1
|
Chan JKN, Lee KCK, Correll CU, So YK, Chan CY, Wong CSM, Cheung KW, Seto MTY, Lin J, Chang WC. Adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes associated with maternal schizophrenia-spectrum disorders and prenatal antipsychotic use: a meta-analysis of 37,214,330 pregnancy deliveries and propensity-score weighted population-based cohort study assessing confounder dependency of risk estimates. Mol Psychiatry 2024:10.1038/s41380-024-02723-1. [PMID: 39223277 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-024-02723-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Revised: 08/19/2024] [Accepted: 08/23/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Studies demonstrated increased obstetric and neonatal complications in women with schizophrenia-spectrum disorder (SSD), but most inadequately addressed confounders and rarely considered antipsychotic effects. We conducted a meta-analysis and a population-based cohort study evaluating associations of adverse obstetric/neonatal outcomes with SSD and prenatal antipsychotic use. In the meta-analysis, we searched four databases from inception to October-31-2023 and generated pooled risk estimates using random-effect models. In the cohort study, we identified women aged 15-50 years with SSD-diagnosis from electronic-heath-record database of public healthcare-services who delivered first/singleton children between 2003 and 2018 in Hong Kong. Propensity-score weighted regression-analyses incorporating important confounders including maternal pre-existing and gestational morbidities, substance/alcohol abuse, and psychotropic use, were performed to assess risk of adverse obstetric/neonatal outcomes in SSD-women versus non-SSD-women, and subsequently treated-SSD and untreated-SSD subgroups to disentangle effects of SSD from antipsychotic exposure. The meta-analysis (studies = 18, women = 37,214,330, including 42,926 SSD-women) found significant associations of SSD with 12 of 17 analyzed negative obstetric/neonatal outcomes (with pooled relative risk ranged:1.12-2.10), including placental complications, induced labor, Caesarean delivery, fetal distress, stillbirth, preterm birth, small-for-gestational-age, low birth weight, low APGAR scores, neonatal and post-neonatal deaths. However, the cohort study (466,358 women, including 804 SSD-women) revealed that elevated risk of most study outcomes in unadjusted-models were markedly-attenuated or became non-significant in propensity-score weighted adjusted-models, except index-delivery hospitalization ≥7 days (odds ratio [OR] = 1.76 [95% CI = 1.33-2.34]), preterm birth (OR = 1.48 [95% CI = 1.09-2.00]) and neonatal special-care admission (OR = 1.65 [95% CI = 1.35-2.01]). Apart from higher neonatal special-care admission in treated-SSD than untreated-SSD women (OR = 1.75 [95% CI = 1.23-2.52]), no significant between-group differences emerged in other outcomes. In sum, elevated risk of most obstetric/neonatal complications reported in SSD-women might largely be explained by maternal physical comorbidities, substance/alcohol use disorders and other confounders. Interventions targeting modifiable maternal risk factors should be incorporated in prenatal care for SSD-women to minimize avoidable adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joe Kwun Nam Chan
- Department of Psychiatry, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Krystal Chi Kei Lee
- Department of Psychiatry, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Christoph U Correll
- The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Yuen Kiu So
- Department of Psychiatry, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ching Yui Chan
- Department of Psychiatry, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Corine Sau Man Wong
- School of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ka Wang Cheung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Mimi Tin-Yan Seto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jessie Lin
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
| | - Wing Chung Chang
- Department of Psychiatry, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
- State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gursoy BK, Atay E, Bilir A, Firat F, Soylemez ESA, Kurt GA, Gozen M, Ertekin T. Effect of aripiprazole on neural tube development in early chick embryos. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2024; 489:117009. [PMID: 38906509 DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2024.117009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Revised: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Aripiprazole (ARI) is a recently developed antipsychotic medication that belongs to the second generation of antipsychotics. The literature has contradictory information regarding ARI, which has been classified as pregnant use category C by the FDA. METHODS 125 pathogen-free fertilized eggs were incubated for 28 h and divided into five groups of 25 eggs each (including the control group), and 18 eggs with intact integrity were selected from each group. After the experimental groups were divided, ARI was administered subblastodermally with a Hamilton micro-injector at 4 different doses (1 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg). At the 48th hour of incubation, all eggs were hatched and embryos were removed from the embryonic membranes. And then morphologic (position of the neural tube (open or closed), crown-rump length, number of somites, embryological development status), histopathologic (apoptosis (caspase 3), cell proliferation (PCNA), in situ recognition of DNA breaks (tunnel)), genetic (BRE gene expression) analyzes were performed. RESULTS According to the results of the morphological analysis, when the frequency of neural tube patency was evaluated among the experimental groups, a statistically significant difference was determined between the control group and all groups (p < 0.001). In addition, the mean crown-rump length and somite number of the embryos decreased in a dose-dependent manner compared to the control group. It was determined that mRNA levels of the BRE gene decreased in embryos exposed to ARI compared to the control group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Morphologically, histopathologically, and genetically, aripiprazole exposure delayed neurogenesis and development in early chick embryos. These findings suggest its use in pregnant women may be teratogenic. We note that these results are preliminary for pregnant women, but they should be expanded and studied with additional and other samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betul Kurtses Gursoy
- Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.
| | - Emre Atay
- Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| | - Abdulkadir Bilir
- Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| | - Fatma Firat
- Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Histology and Embryology, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| | - Evrim Suna Arikan Soylemez
- Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Biology, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| | - Gulan Albas Kurt
- Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| | - Mert Gozen
- Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| | - Tolga Ertekin
- Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kulkarni J, De Chellis A, Gilbert H, Gavrilidis E, Mu E, Karimi L, Li Q. Clozapine Safety in Pregnancy: A Clinical Study. Schizophr Bull 2024:sbae132. [PMID: 39031964 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbae132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS Pregnant women with persistent schizophrenia and related disorders may require ongoing antipsychotic treatment, including clozapine. However, the potential risks of using clozapine during pregnancy and the postnatal period remain uncertain. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a nested case-control study using the National Register of Antipsychotic Medication in Pregnancy (NRAMP) database. Our study assessed pregnancy outcomes among Australian women diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorder and treated with clozapine (n = 14) during the first trimester. These women were compared to 2 subgroups: those treated with quetiapine (n = 53) and those not taking any medication (n = 24) during pregnancy. STUDY RESULTS We observed higher rates of miscarriage in the clozapine group compared to the quetiapine and drug-free groups. The clozapine group had a higher early pregnancy body mass index but lower overall pregnancy weight gain than the other groups. The prevalence of gestational diabetes was significantly higher in the clozapine group. The percentage of vaginal delivery was higher in the clozapine group than in the other 2 groups. Neonatal outcomes such as gestational age, and Apgar scores were similar across groups. The birth weight was lower in the clozapine group compared to the other 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that pregnant women taking clozapine and their babies have greater adverse outcomes compared to other groups. Clozapine appears to be associated with a greater risk of miscarriages, maternal gestational diabetes, and lower birth weight. However, the gestational age, Apgar scores, and admission to NICU/SCN were comparable between all groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayashri Kulkarni
- HER Centre Australia, Department of Psychiatry, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Adam De Chellis
- HER Centre Australia, Department of Psychiatry, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Heather Gilbert
- HER Centre Australia, Department of Psychiatry, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Emmy Gavrilidis
- HER Centre Australia, Department of Psychiatry, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eveline Mu
- HER Centre Australia, Department of Psychiatry, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Leila Karimi
- HER Centre Australia, Department of Psychiatry, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Qi Li
- HER Centre Australia, Department of Psychiatry, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tanzer T, Pham B, Warren N, Barras M, Kisely S, Siskind D. Overcoming clozapine's adverse events: a narrative review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2024; 23:811-831. [PMID: 38814794 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2362796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Clozapine is the gold standard treatment for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, however adverse events remain a clinical challenge. AREAS COVERED This review presents a narrative synthesis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses that have reported the onset, incidence, prevalence, and management of clozapine's adverse events. We conducted a systematic literature search using PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, OvidMEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to April 2024. EXPERT OPINION Effective management of clozapine's adverse events necessitates multi-faceted, individualized, and shared-decision strategies. Despite a lack of high-quality systematic evidence, expert inter-disciplinary solutions are provided to help address a critical need for clinical guidance. This 35-year update offers an evidence-based framework to assist clinicians, patients, and caregivers navigate the adverse events associated with clozapine therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Tanzer
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, Brisbane, Australia
- Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Betty Pham
- Department of Pharmacy, Metro South Community and Oral Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Nicola Warren
- Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Michael Barras
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Steve Kisely
- Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Dan Siskind
- Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pejčić AV, Stefanović SM, Milosavljević MN, Janjić VS, Folić MM, Folić ND, Milosavljević JZ. Outcomes of long-acting injectable antipsychotics use in pregnancy: A literature review. World J Psychiatry 2024; 14:582-599. [PMID: 38659600 PMCID: PMC11036459 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i4.582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with a history of serious psychotic disorders are at increased risk of disease relapse during pregnancy. Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics have been widely used to improve adherence and prevent relapse in patients with various severe psychotic disorders, but there is a lack of high-quality data from previous research on the safety of LAI antipsychotics during pregnancy. AIM To summarize relevant data on maternal, pregnancy, neonatal, and developmental outcomes from published cases of LAI antipsychotic use in pregnancy. METHODS A literature search was performed through November 11, 2023, using three online databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. Case reports or case series that reported information about the outcomes of pregnancy in women who used LAI antipsychotics at any point in pregnancy, with available full texts, were included. Descriptive statistics, narrative summation, and tabulation of the extracted data were performed. RESULTS A total of 19 publications satisfied the inclusion criteria: 3 case series, 15 case reports, and 1 conference abstract. They reported the outcomes of LAI antipsychotic use in 74 women and 77 pregnancies. The use of second-generation LAI antipsychotics was reported in the majority (n = 47; 61.0%) of pregnancies. First-generation LAI antipsychotics were administered during 30 pregnancies (39.0%). Most of the women (approximately 64%) had either satisfactory control of symptoms or no information about relapse, while approximately 12% of them had developed gestational diabetes mellitus. A minority of cases reported adverse outcomes such as stillbirth, spontaneous abortion, preterm birth, low birth weight, congenital anomalies, and neurological manifestations in newborns. However, there were no reports of negative long-term developmental outcomes. CONCLUSION Currently available data seem reassuring, but further well-designed studies are required to properly evaluate the risks and benefits of LAI antipsychotic use during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana V Pejčić
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
| | - Srdjan M Stefanović
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Clinical Center Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
| | - Miloš N Milosavljević
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
| | - Vladimir S Janjić
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
- Clinic for Psychiatry, University Clinical Center Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
| | - Marko M Folić
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Clinical Center Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
- Center for Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Research, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
| | - Nevena D Folić
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
- Pediatric Clinic, University Clinical Center Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
| | - Jovana Z Milosavljević
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tang W, Zhou LJ, Zhang WQ, Jia YJ, Hu FH, Chen HL. Adverse perinatal pregnancy outcomes in women with schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Res 2023; 262:156-167. [PMID: 37979419 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2023.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Schizophrenia is a severe mental illness that affects a significant proportion of the global population, particularly those of childbearing age. Several studies have attempted to find an association between schizophrenia and obstetric complications, with varying results. OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analyses was to summarize the relationship between maternal schizophrenia and perinatal pregnancy outcomes. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Web of Science and Ovid EMBASE were searched from January 2001 to September 2022 using keywords related to pregnancy, women, schizophrenia. STUDY SELECTION A total of 23 independent studies across 21,253 individuals with schizophrenia were identified and included in the analysis. DATA EXTRACTION The following data were extracted: author, year of publication, country/continent of data collection, study design, demographic characteristics, diagnoses criteria, related complications. Data were analyzed using random-effects pairwise meta-analysis and were reported as prevalence and odd ratios (OR). Statistical heterogeneity was quantified with the I2 statistic. RESULTS The prevalence of adverse perinatal pregnancy outcomes was represented in descending order: cesarean section (26.0 %); labor induction (24.0 %); small for gestational age (10.5 %); gestational diabetes mellitus (9.2 %); preterm birth (9.1 %); low birth weight (7.8 %); preterm rupture of membranes (6.1 %); 1-Minute Apgar Score < 7 (5.6 %); large for gestational age (5.5 %); birth defect (5.4 %); antepartum hemorrhage (4.4 %);preeclampsia/eclampsia (4.8 %); postpartum hemorrhage (3.9 %); 5-Minute Apgar Score < 7 (3.6 %); gestational hypertension (3.3 %); placental abruption (1.0 %); placenta previa (0.6 %); thromboembolic disease (0.4 %); neonatal mortality (0.3 %) (P ≤ 0.05). There was a higher risk of adverse outcomes including gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia/eclampsia, placental abruption, thromboembolic disease, preterm birth, birth defect, 1-Minute Apgar score < 7, small for gestational age, low birth weight and neonatal mortality compared with non-schizophrenia population (P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Women with schizophrenia are at higher risk of adverse perinatal pregnancy outcomes. It is imperative that research efforts continue to focus on the reproductive safety of women with schizophrenia during their childbearing years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Tang
- Master of Medicine, Medical School, Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Li-Juan Zhou
- Master of Medicine, Medical School, Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Wan-Qing Zhang
- Master of Medicine, Medical School, Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Yi-Jie Jia
- Master of Medicine, Medical School, Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Fei-Hong Hu
- Master of Medicine, Medical School, Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Hong-Lin Chen
- School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kulkarni J, Worsley R, Gilbert H, Gavrilidis E, Van Rheenen TE, Wang W, McCauley K, Fitzgerald P. Correction: A Prospective Cohort Study of Antipsychotic Medications in Pregnancy: The First 147 Pregnancies and 100 One Year Old Babies. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0290614. [PMID: 37624837 PMCID: PMC10456127 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094788.].
