1
|
Durpoix A, Rolling J, Coutelle R, Lalanne L. Psychotherapies in opioid use disorder: toward a step-care model. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2024; 131:437-452. [PMID: 37987829 PMCID: PMC11055728 DOI: 10.1007/s00702-023-02720-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
Opioid use disorder (OUD) is characterized by a lack of control in opioid use, resulting in psychological distress and deficits in interpersonal and social functioning. OUD is often associated with psychiatric comorbidities that increase the severity of the disorder. The consequences of OUD are dramatic in terms of increased morbi-mortality. Specific medications and psychotherapies are essential tools not only in the treatment of OUD but also in the prevention of suicide and overdoses. In our review, we assess the different types of psychotherapies (counseling, motivational interviewing, contingency management, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and dialectical-behavior therapy) that are delivered to opioid users, either associated or un-associated with OUD medications and/or medications for psychiatric disabilities. We describe the application of these therapies first to adult opioid users and then to adolescents. This work led us to propose a stepped-care model of psychotherapies for OUD which provided information to assist clinicians in decision-making regarding the selection of psychotherapeutic strategies according to patients' OUD severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amaury Durpoix
- Addictology Department, Strasbourg University Hospital, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France
- Strasbourg University, Faculty of Medicine, Strasbourg, France
| | - Julie Rolling
- Psychiatry, Mental Health and Addictology Department, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
- Regional Center for Psychotrauma Great East, Strasbourg, France
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Propre de Recherche 3212 (CNRS UPR 3212), Institute for Cellular and Integrative Neurosciences (INCI), Strasbourg, France
| | - Romain Coutelle
- Psychiatry, Mental Health and Addictology Department, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
- INSERM U1114, Cognitive Neuropsychology, and Pathophysiology of Schizophrenia, Strasbourg, France
| | - Laurence Lalanne
- Addictology Department, Strasbourg University Hospital, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France.
- INSERM U1114, Cognitive Neuropsychology, and Pathophysiology of Schizophrenia, Strasbourg, France.
- Strasbourg University, Faculty of Medicine, Strasbourg, France.
- Fédération de Médecine translationnelle de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
King VL, Siegel G, Priesmeyer HR, Siegel LH, Potter JS. Development and Evaluation of a Digital App for Patient Self-Management of Opioid Use Disorder: Usability, Acceptability, and Utility Study. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8:e48068. [PMID: 38557501 PMCID: PMC11019416 DOI: 10.2196/48068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-management of opioid use disorder (OUD) is an important component of treatment. Many patients receiving opioid agonist treatment in methadone maintenance treatment settings benefit from counseling treatments to help them improve their recovery skills but have insufficient access to these treatments between clinic appointments. In addition, many addiction medicine clinicians treating patients with OUD in a general medical clinic setting do not have consistent access to counseling referrals for their patients. This can lead to decreases in both treatment retention and overall progress in the patient's recovery from substance misuse. Digital apps may help to bridge this gap by coaching, supporting, and reinforcing behavioral change that is initiated and directed by their psychosocial and medical providers. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to conduct an acceptability, usability, and utility pilot study of the KIOS app to address these clinical needs. METHODS We developed a unique, patient-centered computational software system (KIOS; Biomedical Development Corporation) to assist in managing OUD in an outpatient, methadone maintenance clinic setting. KIOS tracks interacting self-reported symptoms (craving, depressed mood, anxiety, irritability, pain, agitation or restlessness, difficulty sleeping, absenteeism, difficulty with usual activities, and conflicts with others) to determine changes in both the trajectory and severity of symptom patterns over time. KIOS then applies a proprietary algorithm to assess the individual's patterns of symptom interaction in accordance with models previously established by OUD experts. After this analysis, KIOS provides specific behavioral advice addressing the individual's changing trajectory of symptoms to help the person self-manage their symptoms. The KIOS software also provides analytics on the self-reported data that can be used by patients, clinicians, and researchers to track outcomes. RESULTS In a 4-week acceptability, usability (mean System Usability Scale-Modified score 89.5, SD 9.2, maximum of 10.0), and utility (mean KIOS utility questionnaire score 6.32, SD 0.25, maximum of 7.0) pilot study of 15 methadone-maintained participants with OUD, user experience, usability, and software-generated advice received high and positive assessment scores. The KIOS clinical variables closely correlated with craving self-report measures. Therefore, managing these variables with advice generated by the KIOS software could have an impact on craving and ultimately substance use. CONCLUSIONS KIOS tracks key clinical variables and generates advice specifically relevant to the patient's current and changing clinical state. Patients in this pilot study assigned high positive values to the KIOS user experience, ease of use, and the appropriateness, relevance, and usefulness of the specific behavioral guidance they received to match their evolving experiences. KIOS may therefore be useful to augment in-person treatment of opioid agonist patients and help fill treatment gaps that currently exist in the continuum of care. A National Institute on Drug Abuse-funded randomized controlled trial of KIOS to augment in-person treatment of patients with OUD is currently being conducted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Van Lewis King
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Gregg Siegel
- Biomedical Development Corporation, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | | | - Leslie H Siegel
- Biomedical Development Corporation, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Jennifer S Potter
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
MacLean RR, Ankawi B, Driscoll MA, Gordon MA, Frankforter TL, Nich C, Szollosy SK, Loya JM, Brito L, Ribeiro MIP, Edmond SN, Becker WC, Martino S, Sofuoglu M, Heapy AA. Efficacy of Integrating the Management of Pain and Addiction via Collaborative Treatment (IMPACT) in Individuals With Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial of a Digital Cognitive Behavioral Treatment. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e54342. [PMID: 38506917 PMCID: PMC10993119 DOI: 10.2196/54342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain is common among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) who are maintained on medications for OUD (MOUD; eg, buprenorphine or methadone). Chronic pain is associated with worse retention and higher levels of substance use. Treatment of individuals with chronic pain receiving MOUD can be challenging due to their increased clinical complexity. Given the acute and growing nature of the opioid crisis, MOUD is increasingly offered in a wide range of settings, where high-quality, clinician-delivered, empirically validated behavioral treatment for chronic pain may not be available. Therefore, digital treatments that support patient self-management of chronic pain and OUD have the potential for wider implementation to fill this gap. OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of Integrating the Management of Pain and Addiction via Collaborative Treatment (IMPACT), an interactive digital treatment program with asynchronous coach feedback, compared to treatment as usual (TAU) in individuals with chronic pain and OUD receiving MOUD. METHODS Adult participants (n=160) receiving MOUD and reporting bothersome or high-impact chronic pain will be recruited from outpatient opioid treatment programs in Connecticut (United States) and randomized 1:1 to either IMPACT+TAU or TAU only. Participants randomized to IMPACT+TAU will complete an interactive digital treatment that includes 9 modules promoting training in pain and addiction coping skills and a progressive walking program. The program is augmented with a weekly personalized voice message from a trained coach based on daily participant-reported pain intensity and interference, craving to use opioids, sleep quality, daily steps, pain self-efficacy, MOUD adherence, and engagement with IMPACT collected through digital surveys. Outcomes will be assessed at 3, 6, and 9 months post randomization. The primary outcome is MOUD retention at 3 months post randomization (ie, post treatment). Secondary outcomes include pain interference, physical functioning, MOUD adherence, substance use, craving, pain intensity, sleep disturbance, pain catastrophizing, and pain self-efficacy. Semistructured qualitative interviews with study participants (n=34) randomized to IMPACT (completers and noncompleters) will be conducted to evaluate the usability and quality of the program and its outcomes. RESULTS The study has received institutional review board approval and began recruitment at 1 site in July 2022. Recruitment at a second site started in January 2023, with a third and final site anticipated to begin recruitment in January 2024. Data collection is expected to continue through June 2025. CONCLUSIONS Establishing efficacy for a digital treatment for addiction and chronic pain that can be integrated into MOUD clinics will provide options for individuals with OUD, which reduce barriers to behavioral treatment. Participant feedback on the intervention will inform updates or modifications to improve engagement and efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05204576; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05204576. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/54342.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Ross MacLean
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, United States
- School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Brett Ankawi
- School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, United States
| | - Mary A Driscoll
- School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, United States
| | - Melissa A Gordon
- School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | | | - Charla Nich
- School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Sara K Szollosy
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, United States
| | - Jennifer M Loya
- School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Larissa Brito
- School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | | | - Sara N Edmond
- School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, United States
| | - William C Becker
- School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, United States
| | - Steve Martino
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, United States
- School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Mehmet Sofuoglu
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, United States
- School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Alicia A Heapy
- School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kiburi SK, Paruk S, Kwobah EK, Chiliza B. Exploring user experiences of a text message-delivered intervention among individuals on opioid use disorder treatment in Kenya: A qualitative study. PLOS DIGITAL HEALTH 2023; 2:e0000375. [PMID: 37930956 PMCID: PMC10627438 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
Opioid use disorder causes significant burden of disease and treatment comprises pharmacotherapy and psychosocial treatment. Cognitive behavioral therapy is an effective psychosocial intervention used in substance use disorders treatment and can be delivered using digital approach. There is limited use of digital treatment among individuals with opioid use disorder in Kenya. This study aimed to describe the experiences and feedback from participants with opioid use disorder enrolled in a text-message intervention in Kenya. Qualitative data was collected from participants in the intervention arm of a feasibility trial testing a text-message intervention based on cognitive behavioral therapy. Data was collected using open-ended questions in a questionnaire and structured in-depth interviews amongst those who received the intervention. Framework method was applied for analysis. Twenty-four participants (83.3% males) were enrolled with a mean age of 32.5 years (SD9.5). Five themes were identified namely: (1) Gain of cognitive behavioral therapy skills which included: identification and change of substance use patterns; drug refusal skills; coping with craving and self-efficacy; (2) Therapeutic alliance which included: development of a bond and agreement on treatment goals; (3) Feedback on intervention components and delivery such as: frequency, and duration of the text message intervention; (4) Challenges experienced during the intervention such as: technical problems with phones; and barriers related to intervention delivery; (5) Recommendations for improvement of intervention in future implementations. The findings demonstrated participants' satisfaction with intervention, gain of skills to change substance use patterns, highlighted challenges experienced and suggestions on improving the intervention among individuals with opioid use disorder. The feedback and recommendations provided by the participants can guide implementation of such interventions to allow acceptability, effectiveness and sustainability. Trial registration: This study was part of a randomized feasibility trial. Clinical trial registration: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry: Registration number: PACTR202201736072847. Date of registration: 10th January 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Kanana Kiburi
- Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
- Discipline of Psychiatry, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Saeeda Paruk
- Discipline of Psychiatry, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Edith Kamaru Kwobah
- Department of Mental Health, Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Eldoret, Kenya
| | - Bonginkosi Chiliza
- Discipline of Psychiatry, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zerden LDS, Sullivan C, Galloway E, Richman EL, Gaiser MG, Lombardi B. Are DEA-waivered buprenorphine prescribers colocated with behavioral health clinicians? Am J Addict 2023; 32:574-583. [PMID: 37559344 DOI: 10.1111/ajad.13462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in primary care includes a combination of medication, behavioral therapy, and/or other psychosocial services. This study assessed rates of colocation between waivered prescribers and behavioral health clinicians across the United States to understand if rates varied by provider type and geographic indicators. METHODS Data from the DEA-Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 provider list as of March 2022 and the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System's National Provider Identifier database were gathered, cleaned, and formatted in Stata. Data were geocoded with ESRI StreetMap® database and ArcGIS software. Covariates at individual, county, and state levels were examined and compared. Chi-square statistics and a mixed-effects logistic regression were analyzed. RESULTS The sample (N = 71, 292 prescribers) included physicians (64%), nurse practitioners (29%), and physician assistants (7%). About 48% of prescribers were colocated with a behavioral health clinician. Physicians were the least likely to be colocated (47%), but differences between provider types were modest. We observed significant geographic differences in provider colocation by provider type. Mixed effects logistic regression identified significant predictors of colocation at individual, county, and state levels. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Optimally distributing the workforce providing MOUD is necessary to broadly ensure the provision of comprehensive MOUD care based on practice guidelines. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE Less than half of all waivered prescribers, outside of hospitals, are colocated with behavioral health clinicians. Findings offer greater clarity on where integrated MOUD is occurring, among which types of providers, and where it needs to be expanded to increase MOUD uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa de Saxe Zerden
