1
|
Bing X, Ke W, Fujioka M, Kurbidaeva A, Levitt S, Levine M, Schedl P, Jaynes JB. Chromosome structure in Drosophila is determined by boundary pairing not loop extrusion. eLife 2024; 13:RP94070. [PMID: 39110499 PMCID: PMC11305675 DOI: 10.7554/elife.94070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Two different models have been proposed to explain how the endpoints of chromatin looped domains ('TADs') in eukaryotic chromosomes are determined. In the first, a cohesin complex extrudes a loop until it encounters a boundary element roadblock, generating a stem-loop. In this model, boundaries are functionally autonomous: they have an intrinsic ability to halt the movement of incoming cohesin complexes that is independent of the properties of neighboring boundaries. In the second, loops are generated by boundary:boundary pairing. In this model, boundaries are functionally non-autonomous, and their ability to form a loop depends upon how well they match with their neighbors. Moreover, unlike the loop-extrusion model, pairing interactions can generate both stem-loops and circle-loops. We have used a combination of MicroC to analyze how TADs are organized, and experimental manipulations of the even skipped TAD boundary, homie, to test the predictions of the 'loop-extrusion' and the 'boundary-pairing' models. Our findings are incompatible with the loop-extrusion model, and instead suggest that the endpoints of TADs in flies are determined by a mechanism in which boundary elements physically pair with their partners, either head-to-head or head-to-tail, with varying degrees of specificity. Although our experiments do not address how partners find each other, the mechanism is unlikely to require loop extrusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyang Bing
- Lewis Sigler Institute, Princeton UniversityPrincetonUnited States
| | - Wenfan Ke
- Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton UniversityPrincetonUnited States
| | - Miki Fujioka
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Thomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaUnited States
| | - Amina Kurbidaeva
- Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton UniversityPrincetonUnited States
| | - Sarah Levitt
- Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton UniversityPrincetonUnited States
| | - Mike Levine
- Lewis Sigler Institute, Princeton UniversityPrincetonUnited States
| | - Paul Schedl
- Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton UniversityPrincetonUnited States
| | - James B Jaynes
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Thomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Berrocal A, Lammers NC, Garcia HG, Eisen MB. Unified bursting strategies in ectopic and endogenous even-skipped expression patterns. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2023.02.09.527927. [PMID: 36798351 PMCID: PMC9934701 DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.09.527927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
Transcription often occurs in bursts as gene promoters switch stochastically between active and inactive states. Enhancers can dictate transcriptional activity in animal development through the modulation of burst frequency, duration, or amplitude. Previous studies observed that different enhancers can achieve a wide range of transcriptional outputs through the same strategies of bursting control. For example, despite responding to different transcription factors, all even-skipped enhancers increase transcription by upregulating burst frequency and amplitude while burst duration remains largely constant. These shared bursting strategies suggest that a unified molecular mechanism constraints how enhancers modulate transcriptional output. Alternatively, different enhancers could have converged on the same bursting control strategy because of natural selection favoring one of these particular strategies. To distinguish between these two scenarios, we compared transcriptional bursting between endogenous and ectopic gene expression patterns. Because enhancers act under different regulatory inputs in ectopic patterns, dissimilar bursting control strategies between endogenous and ectopic patterns would suggest that enhancers adapted their bursting strategies to their trans-regulatory environment. Here, we generated ectopic even-skipped transcription patterns in fruit fly embryos and discovered that bursting strategies remain consistent in endogenous and ectopic even-skipped expression. These results provide evidence for a unified molecular mechanism shaping even-skipped bursting strategies and serve as a starting point to uncover the realm of strategies employed by other enhancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Augusto Berrocal
- Department of Molecular & Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
- Current Address: Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Nicholas C Lammers
- Biophysics Graduate Group, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
- Current Address: Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Hernan G Garcia
- Department of Molecular & Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
- Biophysics Graduate Group, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
- Department of Physics, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
- California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
- Chan Zuckerberg Biohub–San Francisco, San Francisco, California, CA, United States
| | - Michael B Eisen
- Department of Molecular & Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
- Biophysics Graduate Group, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
- California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pollex T, Marco-Ferreres R, Ciglar L, Ghavi-Helm Y, Rabinowitz A, Viales RR, Schaub C, Jankowski A, Girardot C, Furlong EEM. Chromatin gene-gene loops support the cross-regulation of genes with related function. Mol Cell 2024; 84:822-838.e8. [PMID: 38157845 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.12.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Chromatin loops between gene pairs have been observed in diverse contexts in both flies and vertebrates. Combining high-resolution Capture-C, DNA fluorescence in situ hybridization, and genetic perturbations, we dissect the functional role of three loops between genes with related function during Drosophila embryogenesis. By mutating the loop anchor (but not the gene) or the gene (but not loop anchor), we disentangle loop formation and gene expression and show that the 3D proximity of paralogous gene loci supports their co-regulation. Breaking the loop leads to either an attenuation or enhancement of expression and perturbs their relative levels of expression and cross-regulation. Although many loops appear constitutive across embryogenesis, their function can change in different developmental contexts. Taken together, our results indicate that chromatin gene-gene loops act as architectural scaffolds that can be used in different ways in different contexts to fine-tune the coordinated expression of genes with related functions and sustain their cross-regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Pollex
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Raquel Marco-Ferreres
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lucia Ciglar
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yad Ghavi-Helm
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Adam Rabinowitz
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Schaub
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aleksander Jankowski
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Charles Girardot
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eileen E M Furlong
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kawasaki K, Fukaya T. Functional coordination between transcription factor clustering and gene activity. Mol Cell 2023; 83:1605-1622.e9. [PMID: 37207625 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
The prevailing view of metazoan gene regulation is that transcription is facilitated through the formation of static activator complexes at distal regulatory regions. Here, we employed quantitative single-cell live-imaging and computational analysis to provide evidence that the dynamic assembly and disassembly process of transcription factor (TF) clusters at enhancers is a major source of transcriptional bursting in developing Drosophila embryos. We further show that the regulatory connectivity between TF clustering and burst induction is highly regulated through intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). Addition of a poly-glutamine tract to the maternal morphogen Bicoid demonstrated that extended IDR length leads to ectopic TF clustering and burst induction from its endogenous target genes, resulting in defects in body segmentation during embryogenesis. Moreover, we successfully visualized the presence of "shared" TF clusters during the co-activation of two distant genes, which provides a concrete molecular explanation for the newly proposed "topological operon" hypothesis in metazoan gene regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Kawasaki
- Laboratory of Transcription Dynamics, Research Center for Biological Visualization, Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan
| | - Takashi Fukaya
- Laboratory of Transcription Dynamics, Research Center for Biological Visualization, Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan; Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cavalheiro GR, Girardot C, Viales RR, Pollex T, Cao TBN, Lacour P, Feng S, Rabinowitz A, Furlong EEM. CTCF, BEAF-32, and CP190 are not required for the establishment of TADs in early Drosophila embryos but have locus-specific roles. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2023; 9:eade1085. [PMID: 36735786 PMCID: PMC9897672 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.ade1085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
The boundaries of topologically associating domains (TADs) are delimited by insulators and/or active promoters; however, how they are initially established during embryogenesis remains unclear. Here, we examined this during the first hours of Drosophila embryogenesis. DNA-FISH confirms that intra-TAD pairwise proximity is established during zygotic genome activation (ZGA) but with extensive cell-to-cell heterogeneity. Most newly formed boundaries are occupied by combinations of CTCF, BEAF-32, and/or CP190. Depleting each insulator individually from chromatin revealed that TADs can still establish, although with lower insulation, with a subset of boundaries (~10%) being more dependent on specific insulators. Some weakened boundaries have aberrant gene expression due to unconstrained enhancer activity. However, the majority of misexpressed genes have no obvious direct relationship to changes in domain-boundary insulation. Deletion of an active promoter (thereby blocking transcription) at one boundary had a greater impact than deleting the insulator-bound region itself. This suggests that cross-talk between insulators and active promoters and/or transcription might reinforce domain boundary insulation during embryogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel R. Cavalheiro
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, D-69117 Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Collaboration for Joint PhD Degree between EMBL and Heidelberg University, Faculty of Biosciences, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Charles Girardot
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, D-69117 Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Rebecca R. Viales
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, D-69117 Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Tim Pollex
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, D-69117 Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - T. B. Ngoc Cao
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, D-69117 Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Perrine Lacour
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, D-69117 Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- École Normale Supérieure, 45 rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Songjie Feng
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, D-69117 Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Adam Rabinowitz
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, D-69117 Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Eileen E. M. Furlong
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, D-69117 Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mechanisms of Interaction between Enhancers and Promoters in Three Drosophila Model Systems. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24032855. [PMID: 36769179 PMCID: PMC9917889 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24032855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
In higher eukaryotes, the regulation of developmental gene expression is determined by enhancers, which are often located at a large distance from the promoters they regulate. Therefore, the architecture of chromosomes and the mechanisms that determine the functional interaction between enhancers and promoters are of decisive importance in the development of organisms. Mammals and the model animal Drosophila have homologous key architectural proteins and similar mechanisms in the organization of chromosome architecture. This review describes the current progress in understanding the mechanisms of the formation and regulation of long-range interactions between enhancers and promoters at three well-studied key regulatory loci in Drosophila.
