1
|
Boland EG, Tay KT, Khamis A, Murtagh FEM. Patterns of acute hospital and specialist palliative care use among people with non-curative upper gastrointestinal cancer. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:432. [PMID: 38874678 PMCID: PMC11178555 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08624-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers contribute to 16.7% of UK cancer deaths. These patients make high use of acute hospital services, but detail about palliative care use is lacking. We aimed to determine the patterns of use of acute hospital and hospital specialist palliative care services in patients with advanced non-curative upper GI cancer. METHODS We conducted a service evaluation of hospital use and palliative care for all patients with non-curative upper GI cancer seen in one large hospital, using routinely collected data (2019-2022). We report and characterise hospital admissions and palliative care within the study time period, using descriptive statistics, and multivariable Poisson regression to estimate the unadjusted and adjusted incidence rate ratio of hospital admissions. RESULTS The total with non-curative upper GI cancer was 960. 86.7% had at least one hospital admission, with 1239 admissions in total. Patients had a higher risk of admission to hospital if: aged ≤ 65 (IRR for 66-75 years 0.71, IRR 76-85 years 0.68; IRR > 85 years 0.53; p < 0.05), or lived in an area of lower socioeconomic status (IMD Deciles 1-5) (IRR 0.90; p < 0.05). Over the 4-year period, the rate of re-admission was higher in patients not referred to palliative care (rate 0.52 readmissions/patient versus rate 1.47 readmissions/patient). CONCLUSION People with advanced non-curative gastrointestinal cancer have frequent hospital admissions, especially if younger or from areas of lower socioeconomic status. There is clear association between specialist palliative care referral and reduced risk of hospitalisation. This evidence supports referral to specialist palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E G Boland
- Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK.
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
| | - K T Tay
- Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
| | - A Khamis
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - F E M Murtagh
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gerhardt S, Benthien KS, Herling S, Leerhøy B, Jarlbaek L, Krarup PM. Associations between health-related quality of life and subsequent need for specialized palliative care and hospital utilization in patients with gastrointestinal cancer-a prospective single-center cohort study. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:311. [PMID: 38683444 PMCID: PMC11058934 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08509-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We lack knowledge of which factors are associated with the risk of developing complex palliative care needs. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between patient-reported health-related quality of life and subsequent referral to specialized palliative care (SPC) and hospital utilization. METHODS This was a prospective single-center cohort study. Data on patient-reported outcomes were collected through the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire-Core-15-Palliative Care (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL) at the time of diagnosis. Covariates and hospital utilization outcomes were collected from medical records. Adjusted logistic and Poisson regression were applied in the analyses. Participants were newly diagnosed with incurable gastrointestinal cancer and affiliated with a palliative care case management intervention established in a gastroenterology department. RESULTS Out of 397 patients with incurable gastrointestinal cancer, 170 were included in the study. Patients newly diagnosed with incurable gastrointestinal cancer experienced a substantial burden of symptoms. Pain was significantly associated with subsequent referral to SPC (OR 1.015; 95% CI 1.001-1.029). Patients with lower education levels (OR 0.210; 95% CI 0.056-0.778) and a Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 2 or more (OR 0.173; 95% CI 0.041-0.733) were less likely to be referred to SPC. Pain (IRR 1.011; 95% CI 1.005-1.018), constipation (IRR 1.009; 95% CI 1.004-1.015), and impaired overall quality of life (IRR 0.991; 95% CI 0.983-0.999) were significantly associated with increased risk of hospital admissions. CONCLUSION The study indicates a need for interventions in hospital departments to identify and manage the substantial symptom burden experienced by patients, provide palliative care, and ensure timely referral to SPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stine Gerhardt
- Digestive Disease Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark.
| | - Kirstine Skov Benthien
- Palliative Care Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital - Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
- REHPA - Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, University of Southern Denmark, Nyborg, Denmark
| | - Suzanne Herling
- The Neuroscience Center, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bonna Leerhøy
- Digestive Disease Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark
- Centre for Translational Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lene Jarlbaek
- REHPA - Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, University of Southern Denmark, Nyborg, Denmark
| | - Peter-Martin Krarup
- Digestive Disease Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sønderup Tarp M, Rosenberg J. The symptom burden and the assessment of palliative symptoms in patients with metastatic upper gastrointestinal cancer: A qualitative interview study. Palliat Support Care 2024; 22:367-373. [PMID: 37817325 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951523001335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with metastatic upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer may experience a large physical symptom burden. However, less is known about existential, social, and psychological symptoms. To provide the patient with palliative care, quality-of-life questionnaires are used for structured needs assessment. These are sporadically implemented, and there seems to be uncertainty to the efficiency of current practice. The aim of study was to explore the experienced assessment-process and treatment of palliative symptoms, as well as the experienced symptom burden, in patients with metastatic upper GI cancer. METHODS Qualitative, semi-structured interviews were conducted in 10 patients with metastatic upper GI cancer. Data were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS The patients did not expect treatment for all physical symptoms. Existential symptoms revolved around death and dying, social issues were mainly related to family, and psychological issues were based in the continuous dealing with serious illness. Existential, social, and psychological symptoms were mostly not considered part of the expected care when admitted to hospital. Patients had only vague recollections of their experiences with structured needs assessment, and the process had been inconsequential in the treatment of symptoms. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS Patients with upper GI cancer experience symptoms related to all 4 areas of palliative care being physical, existential, social, and psychological, but these are differentiated in the way patients perceive their origins and treatability. Structured needs assessment was not routinely carried out, and in cases where this had been done, no follow-up was effectuated. This calls for increased focus and proper implementation for the process to be relevant in the treatment of palliative symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Sønderup Tarp
- Department of Surgery, Herlev & Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Jacob Rosenberg
- Department of Surgery, Herlev & Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lam AB, Moore V, Nipp RD. Care Delivery Interventions for Individuals with Cancer: A Literature Review and Focus on Gastrointestinal Malignancies. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 12:30. [PMID: 38200936 PMCID: PMC10779432 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12010030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal malignancies represent a particularly challenging condition, often requiring a multidisciplinary approach to management in order to meet the unique needs of these individuals and their caregivers. PURPOSE In this literature review, we sought to describe care delivery interventions that strive to improve the quality of life and care for patients with a focus on gastrointestinal malignancies. CONCLUSION We highlight patient-centered care delivery interventions, including patient-reported outcomes, hospital-at-home interventions, and other models of care for individuals with cancer. By demonstrating the relevance and utility of these different care models for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies, we hope to highlight the importance of developing and testing new interventions to address the unique needs of this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anh B. Lam
- Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| | - Vanessa Moore
- College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73117, USA;
| | - Ryan D. Nipp
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gerhardt S, Leerhøy B, Jarlbaek L, Herling S. Qualitative evaluation of a palliative care case management intervention for patients with incurable gastrointestinal cancer (PalMaGiC) in a hospital department. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2023; 66:102409. [PMID: 37742424 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Generalist palliative care in hospital departments largely lacks an overall structure to fully manage the symptom burden and support needs of patients with incurable gastrointestinal cancer. Palliative care case management interventions show promising results in reducing healthcare use and enhancing quality of life. Less is known about these interventions and their potential to improve the quality of generalist palliative care in hospital departments. The aim of this study was to explore patients' experience of a palliative care case management intervention (PalMaGiC) to acquire knowledge about its advantages and disadvantages and, if needed, adjust the intervention. METHODS Qualitative semi-structured interviews with patients (n = 14) with incurable gastrointestinal cancers of the oesophagus, pancreas, colon, or rectum were conducted and analysed using content analysis. Participants in the study were affiliated with PalMaGiC, an intervention in a gastroenterology department based on symptom assessment, care planning, care coordination, and needs-based follow-up. RESULTS Participants perceived the intervention as filling a gap and as a secure lifeline in the healthcare system since it provided 24-h access, a designated specialist nurse, and a patient-healthcare alliance. Using a needs-based approach, PalMaGiC changed the participants' focus from disease to quality of life. Participants requested more open dialog within complementary and alternative medicine, greater focus on promoting hope and using need assessment questionnaires differently in assessing symptoms and problems. CONCLUSION The PalMaGiC intervention can potentially meet the needs of patients requiring palliative care in hospital departments, but further development of the content and personalised approach is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stine Gerhardt
- Digestive Disease Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark.