- School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC Behavioral Health Workforce Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Connor Sullivan
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC Behavioral Health Workforce Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Evan Galloway
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC Behavioral Health Workforce Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Erica L Richman
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC Behavioral Health Workforce Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Maria G Gaiser
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC Behavioral Health Workforce Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Brianna Lombardi
- School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC Behavioral Health Workforce Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Social Work, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC Behavioral Health Workforce Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mutter R, Spencer D, McPheeters J. Outcomes Associated with Treatment with and Without Medications for Opioid Use Disorder. J Behav Health Serv Res 2023; 50:524-539. [PMID: 37311970 DOI: 10.1007/s11414-023-09841-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
There is limited research on outcomes for patients who start treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) with only psychosocial treatment compared to those who initiate treatment with either medications for OUD (MOUD) or the combination of psychosocial treatment and MOUD. Cox proportional hazards regression was used on a database of individuals with commercial health insurance or Medicare Advantage to estimate the associations of treatment type with opioid overdose and self-harm (separately). Logistic regression was used to estimate the association of treatment type with prescription opioid fill following treatment initiation. Relative to patients who initiated treatment with only psychosocial treatment, patients who also initiated treatment with MOUD had lower risk of having an overdose inpatient or emergency department (ED) encounter, a self-harm inpatient or ED encounter, and a prescription opioid filled following treatment initiation. Starting treatment with MOUD was associated with better patient outcomes than initiating treatment with only psychosocial treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Mutter
- Health Analysis Division, Congressional Budget Office, 441 D St SW, Washington, DC, 20515, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Flam-Ross JM, Marsh E, Weitz M, Savinkina A, Schackman BR, Wang J, Madushani RWMA, Morgan JR, Barocas JA, Walley AY, Chrysanthopoulou SA, Linas BP, Assoumou SA. Economic Evaluation of Extended-Release Buprenorphine for Persons With Opioid Use Disorder. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2329583. [PMID: 37703018 PMCID: PMC10500382 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance In 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a monthly injectable form of buprenorphine, extended-release buprenorphine; published data show that extended-release buprenorphine is effective compared with no treatment, but its current cost is higher and current retention is lower than that of transmucosal buprenorphine. Preliminary research suggests that extended-release buprenorphine may be an important addition to treatment options, but the cost-effectiveness of extended-release buprenorphine compared with transmucosal buprenorphine remains unclear. Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of extended-release buprenorphine compared with transmucosal buprenorphine. Design, Setting, and Participants This economic evaluation used a state transition model starting in 2019 to simulate the lifetime of a closed cohort of individuals with OUD presenting for evaluation for opioid agonist treatment with buprenorphine. The data sources used to estimate model parameters included cohort studies, clinical trials, and administrative data. The model relied on pharmaceutical costs from the Federal Supply Schedule and health care utilization costs from published studies. Data were analyzed from September 2021 to January 2023. Interventions No treatment, treatment with transmucosal buprenorphine, or treatment with extended-release buprenorphine. Main Outcomes and Measures Mean lifetime costs per person, discounted quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Results The simulated cohort included 100 000 patients with OUD receiving (61% male; mean [SD] age, 38 [11] years) or not receiving medication treatment (58% male, mean [SD] age, 48 [18] years). Compared with no medication treatment, treatment with transmucosal buprenorphine yielded an ICER of $19 740 per QALY. Compared with treatment with transmucosal buprenorphine, treatment with extended-release buprenorphine yielded lower effectiveness by 0.03 QALYs per person at higher cost, suggesting that treatment with extended-release buprenorphine was dominated and not preferred. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, treatment with transmucosal buprenorphine was the preferred strategy 60% of the time. Treatment with extended-release buprenorphine was cost-effective compared with treatment with transmucosal buprenorphine at a $100 000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold only after substantial changes in key parameters. Conclusions and Relevance In this economic evaluation of extended-release buprenorphine compared with transmucosal buprenorphine for the treatment of OUD, extended-release buprenorphine was not associated with efficient allocation of limited resources when transmucosal buprenorphine was available. Future initiatives should aim to improve retention rates or decrease costs associated with extended-release buprenorphine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet M. Flam-Ross
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Now with London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth Marsh
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michelle Weitz
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Bruce R. Schackman
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Jianing Wang
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Jake R. Morgan
- Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joshua A. Barocas
- Section of General Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Alexander Y. Walley
- Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Benjamin P. Linas
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
- Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sabrina A. Assoumou
