Eyeless/Pax6 initiates eye formation non-autonomously from the peripodial epithelium

Embryonic Flubendiamide Exposure Alters Expression of OTX2 and Other Early Regulators in Domestic Chick Leading to Congenital Eye Defects

Flubendiamide, a phthalic acid diamide insecticide, has been implicated in potential teratogenic effects on non-target organisms, especially during embryonic development. This study examines the impact of flubendiamide on eye development in chick embryos, a well-established model for vertebrate development. Exposure to 0.5 µg/µL of flubendiamide significantly impaired early ocular morphogenesis, resulting in severe defects such as underdeveloped optic cups and the absence of lens and corneal structures. Histopathological analysis demonstrated disrupted optic cup differentiation, while in silico docking studies revealed strong interactions between flubendiamide and key oculogenic proteins, including OTX2, PAX6, and SOX2. These interactions were associated with altered expression patterns of these critical regulators, alongside overexpression of SHH and downregulation of BMP4, BMP7, and FGF8, which are essential for optic vesicle formation and lens differentiation. Additionally, increased CASPASE-3 expression indicated enhanced apoptosis, contributing to the observed ocular anomalies. These findings suggest that flubendiamide disrupts key signaling pathways necessary for proper eye development, potentially leading to congenital eye defects. The study highlights the need for a thorough evaluation of the molecular mechanisms driving flubendiamide-induced teratogenicity to ensure safer pesticide use and protect environmental and human health.

Knockout of a single Pax6 gene (toy but not ey) leads to compound eye deficiency and small head in honeybees

The compound eyes are crucial to honeybees, playing pivotal roles in color recognition, orientation, localization, and navigation processes. The development of compound eyes is primarily mastered by an evolutionarily conserved transcription factor Pax6. In honeybees, there are two Pax6 homologs: ey and toy. To gain a deeper understanding of their functions, we knock out both homologs using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Intriguingly, we observe that toy knockout mutants have smaller heads without compound eyes and exhibit brain atrophy, while ey knockout mutants develop normal compound eyes, most of which die before/during their metamorphosis from pupa to adult. By comparing the head transcriptomes of four stages (larva, prepupa, pupa, and adult) in toy-knockout mutants versus normal controls, we identify significantly perturbed genes related to DNA binding transcription factors, neuron differentiation, and insect visual primordium development. Additionally, we find the interaction network of toy in honeybees differs obviously from that of D. melanogaster. Our findings suggest the two Pax6 genes serve distinct functions in honeybees and toy takes over the central function of ey in master-regulating the development of honeybee compound eyes. This adds new evidence for breaking the simplified view that some of conservative developmental toolkit genes function as all-or-nothing master regulators.

Control of fate specification within the dorsal head of Drosophila melanogaster

During development, unique combinations of transcription factors and signaling pathways carve the nascent eye-antennal disc of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster into several territories that will eventually develop into the compound eye, ocelli, head epidermis, bristles, antenna and maxillary palpus of the adult head. Juxtaposed patterns of Hedgehog (Hh) and Decapentaplegic (Dpp) initiate compound eye development, while reciprocal domains of Dpp and Wingless (Wg) induce formation of the antennal and maxillary palp fields. Hh and Wg signaling, but not Dpp, contribute to the patterning of the dorsal head vertex. Here, we show that combinatorial reductions of the Pax6 transcription factor Twin of Eyeless and either the Wg pathway or the Mirror (Mirr) transcription factor trigger a transformation of the ocelli into a compound eye and the neighboring head epidermis into an antenna. These changes in fate are accompanied by the ectopic expression of Dpp, which might be expected to trigger these changes in fate. However, the transformation of the field cannot be replicated by increasing Dpp levels alone despite the recreation of adjacent Hh-Dpp and Wg-Dpp domains. As such, the emergence of these ectopic organs occurs through a unique regulatory path.

