1
|
Ozdemir S, Quaife M, Mohamed AF, Norman R. An Overview of Data Collection in Health Preference Research. THE PATIENT 2024:10.1007/s40271-024-00695-6. [PMID: 38662323 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-024-00695-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
This paper focuses on survey administration and data collection methods employed for stated-preference studies in health applications. First, it describes different types of survey administration methods, encompassing web-based surveys, face-to-face (in-person) surveys, and mail surveys. Second, the concept of sampling frames is introduced, clarifying distinctions between the target population and survey frame population. The discussion then extends to different types of sampling methods, such as probability and non-probability sampling, along with an evaluation of potential issues associated with different sampling methods within the context of health preference research. Third, the paper provides information about different recruitment methods, including web-surveys, leveraging patient groups, and in-clinic recruitment. Fourth, a crucial aspect addressed is the calculation of response rate, with insights into determining an adequate response rate and strategies to improve response rates in stated-preference surveys. Lastly, the paper concludes by discussing data management plans and suggesting insights for future research in this field. In summary, this paper examines the nuanced aspects of survey administration and data collection methods in stated-preference studies, offering valuable guidance for researchers and practitioners in the health domain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Semra Ozdemir
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| | | | | | - Richard Norman
- Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kabami J, Koss CA, Sunday H, Biira E, Nyabuti M, Balzer LB, Gupta S, Chamie G, Ayieko J, Kakande E, Bacon MC, Havlir D, Kamya MR, Petersen M. Randomized Trial of Dynamic Choice HIV Prevention at Antenatal and Postnatal Care Clinics in Rural Uganda and Kenya. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2024; 95:447-455. [PMID: 38489493 PMCID: PMC10927304 DOI: 10.1097/qai.0000000000003383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnant and postpartum women in Sub-Saharan Africa are at high risk of HIV acquisition. We evaluated a person-centered dynamic choice intervention for HIV prevention (DCP) among women attending antenatal and postnatal care. SETTING Rural Kenya and Uganda. METHODS Women (aged 15 years or older) at risk of HIV acquisition seen at antenatal and postnatal care clinics were individually randomized to DCP vs. standard of care (SEARCH; NCT04810650). The DCP intervention included structured client choice of product (daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis or postexposure prophylaxis), service location (clinic or out of facility), and HIV testing modality (self-test or provider-administered), with option to switch over time and person-centered care (phone access to clinician, structured barrier assessment and counseling, and provider training). The primary outcome was biomedical prevention coverage-proportion of 48-week follow-up with self-reported pre-exposure prophylaxis or postexposure prophylaxis use, compared between arms using targeted maximum likelihood estimation. RESULTS Between April and July 2021, we enrolled 400 women (203 intervention and 197 control); 38% were pregnant, 52% were aged 15-24 years, and 94% reported no pre-exposure prophylaxis or postexposure prophylaxis use for ≥6 months before baseline. Among 384/400 participants (96%) with outcome ascertained, DCP increased biomedical prevention coverage 40% (95% CI: 34% to 47%; P < 0.001); the coverage was 70% in intervention vs. 29% in control. DCP also increased coverage during months at risk of HIV (81% in intervention, 43% in control; 38% absolute increase; 95% CI: 31% to 45%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION A person-centered dynamic choice intervention that provided flexibility in product, testing, and service location more than doubled biomedical HIV prevention coverage in a high-risk population already routinely offered access to biomedical prevention options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Kabami
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
- Department of Medicine, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Helen Sunday
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Edith Biira
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Marilyn Nyabuti
- Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Laura B. Balzer
- Divisions of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA; and
| | - Shalika Gupta
- Divisions of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA; and
| | - Gabriel Chamie
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - James Ayieko
- Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Elijah Kakande
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Melanie C. Bacon
- Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Diane Havlir
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Moses R. Kamya
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
- Department of Medicine, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Maya Petersen
- Divisions of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA; and
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kabami J, Kakande E, Chamie G, Balzer LB, Petersen ML, Camlin CS, Nyabuti M, Koss CA, Bukusi EA, Kamya MR, Havlir DV, Ayieko J. Uptake of a patient-centred dynamic choice model for HIV prevention in rural Kenya and Uganda: SEARCH SAPPHIRE study. J Int AIDS Soc 2023; 26 Suppl 1:e26121. [PMID: 37408473 PMCID: PMC10323314 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.26121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Person-centred HIV prevention delivery models that offer structured choices in product, testing and visit location may increase coverage. However, data are lacking on the actual uptake of choices among persons at risk of HIV in southern Africa. In an ongoing randomized study (SEARCH; NCT04810650) in rural East Africa, we evaluated the uptake of choices made when offered in a person-centred, dynamic choice model for HIV prevention. METHODS Using the PRECEDE framework, we developed a persont-centred, Dynamic Choice HIV Prevention (DCP) intervention for persons at risk of HIV in three settings in rural Kenya and Uganda: antenatal clinic (ANC), outpatient department (OPD) and in the community. Components include: provider training on product choice (predisposing); flexibility and responsiveness to client desires and choices (pre-exposure prophylaxis [PrEP]/post-exposure prophylaxis [PEP], clinic vs. off-site visits and self- or clinician-based HIV testing) (enabling); and client and staff feedback (reinforcing). All clients received a structured assessment of barriers with personalized plans to address them, mobile phone access to clinicians (24 hours/7 days/week) and integrated reproductive health services. In this interim analysis, we describe the uptake of choices of product, location and testing during the first 24 weeks of follow-up (April 2021-March 2022). RESULTS A total of 612 (203 ANC, 197 OPD and 212 community) participants were randomized to the person-centred DCP intervention. We delivered the DCP intervention in all three settings with diverse populations: ANC: 39% pregnant; median age: 24 years; OPD: 39% male, median age 27 years; and community: 42% male, median age: 29 years. Baseline choice of PrEP was highest in ANC (98%) vs. OPD (84%) and community (40%); whereas the proportion of adults selecting PEP was higher in the community (46%) vs. OPD (8%) and ANC (1%). Personal preference for off-site visits increased over time (65% at week 24 vs. 35% at baseline). Interest in alternative HIV testing modalities grew over time (38% baseline self-testing vs. 58% at week 24). CONCLUSIONS A person-centred model incorporating structured choice in biomedical prevention and care delivery options in settings with demographically diverse groups, in rural Kenya and Uganda, was responsive to varying personal preferences over time in HIV prevention programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Kabami
- Infectious Diseases Research CollaborationKampalaUganda
- Department of MedicineMakerere UniversityKampalaUganda
| | | | - Gabriel Chamie
- Department of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Laura B. Balzer
- Department of BiostatisticsUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyCaliforniaUSA
| | - Maya L. Petersen
- Department of BiostatisticsUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyCaliforniaUSA
| | - Carol S. Camlin
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Marilyn Nyabuti
- Center for Microbiology ResearchKenya Medical Research InstituteNairobiKenya
| | - Catherine A. Koss
- Department of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Elizabeth A. Bukusi
- Center for Microbiology ResearchKenya Medical Research InstituteNairobiKenya
| | | | - Diane V. Havlir
- Department of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - James Ayieko
- Center for Microbiology ResearchKenya Medical Research InstituteNairobiKenya
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Torres-Rueda S, Terris-Prestholt F, Gafos M, Indravudh PP, Giddings R, Bozzani F, Quaife M, Ghazaryan L, Mann C, Osborne C, Kavanagh M, Godfrey-Faussett P, Medley G, Malhotra S. Health Economics Research on Non-surgical Biomedical HIV Prevention: Identifying Gaps and Proposing a Way Forward. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2023; 41:787-802. [PMID: 36905570 PMCID: PMC10007656 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01231-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Although HIV prevention science has advanced over the last four decades, evidence suggests that prevention technologies do not always reach their full potential. Critical health economics evidence at appropriate decision-making junctures, particularly early in the development process, could help identify and address potential barriers to the eventual uptake of future HIV prevention products. This paper aims to identify key evidence gaps and propose health economics research priorities for the field of HIV non-surgical biomedical prevention. METHODS We used a mixed-methods approach with three distinct components: (i) three systematic literature reviews (costs and cost effectiveness, HIV transmission modelling and quantitative preference elicitation) to understand health economics evidence and gaps in the peer-reviewed literature; (ii) an online survey with researchers working in this field to capture gaps in yet-to-be published research (recently completed, ongoing and future); and (iii) a stakeholder meeting with key global and national players in HIV prevention, including experts in product development, health economics research and policy uptake, to uncover further gaps, as well as to elicit views on priorities and recommendations based on (i) and (ii). RESULTS Gaps in the scope of available health economics evidence were identified. Little research has been carried out on certain key populations (e.g. transgender people and people who inject drugs) and other vulnerable groups (e.g. pregnant people and people who breastfeed). Research is also lacking on preferences of community actors who often influence or enable access to health services among priority populations. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis, which has been rolled out in many settings, has been studied in depth. However, research on newer promising technologies, such as long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis formulations, broadly neutralising antibodies and multipurpose prevention technologies, is lacking. Interventions focussing on reducing intravenous and vertical transmission are also understudied. A disproportionate amount of evidence on low- and middle-income countries comes from two countries (South Africa and Kenya); evidence from other countries in sub-Saharan Africa as well as other low- and middle-income countries is needed. Further, data are needed on non-facility-based service delivery modalities, integrated service delivery and ancillary services. Key methodological gaps were also identified. An emphasis on equity and representation of heterogeneous populations was lacking. Research rarely acknowledged the complex and dynamic use of prevention technologies over time. Greater efforts are needed to collect primary data, quantify uncertainty, systematically compare the full range of prevention options available, and validate pilot and modelling data once interventions are scaled up. Clarity on appropriate cost-effectiveness outcome measures and thresholds is also lacking. Lastly, research often fails to reflect policy-relevant questions and approaches. CONCLUSIONS Despite a large body of health economics evidence on non-surgical biomedical HIV prevention technologies, important gaps in the scope of evidence and methodology remain. To ensure that high-quality research influences key decision-making junctures and facilitates the delivery of prevention products in a way that maximises impact, we make five broad recommendations related to: improved study design, an increased focus on service delivery, greater community and stakeholder engagement, the fostering of an active network of partners across sectors and an enhanced application of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mitzy Gafos
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Matthew Quaife
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Lusine Ghazaryan
- United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Washington, DC, USA
| | - Carlyn Mann
- United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Matthew Kavanagh
- Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Graham Medley
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bhushan NL, Ridgeway K, Luecke EH, Palanee-Phillips T, Montgomery ET, Minnis AM. Synthesis of end-user research to inform future multipurpose prevention technologies in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review. FRONTIERS IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2023; 5:1156864. [PMID: 37325244 PMCID: PMC10264572 DOI: 10.3389/frph.2023.1156864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) experience disproportionately high rates of HIV infection and unintended pregnancy compared to their age-matched counterparts in other regions of the world. Multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs) that offer protection against HIV and unintended pregnancy in a single product stand to address these dual sexual and reproductive health needs simultaneously. The aim of this scoping review is to identify factors that are important for optimizing the likelihood of MPT adoption by end users in SSA. Methods Study inclusion criteria included MPT research (HIV and pregnancy prevention dual indication) published or presented in English from 2000 to 2022 and conducted in SSA amongst end-users (women aged 15-44), male partners, health care providers, and community stakeholders. References were identified by searching peer reviewed literature, grey literature, conference presentations (2015-2022), grant databases, and outreach to MPT subject matter experts. Of 115 references identified, 37 references met inclusion criteria and were extracted for analysis. A narrative synthesis approach was used to summarize findings within and across MPT products. Results Studies were identified from six countries in SSA and a substantial proportion included a South African (n = 27) and/or Kenyan (n = 16) study site. Most studies utilized a qualitative study design (n = 22) and evaluated MPT acceptability and preferences by presenting hypothetical products through images or a list of product attributes (n = 21). The vaginal ring (n = 20), oral tablet (n = 20), and injection (n = 15) were examined most frequently. Across studies, there was high acceptability and demand for an HIV and pregnancy prevention MPT. End users valued choice in prevention product type as well as discreetness and long-acting options. Provider counseling and community sensitization were reported as essential for future introduction of novel MPT delivery forms. Conclusion Recognizing the heterogeneity of women's preferences and changing reproductive and sexual health needs over the life course, choice is important in the delivery of pregnancy and HIV prevention products as well as amongst MPT products with distinct product profiles. End user research with active MPTs, vs. hypothetical or placebo MPTs, is necessary to advance understanding of end-user preferences and acceptability of future products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kathleen Ridgeway
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Ellen H. Luecke
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bershteyn A, Resar D, Kim HY, Platais I, Mullick S. Optimizing the pipeline of multipurpose prevention technologies: opportunities across women's reproductive lifespans. FRONTIERS IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2023; 5:1169110. [PMID: 37325241 PMCID: PMC10266103 DOI: 10.3389/frph.2023.1169110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
HIV/AIDS and maternal mortality are the two leading causes of death among women of reproductive age in sub-Saharan Africa. A growing body of research investigates opportunities for multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs) that prevent unintended pregnancy, HIV, and/or other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) with a single product. More than two dozen MPTs are currently in development, most of them combining contraception with HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis, with or without protection from other STIs. If successful, such MPTs could offer women benefits at multiple levels: greater motivation for effective use; lower product administration burden; accelerated integration of HIV, STI, and reproductive health services; and opportunities to circumvent stigma by using contraception as a "fig leaf" for HIV and/or STI prevention. However, even if women find respite from product burden, lack of motivation, and/or stigma in contraceptive-containing MPTs, their use of MPTs will be interrupted, often multiple times, over the reproductive lifecourse due to desire for pregnancy, pregnancy and breastfeeding, menopause, and changes in risk. Interruptions to the benefits of MPTs could be avoided by combining HIV/STI prevention with other life-stage-appropriate reproductive health products. New product concepts could include combining prenatal supplements with HIV and STI prevention, emergency contraception with HIV post-exposure prophylaxis, or hormone replacement therapies for menopause with HIV and STI prevention. Research is needed to optimize the MPT pipeline based on the populations underserved by available options and the capacity of resource-constrained health systems to deliver novel preventative healthcare products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Bershteyn
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Danielle Resar
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Hae-Young Kim
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Ingrida Platais
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Saiqa Mullick
