Using citation tracking for systematic literature searching - study protocol for a scoping review of methodological studies and an expert survey

Sleep health among sexual and gender minority people in the United States: A scoping review

Sleep has been found to be essential to physical and mental health. Sexual and gender minority (SGM; e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, nonbinary) individuals experience significant health disparities, and emerging research indicates that this includes disparities in sleep health. However, the current literature on sleep health in this population has not previously been rigorously reviewed. This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview and synthesis of the current literature on SGM sleep health in the United States. Following established scoping review methodology, we systematically searched PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, LGBTQ + Source, and Scopus; 76 studies met inclusion criteria. Included studies indicated significant sleep disparities exist for SGM people, particularly sexual minority women and gender minority people. Social determinants of health, including bullying and discrimination, were associated with worse sleep health. Included studies were heterogeneous and had methodological weaknesses, leaving opportunities for future research. Overall, findings point to the need for more rigorous research to advance understanding of sleep health across SGM subgroups and inform interventions to improve sleep health among SGM people, given the known negative impact of poor sleep on overall health.

Implementation of hospital-initiated complex interventions for adult people with multiple long-term conditions: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

The increasing prevalence of multiple long-term conditions (MLTC) presents significant challenges to healthcare delivery globally. Although interventions for long-term conditions have predominantly been designed and evaluated in primary care settings, there is a growing recognition of the need to address the management of MLTC within secondary care. This scoping review aims to comprehensively evaluate hospital-initiated complex interventions for people with MLTC.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus and Cochrane Library to identify published studies from Jan 1, 2010, evaluating hospital-initiated interventions initiated for adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with MLTC (PROSPERO: CRD42024498448). Studies reporting patients with frailty only, one long-term condition or orthogeriatric studies that did not focus solely on people with MLTC were excluded. The primary outcome measures were the characteristics of these complex interventions measured as: (i) intervention components, (ii) stakeholders involved; and (iii) implementation strategies, reported according to a theoretical framework (Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change). Secondary outcome measures were clinical and cost implications of these complex interventions, feasibility and sustainability, defined according to the World Health Organisation implementation framework.

FINDINGS

This scoping review identified 70 studies (56,111 participants). Twelve intervention components were identified in 52 combinations; the most common were medication review and optimisation (n = 39), chronic disease management (n = 34) and providing detailed care plans (n = 23). Majority of studies included two or more interventions components (n = 49) delivered by multiple stakeholders (n = 38). Of eleven implementation strategies reported, training and educating stakeholders, establishing integrated wards or clinics and regular multidisciplinary team meetings were the most common. Majority of combinations of intervention groups were associated with improved clinical outcomes for patients with MLTC (n = 43/70, 61.4%), yet eight studies reported on costs. However, embedding training and education or integrated clinics in delivering these intervention groups were associated with improved clinical outcomes, irrespective of the number of healthcare professionals involved. Majority of studies were evaluated in single centre settings, with limited evaluation of broader implementation measures.

INTERPRETATION

Hospital-initiated complex interventions that involve multiple stakeholders may be feasible and appear to be clinically useful for people with MLTC. To strengthen impact and support wider scale-up across health systems, closing knowledge gaps around cost-implications and strategies to improve implementation of these complex interventions through training and education or integrated clinics will be crucial.

Outcomes of guidelines from health technology assessment organizations in community-based primary care: a systematic mixed studies review

BACKGROUND

Health technology assessment (HTA) organizations generate guidelines to inform healthcare practices toward improved health outcomes. This review sought to identify and classify outcomes of guidelines from HTA organizations within published research.

METHODOLOGY

We performed a systematic mixed studies review of empirical studies that (a) referred to a published guideline from an HTA organization and (b) reported an outcome resulting from a guideline. We searched the published literature in English or French within seven databases. Outcome types were classified within five dimensions of an existing framework for online health information (e.g., relevance, cognitive/affective impact, and use). Subdimensions were inductively developed. A two-phase sequential data synthesis was performed. Phase 1: a hybrid deductive-inductive thematic analysis identified the types of outcomes and displayed their relationships on a concept map. Phase 2: descriptive statistics were tabulated by the type of outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 6,719 records were retrieved through searches on 6 February 2023. After screening, we included 120 observational studies (twenty-one qualitative, ninety-four quantitative, and five mixed methods). Phase 1 identified twenty-nine types of outcomes. The most frequently reported outcomes were within the organizational dimension (reported in ninety-four studies). The most common subdimensions were "Referrals" (thirty-eight occurrences), the "Quality of Prescriptions" (fifteen occurrences), and the "Quality of Diagnosis" (eight occurrences). For Phase 2, we could only generate descriptive statistics on seventeen outcomes. These were almost equally distributed among positive, neutral, and negative effects. Our results contribute to knowledge about the outcomes of HTA guidelines and options for documenting and measuring them in future evaluations.

Mapping Australia's COVID-19 quarantine cohort journeys

BACKGROUND

Australia rapidly developed COVID-19 quarantine programs to reduce the adverse outcomes of a novel pathogen imported by visitors and returned travellers. Different quarantine pathways were utilised over the pandemic, yet no definitive cohort map exists to guide future preparedness. We created a whole-of-system cohort journey map of Australian quarantine cohorts to inform future pandemic preparedness activities.

