Left ventricular epicardial outflow tract tachycardia: a new distinct subgroup of outflow tract tachycardia

Catheter Ablation of Left Ventricular Summit Arrhythmias from Adjacent Anatomic Vantage Points

Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VA), particularly left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) VA accounts for up to 10% of all VAs referred for ablative therapy. In addition to being infrequent, its intricate anatomy and its pathophysiology make catheter ablation (CA) of these arrhythmias a challenge even for experts. In this scenario, detailed right ventricular outflow tract as well as LVOT electroanatomic mapping including epicardial mapping are essential. In this article, we will emphasize our approach toward the CA technique used for LVOT VA, particularly IVS and/or LVS VA originating from intramural foci, along with its acute and long-term efficacy and safety.

Idiopathic Ventricular Tachycardia

Idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an important cause of morbidity and less commonly, mortality in patients with structurally normal hearts. Appropriate diagnosis and management are predicated on an understanding of the mechanism, relevant cardiac anatomy, and associated ECG signatures. Catheter ablation is a viable strategy to adequately treat and potentially provide a cure in patients that are intolerant to medications or when these are ineffective. In this review, we discuss special approaches and considerations for effective and safe ablation of VT arising from the right ventricular outflow tract, left ventricular outflow tract, left ventricular fascicles, papillary muscles, and moderator band.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Applicability of computed tomography preoperative assessment of the LAA in LV summit ablations

Purpose

Ventricular arrhythmias originating from the left ventricular summit (LVS) may present with challenges for catheter ablation. Recently, the left atrial appendage (LAA) became a new vantage point for mapping and ablating arrhythmias from that region, but data of possible usefulness is limited.

Methods

From September to December 2019, we retrospectively analyzed 48 consecutive patient hearts (20 male; mean age 57.9y ± 11.56) undergoing diagnostic coronary vessel imaging in 64 dual-source computer tomography angiography (CTA). Distances from the LAA to the LVS, LAA shape type, and coronary arteries in the LVS region were measured. Also, we compared the true LVS area from CTA with a calculated formula derived from LVS definition.

Results

The mean LVS area calculated from the formula was 291.58 mm² (± 115.5) while the true area calculated from CT was 263.33 mm² (± 99.49) (p = 0.44). The mean inaccessible area was 133.42 mm² (± 72.89), accessible 95.67 mm² (± 72.77). The mean LAA coverage over LVS was 196.08 mm²—which is approximately 75% of LVS size in general. The most common LAA shape was chicken wing (50%); windsock has the highest accessible area coverage on average (80.23%), followed by chicken wing (59.88%), broccoli (47.72%), and cactus (46.98%). The mean distance from LAA to the surface was 5.14 mm (1.5 to 10 mm) and was not correlated with BMI. LAA has a 98% coverage over the point of transition between the great cardiac vein and anterior interventricular vein.

Conclusion

Angio-CT assessment of the LAA over the LVS structures may be helpful in decision making before an ablation procedure. LAA appears to be a promising mapping approach in LVS arrhythmias.

Idiopathic right ventricular arrhythmias requiring additional ablation from the left-sided outflow tract: ECG characteristics and efficacy of an anatomical approach

INTRODUCTION

Despite the characteristic electrocardiogram (ECG) findings of early activation during ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VAs) and/or excellent pacemapping in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), some VAs may require additional, left-sided ablation for a cure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study included five patients with idiopathic VAs whose QRS morphologies were highly suggestive of an RVOT origin. The ECG characteristics and intracardiac electrocardiograms during catheter ablation were assessed. In all patients, the clinical VAs had an LBBB QRS morphology and inferior axis with a precordial R/S transition through leads V3-V5, and negative components in lead I. The earliest activation during the VAs (local electrogram-QRS interval = -34 ± 6.8 ms) and excellent pacemapping were obtained at the posterior portion of the RVOT just beneath the pulmonary valve. However, ablation at those sites failed, and the QRS morphology of the VAs changed. During left-sided OT mapping, the earliest activation was found at sites just contralateral to the initially ablated sites of the RVOT (junction of the left and right coronary cusps = 2, left coronary cusp = 3). In spite of the late activation time and poor pacemapping scores, catheter ablation at those sites cured the VAs. Those successful sites were also near the transitional zone from the great cardiac vein to the anterior interventricular vein (GCV-AIV).