- Wits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Milali MP, Resar D, Kaftan D, Campbell J, Olowu A, Edwards D, Platais I, Kim HY, Jenkins S, Bershteyn A. Cost-effectiveness of the dual prevention pill for contraception and HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis. FRONTIERS IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2023; 5:1144217. [PMID: 37266447 PMCID: PMC10230827 DOI: 10.3389/frph.2023.1144217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) experience the world's highest rates of both HIV infection and unintended pregnancy. The Dual Prevention Pill (DPP) is a novel multipurpose prevention technology (MPT) that co-formulates HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and combined hormonal oral contraception into a single daily pill. As a dual indication product, the DPP may be preferred by women facing these overlapping health risks. However, most SSA countries face severe healthcare resource constraints. Research is needed to assess whether, in what populations, and in what use cases the DPP would be cost-effective. Methods We augmented an agent-based SSA HIV model with maternal health parameters including unintended pregnancy, abortion, and maternal mortality. Based on a previous market analysis, we assumed a primary DPP user population of current oral contraceptive users ages 25-49, and alternative user populations in different risk groups (age 15-24, sex workers, HIV-serodiscordant couples) and baseline product use profiles (unmet need for contraception, oral PrEP use, condom use). In three geographies (western Kenya, Zimbabwe, South Africa), we estimated HIV infections averted, pregnancies averted, disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) averted, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over a 30-year time horizon, assuming equivalent adherence to the DPP as to oral contraceptives, higher adherence, or lower adherence. Results The DPP is likely to be a cost-effective alternative to oral PrEP among users in need of contraception. Among women not already using PrEP, the DPP is likely to be cost-saving in sex workers and serodiscordant couples. The DPP is unlikely to be cost-effective in oral contraceptive users in the general population. Switching from oral contraception to the DPP could be net harmful in some settings and populations if it were to substantially reduces adherence to oral contraception. Results were robust to a range of time horizons or discount rates. Conclusion The DPP has the potential to be cost-effective and cost-saving in populations at substantial HIV risk. Outcomes are sensitive to adherence, implying that effective counseling and decision-making tools for users considering the DPP will be essential. More research is needed to understand real-life adherence patterns and ensure health benefits achieved from contraception alone are not lost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masabho P. Milali
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Danielle Resar
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, MA, United States
| | - David Kaftan
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Adebanjo Olowu
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Danny Edwards
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Ingrida Platais
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Hae-Young Kim
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Sarah Jenkins
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Anna Bershteyn
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nkomo S, Makoni W, Shapley-Quinn MK, Luecke E, Mbatsane E, Manenzhe K, Ahmed K, Johnson LM, Mahaka I, van der Straten A. Prospective acceptability of a multipurpose technology (MPT) implant in preclinical development to prevent HIV and unplanned pregnancy: Qualitative insights from women end users and health care providers in South Africa and Zimbabwe. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0285711. [PMID: 37195918 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the high rates of both HIV and unintended pregnancies in sub-Saharan Africa, the SCHIELD program aims to develop a multipurpose technology implant for HIV and pregnancy prevention. An end-user evaluation was undertaken with young women and health care providers to assess preferences for modifiable implant attributes to improve future adoption and rollout. METHODS Focus group discussions were conducted with potential women end users, and health care providers experienced in implant insertion or removal participated in in-depth interviews. All participants were recruited from Harare, Zimbabwe, or Soshanguve, South Africa. The purposively stratified sampled women were either implant experienced or implant naïve and were categorized into three groups: nulliparous, postpartum, or engaged in transactional sex. Topics covered included duration (six months to three years), biodegradability, removability, and independent rod retrievability (per indication). Data were analyzed using Dedoose software and summarized into emerging themes. RESULTS Participants identified three key areas that could facilitate rollout, uptake, and adherence of an implant for HIV and pregnancy prevention. First, discreetness was the most salient topic and was associated with implant characteristics such as anatomical location, flexibility, and biodegradability. Second, the ability to independently retrieve the HIV or pregnancy prevention component was preferred, as life circumstances may change and was favored by all participants, except for young women in Soshanguve. Third, there is a need for proper counseling, sensitization, provider training, and health campaigns to facilitate rollout of a 2-in-1 implant. CONCLUSIONS A 2-in-1 implant was seen as highly desirable by most young women and health care providers. Participants discussed potential concerns and barriers to uptake of a biodegradable implant with dual HIV prevention and contraceptive properties, identifying key implant attributes that product developers can modify while still in preclinical stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mary Kate Shapley-Quinn
- Women's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, San Jose, California, United States of America
| | - Ellen Luecke
- Women's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, San Jose, California, United States of America
| | | | | | - Khatija Ahmed
- Setshaba Research Centre, Soshanguve, South Africa
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Leah M Johnson
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | | | - Ariane van der Straten
- ASTRA Consulting, Kensington, California, United States of America
- Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bhushan NL, Musara P, Hartmann M, Stoner MCD, Shah SR, Nabukeera J, Rukundo I, Mutero P, Lewis MA, Piper J, Shapley‐Quinn MK, Etima J, Minnis AM. Making the Case for Joint Decision-Making in Future Multipurpose Prevention Technology (MPT) Choice: Qualitative Findings on MPT Attribute Preferences from the CUPID Study (MTN-045). J Int AIDS Soc 2022; 25:e26024. [PMID: 36254362 PMCID: PMC9577116 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.26024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Young women in sub‐Saharan Africa account for two‐thirds of all new HIV infections and face high rates of unintended pregnancy. Multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs) are promising products under development that are designed to simultaneously prevent HIV and unintended pregnancy. Since MPTs will be used in the context of sexual relationships, ensuring acceptability and use requires understanding the role of male partners in MPT use decision‐making. Methods This paper draws on qualitative data from 39 couples enrolled in the Microbicide Trials Network (MTN) 045 study, conducted in 2019–2020. Partners completed a discrete choice experiment (DCE), first separately and then jointly, to measure preferences for future MPT attributes and then completed a qualitative interview. We also draw on quantitative data from interviewer observation about who dominated the decision‐making process during the joint DCE. Content analysis was used to examine (1) how couples made decisions on existing non‐MPT HIV and pregnancy prevention products; (2) how couples made decisions on future ideal‐MPT product during the DCE; and (3) how these decision‐making processes varied by decision‐making dominance (10 male, 10 female and 19 equal) and interview type (19 joint and 20 separate). Results Existing non‐MPT product decisions focused on trust between partners and product attributes, while future ideal‐MPT product decisions exclusively focused on product attributes. Across existing and future products, preferences for product attributes varied by gender. Male partners were most concerned with limiting side effects impacting sexual pleasure, female partners were most concerned with limiting side effects causing physical symptoms and both were concerned with the return to fertility. Across all dominance and interview types, couples reported making decisions together and female partners were often able to negotiate with male partners for their preferred product or set of product attributes. Conclusions Research activities in this study provided an opportunity for couples to openly present their product attribute preferences to their partner, learn about their partner's attribute preferences, negotiate for their ideal set of attributes and ultimately choose attributes that benefited the couple without disempowering the female partner. Future research should focus on the utility of couple‐based decision‐making aids or similar tools for facilitating joint MPT decision‐making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Petina Musara
- Clinical Trials Research CentreUniversity of ZimbabweHarareZimbabwe
| | | | | | - Shweta R. Shah
- RTI InternationalResearch Triangle ParkNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Josephine Nabukeera
- Makerere University ‐ Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration (MU‐JHU)KampalaUganda
| | - Ivan Rukundo
- Makerere University ‐ Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration (MU‐JHU)KampalaUganda
| | - Prisca Mutero
- Clinical Trials Research CentreUniversity of ZimbabweHarareZimbabwe
| | - Megan A. Lewis
- RTI InternationalResearch Triangle ParkNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Jeanna Piper
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaMarylandUSA
| | | | - Juliane Etima
- Makerere University ‐ Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration (MU‐JHU)KampalaUganda
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ostermann J, Njau B, Hobbie AM, Mtuy TB, Masnick M, Brown DS, Mühlbacher AC, Thielman NM. Divergent preferences for enhanced HIV testing options among high-risk populations in northern Tanzania: a short report. AIDS Care 2022:1-9. [PMID: 36063533 PMCID: PMC9985668 DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2022.2119471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
To achieve the UNAIDS target of diagnosing 95% of all persons living with HIV, enhanced HIV testing services with greater attractional value need to be developed and implemented. We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to quantify preferences for enhanced HIV testing features across two high-risk populations in the Kilimanjaro Region in northern Tanzania. We designed and fielded a survey with 12 choice tasks to systematically recruited female barworkers and male mountain porters. Key enhanced features included: testing availability on every day of the week, an oral test, integration of a general health check or an examination for sexually transmitted infections (STI) with HIV testing, and provider-assisted confidential partner notification in the event of a positive HIV test result. Across 300 barworkers and 440 porters surveyed, mixed logit analyses of 17,760 choices indicated strong preferences for everyday testing availability, health checks, and STI examinations. Most participants were averse to oral testing and confidential partner notification by providers. Substantial preference heterogeneity was observed within each risk group. Enhancing HIV testing services to include options for everyday testing, general health checks, and STI examinations may increase the appeal of HIV testing offers to high-risk populations.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02714140.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Ostermann
- Department of Health Services Policy & Management, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC,USA,South Carolina Smart State Center for Healthcare Quality, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA,Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA,Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Bernard Njau
- Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Amy M. Hobbie
- Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Tara B. Mtuy
- Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania,Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Derek S. Brown
- Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA,Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Axel C. Mühlbacher
- Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA,Institut Gesundheitsökonomie und Medizinmanagement, Hochschule Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nathan M. Thielman
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA,Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA,Nathan M. Thielman, Duke University, Box 90519, Durham, NC 27708, Tel: +1 919 668 7173,
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Beckham SW, Mantsios A, Galai N, Likindikoki S, Mbwambo J, Davis W, Kerrigan D. Acceptability of multiple modalities of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among female sex workers in Tanzania: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e058611. [PMID: 35977762 PMCID: PMC9389123 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Modalities of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention offer options to women at high risk including female sex workers (FSW). This study aimed to explore FSW's acceptability and preferences for oral pills, long-acting (LA) injectable and vaginal ring PrEP. DESIGN Sequential, explanatory, mixed methods. SETTING Iringa, Tanzania. PARTICIPANTS FSW aged above 18 were recruited from sex work venues using time-location sampling (n=496); HIV-uninfected (n=293) were included in this analysis. Subsequently, survey participants were recruited for in-depth interviews (n=10) and two focus group discussions (n=20). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES (1) Acceptability of PrEP (Do you personally think it would be worth it to you to take ART if it could prevent HIV?: yes/no) and (2) preference for LA injectable versus oral pills (If you personally were going to take ART to prevent HIV infection, would you prefer to take it in the form of a daily pill or an injection once every 3 months? Injection/pill). RESULTS Participants were (92%) unaware of PrEP but 58% thought it would be worth it to personally take PrEP. Acceptability of PrEP was significantly associated with higher social cohesion (aOR 2.12; 95% CI 1.29 to 3.50) and STI symptoms in the past 6 months (aOR 2.52; 95% CI 1.38 to 4.62). Most (88%) preferred LA vs oral PrEP. Qualitative findings revealed generally positive reactions to all types of PrEP, and they were viewed as a welcome backup to condoms. Participants had concerns about pills (burden of daily use, stigma from clients), and the vaginal ring (fear of client noticing and becoming suspicious, fear of infertility) and overall preferred LA-PrEP (less frequent use, easy to hide, belief in higher efficacy). CONCLUSIONS Offering multiple formulations of PrEP within the context of community-driven HIV prevention interventions among FSW may facilitate increased uptake and adherence. LA injectable PrEP may be a particularly preferred formulation among FSW. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02281578.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Wilson Beckham
- Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Noya Galai
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Samuel Likindikoki
- Psychiatry and Mental Health, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of
| | - Jessie Mbwambo
- Psychiatry and Mental Health, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of
| | - Wendy Davis
- Department of Prevention and Community Health, George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Deanna Kerrigan
- Department of Prevention and Community Health, George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Buckell J, Vasavada V, Wordsworth S, Regier DA, Quaife M. Utility maximization versus regret minimization in health choice behavior: Evidence from four datasets. HEALTH ECONOMICS 2022; 31:363-381. [PMID: 34787942 DOI: 10.1002/hec.4455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Choice models in health are almost exclusively based on the neoclassical economic paradigm of utility maximization. Recently developed choice models have captured and shown empirical support for regret minimization as an alternative decision rule. In health economics, recent applications of RRM models indicate that individuals making health-based choices may exhibit regret minimization-type behavior. In this paper, we build on this research using a more flexible model that allows for heterogeneous decision rules, separately from preference heterogeneity, and comparing it to models that assume single decision rules. We use four datasets from diverse settings in which individuals make health choices: tobacco markets, genomic testing, and HIV prevention. We found that, if a one-size-fits-all rule is applied, then utility maximization was preferable to regret minimization for these datasets. However, we also find that individuals apply varying decision rules in similar proportions in these health settings, suggesting that models for heterogeneous decision rules were needed to capture these behaviors in these settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Buckell
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Vrinda Vasavada
- Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Sarah Wordsworth
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Dean A Regier
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, UK
| | - Matthew Quaife
- Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Preferences regarding emerging HIV prevention technologies among Toronto men who have sex with men: a discrete choice experiment. Sci Rep 2021; 11:22252. [PMID: 34782691 PMCID: PMC8592986 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01634-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
New forms of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) include long-acting injectables and topical microbicides, each with unique attributes that may appeal to distinct users. We used a discrete choice experiment to characterize preferences for new PrEP formulations among Toronto men who have sex with men. MSM undergoing anonymous HIV testing completed a discrete choice experiment with 12 choice sets by selecting their preferred option within each set. Each set included “usual methods to prevent HIV” (excluding PrEP) as one alternative and two hypothetical PrEP alternatives, which differed according formulation/dosing, side effects (none/mild), risk of drug resistance (none/low/moderate), and HIV prevention efficacy (50%, 65%, 80% or 99% risk reduction). We used mixed logistic regression to infer preferences for PrEP attributes and calculate the marginal rate of substitution between efficacy and other PrEP attributes. 306 men with median (interquartile range) age = 29 (25, 36) years participated, and reported 6 (3, 10) partners and 0 (0, 2) condomless receptive anal sex acts in the preceding six months. An on-demand pill was the most preferred formulation, followed by a monthly injection, daily pill, and on-demand rectal gel. Drug resistance was an important determinant of preferences if the risk was moderate, but not if it was low. The minimum efficacy required for an on-demand pill to be preferred over no PrEP was 32.6% (95%CI = 21.2–43.9%); for a daily pill, injections, and rectal gel, minimum efficacy was 57.9% (95%CI = 44.1–71.7%), 40.1% (27.0–53.2%), and 71.3% (60.5–82.1%), respectively. Attitudes towards PrEP formulations vary among men who have sex with men, with on-demand pills and monthly injections having the highest average preference scores. Understanding these preferences may help to predict uptake.
