: PMC8298590 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94560-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) has high metabolic demands, which can lead to acidification of the tumor microenvironment. We hypothesize that a machine learning model built on temporal principal component analysis (PCA) of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced (DSC) perfusion MRI can be used to estimate tumor acidity in GBM, as estimated by pH-sensitive amine chemical exchange saturation transfer echo-planar imaging (CEST-EPI). We analyzed 78 MRI scans in 32 treatment naïve and post-treatment GBM patients. All patients were imaged with DSC-MRI, and pH-weighting that was quantified from CEST-EPI estimation of the magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) at 3 ppm. Enhancing tumor (ET), non-enhancing core (NC), and peritumoral T2 hyperintensity (namely, edema, ED) were used to extract principal components (PCs) and to build support vector machines regression (SVR) models to predict MTRasym values using PCs. Our predicted map correlated with MTRasym values with Spearman's r equal to 0.66, 0.47, 0.67, 0.71, in NC, ET, ED, and overall, respectively (p < 0.006). The results of this study demonstrates that PCA analysis of DSC imaging data can provide information about tumor pH in GBM patients, with the strongest association within the peritumoral regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamed Akbari
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jeffrey B Ware
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Mamourian
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hannah Anderson
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Samantha Guiry
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Chiharu Sako
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Catalina Raymond
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jingwen Yao
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Steven Brem
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Donald M O'Rourke
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Arati S Desai
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stephen J Bagley
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ali Nabavizadeh
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Siakallis L, Sudre CH, Mulholland P, Fersht N, Rees J, Topff L, Thust S, Jager R, Cardoso MJ, Panovska-Griffiths J, Bisdas S. Longitudinal structural and perfusion MRI enhanced by machine learning outperforms standalone modalities and radiological expertise in high-grade glioma surveillance. Neuroradiology 2021; 63:2047-2056. [PMID: 34047805 PMCID: PMC8589799 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-021-02719-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Surveillance of patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) and identification of disease progression remain a major challenge in neurooncology. This study aimed to develop a support vector machine (SVM) classifier, employing combined longitudinal structural and perfusion MRI studies, to classify between stable disease, pseudoprogression and progressive disease (3-class problem). METHODS Study participants were separated into two groups: group I (total cohort: 64 patients) with a single DSC time point and group II (19 patients) with longitudinal DSC time points (2-3). We retrospectively analysed 269 structural MRI and 92 dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion (DSC) MRI scans. The SVM classifier was trained using all available MRI studies for each group. Classification accuracy was assessed for different feature dataset and time point combinations and compared to radiologists' classifications. RESULTS SVM classification based on combined perfusion and structural features outperformed radiologists' classification across all groups. For the identification of progressive disease, use of combined features and longitudinal DSC time points improved classification performance (lowest error rate 1.6%). Optimal performance was observed in group II (multiple time points) with SVM sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of 100/91.67/94.7% (first time point analysis) and 85.71/100/94.7% (longitudinal analysis), compared to 60/78/68% and 70/90/84.2% for the respective radiologist classifications. In group I (single time point), the SVM classifier also outperformed radiologists' classifications with sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of 86.49/75.00/81.53% (SVM) compared to 75.7/68.9/73.84% (radiologists). CONCLUSION Our results indicate that utilisation of a machine learning (SVM) classifier based on analysis of longitudinal perfusion time points and combined structural and perfusion features significantly enhances classification outcome (p value= 0.0001).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loizos Siakallis
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
| | - Carole H Sudre
- Translational Imaging Group, Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London , London, UK.,Department of Medical Physics, University College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Mulholland
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Naomi Fersht
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jeremy Rees
- Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.,Department of Neurooncology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Laurens Topff
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Steffi Thust
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Rolf Jager
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.,Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - M Jorge Cardoso
- Translational Imaging Group, Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London , London, UK
| | - Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.,The Queen's College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sotirios Bisdas