CONCLUSIONS

Some VAs, highly suggestive of having RVOT origins, require catheter ablation in the left-sided OT near the initially ablated RVOT site. Those VAs have the same ECG characteristics and might have intramural origins in the superobasal LV surrounded by the RVOT, LVOT, and GCV-AIV.

Effect of Echocardiographic Epicardial Adipose Tissue Thickness on Success Rates of Premature Ventricular Contraction Ablation

Background:

Idiopathic premature ventricular contractions are frequently detected ventricular arrhythmias, and radiofrequency ablation is an effectively treatment for improving symptoms and eliminating premature ventricular contractions. Studies have reported a relationship between an elevated epicardial adipose tissue thickness and myocardial structural pathologies. However, the association between epicardial adipose tissue thickness and success rates of premature ventricular contraction ablation has not yet been investigated.

Aims:

To assess the relationship between epicardial adipose tissue thickness and success rates of premature ventricular contraction ablation.

Study Design:

Retrospective case-control study.

Methods:

This study enrolled a total of 106 consecutive patients who have had a high premature ventricular contraction burden of >10,000/24-h assessed using ambulatory Holter monitorization and underwent catheter ablation. A frequency of premature ventricular contractions of more than 10,000/day was defined as frequent premature ventricular contraction. Epicardial adipose tissue thickness was measured using 2D transthoracic echocardiography. A successful ablation was defined as >80% decrease in pre-procedural premature ventricular contraction attacks with the same morphology during 24-h Holter monitorization after a 1-month follow-up visit from an ablation procedure.

Results:

Successful premature ventricular contraction ablation was achieved in 87 (82.1%) patients. Epicardial adipose tissue thickness was significantly higher in patients with unsuccessful ablation (p<0.001). Procedure time, total fluoroscopy time, and radiofrequency ablation time were statistically higher in the unsuccessful group (p<0.001). Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that epicardial adipose tissue thickness and pseudo-delta wave time were independently associated with procedural success (both p values <0.001). In the receiver-operating curve analysis, epicardial adipose tissue thickness was found to be an important predictor for procedural success (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve= 0.85, p=0.001), with a cutoff value of 7.7 mm, a sensitivity of 92%, and a specificity of 68%.

Conclusion:

Epicardial adipose tissue thickness is higher in patients with premature ventricular contraction ablation failure, which may be indicative of procedural success.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Non-invasive Characterization of Focal Arrhythmia with Electromechanical Wave Imaging in Vivo

There is currently no established method for the non-invasive characterization of arrhythmia and differentiation between endocardial and epicardial triggers at the point of care. Electromechanical wave imaging (EWI) is a novel ultrasound-based imaging technique based on time-domain transient strain estimation that can map and characterize electromechanical activation in the heart in vivo. The objectives of this initial feasibility study were to determine that EWI is capable of differentiating between endocardial and epicardial sources of focal rhythm and, as a proof-of-concept, that EWI could characterize focal arrhythmia in one patient with premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) before radiofrequency (RF) ablation treatment. First, validation of EWI for differentiation of surface of origin was performed in seven (n = 7) adult dogs using four epicardial and four endocardial pacing protocols. Second, one (n = 1) adult patient diagnosed with PVC was imaged with EWI before the scheduled RF ablation procedure, and EWI results were compared with mapping procedure results. In dogs, EWI was capable of detecting whether pacing was of endocardial or epicardial origin in six of seven cases (86% success rate). In the PVC patient, EWI correctly identified both regions and surface of origin, as confirmed by results from the electrical mapping obtained from the RF ablation procedure. These results reveal that EWI can map the electromechanical activation across the myocardium and indicate that EWI could serve as a valuable pre-treatment planning tool in the clinic.