Collapse
|
8
|
Anand A, Phillips K, Subramanian A, Lee SI, Wang Z, McCowan R, Agrawal U, Fagbamigbe AF, Nelson-Piercy C, Brocklehurst P, Damase-Michel C, Loane M, Nirantharakumar K, Azcoaga-Lorenzo A. Prevalence of polypharmacy in pregnancy: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e067585. [PMID: 36878655 PMCID: PMC9990613 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The use of medications among pregnant women has been rising over the past few decades but the reporting of polypharmacy has been sporadic. The objective of this review is to identify literature reporting the prevalence of polypharmacy among pregnant women, the prevalence of multimorbidity in women taking multiple medications in pregnancy and associated effects on maternal and offspring outcomes. DESIGN MEDLINE and Embase were searched from their inception to 14 September 2021 for interventional trials, observational studies and systematic reviews reporting on the prevalence of polypharmacy or the use of multiple medications in pregnancy were included.Data on prevalence of polypharmacy, prevalence of multimorbidity, combinations of medications and pregnancy and offspring outcomes were extracted. A descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS Fourteen studies met the review criteria. The prevalence of women being prescribed two or more medications during pregnancy ranged from 4.9% (4.3%-5.5%) to 62.4% (61.3%-63.5%), with a median of 22.5%. For the first trimester, prevalence ranged from 4.9% (4.7%-5.14%) to 33.7% (32.2%-35.1%). No study reported on the prevalence of multimorbidity, or associated pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to polypharmacy. CONCLUSION There is a significant burden of polypharmacy among pregnant women. There is a need for evidence on the combinations of medications prescribed in pregnancy, how this specifically affects women with multiple long-term conditions and the associated benefits and harms. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Our systematic review shows significant burden of polypharmacy in pregnancy but outcomes for women and offspring are unknown. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021223966.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astha Anand
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Katherine Phillips
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Siang Ing Lee
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Zhaonan Wang
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Utkarsh Agrawal
- Division of Population and Behavioural Sciences, University of Saint Andrews School of Medicine, St. Andrews, UK
| | - Adeniyi Frances Fagbamigbe
- Division of Population and Behavioural Sciences, University of Saint Andrews School of Medicine, St. Andrews, UK
- Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Peter Brocklehurst
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Maria Loane
- Institute of Nursing and Health Research, University of Ulster, Belfast, UK
| | | | - Amaya Azcoaga-Lorenzo
- Division of Population and Behavioural Sciences, University of Saint Andrews School of Medicine, St. Andrews, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Risk of Major Malformations Following First-Trimester Exposure to Olanzapine: Preliminary Data From the Massachusetts General Hospital National Pregnancy Registry for Psychiatric Medications. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2023; 43:106-112. [PMID: 36825887 DOI: 10.1097/jcp.0000000000001665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/BACKGROUND Since its US Food and Drug Administration approval in 1996, olanzapine has been one of the most commonly prescribed atypical antipsychotics, making a better understanding of its reproductive safety profile critical. The goal of the current analysis was to determine the risk of major malformations among infants exposed to olanzapine during pregnancy compared with a group of nonexposed infants. METHODS/PROCEDURES The National Pregnancy Registry for Psychiatric Medications is a prospective pharmacovigilance program in which pregnant women are enrolled and interviewed during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Labor and delivery and pediatric medical records were screened for evidence of major malformations followed by adjudication by a dysmorphologist blinded to medication exposure. Infants with first-trimester exposure to olanzapine were compared with controls without second-generation antipsychotic exposure. FINDINGS/RESULTS As of April 18, 2022, 2619 women have enrolled in the study. At the time of data extraction, 49 olanzapine-exposed infants and 1156 infants in the comparison group were eligible for these analyses. There were no major malformations associated with olanzapine exposure in the first trimester. The absolute risk for major malformations in the exposure group was 0.00% (95% confidence interval, 0.00-7.25) for olanzapine compared with 1.64% (95% confidence interval, 0.99-2.55) in the control group. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS In this prospective cohort, no major malformations were associated with olanzapine exposure during the first trimester. Although these data are preliminary and cannot rule out more modest effects, they are nonetheless important, adding to the growing reproductive safety data for olanzapine.
Collapse
|
10
|
Kulkarni J, Gurvich C, Gilbert H, Worsley R, Li Q, Karimi L. The use of first and second-generation antipsychotic drugs and the potential to develop gestational diabetes mellitus among perinatal patients with psychosis. Schizophr Res 2023; 254:22-26. [PMID: 36758325 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2023.01.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
There is limited knowledge about the effects of antipsychotic exposure on the development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in women with mental illness. Studies have demonstrated an association between antipsychotic medications and metabolic problems such as weight gain and diabetes mellitus in non-pregnant patients with psychiatric disorders. GDM increases the risk of adverse maternal outcomes, including pregnancy-induced hypertension, antepartum and postpartum haemorrhage, and caesarean delivery. The National Register of Antipsychotic Medication in Pregnancy (NRAMP) is a prospective Australian cohort study that observed women who took antipsychotics during pregnancy. Data from 205 women were extracted for the final analysis and included women who took first or second-generation antipsychotics (FGA,SGA) during the first trimester of pregnancy (at minimum) and had a diagnosis of a psychotic disorder (n = 180). The comparison (non-exposed) group (n = 25) were women with psychosis who chose not to take any antipsychotic during the first trimester (at minimum). The comparison groups were not matched, although groups were homogenous in terms of sex, age range, diagnosis and perinatal status. The results of logistic regression analysis revealed that women who were exposed to FGAs, SGAs were seven and five times, respectively, more likely to develop GDM compared to non-exposed groups. When adjusted for confounding variables such as BMI and family history of diabetes, the potential of developing GDM decreased for women taking SGAs. In conclusion, the risk of developing GDM is lower in women taking SGAs compared with women taking FDAs. In addition, family history of diabetes and BMI adds to the risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayashri Kulkarni
- The Monash Alfred Psychiatry research centre, The Alfred and Monash University Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Caroline Gurvich
- The Monash Alfred Psychiatry research centre, The Alfred and Monash University Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Heather Gilbert
- The Monash Alfred Psychiatry research centre, The Alfred and Monash University Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Roisin Worsley
- The Monash Alfred Psychiatry research centre, The Alfred and Monash University Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Qi Li
- The Monash Alfred Psychiatry research centre, The Alfred and Monash University Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Leila Karimi
- The Monash Alfred Psychiatry research centre, The Alfred and Monash University Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Huybrechts KF, Straub L, Karlsson P, Pazzagli L, Furu K, Gissler M, Hernandez-Diaz S, Nørgaard M, Zoega H, Bateman BT, Cesta CE, Cohen JM, Leinonen MK, Reutfors J, Selmer RM, Suarez EA, Ulrichsen SP, Kieler H. Association of In Utero Antipsychotic Medication Exposure With Risk of Congenital Malformations in Nordic Countries and the US. JAMA Psychiatry 2023; 80:156-166. [PMID: 36477338 PMCID: PMC9856848 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.4109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Importance Psychiatric disorders are common among female individuals of reproductive age. While antipsychotic medication use is increasing, the safety of such medications in pregnancy is an area with large evidence gaps. Objective To evaluate the risk of first-trimester antipsychotic exposure with respect to congenital malformations, focusing on individual drugs and specific malformation subtypes. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used data from nationwide health registers from the 5 Nordic countries and the US and spanned 1996 to 2018. The Nordic cohort included all pregnancies resulting in singleton live-born infants, and the US cohort consisted of publicly insured mothers linked to their live-born infants nested in the nationwide Medicaid Analytic eXtract. Data were analyzed from November 2020 to April 2022. Exposures One or more first-trimester dispensing of any atypical, any typical, and individual antipsychotic drugs. Main Outcomes and Measures Any major congenital malformation and specific malformation subtypes previously suggested to be associated with antipsychotic exposure in utero: cardiovascular malformations, oral clefts, neural tube defects, hip dysplasia, limb reduction defects, anorectal atresia/stenosis, gastroschisis, hydrocephalus, other specific brain anomalies, and esophageal disorders. Propensity score stratification was used to control for potential confounders. Pooled adjusted estimates were calculated using indirect standardization. Results A total of 6 455 324 unexposed mothers (mean maternal age range across countries: 24-31 years), 21 751 mothers exposed to atypical antipsychotic drugs (mean age range, 26-31 years), and 6371 mothers exposed to typical antipsychotic drugs (mean age range, 27-32 years) were included in the study cohort. Prevalence of any major malformation was 2.7% (95% CI, 2.7%-2.8%) in unexposed infants, 4.3% (95% CI, 4.1%-4.6%) in infants with atypical antipsychotic drug exposure, and 3.1% (95% CI, 2.7%-3.5%) in infants with typical antipsychotic drug exposure in utero. Among the most prevalent exposure-outcome combinations, adjusted relative risks (aRR) were generally close to the null. One exception was olanzapine exposure and oral cleft (aRR, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.1-4.3]); however, estimates varied across sensitivity analyses. Among moderately prevalent combinations, increased risks were observed for gastroschisis and other specific brain anomalies after atypical antipsychotic exposure (aRR, 1.5 [95% CI, 0.8-2.6] and 1.9 [95% CI, 1.1-3.0]) and for cardiac malformations after chlorprothixene exposure (aRR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.0-2.7]). While the association direction was consistent across sensitivity analyses, confidence intervals were wide, prohibiting firm conclusions. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, considering the evidence from primary and sensitivity analyses and inevitable statistical noise for very rare exposure-outcome combinations, in utero antipsychotic exposure generally was not meaningfully associated with an increased risk of malformations. The observed increased risks of oral clefts associated with olanzapine, gastroschisis, and other specific brain anomalies with atypical antipsychotics and cardiac malformations with chlorprothixene requires confirmation as evidence continues to accumulate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krista F. Huybrechts
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Loreen Straub
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pär Karlsson
- Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Laura Pazzagli
- Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kari Furu
- Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway,Department of Chronic Diseases, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mika Gissler
- Research Centre for Child Psychiatry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland,Department of Knowledge Brokers, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sonia Hernandez-Diaz
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mette Nørgaard
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Helga Zoega
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia,Centre of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Brian T. Bateman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Carolyn E. Cesta
- Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jacqueline M. Cohen
- Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway,Department of Chronic Diseases, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Maarit K. Leinonen
- Department of Knowledge Brokers, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Johan Reutfors
- Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Randi M. Selmer
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elizabeth A. Suarez
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sinna Pilgaard Ulrichsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Helle Kieler
- Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden,Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cohen LS, Church TR, Freeman MP, Gaccione P, Caplin PS, Kobylski LA, Arakelian M, Rossa ET, Chitayat D, Hernández-Díaz S, Viguera AC. Reproductive Safety of Lurasidone and Quetiapine: Update from the National Pregnancy Registry for Psychiatric Medications. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2023; 32:452-462. [PMID: 36716275 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), also called atypical antipsychotics, are common therapies for women with a spectrum of psychiatric disorders. No systematically ascertained human reproductive safety data are available for lurasidone, and prospective data for quetiapine are limited, making decisions regarding use of these medications during pregnancy complicated. Materials and Methods: The National Pregnancy Registry for Psychiatric Medications is a prospective cohort study designed to collect reproductive safety data relative to SGAs. Pregnant women aged 18-45 years, with psychiatric illness and prenatal psychotropic medication exposure completed three phone interviews during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Cases of presumed malformations are abstracted from medical records for adjudication by a teratologist blinded to medication exposure. Results: Of 2,293 women enrolled at the time of analysis, 134 in the lurasidone group, 264 in the quetiapine group, and 886 controls completed the postpartum interview and were therefore eligible for inclusion. Dropped or lost-to-follow-up participants (13%) and those currently pregnant were excluded. Participants were predominantly White, college-educated, and married (lurasidone = 88.1%, 76.9%, 77.6%; quetiapine = 89.8%, 71.2%, 75.0%; controls = 92.7%, 86.7%, 89.1%). Absolute risks of major malformations were 2.19% (lurasidone), 1.85% (quetiapine), and 1.77% (controls). Odds ratios comparing lurasidone and quetiapine with controls were 1.24 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.36-4.32) and 1.04 (95% CI = 0.38-2.85), respectively. Conclusions: No specific patterns of malformations were observed in infants exposed to the medications of interest. Lurasidone and quetiapine did not appear to be major teratogens, but further information is needed to refine risk estimates. Food and Drug Administration guidance underscores the importance of pregnancy registries. Clinical trial number: NCT01246765.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee S Cohen
- Ammon Pinizzotto Center for Women's Mental Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Taylor R Church
- Ammon Pinizzotto Center for Women's Mental Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Marlene P Freeman
- Ammon Pinizzotto Center for Women's Mental Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter Gaccione
- Ammon Pinizzotto Center for Women's Mental Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Phoebe S Caplin
- Ammon Pinizzotto Center for Women's Mental Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lauren A Kobylski
- Ammon Pinizzotto Center for Women's Mental Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Miranda Arakelian
- Ammon Pinizzotto Center for Women's Mental Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ella T Rossa
- Ammon Pinizzotto Center for Women's Mental Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David Chitayat
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sonia Hernández-Díaz
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Adele C Viguera
- Ammon Pinizzotto Center for Women's Mental Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Cleveland Clinic Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Heinonen E, Forsberg L, Nörby U, Wide K, Källén K. Neonatal morbidity after fetal exposure to antipsychotics: a national register-based study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061328. [PMID: 35768086 PMCID: PMC9244682 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the admission rate to neonatal care and neonatal morbidity after maternal use of antipsychotics during pregnancy. DESIGN A population-based register study. SETTING Information on all singleton births between July 2006 and December 2017 in Sweden including data on prescription drugs, deliveries and infants' health was obtained from the Swedish Medical Birth Register, the Prescribed Drug Register and the Swedish Neonatal Quality Register. Exposed infants were compared with unexposed infants and with infants to mothers treated with antipsychotics before or after but not during pregnancy. PARTICIPANTS The cohort comprised a total of 1 307 487 infants, of whom 2677 (0.2%) were exposed to antipsychotics during pregnancy and 34 492 (2.6%) had mothers who were treated before/after the pregnancy. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was admission rate to neonatal care. Secondary outcomes were the separate neonatal morbidities. RESULTS Of the exposed infants, 516 (19.3%) were admitted to neonatal care compared with 98 976 (7.8%) of the unexposed infants (adjusted risk ratio (aRR): 1.7; 95% CI: 1.6 to 1.8), with a further increased risk after exposure in late pregnancy. The highest relative risks were seen for withdrawal symptoms (aRR: 17.7; 95% CI: 9.6 to 32.6), neurological disorders (aRR: 3.4; 95% CI: 2.4 to 5.7) and persistent pulmonary hypertension (aRR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.4 to 3.1) when compared with unexposed infants. The absolute risks for these outcomes were however low among the exposed infants, 1.3%, 1.8% and 1.0%, respectively, and the relative risks were lower when compared with infants to mothers treated before/after the pregnancy. CONCLUSION Fetal exposure to antipsychotics was associated with an increased risk of neonatal morbidity. The effects in the exposed infants seem transient and predominantly mild, and these findings do not warrant discontinuation of a necessary treatment but rather increased monitoring of these infants. The increased risk of persistent pulmonary hypertension requires further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Essi Heinonen
- Department of Clinical Sciences Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Neonatology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lisa Forsberg
- Department of Clinical Sciences Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ulrika Nörby
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Centre of Reproduction Epidemiology, Tornblad Institute, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Health and Medical Care Administration, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Katarina Wide
- Department of Clinical Sciences Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Karin Källén
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Centre of Reproduction Epidemiology, Tornblad Institute, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Thanigaivel R, Bretag-Norris R, Amos A, McDermott B. A systematic review of maternal and infant outcomes after clozapine continuation in pregnancy. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract 2022; 26:178-182. [PMID: 34110979 DOI: 10.1080/13651501.2021.1936070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE While there is a general lack of evidence of the safety of antipsychotic medications in pregnancy, there is a specific reluctance to continue clozapine in treatment resistant patients who become pregnant. Our aim is to systematically review adverse maternal and infant outcomes following clozapine use during pregnancy. METHOD A systematic review of all observational and intervention studies which highlighted adverse maternal and infant outcomes following clozapine continuation in pregnancy was undertaken. Article selection and quality were independently assessed and PRISMA guidelines adhered to. RESULTS Of 481 studies identified only two studies met the inclusion criteria. Both were rated as poor quality. The first found no significant increase in any adverse maternal or infant outcomes associated with antipsychotic exposure, except an increased rate of low birth weight in antipsychotic exposed babies. The number of patients exposed to clozapine was too small for separate statistical analysis. The second study found higher APGAR scoring at one minute for the clozapine group, but the scores were not statistically different at five-minutes. CONCLUSION Limited evidence was found to show significant adverse maternal and infant outcomes in pregnancy following clozapine continuation.Key messagesLimited evidence to show that clozapine has adverse effects on mother and infant when used during pregnancy.Risk/benefit analysis should be done thoroughly for each individual patient regarding clozapine continuation when pregnancy is confirmed.Close monitoring of mother and infant during perinatal period when clozapine is continued.Further research is needed to more clearly define the effects of clozapine on mother and infant during pregnancy and into the postnatal period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramya Thanigaivel
- Department of Medicine, Townsville University Hospital, Townsville, Australia
| | | | - Andrew Amos
- Department of Medicine, Townsville University Hospital, Townsville, Australia
| | - Brett McDermott
- Department of Psychiatry, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Antipsychotic Use in Pregnancy: Patient Mental Health Challenges, Teratogenicity, Pregnancy Complications, and Postnatal Risks. Neurol Int 2022; 14:62-74. [PMID: 35076595 PMCID: PMC8788503 DOI: 10.3390/neurolint14010005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Pregnant women constitute a vulnerable population, with 25.3% of pregnant women classified as suffering from a psychiatric disorder. Since childbearing age typically aligns with the onset of mental health disorders, it is of utmost importance to consider the effects that antipsychotic drugs have on pregnant women and their developing fetus. However, the induction of pharmacological treatment during pregnancy may pose significant risks to the developing fetus. Antipsychotics are typically introduced when the nonpharmacologic approaches fail to produce desired effects or when the risks outweigh the benefits from continuing without treatment or the risks from exposing the fetus to medication. Early studies of pregnant women with schizophrenia showed an increase in perinatal malformations and deaths among their newborns. Similar to schizophrenia, women with bipolar disorder have an increased risk of relapse in antepartum and postpartum periods. It is known that antipsychotic medications can readily cross the placenta, and exposure to antipsychotic medication during pregnancy is associated with potential teratogenicity. Potential risks associated with antipsychotic use in pregnant women include congenital abnormalities, preterm birth, and metabolic disturbance, which could potentially lead to abnormal fetal growth. The complex decision-making process for treating psychosis in pregnant women must evaluate the risks and benefits of antipsychotic drugs.
