A FRET-based biosensor for measuring Gα13 activation in single cells

Gα13 controls pharyngeal endoderm convergence by regulating E-cadherin expression and RhoA activation

Pharyngeal endoderm cells undergo convergence and extension (C&E), which is essential for endoderm pouch formation and craniofacial development. Our previous work implicates Gα13/RhoA-mediated signaling in regulating this process, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we have used endoderm-specific transgenic and Gα13 mutant zebrafish to demonstrate that Gα13 plays a crucial role in pharyngeal endoderm C&E by regulating RhoA activation and E-cadherin expression. We showed that during C&E, endodermal cells gradually establish stable cell-cell contacts, acquire apical-basal polarity and undergo actomyosin-driven apical constriction, which are processes that require Gα13. Additionally, we found that Gα13-deficient embryos exhibit reduced E-cadherin expression, partially contributing to endoderm C&E defects. Notably, interfering with RhoA function disrupts spatial actomyosin activation without affecting E-cadherin expression. Collectively, our findings identify crucial cellular processes for pharyngeal endoderm C&E and reveal that Gα13 controls this through two independent pathways - modulating RhoA activation and regulating E-cadherin expression - thus unveiling intricate mechanisms governing pharyngeal endoderm morphogenesis.

Get Ready to Sharpen Your Tools: A Short Guide to Heterotrimeric G Protein Activity Biosensors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest class of transmembrane receptors encoded in the human genome, and they initiate cellular responses triggered by a plethora of extracellular stimuli ranging from neurotransmitters and hormones to photons. Upon stimulation, GPCRs activate heterotrimeric G proteins (Gαβγ) in the cytoplasm, which then convey signals to their effectors to elicit cellular responses. Given the broad biological and biomedical relevance of GPCRs and G proteins in physiology and disease, there is great interest in developing and optimizing approaches to measure their signaling activity with high accuracy and across experimental systems pertinent to their functions in cellular communication. This review provides a historical perspective on approaches to measure GPCR-G protein signaling, from quantification of second messengers and other indirect readouts of activity to biosensors that directly detect the activity of G proteins. The latter is the focus of a more detailed overview of the evolution of design principles for various optical biosensors of G protein activity with different experimental capabilities. We will highlight advantages and limitations of biosensors that detect different G protein activation hallmarks, like dissociation of Gα and Gβγ or nucleotide exchange on Gα, as well as their suitability to detect signaling mediated by endogenous versus exogenous signaling components or in physiologically relevant systems like primary cells. Overall, this review intends to provide an assessment of the state-of-the-art for biosensors that directly measure G protein activity to allow readers to make informed decisions on the selection and implementation of currently available tools. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: G protein activity biosensors have become essential and widespread tools to assess GPCR signaling and pharmacology. Yet, investigators face the challenge of choosing from a growing list of G protein activity biosensors. This review provides an overview of the features and capabilities of different optical biosensor designs for the direct detection of G protein activity in cells, with the aim of facilitating the rational selection of systems that align with the specific scientific questions and needs of investigators.

Angiotensin receptors and α1B-adrenergic receptors regulate native IK(ACh) and phosphorylation-deficient GIRK4 (S418A) channels through different PKC isoforms