Recommendations for the use of electrophysiological study: Update 2018

The field of cardiac electrophysiology has greatly developed during the past decades. Consequently, the use of electrophysiological studies (EPSs) in clinical practice has also significantly augmented, with a progressively increasing number of certified electrophysiology centers and specialists. Since Zipes et al published the Guidelines for Clinical Intracardiac Electrophysiology and Catheter Ablation Procedures in 1995, no official document summarizing current EPS indications has been published. The current paper focuses on summarizing all relevant data of the role of EPS in patients with different types of cardiac pathologies and provides up-to-date recommendations on this topic. For this purpose, the PubMed database was screened for relevant articles in English up to December 2018 and ESC and ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guidelines, and EHRA/HRS/APHRS position statements related to the current topic were analyzed. Current recommendations for the use of EPS in clinical practice are discussed and presented in 17 distinct cardiac pathologies. A short rationale, evidence, and indications are provided for each cardiac disease/group of diseases. In conclusion, because of its capability to establish a diagnosis in patients with a variety of cardiac pathologies, the EPS remains a useful tool in the evaluation of patients with cardiac arrhythmias and conduction disorders and is capable of establishing indications for cardiac device implantation and guide catheter ablation procedures.

Conventional mapping and ablation of focal ventricular tachycardias in the healthy heart

Ventricular tachycardias (VT) in the healthy heart, also known as idiopathic VTs, often have a focal origin. Triggered activity due to delayed after-depolarization is the most likely mechanism of focal VTs. Localization of the site of origin of focal VTs is based on activation mapping with or without combination with pace mapping. The characteristic anatomic site of origin of idiopathic VTs is the right and left outflow tract. Other sites include the tricuspid and mitral annulus, the papillary muscles, and Purkinje fibers. Catheter ablation is indicated for monomorphic symptomatic VT and can be an alternative to antiarrhythmic drugs. Success rates are high, but mapping and ablation can be challenging. We review the main electrophysiological findings and the important clues for ablation of focal VTs. Specific considerations for each location are considered.

Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Arising From the Cardiac Outflow Tracts - Recent Insights and Techniques for the Successful Treatment of Common and Challenging Cases

Ventricular arrhythmias (VA), like premature ventricular contractions (PVC) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients without structural heart disease (idiopathic VA), mainly arise from the right and left ventricular outflow tracts (RVOT/LVOT). The prognosis for OT VA is generally good in the majority of patients, but there is potential for developing dilated cardiomyopathies from the high burden of VA, as well as a certain risk for sudden cardiac death because of fast monomorphic VT or polymorphic VT triggered by short-coupling PVC. Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has evolved into a widely accepted treatment strategy for patients suffering from VAs. A detailed knowledge of surface ECGs and complex cardiac anatomy, especially within the ventricular OTs, is essential for the understanding of cardiac OT-VAs and highly related to safe and successful RFCA procedures. This review article focuses on RFCA of idiopathic VA arising from the cardiac OT as well as adjacent regions and will illustrate recent insights and technical issues. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1073-1086).

Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Originating From the Pulmonary Sinus Cusp: Prevalence, Electrocardiographic/Electrophysiological Characteristics, and Catheter Ablation

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) originating from the pulmonary sinus cusp (PSC) have not been sufficiently clarified.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to investigate the prevalence, electrocardiographic characteristics, mapping, and ablation of idiopathic VAs arising from the PSC.

METHODS

Data were analyzed from 218 patients undergoing successful endocardial ablation of idiopathic VAs with a left bundle branch block morphology and inferior axis deviation.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients had VAs originating from the PSC. In the first 7 patients, initial ablation performed in the right ventricular outflow tract failed to abolish the clinical VAs but produced a small change in the QRS morphology in 3 patients. In all 24 patients, the earliest activation was eventually identified in the PSC, at which a sharp potential was observed preceding the QRS complex onset by 28.2 ± 2.9 ms. The successful ablation site was in the right cusp (RC) in 10 patients (42%), the left cusp (LC) in 8 (33%), and the anterior cusp (AC) in 6 (25%). Electrocardiographic analysis showed that RC-VAs had significantly larger R-wave amplitude in lead I and a smaller aVL/aVR ratio of Q-wave amplitude compared with AC-VAs and LC-VAs, respectively. The R-wave amplitude in inferior leads was smaller in VAs localized in the RC than in the LC but did not differ between VAs from the AC and LC.