| | - Bonna Leerhøy
- Digestive Disease Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark; Center for Translational Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg, Nielsine Nielsensvej 4, 2400, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark.
| | - Lene Jarlbaek
- Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care (REHPA), University of Southern Denmark, Vestergade 17, 5800, Nyborg, Denmark.
| | - Suzanne Herling
- The Neuroscience Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, København Ø, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Merchant SJ, Kong W, Mahmud A, Booth CM, Hanna TP. Palliative Radiotherapy for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer: Population-Based Patterns of Utilization and Outcomes in Ontario, Canada. J Palliat Care 2023; 38:157-166. [PMID: 35043749 PMCID: PMC10026159 DOI: 10.1177/08258597211072946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with incurable esophageal and gastric cancer may develop local symptoms for which palliative radiotherapy (PRT) may be considered. We sought to evaluate patterns in utilization and outcomes of patients receiving PRT for incurable esophageal and gastric cancer in Ontario, Canada using health administrative data. METHODS Linked health administrative databases were used to identify patients receiving PRT for incurable esophageal and gastric cancer. Primary outcomes were utilization and delivery of PRT, utilization of endoscopic dilation with or without stent insertion after completion of PRT and survival from 1) date of diagnosis and 2) start of PRT. RESULTS We identified 2500 patients who received PRT. Mean age was 70 ± 13 years and the majority (75%, n = 1873/2500) were male. Over half of the patients had a diagnosis of gastric cancer (58%, n = 1453/2500) and began PRT within 6 months of cancer diagnosis (85%, n = 2125/2500). Of the 2500 patients in the cohort, 2174 patients received EBRT with few receiving brachytherapy (n = 326) or EBRT and brachytherapy combined (n = 88). Over the study period, there was an increase in the number of patients receiving PRT (136 in 2007 to 290 in 2016), as well as in the use of advanced conformal radiotherapy techniques. Only 5% (115/2500) required dilation with or without stent insertion after completion of PRT. Median overall and cancer-specific survival of the cohort was 205 days and 209 days from date of diagnosis and 108 days and 110 days from start of PRT. CONCLUSIONS PRT is an important treatment for patients with incurable esophageal and gastric cancer who present with local symptoms. Utilization of PRT and advanced EBRT techniques increased over the study period. Few patients require endoscopic dilation with or without stent insertion after completion of PRT suggesting that PRT provides favorable symptom control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaila J Merchant
- Division of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Weidong Kong
- Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aamer Mahmud
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher M Booth
- Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Timothy P Hanna
- Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen VW, Portuondo JI, Cooper Z, Massarweh NN. Variation in hospital utilization of palliative interventions for patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer near end of life. J Surg Oncol 2023; 127:741-751. [PMID: 36514285 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer often undergo noncurative interventions with palliative intent to relieve high symptom burden near end of life. Hospital-level variation in intervention utilization remains unclear. METHODS National cohort study of 142 304 patients with stage III or IV GI cancer within the National Cancer Database (2004-2014) who died within 1-year of diagnosis. Hospitals were stratified by palliative intervention utilization (surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, pain management). Multivariable, multinomial regression evaluated the association between patient/hospital factors and palliative intervention utilization. RESULTS Across 1322 hospitals, median hospital palliative intervention utilization was 12.0% [interquartile range: 0.0%-26.1%]. Utilization increased over time in all but lowest utilizing hospitals. Relative to lowest utilizing hospitals, factors associated with a lower likelihood of care at highest utilizing hospitals included: race (White [ref]; Black-Relative Risk Ratio [RRR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [0.77-0.85]) and lower income (RRR 0.81 [0.78-0.84]). Factors associated with a higher likelihood included: lower education level (RRR 1.62 [1.55-1.69]) and hospital type (community program [ref]; comprehensive community-RRR 1.33 [1.26-1.41]; academic-RRR 1.88 [1.77-1.99]; integrated network-RRR 1.79 [1.66-1.93]). CONCLUSION Hospital variation in palliative intervention use is substantial and potentially associated with sociodemographic and hospital characteristics. Future work can examine how differences in hospital care processes translate to quantity/quality of life for cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivi W Chen
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Michael E DeBakey Department of Surgery at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jorge I Portuondo
- Michael E DeBakey Department of Surgery at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Zara Cooper
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nader N Massarweh
- Surgical and Perioperative Care, Atlanta VA Health Care System, Decatur, Georgia, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Department of Surgery, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu Y, Wang F, Ma D, Wu X, Hui Z, Zhang H, Zhang L. Views of inpatients on the prevention of venous thrombosis with ankle pump exercise: A cross-sectional survey. Phlebology 2023; 38:28-35. [PMID: 36433701 DOI: 10.1177/02683555221142199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study investigated the current status of patients' knowledge and clinical compliance with ankle pump exercises in order to better enhance patient education and improve patient compliance with ankle pump exercises. METHODS A cross-sectional survey of the current status of ankle pump exercise awareness and compliance was conducted using a self-designed questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of a general demographic information questionnaire, a questionnaire on patients' perceptions of ankle pump exercise and a compliance questionnaire. RESULTS A total of 2,203 patients from 53 clinical departments participated in this survey. 87.8% of patients considered ankle pump exercise important, 92.1% could grasp the knowledge of ankle pump exercise, 48.5% could self-monitor and exercise daily as instructed, 81.5% of health care workers would often supervise patients to complete ankle pump exercise, poor self-control (34.6%), lack of physical strength (21.1%) and perceived hassle (18.9%) were the top 3 factors contributing to patients' inability to complete the ankle pump exercise. Regression analysis showed that the factors influencing patients' compliance with the ankle pump exercise were literacy, economic level, number of comorbidities and caprini risk class (p < .05). CONCLUSION The patient's cognition of ankle pump exercise is good, but the compliance needs to be improved. It is suggested that the compliance of ankle pump exercise in hospitalized patients should be improved in the future to reduce the incidence of Venous thromboembolism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yujie Liu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Fang Wang
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, 34708Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Danfeng Ma
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Xuejun Wu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Zhen Hui
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, 34708Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Haiyan Zhang
