Interleukin-6 in serum and in synovial fluid enhances the differentiation between periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic loosening

Analysis of Serum and Synovial Inflammatory Markers in Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Narrative Review

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is considered a rare but devastating complication after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The problem lies in the fact that there is a paucity of "gold standard" diagnostic tests that make the diagnosis of PJI extremely challenging. Recently, there have been increasing evidence-based guidelines that have been introduced to standardise the approach to a patient with a suspected PJI. Diagnosing a case of PJI traditionally involves initial screening for elevated serum inflammation markers C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/dL) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and aspiration remains the sole confirmatory investigation. However, several factors would affect the values of the aforementioned markers, such as gender, age, and the presence of inflammatory circumstances. Serum D-dimer that detects fibrinolytic activities during infection has high sensitivity, but the specificity was not persuasive as it would elevate during other conditions, such as venous thromboembolism. Therefore, there is also a need for a simultaneous and secondary marker. There are also several synovial biomarkers, including ESR, CRP, alpha-defensin, and synovial fluid leukocyte count and differential for the detection of PJI. In this narrative review, we want to sum up the serum and inflammatory markers that have been introduced so far for detecting PJI.

Evaluation of interleukin-6 in synovial fluid in periprosthetic joint infection of the elbow

PURPOSE

Searching for quick determinable biomarkers with high sensitivity and specificity is necessary to improve and optimise the early diagnosis of periprosthetic elbow infection (PEI). Therefore, this study's objective was to evaluate the diagnostic value of synovial fluid interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels for diagnosing PEI in total elbow arthroplasty.

METHOD

Twelve prospective enrolled patients underwent total elbow arthroplasty revision surgery, during which synovial fluid was obtained. Between the initial implantation and the revision procedure were 33.5 ± 41 months (range, 2-144 months). Synovial fluid was collected for immediate IL-6 analysis parallel to the revision surgery. Furthermore, microbiological samples were obtained and analysed. Two groups were defined based on the microbiological results: non-infection and infection group. The ability of synovial fluid IL-6 analysis to predict infection status was explored using receiver operating characteristic curves and further statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Synovial fluid IL-6 analysis had a good diagnostic accuracy of 83% for PEI with an area under the curve of 0,79 and an ideal cutoff value (determined using Youden's criterion) of 15244 pg/mL.

DISCUSSION

This is the first study to clinically evaluate IL-6 as a diagnostical marker for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total elbow arthroplasty. Our results suggest a good accuracy and high sensitivity for IL-6 to identify a PEI. The analysis of IL-6 can improve surgical decision-making regarding managing total elbow arthroplasty in terms of one- or two-staged revision.

CONCLUSION

IL-6 can play an important role in the perioperative differentiation of infected and non-infected situations.

Zirconium as a Promising Synovial Biomarker for Loose Cemented Knee Prosthesis

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening is the most common mode of failure after total knee arthroplasty. Despite this, the diagnosis often remains challenging and mainly relies on imaging modalities. Until today, no biomarker exists to aid in diagnosing loosening of the implants. As zirconium (Zr) is often found in bone cement, where it serves as radiopacifier, this study aimed to establish Zr as a synovial biomarker for loosened cemented knee prostheses.

METHODS

A total of 31 patients scheduled for revision of a cemented knee prostheses were included. In all patients, the initial used cement contained Zr. After arthrotomy, specimens of synovial fluid were taken and levels of Zr were measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Depending on the necessary amount of force for explantation, the implants were graded "loose" or "well-fixed". Preoperative radiographs were evaluated by 2 independent physicians.

RESULTS

The concentration of Zr in the synovial fluid differed significantly (P < .001) between the "loose" (mean 170.9 μg/L, range 0 to 1941 μg/L) and the "well-fixed" (mean 0.6 μg/L, range 0 to 6 μg/L) implants. The receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed 0.25 μg/l as an optimal cutoff value leading to a sensitivity of 0.84, a specificity of 0.92, a positive predictive value of 0.94, and a negative predictive value of 0.79. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic performance compared to radiographs (P = .66).

CONCLUSIONS

Zirconium proved to be a reliable novel synovial biomarker for diagnosing aseptic loosening of knee prothesis fixed with cement containing Zr. This biomarker should not be interpreted in isolation, but in combination with existing diagnostic tools.

An overview of the current diagnostic approach to Periprosthetic Joint Infections

The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) presents a formidable challenge to orthopaedic surgeons due to its complex and diverse manifestations. Accurate diagnosis is of utmost importance, as even mild pain following joint replacement surgery may indicate PJI in the absence of a definitive gold standard diagnostic test. Numerous diagnostic modalities have been suggested in the literature, and international societies have continually updated diagnostic criteria for this debilitating complication. This review article aims to comprehensively examine the latest evidence-based approaches for diagnosing PJI. Through a thorough analysis of current literature, we explore promising diagnostic strategies that have demonstrated effectiveness in identifying PJI. These strategies encompass the utilization of laboratory markers, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), alongside imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and leukocyte scintigraphy. Additionally, we highlight the importance of synovial fluid analysis, including the potential role of alpha-defensin as a biomarker, and examine evolving international diagnostic criteria to standardize and improve diagnostic accuracy.

Interactions and Trends of Interleukins, PAI-1, CRP, and TNF-α in Inflammatory Responses during the Perioperative Period of Joint Arthroplasty: Implications for Pain Management-A Narrative Review

Inflammation during the perioperative period of joint arthroplasty is a critical aspect of patient outcomes, influencing both the pathophysiology of pain and the healing process. This narrative review comprehensively evaluates the roles of specific cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers in this context and their implications for pain management. Inflammatory responses are initiated and propagated by cytokines, which are pivotal in the development of both acute and chronic postoperative pain. Pro-inflammatory cytokines play essential roles in up-regulating the inflammatory response, which, if not adequately controlled, leads to sustained pain and impaired tissue healing. Anti-inflammatory cytokines work to dampen inflammatory responses and promote resolution. Our discussion extends to the genetic and molecular influences on cytokine production, which influence pain perception and recovery rates post-surgery. Furthermore, the role of PAI-1 in modulating inflammation through its impact on the fibrinolytic system highlights its potential as a therapeutic target. The perioperative modulation of these cytokines through various analgesic and anesthetic techniques, including the fascia iliac compartment block, demonstrates a significant reduction in pain and inflammatory markers, thus underscoring the importance of targeted therapeutic strategies. Our analysis suggests that a nuanced understanding of the interplay between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines is required. Future research should focus on individualized pain management strategies.

Interleukin-1β Polymorphisms Are Genetic Markers of Susceptibility to Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are serious complications of prosthetic surgery. The criteria for the diagnosis of PJI integrate clinical and laboratory findings in a complex and sometimes inconclusive workflow. Host immune factors hold potential as diagnostic biomarkers in bone and joint infections. We reported that the humoral pattern-recognition molecule long pentraxin 3 (PTX3) predicts PJI in total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA, respectively). If and how genetic variation in PTX3 and inflammatory genes that affect its expression (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-17A) contributes to the risk of PJI is unknown. We conducted a case-control study on a Caucasian historic cohort of THA and TKA patients who had prosthesis explant due to PJI (cases) or aseptic complications (controls). Saliva was collected from 93 subjects and used to extract DNA and genotype PTX3, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-17A single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Moreover, the concentration of IL-1β, IL-10, and IL-6 was measured in synovial fluid and plasma. No association was found between PTX3 polymorphisms and PJI; however, the AGG haplotype, encompassing rs2853550, rs1143634, and rs1143627 in IL-1β, was linked to the infection (p = 0.017). Also, synovial levels of all inflammatory markers were higher in cases than in controls, and a correlation emerged between synovial concentration of PTX3 and that of IL-1β in cases only (Spearman r = 0.67, p = 0.004). We identified a relationship between rs2853550 and the synovial concentration of IL-1β and PTX3. Our findings suggest that IL-1β SNPs could be used for the early identification of THA and TKA patients with a high risk of infection.

