Computer-assisted total knee replacement

Full-length weight-bearing radiographs and computed tomography show discrepancies in coronal alignment for robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty

Assessment of lower limb coronal plane alignment is crucial in surgical planning of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and is commonly performed with full-length weight-bearing radiographs (FLWBR). The aim of this study was to determine discrepancies in coronal limb alignment as assessed by conventional FLWBR versus non-weight-bearing computed tomography (CT) modalities in robotic arm-assisted TKA. We retrospectively analyzed 100 consecutive patients with osteoarthritic knees who underwent robotic arm-assisted TKA with preoperative FLWBR and CT assessments of knee alignment. The mechanical axes of the Mako system were established in accordance with the Mako TKA Surgical Guide. The following parameters were compared between the two imaging modalities: (1) mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA), (2) medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), (3) lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), (4) arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), (5) joint line obliquity (JLO), and (6) proportion of the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) types. Regression analyses were performed to identify potential factors associated with discrepancies in measurements of coronal alignment between these two imaging modalities. There were significant differences in terms of the mHKA between preoperative CT and FLWBR (CT vs. FLWBR, 7.0° vs. 8.5°; p < 0.001), which may be attributed to the extent of the weight-bearing condition. The CT measurements with the Mako system demonstrated a lower (more varus) MPTA than the FLWBR measurements (CT vs. FLWBR, 83.7° vs. 85.2°; p < 0.001). Furthermore, there were also significant differences between the CT and FLWBR measurements in terms of the aHKA (-  4.7° vs. - 3.7°; p = 0.028) and JLO (172.2° vs. 174.2°; p < 0.001). There were significant differences of proportion of CPAK types between the two imaging modalities; however, the most common category was type I in both imaging modalities. Multivariate analyses showed that greater preoperative mHKA and posterior tibial slope were associated with the discrepancy in the MPTA measurements between the two imaging modalities. There were discrepancies in coronal alignment between preoperative FLWBR and non-weight-bearing CT using the Mako system. When compared with conventional FLWBR, the Mako system tended to overestimate the magnitude of tibial varus deformity in the knee joint.

Statistical analysis plan for the Robotic-Assisted Surgery and Kinematic ALignment in total knee arthroplasty (RASKAL) registry-nested randomized trial

Aims

There is uncertainty over whether robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) or kinematic alignment (KA) improves outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The Robotic-Assisted Surgery and Kinematic ALignment in TKA trial (RASKAL) is a registry-nested, multicentre, randomized, blinded, 2 × 2 factorial trial involving approximately 300 TKA patients. RASKAL will assess the effectiveness of RAS, KA, or both to improve clinical, operative, functional, radiological, and survivorship outcomes when compared to computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and mechanical alignment (MA), respectively. We describe the statistical analysis plan (SAP) for the RASKAL trial to ensure transparency of this study. Our purpose is to minimize analysis bias to bolster the internal validity of our findings.

Methods

We created a SAP for the RASKAL trial to define the analysis of primary and secondary outcomes. The SAP will also state our approach to protocol deviations, withdrawals, management of missing data, and any loss to follow-up. General statistical analysis principles are outlined for the main outcomes, along with statistical tests required for each outcome.

Conclusion

The RASKAL SAP pre-specifies the statistical plan for the primary outcome of knee-specific function using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-12 comparing RAS to CAS and KA to MA up to one year postoperatively. The primary outcome will be reported as a modified intention-to-treat analysis, with secondary per-protocol analyses. Secondary outcomes will include other patient-reported outcome measures, early recovery, operative outcomes, functional outcomes, radiological precision, prosthetic survivorship, and cost-effectiveness analyses.

Comparing supine CT scanogram and standing long-leg radiograph for postoperative alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study

PURPOSE

Achieving precise postoperative alignment is critical for the long-term success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Long-leg standing radiograph (LLR) at 6 weeks post-op is the gold standard for assessing alignment, but its reliance on weight-bearing and positioning makes it less practical in the early postoperative period. Supine computed tomography scanogram (CTS) offers a potential alternative. This study compares CTS and LLR in patients undergoing TKA with patient-specific valgus correction angles (VCA).

METHODS

A prospective study of 108 knees from 57 patients undergoing primary TKA was conducted. CTS was performed on postoperative day three in a supine non-weight-bearing position, and LLR at six weeks in an upright standing position. Coronal alignment was assessed using hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and compared using Bland-Altman plots, paired-samples t-tests, and Cohen's d.

RESULTS

CTS showed 57% of knees were within 3° of neutral alignment, while LLR showed 61%. The mean difference between modalities was 0.52° (SD, 3.56°; p = 0.07). Inter-observer reliability was excellent for both CTS and LLR (all ICCs > 0.9).

CONCLUSION

While CTS provides a useful alternative for early postoperative alignment assessment-particularly in situations where a standing LLR is not feasible-the observed variability suggests that LLR remains the more reliable modality when precise alignment is critical. Surgeons should therefore consider CTS as an adjunct tool for early decision-making or non-ambulatory patients in the immediate postoperative setting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, Prospective Comparative Study.

Computer-assisted revision total knee arthroplasty does not improve postoperative knee prosthesis alignment compared to the conventional technique

Purpose

Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prosthesis alignment. However, literature on its use during revision TKA (rTKA) is scarce. Moreover, the effect of CAS during rTKA on rotational alignment of the prosthesis has not been described yet. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of CAS during rTKA, focusing on the number of outliers and coronal, sagittal and rotational prosthetic alignment compared to conventional rTKA.

Methods

A prospective cohort study comparing CAS-rTKA with a historical control group (CON-rTKA). The CAS-rTKA group (54 patients/62 knees) underwent rTKA using imageless CAS between 2012 and 2017. The CON-rTKA group (13 patients/23 knees) was operated using the conventional technique between 2002 and 2012. Postoperative alignment was measured using the EOS-2D/3D system (coronal and sagittal planes) and computed tomography scan (rotation).

Results

No significant differences between the CAS-rTKA and CON-rTKA groups were found for coronal and sagittal alignment regarding the mechanical angle of the leg (p = 0.08), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (p = 0.87), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (p = 0.40), anatomical proximal posterior tibial angle (p = 0.43) nor femoral (p = 0.80) and tibial rotation (p = 0.15). For the proportions of coronal, sagittal and rotational outliers, no significant differences were found either.

Conclusion

This study showed no evidence that use of CAS during rTKA leads to improved coronal, sagittal or rotational alignment of knee prostheses or a difference of outliers between the groups.

Level of Evidence

Level III, therapeutic.

A Three-dimensional Comparison of Pre- and Post-component Position in a Series of Off-label Robotic-assisted Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties

Background

The application of robotic-assisted arthroplasty in revision knee scenarios continues to evolve. This study compares the pre- and post-revision implant positions in series of revision total knee arthroplasties (TKA) using a robotic arm system.

Methods

Twenty-five consecutive off-label robotic-assisted revision TKA were performed. After virtual revision femoral and tibial components were positioned to achieve "balanced" medial and lateral flexion and extension gaps, the existing primary implants (PI) were removed, and bone cuts were executed with the robotic arm system. Preoperative coronal, sagittal, and axial position of the PI was compared to the final planned positions of the robotic revision implants (RRI) for each subject. A repeated measures ANOVA using the absolute difference in millimeters and degrees between the PI and RRI orientation was completed.

Results

Intra-operatively, the virtual gaps were balanced within the planning software followed by successful execution of the plan. There was a statistically significant difference between posterior condylar offset and tibial component positioning for RRI compared to PI. There was no difference between the distal femoral component values between PI and RRI.

Conclusions

The sagittal alignment of the revision implants, specifically the femoral posterior condylar offset and tibial component slope, are statistically significant considerations for a stable revision TKA with off-label use of a robotic-arm system. Other potential benefits may include appropriate implant sizing which can affect the resultant ligamentous tension important for a functional revision TKA. Future research and software iterations will be needed to determine the overall accuracy and utility of robotic-assisted revision TKA.

Optimization of the "Perth CT" Protocol for Preoperative Planning and Postoperative Evaluation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background and Objectives: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become the treatment of choice for advanced osteoarthritis. The aim of this paper was to show the possibilities of optimizing the Perth CT protocol, which is highly effective for preoperative planning and postoperative assessment of alignment. Materials and Methods: The cross-sectional study comprised 16 patients for preoperative planning or postoperative evaluation of TKA. All patients were examined with the standard and optimized Perth CT protocol using advance techniques, including automatic exposure control (AEC), iterative image reconstruction (IR), as well as a single-energy projection-based metal artifact reduction algorithm for eliminating prosthesis artifacts. The effective radiation dose (E) was determined based on the dose report. Imaging quality is determined according to subjective and objective (values of signal to noise ratio (SdNR) and figure of merit (FOM)) criteria. Results: The effective radiation dose with the optimized protocol was significantly lower compared to the standard protocol (p < 0.001), while in patients with the knee prosthesis, E increased significantly less with the optimized protocol compared to the standard protocol. No significant difference was observed in the subjective evaluation of image quality between protocols (p > 0.05). Analyzing the objective criteria for image quality optimized protocols resulted in lower SdNR values and higher FOM values. No significant difference of image quality was determined using the SdNR and FOM as per the specified protocols and parts of extremities, and for the presence of prothesis. Conclusions: Retrospecting the ALARA ('As Low As Reasonably Achievable') principles, it is possible to optimize the Perth CT protocol by reducing the kV and mAs values and by changing the collimation and increasing the pitch factor. Advanced IR techniques were used in both protocols, and AEC was used in the optimized protocol. The effective dose of radiation can be reduced five times, and the image quality will be satisfactory.

