1
|
Vardavas C, Nikitara K, Aslanoglou K, Lagou I, Marou V, Phalkey R, Leonardi-Bee J, Fernandez E, Vivilaki V, Kamekis A, Symvoulakis E, Noori T, Wuerz A, Suk JE, Deogan C. Social determinants of health and vaccine uptake during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Prev Med Rep 2023; 35:102319. [PMID: 37564118 PMCID: PMC10410576 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Social determinants of health significantly impact population health status. The aim of this systematic review was to examine which social vulnerability factors or determinants of health at the individual or county level affected vaccine uptake within the first phase of the vaccination program. We performed a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature published from January 2020 until September 2021 in Medline and Embase (Bagaria et al., 2022) and complemented the review with an assessment of pre-print literature within the same period. We restricted our criteria to studies performed in the EU/UK/EEA/US that report vaccine uptake in the general population as the primary outcome and included various social determinants of health as explanatory variables. This review provides evidence of significant associations between the early phases of vaccination uptake for SARS-CoV-2 and multiple socioeconomic factors including income, poverty, deprivation, race/ethnicity, education and health insurance. The identified associations should be taken into account to increase vaccine uptake in socially vulnerable groups, and to reduce disparities in uptake, in particular within the context of public health preparedness for future pandemics. While further corroboration is needed to explore the generalizability of these findings across the European setting, these results confirm the need to consider vulnerable groups and social determinants of health in the planning and roll-out of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination programs and within the context of future respiratory pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantine Vardavas
- School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
- Department of Oral Health Policy and Epidemiology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Ioanna Lagou
- School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Valia Marou
- School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Revati Phalkey
- Health Centre for Evidence Based Healthcare, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jo Leonardi-Bee
- Health Centre for Evidence Based Healthcare, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Esteve Fernandez
- Tobacco Control Unit, WHO Collaborating Centre for Tobacco Control, Institut Català d'Oncologia-ICO, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat (Barcelona), Spain
- Tobacco Control Research Group, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de. Ellvitge-IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat (Barcelona), Spain
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Campus of Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
- Centre of Biomedical Research Network on Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES de Enfermedaes Respiratorias), Insituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Teymur Noori
- Emergency Preparedness and Response Support, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden
| | - Andrea Wuerz
- Emergency Preparedness and Response Support, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden
| | - Jonathan E. Suk
- Emergency Preparedness and Response Support, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden
| | - Charlotte Deogan
- Emergency Preparedness and Response Support, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lench A, Perry M, Johnson RD, Fry R, Richardson G, Lyons RA, Akbari A, Edwards A, Collins B, Joseph-Williams N, Cooper A, Cottrell S. Household Composition and Inequalities in COVID-19 Vaccination in Wales, UK. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:604. [PMID: 36992188 PMCID: PMC10055803 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11030604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The uptake of COVID-19 vaccination in Wales is high at a population level but many inequalities exist. Household composition may be an important factor in COVID-19 vaccination uptake due to the practical, social, and psychological implications associated with different living arrangements. In this study, the role of household composition in the uptake of COVID-19 vaccination in Wales was examined with the aim of identifying areas for intervention to address inequalities. Records within the Wales Immunisation System (WIS) COVID-19 vaccination register were linked to the Welsh Demographic Service Dataset (WDSD; a population register for Wales) held within the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) databank. Eight household types were defined based on household size, the presence or absence of children, and the presence of single or multiple generations. Uptake of the second dose of any COVID-19 vaccine was analysed using logistic regression. Gender, age group, health board, rural/urban residential classification, ethnic group, and deprivation quintile were included as covariates for multivariable regression. Compared to two-adult households, all other household types were associated with lower uptake. The most significantly reduced uptake was observed for large, multigenerational, adult group households (aOR 0.45, 95%CI 0.43-0.46). Comparing multivariable regression with and without incorporation of household composition as a variable produced significant differences in odds of vaccination for health board, age group, and ethnic group categories. These results indicate that household composition is an important factor for the uptake of COVID-19 vaccination and consideration of differences in household composition is necessary to mitigate vaccination inequalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Lench
