Comparison of the aPTT with alternative tests for monitoring direct thrombin inhibitors in patient samples

Explainable machine learning models for early gastric cancer diagnosis

Gastric cancer remains a significant global health concern, with a notably high incidence in East Asia. This paper explores the potential of explainable machine learning models in enhancing the early diagnosis of gastric cancer. Through comprehensive evaluations, various machine learning models, including WeightedEnsemble, CatBoost, and RandomForest, demonstrated high potential in accurately diagnosing early gastric cancer. The study emphasizes the importance of model explainability in medical diagnostics, showing how transparent, explainable models can increase trust and clinical acceptance, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. This research not only highlights key biomarkers and clinical features critical for early detection but also presents a versatile approach that could be applied to other medical diagnostics, promoting broader adoption of machine learning in clinical settings.

Anticoagulation Monitoring and Targets: The Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Anticoagulation CollaborativE Consensus Conference

OBJECTIVES

To derive systematic-review informed, modified Delphi consensus regarding anticoagulation monitoring assays and target levels in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for the Pediatric ECMO Anticoagulation CollaborativE.

DATA SOURCES

A structured literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases from January 1988 to May 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

Anticoagulation monitoring of pediatric patients on ECMO.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors reviewed all citations independently, with a third independent reviewer resolving any conflicts. Evidence tables were constructed using a standardized data extraction form.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool or the revised Cochrane risk of bias for randomized trials, as appropriate and the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Forty-eight experts met over 2 years to develop evidence-based recommendations and, when evidence was lacking, expert-based consensus statements for clinical recommendations focused on anticoagulation monitoring and targets, using a web-based modified Delphi process to build consensus (defined as > 80% agreement). One weak recommendation, two consensus statements, and three good practice statements were developed and, in all, agreement greater than 80% was reached. We also derived some resources for anticoagulation monitoring for ECMO clinician use at the bedside.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to formulate optimal anticoagulation monitoring during pediatric ECMO, but we propose one recommendation, two consensus and three good practice statements. Overall, the available pediatric evidence is poor and significant gaps exist in the literature.

Anticoagulation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A narrative review

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is a technology that offers organ support for critically ill patients with respiratory and/or cardiac failure. Despite improvements in recent years in technology and the biocompatibility of circuits, patients on ECMO remain at high risk of hematologic complications, such as bleeding or thrombosis. Anticoagulation is required in most cases to limit the risk of clotting, but questions persist regarding the optimal anticoagulation strategy. More precisely, there is still debate around the best anticoagulation agent and monitoring tools as well as on the transfusion thresholds and appropriate corrective measures when faced with complications. This narrative review provides an overview of hemostasis on ECMO and the impact of circuit size and coating. The benefits and downsides of unfractionated heparin (UHF) and Direct Thrombin Inhibitors (DTIs) as anticoagulation agents are reviewed. Finally, commonly available coagulation tests (activated clotting time, activated partial thrombin time, anti-Xa, and viscoelastic tests) and their limitations are addressed. In conclusion, future research is needed to determine the best anticoagulation strategy for patients on ECMO.

Is it time to switch to bivalirudin for ECMO anticoagulation?

For decades, unfractionated heparin (hereafter, heparin) has been the primary anticoagulant used for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. More recently, however, bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has emerged as an alternative. This systematic review based on PRISMA guidelines, aims to summarize 16 comparative studies and 8 meta-analysis and review articles published from January, 2011 till May, 2023 which directly compares ECMO courses using heparin versus bivalirudin as the anticoagulant. While this comparison is complicated by the lack of a standardized definition of major bleeding or thrombosis, our overall findings suggest there is no statistical difference between heparin and bivalirudin in incidence of bleeding and thrombosis. That said, some studies found a statistical significance favoring bivalirudin in reducing major bleeding, thrombosis, and the need for transfusions. We also offer essential guidance for appropriately selecting an anticoagulant and monitoring its effect in ECMO settings.

