1
|
Dulac AS, Genova P, Benoit O, Neuzillet C, Hajjam ME, Emile JF, Peschaud F, Lupinacci RM. Surgery for Infrarenal Retroperitoneal Node Metastases from Colon Cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer 2024:10.1007/s12029-024-01086-8. [PMID: 38954189 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-024-01086-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases (RPN) from colon cancer (CC) is a therapeutic challenge. Available evidence supporting a curative approach is weak and uncertainties remain concerning the extent of the dissection, the optimal timing for surgery, and the role of adjuvant radiotherapy. We report the outcomes of a curative intent strategy in a recent monocentric series of patients. METHODS We did a retrospective review of all curative intent surgical treatment of RPN from CC performed consecutively in a French university hospital from June 2015 to April 2021. Demographics, clinicopathological, and molecular characteristics were evaluated. We describe recurrence-free and overall survival and factors related to recurrence. RESULTS Records from 18 patients were reviewed. The median age was 69 years. Most of the patients were male (55%), ASA 1-2 (94%), had a left-sided primary colon cancer (73%), and had metachronous RPN (62%). Thirteen patients (72%) experienced recurrence. Recurrence was often limited to RPN (27%) or liver (22%). Four patients underwent a second surgery for RPN recurrence. Median disease-free and overall survival were 22 months and 50 months after RPN surgery. We did not find any factor associated with recurrence. Short-term recurrence (< 6 months) was associated with shorter overall survival (0.031). CONCLUSION The current results suggest that RPN resection is feasible and associated with long survival in selected patients. Further studies evaluating the benefit of curative strategies including radical surgery for patients with potentially resectable RPN are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Sophie Dulac
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Ambroise-Paré Hospital, 9 Avenue Charles de Gaulle - 92104, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Pietro Genova
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Ambroise-Paré Hospital, 9 Avenue Charles de Gaulle - 92104, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Olivier Benoit
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Ambroise-Paré Hospital, 9 Avenue Charles de Gaulle - 92104, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Cindy Neuzillet
- Institut Curie, Versailles Saint-Quentin University - Paris Saclay University, Saint-Cloud, France
- Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines/Paris Saclay University, UFR Des Sciences de la santé Simone Veil, 78180, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Mostapha El Hajjam
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Ambroise-Paré Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Jean-François Emile
- Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines/Paris Saclay University, UFR Des Sciences de la santé Simone Veil, 78180, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université de Versailles SQY (UVSQ), EA4340-BECCOH, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Ambroise-Paré Hospital, Department of Pathology, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Frédérique Peschaud
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Ambroise-Paré Hospital, 9 Avenue Charles de Gaulle - 92104, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
- Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines/Paris Saclay University, UFR Des Sciences de la santé Simone Veil, 78180, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Renato Micelli Lupinacci
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Ambroise-Paré Hospital, 9 Avenue Charles de Gaulle - 92104, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
- Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines/Paris Saclay University, UFR Des Sciences de la santé Simone Veil, 78180, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miller ED, Klamer BG, Cloyd JM, Pawlik TM, Williams TM, Hitchcock KE, Romesser PB, Mamon HJ, Ng K, Gholami S, Chang GJ, Anker CJ. Consideration of Metastasis-Directed Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Expert Survey and Systematic Review. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2024; 23:160-173. [PMID: 38365567 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2024.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A survey of medical oncologists (MOs), radiation oncologists (ROs), and surgical oncologists (SOs) who are experts in the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was conducted to identify factors used to consider metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). MATERIALS AND METHODS An online survey to assess clinical factors when weighing MDT in patients with mCRC was developed based on systematic review of the literature and integrated with clinical vignettes. Supporting evidence from the systematic review was included to aid in answering questions. RESULTS Among 75 experts on mCRC invited, 47 (response rate 62.7%) chose to participate including 16 MOs, 16 ROs, and 15 SOs. Most experts would not consider MDT in patients with 3 lesions in both the liver and lung regardless of distribution or timing of metastatic disease diagnosis (6 vs. 36 months after definitive treatment). Similarly, for patients with retroperitoneal lymph node and lung and liver involvement, most experts would not offer MDT regardless of timing of metastatic disease diagnosis. In general, SOs were willing to consider MDT in patients with more advanced disease, ROs were more willing to offer treatment regardless of metastatic site location, and MOs were the least likely to consider MDT. CONCLUSIONS Among experts caring for patients with mCRC, significant variation was noted among MOs, ROs, and SOs in the distribution and volume of metastatic disease for which MDT would be considered. This variability highlights differing opinions on management of these patients and underscores the need for well-designed prospective randomized trials to characterize the risks and potential benefits of MDT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric D Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology at the Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.
| | - Brett G Klamer
- Center for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology at the Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology at the Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | - Paul B Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Harvey J Mamon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Sepideh Gholami
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY
| | - George J Chang
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Christopher J Anker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Choi Y, Kim N. Sex Difference of Colon Adenoma Pathway and Colorectal Carcinogenesis. World J Mens Health 2024; 42:256-282. [PMID: 37652658 PMCID: PMC10949019 DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.230085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common causes of cancer morbidity in both sexes but shows sex differences. First, sex-specific differences in tumor recurrence and survival rates have been reported. For example, the development of CRC is found about 1.5 times higher and 4-8 years earlier in males compared to females, suggesting the protective role of estrogen in the disease. Furthermore, female patients have a higher risk of developing right-sided (proximal) colon cancer than male patients, which is known to have more aggressive clinical character compared to left-sided (distal) colon cancer. That is, left and right CRCs show differences in carcinogenic mechanism, that the chromosomal instability pathway is more common in left colon cancer while the microsatellite instability and serrated pathways are more common in right colon cancer. It is thought that there are sex-based differences on the background of carcinogenesis of CRC. Sex differences of CRC have two aspects, sexual dimorphism (biological differences in hormones and genes) and gender differences (non-biological differences in societal attitudes and behavior). Recently, sex difference of colon adenoma pathway and sexual dimorphism in the biology of gene and protein expression, and in endocrine cellular signaling in the CRC carcinogenesis have been accumulated. In addition, behavioral patterns can lead to differences in exposure to risk factors such as drinking or smoking, diet and physical activity. Therefore, understanding sex/gender-related biological and sociocultural differences in CRC risk will help in providing strategies for screening, treatment and prevention protocols to reduce the mortality and improve the quality of life. In this review, sex/gender differences in colon adenoma pathway and various aspects such as clinicopathological, biological, molecular, and socio-cultural aspects of CRC were described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yonghoon Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Nayoung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Beppu T, Yamamura K, Imai K, Hayashi H, Miyamoto Y. Recurrence-risk stratification using the Beppu score and selection of perioperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:893-900. [PMID: 38239092 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
The annual postoperative disease-free survival for colorectal liver metastases can be easily estimated by weighting six preoperative clinical parameters (Beppu score). We identified three recurrence-risk stratification groups: the low (≤6 points), moderate (7-10 points), and high-risk (≥11 points). For low-, moderate-, and high-risk patients, hepatectomy alone, hepatectomy with adjuvant chemotherapy, and hepatectomy with preoperative chemotherapy are recommended, respectively. The Beppu score enables the decision on the necessity and timing of perioperative chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Beppu
- Department of Surgery, Yamaga City Medical Center, Yamaga, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Kensuke Yamamura
- Department of Surgery, Yamaga City Medical Center, Yamaga, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Katsunori Imai
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Hayashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yuji Miyamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aho S, Osterlund E, Ristimäki A, Nieminen L, Sundström J, Mäkinen MJ, Kuopio T, Kytölä S, Ålgars A, Ristamäki R, Heervä E, Kallio R, Halonen P, Soveri LM, Nordin A, Uutela A, Salminen T, Stedt H, Lamminmäki A, Muhonen T, Kononen J, Glimelius B, Isoniemi H, Lehto JT, Lehtomäki K, Osterlund P. Impact of Primary Tumor Location on Demographics, Resectability, Outcomes, and Quality of Life in Finnish Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients (Subgroup Analysis of the RAXO Study). Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1052. [PMID: 38473410 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16051052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
The primary tumor location (PTL) is associated with the phenotype, metastatic sites, mutations, and outcomes of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, but this has mostly been studied according to sidedness (right vs. left sided). We studied right colon vs. left colon vs. rectal PTL in a real-life study population (n = 1080). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed multi-cross-sectionally with QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29, EQ-5D, and 15D. A chi-square, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression were used to compare the groups. The PTL was in the right colon in 310 patients (29%), the left colon in 396 patients (37%), and the rectum in 375 patients (35%). The PTL was associated with distinct differences in metastatic sites during the disease trajectory. The resectability, conversion, and resection rates were lowest in the right colon, followed by the rectum, and were highest in the left colon. Overall survival was shortest for right colon compared with left colon or rectal PTL (median 21 vs. 35 vs. 36 months), with the same trends after metastasectomy or systemic therapy only. PTL also remained statistically significant in a multivariable model. The distribution of symptoms varied according to PTL, especially between the right colon (with general symptoms of metastases) and rectal PTL (with sexual- and bowel-related symptoms). mCRC, according to PTL, behaves differently regarding metastatic sites, resectability of the metastases, outcomes of treatment, and HRQoL.
