1
|
Silver RA, Haidar J, Johnson C. A state-level analysis of macro-level factors associated with hospital readmissions. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024; 25:1205-1215. [PMID: 38244168 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01661-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
Investigation of the factors that contribute to hospital readmissions has focused largely on individual level factors. We extend the knowledge base by exploring macrolevel factors that may contribute to readmissions. We point to environmental, behavioral, and socioeconomic factors that are emerging as correlates to readmissions. Data were taken from publicly available reports provided by multiple agencies. Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling was used to test the association between economic stability and environmental factors on opioid use which was in turn tested for a direct association with hospital readmissions. We also tested whether hospital access as measured by the proportion of people per hospital moderates the relationship between opioid use and hospital readmissions. We found significant associations between Negative Economic Factors and Opioid Use, between Environmental Factors and Opioid Use, and between Opioid Use and Hospital Readmissions. We found that Hospital Access positively moderates the relationship between Opioid Use and Readmissions. A priori assumptions about factors that influence hospital readmissions must extend beyond just individualistic factors and must incorporate a holistic approach that also considers the impact of macrolevel environmental factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reginald A Silver
- University of North Carolina at Charlotte Belk College of Business, 9201 University City, Blvd, Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA.
| | - Joumana Haidar
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 407D Rosenau, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7400, USA
| | - Chandrika Johnson
- Fayetteville State University, 1200 Murchison Road, Fayetteville, NC, 28301, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lenoir KM, Paul R, Wright E, Palakshappa D, Pajewski NM, Hanchate A, Hughes JM, Gabbard J, Wells BJ, Dulin M, Houlihan J, Callahan KE. The Association of Frailty and Neighborhood Disadvantage with Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations in Older Adults. J Gen Intern Med 2024; 39:643-651. [PMID: 37932543 PMCID: PMC10973290 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08503-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk stratification and population management strategies are critical for providing effective and equitable care for the growing population of older adults in the USA. Both frailty and neighborhood disadvantage are constructs that independently identify populations with higher healthcare utilization and risk of adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE To examine the joint association of these factors on acute healthcare utilization using two pragmatic measures based on structured data available in the electronic health record (EHR). DESIGN In this retrospective observational study, we used EHR data to identify patients aged ≥ 65 years at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist on January 1, 2019, who were attributed to affiliated Accountable Care Organizations. Frailty was categorized through an EHR-derived electronic Frailty Index (eFI), while neighborhood disadvantage was quantified through linkage to the area deprivation index (ADI). We used a recurrent time-to-event model within a Cox proportional hazards framework to examine the joint association of eFI and ADI categories with healthcare utilization comprising emergency visits, observation stays, and inpatient hospitalizations over one year of follow-up. KEY RESULTS We identified a cohort of 47,566 older adults (median age = 73, 60% female, 12% Black). There was an interaction between frailty and area disadvantage (P = 0.023). Each factor was associated with utilization across categories of the other. The magnitude of frailty's association was larger than living in a disadvantaged area. The highest-risk group comprised frail adults living in areas of high disadvantage (HR 3.23, 95% CI 2.99-3.49; P < 0.001). We observed additive effects between frailty and living in areas of mid- (RERI 0.29; 95% CI 0.13-0.45; P < 0.001) and high (RERI 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.83; P < 0.001) neighborhood disadvantage. CONCLUSIONS Considering both frailty and neighborhood disadvantage may assist healthcare organizations in effectively risk-stratifying vulnerable older adults and informing population management strategies. These constructs can be readily assessed at-scale using routinely collected structured EHR data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin M Lenoir
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA.
