1
|
Combet-Curt V, Buchalet C, Le Malicot K, Lemanski C, Deshayes E, Bonichon-Lamichhane N, Lièvre A, Huguet F, Tlili G, Vendrely V. Prognostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT Assessment After Radiotherapy of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus in Patients from the National Multicentric Cohort FFCD-ANABASE. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:1194-1201. [PMID: 38936973 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT qualitative assessment in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS), colostomy-free survival (CFS), and overall survival (OS) after radiation therapy (RT) of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA). Secondary objectives were to evaluate the prognostic value of baseline and posttherapeutic quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters in terms of RFS, CFS, and OS. Methods: We included all consecutive patients from the French multicentric cohort FFCD-ANABASE who had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT at baseline and 4-6 mo after RT or chemoradiotherapy for a localized SCCA. Qualitative assessments separated patients with complete metabolic response (CMR) and non-CMR. Quantitative parameters were measured on baseline and posttreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT. RFS, CFS, and OS were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations among qualitative assessments, quantitative parameters, and RFS, CFS, and OS were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression. Results: Among 1,015 patients treated between January 2015 and April 2020, 388 patients (300 women and 88 men) from 36 centers had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT at diagnosis and after treatment. The median age was 65 y (range, 32-90 y); 147 patients (37.9%) had an early-stage tumor and 241 patients (62.1%) had a locally advanced-stage tumor; 59 patients (15.2%) received RT, and 329 (84.8%) received chemoradiotherapy. The median follow-up was 35.5 mo (95% CI, 32.8-36.6 mo). Patients with CMR had better 3-y RFS, CFS, and OS, at 84.2% (95% CI, 77.8%-88.9%), 84.7% (95% CI, 77.2%-89.3%), and 88.6% (95% CI, 82.5%-92.7%), respectively, than did non-CMR patients, at 42.1% (95% CI, 33.4%-50.6%), 47.9% (95% CI, 38.1%-56.8%), and 63.5 (95% CI, 53.2%-72.1%), respectively (P < 0.0001). Quantitative parameters were available for 154 patients from 3 centers. The following parameters were statistically significantly associated with 3-y RFS: baseline SUVmax (primitive tumor [T]) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05 [95% CI, 1.01-1.1; P = 0.018]), SUVpeak (T) (HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.02-1.15; P = 0.007]), MTV 41% (T) (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1-1.03; P = 0.023]), MTV 41% (lymph node [N]) (HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.03-1.1; P < 0.001]), MTV 41% (T + N) (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1-1.03; P = 0.005]), and posttreatment SUVmax (HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.09-1.34; P < 0.001]). Conclusion: Treatment response assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT after RT for SCCA has a significant prognostic value.18F-FDG PET/CT could be useful for adapting follow-up, especially for patients with locally advanced-stage tumors. Quantitative parameters could permit identification of patients with a worse prognosis but should be evaluated in further trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Astrid Lièvre
- Hepatogastroenterology Department, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Horvat N, Jayaprakasam VS, Crane CH, Zheng J, Gangai N, Romesser PB, Golia Pernicka JS, Capanu M, Gollub MJ. Comparison between pelvic MRI, CT, and PET/CT in baseline staging and radiation planning of anal squamous cell carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:1351-1362. [PMID: 38456896 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04213-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the differences in baseline staging of anal squamous cell carcinoma based on CT, MRI, and PET/CT, and the resultant impact on the radiation plan. METHODS This retrospective study included consecutive patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent baseline pelvic MRI, CT, and PET/CT (all examinations within 3 weeks of each other) from January 2010 to April 2020. CTs, MRIs, and PET/CTs were re-interpreted by three separate radiologists. Several imaging features were assessed; tumor stage was determined based on the eight edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual; and T (tumor), N (node), and M (metastasis) categories were determined based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Radiologist assessments were then randomly presented to a radiation oncologist who formulated the radiation plan in a blinded fashion. RESULTS Across 28 patients (median age, 62 years [range, 31-78], T-category classification was significantly different on PET/CT compared to MRI and CT (p = 0.037 and 0.031, respectively). PET/CT staged a higher proportion of patients with T1/T2 disease (16/28, 57%) compared to MRI (11/28, 39%) and CT (10/28, 36%). MRI staged a higher proportion of patients with T3/T4 disease (14/28, 50%) compared to CT (12/28, 43%) and PET/CT (11/28, 39%). However, there was no significant difference between the three imaging modalities in terms of either N-category, AJCC staging, or NCCN TNM group classification, or in treatment planning. CONCLUSION Our exploratory study showed that MRI demonstrated a higher proportion of T3/T4 tumors, while PET/CT demonstrated more T1/T2 tumors; however, MRI, CT, and PET/CT did not show any significant differences in AJCC and TNM group categories, nor was there any significant difference in treatment doses between them when assessed independently by an experienced radiation oncologist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natally Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Christopher H Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Junting Zheng
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Natalie Gangai
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Paul B Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer S Golia Pernicka
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Marinela Capanu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mirshahvalad SA, Mesci A, Murad V, Kohan A, Ortega C, Veit-Haibach P, Metser U. [ 18F]-FDG PET in anal canal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 51:258-277. [PMID: 37592085 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06393-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide comprehensive data on the diagnostic and prognostic value of [18F]-FDG PET (PET) in anal canal cancer patients. METHODS This study was designed following the PRISMA-DTA guidelines. For the meta-analysis, published original articles (until December 2022) that met the following criteria were included: Evaluated PET for locoregional and/or distant disease detection in patients with histopathology-proven anal canal cancer; Compared PET with a valid reference standard; Provided crude data to calculate meta-analytic estimates. Diagnostic measurements from subgroups were calculated in evaluating primary tumour detection, T stage, lymph node and distant metastases. Articles providing prognostic information on PET were also reported as a systematic review. For pooled meta-analytic calculations, the hierarchical method was used. The bivariate model was conducted to find the summary estimates. Analyses were performed using STATA 16. RESULTS After the screening, 28 studies were eligible to enter the meta-analytic calculations, and data from 15 were reported descriptively. For distinguishing T3/T4 from other T-stages, PET had pooled sensitivity and specificity of 91%(95%CI:72%-97%) and 96%(95%CI:88%-98%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting metastatic (regional and/or distant) disease were 100% (95%CI:82%-100%) and 95% (95%CI:90%-98%), respectively. For therapy response assessment, the sensitivity and specificity of PET were 96%(95%CI:78%-99%) and 86%(95%CI:75%-93%), respectively. Higher pre-treatment total metabolic tumour volume was predictive of poorer survival. Conversely, for those achieving complete metabolic response, the 2-year PFS was 94%(95%CI:91%-97%) versus 51%(95%CI:42%-59%) for others (p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION PET may be a useful tool for anal canal cancer therapy planning and provides valuable prognostic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyed Ali Mirshahvalad
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Medical Imaging Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St 4Th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W7, Canada
| | - Aruz Mesci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, Unit 504, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P5, Canada
| | - Vanessa Murad
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Medical Imaging Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St 4Th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W7, Canada
| | - Andres Kohan
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Medical Imaging Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St 4Th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W7, Canada
| | - Claudia Ortega
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Medical Imaging Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St 4Th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W7, Canada
| | - Patrick Veit-Haibach
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Medical Imaging Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St 4Th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W7, Canada
| | - Ur Metser
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Medical Imaging Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St 4Th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bailleux C, Zwarthoed C, Evesque L, Baron D, Scouarnec C, Benezery K, Chardin D, Jaraudias C, Chateau Y, Gal J, François E. Prognostic impact of post-treatment FDG PET/CT in anal canal cancer: A prospective study. Radiother Oncol 2023; 188:109905. [PMID: 37678620 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The aim of our prospective study was to assess the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT performed two months post treatment for anal canal neoplasm. POPULATION AND METHODS Consecutive patients with histologically proved anal cancer, with 18F-FDG PET/CT pre and two months post treatment were included. Patients were not previously treated for this neoplasm and then received radiotherapy ± chemotherapy. Clinical and pathologic data were collected and for 18F-FDG PET/CT visual and quantitative analysis (standardized uptake value, metabolic volume) were performed; response was classified according to EORTC and PERCIST criteria. The results were assessed for disease free survival and local recurrence free survival using the log-Rank test RESULTS: From December 2014 to September 2019, 94 consecutive patients were screened and 78 were included in this study. Median follow-up was 51 months. Two months post treatment, 37 patients (47.4%) had a complete radiological response according to both EORTC and PERCIST criteria, 66 patients (84.6%) had a clinical complete response. For disease free survival, the prognostic value of complete response was statistically significant (p=0.02) with 18F-FDG PET/CT and with clinical examination (p<0.001). For local recurrence free survival, the prognostic value with 18F-FDG PET/CT was lower (p=0.04) than clinical examination (p < 0.007). CONCLUSION While clinical examination remains the gold standard for post treatment evaluation in anal cancer, 18F-FDG PET/CT has a statistically significant prognostic value. These two assessments could be combined to improve early evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Bailleux
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Oncology, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France
| | - Colette Zwarthoed
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Nuclear Medicine, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France
| | - Ludovic Evesque
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Oncology, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France
| | - David Baron
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Radiation Oncology, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France
| | - Cyrielle Scouarnec
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Radiation Oncology, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France
| | - Karen Benezery
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Radiation Oncology, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France
| | - David Chardin
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Nuclear Medicine, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France
| | - Claire Jaraudias
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Oncology, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France
| | - Yann Chateau
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Statistic, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France
| | - Jocelyn Gal
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Statistic, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France
| | - Eric François
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Oncology, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Congedo A, Mallardi D, Danti G, De Muzio F, Granata V, Miele V. An Updated Review on Imaging and Staging of Anal Cancer-Not Just Rectal Cancer. Tomography 2023; 9:1694-1710. [PMID: 37736988 PMCID: PMC10514831 DOI: 10.3390/tomography9050135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Anal cancer is a rare disease, but its incidence has been increasing steadily. Primary staging and assessment after chemoradiation therapy are commonly performed using MRI, which is considered to be the preferred imaging modality. CT and PET/CT are useful in evaluating lymph node metastases and distant metastatic disease. Anal squamous-cell carcinoma (ASCC) and rectal adenocarcinoma are typically indistinguishable on MRI, and a biopsy prior to imaging is necessary to accurately stage the tumor and determine the treatment approach. This review discusses the histology, MR technique, diagnosis, staging, and treatment of anal cancer, with a particular focus on the differences in TNM staging between anal and rectal carcinomas. PURPOSE This review discusses the histology, MR technique, diagnosis, staging, and treatment of anal cancer, with a particular focus on the differences in TNM staging between anal squamous-cell carcinoma (ASCC) and rectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS To conduct this updated review, a comprehensive literature search was performed using prominent medical databases, including PubMed and Embase. The search was limited to articles published within the last 10 years (2013-2023) to ensure their relevance to the current state of knowledge. INCLUSION CRITERIA (1) articles that provided substantial information on the diagnostic techniques used for ASCC, mainly focusing on imaging, were included; (2) studies reporting on emerging technologies; (3) English-language articles. EXCLUSION CRITERIA articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria, case reports, or articles with insufficient data. The primary outcome of this review is to assess the accuracy and efficacy of different diagnostic modalities, including CT, MRI, and PET, in diagnosing ASCC. The secondary outcomes are as follows: (1) to identify any advancements or innovations in diagnostic techniques for ASCC over the past decade; (2) to highlight the challenges and limitations of the diagnostic process. RESULTS ASCC is a rare disease; however, its incidence has been steadily increasing. Primary staging and assessment after chemoradiation therapy are commonly performed using MRI, which is considered to be the preferred imaging modality. CT and PET/CT are useful in evaluating lymph node metastases and distant metastatic disease. CONCLUSION ASCC and rectal adenocarcinoma are the most common histological subtypes and are typically indistinguishable on MRI; therefore, a biopsy prior to imaging is necessary to stage the tumor accurately and determine the treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio Congedo
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy; (A.C.); (D.M.); (V.M.)
