1
|
Maki H, Nishioka Y, Haddad A, Lendoire M, Tran Cao HS, Chun YS, Tzeng CWD, Vauthey JN, Newhook TE. Reproducibility and efficiency of liver volumetry using manual method and liver analysis software. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:911-918. [PMID: 38632032 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.03.1157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For liver volumetry, manual tracing on computed tomography (CT) images is time-consuming and operator dependent. To overcome these disadvantages, several three-dimensional simulation software programs have been developed; however, their efficacy has not fully been evaluated. METHODS Three physicians performed liver volumetry on preoperative CT images on 30 patients who underwent formal right hepatectomy, using manual tracing volumetry and two simulation software programs, SYNAPSE and syngo.via. The future liver remnant (FLR) was calculated using each method of volumetry. The primary endpoint was reproducibility and secondary outcomes were calculation time and learning curve. RESULTS The mean FLR was significantly lower for manual volumetry than for SYNAPSE or syngo.via; there was no significant difference in mean FLR between the two software-based methods. Reproducibility was lower for the manual method than for the software-based methods. Mean calculation time was shortest for SYNAPSE. For the two physicians unfamiliar with the software, no obvious learning curve was observed for using SYNAPSE, whereas learning curves were observed for using syngo.via. CONCLUSIONS Liver volumetry was more reproducible and faster with three-dimensional simulation software, especially SYNAPSE software, than with the conventional manual tracing method. Software can help even inexperienced physicians learn quickly how to perform liver volumetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harufumi Maki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yujiro Nishioka
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Antony Haddad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mateo Lendoire
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yun S Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sundaravadanan S, Welsh FK, Sethi P, Noorani S, Cresswell BA, Connell JJ, Knapp SK, Núñez L, Brady JM, Banerjee R, Rees M. Novel multiparametric MRI detects improved future liver remnant quality post-dual vein embolization. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:764-771. [PMID: 38480098 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimisation of the future liver remnant (FLR) is crucial to outcomes of extended liver resections. This study aimed to assess the quality of the FLR before and after dual vein embolization (DVE) by quantitative multiparametric MRI. METHODS Of 100 patients with liver metastases recruited in a clinical trial (Precision1:NCT04597710), ten consecutive patients with insufficient FLR underwent quantitative multiparametric MRI pre- and post-DVE (right portal and hepatic vein). FLR volume, liver fibro-inflammation (corrected T1) scores and fat percentage (proton density fat fraction, PDFF) were determined. Patient metrics were compared by Wilcoxon signed-rank test and statistical analysis done using R software. RESULTS All patients underwent uncomplicated DVE with improvement in liver remnant health, median 37 days after DVE: cT1 scores reduced from median (interquartile range) 790 ms (753-833 ms) to 741 ms (708-760 ms) p = 0.014 [healthy range <795 ms], as did PDFF from 11% (4-21%), to 3% (2-12%) p = 0.017 [healthy range <5.6%]. There was a significant increase in median (interquartile range) FLR volume from 33% (30-37%)% to 49% (44-52%), p = 0.002. CONCLUSION This non-invasive and reproducible MRI technique showed improvement in volume and quality of the FLR after DVE. This is a significant advance in our understanding of how to prevent liver failure in patients undergoing major liver surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Senthil Sundaravadanan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
| | - Fenella Ks Welsh
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom
| | - Pulkit Sethi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom
| | - Shaheen Noorani
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom
| | - Ben A Cresswell
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Luis Núñez
- Perspectum, Gemini One, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Myrddin Rees
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yabushita Y, Park JS, Yoon YS, Ohtsuka M, Kwon W, Choi GH, Imamura M, Matsumoto I, Mizuno S, Matsuyama R, Sakata J, Hayashi H, Takeda Y, Katagiri S, Sugawara T, Kobayashi S, Kawasaki Y, Nagano H, Murase K, Kim HS, Nah YW, Jang JY, Yamaue H, Yoon DS, Yamamoto M, Choi D, Nakamura M, Kim KH, Endo I. Conversion surgery for initially unresectable locally advanced biliary tract cancer: A multicenter collaborative study conducted in Japan and Korea. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2024. [PMID: 38822227 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although surgical resection is the only curative treatment for biliary tract cancer, in some cases, the disease is diagnosed as unresectable at initial presentation. There are few reports of conversion surgery after the initial treatment for unresectable locally advanced biliary tract cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of conversion surgery in patients with initially unresectable locally advanced biliary tract cancer. METHODS We retrospectively collected clinical data from groups of patients in multiple centers belonging to the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. We analyzed two groups of prognostic factors (pretreatment and surgical factors) and their relation to the treatment outcomes. RESULTS A total of 56 patients with initially unresectable locally advanced biliary tract cancer were enrolled in this study of which 55 (98.2%) patients received chemotherapy, and 16 (28.6%) patients received additional radiation therapy. The median time from the start of the initial treatment to resection was 6.4 months. Severe postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher occurred in 34 patients (60.7%), and postoperative mortality occurred in five patients (8.9%). Postoperative histological results revealed CR in eight patients (14.3%). The median survival time from the start of the initial treatment in all 56 patients who underwent conversion surgery was 37.7 months, the 3-year survival rate was 53.9%, and the 5-year survival rate was 39.1%. CONCLUSIONS Conversion surgery for initially unresectable locally advanced biliary tract cancer may lead to longer survival in selected patients. However, more precise preoperative safety evaluation and careful postoperative management are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuhiro Yabushita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Joon Seong Park
- Pancreatobiliary Cancer Clinic, Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yoo-Seok Yoon
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si, South Korea
| | - Masayuki Ohtsuka
- Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Masafumi Imamura
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Ippei Matsumoto
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shugo Mizuno
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan
| | - Ryusei Matsuyama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Jun Sakata
- Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Hayashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yutaka Takeda
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan
| | - Satoshi Katagiri
- Department of Surgery, Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center, Yachiyo, Japan
| | - Toshitaka Sugawara
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shogo Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yota Kawasaki
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nagano
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Katsutoshi Murase
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan
| | - Hyung Sun Kim
- Pancreatobiliary Cancer Clinic, Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yang Won Nah
- Department of Surgery, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, South Korea
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (KAHBPS), Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hiroki Yamaue
- Department of Cancer Immunology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
- Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Dong Sup Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (KAHBPS), Seoul, South Korea
| | - Masakazu Yamamoto
- Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS), Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Dongho Choi
- Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (KAHBPS), Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Masafumi Nakamura
- Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS), Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Ki-Hun Kim
- Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (KAHBPS), Seoul, South Korea
- Division of HB Surgery and Liver Transplant, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center and University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
- Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS), Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Haddad A, Lendoire M, Maki H, Kang HC, Habibollahi P, Odisio BC, Huang SY, Vauthey JN. Liver volumetry and liver-regenerative interventions: history, rationale, and emerging tools. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:766-775. [PMID: 38519362 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative hepatic insufficiency (PHI) is the most feared complication after hepatectomy. Volume of the future liver remnant (FLR) is one objectively measurable indicator to identify patients at risk of PHI. In this review, we summarized the development and rationale for the use of liver volumetry and liver-regenerative interventions and highlighted emerging tools that could yield new advancements in liver volumetry. METHODS A review of MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted to identify literature related to liver volumetry. The references of relevant articles were reviewed to identify additional publications. RESULTS Liver volumetry based on radiologic imaging was developed in the 1980s to identify patients at risk of PHI and later used in the 1990s to evaluate grafts for living donor living transplantation. The field evolved in the 2000s by the introduction of standardized FLR based on the hepatic metabolic demands and in the 2010s by the introduction of the degree of hypertrophy and kinetic growth rate as measures of the FLR regenerative and functional capacity. Several liver-regenerative interventions, most notably portal vein embolization, are used to increase resectability and reduce the risk of PHI. In parallel with the increase in automation and machine assistance to physicians, many semi- and fully automated tools are being developed to facilitate liver volumetry. CONCLUSION Liver volumetry is the most reliable tool to detect patients at risk of PHI. Advances in imaging analysis technologies, newly developed functional measures, and liver-regenerative interventions have been improving our ability to perform safe hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antony Haddad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Mateo Lendoire
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Harufumi Maki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Hyunseon Christine Kang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Peiman Habibollahi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Bruno C Odisio
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Steven Y Huang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chang E, Wong FCL, Chasen BA, Erwin WD, Das P, Holliday EB, Koong AC, Ludmir EB, Minsky BD, Noticewala SS, Smith GL, Taniguchi CM, Rodriguez MJ, Beddar S, Martin-Paulpeter RM, Niedzielski JS, Sawakuchi GO, Schueler E, Perles LA, Xiao L, Szklaruk J, Park PC, Dasari AN, Kaseb AO, Kee BK, Lee SS, Overman MJ, Willis JA, Wolff RA, Tzeng CWD, Vauthey JN, Koay EJ. Phase I trial of single-photon emission computed tomography-guided liver-directed radiotherapy for patients with low functional liver volume. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2024; 8:pkae037. [PMID: 38730548 PMCID: PMC11164414 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkae037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traditional constraints specify that 700 cc of liver should be spared a hepatotoxic dose when delivering liver-directed radiotherapy to reduce the risk of inducing liver failure. We investigated the role of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to identify and preferentially avoid functional liver during liver-directed radiation treatment planning in patients with preserved liver function but limited functional liver volume after receiving prior hepatotoxic chemotherapy or surgical resection. METHODS This phase I trial with a 3 + 3 design evaluated the safety of liver-directed radiotherapy using escalating functional liver radiation dose constraints in patients with liver metastases. Dose-limiting toxicities were assessed 6-8 weeks and 6 months after completing radiotherapy. RESULTS All 12 patients had colorectal liver metastases and received prior hepatotoxic chemotherapy; 8 patients underwent prior liver resection. Median computed tomography anatomical nontumor liver volume was 1584 cc (range = 764-2699 cc). Median SPECT functional liver volume was 1117 cc (range = 570-1928 cc). Median nontarget computed tomography and SPECT liver volumes below the volumetric dose constraint were 997 cc (range = 544-1576 cc) and 684 cc (range = 429-1244 cc), respectively. The prescription dose was 67.5-75 Gy in 15 fractions or 75-100 Gy in 25 fractions. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed during follow-up. One-year in-field control was 57%. One-year overall survival was 73%. CONCLUSION Liver-directed radiotherapy can be safely delivered to high doses when incorporating functional SPECT into the radiation treatment planning process, which may enable sparing of lower volumes of liver than traditionally accepted in patients with preserved liver function. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02626312.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enoch Chang