First-in-human trial of SAR107375E, a novel small molecule anticoagulant with dual inhibition of factor Xa and factor IIa

BACKGROUND

SAR107375E is a direct dual inhibitor of both Factor Xa and Factor IIa and has shown potent anticoagulation activity in vitro and animals. This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single ascending intravenous doses of SAR107375E in healthy Chinese adult subjects.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 60 healthy Chinese adult subjects were administered intravenously single ascending doses (0.5, 1.5, 3.0, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, 15.0, or 20.0 mg) of SAR107375E (N = 44) or placebo (N = 16). Plasma and urine concentrations of SAR107375E were measured and used to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters. Coagulation functions were measured and compared with baseline values. Treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded to evaluate safety.

RESULTS

In plasma, from the 0.5 to 20.0 mg dose group, t1/2 is 1.51-4.00 h, Cmax is 59.05-1360 ug/L, and AUC0-t is 25.01-528.45 h*ug/L. And it shows dose proportionality in the 5.0-20.0 mg range. Activated partial thromboplastin time and Ecarin clotting time correlated linearly with drug plasma concentration. No serious adverse events were reported during the study.

CONCLUSION

SAR107375E exhibits good safety and tolerability, predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn, identifier is CTR20211082.

Novel Monitoring and Dose Adjustment of Argatroban, a Direct Thrombin Inhibitor, to Maintain Therapeutic Anticoagulation in a Patient With Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome, Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia, and COVID-19 Pneumonia

In patients who require systemic anticoagulation, a reliable monitoring method is required to ensure anticoagulation is maintained within the correct therapeutic window and patients are treated appropriately. When titrating direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs), dilute thrombin time (dTT) measurements have been demonstrated to be more reliable and accurate than activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) measurements and thus often the preferred DTI assessment. However, a clinical need arises when both dTT measurements are not readily available and aPTT measurements are unreliable.

CASE SUMMARY

A 57-year-old woman with a history of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and multiple prior deep venous thromboses and pulmonary emboli was admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia and intubated due to hypoxic respiratory failure. Argatroban was initiated in place of her home medication warfarin. However, the patient had a prolonged aPTT value at baseline and overnight dTT assay measurements were limited at our institution. A multidisciplinary team of hematology and pharmacy clinicians created a modified patient-specific aPTT target range and argatroban dosing was titrated accordingly. Subsequent aPTT values in the modified target range corresponded to therapeutic dTT values, indicating therapeutic anticoagulation was successfully achieved and maintained. Patient blood samples were additionally evaluated retrospectively using an investigational novel point-of-care test that detected and quantified the argatroban anticoagulant effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic anticoagulation with a DTI in a patient with unreliable aPTT measurements can be achieved with use of a modified patient-specific aPTT target range. Early validation of an investigational rapid testing alternative for DTI monitoring is promising.

Haematological Trends and Transfusion during Adult Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Single Centre Study

The temporal trends in haematological parameters and their associations with blood product transfusion requirements in patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are poorly understood. We performed a retrospective data analysis to better understand the behaviour of haematological and coagulation parameters and their associations with transfusion requirements during ECMO.

METHODS

Patient demographics, haematological and coagulation parameters, plasma haemoglobin and fibrinogen concentrations, platelet count, the international normalised ratio (INR), the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and blood product transfusion data from 138 patients who received ECMO in a single high-volume centre were analysed.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients received venoarterial (VA) ECMO and 46 patients received venovenous (VV) ECMO. The median (IQR) duration of VA, and VV ECMO was 8 (5-13) days and 13 (8-23) days, respectively. There were significant reductions in haemoglobin, the platelet count, and the fibrinogen concentration upon initiation of ECMO. On average, over time, patients on VV ECMO had platelet counts 44 × 109/L higher than those on VA ECMO (p ≤ 0.001). Fibrinogen and APTT did not vary significantly based on the mode of ECMO (p = 0.55 and p = 0.072, respectively). A platelet count < 50 × 109/L or a fibrinogen level < 1.8 g/L was associated with 50% chance of PRBC transfusion, regardless of the ECMO type, and packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion was more common with VA ECMO. APTT was predictive of the transfusion requirement, and the decrement in APTT was discriminatory between VVECMO survivors and nonsurvivors.