Collapse
|
14
|
Ostermann J, Yelverton V, Smith HJ, Nanyangwe M, Kashela L, Chisenga P, Mai V, Mwila C, Herce ME. Preferences for transitional HIV care among people living with HIV recently released from prison in Zambia: a discrete choice experiment. J Int AIDS Soc 2021; 24:e25805. [PMID: 34648690 PMCID: PMC8516367 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction No studies from sub‐Saharan Africa have attempted to assess HIV service delivery preferences among incarcerated people living with HIV as they transition from prisons to the community (“releasees”). We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to characterize releasee preferences for transitional HIV care services in Zambia to inform the development of a differentiated service delivery model to promote HIV care continuity for releasees. Methods Between January and October 2019, we enrolled a consecutive sample of 101 releasees from a larger cohort prospectively following 296 releasees from five prisons in Zambia. We administered a DCE eliciting preferences for 12 systematically designed choice scenarios, each presenting three hypothetical transitional care options. Options combined six attributes: (1) clinic type for post‐release HIV care; (2) client focus of healthcare workers; (3) transitional care model type; (4) characteristics of transitional care provider; (5) type of transitional care support; and (6) HIV status disclosure support. We analysed DCE choice data using a mixed logit model, with coefficients describing participants’ average (“mean”) preferences for each option compared to the standard of care and their distributions describing preference variation across participants. Results Most DCE participants were male (n = 84, 83.2%) and had completed primary school (n = 54, 53.5%), with 29 (28.7%) unemployed at follow‐up. Participants had spent an average of 8.2 months in the community prior to the DCE, with 18 (17.8%) reporting an intervening episode of re‐incarceration. While we observed significant preference variation across participants (p < 0.001 for most characteristics), releasees were generally averse to clinics run by community‐based organizations versus government antiretroviral therapy clinics providing post‐release HIV care (mean preference = –0.78, p < 0.001). On average, releasees most preferred livelihood support (mean preference = 1.19, p < 0.001) and HIV care support (mean preference = 1.00, p < 0.001) delivered by support groups involving people living with HIV (mean preference = 1.24, p < 0.001). Conclusions We identified preferred characteristics of transitional HIV care that can form the basis for differentiated service delivery models for prison releasees. Such models should offer client‐centred care in trusted clinics, provide individualized HIV care support delivered by support groups and/or peer navigators, and strengthen linkages to programs providing livelihood support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Ostermann
- Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.,South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.,Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Valerie Yelverton
- Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Helene J Smith
- Implementation Science Unit, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.,School of Public Health & Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mirriam Nanyangwe
- Implementation Science Unit, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Lillian Kashela
- Implementation Science Unit, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Peter Chisenga
- Implementation Science Unit, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Vivien Mai
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chilambwe Mwila
- Implementation Science Unit, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Michael E Herce
- Implementation Science Unit, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.,Institute for Global Health & Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Szinay D, Cameron R, Naughton F, Whitty JA, Brown J, Jones A. Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e32365. [PMID: 34633290 PMCID: PMC8546533 DOI: 10.2196/32365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Understanding the preferences of potential users of digital health products is beneficial for digital health policy and planning. Stated preference methods could help elicit individuals' preferences in the absence of observational data. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) is a commonly used stated preference method-a quantitative methodology that argues that individuals make trade-offs when engaging in a decision by choosing an alternative of a product or a service that offers the greatest utility, or benefit. This methodology is widely used in health economics in situations in which revealed preferences are difficult to collect but is much less used in the field of digital health. This paper outlines the stages involved in developing a DCE. As a case study, it uses the application of a DCE to reveal preferences in targeting the uptake of smoking cessation apps. It describes the establishment of attributes, the construction of choice tasks of 2 or more alternatives, and the development of the experimental design. This tutorial offers a guide for researchers with no prior knowledge of this research technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorothy Szinay
- Behavioural and Implementation Science Group, School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Rory Cameron
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research, Applied Research Collaboration East of England, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Felix Naughton
- Behavioural and Implementation Science Group, School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer A Whitty
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research, Applied Research Collaboration East of England, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jamie Brown
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- SPECTRUM Consortium, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andy Jones
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ostermann J, Flaherty BP, Brown DS, Njau B, Hobbie AM, Mtuy TB, Masnick M, Mühlbacher AC, Thielman NM. What factors influence HIV testing? Modeling preference heterogeneity using latent classes and class-independent random effects. JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING 2021; 40:100305. [PMID: 35422879 PMCID: PMC9007550 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2021.100305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Efforts to eliminate the HIV epidemic will require increased HIV testing rates among high-risk populations. To inform the design of HIV testing interventions, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with six policy-relevant attributes of HIV testing options elicited the testing preferences of 300 female barworkers and 440 male Kilimanjaro mountain porters in northern Tanzania. Surveys were administered between September 2017 and July 2018. Participants were asked to complete 12 choice tasks, each involving first- and second-best choices from 3 testing options. DCE responses were analyzed using a random effects latent class logit (RELCL) model, in which the latent classes summarize common participant preference profiles, and the random effects capture additional individual-level preference heterogeneity with respect to three attribute domains: (a) privacy and confidentiality (testing venue, pre-test counseling, partner notification); (b) invasiveness and perceived accuracy (method for obtaining the sample for the HIV test); and (c) accessibility and value (testing availability, additional services provided). The Bayesian Information Criterion indicated the best model fit for a model with 8 preference classes, with class sizes ranging from 6% to 19% of participants. Substantial preference heterogeneity was observed, both between and within latent classes, with 12 of 16 attribute levels having positive and negative coefficients across classes, and all three random effects contributing significantly to participants' choices. The findings may help identify combinations of testing options that match the distribution of HIV testing preferences among high-risk populations; the methods may be used to systematically design heterogeneity-focused interventions using stated preference methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Ostermann
- Department of Health Services Policy & Management, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, USA
- South Carolina Smart State Center for Healthcare Quality, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Brian P. Flaherty
- Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Derek S. Brown
- Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Bernard Njau
- Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Amy M. Hobbie
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Tara B. Mtuy
- Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Axel C. Mühlbacher
- Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Institut Gesundheitsökonomie und Medizinmanagement, Hochschule Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nathan M. Thielman
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dietrich JJ, Atujuna M, Tshabalala G, Hornschuh S, Mulaudzi M, Koh M, Ahmed N, Muhumuza R, Ssemata AS, Otwombe K, Bekker LG, Seeley J, Martinson NA, Terris-Prestholt F, Fox J. A qualitative study to identify critical attributes and attribute-levels for a discrete choice experiment on oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) delivery among young people in Cape Town and Johannesburg, South Africa. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:17. [PMID: 33407395 PMCID: PMC7788832 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05942-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The uptake and adherence of daily oral PrEP has been poor in high-risk populations in South Africa including young people. We used qualitative research methods to explore user preferences for daily and on-demand oral PrEP use among young South Africans, and to inform the identification of critical attributes and attribute-levels for quantitative analysis of user preferences, i.e. a discrete choice experiment (DCE). METHODS Data were collected between September and November 2018 from eight group discussions and 20 in-depth interviews with young people 13 to 24 years in Cape Town and Johannesburg. Using a convenience sampling strategy, participants were stratified by sex and age. Interviewers used a semi-structured interview guide to discuss several attributes (dosing regimen, location, costs, side effects, and protection period) for PrEP access and use. Group discussions and in-depth interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and translated to English. We used framework analysis to explore context-specific attributes and attribute-levels for delivering oral PrEP in South Africa. The adolescent community advisory board, expert and study team opinions were consulted for the final DCE attributes and levels. RESULTS We enrolled 74 participants who were 51% (n = 38/74) male, had a median age of 18.5 [Interquartile range = 16-21.25] years, 91% (n = 67/74) identified as heterosexual and 49% (n = 36/74) had not completed 12th grade education. Using the qualitative data, we identified five candidate attributes including (1) dosing regimen, (2) location to get PrEP, (3) cost, (4) route of administration and (5) frequency. After discussions with experts and the study team, we revised the DCE to include the following five attributes and levels: dosing regime: daily, and on-demand PrEP; location: private pharmacy, public clinic, mobile clinic, ATM); cost: free-of-charge, R50 (~2GBP), R265 (~12GBP); side effects: nausea, headache, rash; and duration of protection: fulltime protection versus when PrEP is used). CONCLUSIONS There is limited literature on qualitative research methods describing the step-by-step process of developing a DCE for PrEP in adolescents, especially in resource-constrained countries. We provide the process followed for the DCE technique to understand user preferences for daily and on-demand oral PrEP among young people in South Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janan J Dietrich
- Perinatal HIV Research Unit (PHRU), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. .,Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Bellville, South Africa.
| | - Millicent Atujuna
- Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Gugulethu Tshabalala
- Perinatal HIV Research Unit (PHRU), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Stefanie Hornschuh
- Perinatal HIV Research Unit (PHRU), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Mamakiri Mulaudzi
- Perinatal HIV Research Unit (PHRU), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Michelle Koh
- Harvard Global Health Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Nadia Ahmed
- Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.,Mortimer Market Centre, Central North West London NHS Trust, Off Caper Street, London, WC1E 6 JB, UK
| | - Richard Muhumuza
- Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute , Entebbe, Uganda.,Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Andrew S Ssemata
- Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute , Entebbe, Uganda.,Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Kennedy Otwombe
- Perinatal HIV Research Unit (PHRU), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Linda-Gail Bekker
- Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Janet Seeley
- Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute , Entebbe, Uganda.,Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Neil A Martinson
- Perinatal HIV Research Unit (PHRU), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Fern Terris-Prestholt
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Eliciting Preferences for HIV Prevention Technologies: A Systematic Review. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 14:151-174. [PMID: 33319339 PMCID: PMC7884379 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00486-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Background Many human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention technologies (pre-exposure prophylaxis, microbicides, vaccines) are available or in development. Preference elicitation methods provide insight into client preferences that may be used to optimize products and services. Given increased utilization of such methods in HIV prevention, this article identifies and reviews these methods and synthesizes their application to HIV prevention technologies. Methods In May 2020, we systematically searched peer-reviewed literature in PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science for studies employing quantitative preference elicitation methods to measure preferences for HIV prevention technologies among populations of any age, sex, or location. Quality assessment used an existing checklist (PREFS) and a novel adaptation of the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (PROSPERO #CRD42018087027). Results We screened 5022 titles and abstracts, reviewed 318 full texts, and included 84 studies. Common methods employed were discrete-choice experiment (33%), conjoint analysis (25%), and willingness-to-participate/try/accept (21%). Studies were conducted in 25 countries and had a mean of 768 participants (range = 26–7176), two-thirds of them male. Common HIV prevention technologies included pre-exposure prophylaxis (23%), voluntary testing and counseling (19%), HIV self-testing (17%), vaccines (15%), and topical microbicides (9%). Most attributes focused on product design (side effects, frequency), service design (provider type, location), acceptability or willingness to accept/pay; results are summarized in these categories, by prevention type. Mean quality-adapted Newcastle–Ottawa Scale score was 4.5/8 (standard deviation = 2.1) and mean PREFS scores was 3.47/5 (standard deviation = 0.81). Conclusions This review synthesizes extant literature on quantitative measurement of preferences for HIV prevention technologies. This can enable practitioners to improve prevention products and interventions, and ultimately reduce HIV incidence.
