1
|
Perić I, Brkljačić B, Tadić T, Jerković K, Dolić K, Borić M, Ćavar M. DWI in the Differentiation of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions Presenting with Non-Mass Enhancement on CE-MRI. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 17:31. [PMID: 39796662 PMCID: PMC11719006 DOI: 10.3390/cancers17010031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2024] [Revised: 12/17/2024] [Accepted: 12/24/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to investigate whether the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps values of breast lesions presenting as non-mass enhancement (NME) on MRI could predict benign or malignant pathohistological findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective single-center study included 136 female patients with NME and corresponding ultrasound correlate and a subsequent ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy. The patients were subdivided into benign or malignant subgroups based on pathology reports, which served as the gold standard. Blinded to the pathological results, two radiologists independently measured the ADC values of the depicted NME using punctate, 10 mm and whole tumor regions of interest (ROIs) wherever applicable. The mean of all measurements was also analyzed and compared with the pathologic subdivision. RESULTS The sensitivity of whole tumor ROI in detecting benign NME is 91% compared to 74% for 10 mm ROI and 78% for punctate ROI. No significant differences in ADC values were observed when comparing fatty breast tissue and dense breast tissue. CONCLUSIONS There were differences in ADC values between benign and malignant findings using all types of measurements, where the whole tumor ROI was the most sensitive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iva Perić
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Split, Spinčićeva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia; (I.P.); (T.T.); (K.J.); (K.D.)
| | - Boris Brkljačić
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital “Dubrava”, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Avenija Gojka Šuška 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia;
| | - Tade Tadić
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Split, Spinčićeva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia; (I.P.); (T.T.); (K.J.); (K.D.)
| | - Kristian Jerković
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Split, Spinčićeva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia; (I.P.); (T.T.); (K.J.); (K.D.)
| | - Krešimir Dolić
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Split, Spinčićeva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia; (I.P.); (T.T.); (K.J.); (K.D.)
| | - Matija Borić
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Split, University of Split School of Medicine, Spinčićeva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia;
| | - Marija Ćavar
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Split, Spinčićeva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia; (I.P.); (T.T.); (K.J.); (K.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yoshida T, Urikura A, Endo M. Vendor-Specific Correction Software for Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Bias Due to Gradient Nonlinearity in Breast Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Using Ice-Water Phantom. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2024; 48:889-896. [PMID: 38896760 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate a vendor-specific correction software for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) bias due to gradient nonlinearity in breast diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging using an ice-water phantom. METHODS The phantom consists of 5 plastic tubes with a length of 100 mm and a diameter of 15 mm, filled with distilled water and immersed in an ice-water bath. Diffusion-weighted images were acquired by echo-planar imaging sequence on a 3.0-T scanner. ADC maps with and without correction were calculated using 4 b -values (0, 100, 600, and 800 s/mm 2 ). The mean ADCs were measured using a rectangular profile with 5 × 40 pixels in the anterior-posterior (AP) and a square region of interest with 5 × 5 pixels in the right-left (RL) and superior-inferior (SI) directions on the ADC map. ADC was compared with and without correction using a paired t test. Additionally, ADC of the ice-water phantom was measured at the magnet isocenter. RESULTS ADC increased in the AP and RL directions and decreased in the SI direction with increasing distance from the isocenter before correction. After the correction, ADC at the off-center positions in the AP, RL, and SI directions was reduced to within 5% of the expected value. There were significant differences in the ADC at the off-center positions without and with correction ( P < 0.001); however, ADC at the magnet isocenter did not vary after correction (1.08 ± 0.02 × 10 -3 mm 2 /s). CONCLUSIONS The vendor-specific software corrected the ADC bias due to gradient nonlinearity at the off-center positions in the AP, RL, and SI directions. Therefore, the software will contribute to the accurate ADC assessment in breast DWI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsukasa Yoshida
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Atsushi Urikura
- Department of Radiological Technology, Radiological Diagnosis, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Endo
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xie Y, Zhang X. A risk prediction stratification for non-mass breast lesions, combining clinical characteristics and imaging features on ultrasound, mammography, and MRI. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1337265. [PMID: 39484042 PMCID: PMC11524993 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1337265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2024] [Indexed: 11/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Given the inevitable trend of domestic imaging center mergers and the current lack of comprehensive imaging evaluation guidelines for non-mass breast lesions, we have developed a novel BI-RADS risk prediction and stratification system for non-mass breast lesions that integrates clinical characteristics with imaging features from ultrasound, mammography, and MRI, with the aim of assisting clinicians in interpreting imaging reports. Methods This study enrolled 350 patients with non-mass breast lesions (NMLs), randomly assigning them to a training set of 245 cases (70%) and a test set of 105 cases (30%). Radiologists conducted comprehensive evaluations of the lesions using ultrasound, mammography, and MRI. Independent predictors were identified using LASSO logistic regression, and a predictive risk model was constructed using a nomogram generated with R software, with subsequent validation in both sets. Results LASSO logistic regression identified a set of independent predictors, encompassing age, clinical palpation hardness, distribution and morphology of calcifications, peripheral blood supply as depicted by color Doppler imaging, maximum lesion diameter, patterns of internal enhancement, distribution of non-mass lesions, time-intensity curve (TIC), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. The predictive model achieved area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.873 for the training group and 0.877 for the testing group. The model's positive predictive values were as follows: BI-RADS 2 = 0%, BI-RADS 3 = 0%, BI-RADS 4A = 6.25%, BI-RADS 4B = 26.13%, BI-RADS 4C = 80.84%, and BI-RADS 5 = 97.33%. Conclusion The creation of a risk-predictive BI-RADS stratification, specifically designed for non-mass breast lesions and integrating clinical and imaging data from multiple modalities, significantly enhances the precision of diagnostic categorization for these lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- YaMie Xie
- Department of CT/MRI, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Xiaoxiao Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gao W, Yang Q, Li X, Zhang Y, He T, Liang W, Wei X, Yang M, Gao B, Zhang G, Zhang S. Quantitative Assessment of Breast Tumor: Comparison of Four Methods of Positioning Region of Interest for Synthetic Relaxometry and Diffusion Measurement. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:3096-3105. [PMID: 38508932 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.02.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2024] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To compare the differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and synthetic magnetic resonance (MR) measurements of four region of interest (ROI) placement methods for breast tumor and to investigate their diagnostic performance. METHODS 110 (70 malignant, 40 benign) newly diagnosed breast tumors were evaluated. The patients underwent 3.0 T MR examinations including diffusion-weighted imaging and synthetic MR. Two radiologists independently measured ADCs, T1 relaxation time (T1), T2 relaxation time (T2), and proton density (PD) using four ROI methods: round, square, freehand, and whole-tumor volume (WTV). The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess their measurement reliability. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS The mean values of all ROI methods showed good or excellent interobserver reproducibility (0.79-0.99) and showed the best diagnostic performance compared to the minimum and maximum values. The square ROI exhibited superior performance in differentiating between benign from malignant breast lesions, followed by the freehand ROI. T2, PD, and ADC values were significantly lower in malignant breast lesions compared to benign ones for all ROI methods (p < 0.05). Multiparameters of T2 + ADC demonstrated the highest AUC values (0.82-0.95), surpassing the diagnostic efficacy of ADC or T2 alone (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION ROI placement significantly influences ADC and synthetic MR values measured in breast tumors. Square ROI and mean values showed superior performance in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. The multiparameters of T2 + ADC surpassed the diagnostic efficacy of a single parameter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weibo Gao
- Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Quanxin Yang
- Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Xiaohui Li
- Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yanyan Zhang
- Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Tuo He
- Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Wenbin Liang
- Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | | | - Ming Yang
- Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Bo Gao
- Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Guirong Zhang
- Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Shuqun Zhang
- Department of Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Iima M, Kataoka M, Honda M, Le Bihan D. Diffusion-Weighted MRI for the Assessment of Molecular Prognostic Biomarkers in Breast Cancer. Korean J Radiol 2024; 25:623-633. [PMID: 38942456 PMCID: PMC11214919 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2023.1188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/30/2024] Open
Abstract
This study systematically reviewed the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the assessment of molecular prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer, focusing on the correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with hormone receptor status and prognostic biomarkers. Our meta-analysis includes data from 52 studies examining ADC values in relation to estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki-67 status. The results indicated significant differences in ADC values among different receptor statuses, with ER-positive, PgR-positive, HER2-negative, and Ki-67-positive tumors having lower ADC values compared to their negative counterparts. This study also highlights the potential of advanced DWI techniques such as intravoxel incoherent motion and non-Gaussian DWI to provide additional insights beyond ADC. Despite these promising findings, the high heterogeneity among the studies underscores the need for standardized DWI protocols to improve their clinical utility in breast cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mami Iima
- Department of Fundamental Development for Advanced Low Invasive Diagnostic Imaging, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Masako Kataoka
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Maya Honda
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kansai Electric Power Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Denis Le Bihan
- NeuroSpin, Joliot Institute, Department of Fundamental Research, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique (CEA)-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Arponen O, McLean MA, Nanaa M, Manavaki R, Baxter GC, Gill AB, Riemer F, Kennerley AJ, Woitek R, Kaggie JD, Brackenbury WJ, Gilbert FJ. 23Na MRI: inter-reader reproducibility of normal fibroglandular sodium concentration measurements at 3 T. Eur Radiol Exp 2024; 8:75. [PMID: 38853182 PMCID: PMC11162986 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-024-00465-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To study the reproducibility of 23Na magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements from breast tissue in healthy volunteers. METHODS Using a dual-tuned bilateral 23Na/1H breast coil at 3-T MRI, high-resolution 23Na MRI three-dimensional cones sequences were used to quantify total sodium concentration (TSC) and fluid-attenuated sodium concentration (FASC). B1-corrected TSC and FASC maps were created. Two readers manually measured mean, minimum and maximum TSC and mean FASC values using two sampling methods: large regions of interest (LROIs) and small regions of interest (SROIs) encompassing fibroglandular tissue (FGT) and the highest signal area at the level of the nipple, respectively. The reproducibility of the measurements and correlations between density, age and FGT apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were evaluatedss. RESULTS Nine healthy volunteers were included. The inter-reader reproducibility of TSC and FASC using SROIs and LROIs was excellent (intraclass coefficient range 0.945-0.979, p < 0.001), except for the minimum TSC LROI measurements (p = 0.369). The mean/minimum LROI TSC and mean LROI FASC values were lower than the respective SROI values (p < 0.001); the maximum LROI TSC values were higher than the SROI TSC values (p = 0.009). TSC correlated inversely with age but not with FGT ADCs. The mean and maximum FGT TSC and FASC values were higher in dense breasts in comparison to non-dense breasts (p < 0.020). CONCLUSIONS The chosen sampling method and the selected descriptive value affect the measured TSC and FASC values, although the inter-reader reproducibility of the measurements is in general excellent. RELEVANCE STATEMENT 23Na MRI at 3 T allows the quantification of TSC and FASC sodium concentrations. The sodium measurements should be obtained consistently in a uniform manner. KEY POINTS • 23Na MRI allows the quantification of total and fluid-attenuated sodium concentrations (TSC/FASC). • Sampling method (large/small region of interest) affects the TSC and FASC values. • Dense breasts have higher TSC and FASC values than non-dense breasts. • The inter-reader reproducibility of TSC and FASC measurements was, in general, excellent. • The results suggest the importance of stratifying the sodium measurements protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Otso Arponen
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 218, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - Mary A McLean
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 218, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Muzna Nanaa
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 218, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Roido Manavaki
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 218, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Gabrielle C Baxter
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 218, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Andrew B Gill
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 218, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Frank Riemer
- Department of Radiology, Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre (MMIV), Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Aneurin J Kennerley
- York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, York, UK
- Department of Sports and Exercise Science, Institute of Sport, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - Ramona Woitek
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 218, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
- Research Center for Medical Image Analysis and AI (MIAAI), Danube Private University, Krems, Austria
| | - Joshua D Kaggie
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 218, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - William J Brackenbury
- York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, York, UK
- Department of Biology, University of York, York, UK
| | - Fiona J Gilbert
