Sentinel node mapping and skip metastases in patients with early gastric cancer

Indocyanine green and near-infrared fluorescence-guided surgery for gastric cancer: a narrative review

In recent years, indocyanine green (ICG) and near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence-guided surgery has become a versatile and well-researched tool for gastric cancer treatment. Our narrative review aims to explore the applications, benefits, and challenges that are associated with this technique. Initially used to detect sentinel lymph nodes in early gastric cancer, its scope has broadened to include several clinical applications. Its most notable advantages are the ability to guide standard lymphadenectomy, intraoperatively localize tumors and define tumor margins. Despite these advantages, there are still ongoing discussions regarding its accuracy, lack of standardized administration, and oncologic safety in sentinel node navigation surgery. The limited tumor specificity of ICG has been especially put into question, hindering its ability to accurately differentiate between malignant and healthy tissue. With ongoing innovations and its integration into newer endoscopic and robotic systems, ICG-NIR fluorescence imaging shows promise in becoming a standard tool in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer.

Feasibility of Regional Lymphadenectomy for Stomach-Preserving Surgery in Early Gastric Cancer Omitting Sentinel Node Navigation: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SENORITA Trial

BACKGROUND

Sentinel node navigation (SNN) has been known as the effective treatment for stomach-preserving surgery in early gastric cancer; however, SNN presents several technical difficulties in real practice.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of regional lymphadenectomy omitting SNN, using the post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Using data from the SENORITA trial that compared laparoscopic standard gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy and laparoscopic SNN, 237 patients who underwent SNN were included in this study. Tumor location was divided into longitudinal and circumferential directions. According to the location of the tumor, the presence or absence of lymph node (LN) metastases between sentinel and non-sentinel basins were analyzed. Proposed regional LN stations were defined as the closest area to the primary tumor. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values (NPV) of SNN and regional lymphadenectomy were compared.

RESULTS

Metastasis to non-sentinel basins with tumor-free in sentinel basins was observed in one patient (0.4%). The rate of LN metastasis to non-regional LN stations without regional LN metastasis was 2.5% (6/237). The sensitivity and NPV of SNN were found to be significantly higher than those of regional lymphadenectomy (96.8% vs. 80.6% [p = 0.016] and 99.5% vs. 97.2% [p = 0.021], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that regional lymphadenectomy for stomach-preserving surgery, omitting SNN, was insufficient; therefore, SNN is required in stomach-preserving surgery.

Endoscopic resection and laparoscopic lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer beyond conventional endoscopic treatment indications: a 10-year outcome study

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic full-thickness gastric resection (EFTGR) with laparoscopic regional lymph node dissection (LLND) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with LLND have been investigated as treatment options for early gastric cancer beyond the absolute indications for ESD. However, comparative studies on the long-term outcomes of these procedures are lacking. This study aimed to analyze and compare the 10-year outcomes of both procedures in a real clinical setting.

METHODS

Between January 2009 and December 2013, 28 and 37 patients diagnosed with EGC beyond the absolute indications for ESD were treated with EFTGR with LLND and ESD with LLND, respectively. In both procedures, the dye was injected into the tumor. However, after injection and LLND, EFTGR was performed immediately in the EFTGR with LLND group, whereas LLND was followed by ESD in the ESD with LLND group. The primary endpoint was the 10-year survival rate.

RESULTS

The EFTGR with LLND group had one case of local recurrence (3.6%) and mortality (3.6%) each, while the ESD with LLND group had none (0.0% for both); however, the differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.247 for each). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in complications such as ischemia and anastomosis leakage between the groups (P = 0.247).

CONCLUSIONS

When the procedures were properly applied, EFTGR with LLND and ESD with LLND did not increase the 10-year mortality in patients with EGC beyond the absolute ESD indications compared with conventional radical gastrectomy.

Da Vinci robot-assisted endoscopic full-thickness gastric resection with regional lymph node dissection using a 3D near-infrared video system: a single-center 5-year clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic full-thickness gastric resection (EFTGR) with regional lymph node dissection (LND) has been used for early gastric cancer (EGC) exceeding the indications for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The extent of the dissected lymph nodes is crucial. A 3D near-infrared (NIR) video robot system significantly enhances visualization of the lymphatic system. However, this system has not been used in EFTGR with LND. Thus, this study assessed the benefits of the 3D NIR video robot system in a clinical setting.

METHODS

Between February 2015 and September 2018, 24 patients with EGC exceeding the indications for ESD were treated with EFTGR and LND using a 3D NIR video system with the da Vinci surgical robot. Indocyanine green (ICG) was injected endoscopically around the tumor, and basin node (BN) dissection around the nodes was examined using the 3D NIR video system of the da Vinci Si surgical robot. Subsequently, robot-assisted EFTGR was performed. The primary outcome was the 5-year survival rate.

RESULT

During a 5-year follow-up of all 24 patients, an 80-year-old patient with an ulcer and T2 invasion was lost to follow-up. Among the remaining 23 patients, no mortality or recurrence was observed.

CONCLUSION

No metastasis or mortality occurred using the da Vinci robot-assisted EFTGR with LLND and a 3D NIR video system for patients who required radical gastrectomy for EGC in over 5 years. Hence, this may be a safe and effective method for radical gastrectomy; further studies are required confirming its effectiveness.

A combined approach for individualized lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer patients

Introduction: Gastric cancer ranks as the fifth most common cancer globally. The presence of lymph node metastasis is a significant prognostic factor influencing survival. Postoperative morbidity and nodal staging accuracy are heavily affected by the extent of lymph node dissection. Our study aimed to explore the potential integration of two contemporary methods, sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) and the Maruyama Computer Program (MCP), to improve the accuracy of nodal staging. Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective data collection involving patients with gastric adenocarcinoma from 2008 to 2018 at the Department of Surgery, University of Debrecen, Hungary. Data from 100 consecutive patients were collected. The primary and secondary endpoints included evaluating the rate of node-negative patients and the diagnostic accuracy of our combined approach. Results: Sentinel node mapping was successful in 97 out of 100 patients. We found that using the threshold value of the Maruyama Index (MI) ≥ 28, all metastatic stations of sentinel-node-negative patients could be identified. Our method achieved 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value, with a specificity of 60.42% (95% CI = 46.31%-72.98%). Discussion: The combined application of SNNS and MCP has proven to be an effective diagnostic technique in the synergistic approach for identifying metastasis-positive lymph node stations. Despite its limitations, this combination may assist clinicians in customizing lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer patients.

Preclinical evaluation of sentinel node localization in the stomach via mannose-labelled magnetic nanoparticles and indocyanine green

BACKGROUND

Gastrectomy with extended (D2) lymphadenectomy is considered standard of care for gastric cancer to provide the best possible outcomes and pathologic staging. However, D2 gastrectomy is a technically demanding operation and reported to be associated with increased complications and mortality. Application of sentinel lymph node (SLN) concept in gastric cancer has the potential to reduce patient morbidity; however, SLN techniques are not established for gastrectomy, in part due to lack of practical tracers. An effective and convenient tracer with enhanced SLN accumulation is critically needed.

METHODS

Mannose-labelled magnetic tracer 'FerroTrace' and fluorescent dye indocyanine green (ICG) were injected laparoscopically into the stomach submucosa of 8 healthy swine under general anaesthesia. Intraoperative fluorescence imaging was used to highlight draining lymphatic pathways containing ICG, while preoperative T2-weighted MRI and ex vivo magnetometer probe measurements were used to identify nodes containing FerroTrace. Lymphadenectomy was performed either robotically (n = 2) or via laparotomy (n = 6).