- Center for Healthcare Innovation, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
| | - Rajib Paul
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Elena Wright
- Center for Healthcare Innovation, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Department of Implementation Science, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Deepak Palakshappa
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Section of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Nicholas M Pajewski
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Center for Healthcare Innovation, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Amresh Hanchate
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Jaime M Hughes
- Department of Implementation Science, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Section of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer Gabbard
- Section of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Brian J Wells
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Center for Healthcare Innovation, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Michael Dulin
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer Houlihan
- Value Based Care and Population Health, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Kathryn E Callahan
- Center for Healthcare Innovation, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Section of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nash KA, Weerahandi H, Yu H, Venkatesh AK, Holaday LW, Herrin J, Lin Z, Horwitz LI, Ross JS, Bernheim SM. Measuring Equity in Readmission as a Distinct Assessment of Hospital Performance. JAMA 2024; 331:111-123. [PMID: 38193960 PMCID: PMC10777266 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.24874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
Importance Equity is an essential domain of health care quality. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) developed 2 Disparity Methods that together assess equity in clinical outcomes. Objectives To define a measure of equitable readmissions; identify hospitals with equitable readmissions by insurance (dual eligible vs non-dual eligible) or patient race (Black vs White); and compare hospitals with and without equitable readmissions by hospital characteristics and performance on accountability measures (quality, cost, and value). Design, Setting, and Participants Cross-sectional study of US hospitals eligible for the CMS Hospital-Wide Readmission measure using Medicare data from July 2018 through June 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures We created a definition of equitable readmissions using CMS Disparity Methods, which evaluate hospitals on 2 methods: outcomes for populations at risk for disparities (across-hospital method); and disparities in care within hospitals' patient populations (within-a-single-hospital method). Exposures Hospital patient demographics; hospital characteristics; and 3 measures of hospital performance-quality, cost, and value (quality relative to cost). Results Of 4638 hospitals, 74% served a sufficient number of dual-eligible patients, and 42% served a sufficient number of Black patients to apply CMS Disparity Methods by insurance and race. Of eligible hospitals, 17% had equitable readmission rates by insurance and 30% by race. Hospitals with equitable readmissions by insurance or race cared for a lower percentage of Black patients (insurance, 1.9% [IQR, 0.2%-8.8%] vs 3.3% [IQR, 0.7%-10.8%], P < .01; race, 7.6% [IQR, 3.2%-16.6%] vs 9.3% [IQR, 4.0%-19.0%], P = .01), and differed from nonequitable hospitals in multiple domains (teaching status, geography, size; P < .01). In examining equity by insurance, hospitals with low costs were more likely to have equitable readmissions (odds ratio, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.38-1.77), and there was no relationship between quality and value, and equity. In examining equity by race, hospitals with high overall quality were more likely to have equitable readmissions (odds ratio, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.03-1.26]), and there was no relationship between cost and value, and equity. Conclusion and Relevance A minority of hospitals achieved equitable readmissions. Notably, hospitals with equitable readmissions were characteristically different from those without. For example, hospitals with equitable readmissions served fewer Black patients, reinforcing the role of structural racism in hospital-level inequities. Implementation of an equitable readmission measure must consider unequal distribution of at-risk patients among hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine A. Nash
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Himali Weerahandi
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Huihui Yu
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Arjun K. Venkatesh
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Louisa W. Holaday
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
- Institute for Health Equity Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Jeph Herrin
- Flying Buttress Associates, Charlottesville, Virginia