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 218, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Skwierawska D, Laun FB, Wenkel E, Kapsner LA, Janka R, Uder M, Ohlmeyer S, Bickelhaupt S. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Skin Pathologies of the Breast-A Feasibility Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:934. [PMID: 38732348 PMCID: PMC11083106 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14090934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Several breast pathologies can affect the skin, and clinical pathways might differ significantly depending on the underlying diagnosis. This study investigates the feasibility of using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to differentiate skin pathologies in breast MRIs. This retrospective study included 88 female patients who underwent diagnostic breast MRI (1.5 or 3T), including DWI. Skin areas were manually segmented, and the apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were compared between different pathologies: inflammatory breast cancer (IBC; n = 5), benign skin inflammation (BSI; n = 11), Paget's disease (PD; n = 3), and skin-involved breast cancer (SIBC; n = 11). Fifty-eight women had healthy skin (H; n = 58). The SIBC group had a significantly lower mean ADC than the BSI and IBC groups. These differences persisted for the first-order features of the ADC (mean, median, maximum, and minimum) only between the SIBC and BSI groups. The mean ADC did not differ significantly between the BSI and IBC groups. Quantitative DWI assessments demonstrated differences between various skin-affecting pathologies, but did not distinguish clearly between all of them. More extensive studies are needed to assess the utility of quantitative DWI in supplementing the diagnostic assessment of skin pathologies in breast imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominika Skwierawska
- Institute of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Frederik B. Laun
- Institute of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Evelyn Wenkel
- Radiologie München, Burgstraße 7, 80331 München, Germany
- Medical Faculty, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lorenz A. Kapsner
- Institute of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Chair of Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Wetterkreuz 15, 91058 Erlangen-Tennenlohe, Germany
| | - Rolf Janka
- Institute of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Uder
- Institute of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sabine Ohlmeyer
- Institute of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Bickelhaupt
- Institute of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gullo RL, Partridge SC, Shin HJ, Thakur SB, Pinker K. Update on DWI for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024; 222:e2329933. [PMID: 37850579 PMCID: PMC11196747 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.29933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
DWI is a noncontrast MRI technique that measures the diffusion of water molecules within biologic tissue. DWI is increasingly incorporated into routine breast MRI examinations. Currently, the main applications of DWI are breast cancer detection and characterization, prognostication, and prediction of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, DWI is promising as a noncontrast MRI alternative for breast cancer screening. Problems with suboptimal resolution and image quality have restricted the mainstream use of DWI for breast imaging, but these shortcomings are being addressed through several technologic advancements. In this review, we present an up-to-date assessment of the use of DWI for breast cancer imaging, including a summary of the clinical literature and recommendations for future use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Lo Gullo
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Savannah C Partridge
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA 98109, USA
| | - Hee Jung Shin
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, South Korea
| | - Sunitha B Thakur
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Katja Pinker
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Otto PO, Loft MK, Rafaelsen SR, Pedersen MRV. Diffusion-Weighted MRI as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker in Colon Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:144. [PMID: 38201571 PMCID: PMC10778248 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the use of quantitative diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) as a diagnostic imaging biomarker in differentiating between benign colon adenoma, early, and advanced cancer of the colon, as well as predicting lymph node involvement, and finally comparing mucinous-producing colon cancer with adenomas and non-mucinous colon cancer. METHOD Patients with a confirmed tumor on colonoscopy were eligible for inclusion in this study. Using a 3.0 Tesla MRI machine, the main tumor mean apparent diffusion coefficient (mADC) was obtained. Surgically resected tumor specimens served as an endpoint, except in mucinous colon cancers, which were classified based on T2 images. RESULTS A total of 152 patients were included in the study population. The mean age was 71 years. A statistically significant mADC mean difference of -282 × 10-6 mm2/s [-419--144 95% CI, p < 0.001] was found between colon adenomas and early colon cancer, with an AUC of 0.80 [0.68-0.93 95% CI] and an optimal cut off value of 1018 × 10-6 mm2/s. Only a small statistically significant difference (p = 0.039) in mADC was found between benign tumors and mucinous colon cancer. We found no statistical difference in mADC mean values between early and advanced colon cancer, and between colon cancer with and without lymph node involvement. CONCLUSION Quantitative DW-MRI is potentially useful for determining whether a colonic tumor is benign or malignant. Mucinous colon cancer shows less diffusion restriction when compared to non-mucinous colon cancer, a potential pitfall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Obel Otto
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beriderbakken 4, 7100 Vejle, Denmark
| | - Martina Kastrup Loft
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beriderbakken 4, 7100 Vejle, Denmark
- Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Vejle Hospital, 7100 Vejle, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark
| | - Søren Rafael Rafaelsen
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beriderbakken 4, 7100 Vejle, Denmark
- Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Vejle Hospital, 7100 Vejle, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark
| | - Malene Roland Vils Pedersen
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beriderbakken 4, 7100 Vejle, Denmark
- Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Vejle Hospital, 7100 Vejle, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cavalcante CEB, Magalhães Pereira Souza F, Eiras Martins G, Milone Silva M, Pacheco Donato Macedo CR, Lederman H, Lopes LF. Diffusion-weighted imaging in pediatric extracranial germ cell tumors. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0294976. [PMID: 38033015 PMCID: PMC10688858 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Germ cell tumors (GCTs) comprise a rare and heterogeneous group of neoplasms presenting different clinical and histological characteristics, leading to a challenging scenario in clinical practice. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has been suggested as an indirect marker of tumor density and cellularity and could be used to monitor therapeutic response. However, its role in pediatric GCTs needs to be clarified. PURPOSE Here, we evaluated the features of DWI in pediatric extracranial GCTs in a reference Brazilian institution. MATERIAL AND METHODS We included 43 pediatric patients with primary GCTs treated between 2008 and 2022 in Hospital de Amor de Barretos. The patients' MRI images included T1-weighted without contrast, T2-weighted, DWI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. DWI was evaluated in the section that exhibited the greatest restricted diffusion in the largest hypersignal area of the image. The lowest ADC value was determined to define the region of interest (ROI). We used a small ROI, avoiding necrotic, adipose tissue, noisy or nonenhancing lesion voxels as recommended. ROI determination was established by visual inspection by two radiologists in accordance. We used two values of b (b = 50 mm2/s or b = 800) for ADC values. RESULTS The highest mean ADC (mADC) value was observed in pure teratomas (1,403.50 ± 161.76 x10-3 mm2/s; mean ± SD) compared to other histologies (yolk sac, mixed teratoma, dysgerminoma and mixed GCT) of GCT (p<0.001). Furthermore, ROC analysis determined a cutoff mADC value of 1,179.00 x 10-3 mm2/s that differentiated pure teratomas from the other GCT histologies with a sensitivity of 95.8% and a specificity of 92.9% (AUC = 0.979; p<0.01). A significant increase in mADC was observed for malignant GCTs in treatment (1,197.00 ± 372.00 mm2/s; p<0.001) compared to that exhibited at the time of diagnosis (780.00 ± 168.00 mm2/s; mean ± SD. Our findings suggest that mADC assessment could be used as a tool to distinguish pure teratomas from malignant CGT histologies at diagnosis. Additionally, we demonstrated reasonable evidence that it could be used as a complementary tool to monitor treatment response in patients with malignant GCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Eduardo Bezerra Cavalcante
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Children’s Cancer Hospital, Hospital de Amor, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
- Pediatric Oncology, Children’s Cancer Hospital, Hospital de Amor, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
- Brazilian Germ Cell Pediatric Study Group, Hospital de Amor, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fernanda Magalhães Pereira Souza
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Children’s Cancer Hospital, Hospital de Amor, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
- Pediatric Oncology, Children’s Cancer Hospital, Hospital de Amor, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
- Brazilian Germ Cell Pediatric Study Group, Hospital de Amor, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gisele Eiras Martins
- Pediatric Oncology, Children’s Cancer Hospital, Hospital de Amor, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
- Brazilian Germ Cell Pediatric Study Group, Hospital de Amor, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcelo Milone Silva
- Brazilian Germ Cell Pediatric Study Group, Hospital de Amor, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
- Centro de Tratamento Fabiana Macedo de Morais/GACC, São Jose dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Carla Renata Pacheco Donato Macedo
- Brazilian Germ Cell Pediatric Study Group, Hospital de Amor, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
- Instituto de Oncologia Pediatrica - GRAACC, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Henrique Lederman
- Brazilian Germ Cell Pediatric Study Group, Hospital de Amor, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Radiology, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luiz Fernando Lopes
- Pediatric Oncology, Children’s Cancer Hospital, Hospital de Amor, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
- Chairman, Brazilian Germ Cell Pediatric Study Group, Hospital de Amor, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Reijonen M, Holopainen E, Arponen O, Könönen M, Vanninen R, Anttila M, Sallinen H, Rinta-Kiikka I, Lindgren A. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy induces an elevation of tumour apparent diffusion coefficient values in patients with ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:299. [PMID: 37005578 PMCID: PMC10068179 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10760-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI) is the modality of choice in the imaging of ovarian cancer (OC). We aimed to investigate the feasibility of different types of regions of interest (ROIs) in the measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of diffusion-weighted imaging in OC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). METHODS We retrospectively enrolled 23 consecutive patients with advanced OC who had undergone NACT and mMRI. Seventeen of them had been imaged before and after NACT. Two observers independently measured the ADC values in both ovaries and in the metastatic mass by drawing on a single slice of (1) freehand large ROIs (L-ROIs) covering the solid parts of the whole tumour and (2) three small round ROIs (S-ROIs). The side of the primary ovarian tumour was defined. We evaluated the interobserver reproducibility and statistical significance of the change in tumoural pre- and post-NACT ADC values. Each patient's disease was defined as platinum-sensitive, semi-sensitive, or resistant. The patients were deemed either responders or non-responders. RESULTS The interobserver reproducibility of the L-ROI and S-ROI measurements ranged from good to excellent (ICC range: 0.71-0.99). The mean ADC values were significantly higher after NACT in the primary tumour (L-ROI p < 0.001, S-ROIs p < 0.01), and the increase after NACT was associated with sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. The changes in the ADC values of the omental mass were associated with a response to NACT. CONCLUSION The mean ADC values of the primary tumour increased significantly after NACT in the OC patients, and the amount of increase in omental mass was associated with the response to platinum-based NACT. Our study indicates that quantitative analysis of ADC values with a single slice and a whole tumour ROI placement is a reproducible method that has a potential role in the evaluation of NACT response in patients with OC. TRIAL REGISTRATION Retrospectively registered (institutional permission code: 5302501; date of the permission: 31.7.2020).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milja Reijonen
- Department of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
| | - Erikka Holopainen
- Department of Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Clinical Radiology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Otso Arponen
- Department of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Mervi Könönen
- Department of Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Ritva Vanninen
- Department of Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Clinical Radiology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Maarit Anttila
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Hanna Sallinen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Irina Rinta-Kiikka
- Department of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Auni Lindgren
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Holopainen E, Lahtinen O, Könönen M, Anttila M, Vanninen R, Lindgren A. Greater increases in intratumoral apparent diffusion coefficients after chemoradiotherapy predict better overall survival of patients with cervical cancer. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0285786. [PMID: 37167301 PMCID: PMC10174495 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate whether 1) the intratumoral apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) change during cervical cancer treatment and 2) the pretreatment ADC values or their change after treatment predict the treatment outcome or overall survival of patients with cervical cancer. METHODS We retrospectively enrolled 52 patients with inoperable cervical cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy, who had undergone diffusion weighted MRI before treatment and post external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and concurrent chemotherapy. A subgroup of patients (n = 28) underwent altogether six consecutive diffusion weighted MRIs; 1) pretreatment, 2) post-EBRT and concurrent chemotherapy; 3-5) during image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) and 6) after completing the whole treatment course. To assess interobserver and intertechnique reproducibility two observers independently measured the ADCs by drawing freehand a large region of interest (L-ROI) covering the whole tumor and three small ROIs (S-ROIs) in areas with most restricted diffusion. RESULTS Reproducibility was equally good for L-ROIs and S-ROIs. The pretreatment ADCs were higher in L-ROIs (883 mm2/s) than in S-ROIs (687 mm2/s, P < 0.001). The ADCs increased significantly between the pretreatment and post-EBRT scans (L-ROI: P < 0.001; S-ROI: P = 0.001). The ADCs remained significantly higher than pretreatment values during the whole IGBT. Using S-ROIs, greater increases in ADCs between pretreatment and post-EBRT MRI predicted better overall survival (P = 0.018). CONCLUSION ADC values significantly increase during cervical cancer treatment. Greater increases in ADC values between pretreatment and post-EBRT predicted better overall survival using S-ROIs. Standardized methods for timing and delineation of ADC measurements are advocated in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erikka Holopainen
- Department of Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Clinical Radiology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Olli Lahtinen
- Department of Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Clinical Radiology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mervi Könönen
- Department of Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Maarit Anttila
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Ritva Vanninen
- Department of Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Clinical Radiology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Auni Lindgren
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Penn A, Medved M, Abe H, Dialani V, Karczmar GS, Brousseau D. Safely reducing unnecessary benign breast biopsies by applying non-mass and DWI directional variance filters to ADC thresholding. BMC Med Imaging 2022; 22:171. [PMID: 36175878 PMCID: PMC9524062 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00897-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Thresholding apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps obtained from Diffusion-Weighted-Imaging (DWI) has been proposed for identifying benign lesions that can safely avoid biopsy. The presence of malignancies with high ADC values leads to high thresholds, limiting numbers of avoidable biopsies.