Collapse
|
19
|
Ostermann J, Njau B, Hobbie A, Mtuy T, Masaki ML, Shayo A, van Zwetselaar M, Masnick M, Flaherty B, Brown DS, Mühlbacher AC, Thielman NM. Using discrete choice experiments to design interventions for heterogeneous preferences: protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial of a preference-informed, heterogeneity-focused, HIV testing offer for high-risk populations. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e039313. [PMID: 33158826 PMCID: PMC7651730 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Approximately one million undiagnosed persons living with HIV in Southern and Eastern Africa need to test for HIV. Novel approaches are necessary to identify HIV testing options that match the heterogeneous testing preferences of high-risk populations. This pragmatic randomised controlled trial (PRCT) will evaluate the efficacy of a preference-informed, heterogeneity-focused HIV counselling and testing (HCT) offer, for improving rates of HIV testing in two high-risk populations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The study will be conducted in Moshi, Tanzania. The PRCT will randomise 600 female barworkers and 600 male Kilimanjaro mountain porters across three study arms. All participants will receive an HIV testing offer comprised of four preference-informed testing options, including one 'common' option-comprising features that are commonly available in the area and, on average, most preferred among study participants-and three options that are specific to the study arm. Options will be identified using mixed logit and latent class analyses of data from a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Participants in Arm 1 will be offered the common option and three 'targeted' options that are predicted to be more preferred than the common option and combine features widely available in the study area. Participants in Arm 2 will be offered the common option and three 'enhanced' options, which also include HCT features that are not yet widely available in the study area. Participants in Arm 3, an active control arm, will be offered the common option and three predicted 'less preferred' options. The primary outcome will be uptake of HIV testing. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was obtained from the Duke University Health System IRB, the University of South Carolina IRB, the Ethics Review Committee at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Tanzania's National Institute for Medical Research, and the Tanzania Food & Drugs Authority (now Tanzania Medicines & Medical Devices Authority). Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals. The use of rigorous DCE methods for the preference-based design and tailoring of interventions could lead to novel policy options and implementation science approaches. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02714140.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Ostermann
- Department of Health Services Policy & Management, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
- South Carolina Smart State Center for Healthcare Quality, University of South Carolina, Carolina, South Carolina, USA
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Bernard Njau
- Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Amy Hobbie
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tara Mtuy
- Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Aisa Shayo
- Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania
| | | | - Max Masnick
- Selway Labs, LLC, Barrington, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Brian Flaherty
- Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Derek S Brown
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Axel C Mühlbacher
- Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Institut Gesundheitsökonomie und Medizinmanagement, Hochschule Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Nathan M Thielman
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sijstermans E, Cheung KL, Goossens AJM, Conde R, Gonzalez JGR, Hiligsmann M. A discrete choice experiment to assess patients' preferences for HIV treatment in the urban population in Colombia. J Med Econ 2020; 23:812-818. [PMID: 32098614 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1735399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to assess patients' preferences for HIV treatment in an urban Colombian population.Methods: A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) was conducted. Urban Colombian HIV patients were asked to repetitively choose between two hypothetical treatments that differ in regard to five attributes 'effect on life expectancy', 'effect on physical activity', 'risk of moderate side effects, 'accessibility to clinic' and 'economic cost to access controls'. Twelve choice sets were made using an efficient design. A Mixed Logit Panel Model was used for the analysis and subgroup analyses were performed according to age, gender, education level and sexual preference.Results: A total of 224 HIV patients were included. All attributes were significant, indicating that there were differences between at least two levels of each attribute. Patients preferred to be able to perform all physical activity without difficulty, to have large positive effects on life expectancy, to travel less than 2 h, to have lower risk of side-effects and to have subsidized travel costs. The attributes 'effect on physical activity' and 'effects on life expectancy' were deemed the most important. Sub-analyses showed that higher educated patients placed more importance on the large positive effects of HIV treatment, and a more negative preference for subsidized travel cost (5% level).Limitations: A potential limitation is selection bias as it is difficult to make a systematic urban/rural division of respondents. Additional, questionnaires were partly administered in the waiting rooms, which potentially led to some noise in the data.Conclusions: Findings suggests that short-term efficacy (i.e. effect on physical activity) and long-term efficacy (i.e. effect on life expectancy) are the most important treatment characteristics for HIV urban patients in Colombia. Preference data could provide relevant information for clinical and policy decision-making to optimize HIV care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Sijstermans
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kei Long Cheung
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK
| | - Anne J M Goossens
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rafael Conde
- Centro de Investigación Clínica ACISC, Asistencia Científica de Alta Complejida, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Javier G R Gonzalez
- Rosario Graduate School of Business, School of Business, Administración en Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Mickael Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ostermann J, Mühlbacher A, Brown DS, Regier DA, Hobbie A, Weinhold A, Alshareef N, Derrick C, Thielman NM. Heterogeneous Patient Preferences for Modern Antiretroviral Therapy: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:851-861. [PMID: 32762986 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Revised: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Limited data describe patient preferences for the growing number of antiretroviral therapies (ARTs). We quantified preferences for key characteristics of modern ART deemed relevant to shared decision making. METHODS A discrete choice experiment survey elicited preferences for ART characteristics, including dosing (frequency and number of pills), administration characteristics (pill size and meal requirement), most bothersome side effect (from diarrhea, sleep disturbance, headaches, dizziness/difficulty thinking, depression, or jaundice), and most bothersome long-term effect (from increased risk of heart attacks, bone fractures, renal dysfunction, hypercholesterolemia, or hyperglycemia). Between March and August 2017, the discrete choice experiment was fielded to 403 treatment-experienced persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), enrolled from 2 infectious diseases clinics in the southern United States and a national online panel. Participants completed 16 choice tasks, each comparing 3 treatment options. Preferences were analyzed using mixed and latent class logit models. RESULTS Most participants were male (68%) and older (interquartile range: 42-58 years), and had substantial treatment experience (interquartile range: 7-21 years). In mixed logit analyses, all attributes were associated with preferences. Side and long-term effects were most important, with evidence of substantial preference heterogeneity. Latent class analysis identified 5 preference classes. For classes 1 (40%), 2 (24%), and 3 (21%), side effects were most important, followed by long-term effects. For class 4 (10%), dosing was most important. Class 5 (4%) was largely indifferent to ART characteristics. CONCLUSION Overall, treatment-experienced persons living with HIV valued minimizing side effects and long-term toxicities over dosing and administration characteristics. Preferences varied widely, highlighting the need to elicit individual patient preferences in models of shared antiretroviral decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Ostermann
- Department of Health Services, Policy and Management, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Axel Mühlbacher
- Institute of Health Economics and Healthcare Management, Hochschule Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany
| | - Derek S Brown
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Dean A Regier
- Cancer Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Amy Hobbie
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Andrew Weinhold
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Noor Alshareef
- Department of Health Services, Policy and Management, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Caroline Derrick
- Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lancaster KE, Lungu T, Bula A, Shea JM, Shoben A, Hosseinipour MC, Kohler RE, Hoffman IF, Go VF, Golin CE, Wheeler SB, Miller WC. Preferences for Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Service Delivery Among Female Sex Workers in Malawi: A Discrete Choice Experiment. AIDS Behav 2020; 24:1294-1303. [PMID: 31720955 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-019-02705-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Female sex workers (FSW) in Malawi have among the highest HIV prevalence estimates worldwide. Daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention method, yet preferences for PrEP delivery among FSW are lacking. Eight focus group discussions, a literature review, and cognitive interviews were conducted to identify modifiable PrEP delivery attributes and inform discrete-choice experiment (DCE) development for FSW in Lilongwe. Enrolled FSW received an interviewer-assisted DCE. Data were analyzed using mixed logit regression. Dispensing location was most preferred, followed by the provision of additional services. Women preferred receiving PrEP at family planning clinics or non-governmental organization run drop-in centers. Cervical cancer screening was the most preferred additional service, while pregnancy testing and partner risk reduction counseling were less valued. This study was the first study to examine PrEP delivery preferences in Malawi using DCE-a powerful elicitation tool to apply to other key populations at risk for HIV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn E Lancaster
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 334 Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Thandie Lungu
- University of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Agatha Bula
- University of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Jaclyn M Shea
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Abigail Shoben
- Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mina C Hosseinipour
- University of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi
- Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Irving F Hoffman
- Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Vivian F Go
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Carol E Golin
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - William C Miller
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 334 Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Browne EN, Montgomery ET, Mansfield C, Boeri M, Mange B, Beksinska M, Schwartz JL, Clark MR, Doncel GF, Smit J, Chirenje ZM, van der Straten A. Efficacy is Not Everything: Eliciting Women's Preferences for a Vaginal HIV Prevention Product Using a Discrete-Choice Experiment. AIDS Behav 2020; 24:1443-1451. [PMID: 31696371 PMCID: PMC6990865 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-019-02715-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
As new female-initiated HIV prevention products enter development, it is crucial to incorporate women’s preferences to ensure products will be desired, accepted, and used. A discrete-choice experiment was designed to assess the relative importance of six attributes to stated choice of a vaginally delivered HIV prevention product. Sexually active women in South Africa and Zimbabwe aged 18–30 were recruited from two samples: product-experienced women from a randomized trial of four vaginal placebo forms and product-naïve community members. In a tablet-administered survey, 395 women chose between two hypothetical products over eight choice sets. Efficacy was the most important, but there were identifiable preferences among other attributes. Women preferred a product that also prevented pregnancy and caused some wetness (p < 0.001). They disliked a daily-use product (p = 0.002) and insertion by finger (p = 0.002). Although efficacy drove preference, wetness, pregnancy prevention, and dosing regimen were influential to stated choice of a product, and women were willing to trade some level of efficacy to have other more desired attributes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica N Browne
- Women's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, 351 California Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA, 94104, USA.
| | - Elizabeth T Montgomery
- Women's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, 351 California Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA, 94104, USA
| | - Carol Mansfield
- Health Solutions, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Marco Boeri
- Health Solutions, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Brennan Mange
- Health Solutions, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Mags Beksinska
- MatCH Research Unit (MRU), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa
| | | | | | | | - Jenni Smit
- MatCH Research Unit (MRU), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa
| | - Zvavahera M Chirenje
- University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences Clinical Trials Research Centre, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Ariane van der Straten
- Women's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, 351 California Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA, 94104, USA
- Department of Medicine, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Young Women's Stated Preferences for Biomedical HIV Prevention: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment in Kenya and South Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2019; 80:394-403. [PMID: 30633040 PMCID: PMC6410963 DOI: 10.1097/qai.0000000000001945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Background: Integrating end-user perspectives into the design of new biomedical HIV prevention products is recognized as vital to informing the product development pipeline. Setting: Kisumu, Kenya; and Soshanguve, South Africa. Methods: We conducted a discrete choice experiment survey with 536 women aged 18–30 years to assess preferences for hypothetical HIV prevention products characterized by the attributes of efficacy, pregnancy prevention, delivery form, dosing frequency, and side effects. Participants included product-experienced women from Tablet, Ring, Injection as Options TRIO, a cross-over clinical study evaluating 3 placebo delivery forms (oral tablets, vaginal rings, and injections), and a product-naive sample recruited from the same communities. Analyses used random parameters logit and latent class models. Results: HIV prevention efficacy was a strong determinant of stated choice overall; however, in South Africa, delivery form was just as important, with an injection every 2–3 months most preferred and a daily oral tablet least preferred. In Kenya, product-experienced women preferred monthly injections and least preferred a monthly ring. Respondents indicated a preference for multipurpose prevention technologies that combine HIV and pregnancy protection. Latent class analyses confirmed these findings and delineated heterogeneity in preferences across subgroups defined by age, past experience with the delivery forms, and education. Conclusions: Despite an overall preference for products with high efficacy, we identified attributes salient to future uptake and use of HIV prevention products. Preferences for injectable products underscored interest in this pre-exposure prophylaxis delivery form. Likewise, the multipurpose prevention technology feature was valued in both Kenya and South Africa and most influenced interest in vaginal rings.