- Division of Cardiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Zhenqiu Lin
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
- Division of Cardiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Leora I. Horwitz
- Center for Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Joseph S. Ross
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Deputy Editor, JAMA
| | - Susannah M. Bernheim
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Now with Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Elsener M, Santana Felipes RC, Sege J, Harmon P, Jafri FN. Telehealth-based transitional care management programme to improve access to care. BMJ Open Qual 2023; 12:e002495. [PMID: 37940335 PMCID: PMC10632879 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The transition from hospital to home is a vulnerable time for patients and families that can be improved through care coordination and structured discharge planning. LOCAL PROBLEM Our organisation aimed to develop and expand a programme that could improve 30-day readmission rates on overall and disease-specific populations by assessing the impact of a telehealth outreach by a registered nurse (RN) after discharge from an acute care setting on 30-day hospital readmission. METHODS This is a prospective observational design conducted from May 2021 to December 2022 with an urban, non-academic, acute care hospital in Westchester County, New York. Outcomes for patients discharged home following inpatient hospitalisation were analysed within this study. We analysed overall and disease-specific populations (congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and pneumonia (PNA)) as compared with a 40-month prestudy cohort. INTERVENTIONS Patients were identified in a non-random fashion meeting criterion of being discharged home after an inpatient admission. Participants received a telephonic outreach by an RN within 72 hours of discharge. Contacted patients were asked questions addressing discharge instructions, medication access, follow-up appointments and social needs. Patients were offered services and resources based on their individual needs in response to the survey. RESULTS 68.2% of the 24 808 patients were contacted to assess and offer services. Median readmission rates for these patients were 1.2% less than the prestudy cohort (11.0% to 9.8%). Decreases were also noted for disease-specific conditions (CHF (14.3% to 9.1%), COPD (20.0% to 13.4%) and PNA (14.9% to 14.0%)). Among those in the study period, those that were contacted between 24 and 48 hours after discharge were 1.2 times less likely to be readmitted than if unable to be contacted (254/3742 (6.8%) vs 647/7866 (8.2%); p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS Using a multifaceted telehealth approach to improve patient engagement and access reduced 30-day hospital readmission for patients discharged from the acute care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Elsener
- Transitional Care, White Plains Hospital, White Plains, New York, USA
| | | | - Jonathan Sege
- Transitional Care, White Plains Hospital, White Plains, New York, USA
| | - Priscilla Harmon
- Transitional Care, White Plains Hospital, White Plains, New York, USA
| | - Farrukh N Jafri
- Emergency Department, White Plains Hospital, White Plains, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meeting the Needs of ICU Survivors: A Gap Requiring Systems Thinking and Shared Vision. Crit Care Med 2023; 51:319-335. [PMID: 36661456 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
6
|
Adelani MA, Marx CM, Humble S. Are Neighborhood Characteristics Associated With Outcomes After THA and TKA? Findings From a Large Healthcare System Database. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2023; 481:226-235. [PMID: 35503679 PMCID: PMC9831171 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-White patients have higher rates of discharge to an extended care facility, hospital readmission, and emergency department use after primary THA and TKA. The reasons for this are unknown. Place of residence, which can vary by race, has been linked to poorer healthcare outcomes for people with many health conditions. However, the potential relationship between place of residence and disparities in these joint arthroplasty outcomes is unclear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) Are neighborhood-level characteristics, including racial composition, marital proportions, residential vacancy, educational attainment, employment proportions, overall deprivation, access to medical care, and rurality associated with an increased risk of discharge to a facility, readmission, and emergency department use after elective THA and TKA? (2) Are the associations between neighborhood-level characteristics and discharge to a facility, readmission, and emergency department use the same among White and Black patients undergoing elective THA and TKA? METHODS Between 2007 and 2018, 34,008 records of elective primary THA or TKA for osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or avascular necrosis in a regional healthcare system were identified. After exclusions for unicompartmental arthroplasty, bilateral