- Vaccine Preventable Disease Programme and Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, Public Health Wales, 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff CF10 4BZ, UK
- Population Data Science, Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
| | - Malorie Perry
- Vaccine Preventable Disease Programme and Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, Public Health Wales, 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff CF10 4BZ, UK
- Population Data Science, Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
| | - Rhodri D. Johnson
- Population Data Science, Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
| | - Richard Fry
- Population Data Science, Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
| | - Gill Richardson
- Policy, Research and International Development, Public Health Wales, 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff CF10 4BZ, UK
| | - Ronan A. Lyons
- Population Data Science, Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
| | - Ashley Akbari
- Population Data Science, Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre, PRIME Centre Wales, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, 8th floor, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Brendan Collins
- Health and Social Services Group, Finance Directorate, Welsh Government, Cardiff CF10 3NQ, UK
| | - Natalie Joseph-Williams
- Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre, PRIME Centre Wales, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, 8th floor, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Alison Cooper
- Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre, PRIME Centre Wales, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, 8th floor, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Simon Cottrell
- Vaccine Preventable Disease Programme and Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, Public Health Wales, 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff CF10 4BZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Curtis HJ, Inglesby P, MacKenna B, Croker R, Hulme WJ, Rentsch CT, Bhaskaran K, Mathur R, Morton CE, Bacon SC, Smith RM, Evans D, Mehrkar A, Tomlinson L, Walker AJ, Bates C, Hickman G, Ward T, Morley J, Cockburn J, Davy S, Williamson EJ, Eggo RM, Parry J, Hester F, Harper S, O'Hanlon S, Eavis A, Jarvis R, Avramov D, Griffiths P, Fowles A, Parkes N, Evans SJ, Douglas IJ, Smeeth L, Goldacre B. Recording of 'COVID-19 vaccine declined': a cohort study on 57.9 million National Health Service patients' records in situ using OpenSAFELY, England, 8 December 2020 to 25 May 2021. Euro Surveill 2022; 27:2100885. [PMID: 35983770 PMCID: PMC9389857 DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2022.27.33.2100885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundPriority patients in England were offered COVID-19 vaccination by mid-April 2021. Codes in clinical record systems can denote the vaccine being declined.AimWe describe records of COVID-19 vaccines being declined, according to clinical and demographic factors.MethodsWith the approval of NHS England, we conducted a retrospective cohort study between 8 December 2020 and 25 May 2021 with primary care records for 57.9 million patients using OpenSAFELY, a secure health analytics platform. COVID-19 vaccination priority patients were those aged ≥ 50 years or ≥ 16 years clinically extremely vulnerable (CEV) or 'at risk'. We describe the proportion recorded as declining vaccination for each group and stratified by clinical and demographic subgroups, subsequent vaccination and distribution of clinical code usage across general practices.ResultsOf 24.5 million priority patients, 663,033 (2.7%) had a decline recorded, while 2,155,076 (8.8%) had neither a vaccine nor decline recorded. Those recorded as declining, who were subsequently vaccinated (n = 125,587; 18.9%) were overrepresented in the South Asian population (32.3% vs 22.8% for other ethnicities aged ≥ 65 years). The proportion of declining unvaccinated patients was highest in CEV (3.3%), varied strongly with ethnicity (black 15.3%, South Asian 5.6%, white 1.5% for ≥ 80 years) and correlated positively with increasing deprivation.ConclusionsClinical codes indicative of COVID-19 vaccinations being declined are commonly used in England, but substantially more common among black and South Asian people, and in more deprived areas. Qualitative research is needed to determine typical reasons for recorded declines, including to what extent they reflect patients actively declining.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen J Curtis
- The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Inglesby
- The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Brian MacKenna
- The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Croker
- The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - William J Hulme
- The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Rohini Mathur
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline E Morton
- The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sebastian Cj Bacon
- The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca M Smith
- The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David Evans
- The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Amir Mehrkar