Collapse
|
25
|
Humphrey JM, Naanyu V, MacDonald KR, Wools-Kaloustian K, Zimet GD. Stated-preference research in HIV: A scoping review. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0224566. [PMID: 31665153 PMCID: PMC6821403 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2019] [Accepted: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Discrete choice experiments (DCE), conjoint analysis (CA), and best-worst scaling (BWS) are quantitative techniques for estimating consumer preferences for products or services. These methods are increasingly used in healthcare research, but their applications within the field of HIV research have not yet been described. The objective of this scoping review was to systematically map the extent and nature of published DCE, CA, and BWS studies in the field of HIV and identify priority areas where these methods can be used in the future. Online databases were searched to identify published HIV-related DCE, CA and BWS studies in any country and year as the primary outcome. After screening 1,496 citations, 57 studies were identified that were conducted in 26 countries from 2000-2017. The frequency of published studies increased over time and covered HIV themes relating to prevention (n = 25), counselling and testing (n = 10), service delivery (n = 10), and antiretroviral therapy (n = 12). Most studies were DCEs (63%) followed by CA (37%) and BWS (4%). The median [IQR] sample size was 288 [138-496] participants, and 74% of studies used primary qualitative data to develop attributes. Only 30% of studies were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa where the burden of HIV is highest. Moreover, few studies surveyed key populations including men who have sex with men, transgender people, pregnant and postpartum women, adolescents, and people who inject drugs. These populations represent priorities for future stated-preference research. This scoping review can help researchers, policy makers, program implementers, and health economists to better understand the various applications of stated-preference research methods in the field of HIV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M. Humphrey
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Violet Naanyu
- Department of Behavioral Sciences, Moi University, Eldoret, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya
- AMPATH Program, Eldoret, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya
| | - Katherine R. MacDonald
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Kara Wools-Kaloustian
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Gregory D. Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cheng CY, Quaife M, Eakle R, Cabrera Escobar MA, Vickerman P, Terris-Prestholt F. Determinants of heterosexual men's demand for long-acting injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV in urban South Africa. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:996. [PMID: 31340785 PMCID: PMC6657137 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7276-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Heterosexual men in South Africa are a large key population to exposure to HIV, yet preferences for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among this population have not, to date, been investigated in the literature. This paper aims to explore HIV prevention preferences among heterosexual men in urban South Africa, as well as to examine the demand and characteristics of men who favour long-acting injectable (LAI) PrEP over condoms and oral PrEP. Methods Data were collected among 178 self-reported HIV-negative heterosexual men, who were given example products and information before being asked which they preferred. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyse which characteristics were associated with product choice. Results 48% (n = 85) of participants preferred LAI PrEP, while 33% (n = 58) and 20% (n = 35) chose oral PrEP and condoms respectively. Having children (marginal effect = 0.22; 95% CI [0.01, 0.44]) or having higher risk attitude scores (marginal effect = 0.03; 95% CI [0.01, 0.06]) was significantly associated with a choice of LAI PrEP, while those who had unprotected anal intercourse (marginal effect = − 0.42; 95% CI [− 0.57, − 0.27]) and those who were concerned with protection against other sexually transmitted infections over HIV (marginal effect = − 0.42; 95% CI [− 0.60, − 0.24]) appeared less likely to prefer LAI PrEP. Conclusions The results suggested a relatively high demand and theoretical acceptability for LAI PrEP among heterosexual men in urban South Africa, but there appeared to be fewer distinct predictors for the willingness to use LAI PrEP compared to studies conducted among gay and bisexual men and women. Nevertheless, the findings contribute to the mapping of the demand and determinants of heterosexual men’s preferences for novel antiretroviral-based prevention in sub-Saharan Africa, and the data could aid in the differentiated design of future HIV prevention strategies using LAI PrEP in conjunction with other methods. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7276-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Yuan Cheng
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK. .,Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany. .,Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Matthew Quaife
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Robyn Eakle
- Wits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, 22 Esselen Street, Hillbrow, Johannesburg, 2001, South Africa
| | - Maria A Cabrera Escobar
- Wits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, 22 Esselen Street, Hillbrow, Johannesburg, 2001, South Africa
| | - Peter Vickerman
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Fern Terris-Prestholt
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Agot K, Minnis AM, Manenzhe K, Browne EN, Ahmed K, Okello T, van der Straten A. Engaging study participants in interpreting results: lessons from the TRIO study in Kenya and South Africa. Int J Womens Health 2019; 11:395-403. [PMID: 31372060 PMCID: PMC6636186 DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s193905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2018] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Women account for 56% of new HIV infections in sub-Saharan Africa. Multipurpose Prevention Technologies (MPTs) are promising interventions because they combine HIV prevention with a less stigmatizing indication, such as pregnancy. We conducted a study with three placebo-only MPT products in Kisumu, Kenya and Soshanguve, South Africa, to assess preferences for attributes of tablets, vaginal rings and injectable products for dual prevention of HIV and pregnancy (TRIO Study). Here, we present former TRIO participants' views on the study results. Methods: After study completion in 2017, we held five dissemination sessions (two in Kisumu and three in Soshanguve) and five one-on-one sharing sessions in Soshanguve. Key results were discussed, with a focus on why some study products were more popular than others, which findings were surprising and why some women changed products over time. A thematic approach was used for analysis. Results: All 277 TRIO participants were telephoned, 168 (60.6%) were reached and 117 (42.2%) attended the dissemination sessions: 71 in Kisumu and 46 in Soshanguve. Participants were engaged and interested in the TRIO findings and willingly shared their perspectives and views candidly. Ease of use, discretion and familiarity were highlighted as drivers of product choice whereas novelty presented a challenge. In explaining the discrepancy between preference ratings and choices, participants cited features such as tablets being easy to explain to a partner or to discontinue. In explaining why 20% of participants switched products after practical experience, issues related to relationships with partners and product attributes perceived as unfavorable were paramount. Conclusion: The dissemination sessions provided an important forum for study participants to interrogate and explain the results to minimize possible misinterpretation. This exercise helped give context to the results, ensured correct lessons were derived from those results and increased credibility of the findings reported by the investigators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kawango Agot
- Impact Research and Development Organization , Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Alexandra M Minnis
- Women's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Erica N Browne
- Women's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Timothy Okello
- Impact Research and Development Organization , Kisumu, Kenya
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Oberlin AM, Pasipamire T, Chibwesha CJ. Exploring women's preferences for HPV-based cervical cancer screening in South Africa. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2019; 146:192-199. [PMID: 31127861 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Revised: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 05/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine preferences for HPV-based cervical cancer screening among South African women. METHODS A discrete choice experiment survey was conducted among 298 women who attended two public-sector clinics in South Africa from February 1 to May 31, 2018. Participants chose between hypothetical screening scenarios: method of swab collection (self or provider); timing of treatment (same day or return visit); type of clinic (static or mobile); cost of services (US $0 or US $4); and time spent at the clinic (30, 60, or 120 minutes). A logistic regression model was generated to evaluate the importance of each attribute. A market simulation analysis was performed to determine potential uptake of the various screening strategies. RESULTS The participants expressed strong preferences for free services (β=0.50; P<0.001) and same-day HPV testing and treatment (β=0.40; P<0.001). The market simulation indicated that 83.8% of women would be willing to undergo screening if services were free; the swab was collected by the provider; and treatment was offered at a return visit. Including same-day testing and treatment in the model increased uptake to 96.4%. CONCLUSION Offering same-day HPV testing and treatment could substantially improve uptake of cervical cancer screening in the South African public healthcare sector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin M Oberlin
- Division of Global Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Right to Care, Helen Joseph Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.,Clinical HIV Research Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | - Carla J Chibwesha
- Division of Global Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Right to Care, Helen Joseph Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.,Clinical HIV Research Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
van der Straten A, Agot K, Ahmed K, Weinrib R, Browne EN, Manenzhe K, Owino F, Schwartz J, Minnis A. The Tablets, Ring, Injections as Options (TRIO) study: what young African women chose and used for future HIV and pregnancy prevention. J Int AIDS Soc 2019; 21:e25094. [PMID: 29600595 PMCID: PMC5876496 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Preventing HIV and unintended pregnancies are key global health priorities. To inform product rollout and to understand attributes of future multipurpose prevention technologies (MPT) associated with preference and use, we evaluated three placebo delivery forms: daily oral tablets, a monthly vaginal ring, and two monthly intramuscular injections in TRIO, a five‐month study among young Kenyan and South African women. Methods HIV‐negative, sexually active, non‐pregnant women aged 18 to 30 were enrolled and randomized to use each placebo delivery form for one month (stage 1). Then, participants chose one product to use for two additional months (stage 2). We assessed safety, product ranking, choice, and use. We examined demographic and behavioural correlates of choice and, reciprocally, unwillingness to use in the future with logistic regression models. Results 277 women enrolled, 249 completed stage 1 and 246 completed stage 2. Median age was 23 years, 49% were Kenyan and 51% were South African. Three participants became pregnant during the study and one participant HIV‐seroconverted. There were 18 product‐related adverse events, six tablets‐related, 11 ring‐related, and one injection‐related. After trying each product, 85% preferred a TRIO product over condoms. Injections were chosen most (64%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 58%, 70%; p < 0.001), and by more South Africans than Kenyans (odds ratio (OR) 2.01, 95% CI: 1.17, 3.43; p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in choosing tablets versus ring (21%, 95% CI: 16%, 26% vs. 15%, 95% CI: 11%, 20%; p = 0.11). Tablet and ring adherence, based on direct observations and self‐reports, improved over time. However, participants’ self‐reported use of tablets did not match objective data from the electronic dose monitoring device. Participants were fully compliant with injections. Conclusion In this population at risk for HIV and pregnancy, all participants agreed to choose and use a placebo MPT delivery form. A majority of participants preferred TRIO products to male condoms, an existing MPT. Injections were most liked and best used, however, they are years away from reaching the clinics. In the meantime, expanding the availability of tablets and giving access to rings can begin to fulfill the promise of choice for HIV prevention technologies and inform the development of suitable delivery forms as MPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane van der Straten
- Women's Global Health Imperative (WGHI) RTI International, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Medicine, Center for AIDS prevention studies, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kawango Agot
- Impact Research and Development Organization, Kisumu, Kenya
| | | | - Rachel Weinrib
- Women's Global Health Imperative (WGHI) RTI International, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Erica N Browne
- Women's Global Health Imperative (WGHI) RTI International, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Fredrick Owino
- Impact Research and Development Organization, Kisumu, Kenya
| | | | - Alexandra Minnis
- Women's Global Health Imperative (WGHI) RTI International, San Francisco, CA, USA.,School of Public Health, UC Berkeley, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Quaife M, Terris-Prestholt F, Eakle R, Cabrera Escobar MA, Kilbourne-Brook M, Mvundura M, Meyer-Rath G, Delany-Moretlwe S, Vickerman P. The cost-effectiveness of multi-purpose HIV and pregnancy prevention technologies in South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc 2019. [PMID: 29537654 PMCID: PMC5851344 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction A number of antiretroviral HIV prevention products are efficacious in preventing HIV infection. However, the sexual and reproductive health needs of many women extend beyond HIV prevention, and research is ongoing to develop multi‐purpose prevention technologies (MPTs) that offer dual HIV and pregnancy protection. We do not yet know if these products will be an efficient use of constrained health resources. In this paper, we estimate the cost‐effectiveness of combinations of candidate multi‐purpose prevention technologies (MPTs), in South Africa among general population women and female sex workers (FSWs). Methods We combined a cost model with a static model of product impact based on incidence data in South Africa to estimate the cost‐effectiveness of five candidate co‐formulated or co‐provided MPTs: oral PrEP, intravaginal ring, injectable ARV, microbicide gel and SILCS diaphragm used in concert with gel. We accounted for the preferences of end‐users by predicting uptake using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Product availability and protection were systematically varied in five potential rollout scenarios. The impact model estimated the number of infections averted through decreased incidence due to product use over one year. The comparator for each scenario was current levels of male condom use, while a health system perspective was used to estimate discounted lifetime treatment costs averted per HIV infection. Product benefit was estimated in disability‐adjusted life years (DALYs) averted. Benefits from contraception were incorporated through adjusting the uptake of these products based on the DCE and through estimating the costs averted from avoiding unwanted pregnancies. We explore the additional impact of STI protection through increased uptake in a sensitivity analysis. Results At central incidence rates, all single‐ and multi‐purpose scenarios modelled were cost‐effective among FSWs and women aged 16–24, at a governmental willingness‐to‐pay threshold of $1175/DALY averted (range: $214–$810/DALY averted among non‐dominant scenarios), however, none were cost‐effective among women aged 25–49 (minimum $1706/DALY averted). The cost‐effectiveness of products improved with additional protection from pregnancy. Estimates were sensitive to variation in incidence assumptions, but robust to other parameters. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to estimate the cost‐effectiveness of a range of potential MPTs; suggesting that MPTs will be cost‐effective among higher incidence FSWs or young women, but not among lower incidence older women. More work is needed to make attractive MPTs available to potential users who could use them effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Quaife
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.,Wits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Fern Terris-Prestholt
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Robyn Eakle
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.,Wits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | | | | | - Gesine Meyer-Rath
- Center for Global Health and Development, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.,Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | - Peter Vickerman
