Risk factors for hospital readmission after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a prospective study

Updated systematic review and meta‑analysis for risk predictors of 30‑day unplanned readmission following gastric cancer surgery

Readmission to hospital is a common occurrence due to adverse post-operative events. The primary objective of the present study was to examine the possible risk predictors for 30-day unplanned readmissions after the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. The secondary aim was to determine the clinical characteristics that are associated with readmission. Studies that reported the risk factors and clinical characteristics of patients with gastric cancer who had an unplanned 30-day post-operative readmission were identified systematically from PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science and Embase databases, with a final search date of March 30, 2024. A systematic review and meta-analysis were then performed to estimate the risk predictors and relevant clinical characteristics for readmission. A total of 16,154 patients from 12 studies were included in the present study, with 1,736 patients who were readmitted and 14,418 patients who were not readmitted. A higher proportion of patients with an age ≥70 years, cardiovascular comorbidity, Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) 2002 score ≥3, respiratory diseases, male sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3, combined multi-organ resection, greater depth of invasion (T3-4/T1-2), discharge to home with provision of care services, neoadjuvant therapy, post-operative complications or a blood transfusion were found in the readmission group compared with that in the non-readmission group. A meta-analysis was also performed to calculate risk predictors using the results of multivariate regression analyses from the original literature. This identified cardiovascular comorbidity, NRS 2002 score ≥3, pancreatectomy and post-operative complications as risk predictors for 30-day unplanned readmission following surgery for gastric cancer. Therefore, it is recommended that extra attention and support should be given to patients with these high-risk predictors during the perioperative period.

Lactate Dehydrogenase and Risk of Readmission with Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

PURPOSE

Readmission is one of the measures of quality of care and potential costs. This study aimed to determine whether lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is associated with an increased risk of 30-day readmission in gastric cancer.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer at our institution between July 2014 and May 2018. Balanced cohorts were created by propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1:1 ratio to generate the elevated LDH (ELDH) group (n = 151) and the low LDH group (Control) (n = 302). To determine the incidence, causes, and risk factors of 30-day readmission, subgroup analyzes were performed and used to develop an efficient prediction model.

RESULTS

A total of 788 patients met the criteria to be included in the study. The cutoff value for serum LDH was 215.5. After PSM, a total of 302 patients were matched in pairs (ELDH group, n = 151, Control group, n = 151). ELDH levels had a higher risk of readmission (p = 0.005, Odds ratio 3.768, 95% confidence interval 1.493-9.510). The pre-match 30-day readmission rate was 7.2 percent, and common causes of post-match readmission included infection-related symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, and gastrointestinal bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with preoperative ELDH levels, postoperative complications, and high preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists Scores had a higher risk of readmission 30 days after surgery.

A comparison of three preoperative nutritional assessment methods for predicting ovarian cancer patient prognosis: which is better?

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to compare the predictive values of three widely used nutritional assessment methods, body mass index (BMI), Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), for different clinical prognostic indicators of ovarian cancer patients.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer treated in our hospital between January 2017 and March 2019 were retrospectively included. The three nutritional assessment methods were assessed, and multivariable analysis was conducted to explore predictive factors for clinical prognoses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) were generated to evaluate the discriminative abilities of the three nutritional assessment tools.

RESULTS

A total of 442 patients were recruited. Multivariable analysis revealed that the PNI value predicted 1-year death and 1-year recurrence and that both the NRS 2002 score and the PNI value predicted 30-day readmission (P < 0.05). For PNI, AUROCs were 0.834 for predicting 1-year death and 0.719 for 1-year recurrence prediction; for NRS, the AUROC was 0.820 2002 for predicting 30-day readmission. The optimal cutoff values that maximized the prognostic prediction ability were PNI values of 47.75 g/L and 50.40 g/L for 1-year death and 1-year recurrence, respectively, and an NRS 2002 score of 3 points for 30-day readmission following discharge.

CONCLUSION

For ovarian cancer patients, the PNI is better at predicting 1-year death and 30-day readmission after discharge, and the NRS 2002 is superior for predicting 1-year recurrence.

