1
|
Baniasadi A, Das JP, Prendergast CM, Beizavi Z, Ma HY, Jaber MY, Capaccione KM. Imaging at the nexus: how state of the art imaging techniques can enhance our understanding of cancer and fibrosis. J Transl Med 2024; 22:567. [PMID: 38872212 PMCID: PMC11177383 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05379-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Both cancer and fibrosis are diseases involving dysregulation of cell signaling pathways resulting in an altered cellular microenvironment which ultimately leads to progression of the condition. The two disease entities share common molecular pathophysiology and recent research has illuminated the how each promotes the other. Multiple imaging techniques have been developed to aid in the early and accurate diagnosis of each disease, and given the commonalities between the pathophysiology of the conditions, advances in imaging one disease have opened new avenues to study the other. Here, we detail the most up-to-date advances in imaging techniques for each disease and how they have crossed over to improve detection and monitoring of the other. We explore techniques in positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), second generation harmonic Imaging (SGHI), ultrasound (US), radiomics, and artificial intelligence (AI). A new diagnostic imaging tool in PET/computed tomography (CT) is the use of radiolabeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI). SGHI uses high-frequency sound waves to penetrate deeper into the tissue, providing a more detailed view of the tumor microenvironment. Artificial intelligence with the aid of advanced deep learning (DL) algorithms has been highly effective in training computer systems to diagnose and classify neoplastic lesions in multiple organs. Ultimately, advancing imaging techniques in cancer and fibrosis can lead to significantly more timely and accurate diagnoses of both diseases resulting in better patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alireza Baniasadi
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168Th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Jeeban P Das
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Conor M Prendergast
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168Th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Zahra Beizavi
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168Th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Hong Y Ma
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168Th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | | | - Kathleen M Capaccione
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168Th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sharkey AR, Koglin N, Mittra ES, Han S, Cook GJR, Witney TH. Clinical [ 18F]FSPG Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Reveals Heterogeneity in Tumor-Associated System x c- Activity. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1437. [PMID: 38611114 PMCID: PMC11011143 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND (4S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-L-glutamic acid ([18F]FSPG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) provides a readout of system xc- transport activity and has been used for cancer detection in clinical studies of different cancer types. As system xc- provides the rate-limiting precursor for glutathione biosynthesis, an abundant antioxidant, [18F]FSPG imaging may additionally provide important prognostic information. Here, we performed an analysis of [18F]FSPG radiotracer distribution between primary tumors, metastases, and normal organs from cancer patients. We further assessed the heterogeneity of [18F]FSPG retention between cancer types, and between and within individuals. METHODS This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data compared [18F]FSPG PET/CT in subjects with head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC, n = 5) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC, n = 10), scanned at different institutions. Using semi-automated regions of interest drawn around tumors and metastases, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVmean, SUV standard deviation and SUVpeak were measured. [18F]FSPG time-activity curves (TACs) for normal organs, primary tumors and metastases were subsequently compared to 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) PET/CT at 60 min post injection (p.i.). RESULTS The mean administered activity of [18F]FSPG was 309.3 ± 9.1 MBq in subjects with NSCLC and 285.1 ± 11.3 MBq in those with HNSCC. The biodistribution of [18F]FSPG in both cohorts showed similar TACs in healthy organs from cancer patients. There was no statistically significant overall difference in the average SUVmax of tumor lesions at 60 min p.i. for NSCLC (8.1 ± 7.1) compared to HNSCC (6.0 ± 4.1; p = 0.29) for [18F]FSPG. However, there was heterogeneous retention between and within cancer types; the SUVmax at 60 min p.i. ranged from 1.4 to 23.7 in NSCLC and 3.1-12.1 in HNSCC. CONCLUSION [18F]FSPG PET/CT imaging from both NSCLC and HNSCC cohorts showed the same normal-tissue biodistribution, but marked tumor heterogeneity across subjects and between lesions. Despite rapid elimination through the urinary tract and low normal-background tissue retention, the diagnostic potential of [18F]FSPG was limited by variability in tumor retention. As [18F]FSPG retention is mediated by the tumor's antioxidant capacity and response to oxidative stress, this heterogeneity may provide important insights into an individual tumor's response or resistance to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy R. Sharkey
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK; (A.R.S.); (G.J.R.C.)
| | | | - Erik S. Mittra
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA;
| | - Sangwon Han
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea;
| | - Gary J. R. Cook
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK; (A.R.S.); (G.J.R.C.)
- King’s College London and Guy’s and St. Thomas’ PET Center, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Timothy H. Witney
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK; (A.R.S.); (G.J.R.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Timmermand OV, Witney TH. Imaging the Tumor Antioxidant Response with [ 18F]FSPG PET. Methods Mol Biol 2024; 2729:233-249. [PMID: 38006500 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3499-8_14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
Abstract
(4S)-4-(3-[18F]Fluoropropyl)-L-glutamic acid ([18F]FSPG) is a flourine-18 labeled glutamate analog that enables the noninvasive in vivo imaging of cellular redox status. [18F]FSPG is transported across the cell membrane by the cystine/glutamate antiporter, system xc-, whose expression is upregulated in multiple cancer types. The requirement of cystine for the biosynthesis of glutathione, a major antioxidant, connects [18F]FSPG tissue retention to the intracellular redox response via system xc- activity. We herein describe the use of [18F]FSPG positron emission tomography (PET) to image the tumor antioxidant response and highlight key methodological considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Timothy H Witney
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Greenwood HE, Edwards RS, Tyrrell WE, Barber AR, Baark F, Tanc M, Khalil E, Falzone A, Ward NP, DeBlasi JM, Torrente L, Pearce DR, Firth G, Smith LM, Timmermand OV, Huebner A, George ME, Swanton C, Hynds RE, DeNicola GM, Witney TH. Imaging the master regulator of the antioxidant response in non-small cell lung cancer with positron emission tomography. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.12.16.572007. [PMID: 38168428 PMCID: PMC10760199 DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.16.572007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Mutations in the NRF2-KEAP1 pathway are common in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and confer broad-spectrum therapeutic resistance, leading to poor outcomes. The cystine/glutamate antiporter, system xc-, is one of the >200 cytoprotective proteins controlled by NRF2, which can be non-invasively imaged by (S)-4-(3-18F-fluoropropyl)-l-glutamate ([18F]FSPG) positron emission tomography (PET). Through genetic and pharmacologic manipulation, we show that [18F]FSPG provides a sensitive and specific marker of NRF2 activation in advanced preclinical models of NSCLC. We validate imaging readouts with metabolomic measurements of system xc- activity and their coupling to intracellular glutathione concentration. A redox gene signature was measured in patients from the TRACERx 421 cohort, suggesting an opportunity for patient stratification prior to imaging. Furthermore, we reveal that system xc- is a metabolic vulnerability that can be therapeutically targeted for sustained tumour growth suppression in aggressive NSCLC. Our results establish [18F]FSPG as predictive marker of therapy resistance in NSCLC and provide the basis for the clinical evaluation of both imaging and therapeutic agents that target this important antioxidant pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah E. Greenwood
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Richard S. Edwards
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Will E. Tyrrell
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Abigail R. Barber
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Friedrich Baark
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Muhammet Tanc
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Eman Khalil
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Aimee Falzone
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Nathan P. Ward
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Janine M. DeBlasi
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Laura Torrente
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - David R. Pearce
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, WC1E 6DD, UK
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - George Firth
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Lydia M. Smith
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Oskar Vilhelmsson Timmermand
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Ariana Huebner
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, WC1E 6DD, UK
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Madeleine E. George
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Charles Swanton
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, WC1E 6DD, UK
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Robert E. Hynds
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, WC1E 6DD, UK
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Gina M. DeNicola
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Timothy H. Witney
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sharkey AR, Witney TH, Cook GJR. Is System x c- a Suitable Target for Tumour Detection and Response Assessment with Imaging? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5573. [PMID: 38067277 PMCID: PMC10705217 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15235573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
System xc- is upregulated in cancer cells and can be imaged using novel radiotracers, most commonly with (4S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-L-glutamic acid (18F-FSPG). The aim of this review was to summarise the use of 18F-FSPG in humans, explore the benefits and limitations of 18F-FSPG, and assess the potential for further use of 18F-FSPG in cancer patients. To date, ten papers have described the use of 18F-FSPG in human cancers. These studies involved small numbers of patients (range 1-26) and assessed the use of 18F-FSPG as a general oncological diagnostic agent across different cancer types. These clinical trials were contrasting in their findings, limiting the scope of 18F-FSPG PET/CT as a purely diagnostic agent, primarily due to heterogeneity of 18F-FSPG retention both between cancer types and patients. Despite these limitations, a potential further application for 18F-FSPG is in the assessment of early treatment response and prediction of treatment resistance. Animal models of cancer have shown that changes in 18F-FSPG retention following effective therapy precede glycolytic changes, as indicated by 18F-FDG, and changes in tumour volume, as measured by CT. If these results could be replicated in human clinical trials, imaging with 18F-FSPG PET/CT would offer an exciting route towards addressing the currently unmet clinical needs of treatment resistance prediction and early imaging assessment of therapy response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy R. Sharkey
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Timothy H. Witney
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Gary J. R. Cook
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK
- King’s College London and Guy’s and St. Thomas’ PET Centre, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lin M, Ta RT, Manning HC. Simplified and highly-reliable automated production of [ 18F]FSPG for clinical studies. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem 2023; 8:15. [PMID: 37486582 PMCID: PMC10366059 DOI: 10.1186/s41181-023-00200-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND (S)-4-(3-18F-Fluoropropyl)-L-Glutamic Acid ([18F]FSPG) is a positron emission tomography (PET) tracer that specifically targets the cystine/glutamate antiporter (xc-), which is frequently overexpressed in cancer and several neurological disorders. Pilot studies examining the dosimetry and biodistribution of [18F]FSPG in healthy volunteers and tumor detection in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and brain tumors showed promising results. In particular, low background uptake in the brain, lung, liver, and bowel was observed that further leads to excellent imaging contrasts of [18F]FSPG PET. However, reliable production-scale cGMP-compliant automated procedures for [18F]FSPG production are still lacking to further increase the utility and clinical adoption of this radiotracer. Herein, we report the optimized automated approaches to produce [18F]FSPG through two commercially available radiosynthesizers capable of supporting centralized and large-scale production for clinical use. RESULTS Starting with activity levels of 60-85 GBq, the fully-automated process to produce [18F]FSPG took less than 45 min with average radiochemical yields of 22.56 ± 0.97% and 30.82 ± 1.60% (non-decay corrected) using TRACERlab™ FXFN and FASTlab™, respectively. The radiochemical purities were > 95% and the formulated [18F]FSPG solution was determined to be sterile and colorless with the pH of 6.5-7.5. No radiolysis of the product was observed up to 8 h after final batch formulation. CONCLUSIONS In summary, cGMP-compliant radiosyntheses and quality control of [18F]FSPG have been established on two commercially available synthesizers leveraging high activity concentration and radiochemical purity. While the clinical trials using [18F]FSPG PET are currently underway, the automated approaches reported herein will accelerate the clinical adoption of this radiotracer and warrant centralized and large-scale production of [18F]FSPG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mai Lin
- Cyclotron Radiochemistry Facility, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77054, USA
| | - Robert T Ta
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - H Charles Manning
- Cyclotron Radiochemistry Facility, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77054, USA.
