Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction according to Siewert classification: experiences at a single institution in Japan

The Impact of D2 Versus D1 Lymphadenectomy in Siewert II Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Cancer

BACKGROUND

Although multiple treatment options exist for gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer, surgery remains the mainstay for potential cure. Extended nodal dissection with a D2 lymphadenectomy (LAD) remains controversial for Siewert II GEJ cancer. Although D2 LAD may lead to a greater lymph node harvest, its effect on survival remains elusive. The authors hypothesized that additional D2 dissection in Siewert II GEJ cancer does not lead to increased survival.

METHODS

This study reviewed Siewert II patients who received a D1 or D2 LAD in addition to minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) after receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation or perioperative chemotherapy (2012-2022). The patients were followed for up to 5 years. The outcomes measured were survival, number of nodes sampled, and operative time. The association between D1 or D2 LAD and overall survival was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier methods and a multivariable Cox regression model.

RESULTS

Among 155 patients, 74 % underwent D1 and 26 % underwent D2 LAD. The patients with D2 had more than 15 lymph nodes harvested more frequently than those who had D1 (83 % vs 48 %; p < 0.001), with no difference in positive nodes (2.8 ± 5.2 vs 2.1 ± 4.2; p = 0.4). The patients with D2 LAD had a longer median operative time than those who with D1 LAD (362 vs 244 min; p < 0.001). In Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression models, overall survival did not differ significantly between the patients undergoing D2 and those who had D1 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.52; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.25-1.00; p = 0.067).

CONCLUSIONS

Little consensus exists regarding the optimal lymph node harvest for GEJ cancers. In Siewert II cancer, D2 LAD may not be mandatory and may lead to increased operative morbidity with no significant difference in survival.

Contemporary outcomes for resected type 1-3 gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment for tumors of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). However, contemporary analyses of the Western experience for GEJ adenocarcinoma are sparsely reported.

METHODS

Patients with GEJ adenocarcinoma undergoing resection between 2012 and 2022 at a single institution were grouped based on Siewert subtype and analyzed. Pathologic and treatment related variables were assessed with relation to outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 302 patients underwent resection: 161 (53.3%) with type I, 116 (38.4%) with type II, and 25 (8.3%) with type III tumors. Most patients received neoadjuvant therapy (86.4%); 86% of cases were performed in a minimally invasive fashion. Anastomotic leak occurred in 6.0% and 30-day mortality in only 0.7%. The rate of grade 3+ morbidity was lower for the last 5 years of the study than for the first 5 years (27.5% vs 49.3%, P < .001), as was median length of stay (7 vs 8 days, P < .001). There was a significantly greater number of signet ring type tumors among type III tumors (44.0%) than type I/II tumors (11.2/12.9%, P < .001). Otherwise, there was no difference in the distribution of pathologic features among Siewert subtypes. Notably, there was a significant difference in 3-year overall survival based on Siewert classification: type I 60.0%, type II 77.2%, and type III 86.3% (P = .011). Siewert type I remained independently associated with worse survival on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 4.5; P = .023).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large, single-institutional series, operative outcomes for patients with resected GEJ adenocarcinoma improved over time. On multivariable analysis, type I tumors were an independent predictor of poor survival.

MR imaging characteristics of different pathologic subtypes of esophageal carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To describe the specific MRI characteristics of different pathologic subtypes of esophageal carcinoma (EC) METHODS: This prospective study included EC patients who underwent esophageal MRI and esophagectomy between April 2015 and October 2021. Pathomorphological characteristics of EC such as localized type (LT), ulcerative type (UT), protruding type (PT), and infiltrative type (IT) were assessed by two radiologists relying on the imaging characteristics of tumor, especially the specific imaging findings on the continuity of the mucosa overlying the tumor, the opposing mucosa, mucosa linear thickening, and transmural growth pattern. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for the consistency between two readers. The associations of imaging characteristics with different pathologic subtypes were assessed using multilogistic regression model (MLR).

RESULTS

A total of 201 patients were identified on histopathology with a high inter-reader agreement (ICC = 0.991). LT showed intact mucosa overlying the tumor. IT showed transmural growth pattern extending from the mucosa to the adventitia and a "sandwich" appearance. The remaining normal mucosa on the opposing side was linear and nodular in UT. PT showed correlation with T1 staging and grade 1; IT showed correlation with T3 staging and grades 2-3. Four MLR models showed high predictive performance on the test set with AUCs of 0.94 (LT), 0.87 (PT), 0.96 (IT), and 0.97 (UT), respectively, and the predictors that contributed most to the models matched the four specific characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Different pathologic subtypes of EC displayed specific MR imaging characteristics, which could help predict T staging and the degree of pathological differentiation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Different pathologic subtypes of esophageal carcinoma displayed specific MR imaging characteristics, which correspond to differences in the degree of differentiation, T staging, and sensitivity to radiotherapy, and could also be one of the predictive factors of cause-specific survival and local progression-free rates.

KEY POINTS

Different types of EC had different characteristics on MR images. A total of 91/95 (96%) LTEC showed intact mucosa over the tumor, while masses or nodules are specific to PTEC; 21/27 (78%) ITEC showed a "sandwich" sign; and 33/35 (60%) UTEC showed linear and nodular opposing mucosa. In the association of tumor type with degree of differentiation and T staging, PTEC was predominantly associated with T1 and grade 1, and ITEC was associated with T3 and grades 2-3, while LTEC and UECT were likewise primarily linked with T2-3 and grades 2-3.

Current status of gastrectomy and reconstruction types for patients with proximal gastric cancer in Japan

BACKGROUND

Surgical procedures for proximal gastric cancer remain a highly debated topic. Total gastrectomy (TG) is widely accepted as a standard radical surgery. However, subtotal esophagectomy, proximal gastrectomy (PG) or even subtotal gastrectomy, when a small upper portion of the stomach can technically be preserved, are alternatives in current clinical practice.

METHODS

Using a cohort of the PGSAS NEXT trial, consisting of 1909 patients responding to a questionnaire sent to 70 institutions between July 2018 and December 2019, gastrectomy type, reconstruction method, and furthermore the remnant stomach size and the anti-reflux procedures for PG were evaluated.

RESULTS

TG was the procedure most commonly performed (63.0%), followed by PG (33.4%). Roux-en-Y was preferentially employed following TG irrespective of esophageal tumor invasion, while jejunal pouch was adopted in 8.5% of cases with an abdominal esophageal stump. Esophagogastrostomy was most commonly selected after PG, followed by the double-tract method. The former was preferentially employed for larger remnant stomachs (≧3/4), while being used slightly less often for tumors with as compared to those without esophageal invasion in cases with a remnant stomach 2/3 the size of the original stomach. Application of the double-tract method gradually increased as the remnant stomach size decreased. Anti-reflux procedures following esophagogastrostomy varied markedly.

CONCLUSIONS

TG is the mainstream and PG remains an alternative in current Japanese clinical practice for proximal gastric cancer. Remnant stomach size and esophageal stump location appear to influence the choice of reconstruction method following PG.

Patterns of the lymph node metastasis and the influencing factors in esophagogastric junction cancers

OBJECTIVE

A retrospective analysis of 214 cases of esophagogastric junction cancers (EGJCs) in Kunming, Yunnan Province, was conducted to investigate the lymph node metastasis (LNM) pattern for EGJCs and its associated risk factors (RFs), as well as the predictive value of common clinical metabolic indicators for it.

METHODS

The clinical data of 214 patients diagnosed with EGJCs by electronic gastroscope and postoperative pathology between 2013 and 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, and the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University were retrospectively examined. Preoperative gastroscopy, imaging, biochemical data, and postoperative pathological findings analysis in EGJCs were statistically analyzed to determine the RFs of LNM.