Diagnostics in Late Periprosthetic Infections-Challenges and Solutions

The rising number of arthroplasties is combined with a rising number of periprosthetic joint infections, which leads to life-concerning consequences for the patients, including extended antibiotic treatment, further surgery and increased mortality. The heterogeneity of the symptoms and inflammatory response of the patients due to, e.g., age and comorbidities and the absence of a single diagnostic test with 100% accuracy make it very challenging to choose the right parameters to confirm or deny a periprosthetic joint infection and to establish a standardized definition. In recent years, additional diagnostic possibilities have emerged primarily through the increasing availability of new diagnostic methods, such as genetic techniques. The aim of the review is to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge about the various tests, including the latest developments. The combination of different tests increases the accuracy of the diagnosis. Each physician or clinical department must select the tests from the available methods that can be best implemented for them in organizational and technical terms. Serological parameters and the cultivation of the samples from aspiration or biopsy should be combined with additional synovial tests to create an accurate figure for the failure of the prosthesis, while imaging procedures are used to obtain additional information for the planned therapeutic procedure.

Diagnostic value of procalcitonin in patients with periprosthetic joint infection: a diagnostic meta-analysis

Background

The success rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) treatment is still low. Early diagnosis is the key to successful treatment. Therefore, it is necessary to find a biomarker with high sensitivity and specificity. The diagnostic value of serum procalcitonin (PCT) for PJI was systematically evaluated to provide the theoretical basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment in this study.

Methods

We searched the Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and PubMed for studies that evaluated the diagnostic value of serum PCT for PJI (from the inception of each database until September 2020). Two authors independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of each selected literature was evaluated by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool (QUADAS-2) tool. RevMan 5.3 software was used for the quality evaluation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were merged by using Meta-DiSc 1.4 software. The area under the curve (AUC) and Q index were calculated after the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) was generated. We also performed subgroup analysis.

Results

A total of 621 patients were enrolled in the nine studies. The pooled sensitivity of serum PCT for PJI diagnosis was 0.441 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.384-0.500], the pooled specificity was 0.852 (95% CI, 0.811-0.888), the pooled PLR was 2.271 (95% CI, 1.808-2.853), the pooled NLR was 0.713 (95% CI, 0.646-0.786), and the pooled DOR was 5.756 (95% CI, 3.673-9.026). The area under SROC (the pooled AUC) was 0.76 (0.72-0.79). Q index was 0.6948.

Conclusion

This study showed that PCT detection of PJI had poor diagnostic accuracy. Hence, the serum PCT is not suitable as a serum marker for PJI diagnosis.

A paper-based aptamer-sandwich assay for detection of HNP 1 as a biomarker for periprosthetic joint infections on an integrated microfluidic platform

BACKGROUND

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has significantly improved the quality of life for millions suffering from end-stage arthritis. However, periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) remain a serious complication, necessitating extensive interventions and prolonged antimicrobial treatments. The aging population is expected to lead to a rise in TJA cases, subsequently increasing the incidence of PJI, particularly in the elderly who face higher mortality rates. Current diagnostic methods for suspected PJI, such as radiographs and biochemical markers like CRP and ESR, exhibit limited sensitivity. Therefore, there is a critical need for a specific synovial fluid biomarker assay to enhance PJI diagnosis using specific SF-based assay.

RESULTS

This study introduces a novel microfluidic chip with a paper-based aptamer-sandwich assay for the quantitative detection of HNP 1, a crucial PJI biomarker, in synovial fluid. The assay leverages the advantages of aptamers over antibodies, demonstrating high selectivity and affinity for target molecules. The integration of a nitrocellulose (NC) membrane onto the microfluidic platform represents a significant advancement, reducing background signals and simplifying the assay procedure without intricate procedure and pre-treatment. The NC membrane-based microfluidic device offers rapid, cost-effective, and highly sensitive detection of HNP 1, with a limit of detection of 0.5 mg L-1. The microfluidic device demonstrates exceptional performance, detecting up to four clinical samples in approximately 42 min on a single chip with 100 % accuracy, as confirmed by analysis of 12 clinical samples and comparison with "gold-standard". Moreover, the assay exhibits a wide dynamic range of 0.5-100 mg L-1, underscoring its potential as a powerful tool for PJI diagnosis in clinical settings.

SIGNIFICANCE

This work introduces a paper-based microfluidic system tailored for rapid HNP 1 detection using synovial fluid near joint region (and not serum via blood) for better diagnosis. The innovative paper-based aptamer-sandwich assay yields results within 42-min. Significantly, it boasts a wide dynamic range, detecting levels from an impressive 0.5 mg L-1, crucial in the 2.6 mg L-1 threshold region. This heightened sensitivity and expansive detection capability establish our assay as a leader in PJI diagnostics, promising unmatched precision and efficiency in clinical applications.

The Value of Preoperative Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index as a Predictor of Prolonged Hospital Stay in Orthopedic Surgery: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

Many risk factors, such as the duration of surgery and higher ASA scores, are associated with longer hospitalization in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. However, no studies have evaluated the relationship between the preoperative systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and length of hospital stay in orthopedic surgical patients. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether the SII is associated with the length of hospital stay in orthopedic surgery in adults.

Patients and Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study, and data were extracted from electronic health records. Patients were included if they were older than 18 years and had undergone orthopedic surgery between [2016-2021]. The patients were divided into two groups according to the median duration of hospitalization and according to SII cut-off value (high-SII group: ≥799.86, low-SII group: <799.86). Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were used to identify the association between SII and length of hospitalization.

Results

A total of 196 patients who underwent orthopedic surgery were included, and 62 were hospitalized for >21 days. There were significant differences in terms of ASA score (P = 0.041). Patients who required a longer hospitalization of >21 days had significantly lower hemoglobin level (P < 0.001), higher duration of surgery (P = 0.015), and increased requirement of ICU admission (P < 0.001). The optimal cut-off value for preoperative SII of 799.86 stratified the patients into high-SII and low-SII groups. Patients in high-SII group had higher median LOHS (22 days) compared to low-SII group (17 days; P = 0.006). In the multivariable linear regression analysis, the SII was significantly related to the length of hospital stay (β = 0.246, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.000-0.005, P = 0.031).

Conclusion

A high-SII value is associated with an increased risk of longer hospitalization after orthopedic surgery.

Current relevance of biomarkers in diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: an update

With a significant rise in the number of arthroplasty procedures performed worldwide, the increasing revision burden posed by periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a matter of growing concern. In spite of various attempts to diagnose PJI, there are no defined tests that can be called a gold standard. Given the importance of early diagnosis in PJI, newer tests and biomarkers have been introduced to improve cumulative diagnostic accuracy. Novel biomarkers like calprotectin, lipocalcin, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-mean platelet volume ratio have demonstrated a potential as diagnostic biomarkers for PJI. This article discusses the relevance of available and newly described diagnostic biomarkers to provide a perspective on the practical applicability in current medical practice, as well as highlights some recent advances in biomarkers for the diagnosis of PJI.

Joint fluid interleukin-6 combined with the neutral polymorphonuclear leukocyte ratio (PMN%) as a diagnostic index for chronic periprosthesis infection after arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a challenge in clinical practice. Many novel serum and joint fluid biomarkers have important implications for the diagnosis of PJI. The presented study evaluated the value of joint fluid interleukin-6 (IL-6) combined with the neutral polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN%) ratio for chronic PJI diagnosis after arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients with chronic PJI or aseptic failure who underwent hip or knee revision from January 2018 to January 2020 in our department were included in this retrospective study. According to the 2013 MSIS diagnostic criteria, the 60 patients were divided into a PJI group and a non-PJI group (30 patients per group). We collected the joint fluid before surgery and determined the level of IL-6 and the PMN% by ELISA, and the differences between the two groups were compared. The diagnostic efficacy of joint fluid IL-6 combined with PMN% in chronic PJI was analyzed using a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve).

RESULTS

The diagnosis of PJI using joint fluid IL-6 combined with PMN% presented an area under the curve of 0.983, which was more accurate than the areas under the curve for diagnosis using IL-6 and PMN% individually (0.901 and 0.914, respectively). The optimal threshold values for IL-6 and PMN% were 662.50 pg/ml and 51.09%, respectively. Their sensitivity and specificity were 96.67% and 93.33%, respectively. The accuracy of the diagnosis of PJI was 95.00%.