surgery, concomitant procedures, inability to geocode a residential address, duplicate records, and deaths, 21,689 patients remained. Ninety-seven percent of patients in this cohort self-identified as either White or Black, so the remaining 659 patients were excluded due to small sample size. This left 21,030 total patients for analysis. Discharge destination, readmissions within 90 days of surgery, and emergency department visits within 90 days were identified. Each patient's street address was linked to neighborhood characteristics from the American Community Survey and Area Deprivation Index. A multilevel, multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to model each outcome of interest, controlling for clinical and individual sociodemographic factors and allowing for clustering at the neighborhood level. The models were then duplicated with the addition of neighborhood characteristics to determine the association between neighborhood-level factors and each outcome. The linear predictors from each of these models were used to determine the predicted risk of each outcome, with and without neighborhood characteristics, and divided into tenths. The change in predicted risk tenths based on the model containing neighborhood characteristics was compared to that without neighborhood characteristics.The change in predicted risk tenth for each outcome was stratified by race. RESULTS After controlling for age, sex, insurance type, surgery type, and comorbidities, we found that an increase of one SD of neighborhood unemployment (odds ratio 1.26 [95% confidence interval 1.17 to 1.36]; p < 0.001) was associated with an increased likelihood of discharge to a facility, whereas an increase of one SD in proportions of residents receiving public assistance (OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.86 to 0.98]; p = 0.008), living below the poverty level (OR 0.82 [95% CI 0.74 to 0.91]; p < 0.001), and being married (OR 0.80 [95% CI 0.71 to 0.89]; p < 0.001) was associated with a decreased likelihood of discharge to a facility. Residence in areas one SD above mean neighborhood unemployment (OR 1.12 [95% CI [1.04 to 1.21]; p = 0.002) was associated with increased rates of readmission. An increase of one SD in residents receiving food stamps (OR 0.83 [95% CI 0.75 to 093]; p = 0.001), being married (OR 0.89 [95% CI 0.80 to 0.99]; p = 0.03), and being older than 65 years (OR 0.93 [95% CI 0.88 to 0.98]; p = 0.01) was associated with a decreased likelihood of readmission. A one SD increase in the percentage of Black residents (OR 1.11 [95% CI 1.00 to 1.22]; p = 0.04) and unemployed residents (OR 1.15 [95% CI 1.05 to 1.26]; p = 0.003) was associated with a higher likelihood of emergency department use. Living in a medically underserved area (OR 0.82 [95% CI 0.68 to 0.97]; p = 0.02), a neighborhood one SD above the mean of individuals using food stamps (OR 0.81 [95% CI 0.70 to 0.93]; p = 0.004), and a neighborhood with an increasing percentage of individuals older than 65 years (OR 0.90 [95% CI 0.83 to 0.96]; p = 0.002) were associated with a lower likelihood of emergency department use. With the addition of neighborhood characteristics, the risk prediction tenths of the overall cohort remained the same in more than 50% of patients for all three outcomes of interest. When stratified by race, neighborhood characteristics increased the predicted risk for 55% of Black patients for readmission compared with 17% of White patients (p < 0.001). The predicted risk tenth increased for 60% of Black patients for emergency department use compared with 21% for White patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION These results can be used to identify high-risk patients who might benefit from preemptive interventions to avoid these particular outcomes and to create more realistic, comprehensive risk adjustment models for value-based care programs. Additionally, this study demonstrates that neighborhood characteristics are associated with greater risk for these outcomes among Black patients compared with White patients. Further studies should consider that race/ethnicity and neighborhood characteristics may not function independently from each other. Understanding this link between race and place of residence is essential for future racial disparities research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christine M. Marx
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sarah Humble
