1
|
Sussex J, Smith J, Wu FM. Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2024; 12:1-76. [PMID: 38940736 DOI: 10.3310/ptru7108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
Background People living with multiple long-term conditions represent a significant concern for National Health Service policy and practice, and their care is a major theme in the 2019 National Health Service Long Term Plan. The Birmingham RAND and Cambridge Rapid Evaluation Centre team has undertaken a thematic synthesis of the 10 evaluations it has conducted from 2018 to 2023, exploring the needs, priorities and implications for people with multiple long-term conditions. Objectives The aims for this overarching study were to: (1) build a body of learning about service innovations in primary and community settings for people of all ages with multiple long-term conditions, focused on questions that matter most to people with multimorbidity; and (2) develop methodological insights about how rapid evaluation can be used to inform the scoping, testing and implementation of service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions. Design The focus on multiple long-term conditions came from a Birmingham RAND and Cambridge Rapid Evaluation Centre prioritisation process undertaken in 2018 using James Lind Alliance methods. Cross-analysis of the findings from the 10 individual rapid evaluations was supplemented by (1) building aspects of multimorbidity into the design of later evaluations; (2) interviewing national and regional stakeholders (n=19) working in or alongside integrated care systems; (3) undertaking a rapid review of evidence on remote monitoring for people with multiple long-term conditions (19 papers included); and (4) testing overall insights with organisations representing patients and carers through a patient, public and professional engagement workshop with 10 participants plus members of the research team. Results While living with multiple long-term conditions is common and is the norm for people over the age of 50 using health and care services, it is not often a focus of health service provision or innovation, nor of research and evaluation activity. We discuss six themes emerging from the totality of the study: (1) our health system is mainly organised around single conditions and not multiple long-term conditions; (2) research calls and studies usually focus on single conditions and associated services; (3) building opportunities for engaged, informed individuals and carers and improved self-management; (4) the importance of measures that matter for patients and carers; (5) barriers to developing and implementing service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions; and (6) what is needed to make patients with multiple long-term conditions a priority in healthcare planning and delivery. Limitations Care of people with multiple long-term conditions was not the principal focus of several of the rapid evaluations. While this was a finding in itself, it limited our learning about designing and implementing, as well as methodological approaches to evaluating, service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions. Conclusions Through a thematic analysis of the portfolio of evaluations, we have deduced a set of suggested implications for how the needs of people with multiple long-term conditions can be better embedded in policy, research and practice. Future work Areas of uncertainty related to the care of people with multiple long-term conditions should be further explored, including developing and testing measures of patient experience of (un)co-ordinated care across settings, and interrogating the experience of health and care staff when working with people with multiple long-term conditions, to understand what works. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR134284) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 15. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon Sussex
- RAND Europe, Eastbrook House, Cambridge, UK
| | - Judith Smith
- University of Birmingham, Health Services Management Centre, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hellstrand Tang U, Smith F, Karilampi UL, Gremyr A. Exploring the Role of Complexity in Health Care Technology Bottom-Up Innovations: Multiple-Case Study Using the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability Complexity Assessment Tool. JMIR Hum Factors 2024; 11:e50889. [PMID: 38669076 PMCID: PMC11087855 DOI: 10.2196/50889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND New digital technology presents new challenges to health care on multiple levels. There are calls for further research that considers the complex factors related to digital innovations in complex health care settings to bridge the gap when moving from linear, logistic research to embracing and testing the concept of complexity. The nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability (NASSS) framework was developed to help study complexity in digital innovations. OBJECTIVE This study aims to investigate the role of complexity in the development and deployment of innovations by retrospectively assessing challenges to 4 digital health care innovations initiated from the bottom up. METHODS A multicase retrospective, deductive, and explorative analysis using the NASSS complexity assessment tool LONG was conducted. In total, 4 bottom-up innovations developed in Region Västra Götaland in Sweden were explored and compared to identify unique and shared complexity-related challenges. RESULTS The analysis resulted in joint insights and individual learning. Overall, the complexity was mostly found outside the actual innovation; more specifically, it related to the organization's readiness to integrate new innovations, how to manage and maintain innovations, and how to finance them. The NASSS framework sheds light on various perspectives that can either facilitate or hinder the adoption, scale-up, and spread of technological innovations. In the domain of condition or diagnosis, a well-informed understanding of the complexity related to the condition or illness (diabetes, cancer, bipolar disorders, and schizophrenia disorders) is of great importance for the innovation. The value proposition needs to be clearly described early to enable an understanding of costs and outcomes. The questions in the NASSS complexity assessment tool LONG were sometimes difficult to comprehend, not only from a language perspective but also due to a lack of understanding of the surrounding organization's system and its setting. CONCLUSIONS Even when bottom-up innovations arise within the same support organization, the complexity can vary based on the developmental phase and the unique characteristics of each project. Identifying, defining, and understanding complexity may not solve the issues but substantially improves the prospects for successful deployment. Successful innovation within complex organizations necessitates an adaptive leadership and structures to surmount cultural resistance and organizational impediments. A rigid, linear, and stepwise approach risks disregarding interconnected variables and dependencies, leading to suboptimal outcomes. Success lies in embracing the complexity with its uncertainty, nurturing creativity, and adopting a nonlinear methodology that accommodates the iterative nature of innovation processes within complex organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulla Hellstrand Tang
- Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Frida Smith
- Regional Cancer Centre West, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Technology Management and Economics, Collaborative Plattform for Healthcare Improvement, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ulla Leyla Karilampi
- Department of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Andreas Gremyr
- Department of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fletcher R, Regan C, StGeorge J. Providing clinicians with 'how to' knowledge for technology-based innovation: Introducing the SMS4dads texts. Health Promot J Austr 2024; 35:481-486. [PMID: 37438881 DOI: 10.1002/hpja.778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023] Open
Abstract
ISSUE ADDRESSED Male partners are key supports for women in birth preparation and postnatally. Text-messaging can deliver timely information to expectant and new fathers to increase their support of the mother. However, technological innovations in healthcare often fail to be adopted. This study aims to assess the impact of disseminating a 'taster' set of SMS messages to increase clinicians' engagement with the intervention. METHODS Example messages from SMS4dads were delivered to clinicians over a 3-week period and a link provided to an evaluation survey. Agreement to two closed questions was rated on a five-point Likert scale; the frequency of specific recalled messages was calculated for the first open-ended question. Responses to the remaining open-ended questions were analysed with a descriptive thematic approach. RESULTS A total of 418 participants (female 61.5%) working in health organisations (80.4%), mostly in nursing (33.9%) or midwifery (19.6%) enrolled. Of the 77 (18.4%) participants who provided an evaluation, 96% agreed or strongly agreed that the Professional Taster gave them a better understanding of how to explain the program, and 88% agreed or strongly agreed that they are now more likely to tell parents about the program. Analysis of the remaining two open-ended questions revealed clinicians' concerns for fathers alongside their primary focus on maternal wellbeing. CONCLUSION Providing 'how to' knowledge through receiving a sample of the intervention may increase clinicians' acceptance of technological innovation. SO WHAT?: Health-promoting digital interventions using text are increasing. Novel tested strategies for gaining buy-in from healthcare staff will be needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Fletcher
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Casey Regan
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jennifer StGeorge
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Deisenhofer AK, Barkham M, Beierl ET, Schwartz B, Aafjes-van Doorn K, Beevers CG, Berwian IM, Blackwell SE, Bockting CL, Brakemeier EL, Brown G, Buckman JEJ, Castonguay LG, Cusack CE, Dalgleish T, de Jong K, Delgadillo J, DeRubeis RJ, Driessen E, Ehrenreich-May J, Fisher AJ, Fried EI, Fritz J, Furukawa TA, Gillan CM, Gómez Penedo JM, Hitchcock PF, Hofmann SG, Hollon SD, Jacobson NC, Karlin DR, Lee CT, Levinson CA, Lorenzo-Luaces L, McDanal R, Moggia D, Ng MY, Norris LA, Patel V, Piccirillo ML, Pilling S, Rubel JA, Salazar-de-Pablo G, Schleider JL, Schnurr PP, Schueller SM, Siegle GJ, Uher R, Watkins E, Webb CA, Wiltsey Stirman S, Wynants L, Youn SJ, Zilcha-Mano S, Lutz W, Cohen ZD. Implementing precision methods in personalizing psychological therapies: Barriers and possible ways forward. Behav Res Ther 2024; 172:104443. [PMID: 38086157 DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2023.104443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Claudi L Bockting
- AmsterdamUMC, Department of Psychiatry, Research Program Amsterdam Public Health and Centre for Urban Mental Health, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Kim de Jong
- Leiden University, Institute of Psychology, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jessica Fritz
- University of Cambridge, UK; Philipps University of Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Claire M Gillan
- School of Psychology, Trinity College Institute for Neuroscience, And Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mei Yi Ng
- Florida International University, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jessica L Schleider
- Stony Brook University and Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, USA
| | - Paula P Schnurr
- National Center for PTSD and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Soo Jeong Youn
- Reliant Medical Group, OptumCare and Harvard Medical School, USA
| | | | | | - Zachary D Cohen
- University of California, Los Angeles and University of Arizona, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Husereau D, Villalba E, Muthu V, Mengel M, Ivany C, Steuten L, Spinner DS, Sheffield B, Yip S, Jacobs P, Sullivan T, Arshoff L. Progress toward Health System Readiness for Genome-Based Testing in Canada. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:5379-5394. [PMID: 37366891 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30060408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Genomic medicine harbors the real potential to improve the health and healthcare journey of patients, care provider experiences, and improve the health system efficiency-even reducing healthcare costs. There is expected to be an exponential growth in medically necessary new genome-based tests and test approaches in the coming years. Testing can also create scientific research and commercial opportunities beyond healthcare decision making. The purpose of this research is to generate a better understanding of Canada's state of readiness for genomic medicine, and to provide some insights for other healthcare systems. (2) Methods: A mixed-methods approach of a review of the literature and key informant interviews with a purposive sample of experts was used. The health system readiness was assessed using a previously published set of conditions. (3) Results: Canada has created some of the established conditions, but further action needs to be taken to improve the state of readiness for genome-based medicine. The important gaps to be filled are the need for linked information systems and data integration; evaluative processes that are timely and transparent; navigational tools for care providers; dedicated funding to facilitate rapid onboarding and support test development and proficiency testing; and broader engagement with innovation stakeholders beyond care providers and patients. These findings highlight the role of the organizational context, social influence, and other factors that are known to affect the diffusion of innovation within health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Don Husereau
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1G 5Z3, Canada
| | - Eva Villalba
- Coalition Priorité Cancer au Québec, Saint-Lambert, QC J4P 2J7, Canada
| | - Vivek Muthu
- Marivek Healthcare Consulting, Epsom KT18 7PF, UK
| | - Michael Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada
| | - Craig Ivany
- Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1G1, Canada
| | - Lotte Steuten
- Office of Health Economics, London SE1 2HB, UK
- City University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK
| | - Daryl S Spinner
- Menarini Silicon Biosystems Inc., Huntingdon Valley, PA 19006, USA
| | | | - Stephen Yip
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z7, Canada
| | - Philip Jacobs
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
| | - Terrence Sullivan
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3T2, Canada
| | - Larry Arshoff
