Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after transplantation: a network meta-analysis

Comparison of tacrolimus vs. cyclosporine in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for thalassemia

OBJECTIVES

Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT, and effective prevention of GvHD is critical for the success of the HSCT procedure. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have been used for decades as the backbone of GvHD prophylaxis. In this study, the efficacy and safety of Cyclosporine A (CsA) and tacrolimus (TCR) were compared in pediatric HSCT for thalassemia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 129 pediatric patients who underwent HSCT with the diagnosis of thalassemia at Medicalpark Göztepe and Antalya Hospitals between January 2017 and December 2020.

RESULTS

Despite the GvHD prophylaxis, grade II-IV acute GvHD developed in 29 patients. Of these patients, 12 had only gut, 10 had only skin, 6 had combined gut and skin, and one had only liver GvHD. Fifteen of these 29 patients were in the CsA group, and 14 of them were in the TCR group. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of acute GvHD occurrence, GvHD stage, or involvement sites. In terms of CNI-related toxicity, neurotoxicity in 15 (CsA n = 9, TCR n = 6) and nephrotoxicity in 18 (CsA n = 4, TCR n = 14) patients were observed. While there was no difference between the two groups in terms of neurotoxicity, more nephrotoxicity developed in patients using TCR (p = .013). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of engraftment syndrome, veno-occlusive disease, CMV reactivation, PRES, or graft rejection.

CONCLUSION

Regarding GvHD, there was no difference in efficacy between TCR and CsA usage. Patients taking TCR experienced noticeably higher nephrotoxicity in terms of adverse effects. This difference should be considered according to the patient's clinical situation while choosing a CNI.

CYP3A5 influences oral tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and timing of acute kidney injury following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Introduction: Polymorphisms in genes responsible for the metabolism and transport of tacrolimus have been demonstrated to influence clinical outcomes for patients following allogeneic hematologic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT). However, the clinical impact of germline polymorphisms specifically for oral formulations of tacrolimus is not fully described. Methods: To investigate the clinical impact of genetic polymorphisms in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 on oral tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes, we prospectively enrolled 103 adult patients receiving oral tacrolimus for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) following allo-HSCT. Patients were followed in the inpatient and outpatient phase of care for the first 100 days of tacrolimus therapy. Patients were genotyped for CYP3A5 *3 (rs776746), CYP3A4 *1B (rs2740574), ABCB1 exon 12 (rs1128503), ABCB1 exon 21 (rs2032582), ABCB1 exon 26 (rs1045642). Results: Expression of CYP3A5 *1 was highly correlated with tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in the inpatient phase of care (p < 0.001) and throughout the entirety of the study period (p < 0.001). Additionally, Expression of CYP3A5 *1 was associated with decreased risk of developing AKI as an inpatient (p = 0.06). Variants in ABCB1 were not associated with tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in this study. We were unable to discern an independent effect of CYP3A4 *1B or *22 in this population. Conclusion: Expression of CYP3A5 *1 is highly influential on the pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes for patients receiving oral tacrolimus as GVHD prophylaxis following allo-HSCT.

Regulation of hematopoietic stem cells differentiation, self-renewal, and quiescence through the mTOR signaling pathway

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are important for the hematopoietic system because they can self-renew to increase their number and differentiate into all the blood cells. At a steady state, most of the HSCs remain in quiescence to preserve their capacities and protect themselves from damage and exhaustive stress. However, when there are some emergencies, HSCs are activated to start their self-renewal and differentiation. The mTOR signaling pathway has been shown as an important signaling pathway that can regulate the differentiation, self-renewal, and quiescence of HSCs, and many types of molecules can regulate HSCs' these three potentials by influencing the mTOR signaling pathway. Here we review how mTOR signaling pathway regulates HSCs three potentials, and introduce some molecules that can work as the regulator of HSCs' these potentials through the mTOR signaling. Finally, we outline the clinical significance of studying the regulation of HSCs three potentials through the mTOR signaling pathway and make some predictions.

Anti-Thymocyte Globulin Prophylaxis in Patients With Hematological Malignancies Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Background

Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) prophylaxis reduces graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) incidence. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the long-term efficacy of ATG and the influencing factors in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for the relevant studies published up to August 2020. Data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ATG prophylaxis for GVHD prevention in allo-HSCT patients were extracted.