| | - Davide Mallardi
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy; (A.C.); (D.M.); (V.M.)
| | - Ginevra Danti
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy; (A.C.); (D.M.); (V.M.)
| | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences V. Tiberio, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy;
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy; (A.C.); (D.M.); (V.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gul SK, Tepetam H, Yildiz F, Er I, Oksuz DC, Parvizi M, Ozden AS, Alicikus ZA, Sari SY, Alomari O, Gorken IB. Revisiting the Radical Radiotherapy-Radiochemotherapy Results in Anal Canal Cancers: (TROD Gastrointestinal Group Study 02-005). Clin Colorectal Cancer 2023; 22:318-326. [PMID: 37336706 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2023.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM This study aimed to determine treatment outcomes and factors affecting prognosis in patients diagnosed with anal canal cancer who received radical radiotherapy (RT) or radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy (CT-RT) in radiation oncology centers in Turkey and compare the results with literature. MATERIAL AND METHOD The study included 193 patients with anal canal cancer reported between 1995 and 2019, of which 162 had complete data. The study was conducted in 11 radiation oncology centers, and a joint database was shared among them. Patients received radiotherapy doses of 45 Gy to 60 Gy. Data analysis was done using SPSS for Windows version 20. RESULTS Median follow-up was 48.51 months (2-214). All patients received radiotherapy, and 140 (86.4%) received concurrent chemotherapy. Radiotherapy doses of 50.4 Gy to 60 Gy were administered to 74 patients (45.7%) using 2-dimensional-3-dimensional (2D-3D) conformal therapy and 70 patients (43.2%) using intensity modulated radiotherapy technique (IMRT). Acute phase hematologic toxicity was observed in 62 patients (38.3%), and nonhematologic toxicity in 123 patients (75.9%). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 75.1% and disease-specific survival (DSS) rate was 76.4%. OS without colostomy was achieved in 79,8 % at 5 years, and complete response in 112 patients (69.1%). OS rate was significantly higher in 142 patients with positive response (P < .000) and 112 with complete response (P < .000). Anemia (P < .002), local progression, and systemic progression (P < .000) resulted in lower OS (P < .002). In univariate analysis, factors affecting OS rate were: gender, age, stage, lymph node status, T stage, RT treatment duration, and treatment planning with PET fusion, which were found to be statistically significant. Completing radiotherapy in less than 45 days, concurrent chemotherapy, and continued administration of mitomycin and 5 FU as chemotherapy had a significant positive effect on overall survival. OS rate was higher in patients receiving RT dose of 58 Gy or less and undergoing IMRT planning in radiotherapy. IMRT was associated with lower acute and late side effects. CONCLUSION Radiochemotherapy is the primary treatment for anal canal cancer and advanced radiotherapy techniques may increase survival by reducing side effects and improving treatment continuation. Higher treatment doses require further investigation. The efficacy of treatment can be improved by including patients treated with modern radiotherapy techniques in multicenter prospective studies using new and more effective chemotherapy and immunotherapy agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sule Karabulut Gul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Huseyin Tepetam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ferah Yildiz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ilhami Er
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Didem Colpan Oksuz
- Istanbul University Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of Cerrahpasa school of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Murtaza Parvizi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Manisa State Hospital, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Ayse Sevgi Ozden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Sezin Yuce Sari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Omar Alomari
- Hamidiye International School of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ilknur Bilkay Gorken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
El Homsi M, Sheedy SP, Rauch GM, Ganeshan DM, Ernst RD, Golia Pernicka JS. Follow-up imaging of anal cancer after treatment. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:2888-2897. [PMID: 37024606 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03895-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
Anal cancer treatment response assessment can be challenging with both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical evaluation considered essential. MRI, in particular, has shown to be useful for the assessment of treatment response, the detection of recurrent disease in follow up and surveillance, and the evaluation of possible post-treatment complications as well as complications from the tumor itself. In this review, we focus on the role of imaging, mainly MRI, in anal cancer treatment response assessment. We also describe the treatment complications that can occur, and the imaging findings associated with those complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria El Homsi
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | | | - Gaiane M Rauch
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dhakshina M Ganeshan
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Randy D Ernst
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer S Golia Pernicka
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mac Curtain BM, Qian W, Bell J, O'Mahony A, Temperly HC, Ng ZQ. Pre- and post-treatment FDG PET-CT as a predictor of patient outcomes in anal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 67:634-646. [PMID: 37573606 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) has a generally acceptable outlook in terms of survival. 18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computer tomography (FDG PET-CT) is not recommended for routine monitoring post-ASCC treatment. We examine herein if FDG PET-CT has a use in the prognostic evaluation of patients with ASCC, what FDG PET-CT metrics are of value and if a pre- or post-chemo/radiotherapy scan is more prognostic of outcomes. PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials were comprehensively searched until 3 May, 2023. A modified Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to assess for study bias. We present our systematic review alongside pooled hazard ratios (HR) for maximum standardised uptake values (SUV) as a predictor of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Seven studies including 523 patients were included in our systematic review. Current evidence suggests that SUV maximum and median, metabolic tumour volume, total lesion glycolysis and complete and partial metabolic response may be prognostic when considering overall or progression-free survival (OS)/(PFS) along with local recurrence (LR). Pooled HR from two included studies indicate SUV max is prognostic of OS, HR 1.179, CI (1.039-1.338), P = 0.011 and PFS 1.176, CI (1.076-1.285), P < 0.01. FDG PET-CT may have a role to play in the prognostic evaluation of ASCC patients. Current evidence suggests post-treatment scanning may hold superior prognostic value at this time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin M Mac Curtain
- Department of Surgery, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Wanyang Qian
- Department of Surgery, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jack Bell
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Aaron O'Mahony
- Department of Surgery, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Hugo C Temperly
- Department of Surgery, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Zi Qin Ng
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Debacker JM, Maris L, Cordier F, Creytens D, Deron P, Descamps B, D'Asseler Y, De Man K, Keereman V, Libbrecht S, Schelfhout V, Van de Vijver K, Vanhove C, Huvenne W. Direct co-registration of [ 18F]FDG uptake and histopathology in surgically excised malignancies of the head and neck: a feasibility study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:2127-2139. [PMID: 36854863 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06153-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recent technical advancements in PET imaging have improved sensitivity and spatial resolution. Consequently, clinical nuclear medicine will be confronted with PET images on a previously unfamiliar resolution. To better understand [18F]FDG distribution at submillimetric scale, a direct correlation of radionuclide-imaging and histopathology is required. METHODS A total of five patients diagnosed with a malignancy of the head and neck were injected with a clinical activity of [18F]FDG before undergoing surgical resection. The resected specimen was imaged using a preclinical high-resolution PET/CT, followed by slicing of the specimen. Multiple slices were rescanned using a micro-PET/CT device, and one of the slices was snap-frozen for frozen sections. Frozen sections were placed on an autoradiographic film, followed by haematoxylin and eosin staining to prepare them for histopathological assessment. The results from both autoradiography and histopathology were co-registered using an iterative co-registration algorithm, and regions of interest were identified to study radiotracer uptake. RESULTS The co-registration between the autoradiographs and their corresponding histopathology was successful in all specimens. The use of this novel methodology allowed direct comparison of autoradiography and histopathology and enabled the visualisation of uncharted heterogeneity in [18F]FDG uptake in both benign and malignant tissue. CONCLUSION We here describe a novel methodology enabling the direct co-registration of [18F]FDG autoradiography with the gold standard of histopathology in human malignant tissue. The future use of the current methodology could further increase our understanding of the distribution of radionuclides in surgically excised malignancies and hence, improve the integration of pathology and molecular imaging in a multiscale perspective. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05068687.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens M Debacker
- Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
- In vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging Laboratory (ICMI), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Luna Maris
- Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- XEOS Medical, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Fleur Cordier
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - David Creytens
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Philippe Deron
- Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Benedicte Descamps
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- INFINITY Lab, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Yves D'Asseler
- Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Medical Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kathia De Man
- Department of Medical Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Vincent Keereman
- Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- XEOS Medical, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sasha Libbrecht
- Department of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Vanessa Schelfhout
- Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Medical Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Koen Van de Vijver
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Christian Vanhove
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- INFINITY Lab, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Wouter Huvenne
- Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Delhiat AC, Combet-Curt V, Vendrely V. [Anal cancer: Focus on current treatment and future perspective]. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:871-874. [PMID: 36008262 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.06.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Revised: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
Anal cancer is considered a rare tumor, accounting for 6 % of digestive cancers and about 2000 new cases per year in France. It is mostly diagnosed at a localized stage. For many years, the standard of care for patients with localized disease is an association with radiotherapy and chemotherapy including Mitomycin C and 5-Fluorouracil. There weren't any major changes in the therapeutic management of these tumors despite several phase III studies. However, there is an improvement in patient prognostic. This can be explained by imaging progress, using magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography, permitting better staging and evaluation of disease. Moreover, irradiation modalities changed because of the development of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy. Actual research focuses on a more personalized strategy according to tumoral stages. Patients with early-stage tumors are potentially over-treated with a risk of chronic digestive toxicities. Several studies are interested in irradiation de-escalation for these patients. On the other hand, treatment results for patients with advanced tumoral stages are disappointing. It seems relevant to propose a therapeutic intensification for these patients, such as dose escalation, association with new therapies like immunotherapy or induction chemotherapy using taxans given promising results at the metastatic stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A C Delhiat
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie, hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - V Combet-Curt
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie, hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - V Vendrely
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie, hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; U1312-BRIC, eq BioGO, Inserm, université de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Adusumilli P, Elsayed N, Theophanous S, Samuel R, Cooper R, Casanova N, Tolan DJ, Gilbert A, Scarsbrook AF. Combined PET-CT and MRI for response evaluation in patients with squamous cell anal carcinoma treated with curative-intent chemoradiotherapy. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:5086-5096. [PMID: 35274187 PMCID: PMC8913212 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08648-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for response assessment post curative-intent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). METHODS Consecutive ASCC patients treated with curative-intent CRT at a single centre between January 2018 and April 2020 were retrospectively identified. Clinical meta-data including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were collated. Three radiologists evaluated PET-CT and MRI using qualitative response assessment criteria and agreed in consensus. Two-proportion z test was used to compare diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy). Kaplan-Meier analysis (Mantel-Cox log-rank) was performed. RESULTS MRI (accuracy 76%, PPV 44.8%, NPV 95.7%) and PET-CT (accuracy 69.3%, PPV 36.7%, NPV 91.1%) performance metrics were similar; when combined, there were statistically significant improvements (accuracy 94.7%, PPV 78.9%, NPV 100%). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significant differences in PFS between responders and non-responders at PET-CT (p = 0.007), MRI (p = 0.005), and consensus evaluation (p < 0.001). Cox regression analysis of PFS demonstrated a lower hazard ratio (HR) and narrower 95% confidence intervals for consensus findings (HR = 0.093, p < 0.001). Seventy-five patients, of which 52 (69.3%) were females, with median follow-up of 17.8 months (range 5-32.6) were included. Fifteen of the 75 (20%) had persistent anorectal and/or nodal disease after CRT. Three patients died, median time to death 6.2 months (range 5-18.3). CONCLUSION Combined PET-CT and MRI response assessment post-CRT better predicts subsequent outcome than either modality alone. This could have valuable clinical benefits by guiding personalised risk-adapted patient follow-up. KEY POINTS • MRI and PET-CT performance metrics for assessing response following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) were similar. • Combined MRI and PET-CT treatment response assessment 3 months after CRT in patients with ASCC was demonstrated to be superior to either modality alone. • A combined MRI and PET-CT assessment 3 months after CRT in patients with ASCC has the potential to improve accuracy and guide optimal patient management with a greater ability to predict outcome than either modality alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratik Adusumilli
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Noha Elsayed
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Stelios Theophanous
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Robert Samuel
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Rachel Cooper
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Nathalie Casanova
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Damien J. Tolan
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Alexandra Gilbert
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Andrew F. Scarsbrook
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, St James’s University Hospital, Level 1, Bexley Wing, Beckett Street, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS9 7TF UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Koppula BR, Fine GC, Salem AE, Covington MF, Wiggins RH, Hoffman JM, Morton KA. PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology: III. Gastrointestinal Malignancies. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112668. [PMID: 35681647 PMCID: PMC9179927 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Positron emission tomography (PET), typically combined with computed tomography (CT), has become a critical advanced imaging technique in oncology. With PET-CT, a radioactive molecule (radiotracer) is injected in the bloodstream and localizes to sites of tumor because of specific cellular features of the tumor that accumulate the targeting radiotracer. The CT scan, performed at the same time, provides information to facilitate the characterization of radioactivity from deep or dense structures, and to provide detailed anatomic information. PET-CT has a variety of applications in oncology, including staging, therapeutic response assessment, restaging and surveillance. This series of six review articles provides an overview of the value, applications, and imaging interpretive strategies of PET-CT in the more common adult malignancies. The third report in this series provides a review of PET-CT imaging in gastrointestinal malignancies. Abstract PET-CT is an advanced imaging modality with many oncologic applications, including staging, assessment of response to therapy, restaging and longitudinal surveillance for recurrence. The goal of this series of six review articles is to provide practical information to providers and imaging professionals regarding the best use of PET-CT for specific oncologic indications, and the potential pitfalls and nuances that characterize these applications. In the third of these review articles, key tumor-specific clinical information and representative PET-CT images are provided to outline the role that PET-CT plays in the management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. The focus is on the use of 18F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), rather than on research radiopharmaceuticals under development. Many different types of gastrointestinal tumors exist, both pediatric and adult. A discussion of the role of FDG PET-CT for all of these is beyond the scope of this review. Rather, this article focuses on the most common adult gastrointestinal malignancies that may be encountered in clinical practice. The information provided here will provide information outlining the appropriate role of PET-CT in the clinical management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies for healthcare professionals caring for adult cancer patients. It also addresses the nuances and provides interpretive guidance related to PET-CT for imaging providers, including radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians and their trainees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhasker R. Koppula
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA; (B.R.K.); (G.C.F.); (A.E.S.); (M.F.C.); (R.H.W.); (J.M.H.)