CONCLUSIONS

Joint fluid IL-6 combined with PMN% can be used as an auxiliary method to detect chronic infection around the prosthesis after hip/knee arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Patients who underwent hip/knee revision at the First Hospital of Chongqing Medical University for periprosthetic infection or aseptic failure of the prosthesis after hip/knee arthroplasty from January 2018 to January 2020 were included. Trial registration This study was approved by the ethics committee of the First Hospital of Chongqing Medical University on September 26, 2018 (local ethics committee number: 20187101) and registered with the China Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: ChiCTR1800020440) with an approval date of December 29, 2018.

Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Utility of Biomarkers in 2023

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare yet devastating complication following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Early and accurate diagnosis of PJI is paramount in order to maximize the chances of successful treatment. However, we are yet to identify a single "gold standard" test for the diagnosis of PJI. As a result, the diagnosis of PJI is often challenging. Currently, the 2018 ICM definition of PJI is the only validated diagnostic criteria available. This article will review the importance of serum and synovial biomarkers in the diagnosis of PJI. In addition, it will provide a brief overview of the emerging modalities for the identification of infections in this setting.

Which Combination is Best? A Comparison of the Predictive Potential of Serum Biomarker Combinations to Diagnose Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

Without a gold standard test, recent periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) literature has explored the utility of combining serological results, with promising findings. However, previous studies evaluated fewer than 200 patients and often studied only 1 to 2 test combinations. The purpose of this study was to accumulate a large single institution cohort of revision total joint arthroplasty (rTJA) patients to determine the diagnostic utility of combination serum biomarkers to identify PJI.

METHODS

A single institution longitudinal database was assessed to identify all patients who underwent rTJA from 2017 to 2020. There were 1,363 rTJA patients (715 rTKA patients and 648 rTHA patients) including 273 PJI cases (20%) analyzed. The PJI was diagnosed post-rTJA utilizing 2011 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were systematically collected for all patients.

RESULTS

The rTKA combination markers of CRP+ESR (sensitivity: 78.3%, specificity: 88.8%, positive predictive value (PPV): 70.0%, negative predictive value (NPV): 92.5%), CRP+D-dimer (sensitivity: 60.5%, specificity: 92.6%, PPV: 63.4%, NPV: 91.7%), and CRP+IL-6 (sensitivity: 38.5%, specificity: 100.0%, PPV: 100.0%, NPV: 92.9%) all yielded higher specificity than CRP alone (sensitivity: 94.4%, specificity: 75.0%, PPV: 55.5%, NPV: 97.6%). Similarly, the rTHA combination markers of CRP+ESR (sensitivity: 70.1%, specificity: 88.8%, PPV: 58.1%, NPV: 93.1%), CRP+D-dimer (sensitivity: 57.1%, specificity: 90.1%, PPV: 43.2%, NPV: 94.1%), and CRP+IL-6 (sensitivity: 21.4%, specificity: 98.4%, PPV: 60.0%, NPV: 91.7%) all yielded higher specificity than CRP alone (sensitivity: 84.7%, specificity: 77.5%, PPV: 45.4%, NPV: 95.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, in diagnosing PJI for both rTKA and rTHA, two marker combinations yielded higher specificity, while three marker combinations yielded higher sensitivity compared to CRP alone. However, compared to all two and three marker combinations, CRP demonstrated superior overall diagnostic utility. These findings suggest that routine combination testing of markers for PJI diagnosis may be excessive and an unnecessary use of resources, especially in resource-limited situations.

Emerging Technologies in Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infections

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a well-known serious complication following joint replacement surgeries and is responsible for high failure rates of implanted devices. Any delay in the diagnosis can compromise treatment success, putting a huge burden on the patients' wellness and healthcare systems. Diagnosing PJIs is quite complex as there is still no gold standard test to reach the definitive diagnosis in a timely manner. A number of laboratory tests and radiological imaging inventions have evolved in the past few years, requiring consistent updates of the available guidelines to keep up with the latest advances in the field. This article highlights the recent advances in diagnosing PJIs and discusses their validity for use in clinical practice.

Serum versus synovial fluid interleukin-6 for periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 30 diagnostic test accuracy studies

BACKGROUND

Early and accurate detection of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after hip and/or knee arthroplasty remains challenging. This systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of serum and synovial fluid interleukin (IL)-6 in detecting PJI.

METHODS

We searched 3 databases for studies through December 31, 2021, using medical sub-headings terms and keywords. Studies reported sensitivity and specificity of serum and synovial fluid IL-6 in detecting PJI were considered. We calculated the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of serum and synovial fluid IL-6.

RESULTS

Thirty studies were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, DOR, and AUC of serum IL-6 in detecting PJI were 0.76 (0.69-0.81), 0.88 (0.82-0.92), 6.2 (4.3-9.0), 0.28 (0.22-0.35), 22 (14-36), and 0.88 (0.85-0.91), respectively. However, synovial fluid IL-6 achieved a pooled sensitivity of 0.87 (0.75-0.93), specificity of 0.90 (0.85-0.93), positive and negative likelihood ratio of 8.5 (5.3-13.6) and 0.15 (0.08-0.29), DOR of 57 (21-156), and AUC of 0.94 (0.92-0.96), which were higher than serum IL-6.

CONCLUSIONS

Synovial fluid IL-6 test may be a promising test for PJI after hip and/or knee arthroplasty. However, considering the limited volume of synovial fluid and invasive acquisition of synovial fluid IL-6, serum IL-6 test may be also considered.

The Ratio of IL-6 to IL-4 in Synovial Fluid of Knee or Hip Performances a Noteworthy Diagnostic Value in Prosthetic Joint Infection

The diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is still a challenge, the ratio of interleukin-6 (IL-6) to IL-4 in the joint fluid of knee or hip was used to analyze whether the diagnostic accuracy of PJI can be improved. Between January 2017 and May 2022, 180 patients who developed pain after revision total hip or knee arthroplasty were enrolled retrospectively. 92 patients of PJI and 88 of aseptic failure were included. PJI was as defined by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS). The content of IL-6 and IL-4 in synovial fluid of knee or hip were measured, and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and IL-6/IL-4 curve were analyzed to obtain a better diagnostic effect. The area under the curve of IL-6/IL-4 in synovial fluid of knee or hip was 0.9623, which was more accurate than ESR 0.5994 and C-reactive protein 0.6720. The optimal threshold of IL-6/IL-4 ratio was 382.10. Its sensitivity and specificity were 81.32% and 98.86%, respectively. The positive predictive value for the diagnosis of PJI was 98.91%. This study showed that the level of IL-6/IL-4 in synovial fluid of knee or hip could further improve the diagnostic accuracy for PJI.

Reliable Diagnostic Tests and Thresholds for Preoperative Diagnosis of Non-Inflammatory Arthritis Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

Objective

The current diagnostic criteria for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are diverse and controversial, leading to delayed diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate and unify their diagnostic accuracy and the threshold selection of serum and synovial routine tests for PJI at an early stage.

Methods

We searched the MEDLINE and Embase databases for retrospective or prospective studies which reported preoperative‐available assays (serum, synovial, or culture tests) for the diagnosis of chronic PJI among inflammatory arthritis (IA) or non‐IA populations from January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2022. Threshold effective analysis was performed on synovial polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN%), synovial white blood cell (WBC), serum C‐reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) to find the relevant cut‐offs.

Results

Two hundred and sixteen studies and information from 45,316 individuals were included in the final analysis. Synovial laboratory‐based α‐defensin and calprotectin had the best comprehensive sensitivity (0.91 [0.86–0.94], 0.95 [0.88–0.98]) and specificity (0.96 [0.94‐0.97], 0.95 [0.89–0.98]) values. According to the threshold effect analysis, the recommended cut‐offs are 70% (sensitivity 0.89 [0.85–0.92], specificity 0.90 [0.87–0.93]), 4100/μL (sensitivity 0.90 [0.87–0.93], specificity 0.97 [0.93–0.98]), 13.5 mg/L (sensitivity 0.84 [0.78–0.89], specificity 0.83 [0.73–0.89]), and 30 mm/h (sensitivity 0.79 [0.74–0.83], specificity 0.78 [0.72–0.83]) for synovial PMN%, synovial WBC, serum CRP, and ESR, respectively, and tests seem to be more reliable among non‐IA patients.