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Franklin C L Wong
- Nuclear Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Beth A Chasen
- Nuclear Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William D Erwin
- Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Prajnan Das
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emma B Holliday
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Albert C Koong
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sonal S Noticewala
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Grace L Smith
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cullen M Taniguchi
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maria J Rodriguez
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sam Beddar
- Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Joshua S Niedzielski
- Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gabriel O Sawakuchi
- Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emil Schueler
- Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Luis A Perles
- Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lianchun Xiao
- Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Janio Szklaruk
- Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peter C Park
- Radiology Physics, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Arvind N Dasari
- Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ahmed O Kaseb
- Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bryan K Kee
- Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sunyoung S Lee
- Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael J Overman
- Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jason A Willis
- Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert A Wolff
- Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chandra P, Sacks GD. Contemporary Surgical Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:941. [PMID: 38473303 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the United States and the second most common cause of cancer-related death. Approximately 20-30% of patients will develop hepatic metastasis in the form of synchronous or metachronous disease. The treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) has evolved into a multidisciplinary approach, with chemotherapy and a variety of locoregional treatments, such as ablation and portal vein embolization, playing a crucial role. However, resection remains a core tenet of management, serving as the gold standard for a curative-intent therapy. As such, the input of a dedicated hepatobiliary surgeon is paramount for appropriate patient selection and choice of surgical approach, as significant advances in the field have made management decisions extremely nuanced and complex. We herein aim to review the contemporary surgical management of colorectal liver metastasis with respect to both perioperative and operative considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratik Chandra
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Greg D Sacks
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
- VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY 10010, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lopez-Lopez V, Linecker M, Caballero-Llanes A, Reese T, Oldhafer KJ, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Tun-Abraham M, Li J, Fard-Aghaie M, Petrowsky H, Brusadin R, Lopez-Conesa A, Ratti F, Aldrighetti L, Ramouz A, Mehrabi A, Autran Machado M, Ardiles V, De Santibañes E, Marichez A, Adam R, Truant S, Pruvot FR, Olthof PB, Van Gulick TM, Montalti R, Troisi RI, Kron P, Lodge P, Kambakamba P, Hoti E, Martinez-Caceres C, de la Peña-Moral J, Clavien PA, Robles-Campos R. Liver Histology Predicts Liver Regeneration and Outcome in ALPPS: Novel Findings From A Multicenter Study. Ann Surg 2024; 279:306-313. [PMID: 37487004 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Alterations in liver histology influence the liver's capacity to regenerate, but the relevance of each of the different changes in rapid liver growth induction is unknown. This study aimed to analyze the influence of the degree of histological alterations during the first and second stages on the ability of the liver to regenerate. METHODS This cohort study included data obtained from the International ALPPS Registry between November 2011 and October 2020. Only patients with colorectal liver metastases were included in the study. We developed a histological risk score based on histological changes (stages 1 and 2) and a tumor pathology score based on the histological factors associated with poor tumor prognosis. RESULTS In total, 395 patients were included. The time to reach stage 2 was shorter in patients with a low histological risk stage 1 (13 vs 17 days, P ˂0.01), low histological risk stage 2 (13 vs 15 days, P <0.01), and low pathological tumor risk (13 vs 15 days, P <0.01). Regarding interval stage, there was a higher inverse correlation in high histological risk stage 1 group compared to low histological risk 1 group in relation with future liver remnant body weight ( r =-0.1 and r =-0.08, respectively), and future liver remnant ( r =-0.15 and r =-0.06, respectively). CONCLUSIONS ALPPS is associated with increased histological alterations in the liver parenchyma. It seems that the more histological alterations present and the higher the number of poor prognostic factors in the tumor histology, the longer the time to reach the second stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Lopez-Lopez
- Department of Surgery and Liver and Pancreas transplantation, Virgen de la Arrixaca Clinic and University Hospital, IMIB, Murcia, Spain
| | - Michael Linecker
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - Albert Caballero-Llanes
- Department of Pathology, Virgen de la Arrixaca Clinic and University Hospital, IMIB, Murcia, Spain
| | - Tim Reese
- Department of Surgery, Division of Liver, Bileduct and Pancreatic Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Karl J Oldhafer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Liver, Bileduct and Pancreatic Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Mauro Tun-Abraham
- Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Transplantation/Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, NY
| | - Jun Li
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mohammad Fard-Aghaie
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Henrik Petrowsky
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB and Transplant Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Roberto Brusadin
- Department of Surgery and Liver and Pancreas transplantation, Virgen de la Arrixaca Clinic and University Hospital, IMIB, Murcia, Spain
| | - Asuncion Lopez-Conesa
- Department of Surgery and Liver and Pancreas transplantation, Virgen de la Arrixaca Clinic and University Hospital, IMIB, Murcia, Spain
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Department of Surgery, Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Department of Surgery, Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Ali Ramouz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Victoria Ardiles
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Liver Transplant Unit, Italian Hospital Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Eduardo De Santibañes
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Liver Transplant Unit, Italian Hospital Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Arthur Marichez
- Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - René Adam
- Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - Stéphanie Truant
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Francois-René Pruvot
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas M Van Gulick
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roberto Montalti
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Napoli, Italy
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Napoli, Italy
| | - Philipp Kron
- HPB and Transplant Unit, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Peter Lodge
- HPB and Transplant Unit, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Patryk Kambakamba
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Emir Hoti
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Jesus de la Peña-Moral
- Department of Pathology, Virgen de la Arrixaca Clinic and University Hospital, IMIB, Murcia, Spain
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ricardo Robles-Campos
- Department of Surgery and Liver and Pancreas transplantation, Virgen de la Arrixaca Clinic and University Hospital, IMIB, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dixon MEB, Pappas SG. Utilization of Multiorgan Radiomics to Predict Future Liver Remnant Hypertrophy After Portal Vein Embolization: Another Tool for the Toolbox? Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:705-708. [PMID: 38062291 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14659-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew E B Dixon
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Sam G Pappas
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Padmanaban V, Ruff SM, Pawlik TM. Multi-Disciplinary Care of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Review of Guidelines and Recent Advancements. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:30. [PMID: 38201457 PMCID: PMC10778096 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare malignancy of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary ducts. CCA is primarily defined by its anatomic location: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma versus extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) is a subtype of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma that arises from the common hepatic bile duct and can extend to the right and/or left hepatic bile ducts. Upfront surgery with adjuvant capecitabine is the standard of care for patients who present with early disease and the only curative therapy. Unfortunately, most patients present with locally advanced or metastatic disease and must rely on systemic therapy as their primary treatment. However, even with current systemic therapy, survival is still poor. As such, research is focused on developing targeted therapies and multimodal strategies to improve overall prognosis. This review discusses the work-up and management of HC focused on the most up-to-date literature and ongoing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Timothy M. Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (V.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ruff SM, Cloyd JM, Pawlik TM. Annals of Surgical Oncology Practice Guidelines Series: Management of Primary Liver and Biliary Tract Cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:7935-7949. [PMID: 37691030 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14255-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
Primary cancers of the liver and biliary tract are rare and aggressive tumors that often present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. For patients with localized disease amenable to resection, surgery typically offers the best chance at curative-intent therapy. Unfortunately, the incidence of recurrence even after curative-intent surgery remains high. In turn, patients with hepatobiliary cancers commonly require multimodality therapy including a combination of resection, systemic therapy (i.e., targeted therapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, immunotherapy), and/or loco-regional therapies. With advancements in the field, it is crucial for surgical oncologists to remain updated on the latest guidelines and recommendations for surgical management and optimal patient selection. Given the complex and evolving nature of treatment, this report highlights the latest practice guidelines for the surgical management of hepatobiliary cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha M Ruff
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
White MJ, Jensen EH, Brauer DG. A Review of Resection and Surgical Ablation for Primary and Secondary Liver Cancers. Semin Intervent Radiol 2023; 40:536-543. [PMID: 38274223 PMCID: PMC10807965 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