Signaling of G protein-activated inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK) channels is an important mechanism of the parasympathetic regulation of the heart rate and cardiac excitability. GIRK channels are inhibited during stimulation of Gq-coupled receptors (GqPCRs) by depletion of phosphatidyl-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) and/or channel phosphorylation by protein kinase C (PKC). The GqPCR-dependent modulation of GIRK currents in terms of specific PKC isoform activation was analyzed in voltage-clamp experiments in rat atrial myocytes and in CHO or HEK 293 cells. By using specific PKC inhibitors, we identified the receptor-activated PKC isoforms that contribute to phenylephrine- and angiotensin-induced GIRK channel inhibition. We demonstrate that the cPKC isoform PKCα significantly contributes to GIRK inhibition during stimulation of wildtype α1B-adrenergic receptors (α1B-ARs). Deletion of the α1B-AR serine residues S396 and S400 results in a preferential regulation of GIRK activity by PKCβ. As a novel finding, we report that the AT1-receptor-induced GIRK inhibition depends on the activation of the nPKC isoform PKCε whereas PKCα and PKCβ do not mainly participate in the angiotensin-mediated GIRK reduction. Expression of the dominant negative (DN) PKCε prolonged the onset of GIRK inhibition and significantly reduced AT1-R desensitization, indicating that PKCε regulates both GIRK channel activity and the strength of the receptor signal via a negative feedback mechanism. The serine residue S418 represents an important phosphorylation site for PKCε in the GIRK4 subunit. To analyze the functional impact of this PKC phosphorylation site for receptor-specific GIRK channel modulation, we monitored the activity of a phosphorylation-deficient (GIRK4 (S418A)) GIRK4 channel mutant during stimulation of α1B-ARs or AT1-receptors. Mutation of S418 did not impede α1B-AR-mediated GIRK inhibition, suggesting that S418 within the GIRK4 subunit is not subject to PKCα-induced phosphorylation. Furthermore, activation of angiotensin receptors induced pronounced GIRK4 (S418A) channel inhibition, excluding that this phosphorylation site contributes to the AT1-R-induced GIRK reduction. Instead, phosphorylation of S418 has a facilitative effect on GIRK activity that was abolished in the GIRK4 (S418A) mutant. To summarize, the present study shows that the receptor-dependent regulation of atrial GIRK channels is attributed to the GqPCR-specific activation of different PKC isoforms. Receptor-specific activated PKC isoforms target distinct phosphorylation sites within the GIRK4 subunit, resulting in differential regulation of GIRK channel activity with either facilitative or inhibitory effects on GIRK currents.

Gene targeting in adult organs using in vivo cleavable donor plasmids for CRISPR-Cas9 and CRISPR-Cas12a

The CRISPR-Cas system for in vivo genome editing is a powerful tool for gene therapy against several diseases. We have previously developed the pCriMGET_9-12a system, an in vivo cleavable donor plasmid for precise targeted knock-in of exogenous DNA by both Cas9 and Cas12a. Here, we show that the pCriMGET_9-12a system can be applied for in vivo in-frame knock-in of exogenous DNA in adult mouse liver by hydrodynamic delivery of the targeting plasmids. The in vivo cleavable pCriMGET_9-12a donor plasmids significantly increased the knock-in efficiency of both CRISPR-Cas9 and CRISPR-Cas12a in the adult mouse liver compared to uncleavable donor plasmids. This strategy also achieved in-frame reporter gene knock-in without indel mutations. Therefore, in vivo gene targeting using the pCriMGET_9-12a system may contribute to the establishment of safer, more precise, versatile and efficient gene therapy methods in adult organs.

Advancements in G protein-coupled receptor biosensors to study GPCR-G protein coupling

Enzymatic and cellular signalling biosensors are used to decipher the activities of complex biological systems. Biosensors for monitoring G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the most drugged class of proteins in the human body, are plentiful and vary in utility, form and function. Their applications have continually expanded our understanding of this important protein class. Here, we briefly summarize a subset of this field with accelerating importance: transducer biosensors measuring receptor-coupling and selectivity, with an emphasis on sensors measuring receptor association and activation of heterotrimeric signalling complexes.

Detecting and measuring of GPCR signaling - comparison of human induced pluripotent stem cells and immortal cell lines

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a large family of transmembrane proteins that play a major role in many physiological processes, and thus GPCR-targeted drug development has been widely promoted. Although research findings generated in immortal cell lines have contributed to the advancement of the GPCR field, the homogenous genetic backgrounds, and the overexpression of GPCRs in these cell lines make it difficult to correlate the results with clinical patients. Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have the potential to overcome these limitations, because they contain patient specific genetic information and can differentiate into numerous cell types. To detect GPCRs in hiPSCs, highly selective labeling and sensitive imaging techniques are required. This review summarizes existing resonance energy transfer and protein complementation assay technologies, as well as existing and new labeling methods. The difficulties of extending existing detection methods to hiPSCs are discussed, as well as the potential of hiPSCs to expand GPCR research towards personalized medicine.

Genetically encoded tools for in vivo G-protein-coupled receptor agonist detection at cellular resolution

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the most abundant receptor type in the human body and are responsible for regulating many physiological processes, such as sensation, cognition, muscle contraction and metabolism. Further, GPCRs are widely expressed in the brain where their agonists make up a large number of neurotransmitters and neuromodulators. Due to the importance of GPCRs in human physiology, genetically encoded sensors have been engineered to detect GPCR agonists at cellular resolution in vivo. These sensors can be placed into two main categories: those that offer real-time information on the signalling dynamics of GPCR agonists and those that integrate the GPCR agonist signal into a permanent, quantifiable mark that can be used to detect GPCR agonist localisation in a large brain area. In this review, we discuss the various designs of real-time and integration sensors, their advantages and limitations, and some in vivo applications. We also discuss the potential of using real-time and integrator sensors together to identify neuronal circuits affected by endogenous GPCR agonists and perform detailed characterisations of the spatiotemporal dynamics of GPCR agonist release in those circuits. By using these sensors together, the overall knowledge of GPCR-mediated signalling can be expanded.