Association of Sarcopenia and Low Nutritional Status with Unplanned Hospital Readmission after Radical Gastrectomy in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Case-Control Study

Objective. Sarcopenia is one of the influencing factors of poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer but the association with readmission are unknown. We aimed to explore factors associated with readmission after gastrectomy and to determine whether preoperative sarcopenia is a common outcome in readmitted patients. Methods. In this case-control study, patients who underwent gastric resection in the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between April 2016 and September 2017 were included. The reasons of readmission patients were described. The readmission patients and non-readmission patients were matched by propensity score matching (PSM). The univariate analysis was applied for the baseline characteristics, operative details, postoperative prognosis and discharge disposition, and multiple logistic regression analysis for the independent risk factors of readmission. Results. The unplanned readmission rate within 30 days of radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer was 6.5% (43/657). The average time interval from discharge to readmission was 13 days. Delayed gastric evacuation was the main cause of readmission (18.6%, 8/43). Body mass index (BMI), nutritional risk screening (NRS) 2002 score, history of abdominal surgery, sarcopenia, and preoperative albumin were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. NRS 2002 (OR = 3.43, 95% CI: 1.10–10.72, $P=0.034$ ) and sarcopenia (OR = 4.25, 95% CI: 1.13–16.02, $P=0.033$ ) were found to be independently associated with unplanned readmission within 30 days of radical gastrectomy for cancer. Other factors such as age, sex, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, surgical method, operation and reconstruction type, TNM stage, surgical duration, previous abdominal surgery, and preoperative albumin and hemoglobin level were not associated with unplanned readmission after radical gastrectomy for cancer. Conclusions. Sarcopenia and low nutritional status are independently associated with unplanned readmission within 30 days of radical gastrectomy for cancer.

Peripheral Lymphocyte Subsets Absolute Counts as Feasible Clinical Markers for Predicting Surgical Outcome in Gastric Cancer Patients After Laparoscopic D2 Gastrectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background

Immune function influenced patients’ recovery from major abdominal surgery. The aim of this study is to explore the clinical feasibility of peripheral lymphocyte absolute counts for predicting short-term surgical outcomes in gastric cancer patients after laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy.

Methods

This is a prospective cohort study from a single tertiary referral hospital. Patients diagnosed with gastric cancer who met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. We collected the demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of included patients. We monitored perioperative dynamics of absolute counts of peripheral lymphocyte subsets. Predictive factors for length of postoperative hospital stay and complications were investigated in univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

A total of 137 gastric cancer patients were included. Decreased preoperative absolute counts of peripheral lymphocyte subsets were correlated with advanced clinical stage. In multivariate analysis, independent predictive factors for prolonged hospital stay were age (p=0.04), decreased preoperative B cell counts (p=0.05), decreased preoperative NK cell counts (p=0.05) and complications (p<0.01). For postoperative complication, independent predictive factors were age (p=0.02), operation time (p=0.05), lymphocyte to C-reactive protein ratio (p=0.01) and decreased preoperative B cell counts (p=0.01).

Conclusion

Our findings for the first time revealed that absolute counts of peripheral lymphocyte subsets are independent predictive factors for surgical outcomes in gastric cancer patients after D2 gastrectomy. We suggested that patients with impaired immune state should receive both preoperative immune modulator and nutritional support.

Nutritional status and interventions for patients with cancer - A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Malnourishment is commonly seen in ageing, cancer and many chronic conditions, and is associated with poorer prognosis.

AIM

We set out to collect all currently available evidence on the association between nutritional status assessed with a validated screening tool and prognosis or course of treatment in older patients with cancer, and on the benefit of nutritional interventions in improving these outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic search in MEDLINE and EMBASE.

RESULTS

We included 71 studies on the association between nutritional status and outcome in (older) patients with cancer and 17 studies on the benefit of nutritional interventions in improving outcomes in this patient population. There is a significant association between nutritional status and increased intermediate- and long-term mortality (hazard ratio 1.87 (95% confidence interval 1.62-2.17). Those with poorer nutritional status were less likely to complete oncologic treatment according to plan and had higher health care consumption. Benefit of dietary interventions was limited although dietary counselling may lead to improved quality of life while nutritional support may lead to a decrease in post-operative complication rates.