Results

A total of eight relevant RCTs (1,348 patients) were included. ATG significantly reduced the incidence of grade III–IV aGVHD (P = 0.001) and cGVHD (P < 0.001). ATG significantly improved the GVHD relapse-free survival (GRFS) (P < 0.001). The immunosuppressive regimen (number and dose of immunosuppressants) was significantly reduced when using ATG (P = 0.005). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation was high in patients receiving ATG (P = 0.003). No significant differences were detected in relapses, overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) between the ATG and no ATG groups. Subgroup analyses revealed that the donor type and ATG formulation might be the possible sources of heterogeneity among the included studies. Meta-regression analysis showed that the cumulative dose of ATG did not affect GVHD, OS, relapse, RFS, and NRM.

Conclusion

Although ATG had no significant effect on relapse, RFS, and NRM, it significantly reduced the occurrence and severity of GVHD, improved the GRFS, and reduced the number and dose of immunosuppressants in patients undergoing allo-HSCT.

The Akt-mTOR network at the interface of hematopoietic stem cell homeostasis

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are immature blood cells that exhibit multilineage differentiation capacity. Homeostasis is critical for HSC potential and lifelong hematopoiesis, and HSC homeostasis is tightly governed by both intrinsic molecular networks and microenvironmental signals. The evolutionarily conserved serine/threonine protein kinase B (PKB, also referred to as Akt)-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is universal to nearly all multicellular organisms and plays an integral role in most cellular processes. Emerging evidence has revealed a central role of the Akt-mTOR network in HSC homeostasis, because it responds to multiple intracellular and extracellular signals and regulates various downstream targets, eventually affecting several cellular processes, including the cell cycle, mitochondrial metabolism, and protein synthesis. Dysregulated Akt-mTOR signaling greatly affects HSC self-renewal, maintenance, differentiation, survival, autophagy, and aging, as well as transformation of HSCs to leukemia stem cells. Here, we review recent works and provide an advanced understanding of how the Akt-mTOR network regulates HSC homeostasis, thus offering insights into future clinical applications.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) involves the infusion of hematopoietic progenitor cells into patients with hematologic disorders with the goal of re-establishing normal hematopoietic and immune function. HCT is classified as autologous or allogeneic based on the origin of hematopoietic cells. Autologous HCT uses the patient's own cells while allogeneic HCT uses hematopoietic cells from a human leukocyte antigen-compatible donor. Allogeneic HCT is a potentially curative treatment option for patients with certain types of hematologic malignancies, and autologous HCT is primarily used to support patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. Advances in HCT methods and supportive care in recent decades have led to improved survival after HCT; however, disease relapse and posttransplant complications still commonly occur in both autologous and allogeneic HCT recipients. Allogeneic HCT recipients may also develop acute and/or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which results in immune-mediated cellular injury of several organs. The NCCN Guidelines for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation focus on recommendations for pretransplant recipient evaluation and the management of GVHD in adult patients with malignant disease.

Analyzing the clinical outcomes of switching from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVE

The selection of graft-vs. -host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis is vital for the success of hematopoetic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have been used for decades as the backbone of GvHD prophylaxis. The aim of this study is to analyze the results of switching cyclosporine (CSA) to tacrolimus because of acute GvHD, engraftment syndrome (ES), persistent low level of CSA, or various CSA-associated adverse events in the first 100 days of pediatric HSCT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 192 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at Medicalpark Göztepe and Antalya Hospitals between April 2014 and May 2019 had therapy switched from CSA to tacrolimus-based immunosuppression within 100 days of transplant.

RESULTS

The reasons for conversion to tacrolimus were low level of CSA (n = 70), aGvHD (n = 63), CSA-associated neurotoxicity (n = 15), CSA-associated nephrotoxicity (n = 10), hypertension (n = 10), allergic reactions (n = 9), ES (n = 7), CSA-associated hepatotoxicity (n = 5), and vomiting (n = 3). The median day after transplant for conversion to tacrolimus for all patients was day 20 (range 0-100 days). Response rates to conversion were 38% for GvHD, 86% for neurotoxicity, 50% for nephrotoxicity, 60% for hepatotoxicity, 80% for hypertension, 66% for vomiting, and 57% for ES. Twenty-nine patients (15%) experienced tacrolimus-associated toxicities after therapy conversion to tacrolimus. Neurotoxicity emerged as posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), which was the most common toxicity observed after conversion (18/29 patients).