Purpose We evaluate two previously reported methods for identifying avoidable biopsies: using case-set dependent ADC thresholds that assure 100% sensitivity and using negative likelihood ratio (LR-) with a fixed ADC threshold of 1.50 × 10–3 mm2/s. We evaluated improvements in efficacy obtained by excluding non-mass lesions and lesions with anisotropic intra-lesion morphologic characteristics. Study type Prospective. Population 55 adult females with dense breasts with 69 BI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions (38 malignant, 31 benign) identified on ultrasound and mammography and imaged with MRI prior to biopsy. Field strength/sequence 1.5 T and 3.0 T. DWI. Assessment Analysis of DWI, including directional images was done on an ROI basis. ROIs were drawn on DWI images acquired prior to biopsy, referencing all available images including DCE, and mean ADC was measured. Anisotropy was quantified via variation in ADC values in the lesion core across directional DWI images. Statistical tests Improvement in specificity at 100% sensitivity was evaluated with exact McNemar test with 1-sided p-value < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Results Using ADC thresholding that assures 100% sensitivity, non-mass and directional variance filtering improved the percent of avoidable biopsies to 42% from baseline of 10% achieved with ADC thresholding alone. Using LR-, filtering improved outcome to 0.06 from baseline 0.25 with ADC thresholding alone. ADC thresholding showed a lower percentage of avoidable biopsies in our cohort than reported in prior studies. When ADC thresholding was supplemented with filtering, the percentage of avoidable biopsies exceeded those of prior studies. Data conclusion Supplementing ADC thresholding with filters excluding non-mass lesions and lesions with anisotropic characteristics on DWI can result in an increased number of avoidable biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Penn
- Alan Penn and Associates, Inc., Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
| | | | | | - Vandana Dialani
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02467, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Can DWI provide additional value to Kaiser score in evaluation of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:5964-5973. [PMID: 35357535 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08674-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore added value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) as an adjunct to Kaiser score (KS) for differentiation of benign from malignant lesions on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS Two hundred forty-six patients with 273 lesions (155 malignancies) were included in this retrospective study from January 2015 to December 2019. All lesions were proved by pathology. Two radiologists blind to pathological results evaluated lesions according to KS. Lesions with score > 4 were considered malignant. Four thresholds of ADC values -1.3 × 10-3mm2/s, 1.4 × 10-3mm2/s, 1.53 × 10-3mm2/s, and 1.6 × 10-3mm2/s were used to distinguish benign from malignant lesions. For combined diagnosis, a lesion with KS > 4 and ADC values below the preset cutoffs was considered as malignant; otherwise, it was benign. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were compared between KS, DWI, and combined diagnosis. RESULTS The AUC of KS was significantly higher than that of DWI alone (0.941 vs 0.901, p = 0.04). The sensitivity of KS (96.8%) and DWI (97.4 - 99.4%) was comparable (p > 0.05) while the specificity of KS (83.9%) was significantly higher than that of DWI (19.5-56.8%) (p < 0.05). Adding DWI as an adjunct to KS resulted in a 0-2.5% increase of specificity and a 0.1-1.3% decrease of sensitivity; however, the difference did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION KS showed higher diagnostic performance than DWI alone for discrimination of breast benign and malignant lesions. DWI showed no additional value to KS for characterizing breast lesions. KEY POINTS • KS showed higher diagnostic performance than DWI alone for differentiation of benign from breast malignant lesions. • DWI alone showed a high sensitivity but a low specificity for characterizing breast lesions. • Diagnostic performance did not improve using DWI as an adjunct to KS.
Collapse
|
15
|
Mendez AM, Fang LK, Meriwether CH, Batasin SJ, Loubrie S, Rodríguez-Soto AE, Rakow-Penner RA. Diffusion Breast MRI: Current Standard and Emerging Techniques. Front Oncol 2022; 12:844790. [PMID: 35880168 PMCID: PMC9307963 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.844790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) as a biomarker has been the subject of active investigation in the field of breast radiology. By quantifying the random motion of water within a voxel of tissue, DWI provides indirect metrics that reveal cellularity and architectural features. Studies show that data obtained from DWI may provide information related to the characterization, prognosis, and treatment response of breast cancer. The incorporation of DWI in breast imaging demonstrates its potential to serve as a non-invasive tool to help guide diagnosis and treatment. In this review, current technical literature of diffusion-weighted breast imaging will be discussed, in addition to clinical applications, advanced techniques, and emerging use in the field of radiomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley M. Mendez
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Lauren K. Fang
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Claire H. Meriwether
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Summer J. Batasin
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Stéphane Loubrie
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Ana E. Rodríguez-Soto
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Rebecca A. Rakow-Penner
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States,Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States,*Correspondence: Rebecca A. Rakow-Penner,
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Geng X, Zhang D, Suo S, Chen J, Cheng F, Zhang K, Zhang Q, Li L, Lu Y, Hua J, Zhuang Z. Using the apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: comparison among three region of interest selection methods. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2022; 10:323. [PMID: 35433990 PMCID: PMC9011214 DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-1078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value using histogram analysis is helpful to predict responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer. However, the measurement method has not reached a consensus. This study was to assess the diagnostic performance of the ADC histogram analysis at predicting patient response prior to NAC in breast cancer patients using different region of interest (ROI) selection methods. Methods A total of 75 patients who underwent diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) prior to NAC were retrospectively enrolled from February 2017 to December 2019. Images were measured using small 2-dimensional (2D) ROI, large 2D ROI, and volume ROI methods. The measurement time and ROI size were recorded. Histopathologic responses were acquired using the Miller-Payne grading system after surgery. The inter- and intra-observer repeatability was analyzed and the ADC histogram values from the three ROI methods were compared. The efficacy of each method at predicting patient response prior to NAC was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the whole study population and subgroups according to molecular subtype. Results Among the 75 enrolled patients, 26 (34.67%) were responsive to NAC therapy. The ADC histogram values were significantly different among the three ROI methods (P≤0.038). Inter- and intra-observer repeatability of the large 2D ROI method and the volume ROI method was generally greater than that observed with the 2D ROI method. The 10% ADC value of the large 2D ROI method showed the greatest AUC (0.701) in the whole study population and in the luminal subgroup (AUC 0.804). The volume ROI method required significantly more time than the other two ROI methods (P<0.001). Conclusions The small 2D ROI method is not appropriate for predicting response prior to NAC in breast cancer patients due to the poor repeatability. When choosing the ROI method and the histogram parameters for predicting response prior to NAC in breast cancer patients using ADC-derived histogram analysis, 10% of the large 2D ROI method is recommended, especially in luminal A subtype patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaochuan Geng
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Dandan Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shiteng Suo
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Fang Cheng
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Kebei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qing Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Lan Li
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yang Lu
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jia Hua
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiguo Zhuang
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lepola A, Arponen O, Okuma H, Holli-Helenius K, Junkkari H, Könönen M, Auvinen P, Sudah M, Sutela A, Vanninen R. Association between breast cancer's prognostic factors and 3D textural features of non-contrast-enhanced T1 weighted breast MRI. Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20210702. [PMID: 34826254 PMCID: PMC8822552 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this exploratory study was to evaluate whether three-dimensional texture analysis (3D-TA) features of non-contrast-enhanced T1 weighted MRI associate with traditional prognostic factors and disease-free survival (DFS) of breast cancer. METHODS 3D-T1 weighted images from 78 patients with 81 malignant histopathologically verified breast lesions were retrospectively analysed using standard-size volumes of interest. Grey-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM)-based features were selected for statistical analysis. In statistics the Mann-Whitney U and the Kruskal-Wallis tests, the Cox proportional hazards model and the Kaplan-Meier method were used. RESULTS Tumours with higher histological grade were significantly associated with higher contrast (1 voxel: p = 0.033, 2 voxels: p = 0.036). All the entropy parameters showed significant correlation with tumour grade (p = 0.015-0.050) but there were no statistically significant associations between other TA parameters and tumour grade. The Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) was correlated with contrast and sum entropy parameters. A higher sum variance TA parameter was a significant predictor of shorter DFS. CONCLUSION Texture parameters, assessed by 3D-TA from non-enhanced T1 weighted images, indicate tumour heterogeneity but have limited independent prognostic value. However, they are associated with tumour grade, NPI, and DFS. These parameters could be used as an adjunct to contrast-enhanced TA parameters. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE 3D-TA of non-contrast enhanced T1 weighted breast MRI associates with tumour grade, NPI, and DFS. The use of non-contrast 3D-TA parameters in adjunct with contrast-enhanced 3D-TA parameters warrants further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Mervi Könönen
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jeong S, Kim TH. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast invasive lobular carcinoma: comparison with invasive carcinoma of no special type using a histogram analysis. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2022; 12:95-105. [PMID: 34993063 DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the imaging findings and visibility of breast invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and compare quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) metrics of ILC and invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST) using a histogram analysis. METHODS We performed an observational retrospective study of 629 consecutive women with pathologically proven ILC and invasive ductal carcinoma of NST, who underwent 3-T MRI including DWI, between January 2017 and August 2020. RESULTS After propensity score matching, 71 women were allocated to each group. On DWI, 9 (12.7%) lesions of ILC and 4 (5.6%) invasive carcinomas of the NST were not visualized. For the tumor visibility on DWI, tumor size, tumor ADC value, and background diffusion grade were significantly associated with the visibility score in both groups (all P<0.05), whereas the mean background ADC value was not significant (P>0.05). The mean ADC (1.226×10-3 vs. 1.052×10-3 mm2/s, P<0.001), median ADC (1.222×10-3 vs. 1.051×10-3 mm2/s, P=0.002), maximum ADC (1.758×10-3 vs. 1.504×10-3 mm2/s, P<0.001), minimum ADC (0.717×10-3 vs. 0.649×10-3 mm2/s, P=0.003), 90th percentile ADC (1.506×10-3 vs. 1.292×10-3 mm2/s, P<0.001) and 10th percentile ADC (0.956×10-3 vs. 0.818×10-3 mm2/s, P=0.008) were higher in ILC than in invasive carcinoma of NST. Additionally, the ADC difference value of the ILC was higher than that of invasive carcinoma of NST (1.04×10-3 vs. 0.855×10-3 mm2/s, P=0.027). CONCLUSIONS On DWI, the visibility of ILC was lower compared to invasive carcinoma of NST. ILC showed higher quantitative ADC values and higher ADC difference values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seongkyun Jeong
- Department of Human Intelligence Robot Engineering, Sangmyung University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Hee Kim
- Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
van der Hoogt KJJ, Schipper RJ, Winter-Warnars GA, Ter Beek LC, Loo CE, Mann RM, Beets-Tan RGH. Factors affecting the value of diffusion-weighted imaging for identifying breast cancer patients with pathological complete response on neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a systematic review. Insights Imaging 2021; 12:187. [PMID: 34921645 PMCID: PMC8684570 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01123-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
This review aims to identify factors causing heterogeneity in breast DWI-MRI and their impact on its value for identifying breast cancer patients with pathological complete response (pCR) on neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). A search was performed on PubMed until April 2020 for studies analyzing DWI for identifying breast cancer patients with pCR on NST. Technical and clinical study aspects were extracted and assessed for variability. Twenty studies representing 1455 patients/lesions were included. The studies differed with respect to study population, treatment type, DWI acquisition technique, post-processing (e.g., mono-exponential/intravoxel incoherent motion/stretched exponential modeling), and timing of follow-up studies. For the acquisition and generation of ADC-maps, various b-value combinations were used. Approaches for drawing regions of interest on longitudinal MRIs were highly variable. Biological variability due to various molecular subtypes was usually not taken into account. Moreover, definitions of pCR varied. The individual areas under the curve for the studies range from 0.50 to 0.92. However, overlapping ranges of mean/median ADC-values at pre- and/or during and/or post-NST were found for the pCR and non-pCR groups between studies. The technical, clinical, and epidemiological heterogeneity may be causal for the observed variability in the ability of DWI to predict pCR accurately. This makes implementation of DWI for pCR prediction and evaluation based on one absolute ADC threshold for all breast cancer types undesirable. Multidisciplinary consensus and appropriate clinical study design, taking biological and therapeutic variation into account, is required for obtaining standardized, reliable, and reproducible DWI measurements for pCR/non-pCR identification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kay J J van der Hoogt
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Robert J Schipper
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gonneke A Winter-Warnars
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leon C Ter Beek
- Department of Medical Physics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Claudette E Loo
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ritse M Mann
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Danish Colorectal Cancer Unit South, Institute of Regional Health Research, Vejle University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Diffusion tensor imaging on 3-T MRI breast: diagnostic performance in comparison to diffusion-weighted imaging. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 2021. [DOI: 10.1186/s43055-021-00473-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among females. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) breast is highly sensitive (90%) in the detection of breast cancer. Despite its high sensitivity in detecting breast cancer, its specificity (72%) is moderate. Owing to 3-T breast MRI which has the advantage of a higher signal to noise ratio and shorter scanning time rather than the 1.5-T MRI, the adding of new techniques as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to breast MRI became more feasible.
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) which tracks the diffusion of the tissue water molecule as well as providing data about the integrity of the cell membrane has been used as a valuable additional tool of DCE-MRI to increase its specificity.
Based on DWI, more details about the microstructure could be detected using diffusion tensor imaging. The DTI applies diffusion in many directions so apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) will vary according to the measured direction raising its sensitivity to microstructure elements and cellular density. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of DTI in the assessment of breast lesions in comparison to DWI.