- The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Laurie Tomlinson
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alex J Walker
- The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - George Hickman
- The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Ward
- The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jessica Morley
- The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Simon Davy
- The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Rosalind M Eggo
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Stephen Jw Evans
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ian J Douglas
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Liam Smeeth
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ben Goldacre
- The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dolby T, Finning K, Baker A, Fowler-Dowd L, Khunti K, Razieh C, Yates T, Nafilyan V. Monitoring sociodemographic inequality in COVID-19 vaccination uptake in England: a national linked data study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2022; 76:646-652. [PMID: 35470259 DOI: 10.1136/jech-2021-218415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The UK began an ambitious COVID-19 vaccination programme on 8 December 2020. This study describes variation in vaccination uptake by sociodemographic characteristics between December 2020 and August 2021. METHODS Using population-level administrative records linked to the 2011 Census, we estimated monthly first dose vaccination rates by age group and sociodemographic characteristics among adults aged 18 years or over in England. We also present a tool to display the results interactively. RESULTS Our sample included 35 223 466 adults. A lower percentage of males than females were vaccinated in the young and middle age groups (18-59 years) but not in the older age groups. Vaccination rates were highest among individuals of White British and Indian ethnic backgrounds and lowest among Black Africans (aged ≥80 years) and Black Caribbeans (18-79 years). Differences by ethnic group emerged as soon as vaccination roll-out commenced and widened over time. Vaccination rates were also lower among individuals who identified as Muslim, lived in more deprived areas, reported having a disability, did not speak English as their main language, lived in rented housing, belonged to a lower socioeconomic group, and had fewer qualifications. CONCLUSION We found inequalities in COVID-19 vaccination uptake rates by sex, ethnicity, religion, area deprivation, disability status, English language proficiency, socioeconomic position and educational attainment, but some of these differences varied by age group. Research is urgently needed to understand why these inequalities exist and how they can be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ted Dolby
- Health Analysis and Life Events division, Office for National Statistics, Newport, UK
| | - Katie Finning
- Health Analysis and Life Events division, Office for National Statistics, Newport, UK
| | - Allan Baker
- Population Health Analysis Team, Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care, London, UK
| | - Leigh Fowler-Dowd
- Population Health Analysis Team, Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care, London, UK
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Cameron Razieh
- Health Analysis and Life Events division, Office for National Statistics, Newport, UK
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Thomas Yates
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Vahe Nafilyan
- Health Analysis and Life Events division, Office for National Statistics, Newport, UK
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Trends and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 vaccine recipients: a federated analysis of 57.9 million patients’ primary care records in situ using OpenSAFELY. Br J Gen Pract 2022; 72:e51-e62. [PMID: 34750106 PMCID: PMC8589463 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND On 8 December 2020 NHS England administered the first COVID-19 vaccination. AIM To describe trends and variation in vaccine coverage in different clinical and demographic groups in the first 100 days of the vaccine rollout. DESIGN AND SETTING With the approval of NHS England, a cohort study was conducted of 57.9 million patient records in general practice in England, in situ and within the infrastructure of the electronic health record software vendors EMIS and TPP using OpenSAFELY. METHOD Vaccine coverage across various subgroups of Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) priority cohorts is described. RESULTS A total of 20 852 692 patients (36.0%) received a vaccine between 8 December 2020 and 17 March 2021. Of patients aged ≥80 years not in a care home (JCVI group 2) 94.7% received a vaccine, but with substantial variation by ethnicity (White 96.2%, Black 68.3%) and deprivation (least deprived 96.6%, most deprived 90.7%). Patients with pre-existing medical conditions were more likely to be vaccinated with two exceptions: severe mental illness (89.5%) and learning disability (91.4%). There were 275 205 vaccine recipients who were identified as care home residents (JCVI group 1; 91.2% coverage). By 17 March, 1 257 914 (6.0%) recipients had a second dose. CONCLUSION The NHS rapidly delivered mass vaccination. In this study a data-monitoring framework was deployed using publicly auditable methods and a secure in situ processing model, using linked but pseudonymised patient-level NHS data for 57.9 million patients. Targeted activity may be needed to address lower vaccination coverage observed among certain key groups.