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Miners A, Nadarzynski T, Witzel C, Phillips AN, Cambiano V, Rodger AJ, Llewellyn CD. Preferences for HIV testing services among men who have sex with men in the UK: A discrete choice experiment. PLoS Med 2019; 16:e1002779. [PMID: 30973868 PMCID: PMC6459507 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the UK, approximately 4,200 men who have sex with men (MSM) are living with HIV but remain undiagnosed. Maximising the number of high-risk people testing for HIV is key to ensuring prompt treatment and preventing onward infection. This study assessed how different HIV test characteristics affect the choice of testing option, including remote testing (HIV self-testing or HIV self-sampling), in the UK, a country with universal access to healthcare. METHODS AND FINDINGS Between 3 April and 11 May 2017, a cross-sectional online-questionnaire-based discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted in which respondents who expressed an interest in online material used by MSM were asked to imagine that they were at risk of HIV infection and to choose between different hypothetical HIV testing options, including the option not to test. A variety of different testing options with different defining characteristics were described so that the independent preference for each characteristic could be valued. The characteristics included where each test is taken, the sampling method, how the test is obtained, whether infections other than HIV are tested for, test accuracy, the cost of the test, the infection window period, and how long it takes to receive the test result. Participants were recruited and completed the instrument online, in order to include those not currently engaged with healthcare services. The main analysis was conducted using a latent class model (LCM), with results displayed as odds ratios (ORs) and probabilities. The ORs indicate the strength of preference for one characteristic relative to another (base) characteristic. In total, 620 respondents answered the DCE questions. Most respondents reported that they were white (93%) and were either gay or bisexual (99%). The LCM showed that there were 2 classes within the respondent sample that appeared to have different preferences for the testing options. The first group, which was likely to contain 86% of respondents, had a strong preference for face-to-face tests by healthcare professionals (HCPs) compared to remote testing (OR 6.4; 95% CI 5.6, 7.4) and viewed not testing as less preferable than remote testing (OR 0.10; 95% CI 0.09, 0.11). In the second group, which was likely to include 14% of participants, not testing was viewed as less desirable than remote testing (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.53, 0.59) as were tests by HCPs compared to remote testing (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.15, 0.36). In both classes, free remote tests instead of each test costing £30 was the test characteristic with the largest impact on the choice of testing option. Participants in the second group were more likely to have never previously tested and to be non-white than participants in the first group. The main study limitations were that the sample was recruited solely via social media, the study advert was viewed only by people expressing an interest in online material used by MSM, and the choices in the experiment were hypothetical rather than observed in the real world. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that preferences in the context we examined are broadly dichotomous. One group, containing the majority of MSM, appears comfortable testing for HIV but prefers face-to-face testing by HCPs rather than remote testing. The other group is much smaller, but contains MSM who are more likely to be at high infection risk. For these people, the availability of remote testing has the potential to significantly increase net testing rates, particularly if provided for free.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alec Miners
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Nadarzynski
- Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- Royal South Hants Hospital, Solent NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Charles Witzel
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew N. Phillips
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Valentina Cambiano
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alison J. Rodger
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Carrie D. Llewellyn
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Soekhai V, de Bekker-Grob EW, Ellis AR, Vass CM. Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2019; 37:201-226. [PMID: 30392040 PMCID: PMC6386055 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 390] [Impact Index Per Article: 78.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are increasingly advocated as a way to quantify preferences for health. However, increasing support does not necessarily result in increasing quality. Although specific reviews have been conducted in certain contexts, there exists no recent description of the general state of the science of health-related DCEs. The aim of this paper was to update prior reviews (1990-2012), to identify all health-related DCEs and to provide a description of trends, current practice and future challenges. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted to identify health-related empirical DCEs published between 2013 and 2017. The search strategy and data extraction replicated prior reviews to allow the reporting of trends, although additional extraction fields were incorporated. RESULTS Of the 7877 abstracts generated, 301 studies met the inclusion criteria and underwent data extraction. In general, the total number of DCEs per year continued to increase, with broader areas of application and increased geographic scope. Studies reported using more sophisticated designs (e.g. D-efficient) with associated software (e.g. Ngene). The trend towards using more sophisticated econometric models also continued. However, many studies presented sophisticated methods with insufficient detail. Qualitative research methods continued to be a popular approach for identifying attributes and levels. CONCLUSIONS The use of empirical DCEs in health economics continues to grow. However, inadequate reporting of methodological details inhibits quality assessment. This may reduce decision-makers' confidence in results and their ability to act on the findings. How and when to integrate health-related DCE outcomes into decision-making remains an important area for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikas Soekhai
- Section of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre (ECMC), Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR), P.O. Box 1738, Rotterdam, 3000 DR The Netherlands
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000 CA The Netherlands
| | - Esther W. de Bekker-Grob
- Section of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre (ECMC), Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR), P.O. Box 1738, Rotterdam, 3000 DR The Netherlands
| | - Alan R. Ellis
- Department of Social Work, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC USA
| | - Caroline M. Vass
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Quaife M, Terris-Prestholt F, Di Tanna GL, Vickerman P. How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2018; 19:1053-1066. [PMID: 29380229 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-018-0954-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 161] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2017] [Accepted: 01/08/2018] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are economic tools that elicit the stated preferences of respondents. Because of their increasing importance in informing the design of health products and services, it is critical to understand the extent to which DCEs give reliable predictions outside of the experimental context. We systematically reviewed the literature of published DCE studies comparing predictions to choices made in reality; we extracted individual-level data to estimate a bivariate mixed-effects model of pooled sensitivity and specificity. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, and six of these gave sufficient data for inclusion in a meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates were 88% (95% CI 81, 92%) and 34% (95% CI 23, 46%), respectively, and the area under the SROC curve (AUC) was 0.60 (95% CI 0.55, 0.64). Results indicate that DCEs can produce reasonable predictions of health-related behaviors. There is a great need for future research on the external validity of DCEs, particularly empirical studies assessing predicted and revealed preferences of a representative sample of participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Quaife
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | - Fern Terris-Prestholt
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Gian Luca Di Tanna
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Peter Vickerman
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Preferences for linkage to HIV care services following a reactive self-test: discrete choice experiments in Malawi and Zambia. AIDS 2018; 32:2043-2049. [PMID: 29894386 DOI: 10.1097/qad.0000000000001918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The current research identifies key drivers of demand for linkage into care following a reactive HIV self-test result in Malawi and Zambia. Preferences are explored among the general population and key groups such as HIV-positive individuals and adolescents. DESIGN We used discrete choice experiments (DCEs) embedded in representative household surveys to quantify the relative strength of preferences for various HIV services characteristics. METHODS The DCE was designed on the basis of a literature review and qualitative studies. Data were collected within a survey (Malawi n = 553, Zambia n = 388), pooled across country and analysed using mixed logit models. Preference heterogeneity was explored by country, age, sex, wealth, HIV status and belief that HIV treatment is effective. RESULTS DCE results were largely consistent across countries. Major barriers for linkage were fee-based testing and long wait for testing. Community-based confirmatory testing, that is at the participant's or counsellor's home, was preferred to facility-based confirmation. Providing separated waiting areas for HIV services at health facilities and mobile clinics was positively viewed in Malawi but not in Zambia. Active support for linkage was less important to respondents than other attributes. Preference heterogeneity was identified: overall, adolescents were more willing to seek care than adults, whereas HIV-positive participants were more likely to link at health facilities with separate HIV services. CONCLUSION Populations in Malawi and in Zambia were responsive to low-cost, HIV care services with short waiting time provided either at the community or privately at health facilities. Hard-to-reach groups could be encouraged to link to care with targeted support.
Collapse
|
35
|
Krogstad EA, Atujuna M, Montgomery ET, Minnis A, Ndwayana S, Malapane T, Shapley‐Quinn MK, Manenzhe K, Bekker L, van der Straten A. Perspectives of South African youth in the development of an implant for HIV prevention. J Int AIDS Soc 2018; 21:e25170. [PMID: 30152004 PMCID: PMC6111144 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Accepted: 07/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Implants are a new dosage form in development for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with potential for high adherence given that they are provider-administered and are intended for long-acting protection. Integrating end-user preference into early stage product development may further overcome challenges with future product uptake and adherence. Hence, we sought to optimize the design of a PrEP implant in early-stage development by gathering opinions about implant attributes from potential end-users in South Africa. METHODS We conducted 14 focus group discussions (FGDs) with young women and men aged 18 to 24 in Cape Town and Soshanguve, South Africa, inviting participants into discussion as co-designers. FGDs were homogenous by gender and previous implant experience. During FGDs, we showed prototype devices and followed a semi-structured guide with questions on history of contraceptive implant use, preferences for physical characteristics of an implant, implant biodegradability, insertion process, participant-driven ideas for implant design, and social adoption considerations. FGDs were facilitated in English, isiXhosa, Tswana, isiZulu, or Tsonga, audio-recorded, transcribed into English, and qualitatively coded and analysed. RESULTS In this qualitative sample of 105 youth (68 women and 37 men), 58 participants were from Soshanguve and 47 from Cape Town, and 23% had previously used contraceptive implants. Participants expressed preferences for several implant design features; specifically, longer duration (≥6 months) was more important to most participants than the size or number of devices implanted. A majority preferred a flexible versus stiff implant to minimize palpability, thereby increasing discreetness and comfort. Nearly all participants favoured a biodegradable implant to avoid removal and thus reduce clinic visits. Concerns about the implant centred on its possible side effects and the "plastic" look of the prototype displayed for demonstration. CONCLUSIONS This study offers preliminary insights into an implant for HIV prevention that provides long-lasting protection may be well received among young South Africans. Additionally, flexibility, discreetness, and biodegradability may increase acceptability of the implant. Such end-user feedback is being incorporated into current implant designs in the hope of creating an effective long-acting PrEP product that is likely to achieve high uptake and adherence in target populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A Krogstad
- Desmond Tutu HIV CentreUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
- RTI InternationalWomen's Global Health ImperativeSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | | | | | - Alexandra Minnis
- RTI InternationalWomen's Global Health ImperativeSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Sheily Ndwayana
- Desmond Tutu HIV CentreUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
| | | | | | | | | | - Ariane van der Straten
- RTI InternationalWomen's Global Health ImperativeSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
- Center for AIDS Prevention StudiesUniversity of California – San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Zanolini A, Sikombe K, Sikazwe I, Eshun-Wilson I, Somwe P, Bolton Moore C, Topp SM, Czaicki N, Beres LK, Mwamba CP, Padian N, Holmes CB, Geng EH. Understanding preferences for HIV care and treatment in Zambia: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment among patients who have been lost to follow-up. PLoS Med 2018; 15:e1002636. [PMID: 30102693 PMCID: PMC6089406 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In public health HIV treatment programs in Africa, long-term retention remains a challenge. A number of improvement strategies exist (e.g., bring services closer to home, reduce visit frequency, expand hours of clinic operation, improve provider attitude), but implementers lack data about which to prioritize when resource constraints preclude implementing all. We used a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to quantify preferences for a number of potential clinic improvements to enhance retention. METHODS AND FINDINGS We sought a random sample of HIV patients who were lost to follow-up (defined as >90 days late for their last scheduled appointment) from treatment facilities in Lusaka Province, Zambia. Among those contacted, we asked patients to choose between 2 hypothetical clinics in which the following 5 attributes of those facilities were varied: waiting time at the clinic (1, 3, or 5 hours), distance from residence to clinic (5, 10, or 20 km), ART supply given at each refill (1, 3, or 5 months), hours of operation (morning only, morning and afternoon, or morning and Saturday), and staff attitude ("rude" or "nice"). We used mixed-effects logistic regression to estimate relative utility (i.e., preference) for each attribute level. We calculated how much additional waiting time or travel distance patients were willing to accept in order to obtain other desired features of care. Between December 9, 2015 and May 31, 2016, we offered the survey to 385 patients, and 280 participated (average age 35; 60% female). Patients exhibited a strong preference for nice as opposed to rude providers (relative utility of 2.66; 95% CI 1.9-3.42; p < 0.001). In a standard willingness to wait or willingness to travel analysis, patients were willing to wait 19 hours more or travel 45 km farther to see nice rather than rude providers. An alternative analysis, in which trade-offs were constrained to values actually posed to patients in the experiment, suggested that patients were willing to accept a facility located 10 km from home (as opposed to 5) that required 5 hours of waiting per visit (as opposed to 1 hour) and that dispensed 3 months of medications (instead of 5) in order to access nice (as opposed to rude) providers. This study was limited by the fact that attributes included in the experiment may not have captured additional important determinants of preference. CONCLUSIONS In this study, patients were willing to expend considerable time and effort as well as accept substantial inconvenience in order to access providers with a nice attitude. In addition to service delivery redesign (e.g., differentiated service delivery models), current improvement strategies should also prioritize improving provider attitude and promoting patient centeredness-an area of limited policy attention to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arianna Zanolini
- United Kingdom Department for International Development, Dar Es Salaam office, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
| | | | - Izukanji Sikazwe
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Ingrid Eshun-Wilson
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Paul Somwe
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Carolyn Bolton Moore
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America
| | | | - Nancy Czaicki
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Laura K. Beres
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Chanda P. Mwamba
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Nancy Padian
