Short-Term Outcomes of Impella Support in Japanese Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Due to Acute Myocardial Infarction - Japanese Registry for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device (J-PVAD)

No standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in acute myocardial infarction: prevalence, pathophysiology, and prognosis

Standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs), such as hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and current smoking, are associated with the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases including acute myocardial infarction (MI). Thus, therapeutic approaches against SMuRFs are important as primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. In patients with acute MI, however, the prognosis is counterintuitively poor when SMuRFs are lacking. The growing evidence has explored the prevalence, pathophysiology, and prognosis of SMuRF-less patients in acute MI and suggested the potential underlying mechanisms. This review article summarizes the clinical evidence and relevance of the lack of SMuRFs in acute MI.

Clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing mechanical circulatory support escalation from intra-aortic balloon pump to impella: From the J-PVAD registry

BACKGROUND

An escalation strategy from intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) to Impella (AbioMed, Danvers, MA, USA) is proposed in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) refractory to IABP therapy, but its clinical data are lacking. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes in patients undergoing IABP-Impella escalation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From the Japanese nationwide registry of Impella (J-PVAD), a total of 2578 patients with CS receiving Impella support were classified into the IABP-Impella group (n = 189) or the Primary Impella group (n = 2389). We applied 1:3 propensity score (PS) matching, selecting 185 patients and 555 patients, respectively. Before matching, the IABP-Impella group presented longer shock-to-Impella time, worse laboratory data, and more frequent inotropes and pulmonary artery catheter use than the Primary Impella group. After matching, the baseline characteristics were well-balanced. Regarding the 30-day clinical outcomes in the PS-matched cohort, there were no significant differences in the rates of mortality and major complications (a composite of bleeding, hemolysis, infection, stroke, myocardial infarction, limb ischemia, and vascular injury) between the groups. However, The IABP-Impella group showed a significantly higher rate of infection (10.3 % vs. 5.6 %, p = 0.042) and additional mechanical circulatory support use (34.1 % vs. 23.8 %, p = 0.008) than the Primary Impella group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to patients with primary Impella support, those undergoing IABP-Impella escalation showed similar 30-day mortality and major complications despite poorer clinical conditions before Impella support and a more complicated clinical course after Impella insertion.

Contemporary optimal therapeutic strategy with escalation/de-escalation of temporary mechanical circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock and advanced heart failure in Japan

The utilization of temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in the management of cardiogenic shock is experiencing a notable surge. Acute myocardial infarction remains the predominant etiology of cardiogenic shock, followed by heart failure. Recent findings from the DanGer Shock trial indicate that the percutaneous micro-axial flow pump support, in conjunction with standard care, significantly reduced 6-month mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock compared to those receiving standard care alone. However, real-world registry data reveal that the 30-day mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock, who received concomitant veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support along with micro-axial flow pump, remain suboptimal. The persistent challenge in the field is how to incorporate, escalate, and de-escalate these temporary MCS to further improve clinical outcomes in such clinical scenarios. This review aims to elucidate the current practices surrounding the escalation and de-escalation of temporary MCS in real-world clinical settings and proposes considerations for future advancements in this critical area.

Hemocompatibility-related Adverse Events in Patients With Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: The Scoring Haemostasis Events and Assessment for Risk (SHEAR) Score

Evaluation of treatment outcomes in patients supported by temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) currently relies mainly on mortality, which may not sufficiently address other patient benefits or harms. Bleeding and thrombosis are major contributors to mortality. Still, current bleeding scores are not designed for critically ill patients undergoing tMCS, only consider selected populations, and do not account for the high heterogeneity among bleeding and thrombotic adverse events. To improve clinical management, a group of European experts has proposed a revised scoring system based on the MOMENTUM 3 Hemocompatibility Score and the Society of Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCAI)classification of cardiogenic shock. The new system termed the Scoring Haemostasis Events and Assessment for Risk (SHEAR) score, is divided into a baseline characterization stage and four escalating scoring stages encompassing all aspects of clinical relevance. This report summarizes the literature on hemocompatibility-related adverse events associated with tMCS, including bleeding, stroke, vascular access complications, hemolysis, thrombosis, and device failure. The SHEAR score provides a simple and rapid bedside scoring system aiming to provide a univocal tool to increase physician awareness of hemocompatibility complications at baseline and beyond, improve clinical research, and enable the capture of device-related complications that will inform relevant outcomes beyond mortality.

