1
|
Kaspary TE, Roma-Burgos N, Merotto A. Snorkeling Strategy: Tolerance to Flooding in Rice and Potential Application for Weed Management. Genes (Basel) 2020; 11:genes11090975. [PMID: 32842571 PMCID: PMC7564916 DOI: 10.3390/genes11090975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Revised: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Flooding is an important strategy for weed control in paddy rice fields. However, terrestrial weeds had evolved mechanisms of tolerance to flooding, resulting in new 'snorkeling' ecotypes. The aim of this review is to discuss the mechanisms of flooding tolerance in cultivated and weedy rice at different plant stages and the putative utility of this trait for weed management. Knowledge about flooding tolerance is derived primarily from crop models, mainly rice. The rice model informs us about the possible flooding tolerance mechanisms in weedy rice, Echinochloa species, and other weeds. During germination, the gene related to carbohydrate mobilization and energy intake (RAmy3D), and genes involved in metabolism maintenance under anoxia (ADH, PDC, and OsB12D1) are the most important for flooding tolerance. Flooding tolerance during emergence involved responses promoted by ethylene and induction of RAmy3D, ADH, PDC, and OsB12D1. Plant species tolerant to complete submersion also employ escape strategies or the ability to become quiescent during the submergence period. In weedy rice, the expression of PDC1, SUS3, and SUB1 genes is not directly related to flooding tolerance, contrary to what was learned in cultivated rice. Mitigation of flooding tolerance in weeds could be achieved with biotechnological approaches and genetic manipulation of flood tolerance genes through RNAi and transposons, providing a potential new tool for weed management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiago Edu Kaspary
- Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, INIA, La Estanzuela, Colonia 70006, Uruguay;
| | - Nilda Roma-Burgos
- Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA;
| | - Aldo Merotto
- Department of Crop Sciences, Agricultural School, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90040-060, Brazil
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dacosta-Aguayo R, Wylie G, DeLuca J, Genova H. Changes in plant function and root mycobiome caused by flood and drought in a riparian tree. Behav Neurol 2020; 40:886-903. [PMID: 32175581 PMCID: PMC7775148 DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpaa031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Revised: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Under increasingly harsh climatic conditions, conservation of threatened species requires integrative studies to understand stress tolerance. Riparian Ulmus minor Mill. populations have been massively reduced by Dutch Elm disease (DED). However, resistant genotypes were selected to restore lost populations. To understand the acclimation mechanisms to the succession of abiotic stresses, ramets of five DED-tolerant U. minor genotypes were subjected to flood and subsequently to drought. Physiological and biochemical responses were evaluated together with shifts in root-fungal assemblages. During both stresses, plants exhibited a decline in leaf net photosynthesis and an increase in percentage loss of stem hydraulic conductivity and in leaf and root proline content. Stomatal closure was produced by chemical signals during flood and hydraulic signals during drought. Despite broad similarities in plant response to both stresses, root-mycobiome shifts were markedly different. The five genotypes were similarly tolerant to moderate drought, however, flood tolerance varied between genotypes. In general, flood did not enhance drought susceptibility due to fast flood recovery, nevertheless, different responses to drought after flood were observed between genotypes. Associations were found between some fungal taxonomic groups and plant functional traits varying with flood and drought (e.g. proline, chlorophyll and starch content) indicating that the thriving of certain taxa depends on host responses to abiotic stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalia Dacosta-Aguayo
- Neuropsychology and Neuroscience, Kessler Foundation, 120 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 100, East Hanover, New Jersey 07936, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07101, USA
| | - Glenn Wylie
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07101, USA
- Rocco Ortenzio Neuroimaging Center, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, USA
| | - John DeLuca
- Neuropsychology and Neuroscience, Kessler Foundation, 120 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 100, East Hanover, New Jersey 07936, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07101, USA
- Rocco Ortenzio Neuroimaging Center, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, USA
| | - Helen Genova
- Neuropsychology and Neuroscience, Kessler Foundation, 120 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 100, East Hanover, New Jersey 07936, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07101, USA
| |
Collapse
|