Finding the Perfect Fit: Conformational Biosensors to Determine the Efficacy of GPCR Ligands

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are highly druggable targets that adopt numerous conformations. A ligand's ability to stabilize specific conformation(s) of its cognate receptor determines its efficacy or ability to produce a biological response. Identifying ligands that produce different receptor conformations and potentially discrete pharmacological effects (e.g., biased agonists, partial agonists, antagonists, allosteric modulators) is a major goal in drug discovery and necessary to develop drugs with better effectiveness and fewer side effects. Fortunately, direct measurements of ligand efficacy, via receptor conformational changes are possible with the recent development of conformational biosensors. In this review, we discuss classical efficacy models, including the two-state model, the ternary-complex model, and multistate models. We describe how nanobody-, transducer-, and receptor-based conformational biosensors detect and/or stabilize specific GPCR conformations to identify ligands with different levels of efficacy. In particular, conformational biosensors provide the potential to identify and/or characterize therapeutically desirable but often difficult to measure conformations of receptors faster and better than current methods. For drug discovery/development, several recent proof-of-principle studies have optimized conformational biosensors for high-throughput screening (HTS) platforms. However, their widespread use is limited by the fact that few sensors are reliably capable of detecting low-frequency conformations and technically demanding assay conditions. Nonetheless, conformational biosensors do help identify desirable ligands such as allosteric modulators, biased ligands, or partial agonists in a single assay, representing a distinct advantage over classical methods.

Recent Progress in Assays for GPCR Drug Discovery

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), also known as 7 transmembrane receptors, are the largest family of cell surface receptors in eukaryotes. There are ~800 GPCRs in human, regulating diverse physiological processes. GPCRs are the most intensively studied drug targets. Drugs that target GPCRs account for about a quarter of the global market share of therapeutic drugs. Therefore, to develop physiologically relevant and robust assays to search new GPCR ligands or modulators remain the major focus of drug discovery research worldwide. Early functional GPCR assays are mainly depend on the measurement of G protein-mediated second messenger generation. Recent development in GPCR biology indicate the signaling of these receptors is much more complex than the oversimplified classical view. GPCRs have been found to activate multiple G proteins simultaneously and induce b-arrestin-mediated signaling. GPCRs have also been found to interacte with other cytosolic scaffolding proteins and form dimer or heteromer with GPCRs or other transmembrane proteins. Here we mainly discuss technologies focused on detecting protein-protein interactions, such as FRET/BRET, NanoBiT, Tango, etc, and their applications in measuring GPCRs interacting with various signaling partners. In the final part, we also discuss the species differences in GPCRs when using animal models to study the in vivofunctions of GPCR ligands, and possible ways to solve this problem with modern genetic tools.

A Bright Monomeric Near-Infrared Fluorescent Protein with an Excitation Peak at 633 nm for Labeling Cellular Protein and Reporting Protein-Protein Interaction

Bright monomeric near-infrared fluorescent proteins (NIR-FPs) are useful as markers for labeling proteins and cells and as sensors for reporting molecular activities in living cells and organisms. However, current monomeric NIR-FPs are dim under excitation with common 633/635/640 nm lasers, limiting their broad use in cellular/subcellular level imaging. Here, we report a bright monomeric NIR-FP with maximum excitation at 633 nm, named mIFP663, engineered from Xanthomonas campestris pv Campestris phytochrome (XccBphP). mIFP663 has high molecular brightness with a large extinction coefficient (86,600 M^-1 cm^-1) and a decent quantum yield (19.4%), and high cellular brightness that is 3-6 times greater than those of spectrally similar NIR-FPs in HEK293T cells in the presence of exogenous BV. Moreover, we demonstrate that mIFP663 is able to label critical cellular and viral proteins without perturbing subcellular localization and virus replication, respectively. Finally, with mIFP663, we engineer improved bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) and new bioluminescent resonance energy transfer (BRET) systems to detect protein-protein interactions in living cells.