Collapse
|
16
|
Heinonen E, Forsberg L, Nörby U, Wide K, Källén K. Antipsychotic Use During Pregnancy and Risk for Gestational Diabetes: A National Register-Based Cohort Study in Sweden. CNS Drugs 2022; 36:529-539. [PMID: 35220525 PMCID: PMC9095513 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-022-00908-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to study whether antipsychotic use during pregnancy is associated with gestational diabetes. METHODS This was a Swedish national register-based cohort study on the Medical Birth Register and the Prescribed Drug Register including all 1,307,487 singleton births between July 2006 and December 2017. Antipsychotics were divided into first-generation antipsychotics (n = 728), high-risk metabolic second-generation antipsychotics including olanzapine, clozapine and quetiapine (n = 1710), and other second-generation antipsychotics (n = 541). The risks for gestational diabetes, foetal growth disturbances, pre-eclampsia, caesarean section and preterm labour were assessed. Women treated during pregnancy were compared to women not treated during pregnancy and to women who used antipsychotics before/after but not during pregnancy. RESULTS The crude risk ratio for gestational diabetes for women treated with high-risk metabolic second-generation antipsychotics during pregnancy was 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.9) compared to untreated pregnant women (n = 1,296,539) and 1.8 (95% CI 1.4-2.5) compared to women treated before/after pregnancy (n = 34,492). After adjustment for maternal factors including body mass index, the risk ratios were 1.8 (95% CI 1.3-2.4) and 1.6 (95% CI 1.2-2.1). Exposed infants had an increased risk of being large for gestational age: adjusted risk ratios 1.6 (95% CI 1.3-1.9) and 1.3 (95% CI 1.1-1.6) compared to no maternal antipsychotic use during pregnancy and maternal use before/after the pregnancy. Other antipsychotics were not associated with metabolic risks. CONCLUSIONS Olanzapine, clozapine and quetiapine used during pregnancy were associated with increased risks for gestational diabetes and the infant being large for gestational age. Enhanced metabolic monitoring should be considered for pregnant women using these drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Essi Heinonen
- Division of Paediatrics, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, 14157, Stockholm, Sweden. .,Department of Paediatrics, Unit of Neonatology at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Lisa Forsberg
- Division of Paediatrics, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, 14157 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ulrika Nörby
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Centre of Reproduction, Epidemiology, Tornblad Institute, Lund University, Lund, Sweden ,Health and Medical Care Administration, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Katarina Wide
- Division of Paediatrics, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, 14157 Stockholm, Sweden ,Department of Pediatrics, Unit of Emergency Pediatrics at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Karin Källén
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Centre of Reproduction, Epidemiology, Tornblad Institute, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
O'Sullivan DL, Byatt N, Dossett EC. Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Medications in Pregnancy: A Review. J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry 2021; 63:53-60. [PMID: 34461296 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaclp.2021.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 08/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-acting injectable antipsychotic medications (LAIs) are an evidence-based treatment option for people with severe mental illness. While women with severe mental illness who are prescribed LAIs can become pregnant, there is a dearth of research examining the safety of these medication formulations during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE This article summarizes available literature on the use of LAIs in pregnancy to help inform clinical decisions and guide future research. METHODS PubMed literature searches were completed using combinations of keywords including "antipsychotic" and "long-acting injectable" or "depot," or generic or brand names of LAIs with "pregnancy." Pregnancy outcomes were compared across studies. RESULTS Twelve relevant case reports of 13 pregnancies were identified. Six cases did not report any negative birth or infant outcomes, including prematurity, infants being born small for gestational age, congenital anomalies, and extrapyramidal symptoms. No cases reported abnormal Apgar scores, infants being born large for gestational age, or negative long-term developmental outcomes after exposure to LAIs during pregnancy. Cesarean section rate was comparable to the general population. Specific adverse outcomes included one infant with multiple congenital anomalies, 3 infants with minor congenital anomalies, and one infant with possible extrapyramidal symptoms. One infant was born prematurely, one infant was born small for gestational age, and 2 infants were born both prematurely and small for gestational age. CONCLUSIONS There is little research specifically examining the use of LAIs in pregnancy, so risks must be extrapolated from studies on oral antipsychotics in pregnancy. While the few published case reports examining LAIs in pregnancy somewhat align with research examining oral antipsychotics, these findings are inconclusive due to the inherently limited nature of case reports. Further investigation into the use of LAIs in pregnancy is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deirdre L O'Sullivan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
| | - Nancy Byatt
- Department of Psychiatry, UMass Medical School/UMass Memorial Health Care, Shrewsbury, MA
| | - Emily C Dossett
- Departments of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences and of Obstetrics/Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Freeman MP, Viguera AC, Góez-Mogollón L, Young AV, Caplin PS, McElheny SA, Church TR, Chitayat D, Hernández-Díaz S, Cohen LS. Reproductive safety of aripiprazole: data from the Massachusetts General Hospital National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics. Arch Womens Ment Health 2021; 24:659-667. [PMID: 33710399 DOI: 10.1007/s00737-021-01115-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Aripiprazole has become one of the most commonly prescribed psychotropics, making a more comprehensive understanding of its reproductive safety profile a priority. The goal of the current analysis was to determine the risk of major malformations in infants exposed during the first trimester of pregnancy to aripiprazole compared to infants whose mothers had psychiatric diagnoses but did not use an atypical antipsychotic during pregnancy. The National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics is a prospective pharmacovigilance program in which pregnant women are enrolled and interviewed during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Medical records are assessed to confirm presence or absence of major malformations. Pregnant women ages 18-45 with psychiatric diagnoses are enrolled. As of April 2020, N = 848 women who had delivered infants were eligible for analyses. A total of 158 women with first trimester exposure to aripiprazole were compared to 690 controls. For 163 infants born to women in the exposed group, seven major malformations were confirmed (4.29%), compared to fourteen of the 690 unexposed infants (1.99%). The unadjusted odds ratio for major malformations between aripiprazole-exposed and unexposed infants was 2.21 (95% confidence interval [CI] = (0.88, 5.57) The adjusted odds ratio for major malformations was 1.35 (95% confidence interval [CI] = (0.43, 4.20). After adjustment for confounding variables, the risk of major malformations after first trimester exposure to aripiprazole was not significant compared to controls. While these results are reassuring, they are limited by relatively small numbers of participants. Future analyses with larger numbers are expected to provide more of a complete and precise reproductive safety profile regarding aripiprazole use during pregnancy. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT01246765.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlene P Freeman
- Ammon-Pinizzotto Center for Women's Mental Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. .,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Adele C Viguera
- Ammon-Pinizzotto Center for Women's Mental Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Clinic Neurological Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lina Góez-Mogollón
- Ammon-Pinizzotto Center for Women's Mental Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amanda V Young
- Ammon-Pinizzotto Center for Women's Mental Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Phoebe S Caplin
- Ammon-Pinizzotto Center for Women's Mental Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sara A McElheny
- Ammon-Pinizzotto Center for Women's Mental Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Taylor R Church
- Ammon-Pinizzotto Center for Women's Mental Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David Chitayat
- Prenatal Diagnosis and Medical Genetics Program, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Lee S Cohen
- Ammon-Pinizzotto Center for Women's Mental Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Orsolini L, Sceusa F, Pompili S, Mauro A, Salvi V, Volpe U. Severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI) in pregnancy and breastfeeding: focus on second-generation long acting injectable antipsychotics. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 20:1207-1224. [PMID: 33966552 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1928634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Pregnant women and fetuses are more likely than ever to be exposed to antipsychotic drugs (APs) during pregnancy and postpartum period. Second-generation APs (SGA) are increasingly used among women in reproductive age. Key outcomes (i.e., congenital malformations, pregnancy and maternal outcomes, neonatal/infant risks, and developmental/long-term outcomes) following the exposure to APs remain limited in number and size and yield of inconsistent findings overall, particularly regarding long-acting injectable AP (LAI-APs) formulations.Areas covered: The review aims at providing a summary of current knowledge on potential risks and safety profile of LAI-APs during pregnancy and breastfeeding, specifically focusing on SGA.Expert opinion: The management of safety and tolerability of long-acting injectable AP (LAI-APs) is far from having solid scientific evidence. In fact, due to ethical reasons, there is a lack of randomized clinical trials that limits the reliability and generalizability of the available data on LAI-APs safety profile during the perinatal period, being limited in the scientific literature only to isolated case reports. Therefore, it seems to be important for the future pathways to perinatal mental health care, providing a network of specialized clinicians and systematically collecting data of pregnant/puerperal women on oral and/or LAI APs-therapy about mother and infant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Orsolini
- Unit of Clinical Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Neurosciences/DIMSC, School of Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Francesca Sceusa
- Unit of Clinical Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Neurosciences/DIMSC, School of Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Simone Pompili
- Unit of Clinical Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Neurosciences/DIMSC, School of Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Antonella Mauro
- Unit of Clinical Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Neurosciences/DIMSC, School of Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Virginio Salvi
- Unit of Clinical Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Neurosciences/DIMSC, School of Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Umberto Volpe
- Unit of Clinical Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Neurosciences/DIMSC, School of Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
[Antipsychotics during pregnancy: a systematic review]. DER NERVENARZT 2020; 92:494-500. [PMID: 33000289 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-020-01006-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits and risks of treatment with antipsychotics during pregnancy must be weighed up carefully and individually because antipsychotics can penetrate the placental barrier and prescription is off-label. OBJECTIVE Evaluation of the risks and benefits of administering antipsychotics during pregnancy or for women who wish to become pregnant regarding teratogenic effects, risk of fetal death and stillbirths, perinatal complications, persisting postnatal impairments or disorders and gestational diabetes. METHODS A systematic review of the literature is provided to aid the selection of psychotropic drugs during pregnancy and in determining whether to begin, continue or switch an antipsychotic treatment during pregnancy. RESULTS Large, well-designed and controlled studies are missing; however, most studies suggest that the group of antipsychotics seem to be safe in terms of teratogenicity during pregnancy, at least in monotherapy. CONCLUSION Treating mental illnesses during pregnancy requires an individual assessment of the benefits and risks. The risk of an untreated mental illness versus the benefit of a suitable treatment with antipsychotics and the potential harm to the infant must be evaluated. If certain rules are observed and a suitable antipsychotic is selected the risk to the newborn child and/or mother during pregnancy can be minimized, however, a decision about subsequent medication can only be indirectly made from the results of this study.
Collapse
|
21
|
Association Between Gestational Diabetes and Mental Illness. Can J Diabetes 2020; 44:566-571.e3. [PMID: 32792108 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2020.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The rates of both gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and mental illness in pregnancy are rising. There is an association between type 2 diabetes and major depressive disorder, anxiety and schizophrenia, thus there is a need for greater understanding of the relationship between GDM and mental illness. This review suggests that there is a bidirectional and complex relationship between antenatal depression, gestational diabetes and postpartum depression. The combined effect of both a history of depression and gestational diabetes significantly increases the risk of postpartum depression. There is an association between severe mental illness and GDM; however, it is strongly mediated by antipsychotic medications and psychosocial factors, in addition to the disease itself. Medication has a major role in treating mental illness during pregnancy and is not directly linked with GDM in either depression or psychosis. Health-care providers should be mindful of the association between GDM and mental illness to appropriately screen and treat both disorders.