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mahone A, Enich M, Treitler P, Lloyd J, Crystal S. Opioid use disorder treatment and the role of New Jersey Medicaid policy changes: perspectives of office-based buprenorphine providers. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE 2023; 49:606-617. [PMID: 37506336 PMCID: PMC10826857 DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2023.2234075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
Background: In the US, seventy percent of drug-related deaths are attributed to opioids. In response to the ongoing opioid crisis, New Jersey's (NJ) Medicaid program implemented the MATrx model to increase treatment access for Medicaid participants with opioid use disorder (OUD). The model's goals include increasing the number of office-based treatment providers, enhancing Medicaid reimbursement for certain treatment services, and elimination of prior authorizations for OUD medications.Objectives: To explore office-based addiction treatment providers' experiences delivering care in the context of statewide policy changes and their perspectives on treatment access changes and remaining barriers.Methods: This qualitative study used purposive sampling to recruit office-based New Jersey medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) providers . Twenty-two providers (11 females, 11 males) discussed treatment experiences since the policy changes in 2019, including evaluations of the current state of OUD care in New Jersey and perceived outcomes of the MATrx model policy changes.Results: Providers reported the MOUD climate in NJ improved as Medicaid implemented policies intended to reduce barriers to care and increase treatment access. Elimination of prior authorizations was noted as important, as it reduced provider burden and allowed greater focus on care delivery. However, barriers remained, including stigma, pharmacy supply issues, and difficulty obtaining injectable or non-generic medication formulations.Conclusion: NJ policies may have improved access to care for Medicaid beneficiaries by reducing barriers to care and supporting providers in prescribing MOUD. Yet, stigma and lack of psychosocial supports still need to be addressed to further improve access and care quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anais Mahone
- Center for Health Services Research, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 112 Paterson St. 3rd Floor, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
- School of Social Work, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 120 Albany St. New Brunswick, NJ 08901
| | - Michael Enich
- Center for Health Services Research, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 112 Paterson St. 3rd Floor, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
- School of Social Work, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 120 Albany St. New Brunswick, NJ 08901
| | - Peter Treitler
- Center for Health Services Research, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 112 Paterson St. 3rd Floor, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
- School of Social Work, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 120 Albany St. New Brunswick, NJ 08901
| | - James Lloyd
- Center for Health Services Research, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 112 Paterson St. 3rd Floor, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
| | - Stephen Crystal
- Center for Health Services Research, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 112 Paterson St. 3rd Floor, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
- School of Social Work, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 120 Albany St. New Brunswick, NJ 08901
- School of Public Health, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 683 Hoes Lane West. Piscataway, NJ 08854
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kim JJ, Nikoo M, Nikoo N, Javidanbardan S, Kazemi A, Choi F, Gholami A, Lafooraki NY, Vogel M, Rezazadeh-Azar P, Meyer M, Cabanis M, Jang K, Aknondzadeh S, Krausz M. Quality of life of patients treated with opium tincture or methadone: A randomized controlled trial. Drug Alcohol Depend 2023; 249:110874. [PMID: 37402335 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.110874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Quality of life (QoL) is an increasingly recognized patient-centered treatment outcome in individuals with opioid use disorder. There is a gap in literature on the impact of opium tincture (OT) on patients' QoL compared to standard treatment options such as methadone. This study aimed to compare the QoL of participants with opioid use disorder receiving OAT using OT or methadone and identify the factors associated with their QoL during treatment. METHODS The opium trial was a multicenter non-inferiority randomized clinical trial in four private OAT outpatient clinics in Iran. The study assigned patients to either OT (10 mg/ml) or methadone sirup (5 mg/ml) for a follow-up of 85 days. QoL was assessed using the brief version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument (WHOQOL- BREF). RESULTS A total of 83 participants, 35 (42.2%) in the OT arm and 48 (57.8%) in the methadone arm, completed the WHOQOL-BREF in full and were included in the primary analysis. The mean score of patients' QoL showed improvement compared to baseline, but differences were not statistically significant between OT and methadone arms (p = 0.786). Improvements were mainly observed within the first 30 days of receiving treatment. Being married and lower psychological distress were associated with an improved QoL. Within the social relationships domain, male gender showed significantly higher QoL compared to females. CONCLUSION OT shows promise as an OAT medication, comparable to methadone in improving patients' QoL. There is a need to incorporate psychosocial interventions to further sustain and improve the QoL in this population. Identifying other social determinants of health which affect QoL and the cultural adaptation of assessments for individuals from various ethnocultural backgrounds are critical areas of inquiry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane J Kim
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 2A1, Canada.
| | - Mohammadali Nikoo
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 2A1, Canada
| | - Nooshin Nikoo
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Alireza Kazemi
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 2A1, Canada
| | - Fiona Choi
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 2A1, Canada
| | - Ali Gholami
- Kian Methadone Maintenance Treatment Clinic, Sari, Mazandaran, Iran
| | - Neda Y Lafooraki
- Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Mazandaran, Iran
| | - Marc Vogel
- Division of Substance Use Disorders, University of Basel Psychiatric Clinics, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Pouya Rezazadeh-Azar
- Complex Pain and Addiction Services, Vancouver General Hospital & Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Maximilian Meyer
- University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Maurice Cabanis
- Center for Mental Health, Clinic for Addiction Medicine and Addictive Behavior, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, 70374, Germany
| | - Kerry Jang
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 2A1, Canada
| | - Shahin Aknondzadeh
- Psychiatric Research Center, Roozbeh Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran
| | - Michael Krausz