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.,Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Phosphorous Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Detect Regional Differences of Energy and Membrane Metabolism in Naïve Glioblastoma Multiforme. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13112598. [PMID: 34073209 PMCID: PMC8199363 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Glioblastoma multiforme is a highly aggressive brain tumor, tending to infiltrate even larger zones of brain tissue than visible on conventional magnetic resonance imaging. By application of phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients with naïve glioblastoma multiforme, we tried to demonstrate changes in energy and membrane metabolism not only in affected regions but also in distant brain regions, the opposite brain hemisphere, and in comparison to healthy volunteers. We found reduced energetic states and signs of increased cell membrane turnover in regions of visible tumor and differences to and between the “normal-appearing” brains of glioblastoma patients and the brains of healthy volunteers. Our pilot study confirmed the feasibility of the method, so differences between various genetic mutations or clinical applicability for follow-up monitoring can be assessed in larger cohorts. Abstract Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a highly malignant primary brain tumor with infiltration of, on conventional imaging, normal-appearing brain parenchyma. Phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P-MRS) enables the investigation of different energy and membrane metabolites. The aim of this study is to investigate regional differences of 31P-metabolites in GBM brains. Methods: In this study, we investigated 32 patients (13 female and 19 male; mean age 63 years) with naïve GBM using 31P-MRS and conventional MRI. Contrast-enhancing (CE), T2-hyperintense, adjacent and distant ipsilateral areas of the contralateral brain and the brains of age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers were assessed. Moreover, the 31P-MRS results were correlated with quantitative diffusion parameters. Results: Several metabolite ratios between the energy-dependent metabolites and/or the membrane metabolites differed significantly between the CE areas, the T2-hyperintense areas, the more distant areas, and even the brains of healthy volunteers. pH values and Mg2+ concentrations were highest in visible tumor areas and decreased with distance from them. These results are in accordance with the literature and correlated with quantitative diffusion parameters. Conclusions: This pilot study shows that 31P-MRS is feasible to show regional differences of energy and membrane metabolism in brains with naïve GBM, particularly between the different “normal-appearing” regions and between the contralateral hemisphere and healthy controls. Differences between various genetic mutations or clinical applicability for follow-up monitoring have to be assessed in a larger cohort.
Collapse
|
44
|
Buchlak QD, Esmaili N, Leveque JC, Bennett C, Farrokhi F, Piccardi M. Machine learning applications to neuroimaging for glioma detection and classification: An artificial intelligence augmented systematic review. J Clin Neurosci 2021; 89:177-198. [PMID: 34119265 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.04.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Glioma is the most common primary intraparenchymal tumor of the brain and the 5-year survival rate of high-grade glioma is poor. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for detecting, characterizing and monitoring brain tumors but definitive diagnosis still relies on surgical pathology. Machine learning has been applied to the analysis of MRI data in glioma research and has the potential to change clinical practice and improve patient outcomes. This systematic review synthesizes and analyzes the current state of machine learning applications to glioma MRI data and explores the use of machine learning for systematic review automation. Various datapoints were extracted from the 153 studies that met inclusion criteria and analyzed. Natural language processing (NLP) analysis involved keyword extraction, topic modeling and document classification. Machine learning has been applied to tumor grading and diagnosis, tumor segmentation, non-invasive genomic biomarker identification, detection of progression and patient survival prediction. Model performance was generally strong (AUC = 0.87 ± 0.09; sensitivity = 0.87 ± 0.10; specificity = 0.0.86 ± 0.10; precision = 0.88 ± 0.11). Convolutional neural network, support vector machine and random forest algorithms were top performers. Deep learning document classifiers yielded acceptable performance (mean 5-fold cross-validation AUC = 0.71). Machine learning tools and data resources were synthesized and summarized to facilitate future research. Machine learning has been widely applied to the processing of MRI data in glioma research and has demonstrated substantial utility. NLP and transfer learning resources enabled the successful development of a replicable method for automating the systematic review article screening process, which has potential for shortening the time from discovery to clinical application in medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quinlan D Buchlak
- School of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Nazanin Esmaili
- School of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Christine Bennett
- School of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Farrokh Farrokhi
- Neuroscience Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Massimo Piccardi
- Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Quantitative mapping of individual voxels in the peritumoral region of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma to distinguish between tumor infiltration and edema. J Neurooncol 2021; 153:251-261. [PMID: 33905055 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03762-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The peritumoral region (PTR) in glioblastoma (GBM) represents a combination of infiltrative tumor and vasogenic edema, which are indistinguishable on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We developed a radiomic signature by using imaging data from low grade glioma (LGG) (marker of tumor) and PTR of brain metastasis (BM) (marker of edema) and applied it on the GBM PTR to generate probabilistic maps. METHODS 270 features were extracted from T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and apparent diffusion coefficient maps in over 3.5 million voxels of LGG (36 segments) and BM (45 segments) scanned in a 1.5T MRI. A support vector machine classifier was used to develop the radiomics model from approximately 50% voxels (downsampled to 10%) and validated with the remaining. The model was applied to over 575,000 voxels of the PTR of 10 patients with GBM to generate a quantitative map using Platt scaling (infiltrative tumor vs. edema). RESULTS The radiomics model had an accuracy of 0.92 and 0.79 in the training and test set, respectively (LGG vs. BM). When extrapolated on the GBM PTR, 9 of 10 patients had a higher percentage of voxels with a tumor-like signature over radiological recurrence areas. In 7 of 10 patients, the areas under curves (AUC) were > 0.50 confirming a positive correlation. Including all the voxels from the GBM patients, the infiltration signature had an AUC of 0.61 to predict recurrence. CONCLUSION A radiomic signature can demarcate areas of microscopic tumors from edema in the PTR of GBM, which correlates with areas of future recurrence.