RESULTS

At presentation, 92.5% of EGJCs were progressive malignancies, including 68.2% LNMs, 79.5% abdominal lymph nodes (ALN), 20.1% mediastinal lymph nodes (MLN), and 27.1% distal metastases. The ratio of Siewert subtypes was approximately 2:11:7 (type I to type II to type III). In terms of age, disease duration at initial presentation, history, tumor length, pathological biopsy histology, degree of differentiation, depth of infiltration, LNM status, MLN metastasis, and surgical route, the differences between the three Siewert subgroups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Multifactor analysis revealed that the proportion of patients aged <65 at the time of consultation was significantly more significant in Siewert II and Siewert III than in Siewert I. Significantly more patients than in Siewert I had <2 months of disease duration at the time of their first consultation. The proportion of patients with tumors <3 Cm in length was significantly higher than in Siewert I. For the RFs analysis of LNM, Siewert staging (type I and type II), depth of infiltration, and distant metastasis were the independent RFs for LNM. The depth of infiltration and family history of the tumor were the independent RFs for ALN metastasis, and the number of lymph nodes cleared in the abdominal and mediastinal regions was a protective factor for ALN metastasis. Siewert staging(type I and type II), infiltration depth, invasion of the esophagus by the tumor, tumor length, and distant metastasis were independent risk factors for MLN metastasis. Among the metabolic variables evaluated, BMI was an independent RF for LNM, fasting glucose was an independent RF for ALN metastasis, and triacylglycerol was a protective factor for MLN metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

EGJCs are frequently advanced at presentation, characterized by minimal differentiation and a high incidence of LNM. The Siewert subtype is concentrated near the stomach. Different Siewert subtypes exhibit distinct clinicopathological characteristics. LNM and MLN metastasis risk are considerably higher in type I tumors compared to types II and III. There is a strong correlation between LNM and MLN metastasis and distant metastasis in EGJCs, so Siewert I is more aggressive and associated with a worse prognosis. EGJCs have numerous RFs associated with LNM, and there are similarities and differences in the RFs affecting their LNM, ALN metastases, and MLN metastases, which are related to their unique anatomical features. There is a close relationship between metabolic factors and EGJCs with some predictive value.

Role of radiomics in predicting lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: a systematic review

Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) is an aggressive and clinically heterogeneous tumor, and better risk stratification of lymph node metastasis (LNM) could lead to personalized treatments. The role of radiomics in the prediction of nodal involvement in GC has not yet been systematically assessed. This study aims to assess the role of radiomics in the prediction of LNM in GC.

Methods

A PubMed/MEDLINE systematic review was conducted to assess the role of radiomics in LNM. The inclusion criteria were as follows: i. original articles, ii. articles on radiomics, and iii. articles on LNM prediction in GC. All articles were selected and analyzed by a multidisciplinary board of two radiation oncologists and one surgeon, under the supervision of one radiation oncologist, one surgeon, and one medical oncologist.

Results

A total of 171 studies were obtained using the search strategy mentioned on PubMed. After the complete selection process, a total of 20 papers were considered eligible for the analysis of the results. Radiomics methods were applied in GC to assess the LNM risk. The number of patients, imaging modalities, type of predictive models, number of radiomics features, TRIPOD classification, and performances of the models were reported.

Conclusions

Radiomics seems to be a promising approach for evaluating the risk of LNM in GC. Further and larger studies are required to evaluate the clinical impact of the inclusion of radiomics in a comprehensive decision support system (DSS) for GC.

Minimum number of necessary lymph nodes for the accurate staging of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the minimum number of lymph nodes (LNs) necessary for assessing the postoperative staging of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG).

METHODS

We extracted the data of patients from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, who were pathologically diagnosed with AEG between 2000 and 2017. We explored the associations between the number of LNs and overall survival (OS) by univariate and multivariate analyses and determined the proper cutoff value of the number of LNs necessary for accurate postoperative staging.

RESULTS

Of the patients with AEG in the SEER database, 2668 met our inclusion criteria. The total number of regional LNs dissected was found to be significantly associated with survival in analyses stratified by T stage. Univariate and multivariate regression showed that age, grade, positive LNs, number of LNs examined, and T stage were independently associated with OS. For patients with T1-2 tumors, the 5-year survival rate was 58.7%, and patients with more than 11 LNs examined obtained a greater survival benefit. Among patients with T3-4 tumors, the 5-year survival rates were 28.9% and 39.7% for those with 1-16 LNs examined and for those with more than 17 LNs examined, respectively.

CONCLUSION

To accurately determine the pathological stage of patients with AEG, no less than 11 LNs must be resected for patients with stage T1-2 disease, and no less than 16 LNs must be resected for patients with stage T3-4 disease.

Mapping of lymph node dissection determined by the epicenter location and tumor extension for esophagogastric junction carcinoma

Backgrounds

Previous studies identified the extent of lymph node dissection for esophagogastric junction (EGJ) carcinoma based on the metastatic incidence. The study aimed to determine the optimal extent and priority of lymphadenectomy based on the therapeutic efficacy from each station.

Methods

The studies on the lymph node metastasis (LNM) and therapeutic efficacy index (EI) for EGJ carcinomas were identified until April 2022. The obligatory stations with the LNM rates over 5% and therapeutic EI exceeding 2% should be routinely resected for D2 dissection, whereas the optional stations with EI between 0.5% and 2% should be resected for D3 dissection in selective cases.

Results

The survey yielded 16 eligible articles including 6,350 patients with EGJ carcinoma. The metastatic rates exceeded 5% at no. 1, 2, 3, 7, 9, 11p, and 110 stations and were less than 5% in abdominal no. 4sa~6, 8a, 10, 11d, 12a, and 16a2/b1 and mediastinal no. 105~112 stations. Consequently, obligatory stations with EI over 2% were largely determined by the epicenter location and located at the upper perigastric, lower mediastinal, and suprapancreatic zones, corresponding to those with rates of LNM over 5%. Consistent with the LNM rates less than 5%, the optional stations with EI between 0.5% and 2% were largely dependent on the degree of tumor extension toward the lower perigastric, splenic hilar (grecurvature), para-aortic (less curvature of the cardia), and middle or upper mediastinal zones.

Conclusions

The obligatory stations can be resected as an “envelope-like” wrap by transhiatal proximal gastrectomy with lower esophagectomy, whereas the optional stations for dissection are indicated by the tumor extension. The extended gastrectomy is required for the lower perigastric in the stomach-predominant tumor with gastric involvement exceeding 5.0 cm, para-aortic dissection in the less curvature-predominant tumor and splenic hilar dissection in the grecurvature-predominant tumor whereas transthoracic subtotal esophagectomy is required for complete mediastinal dissection and adequate negative margin in the esophagus-predominant tumor with esophageal invasion exceeding 3.0 cm.

Dual-layer dual-energy CT for improving differential diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma from adenocarcinoma at gastroesophageal junction

Objective

To examine the clinical values of dual-energy CT parameters derived from dual-layer spectral detector CT (SDCT) in the differential diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ).

Methods

Totally 66 patients with SCC and AC of the GEJ confirmed by pathological analysis were retrospectively enrolled, and underwent dual-phase contrast-enhancement chest CT with SDCT. Plain CT value, CT attenuation enhancement (△CT), iodine concentration (IC), spectral slope (λHU), effective atomic number (Zeff) and 40keV CT value (CT40keV) of the lesion in the arterial phase (AP) and venous phase (VP) were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacies of different combinations of dual-energy CT parameters. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to analyze the accuracy of dual-energy CT parameters and Delong test was used to compare AUCs.

Results

IC, λHU, Zeff and CT40keV in AP and VP and △CT in VP were significantly higher in the AC group than those in the SCC group (all P&lt;0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that IC, λHU, Zeff and CT40keV in VP had high diagnostic performances, with AUCs of 0.74, 0.74, 0.79 and 0.78, respectively. Logistic regression showed the combination of ICVP, λHU VP, CT40keV VP and Zeff VP had the highest AUC (0.84), with a threshold of 0.40, sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing SCC and AC were 93.1% and 73.0%, respectively. Delong test showed that the AUC of △CTVP was lower than other AUCs of dual-energy CT parameters.

Conclusion

Dual-energy CT parameters derived from SDCT provide added value in the differential diagnosis of SCC and AC of the GEJ, especially the combination of IC, λHU, CT40keV and Zeff in VP.

Advances in knowledge

Dual-energy CT parameters derived from dual-layer spectral detector CT provide added value to differentiate AC from SCC at the GEJ, especially the combination of effective atomic number, spectral slope, iodine concentration and 40keV CT value in VP.

Total laparoscopic versus laparoscopic-assisted transabdominal posterior mediastinal digestive tract reconstruction in the treatment of Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: A retrospective study

Background

The method of operation and the range of resection for Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) remain controversial. This study aims to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and short-term postoperative effect of total laparoscopic versus laparoscopic-assisted transabdominal posterior mediastinal digestive tract reconstruction in the treatment of Siewert II AEG.

Methods

Total laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted gastrointestinal reconstruction through abdominal posterior mediastinum was performed in 108 patients with Siewert II AEG from October 2017 to February 2019. This study evaluated the loss of intraoperative blood, the number of lymph nodes, the marginal of the tumor, short-term postoperative complications (within 30 days), the rate of survival at follow-up, and the economic cost, feasibility, and effect of short-term postoperative recovery for patients who received these two operations.