Visualizing and Quantifying Data from Time-Lapse Imaging Experiments

One obvious feature of life is that it is highly dynamic. The dynamics can be captured by movies that are made by acquiring images at regular time intervals, a method that is also known as time-lapse imaging. Looking at movies is a great way to learn more about the dynamics in cells, tissue, and organisms. However, science is different from Netflix, in that it aims for a quantitative understanding of the dynamics. The quantification is important for the comparison of dynamics and to study effects of perturbations. Here, we provide detailed processing and analysis methods that we commonly use to analyze and visualize our time-lapse imaging data. All methods use freely available open-source software and use example data that is available from an online data repository. The step-by-step guides together with example data allow for fully reproducible workflows that can be modified and adjusted to visualize and quantify other data from time-lapse imaging experiments.

Quantitative assessment of constitutive G protein-coupled receptor activity with BRET-based G protein biosensors

[Figure: see text].

Multiple GPCR Functional Assays Based on Resonance Energy Transfer Sensors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent one of the largest membrane protein families that participate in various physiological and pathological activities. Accumulating structural evidences have revealed how GPCR activation induces conformational changes to accommodate the downstream G protein or β-arrestin. Multiple GPCR functional assays have been developed based on Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) sensors to monitor the conformational changes in GPCRs, GPCR/G proteins, or GPCR/β-arrestin, especially over the past two decades. Here, we will summarize how these sensors have been optimized to increase the sensitivity and compatibility for application in different GPCR classes using various labeling strategies, meanwhile provide multiple solutions in functional assays for high-throughput drug screening.

TRUPATH, an open-source biosensor platform for interrogating the GPCR transducerome

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) remain major drug targets, despite our incomplete understanding of how they signal through 16 non-visual G-protein signal transducers (collectively named the transducerome) to exert their actions. To address this gap, we have developed an open-source suite of 14 optimized bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) Gαβγ biosensors (named TRUPATH) to interrogate the transducerome with single pathway resolution in cells. Generated through exhaustive protein engineering and empirical testing, the TRUPATH suite of Gαβγ biosensors includes the first Gα15 and GαGustducin probes. In head-to-head studies, TRUPATH biosensors outperformed first-generation sensors at multiple GPCRs and in different cell lines. Benchmarking studies with TRUPATH biosensors recapitulated previously documented signaling bias and revealed new coupling preferences for prototypic and understudied GPCRs with potential in vivo relevance. To enable a greater understanding of GPCR molecular pharmacology by the scientific community, we have made TRUPATH biosensors easily accessible as a kit through Addgene.

Not So Dry After All: DRY Mutants of the AT1A Receptor and H1 Receptor Can Induce G-Protein-Dependent Signaling

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are seven transmembrane spanning receptors that regulate a wide array of intracellular signaling cascades in response to various stimuli. To do so, they couple to different heterotrimeric G proteins and adaptor proteins, including arrestins. Importantly, arrestins were shown to regulate GPCR signaling through G proteins, as well as promote G protein-independent signaling events. Several research groups have reported successful isolation of exclusively G protein-dependent and arrestin-dependent signaling downstream of GPCR activation using biased agonists or receptor mutants incapable of coupling to either arrestins or G proteins. In the latter category, the DRY mutant of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor was extensively used to characterize the functional selectivity downstream of AT1_AR. In an attempt to understand histamine 1 receptor signaling, we characterized the signaling capacity of the H1R DRY mutant in a panel of dynamic, live cell biosensor assays, including arrestin recruitment, heterotrimeric G protein activation, Ca²⁺ signaling, protein kinase C activity, GTP binding of RhoA, and activation of ERK1/2. Here, we show that both H1R DRY mutant and the AT1_AR DRY mutant are capable of efficient activation of G protein-mediated signaling. Therefore, contrary to the common belief, they do not constitute suitable tools for the dissection of the arrestin-mediated, G protein-independent signaling downstream of these receptors.