- Department of Extracardiac ICU, 34708Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Li Zhang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bhatt S, Johnson PC, Markovitz NH, Gray T, Nipp RD, Ufere N, Rice J, Reynolds MJ, Lavoie MW, Clay MA, Lindvall C, El-Jawahri A. The Use of Natural Language Processing to Assess Social Support in Patients With Advanced Cancer. Oncologist 2022; 28:165-171. [PMID: 36427022 PMCID: PMC9907037 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data examining associations among social support, survival, and healthcare utilization are lacking in patients with advanced cancer. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional secondary analysis using data from a prospective longitudinal cohort study of 966 hospitalized patients with advanced cancer at Massachusetts General Hospital from 2014 through 2017. We used NLP to identify extent of patients' social support (limited versus adequate as defined by NLP-aided review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)). Two independent coders achieved a Kappa of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84-1.00) using NLP. Using multivariable regression models, we examined associations of social support with: 1) OS; 2) death or readmission within 90 days of hospital discharge; 3) time to readmission within 90 days; and 4) hospital length of stay (LOS). RESULTS Patients' median age was 65 (range: 21-92) years, and a plurality had gastrointestinal (GI) cancer (34.3%) followed by lung cancer (19.5%). 6.2% (60/966) of patients had limited social support. In multivariable analyses, limited social support was not significantly associated with OS (HR = 1.13, P = 0.390), death or readmission (OR = 1.18, P = 0.578), time to readmission (HR = 0.92, P = 0.698), or LOS (β = -0.22, P = 0.726). We identified a potential interaction suggesting cancer type (GI cancer versus other) may be an effect modifier of the relationship between social support and OS (interaction term P = 0.053). In separate unadjusted analyses, limited social support was associated with lower OS (HR = 2.10, P = 0.008) in patients with GI cancer but not other cancer types (HR = 1.00, P = 0.991). CONCLUSION We used NLP to assess the extent of social support in patients with advanced cancer. We did not identify significant associations of social support with OS or healthcare utilization but found cancer type may be an effect modifier of the relationship between social support and OS. These findings underscore the potential utility of NLP for evaluating social support in patients with advanced cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - P Connor Johnson
- Corresponding author: P. Connor Johnson, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit St., Yawkey 9A, Boston, MA 02114, USA. Tel: +1 617 724 4000; Fax: +1 617 724 1135; E-mail:
| | - Netana H Markovitz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tamryn Gray
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ryan D Nipp
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nneka Ufere
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Julia Rice
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew J Reynolds
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mitchell W Lavoie
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Madison A Clay
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Raghunathan NJ, Brens J, Vemuri S, Li QS, Mao JJ, Korenstein D. In the weeds: a retrospective study of patient interest in and experience with cannabis at a cancer center. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:7491-7497. [PMID: 35665859 PMCID: PMC9165925 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07170-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cannabis products, including the cannabinoids CBD and THC, are rising in popularity and increasingly used for medical purposes. While there is some evidence that cannabinoids improve cancer-associated symptoms, understanding regarding appropriate use remains incomplete. PURPOSE To describe patient experiences with medical cannabis with focus on use contexts and patients' reported benefits and harms. METHODS A standardized intake form was implemented in a dedicated medical cannabis clinic at an NCI-designated cancer center; data from this form was abstracted for all initial visits from October 2019 to October 2020. We report descriptive statistics, chi-square analysis, and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS Among 163 unique new patients, cannabis therapy was commonly sought for sleep, pain, anxiety, and appetite. Twenty-nine percent expressed interest for cancer treatment; 40% and 46% reported past use of CBD and THC, respectively, for medical purposes. Among past CBD users, the most commonly reported benefits were less pain (21%) or anxiety (17%) and improvement in sleep (15%); 92% reported no side effects. Among those with past THC use, reported benefits included improvement in appetite (40%), sleep (32%), nausea (28%), and pain (17%); side effects included feeling "high." Seeking cannabis for anti-neoplastic effects was associated with receipt of active cancer treatment in both univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION Cancer patients seek medical cannabis to address a wide variety of concerns despite insufficient evidence of benefits and harms. As more states move to legalize medical and recreational cannabis, cancer care providers must remain aware of emerging data and develop knowledge and skills to counsel their patients about its use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nirupa J Raghunathan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Jessica Brens
- Department of Nursing, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Swetha Vemuri
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Qing S Li
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jun J Mao
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Deborah Korenstein
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kitti PM, Anttonen AM, Leskelä RL, Saarto T. End-of-life care of patients with esophageal or gastric cancer: decision making and the goal of care. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:1173-1178. [PMID: 36005550 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2022.2114379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overall survival (OS) with advanced esophageal or gastric cancer is poor. To avoid overly aggressive treatments at the end-of-life and assure adequate end-of-life quality, the decision to focus on symptom-centered palliative care (PC) and terminate anticancer treatments, i.e., the PC decision, should be made in time. MATERIAL AND METHODS We reviewed the charts of patients (N = 160) with esophageal or gastric cancer treated at the Department of Oncology at Helsinki University Central Hospital in 2013 and deceased by December 2014. The use of acute services (Emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations) and places of death were compared according to the timing of the PC decision. Reasons for ED visits and hospitalizations were collected. RESULTS The median OS from diagnosis of advanced cancer was 6 months. Anti-cancer treatments were never started for 34% of the patients. The PC decision was made early (>30 days before death) for 54% of the patients and late (≤30 days before death) or not at all for 46%. Patients with late or no PC decision died more often in tertiary/secondary hospital (29 versus 7%, p = 0.001) and had more ED visits (49 versus 29%, p < 0.001) and hospitalizations (53 versus 28%, p = 0.001) in their last month, and visited the PC unit less often (18 versus 69%, p < 0.001), than the patients with early PC decision. The ED visits were most commonly related to cancer progression, and clinical deterioration (17%), fever (16%), and dysphagia (15%) were the most common symptoms. CONCLUSION The decision to focus on PC and terminate anticancer treatments, i.e., the PC decision, was made late or not at all in every other patient, leading to increased tertiary/secondary hospital service use and deaths at tertiary/secondary hospital. Early decision-making increased end-of-life care at specialized PC services or at home, implying better end-of-life care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauliina M Kitti
- Department of Oncology, HUS Comprehensive Cancer Centre and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anu M Anttonen
- Department of Oncology, HUS Comprehensive Cancer Centre and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Tiina Saarto
- Department of Oncology, HUS Comprehensive Cancer Centre and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chen VW, Portuondo JI, Cooper Z, Massarweh NN. Use of Palliative Interventions at End of Life for Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:7281-7292. [PMID: 35947309 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12342-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the well-established benefits of palliative care, little is known about the use of palliative interventions among patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer near the end of life (EOL). METHODS A national cohort study analyzed 142,304 patients with advanced GI cancers (stage 3 or 4) near EOL (death within 1 year of diagnosis) in the National Cancer Database (2004-2014) who received palliative interventions (defined as treatment to relieve symptoms: surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and/or pain management). The study used multivariable hierarchical regression evaluate the association between the use of palliative interventions, temporal trends, and patient and hospital factors. RESULTS Overall, 16.5% of the patients were treated with a palliative intervention, and use increased over time (13.4% in 2004 vs 19.8% in 2014; trend test, p < 0.001). Palliative interventions were used most frequently for esophageal cancer (20.6%) and least frequently for gallbladder cancer (13.3%). Palliative interventions were associated with younger age (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-0.99), recent diagnosis year (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.04-1.06), black race (white [ref]; OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12), insurance status (no insurance [ref]; private: OR, 0.92; 95% CI ,0.95-0.99), hospital type (community cancer program [ref]; integrated network cancer programs: OR, 1.37; 95% CI ,1.07-1.75), and stage 4 disease (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 2.07-2.27). Patients in southern and western regions were less likely to receive palliative intervention (Northeast [ref]; OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.94 and OR 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.57, respectively). CONCLUSION Increased palliative intervention use over time suggests ongoing changes in how care is delivered to GI cancer patients toward EOL. However, sociodemographic and geographic variation suggests opportunities to address barriers to optimal EOL care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivi W Chen