Collapse
|
7
|
Simmons JR, An R, Amankwaa B, Zayac S, Kemp J, Labrador M. Phosphorylated histone variant γH2Av is associated with chromatin insulators in Drosophila. PLoS Genet 2022; 18:e1010396. [PMID: 36197938 PMCID: PMC9576066 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Chromatin insulators are responsible for orchestrating long-range interactions between enhancers and promoters throughout the genome and align with the boundaries of Topologically Associating Domains (TADs). Here, we demonstrate an association between gypsy insulator proteins and the phosphorylated histone variant H2Av (γH2Av), normally a marker of DNA double strand breaks. Gypsy insulator components colocalize with γH2Av throughout the genome, in polytene chromosomes and in diploid cells in which Chromatin IP data shows it is enriched at TAD boundaries. Mutation of insulator components su(Hw) and Cp190 results in a significant reduction in γH2Av levels in chromatin and phosphatase inhibition strengthens the association between insulator components and γH2Av and rescues γH2Av localization in insulator mutants. We also show that γH2Av, but not H2Av, is a component of insulator bodies, which are protein condensates that form during osmotic stress. Phosphatase activity is required for insulator body dissolution after stress recovery. Together, our results implicate the H2A variant with a novel mechanism of insulator function and boundary formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R. Simmons
- Department of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Ran An
- Department of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Bright Amankwaa
- Department of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Shannon Zayac
- Department of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Justin Kemp
- Department of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Mariano Labrador
- Department of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Warwick T, Schulz MH, Gilsbach R, Brandes RP, Seuter S. Nuclear receptor activation shapes spatial genome organization essential for gene expression control: lessons learned from the vitamin D receptor. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:3745-3763. [PMID: 35325193 PMCID: PMC9023275 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Spatial genome organization is tightly controlled by several regulatory mechanisms and is essential for gene expression control. Nuclear receptors are ligand-activated transcription factors that modulate physiological and pathophysiological processes and are primary pharmacological targets. DNA binding of the important loop-forming insulator protein CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) was modulated by 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3). We performed CTCF HiChIP assays to produce the first genome-wide dataset of CTCF long-range interactions in 1,25(OH)2D3-treated cells, and to determine whether dynamic changes of spatial chromatin interactions are essential for fine-tuning of nuclear receptor signaling. We detected changes in 3D chromatin organization upon vitamin D receptor (VDR) activation at 3.1% of all observed CTCF interactions. VDR binding was enriched at both differential loop anchors and within differential loops. Differential loops were observed in several putative functional roles including TAD border formation, promoter-enhancer looping, and establishment of VDR-responsive insulated neighborhoods. Vitamin D target genes were enriched in differential loops and at their anchors. Secondary vitamin D effects related to dynamic chromatin domain changes were linked to location of downstream transcription factors in differential loops. CRISPR interference and loop anchor deletion experiments confirmed the functional relevance of nuclear receptor ligand-induced adjustments of the chromatin 3D structure for gene expression regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Warwick
- Institute for Cardiovascular Physiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Rhein-Main 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Marcel H Schulz
- Institute for Cardiovascular Regeneration, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Rhein-Main 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Ralf Gilsbach
- Institute for Cardiovascular Physiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Rhein-Main 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Ralf P Brandes
- Institute for Cardiovascular Physiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Rhein-Main 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Sabine Seuter
- Institute for Cardiovascular Physiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Rhein-Main 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Erokhin M, Gorbenko F, Lomaev D, Mazina MY, Mikhailova A, Garaev AK, Parshikov A, Vorobyeva NE, Georgiev P, Schedl P, Chetverina D. Boundaries potentiate polycomb response element-mediated silencing. BMC Biol 2021; 19:113. [PMID: 34078365 PMCID: PMC8170967 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-021-01047-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Epigenetic memory plays a critical role in the establishment and maintenance of cell identities in multicellular organisms. Polycomb and trithorax group (PcG and TrxG) proteins are responsible for epigenetic memory, and in flies, they are recruited to specialized DNA regulatory elements termed polycomb response elements (PREs). Previous transgene studies have shown that PREs can silence reporter genes outside of their normal context, often by pairing sensitive (PSS) mechanism; however, their silencing activity is non-autonomous and depends upon the surrounding chromatin context. It is not known why PRE activity depends on the local environment or what outside factors can induce silencing. Results Using an attP system in Drosophila, we find that the so-called neutral chromatin environments vary substantially in their ability to support the silencing activity of the well-characterized bxdPRE. In refractory chromosomal contexts, factors required for PcG-silencing are unable to gain access to the PRE. Silencing activity can be rescued by linking the bxdPRE to a boundary element (insulator). When placed next to the PRE, the boundaries induce an alteration in chromatin structure enabling factors critical for PcG silencing to gain access to the bxdPRE. When placed at a distance from the bxdPRE, boundaries induce PSS by bringing the bxdPREs on each homolog in close proximity. Conclusion This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that the repressing activity of PREs can be induced or enhanced by nearby boundary elements. Graphical abstract ![]()
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12915-021-01047-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maksim Erokhin
- Group of Chromatin Biology, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., Moscow, 119334, Russia.
| | - Fedor Gorbenko
- Group of Chromatin Biology, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., Moscow, 119334, Russia.,Present address: Department of Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dmitry Lomaev
- Group of Epigenetics, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., Moscow, 119334, Russia
| | - Marina Yu Mazina
- Group of Transcriptional Complexes Dynamics, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anna Mikhailova
- Group of Chromatin Biology, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., Moscow, 119334, Russia
| | - Azat K Garaev
- Laboratory of Structural and Functional Organization of Chromosomes, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., Moscow, 119334, Russia
| | - Aleksander Parshikov
- Department of the Control of Genetic Processes, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., Moscow, 119334, Russia
| | - Nadezhda E Vorobyeva
- Group of Transcriptional Complexes Dynamics, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pavel Georgiev
- Department of the Control of Genetic Processes, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., Moscow, 119334, Russia
| | - Paul Schedl
- Department of Molecular Biology Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
| | - Darya Chetverina
- Group of Epigenetics, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., Moscow, 119334, Russia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fujioka M, Nezdyur A, Jaynes JB. An insulator blocks access to enhancers by an illegitimate promoter, preventing repression by transcriptional interference. PLoS Genet 2021; 17:e1009536. [PMID: 33901190 PMCID: PMC8102011 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Several distinct activities and functions have been described for chromatin insulators, which separate genes along chromosomes into functional units. Here, we describe a novel mechanism of functional separation whereby an insulator prevents gene repression. When the homie insulator is deleted from the end of a Drosophila even skipped (eve) locus, a flanking P-element promoter is activated in a partial eve pattern, causing expression driven by enhancers in the 3’ region to be repressed. The mechanism involves transcriptional read-through from the flanking promoter. This conclusion is based on the following. Read-through driven by a heterologous enhancer is sufficient to repress, even when homie is in place. Furthermore, when the flanking promoter is turned around, repression is minimal. Transcriptional read-through that does not produce anti-sense RNA can still repress expression, ruling out RNAi as the mechanism in this case. Thus, transcriptional interference, caused by enhancer capture and read-through when the insulator is removed, represses eve promoter-driven expression. We also show that enhancer-promoter specificity and processivity of transcription can have decisive effects on the consequences of insulator removal. First, a core heat shock 70 promoter that is not activated well by eve enhancers did not cause read-through sufficient to repress the eve promoter. Second, these transcripts are less processive than those initiated at the P-promoter, measured by how far they extend through the eve locus, and so are less disruptive. These results highlight the importance of considering transcriptional read-through when assessing the effects of insulators on gene expression. Several distinct activities and functions have been described for chromatin insulators, which are regulatory DNA elements that separate genes along chromosomes into functional units. Here, we describe how insulators can prevent repression of one gene by preventing inappropriate transcription of another gene, without blocking read-through of transcription per se. When the insulator homie is deleted from the end of a transgenic eve locus, a flanking transposable element promoter is activated by eve enhancers, causing repression of the eve promoter. The mechanism involves transcriptional read-through from the flanking promoter, which disrupts normal eve enhancer-promoter activities. When the flanking promoter is turned around, repression of eve is minimal. Thus, transcriptional interference, caused by enhancer capture and read-through when the insulator is removed, represses the eve promoter. These results show a novel role for transcriptional read-through in the effects of insulators on gene expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miki Fujioka
- Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Anastasiya Nezdyur
- Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - James B. Jaynes
- Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Treen N, Shimobayashi SF, Eeftens J, Brangwynne CP, Levine M. Properties of repression condensates in living Ciona embryos. Nat Commun 2021; 12:1561. [PMID: 33692345 PMCID: PMC7946874 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21606-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent studies suggest that transcriptional activators and components of the pre-initiation complex (PIC) form higher order associations-clusters or condensates-at active loci. Considerably less is known about the distribution of repressor proteins responsible for gene silencing. Here, we develop an expression assay in living Ciona embryos that captures the liquid behavior of individual nucleoli undergoing dynamic fusion events. The assay is used to visualize puncta of Hes repressors, along with the Groucho/TLE corepressor. We observe that Hes.a/Gro puncta have the properties of viscous liquid droplets that undergo limited fusion events due to association with DNA. Hes.a mutants that are unable to bind DNA display hallmarks of liquid-liquid phase separation, including dynamic fusions of individual condensates to produce large droplets. We propose that the DNA template serves as a scaffold for the formation of Hes condensates, but limits the spread of transcriptional repressors to unwanted regions of the genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Treen