- Diagnosis, Solutions & Results Inc., Thornhill, ON L4J 7N5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Carter B, Saron H, Blake L, Eyton-Chong CK, Dee S, Evans L, Harris J, Hughes H, Jones D, Lambert C, Lane S, Mehta F, Peak M, Preston J, Siner S, Sefton G, Carrol ED. Clinical utility and acceptability of a whole-hospital, pro-active electronic paediatric early warning system (the DETECT study): A prospective e-survey of parents and health professionals. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0273666. [PMID: 36107953 PMCID: PMC9477367 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Paediatric early warning systems (PEWS) are a means of tracking physiological state and alerting healthcare professionals about signs of deterioration, triggering a clinical review and/or escalation of care of children. A proactive end-to-end deterioration solution (the DETECT surveillance system) with an embedded e-PEWS that included sepsis screening was introduced across a tertiary children’s hospital. One component of the implementation programme was a sub-study to determine an understanding of the DETECT e-PEWS in terms of its clinical utility and its acceptability. Aim This study aimed to examine how parents and health professionals view and engage with the DETECT e-PEWS apps, with a particular focus on its clinical utility and its acceptability. Method A prospective, closed (tick box or sliding scale) and open (text based) question, e-survey of parents (n = 137) and health professionals (n = 151) with experience of DETECT e-PEWS. Data were collected between February 2020 and February 2021. Results Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics and qualitative data with generic thematic analysis. Overall, both clinical utility and acceptability (across seven constructs) were high across both stakeholder groups although some challenges to utility (e.g., sensitivity of triggers within specific patient populations) and acceptability (e.g., burden related to having to carry extra technology) were identified. Conclusion Despite the multifaceted nature of the intervention and the complexity of implementation across a hospital, the system demonstrated clinical utility and acceptability across two key groups of stakeholders: parents and health professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernie Carter
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Holly Saron
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy Blake
- Department of Social Sciences, University of West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Chin-Kien Eyton-Chong
- Department of General Paediatrics, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Dee
- High Dependency Unit, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Leah Evans
- High Dependency Unit, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Harris
- Faculty of Health, Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah Hughes
- Oncology Unit, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Dawn Jones
- Clinical Research Division, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline Lambert
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Steven Lane
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Fulya Mehta
- Department of General Paediatrics, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Peak
- NIHR Alder Hey Clinical Research Facility, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Preston
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Siner
- Clinical Research Division, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Gerri Sefton
- Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Enitan D. Carrol
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Walczak R, Kludacz-Alessandri M, Hawrysz L. Use of Telemedicine Technology among General Practitioners during COVID-19: A Modified Technology Acceptance Model Study in Poland. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph191710937. [PMID: 36078650 PMCID: PMC9518366 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191710937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth became a popular solution for the remote provision of primary care by General Practitioners (GPs) in Poland. This study aimed to assess the GPs' acceptance of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland and to explain the factors that drive GPs' need to implement a telehealth system in primary care using the modified Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). In Poland, 361 GPs from a representative sample of 361 clinics drawn from 21,500 outpatient institutions in Poland participated in the empirical study. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to evaluate the causal relationships that were formulated in the proposed model. Research has shown that Polish GPs reported a positive perception and high acceptance of the telehealth system during the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, the results show that the social factors (image, decision autonomy, perception of patient interaction) significantly positively influence the technological factors (perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness) that influence the need to implement a telehealth system. The proposed socio-technological model can serve as a theoretical basis for future research and offer empirical predictions for practitioners and researchers in health departments, governments, and primary care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renata Walczak
- Faculty of Civil Engineering, Mechanics and Petrochemistry, Warsaw University of Technology, 09-400 Plock, Poland
| | | | - Liliana Hawrysz
- Faculty of Management, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Carter B, Saron H, Siner S, Preston J, Peak M, Mehta F, Lane S, Lambert C, Jones D, Hughes H, Harris J, Evans L, Dee S, Eyton-Chong CK, Sefton G, Carrol ED. Health professionals' initial experiences and perceptions of the acceptability of a whole-hospital, pro-active electronic paediatric early warning system (the DETECT study): a qualitative interview study. BMC Pediatr 2022; 22:365. [PMID: 35751050 PMCID: PMC9233392 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-022-03411-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Paediatric early warning systems (PEWS) alert health professionals to signs of a child’s deterioration with the intention of triggering an urgent review and escalating care. They can reduce unplanned critical care transfer, cardiac arrest, and death. Electronic systems may be superior to paper-based systems. The objective of the study was to critically explore the initial experiences and perceptions of health professionals about the acceptability of DETECT e-PEWS, and what factors influence its acceptability. Methods A descriptive qualitative study (part of The DETECT study) was undertaken February 2020–2021. Single, semi-structured telephone interviews were used. The setting was a tertiary children’s hospital, UK. The participants were health professionals working in study setting and using DETECT e-PEWS. Sampling was undertaken using a mix of convenience and snowballing techniques. Participants represented two user-groups: ‘documenting vital signs’ (D-VS) and ‘responding to vital signs’ (R-VS). Perceptions of clinical utility and acceptability of DETECT e-PEWS were derived from thematic analysis of transcripts. Results Fourteen HPs (12 nurses, 2 doctors) participated; seven in D-VS and seven in the R-VS group. Three main themes were identified: complying with DETECT e-PEWS, circumventing DETECT e-PEWS, and disregarding DETECT e-PEWS. Overall clinical utility and acceptability were deemed good for HPs in the D-VS group but there was diversity in perception in the R-VS group (nurses found it more acceptable than doctors). Compliance was better in the D-VS group where use of DETECT e-PEWS was mandated and used more consistently. Some health professionals circumvented DETECT e-PEWS and fell back into old habits. Doctors (R-VS) did not consistently engage with DETECT e-PEWS, which reduced the acceptability of the system, even in those who thought the system brought benefits. Conclusions Speed and accuracy of real-time data, automation of triggering alerts and improved situational awareness were key factors that contributed to the acceptability of DETECT e-PEWS. Mandating use of both recording and responding aspects of DETECT e-PEWS is needed to ensure full implementation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-022-03411-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sarah Siner
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Matthew Peak
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Fulya Mehta
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Caroline Lambert
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.,University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Dawn Jones
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Hannah Hughes
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jane Harris
- Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Leah Evans
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sarah Dee
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Gerri Sefton
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Enitan D Carrol
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.,University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Whyte S, Bray L, Chan HF, Chan RJ, Hunt J, Peltz TS, Dulleck U, Hutmacher DW. Exploring Surgeons', Nurses', and Patients' Information Seeking Behavior on Medical Innovations: The Case of 3D Printed Biodegradable Implants in Breast Reconstruction. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2022; 3:e176. [PMID: 37601603 PMCID: PMC10431284 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To explore information seeking behavior on medical innovations. Background While autologous and alloplastic options for breast reconstruction are well established, it is the advent of the combination of 3D printing technology and the biocompatible nature of a highly porous biodegradable implants that offers new treatment options for the future. While this type of prosthesis is not yet clinically available understanding how patients, surgeons, and nurses take up new medical innovations is of critical importance for efficient healthcare provision. Materials and Methods Using the largest ever combined sample of breast cancer patients (n = 689), specialist surgeons (n = 53), and breast care nurses (n = 101), we explore participants preference for a new surgical treatment concept rooted in 3D printed and biodegradable implant technologies in the context of breast reconstruction. Results We find that patients overwhelmingly favor information from a successful patient of the proposed new technology when considering transitioning. Surgeons and nurses instead favor regulatory body advice, peer-reviewed journals, and witnessing the procedure performed (either in person or online). But while 1 in 4 nurses nominated talking to a successful patient as an information source, not a single surgeon chose the same. Our multinomial logit analysis exploring patient preference (controlling for individual differences) showed statistically significant results for both the type of surgical treatment and choice to undergo reconstruction. Women who underwent a type of mastectomy procedure (compared with lumpectomy patients) were more likely to choose a former patient than a surgeon for seeking information relating to a new breast implant technology. Further, women who chose to undergo a reconstruction procedure, compared with those who did not, where more likely to prefer a surgeon for information relating to a new breast implant technology, rather than a successful patient. For medical professionals, we find no statistically significant relationship between medical professionals' preference and their age, nor the number of other medical professionals they work with daily, nor the average number of breast procedures performed in their practice on a weekly basis. Conclusions As our findings show large variation exists (both within our patient group and compared with medical professionals) in where individuals favor information on new medical innovations, future behavioral research is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Whyte
- From the School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Centre for Behavioural Economics, Society & Technology (BEST), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Centre in Regenerative Medicine, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia
- ARC Training Centre for Cell and Tissue Engineering Technologies, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Laura Bray
- Centre for Behavioural Economics, Society & Technology (BEST), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- School of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- ARC Training Centre for Cell and Tissue Engineering Technologies, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia
| | - Ho Fai Chan
- From the School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Centre for Behavioural Economics, Society & Technology (BEST), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Raymond J. Chan
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Jeremy Hunt
- Surgical and Orthopedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tim S. Peltz
- Surgical and Orthopedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Uwe Dulleck
- From the School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Centre for Behavioural Economics, Society & Technology (BEST), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Centre in Regenerative Medicine, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia
- ARC Training Centre for Cell and Tissue Engineering Technologies, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Centre for Behavioural Economics, Science & Technology (BEST), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- CESifo Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Center for Economic Studies, Munich, Germany
- Research School of Economics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Dietmar W. Hutmacher
- Centre for Behavioural Economics, Society & Technology (BEST). Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia
- ARC Training Centre in Additive Biomanufacturing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- ARC Training Centre for Multiscale 3D Imaging, Modelling and Manufacturing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tracy DK, Hanson K, Underwood BR, Shergill SS. Why care about integrated care? Part 3. Weighing sunlight: delivering integration in practice and measuring success. BJPSYCH ADVANCES 2022. [DOI: 10.1192/bja.2022.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
SUMMARY
The first two articles in this series have shown the direction of travel for health and social care in England, and how the status quo in already stressed systems is not viable. It is difficult to disagree with the principles of ‘integrated care’, yet we currently lack evidenced models on which we might build. There is a need for experiential learning and sharing of experiences. This third article describes in more granularity the experiences, positive and negative, of an early-adopting integrating service in south-east London that incorporated aspects of the local authority and secondary care physical and mental health services. It provides structured guidance on which types of integration one might aim for, managing internal and external relationships, and discussion on evaluating progress.
