Insulin: Know what your immunoassay detects. Evaluation of two new immunoassays

BACKGROUND

Insulin is essential for glycemic regulation but diseases can cause a default or an excess of insulin secretion leading to dysregulated glycemia. Hence, measurement of insulinemia is useful to investigate hypoglycemia, determine the pathogenesis of diabetes and evaluate β-cell function. Thus, diabetic patients need supplementation with recombinant human insulin and/or insulin analogues. Analogues have primary sequences different from native human insulin and may not be detected by some immunoassays. The objective of our study was to evaluate new insulin immunoassays by determining their ability to detect different types of human insulin or analogues.

METHODS

This study compared the reactivity of two new insulin immunoassays with five well-established immunoassays on ten commercial insulins. We also measured insulin in blood samples from diabetic or pancreas transplant patients with known treatment.

RESULTS

Contrary to recombinant human insulin, there were differences in the specificity to insulin analogues. We distinguished three immunoassay categories: those recognizing all types of insulin such as the non-specific BI-INS-IRMA®, Architect® and Access® immunoassays; those recognizing human insulin only (Cobas®); and those recognizing human insulin and analogues in variable proportions (Liaison XL®, iFlash® and Maglumi®).

CONCLUSION

An accurate biological interpretation of insulinemia relies on knowledge of the specificity of the immunoassay used.

Clinical Case of Surreptitious Hypoglycemia Due to Deliberate Insulin Analog Administration

Hypoglycemic syndrome is a life-threatening condition that can lead to hypoglycemic coma and death. Surreptitious hypoglycemic syndrome is the deliberate use of insulin preparations or oral hypoglycemic drugs aimed to reduce blood glucose level. If human insulin is injected, high level of immunoreactive insulin (IRI) and low level of C-peptide at the moment of hypoglycemia are always detected. However, the fact of deliberate administration of insulin analogs is difficult to prove. In these cases if insulin kit test with low cross-reactivity with insulin analogs is used, the low levels of IRI and C-peptide will be suspected. Some experts suggest the presence of cross reactivity with analogs of insulin in a number of commercial kits, which makes it possible to detect cases of surreptitious hypoglycemia. We present a clinical case of a patient with surreptitious hypoglycemia due to the administration of insulin analogs and discuss the problems of its laboratory diagnosis.

Validation of a Fully Automated Immunoaffinity Workflow for the Detection and Quantification of Insulin Analogs by LC–MS-MS in Postmortem Vitreous Humor

The analysis of biological specimens collected at autopsy for the presence of exogenous insulin(s) is of special interest in select death investigations as they may be suspected in the cause of a death. Technical challenges include the limited stability of insulin, and the forensic requirement of differentiating endogenous insulin from pharmaceutical analogs. A novel method was developed for the detection and quantification of human insulin, Glulisine, Lispro, Aspart, Glargine and Detemir in vitreous fluid. An immunoaffinity extraction procedure is performed followed by separation of the insulin α- and β-chains. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry analysis of the β-chain allows for the unequivocal identification of each insulin analog. The analytical measurement range for each insulin was 0.5–25 ng/mL. The method was evaluated for accuracy, precision, carryover, interferences and stability. Eight vitreous fluid samples collected from cases where untoward insulin use was suspected were subjected to analysis. Positive results were obtained from three samples, and a detailed case history is provided for one of these cases. Even though insulin instability in postmortem biological fluid remains a challenge, this method allows for a reliable forensic-level analysis in vitreous fluid.

Clinical Utility and Cross-Reactivity of Insulin and C-Peptide Assays by the Lumipulse G1200 System

BACKGROUND

Measurement of insulin and C-peptide concentrations is important for deciding whether insulin treatment is required in diabetic patients. We aimed to investigate the analytical performance of insulin and C-peptide assays using the Lumipulse G1200 system (Fujirebio Inc., Tokyo, Japan).

METHODS

We examined the precision, linearity, and cross-reactivity of insulin and C-peptide using five insulin analogues and purified proinsulin. A method comparison was conducted between the Lumipulse G1200 and Roche E170 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) systems in 200 diabetic patients on insulin treatment. Reference intervals for insulin and C-peptide concentrations were determined in 279 healthy individuals.