Long leg radiographs underestimate the degree of constitutional varus limb alignment and joint line obliquity in comparison with computed tomography: a radiographic study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to understand if differences exist between computed tomography (CT) and long leg radiographs (LLR) when defining coronal plane alignment of the lower limb in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It aimed to identify any such differences between the two imaging modalities by quantifying constitutional limb alignment (arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), joint line obliquity (JLO) and Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) type within the same population.

METHODS

A retrospective radiographic study compared pre-operative LLR and CT measurements in patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA. The aHKA, JLO and CPAK types were calculated after measuring the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA). The primary outcomes were the mean differences in aHKA (MPTA-LDFA), JLO (MPTA + LDFA) and proportions of CPAK types between LLR and CT groups. The secondary outcomes were the differences in CT-derived MPTA values based on four different tibial sagittal landmarks.

RESULTS

After exclusions, 465 imaging sets were analysed in 394 patients. There was a statistically significant mean difference between LLR and CT, respectively, for both MPTA (87.5° vs. 86.2°; p < 0.01) and LDFA (88.7° vs. 87.3°; p < 0.01). There were also statistically significant differences for aHKA (- 0.2° vs. - 1.1°) and JLO (175.1° vs. 173.4°) for LLR and CT, respectively (both p < 0.01). CT increased the proportion of patients with CPAK Type I (constitutional varus aHKA, apex distal JLO) and CPAK Type II (neutral aHKA, apex distal JLO), and decreased numbers of CPAK Types III-VI. There were significant mean differences in the MPTA using varying sagittal landmarks.

CONCLUSION

Alignment determined by LLRs underestimates the magnitude of both constitutional varus alignment and joint line obliquity compared to CT, differences that notably increase the proportions of patients included in CPAK Types I and II. These distinctions are primarily due to underestimation of proximal tibial varus when measured on LLRs compared to CT, which more specifically defines articular weight-bearing points.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Combined femoral and tibial component total knee arthroplasty device rotation measurement is reliable and predicts clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

The optimal total knee arthroplasty (TKA) rotational alignment and how best to obtain and measure it are debatable. The aim was to analyse the reliability of the Berger femoral, three different tibial and four different combined two-dimensional computer tomography (2D-CT) TKA component rotation measurements, and to ascertain which rotational values best predict a successful clinical outcome.

METHODS

The 2D-CT scans were obtained post-operatively on 60 patients who had TKA. We determined one femoral [Berger's femoral angle (BFA)], three tibial [Berger's tibial angle (BTA), anatomical tibial angle (ATA) and bimalleolar posterior tibial component angle (BM_PTCA)] and four combined [transepicondylar posterior tibial component angle (TE_PTCA), bicondylar posterior tibial component angle (BC_PTCA, transepicondylar bimalleolar angle (TE_BM) and bicondylar bimalleolar angle (BC_BM)] TKA rotation angles. We made all measures in 23 patients twice by three observers and determined inter- and intra-observer agreement using the Bland-Altman plot method. We analysed measures of 55 patients using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) analysis to ascertain the discriminative capacity of BFA, ATA, TE_PTCA and BC_PTCA for predicting a successful clinical outcome according to the Knee Society Score (KSS) threshold.

RESULTS

ATA showed the smaller inter- and intra-observer average of differences (-0.1° and 1.6°, respectively) of the studied methods followed by BFA (-0.9° and 1.4°), TE_PTCA (-2.1° and 2.7°) and BC_PTCA (-0.5° and 1.8°). BFA (-4° to 2.1° and -6.1° to 8.8°) and BC_PTCA (-4.4° to 3.4° and -7.9° to 4.4°) showed the narrower inter- and intra-observer limits of agreement. A TKA device rotation (BC_PTCA) < 0.8° of external rotation (ER) predicted a KSS and KSS knee successful outcome, and < 3.8° ER for KSS functional (AUC = 0.889; 0.907 and 0.764, respectively). BFA and ATA < 0.9° ER and < 3.9° internal rotation (IR) predicted a successful KSS knee outcome (AUC = 0.796 and 0.889, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The ATA tibial component rotation measurement was the most reliable of those studied. BFA, TE_PTCA and BC_PTCA were reliable measures for TKA femoral and combined rotation. The presence of a minimal rotation between the TKA components (BC_PTCA) and a small femoral ER or tibial IR predicted a successful KSS outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

Interobserver Agreement of Post-operative Perth Computed Tomography Protocol Data in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become the treatment of choice for advanced osteoarthritis. Identifying malalignment is central to improving TKA outcomes and providing optimal management of TKA patients with post-operative pain and dissatisfaction. Computed tomography (CT) imaging has become increasingly popular as a more precise way of analysing post-TKA component alignment and the Perth CT protocol remains the current predominant assessment tool. This study aimed to analyse and compare inter- and intra-observer agreement of a post-operative multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment (Perth CT protocol) in TKA patients.

METHODS

Post-operative CT images of 27 patients who underwent TKA were analysed retrospectively. Images were analysed by an experienced radiographer and a final-year medical student at least two weeks apart. Measurements for nine angles were collected: modified hip-knee-ankle (mHKA) angle, lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), femoral flexion and tibial slope, femoral rotation angle, femoral-tibial match rotational angle, tibial tubercle lateralisation distance, and Berger's tibial rotation. Intra-observer and inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Inter-observer reliability for the measurements of all variables varied from poor to excellent (ICC: -0.003 to 0.981). Five out of the nine angles demonstrated good to excellent reliability. Inter-observer reliability was highest for mHKA in the coronal plane and the poorest for the tibial slope angle in the sagittal plane. The intra-observer reliability for both reviewers was excellent (0.999 vs. 0.989).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the Perth CT protocol has excellent intra-observer reliability and good to excellent inter-observer reliability for five out of nine of the measured angles used to assess component alignment post-TKA, making it a useful tool for surgical outcome prediction and success.

Which Asymmetric Tibial Component Is Optimally Designed for Calipered Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Calipered kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) restores the patient's prearthritic joint lines and sets internal-external rotation of the tibial component parallel to the flexion-extension (FE) plane, which is not a mechanical alignment (MA) target. Two asymmetric tibial components designed for MA set the tibial component to either a femoral component (FC) target or a tibial tubercle (TT) target. The study determined the optimal asymmetric tibial component to use with KA as the one with smaller IE deviation from the MA target, greater coverage of tibial resection, and lower incidence of cortical overhang. The study included 40 patients treated with bilateral calipered KA TKA with different asymmetric tibial components in opposite knees. A best-fit of a kinematic tibial template to the tibial resection set the template's slot parallel to the knee's FE plane. Each asymmetric tibial component's anterior-posterior (AP) axis was set parallel to the slot. Computer tomography analysis determined the IE deviation (-internal/+ external) of each tibial component from its MA target, tibial resection coverage by the baseplate and insert, and incidence of cortical overhang. The patient-reported Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) determined outcomes. The mean IE deviation from the MA target was 2 degrees external for the FC-target asymmetric tibial component and -8 degrees internal for the TT-target asymmetric tibial component (p < 0.001). Tibial resection coverage by the baseplate (insert) was 88% (84%) for the FC target and 84% (79%) for the TT target (p < 0.001 for baseplate and insert). The FC target insert covered 3 mm more of the posterolateral resection (p < 0.001). Posteromedial coverage was comparable. The incidence of cortical overhang was 2.5% for each baseplate. There was no difference in FJS and OKS. When performing calipered KA, the more optimal design was the asymmetric tibial component with the FC target because of the smaller deviation from its MA target and the greater coverage of the tibial resection by the baseplate and insert.

Can Patella Instability After Total Knee Arthroplasty be Treated With Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction?

Background

The aim of this study was to describe outcomes of patients who had undergone medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr) to treat patellofemoral instability (PFI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Material and methods

This is a retrospective case series of consecutive patients treated for PFI after TKA. Patients were included if they had radiographic documentation of patella dislocation or subluxation and component position was adequate. MPFLr was performed using a quadriceps tendon autograft. The graft was fixed with either an interference or additional suspensory fixation. A tibial tubercle osteotomy was performed in select indications. Patients were assessed with Kujala and International Knee Score (IKS) at a minimum 12-month follow-up and radiographically with plain radiographs.

