Readmission after pancreatic resection: causes and causality pattern

Impact of Frailty on Early Readmissions of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the United States: Where Do We Stand?

Background/Objectives: We assessed the impact of frailty on outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the United States. Methods: The National Readmission Database (2016-2020) was used to identify index and 30-day ERCP readmissions, which were categorized into low-frailty, intermediate-frailty, and high-frailty groups based on the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS). Outcomes were then compared. Results: Of 885,416 index admissions, 9.9% were readmitted within 30 days of ERCP. The odds of 30-day readmission were higher in the intermediate-frailty group (12.59% vs. 8.2%, odds ratio [OR] 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-1.71, p < 0.001) and the high-frailty group (10.57% vs. 8.2%, OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.52-1.73, p < 0.001) compared to the low-frailty group. On readmission, a higher HFRS also increased mean length of stay (intermediate-frailty vs. low-frailty: 8.49 vs. 4.22 days, mean difference (MD) 4.26, 95% CI 4.19-4.34, p < 0.001; high-frailty vs. low-frailty: 10.9 vs. 4.22 days, MD 10.9 days, 95% CI 10.52-11.28, p < 0.001) and mean total hospitalization charges (intermediate-frailty vs. low-frailty: $118,996 vs. $68,034, MD $50,962, 95% CI 48, 854-53,069, p < 0.001; high-frailty vs. low-frailty: $195,584 vs. $68,034, MD $127,550, 95% CI 120,581-134,519, p < 0.001). The odds of inpatient mortality were also higher for the intermediate-frailty and high-frailty compared to the low-frailty subgroup. Conclusions: Frailty was associated with worse clinical outcomes after ERCP.

Readmissions Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Experience From a Tertiary Care Center in India

Background An enhanced recovery approach in surgery helps early postoperative discharge. With the decreasing trend of morbidity and mortality in recent times in patients undergoing complex procedures such as pancreaticoduodenectomy, readmissions are the next major concern. The causes and outcomes of these readmissions should be investigated for their impact on patient care and prevention. Methodology A total of 997 patients discharged after pancreaticoduodenectomy from a tertiary care center in northern India, between 1989 and 2021, were studied retrospectively to assess the readmission rate for sequelae after pancreaticoduodenectomy. The causes, interventions, outcomes, and predictive factors were studied. Results A total of 103 (10.3%) patients required readmission for sequelae after pancreaticoduodenectomy, and 52 (50.4%) patients required interventions. The most common cause for readmission in our study was intra-abdominal collection (n = 23, 22.3%). Of these 103 patients, 63 (61.2%) had good outcomes, 36 (34.9%) had fair outcomes, and four (3.9%) had bad outcomes. Overall, 53 (51.5%) of 103 patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge, most commonly with intra-abdominal collection (16 of 53, 30.1%). Of these 53 patients, 22 (41.5%) required interventions, 34 (64.1%) had good outcomes, and 27 (50.9%) were readmitted within seven days of discharge. Of these 27 patients, 12 (44.4%) required interventions, with 24 (88.8%) experiencing good outcomes. Of the 103 patients, 12 (11.6%) were readmitted between 31 and 90 days, mostly due to external stent, T-tube, or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage-related problems. Overall, 38 (36.9%) of 103 patients were readmitted after 90 days, mostly with incisional hernia and strictured hepaticojejunostomy. Of these 38 patients, 26 (68.4%) required intervention, and 23 (60.5%) had good outcomes. A previous history of cholangitis (odds ratio (OR) = 1.771, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.17-2.67, p = 0.007), postoperative fever (OR = 1.628, 95% CI = 1.081-2.452, p = 0.02), wound infection (OR = 2.011, 95% CI = 1.332-3.035, p = 0.001), and wound dehiscence (OR = 2.136, 95% CI = 1.333-3.423, p = 0.002) predicted readmission on univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed a previous history of cholangitis (OR = 1.755, CI = 1.158-2.659, p = 0.008) and wound infection (OR = 1.995, 95% CI = 1.320-2.690, p = 0.001) as factors independently predicting readmission. Conclusions Readmitted patients have high intervention rates and good recovery rates. Readmissions should not be considered a scale for poor healthcare. Patient education, proper management of postoperative complications, and a properly designed discharge care system can help tackle this problem.

The Implications of Readmission on Cost and Patient Outcomes Following Distal Pancreatectomy and Splenectomy

BACKGROUND

Robotic platform usage for distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy has grown exponentially in recent years. This study aims to identify the impact of readmission following robotic distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy and to analyze the financial implications of these readmissions.

METHODS

We prospectively followed 137 patients after robotic distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. Readmission was defined as rehospitalization within 30 days post-discharge. Total cost incorporated initial and readmission hospital costs, when applicable. Outcomes were analyzed using chi-square/Fisher's exact test and Student's t test. Data are presented as median (mean ± SD).

RESULTS

Of 137 patients, 20 (14%) were readmitted. Readmitted patients were 67 (66 ± 10.3) years old and had a BMI of 30 (30 ± 7.0) kg/m2; 9 (45%) had previous abdominal operations. Non-readmitted patients were 67 (62 ± 14.7) years old and had a BMI of 28 (28 ± 5.7) kg/m2; 37 (32%) had previous abdominal operations (P = NS, for all). Readmitted patients vs non-readmitted patients had operative durations of 327 (363 ± 179.1) vs 251 (293 ± 176.4) minutes (P = .10), estimated blood loss (EBL) of 90 (159 ± 214.6) vs 100 (244 ± 559.4) mL (P = .50), and tumor diameter of 3 (4 ± 2.0) vs 3 (4 ± 2.9) cm (P = 1.00). Initial length of stay (LOS) for readmitted patients vs patients who were not readmitted was 5 (5 ± 2.7) vs 4 (5 ± 3.0) days (P = 1.00); total hospital cost of those readmitted, including both admissions, was $29,095 (32,324 ± 20,227.38) vs $24,663 (25,075 ± 10,786.45) (P = .018) for those not readmitted.