| | - Gabriel C. Fine
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA; (B.R.K.); (G.C.F.); (A.E.S.); (M.F.C.); (R.H.W.); (J.M.H.)
| | - Ahmed Ebada Salem
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA; (B.R.K.); (G.C.F.); (A.E.S.); (M.F.C.); (R.H.W.); (J.M.H.)
- Department of Radio Diagnosis and Intervention, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21526, Egypt
| | - Matthew F. Covington
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA; (B.R.K.); (G.C.F.); (A.E.S.); (M.F.C.); (R.H.W.); (J.M.H.)
| | - Richard H. Wiggins
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA; (B.R.K.); (G.C.F.); (A.E.S.); (M.F.C.); (R.H.W.); (J.M.H.)
| | - John M. Hoffman
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA; (B.R.K.); (G.C.F.); (A.E.S.); (M.F.C.); (R.H.W.); (J.M.H.)
| | - Kathryn A. Morton
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA; (B.R.K.); (G.C.F.); (A.E.S.); (M.F.C.); (R.H.W.); (J.M.H.)
- Summit Physician Specialists, Intermountain Healthcare Hospitals, Murray, UT 84123, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-801-581-7553
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Johnsson A, Norman D, Angenete E, Cavalli-Björkman N, Lagerbäck C, Leon O, Lindh B, Lydrup ML, Nilsson MP, Perman M, Radu C, Zackrisson B. Anal cancer in Sweden 2015-2019. Implementation of guidelines, structural changes, national registry and early results. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:575-582. [PMID: 35274596 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2022.2048069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Squamous cell cancer of the anus is an uncommon malignancy, usually caused by human papilloma virus (HPV). Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the recommended treatment in localized disease with cure rates of 60-80%. Local failures should be considered for salvage surgery. With the purpose of improving and equalizing the anal cancer care in Sweden, a number of actions were taken between 2015 and 2017. The aim of this study was to describe the implementation of guidelines and organizational changes and to present early results from the first 5 years of the Swedish anal cancer registry (SACR). METHODS The following were implemented: (1) the first national care program with treatment guidelines, (2) standardized care process, (3) centralization of CRT to four centers and salvage surgery to two centers, (4) weekly national multidisciplinary team meetings where all new cases are discussed, (5) the Swedish anal cancer registry (SACR) was started in 2015. RESULTS The SACR included 912 patients with a diagnosis of anal cancer from 2015 to 2019, reaching a national coverage of 95%. We could show that guidelines issued in 2017 regarding staging procedures and radiotherapy dose modifications were rapidly implemented. At baseline 52% of patients had lymph node metastases and 9% had distant metastases. Out of all patients in the SACR 89% were treated with curative intent, most of them with CRT, after which 92% achieved a local complete remission and the estimated overall 3-year survival was 85%. CONCLUSIONS This is the first report from the SACR, demonstrating rapid nation-wide implementation of guidelines and apparently good treatment outcome in patients with anal cancer in Sweden. The SACR will hopefully be a valuable source for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Johnsson
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Eva Angenete
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | | | - Otilia Leon
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Birgitta Lindh
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Northern Sweden, Umeå, Sweden
| | | | | | - Mats Perman
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Calin Radu
- Department of Oncology, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Björn Zackrisson
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Northern Sweden, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Groendahl AR, Moe YM, Kaushal CK, Huynh BN, Rusten E, Tomic O, Hernes E, Hanekamp B, Undseth C, Guren MG, Malinen E, Futsaether CM. Deep learning-based automatic delineation of anal cancer gross tumour volume: a multimodality comparison of CT, PET and MRI. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:89-96. [PMID: 34783610 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1994645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate target volume delineation is a prerequisite for high-precision radiotherapy. However, manual delineation is resource-demanding and prone to interobserver variation. An automatic delineation approach could potentially save time and increase delineation consistency. In this study, the applicability of deep learning for fully automatic delineation of the gross tumour volume (GTV) in patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) was evaluated for the first time. An extensive comparison of the effects single modality and multimodality combinations of computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have on automatic delineation quality was conducted. MATERIAL AND METHODS 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) images were collected for 86 patients with ASCC. A subset of 36 patients also underwent a study-specific 3T MRI examination including T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging. The resulting two datasets were analysed separately. A two-dimensional U-Net convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained to delineate the GTV in axial image slices based on single or multimodality image input. Manual GTV delineations constituted the ground truth for CNN model training and evaluation. Models were evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (Dice) and surface distance metrics computed from five-fold cross-validation. RESULTS CNN-generated automatic delineations demonstrated good agreement with the ground truth, resulting in mean Dice scores of 0.65-0.76 and 0.74-0.83 for the 86 and 36-patient datasets, respectively. For both datasets, the highest mean Dice scores were obtained using a multimodal combination of PET and ceCT (0.76-0.83). However, models based on single modality ceCT performed comparably well (0.74-0.81). T2W-only models performed acceptably but were somewhat inferior to the PET/ceCT and ceCT-based models. CONCLUSION CNNs provided high-quality automatic GTV delineations for both single and multimodality image input, indicating that deep learning may prove a versatile tool for target volume delineation in future patients with ASCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yngve Mardal Moe
- Faculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway
| | | | - Bao Ngoc Huynh
- Faculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway
| | - Espen Rusten
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Oliver Tomic
- Faculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway
| | - Eivor Hernes
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bettina Hanekamp
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Marianne Grønlie Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
PET imaging in HIV patients. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-822960-6.00037-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
16
|
Franco P, Chiloiro G, Montesi G, Montrone S, Arcelli A, Comito T, Arcadipane F, Caravatta L, Macchia G, Lupattelli M, Niespolo MR, Munoz F, Palazzari E, Krengli M, Valvo F, Gambacorta MA, Genovesi D, Mantello G. A Pattern of Care Report on the Management of Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus—A Study by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Gastrointestinal Tumors Study Group. Medicina (B Aires) 2021; 57:medicina57121342. [PMID: 34946287 PMCID: PMC8707820 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57121342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives: The diagnosis and therapy of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus may vary significantly in daily clinical practice, even if international guidelines are available. Materials and Methods: We conducted a pattern of care survey to assess the management of patients with anal cancer in Italy (38 questions). We analyzed 58 questionnaires. Results: Most of the respondents work in public and/or university hospitals (75.8%) in northern Italy (65.5%). The majority (88.0%) treat less than 20 patients/year. Common examinations for diagnosis and staging are anorectal endoscopy (84.5%), computed tomography scan (86.2%) and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (96.5%). The most frequently prescribed dose to primary tumor is 50–54 Gy (46.5–58.6%) for early stage disease and 54–59.4 Gy (62.1–32.8%) for locally advanced cases. Elective volumes are prescribed around 45 Gy (94.8%). Most participants use volumetric intensity modulated radiotherapy (89.7%) and a simultaneous integrated boost (84.5%). Concurrent radiotherapy, 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin is considered the standard of care (70.6%). Capecitabine is less frequently used (34.4%). Induction chemotherapy is an option for extensive localized disease (65.5%). Consolidation chemotherapy is rarely used (18.9%). A response evaluation is conducted at 26–30 weeks (63.9%) with a pelvic MRI (91.4%). Follow-up is generally run by the multidisciplinary tumor board (62.1%). Conclusions: Differences were observed for radiotherapy dose prescription, calling for a consensus to harmonize treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ‘Maggiore della Carita’ University Hospital, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-032137-33-424
| | - Giuditta Chiloiro
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario ‘Agostino Gemelli’ IRCCS, Via della Pineta Sacchetti, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.C.); (M.A.G.)
| | - Giampaolo Montesi
- Radiation Oncology Department, ‘S.M. Della Misericordia’ Hospital, AULSS 5 Veneto, Viale Tre Martiri 140, 45100 Rovigo, Italy;
| | - Sabrina Montrone
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Alessandra Arcelli
- Radiation Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna University, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Tiziana Comito
- Radiotherapy Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy;
| | - Francesca Arcadipane
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, AOU ‘Citta’ della Salute e della Scienza’, Via Cavour 31, 10123 Turin, Italy;
| | - Luciana Caravatta
- Radiation Oncology Unit, ‘SS Annunziata Hospital’, ‘G. D’Annunzio’ University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini, 66100 Chieti, Italy; (L.C.); (D.G.)
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital–Universita’ Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 1, 86100 Campobasso, Italy;
| | - Marco Lupattelli
- Radiation Oncology Section, Perugia General Hospital, Piazzale Meneghini 1, 06156 Perugia, Italy;
| | - Marina Rita Niespolo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Gerardo, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy;
| | - Fernando Munoz
- Radiation Oncology Department, ‘Umberto Parini’ Regional Hospital, AUSL Valle d’Aosta, Aosta, Viale Ginevra 3, 11100 Aosta, Italy;
| | - Elisa Palazzari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Oncological Referral Center, Via Gallini 2, 33081 Aviano, Italy;
| | - Marco Krengli
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ‘Maggiore della Carita’ University Hospital, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Francesca Valvo
- Scientific Direction Unit, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Strada Campeggi 53, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario ‘Agostino Gemelli’ IRCCS, Via della Pineta Sacchetti, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.C.); (M.A.G.)
| | - Domenico Genovesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, ‘SS Annunziata Hospital’, ‘G. D’Annunzio’ University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini, 66100 Chieti, Italy; (L.C.); (D.G.)