Collapse
|
46
|
Davatzikos C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Bakas S, Colen R, Mahajan A, Quintero CB, Capellades Font J, Puig J, Jain R, Sloan AE, Badve C, Marcus DS, Seong Choi Y, Lee SK, Chang JH, Poisson LM, Griffith B, Dicker AP, Flanders AE, Booth TC, Rathore S, Akbari H, Sako C, Bilello M, Shukla G, Fathi Kazerooni A, Brem S, Lustig R, Mohan S, Bagley S, Nasrallah M, O'Rourke DM. AI-based prognostic imaging biomarkers for precision neuro-oncology: the ReSPOND consortium. Neuro Oncol 2021; 22:886-888. [PMID: 32152622 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rivka Colen
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | - Josep Puig
- Department of Radiology, University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Rajan Jain
- Department of Radiology, New York University
| | - Andrew E Sloan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Chaitra Badve
- Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Daniel S Marcus
- Department of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Yoon Seong Choi
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.,Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Seung-Koo Lee
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jong Hee Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College, Seoul, Korea
| | - Laila M Poisson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Brent Griffith
- Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Adam P Dicker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Adam E Flanders
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Thomas C Booth
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, England, UK
| | - Saima Rathore
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Chiharu Sako
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michel Bilello
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gaurav Shukla
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Steven Brem
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert Lustig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Stephen Bagley
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - MacLean Nasrallah
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Donald M O'Rourke
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Estimating Glioblastoma Biophysical Growth Parameters Using Deep Learning Regression. BRAINLESION : GLIOMA, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, STROKE AND TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES. BRAINLES (WORKSHOP) 2021; 12658:157-167. [PMID: 34514469 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-72084-1_15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma ( GBM ) is arguably the most aggressive, infiltrative, and heterogeneous type of adult brain tumor. Biophysical modeling of GBM growth has contributed to more informed clinical decision-making. However, deploying a biophysical model to a clinical environment is challenging since underlying computations are quite expensive and can take several hours using existing technologies. Here we present a scheme to accelerate the computation. In particular, we present a deep learning ( DL )-based logistic regression model to estimate the GBM's biophysical growth in seconds. This growth is defined by three tumor-specific parameters: 1) a diffusion coefficient in white matter ( Dw ), which prescribes the rate of infiltration of tumor cells in white matter, 2) a mass-effect parameter ( Mp ), which defines the average tumor expansion, and 3) the estimated time ( T ) in number of days that the tumor has been growing. Preoperative structural multi-parametric MRI ( mpMRI ) scans from n = 135 subjects of the TCGA-GBM imaging collection are used to quantitatively evaluate our approach. We consider the mpMRI intensities within the region defined by the abnormal FLAIR signal envelope for training one DL model for each of the tumor-specific growth parameters. We train and validate the DL-based predictions against parameters derived from biophysical inversion models. The average Pearson correlation coefficients between our DL-based estimations and the biophysical parameters are 0.85 for Dw, 0.90 for Mp, and 0.94 for T, respectively. This study unlocks the power of tumor-specific parameters from biophysical tumor growth estimation. It paves the way towards their clinical translation and opens the door for leveraging advanced radiomic descriptors in future studies by means of a significantly faster parameter reconstruction compared to biophysical growth modeling approaches.