DISCUSSION

Despite a similar perioperative course, readmissions were associated with increased costs. We propose thorough consideration before readmission and increased patient education initiatives will reduce readmissions after robotic distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy.

Use of Perioperative Advanced Practice Providers to Reduce Cost and Readmission in the Postoperative Hepatopancreatobiliary Population: Results of a Simulation Study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative healthcare use and readmissions are common among the hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) population. We evaluated the surgical volume required to sustain advanced practice providers (APPs) in the perioperative setting for cost reduction.

STUDY DESIGN

Using decision analysis modeling, we evaluated costs of employing dedicated perioperative APP navigators compared with no APPs navigators. Simulated subjects could: (1) present to an emergency department, with or without readmission, (2) present for direct readmission, (3) require additional office visits, or (4) require no additional care. We informed our model using the most current available published data and performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate thresholds under which dedicated perioperative APP navigators are beneficial.

RESULTS

Subjects within the APP navigator cohort accumulated $1,270 and a readmission rate of 6.9%, compared with $2,170 and 13.5% with no APP navigators, yielding a cost savings of $905 and 48% relative reduction in readmission. Based on these estimated cost savings and national salary ranges, a perioperative APPs become financially self-sustaining with 113 to 139 annual HPB cases, equating to 2 to 3 HPB cases weekly. Sensitivity analyses revealed that perioperative APP navigators were no longer cost saving when direct readmission rates exceeded 8.9% (base case 3.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

We show that readmissions are reduced by nearly 50% with an associated cost savings of $900 when employing dedicated perioperative APPs. This position becomes financially self-sufficient with an annual HPB case load of 113 to 139 cases. High-volume HPB centers could benefit from postdischarge APP navigators to optimize outcomes, minimize high-value resource use, and ultimately save costs.

Do Weekend Discharges Impact Readmission Rate in Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Surgery?

BACKGROUND

Weekend readmissions have been previously associated with increased mortality after pancreatic resection, but the effect of weekend discharge is less understood. In this study, we aim to determine the impact of weekend discharges on 30-day readmission rate after pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

All patients who underwent pancreatic surgery at a single, high-volume institution between 2013 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed from a targeted, institutional ACS-NSQIP database. Patients who died prior to discharge were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between readmission and weekend discharge.

RESULTS

Out of 2042 patients who underwent pancreatectomy, 418 patients (20.5%) were discharged on the weekend. Weekend discharge was associated with fewer Whipple surgeries, fewer open surgical approaches, and shorter operative time. Patients discharged on the weekend were also less likely to have had postoperative complications such as delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (6.7% vs 12.6%, p < 0.01) and were more frequently discharged to home (91.1% vs. 85.3%, p < 0.01). Thirty-day readmission rate was almost identical between groups (14.8% vs 14.8%, p = 0.997). On multivariable analysis, 30-day readmission was independently associated with DGE (OR (95% CI): 3.48 (2.31-5.23), p < 0.01), postoperative pancreatic fistula (3.36 (2.34-4.83), p < 0.01), myocardial infarction, and perioperative blood transfusion, but not weekend discharge (1.02 (0.72-1.43), p = 0.93). Readmission rate also did not differ significantly when including Friday discharges in the weekend group (15.2% vs 14.6%, p = 0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

With careful clinical decision making, patients may safely be discharged on the weekend after pancreatic surgery without increasing 30-day readmission rate.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy Is Associated with Improved Survival for Stage III Colon Cancer When Initiated Beyond 8 Weeks

BACKGROUND

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) within 6-8 weeks of surgical resection for patients with stage III colon cancer. However, postoperative complications or prolonged surgical recovery may affect the receipt of AC. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of AC for patients with prolonged postoperative recovery.

METHODS

We queried the National Cancer Database (2010-2018) for patients with resected stage III colon cancer. Patients were categorized as having either normal or prolonged length of stay (PLOS: >7 days, 75th percentile). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression and logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with overall survival and receipt of AC.

RESULTS

Of the 113,387 patients included, 30,196 (26.6%) experienced PLOS. Of the 88,115 (77.7%) patients who received AC, 22,707 (25.8%) initiated AC more than 8 weeks after surgery. Patients with PLOS were less likely to receive AC (71.5% vs. 80.0%, OR: 0.72, 95%CI=0.70-0.75) and displayed inferior survival (75 vs. 116 months, HR: 1.39, 95%CI=1.36-1.43). Receipt of AC was also associated with patient factors such as high socioeconomic status, private insurance, and White race (p<0.05 for all). AC within and after 8 weeks of surgery was associated with improved survival for patients with both normal LOS and PLOS (normal LOS: <8 weeks HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.54-0.59, >8 weeks HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.65-0.71; PLOS: <8 weeks HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.48-0.54, >8 weeks HR: 0.63, 95% CI 0.60-0.67). AC was associated with significantly improved survival if initiated up to 15 weeks postoperatively (normal LOS: HR: 0.72, 95%CI=0.61-0.85; PLOS: HR: 0.75, 95%CI=0.62-0.90), and very few patients (<3.0%) initiated AC beyond this time.

CONCLUSION

Receipt of AC for stage III colon cancer may be affected by surgical complications or otherwise prolonged recovery. Timely and even delayed AC (>8 weeks) are both associated with improved overall survival. These findings highlight the importance of delivering guideline-based systemic therapies, even after complicated surgical recovery.

The use and clinical outcome of total pancreatectomy in the United States, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden

BACKGROUND

Total pancreatectomy has high morbidity and mortality and differences among countries are currently unknown. This study compared the use and postoperative outcomes of total pancreatectomy among 4 Western countries.