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, ‘G.D’Annunzio’, University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 31, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Giovanna Mantello
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Via Conca 71, Torrette, 60002 Ancona, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological disease extent at FDG PET/CT staging: the ONCOVIPET study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 49:1623-1629. [PMID: 34877609 PMCID: PMC8651274 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05629-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
To investigate whether the COVID-19 pandemic and national lockdown had an impact on the extent of cancer disease at FDG PET/CT staging as surrogate marker. Methods Retrospective observational study including cancer patients submitted to FDG PET/CT staging from June 1 to October 31, 2020, and June 1 to October 31, 2019, respectively. Data regarding primary tumour, nodal (N) status and number of involved nodal stations, and presence and number of distant metastases (M) were collected. Each scan was classified in limited vs advanced status. Data were aggregated across the study population and tumour type. Bi-weekly frequencies of the observed events were analysed. Results Six hundred eleven patients were included (240 in 2019 vs 371 in 2020, respectively). A significant increase of advanced disease patients (rate 1.56, P < 0.001), N + or M + patients (rate 1.84 and 2.09, respectively, P < 0.001), and patients with a greater number of involved N stations or M (rate 2.01 and 2.06, respectively, P < 0.001) were found in 2020 compared with data of 2019. Analysis by tumour type showed a significant increase of advanced disease in lymphoma and lung cancer in 2020 compared with 2019 (P < 0.001). In addition, a significant increase of nodal involvement was found in lung, gastro-intestinal, and breast cancers, as well as in lymphoma patients (P < 0.02). A significant increase of distant metastases was found in lung cancers (P = 0.002). Conclusion Cancer patients with advanced disease at FDG PET/CT staging increased in 2020 compared with 2019, following the national lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 1.5-fold with a significant increase of patients with N or M involvement. Targeted health interventions are needed to mitigate the effects of the pandemic on patient outcome. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-021-05629-0.
Collapse
|
18
|
Parsai A, Zerizer I, Jan H, Kastler A, Subhan S, Balogh P, Nowosinska E, Thaha M, Miquel ME. Assessment of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients and SUVs as Predicators of Histological Differentiation in Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Clin Nucl Med 2021; 46:783-789. [PMID: 34238797 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000003795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
AIM The study aims to assess minimal apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin) and SUVmax as predictors of histological differentiation in patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) and to determine cutoff values for each histopathological tumor grade. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective study of 41 ASCC patients (14 males, 27 females; mean age, 65 ± 13 years) staged with FDG PET/CT and MRI (mean scan time interval, 21 ± 11 days). SUVmax and ADCmin values were measured and compared with histopathological tumor grading obtained from biopsy. RESULTS The mean size and tumor volume were 3 ± 2 cm and 16.5 ± 27.3 cm3, respectively. The mean ADCmin values for well-, moderately, and poorly differentiated ASCC were 935 ± 179, 896 ± 123, and 637 ± 114, respectively. The mean SUVmax for well-, moderately, and poorly differentiated ASCC were 6.9 ± 1.8, 11.5 ± 4.1, and 13.4 ± 2.6, respectively. The difference in mean ADCmin values between poorly and moderately/well-differentiated tumors was statistically significant, whereas this was not significant between moderately and well-differentiated tumors. Differences in SUVmax values were statistically significant between poorly/moderately and well-differentiated tumors, whereas there was no statistical significance between poorly and moderately differentiated tumors. By combining the 2 modalities using cutoff values of 675 × 10-6 mm2·s-1 for ADCmin and 8.5 for SUVmax, it was possible to differentiate the tumor categories with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, respectively, of 84.6%, 96.4%, 91.7%, and 93.1% for well-differentiated ASCC, 76.5%, 87.5%, 81.3%, and 84% for moderately, and 90.9%, 89.3%, 76.9%, and 96.2% for poorly differentiated ASCC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS ADCmin and SUVmax values correlated with the degree of differentiation in ASCC and can be used as predictors of tumor grading and aggressiveness. Combined ADCmin and SUVmax cutoff values can therefore be used for early patient risk stratification and treatment decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hikmat Jan
- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Sana Subhan
- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gerum S, Iglseder W, Schmid R, Peterka K, Knocke-Abulesz TH, Harl P, Schwaiger S, Reiter I, Salinger J, Venhoda C, Kurzweil G, Poetscher M, Jaeger R, Celedin B, Clemens P, Roeder F. Practice of radiation therapy for anal cancer in Austria-a survey on behalf of the Austrian radiation oncology society gastrointestinal tumor group (ÖGRO-GIT). Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:953-961. [PMID: 34591119 PMCID: PMC8547205 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01842-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Purpose We conducted a patterns-of-care survey on chemoradiation for locoregionally confined anal cancer in Austria to evaluate areas of disagreement and to identify possible targets for further standardization. Methods An anonymous questionnaire comprising 38 questions was sent to all Austrian radiation oncology departments. Results were analyzed descriptively and compared to two international guidelines. Results The response rate was 93%. Work-up generally includes DRE, endoscopy, and cross-sectional imaging of chest/abdomen and pelvis. PET-CT is used by 38%. Screening for HIV and biopsies of suspicious lymph nodes are infrequently used. All centers perform IMRT, mainly with daily IGRT. Median doses to the primary are 54.7 Gy (T1–2) and 59.4 Gy (T3–4). Suspicious nodes receive a boost (median dose 54 Gy), while elective nodal areas are mainly treated with 45–50.4 Gy. Target delineation of elective nodal areas seems generally uniform, although disagreement exists regarding inclusion of the common iliac nodes. No agreement was found for OAR-delineation and dose constraints. Concurrent chemotherapy is mitomycin and 5‑FU/capecitabine. Supportive care beyond skin care is infrequently offered. Intensive follow-up is performed for at least 5 years. Treatment of T1N0 shows considerable disagreement. Conclusion We found a high rate of agreement between the centers and concordance with major guidelines. PET-CT, routine HIV testing, and biopsies of suspicious LN seem underrepresented. The largest controversy regarding target volumes concerns inclusion of the common iliac nodes. Prescribed doses are generally in line with the recommendations or higher. OAR delineation, dose constraints, supportive care, and treatment of early anal cancer represent areas for further standardization. Supplementary Information The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-021-01842-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Gerum
- Universitätsklinik für Radiotherapie und Radio-Onkologie, Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg, Uniklinikum der Paracelsus Medizinischen Universität, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
| | - W Iglseder
- Universitätsklinik für Radiotherapie und Radio-Onkologie, Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg, Uniklinikum der Paracelsus Medizinischen Universität, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - R Schmid
- Universitätsklinik für Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Universitätsklinikum AKH Wien, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Austria
| | - K Peterka
- Institut für Radioonkologie, Kaiser-Franz-Josef-Spital/SMZ Süd-Klinik Favoriten, Kundratstraße 3, 1100, Wien, Austria
| | - T H Knocke-Abulesz
- Sonderabteilung Strahlentherapie, Wiener Gesundheitsverbund Klinik Hietzing, Wolkersbergenstraße 1, 1130, Wien, Austria
| | - P Harl
- Institut für Radioonkologie, SMZ - Ost Donauspital der Stadt Wien, Langobardenstraße 122, 1220, Wien, Austria
| | - S Schwaiger
- Institut für Radioonkologie, Klinik Ottakring, Wilhelminenspital der Stadt Wien, Montleartstraße 37, 1160, Wien, Austria
| | - I Reiter
- Institut für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt, Corvinusring 3-5, 2700, Wiener Neustadt, Germany
| | - J Salinger
- Klinische Abteilung für Strahlentherapie - Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Krems, Karl Landsteiner Privatuniversität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Mitterweg 10, 3500, Krems an der Donau, Austria
| | - C Venhoda
- Klinik für Radioonkologie, Klinikum der Barmherzigen Schwestern, Ordensklinikum Linz, Seilerstätte 4, 4010, Linz, Austria
| | - G Kurzweil
- Klinik für Radioonkologie/Strahlentherapie, Salzkammergutklinikum Vöcklabruck, Dr.-Wilhelm-Boch-Straße 1, 4840, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - M Poetscher
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie - Radioonkologie, Comprehensive Cancer Center Graz, Medizinische Universität Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 32, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - R Jaeger
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie - Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - B Celedin
- Institut für Strahlentherapie/Radioonkologie, Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Feschnigstraße 11, 9020, Klagenfurt, Austria
| | - P Clemens
- Institut für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, 6807, Feldkirch, Austria
| | - F Roeder
- Universitätsklinik für Radiotherapie und Radio-Onkologie, Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg, Uniklinikum der Paracelsus Medizinischen Universität, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Guren MG, Sebag-Montefiore D, Franco P, Johnsson A, Segelov E, Deutsch E, Rao S, Spindler KLG, Arnold D. Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus, Unresolved Areas and Future Perspectives for Research: Perspectives of Research Needs in Anal Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 20:279-287. [PMID: 34645589 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Anal cancer is a relatively rare, mostly HPV-related cancer. The curative treatment consists of concurrent chemoradiation delivered with modern radiotherapy techniques. The prognosis for most patients with early localized disease is very favourable; however patients with locally advanced disease and/or HPV negative tumours are at higher risk of locoregional and distant treatment failure. Tailored approaches are presently being investigated to determine the most suitable regimen in terms of radiotherapy dose prescription, target volume selection, normal tissue avoidance, and combination therapy. Metastatic anal cancer is treated with chemotherapy aiming at prolonged survival. The role of immune therapy in the clinical setting is being investigated. There is little knowledge on the biology of anal cancer, and an urgent need for more clinical and translational research dedicated to this disease. In this article, the evidence-base for the current treatment is briefly reviewed, and perspectives on future research needs are high-lighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont and Department of Radiation Oncology, AOU ''Maggiore della Carità,'' Novara, Italy
| | - Anders Johnsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Eva Segelov
- School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Australia and Department of Oncology, Monash Health Clayton, Australia
| | | | - Sheela Rao
- GI Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Dirk Arnold
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1-23. [PMID: 34259912 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01812-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Nuklearmedizin 2021; 60:326-343. [PMID: 34261141 DOI: 10.1055/a-1525-7029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Di Carlo C, di Benedetto M, Vicenzi L, Costantini S, Cucciarelli F, Fenu F, Arena E, Mariucci C, Montisci M, Panni V, Patani F, Valenti M, Palucci A, Burroni L, Mantello G. FDG-PET/CT in the Radiotherapy Treatment Planning of Locally Advanced Anal Cancer: A Monoinstitutional Experience. Front Oncol 2021; 11:655322. [PMID: 34277406 PMCID: PMC8281886 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.655322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Radiotherapy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin-C based chemotherapy has been established as definitive standard therapy approach for anal cancer. Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) leads to a precise treatment of the tumor, allowing dose escalation on Gross Tumor Volume (GTV), with a surrounding healthy tissues sparing. Our study assessed the impact of 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) on the radiotherapy contouring process and its contribution to lymphatic spread detection, resulting to a personalization of Clinical Target Volume (CTV) and dose prescription. METHODS Thirty-seven patients, with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCAC) were analyzed. All patients were evaluated with history and physical examination, trans-anal endoscopic ultrasound, pelvis magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) scans of the chest, abdomen and pelvis and planning 18FDG-PET/CT. The GTV and CTV were drawn on CT, MRI and 18FDG-PET/CT fused images. RESULTS Thirty-four (91%) out of 37 patients presented lymph nodes involvement, in one or more areas, detected on 18FDG-PET/CT and/or MRI. The 18FDG-PET/CT showed positive lymph nodes not detected on MRI imaging (PET+, MRI-) in 14/37 patients (38%). In 14 cases, 18FDG-PET/CT allowed to a dose escalation in the involved nodes. The 18FDG-PET/CT fused images led to change the stage in 5/37(14%) cases: four cases from N0 to N1 (inguinal lymph nodes) and in one case from M0 to M1 (common iliac lymph nodes). CONCLUSIONS The 18FDG-PET/CT has a potentially relevant impact in staging and target volume delineation/definition in patients affected by anal cancer. In our experience, clinical stage variation occurred in 14% of cases. More investigations are needed to define the role of 18FDG-PET/CT in the target volume delineation of anal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clelia Di Carlo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Maika di Benedetto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Lisa Vicenzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Sara Costantini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Francesca Cucciarelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Francesco Fenu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Eleonora Arena
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Cristina Mariucci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Maria Montisci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Valeria Panni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Fabiola Patani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Marco Valenti