Results

A total of 22 patients (23 procedures) were included. The mean follow-up period was 38 months (range 12-72). Average preoperative femoral component rotation on computed tomography was 0.10° external rotation (range 3° internal rotation to 3° external rotation). All patients had improved clinical and radiographic outcomes postoperatively. At the last follow-up, the mean IKS knee score was 77.6 ± 13.1, mean IKS function score was 75.2 ± 23.3, and mean Kujala score was 60.2/100 ± 10.9. There was 1 mechanical failure, which occurred following MPFLr with interference fixation. There were 6 complications (28.1%) postoperatively. Patients receiving double fixation of the MPFLr graft had higher clinical and radiographic scores; however, this difference was not statistically significant. MPFLr had a patella-lowering effect, 0.97 preoperatively to 0.74 postoperatively (P = .069).

Conclusion

MPFLr in appropriately selected patients is a satisfactory option to treat PFI following TKA.

Avaliação radiográfica do alinhamento pós-operatório na artroplastia total de joelho

Objetivo Demonstrar a maior acurácia das radiografias panorâmicas de membros inferiores (longas) em relação às radiografias curtas do joelho na medida do eixo mecânico do membro inferior após a artroplastia total de joelho (ATJ).

Métodos Foi realizado um estudo retrospectivo para avaliar a acurácia de imagens radiográficas longas e curtas pós-operatórias de 70 pacientes submetidos à ATJ em nosso serviço. As imagens foram analisadas ao acaso, em momentos distintos, por três ortopedistas. Em todas as imagens, o eixo mecânico do membro, do fêmur e da tíbia foram traçado,s e os ângulos femorotibiais (AFTs) foram calculados. O coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (CCI) foi calculado para avaliar a concordância da medida do eixo mecânico inter e intraobservador.

Resultados Observou-se que houve alta concordância intra e interobservador quando utilizamos radiografias panorâmicas, apresentando CCI mínimo intrae interobservador de 0,89, equivalente a uma concordância fortíssima. Já nas radiografias curtas na incidência anteroposterior (AP) do joelho, o CCI mostrou-se com concordância moderada, obtendo valor máximo de 0,75.

Conclusão Existe uma diferença significativa na acurácia para a medida do eixo mecânico do membro inferior, comparando-se radiografias longas e curtas do membro inferior. Assim, para a adequada mensuração do eixo mecânico do membro inferior, sugerimos a realização de radiografia longa no pós-operatório de ATJ.

Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a five-year prospective, multicentre, survivorship study

Aims

The mid-term results of kinematic alignment (KA) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using image derived instrumentation (IDI) have not been reported in detail, and questions remain regarding ligamentous stability and revisions. This paper aims to address the following: 1) what is the distribution of alignment of KA TKAs using IDI; 2) is a TKA alignment category associated with increased risk of failure or poor patient outcomes; 3) does extending limb alignment lead to changes in soft-tissue laxity; and 4) what is the five-year survivorship and outcomes of KA TKA using IDI?

Methods

A prospective, multicentre, trial enrolled 100 patients undergoing KA TKA using IDI, with follow-up to five years. Alignment measures were conducted pre- and postoperatively to assess constitutional alignment and final implant position. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of pain and function were also included. The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Arthroplasty Registry was used to assess survivorship.

Results

The postoperative HKA distribution varied from 9° varus to 11° valgus. All PROMs showed statistical improvements at one year (p < 0.001), with further improvements at five years for Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score symptoms (p = 0.041) and Forgotten Joint Score (p = 0.011). Correlation analysis showed no difference (p = 0.610) between the hip-knee-ankle and joint line congruence angle at one and five years. Sub-group analysis showed no difference in PROMs for patients placed within 3° of neutral compared to those placed > 3°. There were no revisions for tibial loosening; however, there were reports of a higher incidence of poor patella tracking and patellofemoral stiffness.

Conclusion

PROMs were not impacted by postoperative alignment category. Ligamentous stability was maintained at five years with joint line obliquity. There were no revisions for tibial loosening despite a significant portion of tibiae placed in varus; however, KA executed with IDI resulted in a higher than anticipated rate of patella complications.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(8):656–665.

Robotic-assisted surgery and kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty (RASKAL study): a protocol of a national registry-nested, multicentre, 2×2 factorial randomised trial assessing clinical, intraoperative, functional, radiographic and survivorship outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) and kinematic alignment (KA) are being increasingly adopted to improve patient outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There is uncertainty around the individual or combined effect of these concepts compared with computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and mechanical alignment (MA), respectively. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of RAS, KA or both to improve clinical outcomes, functional measures, radiographic precision and prosthetic survivorship when compared with current gold standards of surgical care.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A national registry-nested, multicentre, double-blinded, 2×2 factorial, randomised trial will be undertaken with 300 patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA performed by 15 surgeons. The primary outcome will be the between-group differences in postoperative change over 2 years in the mean Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12), comparing first, RAS to CAS as its control, and second, KA to MA as its control. Secondary outcomes will include other knee-specific and general health patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), intraoperative pressure loads as a measure of soft tissue balance, 6-month postoperative functional outcomes, radiological precision using CT imaging, complications and long-term prosthetic survivorship. The contribution of each patient's unique coronal plane alignment of the knee phenotype to primary and secondary PROMs will be investigated. OMERACT-OARSI criteria and Patient Acceptable Symptom State outcome score thresholds for the KOOS-12 and Oxford Knee Score will be used in secondary analyses. Primary intention-to-treat and secondary per-protocol analyses will be performed. Statistical analysis will include a generalised linear mixed model for repeated measures for continuous KOOS-12 scores. Kaplan-Meier estimates with adjusted HRs of implant survivorship will be calculated.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval was obtained from Sydney Local Health District-Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (Approval X20-0494 and 2020/ETH02896 10.24/DEC20). Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented in national, state and international meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12621000205831.

Robotic-Assisted Patellofemoral Replacement-Correlation of Preoperative Planning with Intraoperative Implant Position and Early Clinical Experience: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Patello-femoral arthroplasty (PFA) is successful in a selected group of patients and yields a good functional outcome. Robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty has been shown to provide better implant positioning and alignment. We aim to report our early outcomes and to compare Mako's (Robotic Arm Interactive Orthopaedic System [RIO]) preoperative implant planning position to our intraoperative PFA implant position. Data for this study was prospectively collected for 23 (two bilateral) patients who underwent robotic-assisted PFA between April 2017 and May 2018. All preoperative implant position planning and postoperative actual implant position were recorded. Presence of trochlear dysplasia and functional outcome scores were also collected. There were 17 (two bilateral) female and 6 male patients with a mean age of 66.5 (range: 41-89) years. The mean follow-up period was 30 (range: 24-37) months. Eighteen knees (72%) had evidence of trochlear dysplasia. The anterior trochlear line was on average, 7.71 (range: 3.3-11.3) degrees, internally rotated to the surgical transepicondylar axis and on average 2.9 (range: 0.2-6.5) degrees internally rotated to the posterior condylar line. The preoperative planning range was 4-degree internal to 4-degree external rotation, 4-degree varus to 6-degree valgus, and 7-degree flexion to 3-degree extension. The average difference between preoperative planning and intraoperative implant position was 0.43 degrees for rotation (r = 0.93), 0.99 degrees for varus/valgus (r = 0.29), 1.26 degrees for flexion/extension (r = 0.83), and 0.34 mm for proudness (r = 0.80). Six patients (24%) had a different size component from their preoperative plan (r = 0.98). The mean preoperative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was 16 and the mean postoperative OKS was 42. No patient had implant-related revision surgery or any radiological evidence of implant loosening at final follow-up. Our early results of robotic PFA are promising. Preoperative Mako planning correlates closely with intraoperative implant positioning. Longer follow-up is needed to assess long-term patient outcomes and implant survivorship.

Evaluation of an operation support system using the femoral anterior tangent line to determine intraoperative femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The femoral anterior tangent (FAT) line refers to a line parallel to the anterior surface of the distal femur in the axial plane. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a new operation support system which uses the FAT line to set the femoral component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

A total of 170 consecutive knees in 139 patients undergoing primary TKA with the JIGEN (Jig Engaged Three-dimensional (3D) Pre-Operative Planning Software for TKA) operation support system was examined. The JIGEN system creates 3D models of bones using computed tomography data, allowing for surgical simulations such as positioning of implants while calculating positions of the intramedullary alignment rod (IM rod) and surgical jig. We retrospectively analyzed the FAT line angle relative to the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) on the axis plane perpendicular to the IM rod and evaluated the accuracy of the femoral component alignment after TKA with the 3D measurement system.

RESULTS

The FAT line was 9.6° ± 3.7° (range, 1.4°-20.4°) internally rotated relative to the SEA. The average absolute error was 1.4° ± 1.1° in the coronal plane, 2.0° ± 1.5° in the sagittal plane, and 1.6° ± 1.3° in the axial plane. The femoral component outliers (i.e., >3° away from the goal alignment) were 7.7% in the coronal plane, 20.6% in the sagittal plane, and 10.3% in the axial plane.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the FAT line is a reliable and reproducibly identifiable axis for the accurate determination of proper rotational alignment in TKA. An operation support system which uses the FAT line for determining intraoperative femoral component rotation can effectively achieve highly accurate positioning of the femoral component in TKA.