METHODS

Patients who underwent one-stage total pancreatectomy were included from registries in the United States, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden (2014-2018). Use of total pancreatectomy was assessed by calculating the ratio total pancreatectomy to pancreatoduodenectomy. Primary outcomes were major morbidity (Clavien Dindo ≥3) and in-hospital mortality. Predictors for the primary outcomes were assessed in multivariable logistic regression analyses. Sensitivity analysis assessed the impact of volume (low-volume <40 or high-volume ≥40 pancreatoduodenectomies annually; data available for the Netherlands and Germany).

RESULTS

In total, 1,579 patients underwent one-stage total pancreatectomy. The relative use of total pancreatectomy to pancreatoduodenectomy varied up to fivefold (United States 0.03, Germany 0.15, the Netherlands 0.03, and Sweden 0.15; P < .001). Both the indication and several baseline characteristics differed significantly among countries. Major morbidity occurred in 423 patients (26.8%) and differed (22.3%, 34.9%, 38.3%, and 15.9%, respectively; P < .001). In-hospital mortality occurred in 85 patients (5.4%) and also differed (1.8%, 10.2%, 10.8%, 1.9%, respectively; P < .001). Country, age ≥75, and vascular resection were predictors for in-hospital mortality. In-hospital mortality was lower in high-volume centers in the Netherlands (4.9% vs 23.1%; P = .002), but not in Germany (9.8% vs 10.6%; P = .733).

CONCLUSION

Considerable differences in the use of total pancreatectomy, patient characteristics, and postoperative outcome were noted among 4 Western countries with better outcomes in the United States and Sweden. These large, yet unexplained, differences require further research to ultimately improve patient outcome.

Early vs Late Readmissions in Pancreaticoduodenectomy Patients: Recognizing Comprehensive Episodic Cost to Help Guide Bundled Payment Plans and Hospital Resource Allocation

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies on readmission cost in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients use estimated cost data and do not delineate etiology or cost differences between early and late readmissions. We sought to identify relationships between postoperative complication type and readmission timing and cost in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients.

METHODS

Hospital cost data from date of discharge to postoperative day 90 were merged with 2008-2018 NSQIP data. Early readmission was within 30 days of surgery, and late readmission was 30 to 90 days from surgery. Regression analyses for readmission controlled for patient comorbidities, complications, and surgeon.

RESULTS

Of 230 patients included, 58 (25%) were readmitted. The mean early and late readmission costs were $18,365 ± $20,262 and $24,965 ± $34,435, respectively. Early readmission was associated with index stay deep vein thrombosis (p < 0.01), delayed gastric emptying (p < 0.01), and grade B pancreatic fistula (p < 0.01). High-cost early readmission had long hospital stays or invasive procedures. Common late readmission diagnoses were grade B pancreatic fistula requiring drainage (n = 5, 14%), failure to thrive (n = 4, 14%), and bowel obstruction requiring operation (n = 3, 11%). High-cost late readmissions were associated with chronic complications requiring reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Early and late readmissions following pancreaticoduodenectomy differ in both etiology and cost. Early readmission and cost are driven by common complications requiring percutaneous intervention while late readmission and cost are driven by chronic complications and reoperation. Late readmissions are frequent and a significant source of resource utilization. Negotiations of bundled care payment plans should account for significant late readmission resource utilization.

Composite Length of Stay, An Outcome Measure of Postoperative and Readmission Length of Stays in Pancreatoduodenectomy

PURPOSE

Postoperative length of stay (PLOS) and readmission rate are pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) outcome measures, which are reported individually but may be interrelated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how well a composite length of stay measure (CLOS) that included PLOS and readmission length of stay describes outcomes. To do so, we evaluated how well CLOS correlated to postoperative complications absolutely and compared to PLOS.

METHODS

A total of 668 PDs performed between 2011 and 2018 were evaluated. CLOS was calculated from PLOS and readmission length of stay. Complication severity was judged by the Modified Accordion Grading System (MAGS). Multinomial logistical regression models (MLRM) were used to investigate the relationship between either PLOS or CLOS and complications. Multilevel and pairwise area under curves (AUC) using SAS macro %MultAUC were provided for both models.

RESULTS

A total of 432 of 668 patients (65%) developed complications. One hundred seventy-seven patients (27%) were readmitted. Mean PLOS was 10.2 days (7.1 SD) and mean CLOS was 12.3 days (10.1 SD). PLOS and CLOS both were correlated linearly to MAGS grade. Spearman correlation coefficient for CLOS vs. MAGS of 0.68 was higher than that of 0.49 for PLOS vs. MAGS. Multilevel AUC from MLRM using PLOS was 0.66, but multilevel AUC from MLRM using CLOS was 0.71.

DISCUSSION

CLOS provides an accurate estimate of hospital day utilization per patient for PD, reflecting not only the basal hospital recovery time for PD but the added time needed because of readmissions due to complications. It is tightly correlated to number and severity of postoperative complications.

Deviations from a clinical pathway post pancreatoduodenectomy predict 90-day unplanned re-admission

Deviations from a post-PD clinical care pathway are common. Poor nutrition and cardiac co-morbidities are associated with an increased likelihood of deviation. As the number of deviations increase, so does the risk of significant complications and interventions, delayed discharge and 90-day re-admission rate.

Emergency department visits after pancreatoduodenectomy: examining a novel quality metric

BACKGROUND

Postoperative emergency department (ED) visits represent fragmented care, are costly, and often evolve into readmission. Readmission rates after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) are defined, while ED visits following PD are not. We examined the pattern of 30-day post-discharge ED visits for PD patients.

METHODS

A quaternary institutional database analysis of adult patients who underwent PD between 2010-2017 was reviewed for ED utilization within 30 days from discharge.

RESULTS

Of the 1,004 patients who underwent PD, 12% (N = 117) patients sought care in the ED within 30 days from postoperative discharge. The median time to ED presentation was 5 days post-discharge (IQR 3-9). Half of ED visits occurred during nights and weekends (N = 59, 50%). Of ED-utilizing patients, 64% (N = 76) were admitted to the hospital and 29% (N = 34) were discharged from the ED. ED visits were associated with a Clavien-Dindo Classification of 0 in 10.2% (N = 13) of patients, I-II in 62.4% (N = 73), and III-V in 26.5% (N = 31).