Collapse
|
11
|
Yeung K. The Health Care Sector's Experience of Blockchain: A Cross-disciplinary Investigation of Its Real Transformative Potential. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e24109. [PMID: 34932009 PMCID: PMC8726042 DOI: 10.2196/24109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Academic literature highlights blockchain's potential to transform health care, particularly by seamlessly and securely integrating existing data silos while enabling patients to exercise automated, fine-grained control over access to their electronic health records. However, no serious scholarly attempt has been made to assess how these technologies have in fact been applied to real-world health care contexts. OBJECTIVE The primary aim of this paper is to assess whether blockchain's theoretical potential to deliver transformative benefits to health care is likely to become a reality by undertaking a critical investigation of the health care sector's actual experience of blockchain technologies to date. METHODS This mixed methods study entailed a series of iterative, in-depth, theoretically oriented, desk-based investigations and 2 focus group investigations. It builds on the findings of a companion research study documenting real-world engagement with blockchain technologies in health care. Data were sourced from academic and gray literature from multiple disciplinary perspectives concerned with the configuration, design, and functionality of blockchain technologies. The analysis proceeded in 3 stages. First, it undertook a qualitative investigation of observed patterns of blockchain for health care engagement to identify the application domains, data-sharing problems, and the challenges encountered to date. Second, it critically compared these experiences with claims about blockchain's potential benefits in health care. Third, it developed a theoretical account of challenges that arise in implementing blockchain in health care contexts, thus providing a firmer foundation for appraising its future prospects in health care. RESULTS Health care organizations have actively experimented with blockchain technologies since 2016 and have demonstrated proof of concept for several applications (use cases) primarily concerned with administrative data and to facilitate medical research by enabling algorithmic models to be trained on multiple disparately located sets of patient data in a secure, privacy-preserving manner. However, blockchain technology is yet to be implemented at scale in health care, remaining largely in its infancy. These early experiences have demonstrated blockchain's potential to generate meaningful value to health care by facilitating data sharing between organizations in circumstances where computational trust can overcome a lack of social trust that might otherwise prevent valuable cooperation. Although there are genuine prospects of using blockchain to bring about positive transformations in health care, the successful development of blockchain for health care applications faces a number of very significant, multidimensional, and highly complex challenges. Early experience suggests that blockchain is unlikely to rapidly and radically revolutionize health care. CONCLUSIONS The successful development of blockchain for health care applications faces numerous significant, multidimensional, and complex challenges that will not be easily overcome, suggesting that blockchain technologies are unlikely to revolutionize health care in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Yeung
- Birmingham Law School and School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
St John A, O'Kane M, Christenson R, Jülicher P, Oellerich M, Price CP. Implementation of medical tests in a Value-Based healthcare environment: A framework for delivering value. Clin Chim Acta 2021; 521:90-96. [PMID: 34242637 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Significant variation in the utilisation of medical tests is known to have an adverse impact on health outcomes and analysis of this variation is an important tool for quality assurance in healthcare. The introduction of a new medical test into a care pathway requires two distinct processes, termed adoption and implementation. One cause of the unwarranted variation in the use of medical tests is poor adoption and implementation. Adoption is the decision to acquire a technology and make it available to the users and is supported with evidence of clinical and cost effectiveness. Implementation is delivering the benefits promised in the business case, based on evidence of the impact of a test on each stakeholder involved in delivering the care pathway. The business case will have identified the benefits delivered to all stakeholders, as set out in a value proposition, and according to the quality domains typically addressed in quality improvement, namely clinical, process and structure (resource utilisation) outcomes. The outcome measures extend beyond those of clinical and cost effectiveness required for adoption. We describe an implementation framework which is designed to document the changes to the care pathway, the resource inputs and the expected outcomes with associated quality metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maurice O'Kane
- Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Altnagelvin Hospital, Londonderry, N. Ireland, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Christenson
- Laboratories of Pathology, University of Maryland Medical Centre, 22 South Green Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Paul Jülicher
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Medical Affairs, Abbott Laboratories, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Michael Oellerich
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medicine Göttingen (UMG), Kreuzbergring 36, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Christopher P Price
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Maniatopoulos G, Hunter DJ, Erskine J, Hudson B. Large-scale health system transformation in the United Kingdom. J Health Organ Manag 2021; ahead-of-print. [PMID: 32181995 PMCID: PMC7406990 DOI: 10.1108/jhom-05-2019-0144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Following publication of a new vision for the English National Health Service (NHS) in 2014, known as the NHS Five-Year Forward View, a Vanguard programme was introduced by NHS England charged with the task of designing and delivering a range of new care models (NCMs) aimed at tackling deep-seated problems of a type facing all health systems to a greater or lesser degree. Drawing upon recent theoretical developments on the multilevel nature of context, we explore factors shaping the implementation of five NCM initiatives in the North East of England. Design/methodology/approach Data collection was based on semi-structured interviews (66 in total) between December 2016 and May 2017 with key informants at each site and a detailed review of Trusts' internal documents and policies related to the implementation of each NCM. Our analysis explores factors shaping the implementation of five NCM pilot sites as they touched on the multiple levels of context ranging from the macro policy level to the micro-level setting of workforce redesign. Findings It is far too early to conclude with any confidence that a successful outcome for the NCM programme will be forthcoming although the NHS Long-Term Plan seeks to build on the earlier vision set out in the Five-Year Forward View. Early indications show some signs of promise, especially where there is evidence of the ground having been prepared and changes already being put in place prior to the official launch of NCM initiatives. At the same time our findings demonstrate that all five pilot sites experienced, and were subject to, unrealistic pressure placed upon them to deliver outcomes. Originality/value Our findings demonstrate the need for a deeper understanding of the multilevel nature of context by exploring factors shaping the implementation of five NCMs in the North East of England. Exploring the wider national policy context is desirable as well as understanding the perceptions of front-line staff and service users in order to establish the degree of alignment or, conversely, to identify where policy and practice are at risk of pushing and pulling against each other.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David J Hunter
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Bob Hudson
- Centre for Health Services Studies, Univeristy of Kent, Kent, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Aminoff H, Meijer S, Arnelo U, Frennert S. Telemedicine for Remote Surgical Guidance in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Mixed Methods Study of Practitioner Attitudes. JMIR Form Res 2021; 5:e20692. [PMID: 33427670 PMCID: PMC7834938 DOI: 10.2196/20692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telemedicine innovations are rarely adopted into routine health care, the reasons for which are not well understood. Teleguidance, a promising service for remote surgical guidance during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was due to be scaled up, but there were concerns that user attitudes might influence adoption. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to gain a deeper understanding of ERCP practitioners' attitudes toward teleguidance. These findings could inform the implementation process and future evaluations. METHODS We conducted semistructured interviews with ERCP staff about challenges during work and beliefs about teleguidance. Theoretical constructs from the technology acceptance model (TAM) guided the thematic analysis. Our findings became input to a 16-item questionnaire, investigating surgeons' beliefs about teleguidance's contribution to performance and factors that might interact with implementation. RESULTS Results from 20 interviews with ERCP staff from 5 hospitals were used to adapt a TAM questionnaire, exchanging the standard "Ease of Use" items for "Compatibility and Implementation Climate." In total, 23 ERCP specialists from 15 ERCP clinics responded to the questionnaire: 9 novices (<500 ERCP procedures) and 14 experts (>500 ERCP procedures). The average agreement ratings for usefulness items were 64% (~9/14) among experts and 75% (~7/9) among novices. The average agreement ratings for compatibility items were somewhat lower (experts 64% [~9/14], novices 69% [~6/9]). The averages have been calculated from the sum of several items and therefore, they only approximate the actual values. While 11 of the 14 experts (79%) and 8 of the 9 novices (89%) agreed that teleguidance could improve overall quality and patient safety during ERCP procedures, only 8 of the 14 experts (57%) and 6 of the 9 novices (67%) agreed that teleguidance would not create new patient safety risks. Only 5 of the 14 experts (36%) and 3 of the 9 novices (33%) were convinced that video and image transmission would function well. Similarly, only 6 of the 14 experts (43%) and 6 of the 9 novices (67%) agreed that administration would work smoothly. There were no statistically significant differences between the experts and novices on any of the 16 items (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS Both novices and experts in ERCP procedures had concerns that teleguidance might disrupt existing work practices. However, novices were generally more positive toward teleguidance than experts, especially with regard to the possibility of developing technical skills and work practices. While newly trained specialists were the main target for teleguidance, the experts were also intended users. As experts are more likely to be key decision makers, their attitudes may have a greater relative impact on adoption. We present suggestions to address these concerns. We conclude that using the TAM as a conceptual framework can support user-centered inquiry into telemedicine design and implementation by connecting qualitative findings to well-known analytical themes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hedvig Aminoff
- Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sebastiaan Meijer
- Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Urban Arnelo
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- Division of Surgery, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Susanne Frennert
- Department of Computer Science and Media Technology, Internet of Things and People Research Center, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Azodo I, Williams R, Sheikh A, Cresswell K. Opportunities and Challenges Surrounding the Use of Data From Wearable Sensor Devices in Health Care: Qualitative Interview Study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e19542. [PMID: 33090107 PMCID: PMC7644375 DOI: 10.2196/19542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 08/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Wearable sensors connected via networked devices have the potential to generate data that may help to automate processes of care, engage patients, and increase health care efficiency. The evidence of effectiveness of such technologies is, however, nascent and little is known about unintended consequences. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to explore the opportunities and challenges surrounding the use of data from wearable sensor devices in health care. METHODS We conducted a qualitative, theoretically informed, interview-based study to purposefully sample international experts in health care, technology, business, innovation, and social sciences, drawing on sociotechnical systems theory. We used in-depth interviews to capture perspectives on development, design, and use of data from wearable sensor devices in health care, and employed thematic analysis of interview transcripts with NVivo to facilitate coding. RESULTS We interviewed 16 experts. Although the use of data from wearable sensor devices in health and care has significant potential in improving patient engagement, there are a number of issues that stakeholders need to negotiate to realize these benefits. These issues include the current gap between data created and meaningful interpretation in health and care contexts, integration of data into health care professional decision making, negotiation of blurring lines between consumer and medical care, and pervasive monitoring of health across previously disconnected contexts. CONCLUSIONS Stakeholders need to actively negotiate existing challenges to realize the integration of data from wearable sensor devices into electronic health records. Viewing wearables as active parts of a connected digital health and care infrastructure, in which various business, personal, professional, and health system interests align, may help to achieve this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ijeoma Azodo
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Robin Williams
- Institute for the Study of Science, Technology and Innovation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Price CP, McGinley P, St John A. Where Is the Value of Laboratory Medicine and How Do You Unlock It? J Appl Lab Med 2020; 5:1050-1060. [PMID: 32916715 DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The innovation pathway by which a newly discovered biomarker is developed into a medical test and used in routine clinical practice comprises a number of different processes split between 2 phases. The first follows on from biomarker discovery and involves the development of a robust analytical method, the accumulation of evidence to show its clinical and cost-effectiveness, and then adoption into clinical pathways. The second phase is one of implementation and sustainability, with active performance management to ensure that the test continues to deliver the benefits promised at the time of its adoption. CONTENT To date there has been much more emphasis on the first phase of discovery and accumulation of evidence to demonstrate effectiveness. Insufficient attention has been paid to the second phase of translating that evidence into routine practice, with little real-world evidence to demonstrate the benefits to all of the stakeholders involved in delivering and receiving care. Changes in healthcare that include a move away from activity-based costing to a more value-based approach require more attention be paid to what happens after a test is adopted, including an understanding of the clinical pathway, the stakeholders within that pathway, and the benefits and "disbenefits" that accrue to these stakeholders. SUMMARY The value proposition provides a guide for successful implementation of a test. Although it can address both adoption and implementation, it highlights that the requirements for test implementation are quite different to those of adoption, with an emphasis on real-world evidence and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Price
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Patrick McGinley
- Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone Hospital, Maidstone, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ventuneac A, Li DH, Mongrella MC, Moskowitz DA, Weingardt KR, Brown CH, Parsons JT, Mustanski B. Exploring potential implementation barriers and facilitators of the SMART Program, a stepped-care package of eHealth HIV prevention interventions for adolescent men who have sex with men. SEXUALITY RESEARCH & SOCIAL POLICY : JOURNAL OF NSRC : SR & SP 2020; 17:378-388. [PMID: 32884583 PMCID: PMC7462358 DOI: 10.1007/s13178-019-00402-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Little is known about how to best implement eHealth HIV interventions for adolescent men who have sex with men (AMSM) in real-world settings. In response, our current study describes formative implementation research with community-based organizations (CBOs) in preparation for future implementation of the SMART Program, a stepped-care package of three interventions adapted for AMSM. In-depth interviews focusing on eHealth implementation were conducted with a convenience sample of 12 stakeholders from nine CBOs that actively implemented sexual-minority-focused HIV/AIDS prevention programs. Qualitative analysis was conducted using Dedoose to identify salient themes. Most programs implemented at the CBOs engaged adult MSM for HIV prevention, but CBOs reported less experience with outreach of AMSM for HIV prevention. While comfortable with and skilled at implementing traditional in-person HIV prevention programs, interviewees reported that eHealth programs fell outside of their organizations' technical capacities. They suggested specific strategies to facilitate successful implementation of SMART and other eHealth programs, including technical-capacity-building at CBOs, better training of staff, and partnering with a national coordinating center that provides support for the technology. Overall, the CBOs reported enthusiasm for the SMART Program and thought it an efficient way to bridge their current gaps in online programming and lack of AMSM HIV prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Ventuneac
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Division of Infectious Diseases, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis H. Li
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Melissa C. Mongrella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David A. Moskowitz
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - C. Hendricks Brown
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Center for Prevention Implementation Methodology for Drug Abuse and HIV, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jeffrey T. Parsons
- Department of Psychology, Hunter College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY, USA
| | - Brian Mustanski
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Center for Prevention Implementation Methodology for Drug Abuse and HIV, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cranfield S. Creativity and working knowledge: what healthcare managers can learn from architects. JOURNAL OF WORK-APPLIED MANAGEMENT 2020. [DOI: 10.1108/jwam-01-2020-0004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to describe a qualitative observational study of how middle managers in healthcare in the UK on a work-based masters programme in leadership were introduced to foundational aspects of creativity and delivering innovation through an assignment on contemporary architectural design.Design/methodology/approachThe assignment involved individual research of a recent architectural design followed by group poster presentations of findings and structured analysis. No prior knowledge of design was required. An activity theory approach was used to explore common principles of creativity and leading innovation, key features of design processes and tools for facilitating implementation.FindingsA total of 89 managers in seven cohorts completed the assignment. Data from process records and group work, artefacts and follow-up evaluation questionnaires were analysed within an interpretive approach. Analysis of data lent support for the view that exploring architectural design as an activity system helped participants to develop conceptual and applied links between management performance, creative collaboration and delivering innovation in their own, different field of practice. Where participants expressed limited self-efficacy regarding the capacity for fostering creativity, this was usually ascribed to systemic inhibitors.Practical implicationsExploring architectural design could provide a relatively low-cost, highly stimulating component of management development programmes seeking to harness the contribution of creative industries to foster work-based creativity and innovation.Originality/valueThis study explores a novel use of architectural design within the context of work-applied development programmes for healthcare managers.