The surgical management of primary and secondary liver tumors is constantly evolving. Patient selection, particularly with regard to determining resectability, is vital to the success of programs directed toward invasive treatments of liver tumors. Particular attention should be paid toward determining whether patients are best served with surgical resection or ablative therapies. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary to provide optimal care to patients with liver malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- McKenzie J. White
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Eric H. Jensen
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - David G. Brauer
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kobayashi K, Ono Y, Kitano Y, Oba A, Sato T, Ito H, Mise Y, Shinozaki E, Inoue Y, Yamaguchi K, Saiura A, Takahashi Y. Prognostic Impact of Tumor Markers (CEA and CA19-9) on Patients with Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases Stratified by Tumor Number and Size: Potentially Valuable Biologic Markers for Preoperative Treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:7338-7347. [PMID: 37365416 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13781-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CLM), a population with good prognosis, have been treated with upfront surgery, some patients have had a poor prognosis. This study aimed to investigate biologic prognostic factors in patients with resectable CLMs. METHODS This single-center retrospective study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent liver resection for initial CLMs at the Cancer Institute Hospital between 2010 and 2020. The study defined CLMs as resectable (tumor size < 5 cm; < 4 tumors; no extrahepatic metastasis) or borderline resectable (BR). Preoperative chemotherapy was administered to patients with BR CLMs. RESULTS During the study period, 309 CLMs were classified as resectable without preoperative chemotherapy and 345 as BR with preoperative chemotherapy. For the 309 patients with resectable CLMs, the independent poor prognostic factors associated with overall survival in the multivariable analysis were high tumor marker levels (CEA ≥ 25 ng/mL and/or CA19-9 ≥ 50 U/mL; (hazard ratio [HR], 2.45; p = 0.0007), no adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 1.69; p = 0.043), and age of 75 years or older (HR, 2.09; p = 0.012). The 5-year survival rates for the patients with high tumor marker (TM) levels (CEA ≥25 ng/mL and/or CA19-9 ≥50 U/mL) were significantly worse than for those with low TM levels (CEA < 25 ng/mL and CA19-9 < 50 U/mL) (55.3% vs. 81.1%; p <0.0001) and similar to the rate for those with BR CLMs (52.1%; p = 0.864). Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy had an impact on prognosis only in the high-TM group (HR, 2.65; p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS High TM levels have a prognostic impact on patients with resectable CLMs stratified by tumor number and size. Perioperative chemotherapy improves long-term outcomes for patients with CLM and high TM levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kosuke Kobayashi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Ono
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Yuki Kitano
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Oba
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Sato
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Ito
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Mise
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eiji Shinozaki
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Inoue
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kensei Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akio Saiura
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yu Takahashi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Maki H, Kim BJ, Kawaguchi Y, Fernandez-Placencia R, Haddad A, Panettieri E, Newhook TE, Baumann DP, Santos D, Tran Cao HS, Chun YS, Tzeng CWD, Vauthey JN, Vreeland TJ. Incidence of and Risk Factors for Incisional Hernia After Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:2388-2395. [PMID: 37537494 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05777-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incisional hernia (IH) is common after major abdominal surgery; however, the incidence after hepatectomy for cancer has not been described. We analyzed incidence of and risk factors for IH after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). METHODS Patients who underwent open hepatectomy with midline or reverse-L incision for CLM at a single institution between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative CT scans were reviewed to identify IH and the time from hepatectomy to hernia. Cumulative IH incidence was calculated using competing risk analysis. Risk factors were assessed using Cox proportional hazards model analysis. The relationship between IH incidence and preoperative body mass index (BMI) was estimated using a generalized additive model. RESULTS Among 470 patients (median follow-up: 16.9 months), IH rates at 12, 24, and 60 months were 41.5%, 51.0%, and 59.2%, respectively. Factors independently associated with IH were surgical site infection (HR: 1.54, 95% CI 1.16-2.06, P = 0.003) and BMI > 25 kg/m2 (HR: 1.94, 95% CI 1.45-2.61, P < 0.001). IH incidence was similar in patients undergoing midline and reverse-L incisions and patients who received and did not receive a bevacizumab-containing regimen. The 1-year IH rate increased with increasing number of risk factors (zero: 22.2%; one: 46.8%; two: 60.3%; P < 0.001). Estimated IH incidence was 10% for BMI of 15 kg/m2 and 80% for BMI of 40 kg/m2. CONCLUSION IH is common after open hepatectomy for CLM, particularly in obese patients and patients with surgical site infection. Surgeons should consider risk-mitigation strategies, including alternative fascial closure techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harufumi Maki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Bradford J Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Yoshikuni Kawaguchi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ramiro Fernandez-Placencia
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Antony Haddad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Donald P Baumann
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Santos
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Yun Shin Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Timothy J Vreeland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Horisberger K, Rössler F, Oberkofler CE, Raptis D, Petrowsky H, Clavien PA. The value of intraoperative dynamic liver function test ICG in predicting postoperative complications in patients undergoing staged hepatectomy: a pilot study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:264. [PMID: 37403000 PMCID: PMC10319685 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02983-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the predictive value of intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) test in patients undergoing staged hepatectomy. METHODS We analyzed intraoperative ICG measurements of future liver remnant (FLR), preoperative ICG, volumetry, and hepatobiliary scintigraphy in 15 patients undergoing associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS). Main endpoints were the correlation of intraoperative ICG values to postoperative complications (Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®)) at discharge and 90 days after surgery, and to postoperative liver function. RESULTS Median intraoperative R15 (ICG retention rate at 15 min) correlated significantly with CCI® at discharge (p = 0.05) and with CCI® at 90 days (p = 0.0036). Preoperative ICG, volumetry, and scintigraphy did not correlate to postoperative outcome. ROC curve analysis revealed a cutoff value of 11.4 for the intraoperative R15 to predict major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) with 100% sensitivity and 63% specificity. No patient with R15 ≤ 11 developed major complications. CONCLUSION This pilot study suggests that intraoperative ICG clearance determines the functional capacity of the future liver remnant more accurately than preoperative tests. This may further reduce the number of postoperative liver failures, even if it means intraoperative abortion of hepatectomy in individual cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karoline Horisberger
- Swiss HPB Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Fabian Rössler
- Swiss HPB Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian E Oberkofler
- Swiss HPB Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- vivèvis AG - Visceral, Tumor and Robotic Surgery Clinic Hirslanden Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dimitri Raptis
- Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Henrik Petrowsky
- Swiss HPB Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Swiss HPB Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Maki H, Jain AJ, Haddad A, Lendoire M, Chun YS, Vauthey J. Locoregional treatment for colorectal liver metastases aiming for precision medicine. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2023; 7:543-552. [PMID: 37416742 PMCID: PMC10319606 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
In patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM), surgery is potentially curative. The use of novel surgical techniques and complementary percutaneous ablation allows for curative-intent treatment even in marginally resectable cases. Resection is used as part of a multidisciplinary approach, which for nearly all patients will include perioperative chemotherapy. Small CLM can be treated with parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy (PSH) and/or ablation. For small CLM, PSH results in better survival and higher rates of resectability of recurrent CLM than non-PSH. For patients with extensive bilateral distribution of CLM, two-stage hepatectomy or fast-track two-stage hepatectomy is effective. Our increasing knowledge of genetic alterations allows us to use them as prognostic factors alongside traditional risk factors (e.g. tumor diameter and tumor number) to select patients with CLM for resection and guide surveillance after resection. Alteration in RAS family genes (hereafter referred to as "RAS alteration") is an important negative prognostic factor, as are alterations in the TP53, SMAD4, FBXW7, and BRAF genes. However, APC alteration appears to improve prognosis. RAS alteration, increased number and diameter of CLM, and primary lymph node metastasis are well-known risk factors for recurrence after CLM resection. In patients free of recurrence 2 y after CLM resection, only RAS alteration is associated with recurrence. Thus, surveillance intensity can be stratified by RAS alteration status after 2 y. Novel diagnostic instruments and tools, such as circulating tumor DNA, may lead to further evolution of patient selection, prognostication, and treatment algorithms for CLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harufumi Maki
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Anish J. Jain
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Antony Haddad
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Mateo Lendoire
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Yun Shin Chun
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Jean‐Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Du S, Wang Z, Lin D. A bibliometric and visualized analysis of preoperative future liver remnant augmentation techniques from 1997 to 2022. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1185885. [PMID: 37333827 PMCID: PMC10272555 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1185885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The size and function of the future liver remnant (FLR) is an essential consideration for both eligibility for treatment and postoperative prognosis when planning surgical hepatectomy. Over time, a variety of preoperative FLR augmentation techniques have been investigated, from the earliest portal vein embolization (PVE) to the more recent Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and liver venous deprivation (LVD) procedures. Despite numerous publications on this topic, no bibliometric analysis has yet been conducted. Methods Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database was searched to identify studies related to preoperative FLR augmentation techniques published from 1997 to 2022. The analysis was performed using the CiteSpace [version 6.1.R6 (64-bit)] and VOSviewer [version 1.6.19]. Results A total of 973 academic studies were published by 4431 authors from 920 institutions in 51 countries/regions. The University of Zurich was the most published institution while Japan was the most productive country. Eduardo de Santibanes had the most published articles, and Masato Nagino was the most frequently co-cited author. The most frequently published journal was HPB, and the most cited journal was Ann Surg, with 8088 citations. The main aspects of preoperative FLR augmentation technique is to enhance surgical technology, expand clinical indications, prevent and treat postoperative complications, ensure long-term survival, and evaluate the growth rate of FLR. Recently, hot keywords in this field include ALPPS, LVD, and Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy. Conclusion This bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overview of preoperative FLR augmentation techniques, offering valuable insights and ideas for scholars in this field.