DISCUSSION

Post-discharge ED utilization is a novel quality metric and represents a potential target population for reducing hospital readmissions. Over two-thirds (72%) of ED visits were associated with low acuity complications, and promoting institutional strategies addressing postoperative ED visits may improve patient care and efficient utilization of healthcare resources.

Travel distance affects rates and reasons for inpatient visits after pancreatectomy

BACKGROUND

Centralization of complex surgical care leads to increased travel distances for patients. We sought to determine if increased travel distance to the index hospital altered inpatient Visit rates following pancreatectomy.

METHODS

Pancreatectomies from 2013-2016 were reviewed retrospectively from a single high-volume institution. Travel distance for 936 patients was determined, and patients were grouped by 50-mile increments. Visits (Observations or Readmissions) and corresponding reasons were gathered.

RESULTS

222 patients (23.7%) had a Visit to any hospital (AH) within 90 days postoperative; 195 (87.8%) were to the index hospital (IH). The <50 miles group had the highest Visit rate to AH (28.6% vs. 17.8% vs. 24.6%; P = 0.008) and the IH (26.9% vs. 15.2% vs. 20.6%; P = 0.002) compared to 50-100 and > 100 miles. This trend was statistically significant for Observations, but not Readmissions. Gastrointestinal (GI) complaints alone led to 20.7% patients requiring Visits to AH at 90-days, mostly in <50miles group for Visits and Observations at AH and IH.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients closest to the IH had the highest Visit and Observation rate following pancreatectomy without affecting Readmission rate, with GI complaints as a driving factor. Inpatient education and outpatient symptom management may reduce repeat hospitalization.

The association between ICU admission and emergency hospital readmission following emergency general surgery

Background

The relationship between postoperative intensive care (ICU) admission following emergency general surgery (EGS) and emergency hospital readmission has not been widely investigated.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of registry data for patients undergoing EGS in Scotland, 2005-2007. Exposure of interest was ICU admission status (direct from theatre; indirect after initial care on ward; no ICU admission). The primary outcome was emergency hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge.

Results

Thirty-seven thousand one hundred seventy-three patients were included in the analysis. Overall emergency readmission rate was 8% (n = 2983): 2756 (7.8%) in patients without postoperative ICU admission; 155 (12.1%) with direct ICU admission and 65 (14.7%) with indirect ICU admission. Indirect ICU admission was associated with increased hospital readmission rates (HR 1.24 [1.03, 1.49]; p = 0.024) compared with direct ICU admission. ICU admission was associated with increased three-year readmission rates (p = 0.006) and costs (p < 0.001) compared with initial ward care.

Conclusion

Indirect ICU admission is associated with increased emergency hospital readmission and healthcare costs for patients undergoing EGS.

Variation in pancreatoduodenectomy as delivered in two national audits

Background

Nationwide audits facilitate quality and outcome assessment of pancreatoduodenectomy. Differences may exist between countries but studies comparing nationwide outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy based on audits are lacking. This study aimed to compare the German and Dutch audits for external data validation.

Methods

Anonymized data from patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy between 2014 and 2016 were extracted from the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery StuDoQ|Pancreas and Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit, and compared using descriptive statistics. Univariable and multivariable risk analyses were undertaken.

Results

Overall, 4495 patients were included, 2489 in Germany and 2006 in the Netherlands. Adenocarcinoma was a more frequent indication for pancreatoduodenectomy in the Netherlands. German patients had worse ASA fitness grades, but Dutch patients had more pulmonary co-morbidity. Dutch patients underwent more minimally invasive surgery and venous resections, but fewer multivisceral resections. No difference was found in rates of grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula, grade C postpancreatectomy haemorrhage and in-hospital mortality. There was more centralization in the Netherlands (1·3 versus 13·3 per cent of pancreatoduodenectomies in very low-volume centres; P &lt; 0·001). In multivariable analysis, both hospital stay (difference 2·49 (95 per cent c.i. 1·18 to 3·80) days) and risk of reoperation (odds ratio (OR) 1·55, 95 per cent c.i. 1·22 to 1·97) were higher in the German audit, whereas risk of postoperative pneumonia (OR 0·57, 0·37 to 0·88) and readmission (OR 0·38, 0·30 to 0·49) were lower. Several baseline and surgical characteristics, including hospital volume, but not country, predicted mortality.

Conclusion

This comparison of the German and Dutch audits showed variation in case mix, surgical technique and centralization for pancreatoduodenectomy, but no difference in mortality and pancreas-specific complications.

Index versus Non-index Readmission After Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery: Where Do Patients Go to Be Readmitted?

INTRODUCTION

The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has identified readmission as an important quality metric. With an increased emphasis on regionalization of complex hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery to high-volume centers, care of readmitted HPB patients may be fragmented if readmission occurs at a non-index hospital. We sought to define the proportion of HPB readmissions, as well as evaluate outcomes, that occur at an index versus non-index hospitals and to identify factors associated with non-index hospital readmission.

METHODS

The National Readmissions Database (NRD) was used to identify patients who underwent major HPB surgery between 2010 and 2015. Factors associated with readmission at 30 and 90 days at index versus non-index hospitals were analyzed. Differences in mortality and complications were analyzed among patients readmitted to index versus non-index hospitals.