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lin M, Ta RT, Manning HC. Simplified and Highly-reliable automated production of [18F]FSPG for clinical studies. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3031030. [PMID: 37461634 PMCID: PMC10350228 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3031030/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
Background (S)-4-(3- 18 F-Fluoropropyl)-L-Glutamic Acid ([ 18 F]FSPG) is a positron emission tomography (PET) tracer that specifically targets the cystine/glutamate antiporter (xc-), which is frequently overexpressed in cancer and several neurological disorders. Pilot studies examining the dosimetry and biodistribution of ([ 18 F]FSPG in healthy volunteers and tumor detection in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and brain tumors showed promising results. In particular, low background uptake in the brain, lung, liver, and bowel was observed that further leads to excellent imaging contrasts of [ 18 F]FSPG PET. However, reliable production-scale cGMP-compliant automated procedures for [ 18 F]FSPG production are still lacking to further increase the utility and clinical adoption of this radiotracer. Herein, we report the optimized automated approaches to produce [ 18 F]FSPG through two commercially available radiosynthesizers capable of supporting centralized and large-scale production for clinical use. Results Starting with activity levels of 60-85 GBq, the fully-automated process to produce [ 18 F]FSPG took less than 45 minutes with average radiochemical yields of 22.56 ± 0.97% and 30.82 ± 1.60% (non-decay corrected) using TRACERlab™ FXFN and FASTlab™, respectively. The radiochemical purities were > 95% and the formulated [ 18 F]FSPG solution was determined to be sterile and colorless with the pH of 6.5-7.5. No radiolysis of the product was observed up to 8 hours after final batch formulation. Conclusions In summary, cGMP-compliant radiosyntheses and quality control of [ 18 F]FSPG have been established on two commercially available synthesizers leveraging high activity concentration and radiochemical purity. While the clinical trials using [ 18 F]FSPG PET are currently underway, the automated approaches reported herein will accelerate the clinical adoption of this radiotracer and warrant centralized and large-scale production of [ 18 F]FSPG.
Collapse
|
8
|
Hu M, Yang L, Liu N, Long R, Zhou L, Zhao W, Feng Y, Wang C, Li Z, Chen Y, Wang L. Evaluation of sulfone-labeled amino acid derivatives as potential PET agents for cancer imaging. Nucl Med Biol 2023; 116-117:108311. [PMID: 36580767 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2022.108311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As one of the most important and frequently used molecular imaging techniques in the clinic, positron emission tomography (PET) features high sensitivity and specificity, which generally involves the use of PET contrast agents. Despite the exceptional promise, the availability of novel PET agents could limit its application and there is a clear need to develop new PET agents to improve our understanding of targets of interest and increase the diagnostic specificity. METHODS Based on the fact that amino acid transport and protein anabolism are increased in tumor tissues, a series of 18F-labeled amino acid analog was labeled with 18F by using [18F]fluoro-4-(vinylsulfonyl)benzene as the radionuclide linker. The obtained probes were subjected to in vitro and in vivo evaluation, including stability, cell line transport channel specificity, PET/CT imaging on tumor and inflammation bearing mice, and biodistribution. RESULTS Our data shows that [18F]2a had moderate decay corrected labeling yield (>42 %) and high radiochemical purity (>99 %). When tested in vivo, the uptake of [18F]2a was 1.5 ± 0.2%ID/g in NCI-H1975 tumors and 1.1 ± 0.2%ID/g in inflammatory tissues. In contrast, the values for [18F]FDG were 5.7 ± 0.2%ID/g and 4.8 ± 0.1%ID/g, respectively. The inflammatory lesion-to-muscle contrast is 2.4 for [18F]2a, which is 3.0 for [18F]FDG. CONCLUSION Clearly, [18F]2a hold the great potential for cancer imaging. Its application in distinguishing tumor from inflammatory lesion would still need to be investigated further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Hu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 Taiping St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Liping Yang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 Taiping St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Nan Liu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 Taiping St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Ruiling Long
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 Taiping St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Liu Zhou
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 Taiping St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Weiling Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Yue Feng
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 Taiping St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Changjiang Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 Taiping St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Zibo Li
- Department of Radiology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Yue Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 Taiping St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
| | - Li Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 Taiping St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China; Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lin M, Coll RP, Cohen AS, Georgiou DK, Manning HC. PET Oncological Radiopharmaceuticals: Current Status and Perspectives. Molecules 2022; 27:6790. [PMID: 36296381 PMCID: PMC9609795 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27206790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Molecular imaging is the visual representation of biological processes that take place at the cellular or molecular level in living organisms. To date, molecular imaging plays an important role in the transition from conventional medical practice to precision medicine. Among all imaging modalities, positron emission tomography (PET) has great advantages in sensitivity and the ability to obtain absolute imaging quantification after corrections for photon attenuation and scattering. Due to the ability to label a host of unique molecules of biological interest, including endogenous, naturally occurring substrates and drug-like compounds, the role of PET has been well established in the field of molecular imaging. In this article, we provide an overview of the recent advances in the development of PET radiopharmaceuticals and their clinical applications in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mai Lin
- Cyclotron Radiochemistry Facility, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77054, USA
| | - Ryan P. Coll
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Allison S. Cohen
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Dimitra K. Georgiou
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Henry Charles Manning
- Cyclotron Radiochemistry Facility, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77054, USA
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
18F-FSPG PET imaging for the evaluation of indeterminate pulmonary nodules. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0265427. [PMID: 35294486 PMCID: PMC8926263 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT is recommended for evaluation of intermediate-risk indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs). While highly sensitive, the specificity of FDG remains suboptimal for differentiating malignant from benign nodules, particularly in areas where fungal lung diseases are prevalent. Thus, a cancer-specific imaging probe is greatly needed. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that a PET radiotracer (S)-4-(3-[18F]-fluoropropyl)-L-glutamic acid (FSPG) improves the diagnostic accuracy of IPNs compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT. Methods This study was conducted at a major academic medical center and an affiliated VA medical center. Twenty-six patients with newly discovered IPNs 7-30mm diameter or newly diagnosed lung cancer completed serial PET/CT scans utilizing 18F-FDG and 18F-FSPG, without intervening treatment of the lesion. The scans were independently reviewed by two dual-trained diagnostic radiology and nuclear medicine physicians. Characteristics evaluated included quantitative SUVmax values of the pulmonary nodules and metastases. Results A total of 17 out of 26 patients had cancer and 9 had benign lesions. 18F-FSPG was negative in 6 of 9 benign lesions compared to 7 of 9 with 18F-FDG. 18F-FSPG and 18F-FDG were positive in 14 of 17 and 12 of 17 malignant lesions, respectively. 18F-FSPG detected brain and intracardiac metastases missed by 18F-FDG PET in one case, while 18F-FDG detected a metastasis to the kidney missed by 18F-FSPG. Conclusion In this pilot study, there was no significant difference in overall diagnostic accuracy between 18F-FSPG and 18F-FDG for the evaluation of IPNs and staging of lung cancer. Additional studies will be needed to determine the clinical utility of this tracer in the management of IPNs and lung cancer.
Collapse
|
11
|
Wardak M, Sonni I, Fan AP, Minamimoto R, Jamali M, Hatami N, Zaharchuk G, Fischbein N, Nagpal S, Li G, Koglin N, Berndt M, Bullich S, Stephens AW, Dinkelborg LM, Abel T, Manning HC, Rosenberg J, Chin FT, Sam Gambhir S, Mittra ES. 18F-FSPG PET/CT Imaging of System x C- Transporter Activity in Patients with Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors. Radiology 2022; 303:620-631. [PMID: 35191738 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.203296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Background The PET tracer (4S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-l-glutamate (18F-FSPG) targets the system xC- cotransporter, which is overexpressed in various tumors. Purpose To assess the role of 18F-FSPG PET/CT in intracranial malignancies. Materials and Methods Twenty-six patients (mean age, 54 years ± 12; 17 men; 48 total lesions) with primary brain tumors (n = 17) or brain metastases (n = 9) were enrolled in this prospective, single-center study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02370563) between November 2014 and March 2016. A 30-minute dynamic brain 18F-FSPG PET/CT scan and a static whole-body (WB) 18F-FSPG PET/CT scan at 60-75 minutes were acquired. Moreover, all participants underwent MRI, and four participants underwent fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET imaging. PET parameters and their relative changes were obtained for all lesions. Kinetic modeling was used to estimate the 18F-FSPG tumor rate constants using the dynamic and dynamic plus WB PET data. Imaging parameters were correlated to lesion outcomes, as determined with follow-up MRI and/or pathologic examination. The Mann-Whitney U test or Student t test was used for group mean comparisons. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used for performance comparison of different decision measures. Results 18F-FSPG PET/CT helped identify all 48 brain lesions. The mean tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) on the whole-brain PET images at the WB time point was 26.6 ± 24.9 (range: 2.6-150.3). When 18F-FDG PET was performed, 18F-FSPG permitted visualization of non-18F-FDG-avid lesions or allowed better lesion differentiation from surrounding tissues. In participants with primary brain tumors, the predictive accuracy of the relative changes in influx rate constant Ki and maximum standardized uptake value to discriminate between poor and good lesion outcomes were 89% and 81%, respectively. There were significant differences in the 18F-FSPG uptake curves of lesions with good versus poor outcomes in the primary brain tumor group (P < .05) but not in the brain metastases group. Conclusion PET/CT imaging with (4S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-l-glutamate (18F-FSPG) helped detect primary brain tumors and brain metastases with a high tumor-to-background ratio. Relative changes in 18F-FSPG uptake with multi-time-point PET appear to be helpful in predicting lesion outcomes. Clinical trial registration no. NCT02370563 © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirwais Wardak
- From the Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) (M.W., I.S., A.P.F., R.M., M.J., N.H., G.Z., N.F., J.R., F.T.C., S.S.G., E.S.M.), Department of Neurosurgery (N.F., S.N., G.L.), and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.F., S.N., G.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (I.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (A.P.F.); Stanford Bio-X (M.W., G.Z., G.L., F.T.C., S.S.G.) and Departments of Bioengineering (S.S.G.) and Materials Science & Engineering (S.S.G.), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany (N.K., M.B., S.B., A.W.S., L.M.D.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (T.A.) and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Molecular Probes (H.C.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; and Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (H.C.M.)
| | - Ida Sonni
- From the Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) (M.W., I.S., A.P.F., R.M., M.J., N.H., G.Z., N.F., J.R., F.T.C., S.S.G., E.S.M.), Department of Neurosurgery (N.F., S.N., G.L.), and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.F., S.N., G.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (I.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (A.P.F.); Stanford Bio-X (M.W., G.Z., G.L., F.T.C., S.S.G.) and Departments of Bioengineering (S.S.G.) and Materials Science & Engineering (S.S.G.), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany (N.K., M.B., S.B., A.W.S., L.M.D.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (T.A.) and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Molecular Probes (H.C.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; and Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (H.C.M.)
| | - Audrey P Fan
- From the Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) (M.W., I.S., A.P.F., R.M., M.J., N.H., G.Z., N.F., J.R., F.T.C., S.S.G., E.S.M.), Department of Neurosurgery (N.F., S.N., G.L.), and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.F., S.N., G.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (I.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (A.P.F.); Stanford Bio-X (M.W., G.Z., G.L., F.T.C., S.S.G.) and Departments of Bioengineering (S.S.G.) and Materials Science & Engineering (S.S.G.), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany (N.K., M.B., S.B., A.W.S., L.M.D.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (T.A.) and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Molecular Probes (H.C.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; and Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (H.C.M.)