- grid.16750.350000 0001 2097 5006Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ USA
| | - Shunsuke F. Shimobayashi
- grid.16750.350000 0001 2097 5006Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ USA
| | - Jorine Eeftens
- grid.16750.350000 0001 2097 5006Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ USA
| | - Clifford P. Brangwynne
- grid.16750.350000 0001 2097 5006Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ USA ,grid.16750.350000 0001 2097 5006Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ USA ,grid.413575.10000 0001 2167 1581Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD USA
| | - Michael Levine
- grid.16750.350000 0001 2097 5006Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ USA ,grid.16750.350000 0001 2097 5006Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
The Emergence of the Bilateral Symmetry in Animals: A Review and a New Hypothesis. Symmetry (Basel) 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/sym13020261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Most biological organisms exhibit different kinds of symmetry; an Animal (Metazoa), which is our Darwinist ancestor, has bilateral symmetry, and many plants exhibit rotational symmetry. It raises some questions: I. How can the evolution from an undifferentiated cell without bilateral symmetry to a complex biological organism with symmetry, which is based on asymmetric DNA and enzymes, lead to the bilateral symmetry? II. Is this evolution to an organism with bilateral symmetry obtained by other factors than DNA and enzymatic reactions? The existing literature about the evolution of the bilateral symmetry has been reviewed, and a new hypothesis has been formulated based on these reviews. The hypothesis is that the morphogenesis of biosystems is connected with the metabolism and that the oscillating kinetics in the Glycolysis have played a role in the polarity of the biological cells and in the establishment of the bilateral symmetry in Animals.
Collapse
|
13
|
Cavalheiro GR, Pollex T, Furlong EE. To loop or not to loop: what is the role of TADs in enhancer function and gene regulation? Curr Opin Genet Dev 2021; 67:119-129. [PMID: 33497970 DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2020.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Revised: 12/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
The past decade has seen a huge jump in the resolution and scale at which we can interrogate the three-dimensional properties of the genome. This revealed different types of chromatin structures including topologically associating domains, partitioning genes and their enhancers into interacting domains. While the visualisation of these topologies and their dynamics has dramatically improved, our understanding of their underlying mechanisms and functional roles in gene expression has lagged behind. A suite of recent studies have addressed this using genetic manipulations to perturb topological features and loops at different scales. Here we assess the new biological insights gained on the functional relationship between genome topology and gene expression, with a particular focus on enhancer function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel R Cavalheiro
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, D-69117, Heidelberg, Germany; Collaboration for Joint PhD Degree Between EMBL and Heidelberg University, Faculty of Biosciences, Germany
| | - Tim Pollex
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, D-69117, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eileen Em Furlong
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, D-69117, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
De S, Gehred ND, Fujioka M, Chan FW, Jaynes JB, Kassis JA. Defining the Boundaries of Polycomb Domains in Drosophila. Genetics 2020; 216:689-700. [PMID: 32948625 PMCID: PMC7648573 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.120.303642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are an important group of transcriptional repressors that act by modifying chromatin. PcG target genes are covered by the repressive chromatin mark H3K27me3. Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) is a multiprotein complex that is responsible for generating H3K27me3. In Drosophila, PRC2 is recruited by Polycomb Response Elements (PREs) and then trimethylates flanking nucleosomes, spreading the H3K27me3 mark over large regions of the genome, the "Polycomb domains." What defines the boundary of a Polycomb domain? There is experimental evidence that insulators, PolII, and active transcription can all form the boundaries of Polycomb domains. Here we divide the boundaries of larval Polycomb domains into six different categories. In one category, genes are transcribed toward the Polycomb domain, where active transcription is thought to stop the spreading of H3K27me3. In agreement with this, we show that introducing a transcriptional terminator into such a transcription unit causes an extension of the Polycomb domain. Additional data suggest that active transcription of a boundary gene may restrict the range of enhancer activity of a Polycomb-regulated gene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandip De
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
| | - Natalie D Gehred
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
| | - Miki Fujioka
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107
| | - Fountane W Chan
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
| | - James B Jaynes
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107
| | - Judith A Kassis
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Huang Y, Neijts R, de Laat W. How chromosome topologies get their shape: views from proximity ligation and microscopy methods. FEBS Lett 2020; 594:3439-3449. [PMID: 33073863 DOI: 10.1002/1873-3468.13961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The 3D organization of our genome is an important determinant for the transcriptional output of a gene in (patho)physiological contexts. The spatial organization of linear chromosomes within nucleus is dominantly inferred using two distinct approaches, chromosome conformation capture (3C) and DNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (DNA-FISH). While 3C and its derivatives score genomic interaction frequencies based on proximity ligation events, DNA-FISH methods measure physical distances between genomic loci. Despite these approaches probe different characteristics of chromosomal topologies, they provide a coherent picture of how chromosomes are organized in higher-order structures encompassing chromosome territories, compartments, and topologically associating domains. Yet, at the finer topological level of promoter-enhancer communication, the imaging-centered and the 3C methods give more divergent and sometimes seemingly paradoxical results. Here, we compare and contrast observations made applying visual DNA-FISH and molecular 3C approaches. We emphasize that the 3C approach, due to its inherently competitive ligation step, measures only 'relative' proximities. A 3C interaction enriched between loci, therefore does not necessarily translates into a decrease in absolute spatial distance. Hence, we advocate caution when modeling chromosome conformations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yike Huang
- Oncode Institute, Hubrecht Institute-KNAW, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Roel Neijts
- Oncode Institute, Hubrecht Institute-KNAW, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter de Laat
- Oncode Institute, Hubrecht Institute-KNAW, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Koromila T, Gao F, Iwasaki Y, He P, Pachter L, Gergen JP, Stathopoulos A. Odd-paired is a pioneer-like factor that coordinates with Zelda to control gene expression in embryos. eLife 2020; 9:e59610. [PMID: 32701060 PMCID: PMC7417190 DOI: 10.7554/elife.59610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Pioneer factors such as Zelda (Zld) help initiate zygotic transcription in Drosophila early embryos, but whether other factors support this dynamic process is unclear. Odd-paired (Opa), a zinc-finger transcription factor expressed at cellularization, controls the transition of genes from pair-rule to segmental patterns along the anterior-posterior axis. Finding that Opa also regulates expression through enhancer sog_Distal along the dorso-ventral axis, we hypothesized Opa's role is more general. Chromatin-immunoprecipitation (ChIP-seq) confirmed its in vivo binding to sog_Distal but also identified widespread binding throughout the genome, comparable to Zld. Furthermore, chromatin assays (ATAC-seq) demonstrate that Opa, like Zld, influences chromatin accessibility genome-wide at cellularization, suggesting both are pioneer factors with common as well as distinct targets. Lastly, embryos lacking opa exhibit widespread, late patterning defects spanning both axes. Collectively, these data suggest Opa is a general timing factor and likely late-acting pioneer factor that drives a secondary wave of zygotic gene expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodora Koromila
- California Institute of Technology, Division of Biology and Biological EngineeringPasadenaUnited States
| | - Fan Gao
- California Institute of Technology, Division of Biology and Biological EngineeringPasadenaUnited States
| | - Yasuno Iwasaki
- Stony Brook University, Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology and Center for Developmental GeneticsStony BrookUnited States
| | - Peng He
- California Institute of Technology, Division of Biology and Biological EngineeringPasadenaUnited States
| | - Lior Pachter
- California Institute of Technology, Division of Biology and Biological EngineeringPasadenaUnited States
| | - J Peter Gergen
- Stony Brook University, Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology and Center for Developmental GeneticsStony BrookUnited States
| | - Angelike Stathopoulos
- California Institute of Technology, Division of Biology and Biological EngineeringPasadenaUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Predicting regulatory potential from primary DNA sequences or transcription factor binding patterns is not possible. However, the annotation of the genome by chromatin proteins, histone modifications, and differential compaction is largely sufficient to reveal the locations of genes and their differential activity states. The Polycomb Group (PcG) and Trithorax Group (TrxG) proteins are the central players in this cell type-specific chromatin organization. PcG function was originally viewed as being solely repressive and irreversible, as observed at the homeotic loci in flies and mammals. However, it is now clear that modular and reversible PcG function is essential at most developmental genes. Focusing mainly on recent advances, we review evidence for how PcG and TrxG patterns change dynamically during cell type transitions. The ability to implement cell type-specific transcriptional programming with exquisite fidelity is essential for normal development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitzi I Kuroda
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA; ,
| | - Hyuckjoon Kang
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA; ,
| | - Sandip De
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA; ,
| | - Judith A Kassis
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA; ,
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Enhancer-Promoter Communication: Thinking Outside the TAD. Trends Genet 2020; 36:459-461. [PMID: 32544446 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 04/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
How does the folding of the genome relate to the regulation of gene expression? Using fly embryos and quantitative live imaging, a recent study by Yokoshi et al. reveals that the answer might depend on whether enhancer-promoter communication occurs inside or in-between topological domains.