RESULTS

Mixing ICG and FerroTrace ensured concurrence of fluorescent and magnetic signals in SLNs. An initial trial with robotic dissection removed all magnetic LNs (n = 4). In the subsequent laparotomy study that targeted all ICG-LNs based on intraoperative fluorescence imaging, dissection removed an average of 4.7 ± 1.2 fluorescent, and 2.0 ± 1.3 magnetic LNs per animal. Both MRI and magnetometer detected 100% of SLNs (n = 7). FerroTrace demonstrated high specificity to SLNs, which contained 76 ± 30% of total lymphotropic iron, and 88 ± 20 % of the overall magnetometer signal.

CONCLUSIONS

Through utilisation of this dual tracer approach, SLNs were identified via preoperative MRI, visualised intraoperatively with fluorescence imaging, and confirmed with a magnetometer. This combination pairs the sensitivity of ICG with SLN-specific FerroTrace and can be used for reliable SLN detection in gastric cancer, with potential applications in neoadjuvant therapy.

A Nomogram for Predicting Extraperigastric Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Early Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

There are no clear guidelines to determine whether to perform D1 or D1+ lymph node dissection in early gastric cancer (EGC). This study aimed to develop a nomogram for estimating the risk of extraperigastric lymph node metastasis (LNM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2009 and 2019, a total of 4,482 patients with pathologically confirmed T1 disease at 6 affiliated hospitals were included in this study. The basic clinicopathological characteristics of the positive and negative extraperigastric LNM groups were compared. The possible risk factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Based on these results, a risk prediction model was developed. A nomogram predicting extraperigastric LNM was used for internal validation.

RESULTS

Multivariate analyses showed that tumor size (cut-off value 3.0 cm, odds ratio [OR]=1.886, P=0.030), tumor depth (OR=1.853 for tumors with sm2 and sm3 invasion, P=0.010), cross-sectional location (OR=0.490 for tumors located on the greater curvature, P=0.0303), differentiation (OR=0.584 for differentiated tumors, P=0.0070), and lymphovascular invasion (OR=11.125, P<0.001) are possible risk factors for extraperigastric LNM. An equation for estimating the risk of extraperigastric LNM was derived from these risk factors. The equation was internally validated by comparing the actual metastatic rate with the predicted rate, which showed good agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

A nomogram for estimating the risk of extraperigastric LNM in EGC was successfully developed. Although there are some limitations to applying this model because it was developed based on pathological data, it can be optimally adapted for patients who require curative gastrectomy after endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Endoscopic fluorescent lymphography for gastric cancer

Lymphography by radioisotope or dye is a well-known technique for visualizing the lymphatic drainage pattern in a neoplastic lesion and it is in use in gastric cancer. Indocyanine green (ICG) more recently has been validated in fluorescent lymphography studies and is under evaluation as a novel tracer agent in gastric cancer. The amount and dilution of ICG injected as well as the site and the time of the injection are not standardized. In our unit, endoscopic submucosal injections of ICG are made as 0.5 mg in 0.5 mL at four peritumoral sites the day before surgery (for a total of 2.0 mg in 2.0 mL). Detection instruments for ICG fluorescence are evolving. Near-infrared systems integrated into laparoscopic or robotic instruments (near-infrared fluorescence imaging) have shown the most promising results. ICG fluorescence recognizes the node that receives lymphatic flow directly from a primary tumor. This is defined as the sentinel lymph node, and it has a high predictive negative value at the cT1 stage, able to reduce the extent of gastrectomy and lymph node dissection. ICG also enhances the number of lymph nodes detected during extended lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Nevertheless, the practical effects of ICG use in a single patient are not yet clear. Standardization of the technique and further studies are needed before fluorescent lymphography can be used extensively worldwide. Until then, current guidelines recommend an extensive lymphadenectomy as the standard approach for gastric cancer with suspected metastasis.

Optimal extent of lymph node dissection in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer still remains a major cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Stage-adapted, individualized treatment is crucial to achieving optimal oncological outcomes. Postoperative morbidity and accurate nodal staging are heavily influenced by the extent of lymph node dissection. On one hand, insufficient lymphadenectomy may result in understaging and undertreatment of a patient, on the other hand, unnecessary lymph node dissection may result in a higher rate of postoperative complications. Approximately one-third of patients with gastric cancer undergoes an avoidable lymph node dissection. Many of the recent treatment updates in the management of gastric cancer have a major influence on both surgical and oncological approaches. Currently, a wide range of endoscopic, minimally invasive, and hybrid surgical techniques are available. The concept of sentinel node biopsy and utilization of the Maruyama Computer Program are significant components of stage-adapted gastric cancer surgery. Likewise, centralization and application of national guidelines, widespread use of neoadjuvant therapy, and the stage migration phenomenon are serious concerns to be discussed. Our goal is to review the available surgical strategies for gastric cancer, with a primary focus on lymphadenectomy.

Tracers in Gastric Cancer Surgery

The treatment of gastric cancer mainly depends on radical gastrectomy. Determination of appropriate surgical margins and adequate lymph node (LN) resection are two major surgical steps that directly correlate with prognosis in gastric cancer. Due to the expanding use of minimally invasive procedures, it is no longer possible to locate tumors and LNs through touch. As an alternative, tracers have begun to enter the field due to their capacities for intraoperative visualization. Herein, we summarize the application of contemporary tracers in gastric cancer surgery, including isosulfan blue, methylene blue, patent blue, indocyanine green, carbon particles, and radioactive tracers. Their mechanisms, administration methods, detection efficiency, and challenges, as well as perspectives on them, are also outlined.

Mapping Lymph Node during Indocyanine Green Fluorescence-Imaging Guided Gastric Oncologic Surgery: Current Applications and Future Directions

Huge strides have been made in the navigation of gastric cancer surgery thanks to the improvement of intraoperative techniques. For now, the use of indocyanine green (ICG) enhanced fluorescence imaging has received promising results in detecting sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and tracing lymphatic drainages, which make it applicable for limited and precise lymphadenectomy. Nevertheless, issues of the lack of specificity and unpredictable false-negative lymph nodes were encountered in gastric oncologic surgery practice using ICG-enhanced fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI), which restrict its application. Here, we reviewed the current application of ICG-FI and assessed potential approaches to improving ICG-FI.

The Use of Indocyanine Green (ICG) and Near-Infrared (NIR) Fluorescence-Guided Imaging in Gastric Cancer Surgery: A Narrative Review

Near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green is an emerging technology gaining clinical relevance in the field of oncosurgery. In recent decades, it has also been applied in gastric cancer surgery, spreading among surgeons thanks to the diffusion of minimally invasive approaches and the related development of new optic tools. Its most relevant uses in gastric cancer surgery are sentinel node navigation surgery, lymph node mapping during lymphadenectomy, assessment of vascular anatomy, and assessment of anastomotic perfusion. There is still debate regarding the most effective application, but with relatively no collateral effects and without compromising the operative time, indocyanine green fluorescence imaging carved out a role for itself in gastric resections. This review aims to summarize the current indications and evidence for the use of this tool, including the relevant practical details such as dosages and times of administration.

Extragastric Metastasis of Early Gastric Cancer After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection With Lymphovascular Invasion and Negative Resected Margins

Purpose

Lymphovascular invasion is a criterion for non-curative resection in patients who have undergone endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC). We aimed to determine the rate of extragastric metastasis (EGM) and identify the predictors of EGM in patients with negative resection margins (R0 resection) and lymphovascular invasion in post-ESD pathology.

Materials and Methods

A total of 2,983 patients underwent ESD for EGC. Among them, 110 had a pathology of R0 resection and positive lymphovascular invasion. Patients underwent additional gastrectomy (n=63) or further follow-up without gastrectomy (n=47).