Improved Component Placement Accuracy with Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Component position of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to influence prosthetic survivorships and clinical outcomes. Our objective was to compare the three-dimensional accuracy to plan of robotic-arm assisted TKA (RATKA) with conventional TKA for component position. We conducted a nonrandomized, prospective study comparing 143 RATKA with 86 conventional TKA operated at four U.S. centers between July 2016 and October 2018. Computed tomography (CT) scans obtained approximately 6 weeks postoperatively were analyzed using anatomical landmarks. Absolute deviation from surgical plans were defined as the absolute value of the difference between the CT measurements and surgeons' femoral and tibial component mechanical varus/valgus alignment, tibial component posterior slope, and femoral component internal/external rotation. Differences of absolute deviations were tested using stratified Wilcoxon's tests that controlled for study center. Patient-reported outcome measures collected through 1 postoperative year were modeled using multiple regression controlling for age, sex, body mass index, study center, and the preoperative score. RATKA demonstrated greater accuracy for tibial component alignment (median [25th, 75th percentiles] absolute deviation from plan of all centers combined for conventional vs. RA, 1.7 [0.9, 2.9] vs. 0.9 [0.4, 1.9] degrees, p < 0.001), femoral component rotation (1.5 [0.9, 2.5] vs. 1.3 [0.6, 2.5] degrees, p = 0.015), and tibial slope (2.9 [1.5, 5.0] vs. 1.1 [0.6, 2.0] degrees, p < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, RATKA showed significantly greater Veterans RAND 12-item health survey (VR-12) physical component scores (adjusted mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 2.4 [0.2, 4.5] points, p = 0.034) and qualitatively greater Knee Society (KS) composite functional scores (3.5 [-1.3, 8.2] points, p = 0.159), though not statistically significant. Compared with conventional instrumentation, RATKA demonstrated greater three-dimensional accuracy to plan for various component positioning parameters and clinical improvements in physical status and function with no major safety concerns during the first postoperative year. These results may be attributed to the preoperative CT scan planning, real-time intraoperative feedback, and stereotactic-guided cutting that takes into consideration patient-specific bony anatomy. These findings support the use of RATKA for enhanced arthroplasty outcomes.

Optimal surgical component alignment minimizes TKR wear - An in silico study with nine alignment parameters

Currently, preclinical mechanical wear testing of total knee replacements (TKRs) is done using ideally aligned components using standardized TKR level walking under either force or displacement-control regimes. To understand the influence of implant alignment and testing control regime, we studied the effect of nine component alignment parameters on TKR volumetric wear in silico. We used a computational framework combining Latin Hypercube sampling design of experiments, finite element analysis, and a numerical model of polyethylene wear, to create a predictive model of how component alignment affects wear rate for each control regime. Nine component alignment parameters were investigated, five femoral variables and four tibial variables. To investigate perturbations of the nine implant alignment variables, two separate 300-point designs were executed, one for each control regime. The results were then used to generate surrogate statistical models using stepwise multiple linear regression. Wear at the neutral position was 4.5mm3/million cycle and 8.6mm3/million cycle for displacement and force-control, respectively. Stepwise multiple linear regression surrogate models were highly significant for each control regime, but force-control generated a stronger predictive model, with a higher R2, more included terms, and a lower RMSE. Both models predicted transverse plane rotational mismatch can lead to large changes in predicted wear; a transverse plane alignment mismatch of 15° can elicit a change in wear of up to 5mm3/million cycle, almost double that of neutral alignment. Therefore, transverse plane alignment is particularly important when considering failure of the implant due to wear.

Arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle and stressed hip-knee-ankle angle: equivalent methods for estimating constitutional lower limb alignment in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA TKA) relies on precise determination of constitutional alignment to set resection targets. The arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) is a radiographic method to estimate constitutional alignment following onset of arthritis. Intraoperatively, constitutional alignment may also be approximated using navigation-based angular measurements of deformity correction, termed the stressed HKA (sHKA). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between these methods of estimating constitutional alignment to better understand their utility in KA TKA.

METHODS

A radiological and intraoperative computer-assisted navigation study was undertaken comparing measurements of the aHKA using radiographs and computed tomography (CT-aHKA) to the sHKA in 88 TKAs meeting the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the difference in the paired means between the three methods to determine constitutional alignment (aHKA, CT-aHKA, sHKA). Secondary outcomes included testing agreement across measurements using Bland-Altman plots and analysis of subgroup differences based on different patterns of compartmental arthritis.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between any paired comparison or across groups (aHKA vs. sHKA: 0.1°, p = 0.817; aHKA vs. CT-aHKA: 0.3°, p = 0.643; CT-aHKA vs. sHKA: 0.2°, p = 0.722; ANOVA, p = 0.845). Bland-Altman plots were consistent with good agreement for all comparisons, with approximately 95% of values within limits of agreement. There was no difference in the three paired comparisons (aHKA, CT-aHKA, and sHKA) for knees with medial compartment arthritis. However, these findings were not replicated in knees with lateral compartment arthritis.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference between the arithmetic HKA (whether obtained using CT or radiographs) and the stressed HKA in this analysis. These findings further validate the preoperative arithmetic method and support use of the intraoperative stressed HKA as techniques to restore constitutional lower limb alignment in KA TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Navigation Improves the Survival Rate of Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty by Severe Preoperative Coronal Deformity: A Propensity Matched Case-Control Comparative Study

The primary hypothesis of this study was that the survival rate over 10 years of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) implanted with a navigation system was superior to that of TKAs implanted with a conventional technique. The secondary hypothesis was that the severity of the initial coronal deformity had a negative influence on the survival rate. A national, multicentric, retrospective study was performed in France, including eight university or private centers with high volumes in knee surgery. Cases operated on with either a conventional (control group) or a navigated (study group) technique were matched after calculating the propensity score using the logistic regression technique. All patients were contacted after 10 years or more to determine the survival of the TKA. The need for date and cause of revision were noted. The primary end point of the study was the occurrence of a revision for any mechanical reason. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier's technique, with the primary criterion as end point. The influence of the implantation technique was analyzed by a log-rank test at a 5% level of significance. The influence of severity of the preoperative coronal deformity was analyzed using the same technique. A total of 513 cases were included in each group. The survival rates after 13 years were 96.5% in the study group and 92.9% in the control group (not significant). There was no significant difference between both groups for the survival rates after 13 years for small deformity (96.0 vs. 97.0%), but the difference was significant for large deformity (97.0 vs. 89.0%, p = 0.04). The results suggest that the use of a navigation system, allowing a more consistent correction of the preoperative coronal deformity, thus allows a better long-term prosthetic survival in cases with a large initial coronal deformity. A navigation system should be routinely used in cases of initial coronal deformity greater than or equal to 10 degrees, as conventional techniques do not routinely provide satisfactory axial correction in these difficult cases.

Outcomes of Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Conventional TKA: A Bicentric Controlled Retrospective Clinical Study

Despite the globally ascertained success of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) procedure, 20% of patients are still unsatisfied with the surgery results. The purpose of the study is to identify the functional and radiological outcomes of the computer-assisted (CAS) TKA compared to the conventional technique. The clinical databases and medical records of both clinical sites were retrospectively analyzed, and then according to study time-lapse, inclusion, and exclusion criteria, eligible patients were retrieved and included. A total of 42 patients that underwent to CAS TKA (NAVI) and 61 patients that underwent to Conventional TKA (CONV) were included. The NAVI group reported a statistically significant higher surgical time. A lower intraoperative blood loss was found in the computer-assisted group, though this difference was not statistically significant. Implant survival analysis at two years did not show differences between groups during the follow-up period. At two years, follow-up postoperative intergroup analysis showed no statistically significant difference between groups. According to the radiologic analysis, the NAVI group showed comparable outcomes to the conventional group. The present study showed that there was no clinical and radiological difference between CAS arthroplasty and conventional technique.

Mid-term functional outcomes of patient-specific versus conventional instrumentation total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) utilizes three-dimensional imaging to produce total knee arthroplasty cutting jigs which matches patient's native anatomy. However, there are limited mid- to long-term studies examining its clinical efficacy. The aim of this study was to compare functional outcomes of PSI surgery versus conventional TKA surgery at 5-year follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients were prospectively recruited into either the MRI-based PSI or conventional TKA group. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS), while quality of life was evaluated with the Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) of Short-Form 36 and compared between the two groups at 5-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Although the PCS was 7 ± 3 points better in the PSI group preoperatively (p = 0.017), it became 5 ± 2 points worse than the conventional group at 5-year follow-up (p = 0.025). As compared to the PSI group, the conventional group showed a significantly greater improvement in PCS at 5 years as compared to before surgery (p = 0.003). There were no significant differences in KSFS, KSKS, OKS or MCS between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PSI TKA did not result in improved functional outcomes or better quality of life when compared to conventional TKA. The additional costs and waiting time associated with PSI are not justifiable and therefore not recommended as an alternative to conventional TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Reliability of Imageless Computer-Assisted Navigation for Femoral Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the femoral component rotation on intra-operative data recorded in a computer-assisted navigation system (CAN-FRA) compared with the post-operative femoral component rotation observed on computed tomography (CT-FRA).