- Department of Medical Physics, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Andrea Palucci
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Luca Burroni
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giovanna Mantello
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lukovic J, Kim JJ, Krzyzanowska M, Chadi SA, Taniguchi CM, Hosni A. Anal Adenocarcinoma: A Rare Malignancy in Need of Multidisciplinary Management. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 16:635-640. [PMID: 33049179 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Adenocarcinoma of the anal canal is an uncommon malignancy, making it challenging to perform randomized controlled clinical trials to define best practices in care. For patients with localized disease, there remains a lack of consensus regarding the optimal management, with some physicians advocating for trimodality therapy (similar to the locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma paradigm) and others advocating for definitive radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy (similar to the management of anal squamous cell carcinoma). The objective of this clinical review is to describe the management and outcomes of patients with anal adenocarcinoma to help inform treatment recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelena Lukovic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John J Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Monika Krzyzanowska
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sami A Chadi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cullen M Taniguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ali Hosni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
|
26
|
Bacci M, Quero L, Barbier E, Parrot L, Juguet F, Pommier P, Bazire L, Etienney I, Baba-Hamed N, Spindler L, François E, Ronchin P, Campo ERD, Lemanski C, Lièvre A, Siproudhis L, Abramowitz L, Lepage C, Vendrely V. What is the optimal treatment for T1N0 anal squamous cell carcinoma? Analysis of current practices in the prospective French FFCD ANABASE cohort. Dig Liver Dis 2021; 53:776-784. [PMID: 33867291 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION for localized T1N0 squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) standard radiotherapy (RT) may result in overtreatment and alternative strategies are debated. METHODS T1N0M0 SCCA treated between 2015 and 2020 by local excision (LE) or RT were analyzed from the French prospective FFCD ANABASE cohort. Treatment strategies, recurrence-free and colostomy-free survivals (RFS, CFS) and prognostic factors were reported. RESULTS among 1135 SCCA patients, 99 T1N0M0 were treated by LE(n = 17,17.2%), or RT (n = 82,82.8%) including RT alone (n = 65,79.2%) or chemo-RT (n = 17, 20.7%). Median follow-up was 27.2 months [0.03-54.44]. Median tumor size were 11.4 mm [0.9-20] and 15.3 mm [2-20] in the LE and RT groups respectively. Mean RT tumor dose was 59.4 Gy [18-69.4 Gy]. One patient in LE group and 9 in RT group had a pelvic recurrence, either local (60%), nodal (10%) or both (30%). RFS and CFS at 24 months were 92.2%[95%CI,83.4-96.4] and 94.6%[95%CI,86.1-98.0], at 36 months 88.1%[95%CI,77.1-94.2] and 88.5%[95%CI,77.0-94.5], in LE and RT group respectively, without any significative difference (HR = 0.57;[95%CI,0.07-4.45];p = 0.60). By univariate analysis, male gender was the only prognostic factor(HR = 5.57;95%CI, 1.76-17.63; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION this cohort confirms the heterogeneity of T1N0M0 SCCA management, questioning the place of RT alone, reduced dose or RT volume, and the safety of LE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon Bacci
- Radiation Oncology Department, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, Pessac 33600, France
| | - Laurent Quero
- Radiation Oncology Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, AP-HP, Paris 75010, France
| | - Emilie Barbier
- Biostatistics, FFCD, EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231, University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon 21078, France
| | - Laurène Parrot
- Proctology and digestive diseases Department, Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris 75010, France
| | - Frédéric Juguet
- Proctology and digestive diseases Department, Tivoli Ducos Clinic, Bordeaux 33 000, France
| | - Pascal Pommier
- Radiation Oncology Department, Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon 69008, France
| | - Louis Bazire
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Etienney
- Proctology and digestive diseases Department, Diaconesses Hospital, Croix Saint Simon, Paris 75012, France
| | - Nabil Baba-Hamed
- Medical Oncology Department, Saint-Joseph Hospital group, Paris 75674, France
| | - Lucas Spindler
- Proctology and digestive diseases Department, Saint-Joseph Hospital group, Paris 75674, France
| | - Eric François
- Medical Oncology Department, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, Nice 06189, France
| | - Philippe Ronchin
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Azuréen Center, Mougins 06250, France
| | - Eleonor Rivin Del Campo
- Radiation Oncology Department, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris 75020, France
| | - Claire Lemanski
- Radiation Oncology Department, Regional Cancer Institute, Montpellier 34070, France
| | - Astrid Lièvre
- Proctology and digestive diseases Department, Pontchaillou Hospital, CHU Rennes, Rennes 35000, France
| | - Laurent Siproudhis
- Proctology and digestive diseases Department, Pontchaillou Hospital, CHU Rennes, Rennes 35000, France
| | - Laurent Abramowitz
- Proctology and digestive diseases Department, Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris 75010, France; Ramsay GDS, clinique Blomet, Paris 75000, France
| | - Côme Lepage
- Departement of hepato-gastroenterology, François Mitterrand Hospital, EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231, University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon 21078, France
| | - Véronique Vendrely
- Radiation Oncology Department, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, Pessac 33600, France; INSERM Unit 1035, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux 33000, France.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Siegel R, Werner RN, Koswig S, Gaskins M, Rödel C, Aigner F. Clinical Practice Guideline: Anal Cancer—Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2021; 118:217-24. [PMID: 33531112 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of anal cancer diagnoses has been rising steadily, so that the incidence has doubled in the past 20 years. Almost all anal cancers are induced by persistent infection with human papillomaviruses. Hitherto the care of patients with anal cancer has been heterogeneous and little experience exists with the primary management of anal cancer. METHODS The guideline was developed in accordance with the requirements of the German Guideline Program in Oncology. In line with the GRADE approach, the certainty of the evidence was assessed on the outcome level following a systematic literature search. Interdisciplinary working groups were set up to compile suggestions for recommendations, which were discussed and agreed upon in a formal consensus conference. RESULTS Ninety-three recommendations and statements were developed. No high-quality evidence was available to support recommendations for or against the treatment of stage I anal cancer with local excision alone as an alternative to chemoradiotherapy. Chemoradiotherapy is the gold standard in the treatment of stages II–III. Among other aspects regarding the timing and extent of response evaluation after chemoradiotherapy, the guideline panel recommended against obtaining a biopsy in the event of complete clinical response. Owing to lack of confidence in the available evidence, only open recommendations were given for treatment of stage IV. CONCLUSION This evidence-based clinical practice guideline provides a sound basis for optimizing the interdisciplinary, cross-sector care of anal cancer patients. Among other areas, gaps in research were identified with respect to the care of patients with early-stage or metastatic anal cancer. Approaches such as chemoradiotherapy combined with regional deep hyperthermia require further investigation. The role for immunotherapy in the management of metastasized anal cancer has also been insufficiently explored to date.
Collapse
|
28
|
Parzen JS, Vayntraub A, Squires B, Almahariq MF, Thompson AB, Robertson JM, Kabolizadeh P, Quinn TJ. A population-based analysis of chemoradiation versus radiation alone in the definitive treatment of patients with stage I-II squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:831-844. [PMID: 34012670 PMCID: PMC8107581 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal management of patients with stage I-II squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the anus is controversial. The current study evaluates the efficacy of combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CRT) versus radiation therapy (RT) alone in the treatment of these patients using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries. METHODS SEER 18 Custom Data registries were queried for patients with stage I-II SCC of the anus. Univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariable analysis (MVA) using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression modeling were performed. Propensity-score matched analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to account for indication bias. RESULTS A total of 4,288 patients with stage I-II disease were identified, of whom 3,982 (93%) underwent CRT and 306 (7%) underwent RT. Median follow-up was 42 months. Approximately 30.8% had T1 disease and 69.2% had T2-T3 disease. The IPTW-adjusted 5-year overall survival (OS) was 76.7%, with no significant differences between the CRT and RT groups (77% vs. 73.5%, P=0.33). On multivariate IPTW-adjusted analysis, the lack of association between CRT use and OS was upheld (HR, 0.84, 95% CI, 0.65-1.08, P=0.2). On subgroup analyses, 5-year OS was 86% with CRT (n=1,216) and 84.2% with RT (n=103) (P=0.74) in stage I (T1N0) patients, while 5-year OS was 72.8% with CRT (n=2,766) and 66.4% with RT (n=203) (P=0.13) in stage II (T2-3N0) patients. CRT was associated with improved median OS in stage II patients (119 months vs. not reached, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS The current study suggests that omission of concurrent chemotherapy is not associated with inferior OS in patients with stage I SCC of the anus. However, combined chemoradiation was superior to radiation alone in patients with stage II disease. Prospective evidence is needed to optimize clinical decision-making in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob S Parzen
- Beaumont Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | | | - Bryan Squires
- Beaumont Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | | | - Andrew B Thompson
- Beaumont Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - John M Robertson
- Beaumont Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | | | - Thomas J Quinn
- Beaumont Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Simoni N, Rossi G, Benetti G, Zuffante M, Micera R, Pavarana M, Guariglia S, Zivelonghi E, Mengardo V, Weindelmayer J, Giacopuzzi S, de Manzoni G, Cavedon C, Mazzarotto R. 18F-FDG PET/CT Metrics Are Correlated to the Pathological Response in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated With Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Neoadjuvant Chemo-Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2020; 10:599907. [PMID: 33330097 PMCID: PMC7729075 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.599907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective The aim of this study was to assess the ability of Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) to provide functional information useful in predicting pathological response to an intensive neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (nCRT) protocol for both esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) patients. Material and Methods Esophageal carcinoma (EC) patients, treated in our Center between 2014 and 2018, were retrospectively reviewed. The nCRT protocol schedule consisted of an induction phase of weekly administered docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TCF) for 3 weeks, followed by a concomitant phase of weekly TCF for 5 weeks with concurrent radiotherapy (50–50.4 Gy in 25–28 fractions). Three 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed: before (PET1) and after (PET2) induction chemotherapy (IC), and prior to surgery (PET3). Correlation between PET parameters [maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmax and SUVmean), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG)], radiomic features and tumor regression grade (TGR) was investigated. Results Fifty-four patients (35 ADC, 19 SCC; 48 cT3/4; 52 cN+) were eligible for the analysis. Pathological response to nCRT was classified as major (TRG1-2, 41/54, 75.9%) or non-response (TRG3-4, 13/54, 24.1%). A major response was statistically correlated with SCC subtype (p = 0.02) and smaller tumor length (p = 0.03). MTV and TLG measured prior to IC (PET1) were correlated to TRG1-2 response (p = 0.02 and p = 0.02, respectively). After IC (PET2), SUVmean and TLG correlated with major response (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively). No significance was detected when relative changes of metabolic parameters between PET1 and PET2 were evaluated. At textural quantitative analysis, three independent radiomic features extracted from PET1 images ([JointEnergy and InverseDifferenceNormalized of GLCM and LowGrayLevelZoneEmphasis of GLSZM) were statistically correlated with major response (p < 0.0002). Conclusions 18F-FDG PET/CT traditional metrics and textural features seem to predict pathologic response (TRG) in EC patients treated with induction chemotherapy followed by neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. Further investigations are necessary in order to obtain a reliable predictive model to be used in the clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Simoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Gabriella Rossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulio Benetti
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Zuffante
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Renato Micera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Pavarana
- Department of Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefania Guariglia
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Zivelonghi
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Valentina Mengardo
- Department of General and Upper G.I. Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Jacopo Weindelmayer
- Department of General and Upper G.I. Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Simone Giacopuzzi
- Department of General and Upper G.I. Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni de Manzoni
- Department of General and Upper G.I. Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Carlo Cavedon
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Renzo Mazzarotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Slim N, Passoni P, Incerti E, Tummineri R, Gumina C, Cattaneo GM, De Nardi P, Canevari C, Fiorino C, Ronzoni M, Tamburini AM, Burgio V, Gianolli L, Di Muzio N. Impact of sentinel lymph-node biopsy and FDG-PET in staging and radiation treatment of anal cancer patients. Sci Rep 2020; 10:14613. [PMID: 32884036 PMCID: PMC7471696 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71577-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