Results

The 110 patients were assigned to one of the 3 groups according to ESD indications based on post-ESD pathology. The first group satisfied the absolute indication for ESD (n=18), the second group satisfied the expanded indications for ESD (n=34), and the last group satisfied the beyond indication (n=58). The number of occurrences of EGM in each group was 1 (5.6%), 3 (8.8%), and 3 (5.2%), respectively. The logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, tumor size, and indication for ESD, showed that larger tumor size was associated with EGM (odds ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.00–3.10; P=0.048). In contrast, ESD indication criteria did not affect EGM (P=0.349).

Conclusions

Tumor size was the only predictive indicator for EGM in patients who underwent R0 resection and lymphovascular invasion on post-ESD pathology. Even patients with pathology corresponding to the absolute indication criteria of ESD had lymphovascular invasion, which means that they require additional gastrectomy due to the risk of EGM.

The risk of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer conforming to indications of endoscopic resection and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy: a single-center retrospective study

Background

Lymph node metastasis (LNM) status is an important prognostic factor that strongly influences the treatment decision of early gastric cancer (EGC). This study aimed to evaluate the pattern and clinical significance of LNM in EGC.

Methods

A total of 354 patients with carcinoma in situ (n = 42), EGC (n = 312) who underwent radical gastrectomy were enrolled. Their clinicopathological features, pathological reports, and prognostic data were collected and analyzed.

Results

The incidence of LNM in all patients was 18.36% (65/354). The rates of D1 and D2 station metastases were 12.10% (43/354) and 6.21% (22/354), respectively. The rates of LNM in absolute indication of endoscopic resection and expanded indication were 3.27% (2/61) and 28.55% (4/14), respectively. Skip LNM was observed in 3.67% (13/354) of patients. For those with middle-third tumor, the metastasis rate of the No. 5 lymph node was 3.05% (5/164). The independent risk factors for LNM were tumors measuring > 30 mm, poorly differentiated tumors, and lymphovascular invasion (all P < 0.05; area under the curve, 0.783). The 5-year disease-free survival rates of patients with and without LNM were 96.26 and 79.17%, respectively (P = 0.011). Tumors measuring > 20 mm and LNM were independent predictive factors for poor survival outcome in all patients.

Conclusions

Patients with EGC conforming to expanded indications have a relatively high risk of LNM and may not be suitable for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for patients with middle-third EGC remains controversial due to the high metastasis rate of the No. 5 lymph node.

Integrating No.3 lymph nodes and primary tumor radiomics to predict lymph node metastasis in T1-2 gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to develope and validate a radiomics nomogram by integrating the quantitative radiomics characteristics of No.3 lymph nodes (LNs) and primary tumors to better predict preoperative lymph node metastasis (LNM) in T1-2 gastric cancer (GC) patients.

METHODS

A total of 159 T1-2 GC patients who had undergone surgery with lymphadenectomy between March 2012 and November 2017 were retrospectively collected and divided into a training cohort (n = 80) and a testing cohort (n = 79). Radiomic features were extracted from both tumor region and No. 3 station LNs based on computed tomography (CT) images per patient. Then, key features were selected using minimum redundancy maximum relevance algorithm and fed into two radiomic signatures, respectively. Meanwhile, the predictive performance of clinical risk factors was studied. Finally, a nomogram was built by merging radiomic signatures and clinical risk factors and evaluated by the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) as well as decision curve.

RESULTS

Two radiomic signatures, reflecting phenotypes of the tumor and LNs respectively, were significantly associated with LN metastasis. A nomogram incorporating two radiomic signatures and CT-reported LN metastasis status showed good discrimination of LN metastasis in both the training cohort (AUC 0.915; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.832-0.998) and testing cohort (AUC 0.908; 95% CI 0.814-1.000). The decision curve also indicated its potential clinical usefulness.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram received favorable predictive accuracy in predicting No.3 LNM in T1-2 GC, and the nomogram showed positive role in predicting LNM in No.4 LNs. The nomogram may be used to predict LNM in T1-2 GC and could assist the choice of therapy.

How useful is sentinel lymph node biopsy for the status of lymph node metastasis in cT1N0M0 gastric cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is intriguing because it is expected to further expand the indication of endoscopic resection (ER) for cT1N0M0 gastric cancer and as an additional operation for post-ER gastric cancer. The aim of our study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the feasibility and diagnostic value of SLNB technique in patients with cT1N0M0 gastric cancer. Eligible studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to April 2020. A random-effect model was used to pool the data, and subgroup analysis was used to explain the heterogeneities. A total of 22 clinical studies (1993 patients with cT1N0M0 gastric cancer) were included. The pooled SLN identification rate, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals were 0.99 (0.99-1.00), 0.92 (0.88-0.95), 1.00 (1.00-1.00), and 832.8 (395.5-1753.6), respectively. The summary receiver operator characteristic displayed a test accuracy of 99.3%. Subgroup analysis found an improved SLN sensitivity for studies with the mean number of SLNs > 4 and studies stained with a combination of hematoxylin-eosin with immunohistochemistry (HE + IHC). Further, studies using the basin dissection were associated with a higher SLN identification rate. The current meta-analysis provides data that favors the use of SLNB for predicting the status of lymph node metastasis in patients with cT1N0M0 gastric cancer. However, establishing standard procedure and suitable criteria for further application and optimization of SLNB is urgently needed.

Recent updates and current issues of sentinel node navigation surgery for early gastric cancer

With the increase in the incidence of early gastric cancer (EGC), several endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and function-preserving gastrectomy, have been accepted as standard treatments. Sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) is an ideal surgical option for preservation of most parts of the stomach and consequent maintenance of normal gastric function to improve quality of life in patients with EGC. Although many previous studies and clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of the sentinel node concept in gastric cancer, the clinical application of SNNS is debatable. Several issues regarding technical standardization and oncological safety need to be resolved. Recently several studies to resolve these problems are being actively performed, and SNNS might be an important surgical option in the treatment of gastric cancer in the future.

Sentinel lymph node detection for gastric cancer: Promise or pitfall?

At present, optimal surgery for gastric cancer is still under debate, especially the extent of lymph node dissection. Gastrectomy with D1/D2 lymphadenectomy is standard treatment for resectable advanced gastric cancer. However, in early gastric cancer without lymph node metastasis, gastrectomy with D1/D2 lymphadenectomy may not be unnecessary, which could increases morbidity and mortality and reduces the quality of life (QOL). Therefore, the concept of sentinel lymph node could be applied in gastric cancer. But due to the complexity of gastric lymphatic drainage, there are still many issues under debate, such as suitable tracers, the method of mapping and collecting and the oncologic safety of sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS). In addition, skip metastasis and unreliability of intraoperative pathological diagnosis are two main reasons for false negative cases. In this review, we summarize the current status and controversy of sentinel lymph node detection in gastric cancer, attempting to help with practical application. Further, we hold opinion that we should be cautious about performing sentinel lymph node detection in gastric cancer before an accurate and effective method occurs.

Sentinel Node Navigation in Gastric Cancer: Where Do We Stand?

BACKGROUND

Early gastric cancer (EGC) is more common nowadays and is related a to low percentage of lymph node metastasis. For this reason, there is enormous interest to implicate minimally invasive approaches. Recently, special efforts have been made towards a potential intraoperative (real-time) lymph node metastasis (LNM) assessment, as nodal disease status could not be identified with precision before or during surgery. In this direction, accurate prediction of the LNM status through sentinel LN mapping has been attempted, as an approach to the intraoperative detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). A careful literature search was conducted in order to clarify the potential clinical application of SN biopsy in the gastric cancer field.