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 2A1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jones KF, O'Reilly Jacob M, Spetz J, Hailer L, Tierney M. Eliminate the buprenorphine DEA X waiver: Justification using a policy analysis approach. J Nurs Scholarsh 2023; 55:655-664. [PMID: 36624606 PMCID: PMC10159879 DOI: 10.1111/jnu.12871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Drug overdoses have reached a historic milestone of over 100,000 deaths in a single year, 75,673 related to opioids. The acceleration in opioid-related deaths coupled with stark health inequities demands a close examination of opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment barriers and swift consideration of policy changes. DESIGN The aim of this buprenorphine policy analysis is to summarize existing buprenorphine barriers and present policy solutions to improve access and actualize the contributions of Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs). METHODS The policy analysis follows five sequential steps: (1) defining the problem, (2) identifying key stakeholders, (3) assessing the landscape of relevant policies, (4) describing viable policy options, and (5) making final recommendations. RESULTS Although there are laudable efforts to improve buprenorphine access, such as the new buprenorphine guidelines issued in April 2021, without larger-scale changes to federal, state, and scope of practice laws, overdose rates will continue to rise. We recommend a multipronged policy approach to improve buprenorphine treatment access, including eliminating the DEA X waiver, improving OUD education, and adopting full practice authority for APRNs in all states. CONCLUSION Incremental change is no longer sufficient to address opioid overdose deaths. Bolder and coordinated policy action is possible and necessary to empower the full clinical workforce to apply evidence-based life-saving treatments for OUD. The critical contributions of nurses in advancing equitable access to OUD care are emphasized in the National Academy of Medicine's Report, Future of Nursing: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Nurses are named as instrumental in improving buprenorphine access. Policy changes that acknowledge and build on evidence-based treatment expansion strategies are sorely needed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE One of the most robust tools to combat opioid overdose deaths is buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist, and gold standard medication treatment for OUD, but only 5% of the prescribing workforce possess the required Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) X waiver. A growing body of evidence demonstrates that Advanced Practice Registered Nurses are accelerating the growth in waiver update and buprenorphine use, despite the considerable barriers and limitations described in this policy analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Fitzgerald Jones
- Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Mongan Institute for Aging and Serious Illness, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Boston College, William F. Connell School of Nursing, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Monica O'Reilly Jacob
- Boston College, William F. Connell School of Nursing, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joanne Spetz
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Matthew Tierney
- Office of Population Health, UCSF Health, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Winograd RP, Coffey B, Woolfolk C, Wood CA, Ilavarasan V, Liss D, Jain S, Stringfellow E. To Prescribe or Not to Prescribe?: Barriers and Motivators for Progressing Along Each Stage of the Buprenorphine Training and Prescribing Path. J Behav Health Serv Res 2023; 50:165-180. [PMID: 35060002 DOI: 10.1007/s11414-021-09783-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to identify the strongest barriers and motivators associated with each step toward buprenorphine prescribing (1. obtaining a waiver, 2. beginning to prescribe, and 3. prescribing to more people) among a sample of Missouri-based medical professionals (N = 130). Item weights (number of endorsements times mean rank of the item's importance) were calculated based on their responses. Across groups, lack of access to psychosocial support services, need for higher levels of care, and clinical complexity were strong barriers. Among non-prescribers (n = 57, 46.3%), administrative burden, potential of becoming an addiction clinic, and concern about misuse and diversion were most heavily weighted. Among prescribers (n = 66, 53.7%), patients' inability to afford medications was a barrier across phases. Prominent motivators among all groups were the effectiveness of buprenorphine, improvement in other health outcomes, and a personal interest in treating addiction. Only prescribers reported the presence of institutional support and mentors as significant motivators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel P Winograd
- St. Louis - Missouri Institute of Mental Health, University of Missouri, 43 Benton Court, St. Louis, MO, 63121, USA.
| | - Bridget Coffey
- St. Louis - Missouri Institute of Mental Health, University of Missouri, 43 Benton Court, St. Louis, MO, 63121, USA
| | - Candice Woolfolk
- St. Louis - Missouri Institute of Mental Health, University of Missouri, 43 Benton Court, St. Louis, MO, 63121, USA
| | - Claire A Wood
- St. Louis - Missouri Institute of Mental Health, University of Missouri, 43 Benton Court, St. Louis, MO, 63121, USA
| | - Vinith Ilavarasan
- St. Louis - Missouri Institute of Mental Health, University of Missouri, 43 Benton Court, St. Louis, MO, 63121, USA
| | - David Liss
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Subodh Jain
- Spectrum Health, Division of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, 2750 E Beltline NE, Grand Rapids, MI, 49525, USA
| | - Erin Stringfellow
- Massachusetts General Hospital Institute for Technology Assessment & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kiburi SK, Ngarachu E, Tomita A, Paruk S, Chiliza B. Digital interventions for opioid use disorder treatment: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Subst Abuse Treat 2023; 144:108926. [PMID: 36356329 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Opioid use disorders are associated with a high burden of disease and treatment gap. Digital interventions can be used to provide psycho-social treatment for opioid use disorders, as an alternative to or together with face-to-face interventions. This review aimed to assess the application and effectiveness of digital interventions to treat opioid use disorder globally. METHODS The study team searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Psych INFO, Web of Science and Cochrane Central register of controlled trials). The inclusion criteria were: randomized controlled trials, assessment for opioid use before and at least once following intervention, and use of digital interventions. The primary outcomes were opioid use and/or retention in treatment, with data being summarized in tables and a narrative review presented. RESULTS The initial database search yielded 3542 articles, of which this review includes 20. Nineteen were conducted among adults in the United States. The digital interventions used included web-based, computer-based, telephone calls, video conferencing, automated self-management system, mobile applications and text messaging. They were based on therapeutic education systems, community reinforcement approaches, cognitive behavior therapy, relapse prevention, brief interventions, supportive counselling and motivational interviewing. The studies had mixed findings; of the 20 studies, 10 had statistically significant differences between the treatment groups for opioid abstinence, and four had significant differences for treatment retention. Comparisons were difficult due to varying methodologies. Participants rated the interventions as acceptable and reported high rates of satisfaction. CONCLUSION The use of digital interventions for opioid use disorder treatment was acceptable, with varying levels of effectiveness for improving outcomes, which is influenced by participant and intervention delivery factors. Further studies in different parts of the world should compare these findings, specifically in low- and middle-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Kanana Kiburi
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Nelson Mandela School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa; Department of Psychiatry, Mbagathi Hospital, Nairobi, Postal address P.O. Box 20725-00202, Nairobi, Kenya.