Collapse
|
17
|
Vulasala SSR, Sutphin PD, Kethu S, Onteddu NK, Kalva SP. Interventional radiological therapies in colorectal hepatic metastases. Front Oncol 2023; 13:963966. [PMID: 37324012 PMCID: PMC10266282 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.963966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal malignancy is the third most common cancer and one of the prevalent causes of death globally. Around 20-25% of patients present with metastases at the time of diagnosis, and 50-60% of patients develop metastases in due course of the disease. Liver, followed by lung and lymph nodes, are the most common sites of colorectal cancer metastases. In such patients, the 5-year survival rate is approximately 19.2%. Although surgical resection is the primary mode of managing colorectal cancer metastases, only 10-25% of patients are competent for curative therapy. Hepatic insufficiency may be the aftermath of extensive surgical hepatectomy. Hence formal assessment of future liver remnant volume (FLR) is imperative prior to surgery to prevent hepatic failure. The evolution of minimally invasive interventional radiological techniques has enhanced the treatment algorithm of patients with colorectal cancer metastases. Studies have demonstrated that these techniques may address the limitations of curative resection, such as insufficient FLR, bi-lobar disease, and patients at higher risk for surgery. This review focuses on curative and palliative role through procedures including portal vein embolization, radioembolization, and ablation. Alongside, we deliberate various studies on conventional chemoembolization and chemoembolization with irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads. The radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres has evolved as salvage therapy in surgically unresectable and chemo-resistant metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sai Swarupa R. Vulasala
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Patrick D. Sutphin
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Samira Kethu
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, United States
| | - Nirmal K. Onteddu
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Flowers Hospital, Dothan, AL, United States
| | - Sanjeeva P. Kalva
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ettrich TJ, Schuhbaur JS, Seufferlein T. [Metastatic colorectal cancer-Modern treatment strategies and sequences]. INNERE MEDIZIN (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2023:10.1007/s00108-023-01516-y. [PMID: 37222756 DOI: 10.1007/s00108-023-01516-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
The treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been considerably expanded and relevantly improved in recent years with new strategies, such as resection of liver and/or lung metastases, induction and maintenance treatment, the establishment of targeted therapies and molecularly defined strategies in defined subgroups. This article presents evidence-based treatment options and algorithms, with a focus on systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T J Ettrich
- Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland
| | - J S Schuhbaur
- Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland
| | - T Seufferlein
- Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Calderon Novoa F, Ardiles V, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Goransky J, Mazza O, Sánchez Claria R, de Santibañes M. Pushing the Limits of Surgical Resection in Colorectal Liver Metastasis: How Far Can We Go? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072113. [PMID: 37046774 PMCID: PMC10093442 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, and up to 50% of all patients diagnosed will develop metastatic disease. Management of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has been constantly improving, aided by newer and more effective chemotherapy agents and the use of multidisciplinary teams. However, the only curative treatment remains surgical resection of the CRLM. Although survival for surgically resected patients has shown modest improvement, this is mostly because of the fact that what is constantly evolving is the indication for resection. Surgeons are constantly pushing the limits of what is considered resectable or not, thus enhancing and enlarging the pool of patients who can be potentially benefited and even cured with aggressive surgical procedures. There are a variety of procedures that have been developed, which range from procedures to stimulate hepatic growth, such as portal vein embolization, two-staged hepatectomy, or the association of both, to technically challenging procedures such as simultaneous approaches for synchronous metastasis, ex-vivo or in-situ perfusion with total vascular exclusion, or even liver transplant. This article reviewed the major breakthroughs in liver surgery for CRLM, showing how much has changed and what has been achieved in the field of CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Calderon Novoa
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Victoria Ardiles
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Eduardo de Santibañes
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Juan Pekolj
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Jeremias Goransky
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Oscar Mazza
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Rodrigo Sánchez Claria
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Martín de Santibañes
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ayabe RI, Vauthey JN, Newhook TE. Optimizing the future liver remnant: Portal vein embolization, hepatic venous deprivation, and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. Surgery 2023:S0039-6060(23)00120-4. [PMID: 37024339 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.02.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Preservation of an adequate future liver remnant is paramount when planning any major liver resection and is of particular concern in the setting of bilateral colorectal liver metastases. Procedures including portal vein embolization and hepatic venous deprivation for one- or two-stage hepatectomy, and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy have been developed to enable curative-intent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases in patients with an initially insufficient future liver remnant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reed I Ayabe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, TX
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, TX
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Strategy for hepatoblastoma with major vascular involvement: A guide for surgical decision-making. Surgery 2023; 173:457-463. [PMID: 36473744 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical management of tumor thrombus extending to the major vascular system for children with hepatoblastoma is challenging and insufficiently discussed. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of hepatoblastoma with tumor thrombus extending to the major vascular system (inferior vena cava, 3 hepatic veins, and portal vein trunk) treated at our center between May 2010 and June 2021. We describe our preoperative assessment, surgical strategies, and outcomes. RESULTS We identified 9 patients (median age at the diagnosis: 3.4 years). All patients received chemotherapy before liver surgery. At the time of the diagnosis, tumor thrombus extended to the portal vein trunk (n = 6), inferior vena cava (n = 3), and 3 hepatic veins (n = 2). Among the 9 patients, 4 underwent liver resection. Liver transplantation was performed in 5 patients. The inferior vena cava wall was circumferentially resected for tumor removal in 1 patient and partially resected in 2 patients. One patient underwent liver transplantation using veno-venous bypass. Patients with tumor thrombus extending to the portal vein trunk were more likely to be managed by liver transplantation in comparison to those with tumor thrombus spreading to the inferior vena cava. The median follow-up period was 5.5 years. One patient underwent transhepatic balloon dilatation for biliary stricture after liver resection. Tumor recurrence was seen in 3 patients (33.3%; lung, n = 2; lymph node and liver, n = 1). No patients died during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION Surgical intervention for pediatric hepatoblastoma with tumor thrombus extending into the major vascular system is safe, feasible, and achieves excellent outcomes.
Collapse
|
22
|
Heil J, Schiesser M, Schadde E. Current trends in regenerative liver surgery: Novel clinical strategies and experimental approaches. Front Surg 2022; 9:903825. [PMID: 36157407 PMCID: PMC9491020 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.903825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver resections are performed to cure patients with hepatobiliary malignancies and metastases to the liver. However, only a small proportion of patients is resectable, largely because only up to 70% of liver tissue is expendable in a resection. If larger resections are performed, there is a risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure. Regenerative liver surgery addresses this limitation by increasing the future liver remnant to an appropriate size before resection. Since the 1980s, this surgery has evolved from portal vein embolization (PVE) to a multiplicity of methods. This review presents an overview of the available methods and their advantages and disadvantages. The first use of PVE was in patients with large hepatocellular carcinomas. The increase in liver volume induced by PVE equals that of portal vein ligation, but both result only in a moderate volume increase. While awaiting sufficient liver growth, 20%–40% of patients fail to achieve resection, mostly due to the progression of disease. The MD Anderson Cancer Centre group improved the PVE methodology by adding segment 4 embolization (“high-quality PVE”) and demonstrated that oncological results were better than non-surgical approaches in this previously unresectable patient population. In 2012, a novel method of liver regeneration was proposed and called Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS). ALPPS accelerated liver regeneration by a factor of 2–3 and increased the resection rate to 95%–100%. However, ALPPS fell short of expectations due to a high mortality rate and a limited utility only in highly selected patients. Accelerated liver regeneration, however, was there to stay. This is evident in the multiplicity of ALPPS modifications like radiofrequency or partial ALPPS. Overall, rapid liver regeneration allowed an expansion of resectability with increased perioperative risk. But, a standardized low-risk approach to rapid hypertrophy has been missing and the techniques used and in use depend on local expertise and preference. Recently, however, simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization (PVE/HVE) appears to offer both rapid hypertrophy and no increased clinical risk. While prospective randomized comparisons are underway, PVE/HVE has the potential to become the future gold standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Heil
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Marc Schiesser
- Chirurgisches Zentrum Zürich (CZZ), Klinik Hirslanden Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Chirurgie Zentrum Zentralschweiz (CZZ), Hirslanden St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Erik Schadde
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Chirurgisches Zentrum Zürich (CZZ), Klinik Hirslanden Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Chirurgie Zentrum Zentralschweiz (CZZ), Hirslanden St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
- Correspondence: Erik Schadde
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chávez-Villa M, Ruffolo LI, Tomiyama K, Hernandez-Alejandro R. Where Are We Now With Liver Transplant for Colorectal Metastasis? CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-022-00373-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
24
|
Long-Term Outcomes of Mesohepatectomy for Centrally Located Liver Tumors: Two-Decade Single-Center Experience. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 235:257-266. [PMID: 35839400 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mesohepatectomy is a viable treatment option for patients diagnosed with centrally located liver tumors (CLLTs). There are several reports from Eastern centers, but few data are available on this topic from Western centers. STUDY DESIGN Data of 128 consecutive patients who underwent mesohepatectomy between September 2000 and September 2020 in our center were analyzed from a prospectively collected database. Patient demographic data, liver tumor characteristics, and intraoperative data were collected. In addition, posthepatectomy bile leakage (PHBL), posthepatectomy hemorrhage (PHH), posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), and 90-day mortality after mesohepatectomy were assessed. Long-term outcomes were also reported, and factors that may influence disease-free survival were evaluated. RESULTS Of 128 patients, 113 patients (88.3%) had malignant hepatic tumors (primary and metastatic tumors in 41 [32%] and 72 [56.3%] patients, respectively), and 15 patients suffered from benign lesions (11.7%). Among the relevant surgical complications (grade B or C), PHBL was the most common complication after mesohepatectomy and occurred in 11.7% of patients, followed by PHLF in 3.1% of patients and PHH in 2.3% of patients. Only four patients (3.1%) died within 90 days after mesohepatectomy. The 5-year overall survival and overall recurrence (for malignant lesion) rates were 76.5% and 45.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION Mesohepatectomy is a safe and feasible surgical treatment with low morbidity and mortality for patients with CLLT. Long-term outcomes can be improved by increased surgical expertise.