Collapse
|
48
|
d’Este SH, Nielsen MB, Hansen AE. Visualizing Glioma Infiltration by the Combination of Multimodality Imaging and Artificial Intelligence, a Systematic Review of the Literature. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11040592. [PMID: 33806195 PMCID: PMC8067218 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11040592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature concerning the integration of multimodality imaging with artificial intelligence methods for visualization of tumor cell infiltration in glioma patients. The review was performed in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library and Web of Science and yielded 1304 results. 14 studies were included in the qualitative analysis. The reference standard for tumor infiltration was either histopathology or recurrence on image follow-up. Critical assessment was performed according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS2). All studies concluded their findings to be of significant value for future clinical practice. Diagnostic test accuracy reached an area under the curve of 0.74–0.91 reported in six studies. There was no consensus with regard to included image modalities, models or training and test strategies. The integration of artificial intelligence with multiparametric imaging shows promise for visualizing tumor cell infiltration in glioma patients. This approach can possibly optimize surgical resection margins and help provide personalized radiotherapy planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Honoré d’Este
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital—Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; (M.B.N.); (A.E.H.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Michael Bachmann Nielsen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital—Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; (M.B.N.); (A.E.H.)
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Adam Espe Hansen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital—Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; (M.B.N.); (A.E.H.)
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Cutaia G, La Tona G, Comelli A, Vernuccio F, Agnello F, Gagliardo C, Salvaggio L, Quartuccio N, Sturiale L, Stefano A, Calamia M, Arnone G, Midiri M, Salvaggio G. Radiomics and Prostate MRI: Current Role and Future Applications. J Imaging 2021; 7:jimaging7020034. [PMID: 34460633 PMCID: PMC8321264 DOI: 10.3390/jimaging7020034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is widely used as a triage test for men at a risk of prostate cancer. However, the traditional role of mpMRI was confined to prostate cancer staging. Radiomics is the quantitative extraction and analysis of minable data from medical images; it is emerging as a promising tool to detect and categorize prostate lesions. In this paper we review the role of radiomics applied to prostate mpMRI in detection and localization of prostate cancer, prediction of Gleason score and PI-RADS classification, prediction of extracapsular extension and of biochemical recurrence. We also provide a future perspective of artificial intelligence (machine learning and deep learning) applied to the field of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Cutaia
- Section of Radiology, BiND, University Hospital “Paolo Giaccone”, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (G.C.); (G.L.T.); (F.V.); (F.A.); (C.G.); (M.C.); (M.M.); (G.S.)
| | - Giuseppe La Tona
- Section of Radiology, BiND, University Hospital “Paolo Giaccone”, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (G.C.); (G.L.T.); (F.V.); (F.A.); (C.G.); (M.C.); (M.M.); (G.S.)
| | - Albert Comelli
- Ri.Med Foundation, Via Bandiera 11, 90133 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Federica Vernuccio
- Section of Radiology, BiND, University Hospital “Paolo Giaccone”, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (G.C.); (G.L.T.); (F.V.); (F.A.); (C.G.); (M.C.); (M.M.); (G.S.)
| | - Francesco Agnello
- Section of Radiology, BiND, University Hospital “Paolo Giaccone”, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (G.C.); (G.L.T.); (F.V.); (F.A.); (C.G.); (M.C.); (M.M.); (G.S.)
| | - Cesare Gagliardo
- Section of Radiology, BiND, University Hospital “Paolo Giaccone”, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (G.C.); (G.L.T.); (F.V.); (F.A.); (C.G.); (M.C.); (M.M.); (G.S.)
| | - Leonardo Salvaggio
- Section of Radiology, BiND, University Hospital “Paolo Giaccone”, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (G.C.); (G.L.T.); (F.V.); (F.A.); (C.G.); (M.C.); (M.M.); (G.S.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Natale Quartuccio
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ARNAS Ospedali Civico, Di Cristina e Benfratelli, 90133 Palermo, Italy; (N.Q.); (L.S.); (G.A.)
| | - Letterio Sturiale
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ARNAS Ospedali Civico, Di Cristina e Benfratelli, 90133 Palermo, Italy; (N.Q.); (L.S.); (G.A.)
| | - Alessandro Stefano
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council (IBFM-CNR), 90015 Cefalù, Italy;
| | - Mauro Calamia
- Section of Radiology, BiND, University Hospital “Paolo Giaccone”, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (G.C.); (G.L.T.); (F.V.); (F.A.); (C.G.); (M.C.); (M.M.); (G.S.)
| | - Gaspare Arnone
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ARNAS Ospedali Civico, Di Cristina e Benfratelli, 90133 Palermo, Italy; (N.Q.); (L.S.); (G.A.)
| | - Massimo Midiri
- Section of Radiology, BiND, University Hospital “Paolo Giaccone”, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (G.C.); (G.L.T.); (F.V.); (F.A.); (C.G.); (M.C.); (M.M.); (G.S.)