Conclusions

The laboratory‐based synovial α‐defensin and synovial calprotectin are the two best independent preoperative diagnostic tests for PJI. A cut off of 70% for synovial PMN% and tighter cut‐offs for synovial WBC and serum CRP could have a better diagnostic accuracy for non‐IA patients with chronic PJI.

Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection: a Scoping Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this review is to provide an up to date understanding of the utility and limitations of the current tests utilized in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total knee and hip arthroplasty.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the growth in literature surrounding PJI diagnosis, there remains challenges in establishing a diagnosis of PJI. A combination of clinical, serum, and synovial tests and microbiologic and histologic examinations can yield a diagnosis in the majority of cases. Novel molecular and imaging studies may be beneficial for indeterminant cases. A number of emerging diagnostic tests have been proposed and may be incorporated into diagnostic algorithms in the future. Recently proposed stepwise diagnostic algorithms have shown high sensitivity and specificity. The diagnosis of PJI remains challenging due to a lack of tests that can definitively rule out infection. Diagnosis and investigations should occur in a stepwise fashion. There has been a plethora of new diagnostic tests introduced in attempts to improve the accuracy of diagnostic algorithms. The definition and algorithms for the diagnoses of PJI will continue to evolve as new techniques and tests are introduced.

Synovial Fluid Interleukin Levels Cannot Distinguish between Prosthetic Joint Infection and Active Rheumatoid Arthritis after Hip or Knee Arthroplasty

Inflammatory arthritis affects the level of synovial inflammatory factors, which makes it more difficult to diagnose prosthetic joint infection (PJI) patients with inflammatory arthritis. The aim of this study was to analyze synovial interleukin levels to distinguish between PJI and active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after a hip or knee arthroplasty. From September 2019 to September 2021, we prospectively enrolled patients with joint pain after arthroplasty due to aseptic prosthesis loosening (n = 39), acute RA (n = 26), and PJI (n = 37). Synovial fluid from the affected joint is obtained and tested with a standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was analyzed for each biomarker. Interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and IL-8 showed promising value in differentiating of aseptic loosening from PJI, with areas under the curves (AUCs) of 0.9590, 0.9506, and 0.9616, respectively. Synovial IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8 showed limited value in distinguishing between PJI and acute episodes of RA after arthroplasty, with AUCs of 0.7507, 0.7069, and 0.7034, respectively. Interleukins showed satisfactory efficacy in differentiating aseptic loosening from PJI. However, when pain after arthroplasty results from an acute episode of RA, current synovial interleukin levels do not accurately rule out the presence of PJI.

Synovial-Based Tests Outperform Serum Markers to Rule Out Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides successful results in most patients. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) accounts for up to 25% of failed TKAs needing revision. In clinical practice, consensus in diagnostic strategy for excluding or diagnosing PJI is still lacking. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to provide a simplified data-driven diagnostic strategy for aseptic knee and hip revision surgeons to rule out PJI in the outpatient clinic phase.

METHODS

A literature search in EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane was conducted. Studies involving the diagnosis of PJI in patients with failed TKAs and total hip arthroplasties needing revision were identified. Only studies using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria were included. Quality was assessed using MINORS criteria. Meta-analysis was performed for each diagnostic test identified in the included studies. Pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy measures were calculated using a bivariate model and plotted in summary receiver-operator characteristic curves. Positive and negative predictive values were calculated in a hypothetical sample of patients with a given disease prevalence.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria, describing a total of 2974 patients. Quality scores ranged from 13 to 19. Meta-analysis could be performed on 7 unique diagnostic tests. Highest pooled sensitivity and specificity were demonstrated for α-defensin with values of 86% and 96.6%, respectively. α-defensin and white blood cell count in synovial fluid demonstrate highest negative predictive value values.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend, in a clinical setting with low-intermediate prevalence of PJI, performing arthrocentesis and joint fluid analysis using α-defensin and/or white blood cell count before revision TKA and revision total hip arthroplasty surgery to rule out PJI.

Perivascular lymphocytic aggregates in hip prosthesis-associated adverse local tissue reactions demonstrate Th1 and Th2 activity and exhausted CD8+ cell responses

Hip implants are a successful solution for osteoarthritis; however, some individuals with metal-on-metal (MoM) and metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) prosthetics develop adverse local tissue reactions (ALTRs). While MoM and MoP ALTRs are presumed to be delayed hypersensitivity reactions to corrosion products, MoM- and MoP-associated ALTRs present with different histological characteristics. We compared MoM- and MoP-associated ALTRs histopathology with cobalt and chromium levels in serum and synovial fluid. We analyzed the gene expression levels of leukocyte aggregates and synovial fluid chemokines/cytokines to resolve potential pathophysiologic differences. In addition, we classified ALTRs from 79 patients according to their leukocyte infiltrates as macrophage-dominant, mixed, and lymphocyte-dominant. Immune-related transcript profiles from lymphocyte-dominant MoM- and MoP-associated ALTR patients with perivascular lymphocytic aggregates were similar. Cell signatures indicated predominantly macrophage, Th1 and Th2 lymphocytic infiltrate, with strong exhausted CD8⁺ signature, and low Th17 and B cell, relative to healthy lymph nodes. Lymphocyte-dominant ALTR-associated synovial fluid contained higher levels of induced protein 10 (IP-10), interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RN), IL-8, IL-6, IL-16, macrophage inflammatory protein 1 (MIP-1α), IL-18, MCP-2, and lower cell-attracting chemokine levels, when compared with prosthetic revisions lacking ALTRs. In addition, the higher levels of IP-10, IL-8, IL-6, MIP-1α, and MCP-2 were observed within the synovial fluid of the lymphocyte-dominant ALTRs relative to the macrophage-dominant ALTRs. Not all cytokines/chemokines were detected in the perivascular aggregate transcripts, suggesting the existence of other sources in the affected synovia. Our results support the hypothesis of common hypersensitivity pathogenesis in lymphocyte-dominant MoM and MoP ALTRs. The exhausted lymphocyte signature indicates chronic processes and an impaired immune response, although the cause of the persistent T-cell activation remains unclear. The cytokine/chemokine signature of lymphocyte-dominant-associated ATLRs may be of utility for diagnosing this more aggressive pathogenesis.

Application of ica D, eno, sar A and agr gene testing in early diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

Objective This study intends to explore the diagnostic efficiency and value of PCR in the early diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) based on the testing of the four staphylococcal specific genes ica D, eno, sar A and agr. Methods 41 samples of ultrasonic cleavage RNA eluate were extracted from the human joint model of PJI caused by the five most common PJI pathogens to detect the PCR of ica D, eno, sar A and agr genes. Based on the detection results, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and accuracy of the four genes were analyzed and compared. Results eno test had a high sensitivity (83.33%). However, more false positive results affected the test specificity (47.06%); sar A test did not show false positive results, but the specificity was high (100%), but the sensitivity was low (41.67%); the sensitivity of ica D and agr test was 4.17% and 0%, respectively, and the clinical value was limited. Conclusion eno and sar A gene detection is of high value in early diagnosis of PJI. Reasonable design and sequential application of eno sensitivity preliminary diagnosis and sar A specific screening of false positive results are more beneficial to the early diagnosis of staphylococcal pathogenic PJI.

Serum Inflammatory Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections

Accurate preoperative diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) can be very challenging, especially in patients with chronic PJI caused by low-virulence microorganisms. Serum parameters, such as serum C-reactive protein (CRP) or the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), are—among other diagnostic test methods—widely used to distinguish septic from aseptic failure after total hip or knee arthroplasty and are recommended by the AAOS in the preoperative setting. However, they are systemic parameters, and therefore, unspecific. Nevertheless, they may be the first and occasionally the only preoperative indication, especially when clinical symptoms are lacking. They are easy to obtain, cheap, and are available worldwide. In the last decade, different novel serum biomarkers (percentage of neutrophils, neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio, platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio, fibrinogen, D-Dimer, Il-6, PCT) were investigated to find a more specific and accurate serum parameter in the diagnosis of PJI. This article reviews the diagnostic value of established (serum CRP, ESR, WBC) and ‘novel’ serum inflammatory biomarkers (fibrinogen, D-dimer, interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin, percentage of neutrophils (%N), neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio (NLR), platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio (PC/mPV)) for the preoperative diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections.