CONCLUSION

The real clinical application of SN biopsy in gastric cancer treatment has been more than challenging due to the "complicated" nature of gastric lymphatic drainage and the high possibility of "skip" metastasis phenomenon. Notably, sophisticated technical aspects, such as the preferred tracer used and the potential "ideal" method to verify the presence of metastases in the resected SLNs, made SN biopsy application in gastric cancer field extremely demanding. Assessing the potential role of SN navigation for gastric cancer treatment in the era of advanced technology, where the minimally invasive surgical approaches are in the top of the scientific interest, it has to be highlighted that SN navigation for gastric cancer is a topic that remains highly controversial, and the need for future clinical trials on this topic is obvious.

Clinical significance of skip lymph-node metastasis in pN1 gastric-cancer patients after curative surgery

BACKGROUND

In addition to the stepwise manner of lymph-node metastasis from the primary tumour, the skip lymph-node metastasis (SLNM) was identified as a low-incidence metastasis of gastric cancer (GC). So far, both the mechanism and outcome of SLNM have not been elucidated completely. The purpose of this study was to analyse the clinical significance and the potential mechanism of SLNM in GC patients who had lymph-node metastasis.

METHODS

Clinicopathological data and follow-up information of 505 GC patients who had lymph-node metastasis were analysed to demonstrate the significance of SLNM in evaluating the prognostic outcome. According to the pathological results, all GC patients who had lymph-node metastasis were categorized into three groups: patients with the perigastric lymph-node metastasis, patients with the perigastric and extragastric lymph-node metastasis and patients with SLNM.Results: Among the 505 GC patients who had lymph-node metastasis, 24 (4.8%) had pathologically identified SLNM. The location of lymph-node metastasis was not significantly associated with 5-year survival rate and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.194). The stratified survival analysis results showed that the status of SLNM was significantly associated with the OS in patients with pN1 GC (P = 0.001). The median OS was significantly shorter in 19 pN1 GC patients with SLNM than in 100 patients with perigastric lymph-node metastasis (P < 0.001). The case-control matched logistic regression analysis results showed that tumour size (P = 0.002) was the only clinicopathological factor that may predict SLNM in pN1 GC patients undergoing curative surgery. Among the 19 pN1 GC patients with SLNM, 17 (89.5%) had metastatic lymph nodes along the common hepatic artery, around the celiac artery or in the hepatoduodenal ligament.

CONCLUSIONS

SLNM may be considered a potentially practicable indicator for prognosis among various subgroups of pN1 GC patients.

Techniques and Current Role of Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) Concept in Gastric Cancer Surgery

Gastric cancer patients represent a rather divergent patient group and in certain carefully selected cases of early forms of gastric cancer the D2 gastrectomy could be considered a more radical procedure than the biological and oncological characteristics of the primary tumor on the gastric wall would require. As any unnecessary dissection increases morbidity without always respective survival benefits, an approach that could accurately predict and actually dictate the exact extent of lymph node dissection would be ideal. It is more than logical the assumption that the standard D2 lymphadenectomy could represent an overtreatment in distinct patients groups such as patients with early gastric cancer with favorable pathological characteristics and clinically negative nodes not suitable for endoscopic treatment because this early stage disease shows limited lymph node metastasis incidence and excellent overall survival. Considering that the D2 gastrectomy has a negative impact on the quality of life of gastric cancer patients due to the post-gastrectomy functional results, a concept of a more targeted lymph node dissection, when appropriate, is certainly appealing. It is yet to be proven whether sentinel lymph node navigation surgery can fulfill such expectations providing the appropriate balance between morbidity and oncological safety in selected gastric cancer patients.

Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in non-sentinel node basins in early gastric cancer: sentinel node concept

BACKGROUND

Sentinel node (SN) concept is being applied to early gastric cancer. However, when SNs are positive for metastasis, it is unclear how often LNs in other LN basins show metastasis. We aimed to investigate LN metastasis possibility in LN basins without SNs (non-SN basins). We determined risk factors for metastasis in non-SN basins and identified a prediction model for non-SN basin metastasis using classification and regression tree (CART) analysis.

METHODS

We enrolled 550 patients who were diagnosed with cT1N0M0 or cT2N0M0 gastric cancer with a single lesion and underwent SN mapping. We adopted a dual-tracer method using a radioactive colloid and blue dye to detect SNs.

RESULTS

Of all, 45 (8.2%) patients had SN metastasis; we divided them into two groups: LN metastasis positive and LN metastasis negative in non-SN basins. Univariate analysis showed that the groups differed significantly regarding lymphatic invasion (p = 0.007), number of identified SNs (p = 0.032), and macrometastasis in SN basins (p = 0.005). The CART decision tree for predicting LN metastasis in non-SN basins had area under the curve value of 0.86. Moreover, there were significantly differences in cancer-specific survival (CSS) between the two groups (p = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Macrometastasis in SN basins, lymphatic invasion, and number of identified SNs ≥ 5 are risk factors for LN metastasis in non-SN basins among gastric cancer patients. We identified a prediction model with CART analysis; patients with macrometastasis in SN basins and lymphatic invasion were considered to be at the highest risk for LN metastasis.

Can Preoperative Examination Help Choose the Best Surgical Procedure in Gastric Cancer?

Aim

Gastrectomy with lymph node dissection is standard treatment in gastric cancer. This study aimed to explore whether preoperative investigation finds could predict lymph node metastatic scope in gastric carcinoma so that the optimal surgical procedure could be selected.

Materials and Methods

Radical gastrectomy patients (n = 378) were separated into two groups according to the lymph node metastatic scope. Univariate and multivariate analyses of preoperative examination results were performed to identify the predictors of metastatic scope. ROC curves were constructed, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to estimate diagnostic values.

Results

Serum CEA (OR: 3.73; 95% CI: 1.84–7.56; P ≤ 0.001), tumor size (OR: 2.07; 95% CI: 1.08–3.98; P = 0.03), and CT examination results (OR: 17.81; 95% CI: 9.18–34.55; P ≤ 0.001) were identified as independent predictors. The AUC proved that they possessed significant diagnostic value. When CT examination was negative, the combination of serum CEA and tumor size showed high specificity (95.3%; 164/172), negative predictive value (92.7%; 164/177), and accuracy (89.0%; 170/191).

Conclusions

Preoperative serum CEA, tumor size, and CT examination are independent predictors of lymph node metastatic scope and can be used for selecting the appropriate lymphadenectomy pattern in gastric cancer patients.

Diagnostic evaluation of sentinel lymph node biopsy using indocyanine green and infrared or fluorescent imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) for gastric cancer using infrared visualization of indocyanine green (ICG) is intriguing because it may limit operative morbidity. We are the first to systematically review and perform meta-analysis on the diagnostic utility of ICG and infrared electronic endoscopy (IREE) or near infrared fluorescent imaging (NIFI) for SNNS exclusively in gastric cancer.

METHODS

A search of electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library using search terms "gastric/stomach" AND "tumor/carcinoma/cancer/neoplasm/adenocarcinoma/malignancy" AND "indocyanine green" was completed in May 2017. Articles were selected by two independent reviewers based on the following major inclusion criteria: (1) diagnostic accuracy study design; (2) indocyanine green was injected at tumor site; (3) IREE or NIFI was used for intraoperative visualization. 327 titles or abstracts were screened. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2.