Collapse
Grants
- 2016, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 Finska Läkaresällskapet
- 2019-2020, 2021, 2022-2023 Finnish Cancer Registry
- 2020-2022 Relanderin säätiö
- 2012, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility Area of Tampere, Helsinki, Turku, Kuopio, Oulu, and Satakunta Hospitals
- Tukisäätiö 2019, 2020, 2023 and OOO-project 2020 Tampere University Hospital
- 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 Helsinki University Hospital
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Aho
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 2, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön katu 23, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- TUNI Palliative Care Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön katu 23, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Palliative Care Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 2, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Emerik Osterlund
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ari Ristimäki
- Department of Pathology, HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 3, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Applied Tumor Genomics Research Program, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Lasse Nieminen
- Department of Pathology, FIMLAB, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 2, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Department of Pathology, University of Tampere, Arvo Ylpön katu 23, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Jari Sundström
- Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Kiinanmyllynkatu 4-8, 20520 Turku, Finland
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Kiinanmyllynkatu 10, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Markus J Mäkinen
- Department of Pathology, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, 90220 Oulu, Finland
- Translational Medicine Research Unit, Department of Pathology, University of Oulu, Pentti Kaiteran katu 1, 90570 Oulu, Finland
- Medical Research Center Oulu, Pentti Kaiteran katu 1, 90570 Oulu, Finland
| | - Teijo Kuopio
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Nova, Hoitajantie 3, 40620 Jyväskylä, Finland
- Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Seminaarinkatu 15, 40014 Jyväskylän yliopisto, Finland
| | - Soili Kytölä
- Department of Genetics, HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 3, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Genetics, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Annika Ålgars
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Hämeentie 11, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Raija Ristamäki
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Hämeentie 11, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Eetu Heervä
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Hämeentie 11, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Raija Kallio
- Department of Oncology, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, 90220 Oulu, Finland
- Department of Oncology, University of Oulu, Pentti Kaiteran katu 1, 90570 Oulu, Finland
| | - Päivi Halonen
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Leena-Maija Soveri
- Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Home Care, Joint Municipal Authority for Health Care and Social Services in Keski-Uusimaa, Sairaalakatu 1, 05850 Hyvinkää, Finland
| | - Arno Nordin
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Aki Uutela
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tapio Salminen
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 2, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön katu 23, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Hanna Stedt
- Department of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1A, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
| | - Annamarja Lamminmäki
- Department of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1A, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
| | - Timo Muhonen
- Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, South Carelia Central Hospital, Valto Käkelän Katu 1, 53130 Lappeenranta, Finland
| | - Juha Kononen
- Docrates Cancer Centre, Docrates Hospital, Saukonpaadenranta 2, 00180 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Nova, Hoitajankatu 3, 40620 Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Helena Isoniemi
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Juho T Lehto
- TUNI Palliative Care Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön katu 23, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Palliative Care Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 2, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Kaisa Lehtomäki
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 2, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön katu 23, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Pia Osterlund
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 2, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön katu 23, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Eugeniavägen 3, 17176 Solna, Sweden
- Department of Oncology/Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 1, 17177 Solna, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chandra P, Sacks GD. Contemporary Surgical Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:941. [PMID: 38473303 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the United States and the second most common cause of cancer-related death. Approximately 20-30% of patients will develop hepatic metastasis in the form of synchronous or metachronous disease. The treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) has evolved into a multidisciplinary approach, with chemotherapy and a variety of locoregional treatments, such as ablation and portal vein embolization, playing a crucial role. However, resection remains a core tenet of management, serving as the gold standard for a curative-intent therapy. As such, the input of a dedicated hepatobiliary surgeon is paramount for appropriate patient selection and choice of surgical approach, as significant advances in the field have made management decisions extremely nuanced and complex. We herein aim to review the contemporary surgical management of colorectal liver metastasis with respect to both perioperative and operative considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratik Chandra
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Greg D Sacks
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
- VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY 10010, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Filoni E, Musci V, Di Rito A, Inchingolo R, Memeo R, Mannavola F. Multimodal Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases: State of the Art. Oncol Rev 2024; 17:11799. [PMID: 38239856 PMCID: PMC10794467 DOI: 10.3389/or.2023.11799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Liver is the most common site of colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases. Treatment of CRC liver metastases (CRLM) includes different strategies, prevalently based on the clinical and oncological intent. Valid approaches in liver-limited or liver-prevalent disease include surgery, percutaneous ablative procedures (radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation), intra-arterial perfusional techniques (chemo-embolization, radio-embolization) as well as stereotactic radiotherapy. Systemic treatments, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy and other biological agents, are the only options for patients with no chance of locoregional approaches. The use of chemotherapy in other settings, such as neoadjuvant, adjuvant or conversion therapy of CRLM, is commonly accepted in the clinical practice, although data from several clinical trials have been mostly inconclusive. The optimal integration of all these strategies, when applicable and clinically indicated, should be ever considered in patients affected by CRLM based on clinical evidence and multidisciplinary experience. Here we revised in detail all the possible therapeutic approaches of CRLM focusing on the current evidences, the studies still in progress and the often contradictory data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabetta Filoni
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
- Division of Medical Oncology, A.O.U. Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Vittoria Musci
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
- Division of Medical Oncology, A.O.U. Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Alessia Di Rito
- Radiotherapy Unit, P.O. “Mons A.R. Dimiccoli”, Barletta, Italy
| | - Riccardo Inchingolo
- Unit of Interventional Radiology, “F. Miulli” General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, “F. Miulli” General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy
| | - Francesco Mannavola
- Division of Medical Oncology, A.O.U. Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Plahuta I, Mencinger M, Peruš I, Magdalenić T, Turk Š, Brumec A, Potrč S, Ivanecz A. Ranking as a Procedure for Selecting a Replacement Variable in the Score Predicting the Survival of Patients Treated with Curative Intent for Colorectal Liver Metastases. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:2003. [PMID: 38004052 PMCID: PMC10673064 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59112003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The issue of a missing variable precludes the external validation of many prognostic models. For example, the Liverpool score predicts the survival of patients undergoing surgical therapy for colorectal liver metastases, but it includes the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, which cannot be measured retrospectively. Materials and Methods: We aimed to find the most appropriate replacement for the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio. Survival analysis was performed on data representing 632 liver resections for colorectal liver metastases from 2000 to 2020. Variables associated with the Liverpool score, C-reactive protein, albumins, and fibrinogen were ranked. The rankings were performed in four ways: The first two were based on the Kaplan-Meier method (log-rank statistics and the definite integral IS between two survival curves). The next method of ranking was based on univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Results: The ranks were as follows: the radicality of liver resection (rank 1), lymph node infiltration of primary colorectal cancer (rank 2), elevated C-reactive protein (rank 3), the American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification grade (rank 4), the right-sidedness of primary colorectal cancer (rank 5), the multiplicity of colorectal liver metastases (rank 6), the size of colorectal liver metastases (rank 7), albumins (rank 8), and fibrinogen (rank 9). Conclusions: The ranking methodologies resulted in almost the same ranking order of the variables. Elevated C-reactive protein was ranked highly and can be considered a relevant replacement for the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in the Liverpool score. These methods are suitable for ranking variables in similar models for medical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irena Plahuta
- Clinical Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Centre Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; (I.P.); (T.M.); (Š.T.); (A.B.); (S.P.)
