1
|
Albarracin Duarte JA, Chaparro Hernández J, Rojas Aceros JA, Valoyes Gélvez JE, Ascuntar J, Jaimes F. Association between early manifestations of infection or sepsis and prognosis in a high complexity hospital in the city of Medellín. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION 2024; 71:394-402. [PMID: 38588770 DOI: 10.1016/j.redare.2024.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify the first symptoms and signs of patients with suspected infection or sepsis and their association with the composite outcome of admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or mortality. DESIGN Prospective cohort study between June 2019 and March 2020. SETTING Hospital Universitario San Vicente Fundación, Colombia. PATIENTS Over 18 years of age with suspicion or confirmation of sepsis, which required hospitalization. INTERVENTIONS None. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST Symptoms and signs associated with infection, with their time of evolution, specified in the study. RESULTS From 1005 eligible patients, 261 were included. After multivariable adjustment with a logistic regression model, the main factors for ICU admission or mortality were heart rate (OR 1.04 with 95% CI 1.04-3.7), respiratory rate (OR 1.19 with 95% CI 1.0-1.4) and capillary refill time (OR 3.4 with 95% CI 1.9-6.1). CONCLUSIONS Heart rate, respiratory rate, and capillary refill may behave as early predictors of ICU admission and mortality in cases of sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - J Ascuntar
- Gerente en Sistemas de Información en Salud, GRAEPIC (Grupo Académico de Epidemiología Clínica), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - F Jaimes
- Médico Internista, Epidemiólogo y Doctor en Epidemiologia en Enfermedad Infecciosas, GRAEPIC (Grupo Académico de Epidemiología Clínica), Departamento de Medicina Interna, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ruffin F, Van Horn E, Letvak S, Kennedy‐Malone L. Exploration of pre‐hospital patient delays in seeking care for symptoms of bacteremia and sepsis: A qualitative study. Nurs Open 2022; 10:2934-2945. [PMID: 36480356 PMCID: PMC10077354 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM We explored patient pre-hospital delays in seeking care for symptoms of bacteremia and sepsis. DESIGN A qualitative descriptive study. METHODS In January 2021, we recruited a convenience sample of four men and six women who were former patients diagnosed with bacteremia. We conducted semi-structured interviews by telephone. The tape-recorded interviews were transcribed, coded and analysed using the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation. Data analysis continued until May 2021. RESULTS The three main themes included: gathering threads of information, weaving together the threads of information and impact and outcome of the illness. The main finding revealed was that an inability to recognize symptoms of bacteremia resulted in delayed help-seeking. Participants had difficulty recognizing their symptoms as being related to bacteremia when they lacked experience with infection or could not differentiate them from symptoms of other chronic co-morbid conditions. Recognizing symptoms and searching for their meaning was an early step in developing an action plan for seeking care. Patient-reported physical and psychological outcomes of the infection on their quality of life (QOL) varied widely, from none to major impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicia Ruffin
- Department of Medicine Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA
- School of Nursing University of North Carolina at Greensboro Durham North Carolina USA
| | - Elizabeth Van Horn
- School of Nursing University of North Carolina at Greensboro Durham North Carolina USA
| | - Susan Letvak
- School of Nursing University of North Carolina at Greensboro Durham North Carolina USA
| | - Laurie Kennedy‐Malone
- School of Nursing University of North Carolina at Greensboro Durham North Carolina USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Loots FJ, Smits M, Hopstaken RM, Jenniskens K, Schroeten FH, van den Bruel A, van de Pol AC, Oosterheert JJ, Bouma H, Little P, Moore M, van Delft S, Rijpsma D, Holkenborg J, van Bussel BC, Laven R, Bergmans DC, Hoogerwerf JJ, Latten GH, de Bont EG, Giesen P, Harder AD, Kusters R, van Zanten AR, Verheij TJ. New clinical prediction model for early recognition of sepsis in adult primary care patients: a prospective diagnostic cohort study of development and external validation. Br J Gen Pract 2022; 72:e437-e445. [PMID: 35440467 PMCID: PMC9037184 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recognising patients who need immediate hospital treatment for sepsis while simultaneously limiting unnecessary referrals is challenging for GPs. AIM To develop and validate a sepsis prediction model for adult patients in primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING This was a prospective cohort study in four out-of-hours primary care services in the Netherlands, conducted between June 2018 and March 2020. METHOD Adult patients who were acutely ill and received home visits were included. A total of nine clinical variables were selected as candidate predictors, next to the biomarkers C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and lactate. The primary endpoint was sepsis within 72 hours of inclusion, as established by an expert panel. Multivariable logistic regression with backwards selection was used to design an optimal model with continuous clinical variables. The added value of the biomarkers was evaluated. Subsequently, a simple model using single cut-off points of continuous variables was developed and externally validated in two emergency department populations. RESULTS A total of 357 patients were included with a median age of 80 years (interquartile range 71-86), of which 151 (42%) were diagnosed with sepsis. A model based on a simple count of one point for each of six variables (aged >65 years; temperature >38°C; systolic blood pressure ≤110 mmHg; heart rate >110/min; saturation ≤95%; and altered mental status) had good discrimination and calibration (C-statistic of 0.80 [95% confidence interval = 0.75 to 0.84]; Brier score 0.175). Biomarkers did not improve the performance of the model and were therefore not included. The model was robust during external validation. CONCLUSION Based on this study's GP out-of-hours population, a simple model can accurately predict sepsis in acutely ill adult patients using readily available clinical parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feike J Loots