RESULTS

A total of 49,080 patients underwent HPB surgery (liver n = 27,081, 55%; pancreas n = 14,787, 30%; biliary n = 7212, 15%). Overall, 6643 (14%) and 11,709 (24%) patients were readmitted within 30 and 90 days, respectively. Among all first readmissions, 18 and 21% were to a non-index hospital within the first 30 and 90 days, respectively. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with readmission to a non-index hospital included age (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05, 1.34), pancreatic cancer (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.14, 1.34) and ≥ 3 comorbidities (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.10, 1.63), while procedures on the pancreas (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61, 0.80), private insurance (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.68, 0.87), initial admission at a large hospital (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.65, 0.91), and initial admission length of stay > 7 days (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69, 0.86) were associated with decreased odds of a non-index hospital readmission (all p < 0.05). Patients readmitted to a non-index hospital had higher inpatient mortality (3.7 vs. 2.7%, p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Roughly 1 in 5 patients were readmitted to a non-index hospital where the initial HPB operation had not taken place. Readmission to a non-index hospital was associated with higher overall in-hospital mortality. The impact of regionalization of HPB care relative to site of subsequent readmission may have important implications for patients.

Adaptation and Implementation of a Transitional Care Protocol for Patients Undergoing Complex Abdominal Surgery

BACKGROUND

Transitional care protocols are effective at reducing readmission for medical patients, yet no evidence-based protocols exist for surgical patients. A transitional care protocol was adapted to meet the needs of patients discharged to home after major abdominal surgery.

APPROACH

The Coordinated-Transitional Care (C-TraC) protocol, initially designed for medical patients, was used as the initial framework for the development of a surgery-specific protocol (sC-TraC). Adaptation was accomplished using a modification of the Replicating Effective Programs (REP) model, which has four phases: (1) preconditions, (2) preimplementation, (3) implementation, and (4) maintenance and evolution. A random sample of five patients each month was selected to complete a phone survey regarding patient satisfaction. Preimplementation planning allowed for integration with current systems, avoided duplication of processes, and defined goals for the protocol. The adapted protocol specifically addressed surgical issues such as nutrition, fever, ostomy output, dehydration, drain character/output, and wound appearance. After protocol launch, the rapid iterative adaptation process led to changes in phone call timing, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and discharge instructions.

OUTCOMES

Survey responders reported 100% overall satisfaction with the transitional care program.

KEY INSIGHTS

The adaptable nature of sC-TraC may allow for low-resource hospitals, such as rural or inner-city medical centers, to use the methodology provided in this study for implementation of local phone-based transitional care protocols. In addition, as the C-TraC program has begun to disseminate nationally across US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals and rural health settings, sC-TraC may be implemented using the existing transitional care infrastructure in place at these hospitals.

Impact of Post-Discharge Disposition on Risk and Causes of Readmission Following Liver and Pancreas Surgery

BACKGROUND

The relationship between the post-discharge settings and the risk of readmission has not been well examined. We sought to identify the association between discharge destinations and readmission rates after liver and pancreas surgery.

METHODS

The 2013-2015 Medicare-Provider Analysis and Review (MEDPAR) database was reviewed to identify liver and pancreas surgical patients. Patients were subdivided into three groups based on discharge destination: home/self-care (HSC), home with home health assistance (HHA), and skilled nursing facility (SNF). The association between post-acute settings, readmission rates, and readmission causes was assessed.

RESULTS

Among 15,141 liver or pancreas surgical patients, 60% (n = 9046) were HSC, 26.9% (n = 4071) were HHA, and 13.4% (n = 2024) were SNF. Older, female patients and patients with ≥ 2 comorbidities, ≥ 2 previous admissions, an emergent index admission, an index complication, and ≥ 5-day length of stay were more likely to be discharged to HHA or SNF compared to HSC (all P < 0.001). Compared to HSC, HHA and SNF patients had a 34 and a 67% higher likelihood of 30-day readmission, respectively. The HHA and SNF settings were also associated with a 33 and a 69% higher risk of 90-day readmission. There was no association between discharge destination and readmission causes.

CONCLUSION

Among liver and pancreas surgical patients, HHA and SNF patients had a higher risk of readmission within 30 and 90 days. There was no difference in readmission causes and discharge settings. The association between discharge setting and the higher risk of readmission should be further evaluated as the healthcare system seeks to reduce readmission rates after surgery.

Predictors of 30-day readmission following pancreatic surgery: A retrospective review

BACKGROUND

Pancreatectomies have been identified as procedures with an increased risk of readmission. In surgical patients, readmissions within 30 days of discharge are usually procedure-related. We sought to determine predictors of 30-day readmission following pancreatic resections in a large healthcare system.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected information from the records of 383 patients who underwent pancreatic resections from 2004-2013. To find the predictors of readmission in the 30 days after discharge, we performed a univariate screen of possible variables using the Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the independent factors.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight (15.1%) patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. Of the patients readmitted, the most common diagnoses at readmission were sepsis (17.2%), and dehydration (8.6%). Multivariate logistic regression found that the development of intra-abdominal fluid collections (OR = 5.32, P < 0.0001), new thromboembolic events (OR = 4.08, P = 0.016), and pre-operative BMI (OR = 1.06, P = 0.040) were independent risk factors of readmission within 30 days of discharge.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that factors predictive of 30-day readmission are a combination of patient characteristics and the development of post-operative complications. Targeted interventions may be used to reduce the risk of readmission.

Risk factors and direct medical cost of early versus late unplanned readmissions among diabetes patients at a tertiary hospital in Singapore

OBJECTIVE

To examine the risk factors and direct medical costs associated with early (≤30 days) versus late (31-180 days) unplanned readmissions among patients with type 2 diabetes in Singapore.

METHODS

Risk factors and associated costs among diabetes patients were investigated using electronic medical records from a local tertiary care hospital from 2010 to 2012. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with early and late unplanned readmissions while a generalized linear model was used to estimate the direct medical cost. Sensitivity analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1729 diabetes patients had unplanned readmissions within 180 days of an index discharge. Length of index stay (a marker of acute illness burden) was one of the risk factors associated with early unplanned readmission while patient behavior-related factors, like diabetes-related medication adherence, were associated with late unplanned readmission. Adjusted mean cost of index admission was higher among patients with unplanned readmission. Sensitivity analysis yielded similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

Existing routinely captured data can be used to develop prediction models that flag high risk patients during their index admission, potentially helping to support clinical decisions and prevent such readmissions.

