Drug induced pancreatitis: A systematic review of case reports to determine potential drug associations

The causality between use of glucocorticoids and risk of pancreatitis: a Mendelian randomization study

Background and aim

To date, the association between glucocorticoid use and the risk of pancreatitis remains controversial. The aim of this study was the investigation of this possible relationship.

Methods

We carried out a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using GWAS data from European ancestry, East Asian descendants and the FinnGen Biobank Consortium to evaluate this potential causal relationship. Genetic variants associated with glucocorticoid use were selected based on genome-wide significance (p < 5×10-8).

Results

Our MR analysis of European ancestry data revealed no significant causal relationship between glucocorticoid use and AP (IVW: OR=1.084, 95% CI= 0.945-1.242, P=0.249; MR-Egger: OR=1.049, 95% CI= 0.686-1.603, P=0.828; weighted median: OR=1.026, 95% CI= 0.863-1.219, P=0.775) or CP (IVW: OR=1.027, 95% CI= 0.850-1.240, P=0.785; MR-Egger: OR= 1.625, 95% CI= 0.913-2.890, P= 0.111; weighted median: OR= 1.176, 95% CI= 0.909-1.523, P= 0.218). Sensitivity analyses, including MR-Egger and MR-PRESSO, indicated no evidence of pleiotropy or heterogeneity, confirming the robustness of our findings. Multivariable MR analysis adjusted for alcohol consumption, BMI, cholelithiasis and C-reactive protein levels supported these findings. Replicated analysis was performed on datasets from the FinnGen Biobank Consortium and East Asian descendants, and similar results were obtained.

Conclusions

This MR analysis suggests that there is no causal association between glucocorticoid use and the risk of pancreatitis.

Muscle hypertrophy following acquired neurogenic injury: systematic review and analysis of existing literature

OBJECTIVES

Neurogenic muscle hypertrophy (NMH) is a rare condition characterized by focal muscle hypertrophy caused by chronic partial nervous injury. Given its infrequency, underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Inspired by two clinical cases, we conducted a systematic review to gain insights into the different aspects of NMH.

METHODS

We systematically searched online databases up until May 30, 2023, for reports of muscle hypertrophy attributed to acquired neurogenic factors. We conducted an exploratory analysis to identify commonly associated features. We also report two representative clinical cases.

RESULTS

Our search identified 63 reports, describing 93 NMH cases, to which we added our two cases. NMH predominantly affects patients with compressive radiculopathy (68.4%), negligible muscular weakness (93.3%), and a chronic increase in muscle bulk. A striking finding in most neurophysiological studies (60.0%) is profuse spontaneous discharges, often hindering the analysis of voluntary traces. Some patients exhibited features consistent with more significant muscle damage, including higher creatine phosphokinase levels, muscle pain, and inflammatory muscle infiltration. These patients are sometimes referred to in literature as "focal myositis." Treatment encompassed corticosteroid, Botulinum Toxin A, decompressive surgery, antiepileptic medications, and nerve blocks, demonstrating varying degrees of efficacy. Botulinum Toxin A yielded the most favorable response in terms of reducing spontaneous discharges.

INTERPRETATION

This systematic review aims to provide a clear description and categorization of this uncommon presentation of an often-overlooked neurological disorder. Though questions remain about the underlying mechanism, evidence suggests that aberrant fiber overstimulation along with increased workload that promotes focal damage may result in muscle hypertrophy. This may serve as a guide for therapeutic interventions.

Isoniazid-induced pancreatitis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Isoniazid-induced pancreatitis is a potentially serious adverse drug reaction, however, the frequency of its occurrence is unknown. We conducted a systematic review to explore this adverse drug reaction comprehensively.

METHODS

We performed an advanced search in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Ovid, and Embase for studies that reported isoniazid-induced pancreatitis. From the extracted data of eligible cases, we performed a descriptive analysis and a methodological risk of bias assessment using a standardized tool.

RESULTS

We included 16 case reports from eight countries comprising 16 patients in our systematic review. Most of the isoniazid-induced pancreatitis cases were extrapulmonary tuberculosis cases. We found the mean age across all case reports was 36.7 years. In all the cases, discontinuation of isoniazid resulted in the resolution of pancreatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

We found the latency period for isoniazid-induced pancreatitis to be ranged from 12 to 45 days after initiation of isoniazid therapy. A low threshold for screening of pancreatitis by measuring pancreatic enzymes in patients on isoniazid presenting with acute abdominal pain is recommended. This would facilitate an early diagnosis and discontinuation of isoniazid, thus reducing the severity of pancreatitis and preventing the complications of pancreatitis.

Sodium-Glucose Transport Protein 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors and the Risk of Pancreatitis: A Case Report

Acute pancreatitis is a condition seldom encountered with the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. They are beneficial in the treatment of various conditions and offer great promise. Despite this, they are associated with several adverse effects, necessitating vigilance and further research. This case study reports a 69-year-old male with multiple comorbidities who presented with epigastric pain radiating to the back. Laboratory tests revealed elevated AST, ALT, GGT and lipase. The patient was diagnosed with acute pancreatitis secondary to the SGLT2 inhibitor therapy regimen. Cessation of dapagliflozin resulted in a complete resolution of symptoms. There is credible evidence to suggest the presence of an association between SGLT2 inhibitors and acute pancreatitis, although extensive research is warranted to consolidate this association.

Pancreatitis with use of new diabetic medications: a real-world data study using the post-marketing FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database

Background: Pancreatitis is characterized by inflammation of the pancreas and significantly affects quality of life. Less than 5% of pancreatitis cases are drug-induced, but recent evidence suggests a substantial risk associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs). The aim of this study was to compare the risk of developing pancreatitis between those using GLP-1 RAs and those using sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. Methods: This study was done using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from 2019 to 2021. This database contains information from diverse submissions from healthcare providers, patients, and manufacturers. To ensure fairness and accuracy, the risk of pancreatitis associated with other hypoglycemic agents (SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP-4 inhibitors) was also investigated. Traditional and Bayesian statistical analysis methods were used to identify disproportionate statistics and included the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM), and information component (IC). A drug-adverse-event combination that met the criteria of all four indices was deemed a signal. Results: The analysis of 2,313 pancreatitis reports linked to hypoglycemic agents revealed a predominant association with GLP-1 RA (70.2%) compared to DPP-4 inhibitors (15%) and SGLT2 (14.7%). Most of these reports involved female patients (50.4%), and the highest incidence occurred in those over 50 years old (38.4%). Additionally, 17.7% of the reports were associated with serious events. The ROR was significant for the risk of pancreatitis when using DPP-4 (13.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.84-14.70), while the ROR for GLP-1 was 9.65 (95% CI 9.17-10.16). The EBGM was highest with DPP-4 (12.25), followed by GLP-1 (8.64), while IC was highest with DPP-4 inhibitors (3.61). Liraglutide had the greatest association with pancreatitis among the GLP-1 RAs (ROR: 6.83, 95% CI 6.60-7.07). Conclusion: The findings show that pancreatitis has a strong link with DPP-4 inhibitors and GPL1 agonists, which pose a greater risk. Among the GLP-1 agonist medications, liraglutide has been found to have an association with pancreatitis.