CONCLUSION

Nutritional status is associated with poorer survival, decreased treatment completion and higher health care consumption and nutritional interventions are only able to negate these negatives outcome to a very limited degree.

Nutritional management of patients with oesophageal cancer throughout the treatment trajectory: benchmarking against best practice

PURPOSE

Oesophageal cancer (OC) impacts nutritional status and outcomes. This study aims to benchmark the current nutrition management of patients with OC against best practice recommendations, identify critical points in the treatment trajectory where nutritional status is compromised, service gaps and opportunities for improvement.

METHODS

A retrospective audit collected demographic, medical and nutritional data from medical records of patients who received curative treatment for OC at a tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patient records were audited over the time period. Twenty-nine patients underwent nutrition screening on admission to the service. Eighteen out of 25 patients receiving neoadjuvant radiation therapy, all patients during surgical admission, and only 19 patients at postsurgical discharge were seen by a dietitian. All patients received tube feeding post-operatively; however, initiation within 24 h only occurred for 14 patients. Weight significantly declined over the course of treatment (p < 0.001), whilst malnutrition during surgical admission (p = 0.004) and postsurgical discharge (p = 0.038) were both associated with significantly higher unplanned readmissions.

CONCLUSIONS

Best practice recommendations were met for aspects of the immediate post-operative period; however, service gaps remain during pre-operative and post-discharge care. Findings from this study indicate that nutritional care is inconsistent across different treatment stages, and malnutrition impacts negatively on unplanned readmission. Research is needed to address evidence-practice gaps, assess appropriateness of recommendations and provide evidence for models of care during multimodality treatments and across different services.

Clinical pathway for enhanced recovery after surgery for gastric cancer: A prospective single-center phase II clinical trial for safety and efficacy

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a clinical pathway (CP) for enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in gastric cancer patients, including early oral feeding and discharge on postoperative day 4.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, single-center, phase II clinical trial. Based on proposed indications for an ERAS CP in our retrospective study, we enrolled 133 patients younger than 65 years who were undergoing minimally invasive subtotal gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was the ERAS CP completion rate. Secondary endpoints included complication, mortality, hospital stay, and readmission.

RESULTS

Among 133 patients, six patients were dropped out from this study. The ERAS CP completion rate (77.2%, 98 of 127) was comparable to the historical control group that completed a conventional CP (85.4%, P = .085). The postoperative complication incidence (13.4%, 15 of 127) was also similar to that of the conventional CP group (9.5%, P = .174). We identified reduced hospital stays (4.7 ± 1.3 vs 7.2±2.3 days; P < .001) and lower hospital costs ($7771 vs 8539; P < .001) in the ERAS CP group compared with the conventional CP group.

CONCLUSIONS

An ERAS CP can be safely and effectively adopted for patients with gastric cancer without increasing the complication rate and could shorten hospital stays.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01642953).

Relationship between Postoperative Recovery and Nutrition Risk Screened by NRS 2002 and Nutrition Support Status in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer

Objective: Investigating incidence of nutritional risk and nutrition support in gastrointestinal cancer patients to provide reference for improving the clinical nutritional application level.Method: We evaluated the nutritional risk of gastrointestinal cancer patients who were newly admitted from September 2015 to February 2016 by Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002).Results: Totally, 201 cases completed assessment by NRS 2002, and 69 cases (34.3%) were at nutritional risk. The incidence of nutritional risk was higher in patients with ≥65 (P < 0.05), with tumor size ≥ 5 cm (P < 0.05) or well-differentiated (P < 0.001). Incidence of nutritional risk in patients with BMI < 18.5 was higher than patients with BMI 18.5-25 and ≥25 (P < 0.05). Patients with nutrition risk had greater rate of anemia than with no risk. In nutritional risk group, 54 cases underwent enteral nutrition support, and their hospitalization stay was shorter, and the rates of complications were smaller (P < 0.05). Further multivariate logistic regression analysis showed NRS 2002 score, middle differentiation degree and III/I were the risk factors for postoperative complication.Conclusion: Preoperative NRS 2002 score was proved to be a predictive index for postoperative complication rate, and this indicates that patients with a high preoperative NRS 2002 score are at higher risk of developing postoperative complications and longer recovery period.