Collapse
|
22
|
Beex‐Oosterhuis MM, Samb A, Heerdink ER, Souverein PC, Van Gool AR, Meyboom RHB, Marum RJ. Safety of clozapine use during pregnancy: Analysis of international pharmacovigilance data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2020; 29:725-735. [DOI: 10.1002/pds.5016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Revised: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke M. Beex‐Oosterhuis
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy Albert Schweitzer Hospital Dordrecht The Netherlands
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research VU University Medical Center Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Amadou Samb
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Eibert R. Heerdink
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy Utrecht University Medical Center Utrecht The Netherlands
- Research Group Innovation of Pharmaceutical Care University of Applied Sciences Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Patrick C. Souverein
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
| | | | - Ronald H. B. Meyboom
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Rob J. Marum
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research VU University Medical Center Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Geriatric Department and Center for Clinical Pharmacology Jeroen Bosch Hospital 's‐Hertogenbosch The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Excretion of Antipsychotics Into the Amniotic Fluid, Umbilical Cord Blood, and Breast Milk: A Systematic Critical Review and Combined Analysis. Ther Drug Monit 2020; 42:245-254. [DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000000692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
24
|
Kucukgoncu S, Guloksuz S, Celik K, Bahtiyar MO, Luykx JJ, Rutten BPF, Tek C. Antipsychotic Exposure in Pregnancy and the Risk of Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull 2020; 46:311-318. [PMID: 31167033 PMCID: PMC7442324 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbz058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We have limited knowledge about the effects of antipsychotic exposure on the development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Aim of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess GDM risk associated with antipsychotic exposure in pregnancy. METHODS Systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to August 22, 2018. No restrictions to language or date were applied. Randomized, controlled trials, case-control, or cohort studies reporting GDM risk in antipsychotic-exposed, healthy controls or antipsychotic-ceased patients were included in the meta-analysis. The primary outcomes were study defined GDM, including number of events, odds ratios, and/or risk ratios (RR) with confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. The total number of subjects was 6213 for the antipsychotic-exposed group, 6836 for antipsychotic-ceased control group, and 1 677 087 for the healthy control group. Compared with the healthy controls, the unadjusted cumulative RR for GDM associated with antipsychotic use was 1.63 (95% CI = 1.20-2.22). Adjusted risk for GDM was significantly higher in antipsychotic exposure group than in healthy controls (RR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.023-1.660). The adjusted RR for GDM was similar between the antipsychotic-exposed group and the antipsychotic-ceased group (RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.281-2.164). No significant association was found between study quality, smoking, alcohol use, gestational age, and cumulative GDM risk. DISCUSSION Our results indicate an increased risk of GDM with antipsychotic exposure in pregnant women, who may benefit from close pregnancy monitoring, early testing for GDM, targeting modifiable risk factors, and lifestyle modifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suat Kucukgoncu
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT,To whom correspondence should be addressed; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, 34 Park Street, Room 10, New Haven, CT 06519, US; tel: +1-203-974-7810, fax: +1-203-974-7502, e-mail:
| | - Sinan Guloksuz
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT,Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Nederlands
| | - Kubra Celik
- Faculty of Medicine Ankara, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mert Ozan Bahtiyar
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Jurjen J Luykx
- Department of Psychiatry, Brain Centre Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bart P F Rutten
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Nederlands
| | - Cenk Tek
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Anderson KN, Ailes EC, Lind JN, Broussard CS, Bitsko RH, Friedman JM, Bobo WV, Reefhuis J, Tinker SC. Atypical antipsychotic use during pregnancy and birth defect risk: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011. Schizophr Res 2020; 215:81-88. [PMID: 31761471 PMCID: PMC7036025 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the prevalence of, and factors associated with, atypical antipsychotic use among U.S. pregnant women, and potential associations between early pregnancy atypical antipsychotic use and risk for 14 birth defects. METHODS We analyzed data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (1997-2011), a U.S. population-based case-control study examining risk factors for major structural birth defects. RESULTS Atypical antipsychotic use during pregnancy was more common among women with pre-pregnancy obesity, and women who reported illicit drug use before and during pregnancy, smoking during pregnancy, alcohol use during pregnancy, or use of other psychiatric medications during pregnancy. We observed elevated associations (defined as a crude odds ratio [cOR] ≥2.0) between early pregnancy atypical antipsychotic use and conotruncal heart defects (6 exposed cases; cOR: 2.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9-6.1), and more specifically Tetralogy of Fallot (3 exposed cases; cOR: 2.5, 95% CI: 0.7-8.8), cleft palate (4 exposed cases, cOR: 2.5, 95% CI: 0.8-7.6), anorectal atresia/stenosis (3 exposed cases, cOR: 2.8, 95% CI: 0.8-9.9), and gastroschisis (3 exposed cases, cOR: 2.1, 95% CI: 0.6-7.3). CONCLUSIONS Our findings support the close clinical monitoring of pregnant women using atypical antipsychotics. Women treated with atypical antipsychotics generally access healthcare services before pregnancy; efforts to reduce correlates of atypical antipsychotic use might improve maternal and infant health in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayla N Anderson
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, MS S-106, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
| | - Elizabeth C Ailes
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, MS S-106, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
| | - Jennifer N Lind
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, MS S-106, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA; United States Public Health Service, 4770 Buford Highway, MS S-106, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
| | - Cheryl S Broussard
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, MS S-106, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
| | - Rebecca H Bitsko
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, MS S-106, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
| | - Jan M Friedman
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver V6H 3N1, Canada
| | - William V Bobo
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road S #378, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Jennita Reefhuis
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, MS S-106, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
| | - Sarah C Tinker
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, MS S-106, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Narayanaswamy P, Shaji KS, Sumesh TP. Meningomyelocele on Exposure to Clozapine During Perinatal Period. Indian J Psychol Med 2019; 41:398-399. [PMID: 31391678 PMCID: PMC6657472 DOI: 10.4103/ijpsym.ijpsym_298_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - K S Shaji
- Department of Psychiatry, Government Medical College, Thrissur, Kerala India
| | - T P Sumesh
- Department of Psychiatry, Government Medical College, Thrissur, Kerala India
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Breadon C, Kulkarni J. An update on medication management of women with schizophrenia in pregnancy. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2019; 20:1365-1376. [DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1612876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Breadon
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jayashri Kulkarni
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Uguz F. Antipsychotic Use During Pregnancy and the Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2019; 39:162-167. [PMID: 30624301 DOI: 10.1097/jcp.0000000000001002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to review the current literature examining a potential relationship between the use of antipsychotic drugs during pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS PubMed was searched for English language reports between January 1, 1996, and March 31, 2018, by using combinations of the following key words: antipsychotics, pregnancy, FGAs, SGAs, GDM, obstetric outcomes, pregnancy outcomes, obstetric complications, maternal complications, clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, aripiprazole, amisulpirde, ziprasidone, quetiapine, haloperidol, chlorpromazine, zuclopenthixol, and flupenthixol. Studies but not case reports, case series, or reviews published in a peer-reviewed journal were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS A total of 10 relevant studies that met the review criteria were examined. Data from these studies indicated that the prevalence rates of GDM in pregnant women using antipsychotic drugs and the nomedication group were 2.6% to 22% and 0.95% to 10.7%, respectively. Most comparative studies reported that antipsychotic treatment during pregnancy was not significantly associated with increased in risk of GDM. In addition, the study results also suggested that underlying maternal psychopathologies might affect the risk of GDM. IMPLICATIONS Findings from some studies suggesting a higher risk of GDM in pregnant women who were administered antipsychotic drugs were not confirmed by results of many other studies. The current evidence suggests no significant relationship between antipsychotic drugs, including second- and first-generation antipsychotics, and the risk of GDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faruk Uguz
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Meram Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Purpose of review Antipsychotics are frequently prescribed to women of childbearing age and are increasingly prescribed during pregnancy. A small, but growing, body of research on implications for pregnancy and infant outcomes is available to inform the risks and benefits of in utero exposure to antipsychotics. This review examines the existing published research on the use of common typical and atypical antipsychotics in pregnancy and the implications for pregnancy and infant outcomes. Recent findings The majority of studies do not show associations with major malformations and antipsychotic use in pregnancy, with the possible exception of risperidone. There is concern that atypical antipsychotics may be associated with gestational diabetes. Metabolic changes during pregnancy may necessitate dose adjustments. Summary In general, it is recommended that women who need to take an antipsychotic during pregnancy continue the antipsychotic that has been most effective for symptom remission. Further study on risperidone is needed to better understand its association with malformations and it is not considered a first-line agent for use during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah K Betcher
- Department of Psychiatry, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine 676 N. St. Clair St. Ste 1000, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.,Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Catalina Montiel
- Department of Psychiatry, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine 676 N. St. Clair St. Ste 1000, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Crystal T Clark
- Department of Psychiatry, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine 676 N. St. Clair St. Ste 1000, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
The Relationship Between Pregnancy Exposure to Antidepressant and Atypical Antipsychotic Medications and Placental Weight and Birth Weight Ratio: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2018; 38:563-569. [PMID: 30346334 DOI: 10.1097/jcp.0000000000000964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychotropic medication use in pregnancy has been associated with altered fetal growth. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between placental weight and placental weight-to-birth weight (PBW) ratio, as a potential marker of placental efficiency, and medication use in a cohort of women with severe mental illness in pregnancy. METHODS A retrospective database analysis was carried out on a cohort of pregnant women with severe mental illness (242 singleton pregnancies) and grouped according to their psychotropic medication use. Demographic, obstetric, neonatal, and psychiatric variables were analyzed using t tests, χ, analysis of variance, univariate, binary, and multiple regression adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS Multiple regression analysis demonstrated a mean adjusted increase in placental weight of 114 g (95% confidence interval [CI], 60.2-165.6 g) in women taking antidepressant medication and 113 g (CI, 65.1-162.8 g) in women taking combined antidepressant and atypical antipsychotic medication in pregnancy. There was also a significantly elevated PBW ratio in these 2 medication groups (B 0.02: CI, 0.006-0.034; and B 0.025: CI, 0.012-0.038). Binary regression, adjusted for sex and gestational age, showed a significant odds ratio of 4.57 (95% CI, 2.17-9.62) for PBW ratio of greater than 90% in those taking antidepressant medication, either alone or in combination, compared with unmedicated women. CONCLUSIONS The use of antidepressant medication, alone or in combination, has a significant effect on placental weight and PBW ratio after adjusting for confounding variables. Given that this may reflect adverse effects on intrauterine growth and have possible long-term implications for the fetus, further research is warranted to confirm these findings.
Collapse
|
31
|
Thorsness KR, Watson C, LaRusso EM. Perinatal anxiety: approach to diagnosis and management in the obstetric setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219:326-345. [PMID: 29803818 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2018] [Revised: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 05/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Anxiety is common in women during the perinatal period, manifests with various symptoms and severity, and is associated with significant maternal morbidity and adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Given the intimate relationship and frequency of contact, the obstetric provider is positioned optimally to create a therapeutic alliance and to treat perinatal anxiety. Time constraints, absence of randomized controlled trials, mixed quality of data, and concern for potential adverse reproductive outcomes all limit the clinician's ability to initiate informed risk-benefit discussions. Clear understanding of the role of the obstetric provider in the identification, stabilization, and initiation of medication and/or referral to psychotherapy for women with perinatal anxiety disorders is critical to maternal and neonatal wellbeing. Informed by our clinical practice as perinatal psychiatric providers, we have provided a concise summary of current research on the approach to the treatment of perinatal anxiety disorders in the obstetric setting that includes psychotherapy and supportive interventions, primary and adjuvant psychiatric medication, and general prescribing pearls. Medications that we examined include antidepressants, benzodiazepines, sedative-hypnotics, antihistamines, quetiapine, buspirone, propranolol, and melatonin. Further research into management of perinatal anxiety, particularly psychopharmacologic management, is warranted.