Collapse
|
6
|
Pathak N, Zhang CX, Boukari Y, Burns R, Mathur R, Gonzalez-Izquierdo A, Denaxas S, Sonnenberg P, Hayward A, Aldridge RW. Development and Validation of a Primary Care Electronic Health Record Phenotype to Study Migration and Health in the UK. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:13304. [PMID: 34948912 PMCID: PMC8707886 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182413304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
International migrants comprised 14% of the UK's population in 2020; however, their health is rarely studied at a population level using primary care electronic health records due to difficulties in their identification. We developed a migration phenotype using country of birth, visa status, non-English main/first language and non-UK-origin codes and applied it to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD database of 16,071,111 primary care patients between 1997 and 2018. We compared the completeness and representativeness of the identified migrant population to Office for National Statistics (ONS) country-of-birth and 2011 census data by year, age, sex, geographic region of birth and ethnicity. Between 1997 to 2018, 403,768 migrants (2.51% of the CPRD GOLD population) were identified: 178,749 (1.11%) had foreign-country-of-birth or visa -status codes, 216,731 (1.35%) non-English-main/first-language codes, and 8288 (0.05%) non-UK-origin codes. The cohort was similarly distributed versus ONS data by sex and region of birth. Migration recording improved over time and younger migrants were better represented than those aged ≥50. The validated phenotype identified a large migrant cohort for use in migration health research in CPRD GOLD to inform healthcare policy and practice. The under-recording of migration status in earlier years and older ages necessitates cautious interpretation of future studies in these groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neha Pathak
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Rd., London NW1 2DA, UK; (N.P.); (C.X.Z.); (Y.B.); (R.B.); (A.G.-I.); (S.D.)
- Guy’s & St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Claire X. Zhang
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Rd., London NW1 2DA, UK; (N.P.); (C.X.Z.); (Y.B.); (R.B.); (A.G.-I.); (S.D.)
- Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care, 39 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0EU, UK
| | - Yamina Boukari
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Rd., London NW1 2DA, UK; (N.P.); (C.X.Z.); (Y.B.); (R.B.); (A.G.-I.); (S.D.)
- Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care, 39 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0EU, UK
| | - Rachel Burns
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Rd., London NW1 2DA, UK; (N.P.); (C.X.Z.); (Y.B.); (R.B.); (A.G.-I.); (S.D.)
| | - Rohini Mathur
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK;
| | - Arturo Gonzalez-Izquierdo
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Rd., London NW1 2DA, UK; (N.P.); (C.X.Z.); (Y.B.); (R.B.); (A.G.-I.); (S.D.)
- Health Data Research UK, London NW1 2BF, UK
| | - Spiros Denaxas
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Rd., London NW1 2DA, UK; (N.P.); (C.X.Z.); (Y.B.); (R.B.); (A.G.-I.); (S.D.)