Result

There were no significant differences in general data between the total laparoscopic group and the laparoscopic-assisted group (P > 0.05). However, the total laparoscopic group cost more time on the surgical procedure and digestive tract reconstruction, lost less intraoperative blood, and had more mediastinal lymph nodes compared with the laparoscopic-assisted group (P < 0.05). The total laparoscopic group was significantly better than the laparoscopic-assisted group compared with the short-term postoperative recovery indexes, such as the first exhaust time, the first defecation time, the first fluid time, the first semi-fluid diet time, the postoperative hospital stay, and other postoperative recovery indexes (P < 0.05). In addition, there were no significant differences in postoperative complications, postoperative pathological indexes, the recurrence rate, and mortality between the total laparoscopic group and laparoscopic-assisted group (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

The safety, feasibility, and short-term effect of total laparoscopic transabdominal posterior mediastinal digestive tract reconstruction in the treatment of Siewert II AEG were better than those for the laparoscopic-assisted group.

Clinicopathologic and survival differences between adenocarcinoma of the distal oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction

BACKGROUND

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the distal oesophagus (DO) and gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) are increasing. They may represent differing disease processes. This study aimed to assess clinicopathological and survival differences between patients with DO and GOJ adenocarcinomas.

METHODS

Data were extracted from a prospective single-surgeon database of consecutive patients undergoing an open Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy for oesophageal adenocarcinoma (distal oesophagus, Siewert type I and II). Differences in clinicopathological characteristics and survival were evaluated and prognostic factors examined using univariate and multivariate survival analyses.

RESULTS

The data were available for 234 patients who underwent an oesophagectomy between 1992 and 2019. DO tumours had higher rates of Barrett's oesophagus (P < 0.001), presented with lower tumour stage (P = 0.02) and were more likely to be associated with fewer lymph nodes resected (P = 0.003) than GOJ tumours. The median overall survival for distal oesophageal tumours was 29.2 months, while gastro-oesophageal tumours was 38.6 months. Kaplan Meier analysis did not show a difference in overall survival between the two groups (P = 0.08). However, when adjusted for potential confounders, GOJ tumours were associated with a reduced adjusted hazard of death (adjusted HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.92, P = 0.022) compared with DO tumours.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that GOJ cancers have different clinicopathological characteristics and improved survival compared to DO tumours.

Feasibility of Preserving No. 5 and No. 6 Lymph Nodes in Gastrectomy of Proximal Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of 395 Patients

Objective

The extent of regional lymphadenectomy for proximal gastric cancer (PGC) has remained a controversy and a matter of considerable debate for a long time. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological features to investigate the predictive factors for No. 5 and/or No. 6 lymph node metastases (LNMs) and evaluate the feasibility of performing proximal gastrectomy (PG) with preservation of No. 5 and/or No. 6 lymph nodes for these patients.

Method

Patients who had undergone total gastrectomy plus D2 lymphadenectomy in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, from January 2008 to December 2017 were retrospectively collected and analyzed.

Results

Among the 395 eligible patients in our study, 34 patients (8.61%) had No. 5 and No. 6 LNM. The degree of differentiation, Borrmann classification, vascular or perineural invasion, tumor diameter, depth of invasion, and other perigastric LNM were associated with No. 5 and/or No. 6 LNM. Multivariate analyses showed that tumor diameter ≥4 cm, No. 4 LNM positive, and No. 7, No. 8, No. 9 LNM positive were independent risk factors of No. 5 and/or No. 6 LNM. No. 5 and/or No. 6 LNM was not observed in the 105 patients who were staged from T1 to T3 and were found to be without independent risk factors.

Conclusion

The metastatic rate of No. 5 and/or No. 6 lymph node of the proximal gastric adenocarcinoma was closely associated with the diameter of the tumor and other perigastric LNMs. It is feasible to preserve No. 5 and No. 6 lymph nodes with PG for the T1-T3 patients with lower risk of No. 5 and/or No. 6 LNM.

Survival Benefit of Pyloric Lymph Node Dissection for Siewert Type II/III Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction Based on Tumor Diameter: A Large Cohort Study

Background

It is unclear whether the dissection of pyloric lymph nodes (PLNs, No. 5 and No. 6 lymph nodes) is necessary for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) with a tumor diameter >4 cm based on current guidelines. This study aimed at evaluating whether pyloric node lymphadenectomy is essential for patients with Siewert type II/III AEG according to different tumor diameters.

Methods

This study included 300 patients on whom transabdominal total gastrectomy was performed for Siewert type II/III AEG at a high-volume center in China from January 2006 to December 2015. The index of estimated benefit from lymph node dissection (IEBLD) was used to analyze the priority of pyloric lymphadenectomy.

Results

In Siewert type II AEG, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) were similar between patients with PLN-positive cancer and patients of stage III AEG without PLN metastasis (23.1% vs. 30.6%, p = 0.505; 23.1% vs. 27.1%, p = 0.678). However, in Siewert type III AEG, the OS and the DFS of patients with PLN-positive cancer were significantly lower than that of patients with stage III without PLN metastasis (7.9% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.021; 0 vs. 26.8%, p = 0.005). According to the IEBLD, the dissection of PLNs did not appear to be beneficial in either Siewert type II AEG or type III AEG, whereas a stratified analysis revealed that PLN dissection yielded a high therapeutic benefit for Siewert type II AEG with tumor diameters >4 cm.

Conclusion

We recommended that the PLNs be dissected in Siewert type II AEG when a tumor diameter is >4 cm. Total gastrectomy should be optional for Siewert type II AEG with a tumor diameter >4 cm and Siewert type III AEG.

Feasibility and efficacy of transthoracic single-port assisted laparoscopic esophagogastrectomy for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

Background

The surgical treatment of Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) is controversial, and no systematic technology has been established. The aim of this retrospective study is to introduce the technology of transthoracic single-port assisted laparoscopic esophagogastrectomy.

Methods

Data from patients with Siewert type II AEG who underwent transthoracic single-port assisted laparoscopic esophagogastrectomy in Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine from May 2017 to December 2020 were analyzed.

Results

A total of 35 patients, including 30 males and 5 females, were enrolled in this study. Eight patients underwent proximal gastrectomy while the other 27 patients underwent total gastrectomy. The median operative times were 247.5 (195.0–275.0) min and 290.0 (173.0–530.0) min for proximal and total gastrectomy, respectively. The median lower mediastinal lymph node dissection (LMLD) time was 41.5 (20.0–57.0) min and the median estimated blood loss was 100.0 (20.0–200.0) mL. The median number of harvested mediastinal lymph nodes was 5 [2–13]. Lower mediastinal lymph node metastasis occurred in 9 patients (25.7%). The lower mediastinal lymph node metastasis rate was significantly higher in patients with esophageal involvement exceeding 2 cm [>2 vs. ≤2 cm: 55.6% (5/9) vs. 15.4% (4/26), P=0.03]. The median postoperative hospital stay was 10 [6–73] days. Overall morbidity was 11.8% (4 patients), including 2 cases of pleural effusion, 1 case of pancreatic fistula, and 1 case of anastomotic leakage.

Conclusions

Transthoracic single-port assisted laparoscopic esophagogastrectomy is safe and feasible. It has the advantages of reducing the difficulty of LMLD and digestive tract reconstruction.

Surgical and survival outcomes after laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for serosa-invasive Siewert type II/III esophagogastric junction carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

The potential advantage of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) compared with open gastrectomy (OG) for serosa-invasive (pT4a) Siewert type II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) remains uncertain. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the short- and long-term outcomes of LG compared to OG for pT4a Siewert type II/III AEG cancers.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 283 patients with pathological confirmed T4a Siewert type II and type III AEG who underwent LG or OG in our center between January 2004 and September 2015. The short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the groups using a 1:1 matched propensity score matching method (PSM).

RESULTS

The LG group had a longer operation time, less estimated blood loss, less time to first flatus, less time to start liquid diet, less time to first ambulation, and shorter length of incision than the OG group. The conversion rates were 5.4% in the LG groups. There was no significant difference in the overall complication rate between the LG and OG groups. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) were comparable between the LG and OG groups (35.4% vs 32.1%, p = 0.541; 34.1% vs 31.0%, p = 0.523, respectively). There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate and pattern between the LG and OG groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic gastrectomy is associated with better short-term outcomes and similar long-term outcomes for pT4a Siewert type II/III AEG. This study reveals that LG could be a safe and feasible option for pT4a Siewert type II/III AEG compared to OG.