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Taborska ulica 8, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Matej Mencinger
- Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering, and Architecture, University of Maribor, Smetanova ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; (M.M.); (I.P.)
- Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Mechanics, Jadranska 19, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Iztok Peruš
- Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering, and Architecture, University of Maribor, Smetanova ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; (M.M.); (I.P.)
- Faculty of Natural Science and Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva cesta 12, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tomislav Magdalenić
- Clinical Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Centre Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; (I.P.); (T.M.); (Š.T.); (A.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Špela Turk
- Clinical Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Centre Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; (I.P.); (T.M.); (Š.T.); (A.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Aleks Brumec
- Clinical Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Centre Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; (I.P.); (T.M.); (Š.T.); (A.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Stojan Potrč
- Clinical Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Centre Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; (I.P.); (T.M.); (Š.T.); (A.B.); (S.P.)
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Taborska ulica 8, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Arpad Ivanecz
- Clinical Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Centre Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; (I.P.); (T.M.); (Š.T.); (A.B.); (S.P.)
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Taborska ulica 8, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Meng Q, Zhao Q, Hou D. Use of local wound infiltration in open hepatectomy to reduce wound pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Wound J 2023; 20:3760-3767. [PMID: 37287429 PMCID: PMC10588336 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the effects of local wound infiltration anaesthesia on postoperative wound pain in patients undergoing open liver resection. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) and Wanfang databases were searched. The search period spanned from database creation to December 2022. All relevant studies on local wound infiltration anaesthesia for analgesia after hepatectomy were included. Two investigators independently screened the literature, extracted data and evaluated the quality of each study. Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4 software (Cochrane Collaboration) was used for the meta-analysis, in which 12 studies with 986 patients were included. The results show that local wound infiltration anaesthesia effectively reduced surgical site wound pain at 4 h (mean difference [MD]: -1.26, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: -2.15 to -0.37, P = .005), 12 h (MD: -0.84, 95% CIs: -1.26 to -0.42, P < .001), 24 h (MD: -0.57, 95% CIs: -1.01 to -0.14, P = .009) and 48 h (MD: -0.54, 95% CIs: -0.81 to -0.26, P < .001) postoperatively; however, there was no significant difference in analgesia at 72 h postoperatively (MD: -0.10, 95% CIs: -0.80 to 0.59, P = .77). These findings suggest that local wound infiltration anaesthesia administered to patients undergoing open liver resection provides good postoperative wound analgesia at the surgical site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian‐Qian Meng
- Department of AnesthesiologySecond Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical UniversityDalianLiaoningChina
| | - Qiu‐Cheng Zhao
- Department of AnesthesiologySecond Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical UniversityDalianLiaoningChina
| | - Dong‐Nan Hou
- Department of AnesthesiologySecond Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical UniversityDalianLiaoningChina
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhao J, Zhu J, Huang C, Yuan R, Zhu Z. Impact of primary tumor resection on the survival of patients with unresectable colon cancer liver metastasis at different colonic subsites: a propensity score matching analysis. Acta Chir Belg 2023; 123:132-147. [PMID: 34278951 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2021.1956799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of primary tumor resection (PTR) on the prognosis of patients with unresectable colon cancer liver metastasis (UCCLM) at seven colonic subsites using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. METHODS Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance selection bias using all available variables that could be of potential relevance. After matching, the groups were redefined in a 1:1 ratio using the nearest method. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) was compared among the patients of PTR and non-PTR groups. Cox regression models were used to identify the prognostic factors for CSS. RESULTS CSS was significantly different between all groups. Cox regression analysis showed that PTR was an independent prognostic factor for all groups. After PSM, PTR significantly prolonged CSS for all groups. Subgroup analysis showed that PTR did not improve the prognosis of N2 stage patients in the cecum, ascending colon, and descending colon groups; T1 + T2 stage patients in the hepatic flexure group; and patients with a tumor size ≤5 cm in the splenic flexure group. Segmental colectomy could prolong CSS of patients in the cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, splenic flexure, and sigmoid colon groups, while extended colectomy could prolong CSS of patients in the hepatic flexure and descending colon groups. CONCLUSION At different colonic subsites, UCCLM patients had different CSS. PTR could improve their prognosis, however, N stage, T stage, and tumor size are important reference indicators. In addition to patients in the hepatic flexure and descending colon groups, we suggested that patients in other groups should choose segmental colectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiefeng Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Jinfeng Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Chao Huang
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Rongfa Yuan
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Zhengming Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Beppu T, Yamamura K, Sakamoto K, Honda G, Kobayashi S, Endo I, Hasegawa K, Kotake K, Itabashi M, Hashiguchi Y, Kotera Y, Yamaguchi T, Natsume S, Tabuchi K, Kobayashi H, Yamaguchi K, Morita S, Kikuchi K, Miyazaki M, Sugihara K, Yamamoto M, Takahashi K. Validation study of the
JSHBPS
nomogram for patients with colorectal liver metastases who underwent hepatic resection in the recent era ‐ a nationwide survey in Japan. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2022; 30:591-601. [DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Beppu
- Department of Surgery Yamaga City Medical Center Kumamoto Japan
| | | | - Katsunori Sakamoto
- Department of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic and Breast Surgery Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine Toon Japan
| | - Goro Honda
- Institute of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery Tokyo Women's Medical University Shinjuku‐ku Japan
| | - Shin Kobayashi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery National Cancer Center Hospital East Kashiwa‐shi Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Hasegawa
- Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo Bunkyo‐ku Japan
| | | | - Michio Itabashi
- Institute of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery Tokyo Women's Medical University Shinjuku‐ku Japan
| | - Yojiro Hashiguchi
- Department of Surgery Teikyo University School of Medicine Itabashi‐ku Japan
| | - Yoshihito Kotera
- Institute of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery Tokyo Women's Medical University Shinjuku‐ku Japan
| | - Tatsuro Yamaguchi
- Department of Surgery Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital Tokyo Japan
| | - Soichiro Natsume
- Department of Surgery Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital Tokyo Japan
| | - Ken Tabuchi
- Department of Pediatrics Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital Bunkyo‐ku Japan
| | | | - Kensei Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Chemotherapy Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research Tokyo Japan
| | - Satoshi Morita
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University Kyoto Japan
| | | | - Masaru Miyazaki
- International University of Health and Welfare, Narita Hospital Chiba Japan
| | | | | | - Keiichi Takahashi
- Department of Surgery Tokyo Metropolitan Health and Hospitals Corporation Ohkubo Hospital Shinjuku‐ku Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR. Real-Life Experience of the Prognostic Significance of the Primary Tumor Location on the Timing of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Retrospective Analysis. Cureus 2022; 14:e30607. [PMID: 36299600 PMCID: PMC9588390 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Numerous research studies have looked into how the primary tumor location (PTL) affects patients' prognosis for colorectal cancer (CRC). Our research aimed to investigate the prognostic effects of PTL in patients with synchronous (SM) and metachronous (MM) colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). Material and methods From 2016 to 2021, we looked back at the records of patients at our institute who were affected by CRCLM. Results 109 patients were included, of whom 21.1% received CRCLM resection (R0=73.9%), with 57.7% having left-sided colon cancer (LCC) and 42.2% having right-sided colon cancer (RCC). SM predominated (69.7%). The median duration of follow-up was 21,3 months (95%CI=15,4-25,2). ≥5 hepatic metastases prevailed in the SM group (N=61; 83.5%). 21% of all patients underwent CRCLM resection (R0=78.2%). We observed a double rate of patients unresponsive to standard systemic antineoplastic treatments in the SM group (35.8% vs. 17.9% of the MM group) (p=0.27). We found a significantly longer median overall survival (OS) in patients with MM-LCC compared with the other groups (27.7 months; HR=0.3797; 95%CI=0.19-0.74; p=0.0205). The median OS, regardless of PTL, was higher in the MM group (16,5 months vs. 16,1 months; HR=0,29; 95%CI=0,13-0,67; p=0.0038) as well as progression-free survival (PFS) (11 months vs. 10,2 months; HR=0,61; 95%CI=0,33-1,12; p=0.11). Finally, in patients undergoing liver surgery, a noteworthy median OS was shown to be significantly in favor of patients with metachronous liver metastases from the primary left tumor (37.0 months; HR=0.47; 95%CI=0.11-1.96; p=0.0041). Conclusions Our real-life study demonstrated that patients with LCC, particularly MM-LCC, have the highest survival and that the timing of CRCLM should be a prognostic factor.