Cobalt ions induce metabolic stress in synovial fibroblasts and secretion of cytokines/chemokines that may be diagnostic markers for adverse local tissue reactions to hip implants

Adverse local tissue reactions (ALTRs) are a prominent cause of hip implant failure. ALTRs are characterized by aseptic necrosis and leukocyte infiltration of synovial tissue. The prevalence of ALTRs in hips with failing metal implants, with highest rates occurring in patients with metal-on-metal articulations, suggests a role for CoCrMo corrosion in ALTR formation. Although hypersensitivity reactions are the most accepted etiology, the precise cellular mechanism driving ALTR pathogenesis remains enigmatic. Here we show that cobalt ions released by failing hip implants induce mitochondrial stress and cytokine secretion by synovial fibroblasts: the presumptive initiators of ALTR pathogenesis. We found that in-vitro treatment of synovial fibroblasts with cobalt, but not chromium, generated gene expression changes indicative of hypoxia and mitophagy responses also observed in ALTRs biopsies. Inflammatory factors secreted by cobalt-exposed synovial fibroblasts were among those most concentrated in ALTR synovial fluid. Furthermore, both conditioned media from cobalt-exposed synovial fibroblasts, and synovial fluid from ALTRs patients, elicit endothelial activation and monocyte migration. Finally, we identify the IL16/CTACK ratio in synovial fluid as a possible diagnostic marker of ALTRs. Our results provide evidence suggesting that metal ions induce cell stress in synovial fibroblasts that promote an inflammatory response consistent with initiating ALTR formation. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: We demonstrate that the cytotoxic effects of cobalt ions on the synovial cells (fibroblast) is sufficient to trigger inflammation on hip joints with metal implants. Cobalt ions affect mitochondrial function, leading to the auto phagocytosis of mitochondria and trigger a hypoxic response. The cell's hypoxic response includes secretion of cytokines that are capable of trigger inflammation by activating blood vessels and enhancing leukocyte migration. Among the secreted cytokines is IL-16, which is highly concentrated in the synovial fluid of the patients with adverse local tissue reactions and could be use as diagnostic marker. In conclusion we define the cells of the hip joint as key players in triggering the adverse reactions to hip implants and providing biomarkers for early diagnosis of adverse reactions to hip implants.

Serum and Synovial Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Implant-Associated Infection After Orthopedic Surgery

Implant-associated infection is one of the most devastating complications following orthopedic surgery. Early identification is crucial for treatment. Currently, however, a reliable diagnostic tool is lacking, partly due to disparate bacteria colonies (virulent vs non-virulent), difficulty in distinguishing infection from inflammatory disease, and highly diverse diagnostic thresholds and testing methods. Given the importance of biomarkers in the initial screening for the infection, an extensive effort has been made to develop serum and synovial biomarkers. In this review, the authors summarize the results from the most relevant studies to provide comprehensive information on biomarkers for the diagnosis of implant-associated infection. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(2):e158-e166.].

The diagnostic effect of α-defensin, D-dimer, and IL-6 in periprosthetic joint infection: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most common complication after artificial joint replacement as previously reported. However, the main problem at present is its difficulty in diagnosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of α-defensin, D-dimer, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in clinical practice.

METHOD

Online databases were systematically searched until June 18th, 2020 with keywords and medical sub-headings terms. Studies mentioned the sensitivity and specificity of biological markers in detecting PJI were included in our study. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were obtained after integration.

RESULTS

A total of 34 studies with 1036 patients diagnosing as PJI were included for comparing α-defensin, D-dimer, and IL-6. The sensitivity and specificity of α-defensin for PJI were 0.88 and 0.96, and the DOR was 189 (95% CI 72-496), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of D-dimer (0.82 and 0.72) and IL-6 (0.80 and 0.89) were lower than α-defensin.

CONCLUSION

The detection of α-defensin is a promising biomarker for diagnosing PJI. The optional cut-off needs to be curtained when using other biomarkers.

Synovial Alpha-defensin at Reimplantation in Two-stage Revision Arthroplasty to Rule Out Persistent Infection

BACKGROUND/AIM

Owing to the lack of a diagnostic gold standard, ruling out persistent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) before second-stage surgery in the setting of two-stage revision arthroplasty constitutes a major challenge. We evaluated if the alpha-defensin-1 (AD-1) test could predict successful infection eradication before reimplantation of a new prosthesis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our prospective study included 20 patients who underwent two-stage revision arthroplasty for treatment of PJI. A standard quantitative enzyme AD-1 immunoassay of synovial fluid, the synovial leukocyte esterase test and routine laboratory blood testing were performed prior to explantation and reimplantation. Treatment failure was defined according to the Delphi-based consensus criteria after a minimum follow-up of 1 year.

RESULTS

A 15% of our patients met the Delphi Criteria within 1 year. None of the markers investigated were significantly different in patients with and without reinfection.

CONCLUSION

Further research is necessary to identify biomarkers more suitable for indicating persistent infection before reimplantation.

The Expanding Role of Biomarkers in Diagnosing Infection in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Review of Current Literature

Consistent diagnosis of periprosthetic infection in total joint arthroplasty continues to elude the orthopedic surgeon because no gold standard test exists. Therefore clinicians must rely on a combination of tests to help aid the diagnosis. The expanding role of biomarkers has shown promising results to more accurately diagnose an infection when combined with clinical suspicion and bacterial culture testing. This paper reviews the diagnostic capabilities of the most current serum and synovial biomarkers as well as next generation sequencing in the setting of periprosthetic joint infection. Future research and high-powered studies will be necessary to determine sensitivity and specificity of each biomarker.

Current Guideline for Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Review Article

The nature of implant-related infections is complex. Currently, there is no definitive test for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and diagnosis remains challenging despite recent developments. Failure to diagnose and investigate pathologies of the hip appropriately results in delayed management and prolonged patient morbidity. A systematic approach to establishing clear diagnostic criteria for PJI is needed to improve our ability to avoid devastating outcomes associated with these infections. In the current review, we describe an algorithmic approach to the diagnosis of PJI and current controversies surrounding novel diagnostic methods.

Diagnostic algorithm in septic total knee arthroplasty failure - What is evidence-based?

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is among the most common differential diagnoses of total knee arthroplasty failure. It is a challenging complication, not least because of the difficulty of establishing the correct diagnosis. The fact that no single diagnostic parameter or test has been identified that can accurately rule in or out PJI has led to an evolution of similar but competing definitions of PJI on the grounds of an array of criteria. This development has had very positive effects on the scientific evaluation of various methods of PJI diagnostics and treatment because of an increased comparability. However, it can be challenging to stay abreast of the evidence these definitions are based on. Also, the definitions alone do not necessarily entail an algorithm to aid in evaluating the right criteria in a sound order to be able to use the definitions as a sensible tool. The aim of this overview is to state the most recent evidence on the diagnostic parameters included in the most established PJI definitions and to exhibit and compare the few algorithmic approaches published. Clinical symptoms of PJI are very rarely reported on in the literature, hence the evidence on their diagnostic value is poor. The only symptom that is part of the established PJI definitions is the presence of a fistula. Concerning serological markers, CRP and ESR are still the common denominator in the literature, most recently accompanied by D-Dimer as a potentially suitable marker that has been included in the most recent update of the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria. Imaging plays a minor role in the diagnostic cascade because of inconsistent evidence, and no role whatsoever in the established definitions. The most important preoperative diagnostic measure is arthrocentesis and cultural and cytological analysis of the synovial fluid. The much acclaimed α-Defensin test has so far not been included in the established criteria due to inconsistent reports on its diagnostic accuracy, it is, however, in wide use and considered an optional diagnostic tool for inconclusive cases. The most diagnostic accuracy lies in the cultural and histological analysis of periprosthetic tissue biopsies, whether they are gathered in a small procedure or during arthroplasty revision. Published algorithmic approaches to PJI diagnosis are much rarer than the well-established definitions by various associations. With their PJI definition, the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) published a consensus based flowchart for PJI diagnosis. Another algorithm was proposed as part of the endeavor of the MSIS and the first consensus meeting, also based on a consensus among experts. There have been two more recent publications of flowcharts based on the current evidence, one introduced at our institution in 2013, one established in 2020 by the German Society for Arthroplasty (AE).