Risk factors of the postoperative 30-day readmission of gastric cancer surgery after discharge: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Readmission is a common postoperative adverse event. This study aimed to analyze potential risk factors for the incidence of postoperative 30-day readmission after discharge for gastric cancer patients with surgical treatment.

METHODS

Those studies that reported the risk factors of gastric cancer patients who have a postoperative 30-day readmission were identified systematically from the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases through July 2018. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to estimate the risk factors of postoperative 30-day readmission after gastric cancer surgery.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 6 studies with 12,586 gastric cancer patients were included in the present study. There were 1473 (11.7%) patients who had postoperative 30-day readmission and 12,586 (88.3%) patients without 30-day postoperative readmission. A greater proportion of the readmission group had cardiovascular comorbidity (P < .001), pulmonary comorbidity (P < .001), and diabetes mellitus (P = .020) than the nonreadmission group. Furthermore, more patients in the readmission group had total gastrectomy (P < .001), combined organ resection (P < .001) and postoperative complications (P < .001) than did patients in the nonreadmission group. Nonhome discharge (odds ratio [OR] 1.580, P = .002), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.181, P = .044), postoperative complications (OR 2.656, P = .006), total gastrectomy (OR 2.242, P < .001), and combined organ resection (OR 1.534, P < .001) were independent risk factors for postoperative readmission.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative readmission is influenced by the synthetic action of preparative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors, such as diabetes mellitus, total gastrectomy, combined organ resection, nonhome discharge, and postoperative complications. Extra attention should be paid to those patients with high risk factors during the postoperative follow-up and recovery periods.

Risk factors for 30-day hospital readmission after radical gastrectomy: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Hospital readmission is gathering greater attention as a measure of health care quality. The introduction of fast-track surgery has led to shorter lengths of hospitalization without increasing the risk of postoperative complications and readmission. The collection of comprehensive readmission data is essential for the further improvement of patient care. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the risk factors for readmission within 30 days of discharge after gastrectomy.

METHODS

A total of 1929 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy at Shizuoka Cancer Center were included in this study. A risk analysis with a stepwise logistic regression model was conducted to identify the risk factors for 30-day hospital readmission.

RESULTS

The 30-day readmission rate was 2.70%. Common causes of readmission were an intolerance of oral intake and the presence of an intra-abdominal abscess. The C reactive protein (CRP) level on postoperative day (POD) 3 was significantly higher in the readmitted group; however, the other surgical outcomes, including the incidence of postoperative complications, did not differ to a statistically significant extent. The stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that CRP on POD3 ≥ 12 mg/dl [odds ratio (OR) 2.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-3.95, p = 0.025], laparoscopic surgery (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.17-4.31, p = 0.015), and TG (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.17-4.78, p = 0.023) were found to be independent risk factors for readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

CRP on POD3 ≥ 12 mg/dl, laparoscopic surgery, and TG were identified as independent risk factors for readmission.

Prognostic Value of the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 Scale in Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Large-Scale Cohort Study

Background: The prognostic value of the nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002) scale in metastatic gastric cancer remains unclear. We aimed to explore the role of NRS 2002 in metastatic gastric cancer.

Methods: In this study, 1664 metastatic gastric cancer patients at our institution between 2000 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The characteristics and clinical outcomes of the included patients were analyzed.