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Herrin J, Barthel A, Goutos D, Du C, Zhou S, Peltz A, Poyer J, Lin Z, Bernheim S. Measuring health disparities using a continuous social risk factor. Health Serv Res 2023; 58:30-39. [PMID: 36146904 PMCID: PMC9836958 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To propose and evaluate a novel approach for measuring hospital-level disparities according to the effect of a continuous, polysocial risk factor on those outcomes. STUDY SETTING Our cohort consisted of Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) patients 65 years and older admitted to acute care hospitals for one of six common conditions or procedures. Medicare administrative claims data for six hospital readmission measures including hospitalizations from July 2015 to June 2018 were used. STUDY DESIGN We adapted existing methodologies that were developed to report hospital-level disparities using dichotomous social risk factors (SRFs). The existing methods report disparities within and across hospitals; we developed and tested modified approaches for both methods using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Socioeconomic Status Index. We applied the adapted methodologies to six 30-day hospital readmission measures included in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program measures. We compared the within- and across-hospital results for each to those obtained from using the original methods and dichotomizing the AHRQ SES Index into "low" and "high" scores. DATA COLLECTION We used Medicare FFS administrative claims data linked to U.S. Census data. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS For all six readmission measures we find that, when compared with the existing methods, the methods for continuous SRFs provide disparity results for more facilities though across a narrower range of values. Measures of disparity based on this approach are moderately to highly correlated with those based on a dichotomous version of the same risk factor, while reflecting a fuller spectrum of risk. This approach represents an opportunity for detection of provider-level results that more closely align with underlying social risk. CONCLUSION We have demonstrated the feasibility and utility of estimating hospital disparities of care using a continuous, polysocial risk factor. This approach expands the potential for reporting hospital-level disparities while better accounting for the multifactorial nature of social risk on hospital outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeph Herrin
- The Yale Center for Outcomes Research and EvaluationYale New Haven Health Systems CorporationNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Department of Internal MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Flying Buttress AssociatesCharlottesvilleVirginiaUSA
| | - Andrea Barthel
- The Yale Center for Outcomes Research and EvaluationYale New Haven Health Systems CorporationNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Demetri Goutos
- The Yale Center for Outcomes Research and EvaluationYale New Haven Health Systems CorporationNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Department of Health Law, Policy, and ManagementBoston University School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Chengan Du
- The Yale Center for Outcomes Research and EvaluationYale New Haven Health Systems CorporationNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Section of Cardiovascular MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Sheng Zhou
- The Yale Center for Outcomes Research and EvaluationYale New Haven Health Systems CorporationNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Department of Emergency MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Alon Peltz
- The Yale Center for Outcomes Research and EvaluationYale New Haven Health Systems CorporationNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Department of Population MedicineHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - James Poyer
- The Center for Clinical Standards and QualityThe Centers for Medicare and Medicaid ServicesBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Zhenqiu Lin
- The Yale Center for Outcomes Research and EvaluationYale New Haven Health Systems CorporationNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Department of Internal MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Susannah Bernheim
- The Yale Center for Outcomes Research and EvaluationYale New Haven Health Systems CorporationNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Section of General Internal MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Readmissions to hospital following a decision to eat and drink with acknowledged risk. Geriatr Nurs 2023; 50:90-93. [PMID: 36689850 DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
People with a dysphagia may eat and drink with acknowledged risks (EDAR). The FORWARD care bundle (Feeding via the Oral Route With Acknowledged Risk of Deterioration) is used at our hospital to support patients who are EDAR. This two-year retrospective study of patients supported by FORWARD aimed to determine incidence of EDAR-related readmissions and effects of discharge location and documented preferred place of care in advance care plans. Of 316 patients supported by FORWARD, 200 were discharged alive. 63% (n=126) were not readmitted within six months. Of 74 patients readmitted, 49% had an EDAR-related readmission. Significantly fewer patients wishing to remain at home had EDAR-related readmissions (7%, n=4) than those without a documented preferred place of care (23%, n=30, p<0.01), suggesting advance care plans are effective. Significantly more (23%, n=29) patients discharged to private homes had EDAR-related readmissions than those in nursing/care homes (10%, n=6, p<0.05), which could suggest residential care provides more support.