Lower extremity artery thromboembolism during removal of Impella after repair for ventricular septal rupture: A case report

Although the anticoagulant complications of Impella are well known, the timing of heparin administration when using Impella immediately after open heart surgery has not been established. We report a case of a 59-year-old man with Impella-assisted repair of a ventricular septal perforation after acute myocardial infarction who developed thromboembolism of the lower extremity arteries after removal of Impella.

Current Use and Impact of Pulmonary Artery Catheters on the Short-Term Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Treated With an Impella: Findings From the Japan Registry for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device (J-PVAD)

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the current use and impact of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) who underwent Impella support.

DESIGN

This was a prospective multicenter observational study between January 2020 and December 2021 that registered all patients with drug-refractory acute heart failure and in whom the placement of an Impella 2.5, CP, or 5.0 pump was attempted or successful in Japan.

SETTING

Cardiac ICUs in Japan.

PATIENTS

Between January 2020 and December 2021, a total of 3112 patients treated with an Impella were prospectively enrolled in the Japan registry for percutaneous ventricular assist device (J-PVAD). Among them, 2063 patients with CS were divided into two groups according to the PAC use.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary endpoint was the 30-day mortality, and the secondary endpoints were hemolysis, acute kidney injury, sepsis, major bleeding unrelated to the Impella, and ventricular arrhythmias within 30 days. PACs were used in 1358 patients (65.8%) who underwent an Impella implantation. The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) was significantly higher in the patients with PACs than in those without. Factors associated with PAC use were the prevalence of hypertension, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, New York Heart Association classification IV, the lesser prevalence of a heart rate less than 50, and the use of any catecholamine. The primary and secondary endpoints did not significantly differ according to the PAC use. Focusing on the patients with VA-ECMO use, the 30-day mortality and hemolysis were univariately lower in the patients with PACs.

CONCLUSIONS

The J-PVAD findings indicated that PAC use did not have a significant impact on the short-term outcomes in CS patients undergoing Impella support. Further prospective studies are required to explore the clinical implications of PAC-guided intensive treatment strategies in these patients.

Practice differences and knowledge gaps in complex and high-risk interventions between Japan and the USA: A case-based discussion

Advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) devices and techniques have expanded the pool of eligible patients for revascularization, including those with comorbidities, reduced left ventricular function, or anatomical complexity (defined as CHIP: complex and high-risk interventions in indicated patients). CHIP interventions are typically performed by selected operators who specialize in complex PCI. This review presents two cases performed in the USA, to discuss the similarities and differences in practice patterns between CHIP operators in Japan and the USA. The first case involves a 58-year-old male presenting with myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock, and the second case involves a 51-year-old female with a history of coronary artery bypass grafting presenting with a chronic total occlusion and PCI complicated by vessel perforation. The discussion focuses on appropriate patient selection, the role of the heart team approach for decision-making, the use of hemodynamic support devices, and other relevant factors. By comparing practices in Japan and the USA, this review highlights opportunities for knowledge exchange and potential areas for improving patient outcomes.

Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock in Ukraine: multicentre registry analysis 2021-2022

Background

Data on the results and management strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) in the Low and Lower-Middle Income Countries (LLMICs) are limited. This lack of understanding of the situation partially hinders the development of effective cardiogenic shock treatment programs in this part of the world.

Materials and methods

The Ukrainian Multicentre Cardiogenic Shock Registry was analyzed, covering patient data from 2021 to 2022 in 6 major Ukrainian reperfusion centres from different parts of the country. Analysis was focusing on outcomes, therapeutic modalities and mortality predictors in AMI-CS patients.

Results

We analyzed data from 221 consecutive patients with CS from 6 hospitals across Ukraine. The causes of CS were ST-elevated myocardial infarction (85.1%), non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (5.9%), decompensated chronic heart failure (7.7%) and arrhythmia (1.3%), with a total in-hospital mortality rate for CS of 57.1%. The prevalence of CS was 6.3% of all AMI with reperfusion rate of 90.5% for AMI-CS. In 23.5% of cases, CS developed in the hospital after admission. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) utilization was 19.9% using intra-aortic balloon pump alone. Left main stem occlusion, reperfusion deterioration, Charlson Comorbidity Index >4, and cardiac arrest were found to be independent predictors for hospital mortality in AMI-СS.

Conclusions

Despite the wide adoption of primary percutaneous coronary intervention as the main reperfusion strategy for AMI, СS remains a significant problem in LLMICs, associated with high in-hospital mortality. There is an unmet need for the development and implementation of a nationwide protocol for CS management and the creation of reference CS centers based on the country-wide reperfusion network, equipped with modern technologies for MCS.