Intraoperative periarticular injection can alleviate the inflammatory response and enhance joint function recovery after hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with osteoporotic femoral neck fractures

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the potential beneficial effects of periarticular injection (PAI) of multimodal drugs on the inflammatory response and joint function after hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with osteoporotic femoral neck fractures.

METHODS

Fifty six elderly patients with unilateral osteoporotic femoral neck fractures were randomly allocated to 2 groups: the PAI group, which received the multimodal drug PAI intraoperatively before incision closure, and the control group, which received an injection of saline at the same time as placebo. The C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and IL-6 levels as well as the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in peripheral venous blood samples were measured, along with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score with activity and Harris hip score preoperation at 1, 2, 4, 7, and 14 days as well as 1 and 3 months post-operation.

RESULTS

The 2 groups were comparable in sex and age, and no significant differences were observed in the preoperative CRP, IL-1β, and IL-6 levels, ESR, VAS score, or Harris hip score between the 2 groups (all P > .05). However, during the postoperative period, the PAI group exhibited significantly lower levels of CRP, IL-1β, and IL-6 as well as a lower ERS and VAS score compared with the control group (P < .05), while the Harris hip score was significantly higher postoperatively in the PAI group (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Multimodal drug PAI can alleviate the inflammatory response and enhance hip function recovery after hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with osteoporotic femoral neck fractures.

Soluble Pecam-1 as a Biomarker in Periprosthetic Joint Infection

A reliable workup with regard to a single diagnostic marker indicating periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with sufficient sensitivity and specificity is still missing. The immunologically reactive molecule Pecam-1 is shed from the T-cell surface upon activation via proinflammatory signaling, e.g., triggered by specific pathogens. We hypothesized that soluble Pecam-1 (sPecam-1) can hence function as a biomarker of PJI. Fifty-eight patients were prospectively enrolled and assigned to one of the respective treatment groups (native knees prior to surgery, aseptic, and septic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revision surgeries). Via synovial sample acquisition and ELISA testing, a database on local sPecam-1 levels was established. We observed a significantly larger quantity of sPecam-1 in septic (n = 22) compared to aseptic TKA revision surgeries (n = 20, p ≤ 0.001). Furthermore, a significantly larger amount of sPecam-1 was found in septic and aseptic revisions compared to native joints (n = 16, p ≤ 0.001). Benchmarking it to the gold standard showed a high predictive power for the detection of PJI. Local sPecam-1 levels correlated to the infection status of the implant, and thus bear a strong potential to act as a biomarker of PJI. While a clear role of sPecam-1 in infection could be demonstrated, the underlying mechanism of the molecule’s natural function needs to be further unraveled.

Are Cement Spacers and Beads Loaded with the Correct Antibiotic(s) at the Site of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections?

The optimal impregnation of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in the treatment of periprosthetic hip and knee joint infection is unknown. It is also unclear, whether a suboptimal impregnation might be associated with a higher persistence of infection. A total of 93 patients (44 knee, 49 hip) were retrospectively evaluated, and the most common organism was a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, followed by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Of all the organisms, 37.1% were resistant against gentamicin and 54.2% against clindamycin. All organisms were susceptible against vancomycin. In 41 cases, gentamicin-loaded beads were inserted and in 52 cases, spacers: (2 loaded only with gentamicin, 18 with gentamicin + vancomycin, 19 with gentamicin + clindamycin, and 13 with gentamicin + vancomycin + clindamycin). The analysis of each antibiotic impregnation showed that complete susceptibility was present in 38.7% of the cases and partial susceptibility in 28%. In the remaining 33.3%, no precise statement can be made because either there was a culture-negative infection or the antibiotic(s) were not tested against the specific organism. At a mean follow-up of 27.9 months, treatment failure was observed in 6.7% of the cases. Independent of which antibiotic impregnation was used, when the organism was susceptible against the locally inserted antibiotics or not tested, reinfection or persistence of infection was observed in the great majority of cases. Future studies about the investigation of the optimal impregnation of antibiotic-loaded bone cement are welcome.

Wear of hip prostheses increases serum IGFBP-1 levels in patients with aseptic loosening

The biological mechanisms involved in aseptic loosening include inflammation-associated and bone resorption-associated processes. Coordinated cellular actions result in biochemical imbalances with devastating consequences for the joint. Given that this condition is not known for showing systemic signs, we investigated whether circulating levels of inflammation-related proteins are altered in patients with aseptic loosening. Our study included 37 patients who underwent revision surgery due to hip osteolysis and aseptic loosening and 31 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty. Using antibody arrays, we evaluated the serum levels of 320 proteins in four patients from each group. The results showed differences in insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1) concentrations, which we then quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests in all study patients. The results confirmed that serum IGFBP-1 concentrations were higher in the revision surgery patients than in the hip arthroplasty patients. In vitro studies showed that exposure of human osteoblasts to titanium particles induced an IGFBP-1 release that further increased when exposure to particles was performed in media conditioned by human M1 macrophages. These findings suggest that elevated serum IGFBP-1 levels in patients with aseptic loosening can arise from increased local IGFBP-1 production in the inflammatory environment of the periprosthetic bed.

Synovial fluid interleukin-6 is not superior to cell count and differential in the detection of periprosthetic joint infection

Aims

Synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count and percentage of polymorphonuclear cells (%PMN) are elevated at periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Leucocytes produce different interleukins (IL), including IL-6, so we hypothesized that synovial fluid IL-6 could be a more accurate predictor of PJI than synovial fluid WBC count and %PMN. The main aim of our study was to compare the predictive performance of all three diagnostic tests in the detection of PJI.

Methods

Patients undergoing total hip or knee revision surgery were included. In the perioperative assessment phase, synovial fluid WBC count, %PMN, and IL-6 concentration were measured. Patients were labeled as positive or negative according to the predefined cut-off values for IL-6 and WBC count with %PMN. Intraoperative samples for microbiological and histopathological analysis were obtained. PJI was defined as the presence of sinus tract, inflammation in histopathological samples, and growth of the same microorganism in a minimum of two or more samples out of at least four taken.

Results

In total, 49 joints in 48 patients (mean age 68 years (SD 10; 26 females (54%), 25 knees (51%)) were included. Of these 11 joints (22%) were infected. The synovial fluid WBC count and %PMN predicted PJI with sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of 82%, 97%, 94%, 90%, and 95%, respectively. Synovial fluid IL-6 predicted PJI with sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of 73%, 95%, 90%, 80%, and 92%, respectively. A comparison of predictive performance indicated a strong agreement between tests.

Conclusions

Synovial fluid IL-6 is not superior to synovial fluid WBC count and %PMN in detecting PJI.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2020;1-12:737–742.

The management of infected shoulder arthroplasty by two-stage revision

BACKGROUND

There remains no gold standard management for deep shoulder periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This case series aims to present our experience of two-stage revision arthroplasty, including eradication of infection and reoperation rates.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing revision arthroplasty for shoulder PJI between 2006 and 2015. Cases were confirmed using Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidelines. TSA removal, debridement and irrigation preceded antibiotic-loaded cement spacer insertion and a minimum of six weeks intravenous antibiotics. Reimplantation was performed as a second stage following a negative aspirate.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients underwent a first stage procedure (mean age 69 years; 16 male, 12 female). Propionibacterium acnes, Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and Staphylococcus epidermidis were the commonest microorganisms cultured. Five cases had mixed growths and six cases provided no growth. Three patients did not proceed to a second stage. Twenty-five patients underwent reimplantation (mean interval 6.7 months), with 80% remaining infection-free (mean follow-up 38.3 months).

DISCUSSION

Managing complex and late presentation shoulder PJI with two-stage revision is associated with high rates of infection eradication (80%). In the absence of a management consensus, our experience supports two-stage revision arthroplasty for eradicating infection in this complex patient group.