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marleen Smits
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Kevin Jenniskens
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Fleur H Schroeten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ann van den Bruel
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alma C van de Pol
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Jelrik Oosterheert
- Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar Bouma
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology and Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Little
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Michael Moore
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | | | - Bas Ct van Bussel
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre; Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Dennis Cjj Bergmans
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre; School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Jacobien J Hoogerwerf
- Department of Internal Medicine and Radboud Centre for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen the Netherlands
| | - Gideon Hp Latten
- Emergency Department, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen; Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Eefje Gpm de Bont
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Giesen
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ron Kusters
- Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch; Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Arthur Rh van Zanten
- Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Department of Intensive Care, Ede; Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Theo Jm Verheij
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
OUP accepted manuscript. J Appl Lab Med 2022; 7:1088-1097. [DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfac031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
5
|
Latten GHP, Polak J, Merry AHH, Muris JWM, Ter Maaten JC, Olgers TJ, Cals JWL, Stassen PM. Frequency of alterations in qSOFA, SIRS, MEWS and NEWS scores during the emergency department stay in infectious patients: a prospective study. Int J Emerg Med 2021; 14:69. [PMID: 34837940 PMCID: PMC8903686 DOI: 10.1186/s12245-021-00388-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For emergency department (ED) patients with suspected infection, a vital sign-based clinical rule is often calculated shortly after the patient arrives. The clinical rule score (normal or abnormal) provides information about diagnosis and/or prognosis. Since vital signs vary over time, the clinical rule scores can change as well. In this prospective multicentre study, we investigate how often the scores of four frequently used clinical rules change during the ED stay of patients with suspected infection. METHODS Adult (≥ 18 years) patients with suspected infection were prospectively included in three Dutch EDs between March 2016 and December 2019. Vital signs were measured in 30-min intervals and the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score, the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria, the Modified Early Warning Score and the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) score were calculated. Using the established cut-off points, we analysed how often alterations in clinical rule scores occurred (i.e. switched from normal to abnormal or vice versa). In addition, we investigated which vital signs caused most alterations. RESULTS We included 1433 patients, of whom a clinical rule score changed once or more in 637 (44.5%) patients. In 6.7-17.5% (depending on the clinical rule) of patients with an initial negative clinical rule score, a positive score occurred later during ED stay. In over half (54.3-65.0%) of patients with an initial positive clinical rule score, the score became negative later on. The respiratory rate caused most (51.2%) alterations. CONCLUSION After ED arrival, alterations in qSOFA, SIRS, MEWS and/or NEWS score are present in almost half of patients with suspected infection. The most contributing vital sign to these alterations was the respiratory rate. One in 6-15 patients displayed an abnormal clinical rule score after a normal initial score. Clinicians should be aware of the frequency of these alterations in clinical rule scores, as clinical rules are widely used for diagnosis and/or prognosis and the optimal moment of assessing them is unknown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gideon H P Latten
- Emergency Department, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419 PC, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
| | - Judith Polak
- Emergency Department, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419 PC, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Audrey H H Merry
- Zuyderland Academy, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Jean W M Muris
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan C Ter Maaten
- Department of Internal Medicine, section acute internal medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Tycho J Olgers
- Department of Internal Medicine, section acute internal medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jochen W L Cals
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia M Stassen
