Die therapeutischen Beziehungen in der Gruppenpsychotherapie

Women-only versus mixed-gender groups in multimodal, day clinic treatment of trauma-related disorders

Background: In the German healthcare system benefits include inpatient and day clinic psychotherapy of trauma-related disorders, which are often provided in gender specific groups. Despite this widespread practice, the actual impact and potential outcome have been studied relatively scarcely and are still open to debate. The present study therefore examines whether the therapeutic relationships in the group vary depending on the group composition and whether this has an effect on therapy outcome. Methods: 66 patients (N = 55 women) were treated in our multimodal, day clinic groupbased treatment program and filled out symptom questionnaires (ETI, BDI-II, PHQ-15, Questionnaire on social support) at admission and discharge and the Group Questionnaire (GQ; including subscales positive bonding, positive working and negative relationships) at the end of each of the eight weeks of treatment. Patients took part in five women-only and six mixed-gender groups and underwent therapy in a closed group format, so that they began and ended therapy within the same group. All patients were diagnosed with trauma-related disorders, which included PTSD, cPTSD, depression, somatoform disorders and further mental diseases. Outcome data were examined using functional regression analysis and linear mixed models. Results: In women-only groups, positive bonding and positive working relationship were significantly higher than in mixed-gender groups. Negative relationship ratings were significantly lower in women-only groups, especially in the middle phase of treatment. However, no effect of an exclusively female group composition on treatment outcome was found, except for the higher increase of perceived social support for patients treated in women-only groups. Conclusions: Group relationships were considered more pleasant in women-only groups than in mixed-gender groups, but this had no effect on the symptom-based therapy outcome. To enhance feelings of safety and comfort, traumatized women should have the possibility to choose whether to be treated in a women-only or a mixed-gender group.

Italian adaptation of the Group Questionnaire: validity and factorial structure

The Group Questionnaire (GQ) is a measure recently developed by Krogel et al. (2013) for the evaluation of the therapeutic relationship in group. The GQ identifies a three-factor model of the relationship that allows to measure quality (Positive Bonding, Positive Working and Negative Relationship) and structure (member-member, member-leader and member-group), dimensions in group. This work shows the results of a first study on the Italian validation of the GQ. In this study the GQ was administered to 536 subjects from 32 non-clinical groups of undergraduate students. The cross-cultural validity of the GQ in the Italian population has been examined by comparing the psychometric properties and equivalence in factor structure and scores of the Italian GQ with the original American version. Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine both the between- and within-group structures. Data concerning reliability and validity of GQ and the results for different SEM in Multilevel CFA confirm the three factors structure of the GQ. Data from the Italian population have a good fit with the original proposed model. Finally, we discuss the importance of an instrument like GQ, short but consistent, for the evaluation of the therapeutic relationship in clinical and training group.

Integrating psychotherapy research with public health and public policy goals for incarcerated women and other vulnerable populations

OBJECTIVE AND METHOD

In this article, I review my research applying interpersonal treatments and interpersonal principles from psychotherapy for major depression and substance use to broader public health goals for incarcerated women and other vulnerable populations.

RESULTS

A public health focus has led me to expand the boundaries of psychotherapy research to include partners such as prisons, parole officers, and bachelor's level providers; behaviors like risky sex; service delivery challenges; and ultimately to research with an eye toward informing policy and advocacy.

CONCLUSIONS

A public health perspective provides context and rationale for conducting sound psychotherapy research; the combination of public health and psychotherapy-specific perspectives can lead to novel research.

Gender, race, and group behavior in group drug treatment

BACKGROUND

Group drug counseling is the primary treatment modality used to treat drug dependence in community settings in the United States. Findings from the social psychology literature suggest that gender may influence how individuals participate in groups, and that race may moderate the effects of gender on group behavior. This study examined gender, race, and their interaction as predictors of alliance, participation, self-disclosure, and receipt of advice and feedback in drug counseling groups, and explored how gender and racial differences in drug counseling group behavior related to outcome of cocaine dependence treatment.

METHOD

Ratings of group behavior were made from videotaped sessions of group drug counseling drawn from a randomized trial of treatment for cocaine-dependent individuals (n=438). Analyses examined the effects of race (African American or non-Hispanic White), gender, and the race by gender interaction on group behavior. Additional analyses examined race, gender, and group behavior, and interactions among these variables in predicting monthly cocaine use.

RESULTS

Race and the race by gender interaction, but not gender alone, predicted many group behaviors. Non-Hispanic White women had the highest rates of self-disclosure and receipt of advice and non-positive feedback, followed by men of both races, with African American women having the lowest levels. These differences were unrelated to cross-sectional cocaine outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Women, but not men, of different races acted differently in mixed-race, mixed-gender cocaine treatment groups, with African American women exhibiting less of several behaviors. Additional research on causes and consequences of these differences could inform interventions for drug-dependent women.

A generalizability theory analysis of group process ratings in the treatment of cocaine dependence

Videotaped group drug counseling sessions were rated for alliance, self-disclosure, positive and negative feedback, group cohesion, and degree of participation of each group member. Interrater reliability was good to excellent for most measures. However, generalizability coefficients based on statistical models that included terms for patient, counselor, session, group, and rater revealed that some measures had inadequate dependability at the patient level if only two raters and two sessions were used to create patient-level scores. In contrast, good generalizability coefficients based on two raters and two sessions were obtained for alliance, non-positive learning statements received from counselor, participation variables, and self-disclosures about the past. The implications of the findings for the design of process-outcome studies are discussed.

Effects of individual cohesion and patient interpersonal style on outcome in psychodynamically oriented inpatient group psychotherapy

The influence of patients' interpersonal traits in interaction with experienced individual cohesion (i.e., each patient's feeling of belonging to the group) was investigated in a sample of 327 inpatients with mixed diagnoses. High cohesion and an increase in cohesion emerged as predictive for symptom improvement in a multilevel regression model. This influence was moderated by the affiliation dimension: In dismissive patients, an increase of cohesion over the course of treatment was helpful; in affiliative patients, symptom improvement was correlated with a slight decrease of cohesion. The findings highlight the therapeutic importance of group therapy and point to the differential influence of individually experienced group cohesion.