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA. .,Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Department of Surgery at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Jorge I Portuondo
- Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Department of Surgery at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zara Cooper
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nader N Massarweh
- Surgical and Perioperative Service, Atlanta VA Health Care System, Decatur, GA, USA.,Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Department of Surgery, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Magill N, Walker J, Symeonides S, Gourley C, Hobbs H, Rosenstein D, Frost C, Sharpe M. Depression and anxiety during the year before death from cancer. J Psychosom Res 2022; 158:110922. [PMID: 35500323 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous studies of depression and anxiety during the year before death have reported different findings. We therefore aimed to study depression and anxiety in patients who had died from cancer and had previously attended cancer clinics. METHODS We analysed routine data on 4869 deceased patients who had completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) as part of their routine cancer care. The HADS data were linked with demographic, cancer and mortality data from national registries. We used data from all HADS completed in the last year of life to investigate the relationships between mean depression (HADS-D) and anxiety (HADS-A) scores and the percentages of high scores (≥11 on each subscale) and time to death (Analysis 1). This analysis used multivariable linear regression with cubic splines and robust standard errors to allow for multiple HADS from the same patients. We also investigated within-patient changes in scores (Analysis 2) in a subset of patients who had completed more than one HADS. RESULTS In Analysis 1, modelled mean HADS-D scores increased by around 2.5 and the percentage of high HADS-D scores increased from 13% at six months before death to 30% at one month before death. Changes in HADS-A were smaller and occurred later. In Analysis 2, similar patterns were observed in individual patients' HADS scores. CONCLUSION Depression should be looked for and treated in patients with cancer and a prognosis of six months or less, in order to maximise the quality of patients' remaining life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Magill
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Jane Walker
- Psychological Medicine Research, University of Oxford Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Stefan Symeonides
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Charlie Gourley
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Harriet Hobbs
- Psychological Medicine Research, University of Oxford Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Donald Rosenstein
- Departments of Psychiatry and Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Chris Frost
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Michael Sharpe
- Psychological Medicine Research, University of Oxford Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Patel S, McClintock C, Booth C, Merchant S, Heneghan C, Bankhead C. Variations in Care and Real World Outcomes in those with Rectal Cancer: A protocol for the Ontario Rectal Cancer Cohort (OntaReCC) (Preprint). JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e38874. [PMID: 35930352 PMCID: PMC9391972 DOI: 10.2196/38874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Individuals with rectal cancer require a number of pretreatment investigations, often require multidisciplinary treatment, and require ongoing follow-ups after treatment is completed. Due to the complexity of treatments, large variations in practice patterns and outcomes have been identified. At present, few comprehensive, population-level data sets are available for assessing interventions and outcomes in this group. Objective Our study aims to create a comprehensive database of individuals with rectal cancer who have been treated in a single-payer, universal health care system. This database will provide an excellent resource that investigators can use to study variations in the delivery of care to and real-world outcomes of this population. Methods The Ontario Rectal Cancer Cohort database will include comprehensive details about the management and outcomes of individuals with rectal cancer who have been diagnosed in Ontario, Canada (population: 14.6 million), between 2010 and 2019. Linked administrative data sets will be used to construct this comprehensive database. Individual and care provider characteristics, investigations, treatments, follow-ups, and outcomes will be derived and linked. Surgical pathology details, including the stage of disease, histopathology characteristics, and the quality of surgical excision, will be included. Ethics approval for this study was obtained through the Queen’s University Health Sciences and Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board. Results Approximately 20,000 individuals who meet the inclusion criteria for this study have been identified. Data analysis is ongoing, with an expected completion date of March 2023. This study was funded through the Canadian Institute of Health Research Operating Grant. Conclusions The Ontario Rectal Cancer Cohort will include a comprehensive data set of individuals with rectal cancer who received care within a single-payer, universal health care system. This cohort will be used to determine factors associated with regional variability and adherence to recommended care, and it will allow for an assessment of a number of understudied areas within the delivery of rectal cancer treatment. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR1-10.2196/38874
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunil Patel
- Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Chad McClintock
- Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | - Shaila Merchant
- Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Bankhead
- Centre for Evidence Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hiratsuka Y, Suh SY, Won SH, Kim SH, Yoon SJ, Koh SJ, Kwon JH, Park J, Ahn HY, Cheng SY, Chen PJ, Yamaguchi T, Morita T, Tsuneto S, Mori M, Inoue A. Prevalence and severity of symptoms and signs in patients with advanced cancer in the last days of life: the East Asian collaborative cross-cultural study to elucidate the dying process (EASED). Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:5499-5508. [PMID: 35304634 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06969-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Few large-scale studies have focused on the prevalence of symptoms and signs during the last days of patients diagnosed with advanced cancer. Identifying the patterns of specific symptoms according to cancer type is helpful to provide end-of-life care for patients with advanced cancer. We investigated the prevalence and severity of symptoms and signs associated with impending death in patients with advanced cancer. METHODS In this secondary analysis of an international multicenter cohort study conducted in three East Asian countries, we compared the severity of symptoms and signs among dying patients in the last 3 days of life according to the type of primary cancer using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Post hoc analysis was conducted for multiple comparisons of each symptom according to the type of primary cancer. RESULTS We analyzed 2131 patients from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. The prevalence of most symptoms and signs were relatively stable from 1 week after admission to the last 3 days of life. According to cancer type, edema of the lower extremities was the most common symptom and fatigue/ ascites were the most severe symptoms in digestive tract cancer. For lung cancer, respiratory secretion was the most prevalent and dyspnea/respiratory secretion were the most severe symptoms. CONCLUSION We demonstrated the prevalence and severity of symptoms and signs associated with the impending death of patients with advanced cancer in East Asia. Our study can enable clinicians to recognize the specific symptoms and signs at the very end of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Hiratsuka
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Takeda General Hospital, Aizuwakamatsu, Japan
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Sang-Yeon Suh