CONCLUSION

ECMO support is associated with reductions in haemoglobin, platelet count, and fibrinogen. Patients supported with VA ECMO are more likely to receive a PRBC transfusion compared to those on VV ECMO. Thrombocytopaenia, hypofibrinogenaemia, and anticoagulation effect the likelihood of requiring PRBC transfusion. Further research is needed to define optimal blood management during ECMO, including appropriate transfusion triggers and the anticoagulation intensity.

Monitoring Direct Thrombin Inhibitors With Calibrated Diluted Thrombin Time vs Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time in Pediatric Patients

OBJECTIVES

Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is the primary test used to monitor intravenous (IV) direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) but has many limitations. The plasma diluted thrombin time (dTT) has shown better correlation with DTI levels than aPTT. This study compared dose-response curves for dTT and aPTT in pediatric patients receiving argatroban and bivalirudin.

METHODS

A retrospective review of pediatric patients treated with argatroban (n = 45) or bivalirudin (n = 14) monitored with dTT and aPTT.

RESULTS

The dTT assay was calibrated to report DTI concentrations in µg/mL for argatroban and bivalirudin with good analytic sensitivity and specificity. The dTT was fivefold more likely to show a stable dose-response slope than the aPTT (P < .0002; odds ratio, 4.9). For patients in whom both dTT and aPTT showed a significant correlation between dose and assay results, dTT had a higher average correlation factor compared with aPTT (P = .007). Argatroban dose-response slopes showed more inter- and intrapatient variation than bivalirudin (dose-response slope coefficient of variation, 132% vs 52%).

CONCLUSIONS

The dTT assay was more likely to show a stable dose response and have a stronger correlation with DTI dose than aPTT. Argatroban shows more variation in dose response than bivalirudin.

Assays to Monitor Bivalirudin

Bivalirudin (Angiomax, Angiox) is a parenteral direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) that is used for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), where heparin cannot be used due to the risk of thrombosis. Bivalirudin is also licensed for use in cardiology procedures (e.g., percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty; PTCA). Bivalirudin is a synthetic analogue of hirudin found in the saliva of the medicinal leech and has a relatively short half-life of ~25 min. Several assays can be used to monitor bivalirudin; these include the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), activated clotting time (ACT), ecarin clotting time (ECT), an ecarin-based chromogenic assay, thrombin time (TT), the dilute TT, and the prothrombinase-induced clotting time (PiCT). Drug concentrations can also be measured using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS) and clotting or chromogenic-based assays with specific drug calibrators and controls.

How often are parenteral anticoagulants administered by parents?

Parenteral anticoagulants are a class of anticoagulants that need to be administered non-orally, usually by injection or infusion. There are a variety of such agents, but heparin reflects the most frequently used. Being alerted to an error in a prior publication in which the word "parenteral" was inadvertently replaced by the word "parental," it became clear that even experienced authors make such errors, which could then remain undetected by reviewers and editors, thus leading to failure in correction of same before publication. Given this is likely to be a somewhat ongoing error, we undertook a PubMed search of the literature to identify that "parentally administered" anticoagulants, as well as "parental" administration of other compounds, seems to be evident throughout the literature. We hope this report acts to raise awareness and help avoid similar errors in the future.

Prothrombinase-Induced Clotting Time to Measure Drug Concentrations of Rivaroxaban, Apixaban, and Edoxaban in Clinical Practice: A Cross-Sectional Study

Prothrombinase-induced clotting time (PiCT) is proposed as a rapid and inexpensive laboratory test to measure direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) drug levels. In a prospective, multicenter cross-sectional study, including 851 patients, we aimed to study the accuracy of PiCT in determining rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban drug concentrations and assessed whether clinically relevant drug levels could be predicted correctly. Citrated plasma samples were collected, and the Pefakit^® PiCT was utilized. Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was performed to measure drug concentrations. Cut-off levels were established using receiver-operating characteristics curves. We calculated sensitivities and specificities with respect to clinically relevant drug concentrations. Spearman’s correlation coefficient between PiCT and drug concentrations was 0.85 in the case of rivaroxaban (95% CI 0.82, 0.88), 0.66 for apixaban (95% CI 0.60, 0.71), and 0.78 for edoxaban (95% CI 0.65, 0.86). The sensitivity to detect clinically relevant drug concentrations was 85.1% in the case of 30 µg L⁻¹ (95% CI 82.0, 87.7; specificity 77.9; 72.1, 82.7), 85.7% in the case of 50 µg L⁻¹ (82.4, 88.4; specificity 77.3; 72.5, 81.5), and 85.1% in the case of 100 µg L⁻¹ (80.9, 88.4; specificity 73.2%; 69.1, 76.9). In conclusion, the association of PiCT with DOAC concentrations was fair, and the majority of clinically relevant drug concentrations were correctly predicted.