Collapse
|
19
|
Ward C, Baker K, Smith H, Maurel A, Getachew D, Habte T, McWhorter C, LaBarre P, Karlstrom J, Black J, Bassat Q, Ameha A, Tariku A, Petzold M, Källander K. Usability and acceptability of an automated respiratory rate counter to assess children for symptoms of pneumonia: A cross-sectional study in Ethiopia. Acta Paediatr 2020; 109:1196-1206. [PMID: 31638714 PMCID: PMC7317341 DOI: 10.1111/apa.15074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Revised: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIM Manually counting respiratory rate (RR) is commonly practiced by community health workers to detect fast breathing, an important sign of childhood pneumonia. Correctly counting and classifying breaths manually is challenging, often leading to inappropriate treatment. This study aimed to determine the usability of a new automated RR counter (ChARM) by health extension workers (HEWs), and its acceptability to HEWs, first-level health facility workers (FLHFWs) and caregivers in Ethiopia. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted in one region of Ethiopia between May and August 2018. A total of 131 HEWs were directly observed conducting 262 sick child consultations after training and 337 after 2 months. Usability was measured as adherence to the WHO requirements to assess fast breathing and device manufacturer instructions for use (IFU). Acceptability was measured through semi-structured interviews. RESULTS After 2 months, HEWs were shown to adhere to the requirements in 74.6% consultations; an increase of 18.6% after training (P < .001). ChARM is acceptable to users and caregivers, with HEWs suggesting that ChARM increased client flow and stating a willingness to use ChARM in future. CONCLUSION Further research on the performance, cost-effectiveness and implementation of this device is warranted to inform policy decisions in countries with a high childhood pneumonia burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kevin Baker
- Malaria ConsortiumLondonUK
- Department of Public Health SciencesKarolinska InstitutetSolnaSweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jim Black
- FREO2 Foundation LtdMelbourneAustralia
| | - Quique Bassat
- ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic‐Universitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
- Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM)MaputoMozambique
- ICREABarcelonaSpain
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases UnitPediatrics DepartmentHospital Sant Joan de Déu (University of Barcelona)BarcelonaSpain
| | | | | | - Max Petzold
- School of Public Health and Community MedicineInstitute of MedicineUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Karin Källander
- Malaria ConsortiumLondonUK
- Department of Public Health SciencesKarolinska InstitutetSolnaSweden
- Programme DivisionUNICEFNew YorkNYUSA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
The pressure on healthcare budgets including laboratory medicine is relentless and the focus on activities and costs remains the dominant funding model of laboratory medicine everywhere. The limitations of this model are well documented and for a decade or more laboratory professions worldwide have started looking at alternative models where the value of laboratory medicine and its impact on patient outcomes are the predominant driving force. There are multiple ways to determine the value of a medical test, particularly if one takes into consideration its impact upon the complete clinical pathway. Thus various approaches to value determination are being explored by a number of international organisations. These organisations will be reviewed below, including one which uses the concept of a value proposition that describes in detail how a test should be implemented by measuring its clinical, operational and economic impact. All approaches for determination of value require professional leadership. There is a need for research of varying types including that related to translating global evidence into local practice, a key challenge facing laboratory medicine and healthcare generally. Another challenge is to think and act beyond the silo of the laboratory to achieve greater collaboration with those colleagues more directly involved in patient care.
Collapse
|
21
|
Dissemination of health technologies: Trends in the use of diagnostic test in breast cancer screening. J Healthc Qual Res 2019; 34:177-184. [PMID: 31713528 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2019.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Revised: 12/11/2018] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyse trends in the use of diagnostic test in breast cancer screening programs in Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective study of 542,695 women who had undergone at least one screening mammogram in any of the screening centres of three administrative regions in Spain, between 1996 and 2011. Process measures were: overall recall rate, overall invasive test rate, and rates of each type of invasive test (fine-needle aspiration biopsy, core-needle biopsy and surgical biopsy). As results measures were included detection of benign lesions rate, ductal in situ cancer rate and invasive cancer rate. Adjusted by age rates were estimated year by year for each measure and, also, the annual percent of change and its corresponding joint points. RESULTS Core-needle biopsy rates decreased between 1996 and 1999 and changed trends in 1999-2011 with an increase of 4.9% per year. Overall recall rate declined by 4.6% from 1999 to 2004, invasive test rate declined between 1996 and 2004 by 24.3%. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy rate changes were: a 22.4% declined per year (1996-1998), and 13.5% declined per year (1998-2005). Benign lesions rate decreased from 1996 to 2011, 21.4% per year (1996-2001) and 6.0% (2001-2011). Ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive cancer had no-statistically significant changes. CONCLUSION The introduction of core-needle biopsy was slow and not concurrent with the reduction in the use of other diagnostic tests, but also represented a reduction in the rate of overall diagnostic tests and in the detection rate of benigns lesions without affecting the cancer detection rates.
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Purpose Using a complexity-informed approach, we aim to understand why introduction of a mobile service delivery model for osteoporosis across diverse organisational and country contexts in the UK National Health Service (NHS) met with variable success. Design/methodology/approach Six comparative case studies; three prospectively in Scotland using an action research-informed approach; and three retrospectively in England with variable degrees of success. The Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability framework explored interactions between multi-level contextual factors and their influence on efforts to introduce and sustain services. Findings Cross-boundary service development was a continuous process of adaptation and evolution in rapidly shifting healthcare context. Whilst the outer healthcare policy context differed significantly across cases, inner contextual features predominated in shaping the success or otherwise of service innovations. Technical and logistical issues, organisational resources, patient and staff actions combined in unpredictable ways to shape the lifecycle of service change. Patient and staff thoughts about place and access to services actively shaped service development. The use of tacit “soft intelligence” and a sense of “chronic unease” emerged as important in successfully navigating around awkward people and places. Practical implications “Chronic unease” and “soft intelligence” can be used to help individuals and organisations “tame” complexity, identify hidden threats and opportunities to achieving change in a particular context, and anticipate how these may change over time. Understanding how patients think and feel about where, when and how care is delivered provides unique insights into previously unseen aspects of context, and can usefully inform development and sustainability of patient-centred healthcare services. Originality/value This study has uniquely traced the fortunes of a single service innovation across diverse organisational and country contexts. Novel application of the NASSS framework enabled comparative analysis across real-time service change and historical failures. This study also adds to theories of context and complexity by surfacing the neglected role of patients in shaping healthcare context.
Collapse
|
23
|
Anderson J, O Moore K, Faraj M, Proudfoot J. Stepped care mental health service in Australian primary care: codesign and feasibility study. AUST HEALTH REV 2019; 44:873-879. [PMID: 31662177 DOI: 10.1071/ah19078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective In 2015, the Australian Government introduced several mental health reforms, including the requirement that Primary Health Networks (PHNs) provide stepped care services for Australians with mental health needs such as anxiety and depression. This paper reports on the development and feasibility study of StepCare, an online stepped mental healthcare service in general practice that screens patients, provides immediate feedback to patients and general practitioners (GPs), transmits stepped treatment recommendations to GPs and monitors patients' progress, including notification of deterioration. Methods The present codesign and feasibility study in one PHN examined: (1) the acceptability and feasibility of StepCare to GPs, practice staff and patients; (2) the impact of StepCare on clinical practice; and (3) the barriers to and facilitators of implementation. Results Thirty-two GPs, 22 practice staff and 418 patients participated in the study. Overall, patients, practice staff and GPs found StepCare acceptable and feasible, commending its privacy, the mental health screening, monitoring and feedback. They also made suggestions for service improvements. GPs reported that StepCare helped with their identification and management of patients with common mental health issues. Conclusions Preliminary data suggest that StepCare may be acceptable and feasible in Australian general practice, helping GPs identify and manage common mental health problems in their patients. The study provides implications for policy and practice, and points the way to future translational research into stepped mental health care. What is known about the topic? Depression and anxiety are common illnesses in primary care and GPs are ideally placed to implement stepped care approaches enabling early detection and accessible, effective care. What does this paper add? Developed in and for general practice, StepCare is the first fully integrated stepped approach to primary mental health care in Australia. As a first step in a translational research program evaluating the effectiveness of StepCare, this paper reports data regarding the feasibility and acceptability of the service. What are the implications for practitioners? Integrated into the workflow of general practice, StepCare is an online service that helps GPs detect new cases of depression and anxiety, provide evidence-based stepped care treatments and monitor patients' progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephine Anderson
- Black Dog Institute, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia. , ; and Corresponding author.
| | - Kathleen O Moore
- Black Dog Institute, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia. ,
| | - Mariam Faraj
- Central and Eastern Sydney Primary Health Network, Coward Street, Mascot, NSW, Australia.