| | - Ryogo Minamimoto
- From the Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) (M.W., I.S., A.P.F., R.M., M.J., N.H., G.Z., N.F., J.R., F.T.C., S.S.G., E.S.M.), Department of Neurosurgery (N.F., S.N., G.L.), and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.F., S.N., G.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (I.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (A.P.F.); Stanford Bio-X (M.W., G.Z., G.L., F.T.C., S.S.G.) and Departments of Bioengineering (S.S.G.) and Materials Science & Engineering (S.S.G.), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany (N.K., M.B., S.B., A.W.S., L.M.D.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (T.A.) and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Molecular Probes (H.C.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; and Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (H.C.M.)
| | - Mehran Jamali
- From the Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) (M.W., I.S., A.P.F., R.M., M.J., N.H., G.Z., N.F., J.R., F.T.C., S.S.G., E.S.M.), Department of Neurosurgery (N.F., S.N., G.L.), and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.F., S.N., G.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (I.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (A.P.F.); Stanford Bio-X (M.W., G.Z., G.L., F.T.C., S.S.G.) and Departments of Bioengineering (S.S.G.) and Materials Science & Engineering (S.S.G.), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany (N.K., M.B., S.B., A.W.S., L.M.D.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (T.A.) and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Molecular Probes (H.C.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; and Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (H.C.M.)
| | - Negin Hatami
- From the Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) (M.W., I.S., A.P.F., R.M., M.J., N.H., G.Z., N.F., J.R., F.T.C., S.S.G., E.S.M.), Department of Neurosurgery (N.F., S.N., G.L.), and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.F., S.N., G.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (I.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (A.P.F.); Stanford Bio-X (M.W., G.Z., G.L., F.T.C., S.S.G.) and Departments of Bioengineering (S.S.G.) and Materials Science & Engineering (S.S.G.), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany (N.K., M.B., S.B., A.W.S., L.M.D.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (T.A.) and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Molecular Probes (H.C.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; and Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (H.C.M.)
| | - Greg Zaharchuk
- From the Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) (M.W., I.S., A.P.F., R.M., M.J., N.H., G.Z., N.F., J.R., F.T.C., S.S.G., E.S.M.), Department of Neurosurgery (N.F., S.N., G.L.), and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.F., S.N., G.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (I.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (A.P.F.); Stanford Bio-X (M.W., G.Z., G.L., F.T.C., S.S.G.) and Departments of Bioengineering (S.S.G.) and Materials Science & Engineering (S.S.G.), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany (N.K., M.B., S.B., A.W.S., L.M.D.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (T.A.) and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Molecular Probes (H.C.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; and Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (H.C.M.)
| | - Nancy Fischbein
- From the Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) (M.W., I.S., A.P.F., R.M., M.J., N.H., G.Z., N.F., J.R., F.T.C., S.S.G., E.S.M.), Department of Neurosurgery (N.F., S.N., G.L.), and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.F., S.N., G.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (I.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (A.P.F.); Stanford Bio-X (M.W., G.Z., G.L., F.T.C., S.S.G.) and Departments of Bioengineering (S.S.G.) and Materials Science & Engineering (S.S.G.), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany (N.K., M.B., S.B., A.W.S., L.M.D.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (T.A.) and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Molecular Probes (H.C.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; and Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (H.C.M.)
| | - Seema Nagpal
- From the Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) (M.W., I.S., A.P.F., R.M., M.J., N.H., G.Z., N.F., J.R., F.T.C., S.S.G., E.S.M.), Department of Neurosurgery (N.F., S.N., G.L.), and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.F., S.N., G.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (I.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (A.P.F.); Stanford Bio-X (M.W., G.Z., G.L., F.T.C., S.S.G.) and Departments of Bioengineering (S.S.G.) and Materials Science & Engineering (S.S.G.), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany (N.K., M.B., S.B., A.W.S., L.M.D.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (T.A.) and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Molecular Probes (H.C.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; and Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (H.C.M.)
| | - Gordon Li
- From the Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) (M.W., I.S., A.P.F., R.M., M.J., N.H., G.Z., N.F., J.R., F.T.C., S.S.G., E.S.M.), Department of Neurosurgery (N.F., S.N., G.L.), and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.F., S.N., G.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (I.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (A.P.F.); Stanford Bio-X (M.W., G.Z., G.L., F.T.C., S.S.G.) and Departments of Bioengineering (S.S.G.) and Materials Science & Engineering (S.S.G.), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany (N.K., M.B., S.B., A.W.S., L.M.D.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (T.A.) and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Molecular Probes (H.C.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; and Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (H.C.M.)
| | - Norman Koglin
- From the Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) (M.W., I.S., A.P.F., R.M., M.J., N.H., G.Z., N.F., J.R., F.T.C., S.S.G., E.S.M.), Department of Neurosurgery (N.F., S.N., G.L.), and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.F., S.N., G.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (I.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (A.P.F.); Stanford Bio-X (M.W., G.Z., G.L., F.T.C., S.S.G.) and Departments of Bioengineering (S.S.G.) and Materials Science & Engineering (S.S.G.), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany (N.K., M.B., S.B., A.W.S., L.M.D.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (T.A.) and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Molecular Probes (H.C.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; and Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (H.C.M.)
| | - Mathias Berndt
- From the Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) (M.W., I.S., A.P.F., R.M., M.J., N.H., G.Z., N.F., J.R., F.T.C., S.S.G., E.S.M.), Department of Neurosurgery (N.F., S.N., G.L.), and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.F., S.N., G.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (I.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (A.P.F.); Stanford Bio-X (M.W., G.Z., G.L., F.T.C., S.S.G.) and Departments of Bioengineering (S.S.G.) and Materials Science & Engineering (S.S.G.), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany (N.K., M.B., S.B., A.W.S., L.M.D.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (T.A.) and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Molecular Probes (H.C.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; and Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (H.C.M.)
| | - Santiago Bullich
- From the Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) (M.W., I.S., A.P.F., R.M., M.J., N.H., G.Z., N.F., J.R., F.T.C., S.S.G., E.S.M.), Department of Neurosurgery (N.F., S.N., G.L.), and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.F., S.N., G.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (I.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (A.P.F.); Stanford Bio-X (M.W., G.Z., G.L., F.T.C., S.S.G.) and Departments of Bioengineering (S.S.G.) and Materials Science & Engineering (S.S.G.), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany (N.K., M.B., S.B., A.W.S., L.M.D.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (T.A.) and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Molecular Probes (H.C.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; and Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (H.C.M.)
| | - Andrew W Stephens
- From the Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) (M.W., I.S., A.P.F., R.M., M.J., N.H., G.Z., N.F., J.R., F.T.C., S.S.G., E.S.M.), Department of Neurosurgery (N.F., S.N., G.L.), and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.F., S.N., G.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (I.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (A.P.F.); Stanford Bio-X (M.W., G.Z., G.L., F.T.C., S.S.G.) and Departments of Bioengineering (S.S.G.) and Materials Science & Engineering (S.S.G.), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany (N.K., M.B., S.B., A.W.S., L.M.D.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (T.A.) and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Molecular Probes (H.C.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; and Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (H.C.M.)
| | - Ludger M Dinkelborg
- From the Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) (M.W., I.S., A.P.F., R.M., M.J., N.H., G.Z., N.F., J.R., F.T.C., S.S.G., E.S.M.), Department of Neurosurgery (N.F., S.N., G.L.), and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.F., S.N., G.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (I.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (A.P.F.); Stanford Bio-X (M.W., G.Z., G.L., F.T.C., S.S.G.) and Departments of Bioengineering (S.S.G.) and Materials Science & Engineering (S.S.G.), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany (N.K., M.B., S.B., A.W.S., L.M.D.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (T.A.) and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Molecular Probes (H.C.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; and Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (H.C.M.)
| | - Ty Abel
- From the Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) (M.W., I.S., A.P.F., R.M., M.J., N.H., G.Z., N.F., J.R., F.T.C., S.S.G., E.S.M.), Department of Neurosurgery (N.F., S.N., G.L.), and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.F., S.N., G.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (I.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (A.P.F.); Stanford Bio-X (M.W., G.Z., G.L., F.T.C., S.S.G.) and Departments of Bioengineering (S.S.G.) and Materials Science & Engineering (S.S.G.), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany (N.K., M.B., S.B., A.W.S., L.M.D.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (T.A.) and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Molecular Probes (H.C.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; and Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (H.C.M.)
| | - H Charles Manning
- From the Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) (M.W., I.S., A.P.F., R.M., M.J., N.H., G.Z., N.F., J.R., F.T.C., S.S.G., E.S.M.), Department of Neurosurgery (N.F., S.N., G.L.), and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.F., S.N., G.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (I.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (A.P.F.); Stanford Bio-X (M.W., G.Z., G.L., F.T.C., S.S.G.) and Departments of Bioengineering (S.S.G.) and Materials Science & Engineering (S.S.G.), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany (N.K., M.B., S.B., A.W.S., L.M.D.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (T.A.) and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Molecular Probes (H.C.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; and Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (H.C.M.)
| | - Jarrett Rosenberg
- From the Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) (M.W., I.S., A.P.F., R.M., M.J., N.H., G.Z., N.F., J.R., F.T.C., S.S.G., E.S.M.), Department of Neurosurgery (N.F., S.N., G.L.), and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.F., S.N., G.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (I.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (A.P.F.); Stanford Bio-X (M.W., G.Z., G.L., F.T.C., S.S.G.) and Departments of Bioengineering (S.S.G.) and Materials Science & Engineering (S.S.G.), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany (N.K., M.B., S.B., A.W.S., L.M.D.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (T.A.) and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Molecular Probes (H.C.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; and Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (H.C.M.)
| | - Frederick T Chin
- From the Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) (M.W., I.S., A.P.F., R.M., M.J., N.H., G.Z., N.F., J.R., F.T.C., S.S.G., E.S.M.), Department of Neurosurgery (N.F., S.N., G.L.), and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.F., S.N., G.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (I.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (A.P.F.); Stanford Bio-X (M.W., G.Z., G.L., F.T.C., S.S.G.) and Departments of Bioengineering (S.S.G.) and Materials Science & Engineering (S.S.G.), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany (N.K., M.B., S.B., A.W.S., L.M.D.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (T.A.) and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Molecular Probes (H.C.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; and Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (H.C.M.)
| | - Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
- From the Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) (M.W., I.S., A.P.F., R.M., M.J., N.H., G.Z., N.F., J.R., F.T.C., S.S.G., E.S.M.), Department of Neurosurgery (N.F., S.N., G.L.), and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.F., S.N., G.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (I.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (A.P.F.); Stanford Bio-X (M.W., G.Z., G.L., F.T.C., S.S.G.) and Departments of Bioengineering (S.S.G.) and Materials Science & Engineering (S.S.G.), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany (N.K., M.B., S.B., A.W.S., L.M.D.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (T.A.) and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Molecular Probes (H.C.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; and Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (H.C.M.)