- Department of Family Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
- Department of Medicine, Dongguk University Medical School, Pildong 1-30, Jung-gu, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Seon-Hye Won
- Department of Family Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| | - Sun-Hyun Kim
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, South Korea
| | - Seok-Joon Yoon
- Department of Family Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, South Korea
| | - Su-Jin Koh
- Department Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital Ulsan University College of Medicine, Ulsan, South Korea
| | - Jung Hye Kwon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, South Korea
| | - Jeanno Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Bobath Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Hong-Yup Ahn
- Department of Statistics, Dongguk University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Shao-Yi Cheng
- Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ping-Jen Chen
- Department of Family Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, and School of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Division of Psychiatry, Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Tatsuya Morita
- Division of Palliative and Supportive Care, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Satoru Tsuneto
- Department of Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masanori Mori
- Division of Palliative and Supportive Care, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Akira Inoue
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
van Doorne I, van Rijn M, Dofferhoff SM, Willems DL, Buurman BM. Patients' preferred place of death: patients are willing to consider their preferences, but someone has to ask them. Age Ageing 2021; 50:2004-2011. [PMID: 34473834 PMCID: PMC8581384 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background end-of-life care is not always in line with end-of-life preferences, so patients do not always die at their preferred place of death (PPD). This study aims to identify factors associated with patients’ PPD and changes in PPD. Methods we prospectively collected data on PPD at four time points within 6 months from 230 acutely hospitalised older patients who were part of the control group in a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial. Associations between patient characteristics and preferences were calculated using multivariable (multinomial) logistic regression analysis. Results the mean age of participants was 80.7 years. 47.8% of the patients had no PPD at hospital admission. Patients previously admitted to hospital preferred to die at home (home versus no preference: odds ratio [OR] 2.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15–4.92; home versus healthcare facility: OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.15–9.16). Patients with more chronic diseases preferred the healthcare facility as their PPD (healthcare facility versus no preference: OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.09–1.61; healthcare facility versus home: OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.00–1.47). 32 of 65 patients changed their preference during follow-up, and most of these had no PPD at hospital admission (home versus no preference: OR 0.005, 95% CI ≤0.001–0.095) and poorer self-rated well-being (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.07–3.08). Conclusions almost half of the patients had no PPD at baseline. Previous hospital admission, having more chronic diseases and living alone are associated with having a PPD. Introducing PPD could make older people aware of PPD and facilitate optimal palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris van Doorne
- Section of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjon van Rijn
- Section of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Health, Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Amsterdam University of Applied Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Dofferhoff
- Section of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dick L Willems
- Section of Medical Ethics, Department of General Practice, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bianca M Buurman
- Section of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Health, Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Amsterdam University of Applied Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Self-Care Efficacy-Mediated Associations Between Healthcare Provider-Patient Communication and Psychological Distress Among Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancers. Cancer Nurs 2021; 45:E594-E603. [PMID: 34469356 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both healthcare provider-patient communication and self-care efficacy affect psychological distress, which is prevalent among patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. It is essential to explore the underlying mechanism among them to relieve psychological distress. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine whether self-care efficacy mediated the association between healthcare provider-patient communication and psychological distress among patients with GI cancers. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted between March 2018 and May 2019 in China. In total, 219 patients with GI cancers were recruited before discharge from chemotherapy. Healthcare provider-patient communication was assessed by the revised Physician-Patient Communication Scale; patient self-care efficacy was assessed by the Strategies Used by People to Promote Health; and psychological distress was assessed by the Distress Thermometer and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Mediation analyses were conducted to examine the mediating effect of self-care efficacy on the association between healthcare provider-patient communication and psychological distress. RESULTS A total of 54.34% of patients experienced psychological distress. Patients reported a mean score of 89.93 (SD, 13.81) for healthcare provider-patient communication and 93.91 (SD, 23.39) for self-care efficacy. Self-care efficacy completely mediated the association between healthcare provider-patient communication and psychological distress, and communication outcome was the only domain that significantly influenced self-care efficacy. CONCLUSION Psychological distress is prevalent among patients with GI cancers. Healthcare provider-patient communication, especially communication outcome, promoted patients' self-care efficacy to reduce psychological distress. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Healthcare providers should design interventions to improve communication outcomes and eventually increase self-care efficacy to relieve psychological distress among patients with GI cancers.
Collapse
|
18
|
Cavanagh KE, Baxter MA, Petty RD. Best supportive care and prognosis: advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2021:bmjspcare-2020-002637. [PMID: 34301644 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Real-world data are lacking on survival in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GOA) treated with best supportive care (BSC) alone. This knowledge is vital to personalise cancer treatment and obtain informed consent. This study aimed to define and compare survival in patients with advanced GOA treated with and without palliative chemotherapy (CTx), and to explore the factors that impact prognosis. METHODS Patients in NHS Tayside, Scotland, diagnosed with advanced GOA (defined as non-resectable) over a 2-year period were identified retrospectively. Clinical data were obtained from electronic records. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were performed to determine median overall survival (mOS) and investigate contributing factors. RESULTS 127 eligible patients were identified. There was a significant difference in mOS between patients in the BSC and CTx groups (3.1 months vs 8.9 months, p=0.00089). This was maintained when those deemed not fit for CTx were removed. One-year survival was 16% versus 33%. Cox regression analysis in the BSC group identified stage (p<0.001) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) (p=0.013) as having independent predictive value for survival. Age was not related to outcome. Palliative stents were inserted in 48 patients (37.8%). CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the largest reported study in Europe of outcomes in patients with advanced GOA treated with BSC only. The mOS with BSC is approximately 3 months. Cancer stage and ECOG PS have a role in prognostication at diagnosis. Our findings support the benefit of palliative chemotherapy in this population, and real-world survival corresponds to published trial data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsty E Cavanagh
- School of Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Mark A Baxter
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
- Tayside Cancer Centre, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
| | - Russell D Petty
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