Collapse
|
9
|
Chukmaitov A, Dahman B, Garland SL, Dow A, Parsons PL, Harris KA, Sheppard VB. Addressing social risk factors in the inpatient setting: Initial findings from a screening and referral pilot at an urban safety-net academic medical center in Virginia, USA. Prev Med Rep 2022; 29:101935. [PMID: 36161115 PMCID: PMC9501992 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) impact health outcomes; thus, a pilot to screen for important SDOH domains (food, housing, and transportation) and address social needs in hospitalized patients was implemented in an urban safety-net academic medical center. This study describes the pilot implementation and examines patient characteristics associated with SDOH-related needs. An internal medicine unit was designated as a pilot site. Outreach workers approached eligible patients (n = 1,135) to complete the SDOH screening survey at time of admission with 54% (n = 615) completing the survey between May 2019 and July 2020. Data from patient screening survey and electronic health records were linked to allow for examination of associations between SDOH needs for food, housing, and transportation and various demographic and clinical characteristics of patients in multivariate logistic regression models. Of 615 screened patients, 45% screened positive for any need. Of 275 patients with needs, 33% reported needs in 2, and 34% - in 3 domains. Medicaid beneficiaries were more likely than patients with private health insurance to screen positive for 2 and 3 needs; Black patients were more likely than White patients to screen positive for 1 and 3 needs; Patients with no designated primary care physician status screened positive for 1 need; Patients with a history of substance use disorder screened positive for all 3 needs. SDOH screening assisted in addressing social risk factors of inpatients, informed their discharge plans and linkage to community resources. SDOH screening demonstrated significant correlations of positive screens with race/ethnicity, insurance type, and certain clinical characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Askar Chukmaitov
- Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) School of Medicine, Department of Health Behavior and Policy, 830 E. Main Str, Richmond, VA 23219, USA
| | - Bassam Dahman
- Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) School of Medicine, Department of Health Behavior and Policy, 830 E. Main Str, Richmond, VA 23219, USA
| | | | - Alan Dow
- VCU School of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine; VCU Health Sciences for Interprofessional Education & Collaborative Care; VCU Health Continuing Education; VCU Department of Health Administration, Richmond, USA
| | - Pamela L. Parsons
- VCU School of Nursing, Department of Family and Community Health Nursing; Richmond Memorial Health Foundation, Richmond, USA
| | - Kevin A. Harris
- VCU School of Medicine Dean's Office for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, Richmond, USA
| | - Vanessa B. Sheppard
- Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) School of Medicine, Department of Health Behavior and Policy, 830 E. Main Str, Richmond, VA 23219, USA
- VCU Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Belouali A, Bai H, Raja K, Liu S, Ding X, Kharrazi H. Impact of social determinants of health on improving the LACE index for 30-day unplanned readmission prediction. JAMIA Open 2022; 5:ooac046. [PMID: 35702627 PMCID: PMC9185729 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Early and accurate prediction of patients at risk of readmission is key to reducing costs and improving outcomes. LACE is a widely used score to predict 30-day readmissions. We examine whether adding social determinants of health (SDOH) to LACE can improve its predictive performance. Methods This is a retrospective study that included all inpatient encounters in the state of Maryland in 2019. We constructed predictive models by fitting Logistic Regression (LR) on LACE and different sets of SDOH predictors. We used the area under the curve (AUC) to evaluate discrimination and SHapley Additive exPlanations values to assess feature importance. Results Our study population included 316 558 patients of whom 35 431 (11.19%) patients were readmitted after 30 days. Readmitted patients had more challenges with individual-level SDOH and were more likely to reside in communities with poor SDOH conditions. Adding a combination of individual and community-level SDOH improved LACE performance from AUC = 0.698 (95% CI [0.695–0.7]; ref) to AUC = 0.708 (95% CI [0.705–0.71]; P < .001). The increase in AUC was highest in black patients (+1.6), patients aged 65 years or older (+1.4), and male patients (+1.4). Discussion We demonstrated the value of SDOH in improving the LACE index. Further, the additional predictive value of SDOH on readmission risk varies by subpopulations. Vulnerable populations like black patients and the elderly are likely to benefit more from the inclusion of SDOH in readmission prediction. Conclusion These findings provide potential SDOH factors that health systems and policymakers can target to reduce overall readmissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anas Belouali
- Biomedical Informatics and Data Science (BIDS), Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Haibin Bai
- Biomedical Informatics and Data Science (BIDS), Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kanimozhi Raja
- Biomedical Informatics and Data Science (BIDS), Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Star Liu
- Biomedical Informatics and Data Science (BIDS), Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Xiyu Ding
- Biomedical Informatics and Data Science (BIDS), Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Hadi Kharrazi
- Biomedical Informatics and Data Science (BIDS), Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Brock J, Jencks SF, Hayes RK. Future Directions in Research to Improve Care Transitions From Hospital Discharge. Med Care 2021; 59:S401-S404. [PMID: 34228023 PMCID: PMC8263143 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
|