Collapse
|
13
|
Alexandrescu ST, Dinu IM, Diaconescu AS, Micu A, Pasare E, Durdu C, Dorobantu BM, Popescu I. Embryologic Origin of the Primary Tumor and RAS Status Predict Survival after Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2022; 58:medicina58081100. [PMID: 36013567 PMCID: PMC9416720 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58081100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background and objectives. In colorectal cancers, the embryologic origin of the primary tumor determines important molecular dissimilarities between right-sided (RS) and left-sided (LS) carcinomas. Although important prognostic differences have been revealed between RS- and LS-patients with resected colorectal liver metastases (CLMs), it is still unclear if this observation depends on the RAS mutational status. To refine the impact of primary tumor location (PTL) on the long-term outcomes of patients with resected CLMs, the rates of overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and survival after recurrence (SAR) were compared between RS- vs. LS-patients, according to their RAS status. Material and Methods. All patients with known RAS status, operated until December 2019, were selected from a prospectively maintained database, including all patients who underwent hepatectomy for histologically-proven CLMs. A log-rank test was used to compare survival rates between the RS- vs. LS-group, in RAS-mut and RAS-wt patients, respectively. A multivariate analysis was performed to assess if PTL was independently associated with OS, RFS or SAR. Results. In 53 patients with RAS-mut CLMs, the OS, RFS and SAR rates were not significantly different (p = 0.753, 0.945 and 0.973, respectively) between the RS and LS group. In 89 patients with RAS-wt CLMs, the OS and SAR rates were significantly higher (p = 0.007 and 0.001, respectively) in the LS group vs. RS group, while RFS rates were similar (p = 0.438). The multivariate analysis performed in RAS-wt patients revealed that RS primary (p = 0.009), extrahepatic metastases (p = 0.001), N-positive (p = 0.014), age higher than 65 (p = 0.002) and preoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.004) were independently associated with worse OS, while RS location (p < 0.001) and N-positive (p = 0.007) were independent prognostic factors for poor SAR. Conclusions. After resection of CLMs, PTL had no impact on long-term outcomes in RAS-mut patients, while in RAS-wt patients, the RS primary was independently associated with worse OS and SAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sorin Tiberiu Alexandrescu
- Department of General Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
- Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ioana Mihaela Dinu
- Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Oncology, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +40-722461098
| | - Andrei Sebastian Diaconescu
- Department of General Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
- Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alexandru Micu
- Department of General Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Evelina Pasare
- Department of General Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Cristiana Durdu
- Department of General Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
- Filantropia Clinical Hospital, 011171 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Bogdan Mihail Dorobantu
- Department of General Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
- Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Irinel Popescu
- Department of General Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Valenzuela CD, Moaven O, Gawdi R, Stauffer JA, Del Piccolo NR, Cheung TT, Corvera CU, Wisneski AD, Cha C, Mangieri CW, Zarandi NP, Dourado J, Perry KC, Russell G, Shen P. Association of primary tumor laterality with surgical outcomes for colorectal liver metastases: results from the Colorectal Liver Operative Metastasis International Collaborative (COLOMIC). HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:1351-1361. [PMID: 35289279 PMCID: PMC9356971 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary laterality of colorectal cancer is thought to be associated with differences in outcomes. Liver metastasis is the most common site of solitary colorectal cancer spread. However, how primary colorectal cancer laterality affects outcomes in colorectal liver metastasis remains unclear. METHODS The Colorectal Liver Operative Metastasis International Collaborative (COLOMIC) of operative hepatectomy cases for colorectal liver metastasis was compiled from five participating institutions. This included consecutive cases from 2000 to 2018 at all sites. A total of 884 patients were included in this study. Univariate, multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed. RESULTS Patients with left-sided versus right-sided cancers had significantly better overall survival: 49.4 vs. 41.8 months (p < 0.05). Patients with KRAS mutations had significantly worse median overall survival compared to KRAS wild-type (43.6 vs 56.1 months; p < 0.001). In left-sided cancers, KRAS mutations were associated with significantly worse median overall survival compared to KRAS wild-type cancers (43.6 vs 56.6 months; p < 0.01). This association was absent in patients with right-sided primary tumors. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed different variable sets (non-overlapping) were associated with overall survival, when comparing left-sided and right-sided cancers. CONCLUSION Understanding how primary tumor laterality and related biological aspects affect long-term outcomes can potentially inform treatment decisions for patients with colorectal liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristian D Valenzuela
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Omeed Moaven
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; Department of Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Rohin Gawdi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - John A Stauffer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Nico R Del Piccolo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Tan To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Carlos U Corvera
- Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrew D Wisneski
- Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Charles Cha
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Christopher W Mangieri
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Nima P Zarandi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Justin Dourado
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Kathleen C Perry
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Gregory Russell
- Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Perry Shen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Di Martino M, Primavesi F, Syn N, Dorcaratto D, de la Hoz Rodríguez Á, Dupré A, Piardi T, Rhaiem R, Blanco Fernández G, de Armas Conde N, Rodríguez Sanjuán JC, Fernández Santiago R, Fernández-Moreno MC, Ferret G, López Ben S, Suárez Muñoz MÁ, Perez-Alonso AJ, Koh YX, Jones R, Martín-Pérez E. Long-Term Outcomes of Perioperative Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: An International Multicentre Propensity-Score Matched Analysis with Stratification by Contemporary Risk-Scoring. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6829-6842. [PMID: 35849284 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12027-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is still debate regarding the principal role and ideal timing of perioperative chemotherapy (CTx) for patients with upfront resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study assesses long-term oncological outcomes in patients receiving neoadjuvant CTx only versus those receiving neoadjuvant combined with adjuvant therapy (perioperative CTx). METHODS International multicentre retrospective analysis of patients with CRLM undergoing liver resection between 2010 and 2015. Characteristics and outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Primary endpoints were long-term oncological outcomes, such as recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, stratification by the tumour burden score (TBS) was applied. RESULTS Of 967 patients undergoing hepatectomy, 252 were analysed, with a median follow-up of 45 months. The unmatched comparison revealed a bias towards patients with neoadjuvant CTx presenting with more high-risk patients (p = 0.045) and experiencing increased postoperative complications ≥Clavien-Dindo III (20.9% vs. 8%, p = 0.003). Multivariable analysis showed that perioperative CTx was associated with significantly improved RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.579, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.420-0.800, p = 0.001) and OS (HR 0.579, 95% CI 0.403-0.834, p = 0.003). After PSM (n = 180 patients), the two groups were comparable regarding baseline characteristics. The perioperative CTx group presented with a significantly prolonged RFS (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.37-0.76, p = 0.007) and OS (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.87, p = 0.010) in both low and high TBS patients. CONCLUSIONS When patients after resection of CRLM are able to tolerate additional postoperative CTx, a perioperative strategy demonstrates increased RFS and OS in comparison with neoadjuvant CTx only in both low and high-risk situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Di Martino
- HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Florian Primavesi
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.,Salzkammergutklinikum Vöcklabruck, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Dimitri Dorcaratto
- Department of Surgery, Liver, Biliary, and Pancreatic Unit, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ángela de la Hoz Rodríguez
- HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Aurélien Dupré
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Tullio Piardi
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France.,HPB Unit, Department of Surgery, Simone Veil Hospital, Troyes, France
| | - Rami Rhaiem
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Gerardo Blanco Fernández
- Department of HBP and Liver Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Badajoz. INUBE (Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura). University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
| | - Noelia de Armas Conde
- Department of HBP and Liver Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Badajoz. INUBE (Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura). University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
