RAS Mutation Predicts Positive Resection Margins and Narrower Resection Margins in Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases

The impact of Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) status on local tumor progression after surgical ablation of colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Kirsten rat sarcoma mutation was reported to adversely affect local tumor control after percutaneous ablation of colorectal liver metastasis. Nevertheless, the effect of Kirsten rat sarcoma mutation on surgical ablation has not been investigated in the literature. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of Kirsten rat sarcoma mutation on local recurrence after surgical ablation of colorectal liver metastasis.

METHODS

This was an institutional review board-approved study of patients who underwent surgical ablation of colorectal liver metastasis between 2005 and 2023 at a single center and underwent Kirsten rat sarcoma testing with ≥1 year follow-up. Local recurrence was analyzed using univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox hazard models.

RESULTS

A total of 163 patients with 424 lesions fulfilled inclusion criteria. Fifty (30.7%) patients received radiofrequency ablation and 113 (69.3%) patients received microwave ablation. Fifty-seven patients (32.2%) with 177 lesions were found to have a Kirsten rat sarcoma mutation. Patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma mutation had a larger number of tumors, percentage of posteriorly located tumors, and tumor burden score compared with those with wild-type Kirsten rat sarcoma. Nevertheless, there was no difference between the groups regarding local recurrence per lesion (15% vs 17%, respectively, P = not significant). Independent predictors of local recurrence included tumor size, ablation margin, and blood vessel proximity for microwave ablation compared with tumor size and ablation margin for microwave ablation.

CONCLUSION

There was no effect of Kirsten rat sarcoma mutations on local recurrence after surgical radiofrequency ablation or microwave ablation of colorectal liver metastasis in this study. Tumor size and ablation margin remained as independent predictors.

The challenge of molecular selection in liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer for surgical resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis in the context of current and future approaches

Objectives

Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) includes resection of liver metastases (LM), however, no validated biomarker identifies patients most likely to benefit from this procedure. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of the most relevant molecular alterations in cancer-related genes of CRC (i.e., RAS, BRAF, SMAD4, PIK3CA) as prognostic markers of survival and disease recurrence in patients with mCRC surgically treated by LM resection.

Methods

A systematic literature review was performed to identify studies reporting data regarding survival and/or recurrence in patients that underwent complete liver resection for CRC LM, stratified according to RAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and SMAD4 mutational status. Hazard ratios (HRs) from multivariate analyses were pooled in the meta-analysis and various adjustment strategies for confounding factors were combined. The search was conducted in numerous databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (EBSCO host), and WHO Global Index Medicus, through March 18th, 2022. Meta-analyses, editorials, letters to the editor, case reports, studies on other primary cancers, studies with primary metastatic sites other than the liver, studies lacking specific oncological outcome variables or genetic data, non-English language studies, and studies omitting residual disease data from liver metastasectomy were excluded. The remaining 47 studies were summarized in a descriptive table which outlines the key characteristics of each study and final results were graphically presented.

Results

RAS mutation status was negatively associated with overall survival (OS) (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.54-1.84) and recurrence free survival (RFS) (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.33-1.61). A negative association was also found for BRAF regarding OS (HR, 2.64; 95% CI, 2.15-3.24) and RFS (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.32-2.73) and SMAD4 regarding OS (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.56-2.38) and RFS (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.31-2.91). For PIK3CA only three studies were eligible and no significant association with either OS or RFS could be highlighted.

Conclusion

RAS, BRAF, and SMAD4 are negatively associated with OS and RFS in patients undergoing curative liver metastasectomy from colorectal cancer. No conclusion can be drawn for PIK3CA due to the limited literature availability. These data support the integration of RAS, BRAF, and SMAD4 mutational status in the surgical decision-making for colorectal liver metastasis. Nevertheless, we have to consider several limitations, the major ones being the pooling of results from studies that evaluated patient outcomes as either disease-free survival (DFS) or RFS; the inclusion of patients with minimal residual disease and unconsidered potential confounding factors, such as variability in resectability definitions, chemotherapy use, and a potential interaction between biological markers and pre- and post-resection pharmacological treatments.

Utility of circulating tumor DNA in secondary liver malignancies: What we know and what is to come

Secondary liver malignancies are a serious and challenging global health concern. Secondary metastasis to the liver is most commonly from colorectal cancer that has metastatically spread through splanchnic circulation. Metastatic diseases can portend poor prognosis due to the progressive nature typically found on detection. Improvements in detection of disease, monitoring therapy response, and monitoring for recurrence are crucial to the improvement in the management of secondary liver malignancies. Assessment of ctDNA in these patient populations poses an opportunity to impact the management of secondary liver malignancies. In this review, we aim to discuss ctDNA, the current literature, and future directions of this technology within secondary liver malignancies.

Critical appraisal of surgical margins according to KRAS status in liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: Should surgical strategy be influenced by tumor biology?

BACKGROUND

KRAS mutation is a negative prognostic factor for colorectal liver metastases. Several studies have investigated the resection margins according to KRAS status, with conflicting results. The aim of the study was to assess the oncologic outcomes of R0 and R1 resections for colorectal liver metastases according to KRAS status.

METHODS

All patients who underwent resection for colorectal liver metastases between 2010 and 2015 with available KRAS status were enrolled in this multicentric international cohort study. Logistic regression models were used to investigate the outcomes of R0 and R1 colorectal liver metastases resections according to KRAS status: wild type versus mutated. The primary outcomes were overall survival and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

The analysis included 593 patients. KRAS mutation was associated with shorter overall survival (40 vs 60 months; P = .0012) and disease-free survival (15 vs 21 months; P = .003). In KRAS-mutated tumors, the resection margin did not influence oncologic outcomes. In multivariable analysis, the only predictor of disease-free survival and overall survival was primary tumor location (P = .03 and P = .03, respectively). In KRAS wild-type tumors, R0 resection was associated with prolonged overall survival (74 vs 45 months, P < .001) and disease-free survival (30 vs 17 months, P < .001). The multivariable model confirmed that R0 resection margin was associated with prolonged overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.43, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-2.03) and disease-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.42; 95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.91).

CONCLUSIONS

KRAS-mutated colorectal liver metastases showed more aggressive tumor biology with inferior overall survival and disease-free survival after liver resection. Although R0 resection was not associated with improved oncologic outcomes in the KRAS-mutated tumors group, it seems to be of paramount importance for achieving prolonged long-term survival in KRAS wild-type tumors.

Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with better oncological outcomes after ALPPS for colorectal liver metastases

ALPPS enables complete tumor resection in a shorter interval and a larger number of patients than classic two-stage hepatectomies. However, there is little evidence regarding long-term outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). This study aims to evaluate the short and long-term outcomes of ALPPS in patients with CRM. Single-cohort, prospective, observational study. Patients with unresectable CLM due to insufficient liver remnant who underwent ALPPS between June 2011 and June 2021 were included. Of 32 patients treated, 21 were male (66%) and the median age was 56 years (range = 29-81). Both stages were completed in 30 patients (93.7%), with an R0 rate of 75% (24/32). Major morbidity was 37.5% and the mortality nil. Median overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 28.1 and 8.8 months, respectively. The 1-3, and 5-year OS was 86%, 45%, and 21%, and RFS was 42%, 14%, and 14%, respectively. The only independent risk factor associated with poor RFS (5.7 vs 11.6 months; p = 0.038) and OS (15 vs 37 months; p = 0.009) was not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. KRAS mutation was associated with worse OS from disease diagnosis (24.3 vs. 38.9 months; p = 0.025). ALPPS is associated with favorable oncological outcomes, comparable to traditional strategies to increase resectability in patients with CLM and high tumor burden. Our results suggest for the first time that adjuvant chemotherapy is independently associated with better short- and long-term outcomes after ALPPS. Selection of patients with KRAS mutations should be performed with caution, as this could affect oncological outcomes.