Results
By analyzing the data of the 50 cases (31 malignant cases and 19 benign cases), the sensitivity and specificity of DWI in differentiation between benign and malignant lesions were about 90% and 63% respectively with PPV 90% and NPV 62%, while the DTI showed lower sensitivity and specificity about 81% and 51.7%, respectively, with PPV 78.9% and NPV 54.8% (P-value ≤ 0.05).
Conclusion
While the DWI is still the most established diffusion parameter, DTI may be helpful in the further characterization of tumor microstructure and differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions.
Collapse
|
21
|
Lin M, Wynne JF, Zhou B, Wang T, Lei Y, Curran WJ, Liu T, Yang X. Artificial intelligence in tumor subregion analysis based on medical imaging: A review. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:10-26. [PMID: 34164913 PMCID: PMC8292694 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Medical imaging is widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer, and artificial intelligence (AI) has achieved tremendous success in medical image analysis. This paper reviews AI-based tumor subregion analysis in medical imaging. We summarize the latest AI-based methods for tumor subregion analysis and their applications. Specifically, we categorize the AI-based methods by training strategy: supervised and unsupervised. A detailed review of each category is presented, highlighting important contributions and achievements. Specific challenges and potential applications of AI in tumor subregion analysis are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingquan Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Jacob F. Wynne
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Boran Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Tonghe Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Yang Lei
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Walter J. Curran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Tian Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Whole Volume Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Histogram as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker to Differentiate Breast Lesions: Correlation with the Ki-67 Proliferation Index. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021; 2021:4970265. [PMID: 34258262 PMCID: PMC8249125 DOI: 10.1155/2021/4970265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the value of the whole volume apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions and differentiating different molecular subtypes of breast cancers and to assess the correlation between ADC histogram parameters and Ki-67 expression in breast cancers. Methods The institutional review board approved this retrospective study. Between September 2016 and February 2019, 189 patients with 84 benign lesions and 105 breast cancers underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Volumetric ADC histograms were created by placing regions of interest (ROIs) on the whole lesion. The relationships between the ADC parameters and Ki-67 were analysed using Spearman's correlation analysis. Results Of the 189 breast lesions included, there were significant differences in patient age (P < 0.001) and lesion size (P = 0.006) between the benign and malignant lesions. The results also demonstrated significant differences in all ADC histogram parameters between benign and malignant lesions (all P < 0.001). The median and mean ADC histogram parameters performed better than the other ADC histogram parameters (AUCs were 0.943 and 0.930, respectively). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that the 10th percentile ADC value and entropy could determine the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) status (both P = 0.001) and estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) status (P = 0.020 and P = 0.041, respectively). Among all breast cancer lesions, 35 tumours in the low-proliferation group (Ki − 67 < 14%) and 70 tumours in the high-proliferation group (Ki − 67 ≥ 14) were analysed with ROC curves and correlation analyses. The ROC analysis revealed that entropy and skewness could determine the Ki-67 status (P = 0.007 and P < 0.001, respectively), and there were weak correlations between ADC entropy (r = 0.383) and skewness (r = 0.209) and the Ki-67 index. Conclusion The volumetric ADC histogram could serve as an imaging marker to determine breast lesion characteristics and may be a supplemental method in predicting tumour proliferation in breast cancer.
Collapse
|
23
|
Naranjo ID, Reymbaut A, Brynolfsson P, Lo Gullo R, Bryskhe K, Topgaard D, Giri DD, Reiner JS, Thakur SB, Pinker-Domenig K. Multidimensional Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Characterization of Tissue Microstructure in Breast Cancer Patients: A Prospective Pilot Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1606. [PMID: 33807205 PMCID: PMC8037718 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Diffusion-weighted imaging is a non-invasive functional imaging modality for breast tumor characterization through apparent diffusion coefficients. Yet, it has so far been unable to intuitively inform on tissue microstructure. In this IRB-approved prospective study, we applied novel multidimensional diffusion (MDD) encoding across 16 patients with suspected breast cancer to evaluate its potential for tissue characterization in the clinical setting. Data acquired via custom MDD sequences was processed using an algorithm estimating non-parametric diffusion tensor distributions. The statistical descriptors of these distributions allow us to quantify tissue composition in terms of metrics informing on cell densities, shapes, and orientations. Additionally, signal fractions from specific cell types, such as elongated cells (bin1), isotropic cells (bin2), and free water (bin3), were teased apart. Histogram analysis in cancers and healthy breast tissue showed that cancers exhibited lower mean values of "size" (1.43 ± 0.54 × 10-3 mm2/s) and higher mean values of "shape" (0.47 ± 0.15) corresponding to bin1, while FGT (fibroglandular breast tissue) presented higher mean values of "size" (2.33 ± 0.22 × 10-3 mm2/s) and lower mean values of "shape" (0.27 ± 0.11) corresponding to bin3 (p < 0.001). Invasive carcinomas showed significant differences in mean signal fractions from bin1 (0.64 ± 0.13 vs. 0.4 ± 0.25) and bin3 (0.18 ± 0.08 vs. 0.42 ± 0.21) compared to ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS) and invasive carcinomas with associated DCIS (p = 0.03). MDD enabled qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the composition of breast cancers and healthy glands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac Daimiel Naranjo
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA; (I.D.N.); (R.L.G.); (J.S.R.); (S.B.T.)
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Alexis Reymbaut
- Random Walk Imaging AB, SE-22002 Lund, Sweden; (A.R.); (P.B.); (K.B.)
| | - Patrik Brynolfsson
- Random Walk Imaging AB, SE-22002 Lund, Sweden; (A.R.); (P.B.); (K.B.)
- NONPI Medical AB, SE-90738 Umeå, Sweden
| | - Roberto Lo Gullo
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA; (I.D.N.); (R.L.G.); (J.S.R.); (S.B.T.)
| | - Karin Bryskhe
- Random Walk Imaging AB, SE-22002 Lund, Sweden; (A.R.); (P.B.); (K.B.)
| | - Daniel Topgaard
- Department of Chemistry, Lund University, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden;
| | - Dilip D. Giri
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Jeffrey S. Reiner
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA; (I.D.N.); (R.L.G.); (J.S.R.); (S.B.T.)
| | - Sunitha B. Thakur
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA; (I.D.N.); (R.L.G.); (J.S.R.); (S.B.T.)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medical Physics, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Katja Pinker-Domenig
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA; (I.D.N.); (R.L.G.); (J.S.R.); (S.B.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wielema M, Sijens PE, Dijkstra H, De Bock GH, van Bruggen IG, Siegersma JE, Langius E, Pijnappel RM, Dorrius MD, Oudkerk M. Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: Performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0245930. [PMID: 33493230 PMCID: PMC7833148 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives In breast diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) protocol standardization, it is recently shown that no breast tumor tissue selection (BTTS) method outperformed the others. The purpose of this study is to analyze the feasibility of three fixed-size breast tumor tissue selection (BTTS) methods based on the reproducibility, accuracy and time-measurement in comparison to the largest oval and manual delineation in breast diffusion weighted imaging data. Methods This study is performed with a consecutive dataset of 116 breast lesions (98 malignant) of at least 1.0 cm, scanned in accordance with the EUSOBI breast DWI working group recommendations. Reproducibility of the maximum size manual (BTTS1) and of the maximal size round/oval (BTTS2) methods were compared with three smaller fixed-size circular BTTS methods in the middle of each lesion (BTTS3, 0.12 cm3 volume) and at lowest apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (BTTS4, 0.12 cm3; BTTS5, 0.24 cm3). Mean ADC values, intraclass-correlation-coefficients (ICCs), area under the curve (AUC) and measurement times (sec) of the 5 BTTS methods were assessed by two observers. Results Excellent inter- and intra-observer agreement was found for any BTTS (with ICC 0.88–0.92 and 0.92–0.94, respectively). Significant difference in ADCmean between any pair of BTTS methods was shown (p = <0.001–0.009), except for BTTS2 vs. BTTS3 for observer 1 (p = 0.10). AUCs were comparable between BTTS methods, with highest AUC for BTTS2 (0.89–0.91) and lowest for BTTS4 (0.76–0.85). However, as an indicator of clinical feasibility, BTTS2-3 showed shortest measurement times (10–15 sec) compared to BTTS1, 4–5 (19–39 sec). Conclusion The performance of fixed-size BTTS methods, as a potential tool for clinical decision making, shows equal AUC but shorter ADC measurement time compared to manual or oval whole lesion measurements. The advantage of a fixed size BTTS method is the excellent reproducibility. A central fixed breast tumor tissue volume of 0.12 cm3 is the most feasible method for use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Wielema
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - P. E. Sijens
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - H. Dijkstra
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - G. H. De Bock
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - I. G. van Bruggen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - J. E. Siegersma
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - E. Langius
- Department of Radiology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - R. M. Pijnappel
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M. D. Dorrius
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - M. Oudkerk
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Institute of Diagnostic Accuracy, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
McDonald ES, Romanoff J, Rahbar H, Kitsch AE, Harvey SM, Whisenant JG, Yankeelov TE, Moy L, DeMartini WB, Dogan BE, Yang WT, Wang LC, Joe BN, Wilmes LJ, Hylton NM, Oh KY, Tudorica LA, Neal CH, Malyarenko DI, Comstock CE, Schnall MD, Chenevert TL, Partridge SC. Mean Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Is a Sufficient Conventional Diffusion-weighted MRI Metric to Improve Breast MRI Diagnostic Performance: Results from the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group A6702 Diffusion Imaging Trial. Radiology 2021; 298:60-70. [PMID: 33201788 PMCID: PMC7771995 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020202465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and American College of Radiology Imaging Network Cancer Research Group A6702 multicenter trial helped confirm the potential of diffusion-weighted MRI for improving differential diagnosis of suspicious breast abnormalities and reducing unnecessary biopsies. A prespecified secondary objective was to explore the relative value of different approaches for quantitative assessment of lesions at diffusion-weighted MRI. Purpose To determine whether alternate calculations of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can help further improve diagnostic performance versus mean ADC values alone for analysis of suspicious breast lesions at MRI. Materials and Methods This prospective trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02022579) enrolled consecutive women (from March 2014 to April 2015) with a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category of 3, 4, or 5 at breast MRI. All study participants underwent standardized diffusion-weighted MRI (b = 0, 100, 600, and 800 sec/mm2). Centralized ADC measures were performed, including manually drawn whole-lesion and hotspot regions of interest, histogram metrics, normalized ADC, and variable b-value combinations. Diagnostic performance was estimated by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Reduction in biopsy rate (maintaining 100% sensitivity) was estimated according to thresholds for each ADC metric. Results Among 107 enrolled women, 81 lesions with outcomes (28 malignant and 53 benign) in 67 women (median age, 49 years; interquartile range, 41-60 years) were analyzed. Among ADC metrics tested, none improved diagnostic performance versus standard mean ADC (AUC, 0.59-0.79 vs AUC, 0.75; P = .02-.84), and maximum ADC had worse performance (AUC, 0.52; P < .001). The 25th-percentile ADC metric provided the best performance (AUC, 0.79; 95% CI: 0.70, 0.88), and a threshold using median ADC provided the greatest reduction in biopsy rate of 23.9% (95% CI: 14.8, 32.9; 16 of 67 BI-RADS category 4 and 5 lesions). Nonzero minimum b value (100, 600, and 800 sec/mm2) did not improve the AUC (0.74; P = .28), and several combinations of two b values (0 and 600, 100 and 600, 0 and 800, and 100 and 800 sec/mm2; AUC, 0.73-0.76) provided results similar to those seen with calculations of four b values (AUC, 0.75; P = .17-.87). Conclusion Mean apparent diffusion coefficient calculated with a two-b-value acquisition is a simple and sufficient diffusion-weighted MRI metric to augment diagnostic performance of breast MRI compared with more complex approaches to apparent diffusion coefficient measurement. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth S. McDonald
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Justin Romanoff
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Habib Rahbar
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Averi E. Kitsch
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Sara M. Harvey
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Jennifer G. Whisenant
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Thomas E. Yankeelov
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Linda Moy
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Wendy B. DeMartini
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Basak E. Dogan
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Wei T. Yang
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Lilian C. Wang
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Bonnie N. Joe
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Lisa J. Wilmes
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Nola M. Hylton
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Karen Y. Oh
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Luminita A. Tudorica
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Colleen H. Neal
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Dariya I. Malyarenko
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Christopher E. Comstock
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Mitchell D. Schnall
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Thomas L. Chenevert
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Savannah C. Partridge
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.S.M., M.D.S.); Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109 (H.R., A.E.K., S.C.P.); Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.M.H.) and Medicine (J.G.W.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tenn (J.G.W.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (T.E.Y.); Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (W.B.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (B.E.D.); Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (W.T.Y.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (L.C.W.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif (B.N.J., L.J.W., N.M.H.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (K.Y.O., L.A.T.); Department of Radiology/MRI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (C.H.N., D.I.M., T.L.C.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Razek AAKA, El-Adalany MA, El-Metwally D. Role of diffusion-weighted imaging in prediction of nipple-areolar complex invasion by breast cancer. Clin Imaging 2020; 69:45-49. [PMID: 32652457 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.06.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