Collapse
|
32
|
Frayne J, Nguyen T, Mok T, Hauck Y, Liira H. Lithium exposure during pregnancy: outcomes for women who attended a specialist antenatal clinic. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 39:211-219. [PMID: 28617151 DOI: 10.1080/0167482x.2017.1337743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lithium treatment in pregnancy represents a significant dilemma for women and treating health professionals alike. The complexity of risk-benefit analysis is impacted by limited information. METHODS A cohort study of 33 women with severe mental illness, who were prescribed lithium at any time during the pregnancy, and gave birth between December 2007 and January 2015 at a specialist antenatal clinic in Western Australia. A descriptive comparison for women who continued lithium throughout pregnancy, and those who ceased on discovery of pregnancy was undertaken examining demographic, obstetric, neonatal and psychiatric variables. RESULTS Women who were prescribed lithium, irrespective of whether they continued or discontinued the medication represented a high risk group obstetrically, with high rates of smoking overall (33%) medical comorbidities (54%) and antenatal complications (88%). Preconception counseling occurred in 33% of the cohort but increased the likelihood of continuing lithium in pregnancy (p = .007). Compared to those who ceased lithium, women who remained on lithium through the pregnancy had increased rates of fetal ultrasound abnormalities such as abdominal circumference >90th % (p = .005). Psychiatric relapses through the antenatal and immediate postpartum period appeared to be due to a combination of factors. DISCUSSION Pregnant women with severe mood disorders treated with lithium are a vulnerable, high-risk obstetric population who would benefit from preconception counseling, regular antenatal care in a tertiary center, delivery with neonatal pediatric support and experienced psychiatric management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Frayne
- a Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , Women and Newborn Health Service , Subiaco , Western Australia , Australia.,b School of Medicine, Division of General Practice , University of Western Australia , Western Australia , Australia
| | - Thinh Nguyen
- c School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry , University of Western Australia , Western Australia , Australia.,d Peel and Rockingham Kwinana Mental Health Services , Western Australia , Australia
| | - Tabitha Mok
- e Department of Psychological Medicine , Women and Newborn Health Service , Subiaco , Western Australia , Australia
| | - Yvonne Hauck
- f Department of Nursing and Midwifery Education , Women and Newborn Health Service , Subiaco , Western Australia , Australia.,g School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine , Curtin University , Perth , Western Australia , Australia
| | - Helena Liira
- b School of Medicine, Division of General Practice , University of Western Australia , Western Australia , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Niethe M, Whitfield K. Psychotropic medication use during pregnancy. JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE AND RESEARCH 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/jppr.1483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Miranda Niethe
- School of Pharmacy; The University of Queensland; Woolloongabba Australia
| | - Karen Whitfield
- School of Pharmacy; The University of Queensland; Woolloongabba Australia
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital; Brisbane Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Møller-Olsen C, Friedman SH, Prakash C, North A. Clinical characteristics of maternal mental health service users treated with mood stabilizing or antipsychotic medication. Asia Pac Psychiatry 2018; 10:e12304. [PMID: 29226616 DOI: 10.1111/appy.12304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2017] [Revised: 09/15/2017] [Accepted: 10/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aimed to investigate the characteristics of pregnant women who required either mood stabilizer or antipsychotic treatment. These women requiring such treatment are likely to be more mentally unwell and thus carry a higher burden of comorbidities associated with poor pregnancy outcomes. METHODS This retrospective review investigated the common characteristics of pregnant women who were prescribed with antipsychotics or mood stabilizers under a major city's public maternal mental health service. Demographic data, pregnancy factors and prenatal care, stressors and support, concurrent medical and substance abuse problems, and ongoing maternal mental health issues were recorded. RESULTS Most pregnancies were unplanned. Commonly, social stressors, medical problems, and substance use were identified. The most common diagnosis was bipolar disorder. DISCUSSION Pregnant women requiring treatment with mood stabilizers or antipsychotics are a complex clinical population, with multiple risk factors for negative pregnancy outcome, before even considering the potential risk from psychotropic agents and mental illness itself. Obtaining reliable data about substance use and medication compliance remains problematic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Abigail North
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Paulzen M, Goecke TW, Kuzin M, Augustin M, Gründer G, Schoretsanitis G. Pregnancy exposure to quetiapine - Therapeutic drug monitoring in maternal blood, amniotic fluid and cord blood and obstetrical outcomes. Schizophr Res 2018; 195:252-257. [PMID: 28965779 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.09.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2017] [Revised: 09/24/2017] [Accepted: 09/24/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE This prospective study is the first to measure and correlate quetiapine concentrations in maternal blood, amniotic fluid and umbilical cord blood to account for the distribution of quetiapine. METHODS Concentrations of quetiapine are quantified in seven mother infant pairs at the time of delivery. Data are provided as median values, first (Q1) and third (Q3) quartiles and ranges. To account for the penetration ratio, the concentration of quetiapine in amniotic fluid and cord blood was divided by maternal concentrations. Correlations between daily dosage, maternal serum and umbilical cord blood concentrations were computed for seven patients while calculations for amniotic fluid were only available for six mother-infant pairs. RESULTS The median daily dosage of quetiapine was 300mg (Q1: 300mg, Q3: 600mg, range 200-800mg). There was a strong and significant correlation between maternal serum and cord blood concentrations (r=0.893, p=0.007). The median penetration ratio into fetal circulation was 0.18 (Q1: 0.16, Q3: 0.32; range 0.13-0.42), suggesting a low penetration. The median penetration ratio into amniotic fluid was 0.44 (Q1: 0.15, Q3: 0.96; range 0.09-1.70). CONCLUSIONS Quetiapine concentrations in amniotic fluid and cord blood give evidence that quetiapine is constantly accessible to the fetus with a relatively low penetration ratio. A high correlation between maternal serum and umbilical cord blood concentrations highlights a predictive role of quantifying drug concentrations in maternal serum for assessing drug concentrations in fetal circulation. Findings support the important role of therapeutic drug monitoring in supporting the efficacy and safety of psychopharmacological treatment strategies in highly vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Paulzen
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; Alexianer Hospital Aachen, Germany; JARA - Translational Brain Medicine, Aachen, Germany.
| | - Tamme W Goecke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, RWTH Aachen University, Germany
| | - Maxim Kuzin
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marc Augustin
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Gerhard Gründer
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Georgios Schoretsanitis
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; University Hospital of Psychiatry, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Damkier P, Videbech P. The Safety of Second-Generation Antipsychotics During Pregnancy: A Clinically Focused Review. CNS Drugs 2018; 32:351-366. [PMID: 29637530 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-018-0517-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The issue of antipsychotic treatment during pregnancy is subject to substantial uncertainty and some controversy among healthcare providers, specifically pertaining to second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) that are subject to a large gap in safety data during pregnancy compared with antidepressants. The amount of safety data for the use of SGAs during pregnancy is rapidly increasing, thus constantly changing the level of evidence. We performed a clinically focused review on the safety of SGA during pregnancy. Twenty-three studies provided various pregnancy outcomes for 14,382 pregnant women exposed to an SGA during pregnancy. In utero exposure to aripiprazole, olanzapine, and quetiapine is not associated with increased risks of major congenital malformations, whereas risperidone and paliperidone may be associated with a very minor increased risk of congenital malformations. Safety data on ziprasidone and clozapine remain scarce and insufficient for a quantitative safety evaluation. No or minimal safety data are available for amisulpride, asenapine, lurasidone, and sertindole. For other pregnancy outcomes of interest, e.g. miscarriage, stillbirth, and small for gestational age, the available data overall do not suggest a clinically important increased risk, and do not allow for a meaningful stratification on individual drug level. Furthermore, for neonatal adaption and childhood neurodevelopment, the data do not allow for a meaningful risk assessment. It is imperative that factors in addition to safety data, e.g. individual disease history, characteristics and treatment response, adverse reaction profile, and patient preferences, be considered for the individual patient when choosing specific SGA treatment during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Per Damkier
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Poul Videbech
- Center for Neuropsychiatric Depression Research, Mental Health Center Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cuomo A, Goracci A, Fagiolini A. Aripiprazole use during pregnancy, peripartum and lactation. A systematic literature search and review to inform clinical practice. J Affect Disord 2018; 228:229-237. [PMID: 29275156 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2017] [Revised: 11/26/2017] [Accepted: 12/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aripiprazole is used relatively frequently in women with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia in childbearing years, owing to its efficacy and relatively favorable side effect profile. As is the case for other psychotropic medications, for ethical reasons, no prospective randomized placebo controlled trial to assess aripiprazole safety during pregnancy has ever been conducted. However, animal data are available and the amount of exposure and outcome data for human fetuses and infants has recently increased, providing published prospective safety data in relatively large numbers of pregnant women treated with aripiprazole. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic literature search and review to critically evaluate the available data on the use of aripiprazole during pregnancy, peripartum and lactation. METHODS PubMed, PsychInfo, and Cochrane Library were searched using the following search builder: (pregnancy OR pregnant OR gestation OR malformations OR perinatal OR reproduction OR organogenesis OR delivery OR breast-feeding OR lactation or peripartum or obstetric) AND aripiprazole. Reports that met the following pre-defined criteria were included in the present review: (1) published in English language in a peer-reviewed journal; (2) clearly defined use of aripiprazole during pregnancy and/or lactation and/or postpartum; (3) case report, case series, prospective, retrospective or cross-sectional studies. United States and European Medicine Agency prescribing information for aripiprazole were consulted as well and all the references of selected papers were cross checked for information pertaining to the use of aripiprazole during pregnancy, peripartum and lactation. RESULTS A total of 549 items published in a period ranging from 1995 to 2017, were retrieved from the search databases and reference cross check. One-hundred-fifty-three duplicate items were removed, 176 titles were deemed as not pertinent, 220 abstracts and 122 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and 93 titles were included for qualitative synthesis. United States and European Medicine Agency prescribing information for aripiprazole were consulted and the selected manuscript references were cross checked. No randomized placebo controlled trial was found but relatively large prospective studies, large database studies, and several case reports and case studies were identified and summarized. CONCLUSIONS As is the case for other antipsychotics, definitive evidence on aripiprazole reproductive safety is lacking, but newer safety data are relatively reassuring. In many cases, the potential benefits of aripiprazole for patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia outweigh the potential risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Cuomo
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Siena School of Medicine, Siena 53100, Italy.