RESULTS

For insulin and C-peptide assays, within-laboratory precision (% CV) was 3.78-4.14 and 2.89-3.35%, respectively. The linearity of the insulin assay in the range of 0-2,778 pmol/L was R²=0.9997, and that of the C-peptide assay in the range of 0-10 nmol/L was R²=0.9996. The correlation coefficient (r) between the Roche E170 and Lumipulse G1200 results was 0.943 (P<0.001) for insulin and 0.996 (P<0.001) for C-peptide. The mean differences in insulin and C-peptide between Lumipulse G1200 and the Roche E170 were 19.4 pmol/L and 0.2 nmol/L, respectively. None of the insulin analogues or proinsulin showed significant cross-reactivity with the Lumipulse G1200. Reference intervals of insulin and C-peptide were 7.64-70.14 pmol/L and 0.17-0.85 nmol/L, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin and C-peptide tests on the Lumipulse G1200 show adequate analytical performance and are expected to be acceptable for use in clinical areas.

Interpreting insulin immunoassays during investigation of apparent spontaneous hypoglycaemia and insulin overdose

We report two cases of hypoglycaemia; one with apparently spontaneous hypoglycaemia and one with presumed insulin overdose. In both cases insulin concentration was normal when measured with the Roche immunoassay, but elevated when remeasured with the Advia Centaur immunoassay and a diagnosis of hypoglycaemia secondary to insulin analogue administration was made. These cases highlight that physicians need to understand the binding characteristics of the insulin immunoassay they use.

Serum Insulin Bioassay Reflects Insulin Sensitivity and Requirements in Type 1 Diabetes

CONTEXT

Insulin resistance could increase insulin requirements in type 1 diabetes (T1D). Current insulin immunoassays do not detect insulin analogs. Kinase insulin receptor (IR) activation (KIRA) bioassays specific for human IR isoforms A (IR-A) and B (IR-B) permit assessment of all circulating insulin bioactivity. We studied whether IR-A and IR-B KIRA assays are related to direct measures of insulin sensitivity or insulin doses in T1D.

DESIGN

We evaluated 31 adult patients with T1D (age 45.7 ± 1.6 years, body mass index 28.8 ± 0.7 kg/m2). Serum IR-A and IR-B bioactivities were measured by KIRA bioassays. Insulin sensitivity of glucose production (Ra) was measured by the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp technique in which a low insulin dose (0.4 mU/kg/min for 240 minutes) was combined with D-[3-3H] glucose infusion to measure rates of Ra and utilization and insulin action on antilipolysis from suppression of serum free fatty acids.

RESULTS

Baseline circulating IR-A bioactivity was 53 ± 7 pmol/L, and IR-B bioactivity was 81 ± 11 pmol/L. Compared with baseline, insulin infusion significantly increased IR-A (P < 0.001) and IR-B (P < 0.001) bioactivities. Fasting IR-A and IR-B bioactivities were positively related to endogenous Ra (r = 0.44, P = 0.01 and r = 0.38, P < 0.05). Fasting IR-A (r = 0.43, P = 0.02) and IR-B (r = 0.47, P = 0.01) bioactivities were significantly correlated with insulin requirements and glycosylated hemoglobin (IR-A: r = 0.52, P = 0.002; IR-B: r = 0.48, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Circulating IR-A and IR-B bioactivities are associated with insulin resistance, high insulin requirements, and poor glycemic control in T1D. Measurement of IR bioactivity by KIRA assays provides a tool to assess the amount of biologically active insulin in groups of T1D patients treated with insulin analogs.

Assay-dependent variability of serum insulin concentrations: a comparison of eight assays

Although insulin measurement is essential for both clinical and research purposes, there is currently no reference method for insulin assays. The aim of this study was to compare results of serum insulin determined by a number of commercially available assays. We compared eight insulin assays by analyzing 165 serum samples. Assays included two chemiluminescence (Roche and DiaSorin), four ELISA (Tosoh, Mercodia, Monobind, and Diametra), and two IRMA (Izotop and BioSource) methods. Each assay was compared with the mean of all assay methods and Bland-Altman difference plots were used to measure agreement between each assay and overall mean. Least squared perpendicular distance regression analysis (Deming's method) was used to calculate slope and intercept for bias and also for each assay vs. mean of eight assays. Findings showed that the lowest and highest median insulin concentrations varied by a factor of 1.8. Maximum and minimum correlations with mean of assays were observed for Roche (0.992) and BioSource (0.844), respectively. Significant bias was observed in six assays. In pairwise comparisons of different assays, the highest and least mean differences were 7.78 μU/mL and -0.14 μU/mL, respectively. In conclusion, serum insulin measurement with different assays showed a maximum of 1.8-fold difference, a point that should be taken into consideration in the interpretation of circulating insulin levels in both clinical and research fields.