Somatic Mutations in Surgically Treated Colorectal Liver Metastases: An Overview

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death in the United States, and up to half of patients develop colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Notably, somatic genetic mutations, such as mutations in RAS, BRAF, mismatch repair (MMR) genes, TP53, and SMAD4, have been shown to play a prognostic role in patients with CRLM. This review summarizes and appraises the current literature regarding the most relevant somatic mutations in surgically treated CRLM by not only reviewing representative studies, but also providing recommendations for areas of future research. In addition, advancements in genetic testing and an increasing emphasis on precision medicine have led to a more nuanced understanding of these mutations; thus, more granular data for each mutation are reviewed when available. Importantly, such knowledge can pave the way for precision medicine with the ultimate goal of improving patient outcomes.

The association between KRAS and histopathological growth patterns and the impact on resection margins around vasculature and bile ducts in colorectal liver metastases

The liver is the most frequent and often the only site of distant disease in colorectal cancer and, of all treatment protocols currently in use, resection is the most likely to result in long-term cure. Within the liver, tumour proximity to major vasculature and biliary structures poses a resection challenge, requiring a balance of achieving negative margins while preserving adequate vascular circulation and biliary drainage. The focus on parenchymal sparing resections are important but just as important may be the 'biological' behaviour of the tumour. In colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), biomarkers such as the Kirsten rat sarcoma oncogene homologue (KRAS) gene and histological growth patterns (HGPs) further improve the prognostication after resection. However, to date, the association between the KRAS status and HGPs in CRLM and their impact on resection margins around major vasculature or biliary structures in terms of overall survival and recurrence rates are unclear. The aim of this review was to explore the available evidence for the association between KRAS and HGPs in CRLM and attempt to define their impact on resection margins near major structures.

Is Precision Surgery Applicable to Colorectal Liver Metastases? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies that Investigate the Association of Surgical Technique with Outcomes in the Context of Distinct Tumor Biology

BACKGROUND

Although some data suggest that patients with mutRAS colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) may benefit from anatomic hepatectomy, this topic remains controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether RAS mutation status was associated with prognosis relative to surgical technique [anatomic resection (AR) vs. nonanatomic resection (NAR)] among patients with CRLM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies were performed to investigate the association of AR versus NAR with overall and liver-specific disease-free survival (DFS and liver-specific DFS, respectively) in the context of RAS mutation status.

RESULTS

Overall, 2018 patients (831 mutRAS vs. 1187 wtRAS) were included from five eligible studies. AR was associated with a 40% improvement in liver-specific DFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.81, p = 0.01] and a 28% improvement in overall DFS (HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.95, p = 0.02) among patients with mutRAS tumors; in contrast, AR was not associated with any improvement in liver-specific DFS or overall DFS among wtRAS patients. These differences may have been mediated by the 40% decreased incidence in R1 resection among patients with mutRAS tumors who underwent AR versus NAR [relative risk (RR): 0.6, 95% CI 0.40-0.91, p = 0.02]. In contrast, the probability of an R1 resection was not decreased among wtRAS patients who underwent AR versus NAR (RR: 0.93, 95% CI 0.69-1.25, p = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that precision surgery may be relevant to CRLM. Specifically, rather than a parenchymal sparing dogma for all patients, AR may have a role in individuals with mutRAS tumors.

Contemporary Surgical Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the United States and the second most common cause of cancer-related death. Approximately 20-30% of patients will develop hepatic metastasis in the form of synchronous or metachronous disease. The treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) has evolved into a multidisciplinary approach, with chemotherapy and a variety of locoregional treatments, such as ablation and portal vein embolization, playing a crucial role. However, resection remains a core tenet of management, serving as the gold standard for a curative-intent therapy. As such, the input of a dedicated hepatobiliary surgeon is paramount for appropriate patient selection and choice of surgical approach, as significant advances in the field have made management decisions extremely nuanced and complex. We herein aim to review the contemporary surgical management of colorectal liver metastasis with respect to both perioperative and operative considerations.

Current landscape of preoperative neoadjuvant therapies for initial resectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis

Colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) presents a clinical challenge, and optimizing treatment strategies is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Surgical resection, a key element in achieving prolonged survival, is often linked to a heightened risk of recurrence. Acknowledging the potential benefits of preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in managing resectable liver metastases, this approach has gained attention for its role in tumor downsizing, assessing biological behavior, and reducing the risk of postoperative recurrence. However, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in initially resectable CRLM sparks ongoing debates. The balance between tumor reduction and the risk of hepatic injury, coupled with concerns about delaying surgery, necessitates a nuanced approach. This article explores recent research insights and draws upon the practical experiences at our center to address critical issues regarding considerations for initially resectable cases. Examining the criteria for patient selection and the judicious choice of neoadjuvant regimens are pivotal areas of discussion. Striking the right balance between maximizing treatment efficacy and minimizing adverse effects is imperative. The dynamic landscape of precision medicine is also reflected in the evolving role of gene testing, such as RAS/BRAF and PIK3CA, in tailoring neoadjuvant regimens. Furthermore, the review emphasizes the need for a multidisciplinary approach to navigate the complexities of CRLM. Integrating technical expertise and biological insights is crucial in refining neoadjuvant strategies. The management of progression following neoadjuvant chemotherapy requires a tailored approach, acknowledging the diverse biological behaviors that may emerge. In conclusion, this review aims to provide a comprehensive perspective on the considerations, challenges, and advancements in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for initially resectable CRLM. By combining evidence-based insights with practical experiences, we aspire to contribute to the ongoing discourse on refining treatment paradigms for improved outcomes in patients with CRLM.

RAS mutation status in combination with the JSHBPS nomogram may be useful for preoperative identification of colorectal liver metastases with high risk of recurrence and mortality after hepatectomy

PURPOSE

To investigate the prognostic impact of RAS mutations on the Japanese Society of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgeons (JSHBPS) nomogram score in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) following hepatectomy.

METHODS

We included 218 consecutive patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM between 2004 and 2020. The JSHBPS nomogram score was calculated using six preoperative clinical factors. The score ranged from 0 to 25, and higher scores indicated greater tumor burden. Associations of RAS mutations with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) by the JSHBPS nomogram score were examined. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

RAS mutations were detected in 72 (33%) of the 218 patients. Multivariate analyses revealed that RAS mutations were independently associated with poor DFS (HR, 1.93; 95% CI: 1.20-3.10; p = .007) and OS (HR, 2.65; 95% CI: 1.59-4.71; p = .001) compared with wild-type RAS with JSHBPS nomogram scores ≤ 10. However, in patients with scores ≥ 11, the association of RAS mutations with DFS or OS was not statistically significant (p > .08).

CONCLUSION

RAS mutation status in combination with the JSHBPS nomogram may be useful for preoperatively identifying CRLM with high risk of recurrence and mortality after hepatectomy.

Does RAS Status Increase the Prevalence of Positive Resection Margin in Colorectal Liver Metastasis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Colorectal liver metastasis has a high incidence, and RAS oncogene mutation status carries significant prognostic information. We aimed to assess whether RAS-mutated patients present more or less frequently with positive margins in their hepatic metastasectomy.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from PubMed, Embase, and Lilacs databases. We analyzed liver metastatic colorectal cancer studies, which included information on RAS status and had surgical margin analysis of the liver metastasis. Odds ratios were computed using a random-effect model due to anticipated heterogeneity. We further performed a subanalysis limited to studies that included only patients with KRAS instead of all-RAS mutations.