CONCLUSION

Our data support the quick conversion to tacrolimus in the condition of persistent low CSA levels with acceptable efficacy and safety. Although both drugs are CNI and share a very similar mechanism of action, the conversion could be preferred especially in specific organ toxicities with special attention for neurotoxicity after conversion.

Oral mucositis after tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/methotrexate as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether treatment with tacrolimus plus sirolimus (Tac/Sir) as a prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease worsens severe oral mucositis and delays healing compared to cyclosporine plus methotrexate (CsA/Mtx) following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study comprised 141 patients: 73 randomized to receive Tac/Sir and 68 to receive CsA/Mtx. The oral mucositis assessment scale and toxicity grading according to WHO were used to assess the severity, peak and duration of oral mucositis from the day -3 to day 24 post-transplant.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients developed oral mucositis in the first 24 days post-transplant. No significant difference in oral mucositis severity between the Tac/Sir and CsA/Mtx groups was observed. The peak oral mucositis score occurred on day 10 in both groups. Although oral mucositis scores had returned to baseline in the CsA/Mtx group on day 24 post-transplant, no significant difference compared with the Tac/Sir group was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of tacrolimus/sirolimus as a graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation increased neither the incidence nor severity of oral mucositis compared with cyclosporine/methotrexate. Furthermore, oral mucositis healing was not prolonged and followed the same time pattern as cyclosporine/methotrexate.

Comparison of Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine Combined With Methotrexate for Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

After patients receive hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), both cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus (TAC) in combination with methotrexate (MTX) are recommended as the standard prophylaxis strategy for graft versus host disease (GVHD) by the European Group of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. However, the advantage of TAC combined with MTX lacks conclusive evidence.

METHODS

We searched online databases for studies comparing CsA + MTX and TAC + MTX in patients who received HSCT. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were applied to compare the pooled data.

RESULTS

We found a significant reduction in the grade II to IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) rate (OR, 0.42; CI, 0.28-0.61; P < 0.00001), grade III to IV aGVHD rate (OR, 0.59; CI, 0.38-0.92; P = 0.02), chronic GVHD rate (OR, 0.79; CI, 0.62-1.00; P = 0.05), and nonrelapse mortality rate (OR, 0.62; CI, 0.40-0.95; P = 0.03) and an increase in the overall survival (OS) rate (only in those received from unrelated donor) (OR, 1.30; CI, 1.15-1.48; P < 0.0001) in the TAC + MTX group. Similar outcomes occurred for the relapse rate and disease-free survival rate in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TAC + MTX has a superior effect in the prevention of aGVHD in patients who received HSCT and further prolongs the OS in patients who received from unrelated donor transplants. CsA + MTX prolongs the OS in patients who received HSCT from HLA-identical sibling donors. The leukemic relapse and disease-free survival rate were not different between the 2 regimens. Thus, we conclude that TAC + MTX was superior to CsA + MTX, especially for HSCT patients with nonmalignant disorders. Further studies are still required to evaluate the effect of TAC or CsA combined with other suppressors in the treatment regimen following HSCT.

Combination of Low-Dose, Short-Course Mycophenolate Mofetil With Cyclosporine and Methotrexate for Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant

OBJECTIVES

With the standard regimen for graft-versushost disease prophylaxis in allogeneic stem cell transplant with human leukocyte antigen-matched donor, grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease occurs in 30% to 50% of sibling and up to 80% of unrelated recipients. Studies with limited patient numbers have shown efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. We investigated the effect of low-dose mycophenolate mofetil added to a standardized prophylaxis regimen for graft-versus-host disease in related human leukocyte antigen-matched allogeneic stem cell transplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective randomized clinical trial, we compared cyclosporine and methotrexate versus the combination of cyclosporine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil in all patients who underwent human leukocyte antigencompatible related donor allogeneic stem cell transplant for acute leukemia during 3 years at the Bone Marrow Transplant Unit at Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Shiraz, Iran).