Risk of acute pancreatitis among new users of empagliflozin compared to sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes: A post-authorization safety study

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to evaluate the potential risk of acute pancreatitis with empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) newly initiating empagliflozin.

METHODS

Data from two large US claims databases were analyzed in an observational study of patients with T2D receiving metformin who were newly prescribed empagliflozin versus sulfonylurea (SU). Because dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists have been associated with the risk of acute pancreatitis in some studies, patients on these agents were excluded. Using pooled analyses of data from the two databases (2014-2021), patients initiating empagliflozin were matched 1:1 within database to patients initiating SU using propensity scores (PS) that incorporated relevant demographic and clinical characteristics. Prespecified sensitivity analyses were performed for design parameters.

RESULTS

The analyses identified 72 661 new users of empagliflozin and 422 018 new users of SUs, with both patient groups on concurrent metformin therapy. Baseline characteristics within treatment groups appeared to be similar across the 72 621 matched pairs. After mean follow-up of ~6 months, incidence rates of acute pancreatitis in the pooled matched cohort were 10.30 (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.29-11.39) events per 1000 patient-years (PY) for empagliflozin and 11.65 (95% CI 10.59-12.77) events per 1000 PY for SUs. On a background of metformin, patients newly initiating empagliflozin did not have an increased risk of acute pancreatitis compared with those initiating an SU (pooled PS matched hazard ratio 0.88 [0.76-1.02]) across 75621.42 PY of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this voluntary post-approval safety study provide additional evidence that the use of empagliflozin for the treatment of T2D is not associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis.

Acute pancreatitis associated with pembrolizumab-induced hypertriglyceridemia

INTRODUCTION

Acute pancreatitis (AP) following drug-induced hypertriglyceridemia is a rare clinical phenomenon. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized treatment for a variety of solid organ and hematological malignancies. Pembrolizumab is a programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitor that has shown promising responses in many advanced cancers. However, a constellation of immune-related adverse events has also been described. There are reports of pembrolizumab-induced hypertriglyceridemia, but AP as a result of this side effect remains an exceedingly rare clinical sequela.

CASE REPORT

We delineate a case of a patient with stage IVB non-small-cell lung cancer who developed progressive abdominal pain and nausea following administration of pembrolizumab for four months. Laboratory studies revealed increased serum lipase and triglyceride levels at 12,562 IU/L and 16,901 mg/dL, respectively. The diagnosis of AP was made based on the revised Atlanta classification criteria. After ruling out alternative causes, pembrolizumab-induced hypertriglyceridemia was considered the likely etiology of AP.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

The patient was transferred to the medical intensive care unit for close monitoring. Treatment was initiated with intravenous fluids, pain medications, and an insulin infusion. However, her hypertriglyceridemia levels remained persistently elevated, necessitating therapeutic apheresis. She recovered well with no complications after triglyceride apheresis.

DISCUSSION

AP following pembrolizumab-associated hypertriglyceridemia remains a rare clinicopathologic entity. Given the widespread clinical use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, knowledge of such rare adverse events is crucial. Evaluation of serum triglyceride levels before and after initiating pembrolizumab therapy may be mandated, especially in patients with metabolic comorbidities.

Acute Pancreatitis Secondary to Cocaine Intoxication: A Case Series

Gallstones, alcohol use, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypercalcemia have been considered the most common causes of acute pancreatitis; however, about 20% of the cases remain idiopathic since no definite cause can be established. It has been noticed that there is a small number of patients who have presented to the hospital with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis who have concurrently been using cocaine yet have no recent alcohol use and no gallstones. The purpose of this series of case reports is to review the evidence behind the association between cocaine and pancreatitis. In most of the cases, the etiology of acute pancreatitis is usually straightforward. However, when faced with a patient who has acute pancreatitis but lacks the common causes such as alcoholism, gallstones, normal triglyceride levels, and no evidence of malignancy, it seems reasonable to consider drugs as a potential cause for pancreatitis.

Drug-Induced Acute Pancreatitis: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database

Timely identification and discontinuation of culprit-drug is the cornerstone of clinical management of drug-induced acute pancreatitis (AP), but the comprehensive landscape of AP culprit-drugs is still lacking. To provide the current overview of AP culprit-drugs to guide clinical practice, we reviewed the adverse event (AE) reports associated with AP in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from 2004 to 2022, and summarized a potential AP culprit-drug list and its corresponding AE report quantity proportion. The disproportionality analysis was used to detect adverse drug reaction (ADR) signals for each drug in the drug list, and the ADR signal distribution was integrated to show the risk characteristic of drugs according to the ADR signal detection results. In the FAERS database, a total of 62,206 AE reports were AP-related, in which 1,175 drugs were reported as culprit-drug. On the whole, metformin was the drug with the greatest number of AE reports, followed by quetiapine, liraglutide, exenatide, and sitagliptin. Drugs used in diabetes was the drug class with the greatest number of AE reports, followed by immunosuppressants, psycholeptics, drugs for acid-related disorders, and analgesics. In disproportionality analysis, 595 drugs showed potential AP risk, whereas 580 drugs did not show any positive ADR signal. According to the positive-negative distribution of the ADR signal for drug classes, the drug class with the greatest number of positive drugs was antineoplastic agents. In this study, we provided the current comprehensive landscape of AP culprit-drugs from the pharmacovigilance perspective, which can provide reference information for clinical practice.