Collapse
|
25
|
Wong WG, Perez Holguin RA, Tarren AY, Shen C, Vining C, Peng JS, Dixon ME. Albumin-bilirubin score is superior to platelet-albumin-bilirubin score and model for end-state liver disease sodium for predicting posthepatectomy liver failure. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:667-679. [PMID: 35726364 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk stratification for patients undergoing hepatectomy can be attempted using established models. This study compares the platelet-albumin-bilirubin (PALBI) score with albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) and model for end-stage liver disease sodium (MELD-Na) for predicting posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and 30-day mortality. METHODS The 2014-2018 NSQIP database was queried for patients who underwent elective hepatectomy. Multivariable logistic regressions assessed associations of posthepatectomy outcomes with patient and clinical characteristics. Predictive accuracy of the grading systems was evaluated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and calculating area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS Severe PHLF (Grade B/C) and mortality were present in 2.58% (N = 369) and 1.2% (N = 171) of patients who underwent hepatectomy (N = 13 925), respectively. ALBI Grade 2/3 had a stronger association with severe PHLF (odds ratio [OR] = 1.62, p < 0.01) and mortality (OR = 2.06, p < 0.005) than PALBI Grade 2/3 (OR = 1.14, p = 0.43 for PHLF and OR = 2.01, p < 0.005 for mortality) or MELD-Na ≥10 (OR = 1.29, p = 0.25 for PHLF and OR = 1.84, p < 0.03). ALBI had a higher AUC (0.671) than PALBI (0.625) and MELD-Na (0.627) for predicting severe PHLF. ALBI had a higher AUC (0.695) than PALBI (0.642) for predicting 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS ALBI was a more accurate predictor of severe PHLF and 30-day mortality than MELD-Na and PALBI for patients who underwent hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William G Wong
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rolfy A Perez Holguin
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anna Y Tarren
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Chan Shen
- Division of Outcomes Research and Quality, Department of Surgery, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.,Division of Health Services and Behavioral Research, Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Charles Vining
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - June S Peng
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Matthew E Dixon
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Newhook TE, Vauthey JN. Colorectal liver metastases: state-of-the-art management and surgical approaches. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:1765-1778. [DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02496-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
27
|
Two hundred and fifty-one right hepatectomies for living donation: Association between preoperative risk factors, hepatic dysfunction, and complications. Surgery 2022; 172:397-403. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
28
|
Heil J, Heid F, Bechstein WO, Björnsson B, Brismar TB, Carling U, Erdmann J, Fretland ÅA, Grunhagen D, Hana RA, Hohmann J, Linke R, Meyer Y, Nawawi A, Olthof PB, Sandström P, Schnitzbauer AA, Sparrelid E, Verhoef C, Metrakos P, Schadde E. Sarcopenia predicts reduced liver growth and reduced resectability in patients undergoing portal vein embolization before liver resection - A DRAGON collaborative analysis of 306 patients. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:413-421. [PMID: 34526229 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.08.818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND After portal vein embolization (PVE) 30% fail to achieve liver resection. Malnutrition is a modifiable risk factor and can be assessed by radiological indices. This study investigates, if sarcopenia affects resectability and kinetic growth rate (KGR) after PVE. METHODS A retrospective study was performed of the outcome of PVE at 8 centres of the DRAGON collaborative from 2010 to 2019. All malignant tumour types were included. Sarcopenia was defined using gender, body mass and skeletal muscle index. First imaging after PVE was used for liver volumetry. Primary and secondary endpoints were resectability and KGR. Risk factors impacting liver growth were assessed in a multivariable analysis. RESULTS Eight centres identified 368 patients undergoing PVE. 62 patients (17%) had to be excluded due to unavailability of data. Among the 306 included patients, 112 (37%) were non-sarcopenic and 194 (63%) were sarcopenic. Sarcopenic patients had a 21% lower resectability rate (87% vs. 66%, p < 0.001) and a 23% reduced KGR (p = 0.02) after PVE. In a multivariable model dichotomized for KGR ≥2.3% standardized FLR (sFLR)/week, only sarcopenia and sFLR before embolization correlated with KGR. CONCLUSION In this largest study of risk factors, sarcopenia was associated with reduced resectability and KGR in patients undergoing PVE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Heil
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Main, Germany
| | - Franziska Heid
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Wolf O Bechstein
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Main, Germany
| | - Bergthor Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Torkel B Brismar
- Department of Clinical Science and Technology (CLINTEC), Radiology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ulrik Carling
- Department of Radiology Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Joris Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Åsmund A Fretland
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dirk Grunhagen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Renato A Hana
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Joachim Hohmann
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland; Medical Faculty, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Richard Linke
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Main, Germany
| | - Yannick Meyer
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Abrar Nawawi
- Department of Surgery, McGill Health Center Research Institute, Cancer Program, Montreal, Canada
| | - Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Per Sandström
- Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Andreas A Schnitzbauer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Main, Germany
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter Metrakos
- Department of Surgery, McGill Health Center Research Institute, Cancer Program, Montreal, Canada
| | - Erik Schadde
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hewitt DB, Brown ZJ, Pawlik TM. Surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2021; 22:27-38. [PMID: 34730474 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2022.1999809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) incidence continues to rise worldwide, and overall survival remains poor. Complete surgical resection remains the only opportunity for cure in patients with ICC yet only one-third of patients present with resectable disease. AREAS COVERED While the low incidence rate of ICC hinders accrual of patients to large, randomized control trials, larger database and long-term institutional studies provide evidence to guide surgical management of ICC. These studies demonstrate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of aggressive surgical management in appropriately selected patients with ICC. Recent advances in the management of ICC, with a focus on surgical considerations, are reviewed. EXPERT OPINION Historically, little progress has been made in the management of ICC with stagnant mortality rates and poor long-term outcomes. However, regionalization of care to centers with experienced multidisciplinary teams, advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques, discovery and development of targeted and immunotherapy agents, and combination locoregional and systemic therapies offer signs of progress in the management of ICC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Brock Hewitt
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Zachary J Brown
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Serifis N, Tsilimigras DI, Cloonan DJ, Pawlik TM. Challenges and Opportunities for Treating Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Hepat Med 2021; 13:93-104. [PMID: 34754247 PMCID: PMC8572023 DOI: 10.2147/hmer.s278136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is one of the rarest and most aggressive types of cancer. The symptoms of ICC patients can be vague, leading to late diagnosis and dismal prognosis. In this review, we investigated the treatment options for ICC, as well as ways to overcome challenges in identifying and treating this disease. Imaging remains the gold standard to diagnose ICC. Patients are staged based on the tumor, nodes and metastases (TNM) staging system. Patients eligible for surgical resection should undergo surgery with curative intent with the goal of microscopically disease-free margins (R0 resection) along with lymphadenectomy. Minimal invasive surgery (MIS) and liver transplantation have recently been offered as possible ways to improve disease outcomes. ICC recurrence is relatively common and, thus, most patients will need to be treated with systemic therapy. Several clinical trials have recently investigated the use of neoadjuvant (NT) and adjuvant therapies for ICC. NT may offer an opportunity to downsize larger tumors and provide patients, initially ineligible for surgery, with an opportunity for resection. NT may also treat occult micro-metastatic disease, as well as define tumor biology prior to surgical resection, thereby decreasing the risk for early postoperative recurrence. Adjuvant systemic therapy may improve outcomes of patients with ICC following surgery. Ongoing clinical trials are investigating new targeted therapies that hold the hope of improving long-term outcomes of patients with ICC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Serifis
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Daniel J Cloonan
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Entezari P, Gabr A, Kennedy K, Salem R, Lewandowski RJ. Radiation Lobectomy: An Overview of Concept and Applications, Technical Considerations, Outcomes. Semin Intervent Radiol 2021; 38:419-424. [PMID: 34629708 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Surgical resection has long been considered curative for patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, inadequate future liver remnant (FLR) renders many patients not amenable to surgery. Recently, lobar administration of yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization has been utilized to induce FLR hypertrophy while providing disease control, eventually facilitating resection in patients with hepatic malignancy. This has been termed "radiation lobectomy (RL)." The concept is evolving, with modified approaches combining RL and high-dose curative-intent radioembolization (radiation segmentectomy) to achieve tumor ablation. This article provides an overview of the concept and applications of RL, including technical considerations and outcomes in patients with hepatic malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pouya Entezari
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ahmed Gabr
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kristie Kennedy
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Riad Salem
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.,Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Robert J Lewandowski
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.,Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bolhuis K, Grosheide L, Wesdorp NJ, Komurcu A, Chapelle T, Dejong CHC, Gerhards MF, Grünhagen DJ, van Gulik TM, Huiskens J, De Jong KP, Kazemier G, Klaase JM, Liem MSL, Molenaar IQ, Patijn GA, Rijken AM, Ruers TM, Verhoef C, de Wilt JHW, Punt CJA, Swijnenburg RJ. Short-Term Outcomes of Secondary Liver Surgery for Initially Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases Following Modern Induction Systemic Therapy in the Dutch CAIRO5 Trial. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2021; 2:e081. [PMID: 37635815 PMCID: PMC10455233 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To present short-term outcomes of liver surgery in patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) downsized by chemotherapy plus targeted agents. Background The increase of complex hepatic resections of CRLM, technical innovations pushing boundaries of respectability, and use of intensified induction systemic regimens warrant for safety data in a homogeneous multicenter prospective cohort. Methods Patients with initially unresectable CRLM, who underwent complete resection after induction systemic regimens with doublet or triplet chemotherapy, both plus targeted therapy, were selected from the ongoing phase III CAIRO5 study (NCT02162563). Short-term outcomes and risk factors for severe postoperative morbidity (Clavien Dindo grade ≥ 3) were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 173 patients underwent resection of CRLM after induction systemic therapy. The median number of metastases was 9 and 161 (93%) patients had bilobar disease. Thirty-six (20.8%) 2-stage resections and 88 (51%) major resections (>3 liver segments) were performed. Severe postoperative morbidity and 90-day mortality was 15.6% and 2.9%, respectively. After multivariable analysis, blood transfusion (odds ratio [OR] 2.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-6.4], P = 0.03), major resection (OR 2.9 [95% CI 1.1-7.5], P = 0.03), and triplet chemotherapy (OR 2.6 [95% CI 1.1-7.5], P = 0.03) were independently correlated with severe postoperative complications. No association was found between number of cycles of systemic therapy and severe complications (r = -0.038, P = 0.31). Conclusion In patients with initially unresectable CRLM undergoing modern induction systemic therapy and extensive liver surgery, severe postoperative morbidity and 90-day mortality were 15.6% and 2.7%, respectively. Triplet chemotherapy, blood transfusion, and major resections were associated with severe postoperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Bolhuis