RESULTS

All 134 patients in both groups underwent successful engraftment. Recovery times for neutrophils and platelets were not significantly different between groups (P < .05). Incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease in the cyclosporine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil group was less than in the cyclosporine and methotrexate group (21.6% vs 40.9%; P = .041). Incidence of grade II-IV acute graftversus-host disease in the mycophenolate mofetil group was 15.2% versus the control group at 33% (P = .045).

CONCLUSIONS

Our single-center study suggests the combination of mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, and methotrexate is superior to the standard regimen of cyclosporine and methotrexate for graft-versushost disease prophylaxis after human leukocyte antigen-matched related donor allogeneic stem cell transplant.

Ruxolitinib: a potential treatment for corticosteroid refractory acute graft-versus-host disease

INTRODUCTION

Allogeneic transplantation represents a potentially curative procedure for various lethal conditions; however, it is associated with serious immune mediated complications. The most serious complication is graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Acute GVHD (aGVHD) is unresponsive to initial corticosteroid therapy in ~40% of cases. Corticosteroid-refractory aGVHD (CR-aGVHD) represents a significant unmet need with nearly 60% mortality in patients developing this state.

AREAS COVERED

We review landmark trials which led to the US FDA approval of Ruxolitinb for the treatment of CR-aGVHD. Ruxolitinib phosphate is a Janus Kinase 1 and 2 inhibitor which inhibits pro-inflammatory signaling, and modulates T-cell subsets to an anti-inflammatory phenotype. Ruxolitinib was recently prospectively studied for the treatment of CR-aGVHD in the REACH1 trial, which added Ruxolitinib to corticosteroid therapy. This trial demonstrated favorable results with 73% of patients ultimately responding. Among responders, over 70% remained alive at 6 months. These results led to the US FDA to approve ruxolitinib as treatment for CR-aGVHD, the first approval of its kind.

EXPERT OPINION

Ruxolitinib represents the standard option for CR-aGVHD. Future studies should identify patients less likely to respond to ruxolitinib and/or focus on a more targeted approaches to reduce infectious complications and cytopenias seen with this drug.

Pediatric acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis and treatment: surveyed real-life approach reveals dissimilarities compared to published recommendations

Pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) practices differ from those of adults, particularly the heterogeneity of transplantable nonmalignant diseases and the lower incidence of graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD). Several guidelines regarding the management of acute (a) GVHD in adult HCT have been published. We aimed to capture the real‐life approaches for pediatric aGVHD prophylaxis/treatment, and data from 75/193 (response rate 39%) EBMT centers (26 countries) were included, representing half (48%) of the pediatric EBMT‐HCT activity. Results with ≥75% approval from respondents (74/75) for GVHD prophylaxis after myeloablative HCT for malignancies partially contradict published guidelines: Single‐agent cyclosporine A (CsA) was used for matched sibling donor HCT in 47%; blood CsA levels were reported lower; the relapse risk in malignant diseases influenced GVHD prophylaxis with early withdrawal of CsA; distinct longer duration of CsA was employed in nonmalignant diseases. Most centers used additional anti‐thymocyte globulin for matched unrelated and mismatched donor HCT, but not for matched siblings. Regarding prophylaxis in nonmyeloablative conditioning (mainly for nonmalignant diseases), responses showed broad heterogeneity. High conformity was found for first‐line treatment; however, results regarding steroid‐refractory aGVHD indicate an earlier diagnosis in children. Our findings highlight the need for standardized pediatric approaches toward aGVHD prophylaxis/treatment differentiated for malignant and nonmalignant underlying diseases.

Tacrolimus Levels in the Prophylaxis of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease in the Chinese Early After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus has been widely accepted as the backbone of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). The present work evaluated whether tacrolimus concentrations early after transplant correlate with the incidence of aGVHD in Chinese alloHSCT recipients.