Hospital readmission rates and risk factors for readmission following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal surface malignancies

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery and Hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for peritoneal surface malignancies is associated with high morbidity. The increased numbers of patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC in recent years mandates risk analysis and quality assurance. However, only scarce data exist regarding causative parameters for readmission. The aim of this study was to assess readmission rates and risk factors associated with readmission.

METHODS

A retrospective-cohort study including patients from two high-volume centers who underwent CRS/HIPEC surgery between the years 2007-2016 was performed. Patients' demographics, peri-operative data and readmission rates were recorded.

RESULTS

223 patients were included in the study. The 7 and 30-day readmission rates were 3.5% (n = 8) and 11% (n = 25), respectively. Late readmission rates (up to 90 days) were 11% (n = 25). The most common causes of readmission were surgical related infections (35%), small bowel obstruction (17.5%) and dehydration (14%). Post-operative complications were associated with higher readmission rates (p = 0.0001). PCI score was not associated with higher rates of readmission.

CONCLUSION

Readmissions following CRS/HIPEC occur mainly due to infectious complications and dehydrations. Patients following CRS/HIPEC should be discharged after careful investigation to a community based continuing care with access for IV fluid replacement or antibiotics administration when required.

Risk factors for early readmission after total pancreatectomy and islet auto transplantation

BACKGROUND

Little published data exist examining causes of hospital readmission following total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of a prospectively collected institutional TPIAT database. Primary outcome was unplanned readmission to the hospital within 30 days from discharge. Reasons and risk factors for readmission as well as islet function were evaluated and compared by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

83 patients underwent TPIAT from 2006 to 2014. 21 patients (25.3%) were readmitted within 30 days. Gastrointestinal problems (52.4%) and surgical site infection (42.8%) were the most common reasons for readmission. Initial LOS and reoperation were risk factors for early readmission. Patients with delayed gastric emptying (DGE) were three times more likely to get readmitted. In multivariate analysis, patients undergoing pylorus preservation surgery were nine times more likely to be readmitted than the antrectomy group.

CONCLUSION

Early readmission after TPIAT is common (one in four patients), underscoring the complexity of this procedure. Early readmission is not detrimental to islet graft function. Patients undergoing pylorus preservation are more likely to get readmitted, perhaps due to increased incidence of delayed gastric emptying. Decision for antrectomy vs. pylorus preservation needs to be individualized.

Early Contact after Hospital Discharge Does Not Prevent Readmission in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Studies suggest that early contact (EC) after hospital discharge may help reduce hospital read-missions among medical patients. The objective of this study is to determine if EC after hospital discharge in patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) can reduce readmission. We performed a retrospective study of 35 patients who underwent PD over 18 months. Early, focused contact after hospital discharge was either a telephone call by a registered nurse or a clinic visit with a provider within four days of discharge. Hospital readmission rates were analyzed between the EC and no-early contact (NC) cohorts. Nineteen patients received EC after hospital discharge and 16 were in the NC group. Fourteen patients (40%) were readmitted, with postoperative pancreatic fistula and delayed gastric emptying as the most common indications for readmission (71.4%). Overall readmission rates were not significantly different between the EC and NC groups (31.6 vs 50.0%, respectively, P = 0.27). EC after hospital discharge in patients undergoing PD does not prevent readmission. This is likely due to the high incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula or delayed gastric emptying that clinically manifests after hospital discharge and EC and requires readmission for management.

Synergistic effect of a drug loaded electrospun patch and systemic chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer xenograft

Pancreatic cancer has a high rate of local recurrence and poor prognosis even with adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection. The aim of this study was to investigate if local drug delivery combined with low dose systemic chemotherapy can increase the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy while reducing systemic toxicities. Poly-L-lactic acid-based 5-FU releasing patch was fabricated by electrospinning, and its tumour killing effects were first confirmed in vitro. The 5-FU patch directly adhered to the tumour in subcutaneous and orthotopic murine models, and induced a significant decrease in tumour size. Systemic gemcitabine treatment group, 5-FU drug releasing patch group, and systemic gemcitabine plus 5-FU patch group were compared by tumour size measurement, non-invasive bio-imaging, and histology in subcutaneous models. Combination of local drug patch and systemic chemotherapy led to increased tumour suppression effects that lasted longer, as well as increased survival rate. Histology revealed higher degree of apoptosis in the combined group. Systemic toxicity was recovered within 7 days after the treatment in all mice. Conclusively, local drug delivery using biocompatible polymer patch significantly inhibited tumour growth, and combination with systemic chemotherapy was more effective than single systemic chemotherapy.

Factors associated with prolonged hospitalization in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Complex surgeries such as a pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) traditionally have long hospital stays (LOS).

METHODS

Patients who underwent elective PD at our institution from 8/2011-6/2015 were retrospectively examined. Interquartile ranges were calculated from LOS. Patient were compared between the highest quartile and the remainder of the cohort.

RESULTS

492 patients had a median LOS of 9 days, with 106 (22%) admitted for >14 days. Characteristics associated with prolong hospitalization include age (p = 0.004) and preoperative albumin <3.5 (p = 0.007). Significant intra-operative measures associated with prolonged LOS were blood loss (EBL, p = 0.004) and increased operative time (p = 0.008). Any complication extended hospitalizations (p < 0.001). Patients in the top quartile were less likely to be discharged home (p < 0.0001) and more likely to be readmitted (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Older patients with hypoalbuminemia are at higher risk of prolonged LOS following PD as well as high EBL, operative time, and surgical complications. Focused efforts to counsel and optimize patients pre-operatively and minimize intra-operative complications may shorten hospital stays.