| | - A Goracci
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Siena School of Medicine, Siena 53100, Italy
| | - A Fagiolini
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Siena School of Medicine, Siena 53100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Zhong QY, Gelaye B, Smoller JW, Avillach P, Cai T, Williams MA. Adverse obstetric outcomes during delivery hospitalizations complicated by suicidal behavior among US pregnant women. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0192943. [PMID: 29447245 PMCID: PMC5814027 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2017] [Accepted: 01/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The effects of suicidal behavior on obstetric outcomes remain dangerously unquantified. We sought to report on the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes for US women with suicidal behavior at the time of delivery. Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis of delivery hospitalizations from 2007–2012 National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample. From the same hospitalization record, International Classification of Diseases codes were used to identify suicidal behavior and adverse obstetric outcomes. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were obtained using logistic regression. Results Of the 23,507,597 delivery hospitalizations, 2,180 were complicated by suicidal behavior. Women with suicidal behavior were at a heightened risk for outcomes including antepartum hemorrhage (aOR = 2.34; 95% CI: 1.47–3.74), placental abruption (aOR = 2.07; 95% CI: 1.17–3.66), postpartum hemorrhage (aOR = 2.33; 95% CI: 1.61–3.37), premature delivery (aOR = 3.08; 95% CI: 2.43–3.90), stillbirth (aOR = 10.73; 95% CI: 7.41–15.56), poor fetal growth (aOR = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.10–2.62), and fetal anomalies (aOR = 3.72; 95% CI: 2.57–5.40). No significant association was observed for maternal suicidal behavior with cesarean delivery, induction of labor, premature rupture of membranes, excessive fetal growth, and fetal distress. The mean length of stay was longer for women with suicidal behavior. Conclusion During delivery hospitalization, women with suicidal behavior are at increased risk for many adverse obstetric outcomes, highlighting the importance of screening for and providing appropriate clinical care for women with suicidal behavior during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiu-Yue Zhong
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Bizu Gelaye
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Jordan W. Smoller
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Human Genetic Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Paul Avillach
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Children’s Hospital Informatics Program, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Tianxi Cai
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Michelle A. Williams
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Grigg J, Worsley R, Thew C, Gurvich C, Thomas N, Kulkarni J. Antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia: synthesis of world-wide guidelines and integrated recommendations for assessment, management and future research. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2017; 234:3279-3297. [PMID: 28889207 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-017-4730-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2017] [Accepted: 08/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE Hyperprolactinemia is a highly prevalent adverse effect of many antipsychotic agents, with potentially serious health consequences. Several guidelines have been developed for the management of this condition; yet, their concordance has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this paper were (1) to review current clinical guidelines; (2) to review key systematic evidence for management; and (3) based on our findings, to develop an integrated management recommendation specific to male and female patients who are otherwise clinically stabilised on antipsychotics. METHODS We performed searches of Medline and EMBASE, supplemented with guideline-specific database and general web searches, to identify clinical guidelines containing specific recommendations for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia, produced/updated 01/01/2010-15/09/2016. A separate systematic search was performed to identify emerging management approaches described in reviews and meta-analyses published ≥ 2010. RESULTS There is some consensus among guidelines relating to baseline PRL screening (8/12 guidelines), screening for differential diagnosis (7/12) and discontinuing/switching PRL-raising agent (7/12). Guidelines otherwise diverge substantially regarding most aspects of screening, monitoring and management (e.g. treatment with dopamine agonists). There is an omission of clear sex-specific recommendations. Systematic literature on management approaches is promising; more research is needed. An integrated management recommendation is presented to guide sex-specific clinical response to antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. Key aspects include asymptomatic hyperprolactinemia monitoring and fertility considerations with PRL normalisation. CONCLUSION Further empirical work is key to shaping robust guidelines for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. The integrated management recommendation can assist clinician and patient decision-making, with the goal of balancing effective psychiatric treatment while minimising PRL-related adverse health effects in male and female patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmin Grigg
- The Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Level 4, 607 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004, Victoria, Australia
| | - Roisin Worsley
- The Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Level 4, 607 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004, Victoria, Australia
| | - Caroline Thew
- The Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Level 4, 607 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004, Victoria, Australia
| | - Caroline Gurvich
- The Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Level 4, 607 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004, Victoria, Australia
| | - Natalie Thomas
- The Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Level 4, 607 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jayashri Kulkarni
- The Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Level 4, 607 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Haskey C, Galbally M. Mood stabilizers in pregnancy and child developmental outcomes: A systematic review. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2017; 51:1087-1097. [PMID: 28825316 DOI: 10.1177/0004867417726175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research suggests that maintaining treatment during pregnancy for women with bipolar affective disorder reduces the risk of relapse. However, one of the key questions for women and clinicians during pregnancy is whether there are implications of exposure to mood stabilizers for longer term child development. Despite these concerns, there are few recent systematic reviews comparing the impact on child developmental outcomes for individual mood-stabilizing agents to inform clinical decisions. OBJECTIVES To examine the strengths and limitations of the existing data on child developmental outcomes following prenatal exposure to mood stabilizers and to explore whether there are any differences between agents for detrimental effects on child development. METHOD Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a rigorous systematic search was carried out of four electronic databases from their respective years of inception to September 2016 to identify studies which examined the effects of mood stabilizers including sodium valproate, carbamazepine, lamotrigine, lithium and second-generation antipsychotics on child developmental outcomes. RESULTS We identified 15 studies for critical review. Of these, 10 examined antiepileptic drugs, 2 studied lithium and 3 studied second-generation antipsychotics. The most consistent finding was a dose-response relationship for valproate with higher doses associated with poorer global cognitive abilities compared to other antiepileptic drugs. The limited data available for lithium found no adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. The limited second-generation antipsychotic studies included a report of a transient early neurodevelopmental delay which resolved by 12 months of age. CONCLUSION This review found higher neurodevelopmental risk with valproate. While the existing data on lithium and second-generation antipsychotics are reassuring, these data are both limited and lower quality, indicating that further research is required. The information from this review is relevant for patients and clinicians to influence choice of mood-stabilizing agent in childbearing women. This must be balanced against the known risks associated with untreated bipolar affective disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Haskey
- 1 Peel and Rockingham Kwinana Mental Health Service, Rockingham, WA, Australia
| | - Megan Galbally
- 2 School of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.,3 School of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia.,4 Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Scrandis DA. Bipolar Disorder in Pregnancy: A Review of Pregnancy Outcomes. J Midwifery Womens Health 2017; 62:673-683. [DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2016] [Revised: 04/12/2017] [Accepted: 04/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
42
|
Courty E, Gobalakichenane P, Garcia M, Muscat A, Kazakian C, Ledent T, Moldes M, Blondeau B, Mitanchez D, Buyse M, Fève B. Antenatal antipsychotic exposure induces multigenerational and gender-specific programming of adiposity and glucose tolerance in adult mouse offspring. DIABETES & METABOLISM 2017; 44:281-291. [PMID: 28729164 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2017.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2017] [Revised: 05/17/2017] [Accepted: 06/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are well known for their metabolic side effects in humans, including obesity and diabetes. These compounds are maintained during pregnancy to prevent the relapse of psychoses, but they readily diffuse across the placenta to the fetus, as documented with the widely-prescribed drug olanzapine (OLZ). However, observational studies have provided conflicting results on the potential impact of SGAs on fetal growth and body weight, and their effects on metabolic regulation in the offspring. For this reason, our study has tested whether antenatal exposure of CD1 mice to OLZ influenced metabolic outcomes in the offspring of the first (F1) and second (F2) generations. In F1 mice, OLZ antenatal treatment caused a decrease in neonatal body weight in both genders, an effect that persisted throughout life only in male animals. Interestingly, F1 female mice also displayed altered glucose homoeostasis. F2 mice, generated by mating normal males with F1 female mice exposed to OLZ during antenatal life, exhibited higher neonatal body weights which persisted only in F2 female animals. This was associated with expansion of fat mass and a concordant pattern of adipose tissue gene expression. Moreover, male and female F2 mice were glucose-intolerant. Thus, our study has demonstrated that antenatal OLZ exposure induces multigenerational and gender-specific programming of glucose tolerance in the offspring mice as adults, and points to the need for careful monitoring of children exposed to SGAs during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Courty
- Inserm, Saint-Antoine Research Center, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne University, Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University Paris 06, 75012 Paris, France; Hospitalo-Universitary Institute, ICAN, 75013 Paris, France
| | - P Gobalakichenane
- Inserm, Saint-Antoine Research Center, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne University, Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University Paris 06, 75012 Paris, France; Hospitalo-Universitary Institute, ICAN, 75013 Paris, France; Department of Neonatology, Armand-Trousseau Hospital, 75012 Paris, France
| | - M Garcia
- Inserm, Saint-Antoine Research Center, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne University, Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University Paris 06, 75012 Paris, France; Hospitalo-Universitary Institute, ICAN, 75013 Paris, France
| | - A Muscat
- Inserm, Saint-Antoine Research Center, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne University, Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University Paris 06, 75012 Paris, France; Hospitalo-Universitary Institute, ICAN, 75013 Paris, France
| | - C Kazakian
- Inserm, Saint-Antoine Research Center, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne University, Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University Paris 06, 75012 Paris, France; Hospitalo-Universitary Institute, ICAN, 75013 Paris, France
| | - T Ledent
- Inserm, Saint-Antoine Research Center, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne University, Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University Paris 06, 75012 Paris, France
| | - M Moldes
- Inserm, Saint-Antoine Research Center, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne University, Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University Paris 06, 75012 Paris, France; Hospitalo-Universitary Institute, ICAN, 75013 Paris, France
| | - B Blondeau
- Inserm, Saint-Antoine Research Center, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne University, Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University Paris 06, 75012 Paris, France; Hospitalo-Universitary Institute, ICAN, 75013 Paris, France
| | - D Mitanchez
- Inserm, Saint-Antoine Research Center, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne University, Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University Paris 06, 75012 Paris, France; Hospitalo-Universitary Institute, ICAN, 75013 Paris, France; Department of Neonatology, Armand-Trousseau Hospital, 75012 Paris, France
| | - M Buyse
- Inserm, Saint-Antoine Research Center, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne University, Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University Paris 06, 75012 Paris, France; Hospitalo-Universitary Institute, ICAN, 75013 Paris, France; Paris-Sud University, EA 4123, 92296 Châtenay-Malabry, France; Department of Pharmacy, Saint-Antoine Hospital, AP-HP, 75012 Paris, France
| | - B Fève