METHODS

One hundred four Chinese alloHSCT recipients were included in this retrospective study. All patients received standard prophylaxis with tacrolimus and short-term methotrexate. Blood samples were taken at steady-state for those on i.v. tacrolimus (Cv) or predose (C0) and 2 hours after the last oral dose (C2).

RESULTS

In the first 8 weeks after alloHSCT, significant variability in Cv, C0, and C2 of Chinese patients was observed. It was found that higher tacrolimus C0 and C2 values tended to be associated with a reduced risk of aGVHD, although this was a nonsignificant trend due to the small sample size involved. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that Cv levels of ≥16.52 ng/mL, C0 levels of ≥5.56 ng/mL, and C2 levels of ≥7.83 ng/mL minimized the incidence of treatment failure during weeks 3-4 with intravenous administration and weeks 5-6 with oral administration. There was no statistically significant association of the patient liver and kidney function with the blood concentration of tacrolimus in the desired range of 5-20 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus therapeutic drug monitoring improved treatment outcomes of Chinese alloHSCT recipients. Cv measurements during weeks 3-4 and C0 or C2 measurements during weeks 5-6 better predicted aGVHD (I-IV) than the concentrations measured at other time points during the first 6 weeks after alloHSCT.

Effect of combined sublethal X-ray irradiation and cyclosporine A treatment in NOD scid gamma (NSG) mice

Cyclosporine A (CsA) is used in hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCT) to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). GvHD is the most severe side effect of allogeneic HSCT and efficient therapies are lacking. Mouse models are an essential tool for assessing potential new therapeutic strategies. Our aim is to mimic a clinical setting as close as possible using CsA treatment after sublethal irradiation in NSG mice and thereby evaluate the feasibility of this mouse model for GvHD studies. The effect of CsA (7.5 mg/kg body weight) on sublethally X-ray irradiated (2 Gy) and non-irradiated NSG mice was tested. CsA was administered orally every twelve hours for nine days. Animals irradiated and treated with CsA showed a shorter survival (n=3/10) than irradiated animals treated with NaCl (n=10/10). Furthermore, combined therapy resulted in severe weight loss (82 ± 6% of initial weight, n=7, day 8), with weight recovery after the CsA application was ceased. A high number of apoptotic events in the liver was observed in these mice (0.431 ± 0.371 apoptotic cells/cm², n=2, compared to 0.027 ± 0.034 apoptotic cells/cm², n=5, in the non-irradiated group). Other adverse effects, including a decrease in white blood cell counts were non-CsA-specific manifestations of irradiation. The combination of CsA treatment with irradiation has a hepatotoxic and lethal effect on NSG mice, whereas the treatment without irradiation is tolerated. Therefore, when using in vivo models of GvHD in NSG mice, a combined treatment with CsA and X-ray irradiation should be avoided or carefully evaluated.

Topical Cyclosporine Pretreatment of Ocular Surface in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

PURPOSE

Dry eye disease (DED) of ocular graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Ongoing inflammation and irreversible fibrotic changes of the ocular surface and adnexa are obstacles for effective treatment of ocular GVHD. We hypothesized that topical cyclosporine A (CsA) pretreatment might be effective in preventing ocular GVHD.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, comparative study, patients were randomly assigned to the topical CsA treatment (4 times daily in both eyes for a month before allogeneic HSCT and continued use of eye drops after transplantation) or control (no treatment) groups. Participants underwent thorough ophthalmic examination-including Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire survey, Schirmer test, tear break-up time (TBUT) evaluation, and corneal fluorescein staining-before and 1, 2, and 3 months after allogeneic HSCT.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight participants completed the study. Among patients with baseline Schirmer values <10 mm and TBUT <5 s before allogenic HSCT, those in the topical CsA treatment group exhibited significantly better corresponding values after transplantation than patients in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical CsA pretreatment might be beneficial in the early stage of DED and might prevent further inflammation and consequent irreversible fibrosis, especially in patients with preexisting DED components.