The Determination of Insulin Overdose in Postmortem Investigations

The analysis of biological specimens for the presence of exogenous insulin is of special interest in select postmortem investigations. Insulin analogues are primarily used to mediate the regulation of blood glucose concentrations; however, their use has also been implicated or suspected as a cause of death in suicides, accidents, and homicides. Toxicological analysis for these compounds is challenging due to the large molecular weight, the limited stability of insulin in whole blood, and complexities associated with sample preparation and instrumental testing. As a consequence, determination of insulin in postmortem specimens is not routinely offered by most forensic toxicology laboratories. Forensic death investigation is further complicated by interpretative difficulties such as the frequent absence of anatomical findings, concentration interpretation in known insulin users, and addressing the impact of chemical instability and postmortem redistribution. There are ongoing efforts, however, to develop and validate robust methods that may be used for this analysis on these challenging samples and that are capable of withstanding scientific and legal scrutiny for forensic use. In this regard, in recent years, methods for the detection of exogenous insulin in postmortem samples have been reported and results of this testing has been published in a handful of cases. The purpose of this article is to review the primary functions of insulin, the disease states associated with the therapeutic use of exogenous insulin, the current state of laboratory testing, and to provide case summaries that summarize the timeline of advancements and underscore the importance of this work.

Commercial insulin immunoassays fail to detect commonly prescribed insulin analogues

OBJECTIVES

Blood insulin and C-peptide are key investigations in the differential diagnosis of hypoglycaemia. Analogues of insulin have modified primary-sequences compared to native human insulin, as such may not cross react with insulin assays. This has important implications in detecting surreptitious or malicious insulin administration. The aim of this study is to assess the cross-reactivity of all insulins currently listed in the British National Formulary (BNF65, 2013) in clinical insulin assays currently used in UK clinical laboratories.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Sample sets were prepared for all 15 exogenous insulin classes listed in the BNF, at concentrations of 1000 pmol/L and 300 pmol/L, using pooled human serum. Samples were sent blinded to 5 participating analytical laboratories to cover analysis on the 10 major clinical insulin assays used in the UK.

RESULTS

The ability of insulin assays to detect exogenous insulin preparations was highly variable and ranged from 0% to >140% for a single exogenous insulin. Four assays were highly specific for the human insulin sequence and had no cross-reactivity with any synthetic analogue insulin. Two detected all insulin types (human sequence, animal and synthetic analogue), with the remaining having variable cross-reactivity.

CONCLUSION

The cross-reactivity of the 15 exogenous insulin preparations is highly variable in the assays used in clinical laboratories around the UK. It is important that laboratories and clinicians are aware of the limitations of their local assays to avoid missing the important diagnosis of hypoglycaemia secondary to excessive exogenous insulin. Where necessary, samples should be referred to specialist centres for insulin analysis and ideally by a validated and fully-quantitative mass spectrometry-based method.

Cross-reactivity of insulin analogues with three insulin assays

Background

Immunometric assays have recently shown higher specificity in the detection of human insulin than radioimmunoassays with almost no cross-reaction with proinsulin or C peptide. The introduction of the new insulin analogues on the market, however, has raised the need to define their cross-reactivity in these assays. Several studies have been published in this regard with different results.

Methods

The analogues studied were insulins lispro, aspart, glargine, detemir, and glulisine. Insulin concentrations were measured in Immulite® 2000 and Advia Centaur® XP (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics), and Elecsys® Modular Analytics E170 (Roche). All samples were processed 15 times in the same analytical run following a random sequence. Those samples which showed statistically and clinically significant changes in insulin concentration were reprocessed using increasing concentrations of analogue, and this was done twice, using two different serum pools, one with a low concentration of insulin and one with a high concentration of insulin.

Results

In the Elecsys® E170 analyser, glargine showed statistical changes (comparison of mean concentrations with p < 0.05) and clinically significant changes in measured insulin (percentage difference 986.2% > reference change value: 59.8%), and the interference increased with increasing concentrations of analogue; the differences were not significant in the case of the other analogues. In the Advia Centaur® and Immulite® 2000 only the results for glulisine did not present significance (percentage difference 44.7% < reference change value 103.5%). Increasing concentrations of aspart, glargine, and lispro showed increased interference in Immulite® 2000.

Conclusions

In the Elecsys® E170 assay, relevant cross-reactivity was only detected with insulin glargine, whereas in the other analysers all analogues except glulisine showed significant interference.