Collapse
|
19
|
Yokoshi M, Segawa K, Fukaya T. Visualizing the Role of Boundary Elements in Enhancer-Promoter Communication. Mol Cell 2020; 78:224-235.e5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Revised: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
20
|
The Role of Insulation in Patterning Gene Expression. Genes (Basel) 2019; 10:genes10100767. [PMID: 31569427 PMCID: PMC6827083 DOI: 10.3390/genes10100767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Revised: 09/19/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Development is orchestrated by regulatory elements that turn genes ON or OFF in precise spatial and temporal patterns. Many safety mechanisms prevent inappropriate action of a regulatory element on the wrong gene promoter. In flies and mammals, dedicated DNA elements (insulators) recruit protein factors (insulator binding proteins, or IBPs) to shield promoters from regulatory elements. In mammals, a single IBP called CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) is known, whereas genetic and biochemical analyses in Drosophila have identified a larger repertoire of IBPs. How insulators function at the molecular level is not fully understood, but it is currently thought that they fold chromosomes into conformations that affect regulatory element-promoter communication. Here, we review the discovery of insulators and describe their properties. We discuss recent genetic studies in flies and mice to address the question: Is gene insulation important for animal development? Comparing and contrasting observations in these two species reveal that they have different requirements for insulation, but that insulation is a conserved and critical gene regulation strategy.
Collapse
|
21
|
Piwko P, Vitsaki I, Livadaras I, Delidakis C. The Role of Insulators in Transgene Transvection in Drosophila. Genetics 2019; 212:489-508. [PMID: 30948430 PMCID: PMC6553826 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.119.302165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Transvection is the phenomenon where a transcriptional enhancer activates a promoter located on the homologous chromosome. It has been amply documented in Drosophila where homologs are closely paired in most, if not all, somatic nuclei, but it has been known to rarely occur in mammals as well. We have taken advantage of site-directed transgenesis to insert reporter constructs into the same genetic locus in Drosophila and have evaluated their ability to engage in transvection by testing many heterozygous combinations. We find that transvection requires the presence of an insulator element on both homologs. Homotypic trans-interactions between four different insulators can support transvection: the gypsy insulator (GI), Wari, Fab-8 and 1A2; GI and Fab-8 are more effective than Wari or 1A2 We show that, in the presence of insulators, transvection displays the characteristics that have been previously described: it requires homolog pairing, but can happen at any of several loci in the genome; a solitary enhancer confronted with an enhancerless reporter is sufficient to drive transcription; it is weaker than the action of the same enhancer-promoter pair in cis, and it is further suppressed by cis-promoter competition. Though necessary, the presence of homotypic insulators is not sufficient for transvection; their position, number and orientation matters. A single GI adjacent to both enhancer and promoter is the optimal configuration. The identity of enhancers and promoters in the vicinity of a trans-interacting insulator pair is also important, indicative of complex insulator-enhancer-promoter interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pawel Piwko
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, Heraklion 70013, Crete, Greece
- Department of Biology, University of Crete, Heraklion 70013, Crete, Greece
| | - Ilektra Vitsaki
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, Heraklion 70013, Crete, Greece
- Department of Biology, University of Crete, Heraklion 70013, Crete, Greece
| | - Ioannis Livadaras
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, Heraklion 70013, Crete, Greece
| | - Christos Delidakis
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, Heraklion 70013, Crete, Greece
- Department of Biology, University of Crete, Heraklion 70013, Crete, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yokoshi M, Fukaya T. Dynamics of transcriptional enhancers and chromosome topology in gene regulation. Dev Growth Differ 2019; 61:343-352. [PMID: 30780195 PMCID: PMC6850047 DOI: 10.1111/dgd.12597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Revised: 01/10/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Transcriptional enhancers are regulatory DNAs that instruct when and where genes should be transcribed in response to a variety of intrinsic and external signals. They contain a cluster of binding sites for sequence-specific transcription factors and co-activators to determine the spatiotemporal specificity of gene activities during development. Enhancers are often positioned in distal locations from their target promoters. In some cases, they work over a million base pairs or more. In the traditional view, enhancers have been thought to stably interact with promoters in a targeted manner. However, quantitative imaging studies provide a far more dynamic picture of enhancer action. Moreover, recent Hi-C methods suggest that regulatory interactions are dynamically regulated by the higher-order chromosome topology. In this review, we summarize the emerging findings in the field and propose that assembly of "transcription hubs" in the context of 3D genome structure plays an important role in transcriptional regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moe Yokoshi
- Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Fukaya
- Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Fedotova A, Clendinen C, Bonchuk A, Mogila V, Aoki T, Georgiev P, Schedl P. Functional dissection of the developmentally restricted BEN domain chromatin boundary factor Insensitive. Epigenetics Chromatin 2019; 12:2. [PMID: 30602385 PMCID: PMC6317261 DOI: 10.1186/s13072-018-0249-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Boundaries in the Drosophila bithorax complex delimit autonomous regulatory domains that activate the parasegment (PS)-specific expression of homeotic genes. The Fab-7 boundary separates the iab-6 and iab-7 regulatory domains that control Abd-B expression in PS11 and PS12. This boundary is composed of multiple functionally redundant elements and has two key activities: it blocks crosstalk between iab-6 and iab-7 and facilitates boundary bypass. Results Here, we have used a structure–function approach to elucidate the biochemical properties and the in vivo activities of a conserved BEN domain protein, Insensitive, that is associated with Fab-7. Our biochemical studies indicate that in addition to the C-terminal BEN DNA-binding domain, Insv has two domains that mediate multimerization: one is a coiled-coil domain in the N-terminus, and the other is next to the BEN domain. These multimerization domains enable Insv to bind simultaneously to two canonical 8-bp recognition motifs, as well as to a ~ 100-bp non-canonical recognition sequence. They also mediate the assembly of higher-order multimers in the presence of DNA. Transgenic proteins lacking the N-terminal coiled-coil domain are compromised for boundary function in vivo. We also show that Insv interacts directly with CP190, a protein previously implicated in the boundary functions of several DNA-binding proteins, including Su(Hw) and dCTCF. While CP190 interaction is required for Insv binding to a subset of sites on polytene chromosomes, it has only a minor role in the boundary activity of Insv in the context of Fab-7. Conclusions The subdivision of eukaryotic chromosomes into discrete topological domains depends upon the pairing of boundary elements. In flies, pairing interactions are specific and typically orientation dependent. They occur in cis between neighboring heterologous boundaries, and in trans between homologous boundaries. One potential mechanism for ensuring pairing-interaction specificity is the use of sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins that can bind simultaneously with two or more recognition sequences. Our studies indicate that Insv can assemble into a multivalent DNA-binding complex and that the N-terminal Insv multimerization domain is critical for boundary function. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13072-018-0249-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Fedotova
- Department of Genetics, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Chaevia Clendinen
- Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Artem Bonchuk
- Department of Genetics, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Vladic Mogila
- Department of Genetics, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Tsutomu Aoki
- Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Pavel Georgiev
- Department of Genetics, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
| | - Paul Schedl
- Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Li M, Ma Z, Roy S, Patel SK, Lane DC, Duffy CR, Cai HN. Selective interactions between diverse STEs organize the ANT-C Hox cluster. Sci Rep 2018; 8:15158. [PMID: 30310129 PMCID: PMC6181975 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-33588-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The three-dimensional organization of the eukaryotic genome is important for its structure and function. Recent studies indicate that hierarchies of chromatin loops underlie important aspects of both genomic organization and gene regulation. Looping between insulator or boundary elements interferes with enhancer-promoter communications and limits the spread active or repressive organized chromatin. We have used the SF1 insulator in the Drosophila Antennapedia homeotic gene complex (ANT-C) as a model to study the mechanism and regulation of chromatin looping events. We reported previously that SF1 tethers a transient chromatin loop in the early embryo that insulates the Hox gene Sex comb reduce from the neighbor non-Hox gene fushi tarazu for their independent regulation. To further probe the functional range and connectivity of SF1, we used high-resolution chromosomal conformation capture (3C) to search for SF1 looping partners across ANT-C. We report here the identification of three distal SF1 Tether Elements (STEs) located in the labial, Deformed and Antennapedia Hox gene regions, extending the range of SF1 looping network to the entire complex. These novel STEs are bound by four different combinations of insulator proteins and exhibit distinct behaviors in enhancer block, enhancer-bypass and boundary functions. Significantly, the six STEs we identified so far map to all but one of the major boundaries between repressive and active histone domains, underlining the functional relevance of these long-range chromatin loops in organizing the Hox complex. Importantly, SF1 selectively captured with only 5 STEs out of ~20 sites that display similar insulator binding profiles, indicating that presence of insulator proteins alone is not sufficient to determine looping events. These findings suggest that selective interaction among diverse STE insulators organize the Drosophila Hox genes in the 3D nuclear space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mo Li