RESULTS

From the 2,705 studies screened, 19 articles were included in the meta-analysis. There were 7,391 patients. The prevalence of positive resection margin was not significantly different between patients carrier vs non-carrier for the all-RAS mutations (OR .99; 95% CI 0.83-1.18; P = .87), and for only KRAS mutation (OR .93; 95% CI 0.73-1.19; P = .57).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the strong correlation between colorectal liver metastasis prognosis and RAS mutation status, our meta-analysis's results suggest no correlation between the RAS status and the prevalence of positive resection margins. The findings contribute to a better understanding of the RAS mutation's role in the surgical resections of colorectal liver metastasis.

Impact of Molecular Status on Metastasectomy of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Although surgical resection could provide better survival for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM), the recurrence rate after resection of CRLM remains high. The progress of genome sequencing technologies has greatly improved the molecular understanding of colorectal cancer. In the era of genomics and targeted therapy, genetic mutation analysis is of great significance to guide systemic treatment and identify patients who can benefit from resection of CRLM. RAS and BRAF mutations and microsatellite instability/deficient deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) mismatch repair status have been incorporated into current clinical practice. Other promising molecular biomarkers such as coexisting gene mutations and circulating tumor DNA are under active investigation. This study aimed to review the prognostic significance of molecular biomarkers in patients with CRLM undergoing metastasectomy based on the current evidence.

New Insights into Macrophage Polarization and its Prognostic Role in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis

Background

As liver metastasis is the most common cause of mortality in patients with colorectal cancer, studying colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CLM) microenvironment is essential for improved understanding of tumor biology and to identify novel therapeutic targets.

Methods

We used multiplex immunofluorescence platform to study tumor associated macrophage (TAM) polarization and adaptive T cell subtypes in tumor samples from 105 CLM patients (49 without and 56 with preoperative chemotherapy).

Results

CLM exhibited M2 macrophage polarization, and helper T cells were the prevalent adaptive T cell subtype. The density of total, M2 and TGFβ-expressing macrophages, and regulatory T cells was lower in CLM treated with preoperative chemotherapy. CLM with right-sided primary demonstrated enrichment of TGFβ-expressing macrophages, and with left-sided primary had higher densities of helper and cytotoxic T cells. In multivariate analysis, high density of M2 macrophages correlated with longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the entire cohort [hazard ratio (HR) 0.425, 95% CI 0.219-0.825, p=0.011) and in patients without preoperative chemotherapy (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.221-0.932, p=0.032). High pSMAD3-expressing macrophages were associated with shorter RFS in CLM after preoperative chemotherapy.

Conclusions

Our results highlight the significance of a multi-marker approach to define the macrophage subtypes and identify M2 macrophages as a predictor of favorable prognosis in CLM.

Association between primary tumor characteristics and histopathological growth pattern of liver metastases in colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

The microarchitecture of liver metastases (LMs), or histopathological growth pattern (HGP), has been demonstrated to be a significant prognostic factor in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Currently, however, HGP can be only determined on the operative specimen. Therefore, the development of new tools to predict the HGP of CRLMs before surgery and to understand the mechanisms that drive these patterns is important for improving individualization of therapeutic management. In this study, we analyzed data from a retrospective series of patients who underwent surgery for CRLMs to compare primary tumor characteristics, including markers of local aggressiveness and migratory capacity, and HGP of liver metastases.

METHODS

Data from a retrospective series of 167 patients who underwent curative-intent resection of CRLMs and in whom pathological samples from both primary tumor and liver metastases were available were reviewed. At the primary tumor level, KRAS mutational status, grade of differentiation, and tumor budding were assessed. HGP was scored in each resected CRLM, according to consensus guidelines, and classified as desmoplastic (dHGP) or non-desmoplastic (non-dHGP). Associations between primary tumor characteristics and HGP of CRLMs were evaluated using a binary logistic regression model. Overall survival and disease-free survival were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

CRLMs were classified as dHGP in 36% of the patients and as non-dHGP in 64%. Higher rates of moderately or poorly differentiated primary tumors were observed in the non-dHGP CRLM group (80%), as compared with the dHGP group (60%) (OR = 3.6; 95%CI: 1.6-7.05; p = 0.001). Higher rates of tumor budding were observed in the non-dHGP CRLM group, with a median tumor budding value of 4 as compared with 2.5 in the dHGP group (p = 0.042). In the entire series, 5-year overall and disease-free survival were 43% and 32.5%, respectively. The non-dHGP CRLM group had worse post-hepatectomy survival, with 5-year overall and disease-free survival of 32.2% and 24.6%, respectively, as compared with 60.8% and 45.9%, respectively, for the dHGP group (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Colorectal tumors with moderate or poor differentiation and those with high tumor budding are more frequently associated with CRLMs with a non-dHGP. This suggests that primary tumor characteristics of local aggressiveness and migratory capacity could preferentially promote the development of CRLMs with an infiltrating pattern and that these parameters should be considered as part of new scores for predicting HGP before surgery. This finding may stimulate new lines of research for more individualized therapeutic decision in patients with CRLM candidate to surgery.

Precision Surgery of Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Current Era: A Systematic Review

Liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is widely considered the treatment with the highest curative potential. However, not all patients derive the same oncological benefit, underlining the need for better patient stratification and treatment allocation. In this context, we performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the role of RAS status in selecting the optimal surgical strategy. Evidence comparing anatomical with non-anatomical resections depending on RAS mutational status was scarce and conflicting, with two studies reporting superiority in mutated RAS (mutRAS) patients and two studies reporting equivalent outcomes. The rate of incomplete microscopic resection (R1) was found to be increased among mutRAS patients, possibly due to higher micrometastatic spread lateral to the primary lesion. The impact of R1 resection margins was evaluated separately for mutRAS and wild-type patients in three studies, of which, two indicated an additive detriment to long-term survival in the former group. In the current era of precision surgery, RAS status can be utilized to predict the efficacy of liver resection in the treatment of CRLM, avoiding a potentially morbid operation in patients with adverse tumor profiles.

Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Genomics and Biomarkers with Focus on Local Therapies

Molecular cancer biomarkers help personalize treatment, predict oncologic outcomes, and identify patients who can benefit from specific targeted therapies. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third-most common cancer, with the liver being the most frequent visceral metastatic site. KRAS, NRAS, BRAF V600E Mutations, DNA Mismatch Repair Deficiency/Microsatellite Instability Status, HER2 Amplification, and NTRK Fusions are NCCN approved and actionable molecular biomarkers for colorectal cancer. Additional biomarkers are also described and can be helpful in different image-guided hepatic directed therapies specifically for CRLM. For example, tumors maintaining the Ki-67 proliferation marker after thermal ablation was shown to be particularly resilient to ablation. Ablation margin was also shown to be an important factor in predicting local recurrence, with a ≥10 mm minimal ablation margin being required to attain local tumor control, especially for patients with mutant KRAS CRLM.

Survival analysis and identification of prognostic factors in colorectal liver metastasis after liver resection

INTRODUCTION

Liver resection is the only curative treatment for colorectal liver metastasis. The identification of predictive factors leads to personalize patient management to enhance their long-term outcomes. This population-based study aimed to characterize factors associated with, and survival impact of patients who received hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of all the hepatectomies for colorectal liver metastasis performed at third-level hospital of Spain (2010-2018) was conducted. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analyses. Multivariable Cox and regression models were used to determine prognostic factors associated with overall survival.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival were 42 and 33%, respectively. Survival analysis showed that metastasis features (number, largest size, distribution, and extrahepatic disease) and postsurgical factors (transfusion, major complications, and positive margin resection), as well as non-mutated KRAS, showed a significant association with survival. Otherwise, on multivariate analysis, only 5 independent risk factors were identified: major size metastasis >4 cm, RAS mutation, positive margin resection, intraoperative transfusion, and major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our findings, major size metastasis >4 cm, intraoperative transfusion, and major postoperative complications continue to be traditional prognostic factors. Meanwhile, the KRAS biomarker has a powerful impact as a survival prognostic factor.