Lmx1a is a master regulator of the cortical hem

Development of the nervous system depends on signaling centers - specialized cellular populations that produce secreted molecules to regulate neurogenesis in the neighboring neuroepithelium. In some cases, signaling center cells also differentiate to produce key types of neurons. The formation of a signaling center involves its induction, the maintenance of expression of its secreted molecules, and cell differentiation and migration events. How these distinct processes are coordinated during signaling center development remains unknown. By performing studies in mice, we show that Lmx1a acts as a master regulator to orchestrate the formation and function of the cortical hem (CH), a critical signaling center that controls hippocampus development. Lmx1a co-regulates CH induction, its Wnt signaling, and the differentiation and migration of CH-derived Cajal-Retzius neurons. Combining RNAseq, genetic, and rescue experiments, we identified major downstream genes that mediate distinct Lmx1a-dependent processes. Our work revealed that signaling centers in the mammalian brain employ master regulatory genes and established a framework for analyzing signaling center development.

Peripodial adherens junctions regulate Ajuba-Yorkie signaling to preserve fly eye morphology

The Drosophila eye develops from the larval eye disc, a flattened vesicle comprised of continuous retinal and peripodial epithelia (PE). The PE is an epithelium that plays a supporting role in retinal neurogenesis, but gives rise to cuticle in the adult. We report here that the PE is also necessary to preserve the morphology of the retinal epithelium. Depletion of the adherens junction (AJ) components β-Catenin (β-Cat), DE-Cadherin or α-Catenin from the PE leads to altered disc morphology, characterized by retinal displacement (RDis); so too does loss of the Ajuba protein Jub, an AJ-associated regulator of the transcriptional coactivator Yorkie (Yki). Restoring AJs or overexpressing Yki in β-Cat deficient PE results in suppression of RDis. Additional suppressors of AJ-dependent RDis include knockdown of Rho kinase (Rok) and Dystrophin (Dys). Furthermore, knockdown of βPS integrin (Mys) from the PE results in RDis, while overexpression of Mys can suppress RDis induced by the loss of β-Cat. We thus propose that AJ-Jub-Yki signaling in PE cells regulates PE cell contractile properties and/or attachment to the extracellular matrix to promote normal eye disc morphology.

Protein Phosphatase 2A with B' specificity subunits regulates the Hippo-Yorkie signaling axis in the Drosophila eye disc

Hippo-Yorkie (Hpo-Yki) signaling is central to diverse developmental processes. Although its redeployment has been amply demonstrated, its context-specific regulation remains poorly understood. The Drosophila eye disc is a continuous epithelium folded into two layers, the peripodial epithelium (PE) and the retinal progenitor epithelium. Here, Yki acts in the PE, first to promote PE identity by suppressing retina fate, and subsequently to maintain proper disc morphology. In the latter process, loss of Yki results in the displacement of a portion of the differentiating retinal epithelium onto the PE side. We show that Protein Phosphatase 2A (PP2A) complexes comprising different substrate-specificity B-type subunits govern the Hpo-Yki axis in this context. These include holoenzymes containing the B‴ subunit Cka and those containing the B' subunits Wdb or Wrd. Whereas PP2A(Cka), as part of the STRIPAK complex, is known to regulate Hpo directly, PP2A(Wdb) acts genetically upstream of the antagonistic activities of the Hpo regulators Sav and Rassf. These in vivo data provide the first evidence of PP2A(B') heterotrimer function in Hpo pathway regulation and reveal pathway diversification at distinct developmental times in the same tissue.