- Department of Cellular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - Zhibo Ma
- Department of Cellular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - Sharmila Roy
- Department of Cellular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - Sapna K Patel
- Department of Cellular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - Derrick C Lane
- Department of Cellular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - Carly R Duffy
- Department of Cellular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - Haini N Cai
- Department of Cellular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
The BEN Domain Protein Insensitive Binds to the Fab-7 Chromatin Boundary To Establish Proper Segmental Identity in Drosophila. Genetics 2018; 210:573-585. [PMID: 30082280 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.301259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Boundaries (insulators) in the Drosophila bithorax complex (BX-C) delimit autonomous regulatory domains that orchestrate the parasegment (PS)-specific expression of the BX-C homeotic genes. The Fab-7 boundary separates the iab-6 and iab-7 regulatory domains, which control Abd-B expression in PS11 and PS12, respectively. This boundary is composed of multiple functionally redundant elements and has two key functions: it blocks cross talk between iab-6 and iab-7 and facilitates boundary bypass. Here, we show that two BEN domain protein complexes, Insensitive and Elba, bind to multiple sequences located in the Fab-7 nuclease hypersensitive regions. Two of these sequences are recognized by both Insv and Elba and correspond to a CCAATTGG palindrome. Elba also binds to a related CCAATAAG sequence, while Insv does not. However, the third Insv recognition sequences is ∼100 bp in length and contains the CCAATAAG sequence at one end. Both Insv and Elba are assembled into large complexes (∼420 and ∼265-290 kDa, respectively) in nuclear extracts. Using a sensitized genetic background, we show that the Insv protein is required for Fab-7 boundary function and that PS11 identity is not properly established in insv mutants. This is the first demonstration that a BEN domain protein is important for the functioning of an endogenous fly boundary.
Collapse
|
26
|
Dynamic interplay between enhancer-promoter topology and gene activity. Nat Genet 2018; 50:1296-1303. [PMID: 30038397 PMCID: PMC6119122 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-018-0175-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 267] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
A long-standing question in gene regulation is how remote enhancers communicate with their target promoters, and specifically how chromatin topology dynamically relates to gene activation. Here, we combine genome editing and multi-color live imaging to simultaneously visualize physical enhancer-promoter interaction and transcription at the single-cell level in Drosophila embryos. By examining transcriptional activation of a reporter by the endogenous even-skipped enhancers, which are located 150 kb away, we identify three distinct topological conformation states and measure their transition kinetics. We show that sustained proximity of the enhancer to its target is required for activation. Transcription in turn affects the three-dimensional topology as it enhances the temporal stability of the proximal conformation and is associated with further spatial compaction. Furthermore, the facilitated long-range activation results in transcriptional competition at the locus, causing corresponding developmental defects. Our approach offers quantitative insight into the spatial and temporal determinants of long-range gene regulation and their implications for cellular fates.
Collapse
|
27
|
Lu D, Li Z, Li L, Yang L, Chen G, Yang D, Zhang Y, Singh V, Smith S, Xiao Y, Wang E, Ye Y, Zhang W, Zhou L, Rong Y, Zhou J. The Ubx Polycomb response element bypasses an unpaired Fab-8 insulator via cis transvection in Drosophila. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0199353. [PMID: 29928011 PMCID: PMC6013190 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 06/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Chromatin insulators or boundary elements protect genes from regulatory activities from neighboring genes or chromatin domains. In the Drosophila Abdominal-B (Abd-B) locus, the deletion of such elements, such as Frontabdominal-7 (Fab-7) or Fab-8 led to dominant gain of function phenotypes, presumably due to the loss of chromatin barriers. Homologous chromosomes are paired in Drosophila, creating a number of pairing dependent phenomena including transvection, and whether transvection may affect the function of Polycomb response elements (PREs) and thus contribute to the phenotypes are not known. Here, we studied the chromatin barrier activity of Fab-8 and how it is affected by the zygosity of the transgene, and found that Fab-8 is able to block the silencing effect of the Ubx PRE on the DsRed reporter gene in a CTCF binding sites dependent manner. However, the blocking also depends on the zygosity of the transgene in that the barrier activity is present when the transgene is homozygous, but absent when the transgene is heterozygous. To analyze this effect, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation and quantitative PCR (ChIP-qPCR) experiments on homozygous transgenic embryos, and found that H3K27me3 and H3K9me3 marks are restricted by Fab-8, but they spread beyond Fab-8 into the DsRed gene when the two CTCF binding sites within Fab-8 were mutated. Consistent with this, the mutation reduced H3K4me3 and RNA Pol II binding to the DsRed gene, and consequently, DsRed expression. Importantly, in heterozygous embryos, Fab-8 is unable to prevent the spread of H3K27me3 and H3K9me3 marks from crossing Fab-8 into DsRed, suggesting an insulator bypass. These results suggest that in the Abd-B locus, deletion of the insulator in one copy of the chromosome could lead to the loss of insulator activity on the homologous chromosome, and in other loci where chromosomal deletion created hemizygous regions of the genome, the chromatin barrier could be compromised. This study highlights a role of homologous chromosome pairing in the regulation of gene expression in the Drosophila genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danfeng Lu
- Key Laboratory of bioactive peptides of Yunnan Province/ Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms of Chinese Academy of Sciences & Yunnan Province, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
- Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
- Graduate School, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zhuoran Li
- Key Laboratory of bioactive peptides of Yunnan Province/ Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms of Chinese Academy of Sciences & Yunnan Province, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
| | - Lingling Li
- State Key Laboratory of Bio-control, Institute of Entomology, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liping Yang
- Key Laboratory of bioactive peptides of Yunnan Province/ Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms of Chinese Academy of Sciences & Yunnan Province, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
| | - Guijun Chen
- Key Laboratory of bioactive peptides of Yunnan Province/ Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms of Chinese Academy of Sciences & Yunnan Province, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
| | - Deying Yang
- Key Laboratory of bioactive peptides of Yunnan Province/ Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms of Chinese Academy of Sciences & Yunnan Province, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
| | - Yue Zhang
- Key Laboratory of bioactive peptides of Yunnan Province/ Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms of Chinese Academy of Sciences & Yunnan Province, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
| | - Vikrant Singh
- Gene Expression and Regulation Program, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Sheryl Smith
- Gene Expression and Regulation Program, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Yu Xiao
- Key Laboratory of bioactive peptides of Yunnan Province/ Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms of Chinese Academy of Sciences & Yunnan Province, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
| | - Erlin Wang
- Key Laboratory of bioactive peptides of Yunnan Province/ Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms of Chinese Academy of Sciences & Yunnan Province, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
- Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
| | - Yunshuang Ye
- Key Laboratory of bioactive peptides of Yunnan Province/ Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms of Chinese Academy of Sciences & Yunnan Province, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
- Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Key Laboratory of bioactive peptides of Yunnan Province/ Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms of Chinese Academy of Sciences & Yunnan Province, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
- Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
| | - Lei Zhou
- Department of Molecular Genetics & Microbiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| | - Yikang Rong
- State Key Laboratory of Bio-control, Institute of Entomology, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jumin Zhou
- Key Laboratory of bioactive peptides of Yunnan Province/ Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms of Chinese Academy of Sciences & Yunnan Province, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lim B, Heist T, Levine M, Fukaya T. Visualization of Transvection in Living Drosophila Embryos. Mol Cell 2018; 70:287-296.e6. [PMID: 29606591 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.02.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2017] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
How remote enhancers interact with appropriate target genes persists as a central mystery in gene regulation. Here, we exploit the properties of transvection to explore enhancer-promoter communication between homologous chromosomes in living Drosophila embryos. We successfully visualized the activation of an MS2-tagged reporter gene by a defined developmental enhancer located in trans on the other homolog. This trans-homolog activation depends on insulator DNAs, which increase the stability-but not the frequency-of homolog pairing. A pair of heterotypic insulators failed to mediate transvection, raising the possibility that insulator specificity underlies the formation of chromosomal loop domains. Moreover, we found that a shared enhancer co-activates separate PP7 and MS2 reporter genes incis and intrans. Transvecting alleles weakly compete with one another, raising the possibility that they share a common pool of the transcription machinery. We propose that transvecting alleles form a trans-homolog "hub," which serves as a scaffold for the accumulation of transcription complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bomyi Lim
- Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
| | - Tyler Heist
- Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
| | - Michael Levine
- Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA; Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
| | - Takashi Fukaya
- Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ali T, Krüger M, Bhuju S, Jarek M, Bartkuhn M, Renkawitz R. Chromatin binding of Gcn5 in Drosophila is largely mediated by CP190. Nucleic Acids Res 2017; 45:2384-2395. [PMID: 27903907 PMCID: PMC5389606 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw1178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2016] [Accepted: 11/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Centrosomal 190 kDa protein (CP190) is a promoter binding factor, mediates long-range interactions in the context of enhancer-promoter contacts and in chromosomal domain formation. All Drosophila insulator proteins bind CP190 suggesting a crucial role in insulator function. CP190 has major effects on chromatin, such as depletion of nucleosomes, high nucleosomal turnover and prevention of heterochromatin expansion. Here, we searched for enzymes, which might be involved in CP190 mediated chromatin changes. Eighty percent of the genomic binding sites of the histone acetyltransferase Gcn5 are colocalizing with CP190 binding. Depletion of CP190 reduces Gcn5 binding to chromatin. Binding dependency was further supported by Gcn5 mediated co-precipitation of CP190. Gcn5 is known to activate transcription by histone acetylation. We used the dCas9 system to target CP190 or Gcn5 to a Polycomb repressed and H3K27me3 marked gene locus. Both, CP190 as well as Gcn5, activate this locus, thus supporting the model that CP190 recruits Gcn5 and thereby activates chromatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamer Ali
- Institute for Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University, D35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - Marcus Krüger
- CECAD Research Center, University of Cologne, D50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Sabin Bhuju
- Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, D38124 Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Michael Jarek
- Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, D38124 Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Marek Bartkuhn
- Institute for Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University, D35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - Rainer Renkawitz
- Institute for Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University, D35392 Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kassis JA, Kennison JA, Tamkun JW. Polycomb and Trithorax Group Genes in Drosophila. Genetics 2017; 206:1699-1725. [PMID: 28778878 PMCID: PMC5560782 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.185116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Accepted: 05/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Polycomb group (PcG) and Trithorax group (TrxG) genes encode important regulators of development and differentiation in metazoans. These two groups of genes were discovered in Drosophila by their opposing effects on homeotic gene (Hox) expression. PcG genes collectively behave as genetic repressors of Hox genes, while the TrxG genes are necessary for HOX gene expression or function. Biochemical studies showed that many PcG proteins are present in two protein complexes, Polycomb repressive complexes 1 and 2, which repress transcription via chromatin modifications. TrxG proteins activate transcription via a variety of mechanisms. Here we summarize the large body of genetic and biochemical experiments in Drosophila on these two important groups of genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith A Kassis
- Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
| | - James A Kennison
- Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
| | - John W Tamkun
- Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chetverina D, Fujioka M, Erokhin M, Georgiev P, Jaynes JB, Schedl P. Boundaries of loop domains (insulators): Determinants of chromosome form and function in multicellular eukaryotes. Bioessays 2017; 39. [PMID: 28133765 DOI: 10.1002/bies.201600233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Chromosomes in multicellular animals are subdivided into a series of looped domains. In addition to being the underlying principle for organizing the chromatin fiber, looping is critical for processes ranging from gene regulation to recombination and repair. The subdivision of chromosomes into looped domains depends upon a special class of architectural elements called boundaries or insulators. These elements are distributed throughout the genome and are ubiquitous building blocks of chromosomes. In this review, we focus on features of boundaries that are critical in determining the topology of the looped domains and their genetic properties. We highlight the properties of fly boundaries that are likely to have an important bearing on the organization of looped domains in vertebrates, and discuss the functional consequences of the observed similarities and differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darya Chetverina
- Department of the Control of Genetic Processes, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Miki Fujioka
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Maksim Erokhin
- Department of the Control of Genetic Processes, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pavel Georgiev
- Department of the Control of Genetic Processes, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - James B Jaynes
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Paul Schedl
- Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.,Laboratory of Gene Expression Regulation in Development, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kyrchanova O, Mogila V, Wolle D, Deshpande G, Parshikov A, Cléard F, Karch F, Schedl P, Georgiev P. Functional Dissection of the Blocking and Bypass Activities of the Fab-8 Boundary in the Drosophila Bithorax Complex. PLoS Genet 2016; 12:e1006188. [PMID: 27428541 PMCID: PMC4948906 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2015] [Accepted: 06/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Functionally autonomous regulatory domains direct the parasegment-specific expression of the Drosophila Bithorax complex (BX-C) homeotic genes. Autonomy is conferred by boundary/insulator elements that separate each regulatory domain from its neighbors. For six of the nine parasegment (PS) regulatory domains in the complex, at least one boundary is located between the domain and its target homeotic gene. Consequently, BX-C boundaries must not only block adventitious interactions between neighboring regulatory domains, but also be permissive (bypass) for regulatory interactions between the domains and their gene targets. To elucidate how the BX-C boundaries combine these two contradictory activities, we have used a boundary replacement strategy. We show that a 337 bp fragment spanning the Fab-8 boundary nuclease hypersensitive site and lacking all but 83 bp of the 625 bp Fab-8 PTS (promoter targeting sequence) fully rescues a Fab-7 deletion. It blocks crosstalk between the iab-6 and iab-7 regulatory domains, and has bypass activity that enables the two downstream domains, iab-5 and iab-6, to regulate Abdominal-B (Abd-B) transcription in spite of two intervening boundary elements. Fab-8 has two dCTCF sites and we show that they are necessary both for blocking and bypass activity. However, CTCF sites on their own are not sufficient for bypass. While multimerized dCTCF (or Su(Hw)) sites have blocking activity, they fail to support bypass. Moreover, this bypass defect is not rescued by the full length PTS. Finally, we show that orientation is critical for the proper functioning the Fab-8 replacement. Though the inverted Fab-8 boundary still blocks crosstalk, it disrupts the topology of the Abd-B regulatory domains and does not support bypass. Importantly, altering the orientation of the Fab-8 dCTCF sites is not sufficient to disrupt bypass, indicating that orientation dependence is conferred by other factors. Boundary elements in the Bithorax complex have two seemingly contradictory activities. They must block crosstalk between neighboring regulatory domains, but at the same time be permissive (insulator bypass) for regulatory interactions between the domains and the BX-C homeotic genes. We have used a replacement strategy to investigate how they carry out these two functions. We show that a 337 bp fragment spanning the Fab-8 boundary nuclease hypersensitive site is sufficient to fully rescue a Fab-7 boundary deletion. It blocks crosstalk and supports bypass. As has been observed in transgene assays, blocking activity requires the Fab-8 dCTCF sites, while full bypass activity requires the dCTCF sites plus a small part of PTS. In transgene assays, bypass activity typically depends on the orientation of the two insulators relative to each other. A similar orientation dependence is observed for the Fab-8 replacement in BX-C. When the orientation of the Fab-8 boundary is reversed, bypass activity is lost, while blocking is unaffected. Interestingly, unlike what has been observed in mammals, reversing the orientation of only the Fab-8 dCTCF sites does not affect boundary function. This finding indicates that other Fab-8 factors must play a critical role in determining orientation. Taken together, our findings argue that carrying out the paradoxical functions of the BX-C boundaries does not require any unusual or special properties; rather BX-C boundaries utilize generic blocking and insulator bypass activities that are appropriately adapted to their regulatory context. Thus making them a good model for studying the functional properties of boundaries/insulators in their native setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Kyrchanova
- Department of Genetics, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
- * E-mail: (OK); (PG)
| | - Vladic Mogila
- Department of Genetics, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Daniel Wolle
- Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Girish Deshpande
- Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Alexander Parshikov
- Department of Genetics, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Fabienne Cléard
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Francois Karch
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Paul Schedl
- Department of Genetics, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Pavel Georgiev
- Department of Genetics, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