THE AIM OF THIS WORK The aim of this work was to estimate the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in predicting malignant invasion of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) by underlying breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS This prospective study included 70 female patients with breast cancer with a mean age of 45.8 years (range: 28-68). DWI of the breast was done for all patients. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were automatically constructed. The mean ADC values of NAC were independently measured by two observers who are experts in breast imaging and correlated with the results of histopathological examinations. RESULTS Both observers found a significantly lower ADC value of malignant NAC invasion (n = 18) when compared with free NAC (n = 52), with mean ADC value for malignant NAC invasion was 0.86 ± 0.35 × 10-3 mm2/s and 0.84 ± 0.08 × 10-3 mm2/s for observer one and two respectively versus mean ADC value of 1.34 ± 0.25 × 10-3 mm2/s and 1.4 ± 0.26 × 10-3 mm2/s for free NAC by observer one and two respectively (P-value =0.001). Observer one found that a cutoff ADC value of 1.05 × 0-3 mm2/s can predict malignant NAC invasion with 0.975 AUC, 92.8% accuracy, 94.4% sensitivity, and 92.3% specificity. Observer two found that a cutoff ADC value of 0.95 × 10-3 mm2/s can predict malignant NAC invasion with 0.992 AUC, 95.7% accuracy, 88.9% sensitivity, and 98.1% specificity. CONCLUSION DWI can predict malignant NAC invasion in patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Dina El-Metwally
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Okuma H, Sudah M, Kettunen T, Niukkanen A, Sutela A, Masarwah A, Kosma VM, Auvinen P, Mannermaa A, Vanninen R. Peritumor to tumor apparent diffusion coefficient ratio is associated with biologically more aggressive breast cancer features and correlates with the prognostication tools. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0235278. [PMID: 32584887 PMCID: PMC7316248 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is increasingly used to characterize breast cancer. The peritumor/tumor ADC ratio is suggested to be a reliable and generally applicable index. However, its overall prognostication value remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the associations between the peritumor/tumor ADC ratio and histopathological biomarkers and published prognostic tools in patients with invasive breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective study included 88 lesions (five bilateral) in 83 patients with primary invasive breast cancer who underwent preoperative 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging. The lowest intratumoral mean ADC value on the slice with the largest tumor cross-sectional area was designated the tumor ADC, and the highest mean ADC value on the peritumoral breast parenchymal tissue adjacent to the tumor border was designated the peritumor ADC. The peritumor/tumor ADC ratio was then calculated. The tumor and peritumor ADC values and peritumor/tumor ADC ratios were compared with histopathological parameters using an unpaired t test, and their correlations with published prognostic tools were evaluated with Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS The peritumor/tumor ADC ratio was significantly associated with tumor size (p<0.001), histological grade (p = 0.005), Ki-67 index (p = 0.006), axillary-lymph-node metastasis (p = 0.001), and lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.006), but was not associated with estrogen receptor status (p = 0.931), progesterone receptor status (p = 0.160), or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status (p = 0.259). The peritumor/tumor ADC ratio showed moderate positive correlations with the Nottingham Prognostic Index (r = 0.498, p<0.001) and mortality predicted using PREDICT (r = 0.436, p<0.001). CONCLUSION The peritumor/tumor ADC ratio was correlated with histopathological biomarkers in patients with invasive breast cancer, showed significant correlations with published prognostic indexes, and may provide an easily applicable imaging index for the preoperative prognostic evaluation of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidemi Okuma
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Clinical Radiology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- * E-mail:
| | - Mazen Sudah
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Clinical Radiology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Tiia Kettunen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Oncology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Anton Niukkanen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Clinical Radiology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Anna Sutela
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Clinical Radiology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Amro Masarwah
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Clinical Radiology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Veli-Matti Kosma
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Translational Cancer Research Area, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Biobank of Eastern Finland, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Päivi Auvinen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Oncology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Arto Mannermaa
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Translational Cancer Research Area, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Biobank of Eastern Finland, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Ritva Vanninen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Clinical Radiology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Penn AI, Medved M, Dialani V, Pisano ED, Cole EB, Brousseau D, Karczmar GS, Gao G, Reich BD, Abe H. Discrimination of benign from malignant breast lesions in dense breasts with model-based analysis of regions-of-interest using directional diffusion-weighted images. BMC Med Imaging 2020; 20:61. [PMID: 32517657 PMCID: PMC7282088 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-020-00458-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is an increasing interest in non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting and evaluating breast lesions. We present a methodology utilizing lesion core and periphery region of interest (ROI) features derived from directional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) data to evaluate performance in discriminating benign from malignant lesions in dense breasts. Methods We accrued 55 dense-breast cases with 69 lesions (31 benign; 38 cancer) at a single institution in a prospective study; cases with ROIs exceeding 7.50 cm2 were excluded, resulting in analysis of 50 cases with 63 lesions (29 benign, 34 cancers). Spin-echo echo-planar imaging DWI was acquired at 1.5 T and 3 T. Data from three diffusion encoding gradient directions were exported and processed independently. Lesion ROIs were hand-drawn on DWI images by two radiologists. A region growing algorithm generated 3D lesion models on augmented apparent-diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps and defined lesion core and lesion periphery sub-ROIs. A lesion-core and a lesion-periphery feature were defined and combined into an overall classifier whose performance was compared to that of mean ADC using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Inter-observer variability in ROI definition was measured using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC). Results The region-growing algorithm for 3D lesion model generation improved inter-observer variability over hand drawn ROIs (DSC: 0.66 vs 0.56 (p < 0.001) with substantial agreement (DSC > 0.8) in 46% vs 13% of cases, respectively (p < 0.001)). The overall classifier improved discrimination over mean ADC, (ROC- area under the curve (AUC): 0.85 vs 0.75 and 0.83 vs 0.74 respectively for the two readers). Conclusions A classifier generated from directional DWI information using lesion core and lesion periphery information separately can improve lesion discrimination in dense breasts over mean ADC and should be considered for inclusion in computer-aided diagnosis algorithms. Our model-based ROIs could facilitate standardization of breast MRI computer-aided diagnostics (CADx).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan I Penn
- Alan Penn & Assoc., Inc., 14 Clemson Ct, Rockville, MD, 20810, USA.
| | - Milica Medved
- Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave. MC 2026, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Vandana Dialani
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Etta D Pisano
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.,American College of Radiology, Two Liberty Place, Philadelphia, PA, 19102, USA
| | - Elodia B Cole
- American College of Radiology, Two Liberty Place, Philadelphia, PA, 19102, USA
| | - David Brousseau
- Providence Cedars-Sinai Tarzana Medical Center, 18321 Clark Street, Tarzana, CA, 91356, USA
| | - Gregory S Karczmar
- Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave. MC 2026, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Guimin Gao
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave. MC 2000, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Barry D Reich
- Alan Penn & Assoc., Inc., 14 Clemson Ct, Rockville, MD, 20810, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Abe
- Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave. MC 2026, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wielema M, Dorrius MD, Pijnappel RM, De Bock GH, Baltzer PAT, Oudkerk M, Sijens PE. Diagnostic performance of breast tumor tissue selection in diffusion weighted imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0232856. [PMID: 32374781 PMCID: PMC7202642 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several methods for tumor delineation are used in literature on breast diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) to measure the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). However, in the process of reaching consensus on breast DWI scanning protocol, image analysis and interpretation, still no standardized optimal breast tumor tissue selection (BTTS) method exists. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the impact of BTTS methods on ADC in the discrimination of benign from malignant breast lesions in DWI in terms of sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC). METHODS AND FINDINGS In this systematic review and meta-analysis, adhering to the PRISMA statement, 61 studies, with 65 study subsets, in females with benign or malignant primary breast lesions (6291 lesions) were assessed. Studies on DWI, quantified by ADC, scanned on 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla and using b-values 0/50 and ≥ 800 s/mm2 were included. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for studies up to 23-10-2019 (n = 2897). Data were pooled based on four BTTS methods (by definition of measured region of interest, ROI): BTTS1: whole breast tumor tissue selection, BTTS2: subtracted whole breast tumor tissue selection, BTTS3: circular breast tumor tissue selection and BTTS4: lowest diffusion breast tumor tissue selection. BTTS methods 2 and 3 excluded necrotic, cystic and hemorrhagic areas. Pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC of the BTTS methods were calculated. Heterogeneity was explored using the inconsistency index (I2) and considering covariables: field strength, lowest b-value, image of BTTS selection, pre-or post-contrast DWI, slice thickness and ADC threshold. Pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC were: 0.82 (0.72-0.89), 0.79 (0.65-0.89), 0.88 (0.85-0.90) for BTTS1; 0.91 (0.89-0.93), 0.84 (0.80-0.87), 0.94 (0.91-0.96) for BTTS2; 0.89 (0.86-0.92), 0.90 (0.85-0.93), 0.95 (0.93-0.96) for BTTS3 and 0.90 (0.86-0.93), 0.84 (0.81-0.87), 0.86 (0.82-0.88) for BTTS4, respectively. Significant heterogeneity was found between studies (I2 = 95). CONCLUSIONS None of the breast tissue selection (BTTS) methodologies outperformed in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions. The high heterogeneity of ADC data acquisition demands further standardization, such as DWI acquisition parameters and tumor tissue selection to substantially increase the reliability of DWI of the breast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Wielema
- Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M. D. Dorrius
- Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R. M. Pijnappel
- Department of Radiology, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - G. H. De Bock
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - P. A. T. Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M. Oudkerk
- University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Institute for Diagnostic Accuracy, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - P. E. Sijens
- Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Combining Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps for a Radiomics Nomogram to Predict Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2020; 44:275-283. [PMID: 32004189 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000000978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to develop a nomogrom for prediction of pathological complete response (PCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. METHODS Ninety-one patients were analyzed. A total of 396 radiomics features were extracted from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was selected for data dimension reduction to build a radiomics signature. Finally, the nomogram was built to predict PCR. RESULTS The radiomics signature of the model that combined DCE-MRI and ADC maps showed a higher performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.848) than the models with DCE-MRI (AUC, 0.750) or ADC maps (AUC, 0.785) alone in the training set. The proposed model, which included combined radiomics signature, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor, yielded a maximum AUC of 0.837 in the testing set. CONCLUSIONS The combined radiomics features from DCE-MRI and ADC data may serve as potential predictor markers for predicting PCR. The nomogram could be used as a quantitative tool to predict PCR.
Collapse
|
31
|
Artificial Intelligence-Based Classification of Breast Lesions Imaged With a Multiparametric Breast MRI Protocol With Ultrafast DCE-MRI, T2, and DWI. Invest Radiol 2020; 54:325-332. [PMID: 30652985 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We investigated artificial intelligence (AI)-based classification of benign and malignant breast lesions imaged with a multiparametric breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol with ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed 576 lesions imaged with MRI, including a consecutive set of biopsied malignant (368) and benign (149) lesions, and an additional set of 59 benign lesions proven by follow-up. We used deep learning methods to interpret ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and T2-weighted information. A random forests classifier combined the output with patient information (PI; age and BRCA status) and apparent diffusion coefficient values obtained from diffusion-weighted imaging to perform the final lesion classification. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to evaluate our results. Sensitivity and specificity were compared with the results of the prospective clinical evaluation by radiologists. RESULTS The area under the ROC curve was 0.811 when only ultrafast dynamics was used. The final AI system that combined all imaging information with PI resulted in an area under the ROC curve of 0.852, significantly higher than the ultrafast dynamics alone (P = 0.002). When operating at the same sensitivity level of radiologists in this dataset, this system produced 19 less false-positives than the number of biopsied benign lesions in our dataset. CONCLUSIONS Use of adjunct imaging and PI has a significant contribution in diagnostic performance of ultrafast breast MRI. The developed AI system for interpretation of multiparametric ultrafast breast MRI may improve specificity.