- University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America
| | - Charles B. Holmes
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Georgetown University, Washington D.C., United States of America
| | - Elvin H. Geng
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hendriks A, Wijnen B, van Engelen R, Conde R, Evers SM, Gonzalez J, Govers M, Mühlbacher A, Hiligsmann M. A best-worst scaling in Colombian patients to rank the characteristics of HIV/AIDS treatment. J Med Econ 2018; 21:468-473. [PMID: 29429371 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1440401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
AIM To elicit patients' preferences for HIV/AIDS treatment characteristics in Colombia. MATERIALS AND METHODS A best-worst scaling case was used to provide a ranking of 26 HIV/AIDS treatment characteristics that were similar to a previous study conducted in Germany. In each choice task, participants were asked to choose the most important and the least important treatment characteristics from a set of five from the master list. Using the Hierarchical Bayes method, relative importance scores were calculated. Sub-group analyses were conducted according to sex, education, source of infection, symptoms, and age. RESULTS A total of 195 patients fully completed the questionnaire. The three most important characteristics were "drug has very high efficacy" (relative importance score [RIS] = 10.1), "maximum prolongation of life expectancy" (RIS = 9.7), and "long duration of efficacy" (RIS = 7.4). Sub-group analysis showed only three significant (but minor) differences between older and younger people. CONCLUSION This study suggests that treatment characteristics regarding efficacy and prolongation of life are particularly important for patients in Colombia. Further investigation on how patients make trade-offs between these important characteristics and incorporating this information in clinical and policy decision-making would be needed to improve adherence with HIV/AIDS medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Hendriks
- a Department of Health Services Research , CAPHRI Care and Public Research Institute, Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands
| | - B Wijnen
- a Department of Health Services Research , CAPHRI Care and Public Research Institute, Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands
| | - R van Engelen
- a Department of Health Services Research , CAPHRI Care and Public Research Institute, Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands
| | - R Conde
- b Asistencia Cientifica de Alta Complejidad , Bogotá , Colombia
- c Universidad del Rosario , Bogotá , Colombia
| | - S M Evers
- a Department of Health Services Research , CAPHRI Care and Public Research Institute, Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands
| | - J Gonzalez
- c Universidad del Rosario , Bogotá , Colombia
| | - M Govers
- a Department of Health Services Research , CAPHRI Care and Public Research Institute, Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands
| | - A Mühlbacher
- d Hochschule Neubrandenburg , Neubrandenburg , Germany
| | - M Hiligsmann
- a Department of Health Services Research , CAPHRI Care and Public Research Institute, Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Miners A, Llewellyn C, King C, Pollard A, Roy A, Gilson R, Rodger A, Burns F, Shahmanesh M. Designing a brief behaviour change intervention to reduce sexually transmitted infections: a discrete choice experiment. Int J STD AIDS 2018; 29:851-860. [PMID: 29629651 DOI: 10.1177/0956462418760425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
To understand whether people attending sexual health (SH) clinics are willing to participate in a brief behavioural change intervention (BBCI) to reduce the likelihood of future sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and to understand their preferences for different service designs, we conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with young heterosexual adults (aged 16-25 years), and men who have sex with men (MSM) aged 16 or above, attending SH clinics in England. Data from 368 participants showed that people particularly valued BBCIs that involved talking (OR 1.45; 95%CI 1.35, 1.57 compared with an 'email or text'-based BBCIs), preferably with a health care professional rather than a peer. Findings also showed that 26% of respondents preferred 'email/texts' to all other options; the remaining 14% preferred not to participate in any of the offered BBCIs. These results suggest that most people attending SH clinics in England are likely to participate in a BBCI if offered, but the type/format of the BBCI is likely to be the single important determinant of uptake rather than characteristics such as the length and the number of sessions. Moreover, participants generally favoured 'talking'-based options rather than digital alternatives, which are likely to require the most resources to implement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alec Miners
- 1 Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Carrie Llewellyn
- 2 Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Carina King
- 3 Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alex Pollard
- 2 Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Anupama Roy
- 2 Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Richard Gilson
- 3 Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alison Rodger
- 3 Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Fiona Burns
- 3 Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Maryam Shahmanesh
- 3 Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Zanolini A, Chipungu J, Vinikoor MJ, Bosomprah S, Mafwenko M, Holmes CB, Thirumurthy H. HIV Self-Testing in Lusaka Province, Zambia: Acceptability, Comprehension of Testing Instructions, and Individual Preferences for Self-Test Kit Distribution in a Population-Based Sample of Adolescents and Adults. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2018; 34:254-260. [PMID: 28969432 PMCID: PMC5863088 DOI: 10.1089/aid.2017.0156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
We assessed attitudes and preferences toward HIV self-testing (HIVST) among Zambian adolescents and adults. We conducted a population-based survey of individuals aged 16–49 years old in Lusaka Province, Zambia. HIVST was shown to participants through a short video on oral fluid-based self-testing. In addition to demographics, HIV risk perceptions, and HIV testing history, we assessed participants' acceptability and concerns regarding HIVST. Using a discrete choice experiment, we investigated preferences for the location of self-test pickup, availability of counseling, and cost. After reviewing an instructional sheet or an additional video, we assessed participants' understanding of self-test performance. Among 1617 participants, 647 (40.0%) were male, 269 (16.6%) were adolescents and 754 (46.6%) were nontesters (i.e., no HIV test in the past 12 months). After viewing the video, 1392 (86.0%) reported that HIVST would make them more likely to test and while 35.0% reported some concerns with HIVST, only 2% had serious concerns. Participants strongly preferred HIVST over finger prick testing as well as having counseling and reported willingness to pay out-of-pocket (US$3.5 for testers and US$5.5 for nontesters). Viewing an HIVST demonstration video did not improve participant understanding of self-test usage procedures compared to an instructional sheet alone, but it increased confidence in the ability to self-test. In conclusion, HIVST was highly acceptable and desirable, especially among those not accessing existing HIV testing services. Participants expressed a strong preference for counseling and a willingness to pay for test kits. These data can guide piloting and scaling-up of HIVST in Zambia and elsewhere in Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arianna Zanolini
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
- American Institutes for Research, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Jenala Chipungu
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Michael J. Vinikoor
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
- School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
- School of Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Samuel Bosomprah
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Mazuba Mafwenko
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
- American Institutes for Research, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | - Harsha Thirumurthy
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Govender E, Mansoor L, MacQueen K, Abdool Karim Q. Secrecy, empowerment and protection: positioning PrEP in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. CULTURE, HEALTH & SEXUALITY 2017; 19:1268-1285. [PMID: 28423992 DOI: 10.1080/13691058.2017.1309682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The release of World Health Organisation guidelines recommending the prophylactic use of daily Truvada® for all populations at high risk of acquiring HIV opens the way for implementation of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). The impact of new prevention technologies is, however, dependent on demand creation strategies such as user awareness, acceptability and access, which in turn are influenced by sociocultural and gender norms. This study was conducted in three locations in KwaZulu-Natal, urban, rural and peri-urban, with six participatory workshops. Knowledge, desirable features of a product and demand positioning for PrEP were assessed using a participatory action media research process which included art-based activities and group discussion using a semi-structured interview schedule. The data were analysed using thematic analysis. The key themes that emerged in relation to product adoption were: ability to maintain secrecy of product use; the need for agency with personal choices around HIV prevention; and an increased desire for HIV protection. Findings reaffirm the influence of user engagement in understanding the sociocultural dynamics that influence demand creation for PrEP adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliza Govender
- a Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA) , University of KwaZulu-Natal , Durban , South Africa
- b Centre for Culture, Communication and Media Studies (CCMS), College of Humanities , University of KwaZulu-Natal , Durban , South Africa
| | - Leila Mansoor
- a Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA) , University of KwaZulu-Natal , Durban , South Africa
| | - Kate MacQueen
- c Social and Behavioural Health Sciences, FHI 360 , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Quarraisha Abdool Karim
- a Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA) , University of KwaZulu-Natal , Durban , South Africa
- d Department of Epidemiology , Columbia University , New York , NY , USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Brown L, Lee TH, De Allegri M, Rao K, Bridges JF. Applying stated-preference methods to improve health systems in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2017; 17:441-458. [PMID: 28875767 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1375854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sub-Saharan African health systems must balance shifting disease burdens with desires for robust institutions. Stated-preference methods have been applied extensively to elicit health care workers' preferences and priorities for rural practice. This systematic review characterizes the range of their applications to African health systems problems. Areas covered: A PRISMA protocol was submitted to PROSPERO. Six databases were queried for peer-reviewed articles using quantitative stated-preference methods to evaluate a health systems-related trade-off. Quality was assessed using the PREFS checklist. Seventy-seven articles published between 1996 and 2017 met review criteria. Methods were primarily choice-based: discrete-choice experiments (n = 46), ranking/allocation techniques (n = 21), conjoint analyses (n = 7), and best-worst scaling (n = 3). Trade-offs fell into six 'building blocks': service features (n = 27), workforce incentives (n = 17), product features (n = 14), system priorities (n = 14), insurance features (n = 4), and research priorities (n = 1). Five countries dominated: South Africa (n = 11), Ghana (n = 9), Malawi (n = 9), Uganda (n = 9), and Tanzania (n = 8). Discrete-choice experiments were of highest quality (mean score: 3.36/5). Expert commentary: Stated-preference methods have been applied to many health systems contexts throughout sub-Saharan Africa. Studies examined established strategic areas, especially primary health care for women, prevention and treatment of infectious diseases, and workforce development. Studies have neglected the emerging areas of non-communicable diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Brown
- a Department of International Health , The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA
| | - Ting-Hsuan Lee
- b Department of International Health/Department of Health Policy and Management , The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA
| | - Manuela De Allegri
- c Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine , Heidelberg University , Heidelberg , Germany
| | - Krishna Rao
- a Department of International Health , The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA
| | - John Fp Bridges
- b Department of International Health/Department of Health Policy and Management , The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Quaife M, Eakle R, Cabrera Escobar MA, Vickerman P, Kilbourne-Brook M, Mvundura M, Delany-Moretlwe S, Terris-Prestholt F. Divergent Preferences for HIV Prevention: A Discrete Choice Experiment for Multipurpose HIV Prevention Products in South Africa. Med Decis Making 2017; 38:120-133. [PMID: 28863752 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x17729376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The development of antiretroviral (ARV)-based prevention products has the potential to substantially change the HIV prevention landscape; yet, little is known about how appealing these products will be outside of clinical trials, as compared with the existing options. METHODS We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to measure preferences for 5 new products among 4 important populations in the HIV response: adult men and women in the general population (aged 18 to 49 y), adolescent girls (aged 16 to 17 y), and self-identifying female sex workers (aged 18 to 49 y). We interviewed 661 self-reported HIV-negative participants in peri-urban South Africa, who were asked to choose between 3 unique, hypothetical products over 10 choice sets. Data were analyzed using multinomial, latent class and mixed multinomial logit models. RESULTS HIV protection was the most important attribute to respondents; however, results indicate significant demand among all groups for multipurpose prevention products that offer protection from HIV infection, other STIs, and unwanted pregnancy. All groups demonstrated a strong preference for long-lasting injectable products. There was substantial heterogeneity in preferences within and across population groups. LIMITATIONS Hypothetical DCE data may not mirror real-world choices, and products will have more attributes in reality than represented in choice tasks. Background data on participants, including sensitive areas of HIV status and condom use, was self-reported. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that stimulating demand for new HIV prevention products may require a more a nuanced approach than simply developing highly effective products. No single product is likely to be equally attractive or acceptable across different groups. This study strengthens the call for effective and attractive multipurpose prevention products to be deployed as part of a comprehensive combination prevention strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Quaife
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (MQ, RE, PV, FT).,Wits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa (MQ, RE, EAC, SD)
| | - Robyn Eakle
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (MQ, RE, PV, FT).,Wits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa (MQ, RE, EAC, SD)
| | - Maria A Cabrera Escobar
- Wits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa (MQ, RE, EAC, SD)
| | - Peter Vickerman
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (MQ, RE, PV, FT).,School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, UK (PV)
| | | | | | - Sinead Delany-Moretlwe
- Wits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa (MQ, RE, EAC, SD)
| | - Fern Terris-Prestholt
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (MQ, RE, PV, FT)
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
van der Straten A, Shapley-Quinn MK, Reddy K, Cheng H, Etima J, Woeber K, Musara P, Palanee-Phillips T, Baeten JM, Montgomery ET, Baeten J, Palanee-Phillips T, Brown E, Soto-Torres L, Schwartz K, Makanani B, Martinson F, Bekker LG, Govender V, Siva S, Gaffoor Z, Naidoo L, Pather A, Jeenarain N, Nair G, Palanee-Phillips T, Matovu F, Mgodi N, Mhlanga F. Favoring “Peace of Mind”: A Qualitative Study of African Women's HIV Prevention Product Formulation Preferences from the MTN-020/ASPIRE Trial. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2017. [DOI: 10.1089/apc.2017.0075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane van der Straten
- Women's Global Health Imperative (WGHI), RTI International, San Francisco, California
- Department of Prevention Medicine, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), University of California San Francisco, California
| | | | - Krishnaveni Reddy
- Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute (Wits RHI), Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Helen Cheng
- Women's Global Health Imperative (WGHI), RTI International, San Francisco, California
| | - Juliane Etima
- Makerere University—Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Petina Musara
- UZ-UCSF Collaborative Research Programme, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | | | - Jared M. Baeten