- Department of Internal Medicine, division general medicine, section acute medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Holmbom M, Andersson M, Berg S, Eklund D, Sobczynski P, Wilhelms D, Moberg A, Fredrikson M, Balkhed ÅÖ, Hanberger H. Prehospital delay is an important risk factor for mortality in community-acquired bloodstream infection (CA-BSI): a matched case-control study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e052582. [PMID: 34794994 PMCID: PMC8603295 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to identify prehospital and early hospital risk factors associated with 30-day mortality in patients with blood culture-confirmed community-acquired bloodstream infection (CA-BSI) in Sweden. METHODS A retrospective case-control study of 1624 patients with CA-BSI (2015-2016), 195 non-survivors satisfying the inclusion criteria were matched 1:1 with 195 survivors for age, gender and microorganism. All forms of contact with a healthcare provider for symptoms of infection within 7 days prior CA-BSI episode were registered. Logistic regression was used to analyse risk factors for 30-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS Of the 390 patients, 61% (115 non-survivors and 121 survivors) sought prehospital contact. The median time from first prehospital contact till hospital admission was 13 hours (6-52) for non-survivors and 7 hours (3-24) for survivors (p<0.01). Several risk factors for 30-day all-cause mortality were identified: prehospital delay OR=1.26 (95% CI: 1.07 to 1.47), p<0.01; severity of illness (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score) OR=1.60 (95% CI: 1.40 to 1.83), p<0.01; comorbidity score (updated Charlson Index) OR=1.13 (95% CI: 1.05 to 1.22), p<0.01 and inadequate empirical antimicrobial therapy OR=3.92 (95% CI: 1.64 to 9.33), p<0.01. In a multivariable model, prehospital delay >24 hours from first contact remained an important risk factor for 30-day all-cause mortality due to CA-BSI OR=6.17 (95% CI: 2.19 to 17.38), p<0.01. CONCLUSION Prehospital delay and inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy were found to be important risk factors for 30-day all-cause mortality associated with CA-BSI. Increased awareness and earlier detection of BSI in prehospital and early hospital care is critical for rapid initiation of adequate management and antibiotic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Holmbom
- Department of Urology, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Infectious Diseases, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Maria Andersson
- Department of Infectious Diseases, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Sören Berg
- Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Medicine and Health Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Dan Eklund
- Department of Infectious Diseases, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Pernilla Sobczynski
- Department of Infectious Diseases, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Daniel Wilhelms
- Department of Emergency Medicine in Linköping, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Anna Moberg
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linkoping, Sweden
| | - Mats Fredrikson
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences and Forum Östergötland, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Åse Östholm Balkhed
- Department of Infectious Diseases, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Håkan Hanberger
- Department of Infectious Diseases, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
The Presentation, Pace, and Profile of Infection and Sepsis Patients Hospitalized Through the Emergency Department: An Exploratory Analysis. Crit Care Explor 2021; 3:e0344. [PMID: 33655214 PMCID: PMC7909460 DOI: 10.1097/cce.0000000000000344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
To characterize the signs and symptoms of sepsis, compare them with those from simple infection and other emergent conditions and evaluate their association with hospital outcomes. Design Setting Participants and INTERVENTION A multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 408,377 patients hospitalized through the emergency department from 2012 to 2017 with sepsis, suspected infection, heart failure, or stroke. Infected patients were identified based on Sepsis-3 criteria, whereas noninfected patients were identified through diagnosis codes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Signs and symptoms were identified within physician clinical documentation in the first 24 hours of hospitalization using natural language processing. The time of sign and symptom onset prior to presentation was quantified, and sign and symptom prevalence was assessed. Using multivariable logistic regression, the association of each sign and symptom with four outcomes was evaluated: sepsis versus suspected infection diagnosis, hospital mortality, ICU admission, and time of first antibiotics (> 3 vs ≤ 3 hr from presentation). A total of 10,825 signs and symptoms were identified in 6,148,348 clinical documentation fragments. The most common symptoms overall were as follows: dyspnea (35.2%), weakness (27.2%), altered mental status (24.3%), pain (23.9%), cough (19.7%), edema (17.8%), nausea (16.9%), hypertension (15.6%), fever (13.9%), and chest pain (12.1%). Compared with predominant signs and symptoms in heart failure and stroke, those present in infection were heterogeneous. Signs and symptoms indicative of neurologic dysfunction, significant respiratory conditions, and hypotension were strongly associated with sepsis diagnosis, hospital mortality, and intensive care. Fever, present in only a minority of patients, was associated with improved mortality (odds ratio, 0.67, 95% CI, 0.64-0.70; p < 0.001). For common symptoms, the peak time of symptom onset before sepsis was 2 days, except for altered mental status, which peaked at 1 day prior to presentation. Conclusions The clinical presentation of sepsis was heterogeneous and occurred with rapid onset prior to hospital presentation. These findings have important implications for improving public education, clinical treatment, and quality measures of sepsis care.