Mapping of Lymph Node Metastasis From Esophagogastric Junction Tumors: A Prospective Nationwide Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to determine the optimal extent of lymph node dissection for the 2 histological types of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) tumors based on the incidence of metastasis in a prospective nationwide multicenter study.

BACKGROUND

Because most previous studies were retrospective, the optimal surgical procedure for EGJ tumors has not been standardized.

METHODS

Patients with cT2-T4 adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma located within 2.0 cm of the EGJ were enrolled before surgery. Surgeons dissected all lymph nodes prespecified in the protocol, using either the abdominal transhiatal or right transthoracic approach. The primary endpoint was the metastasis rate of each lymph node. Lymph nodes were classified according to metastasis rate, as follows: category-1 (strongly recommended for dissection), rate more than 10%; category-2 (weakly recommended for dissection), rate from 5% to 10%; and category-3 (not recommended for dissection), rate less than 5%.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2017, 1065 patients with EGJ tumor were screened, and 371 were enrolled. Among 358 patients who underwent surgical resection, category-1 nodes included abdominal stations 1, 2, 3, 7, 9, and 11p, whereas category-2 nodes included abdominal stations 8a, 19, and lower mediastinal station 110. If esophageal involvement exceeded 2.0 cm, station 110 was assigned to category-1. Among 98 patients who had either adenocarcinoma with esophageal involvement over 3.0 cm or squamous cell carcinoma, there were no category-1 nodes in the upper/middle mediastinal field, whereas category-2 nodes included upper mediastinal station 106recR and middle mediastinal station 108. When esophageal involvement exceeded 4.0 cm, station 106recR was assigned to category-1.

CONCLUSION

The study accurately identified the distribution of lymph node metastases from EGJ tumors and the optimal extent of subsequent lymph node dissection.

Accuracy of Preoperative Endoscopy in Determining Tumor Location Required for Surgical Planning for Esophagogastric Junction Cancer

PURPOSE

The surgical strategy for esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer depends on the tumor location as measured relative to the EGJ line. The purpose of this study was to clarify the accuracy of diagnostic endoscopy in different clinicopathological backgrounds.

METHODS

Subjects were 74 consecutive patients with abdominal esophagus to upper gastric cancer who underwent surgical resection. Image-enhanced endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (NBI) was used to determine the EGJ line, prioritizing the presence of palisade vessels, followed by the upper end of gastric folds, as a landmark. The relative positional relationship between the tumor epicenter and the EGJ line was classified into six categories, and the agreement between endoscopic and pathologic diagnoses was examined to evaluate prediction accuracy.

RESULTS

The concordance rate of 69 eligible cases was 87% with a kappa coefficient (K) of 0.81. The palisade vessels were observed in 62/69 patients (89.9%). Of the 37 pathological EGJ cancers centered within 2 cm above and below the EGJ line, Barrett's esophagus was found to be a significant risk factor for discordance (risk ratio, 4.40; p = 0.042); the concordance rate of 60% (K = 0.50) in the Barrett's esophagus group was lower than the rate of 91% (K = 0.84) in the non-Barrett's esophagus group. In five of six discordant cases, the EGJ line was estimated to be proximal to the actual line.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic endoscopy is beneficial for estimating the location of EGJ cancer, with a risk of underestimating esophageal invasion length in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Can we predict mediastinal lymph nodes metastasis in esophagogastric junction cancer? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to define clinical indicator that predicts mediastinal lymph nodes metastasis (MLNM) in patients with Esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC) to select patient population requiring esophagectomy.

METHODS

A systematic and electronic search of several electronic databases was performed up to August 2020. Studies containing information on risk factors for MLNM in patients diagnosed with EJGC and who underwent curative surgery were included.

RESULTS

Two predictors, including undifferentiated type (OR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.07-3.10, p = 0.03) and esophageal invasion length (EIL) (OR = 10.95, 95% CI = 6.37-18.82, p < 0.00001) were identified as significant predictors for the risk of MLNM.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of the associations of these clinicopathological features with MLNM can be useful in determining operative strategy for EGJC.

Safety and feasibility of total laparoscopic radical resection of Siewert type II gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma through the left diaphragm and left thoracic auxiliary hole

BACKGROUND

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) is rising every year; however, the mode of operation for Siewert II AEG is still controversial. Accumulating evidence has shown that transabdominal surgery is better than transthoracic surgery for Siewert II AEG with esophageal invasion < 3 cm. In patients with obesity, a large tumor size, and high transection of the esophagus, the transabdominal esophageal hiatus approach for lower mediastinal lymph node dissection and posterior mediastinal anastomosis is difficult. Thus, total laparoscopic radical resection of Siewert II AEG is carried out through the left diaphragm and left chest auxiliary hole for the optimal surgical field of vision and space. In this prospective study, we assessed the feasibility of carrying out the procedure abdominally through the left diaphragm and auxiliary hole.

METHODS

Ten patients with Siewert II AEG were recruited between April and June 2019. Siewert II AEG was treated by total laparoscopy through the left diaphragm and left chest auxiliary hole. Clinicopathological features, surgical data, and adverse events were collected and analyzed in this prospective study.

RESULTS

The average duration of the operation was 348 ± 37.52 min, lower mediastinal dissection took 20.6 min, the OrVil anastomosis time was 29.8 min, the time necessary to suture the seromuscular layer through the left thoracic auxiliary hole was 11 min, the safety margin was 3.2 cm, and the total number of lymph nodes dissected was 40.6. The number of lower mediastinal lymph nodes dissected was 6.2. The rate of lymph node metastasis in the N110 group was 9 ± 12.45%, and the average intraoperative blood loss was 170 ± 57.47 mL. No anastomotic leakage or anastomotic stricture occurred after the operation. The time of intestinal function recovery was 2 days, and the first time of enteral nutrition through a jejunal nutrition tube was 2.4 days. No tumor recurrence was found in 10 patients at 1 year postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Total laparoscopic radical resection through the left diaphragm and left thoracic auxiliary hole for Siewert II AEG patients is feasible and safe. Thus, it may be a good surgical alternative for patients with esophageal tumors invading less than 3 cm.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR, ChiCTR2000034286. Registered 8 July 2020, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=55866 .

Comparison of the overall survival of proximal and distal gastric cancer after gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the overall survival (OS) between proximal gastric cancer (PG) and distal gastric cancer (DG) patients after gastrectomy.

Methods

Articles on the prognostic study of PG and DG patients after gastrectomy were collected from the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP databases from the date of establishment until December 2020. The data were statistically analyzed by Stata software (version 11.0, StataCorp).

Results

A total of 10 articles met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that the 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates of PG patients were significantly lower than those of DG patients (RR = 0.898, 95% CI: 0.825 to 0.977, P = 0.013; RR = 0.802, 95% CI: 0.708 to 0.909, P = 0.001; RR = 0.736, 95% CI: 0.642 to 0.844, P = 0.000). After subgroup analysis according to different countries, the combined RR values of were as follows: 1-year OS: eastern countries: RR = 0.966, 95% CI: 0.944 to 0.988, P = 0.003, western countries: RR = 0.687, 95% CI: 0.622 to 0.759, P = 0.000; 3-year OS: eastern countries: RR = 0.846, 95% CI: 0.771 to 0.929, P = 0.000, western countries: RR = 0.742, 95% CI: 0.399 to 1.382, P = 0.348; and 5-year OS: eastern countries: RR = 0.798, 95% CI: 0.716 to 0.889, P = 0.000, western countries: RR = 0.646, 95% CI: 0.414 to 1.008, P = 0.054.

Conclusion

In terms of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS, PG patients had lower rates than DG patients and the eastern countries/western countries subgroup, but there were no significant differences in 3- and 5-year OS for the western countries. These results merit further clinical validation in future studies.