The outcomes of COVID-19 and acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first reported in China at the end of 2019. Several case studies have documented a probable association between infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and acute pancreatitis (AP). The objective of this study was to provide a complete analysis of existing literature that compares the clinical outcomes of AP in patients with COVID-19 and those without COVID-19. The intention was to further our understanding of the involvement of SARS-CoV-2 in the development of pancreatitis.

Methods

Between January 2019 and December 2022, we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus. Nine studies (3,160 patients) were included. In this meta-analysis, Stata 12.0. was utilized. The information provided in this study is presented following the MOOSE reporting checklist.

Results

Mortality [odds ratio (OR) =3.95, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.87, 5.43, P<0.001], intensive care unit (ICU) administration (OR =3.74, 95% CI: 2.26, 6.20, P<0.001), mechanical ventilation (OR =4.84, 95% CI: 2.14, 10.96, P<0.001), severe pancreatitis (OR =2.71, 95% CI: 1.04, 7.04, P=0.042), etiology of idiopathic and unknown (OR =4.75, 95% CI: 1.80, 12.56, P=0.002), necrotizing pancreatitis (OR =1.88, 95% CI: 1.28, 2.76, P=0.001), and length of hospital stay [weighted mean difference (WMD) =5.10, 95% CI: 2.79, 7.41, P<0.001] were more significantly increased in AP cases with COVID-19 than those without it.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the findings of this study indicate a potential worsening of AP outcomes in patients affected by COVID-19.

Organ-specific immune-mediated reactions to polyethylene glycol and polysorbate excipients: three case reports

Drug-related acute pancreatitis (AP), acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) and drug-induced liver injury (DILI) are rare but serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that can have life-threatening consequences. Although the diagnosis of these ADRs can be challenging, causality algorithms and the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) can be employed to help with the diagnosis. In this report, we present 3 cases of drug-related AP, AIN and DILI. The first case involved a patient with AP to lacosamide and to the excipient polysorbate 80 in pantoprazole. The second case involved a patient with DILI secondary to polyethylene glycol (PEG) excipients and amoxicillin-clavulanate. In case 3, AIN was considered to be the result of sensitization to excipients. Diagnoses were made using causality algorithms and the LTT. The LTT is a useful tool for helping diagnose drug-related AP and DILI, and it can be used to identify the specific drug or excipient causing the ADR. These cases highlight the importance of considering PEG and polysorbate excipients in the causality diagnosis of ADRs.

Carbimazole-associated Pancreatitis: Report From Western India

Pancreatitis is a very rare complication of methimazole and carbimazole therapy. We describe a case of possible carbimazole-associated pancreatitis. A 41-year-old Asian man (with no comorbidities) reported to the hospital with atrial fibrillation and a fast ventricular rate. He was diagnosed with hyperthyroidism due to Graves disease. His rhythm was reverted with amiodarone, and carbimazole was initiated at 15 mg daily for the medical management of Graves disease. Fifteen days later, he presented with acute severe abdominal pain and vomiting with elevated serum amylase 387 U/L (reference range, 28-100 U/L) and lipase levels 206 U/L (reference range, 13-60 U/L). Magnetic resonance imaging showed a bulky pancreas with extensive extrapancreatic fat stranding suggestive of acute pancreatitis. Considering the possibility of carbimazole-related pancreatitis, the drug was withheld. He was managed conservatively, and his pancreatic enzymes normalized within 1 week. The observation suggests that the pancreatitis was a consequence of the therapy with carbimazole. Although it is a rare occurrence, patients taking carbimazole who report abdominal discomfort and vomiting should be evaluated for pancreatitis.

Necrotizing Pancreatitis After Cardiac Arrest With Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Acute pancreatitis has been reported as a complication of cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, necrotizing pancreatitis as a subsequent complication has not. Because pancreatic necrosis develops 7-10 days after the initial episode of pancreatitis, it may be difficult to identify and, therefore, diagnose. This case details the course of a patient who developed infected necrotizing pancreatitis after receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation after cardiac arrest.

Risk factors for drug-related acute pancreatitis: an analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)

Objective: While several drugs have been linked to acute pancreatitis (AP), the AP-related risk of most drugs remains unclear. This study investigated the risk factors for drug-induced AP by analyzing a large dataset from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: The reporting odds ratios (ROR) were used to assess the reports of drug-induced AP from the first quarter of 2004 to the second quarter of 2022. Single-factor, LASSO, and multi-factor regression analysis were performed to explore drug-related AP-related risk factors. Bonferroni correction was applied for the multiple comparisons performed. Results: A total of 264 drugs associated with AP, including antineoplastic drugs (35/264), antidiabetic drugs (28/264), antibacterial drugs (24/264), immunomodulatory drugs (11/264), antipsychotic drugs (6/264), and other drugs (160/264) were retrieved. Multi-factor analysis showed that males, age 41-54 years old, and 36 drugs, including Tigecycline, were risk factors for drug-related AP. The median time to drug-related AP onset was 31 days (interquartile range [IQR] 7-102 days) and about 75% of adverse events occurred within 100 days. Conclusion: These findings may help clinicians to identify drug-related AP at the early stage and can be used to inform future studies of drug-related AP pathogenesis.

Drug-Induced Acute Pancreatitis in Adults: Focus on Antimicrobial and Antiviral Drugs, a Narrative Review

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an acute inflammation of the pancreas caused by the activation of digestive enzymes in the pancreatic tissue. The main causes of AP are cholelithiasis and alcohol abuse; less commonly, it can be caused by drugs, with a prevalence of up to 5%. Causal associations between drugs and pancreatitis are largely based on case reports or case series with limited evidence. We reviewed the available data on drug-induced AP, focusing on antimicrobial drugs and antivirals, and discussed the current evidence in relation to the classification systems available in the literature. We found 51 suspected associations between antimicrobial and antiviral drugs and AP. The drugs with the most evidence of correlation are didanosine, protease inhibitors, and metronidazole. In addition, other drugs have been described in case reports demonstrating positive rechallenge. However, there are major differences between the various classifications available, where the same drug being assigned to different probability classes. It is likely that the presence in multiple case reports of an association between acute pancreatitis and a drug should serve as a basis for conducting prospective randomized controlled trials to improve the quality of the evidence.

Linezolid-Induced Pancreatitis Associated with Lactic Acidosis and Relative Hypoglycemia: A Rare Case Report

Background

Linezolid is known to cause side effects, including nausea, diarrhea, and headaches of short duration. As extended use of linezolid is becoming more common, additional rare side effects should be considered.