| | - Elizabeth Ngarachu
- Department of Psychiatry, Mathari Teaching and Referral Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Andrew Tomita
- Centre for Rural Health, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa; KwaZulu-Natal Research Innovation and Sequencing Platform, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
| | - Saeeda Paruk
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Nelson Mandela School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Bonginkosi Chiliza
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Nelson Mandela School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Calcaterra SL, Bottner R, Martin M, Englander H, Weinstein ZM, Weimer MB, Lambert E, Ronan MV, Huerta S, Zaman T, Ullal M, Peterkin AF, Torres-Lockhart K, Buresh M, O’Brien MT, Snyder H, Herzig SJ. Management of opioid use disorder, opioid withdrawal, and opioid overdose prevention in hospitalized adults: A systematic review of existing guidelines. J Hosp Med 2022; 17:679-692. [PMID: 35880821 PMCID: PMC9474657 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.12908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospitalizations related to the consequences of opioid use are rising. National guidelines directing in-hospital opioid use disorder (OUD) management do not exist. OUD treatment guidelines intended for other treatment settings could inform in-hospital OUD management. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the quality and content of existing guidelines for OUD treatment and management. DATA SOURCES OVID MEDLINE, PubMed, Ovid PsychINFO, EBSCOhost CINHAL, ERCI Guidelines Trust, websites of relevant societies and advocacy organizations, and selected international search engines. STUDY SELECTION Guidelines published between January 2010 to June 2020 addressing OUD treatment, opioid withdrawal management, opioid overdose prevention, and care transitions among adults. DATA EXTRACTION We assessed quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. DATA SYNTHESIS Nineteen guidelines met the selection criteria. Most recommendations were based on observational studies or expert consensus. Guidelines recommended the use of nonstigmatizing language among patients with OUD; to assess patients with unhealthy opioid use for OUD using the Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Diseases-5th Edition criteria; use of methadone or buprenorphine to treat OUD and opioid withdrawal; use of multimodal, nonopioid therapy, and when needed, short-acting opioid analgesics in addition to buprenorphine or methadone, for acute pain management; ensuring linkage to ongoing methadone or buprenorphine treatment; referring patients to psychosocial treatment; and ensuring access to naloxone for opioid overdose reversal. CONCLUSIONS Included guidelines were informed by studies with various levels of rigor and quality. Future research should systematically study buprenorphine and methadone initiation and titration among people using fentanyl and people with pain, especially during hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan L. Calcaterra
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Richard Bottner
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Marlene Martin
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco and San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Honora Englander
- Section of Addiction Medicine and Division of Hospital Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Zoe M. Weinstein
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Section of General Internal Medicine, Clinical Addiction Research and Education (CARE) Unit, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Eugene Lambert
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA and Massachusetts General Hospital, Medicine, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Matthew V. Ronan
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA and Massachusetts General Hospital, Medicine, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, MA, USA
| | - Sergio Huerta
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, NM, USA
| | - Tauheed Zaman
- San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Monish Ullal
- Department of Internal Medicine at Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Alyssa F. Peterkin
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Section of General Internal Medicine, Clinical Addiction Research and Education (CARE) Unit, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Megan Buresh
- Division of Addiction Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Meghan T. O’Brien
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco and San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hannah Snyder
- Family Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Shoshana J. Herzig
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA and Massachusetts General Hospital, Medicine, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Garg R, Kitchen SA, Men S, Campbell TJ, Bozinoff N, Tadrous M, Antoniou T, Wyman J, Werb D, Munro C, Gomes T. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the prevalence of opioid agonist therapy discontinuation in Ontario, Canada: A population-based time series analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend 2022; 236:109459. [PMID: 35489179 PMCID: PMC9008980 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We assessed the impact of COVID-19, which includes the declaration of a state of emergency and subsequent release of pandemic-specific OAT guidance (March 17, 2020 to March 23, 2020) on the prevalence of OAT discontinuation. METHODS We conducted a population-based time series analysis using interventional autoregressive integrated moving average models among Ontario residents who were stable (>60 days of continuous use) and not yet stable on OAT. Specifically, we examined whether COVID-19 impacted the weekly percentage of individuals who discontinued OAT, overall and stratified by treatment type (methadone vs. buprenorphine/naloxone). Additionally, we compared demographic characteristics and patient outcomes among people stable on OAT who discontinued treatment during (March 17, 2020 to November 30, 2020) and prior (July 3, 2019 to March 16, 2020) to the pandemic. RESULTS The weekly prevalence of OAT discontinuation across the study period ranged between 0.6% and 1.1%, among those stable on treatment compared to 7.3% and 16.6%, among those not stable on treatment. Following COVID-19, there was no significant change in the percentage of Ontarians who discontinued OAT, regardless of whether they were stabilized on treatment. Among those stable on OAT, a similar proportion of patients restarted therapy and experienced opioid-related harm following an OAT discontinuation. However, mortality following OAT discontinuation must be noted, as approximately 1.4% and 0.8% of people who discontinued methadone and buprenorphine/naloxone respectively, died within 30 days of discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS Trends in the prevalence of OAT discontinuation did not significantly change during the first eight months of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ria Garg
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sophie A. Kitchen
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Siyu Men
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Tonya J. Campbell
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s Hospital, 30 Bond St, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Nikki Bozinoff
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 250 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1R8, Canada,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1V7, Canada
| | - Mina Tadrous
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada,Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College St, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3M2, Canada,Women’s College Hospital, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1B2, Canada
| | - Tony Antoniou
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada,Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s Hospital, 30 Bond St, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1V7, Canada,Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Jennifer Wyman
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College St, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3M2, Canada,Women’s College Hospital, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1B2, Canada
| | - Dan Werb
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s Hospital, 30 Bond St, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada,Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada,Division of Infectious Diseases & Global Public Health at the University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Charlotte Munro
- Ontario Drug Policy Research Network Lived Experience Advisory Group, Canada
