Genetic liability in individuals at ultra-high risk of psychosis: A comparison study of 9 psychiatric traits

Genome-wide association exploratory studies in individuals with ultra-high risk for schizophrenia in Chinese Han nationality in two years follow-up: A subpopulation study

BACKGROUND

Although ultra-high risk for schizophrenia (UHR) is related to both genetic and environment factors, the precise pathogenesis is still unknow. To date, few studies have explored the Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) in UHR or HR individuals especially in Han population in China.

METHODS

In this study, a GWAS analysis for 36 participants with UHR and 43 with HR were performed, and all deletion variations in 22q11 region were also compared.

RESULTS

Sixteen individuals with UHR (44.4%) and none with HR converted into schizophrenia in follow-up after two years. Six loci including neurexin-1(NRXN1) (rs1045881), dopamine D1 receptor (DRD1) (rs686, rs4532), chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1) (rs4950928), velocardiofacial syndrome (ARVCF) (rs165815), dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) (rs1076560) were identified higher expression with significant difference in individuals converted into schizophrenia after two years. The Family with Sequence Similarity 230 Member H (FAM230H) gene in the 22q11 region were also found high expression in UHR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Further expansion of sample size and validation studies are needed to explore the pathogenesis of these risk loci in UHR conversion into schizophrenia in the future.

Symptoms of Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome in Relatives of Clinical High-Risk Youth: Preliminary Evidence

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome (APS) impacts functioning and predicts increased risk of psychosis. Risk for developing APS itself has received minimal attention. Knowledge of familial and environmental contributions to APS symptoms would advance understanding of APS and risk for psychosis. As an initial step, this report presents the first data on APS symptoms in family members of APS patients.

STUDY DESIGN

This study utilized a discordant sibling-pair family study design. The Structured Interview for Psychosis-risk Syndromes (SIPS) was administered to 17 APS probands and 26 non-APS biological siblings. Probands and siblings were compared on positive, negative, disorganized, and general SIPS symptom scales and factors derived from those scales.

STUDY RESULTS

There was significantly greater symptom severity in probands compared to siblings on nine of 19 SIPS scales. Negative/anxiety, functioning, and positive symptom factors were identified. Probands showed significantly greater severity than siblings on the negative/anxiety and positive factors. Elevated pathology on the negative/anxiety factor best differentiated between probands and siblings, over and above the contribution of the positive factor. No difference was found for the functioning factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Results support the importance of non-familial effects on risk for APS and suggest differences in familial contribution to APS symptoms. Understanding the relative contribution of familial and environmental effects on APS symptoms may reveal important differences among APS patients, with implications for risk characterization, symptom course, and treatment selection.

Is it possible to stage schizophrenia? A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

A staging model is a clinical tool used to define the development of a disease over time. In schizophrenia, authors have proposed different theoretical staging models of increasing complexity. Therefore, the aims of our study were to provide an updated and critical view of the proposed clinical staging models for schizophrenia and to review the empirical data that support them.

METHODS

Systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines. From the PubMed database and backward reference search, a total of 141 records were retrieved, but only 20 were selected according to the inclusion criteria: (a) available in English; (b) participants with schizophrenia ≥ 18 years; and (c) theoretical and empirical research studies intended to develop, validate, and/or improve staging models of schizophrenia.

RESULTS

Different clinical staging models for schizophrenia were identified, information about the proposed stages was tabulated and presented in the Results section (Tables 1, 2). Most of which include neuroimaging, functioning, and psychopathology, but only two models add objective biomarkers and none include patient point of view. However, few models have been psychometrically tested or used small samples and thus have been validated only partially. In addition, five studies proposed therapeutic interventions according to the stage of the disorder from a theoretical point of view.

DISCUSSION

In conclusion, it is possible to stage schizophrenia, but the models developed have several limitations. Empirical validation and inclusion of more specific biomarkers and measures of other life areas affected by schizophrenia could help in the development of more valid models.