Poor Reliability of Common Measures of Anticoagulation in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Anticoagulation management in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is challenging with multiple laboratory measures utilized across institutions without consensus guidelines. These include partial thromboplastin time (PTT), thromboelastography (TEG), and antifactor Xa (aXa). We aimed to evaluate the consistency of TEG R-time, PTT, and aXa correlation to bivalirudin and heparin dosing. We conducted a single-center restrospective review of pediatric ECMO cases from 2018 to 2020 anticoagulated with bivalirudin or heparin. We collected up to 14 serial simultaneous TEG R-time, PTT, and aXa measurements over a 7 day ECMO course with corresponding bivalirudin or heparin dosing. We analyzed the correlation between bivalirudin, heparin, and the three measurements of anticoagulation. A total of 67 ECMO runs, 32 bivalirudin, and 35 heparin, and more than 1,500 laboratory values, of which >80% simultaneous, were analyzed. When assessing correlations at the individual patient level, there was no consistent correlation between dosing and at least one laboratory parameter in the majority of patients. Furthermore, 44% of the bivalirudin cohort and 37% of the heparin cohort exhibited no correlation with any parameters. There were statistically significant correlations only between bivalirudin and heparin dosing and the sum total of the different laboratory tests. These inconsistencies highlight the importance of multimodality testing of anticoagulation in the management of pediatric ECMO anticoagulation and cannot be relied on in isolation from bedside clinical judgment.

Bivalirudin in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the current literature surrounding the use of bivalirudin as an alternative anticoagulant for pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent single center studies describe that bivalirudin may be associated with decreased blood product transfusion, decreased cost and similar clinical outcomes for pediatric ECMO patients who have failed unfractionated heparin (UFH) anticoagulation. aPTT is the most common test to monitor bivalirudin but has several limitations. Other tests including dilute thrombin time (dTT) and viscoelastic assays are promising but more study is needed. Current evidence suggests that bivalirudin is a well tolerated and effective alternative anticoagulant for pediatric ECMO patients who have failed UFH anticoagulation but prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

SUMMARY

Bivalirudin is a promising alternative anticoagulant for pediatric ECMO patients who have failed UFH. Large prospective, multicenter studies are needed to confirm safety and efficacy.

2021 ELSO Adult and Pediatric Anticoagulation Guidelines

DISCLAIMER

These guidelines for adult and pediatric anticoagulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation are intended for educational use to build the knowledge of physicians and other health professionals in assessing the conditions and managing the treatment of patients undergoing ECLS / ECMO and describe what are believed to be useful and safe practice for extracorporeal life support (ECLS, ECMO) but these are not necessarily consensus recommendations. The aim of clinical guidelines are to help clinicians to make informed decisions about their patients. However, adherence to a guideline does not guarantee a successful outcome. Ultimately, healthcare professionals must make their own treatment decisions about care on a case-by-case basis, after consultation with their patients, using their clinical judgment, knowledge and expertise. These guidelines do not take the place of physicians' and other health professionals' judgment in diagnosing and treatment of particular patients. These guidelines are not intended to and should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment must be made by the physician and other health professionals and the patient in light of all the circumstances presented by the individual patient, and the known variability and biological behavior of the clinical condition. These guidelines reflect the data at the time the guidelines were prepared; the results of subsequent studies or other information may cause revisions to the recommendations in these guidelines to be prudent to reflect new data, but ELSO is under no obligation to provide updates. In no event will ELSO be liable for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided through these guidelines.