- Department of Global Health, Medicine, and Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Quaife M, Eakle R, Cabrera M, Vickerman P, Tsepe M, Cianci F, Delany-Moretlwe S, Terris-Prestholt F. Preferences for ARV-based HIV prevention methods among men and women, adolescent girls and female sex workers in Gauteng Province, South Africa: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e010682. [PMID: 27354071 PMCID: PMC4932295 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For the past few decades, condoms have been the main method of HIV prevention. Recent advances in antiretroviral (ARV)-based prevention products have substantially changed the prevention landscape, yet little is known about how popular these products will be among potential users, or whether new methods might be used in conjunction with, or instead of, condoms. This study will use a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to (1) explore potential users' preferences regarding HIV prevention products, (2) quantify the importance of product attributes and (3) predict the uptake of products to inform estimates of their potential impact on the HIV epidemic in South Africa. We consider preferences for oral pre-exposure prophylaxis; a vaginal microbicide gel; a long-acting vaginal ring; a SILCS diaphragm used in concert with gel; and a long-acting ARV-based injectable. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study will gather data from 4 populations: 200 women, 200 men, 200 adolescent girls (aged 16-17 years) and 200 female sex workers. The DCE attributes and design will be developed through a literature review, supplemented by a thematic analysis of qualitative focus group discussions. Extensive piloting will be carried out in each population through semistructured interviews. The final survey will be conducted using computer tablets via a household sample (for women, men and adolescents) and respondent-driven sampling (for female sex workers), and DCE data analysed using a range of multinomial logit models. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has been approved by the University of the Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee and the Research Ethics Committee at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Findings will be presented to international conferences and peer-reviewed journals. Meetings will be held with opinion leaders in South Africa, while results will be disseminated to participants in Ekurhuleni through a public meeting or newsletter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Quaife
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Wits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Robyn Eakle
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Wits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Maria Cabrera
- Wits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Peter Vickerman
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Fiona Cianci
- Department of Public Health East, Dr Steeven's Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
| | | | - Fern Terris-Prestholt
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wilton J, Kain T, Fowler S, Hart TA, Grennan T, Maxwell J, Tan DH. Use of an HIV-risk screening tool to identify optimal candidates for PrEP scale-up among men who have sex with men in Toronto, Canada: disconnect between objective and subjective HIV risk. J Int AIDS Soc 2016; 19:20777. [PMID: 27265490 PMCID: PMC4911732 DOI: 10.7448/ias.19.1.20777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2015] [Revised: 03/30/2016] [Accepted: 04/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Identifying appropriate pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) candidates is a challenge in planning for the safe and effective roll-out of this strategy. We explored the use of a validated HIV risk screening tool, HIV Incidence Risk Index for Men who have Sex with Men (HIRI-MSM), to identify "optimal" candidates among MSM testing at a busy sexual health clinic's community testing sites in Toronto, Canada. METHODS Between November 2014 and April 2015, we surveyed MSM undergoing anonymous HIV testing at community testing sites in Toronto, Canada, to quantify "optimal" candidates for scaling up PrEP roll-out, defined as being at high objective HIV risk (scoring ≥10 on the HIRI-MSM), perceiving oneself at moderate-to-high HIV risk and being willing to use PrEP. Cascades were constructed to identify barriers to broader PrEP uptake. The association between HIRI-MSM score and both willingness to use PrEP and perceived HIV risk were explored in separate multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Of 420 respondents, 64.4% were objectively at high risk, 52.5% were willing to use PrEP and 27.2% perceived themselves at moderate-to-high HIV risk. Only 16.4% were "optimal" candidates. Higher HIRI-MSM scores were positively associated with both willingness to use PrEP (aOR=1.7 per 10 score increase, 95%CI=1.3-2.2) and moderate-to-high perceived HIV risk (aOR=1.7 per 10 score increase, 95%CI=1.2-2.3). The proportion of men who were "optimal" candidates increased to 42.9% when the objective HIV risk cut-off was changed to top quartile of HIRI-MSM scores (≥26). In our full cascade, a very low proportion (5.3%) of MSM surveyed could potentially benefit from PrEP under current conditions. The greatest barrier in the cascade was low perception of HIV risk among high-risk men, but considerable numbers were also lost in downstream cascade steps. Of men at high objective HIV risk, 68.3% did not perceive themselves to be at moderate-to-high HIV risk, 23.6% were unaware of PrEP, 40.1% were not willing to use PrEP, 47.6% lacked a family physician with whom they felt comfortable discussing sexual health, and 31.6% had no means to cover the cost of PrEP. CONCLUSIONS A higher HIRI-MSM cut-off may be helpful for identifying candidates for PrEP scale-up. Improving engagement in the PrEP cascade will require interventions to simultaneously address multiple barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Wilton
- CATIE (Canadian AIDS Treatment Information Exchange), Toronto, Canada
| | - Taylor Kain
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Trevor A Hart
- Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Troy Grennan
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, Canada
| | - John Maxwell
- ACT (AIDS Committee of Toronto), Toronto, Canada
| | - Darrell Hs Tan
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Infectious Diseases, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Primrose RJ, Zaveri T, Bakke AJ, Ziegler GR, Moskowitz HR, Hayes JE. Drivers of Vaginal Drug Delivery System Acceptability from Internet-Based Conjoint Analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0150896. [PMID: 26999009 PMCID: PMC4801188 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2015] [Accepted: 02/19/2016] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Vaginal microbicides potentially empower women to protect themselves from HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), especially when culture, religion, or social status may prevent them from negotiating condom use. The open literature contains minimal information on factors that drive user acceptability of women's health products or vaginal drug delivery systems. By understanding what women find to be most important with regard to sensory properties and product functionality, developers can iteratively formulate a more desirable product. Conjoint analysis is a technique widely used in market research to determine what combination of elements influence a consumer's willingness to try or use a product. We applied conjoint analysis here to better understand what sexually-active woman want in a microbicide, toward our goal of formulating a product that is highly acceptable to women. Both sensory and non-sensory attributes were tested, including shape, color, wait time, partner awareness, messiness/leakage, duration of protection, and functionality. Heterosexually active women between 18 and 35 years of age in the United States (n = 302) completed an anonymous online conjoint survey using IdeaMap software. Attributes (product elements) were systematically presented in various combinations; women rated these combinations of a 9-point willingness-to-try scale. By coupling systematic combinations and regression modeling, we can estimate the unique appeal of each element. In this population, a multifunctional product (i.e., broad spectrum STI protection, coupled with conception) is far more desirable than a microbicide targeted solely for HIV protection; we also found partner awareness and leakage are potentially strong barriers to use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel J. Primrose
- Sensory Evaluation Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Food Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Toral Zaveri
- Sensory Evaluation Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Food Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Alyssa J. Bakke
- Sensory Evaluation Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Food Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Gregory R. Ziegler
- Department of Food Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Howard R. Moskowitz
- Mind Genomics Associates Inc., White Plains, New York, United States of America
| | - John E. Hayes
- Sensory Evaluation Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Department of Food Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Terris-Prestholt F, Quaife M, Vickerman P. Parameterising User Uptake in Economic Evaluations: The role of discrete choice experiments. HEALTH ECONOMICS 2016; 25 Suppl 1:116-23. [PMID: 26773825 PMCID: PMC5066644 DOI: 10.1002/hec.3297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2015] [Revised: 05/11/2015] [Accepted: 09/21/2015] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
Model-based economic evaluations of new interventions have shown that user behaviour (uptake) is a critical driver of overall impact achieved. However, early economic evaluations, prior to introduction, often rely on assumed levels of uptake based on expert opinion or uptake of similar interventions. In addition to the likely uncertainty surrounding these uptake assumptions, they also do not allow for uptake to be a function of product, intervention, or user characteristics. This letter proposes using uptake projections from discrete choice experiments (DCE) to better parameterize uptake and substitution in cost-effectiveness models. A simple impact model is developed and illustrated using an example from the HIV prevention field in South Africa. Comparison between the conventional approach and the DCE-based approach shows that, in our example, DCE-based impact predictions varied by up to 50% from conventional estimates and provided far more nuanced projections. In the absence of observed uptake data and to model the effect of variations in intervention characteristics, DCE-based uptake predictions are likely to greatly improve models parameterizing uptake solely based on expert opinion. This is particularly important for global and national level decision making around introducing new and probably more expensive interventions, particularly where resources are most constrained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fern Terris-Prestholt
- Social and Mathematical Epidemiology (SaME), Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Matthew Quaife
- Social and Mathematical Epidemiology (SaME), Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Peter Vickerman
- Social and Mathematical Epidemiology (SaME), Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Michaels-Igbokwe C, Lagarde M, Cairns J, Terris-Prestholt F. Designing a package of sexual and reproductive health and HIV outreach services to meet the heterogeneous preferences of young people in Malawi: results from a discrete choice experiment. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2015; 5:9. [PMID: 25984434 PMCID: PMC4424232 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-015-0046-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2014] [Accepted: 03/06/2015] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This article examines young people's preferences for integrated family planning (FP) and HIV services in rural Malawi. Different hypothetical configurations for outreach services are presented using a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). Responses are analysed using Random Parameters Logit and Generalised Mixed Logit (GMXL) models in preference space and a GMXL model parameterised in willingness-to-pay space. Simulations are used to estimate the proportion of respondents expected to choose different service packages as elements are varied individually and in combination. RESULTS Responses were collected from 537 young people aged 15-24. Results show that when considering attending an outreach service to access family planning young people value confidentiality and the availability of HIV services including HIV counselling and testing (HCT) and HIV treatment, though significant observable and unobservable heterogeneity is present. Female respondents and those aged 20-24 were less concerned with service confidentiality compared to male respondents and those aged 15-19; respondents who were in a relationship at the time of the survey valued confidentiality more than those who reported being single. The addition of sports and recreation for young people may also be an attractive feature of a youth-friendly service; however, preferences for this attribute vary according to respondent gender. Results of the simulation modelling indicate that the most preferred service package is one that offers confidential services, both HCT and HIV treatment and sports for youth, with up to 32% of respondents expected to choose this service over a service where clients may have concerns over confidentiality, only HCT is available and there are no additional activities for young people. Estimates of willingness-to-pay for service attributes indicate that respondents were willing to pay up to USD$1.76 for confidentiality, USD$0.65 for a service offering both HCT and HIV treatment and USD$0.26 for a service including sports for youth. CONCLUSIONS Young people were able to complete a complex DCE and appeared to trade between the different characteristics used to describe the outreach services. These findings may offer important insight to policy makers designing youth friendly SRH outreach services and providers aiming to improve the acceptability and uptake of FP services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Michaels-Igbokwe
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, Department of Global Health and Development, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH UK
| | - Mylene Lagarde
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, Department of Global Health and Development, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH UK
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, Health Services Research and Policy, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH UK
| | - John Cairns
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, Health Services Research and Policy, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH UK
| | | | - Fern Terris-Prestholt
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, Department of Global Health and Development, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Romano JW, Van Damme L, Hillier S. The future of multipurpose prevention technology product strategies: understanding the market in parallel with product development. BJOG 2014; 121 Suppl 5:15-8. [PMID: 25335835 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/26/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
50
|
Learning from the private sector: towards a keener understanding of the end-user for microbicide introduction planning. J Int AIDS Soc 2014; 17:19162. [PMID: 25224619 PMCID: PMC4163992 DOI: 10.7448/ias.17.3.19162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2014] [Revised: 06/24/2014] [Accepted: 07/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In planning for the introduction of vaginal microbicides and other new antiretroviral (ARV)-based prevention products for women, an in-depth understanding of potential end-users will be critically important to inform strategies to optimize uptake and long-term adherence. User-centred private sector companies have contributed to the successful launch of many different types of products, employing methods drawn from behavioural and social sciences to shape product designs, marketing messages and communication channels. Examples of how the private sector has adapted and applied these techniques to make decisions around product messaging and targeting may be instructive for adaptation to microbicide introduction. DISCUSSION In preparing to introduce a product, user-centred private sector companies employ diverse methods to understand the target population and their lifestyles, values and motivations. ReD Associates' observational research on user behaviours in the packaged food and diabetes fields illustrates how 'tag along' or 'shadowing' techniques can identify sources of non-adherence. Another open-ended method is self-documentation, and IDEO's mammography research utilized this to uncover user motivations that extended beyond health. Mapping the user journey is a quantitative approach for outlining critical decision-making stages, and Monitor Inclusive Markets applied this framework to identify toilet design opportunities for the rural poor. Through an iterative process, these various techniques can generate hypotheses on user drop-off points, quantify where drop-off is highest and prioritize areas of further research to uncover usage barriers. Although research constraints exist, these types of user-centred techniques have helped create effective messaging, product positioning and packaging of health products as well as family planning information. These methods can be applied to microbicide acceptability testing outside of clinical trials to design microbicide marketing that enhances product usage. CONCLUSIONS The introduction of microbicide products presents an ideal opportunity to draw on the insights from user-centred private sector companies' approaches, which can complement other methods that have been more commonly utilized in microbicide research to date. As microbicides move from clinical trials to real-world implementation, there will be more opportunities to combine a variety of approaches to understand end-users, which can lead to a more effective product launch and ultimately greater impact on preventing HIV infections.
Collapse
|