(Registration ID: UMIN000040393; Date of registration: 2020/05/13)

Esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma shares characteristics with gastric adenocarcinoma: Literature review and retrospective multicenter cohort study

The incidence of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma has been gradually increasing in Asia, just like in Western countries a few decades ago. Despite recent advances in next-generation sequencing and multimodal treatments, EGJ adenocarcinoma is still an aggressive malignancy with poor outcomes. Clinically, EGJ adenocarcinoma can be separated into Barrett's adenocarcinoma and cardiac adenocarcinoma, with frequent similarities observed. Barrett's adenocarcinoma is likely to be of gastric origin in terms of its premalignant background, risk factors, and stem cell regulators. Recent comprehensive genomic analyses suggest that immunotherapy may be essential for high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H)- and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated subtypes, and against the immunosuppressive phenotype in genomically stable (GS) subtypes, in the treatment of EGJ and gastric adenocarcinoma. Although the chromosomal instability (CIN) subtype dominates EGJ adenocarcinoma, there is still a need to investigate the other molecular subtypes and their targets. Because of the distinctive characteristics of tumor location of EGJ adenocarcinoma, we also described the results of a multicenter cohort study of EGJ adenocarcinoma, comparing Siewert type I (distal esophagus), II (cardia of the stomach), and III (subcardia) tumors. We show that type I tumors were frequently accompanied by Barrett's esophagus (78%, P < .0001), with a significantly unfavorable outcome (multivariate EGJ-cancer-specific mortality hazard ratio = 1.81, 95% CI, 1.06-2.97; P = .031). In addition, over half (56%) of these cases experienced disease recurrence in the lymph nodes. Our findings suggest that Barrett's adenocarcinoma may be an aggressive phenotype of EGJ adenocarcinoma due to the potential risk of tumor spread through the complex lympho-vascular network of the esophagus.

Two updates on oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma from the fifth WHO classification: Alteration of definition and emphasis on HER2 test

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma has increased rapidly but remains controversial over the last decades. There are two crucial updates of the fifth World Health Organization (WHO) classification, including the alteration of its definition and the emphasis on the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) test.

METHODS

A total of 566 clinicopathological samples from patients who were diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. We comprehensively compared the clinicopathological features of oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma between the fourth (V4.0) and fifth (V5.0) WHO versions. The clinicalpathological features among oesophagogastric junction, proximal and distal gastric tumors with fourth and fifth edition were also compared, respectively. Also, we discuss the correlation of HER2-expression with clinicopathological features according to the V5.0.

RESULTS

The results showed that the difference was mainly between oesophagogastric junction and distal adenocarcinoma in V4.0, while some were found between proximal and distal adenocarcinoma in V5.0. Tumors invading the oesophagus more than 3cm were still mainly oesophagogastric junction tumors. The expression of HER2 in oesophagogastric junction and proximal gastric adenocarcinoma was still higher than that in gastric body and distal sites.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinicopathological parameters of the oesophagogastric junction tumors changed to some extent in the updated WHO version. The proximal gastric tumors tended to be more invasive, more than those located in oesophagogastric junction. But the latter with oesophageal invasion required additional management. The HER2-expression of oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma is the highest. The classification of V5.0 is reasonable and worth recommendation.

Lymphovascular Invasion as a Prognostic Factor in Non-Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction After Radical Surgery

Purpose

Tumors with lymphovascular invasion (LVI) are thought to be associated with lymph node metastasis and to lead to a worse prognosis. However, the effect of LVI on the prognosis of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) is still unclear.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 224 consecutive patients with non-metastatic AEG who underwent radical surgery in our hospital from 2004 to 2018. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) analysis was used to eliminate the selection bias. IPW-adjusted Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) between patients with and without LVI.

Results

A total of 224 patients with non-metastatic AEG who underwent radical resection were included in the study and 96 (42.9%) patients developed LVI. Survival analysis showed that LVI were associated with worse DSS (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.12; 95% CI: 1.93–5.03) and worse OS (HR = 2.33; 95% CI: 1.61–3.38). The results were consistent across subgroups stratified by pathologic N stage. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that Siewert type III (HR= 3.20, 95% CI: 1.45–7.06) was associated with worse DSS, but not Siewert type I/II (HR= 1.46, 95% CI: 0.94–2.31, P-interaction=0.047).

Conclusion

LVI are associated with worse prognosis in AEG. LVI had a worse effect on DSS in Siewert type III AEG than Siewert type I/II AEG.

True esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: background of its definition and current surgical trends

The definition of true esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma and its surgical treatment are debatable. We review the basis for the current definition and the Japanese surgical strategy in managing true EGJ adenocarcinoma. The Siewert classification is a well-known anatomical classification system for EGJ adenocarcinomas: type II tumors in the region 1 cm above and 2 cm below the EGJ are described as "true carcinoma of the cardia". Coincidentally, this range matches gastric cardiac gland distribution. Conversely, Nishi's classification is generally used to describe EGJ carcinomas, defined as tumors with the center located within 2 cm above and 2 cm below the EGJ, regardless of their histological subtype. This range coincides with the extent of the lower esophageal sphincter combined with gastric cardiac gland distribution. The current Japanese surgical strategy focuses on the tumor range from the EGJ to the esophagus and stomach. According to previous studies, the strategy can be roughly classified into three types. The optimal surgical procedure for true EGJ adenocarcinoma is controversial. However, an ongoing Japanese nationwide prospective trial will help confirm the appropriate standard surgery, including the optimal extent of lymph node dissection.

Risk Factors and Prognostic Impact of Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastases in Patients with Esophagogastric Junction Cancer

PURPOSE

We retrospectively investigated the risk factors for mediastinal lymph node (MLN) metastasis in esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer with an epicenter within 2 cm above and below the anatomical cardia, including both adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

METHODS

Fifty patients who underwent initial surgery for EGJ cancer from January 2002 to December 2013 were included in this study. We defined metastatic lymph nodes as pathological metastases in resected specimens and recurrence within 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients had AC and 16 had SCC; 24 patients underwent transhiatal resection and 26 underwent transthoracic resection. MLN metastasis was observed in 13 patients (26%) regardless of the histological type, 9 of whom had metastasis in the upper and middle mediastinum. Metastasis occurred when the esophageal invasion length (EIL) exceeded 20 mm. In addition, 10/13 patients had stage pN2-3 cancer. Multivariable analysis identified EIL ≥ 20 mm and stage pN2-3 as significant risk factors for MLN metastasis. The 5-year overall survival was 38% and 65% in the MLN-positive and -negative groups, respectively (p = 0.12). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that only stage pN2-3, and not the presence of MLN metastasis, was a significantly poor prognostic factor.

CONCLUSION

MLN metastasis in EGJ cancer may have a close association with the EIL of the tumor, but the presence of MLN metastasis itself was not a poor prognostic factor. The significance and indications for MLN dissection should be clarified in prospective clinical trials.

Priority of lymph node dissection for advanced esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma with the tumor center located below the esophagogastric junction

To clarify the priority of lymph node dissection (LND) in advanced Siewert type II and III AEG, in which the center of the tumor is located below the esophagogastric junction (EGJ).Data in 395 patients with advanced Siewert type II or III AEG was analyzed retrospectively. The index of estimated benefit from LND (IEBLD) was used to evaluate the efficacy of LND for each nodal station.The mean number of dissected LNs did not differ significantly between patients with type II and III AEG, nor did the mean number of retrieved LNs at each station significantly differ between the 2 groups. According to the IEBLD, the dissection of parahiatal LNs (No.19 and 20) and LNs along the distal portion of the stomach (No.5, 6, and 12a) seemed unlikely to be beneficial, whereas the dissection of Nos.1-3, 7, 9 and 11p yielded high therapeutic benefit (IEBLD>3.0) in both groups. The IEBLDs of No.4d, 8a, and 10 were much higher in type III than in type II AEG cases. No.10 LND may improve survival for type III AEG cases (IEBLD = 2.9), especially for subgroups with primary tumors invading the serosa layer, undifferentiated cancers, macroscopic type 3-4 tumors and tumors ≥50 mm in size (all IEBLDs > 4.0).For advanced AEG located below the EGJ, the dissection of paracardial LNs, lesser curvature LNs, and LNs around the celiac axis would promote higher survival benefits regardless of the Siewert subtype. Patients with type III AEG, especially those with serosa-invasive tumors, undifferentiated tumors, macroscopic type 3-4 tumors and tumors ≥50 mm in size may obtain relatively higher survival benefits from No. 10 lymphadenectomy.

Current surgical treatment of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma

The incidence of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma has shown an upward trend over the past several decades worldwide. In this article, we review previous studies and aimed to provide an update on the factors related to the surgical treatment of EGJ adenocarcinoma. The Siewert classification has implications for lymph node spread and is the most commonly used classification. Different types of EGJ cancer have different incidences of mediastinal and abdominal lymph node metastases, and different surgical approaches have unique advantages and disadvantages. Minimally invasive surgeries have been increasingly applied in clinical practice and show comparable oncologic outcomes. Endoscopic resection may be a good therapy for early EGJ cancer. Additionally, there is still a great need for well-designed, large RCTs to forward our knowledge on the surgical treatment of EGJ cancer.