- Tayside Cancer Centre, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Baxter MA, Petty RD, Swinson D, Hall PS, O'Hanlon S. Real‑world challenge for clinicians treating advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (Review). Int J Oncol 2021; 58:22. [PMID: 33760115 PMCID: PMC7979263 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2021.5202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GOA) is a disease of older people. Incidence is rising in the developed world and the majority of patients present with advanced disease. Based on clinical trial data, systemic chemotherapy in the advanced setting is associated with improvements in quality of life and survival. However, there is a recognised mismatch between trial populations and the patients encountered in clinical practice in terms of age, comorbidity and fitness. Appropriate patient selection is essential to safely deliver effective treatment. In this narrative review, we discuss the challenges faced by clinicians when assessing real‑world patients with advanced GOA for systemic therapy. We also highlight the importance of frailty screening and the current available evidence we can use to guide our management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A. Baxter
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee DD2 1SY, Scotland
- Tayside Cancer Centre, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, NHS Tayside, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK
| | - Russell D. Petty
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee DD2 1SY, Scotland
- Tayside Cancer Centre, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, NHS Tayside, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK
| | - Daniel Swinson
- Department of Oncology, St. James's Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Peter S. Hall
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, Scotland, UK
| | - Shane O'Hanlon
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, D04 N2E0, Republic of Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Xuyi W, Seow H, Sutradhar R. Artificial neural networks for simultaneously predicting the risk of multiple co-occurring symptoms among patients with cancer. Cancer Med 2021; 10:989-998. [PMID: 33350595 PMCID: PMC7897969 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with cancer often exhibit multiple co-occurring symptoms which can impact the type of treatment received, recovery, and long-term health. We aim to simultaneously predict the risk of three symptoms: severe pain, moderate-severe depression, and poor well-being in order to flag patients who may benefit from pre-emptive early symptom management. This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of adults diagnosed with cancer between 2008 and 2015. We developed and tested an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model to predict the risk of multiple co-occurring symptoms within 6 months after diagnosis. The ANN model derived from a training cohort was assessed on an independent test cohort for model performance based on sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, AUC, and calibration. The mutually exclusive training and test cohorts consisted of 35,606 and 10,498 patients, respectively. The area under the curve for the risk of experiencing severe pain, moderate-severe depression, and poor well-being were 71%, 73%, and 70%, respectively. Patient characteristics at highest risk of simultaneously experiencing these three symptoms included: those with lung cancer, late stage cancer, existing chronic conditions such as osteoarthritis, mood disorder, hypertension, diabetes, and coronary disease. Patients with over a 40% risk of severe pain also had over a 70% risk of depression, and over a 55% risk of poor well-being. Our ANN model was able to simultaneously predict the risk of pain, depression, and lack of well-being. Accurate prediction of future symptom burden can serve as an early indicator tool so that providers can implement timely interventions for symptom management, ultimately improving cancer care and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenhui Xuyi
- Division of BiostatisticsDalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoONUSA
| | - Hsien Seow
- ICESTorontoONUSA
- Department of OncologyMcMaster UniversityHamiltonONCanada
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- Division of BiostatisticsDalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoONUSA
- ICESTorontoONUSA
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoONUSA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Merchant SJ, Kong W, Gyawali B, Hanna TP, Chung W, Nanji S, Patel SV, Booth CM. First-Line Palliative Chemotherapy for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer: Practice Patterns and Outcomes in the General Population. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 17:e1537-e1550. [PMID: 33449833 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical trials have shown that palliative chemotherapy (PC) improves survival in patients with incurable esophageal and gastric cancer; however, outcomes achieved in routine practice are unknown. We describe treatment patterns and outcomes among patients treated in the general population of Ontario, Canada. METHODS The Ontario Cancer Registry was used to identify patients with esophageal or gastric cancer from 2007 to 2016, and data were linked to other health administrative databases. Patients who received curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy were excluded. Factors associated with the receipt of PC were determined using logistic regression. First-line PC regimens were categorized, and trends over time were reported. Survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The cohort included 9,848 patients; 22% (2,207 of 9,848) received PC. Patients receiving PC were younger (mean age, 63 v 74 years; P < .0001) and more likely male (71% v 65%; P < .0001). Thirty-seven percent of non-PC patients saw a medical oncologist in consultation. Over the study period, utilization of PC increased (from 11% in 2007 to 19% in 2016; P < .0001), whereas the proportion of patients receiving triplet regimens decreased (65% in 2007 to 56% in 2016; P = .04). In the PC group, the median overall and cancer-specific survival from treatment initiation was 7.2 months. CONCLUSION One fifth of patients with incurable esophageal and gastric cancer in the general population receive PC. Median survival of patients treated in routine practice is inferior to that in clinical trials. Only one third of patients not treated with PC had consultation with a medical oncologist. Further work is necessary to understand low utilization of PC and medical oncology consultation in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaila J Merchant
- Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Weidong Kong
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bishal Gyawali
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Timothy P Hanna
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wiley Chung
- Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sulaiman Nanji
- Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sunil V Patel
- Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher M Booth
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Physical and psychological symptoms and signs in dying digestive tract cancer patients: the East Asian collaborative cross-cultural Study to Elucidate the Dying process (EASED). Support Care Cancer 2020; 29:3603-3612. [PMID: 33170402 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05866-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Well detection of the symptoms and signs of dying patients is essential for providing proper palliative care. Our goal is to evaluate the predominant symptoms and compare the changes in dying patients with digestive tract cancer in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. METHODS A total of 1057 cancer patients aged 18 years or older admitted in palliative care units with locally advanced or metastatic gastroesophageal, colorectal, and pancreaticobiliary cancer were enrolled from January 2017 to March 2019. The severity of physical and psychological symptoms and signs assessed by physicians and/or nurses upon admission, 1 week after admission, and within 3 days of death, was compared according to cancer type and country of origin. RESULTS Among the 338 gastroesophageal, 358 pancreaticobiliary, and 361 colorectal cancer patients, 894 (93.1%) died during the observation period. Fatigue was the most severe symptom in all cancer groups before dying. Dyspnea, fatigue, drowsiness, and ascites improved after hospitalization albeit they worsened prior to death. In particular, ascites was a marked symptom in patients with pancreaticobiliary cancer. Delirium and hallucination gradually worsened during the period leading to death. Differences in manifestations with respect to the country of origin were not significant. CONCLUSION We identified the most prevalent signs and symptoms in patients from East Asia who were dying from digestive tract cancers. Proper management, based on these prevalent signs and symptoms during the dying period, plays a vital role in providing adequate palliative care.