RESULTS

Ten full text studies were selected. 643 patients were identified with the majority of patients possessing T1 tumors (79.8%). Pooled identification rate, diagnostic odds ratio, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.99 (0.97-1.0), 380.0 (68.71-2101), 0.87 (0.80-0.93), and 1.00 (0.99-1.00), respectively. The summary receiver operator characteristic for ICG + IREE/NIFI demonstrated a test accuracy of 98.3%. Subgroup analysis found improved test performance for studies with low-risk QUADAS-2 scores, studies published after 2010 and submucosal ICG injection. IREE had improved diagnostic odds ratio, sensitivity, and identification rate compared to NIFI. Heterogeneity among studies ranged from low (I² < 25%) to high (I² > 75%).

CONCLUSIONS

We found encouraging results regarding the accuracy, diagnostic odds ratio, and specificity of the test. The sensitivity was not optimal but may be improved by a strict protocol to augment the technique. Given the number and heterogeneity of studies, our results must be viewed with caution.

The pattern of lymph node metastases in microsatellite unstable gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is one of the new groups of molecular divisions of gastric cancer (GC). The aim of this study was to investigate the pattern of lymph node metastasis according to MSI status.

METHODS

MSI analysis of 361 GC patients with information about lymph node stations was performed using 5 quasimonomorphic mononucleotide repeats. The metastasis rates for each lymphatic station was analyzed, combined with clinicopathologic characteristics. Stations were divided into compartments 1-3 on the basis of Japanese Classification. A median number (interquartile range, IQR) of 33 (18-50) lymph nodes were removed and analyzed.

RESULTS

N0 status was observed in 53.7% MSI patients, and in 29.7% microsatellite stable (MSS) (p < 0.001).The median value of involved nodes was 1 in MSI vs. 5 in MSS (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the number of involved node stations was significantly lower in the MSI group (p < 0.001). MSS tumors showed a higher propensity to spread to second and third compartment nodes. In absence of lymphovascular invasion only 3.2% cases demonstrated positive nodes beyond the first compartment. Skip metastases were seen in 6.1% MSS patients and 0% MSI (p = 0.011). No difference in the 10-year cancer related survival among MSI and MSS patients was found, for both those with 1st compartment (p = 0.223) and with 2nd compartment involvement (p = 0.814).

CONCLUSIONS

MSI GC shows a high rate of N0 stage, a lower number of lymph node metastases, and a less extensive spread to lymph node stations than MSS tumors. These data indicate that tailored lymphadenectomy may be investigated for these patients.

Feasibility and diagnostic performance of dual-tracer-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in cT1-2N0M0 gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies

BACKGROUND

Dual-tracer-guided sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy may provide a promising diagnostic tool to assess accurately the status of lymph node metastasis in the surgical operation and assure the oncologic safety of the function or stomach preserving surgery. The diagnostic performance of this technology in recent studies varied. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered at the PROSPERO. Eligible studies were searched in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Library databases. A random-effect model was used to pool the data. Summary receiver operator characteristic curves, analysis for publication bias, meta-regression, and subgroup analysis were also performed.

RESULTS

The pooled SLN identification rate and sensitivity were 0.97 and 0.89. ^99mTc-human serum albumin with indocyanine green (ICG), ^99mTc-antimony sulfur colloid with ICG, performing SLN biopsy ≥15 min after dye injection, an SLN ≥5, the basin dissection, laparoscopic surgery, in studies conducted in Japan and studies published after 2012, were associated with higher sensitivity. CT1 stage, performing SLN biopsy ≥15 min after dye injection, in studies conducted in Japan and studies published after 2012, were related with a higher identification rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual tracer is promising in SLN biopsy in gastric cancer, and the clinical application of SLN biopsy should be limited to the patients of cT1N0M0 gastric cancer. The combination of ^99mTc-human serum albumin and ICG as well as the combination of ^99mTc-antimony sulfur colloid and ICG may be the optimal tracer combination. However, it seems not justified to put this technique into routine clinical application recently. Some factors that might enhance diagnostic value are identified.

Predictive value for lymph node metastasis of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell marker expression in early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive therapies, including endoscopic mucosal resection or sentinel node navigation surgery, have been widely applied in early gastric cancer because of their benefits in promoting patient quality of life. However, lymph node dissection is beyond the capability of endoscopic therapy, and in sentinel node navigation surgery, the potential for skip metastasis is not negligible. Therefore, the possibility of lymph node metastasis is the most important factor to consider when deciding whether to apply the minimally invasive therapies. In the present study, the significance of epithelial mesenchymal transition and stem cell marker expression in lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer was investigated.

METHODS

We evaluated the significance of the expression of 5 epithelial mesenchymal transition-related markers (E-cadherin, MMP7, S100A, Snail-1, and HGF) and 6 stem cell markers (ALDH1, SOX2, CD24, CD44, CD54, and CD133) in 119 early gastric cancer specimens using immunohistochemistry. Because protein expression is heterogeneous in gastric cancer, we analyzed the expression of these markers in two selected regions (one each at the superficial zone and the deep invasive front).

RESULTS

Expression of E-cadherin, MMP7, HGF, and CD133 at the deep invasive front was associated with the absence of lymph node metastasis (P=0.013, 0.018, <0.001, and 0.026, respectively). Presence of diffuse-type component, lymphatic invasion, and lack of expression of HGF and CD133 at the deep invasive front were independent predictive markers of lymph node metastasis (P=0.019, <0.001, 0.015, and 0.047, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node metastasis is strongly associated with expression status of HGF and CD133 at the deep invasive front, suggesting the usefulness of these proteins as independent predictive markers of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer.

A novel scoring system associating with preoperative platelet/lymphocyte and clinicopathologic features to predict lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Precise determination of the lymph node status is critical for determining appropriate treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). This study attempted to establish a simple, effective risk scoring system to predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) in EGC by investigating the relationship between platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and EGC LNM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 312 operable patients with EGC. The clinical utility of PLR and NLR was tested by receiver operating characteristic curves. The scoring system was developed using independent risk factors. Finally, 89 EGC patients were collected from prospective database to validate the scoring system's accuracy.

RESULTS

The optimal PLR and NLR cut-off values were 106 and 2.97, respectively. High NLR (P = 0.009) and PLR (P = 0.007) values were associated with LNM of EGC in univariate analyses, although only high PLR (P = 0.025) was an independent risk factor in multivariate analyses, together with age (P = 0.009), differentiation (P = 0.017), invasive depth (P < 0.001), and tumor size (P = 0.003). The scoring system's accuracy for retrospective and prospective data was 0.781 (95% confidence interval: 0.721-0.841) and 0.817 (95% confidence interval 0.714-0.920), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative PLR and NLR correlate with EGC LNM. Our scoring system is reliable, accurate, and effective in predicting LNM in EGC patients.

Prognostic impact of lymph node skip metastasis in Stage III colorectal cancer

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of lymph node skip metastasis (LNSM) in patients with Stage III colorectal cancer.

METHOD

Between April 2003 and December 2014, a total of 41 patients with lymph node skip metastasis (skip+) were compared with 86 patients with pericolic lymph node metastases [lymph node distribution (LND)1] and 57 patients with intermediate and/or main lymph node metastasis (LND2+3). All patients had radical D3 lymphadenectomy, performed either laparoscopically or as open surgery.