| | - Judith Proudfoot
- Black Dog Institute, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia. ,
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tarricone R, Cucciniello M, Armeni P, Petracca F, Desouza KC, Hall LK, Keefe D. Mobile Health Divide Between Clinicians and Patients in Cancer Care: Results From a Cross-Sectional International Survey. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019; 7:e13584. [PMID: 31493318 PMCID: PMC6754682 DOI: 10.2196/13584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2019] [Revised: 04/28/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Mobile technologies are increasingly being used to manage chronic diseases, including cancer, with the promise of improving the efficiency and effectiveness of care. Among the myriad of mobile technologies in health care, we have seen an explosion of mobile apps. The rapid increase in digital health apps is not paralleled by a similar trend in usage statistics by clinicians and patients. Little is known about how much and in what ways mobile health (mHealth) apps are used by clinicians and patients for cancer care, what variables affect their use of mHealth, and what patients’ and clinicians’ expectations of mHealth apps are. Objective This study aimed to describe the patient and clinician population that uses mHealth in cancer care and to provide recommendations to app developers and regulators to generally increase the use and efficacy of mHealth apps. Methods Through a cross-sectional Web-based survey, we explored the current utilization rates of mHealth in cancer care and factors that explain the differences in utilization by patients and clinicians across the United States and 5 different countries in Europe. In addition, we conducted an international workshop with more than 100 stakeholders and a roundtable with key representatives of international organizations of clinicians and patients to solicit feedback on the survey results and develop insights into mHealth app development practices. Results A total of 1033 patients and 1116 clinicians participated in the survey. The proportion of cancer patients using mHealth (294/1033, 28.46%) was far lower than that of clinicians (859/1116, 76.97%). Accounting for age and salary level, the marginal probabilities of use at means are still significantly different between the 2 groups and were 69.8% for clinicians and 38.7% for patients using the propensity score–based regression adjustment with weighting technique. Moreover, our analysis identified a gap between basic and advanced users, with a prevalent use for activities related to the automation of processes and the interaction with other individuals and a limited adoption for side-effect management and compliance monitoring in both groups. Conclusions mHealth apps can provide access to clinical and economic data that are low cost, easy to access, and personalized. The benefits can go as far as increasing patients’ chances of overall survival. However, despite its potential, evidence on the actual use of mobile technologies in cancer care is not promising. If the promise of mHealth is to be fulfilled, clinician and patient usage rates will need to converge. Ideally, cancer apps should be designed in ways that strengthen the patient-physician relationship, ease physicians’ workload, be tested for validity and effectiveness, and fit the criteria for reimbursement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosanna Tarricone
- Department of Social and Political Science, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.,Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management, SDA Bocconi School of Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Cucciniello
- Department of Social and Political Science, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.,Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management, SDA Bocconi School of Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizio Armeni
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management, SDA Bocconi School of Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Petracca
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management, SDA Bocconi School of Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| | - Kevin C Desouza
- School of Management, QUT Business School, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Leslie Kelly Hall
- Healthwise, Boise, ID, United States.,Engaging Patient Strategy, Boise, ID, United States
| | - Dorothy Keefe
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Van Velthoven MH, Cordon C. Sustainable Adoption of Digital Health Innovations: Perspectives From a Stakeholder Workshop. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e11922. [PMID: 30907734 PMCID: PMC6452285 DOI: 10.2196/11922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2018] [Revised: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are various complex reasons that influence sustainable adoption of innovations in health care systems. Low adoption can be caused by a lack of support from one or more stakeholders because their needs and expectations are not always considered or aligned. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to identify stakeholders' perceptions of barriers and facilitators toward the sustainable adoption of digital health innovations. METHODS A stakeholder workshop was attended by 12 participants with a range of backgrounds on August 25, 2017, including people representing the views from patients, carers, local hospitals, pharmacy retailers, health insurers, health services researchers, engineers, and technology and pharmaceutical companies in Switzerland. On the basis of adoption of innovation frameworks, we asked participants to interview each other about 3 factors influencing the adoption of digitally delivered health interventions: (1) Facilitators and barriers in the external system, (2) Needs and expectations of stakeholders, and (3) Safety, quality, and usability of innovations. The worksheets and videos generated from the workshop were qualitatively analyzed and summarized. RESULTS Facilitators for adoption mentioned were high levels of income and education, and digital health is a high priority to stakeholders. Main common interests of different stakeholders were patient satisfaction and job protection. Health care spending was a misaligned interest: although some stakeholders were keen on spending more to obtain or provide the highest quality of care, others were focused on reducing health care spending to provide cost-effective services. Switzerland's diversity and complexity, in terms of its organization with 26 cantons (administrative divisions), were barriers as these made it harder to ensure interoperability of interventions. A culture of innovation was considered a push factor, but adoption was inhibited by persistent paper-based systems, a fear of change, and unwillingness to share data. The sustainability of interventions can be promoted by making them patient-centered, meaning that patients should be involved throughout their development. CONCLUSIONS Promoting sustainable adoption of digital health remains challenging despite various push factors being in place. Barriers related to fragmentation, patient-centeredness, data security, privacy, trust, and job security need to be addressed. A strength is that people from a wide range of backgrounds attended the workshop. A limitation is that the findings are focused on the macro level. In-depth case studies of specific issues need to be conducted in different settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carlos Cordon
- International Institute for Management Development Business School, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Turner S, Vasilakis C, Utley M, Foster P, Kotecha A, Fulop NJ. Analysing barriers to service improvement using a multi-level theory of innovation: the case of glaucoma outpatient clinics. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2018; 40:654-669. [PMID: 29441595 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
The development and implementation of innovation by healthcare providers is understood as a multi-determinant and multi-level process. Theories at different analytical levels (i.e. micro and organisational) are needed to capture the processes that influence innovation by providers. This article combines a micro theory of innovation, actor-network theory, with organisational level processes using the 'resource based view of the firm'. It examines the influence of, and interplay between, innovation-seeking teams (micro) and underlying organisational capabilities (meso) during innovation processes. We used ethnographic methods to study service innovations in relation to ophthalmology services run by a specialist English NHS Trust at multiple locations. Operational research techniques were used to support the ethnographic methods by mapping the care process in the existing and redesigned clinics. Deficiencies in organisational capabilities for supporting innovation were identified, including manager-clinician relations and organisation-wide resources. The article concludes that actor-network theory can be combined with the resource-based view to highlight the influence of organisational capabilities on the management of innovation. Equally, actor-network theory helps to address the lack of theory in the resource-based view on the micro practices of implementing change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Turner
- Centre for Primary Care, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Christos Vasilakis
- Centre for Healthcare Innovation & Improvement, School of Management, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Martin Utley
- Clinical Operational Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Foster
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| | - Aachal Kotecha
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| | - Naomi J Fulop
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lewis TL, Furness HN, Miller GW, Parsons N, Seers K, Underwood M, Metcalfe AJ. Adoption of a novel surgical innovation into clinical practice: protocol for a qualitative systematic review examining surgeon views. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e020486. [PMID: 29666134 PMCID: PMC5905758 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Revised: 12/20/2017] [Accepted: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Efficient adoption of clinically effective novel surgical innovations has great potential benefits for patients. Factors affecting the adoption of surgical innovation are not well understood and proposed models of adoption do not accurately correlate with historical evidence. This protocol is for a systematic review that aims to identify the qualitative evidence relating to surgeon views regarding the adoption of novel surgical innovation into clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance will be performed. Two independent reviewers will search the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews. Inclusion criteria are studies which report on the views of surgeons who adopt a novel surgical innovation into clinical practice. Each article will be screened for inclusion and assessed according to a Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Data will be synthesised and analysed according to thematic analysis. Given the anticipated yield of a small heterogeneous body of evidence meeting the eligibility criteria for the review, a narrative-based summary is planned. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This review does not require formal ethical approval as it does not involve direct patient contact or patient-identifiable data. The results of this review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences. The results will also inform an empirical qualitative study exploring surgeon and other stakeholder views regarding the introduction of novel surgical technology and procedures into clinical practice. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42017076715.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas L Lewis
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Coventry & Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | | | | - Nicholas Parsons
- Statistics and Epidemiology Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Kate Seers
- Warwick Research in Nursing, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Martin Underwood
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Andrew J Metcalfe
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Coventry & Warwick, Coventry, UK
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Theodoulou I, Reddy AM, Wong J. Is innovative workforce planning software the solution to NHS staffing and cost crisis? An exploration of the locum industry. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:188. [PMID: 29554911 PMCID: PMC5859452 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-2989-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2017] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Workforce planning in the British healthcare system (NHS) is associated with significant costs of agency staff employment. The introduction of a novel software (ABG) as a 'people to people economy' (P2PE) platform for temporary staff recruitment offers a potential solution to this problem. Consequently, the focus of this study was twofold - primarily to explore the locum doctor landscape, and secondarily to evaluate the implementation of P2PE in the healthcare industry. METHODS Documentary analysis was conducted alongside thirteen semi structured interviews across five informant groups: two industry experts, two healthcare consultants, an executive director, two speciality managers and six doctors. RESULTS We found that locum doctors are indispensable to covering workforce shortages, yet existing planning and recruitment practices were found to be inefficient, inconsistent and lacking transparency. Contrarily, mobile-first solutions such as ABG seem to secure higher convenience, better transparency, cost and time efficiency. We also identified factors facilitating the successful diffusion of ABG; these were in line with classically cited characteristics of innovation such as trialability, observability, and scope for local reinvention. Drawing upon the concept of value-based healthcare coupled with the analysis of our findings led to the development of Information Exchange System (IES) model, a comprehensive framework allowing a thorough comparison of recruitment practices in healthcare. CONCLUSION IES was used to evaluate ABG and its diffusion against other recruitment methods and ABG was found to outperform its alternatives, thus suggesting its potential to solve the staffing and cost crisis at the chosen hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iakovos Theodoulou
- King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT UK
| | - Akshaya Mohan Reddy
- University of Leicester, Centre for Medicine, 15 Lancaster Road, Leicester, LE1 7HA UK
| | - Jeremy Wong
- King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Turner S, D'Lima D, Hudson E, Morris S, Sheringham J, Swart N, Fulop NJ. Evidence use in decision-making on introducing innovations: a systematic scoping review with stakeholder feedback. Implement Sci 2017; 12:145. [PMID: 29202772 PMCID: PMC5715650 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0669-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2017] [Accepted: 11/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A range of evidence informs decision-making on innovation in health care, including formal research findings, local data and professional opinion. However, cultural and organisational factors often prevent the translation of evidence for innovations into practice. In addition to the characteristics of evidence, it is known that processes at the individual level influence its impact on decision-making. Less is known about the ways in which processes at the professional, organisational and local system level shape evidence use and its role in decisions to adopt innovations. METHODS A systematic scoping review was used to review the health literature on innovations within acute and primary care and map processes at the professional, organisational and local system levels which influence how evidence informs decision-making on innovation. Stakeholder feedback on the themes identified was collected via focus groups to test and develop the findings. RESULTS Following database and manual searches, 31 studies reporting primary qualitative data met the inclusion criteria: 24 were of sufficient methodological quality to be included in the thematic analysis. Evidence use in decision-making on innovation is influenced by multi-level processes (professional, organisational, local system) and interactions across these levels. Preferences for evidence vary by professional group and health service setting. Organisations can shape professional behaviour by requiring particular forms of evidence to inform decision-making. Pan-regional organisations shape innovation decision-making at lower levels. Political processes at all levels shape the selection and use of evidence in decision-making. CONCLUSIONS The synthesis of results from primary qualitative studies found that evidence use in decision-making on innovation is influenced by processes at multiple levels. Interactions between different levels shape evidence use in decision-making (e.g. professional groups and organisations can use local systems to validate evidence and legitimise innovations, while local systems can tailor or frame evidence to influence activity at lower levels). Organisational leaders need to consider whether the environment in which decisions are made values diverse evidence and stakeholder perspectives. Further qualitative research on decision-making practices that highlights how and why different types of evidence come to count during decisions, and tracks the political aspects of decisions about innovation, is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Turner
- Centre for Primary Care, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Danielle D'Lima
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, UK
| | - Emma Hudson
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, UK
| | - Stephen Morris
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, UK
| | - Jessica Sheringham
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, UK
| | - Nick Swart
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, UK
| | - Naomi J Fulop