An Autopsy Case of Fulminant Myocarditis with Massive Left Ventricular Calcification

Myocardial calcification in myocarditis is rare and may be linked to poor outcomes. We herein report a case of fulminant myocarditis with massive myocardial calcification and its pathological outcomes at autopsy. A 49-year-old man experienced chest pain and was diagnosed with acute myocarditis. His cardiac function did not recover despite mechanical circulatory support in combination with V-A extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and IMPELLA CP®. He eventually developed sepsis and gastrointestinal bleeding and died on day 27. Diffuse myocardial calcification was observed on computed tomography at autopsy. The pathological autopsy depicted that calcification filled every myocardial cell in the left ventricle.

Impella device in fulminant myocarditis: Japanese Registry for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device (J-PVAD) registry analysis on outcomes and adverse events

AIMS

Given that fulminant myocarditis, characterized by unstable haemodynamics, is a significant clinical challenge and that traditional pharmacological treatments have limitations, evaluating alternatives such as the Impella device is a crucial focus of this study. Further, this study presents pioneering large-scale registry data on its use in managing fulminant myocarditis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from the Japanese Registry for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices (J-PVAD) were analysed to assess Impella's role in managing fulminant myocarditis from February 2020 to December 2021. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality for those treated with Impella. Of the 269 patients treated with Impella, 107 used Impella standalone, and 162 used ECPELLA (Impella combined with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation). The average age was 54 years, with 42.8% females. Overall, 74.3% survived at 30 days. Specifically, the success rate was 68.5% for the ECPELLA group and 83.2% for the Impella standalone group. Cox regression highlighted that lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and pre-Impella systolic blood pressure increased adverse event risk, while Swan-Ganz catheterization use reduced it. Adverse events were noted in 48.7% of patients, such as bleeding (32.0%) and deteriorating renal function (8.6%).

CONCLUSION

Impella's use in fulminant myocarditis demonstrates encouraging short-term outcomes, albeit with significant adverse events. These findings align with previous mechanical circulatory support studies, emphasizing caution regarding haemorrhagic issues. Further studies are essential to enhance patient selection and treatment approaches.

Prevalence of bleeding events in real-world Japanese registry for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device

PURPOSE

Bleeding complication is a critical risk factor for outcomes of acute heart failure patients requiring mechanical circulatory support (MCS), including percutaneous catheter-type heart pumps (Impella). The Japanese registry for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device (J-PVAD) is an ongoing, large-scale, real-world registry to characterize Japanese patients requiring Impella. Here we analyzed bleeding complication profiles in patients who received Impella.

METHODS

All consecutive Japanese patients who received Impella from October 2017 to January 2020 were enrolled. The 30-day survival and bleeding complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 1344 patients were included: 653 patients received Impella alone, 685 patients received a combination of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella (ECPELLA), and 6 patients had failed Impella delivery. Overall 30-day survival was 67.0%, with Impella alone at 81.9% and ECPELLA at 52.7%. Overall bleeding/hematoma adverse events with a relation or not-excluded relation to Impella was 6.92%. Among them, the rates of hematoma and bleeding from medical device access sites were 1.41% and 4.09%, respectively. There was no difference between etiologies for these events.

CONCLUSION

This study represents the first 3-year survival and the safety profile focused on bleeding adverse events from the J-PVAD registry. The results show that the real-world frequency of bleeding adverse events for patients who received Impella was an expected range from previous reports, and future real-world studies should aim to expand this data set to improve outcomes and adverse events.

Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock

Cardiogenic shock is a complex and diverse pathological condition characterized by reduced myocardial contractility. The goal of treatment of cardiogenic shock is to improve abnormal hemodynamics and maintain adequate tissue perfusion in organs. If hypotension and insufficient tissue perfusion persist despite initial therapy, temporary mechanical circulatory support (t-MCS) should be initiated. This decade sees the beginning of a new era of cardiogenic shock management using t-MCS through the accumulated experience with use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), as well as new revolutionary devices or systems such as transvalvular axial flow pump (Impella) and a combination of VA-ECMO and Impella (ECPELLA) based on the knowledge of circulatory physiology. In this transitional period, we outline the approach to the management of cardiogenic shock by t-MCS. The management strategy involves carefully selecting one or a combination of the t-MCS devices, taking into account the characteristics of each device and the specific pathological condition. This selection is guided by monitoring of hemodynamics, classification of shock stage, risk stratification, and coordinated management by the multidisciplinary shock team.