METHODS

Australian parliamentary websites and Google were searched for publicly available grey literature from 2019 to 2023. Data about quarantine cohorts, pandemic plans and documents, journey activities, viral escape events, and quarantine recommendations were extracted and plotted to produce a whole-of-system cohort journey map.

RESULTS

The system mapping process identified 22 distinct quarantine cohort journeys during COVID-19, yet few of the cohorts were mentioned in pandemic and emergency plans. Viral escape events were documented 27 times, and COVID-19 reviews and inquiries produced 282 quarantine-specific recommendations. Cohorts included international and domestic travellers who experienced home, hotel, and facility quarantine iterations. Other cohorts, such as humanitarian evacuations, diplomats, airline crews, community close contacts, and people experiencing homelessness, had distinctive quarantine journeys.

CONCLUSIONS

This whole-of-system quarantine cohort map furthers the case for governments and policymakers to update pandemic plans to include the 22 identified cohorts and test plans through pandemic exercises. Recommendations from inquiries should be acquitted to reduce the risk of viral escape and to strengthen national preparedness if quarantine systems are required in future pandemic responses.

Exploring experiences of times without care and encounters in dementia: protocol for a living and adaptive evidence map

INTRODUCTION

Individuals with dementia spend most of the day without care, without encounters, and usually without activity. Although this has been proven in studies, there is a knowledge gap on how individuals with dementia experience these periods of time. Such knowledge would be highly relevant for health professionals and relatives to develop adequate strategies for dealing with these periods of time. The FreiZeit study aims to reconstruct periods of time without care and encounters from the perspective of individuals with dementia and formal and informal carers. The specific objective of this review is to provide a continuously updated overview of the topical evidence that may be used to guide data synthesis and interpretation within the FreiZeit study.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We conduct a living evidence map, based on a comprehensive systematic literature search in MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO/Ovid and Web of Science Core Collection, citation-based searches and web searches. We include studies on times without care and encounters of individuals with dementia from the perspective of individuals with dementia themselves and formal or informal caregivers of any observational study design that were conducted in the institutional and domestic long-term care setting and published as journal article in English, French or German language without any restriction of the publication year. One reviewer screens titles, abstracts and full texts and extracts data. Key characteristics and results of the included studies are charted in a tabular format. The searches will be run and continuously updated throughout the duration of the overarching FreiZeit study (every 6 months for 2 years from 2023 to 2025).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not required for this evidence map. We disseminate our findings via journal articles and conference proceedings as well as other formats.

REGISTRATION DETAILS

This review protocol is uploaded on Open Science Framework (OSF; DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/GDYZ9).

Inuit-defined determinants of food security in academic research focusing on Inuit Nunangat and Alaska: A scoping review protocol

BACKGROUND

Academic research on food security in Inuit Nunangat and Alaska frequently adopts the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations' working definition of food security and Western conceptualisations of what it means to be 'food secure'. However, in 2014, the Alaskan branch of the Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC) stated that academic and intergovernmental definitions and understandings 'are important, but not what we are talking about when we say food security'. The organisation subsequently developed its own conceptualisation and definition: the Alaskan Inuit Food Security Conceptual Framework (AIFSCF), which in 2020 received informal assent by ICC-Canada.

AIM

This protocol establishes a review strategy to examine how well academic research reflects Inuit conceptualisations and understandings of food security, as outlined in the AIFSCF.

METHODS

Review structure and reporting will be completed according to adapted RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses (ROSES) guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy will be used to locate peer-reviewed research from Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and the Arctic and Antarctic Regions (EBSCO) databases. Dual reviewer screening will take place at the abstract, title, and full-text stages. Different study methodologies (qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods) will be included for review, on the proviso that articles identify drivers of food security. An a priori coding framework will be applied by a single reviewer to extract data on publication characteristics, methods and article aims. Deductive thematic content analysis will then identify the frequency and precedence afforded within literature to the drivers and dimensions of food security identified by the AIFSCF.

Meanings and mechanisms of One Health partnerships: insights from a critical review of literature on cross-government collaborations

Complex health policy challenges such as antimicrobial resistance and other emerging infections are driven by activities in multiple sectors. Therefore, addressing these also requires joint efforts from multiple sectors as exemplified in the One Health approach. We undertake a critical review to examine the different ways in which multisector partnerships have been conceptualized across multiple disciplines and thematic areas. We started with a set of six articles from the disciplines of health, nutrition and public administration that reviewed conceptual frameworks within their respective fields. We conducted backward citation tracing using the bibliography of the six articles to identify other articles in the same and related fields that conceptualized multisector partnerships. We identified 58 articles published from 1967 to 2018 from the fields of global health, infectious diseases, management, nutrition and sustainability sciences indicating that multisector partnerships have been a topic of study across different fields for several decades. A thematic analysis of the 58 articles revealed that multisector partnerships assume a variety of forms and have been described in different ways. Partnerships can be categorized by scope, scale, formality and strength. Multisector partnerships emerge in conditions of dynamic uncertainty and sector failure when the information and resources required are beyond the capacities of any individual sector. Such partnerships are inherently political in nature and subsume multiple competing agendas of collaborating actors. Sustaining collaborations over a long period of time will require collaborative approaches like One Health to accommodate competing political perspectives and include flexibility to allow multisector partnerships to respond to changing external dynamics.