Case Presentation

A 68-year-old man hospitalized for osteomyelitis developed severe abdominal pain and altered mental status following five weeks of linezolid therapy. Laboratory studies showed very high lipase levels, lactic acidosis not responding to resuscitation, and relative hypoglycemia. All common causes of pancreatitis were ruled out, and a trial of linezolid withdrawal was done resulting in drastic improvement in the patient's clinical status.

Conclusions

For patients on extended course of linezolid who develop abdominal pain, drug-induced pancreatitis should be considered as a side effect, and a trial of withdrawal of linezolid should be undertaken.

LEARNING POINTS

Linezolid can be associated with a rare but serious triad of adverse effects of pancreatitis, hypoglycemia, and lactic acidosis.Possible risk factors include a prolonged course of linezolid, renal dysfunction, and sepsis.

Pharmacokinetics of Antibacterial Agents in the Elderly: The Body of Evidence

Infections are important factors contributing to the morbidity and mortality among elderly patients. High rates of consumption of antimicrobial agents by the elderly may result in increased risk of toxic reactions, deteriorating functions of various organs and systems and leading to the prolongation of hospital stay, admission to the intensive care unit, disability, and lethal outcome. Both safety and efficacy of antibiotics are determined by the values of their plasma concentrations, widely affected by physiologic and pathologic age-related changes specific for the elderly population. Drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion are altered in different extents depending on functional and morphological changes in the cardiovascular system, gastrointestinal tract, liver, and kidneys. Water and fat content, skeletal muscle mass, nutritional status, use of concomitant drugs are other determinants of pharmacokinetics changes observed in the elderly. The choice of a proper dosing regimen is essential to provide effective and safe antibiotic therapy in terms of attainment of certain pharmacodynamic targets. The objective of this review is to perform a structure of evidence on the age-related changes contributing to the alteration of pharmacokinetic parameters in the elderly.

A Fatal Case of Lisinopril-Induced Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I), such as lisinopril, are used as first-line therapy in the treatment of hypertension, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and proteinuric chronic kidney disease due to their beneficial effects on reducing morbidity and mortality. Commonly cited adverse effects of lisinopril include hyperkalemia, acute kidney injury, and angioedema, and while uncommon, there have been reports of lisinopril-induced necrotizing pancreatitis in the literature. The true incidence of drug-induced pancreatitis is unknown since establishing a causal relationship between medication's adverse effects and disease occurrence is difficult; however, there are validated tools such as the Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale that can aid in determining causality. Here, we present a case of a 63-year-old man with a history of hypertension who was being treated with lisinopril for eight months and developed a fatal case of lisinopril-induced severe necrotizing pancreatitis.

Antipsychotic drugs and risk of acute pancreatitis: A nationwide case-control study

INTRODUCTION

Use of antipsychotic drugs, especially second-generation agents, has been suggested to cause acute pancreatitis in multiple case reports; however, such an association has not been corroborated by larger studies. This study examined the association of antipsychotic drugs with risk of acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

Nationwide case-control study, based on data from several Swedish registers and including all 52,006 cases of acute pancreatitis diagnosed in Sweden between 2006 and 2019 (with up to 10 controls per case; n = 518,081). Conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) in current and past users of first-generation and second-generation antipsychotic drugs (dispensed prescription <91 and ≥91 days of the index date, respectively) compared with never users of such drugs.

RESULTS

In the crude model, first-generation and second-generation antipsychotic drugs were associated with increased risk of acute pancreatitis, with slightly higher ORs for past use (1.58 [95% confidence interval 1.48-1.69] and 1.39 [1.29-1.49], respectively) than for current use (1.34 [1.21-1.48] and 1.24 [1.15-1.34], respectively). The ORs were largely attenuated in the multivariable model-which included, among others, alcohol abuse and the Charlson comorbidity index-up to the point where only a statistically significant association remained for past use of first-generation agents (OR 1.18 [1.10-1.26]).

CONCLUSION

There was no clear association between use of antipsychotic drugs and risk of acute pancreatitis in this very large case-control study, indicating that previous case report data are most likely explained by confounding.

Liraglutide-Induced Pancreatitis: A Case Report and Literature Review

Liraglutide is an anti-diabetic medication used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, and chronic weight management. It is a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist that helps reduce postprandial hyperglycemia for up to 24 h after administration. It stimulates endogenous insulin secretion according to glucose levels, and also delays gastric emptying and suppresses prandial glucagon secretion. Some of the common complications associated with liraglutide include hypoglycemia, headache, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. Uncommon adverse effects include pancreatitis, kidney failure, pancreatic cancer, and injection site reactions. In this article, we discussed a case of a 73-year-old male with a history of uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus on long-term insulin and liraglutide who presented with abdominal pain, subjective fevers, dry heaves, tachycardia, and mildly reduced oxygen saturation. The patient was diagnosed with pancreatitis on the basis of laboratory and imaging findings. Liraglutide was discontinued, and the patient received supportive care with significant clinical improvement. The use of GLP-1 inhibitors has been increasing not only for diabetes mellitus management, but also for its promising effect on weight management. The literature review endorses our case report findings, and also discusses other complications of liraglutide. Therefore, we recommend to be cognizant of these side-effects upon starting liraglutide.

Mild Pancreatitis Induced by Linagliptin Revealed by a Medication Review

As dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors are becoming more utilized in the treatment of diabetes, it is important to recognize their side effects and become more familiar with them. As these side effects arise, physicians are more prepared to recognize and discontinue these medications. This case report describes a 34-year-old male who initially presented with a hemoglobin A1c greater than 16%. After titration of his diabetic medications, he presented with pancreatitis diagnosed by symptoms and imaging. Common causes of pancreatitis were ruled out, including biliary pathology, alcohol use, tobacco use, elevated calcium levels, and hypertriglyceridemia. The patient followed up in the clinic with persistent symptoms. A review of his medication list revealed pancreatitis as a side effect of linagliptin. After holding this medication, his symptoms improved over the course of a month.