The Largest European Single-Center Experience: 300 Laparoscopic Pancreatic Resections

BACKGROUND

Although laparoscopic pancreatic resection (LPR) has become routine, large single-center series are still lacking. Our aim was to analyze the results of a large European single-center series of LPR.

STUDY DESIGN

Between January 2008 and September 2015, 300 LPRs were performed and studied prospectively, including 165 (55%) distal pancreatectomies, 68 (23%) pancreaticoduodenectomies (PDs), 30 (10%) enucleations, 35 (11%) central pancreatectomies, and 2 (1%) total pancreatectomies.

RESULTS

Mean age was 54 ± 15.4 years old (range 17 to 87 years), and most patients were women (58%). Laparoscopic pancreatic resection was performed for malignancy (46%), low potential malignant (44%), or benign (10%) diseases. The mean operative durations were 211 ± 102 minutes (range 30 to 540 minutes) for the entire population and 351 ± 59 minutes (range 240 to 540 minutes) for PD, and decreased with the learning curve. Mean blood loss was 229 ± 269 mL (range 0 to 1,500 mL), and 13 patients (4%) received transfusions. Conversion to an open procedure was required in 12 patients (4%), and only 5 in the last 250 patients (14% vs 2%; p < 0.001). Mortality occurred in 4 (1.3%) patients and only after PD (5.8%). Common complications were pancreatic fistula (n = 124, 41%), bleeding (n = 35, 12%), and reoperation (n = 28, 9%). The postoperative outcomes were less favorable in procedures with a reconstruction phase (n = 105) than in those without (n = 195), with increased mortality (3.8% vs 0%; p = 0.04), overall morbidity (76% vs % 52%; p < 0.001), and mean hospital stay (26 ± 15 days vs 16 ± 10 days; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic pancreatic resection without a reconstruction phase has excellent outcomes; LPR with a reconstruction phase, especially PD, has less favorable outcomes, and further randomized studies are required to draw conclusions on the safety and benefits of this approach.

Risk Factors and Patterns of Potentially Avoidable Readmission in Patients With Cancer

Purpose:

Patients with cancer are particularly at risk for readmission within 30-days after discharge. To identify the patients who might benefit from more-intensive discharge interventions, we identified the risk factors associated with 30-day potentially avoidable readmissions.

Methods and Materials:

We included all consecutive discharges from the oncology division of an academic tertiary medical center in Boston, Massachusetts, between July 1, 2009, and June 30, 2010. Potentially avoidable 30-day readmissions to the index hospital and two other hospitals within its network were identified. We performed a multivariable logistic regression in which the final model included variables found in bivariable testing to be significantly associated with the outcome.

Results:

Among the 2,916 patients discharged during the study period, 1,086 (37.3%) were readmitted within 30 days. Of these, 341 (31.4% of all readmissions, 11.7% of all discharges) were identified as potentially avoidable. In the multivariable analysis, the following patient factors were associated with a significantly higher risk of a potentially avoidable readmission: total number of medications at discharge, liver disease, last sodium level, and last hemoglobin level before discharge. In addition, potentially avoidable readmissions occurred significantly earlier than unavoidable readmissions (median, 10 v 13 days; P < .001).

Conclusion:

Almost 40% of patients with cancer had a 30-day readmission, and almost one third of these were deemed potentially avoidable, and several risk factors for this were identified. Interventions at discharge may be prioritized to patients with these risk factors.

Laparoscopic-adapted Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is a complex procedure that is becoming increasingly popular among surgeons. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains the most feared specific complication in reconstruction after PD. The Blumgart anastomosis (BA) has been established as one of the safest anastomosis for pancreas remnant reconstruction, with low rates of POPF and postoperative complications. The procedure for performing this anastomosis by laparoscopic approach has not been reported to date.

METHODS

We describe our technique of LPD with laparoscopic-adapted BA (LapBA) and present the results obtained. A case-matched analysis with open cases of BA is also reported.

RESULTS

Since February 2013 to February 2016, thirteen patients were operated of LapBA. An equivalent cohort of open PD patients was obtained by matching sex, ASA, pancreas consistency and main pancreatic duct diameter. Severe complications (grades III-IV) and length of stay were significantly lesser in LapBA group. No differences in POPF, readmission, reoperation rate and mortality were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The LapBA technique we propose can facilitate the pancreatic reconstruction after LPD. In this case-matched study, LPD shows superior results than open PD in terms of less severe postoperative complications and shorter length of stay. Randomized control trials are required to confirm these results.

Perioperative seizure in patients with glioma is associated with longer hospitalization, higher readmission, and decreased overall survival