Survival Outcomes of Optimally Treated Colorectal Metastases: The Importance of R0 Status in Surgical Treatment of Hepatic and Peritoneal Surface Disease

BACKGROUND

Although colorectal hepatic metastases (HM) and peritoneal surface disease (PSD) are distinct biologic diseases, they may have similar long-term survival when optimally treated with surgery.

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed prospectively managed databases. Patients undergoing R0 or R1 resections were analyzed with descriptive statistics, the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression. Survival was compared over time for the following periods: 1993-2006, 2007-2012, and 2013-2020.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 783 HM patients undergoing liver resection and 204 PSD patients undergoing cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Compared with PSD patients, HM patients more often had R0 resections (90.3% vs. 32.4%), less often had pre-procedure chemotherapy (52.4% vs. 92.1%), and less often were functionally independent (79.7% vs. 95.6%). The 5-year overall survival for HM was 40.9%, with a median survival period of 45.8 months versus 25.8% and 33.4 months, respectively, for PSD (p < 0.05). When stratified by resection status, R0 HM and R0 PSD did not differ significantly in median survival (49.0 vs. 45.4 months; p = 0.83). The median survival after R1 resection also was similar between HM and PSD (32.6 vs. 26.9 months; p = 0.59). Survival between the two groups again was similar over time when stratified by resection status. The predictors of survival for HM patients were R0 resection, number of lesions, intraoperative transfusion, age, and adjuvant chemotherapy. For the PSD patients, the predictors were peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score, estimated blood loss (EBL), and female gender.

CONCLUSION

The study showed that R0 resections are associated with improved outcomes and that median survival is similar between HM and PSD patients when it is achieved. Surveillance and treatment strategies that facilitate R0 resections are needed to improve results, particularly for PSD.

Analysis of survival factors after hepatic resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases: Does the R1 margin matter?

Introduction

The effect of liver margin on colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) after hepatectomy has been controversial. In this study, we conducted a postoperative follow-up study of 205 patients with CRLM to clarify whether a positive margin is significant and to define the risk factors affecting CRLM survival.

Methods

The data of 205 patients with CRLM who underwent surgical treatment at the Third Hospital of Peking University in the Department of General Surgery from January 2009 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The general data, surgical data and postoperative follow-up of the patients were statistically analyzed.

Results

There were 130 cases (63.4%) of R0 resection and 75 cases (36.6%) of R1 resection. There were 136 males and 69 females, age 61 ± 11 years, and body mass index (BMI 24.5 ± 3.3 kg/m²). The overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years for the entire cohort were 93.4%, 68.4%, and 45.5% in the R0 resection group vs. 93.2%, 53.7%, and 42% in the R1 resection group, respectively, which were not statistically significant (P = 0.520). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates of 63.2%, 33.3%, and 29.7% were significantly better in the R0 resection group than in the R1 resection group of 47.9%, 22.7%, and 17.7% (P = 0.016), respectively. After multivariable analysis, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) > 39 U/ml (HR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.39-3.79, P = 0.001), primary tumor perineural invasion (HR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.01-3.13, P = 0.047), and BMI > 24 kg/m2 (HR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.05-2.93, P = 0.033) were independently associated with poorer overall patient survival. The number of liver metastases >2 (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.10-2.47, P = 0.016), the maximum diameter of metastases ≥50 mm (HR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.06-2.64, P = 0.026), and vascular invasion of the primary tumor (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.03-2.64, P = 0.038) were also independently associated with poorer disease-free survival.

Conclusion

In patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM, the negative effect of the R1 margin should be downplayed, and although the disease-free survival of the R1 margin is shorter than that of the R0 margin, it has no impact on overall survival. To improve overall survival, extra attention should be given to the factors of preoperative BMI, preoperative CA19-9, and the presence of perineural invasion of the primary tumor.

Tumor biology reflected by histological growth pattern is more important than surgical margin for the prognosis of patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases

INTRODUCTION

The histological growth pattern (HGP) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) reflects tumor biology and local infiltrating behavior. In patients undergoing surgery for CRLMs, we investigated whether HGP and surgical margin status interact when influencing prognosis.

METHODS

Clinicopathological data, margin status, and HGP were reviewed in patients who underwent resection of CRLMs. R1 margin was defined when cancer cells were present at any point along the margin. HGPs were scored according to international guidelines, identifying patients with desmoplastic (DHGP) or non-desmoplastic (non-DHGP) CRLMs.

RESULTS

Among 299 patients, 16% had R1 resection and 81% had non-DHGP CRLMs. Non-DHGP was the only predictive factor for R1 resection (18.7% versus 7.4% in DHGP, p = 0.04). Poorer 5-year overall survival was observed in both R1 and non-DHGP groups in univariate analysis (27.6% in R1 versus 45.6% in R0, p = 0.026, and 37.2% in non-DHGP versus 59.2% in DHGP, p = 0.013), whereas non-DHGP but not R1 remained associated with worse prognosis in multivariate analysis. In patients with non-DHGP, R1 margin has no prognostic impact.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing resection of CRLMs, the prognostic value of poor tumor biology, such as in patients with non-DHGP, exceeds that of surgical radicality.

The impact of RAS mutation on the treatment strategy of colorectal cancer

Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) is the most frequently mutated oncogene in colorectal cancer, being present in 30% of patients with localized disease and in almost half of the patients that develop metastatic disease. While the development of chemotherapy doublets and targeted therapy have improved survival in recent years, KRAS mutation still has a controversial role regarding its prognostic and predictive value both in the adjuvant and in the metastatic setting. The impact of KRAS mutation on treatment strategy remains to be better defined. The development of new KRAS inhibitors promising new treatment options is on the horizon.

Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Is an R1 Hepatic Resection Accepted?

Metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with a rather dismal 5-year overall survival. The liver is the most commonly affected organ. Improved 5-year survival rates after successful hepatic resections for metastases confined to the liver have been reported. Certainly, a hepatectomy that results in an incomplete tumor resection, in terms of leaving macroscopic residual tumor in the future liver remnant, is not associated with survival benefits. However, the prognostic implications of a microscopically positive surgical margin or a clear margin of less than 1 mm (R1) on pathology are debatable. Although it has been a field of extensive research, the relevant literature often reports contradictory results. The purpose of the present study was to define, assess the risk factors for, and, ultimately, analyze the effect that an R1 hepatic resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases might have on local recurrence rates and long-term prognosis by reviewing the relevant literature. Achieving an R0 hepatic resection, optimally with more than 1 mm of clear margin, should always be the goal. However, in the era of the aggressive multimodality treatment of liver metastatic colorectal cancer, an R1 resection might be the cost of increasing the pool of patients finally eligible for resection. The majority of literature reports have highlighted the detrimental effect of R1 resections on local recurrence and overall survival. However, there are indeed studies that degraded the prognostic handicap as a consequence of an R1 resection in selected patients and highlighted the presence of RAS mutations, the response to chemotherapy, and, in general, factors that reflect the biology of the disease as important, if not the determinant, prognostic factors. In these patients, the aggressive disease biology seems to outperform the resection margin status as a prognostic factor, and the recorded differences between R1 and R0 resections are equalized. Properly and accurately defining this patient group is a future challenge in the field of the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Genomic Predictors of Recurrence Patterns After Complete Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases and Adjuvant Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Despite curative hepatectomy, most colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) patients relapse locally within 2 years. Genomic predictors for hepatic recurrence are poorly understood. This study was designed to identify genomic signatures for recurrence in resected CRLM patients treated with adjuvant hepatic artery infusion (HAI) and/or systemic (SYS) chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing curative hepatectomy and adjuvant HAI+SYS or SYS between January 2000 and October 2017 with next-generation sequencing data were catalogued. Gene and signaling-level alterations were checked for association with time to any (AR), liver (LR), and extrahepatic recurrence (ER) by using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Of 172 receiving HAI+SYS, 100 patients recurred, with 69 LR and 83 ER. Five- and ten-year LR-free rates were 57% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48-65%) and 51% (95% CI 41-60%), respectively. Five- and 10-year ER-free, rates were 51% (95% CI 43-58%) and 45% (95% CI 36-54%), respectively. More ER was observed with tumors harboring altered KRAS (38% [95% CI 25-50%] vs. 63% [95% CI 53-71%], p-adj = 0.003) and RAS/RAF (36% [95% CI 25-48%] vs. 66% [95% CI 56-74%], p-adj < 0.001) than wild-type. Co-altered RAS/RAF-TP53 was associated with worse AR (26% [95% CI 14-40%] vs. 48% [95% CI 39-57%], p-unadj < 0.001), ER (30% [95% CI 17-45%] vs. 62% [95% CI 53-70%], p-unadj < 0.001), and LR rate (40% [95% CI 24-57%] vs. 70% [95% CI 60-77%], p-unadj = 0.002). On multivariable analysis, controlling for clinical risk score, ablation, margin status, and primary T-stage, co-altered RAS/RAF-TP53 was associated with increased risk for AR (HR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.38-3.31, p-unadj < 0.001), LR (HR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.06-3.02, p-unadj = 0.029), and ER (HR = 2.81, 95% CI 1.78-4.44, p-unadj < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Altered KRAS, RAS/RAF, and RAS/RAF-TP53 associated with earlier local and distant recurrence in resected CRLM patients receiving adjuvant HAI+SYS. Co-altered RAS/RAF-TP53 was a novel predictor of LR warranting investigation of whether genomic cooperativity is associated with this relapsing phenotype. Systemic therapies tailored to high-risk tumor biology are needed to reduce distant relapse after hepatectomy.

The Role of Biomarkers in the Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases

Simple Summary

Colorectal cancer remains one of the most significant sources of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. The liver is the most common site of metastatic spread. Multiple modalities exist to manage and potentially cure patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, reliable biomarkers to assist with clinical decision-making are limited. Recent advances in genomic sequencing technology have greatly expanded our knowledge of colorectal cancer carcinogenesis and significantly reduced the cost and timing of the investigation. In this article, we discuss the current utility of biomarkers in the management of colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Abstract

Surgical management combined with improved systemic therapies have extended 5-year overall survival beyond 50% among patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Furthermore, a multitude of liver-directed therapies has improved local disease control for patients with unresectable CRLM. Unfortunately, a significant portion of patients treated with curative-intent hepatectomy develops disease recurrence. Traditional markers fail to risk-stratify and prognosticate patients with CRLM appropriately. Over the last few decades, advances in molecular sequencing technology have greatly expanded our knowledge of the pathophysiology and tumor microenvironment characteristics of CRLM. These investigations have revealed biomarkers with the potential to better inform management decisions in patients with CRLM. Actionable biomarkers such as RAS and BRAF mutations, microsatellite instability/mismatch repair status, and tumor mutational burden have been incorporated into national and societal guidelines. Other biomarkers, including circulating tumor DNA and radiomic features, are under active investigation to evaluate their clinical utility. Given the plethora of therapeutic modalities and lack of evidence on timing and sequence, reliable biomarkers are needed to assist clinicians with the development of patient-tailored management plans. In this review, we discuss the current evidence regarding biomarkers for patients with CRLM.

Prognostic Models Incorporating RAS Mutation to Predict Survival in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Narrative Review

Recurrence and survival vary widely among patients who undergo curative-intent resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Prognostic models provide estimated probabilities of these outcomes and allow the effects of multiple potentially interacting variables to be adjusted and assessed simultaneously. Although many prognostic models based on clinicopathologic factors have been developed since the 1990s to predict survival after resection of CRLM, these models vary in their predictive performance when applied to contemporary cohorts. Rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (RAS) mutation status is routinely tested in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor therapy. In addition, mutations in RAS predict survival and recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM. Several recent prognostic models have incorporated RAS mutation status as a surrogate of tumor biology and combined revised clinicopathologic variables to improve the prediction of recurrence and survival. This narrative review aims to evaluate the differences between contemporary prognostic models incorporating RAS mutation status and their clinical applicability in patients considered for curative-intent resection of CRLM.

Using Artificial Intelligence to Find the Optimal Margin Width in Hepatectomy for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Importance

In patients with resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM), the choice of surgical technique and resection margin are the only variables that are under the surgeon's direct control and may influence oncologic outcomes. There is currently no consensus on the optimal margin width.

Objective

To determine the optimal margin width in CRLM by using artificial intelligence-based techniques developed by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and to assess whether optimal margin width should be individualized based on patient characteristics.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The internal cohort of the study included patients who underwent curative-intent surgery for KRAS-variant CRLM between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2017, at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, and Charité-University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Patients from institutions in France, Norway, the US, Austria, Argentina, and Japan were retrospectively identified from institutional databases and formed the external cohort of the study. Data were analyzed from April 15, 2019, to November 11, 2021.

Exposures

Hepatectomy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Patients with KRAS-variant CRLM who underwent surgery between 2000 and 2017 at 3 tertiary centers formed the internal cohort (training and testing). In the training cohort, an artificial intelligence-based technique called optimal policy trees (OPTs) was used by building on random forest (RF) predictive models to infer the margin width associated with the maximal decrease in death probability for a given patient (ie, optimal margin width). The RF component was validated by calculating its area under the curve (AUC) in the testing cohort, whereas the OPT component was validated by a game theory-based approach called Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). Patients from international institutions formed an external validation cohort, and a new RF model was trained to externally validate the OPT-based optimal margin values.

Results

This cohort study included a total of 1843 patients (internal cohort, 965; external cohort, 878). The internal cohort included 386 patients (median [IQR] age, 58.3 [49.0-68.7] years; 200 men [51.8%]) with KRAS-variant tumors. The AUC of the RF counterfactual model was 0.76 in both the internal training and testing cohorts, which is the highest ever reported. The recommended optimal margin widths for patient subgroups A, B, C, and D were 6, 7, 12, and 7 mm, respectively. The SHAP analysis largely confirmed this by suggesting 6 to 7 mm for subgroup A, 7 mm for subgroup B, 7 to 8 mm for subgroup C, and 7 mm for subgroup D. The external cohort included 375 patients (median [IQR] age, 61.0 [53.0-70.0] years; 218 men [58.1%]) with KRAS-variant tumors. The new RF model had an AUC of 0.78, which allowed for a reliable external validation of the OPT-based optimal margin. The external validation was successful as it confirmed the association of the optimal margin width of 7 mm with a considerable prolongation of survival in the external cohort.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study used artificial intelligence-based methodologies to provide a possible resolution to the long-standing debate on optimal margin width in CRLM.

Can the presence of KRAS mutations guide the type of liver resection during simultaneous resection of colorectal liver metastasis?

Backgrounds/Aims

It is generally accepted that non-anatomical resection (NAR) in colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) has comparable safety and efficacy compared to anatomical resection (AR); however, there are reports that AR may have better outcomes in KRAS mutated CRLM. This study aimed to determine the effects of KRAS mutations and surgical techniques on survival outcomes in CRLM patients.

Methods

Two hundred fifty patients who underwent hepatic resection of CRLM with known KRAS mutational status between 2007 and 2018 were analyzed. A total of 94 KRAS mutated CRLM and 156 KRAS wild-type CRLM were subdivided by surgical approach and compared for short- and long-term outcomes.