DOAC-Stop in lupus anticoagulant testing: Direct oral anticoagulant interference removed in most samples

BACKGROUND

The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is a convenient therapeutic option for patients at risk of thrombosis. DOACs interfere with clot-based testing for the identification of lupus anticoagulant antibodies (LACs) in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), a common cause of acquired thrombotic disease.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate a commercially available reagent DOAC-Stop for the removal of DOAC interference encountered in LAC testing.

PATIENTS/METHODS

We collected a cohort of 73 test samples from patients on DOAC therapy identified at a large institutional coagulation laboratory from March to December 2019, along with samples from 40 LAC positive and negative control patients not on therapy. Samples were treated with DOAC-Stop and tested for anti-Xa activity and thrombin time for the removal of apixaban, rivaroxaban, argatroban, and dabigatran activity from patient samples. Treated and untreated samples were tested using the activated partial thromboplastin time, silica clotting time, and dilute Russell's viper venom time to evaluate the reliability and utility of DOAC-Stop.

RESULTS

DOAC-Stop markedly reduced DOAC interference from test samples (P < .05). DOAC-Stop had no effect on LAC testing in the absence of DOAC therapy, permitting the identification of all LAC positive and negative controls. DOAC-Stop removed false positives and false negatives resulting from DOAC interference and allows the identification of patients meeting criteria for the diagnosis of APS by LAC testing, as well as the detection of patients on rivaroxaban who are triple positive for APS.

CONCLUSIONS

DOAC-Stop is an effective adjunct for the clinical laboratory faced with DOAC interference in LAC testing.

Prospective Exploratory Experience With Bivalirudin Anticoagulation in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

OBJECTIVES

Objective of this study was to determine if bivalirudin resulted in less circuit interventions than unfractionated heparin. A secondary objective was to examine associations between bivalirudin dose and partial thromboplastin time, international normalized ratio, and activated clotting time.

DESIGN

Prospective observational.

SETTING

Medical-surgical and cardiac PICUs.

PATIENTS

Neonatal and pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients who received bivalirudin anticoagulation.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Twenty extracorporeal membrane oxygenation runs in 18 patients used bivalirudin; 90% were venoarterial. Median (interquartile range) age was 4.5 months (1.6-35 mo). Thirteen patients (72%) had an underlying cardiac diagnosis. Of the 20 runs using bivalirudin, 16 (80%) were initially started on unfractionated heparin and transitioned to bivalirudin due to ongoing circuit thrombosis despite therapeutic anti-Xa levels (n = 13), ongoing circuit thrombosis with unfractionated heparin greater than or equal to 40 U/kg/hr (n = 2), or absence of increase in ACT after bolus of 100 U/kg of unfractionated heparin and escalation of unfractionated heparin infusion (n = 1). Initial bivalirudin dose ranged from 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg/hr; no bolus doses were used. Median (range) bivalirudin dose was 0.9 mg/kg/hr (0.15-1.6 mg/kg/hr). Median (interquartile range) time on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was 226.5 hours (150.5-393.0 hr) including 84 hours (47-335 hr) on bivalirudin. Nonparametric results are as follows: the rate of circuit intervention was significantly lower in patients on bivalirudin than on unfractionated heparin (median [interquartile range]: 0 [0-1] and 1 [1-2], respectively; Wilcoxon p = 0.0126). Bivalirudin dose was correlated to PTT (rs = 0.4760; p < 0.0001), INR (rs = 0.6833; p < 0.0001), and ACT (rs = 0.6161; p < 0.0001). Four patients had a significant bleeding complication on bivalirudin. Survival to hospital discharge was 56%.

CONCLUSIONS

Bivalirudin appears to be a viable option for systemic anticoagulation in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients who have failed unfractionated heparin, but questions remain namely its optimal monitoring strategy. This pilot study supports the need for larger prospective studies of bivalirudin in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, particularly focusing on meaningful monitoring variables.