| | - Erik S Mittra
- From the Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) (M.W., I.S., A.P.F., R.M., M.J., N.H., G.Z., N.F., J.R., F.T.C., S.S.G., E.S.M.), Department of Neurosurgery (N.F., S.N., G.L.), and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.F., S.N., G.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (I.S.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (A.P.F.); Stanford Bio-X (M.W., G.Z., G.L., F.T.C., S.S.G.) and Departments of Bioengineering (S.S.G.) and Materials Science & Engineering (S.S.G.), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany (N.K., M.B., S.B., A.W.S., L.M.D.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (T.A.) and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Molecular Probes (H.C.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; and Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (H.C.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Van Camp N, Lavisse S, Roost P, Gubinelli F, Hillmer A, Boutin H. TSPO imaging in animal models of brain diseases. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 49:77-109. [PMID: 34245328 PMCID: PMC8712305 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05379-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Over the last 30 years, the 18-kDa TSPO protein has been considered as the PET imaging biomarker of reference to measure increased neuroinflammation. Generally assumed to image activated microglia, TSPO has also been detected in endothelial cells and activated astrocytes. Here, we provide an exhaustive overview of the recent literature on the TSPO-PET imaging (i) in the search and development of new TSPO tracers and (ii) in the understanding of acute and chronic neuroinflammation in animal models of neurological disorders. Generally, studies testing new TSPO radiotracers against the prototypic [11C]-R-PK11195 or more recent competitors use models of acute focal neuroinflammation (e.g. stroke or lipopolysaccharide injection). These studies have led to the development of over 60 new tracers during the last 15 years. These studies highlighted that interpretation of TSPO-PET is easier in acute models of focal lesions, whereas in chronic models with lower or diffuse microglial activation, such as models of Alzheimer's disease or Parkinson's disease, TSPO quantification for detection of neuroinflammation is more challenging, mirroring what is observed in clinic. Moreover, technical limitations of preclinical scanners provide a drawback when studying modest neuroinflammation in small brains (e.g. in mice). Overall, this review underlines the value of TSPO imaging to study the time course or response to treatment of neuroinflammation in acute or chronic models of diseases. As such, TSPO remains the gold standard biomarker reference for neuroinflammation, waiting for new radioligands for other, more specific targets for neuroinflammatory processes and/or immune cells to emerge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadja Van Camp
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, MIRCen, Laboratoire des Maladies Neurodégénératives, 92265, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Sonia Lavisse
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, MIRCen, Laboratoire des Maladies Neurodégénératives, 92265, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Pauline Roost
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, MIRCen, Laboratoire des Maladies Neurodégénératives, 92265, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Francesco Gubinelli
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, MIRCen, Laboratoire des Maladies Neurodégénératives, 92265, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Ansel Hillmer
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale School of Engineering & Applied Science, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Hervé Boutin
- Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Brain and Mental Health, University of Manchester, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK.
- Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, University of Manchester, 27 Palatine Road, M20 3LJ, Manchester, UK.
- Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Northern Care Alliance & University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Glucose Metabolic Alteration of Cerebral Cortical Subareas in Rats with Renal Ischemia/Reperfusion Based on Small-Animal Positron Emission Tomography. Curr Med Sci 2021; 41:961-965. [PMID: 34669118 DOI: 10.1007/s11596-021-2450-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate glucose metabolic alterations in cerebral cortical subareas using 18F-labeled glucose derivative fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) micro-positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in a rat renal ischemia/reperfusion (RIR) model. METHODS Small-animal PET imaging in vivo was performed with 18F-labeled FDG as a PET tracer to identify glucose metabolic alterations in cerebral cortical subregions using a rat model of RIR. RESULTS We found that the average standardized uptake value (SUVaverage) of the cerebral cortical subareas in the RIR group was significantly increased compared to the sham group (P<0.05). We also found that glucose uptake in different cortical subregions including the left auditory cortex, right medial prefrontal cortex, right para cortex, left retrosplenial cortex, right retrosplenial cortex, and right visual cortex was significantly increased in the RIR group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the SUVaverage of right auditory cortex, left medial prefrontal cortex, left para cortex, and left visual cortex between the two groups. CONCLUSION The 18F-FDG PET data suggests that RIR causes a profound shift in the metabolic machinery of cerebral cortex subregions.
Collapse
|
14
|
Lilburn DM, Groves AM. The role of PET in imaging of the tumour microenvironment and response to immunotherapy. Clin Radiol 2021; 76:784.e1-784.e15. [DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
15
|
Fujihara KM, Corrales Benitez M, Cabalag CS, Zhang BZ, Ko HS, Liu DS, Simpson KJ, Haupt Y, Lipton L, Haupt S, Phillips WA, Clemons NJ. SLC7A11 Is a Superior Determinant of APR-246 (Eprenetapopt) Response than TP53 Mutation Status. Mol Cancer Ther 2021; 20:1858-1867. [PMID: 34315763 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-21-0067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
APR-246 (eprenetapopt) is in clinical development with a focus on hematologic malignancies and is promoted as a mutant-p53 reactivation therapy. Currently, the detection of at least one TP53 mutation is an inclusion criterion for patient selection into most APR-246 clinical trials. Preliminary results from our phase Ib/II clinical trial investigating APR-246 combined with doublet chemotherapy [cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)] in metastatic esophageal cancer, together with previous preclinical studies, indicate that TP53 mutation status alone may not be a sufficient biomarker for APR-246 response. This study aims to identify a robust biomarker for response to APR-246. Correlation analysis of the PRIMA-1 activity (lead compound to APR-246) with mutational status, gene expression, protein expression, and metabolite abundance across over 700 cancer cell lines (CCL) was performed. Functional validation and a boutique siRNA screen of over 850 redox-related genes were also conducted. TP53 mutation status was not consistently predictive of response to APR-246. The expression of SLC7A11, the cystine/glutamate transporter, was identified as a superior determinant of response to APR-246. Genetic regulators of SLC7A11, including ATF4, MDM2, wild-type p53, and c-Myc, were confirmed to also regulate cancer-cell sensitivity to APR-246. In conclusion, SLC7A11 expression is a broadly applicable determinant of sensitivity to APR-246 across cancer and should be utilized as the key predictive biomarker to stratify patients for future clinical investigation of APR-246.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji M Fujihara
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. .,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Carlos S Cabalag
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Bonnie Z Zhang
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hyun S Ko
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David S Liu
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,HPB Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kaylene J Simpson
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Centre for Functional Genomics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ygal Haupt
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Cancer Therapeutics Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Clinical Pathology, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lara Lipton
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sue Haupt
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Cancer Therapeutics Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Clinical Pathology, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wayne A Phillips
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Surgery at St. Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicholas J Clemons
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. .,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bolcaen J, Kleynhans J, Nair S, Verhoeven J, Goethals I, Sathekge M, Vandevoorde C, Ebenhan T. A perspective on the radiopharmaceutical requirements for imaging and therapy of glioblastoma. Theranostics 2021; 11:7911-7947. [PMID: 34335972 PMCID: PMC8315062 DOI: 10.7150/thno.56639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite numerous clinical trials and pre-clinical developments, the treatment of glioblastoma (GB) remains a challenge. The current survival rate of GB averages one year, even with an optimal standard of care. However, the future promises efficient patient-tailored treatments, including targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT). Advances in radiopharmaceutical development have unlocked the possibility to assess disease at the molecular level allowing individual diagnosis. This leads to the possibility of choosing a tailored, targeted approach for therapeutic modalities. Therapeutic modalities based on radiopharmaceuticals are an exciting development with great potential to promote a personalised approach to medicine. However, an effective targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) for the treatment of GB entails caveats and requisites. This review provides an overview of existing nuclear imaging and TRT strategies for GB. A critical discussion of the optimal characteristics for new GB targeting therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals and clinical indications are provided. Considerations for target selection are discussed, i.e. specific presence of the target, expression level and pharmacological access to the target, with particular attention to blood-brain barrier crossing. An overview of the most promising radionuclides is given along with a validation of the relevant radiopharmaceuticals and theranostic agents (based on small molecules, peptides and monoclonal antibodies). Moreover, toxicity issues and safety pharmacology aspects will be presented, both in general and for the brain in particular.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Bolcaen
- Radiobiology, Radiation Biophysics Division, Nuclear Medicine Department, iThemba LABS, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Janke Kleynhans
- Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure NPC, Pretoria, South Africa
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University of Pretoria and Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Shankari Nair
- Radiobiology, Radiation Biophysics Division, Nuclear Medicine Department, iThemba LABS, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Ingeborg Goethals
- Ghent University Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Mike Sathekge
- Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure NPC, Pretoria, South Africa
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University of Pretoria and Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Charlot Vandevoorde
- Radiobiology, Radiation Biophysics Division, Nuclear Medicine Department, iThemba LABS, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Thomas Ebenhan
- Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure NPC, Pretoria, South Africa
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Edwards R, Greenwood HE, McRobbie G, Khan I, Witney TH. Robust and Facile Automated Radiosynthesis of [ 18F]FSPG on the GE FASTlab. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; 23:854-864. [PMID: 34013395 PMCID: PMC8578107 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-021-01609-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Purpose (S)-4-(3-18F-Fluoropropyl)-ʟ-Glutamic Acid ([18F]FSPG) is a radiolabeled non-natural amino acid that is used for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of the glutamate/cystine antiporter, system xC-, whose expression is upregulated in many cancer types. To increase the clinical adoption of this radiotracer, reliable and facile automated procedures for [18F]FSPG production are required. Here, we report a cassette-based method to produce [18F]FSPG at high radioactivity concentrations from low amounts of starting activity. Procedures An automated synthesis and purification of [18F]FSPG was developed using the GE FASTlab. Optimization of the reaction conditions and automated manipulations were performed by measuring the isolated radiochemical yield of [18F]FSPG and by assessing radiochemical purity using radio-HPLC. Purification of [18F]FSPG was conducted by trapping and washing of the radiotracer on Oasis MCX SPE cartridges, followed by a reverse elution of [18F]FSPG in phosphate-buffered saline. Subsequently, the [18F]FSPG obtained from the optimized process was used to image an animal model of non-small cell lung cancer. Results The optimized protocol produced [18F]FSPG in 38.4 ± 2.6 % radiochemical yield and >96 % radiochemical purity with a molar activity of 11.1 ± 7.7 GBq/μmol. Small alterations, including the implementation of a reverse elution and an altered Hypercarb cartridge, led to significant improvements in radiotracer concentration from <10 MBq/ml to >100 MBq/ml. The improved radiotracer concentration allowed for the imaging of up to 20 mice, starting with just 1.5 GBq of [18F]Fluoride. Conclusions We have developed a robust and facile method for [18F]FSPG radiosynthesis in high radiotracer concentration, radiochemical yield, and radiochemical purity. This cassette-based method enabled the production of [18F]FSPG at radioactive concentrations sufficient to facilitate large-scale preclinical experiments with a single prep of starting activity. The use of a cassette-based radiosynthesis on an automated synthesis module routinely used for clinical production makes the method amenable to rapid and widespread clinical translation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11307-021-01609-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Edwards
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Hannah E Greenwood
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Graeme McRobbie
- Pharmaceutical Diagnostics, Life Sciences, GE Healthcare, Pollards Wood, Nightingales Lane, Chalfont St. Giles, Buckinghamshire, HP8 4SP, UK
| | - Imtiaz Khan
- Pharmaceutical Diagnostics, Life Sciences, GE Healthcare, Pollards Wood, Nightingales Lane, Chalfont St. Giles, Buckinghamshire, HP8 4SP, UK
| | - Timothy H Witney
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Molotkov A, Carberry P, Dolan MA, Joseph S, Idumonyi S, Oya S, Castrillon J, Konofagou EE, Doubrovin M, Lesser GJ, Zanderigo F, Mintz A. Real-Time Positron Emission Tomography Evaluation of Topotecan Brain Kinetics after Ultrasound-Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13:405. [PMID: 33803856 PMCID: PMC8003157 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13030405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary adult brain malignancy with an extremely poor prognosis and a median survival of fewer than two years. A key reason for this high mortality is that the blood-brain barrier (BBB) significantly restricts systemically delivered therapeutics to brain tumors. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) with microbubbles is a methodology being used in clinical trials to noninvasively permeabilize the BBB for systemic therapeutic delivery to GBM. Topotecan is a topoisomerase inhibitor used as a chemotherapeutic agent to treat ovarian and small cell lung cancer. Studies have suggested that topotecan can cross the BBB and can be used to treat brain metastases. However, pharmacokinetic data demonstrated that topotecan peak concentration in the brain extracellular fluid after systemic injection was ten times lower than in the blood, suggesting less than optimal BBB penetration by topotecan. We hypothesize that HIFU with microbubbles treatment can open the BBB and significantly increase topotecan concentration in the brain. We radiolabeled topotecan with 11C and acquired static and dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) scans to quantify [11C] topotecan uptake in the brains of normal mice and mice after HIFU treatment. We found that HIFU treatments significantly increased [11C] topotecan brain uptake. Moreover, kinetic analysis of the [11C] topotecan dynamic PET data demonstrated a substantial increase in [11C] topotecan volume of distribution in the brain. Furthermore, we found a decrease in [11C] topotecan brain clearance, confirming the potential of HIFU to aid in the delivery of topotecan through the BBB. This opens the potential clinical application of [11C] topotecan as a tool to predict topotecan loco-regional brain concentration in patients with GBMs undergoing experimental HIFU treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrei Molotkov
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA; (A.M.); (P.C.); (M.A.D.); (S.J.); (S.I.); (S.O.); (J.C.); (M.D.)