| | | | | | - María-Carmen Fernández-Moreno
- Department of Surgery, Liver, Biliary, and Pancreatic Unit, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Georgina Ferret
- Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | | | | | - Alejandro J Perez-Alonso
- Unidad de Cirugia HBP y Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | - Ye-Xin Koh
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Robert Jones
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Elena Martín-Pérez
- HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Borakati A, Froghi F, Shetye A, Fusai GK, Davidson BR, Mirnezami R. Assessing the Impact of Primary Tumour Location on Survival After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Propensity Weighted Retrospective Cohort Study. World J Surg 2022; 46:1734-1755. [PMID: 35325347 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06514-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Right-sided colonic tumours appear to have poorer survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases, although this may be confounded by various factors including advanced stage and emergency presentation. METHODS Medical records of consecutive patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases at a single centre from 2008 to 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Cases were categorised by primary tumour location (right colon, left colon, rectum). Each primary location was weighted using propensity scores to balance covariates, including staging and mode of presentation. Cox regression was then applied to derive multivariable hazard ratios (HR) of survival after liver resection. Primary outcomes were 10-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) after liver resection based on PTL. RESULTS 414 patients were included in the analysis. Left colonic tumours were significantly associated with higher rates of bilobar liver metastasis (36.2% vs. 20.1% and 30.1%) and larger maximum size of liver metastases compared with rectal and right-sided tumours, respectively. There was no difference in rates of extra-hepatic metastases, recurrence in the liver after resection or RAS, BRAF or p53 mutational status. After propensity weighting and Cox-regression, right-sided tumours were independently associated with significantly reduced 10 year OS (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.03-2.36, p = 0.04) but not 5 year DFS (HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.89-2.08, p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS Compared with left colonic and rectal tumours, right-sided colonic tumours are independently associated with inferior OS after resection of CRLM. This is despite higher rates of bilobar liver metastases and larger metastases with left-sided tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya Borakati
- University Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK.,Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Farid Froghi
- University Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK.,Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alysha Shetye
- University Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK
| | - Giuseppe K Fusai
- University Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK.,Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Brian R Davidson
- University Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK.,Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Reza Mirnezami
- University Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Differences in T cell immune-related lncRNA and mRNA expression patterns between right- and left-sided colorectal cancers. Hum Immunol 2021; 82:950-959. [PMID: 34426030 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2021.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Revised: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Right-sided colorectal cancer (RCRC) and left-sided colorectal cancer (LCRC) harbor different genetic alterations associated with immune response. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to analyze the differences in T cell immune-related RNA expression patterns between RCRC and LCRC. METHODS The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and lncRNAs (DElncRNAs) between LCRC and RCRC were screened from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. A correlation analysis between DEGs or DElncRNAs and differential T cells was also performed to obtain T cell-related genes, followed by miRNA prediction. The mRNA-lncRNA network and the competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network were subsequently constructed, and the expression level of mRNA in the ceRNA network was verified using GSE104645. RESULTS RCRC patients had a poorer prognosis and were older than LCRC patients. In total, 923 DEGs and 328 DElncRNAs were screened between LCRC and RCRC patients. Compared to RCRC patients, LCRC patients showed a decrease in CD8+ T cells. In addition, 26 miRNAs, 8 mRNAs, and 10 lncRNAs were included in the ceRNA network. Finally, the validation analysis revealed that CDHR1 and PRLR were significantly downregulated, while TRIB2 was upregulated in RCRC patients compared to LCRC patients. CONCLUSION The analysis of T cell immune-related RNA expression might provide new insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms of the differences between LCRC and RCRC.
Collapse
|
18
|
Dijkstra M, Nieuwenhuizen S, Puijk RS, Timmer FEF, Geboers B, Schouten EAC, Opperman J, Scheffer HJ, de Vries JJJ, Versteeg KS, Lissenberg-Witte BI, van den Tol MP, Meijerink MR. Primary Tumor Sidedness, RAS and BRAF Mutations and MSI Status as Prognostic Factors in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Treated with Surgery and Thermal Ablation: Results from the Amsterdam Colorectal Liver Met Registry (AmCORE). Biomedicines 2021; 9:biomedicines9080962. [PMID: 34440165 PMCID: PMC8395017 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9080962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess primary tumor sidedness of colorectal cancer (CRC), rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (RAS) and v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) mutations and microsatellite instability (MSI) status as prognostic factors predicting complications, survival outcomes, and local tumor progression (LTP) following surgery and thermal ablation in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This Amsterdam Colorectal Liver Met Registry (AmCORE) based study included 520 patients, 774 procedures, and 2101 tumors undergoing local treatment (resection and/or thermal ablation) from 2000 to 2021. Outcomes following local treatment were analyzed for primary tumor sidedness of CRC, RAS, and BRAF mutations and MSI status. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS), local control (LC), distant progression-free survival (DPFS), and overall survival (OS). Uni- and multivariable analyses were performed based on Cox proportional hazards model. The chi-square test was used to analyze complications. Complications (p = 0.485), OS (p = 0.252), LTPFS (p = 0.939), and LC (p = 0.423) was not associated with tumor-sidedness. Compared to right-sided colon cancer (CC) (reference HR 1.000), DPFS was superior for left-sided CC and rectal cancer (p = 0.018) with an HR for left-sided CC of 0.742 (95% CI, 0.596–0.923) and for RC of 0.760 (95% CI, 0.597–0.966). Regarding RAS mutations, no significant difference was found in OS (p = 0.116). DPFS (p = 0.001), LTPFS (p = 0.039), and LC (p = 0.025) were significantly lower in the RAS mutation group. Though no difference in LTPFS was found between RAS wildtype and RAS mutated CRLM following resection (p = 0.532), LTPFS was worse for RAS mutated tumors compared to RAS wildtype following thermal ablation (p = 0.037). OS was significantly lower in the BRAF mutation group (p < 0.001) and in the MSI group (p < 0.001) following local treatment, while both did not affect DPFS, LTPFS, and LC. This AmCORE based study suggests the necessity of wider margins to reduce LTP rates in patients with RAS mutated CRLM, especially for thermal ablation. Upfront knowledge regarding molecular biomarkers may contribute to improved oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madelon Dijkstra
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.N.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (B.G.); (E.A.C.S.); (H.J.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (M.R.M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-20-444-4571
| | - Sanne Nieuwenhuizen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.N.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (B.G.); (E.A.C.S.); (H.J.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Robbert S. Puijk
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.N.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (B.G.); (E.A.C.S.); (H.J.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Florentine E. F. Timmer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.N.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (B.G.); (E.A.C.S.); (H.J.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Bart Geboers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.N.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (B.G.); (E.A.C.S.); (H.J.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Evelien A. C. Schouten
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.N.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (B.G.); (E.A.C.S.); (H.J.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Jip Opperman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Location Alkmaar, 1800 AM Alkmaar, The Netherlands;
| | - Hester J. Scheffer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.N.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (B.G.); (E.A.C.S.); (H.J.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Jan J. J. de Vries
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.N.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (B.G.); (E.A.C.S.); (H.J.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Kathelijn S. Versteeg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Birgit I. Lissenberg-Witte
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - M. Petrousjka van den Tol