Rapid flow-induced activation of Gαq/11 is independent of Piezo1 activation

Endothelial cell (EC) mechanochemical transduction is the process by which mechanical stimuli are sensed by ECs and transduced into biochemical signals and ultimately into physiological responses. Identifying the mechanosensor/mechanochemical transducer(s) and describing the mechanism(s) by which they receive and transmit the signals has remained a central focus within the field. The heterotrimeric G protein, Gαq/11, is proposed to be part of a macromolecular complex together with PECAM-1 at EC junctions and may constitute the mechanochemical transducer as it is rapidly activated within seconds of flow onset. The mechanically activated cation channel Piezo1 has recently been implicated due to its involvement in mediating early responses, such as calcium and ATP release. Here, we investigate the role of Piezo1 in rapid shear stress-induced Gαq/11 activation. We show that flow-induced dissociation of Gαq/11 from PECAM-1 in ECs at 15 s is abrogated by BIM-46187, a selective inhibitor of Gαq/11 activation, suggesting that Gαq/11 activation is required for PECAM-1/Gαq/11 dissociation. Although siRNA knockdown of Piezo1 caused a dramatic decrease in PECAM-1/Gαq/11 association in the basal condition, it had no effect on flow-induced dissociation. Interestingly, siRNA knockdown of Piezo1 caused a marked decrease in PECAM-1 expression. Additionally, selective blockade of Piezo1 with ion channel inhibitors had no effect on flow-induced PECAM-1/Gαq/11 dissociations. Lastly, flow onset caused increased association of Gβ1 with Piezo1 as well as with the p101 subunit of phosphoinositide 3-kinase, which were both blocked by the Gβγ inhibitor gallein. Together, our results indicate that flow-induced activation of Piezo1 is not upstream of G protein activation.

Optical approaches for single-cell and subcellular analysis of GPCR-G protein signaling

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), G proteins, and their signaling associates are major signal transducers that control the majority of cellular signaling and regulate key biological functions including immune, neurological, cardiovascular, and metabolic processes. These pathways are targeted by over one-third of drugs on the market; however, the current understanding of their function is limited and primarily derived from cell-destructive approaches providing an ensemble of static, multi-cell information about the status and composition of molecules. Spatiotemporal behavior of molecules involved is crucial to understanding in vivo cell behaviors both in health and disease, and the advent of genetically encoded fluorescence proteins and small fluorophore-based biosensors has facilitated the mapping of dynamic signaling in cells with subcellular acuity. Since we and others have developed optogenetic methods to regulate GPCR-G protein signaling in single cells and subcellular regions using dedicated wavelengths, the desire to develop and adopt optogenetically amenable assays to measure signaling has motivated us to take a broader look at the available optical tools and approaches compatible with measuring single-cell and subcellular GPCR-G protein signaling. Here we review such key optical approaches enabling the examination of GPCR, G protein, secondary messenger, and downstream molecules such as kinase and lipid signaling in living cells. The methods reviewed employ both fluorescence and bioluminescence detection. We not only further elaborate the underlying principles of these sensors but also discuss the experimental criteria and limitations to be considered during their use in single-cell and subcellular signal mapping.

Receptor selectivity between the G proteins Gα12 and Gα13 is defined by a single leucine-to-isoleucine variation

Despite recent advances in structural definition of GPCR-G protein complexes, the basis of receptor selectivity between G proteins remains unclear. The Gα₁₂ and Gα₁₃ subtypes together form the least studied group of heterotrimeric G proteins. G protein-coupled receptor 35 (GPR35) has been suggested to couple efficiently to Gα₁₃ but weakly to Gα₁₂. Using combinations of cells genome-edited to not express G proteins and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based sensors, we confirmed marked selectivity of GPR35 for Gα₁₃. Incorporating Gα₁₂/Gα₁₃ chimeras and individual residue swap mutations into these sensors defined that selectivity between Gα₁₃ and Gα₁₂ was imbued largely by a single leucine-to-isoleucine variation at position G.H5.23. Indeed, leucine could not be substituted by other amino acids in Gα₁₃ without almost complete loss of GPR35 coupling. The critical importance of leucine at G.H5.23 for GPR35-G protein interaction was further demonstrated by introduction of this leucine into Gα_q, resulting in the gain of coupling to GPR35. These studies demonstrate that Gα₁₃ is markedly the most effective G protein for interaction with GPR35 and that selection between Gα₁₃ and Gα₁₂ is dictated largely by a single conservative amino acid variation.-Mackenzie, A. E., Quon, T., Lin, L.-C., Hauser, A. S., Jenkins, L., Inoue, A., Tobin, A. B., Gloriam, D. E., Hudson, B. D., Milligan, G. Receptor selectivity between the G proteins Gα₁₂ and Gα₁₃ is defined by a single leucine-to-isoleucine variation.