Collapse
|
32
|
Avendano D, Marino MA, Leithner D, Thakur S, Bernard-Davila B, Martinez DF, Helbich TH, Morris EA, Jochelson MS, Baltzer PAT, Clauser P, Kapetas P, Pinker K. Limited role of DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping in breast lesions presenting as non-mass enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Breast Cancer Res 2019; 21:136. [PMID: 31801635 PMCID: PMC6894318 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-019-1208-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Available data proving the value of DWI for breast cancer diagnosis is mainly for enhancing masses; DWI may be less sensitive and specific in non-mass enhancement (NME) lesions. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of DWI using different ROI measurement approaches and ADC metrics in breast lesions presenting as NME lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. METHODS In this retrospective study, 95 patients who underwent multiparametric MRI with DCE and DWI from September 2007 to July 2013 and who were diagnosed with a suspicious NME (BI-RADS 4/5) were included. Twenty-nine patients were excluded for lesion non-visibility on DWI (n = 24: 12 benign and 12 malignant) and poor DWI quality (n = 5: 1 benign and 4 malignant). Two readers independently assessed DWI and DCE-MRI findings in two separate randomized readings using different ADC metrics and ROI approaches. NME lesions were classified as either benign (> 1.3 × 10-3 mm2/s) or malignant (≤ 1.3 × 10-3 mm2/s). Histopathology was the standard of reference. ROC curves were plotted, and AUCs were determined. Concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was measured. RESULTS There were 39 malignant (59%) and 27 benign (41%) lesions in 66 (65 women, 1 man) patients (mean age, 51.8 years). The mean ADC value of the darkest part of the tumor (Dptu) achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy, with AUCs of up to 0.71. Inter-reader agreement was highest with Dptu ADC max (CCC 0.42) and lowest with the point tumor (Ptu) ADC min (CCC = - 0.01). Intra-reader agreement was highest with Wtu ADC mean (CCC = 0.44 for reader 1, 0.41 for reader 2), but this was not associated with the highest diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSIONS Diagnostic accuracy of DWI with ADC mapping is limited in NME lesions. Thirty-one percent of lesions presenting as NME on DCE-MRI could not be evaluated with DWI, and therefore, DCE-MRI remains indispensable. Best results were achieved using Dptu 2D ROI measurement and ADC mean.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daly Avendano
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Suite 705, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.,Department of Breast Imaging, Breast Cancer Center TecSalud, ITESM Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| | - Maria Adele Marino
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Suite 705, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.,Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphologic and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Doris Leithner
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Suite 705, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sunitha Thakur
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Blanca Bernard-Davila
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Suite 705, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Danny F Martinez
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Suite 705, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Thomas H Helbich
- Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Elizabeth A Morris
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Suite 705, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Maxine S Jochelson
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Suite 705, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Pascal A T Baltzer
- Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Paola Clauser
- Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Panagiotis Kapetas
- Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Katja Pinker
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Suite 705, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA. .,Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Amornsiripanitch N, Bickelhaupt S, Shin HJ, Dang M, Rahbar H, Pinker K, Partridge SC. Diffusion-weighted MRI for Unenhanced Breast Cancer Screening. Radiology 2019; 293:504-520. [PMID: 31592734 PMCID: PMC6884069 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Revised: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI is a rapid technique that measures the mobility of water molecules within tissue, reflecting the cellular microenvironment. At DW MRI, breast cancers typically exhibit reduced diffusivity and appear hyperintense to surrounding tissues. On the basis of this characteristic, DW MRI may offer an unenhanced method to detect breast cancer without the costs and safety concerns associated with dynamic contrast material-enhanced MRI, the current reference standard in the setting of high-risk screening. This application of DW MRI has not been widely explored but is particularly timely given the growing health concerns related to the long-term use of gadolinium-based contrast material. Moreover, increasing breast density notification legislation across the United States is raising awareness of the limitations of mammography in women with dense breasts, emphasizing the need for additional cost-effective supplemental screening examinations. Preliminary studies suggest unenhanced MRI with DW MRI may provide higher sensitivity than screening mammography for the detection of breast malignancies. Larger prospective multicenter trials are needed to validate single-center findings and assess the performance of DW MRI for generalized breast cancer screening. Standardization of DW MRI acquisition and interpretation is essential to ensure reliable sensitivity and specificity, and an optimal approach for screening using readily available techniques is proposed here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nita Amornsiripanitch
- From the Department of Breast Imaging, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Mass (N.A.); Medical Imaging and Radiology–Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.B.); Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea (H.J.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825 Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (M.D., H.R., S.C.P.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (K.P.); and Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (K.P.)
| | - Sebastian Bickelhaupt
- From the Department of Breast Imaging, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Mass (N.A.); Medical Imaging and Radiology–Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.B.); Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea (H.J.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825 Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (M.D., H.R., S.C.P.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (K.P.); and Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (K.P.)
| | - Hee Jung Shin
- From the Department of Breast Imaging, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Mass (N.A.); Medical Imaging and Radiology–Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.B.); Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea (H.J.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825 Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (M.D., H.R., S.C.P.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (K.P.); and Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (K.P.)
| | - Madeline Dang
- From the Department of Breast Imaging, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Mass (N.A.); Medical Imaging and Radiology–Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.B.); Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea (H.J.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825 Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (M.D., H.R., S.C.P.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (K.P.); and Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (K.P.)
| | - Habib Rahbar
- From the Department of Breast Imaging, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Mass (N.A.); Medical Imaging and Radiology–Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.B.); Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea (H.J.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825 Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (M.D., H.R., S.C.P.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (K.P.); and Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (K.P.)
| | - Katja Pinker
- From the Department of Breast Imaging, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Mass (N.A.); Medical Imaging and Radiology–Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.B.); Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea (H.J.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825 Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (M.D., H.R., S.C.P.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (K.P.); and Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (K.P.)
| | - Savannah C. Partridge
- From the Department of Breast Imaging, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Mass (N.A.); Medical Imaging and Radiology–Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.B.); Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea (H.J.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825 Eastlake Ave E, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109 (M.D., H.R., S.C.P.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (K.P.); and Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (K.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Baltzer P, Mann RM, Iima M, Sigmund EE, Clauser P, Gilbert FJ, Martincich L, Partridge SC, Patterson A, Pinker K, Thibault F, Camps-Herrero J, Le Bihan D. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast-a consensus and mission statement from the EUSOBI International Breast Diffusion-Weighted Imaging working group. Eur Radiol 2019; 30:1436-1450. [PMID: 31786616 PMCID: PMC7033067 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06510-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 256] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Revised: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
The European Society of Breast Radiology (EUSOBI) established an International Breast DWI working group. The working group consists of clinical breast MRI experts, MRI physicists, and representatives from large vendors of MRI equipment, invited based upon proven expertise in breast MRI and/or in particular breast DWI, representing 25 sites from 16 countries. The aims of the working group are (a) to promote the use of breast DWI into clinical practice by issuing consensus statements and initiate collaborative research where appropriate; (b) to define necessary standards and provide practical guidance for clinical application of breast DWI; (c) to develop a standardized and translatable multisite multivendor quality assurance protocol, especially for multisite research studies; (d) to find consensus on optimal methods for image processing/analysis, visualization, and interpretation; and (e) to work collaboratively with system vendors to improve breast DWI sequences. First consensus recommendations, presented in this paper, include acquisition parameters for standard breast DWI sequences including specifications of b values, fat saturation, spatial resolution, and repetition and echo times. To describe lesions in an objective way, levels of diffusion restriction/hindrance in the breast have been defined based on the published literature on breast DWI. The use of a small ROI placed on the darkest part of the lesion on the ADC map, avoiding necrotic, noisy or non-enhancing lesion voxels is currently recommended. The working group emphasizes the need for standardization and quality assurance before ADC thresholds are applied. The working group encourages further research in advanced diffusion techniques and tailored DWI strategies for specific indications. Key Points • The working group considers breast DWI an essential part of a multiparametric breast MRI protocol and encourages its use. • Basic requirements for routine clinical application of breast DWI are provided, including recommendations on b values, fat saturation, spatial resolution, and other sequence parameters. • Diffusion levels in breast lesions are defined based on meta-analysis data and methods to obtain a reliable ADC value are detailed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna/Vienna General Hospital, Wien, Austria
| | - Ritse M Mann
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands. .,Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Mami Iima
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Eric E Sigmund
- Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, Ney York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Paola Clauser
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna/Vienna General Hospital, Wien, Austria
| | - Fiona J Gilbert
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Savannah C Partridge
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Andrew Patterson
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Katja Pinker
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna/Vienna General Hospital, Wien, Austria.,MSKCC, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | | | | | - Denis Le Bihan
- NeuroSpin, Frédéric Joliot Institute, Gif Sur Yvette, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Surov A, Chang YW, Li L, Martincich L, Partridge SC, Kim JY, Wienke A. Apparent diffusion coefficient cannot predict molecular subtype and lymph node metastases in invasive breast cancer: a multicenter analysis. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:1043. [PMID: 31690273 PMCID: PMC6833245 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6298-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Radiological imaging plays a central role in the diagnosis of breast cancer (BC). Some studies suggest MRI techniques like diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) may provide further prognostic value by discriminating between tumors with different biologic characteristics including receptor status and molecular subtype. However, there is much contradictory reported data regarding such associations in the literature. The purpose of the present study was to provide evident data regarding relationships between quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on DWI and pathologic prognostic factors in BC. Methods Data from 5 centers (661 female patients, mean age, 51.4 ± 10.5 years) were acquired. Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) was diagnosed in 625 patients (94.6%) and invasive lobular carcinoma in 36 cases (5.4%). Luminal A carcinomas were diagnosed in 177 patients (28.0%), luminal B carcinomas in 279 patients (44.1%), HER 2+ carcinomas in 66 cases (10.4%), and triple negative carcinomas in 111 patients (17.5%). The identified lesions were staged as T1 in 51.3%, T2 in 43.0%, T3 in 4.2%, and as T4 in 1.5% of the cases. N0 was found in 61.3%, N1 in 33.1%, N2 in 2.9%, and N3 in 2.7%. ADC values between different groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test and by the Kruskal-Wallis H test. The association between ADC and Ki 67 values was calculated by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Results ADC values of different tumor subtypes overlapped significantly. Luminal B carcinomas had statistically significant lower ADC values compared with luminal A (p = 0.003) and HER 2+ (p = 0.007) lesions. No significant differences of ADC values were observed between luminal A, HER 2+ and triple negative tumors. There were no statistically significant differences of ADC values between different T or N stages of the tumors. Weak statistically significant correlation between ADC and Ki 67 was observed in luminal B carcinoma (r = − 0.130, p = 0.03). In luminal A, HER 2+ and triple negative tumors there were no significant correlations between ADC and Ki 67. Conclusion ADC was not able to discriminate molecular subtypes of BC, and cannot be used as a surrogate marker for disease stage or proliferation activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexey Surov
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
| | - Yun-Woo Chang
- Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, 59 Daesakwan-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 140-743, Republic of Korea
| | - Lihua Li
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Laura Martincich
- Unit of Radiology, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment (IRCC), Strada Provinciale 142, 10060 Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Savannah C Partridge
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 825 Eastlake Ave. E, G2-600, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | - Jin You Kim
- Department of Radiology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Medical Research Institute 1-10, Ami-Dong, Seo-gu, Busan, 602-739, South Korea
| | - Andreas Wienke
- Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str, 06097, Halle, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Surov A, Meyer HJ, Wienke A. Can apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) distinguish breast cancer from benign breast findings? A meta-analysis based on 13 847 lesions. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:955. [PMID: 31615463 PMCID: PMC6794799 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6201-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to provide evident data about use of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values for distinguishing malignant and benign breast lesions. METHODS MEDLINE library and SCOPUS database were screened for associations between ADC and malignancy/benignancy of breast lesions up to December 2018. Overall, 123 items were identified. The following data were extracted from the literature: authors, year of publication, study design, number of patients/lesions, lesion type, mean value and standard deviation of ADC, measure method, b values, and Tesla strength. The methodological quality of the 123 studies was checked according to the QUADAS-2 instrument. The meta-analysis was undertaken by using RevMan 5.3 software. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models with inverse-variance weights were used without any further correction to account for the heterogeneity between the studies. Mean ADC values including 95% confidence intervals were calculated separately for benign and malign lesions. RESULTS The acquired 123 studies comprised 13,847 breast lesions. Malignant lesions were diagnosed in 10,622 cases (76.7%) and benign lesions in 3225 cases (23.3%). The mean ADC value of the malignant lesions was 1.03 × 10- 3 mm2/s and the mean value of the benign lesions was 1.5 × 10- 3 mm2/s. The calculated ADC values of benign lesions were over the value of 1.00 × 10- 3 mm2/s. This result was independent on Tesla strength, choice of b values, and measure methods (whole lesion measure vs estimation of ADC in a single area). CONCLUSION An ADC threshold of 1.00 × 10- 3 mm2/s can be recommended for distinguishing breast cancers from benign lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexey Surov
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. .,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
| | - Hans Jonas Meyer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andreas Wienke
- Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 8, 06097, Halle, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kettunen T, Okuma H, Auvinen P, Sudah M, Tiainen S, Sutela A, Masarwah A, Tammi M, Tammi R, Oikari S, Vanninen R. Peritumoral ADC values in breast cancer: region of interest selection, associations with hyaluronan intensity, and prognostic significance. Eur Radiol 2019; 30:38-46. [PMID: 31359124 PMCID: PMC6890700 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06361-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Revised: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Objectives We aimed to evaluate the differences in peritumoral apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values by four different ROI selection methods and to validate the optimal method. Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate if the peritumor-tumor ADC ratios are correlated with axillary lymph node positivity and hyaluronan accumulation. Methods Altogether, 22 breast cancer patients underwent 3.0-T breast MRI, histopathological evaluation, and hyaluronan assay. Paired t and Friedman tests were used to compare minimum, mean, and maximum values of tumoral and peritumoral ADC by four methods: (M1) band ROI, (M2) whole tumor surrounding ROI, (M3) clockwise multiple ROI, and (M4) visual assessment of ROI selection. Subsequently, peritumor/tumor ADC ratios were compared with hyaluronan levels and axillary lymph node status by the Mann-Whitney U test. Results No statistically significant differences were found among the four ROI selection methods regarding minimum, mean, or maximum values of tumoral and peritumoral ADC. Visual assessment ROI measurements represented the less time-consuming evaluation method for the peritumoral area, and with sufficient accuracy. Peritumor/tumor ADC ratios obtained by all methods except the clockwise ROI (M3) showed a positive correlation with hyaluronan content (M1, p = 0.004; M2, p = 0.012; M3, p = 0.20; M4, p = 0.025) and lymph node metastasis (M1, p = 0.001; M2, p = 0.007; M3, p = 0.22; M4, p = 0.015), which are established factors for unfavorable prognosis. Conclusions Our results suggest that the peritumor/tumor ADC ratio could be a readily applicable imaging index associated with axillary lymph node metastasis and extensive hyaluronan accumulation. It could be related to the biological aggressiveness of breast cancer and therefore might serve as an additional prognostic factor. Key Points • Out of four different ROI selection methods for peritumoral ADC evaluation, measurements based on visual assessment provided sufficient accuracy and were the less time-consuming method. • The peritumor/tumor ADC ratio can provide an easily applicable supplementary imaging index for breast cancer assessment. • A higher peritumor/tumor ADC ratio was associated with axillary lymph node metastasis and extensive hyaluronan accumulation and might serve as an additional prognostic factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiia Kettunen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Oncology, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, FI 70211, Kuopio, Finland. .,Department of Oncology, Cancer Center, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 100, FI 70029, Kuopio, Finland.