| | - Patrick Carberry
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA; (A.M.); (P.C.); (M.A.D.); (S.J.); (S.I.); (S.O.); (J.C.); (M.D.)
| | - Martin A. Dolan
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA; (A.M.); (P.C.); (M.A.D.); (S.J.); (S.I.); (S.O.); (J.C.); (M.D.)
| | - Simon Joseph
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA; (A.M.); (P.C.); (M.A.D.); (S.J.); (S.I.); (S.O.); (J.C.); (M.D.)
| | - Sidney Idumonyi
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA; (A.M.); (P.C.); (M.A.D.); (S.J.); (S.I.); (S.O.); (J.C.); (M.D.)
| | - Shunichi Oya
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA; (A.M.); (P.C.); (M.A.D.); (S.J.); (S.I.); (S.O.); (J.C.); (M.D.)
| | - John Castrillon
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA; (A.M.); (P.C.); (M.A.D.); (S.J.); (S.I.); (S.O.); (J.C.); (M.D.)
| | - Elisa E. Konofagou
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University Medical Center, 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA;
| | - Mikhail Doubrovin
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA; (A.M.); (P.C.); (M.A.D.); (S.J.); (S.I.); (S.O.); (J.C.); (M.D.)
| | - Glenn J. Lesser
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA;
| | - Francesca Zanderigo
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA;
- Molecular Imaging and Neuropathology Area, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Akiva Mintz
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA; (A.M.); (P.C.); (M.A.D.); (S.J.); (S.I.); (S.O.); (J.C.); (M.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
|
20
|
Shih KT, Huang YY, Yang CY, Cheng MF, Tien YW, Shiue CY, Yen RF, Hsin LW. Synthesis and analysis of 4-(3-fluoropropyl)-glutamic acid stereoisomers to determine the stereochemical purity of (4S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-L-glutamic acid ([18F]FSPG) for clinical use. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0243831. [PMID: 33315962 PMCID: PMC7735610 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
(4S)-4-(3-[18F]Fluoropropyl)-L-glutamic acid ([18F]FSPG) is a positron emission tomography (PET) imaging agent for measuring the system xC− transporter activity. It has been used for the detection of various cancers and metastasis in clinical trials. [18F]FSPG is also a promising diagnostic tool for evaluation of multiple sclerosis, drug resistance in chemotherapy, inflammatory brain diseases, and infectious lesions. Due to the very short half-life (110 min) of 18F nuclide, [18F]FSPG needs to be produced on a daily basis; therefore, fast and efficient synthesis and analytical methods for quality control must be established to assure the quality and safety of [18F]FSPG for clinical use. To manufacture cGMP-compliant [18F]FSPG, all four nonradioactive stereoisomers of FSPG were prepared as reference standards for analysis. (2S,4S)-1 and (2R,4R)-1 were synthesized starting from protected L- and D-glutamate derivatives in three steps, whereas (2S,4R)-1 and (2R,4S)-1 were prepared in three steps from protected (S)- and (R)-pyroglutamates. A chiral HPLC method for simultaneous determination of four FSPG stereoisomers was developed by using a 3-cm Chirex 3126 column and a MeCN/CuSO4(aq) mobile phase. In this method, (2R,4S)-1, (2S,4S)-1, (2R,4R)-1, and (2S,4R)-1 were eluted in sequence with sufficient resolution in less than 25 min without derivatization. Scale-up synthesis of intermediates for the production of [18F]FSPG in high optical purity was achieved via stereo-selective synthesis or resolution by recrystallization. The enantiomeric excess of intermediates was determined by HPLC using a Chiralcel OD column and monitored at 220 nm. The nonradioactive precursor with >98% ee can be readily distributed to other facilities for the production of [18F]FSPG. Based on the above accomplishments, cGMP-compliant [18F]FSPG met the acceptance criteria in specifications and was successfully manufactured for human use. It has been routinely prepared and used in several pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma metastasis-related clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai-Ting Shih
- School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ya-Yao Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Molecular Probes Development Core, Molecular Imaging Center, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Institute of Medical Device and Imaging, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Ying Yang
- School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Mei-Fang Cheng
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Wen Tien
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chyng-Yann Shiue
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Molecular Probes Development Core, Molecular Imaging Center, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Rouh-Fang Yen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Molecular Probes Development Core, Molecular Imaging Center, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ling-Wei Hsin
- School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Molecular Probes Development Core, Molecular Imaging Center, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Center for Innovative Therapeutics Discovery, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Take Advantage of Glutamine Anaplerosis, the Kernel of the Metabolic Rewiring in Malignant Gliomas. Biomolecules 2020; 10:biom10101370. [PMID: 32993063 PMCID: PMC7599606 DOI: 10.3390/biom10101370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2020] [Revised: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Glutamine is a non-essential amino acid that plays a key role in the metabolism of proliferating cells including neoplastic cells. In the central nervous system (CNS), glutamine metabolism is particularly relevant, because the glutamine-glutamate cycle is a way of controlling the production of glutamate-derived neurotransmitters by tightly regulating the bioavailability of the amino acids in a neuron-astrocyte metabolic symbiosis-dependent manner. Glutamine-related metabolic adjustments have been reported in several CNS malignancies including malignant gliomas that are considered ‘glutamine addicted’. In these tumors, glutamine becomes an essential amino acid preferentially used in energy and biomass production including glutathione (GSH) generation, which is crucial in oxidative stress control. Therefore, in this review, we will highlight the metabolic remodeling that gliomas undergo, focusing on glutamine metabolism. We will address some therapeutic regimens including novel research attempts to target glutamine metabolism and a brief update of diagnosis strategies that take advantage of this altered profile. A better understanding of malignant glioma cell metabolism will help in the identification of new molecular targets and the design of new therapies.
Collapse
|
22
|
Park SY, Mosci C, Kumar M, Wardak M, Koglin N, Bullich S, Mueller A, Berndt M, Stephens AW, Chin FT, Gambhir SS, Mittra ES. Initial evaluation of (4S)-4-(3-[ 18F]fluoropropyl)-L-glutamate (FSPG) PET/CT imaging in patients with head and neck cancer, colorectal cancer, or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. EJNMMI Res 2020; 10:100. [PMID: 32857284 PMCID: PMC7455665 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00678-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose (4S)-4-(3-[18F]Fluoropropyl)-l-glutamic acid ([18F]FSPG) measures system xC− transporter activity and shows promise for oncologic imaging. We present data on tumor uptake of this radiopharmaceutical in human subjects with head and neck cancer (HNC), colorectal cancer (CRC), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Methods A total of 15 subjects with HNC (n = 5), CRC (n = 5), or NHL (n = 5) were recruited (mean age 66.2 years, range 44–87 years). 301.4 ± 28.1 MBq (8.1 ± 0.8 mCi) of [18F]FSPG was given intravenously to each subject, and 3 PET/CT scans were obtained 0–2 h post-injection. All subjects also had a positive [18F]FDG PET/CT scan within 1 month prior to the [18F]FSPG PET scan. Semi-quantitative and visual comparisons of the [18F]FSPG and [18F]FDG scans were performed. Results [18F]FSPG showed strong uptake in all but one HNC subject. The lack of surrounding brain uptake facilitated tumor delineation in the HNC patients. [18F]FSPG also showed tumor uptake in all CRC subjects, but variable uptake in the NHL subjects. While the absolute [18F]FDG SUV values were comparable or higher than [18F]FSPG, the tumor-to-background SUV ratios were greater with [18F]FSPG than [18F]FDG. Conclusions [18F]FSPG PET/CT showed promising results across 15 subjects with 3 different cancer types. Concordant visualization was mostly observed between [18F]FSPG and [18F]FDG PET/CT images, with some inter- and intra-individual uptake variability potentially reflecting differences in tumor biology. The tumor-to-background ratios were greater with [18F]FSPG than [18F]FDG in the cancer types evaluated. Future studies based on larger numbers of subjects and those with a wider array of primary and recurrent or metastatic tumors are planned to further evaluate the utility of this novel tracer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonya Y Park
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Camila Mosci
- Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Meena Kumar
- Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Mirwais Wardak
- Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Norman Koglin
- Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany.,Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andre Mueller
- Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany.,Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mathias Berndt
- Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany.,Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrew W Stephens
- Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany.,Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frederick T Chin
- Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Sanjiv S Gambhir
- Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.,Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Bio-X Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Erik S Mittra
- Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. .,Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Mail Code L340, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Park SY, Na SJ, Kumar M, Mosci C, Wardak M, Koglin N, Bullich S, Mueller A, Berndt M, Stephens AW, Cho YM, Ahn H, Chae SY, Kim HO, Moon DH, Gambhir SS, Mittra ES. Clinical Evaluation of (4S)-4-(3-[ 18F]Fluoropropyl)-L-glutamate ( 18F-FSPG) for PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:5380-5387. [PMID: 32694158 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-0644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE (4S)-4-(3-[18F]Fluoropropyl)-L-glutamic acid (18F-FSPG) is a radiopharmaceutical for PET imaging of system xC - activity, which can be upregulated in prostate cancer. We present data on the first evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent prostate cancer with this radiopharmaceutical. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Ten patients with primary and 10 patients with recurrent prostate cancer were enrolled in this prospective multicenter study. After injection of 300 MBq of 18F-FSPG, three whole-body PET/CT scans were obtained. Visual analysis was compared with step-section histopathology when available as well as other imaging studies and clinical outcomes. Metabolic parameters were measured semiquantitatively. Expression levels of xCT and CD44 were evaluated by IHC for patients with available tissue samples. RESULTS 18F-FSPG PET showed high tumor-to-background ratios with a relatively high tumor detection rate on a per-patient (89%) and per-lobe (87%) basis. The sensitivity was slightly higher with imaging at 105 minutes in comparison with 60 minutes. The maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) for cancer was significantly higher than both normal (P < 0.005) and benign pathology (P = 0.011), while there was no significant difference between normal and benign pathology (P = 0.120). In the setting of recurrence, agreement with standard imaging was demonstrated in 7 of 9 patients (78%) and 13 of 18 lesions (72%), and revealed true local recurrence in a discordant case. 18F-FSPG accumulation showed moderate correlation with CD44 expression. CONCLUSIONS 18F-FSPG is a promising tumor imaging agent for PET that seems to have favorable biodistribution and high cancer detection rate in patients with prostate cancer. Further studies are warranted to determine the diagnostic value for both initial staging and recurrence, and how it compares with other investigational radiotracers and conventional imaging modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonya Youngju Park
- Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (South).,Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Sae Jung Na
- Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (South).,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (South)
| | - Meena Kumar
- Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Camila Mosci
- Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Mirwais Wardak
- Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Yong Mee Cho
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (South)
| | - Hanjong Ahn
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (South)
| | - Sun Young Chae
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (South)
| | - Hye Ok Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (South).,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ewha Woman's University College of Medicine, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (South)
| | - Dae Hyuk Moon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (South)
| | - Sanjiv S Gambhir
- Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.,Department of Bioengineering, Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Stanford Bio-X Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Erik S Mittra
- Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California. .,Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lau J, Rousseau E, Kwon D, Lin KS, Bénard F, Chen X. Insight into the Development of PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Oncology. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E1312. [PMID: 32455729 PMCID: PMC7281377 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12051312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
While the development of positron emission tomography (PET) radiopharmaceuticals closely follows that of traditional drug development, there are several key considerations in the chemical and radiochemical synthesis, preclinical assessment, and clinical translation of PET radiotracers. As such, we outline the fundamentals of radiotracer design, with respect to the selection of an appropriate pharmacophore. These concepts will be reinforced by exemplary cases of PET radiotracer development, both with respect to their preclinical and clinical evaluation. We also provide a guideline for the proper selection of a radionuclide and the appropriate labeling strategy to access a tracer with optimal imaging qualities. Finally, we summarize the methodology of their evaluation in in vitro and animal models and the road to clinical translation. This review is intended to be a primer for newcomers to the field and give insight into the workflow of developing radiopharmaceuticals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Lau
- Laboratory of Molecular Imaging and Nanomedicine (LOMIN), National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA;
| | - Etienne Rousseau
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 5N4, Canada;
| | - Daniel Kwon
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada; (D.K.); (K.-S.L.); (F.B.)