Results: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed that the regrouping NRS 2002 scale (≤ 3 vs. > 3) provided a similar risk stratification predicting 2-year overall survival (OS) (area under the curves [AUCs]: 0.563 vs. 0.564, P > 0.05) but a better stratification predicting the risk of complications of palliative surgery (AUCs: 0.563 vs. 0.522, P = 0.050) than the original NRS 2002 scale (< 3 vs. ≥ 3). Patients with NRS 2002 > 3 tended to have higher postoperative morbidity (13.3% vs. 8.5%, P = 0.027) and mortality (5.3% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.013) and shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS: 6.70 vs. 7.70 months, P = 0.002) and overall survival (OS) (median OS: 9.03 vs. 12.63 months, P < 0.001) than those with NRS 2002 ≤ 3. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the regrouping NRS 2002 scale was the independent prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.16, P = 0.028) and OS (HR: 1.29, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The present study indicated that the NRS 2002 scale (regrouping scale) was an independent prognostic factor to predict the morbidity, mortality and survival outcomes for metastatic gastric cancer.

Incidence, causes and risk factors for 30-day readmission after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective study of 2,023 patients

The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the incidence of, causes and risk factors for readmission to hospital ≤30 days after discharge of patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. A total of 2,023 patients underwent radical gastrectomy operations from November 2010 to July 2017 in our hospital. Of these, 60 patients (3.0%) were readmitted within 30 days after their original discharge. The median time span between the index discharge and readmission was 14 days and the median time for readmission was 8 days. The main reasons for readmission were intestinal obstruction (n = 10, 16.7%), intra-abdominal fluid collection (n = 9, 15.0%), abdominal pain (n = 7, 11.7%), nutritional difficulty (n = 4, 6.7%) and anastomotic leakage (n = 4, 6.7%). Five patients (8.3%) required intensive care and 4 patients (6.7%) died from sudden cardiac arrest, gastrointestinal bleeding, sepsis or multiple organ dysfunctions. Multivariate analysis revealed that post-operative complications (Odds Ratio = 5.116, 95% confidence interval: 2.885–9.073, P < 0.001) was the only independent risk factor for readmission. Thus, appropriate strategies on discharge and close follow-ups for these high-risk patients should be drawn up in order to enhance significantly their quality of care.

Effect of nutritional risk on short-term outcomes after laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy: a prospective study from two centers

BACKGROUND/AIM

The aim of this prospective double-center study was to explore the effect of nutritional risk on short-term outcomes in the patients who had gastric cancer and underwent a laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a study of patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy in two large centers between June 2014 and April 2017. Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics and postoperative short-term outcomes were prospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups depend on the preoperative presence of nutritional risk. Clinical variables were compared. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression analyses evaluating the risk factors for postoperative complications were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 256 patients, comprising 187 males and 69 females, met the inclusion criteria and were included in this study. The mean age was 61.81 years, the average BMI was 22.44 kg/m, and the average preoperative serum albumin was 39.42 g/l. Older age (P=0.001), higher tumor stage (P=0.047), lower BMI (P<0.001), lower preoperative serum albumin (P=0.005), and lower hemoglobin (P=0.013) were more common in the nutritional risk group. There were no significant differences in the short-term postoperative outcomes between nutritional risk and non-nutritional risk groups. Advanced age (P=0.024) and hypoalbuminemia (P=0.004) were independent risk factors for postoperative complications after laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy.

CONCLUSION

Nutritional risk may not be a clinical predictor of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy. Advanced age and preoperative hypoalbuminemia were independent risk factors for grade II or more postoperative complications.

Predictors of 30-day readmissions after gastrectomy for malignancy

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to identify risk factors associated with readmission after gastrectomy to potentially identify potential areas for targeted improvements. Hospital readmission after surgery is a topic of interest in health-care policy among hospitals, payers, and providers. Readmissions are associated with increased costs, morbidity, and mortality. Readmission rates have been proposed as a quality metric for hospitals and quality indicator of individual surgeon's performance. In addition, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has reduced payments to hospitals with excessive readmissions for certain diagnoses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All gastrectomy procedures for malignancy in patients aged ≥18 y from 2005 to 2011 were queried from the California State Inpatient Database. Patients who died during index admission were excluded. Descriptive statistics were examined between all baseline variables and readmission status. Logistic regression models were adjusted for age, race, sex, and insurance status.