- * E-mail: (OK); (PG)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zolotarev N, Fedotova A, Kyrchanova O, Bonchuk A, Penin AA, Lando AS, Eliseeva IA, Kulakovskiy IV, Maksimenko O, Georgiev P. Architectural proteins Pita, Zw5,and ZIPIC contain homodimerization domain and support specific long-range interactions in Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:7228-41. [PMID: 27137890 PMCID: PMC5009728 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2015] [Accepted: 04/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
According to recent models, as yet poorly studied architectural proteins appear to be required for local regulation of enhancer-promoter interactions, as well as for global chromosome organization. Transcription factors ZIPIC, Pita and Zw5 belong to the class of chromatin insulator proteins and preferentially bind to promoters near the TSS and extensively colocalize with cohesin and condensin complexes. ZIPIC, Pita and Zw5 are structurally similar in containing the N-terminal zinc finger-associated domain (ZAD) and different numbers of C2H2-type zinc fingers at the C-terminus. Here we have shown that the ZAD domains of ZIPIC, Pita and Zw5 form homodimers. In Drosophila transgenic lines, these proteins are able to support long-distance interaction between GAL4 activator and the reporter gene promoter. However, no functional interaction between binding sites for different proteins has been revealed, suggesting that such interactions are highly specific. ZIPIC facilitates long-distance stimulation of the reporter gene by GAL4 activator in yeast model system. Many of the genomic binding sites of ZIPIC, Pita and Zw5 are located at the boundaries of topologically associated domains (TADs). Thus, ZAD-containing zinc-finger proteins can be attributed to the class of architectural proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolay Zolotarev
- Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova str. 34/5, Moscow 119334, Russia
| | - Anna Fedotova
- Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova str. 34/5, Moscow 119334, Russia
| | - Olga Kyrchanova
- Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova str. 34/5, Moscow 119334, Russia
| | - Artem Bonchuk
- Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova str. 34/5, Moscow 119334, Russia
| | - Aleksey A Penin
- Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia; Institute for Information Transmission Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 127051 Russia; Department of Genetics, Faculty of Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia
| | - Andrey S Lando
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University), Institutskiy per. 9, Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region 141700, Russia Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Gubkina str. 3, Moscow, GSP-1, 119991, Russia
| | - Irina A Eliseeva
- Group of Protein Biosynthesis Regulation, Institute of Protein Research, Institutskaya str. 4, Pushchino 142290, Russia
| | - Ivan V Kulakovskiy
- Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Gubkina str. 3, Moscow, GSP-1, 119991, Russia Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova str. 32, Moscow, GSP-1, 119991, Russia
| | - Oksana Maksimenko
- Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova str. 34/5, Moscow 119334, Russia
| | - Pavel Georgiev
- Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova str. 34/5, Moscow 119334, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kyrchanova O, Mogila V, Wolle D, Magbanua JP, White R, Georgiev P, Schedl P. The boundary paradox in the Bithorax complex. Mech Dev 2015; 138 Pt 2:122-132. [PMID: 26215349 PMCID: PMC4890074 DOI: 10.1016/j.mod.2015.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2015] [Revised: 07/08/2015] [Accepted: 07/09/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The parasegment-specific expression of the three Drosophila Bithorax complex homeotic genes is orchestrated by nine functionally autonomous regulatory domains. Functional autonomy depends upon special elements called boundaries or insulators that are located between each domain. The boundaries ensure the independent activity of each domain by blocking adventitious interactions with initiators, enhancers and silencers in the neighboring domains. However, this blocking activity poses a regulatory paradox--the Bithorax boundaries are also able to insulate promoters from regulatory interactions with enhancers and silencers and six of the nine Bithorax regulatory domains are separated from their target genes by at least one boundary element. Here we consider several mechanisms that have been suggested for how the Bithorax regulatory domains are able to bypass intervening boundary elements and direct the appropriate parasegment-specific temporal and spatial expression of their target gene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Kyrchanova
- Laboratory of Gene Expression Regulation in Development, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Vladic Mogila
- Department of the Control of Genetic Processes, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; Nikolaev V.A. Sukhomlinsky National University, Department of Biology, Ukraine
| | - Daniel Wolle
- Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Jose Paolo Magbanua
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Robert White
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Pavel Georgiev
- Department of the Control of Genetic Processes, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Paul Schedl
- Laboratory of Gene Expression Regulation in Development, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Halsall JA, Turan N, Wiersma M, Turner BM. Cells adapt to the epigenomic disruption caused by histone deacetylase inhibitors through a coordinated, chromatin-mediated transcriptional response. Epigenetics Chromatin 2015; 8:29. [PMID: 26380582 PMCID: PMC4572612 DOI: 10.1186/s13072-015-0021-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2015] [Accepted: 08/03/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The genome-wide hyperacetylation of chromatin caused by histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) is surprisingly well tolerated by most eukaryotic cells. The homeostatic mechanisms that underlie this tolerance are unknown. Here we identify the transcriptional and epigenomic changes that constitute the earliest response of human lymphoblastoid cells to two HDACi, valproic acid and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (Vorinostat), both in widespread clinical use. RESULTS Dynamic changes in transcript levels over the first 2 h of exposure to HDACi were assayed on High Density microarrays. There was a consistent response to the two different inhibitors at several concentrations. Strikingly, components of all known lysine acetyltransferase (KAT) complexes were down-regulated, as were genes required for growth and maintenance of the lymphoid phenotype. Up-regulated gene clusters were enriched in regulators of transcription, development and phenotypic change. In untreated cells, HDACi-responsive genes, whether up- or down-regulated, were packaged in highly acetylated chromatin. This was essentially unaffected by HDACi. In contrast, HDACi induced a strong increase in H3K27me3 at transcription start sites, irrespective of their transcriptional response. Inhibition of the H3K27 methylating enzymes, EZH1/2, altered the transcriptional response to HDACi, confirming the functional significance of H3K27 methylation for specific genes. CONCLUSIONS We propose that the observed transcriptional changes constitute an inbuilt adaptive response to HDACi that promotes cell survival by minimising protein hyperacetylation, slowing growth and re-balancing patterns of gene expression. The transcriptional response to HDACi is mediated by a precisely timed increase in H3K27me3 at transcription start sites. In contrast, histone acetylation, at least at the three lysine residues tested, seems to play no direct role. Instead, it may provide a stable chromatin environment that allows transcriptional change to be induced by other factors, possibly acetylated non-histone proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Halsall
- Chromatin and Gene Expression Group, School of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK
| | - Nil Turan
- Chromatin and Gene Expression Group, School of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK
| | - Maaike Wiersma
- Chromatin and Gene Expression Group, School of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK
| | - Bryan M Turner
- Chromatin and Gene Expression Group, School of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Maeda RK, Karch F. The open for business model of the bithorax complex in Drosophila. Chromosoma 2015; 124:293-307. [PMID: 26067031 PMCID: PMC4548009 DOI: 10.1007/s00412-015-0522-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2015] [Revised: 05/19/2015] [Accepted: 05/19/2015] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
After nearly 30 years of effort, Ed Lewis published his 1978 landmark paper in which he described the analysis of a series of mutations that affect the identity of the segments that form along the anterior-posterior (AP) axis of the fly (Lewis 1978). The mutations behaved in a non-canonical fashion in complementation tests, forming what Ed Lewis called a "pseudo-allelic" series. Because of this, he never thought that the mutations represented segment-specific genes. As all of these mutations were grouped to a particular area of the Drosophila third chromosome, the locus became known of as the bithorax complex (BX-C). One of the key findings of Lewis' article was that it revealed for the first time, to a wide scientific audience, that there was a remarkable correlation between the order of the segment-specific mutations along the chromosome and the order of the segments they affected along the AP axis. In Ed Lewis' eyes, the mutants he discovered affected "segment-specific functions" that were sequentially activated along the chromosome as one moves from anterior to posterior along the body axis (the colinearity concept now cited in elementary biology textbooks). The nature of the "segment-specific functions" started to become clear when the BX-C was cloned through the pioneering chromosomal walk initiated in the mid 1980s by the Hogness and Bender laboratories (Bender et al. 1983a; Karch et al. 1985). Through this molecular biology effort, and along with genetic characterizations performed by Gines Morata's group in Madrid (Sanchez-Herrero et al. 1985) and Robert Whittle's in Sussex (Tiong et al. 1985), it soon became clear that the whole BX-C encoded only three protein-coding genes (Ubx, abd-A, and Abd-B). Later, immunostaining against the Ubx protein hinted that the segment-specific functions could, in fact, be cis-regulatory elements regulating the expression of the three protein-coding genes. In 1987, Peifer, Karch, and Bender proposed a comprehensive model of the functioning of the BX-C, in which the "segment-specific functions" appear as segment-specific enhancers regulating, Ubx, abd-A, or Abd-B (Peifer et al. 1987). Key to their model was that the segmental address of these enhancers was not an inherent ability of the enhancers themselves, but was determined by the chromosomal location in which they lay. In their view, the sequential activation of the segment-specific functions resulted from the sequential opening of chromatin domains along the chromosome as one moves from anterior to posterior. This model soon became known of as the open for business model. While the open for business model is quite easy to visualize at a conceptual level, molecular evidence to validate this model has been missing for almost 30 years. The recent publication describing the outstanding, joint effort from the Bender and Kingston laboratories now provides the missing proof to support this model (Bowman et al. 2014). The purpose of this article is to review the open for business model and take the reader through the genetic arguments that led to its elaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert K. Maeda