- Inserm, Saint-Antoine Research Center, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne University, Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University Paris 06, 75012 Paris, France; Hospitalo-Universitary Institute, ICAN, 75013 Paris, France; Department of Endocrinology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, AP-HP, 75012 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Signal of Miscarriage with Aripiprazole: A Disproportionality Analysis of the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database. Drug Saf 2017; 40:1141-1146. [DOI: 10.1007/s40264-017-0560-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
44
|
Frayne J, Nguyen T, Bennett K, Allen S, Hauck Y, Liira H. The effects of gestational use of antidepressants and antipsychotics on neonatal outcomes for women with severe mental illness. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 57:526-532. [DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2016] [Accepted: 02/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Frayne
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; King Edward Memorial Hospital; Subiaco Western Australia Australia
- School of Primary, Aboriginal and Rural Health Care; University of Western Australia; Crawley Western Australia Australia
| | - Thinh Nguyen
- School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences; University of Western Australia; Perth Western Australia Australia
- Peel and Rockingham Kwinana Mental Health Services; Rockingham Western Australia Australia
| | - Kellie Bennett
- School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences; University of Western Australia; Perth Western Australia Australia
| | - Suzanna Allen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; King Edward Memorial Hospital; Subiaco Western Australia Australia
| | - Yvonne Hauck
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery Education; King Edward Memorial Hospital; Subiaco Western Australia Australia
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine; Curtin University; Perth Western Australia Australia
| | - Helena Liira
- School of Primary, Aboriginal and Rural Health Care; University of Western Australia; Crawley Western Australia Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Mehta TM, Van Lieshout RJ. A review of the safety of clozapine during pregnancy and lactation. Arch Womens Ment Health 2017; 20:1-9. [PMID: 27704220 DOI: 10.1007/s00737-016-0670-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2016] [Accepted: 09/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Clozapine is an antipsychotic used in the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, little is known about clozapine use during pregnancy and lactation, or its impact on the mother, foetus, and infant. This review aims to summarize the available literature on the safety of clozapine use during the perinatal period. EMBASE, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE were searched from their inceptions through June 2016. The review encompasses 21 studies that have examined clozapine use during pregnancy and lactation. The limited available data do not support an increased risk of congenital malformations in foetuses exposed to clozapine during pregnancy, though rates of gestational diabetes are twice as high in pregnant women using clozapine. Clozapine accumulation in foetal serum possibly contributes to increased rates of floppy infant syndrome at delivery, decreased foetal heart rate variability, and seizures in infancy. Clozapine crosses the placenta and also accumulates in breast milk, which may increase the risk of agranulocytosis in infants and may necessitate infant testing. The majority of these data come from case reports and case series, making it unclear if the published risks associated with clozapine are due to mental illness, lifestyle factors, or co-treatment with other psychotropic medications. While the available literature on clozapine use during the perinatal period is very limited, the risks of clozapine use during pregnancy and the postpartum period should be discussed with women and weighed against those associated with other treatments and partially or untreated schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor M Mehta
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | - Ryan J Van Lieshout
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada
- Women's Health Concerns Clinic, St. Joseph's Hospital, 100 West 5th Street, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3K7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Maharshi V, Banerjee I, Nagar P, Rehan HS. Tracheo-Esophageal Fistula (TEF) in a Newborn Following Maternal Antenatal Exposure to Olanzapine. DRUG SAFETY - CASE REPORTS 2017; 4:2. [PMID: 28063029 PMCID: PMC5218954 DOI: 10.1007/s40800-016-0044-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
There is a dearth of evidence on the safety of the use of antipsychotics during pregnancy. Olanzapine, a pregnancy category C drug, has no unequivocal evidence of harm to the fetus. Against this backdrop, we report the first case of a tracheo-esophageal fistula (TEF) in a newborn following maternal antenatal exposure to olanzapine. A 29-year-old woman with acute psychotic disorder had been treated with olanzapine for the last 7 years. Her first pregnancy, while taking olanzapine, resulted in a miscarriage at 4 months' gestation, following which she discontinued olanzapine. She reconceived after a few months and delivered a full-term normal child. However, due to the recurrence of psychiatric illness after her second pregnancy, she was prescribed olanzapine again, which was continued throughout her third pregnancy. The outcome of the third pregnancy was a full-term female baby with a TEF. The baby was managed surgically and discharged with satisfactory vital signs. Unfortunately, however, the baby did not survive beyond 11 months of age. Causality between antenatal maternal olanzapine exposure and TEF in the newborn was determined to be 'probable' (score +5) as per the Naranjo causality assessment scale. Greater knowledge of this potential teratogenicity caused by olanzapine is needed to reduce morbidity and mortality in newborns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikas Maharshi
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, 110029, India. .,Department of Pharmacology, Lady Hardinge Medical College (LHMC), New Delhi, 110001, India.
| | - Indranil Banerjee
- Department of Pharmacology, Lady Hardinge Medical College (LHMC), New Delhi, 110001, India
| | - Pravesh Nagar
- Department of Pharmacology, Lady Hardinge Medical College (LHMC), New Delhi, 110001, India
| | - Harmeet Singh Rehan
- Department of Pharmacology, Lady Hardinge Medical College (LHMC), New Delhi, 110001, India
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Petersen I, McCrea RL, Sammon CJ, Osborn DPJ, Evans SJ, Cowen PJ, Freemantle N, Nazareth I. Risks and benefits of psychotropic medication in pregnancy: cohort studies based on UK electronic primary care health records. Health Technol Assess 2017; 20:1-176. [PMID: 27029490 DOI: 10.3310/hta20230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although many women treated with psychotropic medication become pregnant, no psychotropic medication has been licensed for use in pregnancy. This leaves women and their health-care professionals in a treatment dilemma, as they need to balance the health of the woman with that of the unborn child. The aim of this project was to investigate the risks and benefits of psychotropic medication in women treated for psychosis who become pregnant. OBJECTIVE(S) (1) To provide a descriptive account of psychotropic medication prescribed before pregnancy, during pregnancy and up to 15 months after delivery in UK primary care from 1995 to 2012; (2) to identify risk factors predictive of discontinuation and restarting of lithium (multiple manufacturers), anticonvulsant mood stabilisers and antipsychotic medication; (3) to examine the extent to which pregnancy is a determinant for discontinuation of psychotropic medication; (4) to examine prevalence of records suggestive of adverse mental health, deterioration or relapse 18 months before and during pregnancy, and up to 15 months after delivery; and (5) to estimate absolute and relative risks of adverse maternal and child outcomes of psychotropic treatment in pregnancy. DESIGN Retrospective cohort studies. SETTING Primary care. PARTICIPANTS Women treated for psychosis who became pregnant, and their children. INTERVENTIONS Treatment with antipsychotics, lithium or anticonvulsant mood stabilisers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Discontinuation and restarting of treatment; worsening of mental health; acute pre-eclampsia/gestational hypertension; gestational diabetes; caesarean section; perinatal death; major congenital malformations; poor birth outcome (low birthweight, preterm birth, small for gestational age, low Apgar score); transient poor birth outcomes (tremor, agitation, breathing and muscle tone problems); and neurodevelopmental and behavioural disorders. DATA SOURCES Clinical Practice Research Datalink database and The Health Improvement Network primary care database. RESULTS Prescribing of psychotropic medication was relatively constant before pregnancy, decreased sharply in early pregnancy and peaked after delivery. Antipsychotic and anticonvulsant treatment increased over the study period. The recording of markers of worsening mental health peaked after delivery. Pregnancy was a strong determinant for discontinuation of psychotropic medication. However, between 40% and 76% of women who discontinued psychotropic medication before or in early pregnancy restarted treatment by 15 months after delivery. The risk of major congenital malformations, and neurodevelopmental and behavioural outcomes in valproate (multiple manufacturers) users was twice that in users of other anticonvulsants. The risks of adverse maternal and child outcomes in women who continued antipsychotic use in pregnancy were not greater than in those who discontinued treatment before pregnancy. LIMITATIONS A few women would have received parts of their care outside primary care, which may not be captured in this analysis. Likewise, the analyses were based on prescribing data, which may differ from usage. CONCLUSIONS Psychotropic medication is prescribed before, during and after pregnancy. Many women discontinue treatment before or during early pregnancy and then restart again in late pregnancy or after delivery. Our results support previous associations between valproate and adverse child outcomes but we found no evidence of such an association for antipsychotics. FUTURE WORK Future research should focus on (1) curtailing the use of sodium valproate; (2) estimating the benefits of psychotropic drug use in pregnancy; and (3) investigating the risks associated with lifestyle choices that are more prevalent among women using psychotropic drugs. FUNDING DETAILS The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Petersen
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rachel L McCrea
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Cormac J Sammon
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Stephen J Evans
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Phillip J Cowen
- University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Nick Freemantle
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Irwin Nazareth
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Santucci AK, Singer LT, Wisniewski SR, Luther JF, Eng HF, Sit DK, Wisner KL. One-Year Developmental Outcomes for Infants of Mothers With Bipolar Disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2017; 78:1083-1090. [PMID: 28068465 PMCID: PMC7296817 DOI: 10.4088/jcp.15m10535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2015] [Accepted: 04/08/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Few data about the development of infants born to women with bipolar disorder have been published. We hypothesized that infants of women with bipolar disorder (by DSM-IV criteria) treated with psychotropics (BD+) or untreated with psychotropics (BD-) would demonstrate poorer cognitive and behavioral development than infants of controls. On the basis of previous studies, we expected that psychotropic-exposed infants of women in the BD+ group would have poorer neuromotor performance during infancy. METHODS This longitudinal study included 197 mother-infant dyads recruited to participate between July 2006 and March 2011: 81 with prenatal maternal bipolar disorder without psychotropic treatment (BD-, n = 27) or bipolar disorder with psychotropic exposure (BD+, n = 54) and 116 in which infants were exposed to neither bipolar disorder nor psychotropics. Maternal psychopathology and pharmacotherapy exposure assessments were completed at 20, 30, and 36 prenatal weeks and 12, 26, and 52 weeks postpartum. Infants were evaluated with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Second Edition, which included the psychomotor (Psychomotor Development Index [PDI]), cognitive (Mental Development Index [MDI]), and behavioral (Behavioral Rating Scale [BRS]) components. RESULTS Neither prenatal exposure to BD- or BD+ significantly impacted overall PDI (P = .2449), MDI (P = .7886), or BRS (P = .6072) scores. However, we observed a significant effect of BD+ exposure-by-time interaction for the BRS Motor Quality index (F₂₄₅ = 3.16, P = .0441), with BD+ exposed infants less likely to be above the 75th percentile at the 52-week assessment (mean = 11.5%) compared with BD- (mean = 40.0%) and nonexposed infants (mean = 48.4%). CONCLUSIONS We found no significant impact of prenatal BD- or BD+ exposure on infant PDI, MDI, or overall BRS scores at 12, 26, or 52 weeks of age, with most scores remaining within normal limits. Consistent with previous studies, we found a specific effect of prenatal BD+ exposure on quality of motor functioning at 1 year. However, the majority of infants were within normal limits on this developmental outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00585702.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimee K. Santucci
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee,Corresponding author: Aimee K. Santucci, PhD, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Epidemiology, 262 Danny Thomas Pl, Memphis, TN 38105 ()
| | - Lynn T. Singer
- Departments of Pediatrics, Psychiatry, Psychology, and Environmental Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Stephen R. Wisniewski
- Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - James F. Luther
- Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Heather F. Eng
- Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Dorothy K. Sit
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Katherine L. Wisner
- Asher Center for the Study and Treatment of Depressive Disorders, Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
|
50
|
Neonatal Adaptation Issues After Maternal Exposure to Prescription Drugs: Withdrawal Syndromes and Residual Pharmacological Effects. Drug Saf 2016; 39:903-24. [DOI: 10.1007/s40264-016-0435-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|