Essential role of Wtip in mouse development and maintenance of the glomerular filtration barrier

Wilms' tumor interacting protein (Wtip) has been implicated in cell junction assembly and cell differentiation and interacts with proteins in the podocyte slit diaphragm, where it regulates podocyte phenotype. To define Wtip expression and function in the kidney, we created a Wtip-deleted mouse model using β-galactosidase-neomycin (β-geo) gene trap technology. Wtip gene trap mice were embryonic lethal, suggesting additional developmental roles outside kidney function. Using β-geo heterozygous and normal mice, Wtip expression was identified in the developing kidneys, heart, and eyes. In the kidney, expression was restricted to podocytes, which appeared initially at the capillary loop stage coinciding with terminal podocyte differentiation. Heterozygous mice had an expected lifespan and showed no evidence of proteinuria or glomerular pathology. However, heterozygous mice were more susceptible to glomerular injury than wild-type littermates and developed more significant and prolonged proteinuria in response to lipopolysaccharide or adriamycin. In normal human kidneys, WTIP expression patterns were consistent with observations in mice and were lost in glomeruli concurrent with loss of synaptopodin expression in disease. Mechanistically, we identified the Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 12 (ARHGEF12) as a binding partner for WTIP. ARHGEF12 was expressed in human podocytes and formed high-affinity interactions through their LIM- and PDZ-binding domains. Our findings suggest that Wtip is essential for early murine embryonic development and maintaining normal glomerular filtration barrier function, potentially regulating slit diaphragm and foot process function through Rho effector proteins.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study characterized dynamic expression patterns of Wilms' tumor interacting protein (Wtip) and demonstrates the novel role of Wtip in murine development and maintenance of the glomerular filtration barrier.

The early history of the eye-antennal disc of Drosophila melanogaster

A pair of eye-antennal imaginal discs give rise to nearly all external structures of the adult Drosophila head including the compound eyes, ocelli, antennae, maxillary palps, head epidermis, and bristles. In the earliest days of Drosophila research, investigators would examine thousands of adult flies in search of viable mutants whose appearance deviated from the norm. The compound eyes are dispensable for viability and perturbations to their structure are easy to detect. As such, the adult compound eye and the developing eye-antennal disc emerged as focal points for studies of genetics and developmental biology. Since few tools were available at the time, early researchers put an enormous amount of thought into models that would explain their experimental observations-many of these hypotheses remain to be tested. However, these "ancient" studies have been lost to time and are no longer read or incorporated into today's literature despite the abundance of field-defining discoveries that are contained therein. In this FlyBook chapter, I will bring these forgotten classics together and draw connections between them and modern studies of tissue specification and patterning. In doing so, I hope to bring a larger appreciation of the contributions that the eye-antennal disc has made to our understanding of development as well as draw the readers' attention to the earliest studies of this important imaginal disc. Armed with the today's toolkit of sophisticated genetic and molecular methods and using the old papers as a guide, we can use the eye-antennal disc to unravel the mysteries of development.

Tiling mechanisms of the Drosophila compound eye through geometrical tessellation

Tiling patterns are observed in many biological structures. The compound eye is an interesting example of tiling and is often constructed by hexagonal arrays of ommatidia, the optical unit of the compound eye. Hexagonal tiling may be common due to mechanical restrictions such as structural robustness, minimal boundary length, and space-filling efficiency. However, some insects exhibit tetragonal facets.^1-4 Some aquatic crustaceans, such as shrimp and lobsters, have evolved with tetragonal facets.^5-8 Mantis shrimp is an insightful example as its compound eye has a tetragonal midband region sandwiched between hexagonal hemispheres.^9,10 This casts doubt on the naive explanation that hexagonal tiles recur in nature because of their mechanical stability. Similarly, tetragonal tiling patterns are also observed in some Drosophila small-eye mutants, whereas the wild-type eyes are hexagonal, suggesting that the ommatidial tiling is not simply explained by such mechanical restrictions. If so, how are the hexagonal and tetragonal patterns controlled during development? Here, we demonstrate that geometrical tessellation determines the ommatidial tiling patterns. In small-eye mutants, the hexagonal pattern is transformed into a tetragonal pattern as the relative positions of neighboring ommatidia are stretched along the dorsal-ventral axis. We propose that the regular distribution of ommatidia and their uniform growth collectively play an essential role in the establishment of tetragonal and hexagonal tiling patterns in compound eyes.