Collapse
|
23
|
Merchant SJ, Kong W, Brundage M, Booth CM. Symptom Evolution in Patients with Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Receiving Palliative Chemotherapy: A Population-Based Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:79-87. [PMID: 33140252 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09289-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Palliative chemotherapy (PC) is associated with a modest survival benefit in patients with incurable esophageal and gastric cancer; however, changes in symptom profile during treatment are not well described. Understanding the trajectory of symptoms during treatment may lead to improved care and facilitate shared decision making. In this study, we address this knowledge gap among all patients receiving PC in the Canadian province of Ontario. METHODS Patients diagnosed with incurable esophageal and gastric cancer who received PC from 2012 to 2017 were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry. Patients with one or more recorded Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) scores in the 12 months following cancer diagnosis were included. The ESAS includes scores from 0 to 10 in nine domains (anxiety, depression, drowsiness, lack of appetite, nausea, pain, shortness of breath, tiredness, and lack of well-being). Symptom severity is categorized as none-mild (≤ 3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10). We focused on potentially modifiable symptoms, i.e. nausea, pain, and anxiety/depression. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with moderate-severe ESAS scores in these domains. Among those patients with serial ESAS scores (at 8 ± 2 and 12 ± 2 weeks) receiving chemotherapy, we describe changes during treatment (decrease by ≥ 1 = improved; - 1 > 0 > 1 = unchanged; increase by ≥ 1 = deteriorated). RESULTS The cohort included 1900 patients who received PC, of whom 79% (1497/1900) had one or more recorded ESAS scores. In multivariate analysis, younger patients were more likely to have moderate-severe scores in nausea (odds ratio [OR] 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-2.90 [p < 0.01] in patients aged 41-50 years compared with patients aged ≥ 71 years) and pain (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.36-2.60 [p < 0.01] in patients aged 51-60 years compared with patients aged ≥ 71 years). Compared with males, females were more likely to report moderate-severe scores in anxiety/depression (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.21-2.08 [p < 0.01]). At 8 ± 2 weeks from PC initiation, symptom scores were unchanged in 19-42% of patients, improved in 30-51% of patients, and deteriorated in 17-35% of patients. The greatest change in symptom burden was observed for appetite (51% improvement) and anxiety/depression (35% deterioration). Similar trends were observed at 12 ± 2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS In this large, population-based study, we observed that younger patients were more likely to report moderate-severe symptoms in pain and nausea, and females were more likely to report moderate-severe symptoms in anxiety/depression. Anxiety/depression symptoms become increasingly problematic for a substantial proportion of patients receiving PC. Supportive care efforts to mitigate these symptoms in routine practice are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaila J Merchant
- Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. .,Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, ON, Canada. .,Division of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada.
| | - Weidong Kong
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Brundage
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Christopher M Booth
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kim S, DiPeri TP, Guan M, Placencio-Hickok VR, Kim H, Liu JY, Hendifar A, Klempner SJ, Nipp R, Gangi A, Burch M, Waters K, Cho M, Chao J, Atkins K, Kamrava M, Tuli R, Gong J. Impact of palliative therapies in metastatic esophageal cancer patients not receiving chemotherapy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 12:377-389. [PMID: 33024512 PMCID: PMC7520571 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i9.377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative therapy has been associated with improved overall survival (OS) in several tumor types. Not all patients with metastatic esophageal cancer receive palliative chemotherapy, and the roles of other palliative therapies in these patients are limited.
AIM To investigate the impact of other palliative therapies in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer not receiving chemotherapy.
METHODS The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients between 2004-2015. Patients with M1 disease who declined chemotherapy and had known palliative therapy status [palliative therapies were defined as surgery, radiotherapy (RT), pain management, or any combination thereof] were included. Cases with unknown chemotherapy, RT, or nonprimary surgery status were excluded. Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS were calculated. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to examine factors influencing survival.
RESULTS Among 140234 esophageal cancer cases, we identified 1493 patients who did not receive chemotherapy and had complete data. Median age was 70 years, most (66.3%) had a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 0, and 37.1% were treated at an academic center. The majority (72.7%) did not receive other palliative therapies. On both univariate and multivariable analyses, there was no difference in OS between those receiving other palliative therapy (median 2.83 mo, 95%CI: 2.53-3.12) vs no palliative therapy (2.37 no, 95%CI: 2.2-2.56; multivariable P = 0.290). On univariate, but not multivariable analysis, treatment at an academic center was predictive of improved OS [Hazard ratio (HR) 0.90, 95%CI: 0.80-1.00; P = 0.047]. On multivariable analysis, female sex (HR 0.81, 95%CI: 0.71-0.92) and non-black, other race compared to white race (HR 0.72, 95%CI: 0.56-0.93) were associated with reduced mortality, while South geographic region relative to West region (HR 1.23, 95%CI: 1.04-1.46) and CCI of 1 relative to CCI of 0 (HR 1.17, 95%CI: 1.03-1.32) were associated with increased mortality. Higher histologic grade and T-stage were also associated with worse OS (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION Palliative therapies other than chemotherapy conferred a numerically higher, but not statistically significant difference in OS among patients with metastatic esophageal cancer not receiving chemotherapy. Quality of life metrics, inpatient status, and subgroup analyses are important for examining the role of palliative therapies other than chemotherapy in metastatic esophageal cancer and future studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sungjin Kim
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Timothy P DiPeri
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Michelle Guan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Veronica R Placencio-Hickok
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Haesoo Kim
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Jar-Yee Liu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Andrew Hendifar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Samuel J Klempner
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Ryan Nipp
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Alexandra Gangi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Miguel Burch
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Kevin Waters
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - May Cho
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, United States
| | - Joseph Chao
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA 91010, United States
| | - Katelyn Atkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Mitchell Kamrava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Richard Tuli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Jun Gong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hammock JB, Williams CP, Aswani MS, Thomas JW, Rocque GB. Oncologic Services Through Project Access and Other Safety Net Care Coordination Programs. JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 16:e1489-e1498. [PMID: 32735510 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Little is known about the provision of oncologic services by Project Access safety net care coordination programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS Information on safety net care coordination program locations, health services, and patient eligibility was obtained via program Web sites and calls. For programs not offering oncologic care, program directors were interviewed to identify oncologic care barriers. RESULTS Web sites of 29 safety net care coordination programs in 22 states were identified; 62% (n = 18) offered oncologic services. Programs were in 65% (n = 11) of states that did not expand Medicaid. Of those offering oncologic services, 83% (n = 15) offered free chemotherapy, and 93% (n = 27) of all programs offered oncologic imaging. Program director interviews revealed costs, longitudinal care, and multiple-physician buy-in as barriers limiting oncologic care. CONCLUSION Third-party care coordination centers provide a novel and potentially unrecognized approach to increasing oncology service access. Further research should identify strategies to overcome the relative lack of oncologic care offerings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James B Hammock
- Tinsley Harrison Internal Medicine Residency Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Courtney P Williams
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Monica S Aswani
- School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - John W Thomas
- Tinsley Harrison Internal Medicine Residency Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Gabrielle B Rocque