| | - Kuo-Shyan Lin
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada; (D.K.); (K.-S.L.); (F.B.)
| | - François Bénard
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada; (D.K.); (K.-S.L.); (F.B.)
| | - Xiaoyuan Chen
- Laboratory of Molecular Imaging and Nanomedicine (LOMIN), National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wen F, Liu S, Ma H, Tang G. Radiosynthesis of novel N- 18 F-labeled 18 F-FHex-α-l-Glu and 18 F-FHex-β-Glu. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm 2020; 63:222-230. [PMID: 32227528 DOI: 10.1002/jlcr.3834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Revised: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
N-18 F-labeled amino acids are important substitutes for new positron emission tomography (PET) imaging tracers complementing the deficiency of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18 F-FDG). In this work, two novel N-6-18 F-alkyl amino acid imaging agents, 18 F-FHex-α-l-Glu and 18 F-FHex-β-Glu, were designed and synthesized as potential probes for PET imaging of tumors. 18 F-FHex-α-l-Glu was synthesized using the precursor 6 from 18 F-F- with the yield of 16 ± 4% (n = 5, uncorrected) within about 50 minutes. The specific activity was 14.5 GBq/μmol, and the radiochemical purity was more than 95%. 18 F-FHex-β-Glu was synthesized using the precursor 12 based on 18 F-F- with the yield of 11 ± 3% (n = 3, uncorrected) in about 60 minutes. The specific activity was 9.1 GBq/μmol, and the radiochemical purity was more than 95%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fuhua Wen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Translational Application of Medical Radiopharmaceuticals, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shaoyu Liu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Translational Application of Medical Radiopharmaceuticals, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of GuangZhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Ma
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Translational Application of Medical Radiopharmaceuticals, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ganghua Tang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Translational Application of Medical Radiopharmaceuticals, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Nanfang PET Center and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pulagam KR, Gómez-Vallejo V, Llop J, Rejc L. Radiochemistry: A Useful Tool in the Ophthalmic Drug Discovery. Curr Med Chem 2020; 27:501-522. [PMID: 31142249 DOI: 10.2174/0929867326666190530122032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2018] [Revised: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Single Photon Emission Computerized Tomography (SPECT) are ultra-sensitive, fully translational and minimally invasive nuclear imaging techniques capable of tracing the spatiotemporal distribution of positron (PET) or gamma (SPECT) emitter-labeled molecules after administration into a living organism. Besides their impact in the clinical diagnostic, PET and SPECT are playing an increasing role in the process of drug development, both during the evaluation of the pharmacokinetic properties of new chemical entities as well as in the proof of concept, proof of mechanism and proof of efficacy studies. However, they have been scarcely applied in the context of ophthalmic drugs. In this paper, the basics of nuclear imaging and radiochemistry are briefly discussed, and the few examples of the use of these imaging modalities in ophthalmic drug development reported in the literature are presented and discussed. Finally, in a purely theoretical exercise, some labeling strategies that could be applied to the preparation of selected ophthalmic drugs are proposed and potential applications of nuclear imaging in ophthalmology are projected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishna R Pulagam
- Radiochemistry and Nuclear Imaging Group, CIC biomaGUNE, San Sebastian, Spain
| | | | - Jordi Llop
- Radiochemistry and Nuclear Imaging Group, CIC biomaGUNE, San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Luka Rejc
- Radiochemistry and Nuclear Imaging Group, CIC biomaGUNE, San Sebastian, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Obara-Michlewska M, Szeliga M. Targeting Glutamine Addiction in Gliomas. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12020310. [PMID: 32013066 PMCID: PMC7072559 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12020310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The most common malignant brain tumors are those of astrocytic origin, gliomas, with the most aggressive glioblastoma (WHO grade IV) among them. Despite efforts, medicine has not made progress in terms of the prognosis and life expectancy of glioma patients. Behind the malignant phenotype of gliomas lies multiple genetic mutations leading to reprogramming of their metabolism, which gives those highly proliferating cells an advantage over healthy ones. The so-called glutamine addiction is a metabolic adaptation that supplements oxidative glycolysis in order to secure neoplastic cells with nutrients and energy in unfavorable conditions of hypoxia. The present review aims at presenting the research and clinical attempts targeting the different metabolic pathways involved in glutamine metabolism in gliomas. A brief description of the biochemistry of glutamine transport, synthesis, and glutaminolysis, etc. will forego a detailed comparison of the therapeutic strategies undertaken to inhibit glutamine utilization by gliomas.
Collapse
|
28
|
Liu S, Wu R, Sun Y, Ploessl K, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Wu Z, Zhu L, Kung HF. Design, synthesis and evaluation of a novel glutamine derivative (2 S,4 R)-2-amino-4-cyano-4-[ 18F]fluorobutanoic acid. NEW J CHEM 2020. [DOI: 10.1039/d0nj00410c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
A new glutamine derivative (2S,4R)-2-amino-4-cyano-4-[18F]fluorobutanoic acid (2S,4R)-4-[18F]FCABA ([18F]1) and its labeled precursor can be converted into (2S,4R)-4-[18F]FGln and (2S,4R)4-[18F]FGlu by changing the labeling conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Song Liu
- Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders
- Laboratory of Brain Disorders
- Ministry of Science and Technology
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Disorders
- Capital Medical University
| | - Renbo Wu
- Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders
- Laboratory of Brain Disorders
- Ministry of Science and Technology
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Disorders
- Capital Medical University
| | - Yuli Sun
- Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders
- Laboratory of Brain Disorders
- Ministry of Science and Technology
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Disorders
- Capital Medical University
| | - Karl Ploessl
- Department of Radiology
- University of Pennsylvania
- Philadelphia
- USA
| | - Yan Zhang
- College of Chemistry
- Beijing Normal University
- Beijing
- China
| | - Yajing Liu
- School of Pharmaceutical Science, Capital Medical University
- Beijing 100069
- China
| | - Zehui Wu
- Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders
- Laboratory of Brain Disorders
- Ministry of Science and Technology
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Disorders
- Capital Medical University
| | - Lin Zhu
- College of Chemistry
- Beijing Normal University
- Beijing
- China
| | - Hank F. Kung
- Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders
- Laboratory of Brain Disorders
- Ministry of Science and Technology
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Disorders
- Capital Medical University
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Duan H, Baratto L, Iagaru A. The Role of PET/CT in the Imaging of Pancreatic Neoplasms. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2019; 40:500-508. [PMID: 31806148 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2019.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Pancreas cancer is a complex disease and its prognosis is related to the origin of the tumor cell as well as the stage of disease at the time of diagnosis. Pancreatic adenocarcinomas derive from the exocrine pancreas and are the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States, while well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) derived from the endocrine part of the pancreas are rare and characterized by a slow growth and good life expectancy. Surgery is the only curative treatment approach, and an accurate assessment of resectability is of paramount importance in order to avoid futile procedures. The role of molecular imaging with positron emission tomography and computed tomography ranges from indispensable for pNETs to controversial for certain scenarios in pancreatic adenocarcinomas. This review article aims to overview molecular pancreatic imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heying Duan
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Lucia Baratto
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Natarajan SK, Venneti S. Glutamine Metabolism in Brain Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:E1628. [PMID: 31652923 PMCID: PMC6893651 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11111628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2019] [Revised: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 10/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Altered metabolism is a hallmark of cancer cells. Tumor cells rewire their metabolism to support their uncontrolled proliferation by taking up nutrients from the microenvironment. The amino acid glutamine is a key nutrient that fuels biosynthetic processes including ATP generation, redox homeostasis, nucleotide, protein, and lipid synthesis. Glutamine as a precursor for the neurotransmitter glutamate, and plays a critical role in the normal functioning of the brain. Brain tumors that grow in this glutamine/glutamate rich microenvironment can make synaptic connections with glutamatergic neurons and reprogram glutamine metabolism to enable their growth. In this review, we examine the functions of glutamate/glutamine in the brain and how brain tumor cells reprogram glutamine metabolism. Altered glutamine metabolism can be leveraged to develop non-invasive imaging strategies and we review these imaging modalities. Finally, we examine if targeting glutamine metabolism could serve as a therapeutic strategy in brain tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siva Kumar Natarajan
- Laboratory of Brain Tumor Metabolism and Epigenetics, Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| | - Sriram Venneti
- Laboratory of Brain Tumor Metabolism and Epigenetics, Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan 3520E MSRB 1, 1150 West Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 41804, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Beinat C, Gowrishankar G, Shen B, Alam IS, Robinson E, Haywood T, Patel CB, Azevedo EC, Castillo JB, Ilovich O, Koglin N, Schmitt-Willich H, Berndt M, Mueller A, Zerna M, Srinivasan A, Gambhir SS. The Characterization of 18F-hGTS13 for Molecular Imaging of xC− Transporter Activity with PET. J Nucl Med 2019; 60:1812-1817. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.225870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
|
32
|