| | - Giuseppe Salvaggio
- Section of Radiology, BiND, University Hospital “Paolo Giaccone”, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (G.C.); (G.L.T.); (F.V.); (F.A.); (C.G.); (M.C.); (M.M.); (G.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Molinaro AM, Hervey-Jumper S, Morshed RA, Young J, Han SJ, Chunduru P, Zhang Y, Phillips JJ, Shai A, Lafontaine M, Crane J, Chandra A, Flanigan P, Jahangiri A, Cioffi G, Ostrom Q, Anderson JE, Badve C, Barnholtz-Sloan J, Sloan AE, Erickson BJ, Decker PA, Kosel ML, LaChance D, Eckel-Passow J, Jenkins R, Villanueva-Meyer J, Rice T, Wrensch M, Wiencke JK, Oberheim Bush NA, Taylor J, Butowski N, Prados M, Clarke J, Chang S, Chang E, Aghi M, Theodosopoulos P, McDermott M, Berger MS. Association of Maximal Extent of Resection of Contrast-Enhanced and Non-Contrast-Enhanced Tumor With Survival Within Molecular Subgroups of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma. JAMA Oncol 2020; 6:495-503. [PMID: 32027343 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.6143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 319] [Impact Index Per Article: 79.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Per the World Health Organization 2016 integrative classification, newly diagnosed glioblastomas are separated into isocitrate dehydrogenase gene 1 or 2 (IDH)-wild-type and IDH-mutant subtypes, with median patient survival of 1.2 and 3.6 years, respectively. Although maximal resection of contrast-enhanced (CE) tumor is associated with longer survival, the prognostic importance of maximal resection within molecular subgroups and the potential importance of resection of non-contrast-enhanced (NCE) disease is poorly understood. Objective To assess the association of resection of CE and NCE tumors in conjunction with molecular and clinical information to develop a new road map for cytoreductive surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included a development cohort from the University of California, San Francisco (761 patients diagnosed from January 1, 1997, through December 31, 2017, with 9.6 years of follow-up) and validation cohorts from the Mayo Clinic (107 patients diagnosed from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2014, with 5.7 years of follow-up) and the Ohio Brain Tumor Study (99 patients with data collected from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2011, with a median follow-up of 10.9 months). Image accessors were blinded to patient groupings. Eligible patients underwent surgical resection for newly diagnosed glioblastoma and had available survival, molecular, and clinical data and preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance images. Data were analyzed from November 15, 2018, to March 15, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall survival. Results Among the 761 patients included in the development cohort (468 [61.5%] men; median age, 60 [interquartile range, 51.6-67.7] years), younger patients with IDH-wild-type tumors and aggressive resection of CE and NCE tumors had survival similar to that of patients with IDH-mutant tumors (median overall survival [OS], 37.3 [95% CI, 31.6-70.7] months). Younger patients with IDH-wild-type tumors and reduction of CE tumor but residual NCE tumors fared worse (median OS, 16.5 [95% CI, 14.7-18.3] months). Older patients with IDH-wild-type tumors benefited from reduction of CE tumor (median OS, 12.4 [95% CI, 11.4-14.0] months). The results were validated in the 2 external cohorts. The association between aggressive CE and NCE in patients with IDH-wild-type tumors was not attenuated by the methylation status of the promoter region of the DNA repair enzyme O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. Conclusions and Relevance This study confirms an association between maximal resection of CE tumor and OS in patients with glioblastoma across all subgroups. In addition, maximal resection of NCE tumor was associated with longer OS in younger patients, regardless of IDH status, and among patients with IDH-wild-type glioblastoma regardless of the methylation status of the promoter region of the DNA repair enzyme O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. These conclusions may help reassess surgical strategies for individual patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette M Molinaro
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | | | - Ramin A Morshed
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Jacob Young
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Seunggu J Han
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland
| | - Pranathi Chunduru
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Yalan Zhang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Joanna J Phillips
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.,Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Anny Shai
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Marisa Lafontaine
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Jason Crane
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Ankush Chandra
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Patrick Flanigan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Arman Jahangiri
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Gino Cioffi
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Quinn Ostrom
- Section of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - John E Anderson
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Chaitra Badve
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jill Barnholtz-Sloan
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.,Research Division, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Andrew E Sloan
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.,Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Terri Rice
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Margaret Wrensch
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - John K Wiencke
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Nancy Ann Oberheim Bush
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.,Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Jennie Taylor
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.,Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Nicholas Butowski
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Michael Prados
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Jennifer Clarke
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.,Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Susan Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Edward Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Manish Aghi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | | | - Michael McDermott
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Mitchel S Berger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|