RESULTS

The frequency of pT1-2 stage cancer was significantly higher in the skip+ group than in the LND1 group (26.8% vs 5.8%, P = 0.001). The number of metastatic lymph nodes in the skip+ group was lower than in the LND2+3 group (1.9 ± 1.5 vs 6.5 ± 6.0, P < 0.001). The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) of the skip+, LND1 and LND2+3 groups was 64.8%, 69.7% and 40.1%, respectively (P = 0.008). The 3-year systemic recurrence rates of the skip+, LND1 and LND2+3 groups were 30.2%, 20.3% and 48.1%, respectively; (P = 0.002). Cox regression analysis revealed that preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) of ≥ 5 ng/ml [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.2, P = 0.029], poor differentiation (HR = 3.8, P = 0.001) and skip+ (HR = 0.2, P = 0.021) were independently prognostic factors for DFS.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis for the LND1-negative lymph node skip metastasis group was better than for the LND2+3 group and was comparable with that of the LND1 group after radical D3 lymphadenectomy.

Practical intraoperative pathologic evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes during sentinel node navigation surgery in gastric cancer patients - Proposal of the pathologic protocol for the upcoming SENORITA trial

Over the last decade, as the number of patients with early gastric cancer increased and the subsequent survival rate improved, there has been a consistent effort to verify the applicability of the sentinel node concept in gastric cancer in a bid to improve postoperative quality of life in these patients. During sentinel node navigation surgery in gastric cancer patients, intraoperative pathologic examination of the retrieved sentinel nodes plays a critical role in determining the extent of surgery, but the optimal method is still under debate. Currently, a multicenter, phase III clinical trial is underway to compare laparoscopic sentinel basin dissection with stomach preserving surgery and standard laparoscopic gastrectomy in terms of oncologic outcomes in patients with clinical stage T1N0 gastric cancer. Herein, the currently available intraoperative pathologic techniques are reviewed and their clinical significance and applicability are appraised based on the published literature. The proper pathologic examination of the sentinel lymph nodes in an upcoming clinical trial (SENORITA trial) is also proposed here based on this review.

Assessment of laparoscopic stomach preserving surgery with sentinel basin dissection versus standard gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy in early gastric cancer-A multicenter randomized phase III clinical trial (SENORITA trial) protocol

Background

Along with the marked increase in early gastric cancer (EGC) in the Eastern countries, there has been an effort to adopt the sentinel node concept in EGC to preserve gastric function and reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications. Based on promising results from a previous quality control study, this prospective multicenter randomized controlled phase III clinical trial aims to elucidate the oncologic safety of laparoscopic stomach-preserving surgery with sentinel basin dissection (SBD) compared to a standard laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Methods/Design

This trial is an investigator-initiated, open-label, multicenter randomized controlled phase III trial with a non-inferiority design. Patients diagnosed with a single lesion of clinical stage T1N0M0 gastric adenocarcinoma, with a diameter of 3 cm or less are eligible for the present study. A total of 580 patients (290 per group) will be randomized to either laparoscopic stomach-preserving surgery with SBD or standard surgery. The primary end-point is 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and the secondary endpoints include postoperative morbidity and mortality, quality of life, 5-year DFS, and overall survival. Qualified investigators who completed the prior quality control study are exclusively allowed to participate in this phase III clinical trial.

Discussion

The proposed trial is expected to verify whether laparoscopic stomach-preserving surgery with SBD achieves similar oncologic outcomes and improved quality of life compared to a standard gastrectomy in EGC patients.

Trial registration

This study was registered at the NIH ClinicalTrial.gov database (NCT01804998) on March 4th, 2013.

Sentinel Lymph Node Navigation Surgery for Early Gastric Cancer: Is It a Safe Procedure in Countries with Non-Endemic Gastric Cancer Levels? A Preliminary Experience

Purpose

Early diagnosis of gastric cancer is still the exception in Western countries. In the East, as in Japan and Korea, this disease is an endemic disorder. More conservative surgical procedures are frequently performed in early gastric cancer cases in these countries where sentinel lymph node navigation surgery is becoming a safe option for some patients. This study aims to evaluate preliminary outcomes of patients with early gastric cancer who underwent sentinel node navigation surgeries in Brazil, a country with non-endemic gastric cancer levels.

Materials and Methods

From September 2008 to March 2014, 14 out of 205 gastric cancer patients underwent sentinel lymph node navigation surgeries, which were performed using intraoperative, endoscopic, and peritumoral injection of patent blue dye.

Results

Antrectomies with Billroth I gastroduodenostomies were performed in seven patients with distal tumors. The other seven patients underwent wedge resections. Sentinel basin resections were performed in four patients, and lymphadenectomies were extended to stations 7, 8, and 9 in the other 10. Two patients received false-negative results from sentinel node biopsies, and one of those patients had micrometastasis. There was one postoperative death from liver failure in a cirrhotic patient. Another cirrhotic patient died after two years without recurrence of gastric cancer, also from liver failure. All other patients were followed-up for 13 to 79 months with no evidence of recurrence.

Conclusions

Sentinel lymph node navigation surgery appears to be a safe procedure in a country with non-endemic levels of gastric cancer.

Skip lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: is it skipping or skipped?

BACKGROUND

Skip metastasis is the presence of a metastatic lymph node (LN) in an extraperigastric (EP) area without perigastric (PG) involvement. The mechanism and prognosis of skip metastasis are still unknown. The purpose of this study was to scrutinize the clinical significance of skip metastasis in gastric cancer.

METHODS

Data were reviewed from 6,025 patients who had undergone gastrectomy for primary gastric cancer. Patients were categorized as a PG-only group when the metastatic LNs were limited to only the PG area, as a PG + EP group if metastatic LNs extended to both the PG area and the EP area, and as a skip group if metastatic LNs were in the EP area but there were no metastatic LNs in the PG area.

RESULTS

After we had performed matching, the prognosis of the skip group was worse than that of the PG-only group (adjusted hazard ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.13-2.54) and was similar to that of the PG + EP group (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.54, 95% confidence interval 0.92-2.59). The number of retrieved LNs was less in the skip group than in the other groups, especially from the PG area (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of the skip group was worse than that of the PG-only group and was similar to that of the PG + EP group when the tumor stage was considered. It is difficult to conclude whether skip metastasis is real skipping of cancer cells or a result of inadequate LN sampling. Further evaluation of LNs in the PG area of the skip group could provide more clues for the mechanism of skip metastasis.

Is It Reasonable to Treat Early Gastric Cancer with Mucosal Infiltration and Well Differentiation by Endoscopic Submucosal Resection?

BACKGROUND

While limited endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasingly applied in the treatment of early gastric cancer, preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis is very critical for determining treatment strategies preoperatively. Thus, the aim of this study was to accurately assess the prevalence and pattern of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer patients and to identify the best candidates for ESD.

METHODS

From September 2008 to December 2013, a total of 539 patients with early gastric cancer were retrospectively analyzed in the present study. Of them, 503 patients underwent radical gastrectomy and 36 patients underwent ESD. The clinicopathological features were collected and correlations with lymph node metastasis were analyzed. The survival rates of patients were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Lymph node metastasis was observed in 80 of 503 patients (15.9 %). Among these, the rate for mucosal cancer was 8.3 %, and 20.1 % for submucosal cancer. By univariate analysis, risk factors for lymph node metastasis were growth pattern, tumor size, pathological type, depth of invasion, lymphatic-vascular invasion, and neural invasion. By multivariate analysis, risk factors for lymph node metastasis were tumor size, pathological type, depth of invasion, and lymphatic-vascular invasion. The incidence of lymph node metastasis was 0 % in the well-differentiated mucosal cancers, irrespective of tumor size. For the well-differentiated mucosal cancers, the overall survival rates were comparable between patients underwent gastrectomy with lymph node dissection and patients underwent ESD (100 vs 100 %).

CONCLUSIONS

The most important factors for predicting lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer are tumor size, pathological type, depth of invasion, and lymphatic-vascular invasion. Well-differentiated mucosal gastric cancers could be candidates for ESD.