| | - Hidemi Okuma
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Clinical Radiology, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, FI 70211, Kuopio, Finland.,Department of Clinical Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging Center, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 100, FI 70029, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Päivi Auvinen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Oncology, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, FI 70211, Kuopio, Finland.,Department of Oncology, Cancer Center, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 100, FI 70029, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mazen Sudah
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Clinical Radiology, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, FI 70211, Kuopio, Finland.,Department of Clinical Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging Center, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 100, FI 70029, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Satu Tiainen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Oncology, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, FI 70211, Kuopio, Finland.,Department of Oncology, Cancer Center, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 100, FI 70029, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Anna Sutela
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Clinical Radiology, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, FI 70211, Kuopio, Finland.,Department of Clinical Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging Center, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 100, FI 70029, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Amro Masarwah
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Clinical Radiology, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, FI 70211, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Markku Tammi
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, FI 70211, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Raija Tammi
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, FI 70211, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Sanna Oikari
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, FI 70211, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Ritva Vanninen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Clinical Radiology, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, FI 70211, Kuopio, Finland.,Department of Clinical Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging Center, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 100, FI 70029, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
AI-based applications in hybrid imaging: how to build smart and truly multi-parametric decision models for radiomics. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46:2673-2699. [PMID: 31292700 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04414-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The quantitative imaging features (radiomics) that can be obtained from the different modalities of current-generation hybrid imaging can give complementary information with regard to the tumour environment, as they measure different morphologic and functional imaging properties. These multi-parametric image descriptors can be combined with artificial intelligence applications into predictive models. It is now the time for hybrid PET/CT and PET/MRI to take the advantage offered by radiomics to assess the added clinical benefit of using multi-parametric models for the personalized diagnosis and prognosis of different disease phenotypes. OBJECTIVE The aim of the paper is to provide an overview of current challenges and available solutions to translate radiomics into hybrid PET-CT and PET-MRI imaging for a smart and truly multi-parametric decision model.
Collapse
|
39
|
Role of diffusion weighted imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy in breast cancer patients with indeterminate dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging findings. Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 61:66-72. [PMID: 31128225 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.05.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2019] [Revised: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCEMRI), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and in vivo proton (1H) magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) provides functional and molecular nature of breast cancer. This study evaluates the potential of the combination of three MR parameters [curve kinetics, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and total choline (tCho) concentration] determined from these techniques in increasing the sensitivity of breast cancer detection. METHODS MR investigations were carried out at 1.5 T on 56 patients with cytologically/histologically confirmed breast carcinoma. Single-voxel MRS was used to determine the tCho concentration. 3D FLASH was used for DCEMRI while single shot EPI based DWI was used for ADC determination. RESULTS On DCEMRI, one patient showed type I curve, while 8 showed type II and 47 showed type III curve thus giving a sensitivity of 83.9% as detection rate of malignancy. tCho concentration was above cut-off value (2.54 mmol/kg) for 50/56 cases giving a sensitivity of 89.3%. Among 9 indeterminate DCEMRI cases, tCho showed malignancy in 6 cases with type II curve. DWI detected malignancy in 54/56 cases that included 9 cases that were false negative on DCEMRI, yielding a sensitivity of 96.4%. A total of 54 cases showed malignancy when any two of the three MR parameters was positive for malignancy yielding a sensitivity of 96.4% while it increased to 100% when any one parameters showed positive result. CONCLUSION DWI showed highest sensitivity of detection compared to DCEMRI and MRS. Multi-parametric approach yielded 96.4% and 100% sensitivity when any two or one of the three parameters was taken as positive for malignancy, respectively. Also the results demonstrated that addition of DWI and MRS play a significant role in establishing the final diagnosis of malignancy, especially in cases where DCEMRI is indeterminate.
Collapse
|
40
|
Threshold Isocontouring on High b-Value Diffusion-Weighted Images in Magnetic Resonance Mammography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2019; 43:434-442. [PMID: 31082949 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000000868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Motivated by the similar appearance of malignant breast lesions in high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and positron emission tomography, the purpose of this work was to evaluate the applicability of a threshold isocontouring approach commonly used in positron emission tomography to analyze DWI data acquired from female human breasts with minimal interobserver variability. METHODS Twenty-three female participants (59.4 ± 10.0 years) with 23 lesions initially classified as suggestive of cancers in x-ray mammography screening were subsequently imaged on a 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Diffusion-weighted imaging was performed prior to biopsy with b values of 0, 100, 750, and 1500 s/mm. Isocontouring with different threshold levels was performed on the highest b-value image to determine the voxels used for subsequent evaluation of diffusion metrics. The coefficient of variation was computed by specifying 4 different regions of interest drawn around the lesion. Additionally, a receiver operating statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS Using a relative threshold level greater than or equal to 0.85 almost completely suppresses the intra-individual and inter-individual variability. Among 4 studied diffusion metrics, the diffusion coefficients from the intravoxel incoherent motion model returned the highest area under curve value of 0.9. The optimal cut-off diffusivity was found to be 0.85 μm/ms with a sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 90.9%. CONCLUSION Threshold isocontouring on high b-value maps is a viable approach to reliably evaluate DWI data of suspicious focal lesions in magnetic resonance mammography.
Collapse
|
41
|
Camps-Herrero J. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: current status as an imaging biomarker and future role. BJR Open 2019; 1:20180049. [PMID: 33178933 PMCID: PMC7592470 DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20180049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Revised: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the breast is a MRI sequence that shows several advantages when compared to the dynamic contrast-enhanced sequence: it does not need intravenous contrast, it is relatively quick and easy to implement (artifacts notwithstanding). In this review, the current applications of DWI for lesion characterization and prognosis as well as for response evaluation are analyzed from the point of view of the necessary steps to become a useful surrogate of underlying biological processes (tissue architecture and cellularity): from the proof of concept, to the proof of mechanism, the proof of principle and finally the proof of effectiveness. Future applications of DWI in screening, DWI modeling and radiomics are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Camps-Herrero
- Head of Radiology Department, Breast Unit. Hospital Universitario de la Ribera, Alzira, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Shi B, Yuan F, Yan F, Zhang H, Pan Z, Chen W, Wang G, Tan J, Zhang Y, Ren Y, Du L. Evaluation of Effects of TGF-β1 Inhibition on Gastric Cancer in Nude Mice by Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and In-Line X-ray Phase Contrast Imaging With Sequential Histology. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018; 49:1553-1564. [PMID: 30291648 PMCID: PMC6585615 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2018] [Revised: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 09/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Accurate and complete response evaluation after treatment is important to implement individualized therapy for gastric cancer. Purpose To investigate the effectiveness of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and in‐line X‐ray phase contrast imaging (ILXPCI) in the assessment of the therapeutic efficacy by transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF‐β1) inhibition. Study Type Prospective animal study. Animal Model Thirty nude mice subcutaneous xenotransplantation tumor model of gastric cancer for DKI and 10 peritoneal metastasis nude mice model for ILXPCI. Field Strength/Sequence Examinations before and serially at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after TGF‐β1 inhibition treatment were performed at 3T MRI including T2‐weighted imaging (T2WI) and DKI with five b values of 0, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000 s/mm2; ILXPCI examinations were performed at 14 days after treatment. Assessment DKI parameters (apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC], diffusivity [D] and kurtosis [K]) were calculated by two experienced radiologists after postprocessing. Statistical Tests For the differences in all the parameters between the baseline and each timepoint for both the treated and the control mice, the Mann–Whitney test was used. The Spearman correlation test was used to evaluate correlations among the DKI parameters and corresponding pathologic necrosis fraction (NF). Results ADC, D, and K values were significantly different between the two groups after treatment (P < 0.05). Serial measurements in the treated group showed that the ADC, D, and K values were significantly different at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days compared with baseline (P < 0.05). There were significant correlations between DKI parameters and NF (ADC, r = 0.865, P < 0.001; D, r = 0.802, P < 0.001; K, r = –0.944, P < 0.001). The ILXPCI results in the treated group showed a stronger absorption area than the control group. Data Conclusion DKI may be used to evaluate the complete course therapeutic effects of gastric cancer induced by TGF‐β1 inhibition, and the ILXPCI technique will improve the tumor microstructure resolution. Level of Evidence: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 4 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:1553–1564.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bowen Shi
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Fei Yuan
- Department of Pathology, RuiJin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Fuhua Yan
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Huan Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Zilai Pan
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Weibo Chen
- Philips Healthcare, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | | | - Jingwen Tan
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Yang Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Yuqi Ren
- Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Lianjun Du
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Surov A, Clauser P, Chang YW, Li L, Martincich L, Partridge SC, Kim JY, Meyer HJ, Wienke A. Can diffusion-weighted imaging predict tumor grade and expression of Ki-67 in breast cancer? A multicenter analysis. Breast Cancer Res 2018; 20:58. [PMID: 29921323 PMCID: PMC6011203 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-018-0991-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 05/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Numerous studies have analyzed associations between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and histopathological features such as Ki-67 proliferation index in breast cancer (BC), with mixed results. The purpose of this study was to perform a multicenter analysis to determine relationships between ADC and expression of Ki-67 and tumor grade in BC. Methods For this study, data from six centers were acquired. The sample comprises 870 patients (all female; mean age, 52.6 ± 10.8 years). In every case, breast magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging was performed. The comparison of ADC values in groups was performed by Mann-Whitney U test where the p values are adjusted for multiple testing (Bonferroni correction). The association between ADC and Ki-67 values was calculated by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, accuracy, and AUC were calculated for the diagnostic procedures. ADC thresholds were chosen to maximize the Youden index. Results Overall, data of 870 patients were acquired for this study. The mean ADC value of the tumors was 0.98 ± 0.22 × 10− 3 mm2 s− 1. ROC analysis showed that it is impossible to differentiate high/moderate grade tumors from grade 1 lesions using ADC values. Youden index identified a threshold ADC value of 1.03 with a sensitivity of 56.2% and specificity of 67.9%. The positive predictive value was 18.2%, and the negative predictive value was 92.4%. The level of the Ki-67 proliferation index was available for 845 patients. The mean value was 12.33 ± 21.77%. ADC correlated with weak statistical significant with expression of Ki-67 (p = − 0.202, p < 0.001). ROC analysis was performed to distinguish tumors with high proliferative potential from tumors with low expression of Ki-67 using ADC values. Youden index identified a threshold ADC value of 0.91 (sensitivity 64%, specificity 50%, positive predictive value 67.7%, negative predictive value 45.0%). Conclusions ADC cannot be used as a surrogate marker for proliferation activity and/or for tumor grade in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexey Surov
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Paola Clauser
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel, 18-20 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Yun-Woo Chang
- Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, 59 Daesakwan-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 140-743, Republic of Korea
| | - Lihua Li
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Laura Martincich
- Unit of Radiology, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment of Candiolo (IRCC), Strada Provinciale 142, 10060 Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Savannah C Partridge
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 825 Eastlake Avenue E, G2-600, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | - Jin You Kim
- Department of Radiology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Medical Research Institute, 1-10, Ami-Dong, Seo-gu, Busan, 602-739, Korea
| | - Hans Jonas Meyer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andreas Wienke
- Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Strasse, 06097, Halle, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Shi RY, Yao QY, Wu LM, Xu JR. Breast Lesions: Diagnosis Using Diffusion Weighted Imaging at 1.5T and 3.0T—Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Breast Cancer 2018; 18:e305-e320. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2016] [Revised: 05/20/2017] [Accepted: 06/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