CONCLUSIONS

VAs arising from the PSC are not uncommon, and RC-VAs have unique electrocardiographic characteristics. These VAs can be successfully ablated within the PSC.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias originating from the continuum between the aortic sinus of Valsalva and the left ventricular summit: Electrocardiographic characteristics and correlative anatomy

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) originating from the continuum between the aortic sinus of Valsalva (ASV) and the left ventricular (LV) summit is a challenge.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to investigate the electrocardiographic, electrophysiological, and anatomical characteristics of VAs and to develop an algorithm for predicting the successful ablation site.

METHODS

We recruited 66 patients (mean age, 47 ± 15 years; 42 male patients) with symptomatic VAs originating from the continuum between the ASV and the LV summit who underwent radiofrequency ablation. Patients were classified into 4 groups (group 1: ASV, n = 20; group 2: subvalvular region, n = 15; group 3: great cardiac vein/anterior interventricular vein [GCV/AIV], n = 16; group 4: epicardium requiring pericardial access, n = 15). The QRS morphological characteristics of VAs were compared between the 4 groups.

RESULTS

Electrocardiographic analysis revealed that the aVL/aVR Q-wave ratio is useful in the prediction of successful ablation sites in the ASV, subvalvular area, GCV/AIV, and epicardium requiring pericardial access at cutoff values of ≤1.415, 1.416-1.535, 1.536-1.740, and >1.740, respectively. The aVL/aVR Q-wave ratio was well correlated with the distance between the successful ablation site and the tip of the LV summit. A distance of >18.9 mm and an LV myocardial thickness of >9.1 mm predicted the need for the epicardial or GCV/AIV approaches. There were no major procedural complications. Eight patients (12.1%) developed VA recurrence during a mean follow-up of 15.9 months (interquartile range 9.2-24.2 months).

CONCLUSION

The aVL/aVR Q-wave ratio is a useful parameter for predicting the successful ablation sites of VAs originating from the continuum between the ASV and the LV summit.

How To Identify & Treat Epicardial Origin Of Outflow Tract Tachycardias

The right ventricle outflow tract (RVOT) is the most common site of origin of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias. The typical outflow tract arrhythmias pattern on ECG is an inferior axis deviation and left bundle branch block when originated on the RVOT and right bundle branch block morphology when originated on the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). There are several ECG tricks for different locations of origin. An increased Maximum Deflection Index (MDI) suggests epicardial origin of arrhythmia. In general the result of ablation is very good, but sometimes there are difficult and unsuccessful procedures. The origin in the aortic cusps and epicardium are the reason for failure in some cases. When they are epicardial, the arrhythmias can be accessed by the venous system or by subxiphoid epicardial mapping.

Percutaneous Epicardial Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias Arising From the Left Ventricular Summit

Background—

Percutaneous epicardial ablation of ventricular arrhythmias arising from the left ventricular summit is limited by the presence of major coronary vessels and epicardial fat. We report the outcomes of percutaneous epicardial mapping and ablation of ventricular arrhythmias arising from the left ventricular summit and the ECG features associated with successful ablation.

Methods and Results—

Between January 2003 and December 2012, a total of 23 consecutive patients (49±14 years; 39% men) with ventricular arrhythmias arising from the left ventricular summit underwent percutaneous epicardial instrumentation for mapping and ablation because of unsuccessful ablation from the coronary venous system and multiple endocardial LV/right ventricular sites. Successful epicardial ablation was achieved in 5 (22%) patients. In the remaining 18 (78%) cases, ablation was aborted for either close proximity to major coronary arteries or poor energy delivery over epicardial fat. The Q-wave amplitude ratio in aVL/aVR was higher in the successful group, with a ratio of >1.85 present in 4 (80%) patients in the successful group versus 2 (11%) in the unsuccessful group ( P =0.008). The ratio of R/S wave in V1 was greater in the successful group, with 4 (80%) patients in the successful group having a R/S ratio of >2 in V1 versus 5 (28%) in the unsuccessful group ( P =0.056). None of the patients in the successful group had an initial q wave in lead V1, as opposed to 6 (33%) in the unsuccessful group. The presence of at least 2 of the 3 ECG criteria above predicted successful ablation with 100% sensitivity and 72% specificity.