Evaluation of intravenous direct thrombin inhibitor monitoring tests: Correlation with plasma concentrations and clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients

The parenterally administered direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) argatroban and bivalirudin are effective anticoagulants for acute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) treatment. The activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) has classically been used as the monitoring test to assess degree of anticoagulation, however concerns exist with using aPTT to monitor DTI therapy. In this observational study plasma samples from DTI treated patients were analyzed by aPTT, dilute thrombin time (dTT) and ecarin chromogenic assay (ECA) to delineate results into concordant and discordant groups. Discordant samples were further analyzed via liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC MS/MS). In total 101 patients with 198 samples were evaluated. Discordance between tests were frequent (59% of DTI treated patients). Bivalirudin aPTT vs dTT discordance was observed in 45% (57/126) of samples. Amongst bivalirudin samples with test discordance dTT results were more likely to be concordant with LC MS/MS than the aPTT (77% vs 9%, p < 0.0001). Argatroban aPTT vs dTT discordance was observed in 43% (31/72) and aPTT vs ECA discordance was observed in 40% (29/72) of samples. Amongst argatroban samples with test discordance both the dTT and ECA tests were more likely to have concordant results with LC MS/MS than the aPTT (88% vs 9%, p < 0.0001 for both dTT and ECA tests). There were no differences between discordant and concordant patient groups in a composite outcome of bleeding/thrombosis rate (23% vs 27%, p = 0.689). Further investigation is warranted to elucidate the effect of suitable monitoring assays on patient outcomes in the setting of DTI therapy.

Advances in monitoring anticoagulant therapy

Anticoagulant drugs directly or indirectly influence coagulation factors preventing fibrin formation, thus preventing blood clotting. They are classified into two groups according to the mode of application, namely parenteral and oral drugs. Among the latter, vitamin K antagonists (most often warfarin) were most widely used for almost a century. In recent years new oral anticoagulant drugs have become available that directly target either factor IIa or Xa (direct oral anticoagulants, DOACs). The proportion of patients to whom DOACs are prescribed is increasing because clinical studies have proved they are at least as effective and safe as vitamin K antagonists. Some of the anticoagulant drugs require regular laboratory monitoring, while others only need assessment of blood drug levels in specific clinical situations. This chapter provides an overview of appropriate laboratory tests used for either regular laboratory monitoring of therapy or occasional assessment of the anticoagulant effect of both parenteral and oral anticoagulant drugs used in clinical practice.

Detecting clinically relevant rivaroxaban or dabigatran levels by routine coagulation tests or thromboelastography in a cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Traditional coagulation tests are included in emergency guidelines for management of patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) who experience acute bleeding or require surgery. We determined the ability of traditional coagulation tests and fast whole blood thromboelastography (ROTEM®) to screen for anticoagulation activity of dabigatran and rivaroxaban as low as 30 ng/mL.

METHODS

One hundred eighty-four citrated blood samples (75 dabigatran, 109 rivaroxaban) were collected from patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), to perform screening tests from different manufacturers, (diluted, D) PT, aPTT, TT and ROTEM®. The activity of DOACs was quantitatively determined by clot detection assays: Hemoclot DTT and DiXaI test (Biophen), on CS2100 (Siemens). The clotting time (CT) of INTEM and EXTEM ROTEM® (Werfen) were used as test parameters.

RESULTS

Dabigatran, ≥ 30 ng/mL, was accurately detected by five coagulation tests: APTT Actin FSL (93%), PT Neoplastin (93%), APTT Cephascreen, Thromboclotin, and Thrombin (all 100%), but not by PT Innovin (49%). CT-EXTEM (91%) was sufficiently sensitive, but not CT-INTEM (52%). APTT Cephascreen and Thrombin showed good linearity (R2 = 0.71,R2 = 0.72). For the other tests linearity was moderate to poor. Rivaroxaban was accurately detected by PT Neoplastin (98%) and less so by APTT Cephascreen (85%). In addition, rivaroxaban was also accurately detected by CT-INTEM (96%). PT Neoplastin showed good linearity (R2 = 0.81), all other tests had moderate to poor linearity.

CONCLUSION

In patients with NVAF, the ability of routine coagulation tests to detect the presence of significant levels of DOACs is test and reagent dependent. CT-INTEM and CT-EXTEM may be fast whole blood alternatives.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Institutional Review Board of the MUMC approved this study (December 2011, project number 114069).