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Martijn R. Meijerink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.N.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (B.G.); (E.A.C.S.); (H.J.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (M.R.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Treska V, Skala M, Prochazkova K, Svejdova A, Petrakova T, Sebek J, Riha I, Rosendorf J, Polak R, Skalicky T, Liska V. Long-term Results of Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases in Terms of Primary Tumour Location and Clinical Risk Factors. In Vivo 2021; 34:2675-2685. [PMID: 32871799 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of primary tumour location and clinical risk factors for long-term results of surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CLMs). PATIENTS AND METHODS Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated in 636 patients. Patients were divided by tumour location (right-/left-sided colorectal cancer: RCRC/LCRC; rectal cancer), and age, gender, number and size of CLMs, type of liver surgery and interval from primary operation were evaluated. RESULTS One-, 3- and 5-year OS and RFS were independent of primary tumour location (p<0.59). CLM diameter was negatively associated with OS for the whole cohort (p<0.002), and RCRC (p<0.03) and LCRC (p<0.04) groups, as well as for RFS of those with LCRC (p<0.04). CLM number was negatively associated with RFS for the whole cohort (p<0.0001), RCRC (p<0.02), LCRC (p<0.0001) and RC (p<0.02). Radiofrequency ablation and combined procedures led to worse OS for the whole cohort (p<0.03), and to worse RFS for the whole cohort (p<0.0003) and for those with LCRC (p<0.03). A shorter interval between primary colorectal cancer surgery and CLMs procedure was risky for poor OS and RFS of patients with CLMs from RCRC (p<0.05), LCRC (p<0.05) and RC (p<0.02). CONCLUSION Primary tumour location together with clinical risk factors are important for long-term results of surgery CLMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladislav Treska
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Skala
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Kristyna Prochazkova
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Aneta Svejdova
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Tereza Petrakova
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Jakub Sebek
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Ivan Riha
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Jachym Rosendorf
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Robert Polak
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Skalicky
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Vaclav Liska
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sasaki K, Gagnière J, Dupré A, Ardiles V, O'Connor JM, Wang J, Moro A, Morioka D, Buettner S, Gau L, Ribeiro M, Wagner D, Andreatos N, Løes IM, Fitschek F, Kaczirek K, Lønning PE, Kornprat P, Poultsides G, Kamphues C, Imai K, Baba H, Endo I, Kwon CHD, Aucejo FN, de Santibañes E, Kreis ME, Margonis GA. Performance of two prognostic scores that incorporate genetic information to predict long-term outcomes following resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases: An external validation of the MD Anderson and JHH-MSK scores. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2021; 28:581-592. [PMID: 33797866 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 02/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Two novel clinical risk scores (CRS) that incorporate KRAS mutation status were developed: modified CRS (mCRS) and GAME score. However, they have not been tested in large national and international cohorts. The aim of this study was to validate the prognostic discrimination utility and determine the clinical usefulness of the two novel CRS. METHODS Patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM (2000-2018) in 10 centers were included. The discriminatory abilities of mCRS, GAME, and Fong CRS were evaluated using Harrell's C-index and Akaike's Information Criterion. RESULTS In the entire cohort, the C-index of the GAME score (0.61) was significantly higher than those of Fong score (0.57) and mCRS (0.54), while the C-Index of mCRS was significantly lower than that of Fong score. When we compared the models in the various geographical regions, the C-index of GAME score was significantly higher than that of mCRS in North America, Europe, and South America. The AIC of Fong score, mCRS, and GAME score were 14 405, 14 447, and 14 319, respectively. CONCLUSION In conclusion, using the largest and most heterogenous population of CRLM patients with known KRAS status, this independent, external validation demonstrated that the GAME score outperforms both the traditional Fong score and mCRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Johan Gagnière
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Inserm, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Aurélien Dupré
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Inserm, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Victoria Ardiles
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Jaeyun Wang
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amika Moro
- Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Daisuke Morioka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Stefan Buettner
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Laurence Gau
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Inserm, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Mathieu Ribeiro
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Inserm, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Doris Wagner
- Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Inger Marie Løes
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Fabian Fitschek
- Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Klaus Kaczirek
- Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Per Eystein Lønning
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Peter Kornprat
- Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - George Poultsides
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Carsten Kamphues
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Charite Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katsunori Imai
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Hideo Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | | | | | - Eduardo de Santibañes
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Martin E Kreis
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Charite Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Georgios Antonios Margonis
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Charite Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abancens M, Bustos V, Harvey H, McBryan J, Harvey BJ. Sexual Dimorphism in Colon Cancer. Front Oncol 2020; 10:607909. [PMID: 33363037 PMCID: PMC7759153 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.607909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
A higher incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is found in males compared to females. Young women (18-44 years) with CRC have a better survival outcome compared to men of the same age or compared to older women (over 50 years), indicating a global incidence of sexual dimorphism in CRC rates and survival. This suggests a protective role for the sex steroid hormone estrogen in CRC development. Key proliferative pathways in CRC tumorigenesis exhibit sexual dimorphism, which confer better survival in females through estrogen regulated genes and cell signaling. Estrogen regulates the activity of a class of Kv channels (KCNQ1:KCNE3), which control fundamental ion transport functions of the colon and epithelial mesenchymal transition through bi-directional interactions with the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway. Estrogen also modulates CRC proliferative responses in hypoxia via the novel membrane estrogen receptor GPER and HIF1A and VEGF signaling. Here we critically review recent clinical and molecular insights into sexual dimorphism of CRC biology modulated by the tumor microenvironment, estrogen, Wnt/β-catenin signalling, ion channels, and X-linked genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Abancens
- Department of Molecular Medicine, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Viviana Bustos
- Departamento de Acuicultura y Recursos Agroalimentarios, Programa Fitogen, Universidad de Los Lagos, Osorno, Chile
| | - Harry Harvey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Jean McBryan
- Department of Molecular Medicine, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Brian J. Harvey
- Department of Molecular Medicine, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Centro de Estudios Cientificos CECs, Valdivia, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Garajova I, Balsano R, Tommasi C, Dalla Valle R, Pedrazzi G, Ravaioli M, Spallanzani A, Leonardi F, Santini C, Caputo F, Riefolo M, Giuffrida M, Gelsomino F. Synchronous and metachronous colorectal liver metastases: impact of primary tumor location on patterns of recurrence and survival after hepatic resection. ACTA BIO-MEDICA : ATENEI PARMENSIS 2020; 92:e2021061. [PMID: 33682832 PMCID: PMC7975968 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v92i1.11050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Background: Considerable differences in terms of prognosis exist between the right-sided (RCC) and the left-sided colon cancer (LCC). Aim of the work: In this study, we evaluated prognostic implications of primary tumor location (PTL) among patients who underwent curative-intent hepatectomy for synchronous (SM) and metachronous (MM) colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Methods: The study population included all consecutive patients affected by CRLM scheduled for first liver resection at three Italian oncological centers. Results: A total of 204 patients who underwent CRLM resection were included, 50% with RCC. Synchronous lesions were prevalent (n=133, 65%). Median OS was respectively 40.3 months for SM-RCC, 53.5 months for SM-LCC, 64.5 months for MM-RCC and 81.6 months for MM-LCC. Patients with MM-LCC showed an OS better than patients with SM-RCC (p=0.008) and SM-LCC (p=0.002). PTL had no influence on RFS. RCC group had less recurrences (75% vs 86.5%), though further surgery with curative-intent was possible more in LCC group (29.3% vs 32.5%). Cox proportional hazards model analysis showed that age and the presence of SM vs MM was associated with a significantly higher hazard ratio (HR) for death (HR=1.024; 95%CI=1.005-1.043; p=0.011 and HR=2.010; 95%CI=1.328-3.043; p=0.001, respectively). Conclusions: We confirmed that patients with CRLM and right-sided primary colon cancer experience worse survival after hepatic resection. The timing of metastasis has been revealed as important prognostic factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rita Balsano
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma.