Analysis of synovial biomarkers with a multiplex protein microarray in patients with PJI undergoing revision arthroplasty of the hip or knee joint

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosing a (low-grade) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after hip or knee arthroplasty remains a diagnostic challenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of using a novel multiplex protein microarray system for synovial biomarkers in determining PJI in patients undergoing revision knee or hip arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The individual synovial fluid levels of 12 cytokines (IL-1b, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17, GM-CSF, TNF-α, and INF-γ) were analysed with a novel multiplex protein microarray system in 32 patients undergoing revision hip (n = 22) or knee (n = 10) arthroplasty. Cases were classified into septic and aseptic groups on basis of pre- and interoperative findings: [PJI (n = 14) vs. non-PJI (n = 18)]. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to assess the discriminatory strength of the individual parameters. A multiple regression model was used to determine the utility of using a combination of the tested cytokines to determine the infection status.

RESULTS

The levels of all of the evaluated cytokines were significantly elevated in the PJI-group. Best sensitivity and specificity were found for IL-6, followed by IL-1b, IL-10, and IL-17. The multiple regression models revealed a combination of IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL6, lL-12, and GM-CSF to be associated with the best sensitivity (100%) and specificity (88.9%) for a cut-off value of 0.41, with a likelihood ratio of 9.0.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of individual synovial fluid cytokine levels showed both high sensitivity and high specificity in diagnosing PJI. A combined model using several cytokines showed even higher sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing PJI and could thus be a useful predictive tool to determine the probability of PJI in patients with a painful prosthesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic IV.

Predictive values of the postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio for the diagnosis of early periprosthetic joint infections: a preliminary study

Background

Several studies have been conducted to report diagnostic values of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in the many diseases, such as oncological, inflammatory, and some infectious diseases. However, the predictive value of these laboratory parameters for early periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) has not yet been reported. The aim of this study was to determine predictive values of the postoperative NLR, PLR, and LMR for the diagnosis of PJIs.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 104 patients (26 early PJI cases and 78 non-PJI cases) who underwent total joint arthroplasty were enrolled in this study. All the patients were then categorized into two groups: PJI group, patients with the diagnosis of PJI (26 patients; 14 males, 12 females; mean age = 65.47 ± 10.23 age range = 51–81 ) and non-PJI group, patients without PJI (78 patients; 40 males, 38 females; mean age = 62.15 ± 9.33, age range = 41–92). We defined “suspected time” as the time that any abnormal symptoms or signs occurred, including fever, local swelling, or redness around the surgical site between 2 and 4 weeks after surgery and before the diagnosis. Suspected time and laboratory parameters, including NLR, PLR, LMR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP), were compared between both groups. The trends of postoperative NLR, LMR, PLR, CRP, and ESR were also reviewed. The predictive ability of these parameters at the suspected time for early PJI was evaluated by multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

NLR, PLR, and LMR returned to preoperative levels within 2 weeks after surgery in the two groups. In the PJI group, NLR and PLR were significantly increased during the incubation period of infection or infection, and LMR was significantly reduced, although 61.5% (16/26) of the patients had normal white blood cells. Interestingly, ESR and CRP were still relatively high 2 weeks after surgery and were not different between the two groups before infection started (p = 0.12 and 0.4, respectively). NLR and PLR were significantly correlated with early PJI (Odds ratios for NLR and PLR = 88.36 and 1.12, respectively; p values for NLR and PLR = 0.005 and 0.01, respectively). NLR had great predictive ability for the diagnosis of early PJI, with a cut-off value of 2.77 (sensitivity = 84.6%, specificity = 89.7%, 95% CI = 0.86–0.97).

Conclusions

ESR and CRP seem not to be sensitive for the diagnosis of early PJI due to their persistently high levels after arthroplasty. The postoperative NLR at the suspected time may have a great ability to predict early PJI.

Inferior performance of established and novel serum inflammatory markers in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections

Purpose

Besides other diagnostic test methods, established serum inflammatory markers such as serum C-reactive protein or leukocyte count are widely used preoperatively to aid in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). Although low accuracies were reported, these parameters are easily accessible and routinely available. Novel biomarkers with promising results in diagnosing PJI (platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio) or other infectious conditions (percentage of neutrophils, neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio) were described. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of established and novel serum inflammatory biomarkers for the diagnosis of PJI so as to compare the results to find the serum inflammatory marker with the best performance.

Methods

In 177 patients with a previous total hip (n = 91) or knee (n = 86) arthroplasty and indicated revision surgery, the diagnostic value of the routinely available serum inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), percentage of neutrophils (%N), neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio (NLR), fibrinogen and platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio (PC/mPV) were examined retrospectively via receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (AUC). The curves were compared using the z-test.

Results

Sensitivities of serum CRP, WBC, %N, NLR, fibrinogen and PC/mPV were calculated with 68%, 36%, 66%, 63%, 69% and 43%, respectively. Specificities were 87%, 89%, 67%, 73%, 89% and 81%, respectively. Serum CRP (0.78) and fibrinogen (0.79) showed significantly better AUCs compared with serum WBC (0.63), %N (0.67), NLR (0.68) and PC/mPV (0.62) (p < 0.0001). Patients with PJI caused by a low-virulent microorganism (median CRP: 17.6 mg/L) obtained lower CRP levels compared with infections caused by high-virulent microorganisms (median CRP: 49.2 mg/L; p = 0.044). The combination of CRP and fibrinogen showed a better sensitivity (77%) with similar specificity (83%) than one method alone but not at a significant level (CRP (p = 0.200); fibrinogen (p = 0.437)).

Conclusion

Serum CRP and fibrinogen showed the best accuracies among these widely available serum inflammatory parameters. However, due to the insufficient performance, these biomarkers can only be recommended as suggestive criteria in diagnosing PJI. The preoperative workup should always be complemented by more specific tests such as synovial fluid analysis.

Combination Tests in the Diagnosis of Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Systematic Review and Development of a Stepwise Clinical Decision-Making Tool

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to identify combination tests used to diagnose chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and develop a stepwise decision-making tool to facilitate diagnosis.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of existing combinations of serum, synovial, and tissue-based tests for diagnosing chronic PJI after hip or knee replacement. This work is an extension of our systematic review of single tests, from which we chose eligible studies that also described the diagnostic performance of combination tests.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven eligible articles described the performance of 56 combination tests, of which 8 combinations had at least 2 studies informing both sensitivity and specificity. We also identified 5 types of combination tests: (1) a type-I Boolean combination, which uses Boolean logic (AND, OR) and usually increases specificity at the cost of sensitivity; (2) a type-II Boolean combination, which usually increases sensitivity at the cost of specificity; (3) a triage-conditional rule, in which the value of 1 test serves to triage the use of another test; (4) an arithmetic operation on the values of 2 tests; and (5) a model-based prediction rule based on a fitted model applied to biomarker values.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians can initiate their diagnostic process with a type-II Boolean combination of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). False negatives of the combination can be minimized when the threshold is chosen to reach 90% to 95% sensitivity for each test. Once a joint infection is suspected on the basis of serum testing, joint aspiration should be performed. If joint aspiration yields a wet tap, a leukocyte esterase (LER) strip is highly recommended for point-of-care testing, with a reading of ++ or greater indicating PJI; a reading below ++ should be followed by one of the laboratory-based synovial tests. If joint aspiration yields a dry tap, clinicians should rely on preoperative tissue culture and histological analysis for diagnosis. Combinations based on triage-conditional, arithmetic, and model-based prediction rules require further research.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Improved diagnosis of chronic hip and knee prosthetic joint infection using combined serum and synovial IL-6 tests

Aims

This study aimed to explore whether serum combined with synovial interleukin-6 (IL-6) measurement can improve the accuracy of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis, and to establish the cut-off values of IL-6 in serum and synovial fluid in detecting chronic PJI.

Methods

Patients scheduled to have a revision surgery for indications of chronic infection of knee and hip arthroplasties or aseptic loosening of an implant were prospectively screened before being enrolled into this study. The Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) definition of PJI was used for the classification of cases as aseptic or infected. Serum CRP, ESR, IL-6, and percentage of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN%) and IL-6 in synovial fluid were analyzed. Statistical tests were performed to compare these biomarkers in the two groups, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) were analyzed for each biomarker.