Difficulty of predicting the presence of lymph node metastases in patients with clinical early stage gastric cancer: a case control study

BACKGROUND

The relationship between pathological factors and lymph node metastasis of pathological stage early gastric cancer has been extensively investigated. By contrast, the relationship between preoperative factors and lymph node metastasis of clinical stage early gastric cancer has not been investigated. The present study was to investigate discrepancies between preoperative and postoperative values.

METHODS

From January 2011 to December 2013, 1042 patients with clinical stage early gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy were enrolled. Preoperative and postoperative values were collected for subsequent analysis. Receiver operating characteristics curves were computed using independent predictive factors.

RESULTS

Several discrepancies were observed between preoperative and postoperative values, including existence of ulcer, gross type, and histology (all McNemar p-values were <0.001). Multivariate analyses identified the following independent predictive factors for lymph node metastasis: postoperative values including age (p = 0.002), tumor size (p < 0.001), and tumor depth (p < 0.001); preoperative values including age (p = 0.017), existence of ulcer (p = 0.037), tumor size (p = 0.009), and prediction of the presence of lymph node metastasis in computed tomography scans (p = 0.002). These postoperative and preoperative independent predictive factors produced areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves of 0.824 and 0.660, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons need to be aware of limitations in preoperative predictions of the presence of lymph node metastasis for clinical stage early gastric cancer.

Aberrant metastatic behavior and particular features of early gastric cancer

In this paper, we have focused on the metastatic behavior of EGC and its particularities. The main factors that are currently considered as predictors of the metastatic behavior and that are used in the therapeutic decision (endoscopic resection vs surgical removal) are the tumor size (upper or bellow 2 cm), depth of infiltration, angiolymphatic invasion, the presence or absence of ulceration, and histologic type (undifferentiated vs differentiated carcinomas). However, most of the metastatic cases were published as case reports or case series. This is the reason why a proper estimation of metastatic risk in EGC is not well known. To date, 79 cases presenting bone metastases, three reports of brain metastases, and one EGC that was associated with skin metastasis were published. However, occult metastasis, lymph node micrometastasis, and skip metastasis can also occur and should be identified. Making a synthesis of the literature data that is correlated with our experience, we finally proposed the inclusion of the six Japanese subgrouping system, tumor size, angiolymphatic invasion, and micrometastasis as components of the pTNM staging system, which should be particularly adapted for EGC.

Prospective Multicenter Feasibility Study of Laparoscopic Sentinel Basin Dissection for Organ Preserving Surgery in Gastric Cancer: Quality Control Study for Surgical Standardization Prior to Phase III Trial

The clinical application of sentinel node biopsies in early gastric cancer is still controversial even though it appears promising. This study was conducted as a prerequisite quality control for surgical standardization of laparoscopic sentinel basin dissection (SBD) prior to the initiation of a phase III trial.Laparoscopic SBD was performed in patients with preoperative stage T1-2N0 and tumor size <4 cm in diameter. Intraoperative endoscopic submucosal injection of a standardized dual tracer was administered. All retrieved sentinel basin nodes (SBN) were investigated with intraoperative frozen hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. A strict checklist consisting of 7 essential steps was followed during laparoscopic SBD as the quality control study for a phase III trial. Completion of all essential steps in the checklist for 10 cases was used to define a qualified institution.Seven institutions participated and 112 patients were enrolled in this study. However, 4 patients were excluded owing to screening failure. The mean number of cases required for institutional qualification was 15 cases (range, 13-20 cases). Sentinel basins (SB) were detected and dissected in 100 of the 108 patients (92.6%); the median number of SB and SBN was 2 and 7, respectively. Lymph node metastases were detected in 10 patients by postoperative permanent H&E staining and they were detected by SBD in all 10 patients. Frozen results of SBN were compatible with permanent staining reports.Laparoscopic SBD is feasible and demonstrated improved sensitivity in detecting metastatic lymph nodes compared to the previous study. A future phase III randomized trial comparing laparoscopic SBD with organ-preserving gastrectomy and laparoscopic standard gastrectomy seems promising for qualified institutions.

The clinical significance and risk factors of solitary lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer

AIMS

To assess the clinical significance and risk factors of solitary lymph node metastasis (SLM) in gastric carcinoma and establish a more accurate method to evaluate the possibility of lymph node metastasis (LM).

METHODS

A total of 385 patients with gastric carcinoma who underwent D2 lymphadenectomy at the Cancer Center of Sun Yat-Sen University were included in this research. Then we used a group of data from Sun Yat-sen University Gastrointestinal Hospital (SYSUGIH) to validate the accuracy of our developed method. The χ2 test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, COX model, and discriminate analysis were used to analyze the data with SPSS13.0.

RESULTS

We found that the LM number and pathological T staging were independent prognostic risk factors. CEA grading, LN status by CT, and T staging by CT were independent risk factors for LM in gastric carcinoma. In addition, we developed the equation Y = -5.0 + X1 + 1.8X3 + 0.7X4 (X1 = CEA grading, X3 = LN status by CT, X4 = T staging by CT) to evaluate the situation of LM. The data from SYSUGIH shows this equation has a better accuracy compared with CT.

CONCLUSIONS

SLM is an independent risk factor in gastric cancer. And there was no survival difference between the skip metastasis group and the other SLM group (P = 0.659). It is inappropriate for the patient with SLM doing a standard D2 lymphadenectomy, due to the fact that LM rarely occurs in the splenic artery, splenic hilum. The risk factors for LM include CEA grading, LN status by CT, and T staging by CT. And we can use Y = -5.0 + X1 + 1.8X3 + 0.7X4 (X1, CEA grading, X3 = LN status by CT, X4 = T staging by CT, the critical value is 0.3) to estimate the possibility of LM, which has a better accuracy compared with CT.

Clinical significance of skip lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer patients

PURPOSE

Given the recent increase in the incidence of early gastric cancer, there is greater interest in identifying a minimally invasive therapy. The purpose of this study was to analyze the patterns of lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer and to elucidate the clinical significance of skip metastasis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patterns of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and clinicopathologic factors related to skip metastasis.

RESULTS

Among 2963 patients with gastric cancer, 997 patients (33.6%) were detected as having LNM, and 27 patients (2.7%) with skip metastasis were detected among 997 patients with LNM. Skip metastasis were detected more frequently in the elderly. Compared with the N1 group, the skip metastasis group showed lower frequency of vascular invasion, and compared with the stepwise N2 group, the skip metastasis group showed smaller tumor size and a significantly higher incidence of negative lymphatic, vascular, and perineural invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently there is no way to predict N2 station LNM including skip metastasis, D2 LN dissection for gastric cancer is thought to be the appropriate treatment, even during early stage disease. Minimally invasive therapy should be performed cautiously in consideration of possible skip metastasis.

Tumor differentiation is not a risk factor for lymph node metastasis in elderly patients with early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for lymph node metastasis in elderly patients (70 years or more) with early gastric cancer.

METHODS

We reviewed the prospectively collected database of 6893 patients with early gastric cancer who had undergone curative gastrectomy in 3 tertiary cancer centers between January 2003 and December 2009 in Korea. Patients were sorted into 4 groups according to age: less than 50, fifties, sixties, and 70 years or more. Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer were analyzed.

RESULTS

One thousand and thirty five patients (15.0%) were 70 years or more. As age increased, the frequency of large differentiated tumor, lymphatic and submucosa invasion increased. Old age was associated with a lower risk for lymph node metastasis in patients with early gastric cancer (Odds ratio [OR], OR, 0.622; 95% CI, 0.5466-0.830, P = 0.010). Ulceration or differentiation of tumor was not associated with lymph node metastasis in elderly patients with early gastric cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients with undifferentiated type histology early gastric cancer without other risk factors for lymph node metastasis may be candidates for endoscopic resection.