| | - Tara Gomes
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond St, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College St, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3M2, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation at the University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Krawczyk N, Bandara S, Merritt S, Shah H, Duncan A, McEntee B, Schiff M, Ahmad NJ, Whaley S, Latimore A, Saloner B. Jail-based treatment for opioid use disorder in the era of bail reform: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to implementation of a state-wide medication treatment initiative. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2022; 17:30. [PMID: 35655293 PMCID: PMC9161649 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-022-00313-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Until recently, few carceral facilities offered medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Although more facilities are adopting MOUD, much remains to be learned about addressing implementation challenges related to expansion of MOUD in carceral settings and linkage to care upon re-entry. This is particularly important in jails, where individuals cycle rapidly in and out of these facilities, especially in jurisdictions beginning to implement bail reform laws (i.e., laws that remove the requirement to pay bail for most individuals). Increasing access to MOUD in these settings is a key unexplored challenge. Methods In this qualitative study, we interviewed staff from county jails across New Jersey, a state that has implemented state-wide efforts to increase capacity for MOUD treatment in jails. We analyzed themes related to current practices used to engage individuals in MOUD while in jail and upon re-entry; major challenges to delivering MOUD and re-entry services, particularly under bail reform conditions; and innovative strategies to facilitate delivery of these services. Results Jail staff from 11 New Jersey county jails participated in a baseline survey and an in-depth qualitative interview from January–September 2020. Responses revealed that practices for delivering MOUD varied substantially across jails. Primary challenges included jails’ limited resources and highly regulated operations, the chaotic nature of short jail stays, and concerns regarding limited MOUD and resources in the community. Still, jail staff identified multiple facilitators and creative solutions for delivering MOUD in the face of these obstacles, including opportunities brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions Despite challenges to the delivery of MOUD, states can make concerted and sustained efforts to support opioid addiction treatment in jails. Increased use of evidence-based clinical guidelines, greater investment in resources, and increased partnerships with health and social service providers can greatly improve reach of treatment and save lives. Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13722-022-00313-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noa Krawczyk
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison Ave, Room 4-12, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Sachini Bandara
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sydney Merritt
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hridika Shah
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | - N Jia Ahmad
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sara Whaley
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amanda Latimore
- Center for Addiction Research and Effective Solutions, American Institutes for Research, Arlington, VA, USA
| | - Brendan Saloner
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lim J, Farhat I, Douros A, Panagiotoglou D. Relative effectiveness of medications for opioid-related disorders: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0266142. [PMID: 35358261 PMCID: PMC8970369 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Several pharmacotherapeutic interventions are available for maintenance treatment for opioid-related disorders. However, previous meta-analyses have been limited to pairwise comparisons of these interventions, and their efficacy relative to all others remains unclear. Our objective was to unify findings from different healthcare practices and generate evidence to strengthen clinical treatment protocols for the most widely prescribed medications for opioid-use disorders. METHODS We searched Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov for all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT) from database inception to February 12, 2022. Primary outcome was treatment retention, and secondary outcome was opioid use measured by urinalysis. We calculated risk ratios (RR) and 95% credible interval (CrI) using Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) for available evidence. We assessed the credibility of the NMA using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis tool. RESULTS Seventy-nine RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Due to heterogeneity in measuring opioid use and reporting format between studies, we conducted NMA only for treatment retention. Methadone was the highest ranked intervention (Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking [SUCRA] = 0.901) in the network with control being the lowest (SUCRA = 0.000). Methadone was superior to buprenorphine for treatment retention (RR = 1.22; 95% CrI = 1.06-1.40) and buprenorphine superior to naltrexone (RR = 1.39; 95% CrI = 1.10-1.80). However, due to a limited number of high-quality trials, confidence in the network estimates of other treatment pairs involving naltrexone and slow-release oral morphine (SROM) remains low. CONCLUSION All treatments had higher retention than the non-pharmacotherapeutic control group. However, additional high-quality RCTs are needed to estimate more accurately the extent of efficacy of naltrexone and SROM relative to other medications. For pharmacotherapies with established efficacy profiles, assessment of their long-term comparative effectiveness may be warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION This systematic review has been registered with PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero) (identifier CRD42021256212).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihoon Lim
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Imen Farhat
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Antonios Douros
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dimitra Panagiotoglou
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Alawa J, Muhammad M, Kazemitabar M, Bromberg DJ, Garcia D, Khoshnood K, Ghandour L. Medication for opioid use disorder in the Arab World: A systematic review. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2022; 102:103617. [PMID: 35182841 PMCID: PMC9851143 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a global public health concern. The standard of care for OUD involves treatment using medications such as buprenorphine, methadone, or naltrexone. No known review exists to assess the contextual factors associated with medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in the Arab World. This systematic review serves as an implementation science study to address this research gap and improve the uptake of MOUD in the Arab World. METHODS Systematic searches of Medline, PsycINFO, and EMBASE, and a citation analysis, were used to identify peer-reviewed articles with original data on MOUD in the Arab World. Quality assessment was conducted using the CASP appraisal tools, and main findings were extracted and coded according to the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. RESULTS 652 research articles were identified, and 10 met inclusion criteria for final review. Four studies considered health-systems aspects of MOUD administration, such as cost-effectiveness, the motivations for and impact of national MOUD policies, the types of social, political, and scientific advocacy that led to the adoption of MOUD in Arab countries, and the challenges limiting its wide-scale adoption in the Arab World. Six papers considered MOUD at individual and group patient levels by evaluating patient quality of life, addiction severity, patient satisfaction, and patient perspectives on opioid agonist therapy. CONCLUSION Despite financial and geographic barriers that limit access to MOUD in the Arab World, this review found MOUD to be cost-effective and associated with positive health outcomes for OUD patients in the Arab World. MOUD can be successfully established and scaled to the national level in the Arab context, and strong coalitions of health practitioners can lobby to establish MOUD programs in Arab countries. Still, the relative novelty of MOUD in this context precludes an abundance of research to address its long-term delivery in the Arab World.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jude Alawa