Conclusions—

Epicardial instrumentation for mapping and ablation of ventricular arrhythmias arising from the left ventricular summit is successful only in a minority of patients because of close proximity to major coronary arteries and epicardial fat. A Q-wave ratio of >1.85 in aVL/aVR, a R/S ratio of >2 in V1, and absence of q waves in lead V1 help identify appropriate candidates for epicardial ablation.

Ventricular Arrhythmias Arising From the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Below the Aortic Sinus Cusps

Background—

Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) originating from the anterosuperior left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) represent a challenging location for catheter ablation. This study investigates mapping and ablation of VA from anterosuperior LVOT via a transseptal approach.

Methods and Results—

This study included 27 patients with symptomatic VA, of which 13 patients had previous failed ablations. LVOT endocardial 3-dimensional mapping via retrograde transaortic and antegrade transseptal approaches was performed. Previous ECG markers for procedure failure were analyzed. In all patients, earliest activation with low-amplitude potentials was identified at the anterosuperior LVOT 5.1±2.8 mm below the aortic cusp and preceded the QRS onset by 39.5±7.7 ms only via an antegrade transseptal approach using a reversed S curve. In all patients, pace mapping failed to demonstrate perfect QRS morphology match. The anatomic location was below the left coronary cusp in 16, below the left coronary cusp/right coronary cusp junction in 8, and below the right coronary cusp in 3 patients. Radiofrequency energy resulted in rapid disappearance of VAs in all patients. ECG analysis showed aVL/aVR Q-wave amplitude ratio >1.4 in 7, lead III/II R-wave amplitude ratio >1.1 in 10, and peak deflection index >0.6 in 11 patients. There were no complications or clinical VA recurrence during a mean follow-up of 8.4±2.5 months.

Conclusions—

The anterosuperior LVOT can be reached via a transseptal approach with a reversed S curve of the ablation catheter. The rapid effect from radiofrequency energy indicates that the VA is most likely located under the endocardium. Also, previous ECG markers for procedure failure need further investigation.

Electrocardiogram features of premature ventricular contractions/ventricular tachycardia originating from the left ventricular outflow tract and the treatment outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has been used for the ablation of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) or ventricular tachycardia (VT). To date, the mapping and catheter ablation of the arrhythmias originating from the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) has not been specified. This study investigates the electrocardiogram (ECG) feature of PVCs or VT originating from the LVOT. Moreover, the treatment outcome of RFCA is analyzed.

METHODS

Mapping and ablation were performed on the supravalvular or subvalvular aorta in 52 cases with PVCs/VT originating from the LVOT. The data were compared with those from 104 patients with PVCs/VT originating from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). A differential procedure was prepared based on the comparison of the ECG features of PVCs/VT originating from the RVOT, LVOT, and their different parts.

RESULTS

Among 52 cases with PVCs originating from the LVOT, 47 were successfully treated by RFCA, with a success rate of 90.38%. Several differences among the 12-lead ECG features were observed from the RVOT and LVOT in the left and right coronary sinus groups, as well as under the left coronary sinus group (left fibrous trigone): (1) If the precordial leads transition <V3 plus the precordial leads transitional index >0 are considered as the diagnostic parameters of PVCs/VT originating from the LVOT, then the sensitivity, specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values are 94.12%, 93.00%, 87.27%, and 96.88%, respectively; (2) The analysis of different subgroups of the LVOT are as follows: (a) A mainly positive wave of r or m pattern was recorded in the lead I in 72.73% of patients in the right coronary sinus group, versus 12.90% of patients in the left coronary sinus group, and 0% in the under left coronary sinus group. (b) All patients in the right coronary sinus group presented waves of RII>RIII and QSaVR>QSaVL, whereas most patients in the other two groups showed waves of RIII>RII and QSaVL>QSaVR. (c) Most patients in the under left coronary sinus group in lead V1 had a mainly positive wave (R) (77.78%), whereas those in the right (81.82%) and left (62.50%) coronary sinus groups had mainly negative waves (rS).