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, Lynch J, Hughes G, A'Court C, Hinder S, Fahy N, Procter R, Shaw S. Beyond Adoption: A New Framework for Theorizing and Evaluating Nonadoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to the Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability of Health and Care Technologies. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19:e367. [PMID: 29092808 PMCID: PMC5688245 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 867] [Impact Index Per Article: 123.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2017] [Revised: 09/08/2017] [Accepted: 09/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many promising technological innovations in health and social care are characterized by nonadoption or abandonment by individuals or by failed attempts to scale up locally, spread distantly, or sustain the innovation long term at the organization or system level. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to produce an evidence-based, theory-informed, and pragmatic framework to help predict and evaluate the success of a technology-supported health or social care program. METHODS The study had 2 parallel components: (1) secondary research (hermeneutic systematic review) to identify key domains, and (2) empirical case studies of technology implementation to explore, test, and refine these domains. We studied 6 technology-supported programs-video outpatient consultations, global positioning system tracking for cognitive impairment, pendant alarm services, remote biomarker monitoring for heart failure, care organizing software, and integrated case management via data sharing-using longitudinal ethnography and action research for up to 3 years across more than 20 organizations. Data were collected at micro level (individual technology users), meso level (organizational processes and systems), and macro level (national policy and wider context). Analysis and synthesis was aided by sociotechnically informed theories of individual, organizational, and system change. The draft framework was shared with colleagues who were introducing or evaluating other technology-supported health or care programs and refined in response to feedback. RESULTS The literature review identified 28 previous technology implementation frameworks, of which 14 had taken a dynamic systems approach (including 2 integrative reviews of previous work). Our empirical dataset consisted of over 400 hours of ethnographic observation, 165 semistructured interviews, and 200 documents. The final nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability (NASSS) framework included questions in 7 domains: the condition or illness, the technology, the value proposition, the adopter system (comprising professional staff, patient, and lay caregivers), the organization(s), the wider (institutional and societal) context, and the interaction and mutual adaptation between all these domains over time. Our empirical case studies raised a variety of challenges across all 7 domains, each classified as simple (straightforward, predictable, few components), complicated (multiple interacting components or issues), or complex (dynamic, unpredictable, not easily disaggregated into constituent components). Programs characterized by complicatedness proved difficult but not impossible to implement. Those characterized by complexity in multiple NASSS domains rarely, if ever, became mainstreamed. The framework showed promise when applied (both prospectively and retrospectively) to other programs. CONCLUSIONS Subject to further empirical testing, NASSS could be applied across a range of technological innovations in health and social care. It has several potential uses: (1) to inform the design of a new technology; (2) to identify technological solutions that (perhaps despite policy or industry enthusiasm) have a limited chance of achieving large-scale, sustained adoption; (3) to plan the implementation, scale-up, or rollout of a technology program; and (4) to explain and learn from program failures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trisha Greenhalgh
- Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph Wherton
- Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Chrysanthi Papoutsi
- Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Lynch
- School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Gemma Hughes
- Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Christine A'Court
- Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Susan Hinder
- RAFT Research and Consulting Ltd, Clitheroe, Lancs, United Kingdom
| | - Nick Fahy
- Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Rob Procter
- Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Sara Shaw
- Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Price CP, Wolstenholme J, McGinley P, St John A. Translational health economics: The key to accountable adoption of in vitro diagnostic technologies. Health Serv Manage Res 2017; 31:43-50. [PMID: 29084478 DOI: 10.1177/0951484817736727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Adoption of new technologies, including diagnostic tests, is often considered not to deliver the expected return on investment. The reasons for this poor link between expectation and outcome include lack of evidence, variation in use of the technology, and an inability of the health system to manage the balance between investment and disinvestment associated with the change in care pathway. The challenges lie in the complex nature of healthcare provision where the investment is likely to be made in the jurisdiction of one stakeholder while the benefits (as well as dis-benefits) accrue to the other stakeholders. A prime example is found in the field of laboratory medicine and the use of diagnostic tests. The current economic tools employed in healthcare are primarily used to make policy and strategic decisions, particularly across health systems, and in purchaser and provider domains. These tools primarily involve cost effectiveness and budget impact analyses, both of which have been applied in health technology assessment of diagnostic technologies. However, they lack the granularity to translate findings down to the financial management and operational decision making at the provider department level. We propose an approach to translational health economics based on information derived from service line management and time-driven activity-based costing, identifying the resource utilisation for each of the units involved in the delivery of a care pathway, before and after adoption of new technology. This will inform investment and disinvestment decisions, along with identifying where the benefits, and dis-benefits, can be achieved for all stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Price
- 1 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jane Wolstenholme
- 2 Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Patrick McGinley
- 3 Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone Hospital, Maidstone, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
van der Zande MM, Gorter RC, Bruers JJM, Aartman IHA, Wismeijer D. Dentists' opinions on using digital technologies in dental practice. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2017; 46:143-153. [PMID: 28983942 DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2016] [Revised: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 09/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate which opinions among dentists are associated with level of technology use, when characteristics of the dentist and dental practice, as well as motivating work aspects are taken into account. METHODS A total of 1000 general dental practitioners in the Netherlands received a questionnaire on digital technologies they use, opinions on using technologies and related motivating work aspects. Questions were derived from expert interviews, the Dentists' Experienced Job Resources Scale and literature on technology implementation. Technology use was measured as the number of technologies used, and divided into three technology user groups: low (using 0-4 technologies, mostly administrative and radiographic technologies), intermediate (using 5-7, more varied technologies) and high technology users (using 8-12, including more innovative diagnostic technologies). Opinions on technology use and motivating work aspects were analysed using principal components analysis (PCA) and exploratory factor analysis. Scores on all components and factors were calculated for each respondent by computing the mean of all valid responses on the underlying items. Differences in these scale scores on opinions among the technology user groups were assessed using one-way analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis tests. A multiple linear regression analysis assessed the association of scale scores about opinions on technology use with the sum of technologies used, taking into account motivating work aspects and characteristics of the dentist and dental practice. RESULTS The response rate was 31%. Dentists who were high technology users perceived technologies as yielding more improvements in quality of care, adding more value to the dental practice and being easier to use, than low technology users. High technology users thought technologies added more value to their work and they reported higher skills and resources. They also focused more on technologies and thought these are more ready to use than low technology users. High technology users derived more motivation from "Immediate results" and "Craftsmanship" than low technology users. Personal and practice characteristics, motivating work aspects, and the opinion scales "Focus" and "Added value to dentist" explained 50% of the variance in the number of technologies a dentist uses. CONCLUSION Opinions on digital technologies among dentists and motivating work aspects vary with level of technology use. Being more focused on technologies and perceiving a higher added value from using them are associated with using more digital dental technologies, when taking into account motivating work aspects and characteristics of the dentist and dental practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke M van der Zande
- Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthetic Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Social Dentistry and Behavioural Sciences, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald C Gorter
- Department of Social Dentistry and Behavioural Sciences, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Josef J M Bruers
- Department of Social Dentistry and Behavioural Sciences, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Royal Dutch Dental Association (KNMT), Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Irene H A Aartman
- Department of Social Dentistry and Behavioural Sciences, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Wismeijer
- Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthetic Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Barrett AK, Stephens KK. Making Electronic Health Records (EHRs) Work: Informal Talk and Workarounds in Healthcare Organizations. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2017; 32:1004-1013. [PMID: 27463257 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1196422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
A key provision of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 mandated that electronic health records (EHR) be adopted in US healthcare organizations by 2015. The purpose of this study is to examine the communicative processes involved as healthcare workers implement an EHR and make changes, known as workarounds. Guided by theories in social influence, and diffusion of innovations, we conducted a survey of healthcare professionals using an EHR system in an organization. Our structural equation modeling (SEM) and multiple regression results reveal coworker communication, in the form of informal social support and feedback, play an important role in whether people engage in workarounds. Understanding this relationship is important because our study also demonstrates that workarounds predict healthcare employees' overall satisfaction with the EHR system. Specifically, workarounds are associated with higher perceptions of the EHR's relative advantage, higher perceptions of EHR implementation success, and lower levels of resistance to EHR change. This study offers a health communication contribution to the growing research on EHR systems and demonstrates the persuasive effects that coworkers have on new technology use in healthcare organizations.
Collapse
|
34
|
Shaw J, Shaw S, Wherton J, Hughes G, Greenhalgh T. Studying Scale-Up and Spread as Social Practice: Theoretical Introduction and Empirical Case Study. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19:e244. [PMID: 28687532 PMCID: PMC5522581 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2017] [Revised: 04/24/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Health and care technologies often succeed on a small scale but fail to achieve widespread use (scale-up) or become routine practice in other settings (spread). One reason for this is under-theorization of the process of scale-up and spread, for which a potentially fruitful theoretical approach is to consider the adoption and use of technologies as social practices. Objective This study aimed to use an in-depth case study of assisted living to explore the feasibility and usefulness of a social practice approach to explaining the scale-up of an assisted-living technology across a local system of health and social care. Methods This was an individual case study of the implementation of a Global Positioning System (GPS) “geo-fence” for a person living with dementia, nested in a much wider program of ethnographic research and organizational case study of technology implementation across health and social care (Studies in Co-creating Assisted Living Solutions [SCALS] in the United Kingdom). A layered sociological analysis included micro-level data on the index case, meso-level data on the organization, and macro-level data on the wider social, technological, economic, and political context. Data (interviews, ethnographic notes, and documents) were analyzed and synthesized using structuration theory. Results A social practice lens enabled the uptake of the GPS technology to be studied in the context of what human actors found salient, meaningful, ethical, legal, materially possible, and professionally or culturally appropriate in particular social situations. Data extracts were used to illustrate three exemplar findings. First, professional practice is (and probably always will be) oriented not to “implementing technologies” but to providing excellent, ethical care to sick and vulnerable individuals. Second, in order to “work,” health and care technologies rely heavily on human relationships and situated knowledge. Third, such technologies do not just need to be adopted by individuals; they need to be incorporated into personal habits and collaborative routines (both lay and professional). Conclusions Health and care technologies need to be embedded within sociotechnical networks and made to work through situated knowledge, personal habits, and collaborative routines. A technology that “works” for one individual in a particular set of circumstances is unlikely to work in the same way for another in a different set of circumstances. We recommend the further study of social practices and the application of co-design principles. However, our findings suggest that even if this occurs, the scale-up and spread of many health and care technologies will be neither rapid nor smooth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Shaw
- Women's College Hospital, Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sara Shaw
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph Wherton
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Gemma Hughes
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Trisha Greenhalgh
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Williams I, Harlock J, Robert G, Mannion R, Brearley S, Hall K. Decommissioning health care: identifying best practice through primary and secondary research – a prospective mixed-methods study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2017. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr05220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundDecommissioning – defined as the planned process of removing, reducing or replacing health-care services – is an important component of current reforms in the NHS. However, the evidence base on which to guide policy and practice in this area is weak.AimThis study aims to formulate theoretically grounded, evidence-informed guidance to support best practice in effective decommissioning of NHS services.DesignThe overall approach is a sequential, multimethod research design. The study involves (1) a literature synthesis summarising what is known about decommissioning, an international expert Delphi study, 12 interviews with national/regional bodies and seven narrative vignettes from NHS leaders; (2) a survey of Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) in England (n = 56/211, 27%); (3) longitudinal, prospective case studies of four purposively sampled decommissioning projects comprising 59 semistructured interviews, 18 non-participant observations and documentary analysis; and (4) research with citizens, patient/service user representatives, carers, third-sector organisations and local community groups, including three focus groups (30 participants) and a second Delphi study (26 participants). The study took place over the period 2013–16.SettingThe English NHS.ResultsThere is a lack of robust evidence to guide decommissioning, but among experts there is a high level of consensus for the following good-practice principles: establish a strong leadership team, engage clinical leaders from an early stage and establish a clear rationale for change. The most common type of CCG decommissioning activity was ‘relocation or replacement of a service from an acute to a community setting’ (28% of all activities) and the majority of responding CCGs (77%) were planning to decommission services. Case studies demonstrate the need to (1) draw on evidence, reviews and policies to frame the problem; (2) build alliances in order to legitimise decommissioning as a solution; (3) seek wider acceptance, including among patients and community groups, of decommissioning; and (4) devise implementation plans that recognise the additional challenges of removal and replacement. Citizens, patient/service user representatives, carers, third-sector organisations and local community groups were more likely to believe that decommissioning is driven by financial and political concerns than by considerations of service quality and efficiency, and to distrust and/or resent decision-makers. Overall, the study suggests that failure rates in decommissioning are likely to be higher than in other forms of service change, suggesting the need for tailored design and implementation approaches.LimitationsThere were few opportunities for patient and public engagement in early phases of the research; however, this was mitigated by the addition of work package 4. We were unable to track outcomes of decommissioning activities within the time scales of the project and the survey response rate was lower than anticipated.ConclusionsDecommissioning is shaped by change management and implementation, evidence and information, and relationships and politics. We propose an expanded understanding, encompassing organisational and political factors, of how avoidance of loss affects the delivery of decommissioning programmes. Future work should explore the relationships between contexts, mechanisms and outcomes in decommissioning, develop the understanding of how loss affects decisions and explore the long-term impact of decommissioning and its impact on patient care and outcomes.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iestyn Williams
- Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jenny Harlock
- Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Glenn Robert
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Russell Mannion
- Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sally Brearley
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Kelly Hall
- Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bauer MS, Krawczyk L, Tuozzo K, Frigand C, Holmes S, Miller CJ, Abel E, Osser DN, Franz A, Brandt C, Rooney M, Fleming J, Smith E, Godleski L. Implementing and Sustaining Team-Based Telecare for Bipolar Disorder: Lessons Learned from a Model-Guided, Mixed Methods Analysis. Telemed J E Health 2017; 24:45-53. [PMID: 28665773 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telemental health interventions have empirical support from clinical trials and structured demonstration projects. However, their implementation and sustainability under less structured clinical conditions are not well demonstrated. INTRODUCTION We conducted a follow-up analysis of the implementation and sustainability of a clinical video teleconference-based collaborative care model for individuals with bipolar disorder treated in the Department of Veterans Affairs to (a) characterize the extent of implementation and sustainability of the program after its establishment and (b) identify barriers and facilitators to implementation and sustainability. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a mixed methods program evaluation, assessing quantitative aspects of implementation according to the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance implementation framework. We conducted qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews with 16 of the providers who submitted consults, utilizing the Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in the Health Services implementation framework. RESULTS The program demonstrated linear growth in sites (n = 35) and consults (n = 915) from late 2011 through mid-2016. Site-based analysis indicated statistically significant sustainability beyond the first year of operation. Qualitative analysis identified key facilitators, including consult content, ease of use via electronic health record, and national infrastructure. Barriers included availability of telehealth space, equipment, and staff at the sites, as well as the labor-intensive nature of scheduling. DISCUSSION The program achieved continuous growth over almost 5 years due to (1) successfully filling a need perceived by providers, (2) developing in a supportive context, and (3) receiving effective facilitation by national and local infrastructure. CONCLUSION Clinical video teleconference-based interventions, even multicomponent collaborative care interventions for individuals with complex mental health conditions, can grow vigorously under appropriate conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark S Bauer
- 1 VA Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Boston and Bedford, Massachusetts.,2 Harvard Medical School Department of Psychiatry and VA Boston Healthcare System , Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lois Krawczyk
- 2 Harvard Medical School Department of Psychiatry and VA Boston Healthcare System , Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kathy Tuozzo
- 3 Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine and VA Connecticut Healthcare System , West Haven, Connecticut.,6 VA Central Office, Office of Connected Care, West Haven, Connecticut
| | - Cara Frigand
- 1 VA Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Boston and Bedford, Massachusetts
| | - Sally Holmes
- 1 VA Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Boston and Bedford, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher J Miller
- 1 VA Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Boston and Bedford, Massachusetts.,2 Harvard Medical School Department of Psychiatry and VA Boston Healthcare System , Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Erica Abel
- 3 Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine and VA Connecticut Healthcare System , West Haven, Connecticut
| | - David N Osser
- 2 Harvard Medical School Department of Psychiatry and VA Boston Healthcare System , Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aleda Franz
- 3 Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine and VA Connecticut Healthcare System , West Haven, Connecticut
| | - Cynthia Brandt
- 3 Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine and VA Connecticut Healthcare System , West Haven, Connecticut
| | - Meghan Rooney
- 4 Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center , Richmond, Virginia
| | - Jerry Fleming
- 2 Harvard Medical School Department of Psychiatry and VA Boston Healthcare System , Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eric Smith
- 1 VA Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Boston and Bedford, Massachusetts.,5 Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts School of Medicine , Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Linda Godleski
- 3 Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine and VA Connecticut Healthcare System , West Haven, Connecticut.,6 VA Central Office, Office of Connected Care, West Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hatz MHM, Sonnenschein T, Blankart CR. The PMA Scale: A Measure of Physicians' Motivation to Adopt Medical Devices. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2017; 20:533-541. [PMID: 28407994 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Revised: 11/29/2016] [Accepted: 12/02/2016] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have often stated that individual-level determinants are important drivers for the adoption of medical devices. Empirical evidence supporting this claim is, however, scarce. At the individual level, physicians' adoption motivation was often considered important in the context of adoption decisions, but a clear notion of its dimensions and corresponding measurement scales is not available. OBJECTIVES To develop and subsequently validate a scale to measure the motivation to adopt medical devices of hospital-based physicians. METHODS The development and validation of the physician-motivation-adoption (PMA) scale were based on a literature search, internal expert meetings, a pilot study with physicians, and a three-stage online survey. The data collected in the online survey were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and the PMA scale was revised according to the results. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to test the results from the EFA in the third stage. Reliability and validity tests and subgroup analyses were also conducted. RESULTS Overall, 457 questionnaires were completed by medical personnel of the National Health Service England. The EFA favored a six-factor solution to appropriately describe physicians' motivation. The CFA confirmed the results from the EFA. Our tests indicated good reliability and validity of the PMA scale. CONCLUSIONS This is the first reliable and valid scale to measure physicians' adoption motivation. Future adoption studies assessing the individual level should include the PMA scale to obtain more information about the role of physicians' motivation in the broader adoption context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tim Sonnenschein
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hatz MHM, Schreyögg J, Torbica A, Boriani G, Blankart CRB. Adoption Decisions for Medical Devices in the Field of Cardiology: Results from a European Survey. HEALTH ECONOMICS 2017; 26 Suppl 1:124-144. [PMID: 28139093 DOI: 10.1002/hec.3472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2016] [Revised: 07/29/2016] [Accepted: 11/23/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Decisions to adopt medical devices at the hospital level have consequences for health technology assessment (HTA) on system level and are therefore important to decision makers. Our aim was to investigate the characteristics of organizations and individuals that are more inclined to adopt and utilize cardiovascular devices based on a comprehensive analysis of environmental, organizational, individual, and technological factors and to identify corresponding implications for HTA. Seven random intercept hurdle models were estimated using the data obtained from 1249 surveys completed by members of the European Society of Cardiology. The major findings were that better manufacturer support increased the adoption probability of 'new' devices (i.e. in terms of CE mark approval dates), and that budget pressure increased the adoption probability of 'old' devices. Based on our findings, we suggest investigating the role of manufacturer support in more detail to identify diffusion patterns relevant to HTA on system level, to verify whether it functions as a substitute for medical evidence of new devices, and to receive new insights about its relationship with clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. © 2017 The Authors. Health Economics published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jonas Schreyögg
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University of Hamburg, Germany
| | - Aleksandra Torbica
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Policy Analysis and Public Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Boriani
- Cardiology Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena University Hospital, Modena, Italy
- European Society of Cardiology, Sophia Antipolis, France
| | - Carl R B Blankart
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University of Hamburg, Germany
- Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Callea G, Armeni P, Marsilio M, Jommi C, Tarricone R. The impact of HTA and procurement practices on the selection and prices of medical devices. Soc Sci Med 2017; 174:89-95. [DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2016] [Revised: 10/07/2016] [Accepted: 11/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
40
|
Varabyova Y, Blankart CR, Greer AL, Schreyögg J. The determinants of medical technology adoption in different decisional systems: A systematic literature review. Health Policy 2017; 121:230-242. [PMID: 28162813 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2016] [Revised: 01/11/2017] [Accepted: 01/13/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Studies of determinants of adoption of new medical technology have failed to coalesce into coherent knowledge. A flaw obscuring strong patterns may be a common habit of treating a wide range of health care innovations as a generic technology. We postulate three decisional systems that apply to different medical technologies with distinctive expertise, interest, and authority: medical-individualistic, fiscal-managerial, and strategic-institutional decisional systems. This review aims to examine the determinants of the adoption of medical technologies based on the corresponding decision-making system. We included quantitative and qualitative studies that analyzed factors facilitating or inhibiting the adoption of medical technologies. In total, 65 studies published between 1974 and 2014 met our inclusion criteria. These studies contained 688 occurrences of variables that were used to examine the adoption decisions, and we subsequently condensed these variables to 62 determinants in four main categories: organizational, individual, environmental, and innovation-related. The determinants and their empirical association with adoption were grouped and analyzed by the three decision-making systems. Although we did not identify substantial differences across the decision-making systems in terms of the direction of the determinants' influence on adoption, a clear pattern emerged in terms of the categories of determinants that were targeted in different decision-making systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- Universität Hamburg, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Hamburg, Germany; Brown University, Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | - Jonas Schreyögg
- Universität Hamburg, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Robert G, Philippou J, Leamy M, Reynolds E, Ross S, Bennett L, Taylor C, Shuldham C, Maben J. Exploring the adoption of Schwartz Center Rounds as an organisational innovation to improve staff well-being in England, 2009-2015. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e014326. [PMID: 28057662 PMCID: PMC5223680 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Schwartz Center Rounds ('Rounds') are a multidisciplinary forum in which healthcare staff within an organisation discuss the psychological, emotional and social challenges associated with their work in a confidential and safe environment. Implemented in over 375 North American organisations, since 2009, they have been increasingly adopted in England. This study aimed to establish how many and what types of organisations have adopted Rounds in England, and to explore why they did so. SETTING Public healthcare organisations in England. PARTICIPANTS Secondary data analysis was used to map and profile all 116 public healthcare organisations that had adopted Rounds in England by July 2015. Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with 45 Round coordinators within adopting organisations. RESULTS The rate of adoption increased after a major national report in 2013. Rounds were typically adopted in order to improve staff well-being. Adopting organisations scored better on staff engagement than non-adopters; among adopting organisations, those performing better on patient experience were more likely to adopt earlier. Most adoption decision-making processes were straightforward. A confluence of factors-a generally favourable set of innovation attributes (including low cost), advocacy from opinion leaders in different professional networks, active dissemination by change agents and a felt need to be seen to be addressing staff well-being-initially led to Rounds being seen as 'an idea whose time had come'. More recent adoption patterns have been shaped by the timing of charitable and other agency funding in specific geographical areas and sectors, as well as several forms of 'mimetic pressure'. CONCLUSIONS The innate attributes of Rounds, favourable circumstances and the cumulative impact of a sequence of distinct informal and formal social processes have shaped the pattern of their adoption in England.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glenn Robert
- The Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Julia Philippou
- The Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mary Leamy
- The Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ellie Reynolds
- The Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Cath Taylor
- The Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Jill Maben
- The Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Černe M, Kaše R, Škerlavaj M. Non-technological innovation research: evaluating the intellectual structure and prospects of an emerging field. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2016.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
43
|
Wade VA, Taylor AD, Kidd MR, Carati C. Transitioning a home telehealth project into a sustainable, large-scale service: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16:183. [PMID: 27185041 PMCID: PMC4869378 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1436-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2015] [Accepted: 05/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study was a component of the Flinders Telehealth in the Home project, which tested adding home telehealth to existing rehabilitation, palliative care and geriatric outreach services. Due to the known difficulty of transitioning telehealth projects services, a qualitative study was conducted to produce a preferred implementation approach for sustainable and large-scale operations, and a process model that offers practical advice for achieving this goal. Methods Initially, semi-structured interviews were conducted with senior clinicians, health service managers and policy makers, and a thematic analysis of the interview transcripts was undertaken to identify the range of options for ongoing operations, plus the factors affecting sustainability. Subsequently, the interviewees and other decision makers attended a deliberative forum in which participants were asked to select a preferred model for future implementation. Finally, all data from the study was synthesised by the researchers to produce a process model. Results 19 interviews with senior clinicians, managers, and service development staff were conducted, finding strong support for home telehealth but a wide diversity of views on governance, models of clinical care, technical infrastructure operations, and data management. The deliberative forum worked through these options and recommended a collaborative consortium approach for large-scale implementation. The process model proposes that the key factor for large-scale implementation is leadership support, which is enabled by 1) showing solutions to the problems of service demand, budgetary pressure and the relationship between hospital and primary care, 2) demonstrating how home telehealth aligns with health service policies, and 3) achieving clinician acceptance through providing evidence of benefit and developing new models of clinical care. Two key actions to enable change were marketing telehealth to patients, clinicians and policy-makers, and building a community of practice. Conclusions The implementation of home telehealth services is still in an early stage. Change agents and a community of practice can contribute by marketing telehealth, demonstrating policy alignment and providing potential solutions for difficult health services problems. This should assist health leaders to move from trials to large-scale services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria A Wade
- Discipline of General Practice, The University of Adelaide, North Tce., Adelaide, 5005, Australia.