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, 30 quai E. Ansermet, 1211 Geneva-4, Switzerland
| | - François Karch
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, 30 quai E. Ansermet, 1211 Geneva-4, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Functional Requirements for Fab-7 Boundary Activity in the Bithorax Complex. Mol Cell Biol 2015; 35:3739-52. [PMID: 26303531 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.00456-15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2015] [Accepted: 08/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Chromatin boundaries are architectural elements that determine the three-dimensional folding of the chromatin fiber and organize the chromosome into independent units of genetic activity. The Fab-7 boundary from the Drosophila bithorax complex (BX-C) is required for the parasegment-specific expression of the Abd-B gene. We have used a replacement strategy to identify sequences that are necessary and sufficient for Fab-7 boundary function in the BX-C. Fab-7 boundary activity is known to depend on factors that are stage specific, and we describe a novel ∼700-kDa complex, the late boundary complex (LBC), that binds to Fab-7 sequences that have insulator functions in late embryos and adults. We show that the LBC is enriched in nuclear extracts from late, but not early, embryos and that it contains three insulator proteins, GAF, Mod(mdg4), and E(y)2. Its DNA binding properties are unusual in that it requires a minimal sequence of >65 bp; however, other than a GAGA motif, the three Fab-7 LBC recognition elements display few sequence similarities. Finally, we show that mutations which abrogate LBC binding in vitro inactivate the Fab-7 boundary in the BX-C.
Collapse
|
38
|
Functional role of dimerization and CP190 interacting domains of CTCF protein in Drosophila melanogaster. BMC Biol 2015; 13:63. [PMID: 26248466 PMCID: PMC4528719 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-015-0168-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2015] [Accepted: 07/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Insulators play a central role in gene regulation, chromosomal architecture and genome function in higher eukaryotes. To learn more about how insulators carry out their diverse functions, we have begun an analysis of the Drosophila CTCF (dCTCF). CTCF is one of the few insulator proteins known to be conserved from flies to man. Results In the studies reported here we have focused on the identification and characterization of two dCTCF protein interaction modules. The first mediates dCTCF multimerization, while the second mediates dCTCF–CP190 interactions. The multimerization domain maps in the N-terminus of the dCTCF protein and likely mediates the formation of tetrameric complexes. The CP190 interaction module encompasses a sequence ~200 amino acids long that spans the C-terminal and mediates interactions with the N-terminal BTB domain of the CP190 protein. Transgene rescue experiments showed that a dCTCF protein lacking sequences critical for CP190 interactions was almost as effective as wild type in rescuing the phenotypic effects of a dCTCF null allele. The mutation did, however, affect CP190 recruitment to specific Drosophila insulator elements and had a modest effect on dCTCF chromatin association. A protein lacking the N-terminal dCTCF multimerization domain incompletely rescued the zygotic and maternal effect lethality of the null and did not rescue the defects in Abd-B regulation evident in surviving adult dCTCF mutant flies. Finally, we show that elimination of maternally contributed dCTCF at the onset of embryogenesis has quite different effects on development and Abd-B regulation than is observed when the homozygous mutant animals develop in the presence of maternally derived dCTCF activity. Conclusions Our results indicate that dCTCF–CP190 interactions are less critical for the in vivo functions of the dCTCF protein than the N-terminal dCTCF–dCTCF interaction domain. We also show that the phenotypic consequences of dCTCF mutations differ depending upon when and how dCTCF activity is lost. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12915-015-0168-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
39
|
Maksimenko O, Gasanov NB, Georgiev P. Regulatory Elements in Vectors for Efficient Generation of Cell Lines Producing Target Proteins. Acta Naturae 2015; 7:15-26. [PMID: 26483956 PMCID: PMC4610161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
To date, there has been an increasing number of drugs produced in mammalian cell cultures. In order to enhance the expression level and stability of target recombinant proteins in cell cultures, various regulatory elements with poorly studied mechanisms of action are used. In this review, we summarize and discuss the potential mechanisms of action of such regulatory elements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O. Maksimenko
- Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova str. 34/5, 119334, Moscow, Russia
| | - N. B. Gasanov
- Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova str. 34/5, 119334, Moscow, Russia
| | - P. Georgiev
- Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova str. 34/5, 119334, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Using transgenic reporter assays to functionally characterize enhancers in animals. Genomics 2015; 106:185-192. [PMID: 26072435 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2015.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2015] [Revised: 05/11/2015] [Accepted: 06/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Enhancers or cis-regulatory modules play an instructive role in regulating gene expression during animal development and in response to the environment. Despite their importance, we only have an incomplete map of enhancers in the genome and our understanding of the mechanisms governing their function is still limited. Recent advances in genomics provided powerful tools to generate genome-wide maps of potential enhancers. However, most of these methods are based on indirect measures of enhancer activity and have to be followed by functional testing. Animal transgenesis has been a valuable method to functionally test and characterize enhancers in vivo. In this review I discuss how different transgenic strategies are utilized to characterize enhancers in model organisms focusing on studies in Drosophila and mouse. I will further discuss recent large-scale transgenic efforts to systematically identify and catalog enhancers as well as highlight the challenges and future directions in the field.
Collapse
|
41
|
Schoborg T, Labrador M. Expanding the roles of chromatin insulators in nuclear architecture, chromatin organization and genome function. Cell Mol Life Sci 2014; 71:4089-113. [PMID: 25012699 PMCID: PMC11113341 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-014-1672-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2014] [Revised: 05/31/2014] [Accepted: 06/23/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Of the numerous classes of elements involved in modulating eukaryotic chromosome structure and function, chromatin insulators arguably remain the most poorly understood in their contribution to these processes in vivo. Indeed, our view of chromatin insulators has evolved dramatically since their chromatin boundary and enhancer blocking properties were elucidated roughly a quarter of a century ago as a result of recent genome-wide, high-throughput methods better suited to probing the role of these elements in their native genomic contexts. The overall theme that has emerged from these studies is that chromatin insulators function as general facilitators of higher-order chromatin loop structures that exert both physical and functional constraints on the genome. In this review, we summarize the result of recent work that supports this idea as well as a number of other studies linking these elements to a diverse array of nuclear processes, suggesting that chromatin insulators exert master control over genome organization and behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd Schoborg
- Department of Biochemistry, Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Tennessee, M407 Walters Life Sciences, 1414 Cumberland Avenue, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
- Present Address: Laboratory of Molecular Machines and Tissue Architecture, Cell Biology and Physiology Center, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 50 South Dr Rm 2122, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
| | - Mariano Labrador
- Department of Biochemistry, Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Tennessee, M407 Walters Life Sciences, 1414 Cumberland Avenue, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Maksimenko O, Georgiev P. Mechanisms and proteins involved in long-distance interactions. Front Genet 2014; 5:28. [PMID: 24600469 PMCID: PMC3927085 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2013] [Accepted: 01/25/2014] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to advances in genome-wide technologies, consistent distant interactions within chromosomes of higher eukaryotes have been revealed. In particular, it has been shown that enhancers can specifically and directly interact with promoters by looping out intervening sequences, which can be up to several hundred kilobases long. This review is focused on transcription factors that are supposed to be involved in long-range interactions. Available data are in agreement with the model that several known transcription factors and insulator proteins belong to an abundant but poorly studied class of proteins that are responsible for chromosomal architecture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oksana Maksimenko
- Laboratory of Gene Expression Regulation in Development, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia
| | - Pavel Georgiev
- Department of the Control of Genetic Processes, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|