Greenwood HE, McCormick PN, Gendron T, Glaser M, Pereira R, Maddocks ODK, Sander K, Zhang T, Koglin N, Lythgoe MF, Årstad E, Hochhauser D, Witney TH. Measurement of Tumor Antioxidant Capacity and Prediction of Chemotherapy Resistance in Preclinical Models of Ovarian Cancer by Positron Emission Tomography. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:2471-2482. [PMID: 30651275 PMCID: PMC6522377 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-3423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Revised: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 01/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Drug resistance is a major obstacle for the effective treatment of patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Currently, there is no satisfactory way to identify patients with HGSOC that are refractive to the standard of care. Here, we propose the system xc - radiotracer (4S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-l-glutamate ([18F]FSPG) as a non-invasive method to measure upregulated antioxidant pathways present in drug-resistant HGSOC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Using matched chemotherapy sensitive and resistant ovarian cancer cell lines, we assessed their antioxidant capacity and its relation to [18F]FSPG uptake, both in cells and in animal models of human ovarian cancer. We identified the mechanisms driving differential [18F]FSPG cell accumulation and evaluated [18F]FSPG tumor uptake as predictive marker of treatment response in drug-resistant tumors. RESULTS High intracellular glutathione (GSH) and low reactive oxygen species corresponded to decreased [18F]FSPG cell accumulation in drug-resistant versus drug-sensitive cells. Decreased [18F]FSPG uptake in drug-resistant cells was a consequence of changes in intracellular cystine, a key precursor in GSH biosynthesis. In vivo, [18F]FSPG uptake was decreased nearly 80% in chemotherapy-resistant A2780 tumors compared with parental drug-sensitive tumors, with nonresponding tumors displaying high levels of oxidized-to-reduced GSH. Treatment of drug-resistant A2780 tumors with doxorubicin resulted in no detectable change in tumor volume, GSH, or [18F]FSPG uptake. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the ability of [18F]FSPG to detect upregulated antioxidant pathways present in drug-resistant cancer. [18F]FSPG may therefore enable the identification of patients with HGSOC that are refractory to standard of care, allowing the transferal of drug-resistant patients to alternative therapies, thereby improving outcomes in this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah E Greenwood
- Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patrick N McCormick
- Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thibault Gendron
- Department of Chemistry, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthias Glaser
- Department of Chemistry, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Raul Pereira
- Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Oliver D K Maddocks
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Kerstin Sander
- Department of Chemistry, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tong Zhang
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mark F Lythgoe
- Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Erik Årstad
- Department of Chemistry, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Hochhauser
- Cancer Research UK Drug-DNA Interactions Research Group, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy H Witney
- Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
McCormick PN, Greenwood HE, Glaser M, Maddocks ODK, Gendron T, Sander K, Gowrishankar G, Hoehne A, Zhang T, Shuhendler AJ, Lewis DY, Berndt M, Koglin N, Lythgoe MF, Gambhir SS, Årstad E, Witney TH. Assessment of Tumor Redox Status through ( S)-4-(3-[ 18F]fluoropropyl)-L-Glutamic Acid PET Imaging of System x c - Activity. Cancer Res 2019; 79:853-863. [PMID: 30401715 PMCID: PMC6379064 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-2634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2018] [Revised: 10/16/2018] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
The cell's endogenous antioxidant system is vital to maintenance of redox homeostasis. Despite its central role in normal and pathophysiology, no noninvasive tools exist to measure this system in patients. The cystine/glutamate antiporter system xc - maintains the balance between intracellular reactive oxygen species and antioxidant production through the provision of cystine, a key precursor in glutathione biosynthesis. Here, we show that tumor cell retention of a system xc --specific PET radiotracer, (S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-L-glutamic acid ([18F]FSPG), decreases in proportion to levels of oxidative stress following treatment with a range of redox-active compounds. The decrease in [18F]FSPG retention correlated with a depletion of intracellular cystine resulting from increased de novo glutathione biosynthesis, shown through [U-13C6, U-15N2]cystine isotopic tracing. In vivo, treatment with the chemotherapeutic doxorubicin decreased [18F]FSPG tumor uptake in a mouse model of ovarian cancer, coinciding with markers of oxidative stress but preceding tumor shrinkage and decreased glucose utilization. Having already been used in pilot clinical trials, [18F]FSPG PET could be rapidly translated to the clinic as an early redox indicator of tumor response to treatment. SIGNIFICANCE: [18F]FSPG PET imaging provides a sensitive noninvasive measure of tumor redox status and provides an early marker of tumor response to therapy.See related commentary by Lee et al., p. 701.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick N McCormick
- Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah E Greenwood
- Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthias Glaser
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Department of Chemistry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Oliver D K Maddocks
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Thibault Gendron
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Department of Chemistry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kerstin Sander
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Department of Chemistry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gayatri Gowrishankar
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Stanford, California
| | - Aileen Hoehne
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Stanford, California
| | - Tong Zhang
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Adam J Shuhendler
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Stanford, California
| | - David Y Lewis
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Stanford, California
| | | | | | - Mark F Lythgoe
- Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sanjiv S Gambhir
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Stanford, California
- Department of Bioengineering, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Bio-X, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Stanford, California
| | - Erik Årstad
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Department of Chemistry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy H Witney
- Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hoerner CR, Chen VJ, Fan AC. The 'Achilles Heel' of Metabolism in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Glutaminase Inhibition as a Rational Treatment Strategy. KIDNEY CANCER 2019; 3:15-29. [PMID: 30854496 PMCID: PMC6400133 DOI: 10.3233/kca-180043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
An important hallmark of cancer is 'metabolic reprogramming' or the rewiring of cellular metabolism to support rapid cell proliferation [1-5]. Metabolic reprogramming through oncometabolite-mediated transformation or activation of oncogenes in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) globally impacts energy production as well as glucose and glutamine utilization in RCC cells, which can promote dependence on glutamine supply to support cell growth and proliferation [6, 7]. Novel inhibitors of glutaminase, a key enzyme in glutamine metabolism, target glutamine addiction as a viable treatment strategy in metastatic RCC (mRCC). Here, we review glutamine metabolic pathways and how changes in cellular glutamine utilization enable the progression of RCC. This overview provides scientific rationale for targeting this pathway in patients with mRCC. We will summarize the current understanding of cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying anti-tumor efficacy of glutaminase inhibitors in RCC, provide an overview of clinical efforts targeting glutaminase in mRCC, and review approaches for identifying biomarkers for patient stratification and detecting therapeutic response early on in patients treated with this novel class of anti-cancer drug. Ultimately, results of ongoing clinical trials will demonstrate whether glutaminase inhibition can be a worthy addition to the current armamentarium of drugs used for patients with mRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian R Hoerner
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA
| | - Viola J Chen
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA
| | - Alice C Fan
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Prospective comparison of (4S)-4-(3- 18F-fluoropropyl)-L-glutamate versus 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT for detecting metastases from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a proof-of-concept study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46:810-820. [PMID: 30635754 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4251-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2018] [Accepted: 12/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE (4S)-4-(3-18F-Fluoropropyl)-L-glutamate (FSPG) positron emission tomography (PET) reflects system xC- transporter (xCT) expression. FSPG PET has been used to detect brain, lung, breast and liver cancer with only modest success. There is no report on the use of FSPG PET in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), presumably because of normal xCT expression in the pancreas. Nonetheless, the tissue-specific expression of xCT in the pancreas suggests that FSPG PET may be ideal for identifying metastasized PDAC. METHODS The performance of FSPG in detecting PDAC metastases was compared with that of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in small-animal PET studies in seven PDAC tumour-bearing mice and in prospective PET/computed tomography (CT) studies in 23 patients with tissue-confirmed PDAC of stage III or stage IV. All PET/CT results were correlated with the results of histopathology or contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) performed 3 and 6 months later. RESULTS In the rodent model, FSPG PET consistently found more PDAC metastases earlier than FDG PET. FSPG PET showed a trend for a higher sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy than FDG PET in detecting PDAC metastases in a patient-based analysis: 95.0%, 100.0% and 95.7%, and 90.0%, 66.7% and 90.0%, respectively. In a lesion-based analysis, FSPG PET identified significantly more PDAC metastases, especially in the liver, than FDG PET (109 vs. 95; P = 0.0001, 95% CI 4.9-14.6). The tumour-to-background ratios for FSPG and FDG uptake on positive scans were similar (FSPG 4.2 ± 4.3, FDG 3.6 ± 3.0; P = 0.44, 95% CI -1.11 to 0.48), despite a lower tumour maximum standardized uptake value in FSPG-avid lesions (FSPG 4.2 + 2.3, FDG 7.7 + 5.7; P = 0.002, 95% CI 0.70-4.10). Because of the lower physiological activity of FSPG in the liver, FSPG PET images of the liver are more easy to interpret than FDG PET images, and therefore the use of FSPG improves the detection of liver metastasis. CONCLUSION FSPG PET is superior to FDG PET in detecting metastasized PDAC, especially in the liver.