QCM-D surpassing clinical standard for the dose administration of new oral anticoagulant in the patient of coagulation disorders

The study focuses the dose administration of dabigatran to avoid the deaths due to hemorrhagic complications and thromboembolic stroke in clinics worldwide. To target the issue, a novel emerging acoustic technology, namely ''Quartz Crystal Microbalance with Dissipation'' (QCM-D) has been applied, while the acoustic assays namely ''activated Partial Thromboplastin Time'' (aPTT) and ''Prothrombinase complex-induced Clotting Test'' (PiCT) have been compared with the standard methods in parallel. Both techniques have been applied to 300 samples, including 220 plasma samples of patients suffering coagulation disorders and 80 plasma samples of non-patients. In comparison, the coagulation times of the acoustic aPTT and PiCT yielded an excellent correlation with the standard methods with in analytical standard deviation limits. Finally, the acoustic aPTT assay is the ''gold standard'' for a dose administration of the new oral anticoagulant, where the Δf/ΔΓ ratio of the acoustic assay demonstrates that dabigatran with FEIBA 50 combination could be a safe remedy to avoid the deaths in clinics.

Monitoring of Argatroban and Lepirudin: What is the Input of Laboratory Values in "Real Life"?

Monitoring of direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is primarily performed using the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). This assay is poorly standardized, reagent dependent, and not DTI specific. We compared aPTT, thrombin time (TT), and prothrombin time (PT) to drug levels obtained by the ecarin chromogenic assay (ECA). We analyzed 495 samples of patients with confirmed or suspected HIT on treatment with either argatroban (n = 37) or lepirudin (n = 80). Mean DTI levels ± standard deviation (SD) were 0.41 ± 0.36 µg/mL for argatroban and 0.20 ± 0.21 µg/mL for lepirudin. Results of aPTT were highly variable: 67 ± 22 seconds for argatroban and 55 ± 20 seconds for lepirudin. Significant correlations ( P < .01) were found between ECA-based DTI level and TT (argatroban, r = .820 and lepirudin, r = .830), PT (argatroban, r = -.544), and aPTT (lepirudin, r = .572). However, there was no correlation of aPTT with argatroban or PT with lepirudin concentration. Multiple regression analyses revealed that the TT predicted 54% of argatroban and 42% of lepirudin levels, but no significant impact was seen for PT or aPTT. The aPTT-guided monitoring of DTI therapy leads to a high percentage of patients with inaccurate plasma levels, hence resulting to either undertreatment or overtreatment. Knowledge of baseline values prior to DTI therapy and inclusion of clinical settings are essential for dosing DTIs when using aPTT. However, due to several limitations of aPTT, monitoring according to exact plasma concentrations as obtained by specific tests such as ECA may be more appropriate.

Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society 2014 Consensus Statement: Pharmacotherapies in Cardiac Critical Care Anticoagulation and Thrombolysis

OBJECTIVE

Thrombotic complications are increasingly being recognized as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric and congenital heart disease. The objective of this article is to review the medications currently available to prevent and treat such complications.

DATA SOURCES

Online searches were conducted using PubMed.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were selected for inclusion based on their scientific merit and applicability to the pediatric cardiac population.

DATA EXTRACTION

Pertinent information from each selected study or scientific review was extracted for inclusion.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Four classes of medications were identified as potentially beneficial in this patient group: anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, thrombolytic agents, and novel oral anticoagulants. Data on each class of medication were synthesized into the follow sections: mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing, monitoring, reversal, considerations for use, and evidence to support.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, and thrombolytic agents are routinely used successfully in the pediatric patient with heart disease for the prevention and treatment of a wide range of thrombotic complications. Although the novel oral anticoagulants have been approved for a limited number of indications in adults, studies on the safety and efficacy of these agents in children are pending.