CONCLUSIONS

RFCA is a safe and effective curative therapy for PVCs/VT originating from the LVOT. The 12-lead ECG features of the LVOT from different origins exhibit certain distinctions.

Utility of distinctive local electrogram pattern and aortographic anatomical position in catheter manipulation at coronary cusps

BACKGROUND

The coronary cusps have recently become target sites for radiofrequency catheter ablation of both outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias originating near the coronary cusps (CC-VA) and atrial tachyarrhythmias such as focal atrial tachycardia originating near the noncoronary cusp (NCC-AT). However, the relation between local electrograms recorded at each CC during sinus rhythm and their anatomical position as assessed by aortography has not yet been systematically described.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 28 patients undergoing RFCA for CC-VA or NCC-AT, amplitudes of the atrial and ventricular potentials at the CCs were measured during sinus rhythm, and the atrial/ventricular (A/V) potential ratio was computed. Relative positions of the CCs were assessed by aortography in 2 X-ray projections. In the right (RCC) and left coronary cusps (LCC), amplitudes of the ventricular potential were larger than those of the atrial potential, leading to an A/V ratio <1 in all patients (0.08 ± 0.10, 0.32 ± 0.21, respectively). In contrast, in the NCC, the amplitude of the atrial potential was larger than the ventricular potential, leading to a higher A/V ratio relative to the CCs (5.7 ± 2.6, P < 0.0001). Aortography demonstrated the rightward and anterior location of the RCC, the leftward and superior location of the LCC, and the inferior and posterior location of the NCC.

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness of the distinctive local electrogram pattern of each CC and their positions on aortography should lead to safer and more effective catheter ablation at the CCs.

Epicardial Ablation of Idiopathic Ventricular Tachycardia

Epicardial ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an increasingly recognized arrhythmia in clinical practice. Electrocardiographic algorithms to identify epicardial VT should be used with the understanding that they are an initial guide to localization and do not exclude an epicardial origin of VT, particularly when endocardial approaches are unsuccessful. Ablation using a transvenous approach or direct epicardial access may produce favorable results, although care must be taken to avoid coronary artery or phrenic nerve injury. A subset of patients require a combined endocardial and epicardial approach to eliminate VT. Although these ablation strategies are generally well tolerated, they should be limited to patients with highly symptomatic arrhythmias or those in whom myocardial depression is thought to be related to prolonged tachycardia or repetitive ventricular ectopy.

Electrocardiographic algorithm to identify the optimal target ablation site for idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract ventricular premature contraction

AIMS

Several electrocardiographic (ECG) algorithms have been developed to identify the site of origin of ventricular premature contractions (VPCs) from right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) based on pacemapping; however, their accuracy remains unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated the accuracy of these algorithms in 52 consecutive patients (31 female, mean age 42.6+/-14.6 years) with successful radiofrequency ablation of RVOT-VPC as guided by 3D electroanatomical non-contact mapping (Ensite, St Jude Medical, USA) and compared with a newly proposed ECG algorithm. As guided by 3D electroanatomical mapping, the successful ablation sites of RVOT-VPC were RVOT septum (n=31), RVOT free wall (n=19), and His region (n=2). Retrospective evaluation in the initial 39 patients shows that the overall positive prediction value to identify a successful ablation site of this newly proposed ECG algorithm is 77.3% and is higher than the 73.3% by Ito et al., 73.3% by Joshi et al., and 53.8% by Dixit et al. (P>0.05). Prospective evaluation in the subsequent 13 patients also demonstrate similar high overall sensitivity (79.0%), specificity (92.7%), and positive prediction value (88.2%) to identify a successful ablation site with this newly proposed ECG algorithm.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of detail 3D electroanatomical mapping of successful ablation sites, a newly proposed ECG algorithm was developed to improve the sensitivity, specificity, and positive prediction value in identification of targeted ablation sites for RVOT-VPC.