45
|
Ertaş G, Onaygil C, Buğdaycı O, Arıbal E. Dual-Phase ADC Modelling of Breast Masses in Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Comparison with Histopathologic Findings. Eur J Breast Health 2018; 14:85-92. [PMID: 29774316 DOI: 10.5152/ejbh.2018.3829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 12/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of dual-phase apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) compared to traditional ADC values in quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for differentiating between benign and malignant breast masses. Materials and Methods Diffusion-weighted images of pathologically confirmed 88 benign and 85 malignant lesions acquired using a 3.0T MR scanner were analyzed. Small region-of-interests focusing on the highest signal intensity of lesions were used. Lesion ADC estimates were obtained separately from all b-value images (ADC; b=50, 400 and 800s/mm2), lower b-value images (ADClow; b=50 and 400s/mm2) and higher b-value images (ADChigh; b=400 and 800s/mm2). A set of dual-phase ADC (dpADC) models were constructed using ADClow, ADChigh and a perfusion influence factor ranging from 0 to 1. Results Strong positive correlation is observable between ADC and all dpADCs (ρ=0.80-1.00). Differences in ADC and dpADCs between the benign and the malignant lesions are all significant (p<0.05). In detecting malignancy, traditional lesion ADC provides a good performance (AUC=89.9%) however dpADC0.5 (dpADC with a factor of 0.5) accomplishes a better performance (AUC=90.8%). At optimal thresholds, ADC achieves 94.1% sensitivity, 72.7% specificity and 83.2% accuracy while dpADC0.5 leads to 92.9% sensitivity, 79.5% specificity and 86.1% accuracy. Conclusion Dual-phase ADC modelling may improve the accuracy in breast cancer diagnosis using DWI. Further prospective studies are needed to justify its benefit in clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gökhan Ertaş
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yeditepe University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Can Onaygil
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Oberlausitz-Kliniken gGmbH, Bautzen, Germany
| | - Onur Buğdaycı
- Department of Radiology, Marmara University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Erkin Arıbal
- Department of Radiology, Acıbadem Altunizade Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Apparent diffusion coefficient for molecular subtyping of non-gadolinium-enhancing WHO grade II/III glioma: volumetric segmentation versus two-dimensional region of interest analysis. Eur Radiol 2018; 28:3779-3788. [PMID: 29572636 PMCID: PMC6096613 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5351-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2017] [Revised: 12/26/2017] [Accepted: 01/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To investigate if quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements can predict genetic subtypes of non-gadolinium-enhancing gliomas, comparing whole tumour against single slice analysis. Methods Volumetric T2-derived masks of 44 gliomas were co-registered to ADC maps with ADC mean (ADCmean) calculated. For the slice analysis, two observers placed regions of interest in the largest tumour cross-section. The ratio (ADCratio) between ADCmean in the tumour and normal appearing white matter was calculated for both methods. Results Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type gliomas showed the lowest ADC values throughout (p < 0.001). ADCmean in the IDH-mutant 1p19q intact group was significantly higher than in the IDH-mutant 1p19q co-deleted group (p < 0.01). A volumetric ADCmean threshold of 1201 × 10−6 mm2/s identified IDH wild-type with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 86%; a volumetric ADCratio cut-off value of 1.65 provided a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 92% (area under the curve (AUC) 0.9–0.94). A slice ADCratio threshold for observer 1 (observer 2) of 1.76 (1.83) provided a sensitivity of 80% (86%), specificity of 91% (100%) and AUC of 0.95 (0.96). The intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent (0.98). Conclusions ADC measurements can support the distinction of glioma subtypes. Volumetric and two-dimensional measurements yielded similar results in this study. Key Points • Diffusion-weighted MRI aids the identification of non-gadolinium-enhancing malignant gliomas • ADC measurements may permit non-gadolinium-enhancing glioma molecular subtyping • IDH wild-type gliomas have lower ADC values than IDH-mutant tumours • Single cross-section and volumetric ADC measurements yielded comparable results in this study
Collapse
|
47
|
Arponen O, Sudah M, Sutela A, Taina M, Masarwah A, Liimatainen T, Vanninen R. Gadoterate meglumine decreases ADC values of breast lesions depending on the b value combination. Sci Rep 2018; 8:87. [PMID: 29311709 PMCID: PMC5758819 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18035-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2017] [Accepted: 11/30/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
To retrospectively evaluated the influence of administration of the gadolinium based intravenous contrast agent (G-CA) on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in ADC maps generated using multiple b value combinations. A total of 106 women underwent bilateral 3.0 T breast MRI. As an internal validation, diffusion-weighted imaging (b values of 0, 200, 400, 600, 800 s/mm2) was performed before and after the G-CA (gadoterate meglumine (0.2 ml/kg, 3 ml/s)). Whole lesion and fibroglandular tissue (FGT) covering region-of-interests (ROIs) were drawn on the b = 800 s/mm2 images; ROIs were then propagated to multiple retrospectively generated ADC maps. Twenty-seven patients (mean age 55.8 ± 10.8 years) with 32 mass-like enhancing breast lesions including 25 (78.1 %) histopathologically malignant lesions were enrolled. Lesion ADC values were statistically significantly higher in pre-G-CA than post-G-CA ADC maps (ADC0,200,400,600,800: 1.05 ± 0.35 × 10−3 mm2/s vs. 1.02 ± 0.36 × 10−3 mm2/s (P < 0.05); ADC0,200,400: 1.25 ± 0.42 × 10−3 mm2/s vs. 1.20 ± 0.35 × 10−3 mm2/s (P < 0.05)). ADC values between pre- and post-contrast maps were not statistically different when the maps were generated using other b value combinations. Contrast agent administration did not affect the FGT ADC values. G-CA statistically significantly reduced the ADC values of breast lesions on ADC maps generated using the clinically widely utilized b values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Otso Arponen
- Kuopio University Hospital, Diagnostic Imaging Centre, Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, PO Box 100, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70029, Kuopio, Finland. .,University of Eastern Finland, Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, PO Box 1777, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70210, Kuopio, Finland.
| | - Mazen Sudah
- Kuopio University Hospital, Diagnostic Imaging Centre, Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, PO Box 100, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70029, Kuopio, Finland.,University of Eastern Finland, Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, PO Box 1777, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70210, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Anna Sutela
- Kuopio University Hospital, Diagnostic Imaging Centre, Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, PO Box 100, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70029, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mikko Taina
- Kuopio University Hospital, Diagnostic Imaging Centre, Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, PO Box 100, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70029, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Amro Masarwah
- Kuopio University Hospital, Diagnostic Imaging Centre, Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, PO Box 100, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70029, Kuopio, Finland.,University of Eastern Finland, Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, PO Box 1777, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70210, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Timo Liimatainen
- Kuopio University Hospital, Diagnostic Imaging Centre, Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, PO Box 100, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70029, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Ritva Vanninen
- Kuopio University Hospital, Diagnostic Imaging Centre, Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, PO Box 100, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70029, Kuopio, Finland.,University of Eastern Finland, Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, PO Box 1777, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70210, Kuopio, Finland.,University of Eastern Finland, Cancer Center of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1, 70210, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hu B, Xu K, Zhang Z, Chai R, Li S, Zhang L. A radiomic nomogram based on an apparent diffusion coefficient map for differential diagnosis of suspicious breast findings. Chin J Cancer Res 2018; 30:432-438. [PMID: 30210223 PMCID: PMC6129569 DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.04.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To develop and validate a radiomic nomogram based on an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map for differentiating benign and malignant lesions in suspicious breast findings classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods Eighty-eight patients diagnosed with BI-RADS 4 findings on breast MRI in the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University from December 2014 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Sixty-three were randomized electronically to establish forecasting models, and the other 25 were used for validation. Radiomic features based on the ADC map were generated automatically by Artificial Intelligence Kit software (A.K. software; GE Healthcare, China). Feature reduction was conducted using the Mann-Whitney test and Spearman correlation after pre-treatment. A prediction model of ADC radiomics was established by logistic linear regression and cross-validation. A nomogram was established based on ADC radiomic features, pharmacokinetics and clinical features, including the morphology and ADC value for breast BI-RADS 4 lesions on MRI. Results A total of 396 radiomic features were extracted automatically by the A.K. software. Five features were selected after pre-processing, Mann-Whitney tests and Spearman correlation analysis. The area under the ROC curve of the prediction model comprising ADC radiomic features was 0.79 when the cutoff value was 0.45, and the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were 80.0%, 0.813 and 0.778, respectively. A visualized differential nomogram based on the radiomic score, pharmacokinetics and clinical features was established. The decision curve showed good consistency. Conclusions ADC radiomic features could provide an important reference for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lesions in suspicious BI-RADS 4 lesions. The visualized nomogram based on ADC radiomic features, pharmacokinetics and clinical features may have good prospects for clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Hu
- Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China.,Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China
| | - Ke Xu
- Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China
| | - Zheng Zhang
- Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China
| | - Ruimei Chai
- Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China
| | - Shu Li
- Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China
| | - Lina Zhang
- Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) holds promise to address some of the shortcomings of routine clinical breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to expand the capabilities of imaging in breast cancer management. DWI reflects tissue microstructure, and provides unique information to aid in characterization of breast lesions. Potential benefits under investigation include improving diagnostic accuracy and guiding treatment decisions. As a result, DWI is increasingly being incorporated into breast MRI protocols and multicenter trials are underway to validate single-institution findings and to establish clinical guidelines. Advancements in DWI acquisition and modeling approaches are helping to improve image quality and extract additional biologic information from breast DWI scans, which may extend diagnostic and prognostic value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savannah C Partridge
- *Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Section, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA †University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Catalano OA, Horn GL, Signore A, Iannace C, Lepore M, Vangel M, Luongo A, Catalano M, Lehman C, Salvatore M, Soricelli A, Catana C, Mahmood U, Rosen BR. PET/MR in invasive ductal breast cancer: correlation between imaging markers and histological phenotype. Br J Cancer 2017; 116:893-902. [PMID: 28208155 PMCID: PMC5379139 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2017] [Revised: 01/13/2017] [Accepted: 01/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Differences in genetics and receptor expression (phenotypes) of invasive ductal breast cancer (IDC) impact on prognosis and treatment response. Immunohistochemistry (IHC), the most used technique for IDC phenotyping, has some limitations including its invasiveness. We explored the possibility of contrast-enhanced positron emission tomography magnetic resonance (CE-FDG PET/MR) to discriminate IDC phenotypes. METHODS 21 IDC patients with IHC assessment of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2), and antigen Ki-67 (Ki67) underwent CE-FDG PET/MR. Magnetic resonance-perfusion biomarkers, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and standard uptake value (SUV) were compared with IHC markers and phenotypes, using a Student's t-test and one-way ANOVA. RESULTS ER/PR- tumours demonstrated higher Kepmean and SUVmax than ER or PR+ tumours. HER2- tumours displayed higher ADCmean, Kepmean, and SUVmax than HER2+tumours. Only ADCmean discriminated Ki67⩽14% tumours (lower ADCmean) from Ki67>14% tumours. PET/MR biomarkers correlated with IHC phenotype in 13 out of 21 patients (62%; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS Positron emission tomography magnetic resonance might non-invasively help discriminate IDC phenotypes, helping to optimise individual therapy options.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Aged
- Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism
- Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
- Breast Neoplasms/metabolism
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnostic imaging
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods
- Female
- Fluorodeoxyglucose F18/metabolism
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Ki-67 Antigen/metabolism
- Middle Aged
- Multimodal Imaging/methods
- Neoplasm Staging
- Phenotype
- Positron-Emission Tomography/methods
- Prognosis
- Radiopharmaceuticals/metabolism
- Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism
- Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism
- Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism
- Retrospective Studies
- Young Adult
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onofrio Antonio Catalano
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
- Abdominal Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Gary Lloyd Horn
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555, USA
| | - Alberto Signore
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, University of Rome ‘La Sapienza', Viale del Policlinico 5, Rome 00161, Italy
| | - Carlo Iannace
- Breast Unit, Ospedale Moscati, Avellino 83010, Italy
| | - Maria Lepore
- Department of Pathology, Ospedale Moscati, Avellino 83010, Italy
| | - Mark Vangel
- Department of Biostatistics, Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Angelo Luongo
- Department of Radiology, Gamma Cord, Benevento 82100, Italy
| | - Marco Catalano
- Department of Radiology, University of Naples ‘Federico II', Napoli 80131, Italy
| | - Constance Lehman
- Breast Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Marco Salvatore
- Diagnostic Imaging, SDN, Via Gianturco 113, Napoli 80131, Italy
| | - Andrea Soricelli
- Diagnostic Imaging, University of Naples ‘Parthenope', Napoli 80131, Italy
| | - Ciprian Catana
- Department of Radiology, Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Umar Mahmood
- Precision Medicine and Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Bruce Robert Rosen
- Department of Radiology, Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| |
Collapse
|