The Role of Anti-Thymocyte Globulin or Alemtuzumab-Based Serotherapy in the Prophylaxis and Management of Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant is an established treatment modality for hematologic and non-hematologic diseases. However, it is associated with acute and long-term sequelae which can translate into mortality. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a glaring obstacle, especially with the advent of reduced-intensity conditioning. Serotherapy capitalizes on antibodies which target T cells and other immune cells to mitigate this effect. This article focuses on the utility of two such agents: anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and alemtuzumab. ATG has demonstrated benefit in prophylaxis against GVHD, especially in the chronic presentation. However, there is limited impact of ATG on overall survival and it has little utility in the treatment context. There may be an initial improvement, particularly in skin manifestations, but no substantial benefit has been elicited. Alemtuzumab has shown benefit in both prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD, but at the consequence of a more profound immunosuppressive phase, mandating aggressive viral prophylaxis. There remains heterogeneity in the doses and regimens of the agents, with no standardized protocol in place. Furthermore, it seems that once steroid-refractory GVHD has been established, there is little that can be offered to offset the ultimately dismal outcome. Here we present a systematic overview of ATG- or alemtuzumab-based serotherapy in the prophylaxis and management of GVHD.

Reduced intensity conditioning of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia in patients older than 50 years of age: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to explore the efficacy and safety of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with a reduced intensity conditioning regimen in elderly patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

METHODS

Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were established as the primary endpoints for directly assessing the efficacy, and non-relapse mortality (NRM) for safety. The eligible patients were at or above 50 years of age, and the outcomes of the typical elderly patients (≥60 years) were analyzed individually.

RESULTS

The pooled estimates (95% confidence interval (CI)) for 1-year OS, EFS and NRM were 65 (55-74)  %, 50 (44-55)  % and 26 (21-30)  %, respectively; as for the patients ≥60 years of age, these were 63 (53-72) %, 46 (41-50)  % and 28 (23-32) %, respectively. No significantly statistical difference achieved between MDS and AML patients in 1-year EFS and NRM [relative risk (RR) 0.91, 95% CI 0.80-1.04; P = 0.172 and RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.82-1.69; P = 0.365]. The patients with lower diseases risk had the possibility of higher OS rate at ≥ 3 years than those with higher diseases risk (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.95-1.97; P = 0.088). The patients had significantly higher 2-year OS and EFS rates in complete remission (CR, CR1 and CR2) at transplantation compared to those with advanced diseases (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

RIC-alloHSCT is a feasible treatment option for the patients older than 50 year of age with MDS and AML. Advanced diseases status and higher diseases risk may be the poor factors for prognosis.

Low incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease with short-term tacrolimus in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Although tacrolimus (Tac) has immunosuppressive properties and exhibits promising efficacy against graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), little is known about Tac in the prophylaxis of GVHD after HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). In a multicenter randomized controlled trial, 174 patients received haplo-HSCT with GVHD prophylaxis involving short-term Tac (from -8days to +30days) or cyclosporine (CsA). The 100day cumulative incidences of acute GVHD (aGVHD) and grade III-IV aGVHD with the short-term Tac regimen and CsA regimen were 29.1 (19.5-38.7)% vs. 50.0(39.6-60.4)% (p=0.005) and 3.6(0.0-7.5)% vs. 13.5(6.1-20.9)% (p=0.027), respectively. There were no significant differences in the incidences of chronic GVHD (cGVHD), relapse and cytomegalovirus infection. Lymphocyte subset analysis showed that T cells decreased to lower levels on the short-term Tac regimen within 3 months of transplantation. The disease-free survival and overall survival on the short-term Tac and CsA regimens were 59.3 (48.9-69.7)% vs. 55.7 (45.3-66.1)% (p=0.696) and 65.1 (55.1-75.1)% vs. 61.4 (51.2-71.6)% (p=0.075), respectively. Our findings indicate that the short-term Tac regimen for GVHD prophylaxis in patients undergoing haplo-HSCT is associated with a low incidence and slight severity of aGVHD and did not increase the incidence of relapse and cytomegalovirus infection.