To assess the role of sentinel lymph-node biopsy (SLNB) and FDG-PET in staging and radiation treatment (RT) of anal cancer patients. This retrospective study was performed on 80 patients (male: 32, female: 48) with a median age of 60 years (39-89 years) with anal squamous cell carcinoma who were treated from March 2008 to March 2018 at the IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital. Patients without clinical evidence of inguinal LNs metastases and/or with discordance between clinical evidence and imaging features were considered for SLNB. FDG-PET was performed in 69/80 patients. Patients with negative imaging in inguinal region and negative SLNB could avoid RT on groin to spare inguinal toxicity. CTV included GTV (primary tumour and positive LNs) and pelvic ± inguinal LNs. PTV1 and PTV2 corresponded to GTV and CTV, respectively, adding 0.5 cm. RT dose was 50.4 Gy/28 fractions to PTV2 and 64.8 Gy/36 fractions to PTV1, delivered with 3DCRT (n = 24) or IMRT (n = 56), concomitant to Mitomycin-C and 5-FU chemotherapy. FDG-PET showed inguinal uptake in 21/69 patients (30%) and was negative in 48/69 patients (70%). Lymphoscintigraphy was performed in 11/21 positive patients (4 patients SLNB confirmed inguinal metastases, 6 patients false positive and 1 patient SLN not found), and in 29/48 negative patients (5/29 showed metastases, 23/29 true negative and 1 SLN not found). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of FDG-PET were 62%, 79%, 40% and 82%, respectively. Median follow-up time from diagnosis was 40.3 months (range: 4.6-136.4 months): 69 patients (86%) showed a complete response, 10 patients (13%) a partial response, 1 patient (1%) a stable disease. Patients treated on groin (n = 54) versus not treated (n = 26) showed more inguinal dermatitis (G1-G2: 50% vs. 12%; G3-G4: 17% vs. 0%, p < 0.05). For patients treated on groin, G3-G4 inguinal dermatitis, stomatitis and neutropenia were significantly reduced with IMRT against 3DCRT techniques (13% vs. 36%, p = 0.10; 3% vs. 36%, p = 0.003; 8% vs. 29%, p = 0.02, respectively). SLNB improves the FDG-PET inguinal LNs staging in guiding the decision to treat inguinal nodes. IMRT technique significantly reduced G3-G4 toxicities when patients are treated on groin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Najla Slim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Passoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Elena Incerti
- Unit of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Calogero Gumina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paola De Nardi
- Unit of Gastroenterology Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Carla Canevari
- Unit of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Fiorino
- Unit of Medical Physics, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Ronzoni
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Valentina Burgio
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Gianolli
- Unit of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Nadia Di Muzio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sandach P, Kasper-Virchow S, Rischpler C, Herrmann K. Molecular Imaging and Therapy of Colorectal and Anal Cancer. Semin Nucl Med 2020; 50:465-470. [PMID: 32768009 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the cancer with the third highest incidence both in males and females in the USA and is also frequently occurring in other industrialized nations. Anal cancer on the other hand is much rarer, but has a rising incidence, especially in high income nations and with a connection to HIV infections, homosexual men and a younger age of the first sexual encounter. Both have high mortality rates in common and are complex to handle in terms of prevention, staging, treatment and diagnostic of recurrence. This article aims to give an overview about the established diagnostic methods of nuclear medicine, especially sole PET and (contrast enhanced) hybrid imaging with 18F-FDG as tracer for primary staging, restaging, therapy monitoring and radiotherapy planning in current guidelines, with a special focus on the American guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network for colorectal and anal cancer. There will also be an outlook on potential future adjustments in those leading to a more significant representation of nuclear medicine by giving a synopsis of the available studies and data published in international medical press. New tracers that are still in research stage, progress in the imaging techniques, for example a further establishment of PET/MR hybrid imaging, the use of artificial intelligence and parametric imaging, as well as possible future theranostic applications like c-MET binding peptides will also be shortly discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Sandach
- Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Stefan Kasper-Virchow
- Westdeutsches Magen-und Darmzentrum Essen, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | | | - Ken Herrmann
- Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Braun L, Reinert C, Zips D, Nikolaou K, Pfannenberg C, Gani C. Treatment outcome after radiochemotherapy in anal cancer patients staged with 18F-FDG-PET-CT. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2020; 24:83-87. [PMID: 32642564 PMCID: PMC7334798 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anal cancer (AC) is a malignancy with increasing incidence and commonly treated with radiochemotherapy. Positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) has been shown to improve treatment outcome in various oncological diseases, however, for AC long-term outcome data is sparse. The aim of the present study is therefore to report outcomes in our cohort of PET/CT staged AC patients treated with radiochemotherapy. METHODS Patients with AC who were treated with radiochemotherapy in curative intent were included in this retrospective study if a PET/CT scan was performed pre-therapeutically. Information from PET/CT was considered for nodal and primary target volume definition. Radiotherapy dose to the primary tumor was 50-66 Gy and concomitant chemotherapy included 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C. The uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) was quantified using 50%-isocontour volumes of interests (VOIs) and measuring the standardized uptake value (SUV) and the metabolic tumor volume (MTV).18F-FDG uptake was correlated with baseline clinical parameters and long-term oncological outcome. Survival estimates were determined according to Kaplan-Meier. RESULTS A total of 60 patients were included in this study. Estimates for three-year overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were 94.5% and 80%. Five patients developed local (n = 2) or locoregional and local (n = 3) failure. Baseline PET/CT related parameters correlated with primary tumor stage, nodal stage and tumor grading. DFS was independent of T-stage, N-stage and baseline 18F-FDG-uptake. CONCLUSION In this cohort of PET/CT staged AC patients, excellent outcomes for DFS were seen. PET-based markers of tumor burden correlate with local stage of AC, however, are not of prognostic relevance for disease-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L.H. Braun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Palliativmedizin, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Germany
| | - C.P. Reinert
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tubingen, Germany
| | - D. Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - K. Nikolaou
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tubingen, Germany
| | - C. Pfannenberg
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tubingen, Germany
| | - C. Gani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Additional Value of 2-[ 18F]FDG PET/CT Comparing to MRI in Treatment Approach of Anal Cancer Patients. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9092715. [PMID: 32842617 PMCID: PMC7563850 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9092715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Accurate staging and treatment planning are imperative for precise management in Anal Cancer (ACa) patients. We aimed to evaluate the additive and prognostic value of pre-treatment 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (2-[18F]FDG PET/CT) in the staging and management of ACa compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This retrospective study was conducted on 54 patients. Pre-treatment 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT studies and MRI reports were compared considering the primary tumor, pelvic lymph nodes, and metastatic lesions. The impact of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in the management and its prognostic value, using maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), were assessed. Discordant findings were found in 46.3% of patients (5 in T; 1 in T and N; 18 in N; and 1 in M stage). 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT resulted in up-staging in 9.26% and down-staging in 3.7% of patients. Perirectal lymph nodes were metabolically inactive in 12.9% of patients. Moreover, 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT resulted in management change in 24.1% of patients. Finally, SUVmax provided no prognostic value. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT altered staging and management in a sizable number of patients in this study, and supports a need for a change in guidelines for it to be used as a routine complementary test in the initial management of ACa.
Collapse
|
34
|
Lum C, Prenen H, Body A, Lam M, Segelov E. A 2020 update of anal cancer: the increasing problem in women and expanding treatment landscape. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 14:665-680. [PMID: 32458709 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2020.1775583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Anal cancer is a rare malignancy with increasing incidence, notably in women. This disease is highly associated with HPV infection and its incidence and mortality are currently rising. Most patients present with localized disease which has a high survival after definitive treatment with chemoradiation. For patients who develop metastatic disease or present with this de novo, survival is poor. AREAS COVERED This review provides a summary of current literature on anal cancer. With a focus on women, this includes current epidemiological trends, role of HPV, and the current and future treatment landscape, including HPV vaccination and immunotherapy. Screening currently focusses on HIV-positive men, missing most female cases. In curative disease, trials are investigating treatment de-intensification in good prognostic groups. Immunotherapy is showing early promise in the advanced disease setting. EXPERT OPINION Similar to cervical cancer, anal cancer is strongly associated with HPV, and therefore, broader implementation of screening programs may reduce its incidence. HPV vaccination is expected to reduce the development of (pre)malignant anal lesions. The emergence of biomarkers will assist patient treatment selection, allowing optimal balance of treatment efficacy and morbidity. It is hoped that new treatment approaches, including immunotherapy, will improve outcomes. International collaboration is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Lum
- Medical Oncology, Monash Medical Centre , Clayton, Australia
| | - Hans Prenen
- Medical Oncology, Monash Medical Centre , Clayton, Australia.,Oncology Department, University Hospital Antwerp , Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Amy Body
- Medical Oncology, Monash Medical Centre , Clayton, Australia
| | - Marissa Lam
- Medical Oncology, Monash Medical Centre , Clayton, Australia
| | - Eva Segelov
- Medical Oncology, Monash Medical Centre , Clayton, Australia.,School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University , Clayton, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Le Thiec M, Testard A, Ferrer L, Guillerminet C, Morel O, Maucherat B, Rusu D, Girault S, Lacombe M, Hamidou H, Meyer VG, Rio E, Hiret S, Kraeber-Bodéré F, Campion L, Rousseau C. Prognostic Impact of Pretherapeutic FDG-PET in Localized Anal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E1512. [PMID: 32527039 PMCID: PMC7352672 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Due to the heterogeneity of tumour mass segmentation methods and lack of consensus, our study evaluated the prognostic value of pretherapeutic positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) metabolic parameters using different segmentation methods in patients with localized anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Eighty-one patients with FDG-PET before radiochemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Semiquantitative data were measured with three fixed thresholds (35%, 41% and 50% of Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax)) and four segmentation methods based on iterative approaches (Black, Adaptive, Nestle and Fitting). Metabolic volumes of primary anal tumour (P-MTV) and total tumour load (T-MTV: P-MTV+ lymph node MTV) were calculated. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Seven multivariate models were created to compare FDG-PET tumour volumes prognostic impact. For all segmentation thresholds, PET metabolic volume parameters were independent prognostic factor and T-MTV variable was consistently better associated with EFS than P-MTV. Patient's sex was an independent variable and significantly correlated with EFS. With fixed threshold segmentation methods, 35% of SUVmax threshold seemed better correlated with EFS and the best cut-off for discrimination between a low and high risk of event occurrence was 40 cm3. Determination of T-MTV by FDG-PET using fixed threshold segmentation is useful for predicting EFS for primary anal SCC. If these data are confirmed in larger studies, FDG-PET could contribute to individualized patient therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maelle Le Thiec
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 44805 Saint Herblain, France; (B.M.); (D.R.); (F.K.-B.); (C.R.)
| | - Aude Testard
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 49055 Angers, France; (A.T.); (O.M.); (S.G.); (M.L.)
| | - Ludovic Ferrer
- Medical Physics Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 44805 Saint Herblain, France;
- CRCINA, University of Nantes and Angers, INSERM UMR1232, CNRS-ERL6001, 49055 Angers, France;
| | | | - Olivier Morel
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 49055 Angers, France; (A.T.); (O.M.); (S.G.); (M.L.)
| | - Bruno Maucherat
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 44805 Saint Herblain, France; (B.M.); (D.R.); (F.K.-B.); (C.R.)
| | - Daniela Rusu
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 44805 Saint Herblain, France; (B.M.); (D.R.); (F.K.-B.); (C.R.)
| | - Sylvie Girault
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 49055 Angers, France; (A.T.); (O.M.); (S.G.); (M.L.)
| | - Marie Lacombe
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 49055 Angers, France; (A.T.); (O.M.); (S.G.); (M.L.)
| | - Hadji Hamidou
- Radiation Oncology Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 49055 Angers, France;
| | | | - Emmanuel Rio
- Radiation Oncology Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 44805 Saint Herblain, France;
| | - Sandrine Hiret
- Medical oncology Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 44805 Saint Herblain, France;
| | - Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 44805 Saint Herblain, France; (B.M.); (D.R.); (F.K.-B.); (C.R.)