Material and method:

Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or primary osteoarthritis of the knee was performed in 51 knees in 36 patients with a mean age of 69.51 years. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon using the same implant design. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to compare the intra-operative CAN-FRA with the post-operative CT-FRA. The angle between the anatomical epicondylar axis and the posterior condylar axis of the implant (CT-FRA) was measured at two separate timepoints by three observers who were blinded to the intra-operative CAN-FRA. Internal rotation was defined as rotation in the negative direction, while external rotation was defined as positive.

Results:

The mean intra-operative CAN-FRA was 0.1° ± 2.8° (range -5.0° to 5.5°). The mean post-operative CT-FRA was -1.3° ± 2.1° (range -4.6° to 4.4°). The mean difference between the CAN-FRA and the CT-FRA was -1.3° ± 2.2° (range -7.9° to 2.4°). The respective ICC values for the three observers were 0.92, 0.94, and 0.93, while the respective intra-observer coefficients were 0.91, 0.85, and 0.90. The ICC for the intra-operative CAN-FRA versus the post-operative CT-FRA was 0.71.

Conclusion:

This study shows that using a computer-assisted navigation system in TKA achieves reliable results and helps to achieve optimal positioning of the femoral component and rotation alignment correction.

Quantification of intra-articular fibrosis in patients with stiff knee arthroplasties using metal-reduction MRI

AIMS

Stiffness is a common complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Pathogenesis is not understood, treatment options are limited, and diagnosis is challenging. The aim of this study was to investigate if MRI can be used to visualize intra-articular scarring in patients with stiff, painful knee arthroplasties.

METHODS

Well-functioning primary TKAs (n = 11), failed non-fibrotic TKAs (n = 5), and patients with a clinical diagnosis of fibrosis1 (n = 8) underwent an MRI scan with advanced metal suppression (Slice Encoding for Metal Artefact Correction, SEMAC) with gadolinium contrast. Fibrotic tissue (low intensity on T1 and T2, low-moderate post-contrast enhancement) was quantified (presence and tissue thickness) in six compartments: supra/infrapatella, medial/lateral gutters, and posterior medial/lateral.

RESULTS

Fibrotic tissue was identified in all patients studied. However, tissue was significantly thicker in fibrotic patients (4.4 mm ± 0.2 mm) versus non-fibrotic (2.5 mm ± 0.4 mm) and normal TKAs (1.9 mm ± 0.2 mm, p = < 0.05). Significant (> 4 mm thick) tissue was seen in 26/48 (54%) of compartments examined in the fibrotic group, compared with 17/30 (57%) non-fibrotic, and 10/66 (15%) normal TKAs. Although revision surgery did improve range of movement (ROM) in all fibrotic patients, clinically significant restriction remained post-surgery.

CONCLUSION

Stiff TKAs contain intra-articular fibrotic tissue that is identifiable by MRI. Studies should evaluate whether MRI is useful for surgical planning of debridement, and as a non-invasive measurement tool following interventions for stiffness caused by fibrosis. Revision for stiffness can improve ROM, but outcomes are sub-optimal and new treatments are required. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(10):1331-1340.

Assessment of Limb Alignment and Component Placement After All Burr Robotic-Assisted TKA

BACKGROUND

All burr robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (R-TKA) is the new way of doing TKA without conventional jigs and saw. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of limb alignment and component placement after R-TKA.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This is the prospective study of 63 patients who underwent R-TKA between March and October 2019. Standing scanogram and AP/lateral radiograph were done on day of discharge, 5th day after surgery to calculate limb alignment and component placement angles in coronal and sagittal plane. Deformity correction Bone Ninja software had been used to calculate all this angles.

RESULTS

Mean difference between robotic achieved and postoperative limb alignment was 1.24°. Mean difference between planned and achieved component placement in coronal and sagittal plane for tibia was 0.33° and 0.66° and for femur was 0.62° and 0.30°, respectively. Posterior condylar offset difference was 0.03. As per planned by Navio software, R-TKA had reduced the overall outlier of coronal limb alignment from 3° to less than 1.2° and component placement malposition to less than 1° in coronal and sagittal plane.

CONCLUSION

R-TKA provides near perfect limb alignment and near accurate femoral/tibial component placement as planned in both coronal and sagittal plane. Posterior condylar offset was also perfectly maintained. R-TKA had reduced the overall outlier of coronal limb alignment from 3° to less than 1.2° and component placement malposition to less than 1° in coronal and sagittal plane.

The relationship between alignment, function and loading in total knee replacement: In-vivo analysis of a unique patient population

The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of total knee replacement (TKR) alignment on in-vivo knee function and loading in a unique patient cohort who have been identified as having a high rate of component mal-alignment. Post-TKR (82.4 ± 6.7 months), gait analysis was performed on 25 patients (27 knees), to calculate knee kinematics and kinetics. For a step activity, video fluoroscopic analysis quantified in-vivo implant kinematics. Frontal plane lower-limb alignment was defined by the Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKA) measured on long leg static X-rays. Transverse plane component rotation was calculated from computed tomography scans. Sagittal plane alignment was defined by measuring the flexion angle of the femoral component and the posterior tibial slope angle (PTSA). For gait analysis, a more varus HKA correlated with increased peak and dynamic joint kinetics, predicting 47.6% of Knee Adduction Angular Impulse variance. For the step activity, during step-up and single leg loaded, higher PTSA correlated with a posterior shift in medial compartment Anterior-Posterior (AP) translation. During step-down, higher PTSA correlated with reduced lateral compartment AP translation with a posterior shift in AP translation in both compartments. A more varus HKA correlated with a more posterior medial AP translation and inter-component rotation was related to transverse plan range of motion. This in-vivo study found that frontal plane lower-limb alignment had a significant effect on joint forces during gait but had minimal influence on in-vivo implant kinematics for step activity. PTSA was found to influence in-vivo TKR translations and is therefore an important surgical factor.

Accuracy of computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective computed tomography-based study

INTRODUCTION

Evidence now exists advocating the use of computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite the introduction of new navigation systems into clinical practice no evidence currently exists showing independent verification of their accuracy. The aim of this study was to validate the in vivo accuracy of the Exactech Guided Personalised Surgery (GPS) computer navigation system using a validated computed tomography (CT) measurement of alignment.

METHOD

Consecutive patients who underwent TKA using the GPS Navigation System at our institution were prospectively recruited. Intraoperative parameters of 3D alignment as measured by the GPS navigation system were recorded and compared against the postoperative measurements of alignment measured using the Perth CT Protocol to assess the accuracy of the GPS navigation system.

RESULTS

29 consecutive patients (13 male, 16 female) who underwent TKA were prospectively recruited. Overall, for all measures of 3D alignment the mean difference between intraoperatively recorded and postoperative CT-measured alignment was 1.55° ± 0.22° (95% confidence interval). Individual measurement differences in the femoral prosthesis were: coronal alignment 1.64° ± 0.52°; flexion 2.07° ± 0.55°; rotation 1.38° ± 0.33° Differences in the tibial prosthesis were: coronal alignment 2.03° ± 0.53°; slope 1.14° ± 0.39° The whole limb coronal alignment difference was 2.34° ± 0.83° CONCLUSION: The Exactech GPS Navigation system is very accurate with a high concordance between intraoperative and postoperative measures of alignment and prosthesis positioning. We therefore confidently validate the system and support its continued use in clinical practice. Other navigation systems should undergo a similar validation process.

Is TKA with computer-assisted navigation associated with less blood loss? A comparative study between computer-navigated and conventional method

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether computer-assisted navigated TKA reduces perioperative blood loss. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups and underwent either a conventional TKA (n = 40) or a TKA with computer-assisted navigation (n = 40). Perioperative blood loss was evaluated by laboratory parameters, postoperative drain output and number of required transfusions. Change in hemoglobin concentration and in hematocrit levels was similar. Also, there was no statistically significant difference in drain output and in the number of transfused units. The results of this study showed that TKA with computer-assisted navigation is similar to the conventional TKA regarding perioperative hemorrhage.

CT-based TruMatch® Personal Solutions for knee replacement Surgery … Does it really match?

Objective

Patient-specific templates promises to be able to increase alignment while decreasing operative time, increasing patient throughput, decreasing instrumentation, reducing risk of fat embolism and intraoperative bleeding, decreasing tissue loss, shortening recovery, reducing post-operative pain and decreasing incidence of infection. However, multiple studies have shown conflicting results regarding these potential benefits. This study serves to critically evaluate the potential advantages and disadvantages of using a patient-specific templating technique through a single-surgeon study.

Methods

All patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis of the knee using TruMatch® Personal Solutions total knee replacement by a single surgeon were identified. An age-, gender-, side-, diagnosis- and surgeon-matched cohort who underwent conventional primary TKAs was randomly identified for comparison.

Results

The average distal medial femur (p < 0.001), distal lateral femur (p < 0.001), posteromedial femur (p < 0.001), posterolateral femur (p < 0.001), medial tibial (p < 0.001) and lateral tibial (p = 0.12) predicted cuts showed significant difference from the actual corresponding cuts. Three knees also required the need to freehand. There was no significant difference in mechanical (p = 0.96) and anatomical alignments (p = 0.26), as well as the changes in mechanical (p = 0.06) and anatomical (p = 0.39) alignments between the two groups. Duration of surgery (p = 0.26), length of inpatient stay (p = 0.06) and incidence of wound infection (p = 1.00) were similar. Additionally, patients in the TruMatch® Personal Solutions group had a greater decrease drop in hemoglobin levels (p = 0.02), with five transfusions needed while only one patient in the conventional group required transfusion (p = 0.09).