Bivalirudin as an Alternative to Heparin for Anticoagulation in Infants and Children

Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, is a useful alternative to heparin for anticoagulation in infants and children. It has been found to be effective in patients requiring treatment of thrombosis, as well as those needing anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass, extracorporeal life support, or with a ventricular assist device. While it has traditionally been used in patients who were unresponsive to heparin or who developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, it has recently been studied as a first-line agent. Bivalirudin, unlike heparin, does not require antithrombin to be effective, and as a result, has the potential to provide a more consistent anticoagulation. The case reports and clinical studies currently available suggest that bivalirudin is as effective as heparin at reaching target activated clotting times or activated partial thromboplastin times, with equivalent or the lower rates of bleeding or thromboembolic complications. It is more expensive than heparin, but the cost may be offset by reductions in the costs associated with heparin use, including anti-factor Xa testing and the need for administration of antithrombin. The most significant disadvantage of bivalirudin remains the lack of larger prospective studies demonstrating its efficacy and safety in the pediatric population.

Measuring dabigatran with the dilute Russell viper venom confirm assay in an anticoagulation clinic population

The dabigatran dose-response is predictable; however, it is necessary to measure plasma levels in a variety of clinical conditions. We evaluated a novel dabigatran measure - the 'dilute Russell viper venom confirm (DRVVC) assay' - against current developmental assays and a reference method. We measured plasma dabigatran and compared results from the Stago Sta-Clot DRVVC assay, Stago Ecarin Chromogenic Assay, Biophen Hemoclot Thrombin Inhibitor, and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. We obtained dabigatran calibrators and controls from Biophen, and performed the coagulation assays using a Stago STA-R Evolution coagulometer. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method specimens were performed on an AB Sciex instrument at LabCorp. We enrolled 97 anticoagulation clinic patients (mean age 76 years) who were taking 150 mg dabigatran twice daily. All had creatinine clearances above 30 ml/min; patients were not excluded for concurrent medications or health issues. Citrated blood specimens were processed immediately, and stored at -70°C. We did not correlate collection time with medication time. We employed descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, and the Bland-Altman difference plot to assess the data. The range for all assays was 11.6-917 ng/ml. Analysis of variance generated a P value of 0.1 and Bland-Altman differences were all below 4.0% compared with DRVVC. The DRVVC measures dabigatran with validity comparable to other methods.

Effect of standardized perioperative dabigatran interruption on the residual anticoagulation effect at the time of surgery or procedure

ESSENTIALS: Anticoagulants need to be stopped preprocedure so there is little or no remaining anticoagulant effect. We assessed the residual anticoagulant effect with standardized interruption for patients on dabigatran. With this protocol, 80-86% of patients had no residual anticoagulant effect at the time of a procedure. A standardized perioperative dabigatran protocol appears to be safe, but requires further study.

BACKGROUND

In patients taking dabigatran who require treatment interruption for a surgery/procedure, a sufficient interruption interval is needed so that there is little or no residual anticoagulant effect at the time of the surgery/procedure.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of patients receiving dabigatran (110 mg or 150 mg twice daily) who required an elective surgery/procedure and received a standardized dabigatran interruption protocol based on surgery/procedure bleeding risk and renal function was performed. Before the surgery/procedure, a blood sample was taken for measurement of the prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time (TT), and dilute thrombin time (dTT). We determined the proportion of all patients and those having a high bleeding risk surgery/procedure with normal coagulation test results at the time of the surgery/procedure. The APTT and dTT were considered to be most likely to reflect a dabigatran anticoagulant effect. Patients were followed up for 30 days postprocedure to assess for bleeding and thromboembolism.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-one patients were studied: 118 with low bleeding risk, and 63 with high bleeding risk. For all patients, the proportions with normal PT, APTT, TT dTT levels were 92.8%, 79.6%, 33.1%, and 80.7%, respectively. In patients with high bleeding risk, the proportions with normal PT, APTT, TT dTT levels were 93.7%, 85.7%, 57.1%, and 87.3%, respectively. During follow-up, there was one (0.6%) major bleed, there were nine (5.0%) minor bleeds, and there was one (0.6%) transient ischemic attack.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients receiving dabigatran who require an elective surgery/procedure, a standardized interruption protocol yielded 80-86% of patients with no residual anticoagulant effect at the time of surgery/procedure, and with a low incidence of bleeding.