New perspectives on the use of mTOR inhibitors in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and graft-versus-host disease

Inhibition of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) has been exploited largely both in solid tumour oncology and solid organ transplantation. More recently mTOR inhibitors such as sirolimus and everolimus have been introduced to the field of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation where their unique combination of immunosuppressive purposes offering reduced nephrotoxicity and potential antimalignant effects reflect a unique drug profile that has led to their widespread use in both prophylaxis and therapy of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). On the other hand haematological insufficiency, infectious complications as well as vasculopathies, have been frequently reported as limiting toxicities. Here, we review both the retrospective and prospective experience available to date and stress the need for prospective registration trials to reduce off label use and improve patient safety by optimizing dosing and enhancing pharmacovigilance. Furthermore, we speculate on the future role of mTOR inhibitors in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

A prospective randomized trial comparing cyclosporine/methotrexate and tacrolimus/sirolimus as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Improvement of graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis remains an important goal in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Based on reports of possibly preferential properties of sirolimus, we compared the standard regimen of cyclosporine and methotrexate (n=106) with a combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus (n=103) as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a prospective, open, randomized trial. The hypothesis was that the tacrolimus/sirolimus regimen would lead to less acute graft-versus-host disease and reduced transplant-related mortality. There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease of grades II-IV (41% vs. 51%; P=0.19) or grades III-IV (13% vs. 7%; P=0.09) between the groups. Time to neutrophil engraftment (18 days vs. 17 days; P=0.24) was similar, but time to platelet engraftment was longer in cyclosporine/methotrexate patients (14 vs. 12 days; P<0.01). No significant differences in incidence of oropharyngeal mucositis, time to full donor chimerism, or number of cytomegalovirus infections were seen between the two treatment arms, and transplant-related toxicities were equally distributed. Triglyceride (P=0.005) and cholesterol (P=0.009) levels were higher in tacrolimus/sirolimus patients. Transplant-related mortality (18% vs. 12%; P=0.40) and 5-year overall survival (72% vs. 71%; P=0.71) were similar. Five-year relapse-free survival in patients with malignant diagnoses was 65% in the cyclosporine/methotrexate group and 63% in the tacrolimus/sirolimus group (P=0.73). We conclude that tacrolimus/sirolimus remains a valid and safe alternative to cyclosporine/methotrexate as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, with comparable transplant-related outcomes. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 00993343.

Graft-versus-host disease in paediatric solid organ transplantation: A review of the literature

GvHD is a rare and serious complication of organ transplantation. The literature is sparse following solid organ transplantation. The aim of this report was to review the literature of GvHD in paediatric solid organ transplantation. We searched PubMed for English-language full-text manuscripts between 1990 and 2015 for eligible studies. A total of 28 publications were found pertaining to paediatric GvHD following solid organ transplantation. GvHD had a mean incidence of 11% (range 8.3-13.4%) following SBTx and 1.5% following liver transplantation. Where described, the most common sites for presentation of GvHD were the skin (87%), the native GI tract (43%), the lungs (7%), the eyes (4%), HA (4%), and the kidneys (1%). Diagnosis was confirmed with biopsy (93%) and/or chimerism (41%). Treatments used include steroids (80%), of which 75% showed partial or complete resolution. Mortality was 33.3% (range 0-100%). Novel therapies include ECP and MSC therapy. GvHD is a rare but serious disease with high mortality. Novel therapies may offer hope in the future, but currently there is limited evidence for their efficacy in the context of intestinal or liver transplantation.

Haploidentical hematopoietic transplantation without T-cell depletion: current status and future perspectives

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HLA-haplo HSCT) without T-cell depletion has tremendously progressed over the past 20 years and has become a feasible treatment option for leukemia patients without an HLA-identical sibling donor. Advances in conditioning regimens, graft manipulation, and pharmacological graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis have reduced the risk of fatal graft failure and severe GVHD, two of the most serious complications of traversing the HLA barrier. According to clinical observations, killer immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) mismatch and donor-specific anti-HLA (DSA) antibodies-negative status play potential roles in reducing the risk of GVHD and graft failure following HLA-haploidentical SCT. New strategies to improve transplant outcomes include donor lymphocyte, NK cell and selected T-cell subset infusion, mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) co-transplantation and interleukin-2 (IL-2) application. Future challenges remain in improving post-transplant immune reconstitution and finding the best approach to reduce the incidence and severity of GVHD while simultaneously preserving the graft-versus leukemia effect to prevent the recurrence of underlying malignancy.