Stomach Pain Upon Stomach Pain: Medication-Induced Pancreatitis

As a first-line immunosuppressant to maintain remission in Crohn's disease, 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) has been commonly used. A rare, unpredictable, dose-independent and idiosyncratic reaction to this medication is acute pancreatitis. Unlike other side effects of this drug which have been well characterized and are often dose-dependent, acute pancreatitis is an uncommon adverse effect not frequently encountered in clinical practice. In this case report, we describe a 40-year-old man with Crohn's disease who developed acute pancreatitis within two weeks of starting 6-MP. Discontinuation of the drug followed by fluid resuscitation led to the overall improvement of symptoms within 72 hours. No complications were noted during the follow-up. It is our intention to raise awareness for this lesser-known side effect with this case report and to urge physicians to provide thorough counseling prior to starting on this medication, especially in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Additionally, we hope to reinforce this disease entity as a differential for acute pancreatitis and aim to emphasize the importance of detailed medication reconciliations with this report, especially in the emergency department, to enable quick diagnoses and limit unnecessary treatments.

The Role of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Cell Injury Induced by Methimazole on Pancreatic Cells

Purpose: Methimazole is an anti-thyroid agent, especially as main therapy option for Graves' disease in children and adults. Drug induced pancreatitis is one of the known adverse effect of methimazole mentioned in case reports. However, the detailed molecular mechanisms of methimazole-induced pancreatitis are still unclear. In this study, the aim is to investigate the adverse effect of methimazole on pancreas cell stress mechanism and apoptosis. Methods: Cytotoxicity was evaluated in human pancreas/duct (PANC-1) cell line. Total oxidant (TOS) and antioxidant status (TAS) for oxidative stress index, glutathione (GSH) level and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress biomarkers were evaluated by ELISA. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and apoptosis were evaluated by flow-cytometer. Results: The 30% inhibition rate concentration (IC₃₀) value was determined as 53 mM in PANC1 cells. The exposure concentrations were in the range of 0-40 mM for 48 hours. Methimazole might induce cellular stress conditions. ROS production increases depending on concentration, and this increase shows parallelism with the increase in ER stress biomarkers such as TOS, ERN1 and CASPASE12. Conversely, there was no significant difference between control and exposure groups in terms of apoptosis. Conclusion: In conclusion, methimazole might have triggered the mechanisms of inflammation or autophagy in the pancreatic cells. However, there is still a need for in vitro and in vivo studies including other cellular parameters related to apoptosis.

Mirtazapine-induced Acute Pancreatitis in Patients With Depression: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Antidepressant-induced pancreatitis is a rare, albeit serious, adverse effect, with a frequency of occurrence that is not equally distributed among antidepressant drugs. The goal of this study was to investigate the association and causal relationship between mirtazapine treatment of patients with depression and pancreatitis.

METHODS

The study was designed as a systematic review of the literature, accompanied by the description of a new case of mirtazapine-associated acute pancreatitis.

RESULTS

Nine cases of mirtazapine-associated pancreatitis have been reported, involving 7 female patients and 2 male patients with a mean age of 46.4 years (range: 26 to 83 y of age). All of the patients were hospitalized, with an average length of stay of 16.2 days (range: 3 to 34 d). In 6 cases, "de-challenge" followed by improvement was reported. The patients for whom the outcome was reported (7 of 9) recovered completely.

CONCLUSION

Although a rare adverse effect, mirtazapine-induced pancreatitis should be considered when patients taking mirtazapine report abdominal discomfort.

Lamotrigine-Induced Acute Pancreatitis

Drug-induced pancreatitis is a rare phenomenon. Therefore, diagnosis requires ruling out more common etiologies of acute pancreatitis. The majority of research on drug-induced pancreatitis is from case reports. Only a limited number of drugs have been definitively established to induce pancreatitis. Lamotrigine is used in both bipolar and epilepsy. Lamotrigine is currently weakly identified to induce pancreatitis. We present a case of lamotrigine-induced pancreatitis. Extensive workup ruled out other major causes of pancreatitis-including alcohol. We aimed to show lamotrigine can be a causative drug of acute pancreatitis.

Analysis of acute pancreatitis associated with SGLT-2 inhibitors and predictive factors of the death risk: Based on food and drug administration adverse event report system database

Background and objectives: The US FDA and Health Canada have successively published potential red flags for acute pancreatitis caused by sodium-dependent glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i). However, existing studies have focused on case reports. We aimed to assess the possible association of SGLT-2i with acute pancreatitis by analyzing postmarketing adverse events reported in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS), to explore risk factors for SGLT-2i-related acute pancreatitis death, and to build a nomogram. Methods and Results: We used a disproportionality analysis of suspected acute pancreatitis-related reports in the FAERS database of patients from the use of SGLT-2i from the first quarter of 2013 to the fourth quarter of 2021. Single-factor and multi-factor logistic regression analyses were performed using the relevant clinical information of patients, and risk factors were combined with the age of patients to construct a SGLT-2i risk prediction model for acute pancreatitis-related death. A total of 757 reports were retrieved. The largest number of acute pancreatitis-related cases were caused by canagliflozin (317 reports), which was also the strongest agent associated with acute pancreatitis, with the information component (IC 2.41, lower 95% one-sided confidence interval 2.16), the reporting odds ratio (ROR 5.37, 95% two-sided confidence interval 4.8-5.99), and the empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM 5.32, lower 90% one-sided confidence interval 4.85). The median time to acute pancreatitis was 54 (interquartile range [IQR] 14-131) days, and approximately 83% of adverse events occurred within 6 months. Odds ratio(OR) adjusted by acute pancreatitis and the coadministration of SGLT-2i with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i), glucagon-like peptide 1 analog (GLP-1RA), and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEIs) was 1.39, 1.97, and 1.34, respectively, all of which were statistically significant. Logistic regression analysis showed that different SGLT-2i type and their combinations with statins were independent risk factors for acute pancreatitis mortality in the patients (p < 0.05). The mortality risk prediction model showed good discrimination and clinical applicability in both the training set (AUC 0.708) and the validation set (AUC 0.732). Conclusion: SGLT-2i may increase the risk of acute pancreatitis especially within the first 6 months of drug administration. Combination with DPP-4i, GLP-1RA or ACEIs significantly increases the risk of acute pancreatitis. In addition, different SGLT-2i type and their combination with statins are risk factors that can predict the risk of death following acute pancreatitis.

Doxycycline Induced Pancreatitis: An Uncommon Complication of a Common Drug

We describe the risk factors for the development, timing, and severity of doxycycline induced acute pancreatitis (DIAP) in two case reports and a review of prior published cases, to better understand DIAP. Clinicians must maintain a high level of suspicion for DIAP in patients presenting with acute pancreatitis, while on doxycycline therapy. The latency and severity of DIAP are variable, making diagnosis challenging. Treatment includes bowel rest, hydration, and discontinuation of doxycycline.