Conclusion

Our early experience and results with the CT-based TruMatch® Personal Solutions templates for TKA has not been promising. Despite promised, there were no demonstrable benefits with the technology. Moreover, the disadvantage of having increased blood loss was identified. Further studies are required to recommend the use of this technology.

Restoring the constitutional alignment with a restrictive kinematic protocol improves quantitative soft-tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

AIMS

It is unknown whether kinematic alignment (KA) objectively improves knee balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), despite this being the biomechanical rationale for its use. This study aimed to determine whether restoring the constitutional alignment using a restrictive KA protocol resulted in better quantitative knee balance than mechanical alignment (MA).

METHODS

We conducted a randomized superiority trial comparing patients undergoing TKA assigned to KA within a restrictive safe zone or MA. Optimal knee balance was defined as an intercompartmental pressure difference (ICPD) of 15 psi or less using a pressure sensor. The primary endpoint was the mean intraoperative ICPD at 10° of flexion prior to knee balancing. Secondary outcomes included balance at 45° and 90°, requirements for balancing procedures, and presence of tibiofemoral lift-off.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients (70 knees) were randomized to KA and 62 patients (68 knees) to MA. Mean ICPD at 10° flexion in the KA group was 11.7 psi (SD 13.1) compared with 32.0 psi in the MA group (SD 28.9), with a mean difference in ICPD between KA and MA of 20.3 psi (p < 0.001). Mean ICPD in the KA group was significantly lower than in the MA group at 45° and 90°, respectively (25.2 psi MA vs 14.8 psi KA, p = 0.004; 19.1 psi MA vs 11.7 psi KA, p < 0.002, respectively). Overall, participants in the KA group were more likely to achieve optimal knee balance (80% vs 35%; p < 0.001). Bone recuts to achieve knee balance were more likely to be required in the MA group (49% vs 9%; p < 0.001). More participants in the MA group had tibiofemoral lift-off (43% vs 13%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study provides persuasive evidence that restoring the constitutional alignment with KA in TKA results in a statistically significant improvement in quantitative knee balance, and further supports this technique as a viable alternative to MA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(1):117-124.

Different targets of mechanical alignment do not improve knee outcomes after TKA

BACKGROUND

Accurate alignment is a basic principle of TKA surgery, but achieving alignment within this target may not translate into superior outcomes after surgery.

PURPOSE

To assess if neutral TKA mechanical alignment was associated with superior knee outcomes and to examine the effect of various aspects of pre-operative and post-operative alignment on knee function.

METHODS

Analysis of a database of 444 TKA patients between June 2009 and October 2016. Knee outcomes (WOMAC, AKSS and knee range of motion) were collected before surgery and during follow-up at a minimum of six months.

RESULTS

Analysis included 444 TKA patients (62% female, mean age 66 years, mean follow-up 23 months). Deformity varied from 21° varus (mean = 7.9, SD = 2.8) to 17° valgus deformity (mean = 7.7, SD = 2.8). Pre-operatively, 101 (23%) knees were in native neutral mechanical alignment, while 278 (63%) were in varus and 65 (15%) were in valgus. Post-operatively, a group of 365 (82%) TKA were found to be in neutral mechanical alignment and a group of 79 (18%) TKA were noted to be 'Outliers' (17 [4%] TKA > 3° varus and 62 [14%] TKA > 3° valgus alignment). Restoration of the target of alignment of 0 ± 3° or 0 ± 1°, did not have better functional outcomes scores, range of motion or prosthesis longevity than those in the outlier range.

CONCLUSION

Neutral TKA alignment did not appear to be a significant contributing factor to the improvement in knee function in short-medium term follow-up.

Current variability in the assessment of component position for the unhappy knee replacement

INTRODUCTION

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has a success rate of 80-90%, but despite this encouraging figure a painful TKA can be a source of dismay for patients and surgeons. Computed tomography (CT) scan has been developed as a tool to collect data in the analysis of TKA component placement. Protocols used to collect such data exist in orthopaedic and radiology practice with little standardization and significant variation. The aim of this review article was to evaluate such variability by sampling a series of protocols from a range of different radiology practices within NSW, Australia in a case-based manner and to then compare them against any literature standards.

METHODS

The literature was surveyed for existing CT scan protocols used in TKA assessment. These were then compared with a series of metropolitan and rural radiology firms across the public and private sectors in NSW, Australia.

RESULTS

Considerable variability exists between current protocols across NSW, Australia, which differ with proposed literature standards.

CONCLUSION

Variabilities encountered when comparing the different scanning protocols in use for the assessment of TKA constitute a large potential source of error in the analysis of TKA component positioning. The reliance surgeons place on such analyses suggests the need for an established scanning protocol with an incorporated grading system and standardized values to allow reproducible data to help assess and predict TKA function.

The effect of surgical alignment and soft tissue conditions on the kinematics and wear of a fixed bearing total knee replacement

As life expectancy and activity levels of patients increase so does the demand on total knee replacements (TKRs). Abnormal mechanics and wear of TKRs can lead to implant loosening and revision. Component alignment after surgery varies due to the presurgical alignment, the accuracy of the surgical instrumentation and due to patient factors, such as the soft tissue balance. This study experimentally investigated the effect of variation in component alignment and the soft tissue conditions on the kinematics and wear of a fixed bearing TKR. DePuy Sigma fixed bearing TKRs with moderately cross-linked UHMWPE were used. Different alignment conditions were simulated in the coronal, sagittal and transverse planes in an ISO force-controlled simulation system. Three different soft tissue conditions were simulated using virtual springs to represent a stiff knee, a preserved PCL and a resected PCL. Four different alignment conditions were studied; ideal alignment, 4° tibial and femoral varus joint line, 14° rotational mismatch and 10° posterior tibial slope. The varus joint line alignment resulted in similar kinematics and lower wear rate compared to ideal alignment. The rotational mismatch alignment resulted in significantly higher tibial rotation and abduction-adduction as well as a significantly higher wear rate than ideal alignment. The posterior tibial slope alignment resulted in significantly higher wear than the ideal alignment and dislocated under the lower tension soft tissue conditions. Component alignment and the soft tissue conditions had a significant effect on the kinematics and wear of the TKR investigated in this study. The surgical alignment of the TKR is an important factor in the clinical outcome of the joint as factors such as increased tibial rotation can lead to anterior knee pain and instability and increased wear can lead to aseptic loosening and early failure resulting in revision.

Comparison between navigated reported position and postoperative computed tomography to evaluate accuracy in a robotic navigation system in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Computer navigation increases reproducibility compared to non-navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Robotics navigation is a branch of computer navigation technology that might further improve accuracy of implant placement. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy achieved in TKA with a robotic navigation system.

METHODS

One hundred seventy three knees. System studied: Omni navigation System (OMNI, Raynham, MA). Navigated femoral and tibial cuts were compared to postoperative computed tomography (CT). Measurements reviewed: femoral coronal alignment (FCA), femoral sagittal alignment (FSA), femoral rotational alignment (FRA), tibial coronal alignment (TCA), tibial sagittal alignment (TSA) and hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle. Statistical analysis was made using R.

RESULTS

The mean differences between the navigated reported and the CT positions were: FCA: 0.1 ± 1.2° more varus (P = 0.58), FSA: 1.5 ± 0.3° more flexed (P < 0.001), FRA: 0.0 ± 1.7° (P = 0.93), TCA: 0.7 ± 1.1° more varus (P < 0.001), TSA: -1.3 ± 1.5 more negative slope (P < 0.001), HKA angle: 0.4 ± 2.4 more varus (P < 0.049). The percentages of concordance inside a three degree difference were: FCA: 98% (169 knees), FSA: 100% (173 knees), FRA: 94% (162 knees), TCA: 99% (171 knees), TSA: 93% (161 knees) and HKA angle: 83% (144 knees).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study showed that the robotic navigation system studied is highly accurate regarding final implant positioning for FCA, FRA and TCA. It has less accuracy in FSA, TSA and the HKA angle.

Accuracy assessment of a novel image-free handheld robot for Total Knee Arthroplasty in a cadaveric study

Surgical navigation has been shown to improve the accuracy of bone preparation and limb alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Previous work has shown the effectiveness of various types of navigation systems. Here, for the first time, we assessed the accuracy of a novel imageless semiautonomous handheld robotic sculpting system in performing bone resection and preparation in TKA using cadaveric specimens. In this study, we compared the planned and final implant placement in 18 cadaveric specimens undergoing TKA using the new tool. Eight surgeons carried out the procedures using three types of implant designs. A quantitative analysis was performed to determine the translational, angular, and rotational differences between the planned and achieved positions of the implants. The mean femoral flexion, varus/valgus, and rotational error was -2.0°, -0.1°, and -0.5°, respectively. The mean tibial posterior slope, and varus/valgus error was -0.2°, and -0.2°, respectively. We obtained higher flexion errors for the femoral implant when using cut-guides as compared to using a bur for cutting the bones. The image-free robotic sculpting tool achieved accurate implementation of the surgical plan with small errors in implant placement. Future studies will focus on determining how well the accurate implant placement translates into a clinical and functional benefit for the patient.