- Stanford University School of Medicine, 291 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, United States
| | - Muzzammil Muhammad
- Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06510, United States
| | - Maryam Kazemitabar
- Yale University School of Public Health, 60 College St, New Haven, CT 06510, United States
| | - Daniel J Bromberg
- Yale University School of Public Health, 60 College St, New Haven, CT 06510, United States
| | - Danilo Garcia
- Centre for Ethics, Law and Mental Health (CELAM), University of Gothenburg, Box 100, 405 30 Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, SE 581 83, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Kaveh Khoshnood
- Yale University School of Public Health, 60 College St, New Haven, CT 06510, United States
| | - Lilian Ghandour
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Van Dyck Building, PO Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kiburi SK, Mwangi J, Maina G. Exploring the experiences of clients receiving opioid use disorder treatment at a methadone clinic in Kenya: a qualitative study. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2022; 17:71. [PMID: 36510246 PMCID: PMC9742652 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-022-00352-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assessing the experiences of individuals on methadone treatment is essential to help evaluate the treatment program's effectiveness. This study aimed to explore the experiences of patients receiving methadone treatment at a clinic in Nairobi, Kenya. METHOD This study employed an exploratory qualitative study design. Through purposive sampling, participants were enrolled from individuals attending a methadone clinic for at least 2 years. Semi-structured individual interviews were used to collect data on substance use and experience before methadone treatment and experiences after starting methadone treatment, including benefits and challenges. Interviews were transcribed, and NVIVO 12 software was used to code the data using the preidentified analytical framework. Thematic analyses were utilized to identify cross-cutting themes between these two data sets. Seventeen participants were enrolled. RESULTS Seventeen participants were enrolled comprising 70% males, with age range from 23 to 49 years and more than half had secondary education. The interview data analysis identified four themes, namely: (a) the impact of opioid use before starting treatment which included adverse effects on health, legal problems and family dysfunction; (b) learning about methadone treatment whereby the majority were referred from community linkage programs, family and friends; (c) experiences with care at the methadone treatment clinic which included benefits such as improved health, family reintegration and stigma reduction; and (d) barriers to optimal methadone treatment such as financial constraints. CONCLUSION The findings of this study show that clients started methadone treatment due to the devastating impact of opioid use disorder on their lives. Methadone treatment allowed them to regain their lives from the adverse effects of opioid use disorder. Additionally, challenges such as financial constraints while accessing treatment were reported. These findings can help inform policies to improve the impact of methadone treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Kanana Kiburi
- grid.411192.e0000 0004 1756 6158Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya ,grid.16463.360000 0001 0723 4123Discipline of Psychiatry, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Jackline Mwangi
- grid.9762.a0000 0000 8732 4964Department of Psychology, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Geoffrey Maina
- grid.25152.310000 0001 2154 235XCollege of Nursing, Prince Albert Campus, University of Saskatchewan, Prince Albert, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Influence of Prolonged Serotonin and Ergovaline Pre-Exposure on Vasoconstriction Ex Vivo. Toxins (Basel) 2021; 14:toxins14010009. [PMID: 35050986 PMCID: PMC8777993 DOI: 10.3390/toxins14010009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Ergot alkaloid mycotoxins interfere in many functions associated with serotonergic neurotransmitters. Therefore, the objective was to evaluate whether the association of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) and ergot alkaloids during a 24 h pre-incubation could affect the vascular contractile response to ergot alkaloids. To evaluate the effects of 24 h exposure to 5-HT and ergot alkaloids (ergovaline, ERV), two assays were conducted. The first assay determined the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) following the 24 h pre-exposure period, while the second assay evaluated the effect of IC50 concentrations of 5-HT and ERV either individually or in combination. There was an interaction between previous exposure to 5-HT and ERV. Previous exposure to 5-HT at the IC50 concentration of 7.57 × 10−7 M reduced the contractile response by more than 50% of control, while the exposure to ERV at IC50 dose of 1.57 × 10−10 M tended to decrease (p = 0.081) vessel contractility with a response higher than 50% of control. The 24 h previous exposure to both 5-HT and ERV did not potentiate the inhibitory response of blood vessels in comparison with incubation with each compound alone. These results suggest receptor competition between 5-HT and ERV. More studies are necessary to determine the potential of 5-HT to treat toxicosis caused by ergot alkaloids.
Collapse
|
20
|
Evaluating how has care been affected by the Ontario COVID-19 Opioid Agonist Treatment Guidance: Patients’ and prescribers’ experiences with changes in unsupervised dosing. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2021; 102:103573. [PMID: 35123246 PMCID: PMC8695187 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Background Method Results Conclusions
Collapse
|
21
|
Silva TC, Andersson FB. The "black box" of treatment: Patients' perspective on what works in opioid maintenance treatment for opioid dependence. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2021; 16:41. [PMID: 33971909 PMCID: PMC8111936 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-021-00378-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A lack of conceptual modeling of how the components of opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) for opioid dependence (OD) work causes it to occasionally be labeled the "black-box" of treatment. This study had a two-fold objective: First, to analyze which factors related to OMT for OD contribute to the abstinence of problematic use of non-prescribed opioids and sustain recovery, from the patients' perspective; second, to understand which changes OMT produced in the individuals' lives might significantly contribute to relapse prevention. METHODS We used qualitative methods of design, inquiry, and analysis from a convenience sample of 19 individuals in a Swedish treatment setting. RESULTS All the participants reported previous cycles of problematic use of non-prescribed opioids and other non-prescribed psychoactive substances, treatment, abstinence, recovery, and relapse before starting the current OMT program. During the pre-treatment stage, specific events, internal processes, and social environments enhanced motivation toward abstinence and seeking treatment. During the treatment stage, participants perceived the quality of the human relationships established with primary social groups as important as medication and the individual plan of care in sustaining recovery. From the participants' perspective, OMT was a turning point in their life course, allowing them a sense of self-fulfillment and the reconstruction of personal and social identity. However, they still struggled with the stigmatization produced by a society that values abstinence-oriented over medication-assisted treatments. CONCLUSION OMT is not an isolated event in individuals' lives but rather a process occurring within a specific social context. Structural factors and the sense of acceptance and belonging are essential in supporting the transformation. Treatment achievements and the risk for relapse vary over time, so the objectives of the treatment plan must account for characteristics of the pre-treatment stage and the availability and capacity of individuals to restructure their social network, besides the opioid maintenance treatment and institutional social care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa C. Silva
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Mid Sweden University, 10 – 85170 Holmgatan, Sundsvall, Sweden
- Risk and Crisis Research Center, Mid Sweden University, Kunskapens väg 1, Stapelmohrs väg, 831 40 Östersund, Sweden
| | - Fredrik B. Andersson
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Mid Sweden University, 10 – 85170 Holmgatan, Sundsvall, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|