Collapse
|
8
|
Morris DC, Jaehne AK, Chopp M, Zhang Z, Poisson L, Chen Y, Datta I, Rivers EP. Proteomic Profiles of Exosomes of Septic Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department Compared to Healthy Controls. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9092930. [PMID: 32932765 PMCID: PMC7564089 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9092930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Septic Emergency Department (ED) patients provide a unique opportunity to investigate early sepsis. Recent work focuses on exosomes, nanoparticle-sized lipid vesicles (30-130 nm) that are released into the bloodstream to transfer its contents (RNA, miRNA, DNA, protein) to other cells. Little is known about how early changes related to exosomes may contribute to the dysregulated inflammatory septic response that leads to multi-organ dysfunction. We aimed to evaluate proteomic profiles of plasma derived exosomes obtained from septic ED patients and healthy controls. METHODS This is a prospective observational pilot study evaluating a plasma proteomic exosome profile at an urban tertiary care hospital ED using a single venipuncture blood draw, collecting 40 cc Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) blood. MEASUREMENTS We recruited seven patients in the ED within 6 h of their presentation and five healthy controls. Plasma exosomes were isolated using the Invitrogen Total Exosome Isolation Kit. Exosome proteomic profiles were analyzed using fusion mass spectroscopy and Proteome Discoverer. Principal component analysis (PCA) and differential expression analysis (DEA) for sepsis versus control was performed. RESULTS PCA of 261 proteins demonstrated septic patients and healthy controls were distributed in two groups. DEA revealed that 62 (23.8%) proteins differed between the exosomes of septic patients and healthy controls, p-value < 0.05. Adjustments using the False Discovery Rate (FDR) showed 23 proteins remained significantly different (FDR < 0.05) between sepsis and controls. Septic patients and controls were classified into two distinct groups by hierarchical clustering using the 62 nominally DE proteins. After adjustment multiple comparisons, three acute phase proteins remained significantly different between patients and controls: Serum amyloid A-1, C-reactive protein and Serum Amyloid A-2. Inflammatory response proteins immunoglobulin heavy constant Δ and Fc-fragment of IgG binding protein were increased. CONCLUSION Exosome proteomic profiles of septic ED patients differ from their healthy counterparts with regard to acute phase response and inflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel C. Morris
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA; (D.C.M.); (E.P.R.)
- Department of Neurology Research, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA; (M.C.); (Z.Z.)
| | - Anja K. Jaehne
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA; (D.C.M.); (E.P.R.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-313-916-8877
| | - Michael Chopp
- Department of Neurology Research, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA; (M.C.); (Z.Z.)
| | - Zhanggang Zhang
- Department of Neurology Research, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA; (M.C.); (Z.Z.)
| | - Laila Poisson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA; (L.P.); (Y.C.); (I.D.)
| | - Yalei Chen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA; (L.P.); (Y.C.); (I.D.)
| | - Indrani Datta
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA; (L.P.); (Y.C.); (I.D.)
| | - Emanuel P. Rivers
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA; (D.C.M.); (E.P.R.)