The optimal extent of lymph node dissection in gastroesophageal junctional cancer: retrospective case control study

BACKGROUND

Recently, the incidence of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer has been increasing in Eastern countries. Mediastinal lymph node (MLN) metastasis rates among patients with GEJ cancer are reported to be 5-25%. However, survival benefits associated with MLN dissection in GEJ cancer has been a controversial issue, especially in Eastern countries, due to its rarity and potential morbidity.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 290 patients who underwent surgery for GEJ cancer at the National Cancer Center in Korea from June 2001 to December 2015. Clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared between patients without MLN dissection (Group A) and patients with MLN dissection (Group B). Prognostic factors associated with the survival rate were identified in a multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine (10%) patients underwent MLN dissection (Group B). Three of 29 patients (10.3%) showed a metastatic MLN in Group B. For abdominal LNs, the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 79.5% in Group A and 33.9% in Group B (P < 0.001). The multivariate analysis revealed that abdominal LN dissection, pT category, and pN category were statistically significant prognostic factors. LNs were the most common site for recurrence in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Abdominal LN dissection and pathologic stage are the important prognostic factors for type II and III GEJ cancer rather than mediastinal lymph node dissection.

Mediastinal Nodal Involvement After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Siewert II/III Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (AEG) poses a management challenge, as preoperative prediction of occult mediastinal nodal metastasis is difficult. We sought to identify factors predictive of mediastinal involvement among patients undergoing trimodality therapy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing trimodality therapy for Siewert II and III AEG at a single institution between 2000 and 2015 were identified. Mediastinal involvement was defined as pathologic nodal involvement after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (ypN+) in mediastinal stations or mediastinal recurrence 2 years or less after resection. Maximal χ² analysis and Youden's J index were used to identify the pretreatment proximal tumor extent that best discriminated mediastinal involvement.

RESULTS

In all, 204 patients (151 [74%] AEG II, 53 [26%] AEG III) were included, of whom 47 (23%) had clinical evidence of thoracic nodal disease. Thirty-one of the 204 patients (15%) met criteria for mediastinal involvement (24 of 31 ypN+, 10 of 31 mediastinal recurrence). Patients with mediastinal involvement had greater proximal tumor extent (median 2 cm [interquartile range, 1.0 to 3.0 cm] vs 1.4 cm [interquartile range, 0.7 to 3.0 cm], P = .030), were more frequently Siewert II lesions (27 of 31 [87.1%] vs 124 of 173 [71.7%], P = .071), and were more often observed to have clinical thoracic nodal metastasis (cN) evidence (13 of 31 [42%] vs 34 of 173 [20%], P = .007) than patients who did not. On multivariable analysis of patients with intrathoracic cN0, esophageal extent of 1.5 cm or greater was independently predictive of mediastinal involvement (odds ratio 5.46, P = .011), whereas Siewert classification was not (Siewert II odds ratio 3.48, P = .116).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment proximal tumor extent, rather than Siewert classification, is an independent predictor of mediastinal involvement among AEG II/III patients without clinical evidence of mediastinal metastasis and should be considered during treatment planning.

Optimal Extent of Transhiatal Gastrectomy and Lymphadenectomy for the Stomach-Predominant Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction: Retrospective Single-Institution Study in China

Background: The optimal extent of gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy for esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer is controversial. Our study aimed to compare the long-term survival of transhiatal proximal gastrectomy with extended periproximal lymphadenectomy (THPG with EPL) and transhiatal total gastrectomy with complete perigastric lymphadenectomy (THTG with CPL) for patients with the stomach-predominant EGJ cancer.

Methods: Between January 2004, and August 2015, 306 patients with Siewert II tumors were divided into the THTG group (n = 148) and the THPG group (n = 158). Their long-term survival was compared according to Nishi's classification. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival analysis.

Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in the distribution of age, gender, tumor size or Nishi's type (P > 0.05). However, a significant difference was observed in terms of pathological tumor stage (P < 0.05). The 5-year overall survival rates were 62.0% in the THPG group and 59.5% in the THTG group. The hazard ratio for death was 0.455 (95% CI, 0.337 to 0.613; log-rank P < 0.001). Type GE/E = G showed a worse prognosis compared with Type G (P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis stratified by Nishi's classification, Stage IA-IIB and IIIA, and tumor size ≤ 30 mm indicated significant survival advantages for the THPG group (P < 0.05). However, this analysis failed to show a survival benefit in Stage IIIB (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Nishi's classification is an effective method to clarify the subdivision of Siewert II tumors with a diameter ≤ 40 mm above or below the EGJ. THPG with EPL is an optimal procedure for the patients with the stomach-predominant EGJ tumors ≤30 mm in diameter and in Stage IA-IIIA. For more advanced and larger EGJ tumors, further studies are required to confirm the necessity of THTG with CPL.

Feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with Siewert-type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: A propensity score matching analysis

Background/Aim

The feasibility of using laparoscopic gastrectomy for the treatment of Siewert-type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) has not been addressed. This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the short- and long-term effects on laparoscopic versus open surgery using (propensity score matching) PSM for Siewert-type II/III AEG.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data from the patients with Siewert-type II/III AEG who were treated in our cancer center between January 2013 and December 2015. Patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy and open gastrectomy were matched via PSM. The cumulative 2-year Overall survival (OS) rate of patients in the two cohorts was estimated by Kaplan-Meier plots. Multi-variable analysis using a Cox regression model was conducted to identify independent risk factors.

Results

A total of 963 patients with Siewert-type II/III AEG were included, of which 132 cases were in the laparoscopic gastrectomy group, and 831 cases were in the open gastrectomy group. After regrouping with PSM, 132 patients in the laparoscopic gastrectomy group were balanced with 264 similar patients in the open gastrectomy group. As expected, the laparoscopic gastrectomy group had significantly longer operation times, but less blood loss. Furthermore, the two groups showed similar results for post-operative complications, duration of hospital stay and 2-year OS rate. Combined organ resection was an independent risk factor for 2-year OS rate.

Conclusion

This study suggests that laparoscopic gastrectomy may serve as a safe and feasible treatment for Siewert-type II/III AEG and achieve similar oncologic outcomes as open gastrectomy.

Surgical Treatment of Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer

Although the incidence of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma has been increasing worldwide, no standardized surgical strategy for its treatment has been established. This study aimed to provide an update on the surgical treatment of GEJ adenocarcinoma by reviewing previous reports and propose recommended surgical approaches. The Siewert classification is widely used for determining which surgical procedure is used, because previous studies have shown that the pattern of lymph node (LN) metastasis depends on tumor location. In terms of surgical approaches for GEJ adenocarcinoma, a consensus was reached based on two randomized controlled trials. Siewert types I and III are treated as esophageal cancer and gastric cancer, respectively. Although no consensus has been reached regarding the treatment of Siewert type II, several retrospective studies suggested that the optimal treatment strategy includes paraaortic LN dissection. Against this background, a Japanese nationwide prospective trial is being conducted to determine the proportion of LN metastasis in GEJ cancers and to identify the optimal extent of LN dissection in each type.

Surgical strategies in true adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG II): thoracoabdominal or abdominal approach?

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical approach for adenocarcinoma directly at the esophagogastric junction (AEG II) is still under debate. This study aims to evaluate the differences between right thoracoabdominal esophagectomy (TAE) (Ivor-Lewis operation) and transhiatal extended gastrectomy (THG) for AEG II.

METHODS

From a prospective database, 242 patients with AEG II (TAE, n = 56; THG, n = 186) were included and analyzed according to characteristics and perioperative morbidity and mortality and overall survival (chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, log-rank, Cox regression).

RESULTS

Groups were comparable at baseline with exception of age. Patients older than 70 years were more frequently resected by THG (p = 0.003). No differences in perioperative morbidity (p = 0.197) and mortality (p = 0.711) were observed, including anastomotic leakages (p = 0.625) and pulmonary complications (p = 0.494). There was no significant difference in R0 resection (p = 0.719) and number of resected lymph nodes (p = 0.202). Overall median survival was 38.4 months. Survival after TAE was significantly longer than after THG (median OS not reached versus 33.6 months, p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed pN-category (p < 0.001) and type of surgery (p = 0.017) as independent prognostic factors. The type of surgery was confirmed as prognostic factor in locally advanced AEG II (cT 3/4 or cN1), but not in cT1/2 and cN0 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our single-center experience suggests that patients with (locally advanced) AEG II tumors may benefit from TAE compared to THG. For further evaluation, a randomized trial would be necessary.