Results

A total of 93 patients were enrolled. There was no difference in demographic data between both groups. Synovial fluid IL-6, with a threshold of 1,855.36 pg/ml, demonstrated a mean sensitivity of 94.59% (95% confidence interval (CI) 81.8% to 99.3%) and a mean specificity of 92.86% (95% CI 82.7 to 98.0) for detecting chronic PJI. Then 6.7 pg/ml was determined to be the optimal threshold value of serum IL-6 for the diagnosis of chronic PJI, with a mean sensitivity of 97.30% (95% CI 85.8% to 99.9%) and a mean specificity of 76.79% (95% CI 63.6% to 87.0%). The combination of synovial IL-6 and serum IL-6 led to improved accuracy of 96.77% in diagnosing chronic PJI.

Conclusion

The present study identified that a combination of IL-6 in serum and synovial IL-6 has the potential for further improvement of the diagnosis of PJI.Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(9):587-592.

High-Dimensional Analysis of Immune Cell Composition Predicts Periprosthetic Joint Infections and Dissects Its Pathophysiology

Accurate diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) is one of the most widely researched areas in modern orthopedic endoprosthesis. However, our understanding of the immunological basis of this severe complication is still limited. In this study, we developed a flow cytometric approach to precisely characterize the immune cell composition in periprosthetic joints. Using high-dimensional multi-parametric data, we defined, for the first time, the local immune cell populations of artificial joints. We identified significant differences in the cellular distribution between infected and non-infected samples, and revealed that myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) act as potential regulators of infiltrating immune cells in PJI. Further, we developed an algorithm to predict septic and aseptic samples with high sensitivity and specificity, that may serve as an indispensable addition to the current criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. This study describes a novel approach to flow cytometrically analyze the immune cell infiltrate of joint fluid that not only improves our understanding of the pathophysiology of PJI, but also enables the development of a novel screening tool to predict infection status. Our data further suggest that pharmacological targeting of MDSCs represents a novel strategy for addressing PJI.

Mildly decreased preoperative bilirubin levels are associated with infections after shoulder and knee arthroplasty

Increasing numbers of arthroplasties are also accompanied by postoperative infections. The main purpose was to evaluate preoperative serum bilirubin levels between patients with and without infections after shoulder and knee arthroplasties. For this retrospective case-control single-center study, a total of 108 patients were extracted from a prospectively collected database. Eighteen patients with infections after shoulder (n = 8) and knee (n = 10) arthroplasty were matched by age, gender, and implant type in a 1:5-scenario to 90 patients (40 shoulders and 50 knees) without postoperative infection. Demographic data, preoperative blood parameters, and postoperative infection-related outcomes were evaluated. Total bilirubin was the only preoperative parameter significantly different between the infection (8.21 ± 3.25 μmol/L or 0.48 ± 0.19 mg/dL) and noninfection (10.78 ± 4.62 μmol/L or 0.63 ± 0.27 mg/dL; P = .014) group, while C-reactive protein and other liver parameters were similar between the groups. Significantly more controls (92.1%) had preoperative bilirubin levels above 8.72 μmol/L or 0.51 mg/dL than cases (7.9%; P = .007). The 5-year infection survival-rate was 65.6% for patients with preoperative bilirubin levels < 8.72 μmol/L or < 0.51 mg/dL and 91.2% with ≥ 8.72 μmol/L or ≥ 0.51 mg/dL. Mildly decreased preoperative bilirubin levels with a cutoff at 8.72 μmol/L or 0.51 mg/dL were significantly associated to patients with infections after shoulder and knee arthroplasty. There were no differences in other blood parameters or comorbidities between patients with infections and their matched-controls.

Serum Fibrinogen Test Performs Well for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

Serum fibrinogen (FIB) is an acute-phase glycoprotein in the infection response that may stop excessive bleeding. The purposes of this study are to determine the value of FIB that can be used to differentiate between periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and aseptic loosening of the prosthesis, and to determine the clinical significance of FIB for analyzing infection outcomes after first-stage surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 90 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty revision from January 2015 to August 2019. PJI was confirmed in 53 patients (group A), and the other 37 patients were diagnosed with aseptic loosening of the prosthesis (group B). Only 21 patients in group A documented the results for serum FIB, C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) after spacer insertion, so the postoperative serological marker levels of the these patients were also assessed.

RESULTS

The FIB, CRP, and ESR levels were significantly higher in group A than in group B (P < .001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was highest for FIB at 0.928. Analyses of FIB levels revealed a sensitivity of 79.25% and a specificity of 94.59%. FIB levels were significantly lower in patients with PJI after spacer insertion (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

FIB is an adequate test to aid in diagnosing PJI, and it is not inferior to CRP and ESR in distinguishing between PJI and aseptic loosening of the prosthesis. It is an especially useful tool in assessing infection outcomes after first-stage surgery.

Orthopaedic Surgery Elicits a Systemic Anti-Inflammatory Signature

Little information is available on the functional activity of leukocytes after arthroplasty or the expansion of populations with immune suppressive properties during the acute post-operative period. Synovial fluid and matched pre- and post-surgical blood samples were collected from total hip and knee arthroplasty patients (THA and TKA, respectively) to examine the impact of surgery on peripheral blood leukocyte frequency, bactericidal activity, and inflammatory mediator expression. For spinal surgeries, inflammatory mediator production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) pre- and post-surgery was examined. An expansion of immune suppressive granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (G-MDSCs) was observed following arthroplasty, which correlated with significantly increased serum interleukin-10 (IL-10) levels. Analysis of synovial fluid from THA and TKAs revealed reduced granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) and increased interleukin-6 (IL-6), monocyte chemoattractant protein 2 (CCL2) and Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (Flt-3L) compared to pre- and post-surgical serum. For the spinal surgery cohort, stimulation of PBMCs isolated post-surgery with bacterial antigens produced significantly less pro-inflammatory (IL-1α, IL-1β, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA), IL-12p40, growth-related oncogene-α/GRO-α (CXCL1) and 6Ckine (CCL21)) and more anti-inflammatory/tissue repair mediators (IL-10, G-CSF and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)) compared to PBMCs recovered before surgery. The observed bias towards systemic anti-inflammatory changes without concomitant increases in pro-inflammatory responses may influence susceptibility to infection following orthopaedic surgery in the context of underlying co-morbidities or risk factors.

New developments and future challenges in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of prosthetic joint infection

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication that results in substantial costs to society and patient morbidity. Advancements in our knowledge of this condition have focused on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, in order to reduce rates of PJI and improve patient outcomes. Preventive measures such as optimization of patient comorbidities, and perioperative antibiotic usage are intensive areas of current clinical research to reduce the rate of PJI. Improved diagnostic tests such as synovial fluid (SF) α-defensin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and nucleic acid-based tests for serum, SF, and tissue cultures, have improved diagnostic accuracy and organism identification. Increasing the diversity of available antibiotic therapy, immunotherapy, and alternative implant coatings remain promising treatments to improve infection eradication in the setting of PJI.

Alpha-Defensin-1 in Synovial Fluid is Useful for Diagnosis of Joint Infection

The distinction between bacterial infectious and noninfectious arthritis is typically challenging in the early stages; however, it is critical for treatment decision making. Here, we investigated the diagnostic relevance of alpha- and beta-defensin levels in serum and synovial fluid as biomarkers of joint infection in patients presenting with fever and arthritis. The study included 12 patients who presented with fever (≥37°C) and arthritis (pain in the knee or hip joint). The diagnostic criteria for periprosthetic joint infection proposed by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society were used to detect joint infection and categorize the patients into infection and non-infection groups. Alpha-defensin-1 and beta-defensin-3 levels in serum and synovial fluid were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. No significant between-group difference was observed with respect to serum alpha-defensin-1 levels; however, synovial fluid alpha-defensin-1 levels were significantly higher in the infection group (33.6 ± 26.2 ng/ml) than in the non-infection group (0.9 ± 0.4 ng/ml). No significant between-group differences were observed with respect to serum or synovial fluid beta-defensin-3 levels. Furthermore, synovial fluid alpha-defensin-1 levels were increased in patients without prosthesis in the infection group. In conclusion, in patients with fever and arthritis, synovial fluid alpha-defensin-1 levels were significantly higher in patients with infectious arthritis than in those with noninfectious arthritis. Therefore, synovial fluid alpha-defensin-1 levels is a useful diagnostic marker for joint infection.