RESULTS

A total of 6985 patients underwent gastrectomy for malignancy; 16.5% of the patients were readmitted after postoperative discharge. Readmission rate did not change significantly over time. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the occurrence of any postoperative complications, postoperative length of stay greater than 10 d, discharge to skilled nursing facility or home health care, combined resection with distal pancreatectomy and/or splenectomy, and patient comorbidities like diabetes mellitus and renal failure were independently associated with readmissions.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that focusing on quality improvement efforts by targeting reduction of postoperative complications may reduce readmission rates.

Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Multimodal Approach

Despite its declining incidence, gastric cancer (GC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. A multimodal approach to GC is critical to ensure optimal patient outcomes. Pretherapy fine resolution contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging, endoscopic ultrasound and staging laparoscopy play an important role in patients with newly diagnosed ostensibly operable GC to avoid unnecessary non-therapeutic laparotomies. Currently, margin negative gastrectomy and adequate lymphadenectomy performed at high volume hospitals remain the backbone of GC treatment. Importantly, adequate GC surgery should be integrated in the setting of a multimodal treatment approach. Treatment for advanced GC continues to expand with the emergence of additional lines of systemic and targeted therapies.

Effect on Body Weight, Quality of Life and Appetite Following Individualized, Nutritional Counselling to Home-Living Elderly after Rehabilitation - An Open Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVES

We examined if individually-adapted nutritional counselling could prevent > 5% weight loss among elderly patients 3 months after discharge from a rehabilitation institution. In addition we assessed quality of life (QoL) and appetite.

DESIGN

An open, randomized trial.

SETTING

Godthaab Health and Rehabilitation Institution in Bærum, Norway.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients identified as being undernourished or at risk of disease-related malnutrition using the Nutritional Risk Screening tool NRS-2002.

INTERVENTION

Shortly before discharge, patients in the intervention group received an individually-tailored nutrition plan. During the subsequent 3 months these patients were contacted 3 times via telephone calls and they received one visit at their homes, for nutrition counselling. Focus on this counselling was on optimizing meal environment, improving appetite, increasing food intake, advice on food preparation, and motivation and support.

MEASUREMENTS

In addition to weight, QoL and appetite were assessed using the EQ-5D questionnaire and a modified version of the Disease-Related Appetite Questionnaire, respectively.

RESULTS

Among 115 considered eligible for the study, 100 were enrolled (72 women and 28 men), with a mean age of 75 years and a mean body mass index of 20 kg/m2. Two in the intervention group (n = 52) and 5 in the control group (n = 48) lost > 5% of their body weight, giving an odds ratio of 0.34 (95% CI: 0.064 - 1.86; p = 0.22). We did not detect any significant differences in the QoL- or appetite scores between the two study groups after three months.

CONCLUSION

An individually-adapted nutritional counselling did not improve body mass among elderly patients 3 months after discharge from a rehabilitation institution. Neither quality of life nor appetite measures were improved. Possibly, nutritional counselling should be accompanied with nutritional supplementation to be effective in this vulnerable group of elderly. The trial is registered in Clinical Trials (ID: NCT01632072).

Morbidity and Mortality After Gastrectomy: Identification of Modifiable Risk Factors

BACKGROUND

Morbidity after gastrectomy remains high. The potentially modifiable risk factors have not been well described. This study considers a series of potentially modifiable patient-specific and perioperative characteristics that could be considered to reduce morbidity and mortality after gastrectomy.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study includes adults in the ACS NSQIP PUF dataset who underwent gastrectomy between 2011 and 2013. Sequential multivariable models were used to estimate effects of clinical covariates on study outcomes including morbidity, mortality, readmission, and reoperation.