The Pancreas and Known Factors of Acute Pancreatitis

Pancreatitis is regarded by clinicians as one of the most complicated and clinically challenging of all disorders affecting the abdomen. It is classified on the basis of clinical, morphological, and histological criteria. Causes of acute pancreatitis can easily be identified in 75–85% of patients. The main causes of acute, recurrent acute, and chronic pancreatitis are gallstone migration and alcohol abuse. Other causes are uncommon, controversial, or unexplained. For instance, cofactors of all forms of pancreatitis are pancreas divisum and hypertriglyceridemia. Another factor that should be considered is a complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography acute pancreatitis. The aim of this study is to present the known risk factors for acute pancreatitis, beginning with an account of the morphology, physiology, and development of the pancreas.

Clinical insights into drug-associated pancreatic injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Drug-induced pancreatitis is one of the top three causes of acute pancreatitis. A drug exposure is traditionally determined to be the cause of pancreatitis only after other possible and common causes of pancreatitis have been excluded.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this review, we challenge this traditional notion of drug-induced pancreatitis as a diagnosis of exclusion. Instead, we propose to shift the paradigm of conceptualizing what we term drug-associated pancreatic injury (DAPI); as a continuum of pancreatic injury that can be concomitant with other risk factors. The aims of this targeted review are to harness recent literature to build a foundation for conceptualizing DAPI, to highlight specific drugs associated with DAPI, and to describe a framework for future studies of DAPI.

SUMMARY

Our hope is that probing and characterizing the mechanisms underlying the various types of DAPI will lead to safer use of the DAPI-inducing drugs by minimizing the adverse event of pancreatitis.

Stocky/Packed Pancreas: A Case of Focal Drug-Induced Acute Pancreatitis Mimicking Cancer

Drug-induced acute pancreatitis (DIP) is a recognised but underreported entity in the literature. Immunotherapy drugs have been described as one possible emerging cause, although the pathogenic mechanism is still largely unclear. To date, only a few cases have been reported, even if in recent times there is an over-increasing awareness of this pathologic entity. The imaging-based diagnosis of DIP can be difficult to establish, representing a real challenge for a radiologist, especially when the inflammatory disease appears as a focal mass suspicious for a malignancy. Case report: We herein report the case of a 71-year-old man with a known history of partially responsive lung adenocarcinoma subtype with high programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, who underwent positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging follow-up after one year of immunotherapy. The exam revealed a stocky/packed lesion in the pancreatic body, with increased 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) accumulation highly suggestive of pancreatic cancer, which finally was proven to be a DIP induced by immunotherapy. Conclusion: Distinguishing between focal DIP and pancreatic neoplasm is, therefore, crucial for timely therapeutic management and prognostic stratification. A deep knowledge of possible imaging pitfalls coupled with a comprehensive clinical and laboratory assessment is pivotal to avoid any delays in diagnosis.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis

The pancreas is a glandular organ that is responsible for the proper functioning of the digestive and endocrine systems, and therefore, it affects the condition of the entire body. Consequently, it is important to effectively diagnose and treat diseases of this organ. According to clinicians, pancreatitis—a common disease affecting the pancreas—is one of the most complicated and demanding diseases of the abdomen. The classification of pancreatitis is based on clinical, morphologic, and histologic criteria. Medical doctors distinguish, inter alia, acute pancreatitis (AP), the most common causes of which are gallstone migration and alcohol abuse. Effective diagnostic methods and the correct assessment of the severity of acute pancreatitis determine the selection of an appropriate treatment strategy and the prediction of the clinical course of the disease, thus preventing life-threatening complications and organ dysfunction or failure. This review collects and organizes recommendations and guidelines for the management of patients suffering from acute pancreatitis.

Pancreas and Adverse Drug Reactions: A Literature Review

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) affecting the pancreas are a heterogeneous group of side effects that cause damage to pancreatic cells. Various mechanisms such as hypersensitization, sphincter of Oddi constriction, direct cytotoxic and metabolic effects on pancreatic cells, and dose-dependent idiosyncrasy lead to intrapancreatic activation of pancreatic enzymes resulting in drug-induced acute pancreatitis. Several medications have been linked with the development of pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer may result from proinflammatory, proliferative, and antiapoptotic effects. Diabetogenic effect of drugs, which is understood as impairment of insulin secretion, may occur due to direct destruction of β cells, systemic toxicity affecting pancreatic islets and cell membrane glucose transporters, induction of Th1-type autoimmune response, and impairment of voltage-gated calcium channels in β cells, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and insulin signaling. A better understanding of ADRs that affect the pancreas may contribute to improving the awareness of clinicians and patients and reducing potential harmful side effects of implemented therapies.

Systematic review-pancreatic involvement in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory immune-mediated disorder of the gut with frequent extra-intestinal complications. Pancreatic involvement in IBD is not uncommon and comprises a heterogeneous group of conditions, including acute pancreatitis (AP), chronic pancreatitis (CP), autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI); however, data on such an association remain sparse and heterogeneous.

METHOD

PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies investigating pancreatic involvement in patients with IBD.

RESULTS

Four thousand one hundred and twenty-one records were identified and 547 screened; finally, 124 studies were included in the review. AP is the most frequent pancreatic manifestation in IBD; the majority of AP cases in IBD are due to gallstones and drugs but cases of idiopathic AP are increasingly reported. AIP is a rare disease, but a strong association with IBD has been demonstrated, especially for type 2 and ulcerative colitis. The pathogenetic link between IBD and AIP remains unclear, but an immune-mediated pathway seems plausible. An association between CP and PEI with IBD has also been suggested, but data are to date scarce and conflicting.

CONCLUSION

This is the first systematic review of the association between IBD and pancreatic diseases. Gallstones and drugs should be considered the most probable causes of AP in IBD, with type 2 AIP also being possible.

Managing severe acute and necrotizing pancreatitis

ABSTRACT

Acute pancreatitis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders requiring hospitalization. This article describes current concepts in the diagnosis and management of severe acute and necrotizing pancreatitis. Management of this disease requires IV fluids, pain control, and advanced medical and interventional care. Early identification and intervention may help to prevent patient morbidity and mortality.