- CRCINA, University of Nantes and Angers, INSERM UMR1232, CNRS-ERL6001, 49055 Angers, France;
| | - Loïc Campion
- CRCINA, University of Nantes and Angers, INSERM UMR1232, CNRS-ERL6001, 49055 Angers, France;
- Biometrics Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 44805 Saint Herblain, France
| | - Caroline Rousseau
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, 44805 Saint Herblain, France; (B.M.); (D.R.); (F.K.-B.); (C.R.)
- CRCINA, University of Nantes and Angers, INSERM UMR1232, CNRS-ERL6001, 49055 Angers, France;
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Martin D, von der Grün J, Rödel C, Fokas E. Management of anal cancer patients - a pattern of care analysis in German-speaking countries. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:122. [PMID: 32450863 PMCID: PMC7249388 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01539-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Radiotherapy dose and target volume prescriptions for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) vary considerably in daily practice and guidelines, including those from NCCN, UK, Australasian, and ESMO. We conducted a pattern-of-care survey to assess the patient management in German speaking countries. Methods We developed an anonymous questionnaire comprising 18 questions on diagnosis and treatment of ASCC. The survey was sent to 361 DEGRO-associated institutions, including 41 university hospitals, 118 non-university institutions, and 202 private practices. Results We received a total of 101 (28%) surveys, including 20 (19.8%) from university, 36 (35.6%) from non-university clinics, and 45 (44.6%) from private practices. A total of 28 (27.8%) institutions reported to treat more than 5 patients with early-stage ASCC and 42 (41.6%) institutions treat more than 5 patients with locoregionally-advanced ASCC per year. Biopsy of suspicious inguinal nodes was advocated in only 12 (11.8%) centers. Screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is done in 28 (27.7%). Intensity modulated radiotherapy or similar techniques are used in 97%. The elective lymph node dose ranged from 30.6 Gy to 52.8 Gy, whereas 87% prescribed 50.4–55. 8 Gy (range: 30.6 to 59.4 Gy) to the involved lymph nodes. The dose to gross disease of cT1 or cT2 ASCC ranged from 50 to ≥60 Gy. For cT3 or cT4 tumors the target dose ranged from 54 Gy to more than 60 Gy, with 76 (75.2%) institutions prescribing 59.4 Gy. The preferred concurrent chemotherapy regimen was 5-FU/Mitomycin C, whereas 6 (6%) prescribed Capecitabine/Mitomycin C. HIV-positive patients are treated with full-dose CRT in 87 (86.1%) institutions. First assessment for clinical response is reported to be performed at 4–6 weeks after completion of CRT in 2 (2%) institutions, at 6–8 weeks in 20 (19.8%), and 79 (78%) institutions wait up to 5 months. Conclusions We observed marked differences in radiotherapy doses and treatment technique in patients with ASCC, and also variable approaches for patients with HIV. These data underline the need for an consensus treatment guideline for ASCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Martin
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany. .,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany. .,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site: Frankfurt a. M, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Jens von der Grün
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site: Frankfurt a. M, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site: Frankfurt a. M, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site: Frankfurt a. M, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Riechelmann RP, Peixoto RD, Fernandes GDS, Weschenfelder RF, Prolla G, Filho DR, Andrade AC, Crosara M, Rego JFM, Gansl RC, Coimbra F, Aguiar S, Carvalho E, Hoff PM, Coutinho AK. Evidence-based recommendations for gastrointestinal cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic by the Brazilian Gastrointestinal Tumours Group. Ecancermedicalscience 2020; 14:1048. [PMID: 32565901 PMCID: PMC7289615 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE As of 2020, the world is facing the great challenge of the COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. While the overall mortality is low, the virus is highly virulent and may infect millions of people worldwide. This will consequently burden health systems, particularly by those individuals considered to be at high risk of severe complications from COVID-19. Such risk factors include advanced age, cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases, diabetes and cancer. However, few data on the outcomes of cancer patients infected by SARS CoV-2 exist. Therefore, there is a lack of guidance on how to manage cancer patients during the pandemic. We sought to propose specific recommendations about the management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. METHODS The Brazilian Gastrointestinal Tumours Group board of directors and members sought up-to-date scientific literature on each tumour type and discussed all recommendations by virtual meetings to provide evidence-based-and sometimes, expert opinion-recommendation statements. Our objectives were to recommend evidence-based approaches to both treat and minimise the risk of COVID-19 for cancer patients, and simultaneously propose how to decrease the use of hospital resources at a time these resources need to be available to treat COVID-19 patients. RESULTS Overall and tumour-specific recommendations were made by stage (including surgical, locoregional, radiotherapy, systemic treatments and follow-up strategies) for the most common gastrointestinal malignancies: esophagus, gastric, pancreas, bile duct, hepatocellular, colorectal, anal cancer and neuroendocrine tumours. CONCLUSIONS Our recommendations emphasise the importance of treating cancer patients, using the best evidence available, while simultaneously taking into consideration the world-wide health resource hyperutilisation to treat non-cancer COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Gabriel Prolla
- Centro de Oncologia Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS 90610-000, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Rene C Gansl
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, SP 05652-900, Brazil
| | - Felipe Coimbra
- AC Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, SP 01509-010, Brazil
| | - Samuel Aguiar
- AC Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, SP 01509-010, Brazil
| | | | - Paulo M Hoff
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP 01246-000, Brazil
| | - Anelisa K Coutinho
- Clinica AMO, Assistência Multidisciplinar em Oncologia, Salvador, BA 41950-640, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Understanding the Lymphatics: Review of the N Category in the Updated TNM Staging of Cancers of the Digestive System. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 215:58-68. [PMID: 32432907 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.19.22636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The N category has been significantly updated in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer's TNM classification. To ensure correct tumor staging, prognosis, and management, it is critical to be aware of these changes. This article reviews the updated N category, organ-specific regional lymph nodes, and lymphatic drainage pathways for cancers of the digestive system from the esophagus to the anal canal. CONCLUSION. Detection of lymph node involvement may be challenging, and knowledge of nodal characteristics, lymphatic drainage pathways, and imaging modalities is essential to optimize detection rate to ensure accurate staging, prognosis estimation, and streamlined management.
Collapse
|
39
|
Schaub SK, Ermoian RP, Wang CL, O'Malley RB, Kim EY, Shuman WP, Hendrickson K, Apisarnthanarax S. Bridging the Radiation Oncology and Diagnostic Radiology Communication Gap: A Survey to Determine Usefulness and Optimal Presentation of Radiotherapy Treatment Plans for Radiologists. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2020; 49:161-167. [PMID: 30885420 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Revised: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES We hypothesized that providing visual-spatial information to radiologists on where radiation has been delivered in an easily accessible way may improve the accuracy of image interpretation and thereby improve quality of patient care. We present a national representation of radiologists' opinions regarding the usefulness and optimal approach for implementing a system to promote access to radiotherapy (RT) plans. METHODS An anonymous survey was sent to the members of the Association of University Radiologists. Descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS Questionnaires were returned by 95 of 1383 members. Demographics comprised of 76% attendings with 94% practicing within an academic setting. Only 40% of radiologists reported that they knew most of the time whether a patient has received RT in the field scanned. A large majority of respondents (88%) felt that a history of prior radiation in a cancer patient was at least an occasional barrier that affected the ability to interpret imaging findings in a clinically useful way. The following types of information was considered helpful when interpreting a scan: screenshots of the radiation plan (85%), scrollable DICOM data on planning CT showing delivered RT dose lines (54%), and written text RT treatment summary (47%). Nearly all (89%) desired DICOM data within the clinical radiology Picture Archiving and Communication System system. Radiologists expected the ease of accessibility to RT plans to result in increased efficiency (76%) and accuracy (88%). CONCLUSION Diagnostic radiologists desire improved access and integration of radiotherapy plans into the diagnostic radiology clinical workup in the form of visual-spatial data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie K Schaub
- University of Washington, Department of Radiation Oncology, Seattle, WA.
| | - Ralph P Ermoian
- University of Washington, Department of Radiation Oncology, Seattle, WA
| | - Carolyn L Wang
- University of Washington, Department of Radiology, Seattle, WA
| | - Ryan B O'Malley
- University of Washington, Department of Radiology, Seattle, WA
| | - Edward Y Kim
- University of Washington, Department of Radiation Oncology, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Unterrainer M, Eze C, Ilhan H, Marschner S, Roengvoraphoj O, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Walter F, Kunz WG, Rosenschöld PMA, Jeraj R, Albert NL, Grosu AL, Niyazi M, Bartenstein P, Belka C. Recent advances of PET imaging in clinical radiation oncology. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:88. [PMID: 32317029 PMCID: PMC7171749 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01519-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy and radiation oncology play a key role in the clinical management of patients suffering from oncological diseases. In clinical routine, anatomic imaging such as contrast-enhanced CT and MRI are widely available and are usually used to improve the target volume delineation for subsequent radiotherapy. Moreover, these modalities are also used for treatment monitoring after radiotherapy. However, some diagnostic questions cannot be sufficiently addressed by the mere use standard morphological imaging. Therefore, positron emission tomography (PET) imaging gains increasing clinical significance in the management of oncological patients undergoing radiotherapy, as PET allows the visualization and quantification of tumoral features on a molecular level beyond the mere morphological extent shown by conventional imaging, such as tumor metabolism or receptor expression. The tumor metabolism or receptor expression information derived from PET can be used as tool for visualization of tumor extent, for assessing response during and after therapy, for prediction of patterns of failure and for definition of the volume in need of dose-escalation. This review focuses on recent and current advances of PET imaging within the field of clinical radiotherapy / radiation oncology in several oncological entities (neuro-oncology, head & neck cancer, lung cancer, gastrointestinal tumors and prostate cancer) with particular emphasis on radiotherapy planning, response assessment after radiotherapy and prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. .,Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - C Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - H Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - S Marschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - O Roengvoraphoj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - N S Schmidt-Hegemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - F Walter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - W G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - P Munck Af Rosenschöld
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - R Jeraj
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA
| | - N L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - M Niyazi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Belka
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Aide N, Tainturier LE, Nganoa C, Houdu B, Kammerer J, Galais MP, Ciappuccini R, Lasnon C. HYPHYCA: a prospective study in 613 patients conducting a comprehensive analysis for predictive factors of physiological 18F-FDG anal uptake. EJNMMI Res 2020; 10:28. [PMID: 32193623 PMCID: PMC7082447 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-0615-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Anal cancer is a relatively rare tumor of which incidence increases in developed countries. 18F-FDG PET has been increasingly used for its post radio-chemotherapy evaluation. However, several authors have reported the risk of local false-positive findings leading to low specificity and positive predictive values. These false-positive results could be due to post-radiotherapy inflammation or infection but certainly also to physiological anal canal uptake that is observed on a regular basis in clinical practice. The purpose of this prospective study (NCT03506529; HYPHYCA) was therefore to seek predictive factors of physiological anal canal hypermetabolism. Materials and methods Over a 2-month period, patients aged 18 years old and more, referred for 18F-FDG PET-CT at two EARL-accredited PET centers were included, after obtaining their informed and written consent. They were asked to fill in a questionnaire including seven closed questions about usual intestinal transit, ongoing medications relative to intestinal transit, history of digestive, and anal and/or pelvic diseases. Age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) were recorded. A single nuclear medicine physician visually and quantitatively analyzed anal canal uptake (SUVmax_EARL) and assessed visual rectal content (air, feces, or both) and the largest rectal diameter (mm). Results Six hundred and thirteen patients were included (sex ratio F/M = 0.99) and 545 (89%) questionnaires were entirely completed. Significantly more males presented anal canal hypermetabolism (sex ratio (M/F) = 1.18 versus 0.85, p = 0.048). Moreover, patients with anal canal hypermetabolism had higher BMI (27.6 (5.7) kg/m2 versus 23.9 (4.5) kg/m2, p < 0.0001), higher rate of hemorrhoid history (43% versus 27%, p = 0.016), and higher rate of rectum filled with only feces (21% versus 12%, p = 0.019) as compared to patients with no anal canal uptake. On logistic regression, all these variables were found to be independent predictors of the occurrence of an anal canal hypermetabolism. Odds ratio were 1.16 (1.12–1.20) per unit of BMI (kg/m2) (p < 0.0001), 1.48 (1.04–2.11) for males (p = 0.030), 1.64 (1.10–2.45) for hemorrhoids history (p = 0.016), and 1.94 (1.147–3.22) for the rectum filled with only feces (p = 0.010). Conclusion According to our study, the predictive factors of physiological anal canal hypermetabolism are high BMI, male gender, hemorrhoid history, and rectum filled with only feces. This may pave the way to a more specific interpretation of post radio-chemotherapy PET evaluations of anal canal cancer, provided that other studies are conducted in this specific population. Trial registration This prospective study was registered at Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT03506529; HYPHYCA on April 24, 2018
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Aide
- Normandie University, Caen, France. .,Nuclear Medicine Department, Caen University Hospital, Avenue Côte de Nacre, 14000, Caen, France. .,INSERM 1086 ANTICIPE, Normandie University, Caen, France.