RESULTS

Three thousand six hundred and seventy-eight patients underwent gastrectomy. A majority of patients had distal gastrectomy (N = 2,799, 76.1 %) and had resection for malignancy (N = 2,316, 63.0 %). Seven hundred and ninety-eight patients (21.7 %) experienced a major complication. Reoperation was required in 290 patients (7.9 %). Thirty-day mortality was 5.2 %. Age (OR = 1.01, 95 % CI = 1.01-1.02, p = 0.001), preoperative malnutrition (OR = 1.65, 95 % CI = 1.35-2.02, p < 0.001), total gastrectomy (OR = 1.63, 95 % CI = 1.31-2.03, p < 0.001), benign indication for resection (OR = 1.60, 95 % CI = 1.29-1.97, p < 0.001), blood transfusion (OR = 2.57, 95 % CI = 2.10-3.13, p < 0.001), and intraoperative placement of a feeding tubes (OR = 1.28, 95 % CI = 1.00-1.62, p = 0.047) were independently associated with increased risk of morbidity. Association between tobacco use and morbidity was statistically marginal (OR = 1.23, 95 % CI = 0.99-1.53, p = 0.064). All-cause postoperative morbidity had significant associations with reoperation, readmission, and mortality (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Mitigation of perioperative risk factors including smoking and malnutrition as well as identified operative considerations may improve outcomes after gastrectomy. Postoperative morbidity has the strongest association with other measures of poor outcome: reoperation, readmission, and mortality.

Role of frailty and nutritional status in predicting complications following total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a prospective study

PURPOSE

This study was performed to determine the association of frailty and nutritional status with postoperative complications after total gastrectomy (TG) with D2 lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients undergoing TG with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer between August 2014 and February 2016 were enrolled. Frailty was evaluated by sarcopenia which was diagnosed by a combination of third lumbar vertebra muscle index (L3 MI), handgrip strength, and 6-m usual gait speed. Nutritional status was evaluated by the nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002) score. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluating the risk factors for postoperative complications were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 158 patients were analyzed, and 27.2 % developed complications within 30 days of surgery. One patient died within 30 days of the operation. In the univariate analyses, NRS 2002 score ≥3 (OR = 2.468, P = 0.012), sarcopenia (OR = 2.764, P = 0.008), and tumor located at the cardia (OR = 2.072, P = 0.046) were associated with the postoperative complications. Multivariable analysis revealed that sarcopenia (OR = 3.084, P = 0.005) and tumor located at the cardia (OR = 2.347, P = 0.026) were independent predictors of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed a significant relationship between postoperative complications and geriatric frailty using sarcopenia in patients with gastric cancer after TG with D2 lymphadenectomy. Frailty should be integrated into preoperative risk assessment and may have implications in preoperative decisionmaking.

Incidence and Risk Factors Associated with Readmission After Surgical Treatment for Adrenocortical Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Given the lack of data on readmission after resection of ACC, the objective of the current study was to define the incidence of readmission, as well as identify risk factors associated with readmission among patients with ACC who underwent surgical resection.

METHODS

Two hundred nine patients who underwent resection of ACC between January 1993 and December 2014 at 1 of 13 major centers in the USA were identified. Demographic and clinicopathological data were collected and analyzed relative to readmission.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 52 years, and 62 % of the patients were female. Median tumor size was 12 cm, and the majority of patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class of 3-4 (n = 85, 56 %). The overall incidence of readmission within 90 days from surgery was 18 % (n = 38). Factors associated with readmission included high ASA class (odds ratio (OR), 4.88 (95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.75-13.61); P = 0.002), metastatic disease on presentation (OR, 2.98 (95 % CI, 1.37-6.46); P = 0.006), EBL (>700 mL: OR, 2.75 (95 % CI, 1.16-6.51); P = 0.02), complication (OR, 1.91 (95 % CI, 1.20-3.05); P = 0.007), and prolonged length of stay (LOS; ≥9 days: OR, 4.12 (95 % CI, 1.88-9.01); P < 0.001). On multivariate logistic regression, a high ASA class (OR, 4.01 (95 % CI, 1.44-11.17); P = 0.008) and metastatic disease on presentation (OR, 3.44 (95 % CI, 1.34-8.84); P = 0.01) remained independently associated with higher odds of readmission.

CONCLUSION

Readmission following surgery for ACC was common as one in five patients experienced a readmission. Patients with a high ASA class and metastatic disease on presentation were over four and three times more likely to be readmitted after surgical treatment for ACC, respectively.