Noninvasive navigated assessment of the lower limb axis prior to knee arthroplasty: a feasibility study

The purpose of the study was to assess accuracy and repeatability of a noninvasive navigated (NIN) measurement of the lower limb axes by comparison with the conventional, invasive navigated (IN) technique. The tested hypothesis was that NIN measure will significantly differ from IN measure when performed on a supine patient under general anesthesia just prior to knee arthroplasty. The accuracy study involved 20 cases. The following measures were performed with both systems: maximal extension angle, coronal mechanical femoro-tibial angle at the previously assessed maximal extension angle, coronal mechanical femoro-tibial angle at 30° of knee flexion. NIN and IN measures were compared with the appropriate statistical tests. The repeatability study involved 14 cases. The same measures were performed with the NIN system twice by two independent observers. The intra- and inter-observer variability was assessed by the calculation of the intra-class correlation coefficient. After correction for the systematic biases, the differences between the two systems were not significant. A good correlation, a good coherence and an excellent agreement between NIN and IN measures of maximal extension angle and coronal femoro-tibial mechanical angle at maximal extension. But measures at 30° of flexion were inconsistent. The NIN system can be considered as an accurate and precise tool for the assessment of the knee extension angle and the coronal deformation at maximal extension prior to knee arthroplasty. But this system is less accurate and less repeatable when measuring coronal femoro-tibial mechanical angle at 30° of flexion and should not be used for this purpose.

Accurate determination of post-operative 3D component positioning in total knee arthroplasty: the AURORA protocol

Background

Successful component alignment is a major metric of success in total knee arthroplasty. Component translational placement, however, is less well reported despite being shown to affect patient outcomes. CT scans and planar X-rays are routinely used to report alignment but do not report measurements as precisely or accurately as modern navigation systems can deliver, or with reference to the pre-operative anatomy.

Methods

A method is presented here that utilises a CT scan obtained for pre-operative planning and a post-operative CT scan for analysis to recreate a computation model of the knee with patient-specific axes. This model is then used to determine the post-operative component position in 3D space.

Results

Two subjects were investigated for reproducibility producing 12 sets of results. The maximum error using this technique was 0.9° ± 0.6° in rotation and 0.5 mm ± 0.3 mm in translation. Eleven subjects were investigated for reliability producing 22 sets of results. The intra-class correlation coefficient for each of the three axes of rotation and three primary resection planes was > 0.93 indicating excellent reliability.

Conclusions

Routine use of this analysis will allow surgeons and engineers to better understand the effect of component alignment as well as the placement on outcome.

Comparison of Coronal Prosthetic Alignment After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using 3 Computer-Assisted Navigation Systems

Recent advances in surgical tools such as navigation systems have contributed to accurate implantation in total knee arthroplasty. Although several navigation systems have been developed, reports regarding which navigation system has better accuracy are few. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the accuracy of postoperative coronal alignment among 3 navigation systems. A total of 90 knee prostheses were implanted for 90 patients with osteoarthritis. Thirty patients were enrolled in each of the following 3 navigation groups: Stryker Navigation System II (computed tomography-free navigation; Stryker, Mahwah, New Jersey); OrthoPilot version 4.2 navigation system (computed tomography-free navigation; B. Braun Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany); and VectorVision navigation system (computed tomography-based navigation system; BrainLAB, Munich, Germany). Thirty consecutive total knee arthroplasties performed via the conventional method without navigation were selected as a control group for comparison with the navigation groups. Postoperative coronal mechanical axis and femoral and tibial coronal component angles were compared among the groups using long-leg standing radiographs for the rate of outliers beyond 3°. No differences were observed in the mean femoral and tibial component angles among the navigation and conventional groups. However, the proportion of outliers beyond 3° was higher in the conventional group than in the 3 navigation groups. No significant differences in the outlying values were found among the 3 navigation groups. These 3 navigation systems achieved equally accurate coronal mechanical alignment with fewer outliers. The navigation systems exhibited more precise implantation than the conventional method. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(5):e621-e628.].

Iatrogenic Bone and Soft Tissue Trauma in Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared With Conventional Jig-Based Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study and Validation of a New Classification System

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to compare macroscopic bone and soft tissue injury between robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) and conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty (CJ-TKA) and create a validated classification system for reporting iatrogenic bone and periarticular soft tissue injury after TKA.

METHODS

This study included 30 consecutive CJ-TKAs followed by 30 consecutive RA-TKAs performed by a single surgeon. Intraoperative photographs of the femur, tibia, and periarticular soft tissues were taken before implantation of prostheses. Using these outcomes, the macroscopic soft tissue injury (MASTI) classification system was developed to grade iatrogenic bone and soft tissue injuries. Interobserver and Intraobserver validity of the proposed classification system was assessed.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing RA-TKA had reduced medial soft tissue injury in both passively correctible (P < .05) and noncorrectible varus deformities (P < .05); more pristine femoral (P < .05) and tibial (P < .05) bone resection cuts; and improved MASTI scores compared to CJ-TKA (P < .05). There was high interobserver (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.92 [95% confidence interval: 0.88-0.96], P < .05) and intraobserver agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.94 [95% confidence interval: 0.92-0.97], P < .05) of the proposed MASTI classification system.

CONCLUSION

There is reduced bone and periarticular soft tissue injury in patients undergoing RA-TKA compared to CJ-TKA. The proposed MASTI classification system is a reproducible grading scheme for describing iatrogenic bone and soft tissue injury in TKA.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

RA-TKA is associated with reduced bone and soft tissue injury compared with conventional jig-based TKA. The proposed MASTI classification may facilitate further research correlating macroscopic soft tissue injury during TKA to long-term clinical and functional outcomes.

Extrinsic Factors as Component Positions to Bone and Intrinsic Factors Affecting Postoperative Rotational Limb Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to identify the factors affecting postoperative rotational limb alignment of the tibia relative to the femur. We hypothesized that not only component positions but also several intrinsic factors were associated with postoperative rotational limb alignment.

METHODS

This study included 99 knees (90 women and 9 men) with a mean age of 77 ± 6 years. A three-dimensional (3D) assessment system was applied under weight-bearing conditions to biplanar long-leg radiographs using 3D-to-2D image registration technique. The evaluation parameters were (1) component position; (2) preoperative and postoperative coronal, sagittal, and rotational limb alignment; (3) preoperative bony deformity, including femoral torsion, condylar twist angle, and tibial torsion; and (4) preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM).

RESULTS

In multiple linear regression analysis using a stepwise procedure, postoperative rotational limb alignment was associated with the following: (1) rotation of the component position (tibia: β = 0.371, P < .0001; femur: β = -0.327, P < .0001), (2) preoperative rotational limb alignment (β = 0.253, P = .001), (3) postoperative flexion angle (β = 0.195, P = .007), and (4) tibial torsion (β = 0.193, P = .010).

CONCLUSION

In addition to component positions, the intrinsic factors, such as preoperative rotational limb alignment, ROM, and tibial torsion, affected postoperative rotational limb alignment. On a premise of correct component positions, the intrinsic factors that can be controlled by surgeons should be taken care. In particular, ROM is necessary to be improved within the possible range to acquire better postoperative rotational limb alignment.

A computer-assisted, tibia-first technique for improved femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty

Background

The use of navigation for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves limb alignment in the coronal and sagittal planes. However, similar improvements in femoral and tibial component rotation have not yet been realized using currently available systems.

Methods

We developed a modified navigated TKA technique in which femoral rotation was set using the resected tibial plane as the reference with the aim of achieving a rectangular flexion gap. Limb alignment was assessed in a cohort of 30 knees using the navigation system. Post-operative limb alignment was measured using long-leg standing radiographs. Computed tomography was used to determine post-operative component orientation.

Results

Sagittal alignment data improved from a mean of 7.8° varus (pre-operative) to 0.0° (post-operative), assessed by intra-operative navigation. Post-operative hip-knee-ankle axis alignment was 0.9° valgus (mean; standard deviation [SD] 1.7°). Mean femoral component rotation was 0.5° internally rotated (SD 2.6°), relative to the surgical transepicondylar axis. Mean tibial component rotation was 0.9° externally rotated (SD 5.5°). No soft tissue releases were performed.

Conclusions

These results confirm that the desired femoral rotation, set using a tibia-first approach with the resected tibial plane as the reference, can be achieved without compromising overall limb alignment. Femoral component rotation was within a narrow range, with a moderate improvement in achieving more consistent tibial component rotation compared with other techniques. This technique may prove to be useful for surgeons wishing to employ a tibia-first philosophy for TKA while maximizing the benefits associated with computer-assisted navigation.