| | | | | | | | - Matteo Ravaioli
- 3Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna.
| | | | | | - Chiara Santini
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena.
| | - Francesco Caputo
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena.
| | - Mattia Riefolo
- 5Pathology Unit, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna.
| | | | - Fabio Gelsomino
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zimmitti G, Panettieri E, Ardito F, Mele C, Maria V, Rosso E, Nuzzo G, Giuliante F. Aggressive recurrences determine oncologic outcomes after resection of liver metastases from primary right colon cancer: Results of a case-control study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 47:834-841. [PMID: 33032866 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite recent studies suggest that, among patients operated on for colorectal liver metastases (CLM), the primary tumor location may impact on postoperative survivals, results are still contrasting. OBJECTIVE evaluating survivals (overall (OS) and (DFS)) following liver resection of CLM from Right colon Cancer (RcC-CLM) versus Left colon Cancer (LcC-CLM), among patients undergoing preoperative chemotherapy (pCHT), identifying survival predictors, and investigating impact of recurrent disease pattern and management on survival. METHODS Among 727 patients operated for CLM(1989-2016), after excluding patients with primary transverse colon/rectum tumor and patients not receving pCHT, 297 patients were identified. Among them, 81 with RcC-CLM were matched 1:1 with LcC-CLM, according to CLM number and diameter, disease-free interval between primary tumor and CLM diagnosis, primary tumor N-status, and the presence of extrahepatic disease. RESULTS Overall, 66.7% of patients had multiple CLM, 21% had CLM>5 cm, 82.7% had DFI<12 months, 67.9% had N+ primary tumor, and 11.1% had extrahepatic disease at time of hepatectomy. RcC-CLM patients were similar to LcC-CLM in terms of demographic, clinical, perioperative, and pathologic characteristics. Patients operated for RcC-CLM, compared to LcC-CLM, had significantly shorter 5y-DFS(18% versus 39%) and 5y-OS(38% vs 65%). At multivariate analysis, being operated for RcC-CLM, compared to LcC-CLM, was the strongest predictor of recurrence (Hazard Ratio:2.265,p < .001) and death (HR:2.234,p = .001). Among 107 patients experiencing recurrent disease, curative recurrence resection was associated with higher 5y-OS(64% vs 17%; p < .001). However, recurrence resection was less frequently feasible among RcC-CLM(26%) patients, compared to LcC-CLM(44%,p = .05). CONCLUSIONS resection of RcC-CLM, compared to LcC-CLM, is associated with worse survivals, probably related to a different pattern of recurrence precluding recurrence resection among RcC-CLM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati 57, Brescia, Italy
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Catholic University, L.go A. Gemelli, 8 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Ardito
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Catholic University, L.go A. Gemelli, 8 Rome, Italy
| | - Caterina Mele
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Catholic University, L.go A. Gemelli, 8 Rome, Italy
| | - Vellone Maria
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Catholic University, L.go A. Gemelli, 8 Rome, Italy
| | - Edoardo Rosso
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati 57, Brescia, Italy
| | - Gennaro Nuzzo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Catholic University, L.go A. Gemelli, 8 Rome, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Catholic University, L.go A. Gemelli, 8 Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Enhanced Rim on MDCT of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Assessment of Ability to Predict Progression-Free Survival and Response to Bevacizumab-Based Chemotherapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 215:1377-1383. [PMID: 32991216 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.19.22280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the enhanced rim on the portal venous phase (PVP) on MDCT as a predictor of 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) and response to bevacizumab-based chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively identified 111 patients with primary unresectable CRLM treated with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy at two institutions between 2012 and 2018. Pretreatment contrast-enhanced MDCT images were reviewed and data on clinical characteristics were collected from the electronic medical records. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to assess several imaging features and clinical characteristics as potential predictors of 1-year PFS and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS. After 1 year of follow-up, liver metastatic tumor progression was detected in 52 patients (46.8%) after bevacizumab-based chemotherapy. A log-rank test showed that enhanced rim on PVP (chi-square test, 5.862; p = 0.015) and the occurrence of liver resection surgery (chi-square test, 7.836; p = 0.005) were significant predictors of 1-year PFS. Multivariable analysis showed that enhanced rim on PVP images was an independent predictor of 1-year PFS (hazard ratio, 0.510; 95% CI, 0.282-0.926; p = 0.027) and ORR (odds ratio, 4.694; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION. The presence of an enhanced rim on PVP MDCT is an independent predictor of survival and response to bevacizumab-based chemotherapy among patients with CRLM.
Collapse
|
25
|
First Long-term Oncologic Results of the ALPPS Procedure in a Large Cohort of Patients With Colorectal Liver Metastases. Ann Surg 2020; 272:793-800. [DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
26
|
Han Y, Chai F, Wei J, Yue Y, Cheng J, Gu D, Zhang Y, Tong T, Sheng W, Hong N, Ye Y, Wang Y, Tian J. Identification of Predominant Histopathological Growth Patterns of Colorectal Liver Metastasis by Multi-Habitat and Multi-Sequence Based Radiomics Analysis. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1363. [PMID: 32923388 PMCID: PMC7456817 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Developing an MRI-based radiomics model to effectively and accurately predict the predominant histopathologic growth patterns (HGPs) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Materials and Methods: In this study, 182 resected and histopathological proven CRLMs of chemotherapy-naive patients from two institutions, including 123 replacement CRLMs and 59 desmoplastic CRLMs, were retrospectively analyzed. Radiomics analysis was performed on two regions of interest (ROI), the tumor zone and the tumor-liver interface (TLI) zone. Decision tree (DT) algorithm was used for radiomics modeling on each MR sequence, and fused radiomics model was constructed by combining the radiomics signature of each sequence. The clinical and combination models were developed through multivariate logistic regression method. The performance of the developed models was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with indicators of area under curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. A nomogram was constructed to evaluate the discrimination, calibration, and usefulness. Results: The fused radiomicstumor and radiomicsTLI models showed better performance than any single sequence and clinical model. In addition, the radiomicsTLI model exhibited better performance than radiomicstumor model (AUC of 0.912 vs. 0.879) in internal validation cohort. The combination model showed good discrimination, and the AUC of nomogram was 0.971, 0.909, and 0.905 in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively. Conclusion: MRI-based radiomics method has high potential in predicting the predominant HGPs of CRLM. Preoperative non-invasive identification of predominant HGPs could further explore the ability of HGPs as a potential biomarker for clinical treatment strategy, reflecting different biological pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuqi Han
- School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, China.,Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing, China
| | - Fan Chai
- Department of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jingwei Wei
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing, China
| | - Yali Yue
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jin Cheng
- Department of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Dongsheng Gu
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing, China
| | - Yinli Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tong Tong
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiqi Sheng
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Nan Hong
- Department of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yingjiang Ye
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University People' Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Wang
- Department of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Tian
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing, China.,Beijing Advanced Innovation Centre for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing, China.,Engineering Research Centre of Molecular and Neuro Imaging of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Uchino T, Ouchi A, Komori K, Kinoshita T, Oshiro T, Sano T, Shimizu Y. The prognostic relevance of primary tumor sidedness to surgical treatment for recurrent colon cancer. Surg Today 2020; 51:94-100. [PMID: 32596797 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-020-02060-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive relevance of tumor sidedness on surgical resection after recurrence by evaluating the treatment outcomes after primary resection and recurrence in patients with localized colon cancer (CC). METHODS A total of 735 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for Stage I-III CC from 1997 to 2013 were categorized as having either right- or left-sided CC, and survival after primary surgery and after recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 104 patients (14.1%) developed recurrence, 94 of which were in a single organ, and 59 patients underwent curative resection. For recurrence from both sides of the colon, a significantly better 5-year overall survival (OS) was experienced by patients who underwent curative resection compared to those who received palliative treatment (right: 42.2% vs not reached, respectively; P < 0.001; left: 71 vs 15.9%, respectively; P < 0.001). Meanwhile, a still worse OS was observed in patients with curative resection for recurrent right-sided CC compared to those with resection for recurrent left-sided CC (5-year: 42.2 vs 71%; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION Surgical resection undoubtedly improved survival after recurrence, however, patients with surgical resection for recurrent right-sided CC tended to have a worse prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tairin Uchino
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1, Kanokoden, Chikusa, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Medical University, 1-1, Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan
| | - Akira Ouchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1, Kanokoden, Chikusa, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan.