The timing of cell fate decisions is crucial for initiating pattern formation in the Drosophila eye

The eye-antennal disc of Drosophila is composed of three cell layers: a columnar epithelium called the disc proper (DP); an overlying sheet of squamous cells called the peripodial epithelium (PE); and a strip of cuboidal cells that joins the other two cellular sheets to each other and comprises the outer margin (M) of the disc. The M cells play an important role in patterning the eye because it is here that the Hedgehog (Hh), Decapentaplegic (Dpp) and JAK/STAT pathways function to initiate pattern formation. Dpp signaling is lost from the margin of eyes absent (eya) mutant discs and, as a result, the initiation of retinal patterning is blocked. Based on these observations, Eya has been proposed to control the initiation of the morphogenetic furrow via regulation of Dpp signaling within the M. We show that the failure in pattern formation surprisingly results from M cells prematurely adopting a head epidermis fate. This switch in fate normally takes place during pupal development after the eye has been patterned. Our results suggest that the timing of cell fate decisions is essential for correct eye development.

Variation in Pleiotropic Hub Gene Expression Is Associated with Interspecific Differences in Head Shape and Eye Size in Drosophila

Revealing the mechanisms underlying the breathtaking morphological diversity observed in nature is a major challenge in Biology. It has been established that recurrent mutations in hotspot genes cause the repeated evolution of morphological traits, such as body pigmentation or the gain and loss of structures. To date, however, it remains elusive whether hotspot genes contribute to natural variation in the size and shape of organs. As natural variation in head morphology is pervasive in Drosophila, we studied the molecular and developmental basis of differences in compound eye size and head shape in two closely related Drosophila species. We show differences in the progression of retinal differentiation between species and we applied comparative transcriptomics and chromatin accessibility data to identify the GATA transcription factor Pannier (Pnr) as central factor associated with these differences. Although the genetic manipulation of Pnr affected multiple aspects of dorsal head development, the effect of natural variation is restricted to a subset of the phenotypic space. We present data suggesting that this developmental constraint is caused by the coevolution of expression of pnr and its cofactor u-shaped (ush). We propose that natural variation in expression or function of highly connected developmental regulators with pleiotropic functions is a major driver for morphological evolution and we discuss implications on gene regulatory network evolution. In comparison to previous findings, our data strongly suggest that evolutionary hotspots are not the only contributors to the repeated evolution of eye size and head shape in Drosophila.

A multi-gene knockdown approach reveals a new role for Pax6 in controlling organ number in Drosophila

Genetic screens are designed to target individual genes for the practical reason of establishing a clear association between a mutant phenotype and a single genetic locus. This allows for a developmental or physiological role to be assigned to the wild-type gene. We previously observed that the concurrent loss of Pax6 and Polycomb epigenetic repressors in Drosophila leads the eye to transform into a wing. This fate change is not seen when either factor is disrupted separately. An implication of this finding is that standard screens may miss the roles that combinations of genes play in development. Here, we show that this phenomenon is not limited to Pax6 and Polycomb but rather applies more generally. We demonstrate that in the Drosophila eye-antennal disc, the simultaneous downregulation of Pax6 with either the NURF nucleosome remodeling complex or the Pointed transcription factor transforms the head epidermis into an antenna. This is a previously unidentified fate change that is also not observed with the loss of individual genes. We propose that the use of multi-gene knockdowns is an essential tool for unraveling the complexity of development.