No radiological and clinical advantages with patient-specific positioning guides in total knee replacement

Background and purpose - Although the use of patient-specific positioning guides (PSPGs) in total knee replacement (TKR) in theory is promising, the technique has not yet proven its superior- ity compared with the conventional method. We compared radio- logical alignment and clinical outcome between TKR performed with the use of PSPGs and the conventional operation method. Patients and methods - 3 hospitals participated in a prospec- tive trial. 109 patients were randomized to either the conventional method or to the use of PSPGs. Postoperatively a full-length standing anteroposterior radiograph and a postoperative CT scan were taken. On the CT scan the alignments were measured for both the femoral and tibial components in the frontal, sagit- tal, and axial plane. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Eurocol-5D-3L (Eq5D) descriptive system and visual analogue scale (VAS), a pain score (NRS), and range of motion (ROM) were recorded preoperatively, and at 3 months, 1, and 2 years. The operation time and length of hospital stay were recorded. Results - 90 patients were available for postoperative CT mea- surements. A statistically significant difference was found between the conventional TKR instrumentation and the use of PSPGs for the frontal femoral (mean (SD) 0.6° (1.7) vs. -0.3° (2.2), CI 0.08 to 1.69) and tibial (-0.3° (1.5) vs. 0.9° (2.1), CI -1.98 to -0.44) compo- nent angles and for the tibial alignment in the sagittal plane (-3.8° (3.0) vs. -2.2° (2.5), CI -2.72; -0.42). The proportions of outliers were similar between the groups as well as the hip-knee-ankle angle, the KOOS sub scores, the Eq5D, pain (NRS), ROM, opera- tion time, and length of hospital stay. Interpretation - The use of PSPGs requires a preoperative CT scan or MRI and the guides have an additional cost. As this study was not able to prove any extra benefit of the use of PSPGs we recommend the conventional operation method for TKR.

Three-dimensional analysis of accuracy of component positioning in total knee arthroplasty with patient specific and conventional instruments: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Component malalignment remains a major concern in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patient-specific guides (PSG) were developed to increase accuracy of bone resections and component placement, but available evidence is contradictory. We assessed the accuracy of 3D component placement in TKA with PSG compared to conventional surgery using virtual 3D bone models.

METHODS

Fifty patients were randomly assigned to the PSG or conventional instrumentation group, 44 were finally analyzed. Preoperatively, MRI and CT scans were converted into virtual 3D models and a surgical plan was developed. Surgery was performed and changes in component sizing were recorded. Postoperative CT images were converted to 3D models and aligned to the planned, preoperative models and implant orientation. Differences between planned and postoperative implant orientations were calculated in 3D.

RESULTS

PSG allowed significantly more accurate varus/valgus placement for the femoral component (PSG: 0.14±1.47; control: 1.40±1.99; p<0.05), but more slope was introduced (PSG: 2.82±2.42; control: 0.90±2.28; p<0.05). Less variability in positioning accuracy for femoral flexion angle and tibial rotation was found with PSG, indicating a result closer to the planned position, but no significant differences in positioning accuracy were found. PSG allowed more accurate prediction of the femoral (PSG: 100%; control: 64%) and tibial (PSG: 79%; control 56%) component size.

CONCLUSION

PSG led to adequate component positioning accuracy compared to the pre-operative plan. For the femoral component, the positioning was significantly closer to the planned position in the coronal plane, a similar trend was observed for the sagittal plane. But, for the tibial component, significantly more slope was introduced. A better prediction of component sizing was found with PSG compared to conventional surgery.

Mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty carries a risk of bony gap changes and flexion-extension axis displacement

PURPOSE

The flexion-extension axis (FEA) of the femur is substantially changed after mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to a discrepancy in bone cut thickness between the posterior and distal femoral regions. This study assessed the bony gap changes and FEA displacement caused by this problem in osteoarthritis patients.

METHODS

The study enrolled 60 knees from 60 patients for whom primary TKA was planned due to medial knee osteoarthritis. All patients underwent computed tomography, and 3-dimensional (3D) bone models were reconstructed on 3D-planning software. Bone cuts of the distal femur and proximal tibia were simulated to be perpendicular to each mechanical axis. Bony gap change was computed as the difference in bone cut thickness between medial and lateral compartments. Each femoral condyle was assessed for potential FEA displacement, as the difference in bone cut thickness between posterior and distal femoral regions.

RESULTS

The mean magnitude of bony gap discrepancy necessary for mediolateral balancing was 1.6 ± 3.3 mm (range -7 to 8.2 mm) at 0° extension and -0.2 ± 2.6 mm (range -6.4 to 4.3 mm) at 90° flexion. At least 2 mm of bony gap discrepancy at 0° extension and 90° flexion was found in 40 patients (67%) and 26 patients (43%), respectively. In terms of femoral bone cut, posterior bone cut thickness was significantly larger than distal bone cut thickness in the medial compartment (p < 0.001). Bony gap discrepancy between distal and posterior regions of the femoral condyle was ≥2 mm in 28 patients (47%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study focused on two flaws of mechanically aligned TKA in OA patients. Substantial numbers of patients inevitably required >2 mm of medial collateral ligament release at 0° extension and showed a bone cut discrepancy between distal and posterior regions, carrying a risk of FEA displacement and subsequent unnatural knee motions during knee extension and flexion. Level of evidence IV.

No influence of femoral component rotation by the lateral femoral posterior condylar cartilage remnant technique on clinical outcomes in navigation-assisted TKA

PURPOSE

To investigate whether cartilage thickness in the lateral femoral posterior condyle affects the femoral rotation angles on navigation and clinical outcomes of navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

This is a prospective randomized study of navigation-assisted TKA. Fifty cases underwent TKA without removal of the lateral posterior femoral cartilage (Group 1), and 56 cases underwent TKA with removal of the lateral posterior femoral cartilage (Group 2). The femoral rotation was evaluated using CT and compared with navigation values. The angle between the clinical transepicondylar axis and posterior condylar axis measured on CT was defined as the femoral rotation angle on CT. Elevation of the joint line and patellar measurements were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The clinical outcomes were not statistically different in the two groups. The radiographic measurements were not statistically different except femoral rotation angle on navigation. The mean femoral rotation angle of navigation was 4.0° ± 2.2° without cartilage removal and 5.1° ± 2.5° with cartilage removal. The reliability and validity were high between the femoral rotation angle on navigation in the cartilage removal group and that on CT, but there were no differences in clinical outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

There was little effect of navigation-assisted TKA on radiographic and clinical outcomes, although femoral rotational differences were caused by the lateral femoral posterior condylar cartilage. Although the rotational differences due to cartilage would be within the clinical safety margin, surgeons should consider that difference during TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Lower quality randomized trial (no masking), Level II.

Usefulness of an accelerometer-based portable navigation system in total knee arthroplasty

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of using a portable, accelerometer-based surgical navigation system (KneeAlign2) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the alignment of the femoral component, and blood loss.

Patients and Methods

A total of 241 consecutive patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee were enrolled in this prospective, randomised controlled study. There were 207 women and 34 men. The mean age of the patients was 74.0 years (57 to 89). The KneeAlign2 system was used for distal femoral resection in 121 patients (KA2 group) and a conventional intramedullary femoral guide was used in 120 patients (IM group).

Results

One patient (0.8%) in the KA2 group and 19 in the IM group had an alignment which was > 3° away from the neutral mechanical axis (p < 0.01). The mean deviation from neutral alignment was 1.01° (standard deviation (sd) 1.0°) in the KA2 group and 1.93° (sd 1.7°) in the IM group (p < 0.01). Blood loss was significantly less in the KA2 group compared with the IM group (784 ml (sd 357) versus 1071 ml (sd 310), p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The KneeAlign2 system provides a technically straightforward method for identifying the femoral head and performing an accurate distal femoral resection at TKA with significantly less blood loss compared with a conventional intramedullary guide. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1047–52.

A Comparison of Plain Radiography with Computer Tomography in Determining Coronal and Sagittal Alignments following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction: Optimal coronal and sagittal component positioning is important in achieving a successful outcome following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Modalities to determine post-operative alignment include plain radiography and computer tomography (CT) imaging. This study aims to determine the accuracy and reliability of plain radiographs in measuring coronal and sagittal alignment following TKA.

Materials and Methods: A prospective, consecutive study of 58 patients undergoing TKA was performed comparing alignment data from plain radiographs and CT imaging. Hip-knee-angle (HKA), sagittal femoral angle (SFA) and sagittal tibial angle (STA) measurements were taken by two observers from plain radiographs and compared with CT alignment. Intra- and inter-observer correlation was calculated for each measurement.

Results: Intra-observer correlation was excellent for HKA (r>0.89) with a mean difference of <1.9°. The least intra-observer correlation was for SFA (mean r=0.58) with a mean difference of 8°. Inter-observer correlation was better for HKA (r>0.95) and STA (r>0.8) compared to SFA (r=0.5). When comparing modalities (radiographs vs CT), HKA estimations for both observers showed the least maximum and mean differences while SFA observations were the least accurate.

Conclusion: Radiographic estimation of HKA showed excellent intra- and inter-observer correlation and corresponds well with CT imaging. However, radiographic estimation of sagittal plane alignment was less reliably measured and correlated less with CT imaging. Plain radiography was found to be inferior to CT for estimation of biplanar prosthetic alignment following TKA.