| | - Alan D Taylor
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, 5042, Australia
| | - Michael R Kidd
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, 5042, Australia
| | - Colin Carati
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, 5042, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Neylon OM, Skinner TC, O'Connell MA, Cameron FJ. A novel tool to predict youth who will show recommended usage of diabetes technologies. Pediatr Diabetes 2016; 17:174-83. [PMID: 25643603 DOI: 10.1111/pedi.12253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2014] [Revised: 12/14/2014] [Accepted: 12/16/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Controversy exists regarding which individuals will benefit most from commencement of diabetes technologies such as continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGMS), such as 'real-time' sensor-augmented pumping (SAP). Because higher usage correlates with haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) achieved, we aimed to predict future usage of technologies using a questionnaire-based tool. SUBJECTS The tool was distributed to two groups of youth with type 1 diabetes; group A (n = 50; mean age 12 ± 2.5 yr) which subsequently commenced 'real-time' CGMS and group B (n = 47; mean age 13 ± 3 yr) which commenced CSII utilisation. METHODS For the CGMS group, recommended usage was ≥5 days (70%) per week [≥70% = high usage (HU); <70% = low usage (LU)], assessed at 3 months. In the CSII group, HU was quantified as entering ≥5 blood sugars per day to the pump and LU as <5 blood sugars per day, at 6 months from initiation. Binary logistic regression with forward stepwise conditional was used to utilise tool scales and calculate an applied formula. RESULTS Of the CGMS group, using gender, baseline HbA1c, and two subscales of the tool generated a formula which predicted both high and low usage with 92% accuracy. Twelve (24%) showed HU vs. 38 who exhibited LU at 3 months. Of the CSII group, 32 (68%) exhibited HU vs. 15 who exhibited LU at 6 months. Four tool items plus gender predicted HU/LU with 95% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS This pilot study resulted in successful prediction of individuals who will and those who will not go on to show recommended usage of CSII and CGMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orla M Neylon
- Department of Endocrinology, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute and The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Timothy C Skinner
- School of Psychological and Clinical Sciences, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia
| | - Michele A O'Connell
- Department of Endocrinology, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute and The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Fergus J Cameron
- Department of Endocrinology, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute and The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lehoux P, Miller FA, Daudelin G. How does venture capital operate in medical innovation? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 2:111-117. [PMID: 27547447 PMCID: PMC4975839 DOI: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2015-000079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2015] [Revised: 12/11/2015] [Accepted: 03/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
While health policy scholars wish to encourage the creation of technologies that bring more value to healthcare, they may not fully understand the mandate of venture capitalists and how they operate. This paper aims to clarify how venture capital operates and to illustrate its influence over the kinds of technologies that make their way into healthcare systems. The paper draws on the international innovation policy scholarship and the lessons our research team learned throughout a 5-year fieldwork conducted in Quebec (Canada). Current policies support the development of technologies that capital investors identify as valuable, and which may not align with important health needs. The level of congruence between a given health technology-based venture and the mandate of venture capital is highly variable, explaining why some types of innovation may never come into existence. While venture capitalists' mandate and worldview are extraneous to healthcare, they shape health technologies in several, tangible ways. Clinical leaders and health policy scholars could play a more active role in innovation policy. Because certain types of technology are more likely than others to help tackle the intractable problems of healthcare systems, public policies should be equipped to promote those that address the needs of a growing elderly population, support patients who are afflicted by chronic diseases and reduce health disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Lehoux
- Department of Health Administration , University of Montreal, School of Public Health of University of Montreal (ESPUM) , Montréal, Quebec , Canada
| | - F A Miller
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
| | - G Daudelin
- School of Public Health of University of Montreal (ESPUM) , Montreal, Quebec , Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Liebe JD, Hüsers J, Hübner U. Investigating the roots of successful IT adoption processes - an empirical study exploring the shared awareness-knowledge of Directors of Nursing and Chief Information Officers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016; 16:10. [PMID: 26818464 PMCID: PMC4728829 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-016-0244-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2015] [Accepted: 01/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The majority of health IT adoption research focuses on the later stages of the IT adoption process: namely on the implementation phase. The first stage, however, which is defined as the knowledge-stage, remains widely unobserved. Following Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation Theory (DOI) this paper presents a research framework to examine the possible lack of shared IT awareness-knowledge, i.e. an information gradient, of two crucial stakeholders, the Chief Information Officer (CIO) and the Director of Nursing (DoN). This study shall answer the following research questions: (1.) Does this gradient exist? (2.) Which direction does it have? (3.) Are certain health IT (HIT) attributes associated with a potential gradient? (4.) Which determinants of diffusion go along with this gradient? Method Results of two surveys that focused on the topic “IT support of clinical workflows” from the viewpoint of CIOs and DoNs with corresponding datasets from 75 hospitals were used in a secondary data analysis. The gradient was operationalised by measuring the disagreement of CIOs and DoNs on the availability and implementation status of 29 IT functions. HIT attributes tested were relevance and market penetration of the IT functions, determinants of diffusion were inter-professional leadership and IT service density. Results The analysis revealed a significant disagreement on the availability of 9 out of 29 HIT functions. In 23 HIT functions, the CIOs reported a higher implementation status than the DoNs, which pointed to a trend for a unidirectional gradient. The disagreement was significantly lower when the relevance of the IT function was high. Both determinants of diffusion correlated significantly negative with the degree of disagreement. Conclusion This is the first study to empirically examine shared awareness-knowledge of two IT-stakeholders that are crucial for triggering IT adoption on the frontline level in hospitals. It could be shown that a gradient and thus a lack of shared awareness-knowledge existed and was associated with certain factors. In conclusion, hospitals should implement improved cooperation between IT staff and clinicians and IT service density when establishing the prerequisites for successful IT adoption processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J D Liebe
- Department of Business Management and Social Sciences, Health Informatics Research Group, Hochschule Osnabrück, P.O. Box 1940, Osnabrück, D-49009, Germany.
| | - J Hüsers
- Department of Business Management and Social Sciences, Health Informatics Research Group, Hochschule Osnabrück, P.O. Box 1940, Osnabrück, D-49009, Germany.
| | - U Hübner
- Department of Business Management and Social Sciences, Health Informatics Research Group, Hochschule Osnabrück, P.O. Box 1940, Osnabrück, D-49009, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Porter A, Kingston MR, Evans BA, Hutchings H, Whitman S, Snooks H. It could be a 'Golden Goose': a qualitative study of views in primary care on an emergency admission risk prediction tool prior to implementation. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2016; 17:1. [PMID: 26739311 PMCID: PMC4704251 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-015-0398-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2015] [Accepted: 12/24/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rising demand for health care has prompted interest in new technologies to support a shift of care from hospital to community and primary care, which may require clinicians to undertake new working practices. A predictive risk stratification tool (Prism) was developed for use in primary care to estimate patients' risk of an emergency hospital admission. As part of an evaluation of Prism, we aimed to understand what might be needed to bring Prism into effective use by exploring clinicians and practice managers' attitudes and expectations about using it. We were informed by Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) which examines the work needed to bring an innovation into use. METHODS We conducted 4 focus groups and 10 interviews with a total of 43 primary care doctors and colleagues from 32 general practices. All were recorded and transcribed. Analysis focussed in particular on the construct of 'coherence' within NPT, which examines how people understand an innovation and its purpose. RESULTS Respondents were in agreement that Prism was a technological formalisation of existing practice, and that it would function as a support to clinical judgment, rather than replacing it. There was broad consensus about the role it might have in delivering new models of care based on active management, but there were doubts about the scope for making a difference to some patients and about whether Prism could identify at-risk patients not already known to the clinical team. Respondents did not expect using the tool to be onerous, but were concerned about the work which might follow in delivering care. Any potential value would not be of the tool in isolation, but would depend on the availability of support services. CONCLUSIONS Policy imperatives and the pressure of rising demand meant respondents were open to trying out Prism, despite underlying uncertainty about what difference it could make. TRIAL REGISTRATION Controlled Clinical Trials no. ISRCTN55538212 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Porter
- Swansea University Medical School, ILS2, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
| | | | | | | | - Shirley Whitman
- SUCCESS Service User group, Swansea University Medical School, ILS2, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
| | - Helen Snooks
- Swansea University Medical School, ILS2, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Chamberlain C, Owen-Smith A, Donovan J, Hollingworth W. A systematic review of geographical variation in access to chemotherapy. BMC Cancer 2015; 16:1. [PMID: 26721515 PMCID: PMC4697930 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-2026-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2014] [Accepted: 12/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rising cancer incidence, the cost of cancer pharmaceuticals and the introduction of the Cancer Drugs Fund in England, but not other United Kingdom(UK) countries means evidence of 'postcode prescribing' in cancer is important. There have been no systematic reviews considering access to cancer drugs by geographical characteristics in the UK. METHODS Studies describing receipt of cancer drugs, according to healthcare boundaries (e.g. cancer network [UK]) were identified through a systematic search of electronic databases and grey literature. Due to study heterogeneity a meta-analysis was not possible and a narrative synthesis was performed. RESULTS 8,780 unique studies were identified and twenty-six included following a systematic search last updated in 2015. The majority of papers demonstrated substantial variability in the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy between hospitals, health authorities, cancer networks and UK countries (England and Wales). After case-mix adjustment, there was up to a 4-5 fold difference in chemotherapy utilisation between the highest and lowest prescribing cancer networks. There was no strong evidence that rurality or distance travelled were associated with the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy and conflicting evidence for an effect of travel time. CONCLUSIONS Considerable variation in chemotherapy prescribing between healthcare boundaries has been identified. The absence of associations with natural geographical characteristics (e.g. rurality) and receipt of chemotherapy suggests that local treatment habits, capacity and policy are more influential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Chamberlain
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Rd, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Amanda Owen-Smith
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Rd, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Jenny Donovan
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Rd, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - William Hollingworth
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Rd, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Cranfield S, Hendy J, Reeves B, Hutchings A, Collin S, Fulop N. Investigating healthcare IT innovations: a “conceptual blending” approach. J Health Organ Manag 2015; 29:1131-48. [DOI: 10.1108/jhom-08-2015-0121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to better understand how and why adoption and implementation of healthcare IT innovations occur. The authors examine two IT applications, computerised physician order entry (CPOE) and picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) at the meso and micro levels, within the context of the National Programme for IT in the English National Health Service (NHS).
Design/methodology/approach
– To analyse these multi-level dynamics, the authors blend Rogers’ diffusion of innovations theory (DoIT) with Webster’s sociological critique of technological innovation in medicine and healthcare systems to illuminate a wider range of interacting factors. Qualitative data collected between 2004 and 2006 uses semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 72 stakeholders across four English NHS hospital trusts.
Findings
– Overall, PACS was more successfully implemented (fully or partially in three out of four trusts) than CPOE (implemented in one trust only). Factors such as perceived benefit to users and attributes of the application – in particular speed, ease of use, reliability and flexibility and levels of readiness – were highly relevant but their influence was modulated through interaction with complex structural and relational issues.
Practical implications
– Results reveal that combining contextual system level theories with DoIT increases understanding of real-life processes underpinning implementation of IT innovations within healthcare. They also highlight important drivers affecting success of implementation, including socio-political factors, the social body of practice and degree of “co-construction” between designers and end-users.
Originality/value
– The originality of the study partly rests on its methodological innovativeness and its value on critical insights afforded into understanding complex IT implementation programmes.
Collapse
|
50
|
de Camargo KR, Guedes CR, Caetano R, Menezes A, Trajman A. The adoption of a new diagnostic technology for tuberculosis in two Brazilian cities from the perspective of patients and healthcare workers: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2015. [PMID: 26195000 PMCID: PMC4507311 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0941-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This article presents the qualitative component linked to a larger study of implementation of the Xpert™ MTB/Rif technology in two Brazilian cities. Despite intrinsic advantages of new health technologies, its introduction can be disruptive to existing routines, and it is thus important to understand how these innovations are perceived by the different groups involved in its regular use. METHODS This study was based on semi-structured interviews with patients, lab technicians, health care workers and managers involved with diagnosis and care of Tuberculosis (TB). The interviews had their content analyzed in order to abstract the different perspectives for the various actors. RESULTS For patients the changes were not perceived as significant, since their greatest concerns were related to treatment and the stigma associated with TB. The professionals in general welcomed the new technique, which dramatically decreases the workload, time and reliability of diagnosis, in their view. However, we noted difficulties with the concomitant implementation of new IT technology for recording and reporting test results, which negatively impacted the time necessary to get lab diagnosis to physicians. CONCLUSIONS Through this analysis we detected some bottlenecks in the surrounding environment, not necessarily linked to the technology itself but which could hamper considerably its advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth R de Camargo
- Departamento de Planejamento e Administração em Saúde, Instituto de Medicina Social, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, (R. S. Fco. Xavier, 524 7º Andar Bloco D.), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, (20559-900), Brazil.
| | - Carla R Guedes
- Departamento de Saúde e Sociedade, Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal Fluminense, (Rua Marquês do Paraná, 303 - 3º andar), Niterói, RJ, (24030-210), Brazil.
| | - Rosângela Caetano
- Departamento de Planejamento e Administração em Saúde, Instituto de Medicina Social, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, (R. S. Fco. Xavier, 524 7º Andar Bloco D.), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, (20559-900), Brazil.
| | - Alexandre Menezes
- Global Health Strategies Brazil, (Largo do Machado, 21 sala 518), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, (22221-020), Brazil.
| | - Anete Trajman
- Internal Medicine Post-graduation Program, University Hospital, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, (Av. Brigadeiro Trompowski s/no, Ilha do Fundão), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, (21949-90), Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|