Association between Severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Severe Acute Pancreatitis in Pregnancy and Postpartum

INTRODUCTION

SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) affects the respiratory system but is not limited to it. The gastrointestinal symptoms are polymorphic, including diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and even acute pancreatitis (AP). Pregnant women are more vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection and have a higher risk of severe outcomes of COVID-19.

CASE REPORT

We present a case report of a 31-year-old primigravid patient at 30 weeks of gestation, unvaccinated, with a medical history of thrombophilia, chronic nephropathy of unknown origin, hypertension, and optic neuropathy with left eye hemianopsia. She was diagnosed with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 and respiratory failure, with indication for cesarean section. Postpartum, she developed severe acute pancreatitis, complicated by peripancreatic and supradiaphragmatic abscesses. After 3 months of hospitalization and eight surgical interventions, the patient was discharged. A short mini-review of the literature is introduced.

CONCLUSION

Pregnant women with cardiovascular comorbidities are prone to severe complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clinicians should be aware of the association of SARS-CoV-2 and AP in pregnant women.

Docetaxel monotherapy induces necrotic acute pancreatitis

Introduction

Drug-induced acute pancreatitis (AP) is uncommon and represents 0.1 to 2% of all AP cases. Chemotherapy-induced AP is very rare. Docetaxel monotherapy-induced AP has been reported only once in the literature. Herein we report the second case of docetaxel-related AP and the first case of necrotic AP induced by this agent.

Case report

We describe the case of a severe docetaxel-induced AP classified as stage E Balthazar in a 55-year-old female treated with adjuvant docetaxel for localized breast cancer. Symptoms occurred five hours following the first infusion of docetaxel.

Management and outcome

The patient was hospitalized for 15 days for appropriate management. According to the CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) version 5.0 this was a grade 4 toxicity and chemotherapy was withdrawn thereafter. Drug rechallenge was not possible because of the severity of the presentation.

Discussion

Medical oncologists should be aware that docetaxel may induce severe pancreatitis. Therefore, they should prompt testing of serum lipase when patients consult for unusual abdominal pain following chemotherapy infusion. Recognizing this entity is paramount to allow early and appropriate management.

Global Incidence of Acute Pancreatitis Is Increasing Over Time: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Acute pancreatitis is a common disease with significant associated morbidity and mortality. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies to explore the changing temporal trends of acute pancreatitis incidence globally.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search to identify population-based studies reporting the annual incidence of acute pancreatitis. Abstracts were assessed independently to identify applicable articles for full-text review and data extraction. Joinpoint temporal trend analyses were performed to calculate the average annual percent change (AAPC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The AAPCs were pooled in a meta-analysis to capture the overall and regional trends in acute pancreatitis incidence over time. Temporal data were summarized in a static map and an interactive, web-based map.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies reported the temporal incidence of acute pancreatitis (online interactive map: https://kaplan-acute-pancreatitis-ucalgary.hub.arcgis.com/). The incidence of acute pancreatitis has increased from 1961 to 2016 (AAPC, 3.07%; 95% CI, 2.30% to 3.84%; n = 34). Increasing incidence was observed in North America (AAPC, 3.67%; 95% CI, 2.76% to 4.57%; n = 4) and Europe (AAPC, 2.77%; 95% CI, 1.91% to 3.63%; n = 23). The incidence of acute pancreatitis was stable in Asia (AAPC, -0.28%; 95% CI, -5.03% to 4.47%; n = 4).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the global incidence of acute pancreatitis over the last 56 years and demonstrates a steadily rising incidence over time in most countries of the Western world. More studies are needed to better define the changing incidence of acute pancreatitis in Asia, Africa, and Latin America.

Somatostatin receptors in congenital hyperinsulinism: Biology to bedside

Congenital hyperinsulinism (CHI), although a rare disease, is an important cause of severe hypoglycemia in early infancy and childhood, causing preventable morbidity and mortality. Prompt diagnosis and appropriate treatment is necessary to prevent hypoglycaemia mediated brain damage. At present, the medical treatment of CHI is limited to diazoxide as first line and synthetic somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) as second line options; therefore understanding somatostatin biology and treatment perspectives is important. Under healthy conditions, somatostatin secreted from pancreatic islet δ-cells reduces insulin release through somatostatin receptor induced cAMP-mediated downregulation and paracrine inhibition of β- cells. Several SRLs with extended duration of action are now commercially available and are being used off-label in CHI patients. Efficacy remains variable with the present generation of SRLs, with treatment effect often being compromised by loss of initial response and adverse effects such as bowel ischaemia and hepatobiliary dysfunction. In this review we have addressed the biology of the somatostatin system contexualised to CHI. We have discussed the clinical use, limitations, and complications of somatostatin agonists and new and emerging therapies for CHI.

Another Case of Lisinopril-Induced Acute Pancreatitis

Lisinopril as a cause for acute drug-induced pancreatitis is an emerging phenomenon that due to its generally low-risk profile often goes unnoticed. The true incidence of drug-induced pancreatitis is unknown, probably because of its nonrecognition among differential diagnosis. Only a handful of lisinopril-induced pancreatitis has been discussed in the literature, and little epidemiological evidence exists to establish true causality. Additionally, many of these reports have been met with skepticism claiming that it is difficult to isolate a true cause since many of these patients had comorbidities or were concomitantly taking other medications that may have contributed to the pancreatitis. Here, we report a case in which a generally otherwise healthy patient presented with acute drug-induced pancreatitis caused by an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor taken eight weeks prior to the onset of symptoms. The drug was immediately stopped, and the patient recovered well, with no complications.

Acute Pancreatitis Coincided with Multiple Arteriolar Aneurysms in a Patient with Polyarteritis Nodosa

A 78-year-old man presented to our hospital with a history of 10kg weight loss within 6 months previously, and general fatigue and fever for 2 and 1 months, respectively. On hospitalization, the patient was diagnosed with polyarteritis nodosa after multiple microaneurysms were observed in the liver, kidney, pancreas, and mesenteries. He achieved remission with the administration of 1,000mg methylprednisolone for 3 days, followed by prednisolone (55mg/day). Steroids were successfully tapered with no re-elevation in inflammation. Two months after the administration of steroids, the patient complained of acute abdominal pain, and developed severe acute pancreatitis. During treatment for pancreatitis, the patient died due to septic shock and disseminated intravascular coagulation. An autopsy revealed necrotizing vasculitis in the intrapancreatic arteries and ischemia of the downstream arterioles resulting in acute pancreatitis.