Outcomes of abdominal esophageal cancer patients who were treated with esophagectomy

The aim of the present study was to elucidate the characteristics and outcomes of abdominal esophageal cancer patients who were treated with esophagectomy. The records of 210 esophagectomy patients were retrospectively reviewed and the differences in postoperative outcomes and disease-specific survival between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma were evaluated. Of the 20 abdominal esophageal cancer patients, 11 had squamous cell carcinoma, 8 had adenocarcinoma and 1 had adenosquamous cell carcinoma. The body mass index and serum albumin levels were significantly lower in the squamous cell carcinoma patients compared with those in the adenocarcinoma patients, and abdominal lymph node metastasis was significantly more frequent in the adenocarcinoma patients. Early recurrence occurred in 5 patients who had postoperative surgical site infection, microscopic residual cancer, and mediastinal lymph node metastasis. A Kaplan-Meier curve indicated a significantly shorter survival time in patients who underwent surgery with a thoraco-abdominal approach, who had postoperative complications, and who had microscopic residual cancer. This study demonstrated the significance of R0 resection and prevention of postoperative complications in improving the prognosis of patients with abdominal esophageal cancer.

Prognostic value of resected lymph nodes numbers for Siewert II gastroesophageal junction cancer

We aim to evaluate whether resected lymph nodes (RLNs) numbers have prognostic value in patients with gastroesophageal junction cancers (GEJ, Siewert type II). Patients with gastroesophageal junction cancers were identified from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry between 1988 to 2013. Multivariate Cox regression analyses and Kaplan–Meier method were performed to analyze risk factors for overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival(CSS). A total of 8396 patients who underwent surgeries and had reginal lymph nodes examined were identified. Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that more numbers of resected lymph nodes (RLNs) were associated with better survival. The five-year OS rates for 1–20 and 21–90 RLNs were 26.8% and 32.4%, with a median survival time of 62 and 72 months, respectively (P < 0.001). The five-year CSS rates were 32.2% and 37.2% in each group, with median survival time of 90 and 101 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Cox regression multivariate analysis showed that year of diagnosis, age, sex, marital status, grade, seer histology, tumor histology, lymph node ratio (LNR) and RLNs as a categorical variable were all significant prognostic factors for both OS and CSS. RLN count is an independent prognostic factor for Siewert type II GEJ cancer patients and patients can achieve better overall and cancer-specific survival with more than 20 RLNs dissected.

The optimal lymph node dissection in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to refine the optimal lymph node dissection in Western patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG).

BACKGROUND

Lymphadenectomy is essential in addition to surgery for AEG. Asian studies continually present superior survival rates using a more extended lymphadenectomy compared with results reproduced in the West. Thus, the optimal extend of the lymphadenectomy remains unclear in Western patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort was conducted of patients with AEG from January 1st, 2003 to December 31st, 2011. All patients undergoing curatively intended surgery was included. Two types of resections were constructed; Res1 included patients where only the loco regional lymph nodes were removed (station 1-4, 7 and 9) and Res2 included the additional removal of the more distant stations 8 and/or 11.

RESULTS

We identified 510 patients with AEG. The highest frequency of lymph node metastases was seen in the loco regional stations 1-3, 7 and 9, ranging from 34% to 41.4%. There was no difference in overall survival between the two groups; the median survival rate for Res1 was 30.4 months compared to 24.1 months for Res2 (p = 0.157). Furthermore, the extend of lymph node dissection seemed to have no effect on survival (HR = 1.061, 95%CI 0.84-1.33).

CONCLUSION

No significant difference in survival between the extended and the less extended lymphadenectomy was found. The presence of metastases in distant lymph nodes indicates poor survival and may represent disseminated disease. We do not find evidence that supports an extended lymph node dissection in Western patients.

Overexpression of CTEN relates to tumor malignant potential and poor outcomes of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

Background

To detect a novel treatment target for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), we tested whether C-terminal tensin-like (CTEN), a member of the tensin gene family and frequently overexpressed in various cancers, acts as a cancer-promoting gene through overexpression in AEG.

Materials and Methods

We analyzed 5 gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) cell lines and 104 primary AEG tumors curatively resected in our hospital between 2000 and 2010.

Results

CTEN overexpression was detected in GC cell lines (2/5 cell lines; 40%) and primary AEG tumor samples (35/104 cases; 34%). CTEN knockdown using several specific siRNAs inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion of CTEN-overexpressing cells. CTEN overexpression was significantly correlated with more aggressive venous and lymphatic invasion, deeper tumor depth, and higher rates of lymph node metastasis and recurrence. Patients with CTEN-overexpressing tumors had a worse overall rate of survival than those with non-expressing tumors (P < 0.0001, log-rank test) in an expression-dependent manner. CTEN positivity was independently associated with a worse outcome in the multivariate analysis (P = 0.0423, hazard ratio 3.54 [1.04-16.4]).

Conclusions

CTEN plays a crucial role in tumor cell proliferation, migration, and invasion through its overexpression, which highlights its usefulness as a prognosticator and potential therapeutic target in AEG.

Recurrence Pattern and Lymph Node Metastasis of Adenocarcinoma at the Esophagogastric Junction

BACKGROUND

The surgical approach for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEJ) still is controversial despite revised tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification. This study aimed to evaluate the oncologic outcome of a routine transhiatal approach for AEJ in terms of recurrence and lymph node (LN) metastasis of AEJ.

METHODS

Recurrence patterns and LN metastasis of a single, primary AEJ (n = 463) treated by a surgical resection using a transhiatal approach without routine complete mediastinal LN dissection or routine splenectomy were analyzed respectively. To validate current treatment for recurrence, a validation index of recurrence (ViR; overall survival/incidence of solitary recurrence factor) was developed.

RESULTS

The overall recurrence rate for AEJ was 20.3%, which did not differ significantly between AEJ II (20.8%; n = 125) and AEJ III (20.1%; n = 338). Mediastinal recurrence did not differ significantly among the subtypes of AEJ, irrespective of gastroesophageal junction involvement. Splenic hilar LN recurrence-free survival did not differ significantly between the gastrectomy-only group, the gastrectomy-plus-splenectomy group, and the gastrectomy plus distal pancreatectomy group. The solitary recurrence rate for the mediastinal LN was 0.7% for AEJ, and the overall median survival with that recurrence was 30.5 months. The ViR for mediastinal LN recurrence (43.6) was higher than for regional LN (20.9) or distant LN (14.6) metastasis.

CONCLUSION

In terms of LN metastasis and recurrence, a transhiatal approach without complete mediastinal LN dissection can be acceptable, and routine splenectomy is not necessary for AEJ II or AEJ III arising within the stomach.

Appropriate extent of lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

AIM

To investigate the appropriate extent of lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagogastric junction (ECJ).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 52 patients with SCC of the ECJ who underwent extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy. We assessed potential risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in the upper/middle mediastinum by conducting univariate and multivariate analyses, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the therapeutic value index of each nodal basin dissection was calculated by multiplying the frequency of metastasis at the basin and the 5-year overall survival rate of patients with metastasis at that basin.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (38%) had mediastinal LNM; 13 (25%) had metastasis in the upper/middle mediastinum, and 13 (25%) had metastasis in the lower mediastinum. Tumor length (P = 0.03) and pathological nodal status (P = 0.01) were independent risk factors for upper/middle mediastinal LNM. The optimal ROC cutoff value of tumor length was 54 mm. The 5-year overall survival rate of the patients with LNM in the upper/middle mediastinum was 46%. The therapeutic value index of upper/middle mediastinal lymphadenectomy was 11.6, which was inferior to that of perigastric lymphadenectomy at 17.3, but superior to that of lower mediastinal lymphadenectomy at 5.8.

CONCLUSION

An upper/middle mediastinal lymphadenectomy may be required for patients with tumors that are ≥54 mm long, and in those with suspected LNM.

Optimal treatment for Siewert type II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: A retrospective cohort study with long-term follow-up

AIM

To determine the optimal treatment strategy for Siewert type II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 83 patients with Siewert type II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and calculated both an index of estimated benefit from lymph node dissection for each lymph node (LN) station and a lymph node ratio (LNR: ratio of number of positive lymph nodes to the total number of dissected lymph nodes). We used Cox proportional hazard models to clarify independent poor prognostic factors. The median duration of observation was 73 mo.