Results

In both KRAS wild-type and mutated type, there was no difference in estimated blood loss, postoperative complications, and 30-day mortality. There was no difference in disease-free survival (DFS) between AR and NAR in both groups (p = 0.326, p = 0.954, respectively). Finally, there was no difference in intrahepatic DFS between AR and NAR groups in both the KRAS groups (p = 0.165, p = 0.516, respectively).

Conclusions

The presence of KRAS mutation may not be a significant factor when deciding the approach in simultaneous resection of CRLM.

Neither Surgical Margin Status nor Somatic Mutation Predicts Local Recurrence After R0-intent Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the associations of surgical margin status and somatic mutations with the incidence of local recurrence (LR) and oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing R0-intent (microscopically negative margin) resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM).

METHODS

Patients with CLM who underwent initial R0-intent resection and analysis of tumor tissue using next-generation sequencing during 2001-2018 were analyzed. Recurrences were classified as LR (at the resection margin), other intrahepatic recurrence, or extrahepatic recurrence. Predictors and survival effect of LR were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of 552 patients analyzed, 415 (75%) had R0 resection (margin width ≥ 1.0 mm), and 38 (7%) had LR. LR incidence was not affected by surgical margin width. RAS/TP53 co-mutation was associated with increased risk of intrahepatic recurrence (67% vs. 49%; p < 0.001) and overall recurrence (p < 0.001). However, incidence of LR did not differ significantly by RAS/TP53, BRAF, SMAD4, or FBXW7 mutation. Extrahepatic disease (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; p = 0.034), > 8 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy (HR, 1.98; p = 0.033), tumor viability ≥ 50% (HR, 1.55; p = 0.007), RAS/TP53 co-mutation (HR, 1.69; p = 0.001), and SMAD4 mutation (HR, 2.44; p < 0.001) were independently associated with poor overall survival, but surgical margin status was not.

CONCLUSIONS

Although somatic mutations were associated with overall recurrence, neither surgical margin width nor somatic mutations affected LR risk after R0-intent hepatectomy for CLM. LR and prognosis were likely driven by individual tumor biology rather than surgical margins.

Combination of artesunate and WNT974 induces KRAS protein degradation by upregulating E3 ligase ANACP2 and β-TrCP in the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway

Background

KRAS mutation is one of the dominant gene mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC). Up to present, targeting KRAS for CRC treatment remains a clinical challenge. WNT974 (LGK974) is a porcupine inhibitor that interferes Wnt signaling pathway. Artesunate (ART) is a water-soluble semi-synthetic derivative of artemisinin.

Methods

The synergistic effect of ART and WNT974 combination in reducing CRC cell viability was determined by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. RT-PCR was utilized for the mRNA levels of KRAS, CUL7, ANAPC2, UBE2M, RNF123, SYVN1, or β-TrCP. Western blot assay was utilized for the protein levels of NRAS, HRAS, KRAS, ANAPC2, β-TrCP, GSK-3β, p-Akt (Ser473), t-Akt, p-PI3K (Tyr458), t-PI3K, p-mTOR (Ser2448), t-mTOR. Xenograft mouse model assay was performed for the anti-CRC effect of combination of ART and WNT974 in vivo. IHC assay was utilized for the levels of KRAS, β-TrCP, GSK-3β or ANAPC2 in tumor tissues.

Results

Our study shows that the combination of WNT974 and ART exhibits synergistic effect in reducing CRC growth. The combination treatment significantly reduces KRAS protein level and activity in CRC cells. Interestingly, the combination treatment increases E3 ligases ANAPC2 expression. Our data show that overexpression of ANAPC2 significantly reduces KRAS protein levels, which is reversed by MG132. Knockdown of ANAPC2 in CRC abolishes the combination treatment-reduce KRAS expression. Besides, the treatment also increases the expressions of GSK-3β and E3 ligase β-TrCP that is known to degrade GSK-3β-phosphorylated KRAS protein. Knockdown of β-TrCP- and inhibition of GSK-3β abolish the combination treatment-induce KRAS ubiquitination and reduction in expression. Last but not least, combination treatment suppresses PI3K/Akt/m-TOR signaling pathway.

Conclusions

Our data clearly show that the combination treatment significantly enhances KRAS protein degradation via the ubiquitination ubiquitin–proteasome pathway, which is also demonstrated in xenograft mouse model. The study provides strong scientific evidence for the development of the combination of WNT974 and ART as KRAS-targeting therapeutics for CRC treatment.

Implications of RAS Mutations on Oncological Outcomes of Surgical Resection and Thermal Ablation Techniques in the Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related death. More than 50% of patients with CRC will develop liver metastases (CRLM) during their disease. In the era of precision surgery for CRLM, several advances have been made in the multimodal management of this disease. Surgical treatment, combined with a modern chemotherapy regimen and targeted therapies, is the only potential curative treatment. Unfortunately, 70% of patients treated for CRLM experience recurrence. RAS mutations are associated with worse overall and recurrence-free survival. Other mutations such as BRAF, associated RAS /TP53 and APC/PIK3CA mutations are important genetic markers to evaluate tumor biology. Somatic mutations are of paramount interest for tailoring preoperative treatment, defining a surgical resection strategy and the indication for ablation techniques. Herein, the most relevant studies dealing with RAS mutations and the management of CRLM were reviewed. Controversies about the implication of this mutation in surgical and ablative treatments were also discussed.

Multi-institutional analysis of outcomes for thermosphere microwave ablation treatment of colorectal liver metastases: the SMAC study

OBJECTIVES

Oligometastatic colorectal cancer benefits of locoregional treatments but data concerning microwave ablation (MWA) are limited and interactions with systemic therapy are still debated. The aim of this study is to evaluate safety and effectiveness of Thermosphere™ MWA (T-MWA) of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) and factors affecting local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS).

METHODS

In this multi-institutional retrospective study (January 2015-September 2019), patients who underwent T-MWA for CLM were enrolled. Complications according to SIR classification were collected, primary efficacy and LTP were calculated. Analyzed variables included CLM size at diagnosis and at ablation, CLM number, ablation margins, intra-segment progression, chemotherapy before ablation (CBA), variations in size (ΔS_DIA-ABL), and velocity of size variation (V_DIA-ABL) between CLM diagnosis and ablation. Uni/multivariate analyses were performed using mixed effects Cox model to account for the hierarchical structure of data, patient/lesions.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-two patients with 213 CLM were evaluated. Complications were reported in 6/150 procedures (4%); no biliary complications occurred. Primary efficacy was achieved in 204/213 CLM (95.7%). LTP occurred in 58/204 CLM (28.4%). Six-, twelve-, and eighteen-month LTPFS were 88.2%, 75.8%, and 69.9%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, CLM size at ablation (p = 0.00045), CLM number (p = 0.046), ablation margin < 5 mm (p = 0.0035), and intra-segment progression (p < 0.0001) were statistically significant for LTPFS. ΔS_DIA-ABL (p = 0.63) and V_DIA-ABL (p = 0.38) did not affect LTPFS. Ablation margins in the chemo-naïve group were larger than those in the CBA group (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

T-MWA is a safe and effective technology with adequate LTPFS rates. Intra-segment progression is significantly linked to LTPFS. CBA does not affect LTPFS. Anticipating ablation before chemotherapy may take the advantages of adequate tumor size with correct ablation margin planning.

KEY POINTS

• Thermosphere™-Microwave ablation is a safe and effective treatment for colorectal liver metastases with no registered biliary complications in more than 200 ablations. • Metastases size at time of ablation, intra-segment progression, and minimal ablation margin < 5 mm were found statistically significant for local tumor progression-free survival. • Chemotherapy before ablation modifies kinetics growth of the lesions but deteriorates ablation margins and does not significantly impact local tumor progression-free survival.

Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications of Tumor Biology in Colorectal Liver Metastases

Prognostic models allow clinicians to predict survival outcomes, facilitate patient-physician discussions, and identify subgroups with potentially distinct prognoses [...].

Limited Prognostic Value of KRAS in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

RAS mutation status is considered a powerful prognostic factor in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). However, whether its prognostic power is robust regardless of administration of preoperative chemotherapy or tumor burden remains unclear.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for CLM from April 2010 through March 2017 in two hospitals were included. The prognostic value of KRAS was compared based on whether patients received preoperative chemotherapy and their tumor burden score (TBS).

RESULTS

We included 409 patients (median follow-up 38 months). In the preoperative chemotherapy group, patients with mutant KRAS (mt-KRAS) CLM had poorer overall survival (OS) than those with wild KRAS (wt-KRAS; 5-year OS: 37.7% vs 53.8%, p = 0.024), although their OS was not different from patients undergoing upfront surgery. Similarly, patients with mt-KRAS had poorer OS than those with wt-KRAS in TBS of 3-9 (5-year OS: 33.1% vs 63.2%, p = 0.001), although their OS was not different from patients with TBS < 3 or ≥ 9. In multivariate analysis, mt-KRAS was an independent prognostic factor of OS among patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.034-2.491; p = 0.035) and patients with TBS of 3-9 (HR 1.836, 95% CI 1.176-2.866; p = 0.008). However, it was not a prognostic factor in patients who underwent upfront surgery or with TBS > 3 or ≥ 9.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing hepatectomy for CLM, the prognostic value of KRAS depends on their history of preoperative chemotherapy or tumor burden.

Laparoscopic anatomical liver resection for malignancies using positive or negative staining technique with intraoperative indocyanine green-fluorescence imaging

BACKGROUND

Indications for a minimally invasive resections are increasing worldwide, but respecting anatomical planes during intraparenchymal transection is demanding. Intraoperative ICG fluorescence staining of liver parenchyma has been introduced as a tool for real-time intraoperative guidance. The aim of this study is to make a systematic review of the current relevant literature on indications, techniques, and results of laparoscopic anatomical liver resection (LALR) using intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence for positive and negative staining of liver segments in patients affected by liver malignancies.

METHODS

Electronic bibliographical databases (MEDLINE and PubMed) were searched according to the PRISMA criteria. English language articles meeting the selection criteria and published until June 2020 were retrieved and reviewed.

RESULTS

a total of 86 articles were initially found and 11 articles were finally included in the analysis with a total of 83 patients treated. Sixty-two patients (74.6%) underwent mono-segmentectomies. Thirty-five patients (42.1%) underwent the positive staining technique, and forty-eight patients (57.8%) the negative staining technique.

CONCLUSIONS

The positive or negative indocyanine green staining technique with real-time fluorescence guidance is an emerging and promising approach. However, the technique has to be standardized and advantages in terms of oncologic results still need validation in further studies.

Tailored Systemic Therapy for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Liver metastases are the most common site of metastatic spread in colorectal cancer. Current treatment approaches involve effective systemic therapies in combination with surgical and/or interventional strategies. Multimodal strategies greatly improved clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer over the last decades. Identification of predictive and prognostic biomarkers helped to comprehensively refine individual targeted treatment approaches and resulted in median overall survival rates of 30 months or longer. Current guidelines, thus, recommend treatment selection according to patients' performance status, tumor localization and stage as well as the tumor's molecular and genetic status. Here, we outline the latest developments in molecular decision-making for patients with upfront resectable, potentially or initially unresectable and non/never-resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Repeat Local Treatment of Recurrent Colorectal Liver Metastases, the Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: An Amsterdam Colorectal Liver Met Registry (AmCORE) Based Study

This cohort study aimed to evaluate efficacy, safety, and survival outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by repeat local treatment compared to upfront repeat local treatment of recurrent colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). A total of 152 patients with 267 tumors from the prospective Amsterdam Colorectal Liver Met Registry (AmCORE) met the inclusion criteria. Two cohorts of patients with recurrent CRLM were compared: patients who received chemotherapy prior to repeat local treatment (32 patients) versus upfront repeat local treatment (120 patients). Data from May 2002 to December 2020 were collected. Results on the primary endpoint overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) and distant progression-free survival (DPFS) were reviewed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Subsequently, uni- and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models, accounting for potential confounders, were estimated. Additionally, subgroup analyses, according to patient, initial and repeat local treatment characteristics, were conducted. Procedure-related complications and length of hospital stay were compared using chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS from date of diagnosis of recurrent disease was 98.6%, 72.5%, and 47.7% for both cohorts combined. The crude survival analysis did not reveal a significant difference in OS between the two cohorts (p = 0.834), with 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS of 100.0%, 73.2%, and 57.5% for the NAC group and 98.2%, 72.3%, and 45.3% for the upfront repeat local treatment group, respectively. After adjusting for two confounders, comorbidities (p = 0.010) and primary tumor location (p = 0.023), the corrected HR in multivariable analysis was 0.839 (95% CI, 0.416-1.691; p = 0.624). No differences between the two cohorts were found with regards to LTPFS (HR = 0.662; 95% CI, 0.249-1.756; p = 0.407) and DPFS (HR = 0.798; 95% CI, 0.483-1.318; p = 0.378). No heterogeneous treatment effects were detected in subgroup analyses according to patient, disease, and treatment characteristics. No significant difference was found in periprocedural complications (p = 0.843) and median length of hospital stay (p = 0.600) between the two cohorts. Chemotherapy-related toxicity was reported in 46.7% of patients. Adding NAC prior to repeat local treatment did not improve OS, LTPFS, or DPFS, nor did it affect periprocedural morbidity or length of hospital stay. The results of this comparative assessment do not substantiate the routine use of NAC prior to repeat local treatment of CRLM. Because the exact role of NAC (in different subgroups) remains inconclusive, we are currently designing a phase III randomized controlled trial (RCT), COLLISION RELAPSE trial, directly comparing upfront repeat local treatment (control) to neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by repeat local treatment (intervention).

Laparoscopic anatomical portal territory hepatectomy using Glissonean pedicle approach (Takasaki approach) with indocyanine green fluorescence negative staining: how I do it

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic anatomical resection (LAR) is a highly challenging procedure. This study aimed to describe our experience of the LAR with an indocyanine green fluorescence negative staining (ICGNS) by the Glissonean pedicle transection (Takasaki) approach.

METHODS

From April 2017 to December 2019, 43 consecutive patients underwent LAR with ICGNS strategy in our medical team. The details of the ICGNS strategy were described. The demographic and clinicopathological data of the included patients were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The extent of resections included right hemihepatectomy (n = 12), left hemihepatectom (n = 4), left lateral sectionectomy (n = 3), Right anterior sectionectomy (n = 3), Right posterior sectionectomy (n = 6), central hepatectomy (n = 2), single anterolateral segmentectomy (n = 5), single posterosuperior segmentectomy (n = 6), and bisegmentectomy (n = 2). The mean operation time was 212 ± 53 min, and the median estimated blood loss was 200 (100-300) ml. The overall complication rate was 30.2% (grade I, 14%; grade II, 14%; grade III, 2.3%). The median duration of postoperative hospital stay was 6 (4-7) days.

CONCLUSION

ICGNS is a safe and feasible LAR strategy that greatly facilitates selecting the liver transection plane, although its benefits need to be verified by large-sample comparative studies.