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bischoff KE, Zapata C, Sedki S, Ursem C, O'Riordan DL, England AE, Thompson N, Alfaro A, Rabow MW, Atreya CE. Embedded palliative care for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a mixed-methods pilot study. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28:5995-6010. [PMID: 32285263 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05437-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Palliative care is recommended for patients with metastatic cancer, but there has been limited research about embedded palliative care for specific patient populations. We describe the impact of a pilot program that provided routine, early, integrated palliative care to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS Mixed methods pre-post intervention cohort study at an academic cancer center. Thirty control then 30 intervention patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were surveyed at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months thereafter about symptoms, quality-of-life, and likelihood of cure. We compared survey responses, trends over time, rates of advance care planning, and healthcare utilization between groups. Patients, family caregivers, and clinicians were interviewed. RESULTS Patients in the intervention group were followed for an average of 6.5 months and had an average of 3.5 palliative care visits. At baseline, symptoms were mild (average 1.85/10) and 78.2% of patients reported good/excellent quality-of-life. Half (50.9%) believed they were likely to be cured of cancer. Over time, symptoms and quality-of-life metrics remained similar between groups, however intervention patients were more realistic about their likelihood of cure (p = 0.008). Intervention patients were more likely to have a surrogate documented (83.3% vs. 26.7%, p < 0.0001), an advance directive completed (63.3% vs. 13.3%, p < 0.0001), and non-full code status (43.3% vs. 16.7%, p < 0.03). All patients and family caregivers would recommend the program to others with cancer. CONCLUSIONS We describe the impact of an embedded palliative care program for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, which improved prognostic awareness and rates of advance care planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara E Bischoff
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0131, 533 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
| | - Carly Zapata
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0131, 533 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Sarah Sedki
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0131, 533 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Carling Ursem
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David L O'Riordan
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0131, 533 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | | | - Nicole Thompson
- Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California. San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ariceli Alfaro
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michael W Rabow
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0131, 533 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Chloe E Atreya
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Vettori JC, da Silva LG, Pfrimer K, Jordão Junior AA, Moriguti JC, Ferriolli E, Lima NKC. Older Adult Cancer Patients Under Palliative Care With a Prognosis of 30 Days or More: Clinical and Nutritional Changes. J Am Coll Nutr 2020; 40:148-154. [PMID: 32275483 DOI: 10.1080/07315724.2020.1747032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to characterize nutritional status, body composition, oxidative stress, and inflammatory activity and to determine the possible associations between nutritional status and clinical variables in advanced cancer patients.Method: This was a cross-sectional study of 46 elderly cancer patients under palliative care with a prognosis of 30 days or more. Nutritional status, food intake, anthropometry, body composition (deuterium oxide method), metabolic profile, inflammation damage (C-reactive protein), oxidative damage (8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine), and symptom intensity were evaluated.Results: Among elderly cancer patients, 36.9% were malnourished or at risk of malnutrition. Systemic inflammation was detected, with a correlation between worse nutritional status and higher C-reactive protein levels (p < 0.01, r= -0.57), while lower lean mass (p < 0.01, r = 0.62) and higher fat mass percentages (p < 0.01, r = 0.62) correlated with higher levels of 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine. Furthermore, daily energy (n = 25; 57.4%) and protein intake (n = 24; 52.2%) were lower than recommended in more than half the patients. The most prevalent symptoms were anxiety, impairment of well-being, drowsiness, tiredness, and lack of appetite.Conclusions: Despite preserved functionality, patients already had clinical and laboratory changes that, together with inadequate food intake, risk of malnutrition, systemic inflammation, and the presence of uncontrolled symptoms, alerted to the importance of an early and comprehensive palliative approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josiane C Vettori
- Internal Medicine Department, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil
| | - Luanda G da Silva
- Internal Medicine Department, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil
| | - Karina Pfrimer
- Internal Medicine Department, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil
| | - Alceu A Jordão Junior
- Internal Medicine Department, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil
| | - Júlio C Moriguti
- Internal Medicine Department, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil
| | - Eduardo Ferriolli
- Internal Medicine Department, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil
| | - Nereida K C Lima
- Internal Medicine Department, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Emiloju OE, Djibo DAM, Ford JG. Association Between the Timing of Goals-of-Care Discussion and Hospitalization Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Cancer. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2019; 37:433-438. [PMID: 31635471 DOI: 10.1177/1049909119882891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with cancer often require acute hospitalizations, many of which are unplanned. These hospitalizations have been shown to increase in frequency near the end of life. The American College of Physicians recommends that goals-of-care (GOC) discussions be initiated early for metastatic cancers. We hypothesized that discussing GOC during hospitalization could help reduce readmissions. Our aim was to examine the association between the timing of GOC discussion, length of hospital stay, and the time to readmission. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of medical records of patients with stage IV cancers hospitalized between August 2017 and July 2018. We recorded timing of GOC discussion, use of palliative care services, and hospital readmissions within 90 days. χ2 tests were used to identify independent associations with GOC discussion, and logistic regression was used to examine association with readmission within 90 days. RESULTS Of all study patients (N = 241), 40.6% were female, 46% (n = 112) had a GOC discussion, and 34% (n = 82) had a palliative care consultation. Having a palliative care consult and being admitted to critical care were independently associated with having a GOC discussion. Early timing of GOC discussion was inversely associated with admission to critical care units (P < .05). Thirty-eight percent (n = 92) had unplanned hospital readmission within 90 days. Having a GOC discussion was independently associated with a reduction in the odds of an unplanned hospital readmission within 90 days by 79% (odds ratio = 0.21, 95% confidence interval: 0.12-0.37). CONCLUSION Among hospitalized patients with stage IV cancer, performing an early GOC discussion has an important association with lower hospital readmission rates and increased rates of goal-congruent patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Djeneba Audrey M Djibo
- Division of Research, Department of Medicine, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jean G Ford
- Department of Medicine, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Paredes AZ, Hyer JM, Tsilimigras DI, Mehta R, Sahara K, White S, Dillhoff ME, Ejaz A, Cloyd JM, Pawlik TM. Hospice utilization among Medicare beneficiaries dying from pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol 2019; 120:624-631. [PMID: 31290170 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 06/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Use of hospice services among patients with pancreatic cancer following pancreatic resection remains unknown. METHODS Patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent resection were identified in the Medicare Standard Analytic Files. Outcomes included overall hospice use, early hospice enrollment (≥4 weeks before death), late hospice enrollment (initiation within 3 days of death), and Medicare expenditures. RESULTS Among the 4369 deceased individuals, three-fourths of patients (n = 3252, 74.4%) used hospice at the time of death. Patients who did not use hospice were more likely to be male, have a complication on index admission and receive life sustaining treatments on subsequent admissions (P < .05). Only one-third (32.2%) of patients initiated hospice services early. Medicare expenditure during the last month of life was $10 000 lower among patients who initialized hospice services at least 1 month before death versus within 3 days of death (late: $10 581 [$5454-$17 200], early: $221 [$46-$733]; P < .001) CONCLUSION: While three-fourths of patients utilized hospice services after pancreatic resection, only one-third of patients initiated hospice services at least one-month before death. Late hospice use was associated with higher Medicare expenditures during the last month of life. Further research is needed to understand barriers to early hospice utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anghela Z Paredes
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.,Division of Health Information Management and Systems, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - J Madison Hyer
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.,Division of Health Information Management and Systems, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Diamantis I Tsilimigras
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.,Division of Health Information Management and Systems, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Rittal Mehta
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.,Division of Health Information Management and Systems, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Kota Sahara
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.,Division of Health Information Management and Systems, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Susan White
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.,Division of Health Information Management and Systems, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mary E Dillhoff
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.,Division of Health Information Management and Systems, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Aslam Ejaz
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.,Division of Health Information Management and Systems, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.,Division of Health Information Management and Systems, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.,Division of Health Information Management and Systems, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Merchant SJ. ASO Author Reflections: Managing Symptoms at the End-of-Life-Some Progress, Many Unanswered Questions. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:2346-2347. [PMID: 31144140 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07470-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|