RESULTS

Indices of estimated benefit from LN dissection were as follows, in descending order: lymph nodes (LN) along the lesser curvature, 26.5; right paracardial LN, 22.8; left paracardial LN, 11.6; LN along the left gastric artery, 10.6. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 58%. Cox regression analysis revealed that vigorous venous invasion (v2, v3) (HR = 5.99; 95%CI: 1.71-24.90) and LNR of > 0.16 (HR = 4.29, 95%CI: 1.79-10.89) were independent poor prognostic factors for OS.

CONCLUSION

LN along the lesser curvature, right and left paracardial LN, and LN along the left gastric artery should be dissected in patients with Siewert type II or III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Patients with vigorous venous invasion and LNR of > 0.16 should be treated with aggressive adjuvant chemotherapy to improve survival outcomes.

Different time trend and management of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma in three Asian countries

Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma has been on the increase in Western countries. However, in Asian countries, data on the incidence of EGJ adenocarcinoma are evidently lacking. In the present review, we focus on the current clinical situation of EGJ adenocarcinoma in three Asian countries: Japan, Hong Kong, and Malaysia. The incidence of EGJ adenocarcinoma has been reported to be gradually increasing in Malaysia and Japan, whereas it has stabilized in Hong Kong. However, the number of cases in these countries is comparatively low compared with Western countries. A reason for the reported difference in the incidence and time trend of EGJ adenocarcinoma among the three countries may be explained by two distinct etiologies: one arising from chronic gastritis similar to distal gastric cancer, and the other related to gastroesophageal reflux disease similar to esophageal adenocarcinoma including Barrett's adenocarcinoma. This review also shows that there are several concerns in clinical practice for EGJ adenocarcinoma. In Hong Kong and Malaysia, many EGJ adenocarcinomas have been detected at a stage not amenable to endoscopic resection. In Japan, histological curability criteria for endoscopic resection cases have not been established. We suggest that an international collaborative study using the same definition of EGJ adenocarcinoma may be helpful not only for clarifying the characteristics of these cancers but also for improving the clinical outcome of these patients.

New evidence guiding extent of lymphadenectomy for esophagogastric junction tumor: Application of Ber-Ep4 Joint with CD44v6 staining on the detection of lower mediastinal lymph node micrometastasis and survival analysis

For Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEJ), the optimal surgical approach and extent of lymph nodes dissection remain controversial. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been reported to be available for identifying lymph node micrometastasis (LNMM) in patients with AEJ. This was a prospective case series of patients who underwent R0 resection and lower mediastinal lymphadenectomy from January 2010 to June 2015 in Fujian Medical University Union Hospital for Siewert type II AEJ. The outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 1325 lymph nodes were collected from 49 patients, grouped into 3 groups: lower mediastinal, paracardial, and abdominal. The former 2 groups were examined by monoclonal antibodies against Ber-Ep4 and CD44v6. The incidence of LNMM in mediastinal group was 37% (18/49) for Ber-Ep4 and 33% (16/49) for CD44v6. While in routine histological diagnosis, the number of patients with the positive lymph nodes was 7 (14%). When combining IHC with histopathology (HE) staining, the incidence of positive mediastinal lymph nodes was increased to 24%, with a total number of 37 lymph nodes from 28 patients (57%). Micrometastases indicated by Ber-Ep4 and CD44v6 were associated with the depth of tumor invasion (P = 0.020 and 0.037, respectively), histopathological nodal status (P = 0.024 and 0.01, respectively), and Lauren classification (P = 0.038 and, respectively). Expression of CD44v6 and Ber-Ep4 was positively correlated (r = 0.643, P < 0.001). The 3- and 5-year survival rates for all patients were 66% and 50%, respectively. The patients with LNMM had a lower 3-year survival rate of 51%, compared to 80% from no LNMM group; 5-year survival rate was also lower in LNMM group, which is 29% versus 68% (P = 0.006) in the no LNMM group. Patients with positive Ber-Ep4 cells had a lower survival, but not statistically significant (P = 0.058). CD44v6-positive group had a significantly reduced survival (P < 0.001). In patients group with negative lower mediastinal lymph nodes, patients without LNMM obtained a significant survival benefit (P = 0.021). Our study demonstrated that routine test for LNMM is necessary for patients with negative lymph nodes. As a positive prognostic factor, thorough lower mediastinal lymphadenectomy in an invasive approach should be considered when necessary. Ber-Ep4 and CD44v6 were shown to be great markers for detecting LNMM.

Siewert III adenocarcinoma: treatment update

Siewert III cancer, although representing around 40% of EGJ cancers and being the EGJ cancer with worst prognosis, does not have a homogenous treatment, has few dedicated studies, and is often not considered in study protocols. Although staged as an esophageal cancer by the TNM 7th ed., it is considered a gastric cancer by new TNM 8th ed. Our aim was to consolidate the current literature on the indications and treatment options for Siewert III adenocarcinoma. A review of the literature was performed to better delineate treatment indications (according to stage, surgical margins, type of lymphatic spread and lymphadenectomy) and treatment strategy. The treatment approach is strictly dependent on cancer site and nodal diffusion. T1m cancers have insignificant risk of nodal metastases and can be safely treated with endoscopic resections. The risk of nodal metastases increases markedly starting from T1sm cancers and requires surgery with lymphadenectomy. The site of this type of cancer and the nodal diffusion require a total gastrectomy and distal esophagectomy, with 5 cm of clear proximal and distal margins and a D2 abdominal and inferior mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Multimodal treatments are indicated in all locally advanced and node positive cancers. Siewert III cancers are gastric cancers with some peculiarities and require dedicated studies and deserve more consideration in the current literature, especially because their treatment is particularly challenging.

Western strategy for EGJ carcinoma

In this paper, the epidemiological and clinicobiological behavior of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma in the West is compared and contrasted to that in the East, and an overview is provided of current therapeutic strategies employed for this type of tumor in Western countries. It is well known that multimodal treatment is the therapeutic standard in locally advanced EGJ adenocarcinoma, but whether neoadjuvant/perioperative chemotherapy (CT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the optimal approach is still debated. Neoadjuvant CRT improves local control in locally advanced Siewert type I and II tumors, so it should be considered the treatment of choice. In the subset of these patients with microscopic systemic disease at diagnosis, more intensive exclusive chemotherapy protocols could be of benefit. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify these patients before planning the treatment. For Siewert type III tumors, perioperative chemotherapy is the standard. While there is general agreement on the optimal surgical approach for Siewert types I and III (a two-field Ivor Lewis operation and a total gastrectomy with distal esophagectomy, respectively), no standard surgical treatment has been defined for Siewert type II tumors. When data from Western series on proximal and circumferential resection margins and on nodal spread in Siewert type II tumors are taken into account, the optimal surgical approach appears to be Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Whether the extent of esophageal invasion can correctly predict nodal involvement in middle-upper mediastinal stations as a means to restrict indications for transthoracic esophagectomy requires further investigation in the West.

Results of a nation-wide retrospective study of lymphadenectomy for esophagogastric junction carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) carcinoma has attracted considerable attention because of the marked increase in its incidence globally. However, the optimal extent of esophagogastric resection for this tumor entity remains highly controversial.

METHODS

This was a questionnaire-based national retrospective study undertaken in an attempt to define the optimal extent of lymph node dissection for EGJ cancer. Data from patients with EGJ carcinoma, less than 40 mm in diameter, who underwent R0 resection between January 2001 and December 2010 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Clinical records of 2807 patients without preoperative therapy were included in the analysis. There are distinct disparities in terms of the nodal dissection rate according to histology and the predominant tumor location. Nodal metastases frequently involved the abdominal nodes, especially those at the right and left cardia, lesser curvature and along the left gastric artery. Nodes along the distal portion of the stomach were much less often metastatic, and their dissection seemed unlikely to be beneficial. Lower mediastinal node dissection might contribute to improving survival for patients with esophagus-predominant EGJ cancer. However, due to low dissection rates for nodes of the middle and upper mediastinum, no conclusive result was obtained regarding the optimal extent of nodal dissection in this region.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete nodal clearance along the distal portion of the stomach offers marginal survival benefits for patients with EGJ cancers less than 4 cm in diameter. The optimal extent of esophageal resection and the benefits of mediastinal node dissection remain issues to be addressed in managing patients with esophagus-predominant EGJ cancers.