| | - Koji Komori
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1, Kanokoden, Chikusa, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan
| | - Takashi Kinoshita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1, Kanokoden, Chikusa, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan
| | - Taihei Oshiro
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1, Kanokoden, Chikusa, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Sano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Medical University, 1-1, Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Shimizu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1, Kanokoden, Chikusa, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Okuno M, Hatano E, Toda R, Nishino H, Nakamura K, Ishii T, Seo S, Taura K, Yasuchika K, Yazawa T, Zaima M, Kanazawa A, Terajima H, Kaihara S, Adachi Y, Inoue N, Furumoto K, Manaka D, Tokuka A, Furuyama H, Doi K, Hirose T, Horimatsu T, Hasegawa S, Matsumoto S, Sakai Y, Uemoto S. Conversion to complete resection with mFOLFOX6 with bevacizumab or cetuximab based on K-RAS status for unresectable colorectal liver metastasis (BECK study): Long-term results of survival. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2020; 27:496-509. [PMID: 32362018 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE To investigate the long-term outcome and entire treatment course of patients with technically unresectable CRLM who underwent conversion hepatectomy and to examine factors associated with conversion to hepatectomy. METHODS Recurrence and survival data with long-term follow-up were analyzed in the cohort of a multi-institutional phase II trial for technically unresectable colorectal liver metastases (the BECK study). RESULTS A total of 22/12 patients with K-RAS wild-type/mutant tumors were treated with mFOLFOX6 + cetuximab/bevacizumab. The conversion R0/1 hepatectomy rate was significantly higher in left-sided primary tumors than in right-sided tumors (75.0% vs 30.0%, P = .022). The median follow-up was 72.6 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate in the entire cohort was 48.1%. In patients who underwent R0/1 hepatectomy (n = 21), the 5-year RFS rate and OS rate were 19.1% and 66.3%, respectively. At the final follow-up, seven patients had no evidence of disease, five were alive with disease, and 20 had died from their original cancer. All 16 patients who achieved 5-year survival underwent conversion hepatectomy, and 11 of them underwent further resection for other recurrences (median: 2, range: 1-4). CONCLUSIONS Conversion hepatectomy achieved a similar long-term survival to the results of previous studies in initially resectable patients, although many of them experienced several post-hepatectomy recurrences. Left-sided primary was found to be the predictor for conversion hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayuki Okuno
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Etsuro Hatano
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Rei Toda
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiroto Nishino
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kojiro Nakamura
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Nishi-Kobe Medical Center, Kobe, Japan
| | - Takamichi Ishii
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Satoru Seo
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kojiro Taura
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kentaro Yasuchika
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Takefumi Yazawa
- Department of Surgery, Shiga General Hospital, Moriyama, Japan
| | - Masazumi Zaima
- Department of Surgery, Shiga General Hospital, Moriyama, Japan
| | - Akiyoshi Kanazawa
- Department of Surgery, Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, Izumo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Terajima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery and Oncology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kaihara
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | | | - Naoya Inoue
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Electric Power Hospital, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Clinical Laboratory, Yamato Takada Municipal Hospital, Yamato Takada, Japan
| | - Katsuyoshi Furumoto
- Department of Surgery, Kishiwada City Hospital, Kishiwada, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Koseikai Takeda Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Dai Manaka
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Atsuo Tokuka
- Department of Surgery, Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, Izumo, Japan
| | | | - Koji Doi
- Department of Surgery, Fukui Red Cross Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | - Tetsuro Hirose
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Takamatsu Red Cross Hospital, Takamatsu, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Otsu Red Cross Hospital, Otsu, Japan
| | - Takahiro Horimatsu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Suguru Hasegawa
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Shigemi Matsumoto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshiharu Sakai
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinji Uemoto
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bingham G, Shetye A, Suresh R, Mirnezami R. Impact of primary tumour location on colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review. World J Clin Oncol 2020; 11:294-307. [PMID: 32728532 PMCID: PMC7360521 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i5.294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Revised: 05/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Despite significant advances in screening, surgical management and adjuvant therapies, average 5-year survival seldom exceeds 60% in most developed nations. Metastatic disease represents the primary cause of mortality in patients with CRC, and the liver is the most common location for distant tumour spread. Up to 25% of patients are found to have synchronous liver metastases at the time of diagnosis and a further 30%-40% will develop metachronous disease in the course of follow-up. It has been suggested that primary tumour location [right side versus left side, primary tumour location (PTL)] can influence oncological outcomes in this patient group and that this should be considered in prognostic models and therapeutic decision-making algorithms. This suggestion is not universally accepted and there have been conflicting reports in the literature to date.
AIM To provide a comprehensive summary of the available evidence regarding the impact of PTL on oncological outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM).
METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE were searched for relevant publications using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology. Data on oncological outcomes was then extracted from full text articles that met the predefined inclusion criteria.
RESULTS A total of 41 studies were identified that met predefined inclusion criteria for this review. In 21 out of 38 studies that provided data on overall survival, a statistically significant improvement in overall survival was reported in patients with left sided primary tumours. These studies included a total of 13897 patients compared with 4306 patients in the studies that did not show a significant difference. Eight studies noted a similar trend towards improved disease-free or progression-free survival. Several authors observed distinct patterns of relapse after treatment of hepatic metastases according to PTL; for example hepatic recurrence after treatment of CRCLM appears to occur more aggressively with right-sided CRC.
CONCLUSION Taken together, the findings of the present review indicate that PTL may have a role as an independent prognostic factor when determining treatment and disease surveillance strategies in CRC. The mechanisms responsible for this variation remain poorly understood, but are likely to relate to molecular, histological and embryological differences, as well as inherent differences in therapeutic sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Bingham
- Department of General Surgery, St. Thomas’s Hospital, Lambeth, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
| | - Alysha Shetye
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Hampstead, London NW3 2QG, United Kingdom
| | - Reena Suresh
- Department of General Surgery, St. Thomas’s Hospital, Lambeth, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
| | - Reza Mirnezami
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Hampstead, London NW3 2QG, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|