Collapse
|
36
|
Choudhary G, Langen KJ, Galldiks N, McConathy J. Investigational PET tracers for high-grade gliomas. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF... 2018; 62:281-294. [PMID: 29869489 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.18.03105-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are the most common primary malignant tumors of the brain, with glioblastoma (GBM) constituting over 50% of all the gliomas in adults. The disease carries very high mortality, and even with optimal treatment, the median survival is 2-5 years for anaplastic tumors and 1-2 years for GBMs. Neuroimaging is critical to managing patients with HGG for diagnosis, treatment planning, response assessment, and detecting recurrent disease. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the cornerstone of imaging in neuro-oncology, but molecular imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) can overcome some of the inherent limitations of MRI. Additionally, PET has the potential to target metabolic and molecular alterations in HGGs relevant to prognosis and therapy that cannot be assessed with anatomic imaging. Many classes of PET tracers have been evaluated in HGG including agents that target cell membrane biosynthesis, protein synthesis, amino acid transport, DNA synthesis, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, hypoxic environments, cell surface receptors, blood flow, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), epidermal growth factor (EGFR), and the 18-kDa translocator protein (TSPO), among others. This chapter will provide an overview of PET tracers for HGG that have been evaluated in human subjects with a focus on tracers that are not yet in widespread use for neuro-oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gagandeep Choudhary
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Jülich Research Center, Jülich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Jülich Research Center, Jülich, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jonathan McConathy
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA -
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lantos J, Mittra ES, Levin CS, Iagaru A. Standard OSEM vs. regularized PET image reconstruction: qualitative and quantitative comparison using phantom data and various clinical radiopharmaceuticals. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING 2018; 8:110-118. [PMID: 29755844 PMCID: PMC5944826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2017] [Accepted: 02/13/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
We investigated the block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) algorithm. ACR phantom measurements with different count statistics and 60 PET/CT research scans from the GE Discovery 600 and 690 scanners were reconstructed using BSREM and the standard-of-care OSEM algorithm. Hot concentration recovery and cold contrast recovery were measured from the phantom data. Two experienced nuclear medicine physicians reviewed the clinical images blindly. Liver SNR liver and SUVmax of the smallest lesion detected in each patient were also measured. The relationship between the maximum and mean hot concentration recovery remained monotonic below 1.5 maximum concentration recovery. The mean cold contrast recovery remained stable even for decreasing statistics with a highest absolute difference of 4% in air and 2% in bone for each reconstruction method. The D600 images resulted in an average 30% higher SNR than the D690 data for BSREM; there was no difference in SNR results between the two scanners with OSEM. The small lesion SUVmax values on the BSREM images with β of 250, 350 and 450, respectively were on average 80%, 60% and 43% (D690) and 42%, 29%, and 21% (D600) higher than in the case of OSEM. In conclusion, BSREM can outperform OSEM in terms of contrast recovery and organ uniformity over a range of PET tracers, but a task dependent regularization strength parameter (beta) selection may be necessary. To avoid image noise and artifacts, our results suggest that using higher beta values (at least 350) may be appropriate, especially if the data has low count statistics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judit Lantos
- Department of Radiology, Stanford UniversityStanford 94305, CA, USA
| | - Erik S Mittra
- Department of Radiology, Stanford UniversityStanford 94305, CA, USA
| | - Craig S Levin
- Department of Radiology, Stanford UniversityStanford 94305, CA, USA
- Department of Physics, Stanford UniversityStanford 94305, CA, USA
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford UniversityStanford 94305, CA, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford UniversityStanford 94305, CA, USA
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- Department of Radiology, Stanford UniversityStanford 94305, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Cohen AS, Khalil FK, Welsh EA, Schabath MB, Enkemann SA, Davis A, Zhou JM, Boulware DC, Kim J, Haura EB, Morse DL. Cell-surface marker discovery for lung cancer. Oncotarget 2017; 8:113373-113402. [PMID: 29371917 PMCID: PMC5768334 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.23009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States. Novel lung cancer targeted therapeutic and molecular imaging agents are needed to improve outcomes and enable personalized care. Since these agents typically cannot cross the plasma membrane while carrying cytotoxic payload or imaging contrast, discovery of cell-surface targets is a necessary initial step. Herein, we report the discovery and characterization of lung cancer cell-surface markers for use in development of targeted agents. To identify putative cell-surface markers, existing microarray gene expression data from patient specimens were analyzed to select markers with differential expression in lung cancer compared to normal lung. Greater than 200 putative cell-surface markers were identified as being overexpressed in lung cancers. Ten cell-surface markers (CA9, CA12, CXorf61, DSG3, FAT2, GPR87, KISS1R, LYPD3, SLC7A11 and TMPRSS4) were selected based on differential mRNA expression in lung tumors vs. non-neoplastic lung samples and other normal tissues, and other considerations involving known biology and targeting moieties. Protein expression was confirmed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and scoring of patient tumor and normal tissue samples. As further validation, marker expression was determined in lung cancer cell lines using microarray data and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were performed for each of the markers using patient clinical data. High expression for six of the markers (CA9, CA12, CXorf61, GPR87, LYPD3, and SLC7A11) was significantly associated with worse survival. These markers should be useful for the development of novel targeted imaging probes or therapeutics for use in personalized care of lung cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison S Cohen
- Department of Cancer Imaging and Metabolism, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Farah K Khalil
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Eric A Welsh
- Biomedical Informatics Shared Resource, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Matthew B Schabath
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Steven A Enkemann
- Molecular Genomics Shared Resource, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Andrea Davis
- Department of Cancer Imaging and Metabolism, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jun-Min Zhou
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - David C Boulware
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jongphil Kim
- Department of Biostatistics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Eric B Haura
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - David L Morse
- Department of Cancer Imaging and Metabolism, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Physics, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Fluorine-18 labeled amino acids for tumor PET/CT imaging. Oncotarget 2017; 8:60581-60588. [PMID: 28947996 PMCID: PMC5601164 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumor glucose metabolism and amino acid metabolism are usually enhanced, 18F-FDG for tumor glucose metabolism PET imaging has been clinically well known, but tumor amino acid metabolism PET imaging is not clinically familiar. Radiolabeled amino acids (AAs) are an important class of PET/CT tracers that target the upregulated amino acid transporters to show elevated amino acid metabolism in tumor cells. Radiolabeled amino acids were observed to have high uptake in tumor cells but low in normal tissues and inflammatory tissues. The radionuclides used in labeling amino acids include 15O, 13N, 11C, 123I, 18F and 68Ga, among which the most commonly used is 18F [1]. Available data support the use of certain 18F-labeled AAs for PET/CT imaging of gliomas, neuroendocrine tumors, prostate cancer and breast cancer [2, 3]. With the progress of the method of 18F labeling AAs [4-6], 18F-labeled AAs are well established for tumor PET/CT imaging. This review focuses on the current status of key clinical applications of 18F-labeled AAs in tumor PET/CT imaging.
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Modern imaging techniques, particularly functional imaging techniques that interrogate some specific aspect of underlying tumor biology, have enormous potential in neuro-oncology for disease detection, grading, and tumor delineation to guide biopsy and resection; monitoring treatment response; and targeting radiotherapy. This brief review considers the role of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy, and positron emission tomography in these areas and discusses the factors that limit translation of new techniques to the clinic, in particular, the cost and difficulties associated with validation in multicenter clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin M Brindle
- Kevin M. Brindle, Richard J. Mair, and Alan J. Wright, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge; David Y. Lewis, Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom; José L. Izquierdo-García, Fundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Respiratorias, Madrid, Spain
| | - José L Izquierdo-García
- Kevin M. Brindle, Richard J. Mair, and Alan J. Wright, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge; David Y. Lewis, Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom; José L. Izquierdo-García, Fundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Respiratorias, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Y Lewis
- Kevin M. Brindle, Richard J. Mair, and Alan J. Wright, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge; David Y. Lewis, Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom; José L. Izquierdo-García, Fundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Respiratorias, Madrid, Spain
| | - Richard J Mair
- Kevin M. Brindle, Richard J. Mair, and Alan J. Wright, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge; David Y. Lewis, Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom; José L. Izquierdo-García, Fundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Respiratorias, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alan J Wright
- Kevin M. Brindle, Richard J. Mair, and Alan J. Wright, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge; David Y. Lewis, Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom; José L. Izquierdo-García, Fundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Respiratorias, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Giardino A, Gupta S, Olson E, Sepulveda K, Lenchik L, Ivanidze J, Rakow-Penner R, Patel MJ, Subramaniam RM, Ganeshan D. Role of Imaging in the Era of Precision Medicine. Acad Radiol 2017; 24:639-649. [PMID: 28131497 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2016] [Revised: 11/07/2016] [Accepted: 11/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Precision medicine is an emerging approach for treating medical disorders, which takes into account individual variability in genetic and environmental factors. Preventive or therapeutic interventions can then be directed to those who will benefit most from targeted interventions, thereby maximizing benefits and minimizing costs and complications. Precision medicine is gaining increasing recognition by clinicians, healthcare systems, pharmaceutical companies, patients, and the government. Imaging plays a critical role in precision medicine including screening, early diagnosis, guiding treatment, evaluating response to therapy, and assessing likelihood of disease recurrence. The Association of University Radiologists Radiology Research Alliance Precision Imaging Task Force convened to explore the current and future role of imaging in the era of precision medicine and summarized its finding in this article. We review the increasingly important role of imaging in various oncological and non-oncological disorders. We also highlight the challenges for radiology in the era of precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Giardino
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Supriya Gupta
- Department of Radiology and Imaging, Medical College of Georgia, 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA 30912.
| | - Emmi Olson
- Radiology Resident, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | | | - Leon Lenchik
- Department of Radiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Jana Ivanidze
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Rebecca Rakow-Penner
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Midhir J Patel
- Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Rathan M Subramaniam
- Cyclotron and Molecular Imaging Program, Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Zhu L, Ploessl K, Zhou R, Mankoff D, Kung HF. Metabolic Imaging of Glutamine in Cancer. J Nucl Med 2017; 58:533-537. [PMID: 28232608 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.182345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2017] [Accepted: 02/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Glucose and glutamine are the most abundant nutrients for producing energy and building blocks in normal and tumor cells. Increased glycolysis in tumors, the Warburg Effect, is the basis for 18F-FDG PET imaging. Cancer cells can also be genetically reprogrammed to use glutamine. 5-11C-(2S)-glutamine and 18F-(2S,4R)4-fluoroglutamine may be useful complementary tools to measure changes in tumor metabolism. In glioma patients, the tracer 18F-(2S,4R)4-fluoroglutamine showed tumor-to-background contrast different from that of 18F-FDG and differences in uptake in glioma patients with clinical progression of disease versus stable disease (tumor-to-brain ratio > 3.7 in clinically active glioma tumors, minimal or no specific uptake in clinically stable tumors). These preliminary results suggest that 18F-(2S,4R)4-fluoroglutamine PET may be a new tool for probing in vivo metabolism of glutamine in cancer patients and for guiding glutamine-targeted therapeutics. Further studies of uptake mechanism, and comparison of kinetics for 18F-(2S,4R)4-fluoroglutamine versus the 11C-labeled native glutamine, will be important and enlightening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Zhu
- College of Chemistry 82#, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Karl Ploessl
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Rong Zhou
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - David Mankoff
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Hank F Kung
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and .,Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Domercq M, Szczupak B, Gejo J, Gómez-Vallejo V, Padro D, Gona KB, Dollé F, Higuchi M, Matute C, Llop J, Martín A. PET Imaging with [(18)F]FSPG Evidences the Role of System xc(-) on Brain Inflammation Following Cerebral Ischemia in Rats. Am J Cancer Res 2016; 6:1753-67. [PMID: 27570548 PMCID: PMC4997234 DOI: 10.7150/thno.15616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2016] [Accepted: 05/18/2016] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
In vivo Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging of the cystine-glutamate antiporter (system xc-) activity with [18F]FSPG is meant to be an attractive tool for the diagnosis and therapy evaluation of brain diseases. However, the role of system xc- in cerebral ischemia and its involvement in inflammatory reaction has been scarcely explored. In this work, we report the longitudinal investigation of the neuroinflammatory process following transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) in rats using PET with [18F]FSPG and the translocator protein (TSPO) ligand [18F]DPA-714. In the ischemic territory, [18F]FSPG showed a progressive binding increase that peaked at days 3 to 7 and was followed by a progressive decrease from days 14 to 28 after reperfusion. In contrast, [18F]DPA-714 evidenced maximum binding uptake values over day 7 after reperfusion. Ex vivo immnunohistochemistry confirmed the up-regulation of system xc- in microglial cells and marginally in astrocytes. Inhibition of system xc- with sulfasalazine and S-4-CPG resulted in increased arginase (anti-inflammatory M2 marker) expression at day 7 after ischemia, together with a decrease in TSPO and microglial M1 proinflammatory markers (CCL2, TNF and iNOS) expression. Taken together, these results suggest that system xc- plays a key role in the inflammatory reaction underlying experimental stroke.
Collapse
|