- Department of Surgical Critical Care, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Latten G, Hensgens K, de Bont EGPM, Muris JWM, Cals JWL, Stassen P. How well are sepsis and a sense of urgency documented throughout the acute care chain in the Netherlands? A prospective, observational study. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e036276. [PMID: 32690518 PMCID: PMC7371221 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the documentation of sepsis and a sense of urgency throughout the acute care chain. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Emergency department (ED) in a large district hospital in Heerlen, The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS Participants included patients ≥18 years with suspected sepsis who visited the ED during out-of-hours between September 2017 and January 2018 (n=339) and had been referred by a general practitioner and/or transported by ambulance. We defined suspected sepsis as suspected or proven infection and the presence of ≥2 quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment and/or ≥2 Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome criteria. OUTCOME MEASURES We analysed how often sepsis and a sense of urgency were documented in the prehospital and ED medical records. A sense of urgency was considered documented when a medical record suggested the need of immediate assessment by a physician in the ED. We described documentation patterns throughout the acute care chain and investigated whether documentation of sepsis or a sense of urgency is associated with adverse outcomes (intensive care admission/30-day all-cause mortality). RESULTS Sepsis was documented in 16.8% of medical records and a sense of urgency in 22.4%. In 4.1% and 7.7%, respectively, sepsis and a sense of urgency were documented by all involved professionals. In patients with an adverse outcome, sepsis was documented more often in the ED than in patients without an adverse outcome (47.9% vs 13.7%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that in prehospital and ED medical records, sepsis and a sense of urgency are documented in one out of five patients. In only 1 out of 20 patients sepsis or a sense of urgency is documented by all involved professionals. It is possible that poor documentation causes harm, due to delayed diagnosis or treatment. Hence, it could be important to raise awareness among professionals regarding the importance of their documentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gideon Latten
- Emergency Department, Zuyderland Medical Centre Heerlen, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Kirsten Hensgens
- Emergency Department, Zuyderland Medical Centre Heerlen, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Eefje G P M de Bont
- Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Research Institute CAPHRI, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Jean W M Muris
- Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Research Institute CAPHRI, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Jochen W L Cals
- Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Research Institute CAPHRI, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Søvsø MB, Christensen MB, Bech BH, Christensen HC, Christensen EF, Huibers L. Contacting out-of-hours primary care or emergency medical services for time-critical conditions - impact on patient outcomes. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:813. [PMID: 31699103 PMCID: PMC6839230 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4674-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Out-of-hours (OOH) healthcare services in Western countries are often differentiated into out-of-hours primary healthcare services (OOH-PC) and emergency medical services (EMS). Call waiting time, triage model and intended aims differ between these services. Consequently, the care pathway and outcome could vary based on the choice of entrance to the healthcare system. We aimed to investigate patient pathways and 1- and 1-30-day mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) stay and length of hospital stay for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke and sepsis in relation to the OOH service that was contacted prior to the hospital contact. METHODS Population-based observational cohort study during 2016 including adult patients from two Danish regions with an OOH service contact on the date of hospital contact. Patients <18 years were excluded. Data was retrieved from OOH service databases and national registries, linked by a unique personal identification number. Crude and adjusted logistic regression analyses were performed to assess mortality in relation to contacted OOH service with OOH-PC as the reference and cox regression analysis to assess risk of ICU stay. RESULTS We included 6826 patients. AMI and stroke patients more often contacted EMS (52.1 and 54.1%), whereas sepsis patients predominately called OOH-PC (66.9%). Less than 10% (all diagnoses) of patients contacted both OOH-PC & EMS. Stroke patients with EMS or OOH-PC & EMS contacts had higher likelihood of 1- and 1-30-day mortality, in particular 1-day (EMS: OR = 5.33, 95% CI: 2.82-10.08; OOH-PC & EMS: OR = 3.09, 95% CI: 1.06-9.01). Sepsis patients with EMS or OOH-PC & EMS contacts also had higher likelihood of 1-day mortality (EMS: OR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.40-3.51; OOH-PC & EMS: OR = 2.86, 95% CI: 1.56-5.23) and 1-30-day mortality. Risk of ICU stay was only significantly higher for stroke patients contacting EMS (EMS: HR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.51-3.75). Stroke and sepsis patients with EMS contact had longer hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS More patients contacted OOH-PC than EMS. Sepsis and stroke patients contacting EMS solely or OOH-PC & EMS had higher likelihood of 1- and 1-30-day mortality during the subsequent hospital contact. Our results suggest that patients contacting EMS are more severely ill, however OOH-PC is still often used for time-critical conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morten Breinholt Søvsø
- Centre for Prehospital and Emergency Research, Aalborg University, Søndre Skovvej 15, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark
- Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Bodil Hammer Bech
- Department of Public Health, Research Unit of Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Erika Frischknecht Christensen
- Centre for Prehospital and Emergency Research, Aalborg University, Søndre Skovvej 15, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark
- Emergency Medical Services, North Denmark Region, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Linda Huibers
- Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|