Primary Tumor Sidedness, RAS and BRAF Mutations and MSI Status as Prognostic Factors in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Treated with Surgery and Thermal Ablation: Results from the Amsterdam Colorectal Liver Met Registry (AmCORE)

The aim of this study was to assess primary tumor sidedness of colorectal cancer (CRC), rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (RAS) and v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) mutations and microsatellite instability (MSI) status as prognostic factors predicting complications, survival outcomes, and local tumor progression (LTP) following surgery and thermal ablation in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This Amsterdam Colorectal Liver Met Registry (AmCORE) based study included 520 patients, 774 procedures, and 2101 tumors undergoing local treatment (resection and/or thermal ablation) from 2000 to 2021. Outcomes following local treatment were analyzed for primary tumor sidedness of CRC, RAS, and BRAF mutations and MSI status. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS), local control (LC), distant progression-free survival (DPFS), and overall survival (OS). Uni- and multivariable analyses were performed based on Cox proportional hazards model. The chi-square test was used to analyze complications. Complications (p = 0.485), OS (p = 0.252), LTPFS (p = 0.939), and LC (p = 0.423) was not associated with tumor-sidedness. Compared to right-sided colon cancer (CC) (reference HR 1.000), DPFS was superior for left-sided CC and rectal cancer (p = 0.018) with an HR for left-sided CC of 0.742 (95% CI, 0.596–0.923) and for RC of 0.760 (95% CI, 0.597–0.966). Regarding RAS mutations, no significant difference was found in OS (p = 0.116). DPFS (p = 0.001), LTPFS (p = 0.039), and LC (p = 0.025) were significantly lower in the RAS mutation group. Though no difference in LTPFS was found between RAS wildtype and RAS mutated CRLM following resection (p = 0.532), LTPFS was worse for RAS mutated tumors compared to RAS wildtype following thermal ablation (p = 0.037). OS was significantly lower in the BRAF mutation group (p < 0.001) and in the MSI group (p < 0.001) following local treatment, while both did not affect DPFS, LTPFS, and LC. This AmCORE based study suggests the necessity of wider margins to reduce LTP rates in patients with RAS mutated CRLM, especially for thermal ablation. Upfront knowledge regarding molecular biomarkers may contribute to improved oncological outcomes.

Nomogram including chemotherapy response for prediction of intrahepatic progression-free survival in patients with colorectal liver metastasis through chemotherapy followed by radiofrequency ablation

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is being considered as the favorable treatment option for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) receiving chemotherapy, yet there still exist challenges for recurrence after RFA. The present study aims to establish an effective nomogram to predict intrahepatic progression-free survival (PFS) and select RFA candidates.

METHODS

Patients with unresectable CRLM treated with chemotherapy followed by RFA between 2010 and 2016 were enrolled in this study. The nomogram to predict intrahepatic PFS was established based on multivariable Cox regression analysis. The predictive performance of the nomogram was assessed according to the C-index, calibration plots and Kaplan-Meier curve.

RESULTS

Of a total of 158 patients, the earlier new intrahepatic metastases over local tumor progression were observed in 157 patients during the follow-up, and the mean intrahepatic PFS was 16.9 ± 1.4 months in the present cohort. The optimal cutoff value of tumor size after chemotherapy was identified as 16 mm by X-tile analysis. Based on multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors for intrahepatic PFS included primary positive lymph nodes, multiple metastases, tumor size >16 mm, no primary lesion resection, mutant KRAS and PD response after chemotherapy. The nomogram was established to predict intrahepatic PFS based on all independent factors, which achieved favorable discrimination and calibration.

CONCLUSION

This study firstly established the nomogram to predict intrahepatic PFS for unresectable CRLM patients receiving chemotherapy followed by RFA. It can facilitate the selection of RFA candidates, and help both surgeons and patients choose individualized regimens in the treatment decision.

The prognostic impact of resection margin status varies according to the genetic and morphological evaluation (GAME) score for colorectal liver metastasis

BACKGROUND

Surgical margin status remains a controversial factor in predicting the outcome of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) resection. Our study aims to evaluate the effects of surgical margins on oncologic outcomes with regard to the genetic and morphological evaluation (GAME) score.

METHODS

R1 resection was defined as having a less than 1 mm margin width. Patients who underwent surgery for CRLM from January 2005 to December 2018 were recruited. The patients were divided into two risk subgroups, namely, the low or medium risk (GAME 0-3) and high-risk (GAME score 4 or more) groups. The effects of margin status on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival rate (RFS) were examined.

RESULTS

In total, 661 patients were recruited, among which 159 (24.1%) had R1 resection. Before hepatectomy, 514 patients showed a low or medium risk (R1 resection: n = 124), while 147 patients demonstrated a high risk (R1 resection: n = 35). In the whole cohort, multivariable analysis did show that R1 resection was associated with worse RFS and OS. While further research only found that in the low or medium risk group, R1 resection was related to poor OS and RFS. Meanwhile, in the high risk group, no significant difference was found in the median OS and RFS among patients with R0 or R1 resection.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic role of margin status varied according to the GAME score. Margin clearance only improved survival rates in patients with low or medium GAME score. In contrast, R1 resection demonstrated similar oncologic outcomes with R0 resection in patients with high GAME score.

Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications of Tumor Biology, Including Gene Alterations, in Colorectal Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

For patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM), the combination of surgical resection with other therapeutic options is essential. This article shows how recent advances in knowledge of tumor biology, including genetic alterations, affect the choice of therapeutic approach for patients with CLM.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature on recent advances in knowledge about CLM tumor biology including genetic profiles, clinical risk score models for CLM, preoperative therapy for CLM, and liver-directed therapy for CLM.

RESULTS

Studies showed that RAS alteration is a negative prognostic factor in addition to traditional clinical risk factors (e.g., larger diameter and higher number of CLM, spread of the primary tumor to regional lymph nodes). Although the response to preoperative chemotherapy is an important predictor of survival, poor response is not a contraindication to surgical resection. The combination of surgical therapy and percutaneous ablation can be considered in marginally resectable cases; however, a wider ablation margin is required for RAS-mutant CLM. More recently, genetic analysis using next-generation sequencing showed the negative prognostic impact of alterations in TP53, SMAD4, FBXW7, and RAS/BRAF in patients with CLM. In RAS-mutant CLM, intensive follow-up is required in patients who remain recurrence free 2 years after surgery.

DISCUSSION

In patients with CLM, RAS mutation status is important in predicting postoperative survival, selecting the treatment approach, and tailoring postoperative follow-up. In addition, more recent genetic analyses of CLM have identified additional predictors of survival.

Optimizing Loco Regional Management of Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: Technical Aspects and Biomarkers, Two Sides of the Same Coin

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and has a high rate of metastatic disease which is the main cause of CRC-related death. Oligometastatic disease is a clinical condition recently included in ESMO guidelines that can benefit from a more aggressive locoregional approach. This review focuses the attention on colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and highlights recommendations and therapeutic locoregional strategies drawn from the current literature and consensus conferences. The different percutaneous therapies (radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, irreversible electroporation) as well as trans-arterial approaches (chemoembolization and radioembolization) are discussed. Ablation margins, the choice of the imaging guidance as well as characteristics of the different ablation techniques and other technical aspects are analyzed. A specific attention is then paid to the increasing role of biomarkers (in particular molecular profiling) and their role in the selection of the proper treatment for the right patient. In conclusion, in this review an up-to-date state of the art of the application of locoregional treatments on CRLM is provided, highlighting both technical aspects and the role of biomarkers, two sides of the same coin.

The current understanding on the impact of KRAS on colorectal cancer

KRAS (kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene) is a member of the RAS family. KRAS mutations are one of most dominant mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC). The impact of KRAS mutations on the prognosis and survival of CRC patients drives many research studies to explore potential therapeutics or target therapy for the KRAS mutant CRC. This review summarizes the current understanding of the pathological consequences of the KRAS mutations in the development of CRC; and the impact of the mutations on the response and the sensitivity to the current front-line chemotherapy. The current therapeutic strategies for treating KRAS mutant CRC, the difficulties and challenges will also be discussed.