Changing Trends in Mechanical Circulatory Support Use and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Acute Coronary Syndrome Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From a Nationwide Registry in Japan

BACKGROUND

Temporal trends in the management of acute coronary syndrome complicated with cardiogenic shock after the revision of guideline recommendations for intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use and the approval of the Impella require further investigation, because their impact remains uncertain.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using the Japanese Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (J-PCI) registry database from 2019 to 2021, we identified 12 171 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome complicated with cardiogenic shock under mechanical circulatory support. The patients were stratified into 3 groups: (1) IABP alone, (2) Impella, and (3) venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO); the VA-ECMO group was further stratified into (3a) VA-ECMO alone, (3b) VA-ECMO in combination with IABP, and (3c) VA-ECMO in combination with Impella. The quarterly prevalence and outcomes were reported. The use of IABP alone decreased significantly from 63.5% in the first quarter of 2019 to 58.3% in the fourth quarter of 2021 (P for trend=0.01). Among 4245 patients requiring VA-ECMO, the use of VA-ECMO in combination with IABP decreased significantly from 78.7% to 67.3%, whereas the use of VA-ECMO in combination with Impella increased significantly from 4.2% to 17.0% (P for trend <0.001 for both). After adjusting for the confounders, the risk difference in the fourth quarter of 2021 relative to the first quarter of 2019 for in-hospital mortality was not significant (adjusted odds ratio, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.69-1.01]).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed substantial changes in the use of different mechanical circulatory support modalities in acute coronary syndrome complicated with cardiogenic shock, but they did not significantly improve the outcomes.

Intracerebral Hematoma in Patients With Impella Ventricular Assist Device Placement for Cardiogenic Shock: Report of Three Cases

Despite the clear benefits of Impella in patients with cardiogenic shock, bleeding is a possible complication. Herein, we report three cases of intracerebral hemorrhage in patients with Impella implantation for cardiogenic shock, which were treated with hematoma evacuation. We present the clinical features, diagnosis, and management (hematoma evacuation) of patients with the Impella device (Abiomed, Danvers, Massachusetts) who developed intracerebral hemorrhage. Case one was a 56-year-old man who presented with chest pain and loss of consciousness, was diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction, and underwent urgent percutaneous coronary intervention and Impella placement. After eight days, the patient developed anisocoria. Computed tomography revealed a left intracerebral hemorrhage. An emergency hematoma evacuation was successfully performed (intraoperative blood loss: 2600 mL). Case two was a 54-year-old male who presented with persistent chest pain and loss of consciousness, was diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction, and underwent an emergency percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella implantation and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The patient developed intracerebral hemorrhage after 26 days. Hematoma evacuation was successfully performed (intraoperative blood loss: 380 mL). Case three was a 52-year-old male who presented with dyspnea and hypotension, was diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy, and underwent Impella implantation and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, followed by which the patient developed subcortical hematoma. An emergency hematoma evacuation was performed (intraoperative blood loss: 3205 mL). The patient died 14 days after admission. Intracerebral hemorrhage is a potential cause of morbidity associated with Impella placement. Although hematoma evacuation is optimal, the bleeding tends to increase.

Cardiac Rehabilitation in Severe Heart Failure Patients with Impella 5.0 Support via the Subclavian Artery Approach Prior to Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Impella 5.0 circulatory support via subclavian artery (SA) access may be a safe approach for patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation (CR). In this case series, we retrospectively analyzed the demographic characteristics, physical function, and CR data of six patients who underwent Impella 5.0 implantation via the SA prior to left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation between October 2013 and June 2021. The median age was 48 years, and one patient was female. Grip strength was maintained or increased in all patients before LVAD implantation (pre-LVAD) compared to after Impella 5.0 implantation. The pre-LVAD knee extension isometric strength (KEIS) was less than 0.46 kgf/kg in two patients and more than 0.46 kgf/kg in three patients (unavailable KEIS data, n = 1). With Impella 5.0 implantation, two patients could ambulate, one could stand, two could sit on the edge of the bed, and one remained in bed. One patient lost consciousness during CR due to decreased Impella flow. There were no other serious adverse events. Impella 5.0 implantation via the SA allows mobilization, including ambulation, prior to LVAD implantation, and CR can be performed relatively safely.