Pediatric hypoglycemia

Hypoglycemia in the pediatric population is a common finding important to recognize and manage to prevent brain injury. Recent advances in molecular genetics have provided new insight into its biochemical and physiologic basis and have led to more appropriate and specific treatment. Although a major cause of brain injury in pediatrics, the ability to predict the long-term outcome in these patients remains difficult. Identification of these at-risk individuals is important. The physiologic adaptations associated with transition from fetal to neonatal life are now better understood thus allowing for improved surveillance and management. Despite these advances, analytical limitations of point-of-care testing instruments at low glucose concentration continue to persist, This review aims to address these questions and provide an overview of pediatric hypoglycemia and the molecular pathways involved.

Extensive study of human insulin immunoassays: promises and pitfalls for insulin analogue detection and quantification

Background: Over the last few decades, new synthetic insulin analogues have been developed. Their measurement is of prime importance in the investigation of hypoglycaemia, but their quantification is hampered by variable cross-reactivity with many insulin assays. For clinical analysis, it has now become essential to know the potential cross-reactivity of analogues of interest.

Methods: In this work, we performed an extensive study of insulin analogue cross-reactivity using numerous human insulin immunoassays. We investigated the cross-reactivity of five analogues (lispro, aspart, glulisine, glargine, detemir) and two glargine metabolites (M1 and M2) with 16 commercial human insulin immunoassays as a function of concentration.

Results: The cross-reactivity values for insulin analogues or glargine metabolites ranged from 0% to 264%. Four assays were more specific to human insulin, resulting in negligible cross-reactivity with the analogues. However, none of the 16 assays was completely free of cross-reactivity with analogues or metabolites. The results show that analogue cross-reactivity, which varies to a large degree, is far from negligible, and should not be overlooked in clinical investigations.

Conclusions: This study has established the cross-reactivity of five insulin analogues and two glargine metabolites using 16 immunoassays to facilitate the choice of the immunoassay(s) and to provide sensitive and specific analyses in clinical routine or investigation.

Pharmacokinetic studies of protein drugs: past, present and future

Among the growing number of therapeutic proteins on the market, there is an emergence of biotherapeutics designed from our comprehension of the physiological mechanisms responsible for their peripheral and tissue pharmacokinetics. Most of them have been optimized to increase their half-life through glycosylation engineering, polyethylene glycol conjugation or Fc fusion. However, our understanding of biological drug behaviors is still its infancy compared to the huge amount of data regarding small molecular weight drugs accumulated over half a century. Unfortunately, therapeutic proteins share few resemblances with these drugs. For instance drug-targeted-mediated disposition, binding to glycoreceptors, lysosomal recycling, large hydrodynamic volume and electrostatic charge are typical critical characteristics that cannot be derived from our anterior knowledge of classical drugs. However, the numerous discoveries made in the two last decades have driven and will continue to drive new options in biochemical engineering and support the design of complex delivery systems. Most of these new developments will be supported by novel analytical methods for assessing in vitro or in vivo metabolism parameters.

Development of a fast method for direct analysis of intact synthetic insulins in human plasma: the large peptide challenge

Background: Intact insulins are difficult to analyze by LC–MS/MS due to nonspecific binding and poor sensitivity, solubility and fragmentation. This work aims to provide a simpler, faster LC–MS method and focuses on solving the above issues. Results: A novel charged-surface chromatographic column produced peak widths for insulin that were significantly narrower than traditional C18 columns when using formic acid as mobile phase. Mass spectral fragments m/z >700 provided greater specificity, significantly reducing endogenous background. Detection limits in human plasma were 0.2 ng/ml for insulin glargine, glulisine and detemir, and 0.5 ng/ml for insulin aspart. Average accuracy for standard curve and QC samples was 93.4%. Conclusion: A simple SPE LC–MS analysis was developed for direct, simultaneous quantification of insulin glargine, detemir, aspart and glulisine.

Update on investigating hypoglycaemia in childhood

Identification and investigation of hypoglycaemia in childhood remains an important clinical emergency. Rapid recognition and appropriate management of this clinical state continues to be important in order to prevent neurological damage or even death. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on the advances made in this area since the review by Bonham in this journal in 1993. Advances in molecular science and diagnostic techniques have assisted in understanding the mechanisms involved in the homeostasis of glucose metabolism at rest and when stressed. New disorders causing hypoglycaemia are described using the classification based upon aetiologies, which was used in Bonham's original paper. The development and use of guidelines and pre-assembled packs for investigating hypoglycaemia is also discussed.