Genetic control of retinal ganglion cell genesis

Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) are the only projection neurons in the neural retina. They receive and integrate visual signals from upstream retinal neurons in the visual circuitry and transmit them to the brain. The function of RGCs is performed by the approximately 40 RGC types projecting to various central brain targets. RGCs are the first cell type to form during retinogenesis. The specification and differentiation of the RGC lineage is a stepwise process; a hierarchical gene regulatory network controlling the RGC lineage has been identified and continues to be elaborated. Recent studies with single-cell transcriptomics have led to unprecedented new insights into their types and developmental trajectory. In this review, we summarize our current understanding of the functions and relationships of the many regulators of the specification and differentiation of the RGC lineage. We emphasize the roles of these key transcription factors and pathways in different developmental steps, including the transition from retinal progenitor cells (RPCs) to RGCs, RGC differentiation, generation of diverse RGC types, and central projection of the RGC axons. We discuss critical issues that remain to be addressed for a comprehensive understanding of these different aspects of RGC genesis and emerging technologies, including single-cell techniques, novel genetic tools and resources, and high-throughput genome editing and screening assays, which can be leveraged in future studies.

miRNAs and Müller Glia Reprogramming During Retina Regeneration

The use of model systems that are capable of robust, spontaneous retina regeneration has allowed for the identification of genetic pathways and components that are required for retina regeneration. Complemented by mouse models in which retina regeneration can be induced after forced expression of key factors, altered chromatin accessibility, or inhibition of kinase/signaling cascades, a clearer picture of the key regulatory events that control retina regeneration is emerging. In all cases, Müller glia (MG) serve as an adult retinal stem cell that must be reprogrammed to allow for regeneration, with the end goal being to understand why regenerative pathways are blocked in mammals, but spontaneous in other vertebrates such as zebrafish. miRNAs have emerged as key gene regulatory molecules that control both development and regeneration in vertebrates. Here, we focus on a small subset of miRNAs that control MG reprogramming during retina regeneration and have the potential to serve as therapeutic targets for treatment of visual disorders and damage.

Gene regulatory networks during the development of the Drosophila visual system

The Drosophila visual system integrates input from 800 ommatidia and extracts different features in stereotypically connected optic ganglia. The development of the Drosophila visual system is controlled by gene regulatory networks that control the number of precursor cells, generate neuronal diversity by integrating spatial and temporal information, coordinate the timing of retinal and optic lobe cell differentiation, and determine distinct synaptic targets of each cell type. In this chapter, we describe the known gene regulatory networks involved in the development of the different parts of the visual system and explore general components in these gene networks. Finally, we discuss the advantages of the fly visual system as a model for gene regulatory network discovery in the era of single-cell transcriptomics.

Genes and Mechanisms Involved in the Generation and Amplification of Basal Radial Glial Cells

The development of the cerebral cortex relies on different types of progenitor cell. Among them, the recently described basal radial glial cell (bRG) is suggested to be of critical importance for the development of the brain in gyrencephalic species. These cells are highly numerous in primate and ferret brains, compared to lissencephalic species such as the mouse in which they are few in number. Their somata are located in basal subventricular zones in gyrencephalic brains and they generally possess a basal process extending to the pial surface. They sometimes also have an apical process directed toward the ventricular surface, similar to apical radial glial cells (aRGs) from which they are derived, and whose somata are found more apically in the ventricular zone. bRGs share similarities with aRGs in terms of gene expression (SOX2, PAX6, and NESTIN), whilst also expressing a range of more specific genes (such as HOPX). In primate brains, bRGs can divide multiple times, self-renewing and/or generating intermediate progenitors and neurons. They display a highly specific cytokinesis behavior termed mitotic somal translocation. We focus here on recently identified molecular mechanisms associated with the generation and amplification of bRGs, including bRG-like cells in the rodent. These include signaling pathways such as the FGF-MAPK cascade, SHH, PTEN/AKT, PDGF pathways, and proteins such as INSM, GPSM2, ASPM, TRNP1, ARHGAP11B, PAX6, and HIF1α. A number of these proteins were identified through transcriptome comparisons in human aRGs vs. bRGs, and validated by modifying their activities or expression levels in the mouse. This latter experiment often revealed enhanced bRG-like cell production, even in some cases generating folds (gyri) on the surface of the mouse cortex. We compare the features of the identified cells and methods used to characterize them in each model. These important data converge to indicate pathways essential for the production and expansion of bRGs, which may help us understand cortical development in health and disease.