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lodi Grosheide
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nina J. Wesdorp
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aysun Komurcu
- The Netherlands Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Thiery Chapelle
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Transplantation, and Endocrine Surgery, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Cornelis H. C. Dejong
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Maastricht, The Netherlands and Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Dirk J. Grünhagen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas M. van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Koert P. De Jong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M. Klaase
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen
| | - Mike S. L. Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - I. Quintus Molenaar
- Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | - Arjen M. Rijken
- Amphia hospital, Department of Surgery, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Theo M. Ruers
- Amphia hospital, Department of Surgery, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cornelis J. A. Punt
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Department of Epidemiology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Beane JD, Hyer M, Mehta R, Onuma AE, Gleeson EM, Thompson VM, Pawlik TM, Pitt HA. Optimal hepatic surgery: Are we making progress in North America? Surgery 2021; 170:1741-1748. [PMID: 34325906 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.06.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this analysis was to determine whether optimal outcomes have increased in recent years. Hepatic surgery is high risk, but regionalization and minimally invasive approaches have evolved. Best practices also have been defined with the goal of improving outcomes. METHODS The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried. Analyses were performed separately for partial (≤2 segments), major (≥3 segments), and all hepatectomies. Optimal hepatic surgery was defined as the absence of mortality, serious morbidity, need for a postoperative invasive procedure or reoperation, prolonged length of stay (<75th percentile) or readmission. Tests of trend, χ2, and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS From 2014 to 2018, 17,082 hepatectomies, including 11,862 partial hepatectomies and 5,220 major hepatectomies, were analyzed. Minimally invasive approaches increased from 25.6% in 2014 to 29.6% in 2018 (P < .01) and were performed more frequently for partial hepatectomies (34.2%) than major hepatectomies (14.4%) (P < .01). Operative time decreased from 220 minutes in 2014 to 208 minutes in 2018 (P < .05) and was lower in partial hepatectomies (189 vs 258 minutes for major hepatectomies) (P < .01). Mortality (0.7%) and length of stay (4 days) were lower for partial hepatectomies compared with major hepatectomies (1.9%; 6 days), and length of stay decreased for both partial hepatectomies (5 days in 2014 to 4 days in 2018) and major hepatectomies (6 days in 2014 to 6 days in 2018) (all P < .01). Postoperative sepsis (2.9% in 2014 and 2.4% in 2018), bile leaks (6% in 2014 and 4.8% in 2018), and liver failure (3.7% in 2014 and 3.3% in 2018) decreased for all patients (<.05). On multivariable analyses, overall morbidity decreased for major hepatectomies (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99) and all hepatectomies (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99, both P < .01), and optimal hepatic surgery increased over time for partial hepatectomies (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.09) and all hepatectomies (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.07, both P < .01). CONCLUSION Over a 5-year period in North America, minimally invasive hepatectomies have increased, while operative time, postoperative sepsis, bile leaks, liver failure, and prolonged length of stay have decreased. Optimal hepatic surgery has increased for partial and all hepatectomies and is achieved more often in partial than in major resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joal D Beane
- Department of Surgery, The James Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
| | - Madison Hyer
- Department of Surgery, The James Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Rittal Mehta
- Department of Surgery, The James Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Amblessed E Onuma
- Department of Surgery, The James Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Elizabeth M Gleeson
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The James Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Henry A Pitt
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Andreou A, Gloor S, Inglin J, Di Pietro Martinelli C, Banz V, Lachenmayer A, Kim-Fuchs C, Candinas D, Beldi G. Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases reduces postoperative morbidity while maintaining equivalent oncologic outcomes compared to non-parenchymal-sparing resection. Surg Oncol 2021; 38:101631. [PMID: 34298267 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Modern chemotherapy and repeat hepatectomy allow to tailor the surgical strategies for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study addresses the hypothesis that parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy reduces postoperative complications while ensuring similar oncologic outcomes compared to the standardized non-parenchymal-sparing procedures. METHODS Clinicopathological data of patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM between 2012 and 2019 at a hepatobiliary center in Switzerland were assessed. Patients were stratified according to the tumor burden score [TBS2 = (maximum tumor diameter in cm)2 + (number of lesions)2)] and were dichotomized in a lower and a higher tumor burden cohort according to the median TBS. Postoperative outcomes, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients following parenchymal-sparing resection (PSR) for CRLM were compared with those of patients undergoing non-PSR. RESULTS During the study period, 153 patients underwent liver resection for CRLM with curative intent. PSR was performed in 79 patients with TBS <4.5, and in 42 patients with TBS ≥4.5. Perioperative chemotherapy was administered in equal rates in both groups (PSR vs. non-PSR) both in TBS ≥4.5 and TBS <4.5. In patients with lower tumor burden (TBS <4.5), PSR was associated with lower overall complication rate (15.2% vs. 46.2%, p = 0.009), a trend for lower major complication rate (8.9% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.123), and shorter length of hospital stay (5 vs. 9 days, p = 0.006) in comparison to non-PSR. For TBS <4.5, PSR resulted in equivalent 5-year OS (48% vs. 39%, p = 0.479) and equivalent 5-year RFS rates (44% vs. 29%, p = 0.184) compared to non-PSR. For TBS ≥4.5, PSR resulted in lower postoperative complication rate (33.3% vs. 63.2%, p = 0.031), a trend for lower major complication rate (23.8% vs. 42.2%, p = 0.150), lower length of hospital stay (6 vs. 9 days, p = 0.005), equivalent 5-year OS (29% vs. 22%, p = 0.314), and equivalent 5-year RFS rates (29% vs. 18%, p = 0.156) compared to non-PSR. Among all patients treated with PSR, patients undergoing minimal-invasive hepatectomy had equivalent 5-year OS (42% vs. 37%, p = 0.261) and equivalent 5-year RFS (34% vs. 34%, p = 0.613) rates compared to patients undergoing open hepatectomy. CONCLUSIONS PSR for CRLM is associated with lower postoperative morbidity, shorter length of hospital stay, and equivalent oncologic outcomes compared to non-PSR, independently of tumor burden. Our findings suggest that minimal-invasive PSR should be considered as the preferred method for the treatment of curatively resectable CRLM, if allowed by tumor size and location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Andreou
- From the Department of Visceral Surgery und Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Severin Gloor
- From the Department of Visceral Surgery und Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Julia Inglin
- From the Department of Visceral Surgery und Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Claudine Di Pietro Martinelli
- From the Department of Visceral Surgery und Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Vanessa Banz
- From the Department of Visceral Surgery und Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Anja Lachenmayer
- From the Department of Visceral Surgery und Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Corina Kim-Fuchs
- From the Department of Visceral Surgery und Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Candinas
- From the Department of Visceral Surgery und Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Guido Beldi
- From the Department of Visceral Surgery und Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Shindoh J. Risk stratification and goal of systemic therapy for successful surgical management of colorectal liver metastases: Oncological optimization. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2021; 28:461-469. [PMID: 33797853 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2020] [Revised: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
For patients with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC), curative-intent surgery has actively been performed for expecting prolonged survival outcomes. However, because the population with stage IV CRC is considerably heterogeneous, optimal selection of surgical candidate is inevitable to maximize survival outcomes. In the era of effective chemotherapy, there is an increasing need for a strategic use of chemotherapy as a part of multidisciplinary treatment to expand surgical indications and enhance the clinical outcomes. However, since the fate of each patient is difficult to predict at initial presentation, our clinical practice is rather "tailored", considering the anatomy, oncological behavior of tumor, response to chemotherapy, and patient's physical status. Given that surgery is the only treatment option for expecting cure of colorectal liver metastases (CLM), the main purpose of chemotherapy for potentially/marginally resectable disease is to clarify the likelihood of surgical benefit through testing the behavior of the tumor and to select an appropriate candidate for surgery. This process of clinical decision is actually optimization of the initial population for surgery through the optimization of treatment for each patient. In this article, theoretical bases of multidisciplinary management for CLM were revisited and the concept of "oncological optimization" underling our clinical decision was discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junichi Shindoh
- Hepatobiliary-pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.,Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Disease, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Chan A, Zhang WY, Chok K, Dai J, Ji R, Kwan C, Man N, Poon R, Lo CM. ALPPS Versus Portal Vein Embolization for Hepatitis-related Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Changing Paradigm in Modulation of Future Liver Remnant Before Major Hepatectomy. Ann Surg 2021; 273:957-965. [PMID: 31305284 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcome of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) for hepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA ALPPS has been advocated for future liver remnant (FLR) augmentation in liver metastasis or noncirrhotic liver tumors in recent years. Data on the effect of ALPPS in chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis-related HCC remained scarce. METHODS Data for clinicopathological details, portal hemodynamics, and oncological outcome were reviewed for ALPPS and compared with portal vein embolization (PVE). Tumor immunohistochemistry for PD-1, VEGF, and AFP was evaluated in ALPPS and compared with PVE and upfront hepatectomy (UH). RESULTS From 2002 to 2018, 148 patients with HCC (hepatitis B: n = 136, 92.0%) underwent FLR modulation (ALPPS, n = 46; PVE: n = 102). One patient with ALPPS and 33 patients with PVE failed to proceed to resection (resection rate: 97.8% vs 67.7%, P < 0.001). Among those who had resections, 65 patients (56.5%) had cirrhosis. ALPPS induced absolute FLR volume increment by 48.8%, or FLR estimated total liver volume ratio by 12.8% over 6 days. No difference in morbidity (20.7% vs 30.4%, P = 0.159) and mortality (6.5% vs 5.8%, P = 1.000) with PVE was observed. Chronic hepatitis and intraoperative indocyanine green clearance rate ≤39.5% favored adequate FLR hypertrophy in ALPPS. Five-year overall survival for ALPPS and PVE was 46.8% and 64.1% (P = 0.234). Tumor immunohistochemical staining showed no difference in expression of PD-1, V-EGF, and AFP between ALPPS, PVE, and UH. CONCLUSIONS ALPPS conferred a higher resection rate in hepatitis-related HCC with comparable short- and long-term oncological outcome with PVE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Chan
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.,Department of Surgery, HKU-Shenzhen Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Wei Yi Zhang
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kenneth Chok
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.,Department of Surgery, HKU-Shenzhen Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Jeff Dai
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ren Ji
- Department of Surgery, HKU-Shenzhen Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Crystal Kwan
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Nancy Man
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.,Department of Surgery, HKU-Shenzhen Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Ronnie Poon