A Case of Acute Pancreatitis in a Patient Receiving High-Dose Steroids for Optic Neuritis

Although rare, drug-induced pancreatitis is an important cause of acute pancreatitis. The diagnosis of drug-induced pancreatitis remains a challenge for clinicians. Steroids are one of the frequently used drugs in hospitals for many acute illnesses. Patients presenting with signs and symptoms of acute pancreatitis, with a recent history of steroid use, in the absence of other potential causes, should be approached with a high suspicion for steroid-induced pancreatitis to ensure a timely diagnosis. We describe a case of a 57-year-old female treated for optic neuritis of the left eye with high doses of Methylprednisolone for five days, who presented to the emergency room with acute abdominal pain within 24 hours of discharge. A detailed evaluation of the patient's medical history and exclusion of other probable etiologies confirmed the diagnosis of steroid-induced pancreatitis. Withdrawal of the offending agent and supportive care resolved the underlying acute pancreatitis.

Pancreatitis in Children

Pediatric pancreatitis describes a spectrum covering acute pancreatitis, acute recurrent pancreatitis, and chronic pancreatitis, each with varying clinical manifestations and risk factors requiring a tailored diagnostic approach. We emphasize management strategies based on age, risk factors, recurrence, and complications. A discussion of the role of therapeutic endoscopy is reviewed and highlights the growing role of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children with pancreatitis. Particular diagnostic challenges in autoimmune pancreatitis are reviewed with an emphasis on differentiating this entity from alternate pancreaticobiliary pathologies. Finally, we explore a multidisciplinary approach to acute recurrent and chronic pancreatitis.

Is steroid pulse therapy a suitable treatment for drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms? A systematic review of case reports in patients treated with corticosteroids in Japan

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms is a life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse reaction, characterized by multiple organ involvement and reactivation of herpes viruses. Although the mainstay of treatment is a high dosage of corticosteroids delivered by pulse therapy or conventional oral administration, it remains debatable which mode is better. To clarify this issue, we reviewed publications in Japan of 299 cases of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms treated with corticosteroids, to evaluate safety concerns with regards to these two modes of treatment. As a result, we found that patients treated with pulse therapy more frequently suffered cytomegalovirus reactivation, persistency, and high mortality but less frequently experienced herpesvirus 6 reactivation or type 1 diabetes compared with those undergoing conventional treatment, suggesting that the administration mode may differentially modulate inflammatory responses toward distinct consequences. This is the first statistical analysis revealing that steroid pulse therapy frequently resulted in severe sequelae with high mortality. In terms of the risk of serious consequences, we consider that steroid pulse therapy should be eschewed for the treatment of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms.

Current update on molecular cytogenetics, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and are thought to arise from precursors of the interstitial cells of Cajal. GISTs can arise anywhere in the GI tract, but most commonly originate from the stomach and small intestine. The majority of GISTs occur as a result of activating mutations in two receptor protein tyrosine kinases: KIT and/or platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α. Mutational analyses allow for predicting patient prognosis and treatment response. Clinical presentations can vary from no symptoms, typical in the case of small incidentally found tumors, to GI bleeding, abdominal discomfort, and ulcer-related symptoms when the tumor is enlarged. Imaging plays a critical role in the diagnosis and management of these tumors with multiphasic computed tomography serving as the imaging modality of choice. Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography can serve as imaging adjuncts in lesion characterization, especially with liver metastases, and subsequent staging and assessment for treatment response or recurrence. Surgical resection is the preferred management for small GISTs, while tyrosine kinase inhibitors − imatinib mesylate and sunitinib malate − serve as crucial molecular-targeted therapies for locally advanced and metastatic GISTs. This review article highlights the clinical presentation, pathology and molecular cytogenetics, imaging features, and current management of GISTs.

Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors and Risk of Acute Pancreatitis: A Population-Based Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

There are conflicting reports on the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) on acute pancreatitis incidence.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to determine whether use of ACE inhibitors and ARBs is associated with the incidence of acute pancreatitis, compared with use of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (dCCBs).

METHODS

We assembled two population-based, new-user, active comparator cohorts using the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics repository and Office for National Statistics from 1998 to 2018, with follow-up until 2019. The first cohort included 304,083 ACE inhibitor initiators and 194,431 dCCB initiators. The second cohort included 29,160 ARB initiators and 203,610 dCCB initiators. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of acute pancreatitis, comparing ACE inhibitors and ARBs, separately, with dCCBs. Models were weighted using standardized mortality ratio weights generated from calendar time-specific propensity scores.

RESULTS

ACE inhibitors were associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis, compared with dCCBs (64.3 vs 45.2 per 100,000 person-years, respectively; HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.15-1.83). The number needed to harm after 2 and 5 years of use was 2438 and 1019, respectively. In contrast, ARBs were not associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis, compared with dCCBs (40.1 vs 47.6 per 100,000 person-years, respectively; HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.60-1.31).

CONCLUSIONS

ACE inhibitors were associated with a modest increased risk of acute pancreatitis compared with dCCBs. This association should be balanced with the known clinical benefits of ACE inhibitors in hypertension management. In contrast, no association was observed with ARBs.

Use of thiopurines is not a risk factor for post-ERC pancreatitis in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

INTRODUCTION

Risk of post-ERC pancreatitis (PEP) in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is 1-7.8%. PSC is often associated with inflammatory bowel disease and autoimmune hepatitis, which are usually treated with thiopurines. The role of thiopurines in PEP risk is still unclear.

AIMS AND METHODS

We evaluated the thiopurine use in PEP. The data of 354 PSC patients who underwent 985 ERCs between 2009 and 2018 were collected. 177 patients treated with thiopurines (study group, SG) and 177 controls (CG) were matched with a propensity score (PSM). Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression analysis and generalized linear mixed model were performed. The P-value <0.05 was significant.

RESULTS

In matched data, 472 ERCs were performed in SG and 513 in CG. Thiopurines were used in 373/472 (79.0%) ERCs in SG. The PEP rate was 5.3% in SG and 5.7% in CG (p = 0.889). Unintentional pancreatic duct cannulation (OR 1.28, 95%CI 1.07-1.51, p = 0.004), and periampullary diverticulum (OR 4.87, 95%CI 1.72-11.98, p = 0.001) increased the risk of PEP.

CONCLUSION

Prior or present thiopurine use did not increase the risk of PEP.