Sentinel node navigation surgery in gastric cancer: Current status

The theory behind using sentinel node mapping and biopsy in gastric cancer surgery, the so-called sentinel node navigation surgery, is to limit the extent of surgical tissue dissection around the affected organ and subsequently the accompanied morbidity. However, obstacles on the clinical correspondence of sentinel node navigation surgery in everyday practice have occasionally alleviated researchers’ interest on the topic. Only recently with the widespread use of minimally invasive surgical techniques, i.e., laparoscopic gastric cancer resections, surgical community’s interest on the topic have been unavoidably reflated. Double tracer methods appear superior compared to single tracer techniques. Ongoing research is now focused on the invention of new lymph node detection methods utilizing sophisticated technology such as infrared ray endoscopy, florescence imaging and near-infrared technology. Despite its notable limitations, hematoxylin/eosin is still the mainstay staining for assessing the metastatic status of an identified lymph node. An intra-operatively verified metastatic sentinel lymph node will dictate the need for further conventional lymph node dissection. Thus, laparoscopic resection of the gastric primary tumor combined with the appropriate lymph node dissection as determined by the process of sentinel lymph node status characterization represents an option for early gastric cancer. Patients with T3 or more advanced disease should still be managed conventionally with resection plus standard lymph node dissection.

Clinical impact of the extent of lymph node micrometastasis in undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

Lymph node (LN) metastasis is one of the most important prognostic factors for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer (EGC). The aim of this study was to examine expansion of micrometastasis in regional LNs to clarify the importance of lymphadenectomy for undifferentiated-type EGC.

METHODS

Clinicopathological features of 307 patients with undifferentiated-type EGC who underwent gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy between 1997 and 2010 at the Department of Surgical Oncology, Osaka City University, were retrospectively reviewed. Micrometastasis in LNs was detected by immunohistochemistry using anticytokeratin antibody.

RESULTS

The incidence of LN metastasis was 1.8% in patients with mucosal (pT1a) tumors and 17.3% in those with submucosal (pT1b) tumors. Multivariate analysis revealed that lymphatic invasion and tumor depth were independently related to LN metastasis. Micrometastasis was found in 41 (13.3%) patients. Twenty-two patients with pN0 had micrometastasis in the perigastric region. Micrometastasis had spread to the area along the left gastric or common hepatic artery in 12 patients. Patients with an upgraded stage by micrometastasis had significantly worse disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

LN micrometastasis was observed beyond the perigastric LNs and correlated with poor outcomes in patients with undifferentiated-type EGC. These data underscore the importance of adequate lymphadenectomy for patients with undifferentiated-type EGC. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Progress in diagnosis and treatment of precancerous lesions and early gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is the fourth most prevalent cancer worldwide and the second cause of cancer-related death. The 5-year survival rate for early gastric cancer after treatment is 84%-99%. Early detection and treatment of precancerous lesions are pivotal to improved patient survival. The development of various endoscopic (e.g., endoscopic ultrasound, narrowband imaging, magnifying endoscopy and chromoendoscopy), imaging and laboratory technologies has significantly improved the rate of diagnosis of early cancer and precancerous lesions. In addition, endoscopic techniques (e.g., endoscopic submucosal dissection) and minimally invasive surgery (e.g., laparoscopy) make the therapy of early cancer and precancerous lesions better and less invasive, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, and improve the quality of life of patients after surgery.

Proposal of the surgical options for primary tumor control during sentinel node navigation surgery based on the discrepancy between preoperative and postoperative early gastric cancer diagnoses

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the optimal method of primary tumor control, determined by preoperative clinical factors, during sentinel node (SN) navigation surgery for early gastric cancer (EGC). In this study, we investigated the accuracy of clinical diagnosis based on preoperative examination in patients with EGC and proposed surgical options for primary tumor control during SN navigation surgery.

METHODS

We analyzed 815 patients with clinical stage IA gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy at the National Cancer Center in Korea between March 2001 and February 2011. The clinical stage was determined by endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography, and abdominal computed tomography.

RESULTS

The preoperative assessment of tumor depth and tumor size was accurate in 57.5 and 70.8 % of patients, respectively. Tumor depth and size were underestimated in 8 and 25.3 % of patients. The overall accuracy of histologic diagnosis by endoscopic biopsy was 87.2 %. Of those tumors diagnosed preoperatively as differentiated, 20.5 % revealed mixed histology of undifferentiated type.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommendation for SN biopsy may be limited to tumors sized 3 cm or smaller to avoid positive lateral margins and to minimize the risk of skip metastases. Endoscopic resection may safely be applied to small mucosal cancers, but other surgical options should be employed for undifferentiated large mucosal lesions, given their tendency for diffuse invasion. Full-thickness resection is preferable for submucosal cancers, to secure clear vertical margins.

Analysis of the lymphatic stream to predict sentinel nodes in gastric cancer patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the pattern of lymphatic drainage in gastric cancer patients to predict sentinel node placement according to tumor location.

METHODS

A total of 462 pT1 or T2 gastric adenocarcinoma patients with metastasis to 1-3 lymph nodes (LNs) who had undergone lymphadenectomy greater than D1+β were included in the study. The distribution of metastatic LNs was evaluated according to tumor longitudinal and circumferential location. The incidence rate of atypical metastasis (skip or transversal metastasis) and related clinicopathologic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

The rates of skip and transversal metastasis were 15.8 % (73 of 462) and 10.3 % (23 of 224), respectively. Atypical metastasis was observed regardless of tumor location. Tumors that showed the most frequent atypical metastasis were located in the lower third and lesser curvature (LC) of the stomach (29.0 % for skip metastasis and 18.0 % for transversal metastasis). In uni- and multivariate analyses, an LC tumor was a risk factor for skip metastasis, and tumor located circumferentially in the LC or longitudinally in the lower third of the stomach was an independent risk factor for transversal metastasis. There was no correlation between tumor aggressiveness and atypical metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumors at any location had a chance of atypical metastasis; however, those located longitudinally in the lower or circumferentially at the LC had a significantly higher chance of atypical metastasis compared to other locations. When sentinel node navigation surgery is applied, special care should be taken with tumors at these locations to prevent false-negative results.

Risk of limited lymph node dissection in patients with clinically early gastric cancer: indications of extended lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic gastrectomy is usually indicated in T1 N0-1 early gastric cancer (EGC). Limited lymph node dissection, such as D1+, is applied in these cases. However, preoperative staging is not always correct, and the risk of undertreatment thus exists.

METHODS

Patients with clinically early gastric cancer (cEGC) who underwent gastrectomy with lymph node dissection of D2 and over were selected from 4,021 patients with gastric cancer. The station numbers of all metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) were identified, and MLNs were classified into groups 1 and 2 (including lymph nodes of second tier and over) on the basis of the system of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, irrespective of the number of MLNs. Clinicopathological data were compared according to the existence of lymph node metastasis and the classification of MLNs.

RESULTS

Of 1,308 patients with cEGC who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 1,184 (90.5 %) were diagnosed pathologically with EGC. Among 126 patients with cEGC who were diagnosed with lymph node metastasis, 93 patients had only group 1 MLNs and 33 patients had group 2 MLNs. Tumor location in the proximal third of the stomach (odds ratio 5.450) and ulceration (odds ratio 11.928) were significant factors for group 2 metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended lymph node dissection is recommended in cEGC with ulceration or disease located in the proximal third of the stomach.