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Chung Mau Lo
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.,Department of Surgery, HKU-Shenzhen Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Guiu B, Deshayes E, Panaro F, Sanglier F, Cusumano C, Herrerro A, Sgarbura O, Molinari N, Quenet F, Cassinotto C. 99mTc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy and volume metrics before liver preparation: correlations and discrepancies in non-cirrhotic patients. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:795. [PMID: 34268408 PMCID: PMC8246210 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-7372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Accurate identification of insufficient future liver remnant (FLR) is required to select patients for liver preparation and limit the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). The objective of this study was to investigate the correlations and discrepancies between the most-commonly used FLR volume metrics and 99mTc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS). Methods In 101 non-cirrhotic patients who underwent HBS before major hepatectomy, we retrospectively analyzed the correlations and discrepancies between FLR function and FLR volume metrics: actual percentage (FLRV%), standardized to body surface area (FLRV%BSA) and weight (FLRV%weight), and FLR to body weight ratio (FLRV-BWR). Results Among 67 patients with FLR function ≥2.69%/min/m2, PHLF was observed in none and 13 patients according to respectively 50-50 and ISGLS criteria. FLRV%, FLRV%BSA, FLRV%weight and FLRV-BWR significantly correlated with FLR function (P<0.001), with Spearman's correlation coefficients of 0.680, 0.704, 0.698, and 0.711, respectively. No difference was observed between the areas under the curve of FLRV%, FLRV%BSA, FLRV%weight and FLR-BWR (all P=ns). Overall, the percentages of patients misclassified by FLRV%, FLRV%BSA, FLRV%weight (thresholds: 30%) and FLR-BWR (threshold: 0.5) versus FLR function (threshold: 2.69%/min/m2) were 23.8% (95% CI: 15.9-33.3%), 18.8% (95% CI: 11.7-27.8%), 17.8% (95% CI: 11-26.7%), and 31.7% (95% CI: 22.8-41.7%), respectively. FLR volume metrics wrongly classified 1-13.9% of patients with sufficient FLR function (i.e., ≥2.69%/min/m2), and 9.9-30.7% of patients with insufficient FLR function. FLRV-BWR was the most and the least reliable measure to identify patients with sufficient and insufficient FLR function, respectively. Conclusions Despite significant correlations, the discrepancy rates between FLR volume and function metrics speaks in favor of implementing 99mTc-mebrofenin HBS in the work-up before liver preparation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boris Guiu
- Department of Radiology, St-Eloi University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Emmanuel Deshayes
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Fabrizio Panaro
- Department of Surgery, St-Eloi University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Florian Sanglier
- Department of Radiology, Limoges University Hospital, Limogesr, France
| | - Caterina Cusumano
- Department of Surgery, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Astrid Herrerro
- Department of Surgery, St-Eloi University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Olivia Sgarbura
- Department of Surgery, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Nicolas Molinari
- IDESP, INSERM, Montpellier Univesity Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - François Quenet
- Department of Surgery, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Liver surface nodularity: a novel predictor of post-hepatectomy liver failure in patients with colorectal liver metastases following chemotherapy. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:5830-5839. [PMID: 33666699 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07683-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to assess the relationship between liver surface nodularity (LSN), chemotherapy-associated liver injury (CALI), and clinically relevant post-hepatectomy liver failure (CR-PHLF) (i.e., ≥ grade B) in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). METHODS Preoperative CT scans of patients who underwent chemotherapy followed by hepatectomy for CLM between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. LSN was measured using semi-automated CT software CT images in patients who had available preoperative CT scans within 6 weeks before hepatectomy, and was computed based on the means of one to 10 measurements by two abdominal radiologists consensually. The association of LSN, CALI, and CR-PHLF was analyzed. RESULTS Two hundred fifty-six patients were analyzed (149 men and 107 women; overall median age, 61 [range, 29-88 years]). A total of 26 patients (10.2%) developed CR-PHLF. The optimal LSN cut-off value for detecting CR-PHLF was 2.5, as determined by receiver operative characteristic analysis (p < 0.001). LSN ≥ 2.5 was associated with prolonged chemotherapy (> 6 cycles, p = 0.018), but not with CALIs. After propensity score matching, LSN remained significantly associated with CR-PHLF (p = 0.031). Furthermore, multivariate analysis identified LSN ≥ 2.50 and future liver remnant (FLR) < 30% as significant preoperative predictors of CR-PHLF in 102 patients undergoing major hepatectomy. LSN ≥ 2.50 was more frequent in patients undergoing major hepatectomy despite FLR ≥ 30% (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION LSN quantified on CT is an independent surrogate of CR-PHLF in patients who undergo chemotherapy followed by hepatectomy for CLM and may provide a valuable additional tool in the preoperative assessment of these patients. KEY POINTS • LSN was not associated with chemotherapy- associated liver injury but high LSN (defined ≥ 2.5) was associated with prolonged chemotherapy (> 6 cycles). • High LSN was an independent predictor of clinically relevant postoperative liver failure in patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM. • LSN ≥ 2.50 was more frequent in patients with PHLF after major hepatectomy despite a future liver remnant ≥ 30%.
Collapse
|
39
|
Gautier S, Chevallier O, Mastier C, d'Athis P, Falvo N, Pilleul F, Midulla M, Rat P, Facy O, Loffroy R. Portal vein embolization with ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer for contralateral lobe hypertrophy before liver resection: safety, feasibility and initial experience. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2021; 11:797-809. [PMID: 33532278 DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background To report our preliminary experience with preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) using liquid ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH) copolymer. Methods Retrospectively review of patients with primary or secondary liver malignancies scheduled for extensive hepatectomy after the induction of future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy by right or left PVE with EVOH as the only embolic agent between 2014 and 2018 at two academic centers. Cross-sectional imaging liver volumetry data obtained before and 3-6 weeks after PVE were used to assess the FLR volume (FLRV) increase, degree of FLR hypertrophy and the FLR kinetic growth rate (KGR). Results Twenty-six patients (17 males; mean age, 58.7±11 years; range, 32-79 years) were included. The technical and clinical success rate was 100%. PVE produced adequate FLR hypertrophy in all patients. Embolization occurred in all targeted portal branches and in no non-target vessels. The %FLRV increased by 52.9%±32.5% and the degree of FLR hypertrophy was 16.7%±6.8%. The KGR was 4.4%±2.0% per week. Four patients experience minor complications after PVE which resolved with symptomatic treatment. The resection rate was 84.5%. One patient died during surgery for reasons unrelated to PVE. Conclusions Preoperative PVE with EVOH copolymer is feasible, safe, and effective in inducing FLR hypertrophy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sébastien Gautier
- Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Image-Guided Therapy Center, ImViA Laboratory-EA 7535, François-Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Olivier Chevallier
- Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Image-Guided Therapy Center, ImViA Laboratory-EA 7535, François-Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Charles Mastier
- Department of Interventional Radiology and Oncology, Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - Philippe d'Athis
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, François-Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Nicolas Falvo
- Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Image-Guided Therapy Center, ImViA Laboratory-EA 7535, François-Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Frank Pilleul
- Department of Interventional Radiology and Oncology, Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - Marco Midulla
- Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Image-Guided Therapy Center, ImViA Laboratory-EA 7535, François-Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Patrick Rat
- Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, François-Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Olivier Facy
- Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, François-Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Romaric Loffroy
- Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Image-Guided Therapy Center, ImViA Laboratory-EA 7535, François-Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Padmanabhan C, Nussbaum DP, D'Angelica M. Surgical Management of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2021; 30:1-25. [PMID: 33220799 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2020.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Approximately 50% of colorectal cancer patients develop liver metastases. Hepatic metastases represent the most common cause of colorectal cancer-related mortality. Metastasectomy, if possible, represents the most effective treatment strategy; 20% of patients will be cured and more than 50% survive at least 5 years. Nuances to treatment planning hinge on whether patients present with resectable disease upfront, whether the future liver remnant is adequate, and whether the primary tumor, if present, is colon versus rectal in origin. This article discusses considerations impacting our approach to patients with colorectal liver metastases and the role for various multimodal treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chandrasekhar Padmanabhan
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, C-1272, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Daniel P Nussbaum
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, C-1272, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Michael D'Angelica
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, C-898, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
O'Leary C, Soulen MC, Shamimi-Noori S. Interventional Oncology Approach to Hepatic Metastases. Semin Intervent Radiol 2020; 37:484-491. [PMID: 33328704 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Metastatic liver disease is one of the major causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Locoregional therapies offered by interventional oncologists alleviate cancer-related morbidity and in some cases improve survival. Locoregional therapies are often palliative in nature but occasionally can be used with curative intent. This review will discuss important factors to consider prior to palliative and curative intent treatment of metastatic liver disease with locoregional therapy. These factors include those specific to the tumor, liver function, liver reserve, differences between treatment modalities, and patient-specific considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathal O'Leary
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael C Soulen
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Susan Shamimi-Noori
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Krasnodebski M, Kim BJ, Wei SH, Velasco JD, Nishioka Y, Vauthey JN. Chemotherapy in combination with resection for colorectal liver metastases – current evidence. SURGERY IN PRACTICE AND SCIENCE 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2020.100021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
43
|
Modern therapeutic approaches for the treatment of malignant liver tumours. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 17:755-772. [PMID: 32681074 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-020-0314-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Malignant liver tumours include a wide range of primary and secondary tumours. Although surgery remains the mainstay of curative treatment, modern therapies integrate a variety of neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies and have achieved dramatic improvements in survival. Extensive tumour loads, which have traditionally been considered unresectable, are now amenable to curative treatment through systemic conversion chemotherapies followed by a variety of interventions such as augmentation of the healthy liver through portal vein occlusion, staged surgeries or ablation modalities. Liver transplantation is established in selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma but is now emerging as a promising option in many other types of tumour such as perihilar cholangiocarcinomas, neuroendocrine or colorectal liver metastases. In this Review, we summarize the available therapies for the treatment of malignant liver tumours, with an emphasis on surgical and ablative approaches and how they align with other therapies such as modern anticancer drugs or radiotherapy. In addition, we describe three complex case studies of patients with malignant liver tumours. Finally, we discuss the outlook for future treatment, including personalized approaches based on molecular tumour subtyping, response to targeted drugs, novel biomarkers and precision surgery adapted to the specific tumour.