OBJECTIVE Seizures are among the most common perioperative complications in patients undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor resection and have been associated with increased disease progression and decreased survival. Little evidence exists regarding the relationship between postoperative seizures and hospital quality measures, including length of stay (LOS), disposition, and readmission. The authors sought to address these questions by analyzing a glioma population over 15 years. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was used to evaluate the outcomes of patients who experienced a postoperative seizure. Patients with glioma who underwent craniotomy for resection between 1998 and 2013 were enrolled in the institutional tumor registry. Basic data, including demographics and comorbidities, were recorded in addition to hospitalization details and complications. Seizures were diagnosed by clinical examination, observation, and electroencephalography. The Student t-test and chi-square test were used to analyze differences in the means between continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariate logistic and linear regression was used to compare multiple clinical variables against hospital quality metrics and survival figures, respectively. RESULTS In total, 342 patients with glioma underwent craniotomy for first-time resection. The mean age was 51.0 ± 17.3 years, 192 (56.1%) patients were male, and the median survival time for all grades was 15.4 months (range 6.2-24.0 months). High-grade glioma (Grade III or IV) was seen in 71.9% of patients. Perioperative antiepileptic drugs were administered to 88% of patients. Eighteen (5.3%) patients experienced a seizure within 14 days postoperatively, and 9 (50%) of these patients experienced first-time seizures. The mean time to the first postoperative seizure was 4.3 days (range 0-13 days). There was no significant association between tumor grade and the rate of perioperative seizure (Grade I, 0%; II, 7.0%; III, 6.1%; IV, 5.2%; p = 0.665). A single ictal episode occurred in 11 patients, while 3 patients experienced 2 seizures and 4 patients developed 3 or more seizures. Compared with their seizure-free counterparts, patients who experienced a perioperative seizure had an increased average hospital (6.8 vs 3.6 days, p = 0.032) and ICU LOS (5.4 vs 2.3 days; p < 0.041). Seventy-five percent of seizure-free patients were discharged home in comparison with 55.6% of seizure patients (p = 0.068). Patients with a postoperative seizure were significantly more likely to visit the emergency department within 90 days (44.4% vs 19.0%; OR 3.41 [95% CI 1.29-9.02], p = 0.009) and more likely to be readmitted within 90 days (50.0% vs 18.4%; OR 4.45 [95% CI 1.69-11.70], p = 0.001). In addition, seizure-free patients had a longer median overall survival (15.6 months [interquartile range 6.6-24.4 months] vs 3.0 months [interquartile range 1.0-25.0 months]; p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS Patients with perioperative seizures following glioma resection required longer hospital and ICU LOS, were readmitted at higher rates than seizure-free patients, and experienced shorter overall survival. Biological and clinical factors that predispose to the development of seizures after glioma surgery portend a worse outcome. Efforts to identify these factors and reduce the risk of postoperative seizure should remain a priority among neurosurgical oncologists.

Fragmentation of Care after Surgical Discharge: Non-Index Readmission after Major Cancer Surgery

BACKGROUND

Despite national emphasis on care coordination, little is known about how fragmentation affects cancer surgery outcomes. Our study examines a specific form of fragmentation in post-discharge care-readmission to a hospital different from the location of the operation-and evaluates its causes and consequences among patients readmitted after major cancer surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

We used the State Inpatient Database of California (2004 to 2011) to identify patients who had major cancer surgery and their subsequent readmissions. Logistic models were used to examine correlates of non-index readmissions and to assess associations between location of readmission and outcomes, measured by in-hospital mortality and repeated readmission.

RESULTS

Of 9,233 readmissions within 30 days of discharge after major cancer surgery, 20.0% occurred in non-index hospitals. Non-index readmissions were associated with emergency readmission (odds ratio [OR] = 2.63; 95% CI, 2.26-3.06), rural residence (OR = 1.81; 95% CI, 1.61-2.04), and extensive procedures (eg hepatectomy vs proctectomy; OR = 2.77; CI, 2.08-3.70). Mortality was higher during non-index readmissions than index readmissions independent of patient, procedure, and hospital factors (OR = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.03-1.66), but was mitigated by adjusting for conditions present at readmission (OR = 1.24; 95% CI, 0.98-1.58). Non-index readmission predicted higher odds of repeated readmission within 60 days of discharge from the first readmission (OR = 1.16; 95% CI, 1.02-1.32), independent of all covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-index readmissions constitute a substantial proportion of all readmissions after major cancer surgery. They are associated with more repeated readmissions and can be caused by severe surgical complications and increased travel burden. Overcoming disadvantages of non-index readmissions represents an opportunity to improve outcomes for patients having major cancer surgery.

Proximal Roux-en-y Gastrojejunal Anastomosis with Pyloric Ring Resection Improves Gastric Emptying After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a common complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy. We determined the efficiency of a new reconstruction technique, designed to preserve motilin-secreting cells and maximize the utility of their receptors, in reducing the incidence of DGE after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS

From April 2005 to September 2014, 217 consecutive patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at our institution. Nine patients who underwent total pancreatectomy were excluded. We compared outcomes between patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with resection of the pyloric ring followed by proximal Roux-en-y gastrojejunal anastomosis (group I, n = 90) and patients who underwent standard pancreaticoduodenectomy with the orthotopic reconstruction technique (group II, n = 118).

RESULTS

Overall and clinically relevant rates of DGE were significantly lower in group I than in group II (10 and 2.2 % vs. 57 and 24 %, respectively; p < 0.05). Length of hospital stay as a result of DGE was shorter in group I than in group II. In univariate analysis, older age, comorbidities, ASA grade 4, operative time, preoperative diabetes, standard reconstruction technique, and postoperative complications were significant risk factors for DGE. In multivariate analysis, older age, standard technique, and postoperative complications were independent risk factors for DGE.

CONCLUSION

Our new reconstruction technique reduces the occurrence of DGE after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Definition of Readmission in 3,041 Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Readmission rates of 9.7% to 15.5% after hepatectomy have been reported. These rates are difficult to interpret due to variability in the time interval used to monitor readmission. The aim of this study was to refine the definition of readmission after hepatectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospectively maintained database of 3,041 patients who underwent hepatectomy from 1998 through 2013 was merged with the hospital registry to identify readmissions. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis was used to determine the time interval that best captured unplanned readmission.

RESULTS

Readmission rates at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year after discharge were 10.7% (n = 326), 17.3% (n = 526), and 31.9% (n = 971) respectively. The time interval that best accounted for unplanned readmissions was 45 days after discharge (AUC, 0.956; p < 0.001), during which 389 patients (12.8%) were readmitted (unplanned: n = 312 [10.3%]; planned: n = 77 [2.5%]). In comparison, the 30 days after surgery interval (used in the ACS-NSQIP database) omitted 65 (26.3%) unplanned readmissions. Multivariate analysis revealed the following risk factors for unplanned readmission: diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 1.6; p = 0.024), right hepatectomy (OR 2.1; p = 0.034), bile duct resection (OR 1.9; p = 0.034), abdominal complication (OR 1.8; p = 0.010), and a major postoperative complication (OR 2.4; p < 0.001). Neither index hospitalization > 7 days nor postoperative hepatobiliary complications were independently associated with readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

To accurately assess readmission after hepatectomy, patients should be monitored 45 days after discharge.