| | - Laure-Eugénie Tainturier
- Normandie University, Caen, France.,Nuclear Medicine Department, Caen University Hospital, Avenue Côte de Nacre, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Cathy Nganoa
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Caen University Hospital, Avenue Côte de Nacre, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Benjamin Houdu
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Caen University Hospital, Avenue Côte de Nacre, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Jennifer Kammerer
- Normandie University, Caen, France.,Radiation Oncology Department, François Baclesse Cancer Centre, Caen, France
| | - Marie-Pierre Galais
- Digestive Oncology Department, François Baclesse Cancer Centre, Caen, France
| | - Renaud Ciappuccini
- Nuclear Medicine Department, François Baclesse Cancer Centre, Caen, France
| | - Charline Lasnon
- INSERM 1086 ANTICIPE, Normandie University, Caen, France.,Nuclear Medicine Department, François Baclesse Cancer Centre, Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
A prospective, multi-centre trial of multi-parametric MRI as a biomarker in anal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2020; 144:7-12. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Revised: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
43
|
|
44
|
de Meric de Bellefon M, Lemanski C, Castan F, Samalin E, Mazard T, Lenglet A, Demontoy S, Riou O, Llacer-Moscardo C, Fenoglietto P, Aillères N, Thezenas S, Debrigode C, Vieillot S, Gourgou S, Azria D. Long-term follow-up experience in anal canal cancer treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: Clinical outcomes, patterns of relapse and predictors of failure. Radiother Oncol 2019; 144:141-147. [PMID: 31809980 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Revised: 11/02/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To assess the long-term outcomes of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCAC) treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS From 2007 to 2015, 193 patients were treated by IMRT for SCCAC. Radiotherapy delivered 45 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily-fractions to the primary tumor and elective nodal areas, immediately followed by a boost of 14.4-20 Gy to the primary tumor and involved nodes. Concurrent chemotherapy with 5-FU-mitomycin (MMC) or cisplatin was added for locally advanced tumors. Survivals were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Locoregional (LR) relapses were precisely assessed. Prognostic factors were evaluated by uni- and multivariate analyses. Late toxicity was scored according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. RESULTS Median follow-up was 70 months (range, 1-131). Forty-nine men (25%) and 144 women (75%) were analyzed. Median age was 62 years. Tumor stages were I, II, III and IV in 7%, 24%, 63% and 6% of cases, respectively. Chemotherapy was delivered in 167 patients (87%), mainly MMC (80%). Five-year OS, DFS, CFS and LR control rates were 74%, 68%, 66% and 85%, respectively. Forty-one patients (21%) had a relapse: 22 were LR, mostly in-field (68%). Predictors for LR failure were exclusive radiotherapy, chemotherapy lacking MMC and treatment breaks >3 days. Overall late toxicity ≥grade 2 occurred in 43% of patients, with 24% grade 3 and one case of grade 4 (hematuria). CONCLUSION CRT with IMRT assures excellent local control in locally advanced SCCAC with manageable long-term toxicity. Multicentric prospective trials are required to reinforce those results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maïlys de Meric de Bellefon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France.
| | - Claire Lemanski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Florence Castan
- Biometrics Unit ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Emmanuelle Samalin
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, INSERM U1194, IRCM, France
| | - Thibault Mazard
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, INSERM U1194, IRCM, France
| | - Alexis Lenglet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Sylvain Demontoy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Olivier Riou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Carmen Llacer-Moscardo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Pascal Fenoglietto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Norbert Aillères
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Simon Thezenas
- Biometrics Unit ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Charles Debrigode
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, CHU Nîmes, France
| | - Sabine Vieillot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Oncology Center, Perpignan, France
| | - Sophie Gourgou
- Biometrics Unit ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - David Azria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Brown PJ, Zhong J, Frood R, Currie S, Gilbert A, Appelt AL, Sebag-Montefiore D, Scarsbrook A. Prediction of outcome in anal squamous cell carcinoma using radiomic feature analysis of pre-treatment FDG PET-CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46:2790-2799. [PMID: 31482428 PMCID: PMC6879433 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04495-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Incidence of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is increasing, with curative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as the primary treatment of non-metastatic disease. A significant proportion of patients have locoregional treatment failure (LRF), but distant relapse is uncommon. Accurate prognostication of progression-free survival (PFS) would help personalisation of CRT regimens. The study aim was to evaluate novel imaging pre-treatment features, to prognosticate for PFS in ASCC. METHODS Consecutive patients with ASCC treated with curative intent at a large tertiary referral centre who underwent pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT were included. Radiomic feature extraction was performed using LIFEx software on baseline FDG-PET/CT. Outcome data (PFS) was collated from electronic patient records. Elastic net regularisation and feature selection were used for logistic regression model generation on a randomly selected training cohort and applied to a validation cohort using TRIPOD guidelines. ROC-AUC analysis was used to compare performance of a regression model encompassing standard clinical prognostic factors (age, sex, tumour and nodal stage-model A), a radiomic feature model (model B) and a combined radiomic/clinical model (model C). RESULTS A total of 189 patients were included in the study, with 145 in the training cohort and 44 in the validation cohort. Median follow-up was 35.1 and 37. 9 months, respectively for each cohort, with 70.3% and 68.2% reaching this time-point with PFS. GLCM entropy (a measure of randomness of distribution of co-occurring pixel grey-levels), NGLDM busyness (a measure of spatial frequency of changes in intensity between nearby voxels of different grey-level), minimum CT value (lowest HU within the lesion) and SMTV (a standardized version of MTV) were selected for inclusion in the prognostic model, alongside tumour and nodal stage. AUCs for performance of model A (clinical), B (radiomic) and C (radiomic/clinical) were 0.6355, 0.7403, 0.7412 in the training cohort and 0.6024, 0.6595, 0.7381 in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION Radiomic features extracted from pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT in patients with ASCC may provide better PFS prognosis than conventional staging parameters. With external validation, this might be useful to help personalise CRT regimens in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P J Brown
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Lincoln Wing, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
| | - J Zhong
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Lincoln Wing, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - R Frood
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Lincoln Wing, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - S Currie
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Lincoln Wing, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - A Gilbert
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Bexley Wing, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - A L Appelt
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Bexley Wing, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - D Sebag-Montefiore
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Bexley Wing, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - A Scarsbrook
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Lincoln Wing, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
The Utility of PET/Computed Tomography for Radiation Oncology Planning, Surveillance, and Prognosis Prediction of Gastrointestinal Tumors. PET Clin 2019; 15:77-87. [PMID: 31735304 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2019.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
At present, the strongest evidence for the use of PET/computed tomography (CT) in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies is to rule out distant metastatic disease at diagnosis, radiation treatment planning for anal malignancies, and disease recurrence monitoring in colorectal and anal malignancies. Use of PET/CT for GI malignancies continues to evolve over time, with new studies evaluating prognostic abilities of PET/CT and with increasing sensitivity and spatial resolution of more modern PET/CT scanners. The authors encourage future applications and prospective evaluation of the use of PET/CT in the staging, prognostication, and recurrence prediction for GI malignancies.
Collapse
|
47
|
Russo S, Anker CJ, Abdel-Wahab M, Azad N, Bianchi N, Das P, Dragovic J, Goodman KA, Jones W, Kennedy T, Kumar R, Lee P, Sharma N, Small W, Suh WW, Jabbour SK. Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Treatment of Anal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:591-605. [PMID: 31288054 PMCID: PMC11101015 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.2544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2019] [Revised: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Russo
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and University Hospitals, Cleveland Ohio
| | | | - May Abdel-Wahab
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Division of Human Health, New York City, New York
| | - Nilofer Azad
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Nancy Bianchi
- University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Prajnan Das
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | - William Jones
- UT Health Cancer Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | | | - Rachit Kumar
- Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona
| | - Percy Lee
- University of California, Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Navesh Sharma
- Milton S. Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | | | - W Warren Suh
- Ridley-Tree Cancer Center, Sansum Clinic, Santa Barbara, California
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
Anal canal cancer is a rare disease and squamous cell carcinoma is the most common histologic subtype. Traditionally, anal cancer is imaged with CT and PET/CT for purposes of TNM staging. With the increased popularity of MRI for rectal cancer evaluation, MRI has become increasingly utilized for local staging of anal cancer. In this review, we focus on the necessary information radiologists need to know to understand this rare and unique disease and to be familiar with staging of anal cancer on MRI.
Collapse
|
49
|
Peiffert D. [Anal channel cancer: customization of dose, volume and breaching]. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:773-777. [PMID: 31471250 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.07.138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
The conservative treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of anal canal by irradiation is recommended as first indication. Despite its rarity, significant improvements were obtained by retrospective or prospective clinical studies these 20 past years, evaluating concomitant chemotherapy and IMRT. Nevertheless, the individualisation of the treatment, over dose distribution, has poor data available. Fractionation remains classic (1.8-2.0Gy/Fr), but the optimal dose level remains under discussion. The strategy concerning the volumes and doses for the prophylactic volumes remains under discussion. This paper will describe the data published, and the recommendations of working Groups, and the main options under evaluation. To conclude, today only the absence of gap is recommended, the benefit of a one-step schedule reducing the treatment time, then increasing local control and survival, but personalised schedules remain under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Peiffert
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de Lorraine Alexis-Vautrin, avenue de Bourgogne, 54511 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
De Nardi P, Guarneri G, Canevari C, Tamburini A, Slim N, Passoni P, Rosati R. Prognostic value of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and inguinal sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with anal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2019; 21:1017-1024. [PMID: 31077550 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2018] [Accepted: 04/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to assess the value of positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in staging inguinal lymph nodes in anal cancer patients and to determine if the results of the two methods could be of prognostic value. METHOD Sixty-three patients with anal cancer and clinically negative inguinal lymph nodes underwent lymphoscintigraphy and inguinal SLN biopsy and/or fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT scan. All patients were treated with radiotherapy combined with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C. RESULTS Overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 43 months (range 5-211) and 43 months (range 4-142) respectively. PET/CT examination showed high FDG uptake in the inguinal lymph nodes in 25% of patients. Thirty-five patients with inguinal uptake at lymphoscintigraphy underwent inguinal SLN biopsy and metastatic nodes were found in 31.4%. There was no statistical difference in OS (55 vs 41 months; P = 0.652) and DFS (48 vs 38 months; P = 0.992) between the group which showed inguinal uptake on PET/CT and the group which did not, while a positive inguinal SLN was associated with a worse OS (28 vs 59 months; P = 0.028) and DFS (56 vs 21 months; P = 0.046). When the two examinations were compared PET/CT showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 22%, 82%, 33% and 73% respectively. CONCLUSION The technique of SLN biopsy had a better diagnostic accuracy than total body FDG-PET/CT for the staging of inguinal lymph nodes in anal cancer patients; moreover it was a stronger predictor of OS and DFS than PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P De Nardi
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - G Guarneri
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - C Canevari
- Nuclear Medicine Department, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - A Tamburini
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - N Slim
- Radiotherapy Department, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - P Passoni
- Radiotherapy Department, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - R Rosati
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|