Collapse
|
44
|
Quantification of liver function using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:3532-3544. [PMID: 33034671 PMCID: PMC7593310 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02779-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The introduction of hepatobiliary contrast agents, most notably gadoxetic acid (GA), has expanded the role of MRI, allowing not only a morphologic but also a functional evaluation of the hepatobiliary system. The mechanism of uptake and excretion of gadoxetic acid via transporters, such as organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATP1,3), multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2) and MRP3, has been elucidated in the literature. Furthermore, GA uptake can be estimated on either static images or on dynamic imaging, for example, the hepatic extraction fraction (HEF) and liver perfusion. GA-enhanced MRI has achieved an important role in evaluating morphology and function in chronic liver diseases (CLD), allowing to distinguish between the two subgroups of nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases (NAFLD), simple steatosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and help to stage fibrosis and cirrhosis, predict liver transplant graft survival, and preoperatively evaluate the risk of liver failure if major resection is planned. Finally, because of its noninvasive nature, GA-enhanced MRI can be used for long-term follow-up and post-treatment monitoring. This review article aims to describe the current role of GA-enhanced MRI in quantifying liver function in a variety of hepatobiliary disorders.
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have many treatment options. For patients with surgical indication, consideration of future liver remnant and the surgical complexity of the procedure is essential. A new 3-level complexity classification categorizing 11 liver resection procedures predicts surgical complexity and postoperative morbidity better than reported classifications. Preoperative portal vein embolization can mitigate the risk of hepatic insufficiency. For small HCCs, both liver resection and ablation are effective. New medical treatment options are promising and perioperative use of these drugs may further improve outcomes for patients undergoing liver resection and lead to changes in current treatment guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshikuni Kawaguchi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Heather A Lillemoe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Dixon M, Cruz J, Sarwani N, Gusani N. The Future Liver Remnant : Definition, Evaluation, and Management. Am Surg 2020; 87:276-286. [PMID: 32931301 DOI: 10.1177/0003134820951451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
When considering patients for a major hepatectomy, one must carefully consider the volume of liver to be left behind and if additional procedures are necessary to augment its volume. This review considers the optimal volume of the future liver remnant (FLR) and analyzes the techniques of augmenting this volume, the various growth parameters to assess adequate growth of the FLR, as well as further management when there has been inadequate growth of the FLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Dixon
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Cruz
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.,Department of Radiology, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.,Department of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Nabeel Sarwani
- Department of Radiology, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Niraj Gusani
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.,Department of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.,Department of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization before major liver resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 406:1295-1305. [PMID: 32839889 PMCID: PMC8370912 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01960-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Regenerative liver surgery expands the limitations of technical resectability by increasing the future liver remnant (FLR) volume before extended resections in order to avoid posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Portal vein rerouting with ligation of one branch of the portal vein bifurcation (PVL) or embolization (PVE) leads to a moderate liver volume increase over several weeks with a clinical dropout rate of 20–40%, mostly due to tumor progression during the waiting period. Accelerated liver regeneration by the Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) was poised to overcome this limitation by reduction of the waiting time, but failed due increased perioperative complications. Simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization (PVE/HVE) is a novel minimal invasive way to induce rapid liver growth without the need of two surgeries. Purpose This article summarizes published results of PVE/HVE and analyzes what is known about its efficacy to achieve resection, safety, and the volume changes induced. Conclusions PVE/HVE holds promise to induce accelerated liver regeneration in a similar safety profile to PVE. The demonstrated accelerated hypertrophy may increase resectability. Randomized trials will have to compare PVE/HVE and PVE to determine if PVE/HVE is superior to PVE.
Collapse
|
48
|
Snyder RA, Ewing JA, Parikh AA. Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization Is Not Associated with Increased Postoperative Complications After Major Hepatectomy: a Study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Database. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:1561-1570. [PMID: 31342262 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04313-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is selectively performed to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant prior to major liver resection. The primary aim of this study was to determine the association of PVE with liver-specific and overall postoperative morbidity. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent major hepatectomy from 2014 to 2016 within the ACS-NSQIP hepatectomy-specific module was performed. RESULTS Of the 3912 patients identified, 9.9% (N = 388) underwent PVE. Patients who underwent PVE were older (59.1 vs. 57.7 years). Most patients in the PVE cohort underwent right hepatectomy (51.8%, N = 201) or trisectionectomy (46.1%, N = 179), compared with right (49.3%, N = 1738) and left hepatectomy (29.6%, N = 1042) in the non-PVE cohort (p < 0.001). Median operative time was longer in the PVE group (310 vs. 276 min, p < 0.001). Post-hepatectomy liver failure was more common among patients undergoing PVE (18.6% (N = 72) vs. 9.9% (N = 350), p < 0.001), as was bile leak (17.3% (N = 67) vs. 12.2% (N = 428), p = 0.005). Overall complication rates were higher among patients who underwent PVE (45.9% (N = 178) vs. 34.0% (N = 1199), p < 0.001). However, on multivariable analysis controlling for patient and technical factors, PVE remained associated with an increased risk of liver-specific complications (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01-1.74) but not with overall complications (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.92-1.50). CONCLUSION Within a national cohort, patients treated with PVE are older and undergo a more extensive liver resection. When controlling for patient and technical factors, PVE is neither associated with an increase in overall morbidity nor mortality, suggesting that PVE can be safely used in appropriate patients undergoing major hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Snyder
- Department of Surgery, University of South Carolina School of Medicine-Greenville, Greenville, SC, USA.,Department of Surgery, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, 600 Moye Blvd Surgical Oncology Suite 4S-24, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.,Department of Public Health, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Joseph A Ewing
- Department of Surgery, University of South Carolina School of Medicine-Greenville, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - Alexander A Parikh
- Department of Surgery, University of South Carolina School of Medicine-Greenville, Greenville, SC, USA. .,Department of Surgery, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, 600 Moye Blvd Surgical Oncology Suite 4S-24, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Nitta H, Kitano Y, Miyata T, Nakagawa S, Mima K, Okabe H, Hayashi H, Imai K, Yamashita YI, Chikamoto A, Beppu T, Baba H. Validation of Functional Assessment for Liver Resection Considering Venous Occlusive Area after Extended Hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:1510-1519. [PMID: 31144188 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04234-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies demonstrated that liver function in a veno-occlusive region is approximately 40% of that in a non-veno-occlusive region after hepatectomy with excision of major hepatic vein. We validated the preoperative assessment of future remnant liver (FRL) function based on 40% decreased function of the veno-occlusive region. METHODS Sixty patients who underwent hepatectomy with excision of major hepatic vein were analyzed. The FRL functions of the veno-occlusive and non-veno-occlusive regions were calculated with 99mTc-galactosyl human serum albumin scintigraphy single-proton emission computed tomography fusion system and SYNAPSE VINCENT® preoperatively. Risk assessment for hepatectomy was evaluated based on indocyanine green retention at 15 min, and patients with insufficient FRL function were described as marginal. RESULTS The median volume and function of the veno-occlusive region per whole liver were 111 ml and 11.0%, respectively. When the function of the veno-occlusive region was presumed as 0%, 40%, and 100%, the FRL function was 62.5%, 68.4%, and 75.0% and 21, 15, and 7 patients were classified as marginal, respectively. When the function of the veno-occlusive region was presumed as 40%, the posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) rate of marginal patients was significantly higher than that of safe patients (46.7% vs 8.9%, P = 0.002). Multivariable analysis indicated that marginal FRL function based on 40% decreased function of the veno-occlusive region was the only independent risk factor for PHLF (odds ratio 8.97, P = 0.002) after extended hepatectomy. CONCLUSION Assessment of preoperative FRL function based on 40% decreased function of the veno-occlusive region may have high validity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidetoshi Nitta
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
| | - Yuki Kitano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Tatsunori Miyata
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Shigeki Nakagawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Kosuke Mima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Hirohisa Okabe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Hayashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Katsunori Imai
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Yo-Ichi Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Akira Chikamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Toru Beppu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Yamaga City Medical Center, Yamaga, Japan
| | - Hideo Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Comprehensive Complication Index Validates Improved Outcomes Over Time Despite Increased Complexity in 3707 Consecutive Hepatectomies. Ann Surg 2020; 271:724-731. [PMID: 30339628 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate trends over time in perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing hepatectomy. BACKGROUND As perioperative care and surgical technique for hepatectomy have improved, the indications for and complexity of liver resections have evolved. However, the resulting effect on the short-term outcomes over time has not been well described. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing hepatectomy during 1998 to 2015 at 1 institution were analyzed. Perioperative outcomes, including the comprehensive complication index (CCI), were compared between patients who underwent hepatectomy in the eras 1998 to 2003, 2004 to 2009, and 2010 to 2015. RESULTS The study included 3707 hepatic resections. The number of hepatectomies increased in each era (794 in 1998 to 2003, 1402 in 2004 to 2009, and 1511 in 2010 to 2015). Technical complexity increased over time as evidenced by increases in the rates of major hepatectomy (20%, 23%, 30%, P < 0.0001), 2-stage hepatectomy (0%, 3%, 4%, P < 0.001), need for portal vein embolization (5%, 9%, 9%, P = 0.001), preoperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases (70%, 82%, 89%, P < 0.001) and median operative time (180, 175, 225 minutes, P < 0.001). Significant decreases over time were observed in median blood loss (300, 250, 200 mL, P < 0.001), transfusion rate (19%, 15%, 5%, P < 0.001), median length of hospitalization (7, 7, 6 days, P < 0.001), rates of CCI ≥26.2 (20%, 22%, 16%, P < 0.001) and 90-day mortality (3.1%, 2.6%, 1.3%, P < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, hepatectomy in the most recent era 2010 to 2015 was associated with a lower incidence of CCI ≥26.2 (odds ratio 0.7, 95% confidence interval 0.6-0.8, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Despite increases in complexity over an 18-year period, continued improvements in surgical technique and perioperative outcomes yielded a resultant decrease in CCI in the most current era.
Collapse
|