- Health Data Research UK, London NW1 2BF, UK
| | - Pam Sonnenberg
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK;
| | - Andrew Hayward
- Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, UK;
| | - Robert W. Aldridge
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Rd., London NW1 2DA, UK; (N.P.); (C.X.Z.); (Y.B.); (R.B.); (A.G.-I.); (S.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Walker JL, Rentsch CT, McDonald HI, Bak J, Minassian C, Amirthalingam G, Edelstein M, Thomas S. Social determinants of pertussis and influenza vaccine uptake in pregnancy: a national cohort study in England using electronic health records. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e046545. [PMID: 34155074 PMCID: PMC8217954 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the social determinants of influenza and pertussis vaccine uptake among pregnant women in England. DESIGN Nationwide population-based cohort study. SETTING The study used anonymised primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and linked Hospital Episode Statistics secondary care data. PARTICIPANTS Pregnant women eligible for pertussis (2012-2015, n=68 090) or influenza (2010/2011-2015/2016, n=152 132) vaccination in England. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Influenza and pertussis vaccine uptake. RESULTS Vaccine uptake was 67.3% for pertussis and 39.1% for influenza. Uptake of both vaccines varied by region, with the lowest uptakes in London and the North East. Lower vaccine uptake was associated with greater deprivation: almost 10% lower in the most deprived quintiles compared with the least deprived for influenza (34.5% vs 44.0%), and almost 20% lower for pertussis (57.7% vs 76.0%). Lower uptake for both vaccines was also associated with non-white ethnicity (lowest among women of black ethnicity), maternal age under 20 years and a greater number of children in the household. The associations between all social factors and vaccine uptake were broadly unchanged in fully adjusted models, suggesting the social determinants of uptake were largely independent of one another. Among 3111 women vaccinated against pertussis in their first eligible pregnancy and pregnant again, 1234 (40%) were not vaccinated in their second eligible pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS Targeting promotional campaigns to pregnant women who are younger, of non-white ethnicity, with more children, living in areas of greater deprivation or the London or North East regions, has potential to reduce vaccine-preventable disease among infants and pregnant women, and to reduce health inequalities. Vaccination promotion needs to be sustained across successive pregnancies. Further research is needed into whether the effectiveness of vaccine promotion strategies may vary according to social factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jemma L Walker
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Statistics, Modelling and Economics Department, Public Health England, London, UK
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Vaccines and Immunisation, London, UK
| | - Christopher T Rentsch
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Vaccines and Immunisation, London, UK
| | - Helen I McDonald
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Vaccines and Immunisation, London, UK
| | - JeongEun Bak
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Vaccines and Immunisation, London, UK
| | - Caroline Minassian
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Gayatri Amirthalingam
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Vaccines and Immunisation, London, UK
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Michael Edelstein
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Vaccines and Immunisation, London, UK
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Sara Thomas
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Vaccines and Immunisation, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Persson MSM, Harman KE, Thomas KS, Chalmers JR, Vinogradova Y, Langan SM, Hippisley-Cox J, Gran S. Using electronic health records to inform trial feasibility in a rare autoimmune blistering skin disease in England. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021; 21:22. [PMID: 33541270 PMCID: PMC7863423 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01212-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Trials of novel agents are required to improve the care of patients with rare diseases, but trial feasibility may be uncertain due to concerns over insufficient patient numbers. We aimed to determine the size of the pool of potential participants in England 2015–2017 for trials in the autoimmune blistering skin disease bullous pemphigoid. Methods The size of the pool of potential participants was estimated using routinely collected healthcare data from linked primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink; CPRD) and secondary care (Hospital Episode Statistics; HES) databases. Thirteen consultant dermatologists were surveyed to determine the likelihood that a patient would be eligible for a trial based on the presence of cautions or contra-indications to prednisolone use. These criteria were applied to determine how they influenced the potential pool of participants. Results Extrapolated to the population of England, we would expect approximately 10,800 (point estimate 10,747; 95% CI 7191 to 17,239) new cases of bullous pemphigoid to be identified in a three-year period. For a future trial involving oral prednisolone (standard care), the application of cautions to its use as exclusion criteria would result in approximately 365 potential participants unlikely to be recruited, a further 5332 could be recruited with caution, and 5104 in whom recruitment is still possible. 11–17% of potential participants may have pre-existing dementia and require an alternative consent process. Conclusions Routinely collected electronic health records can be used to inform the feasibility of clinical trials in rare diseases, such as whether recruitment is feasible nationally and how long recruitment might take to meet recruitment targets. Future trials of bullous pemphigoid in England may use the data presented to inform trial design, including eligibility criteria and consent processes for enrolling people with dementia. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-021-01212-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S M Persson
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - K E Harman
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - K S Thomas
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - J R Chalmers
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Y Vinogradova
- Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - S M Langan
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - J Hippisley-Cox
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S Gran
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|