Comparison of the SpO2/FIO2 ratio and the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS

Definitions of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Present Recommendations and Challenges

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an acute inflammatory process resulting in diffuse lung injury precipitated by an underlying risk factor. However, current definitions may pose barriers to the accurate diagnosis of this syndrome. These include changes in risk factors and associated disease evolution of ARDS, changes in contemporary clinical practice, and access to diagnostic tools required to diagnose ARDS in resource-limited settings. A consensus conference has proposed changes for an expanded global definition of ARDS. In this review article, we review challenges in defining ARDS and present recommendations of the global definition of ARDS.

The predictive capacity of biomarkers for clinical pulmonary oedema in patients with severe falciparum malaria is low: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary oedema is a feared and difficult to predict complication of severe malaria that can emerge after start of antimalarial treatment. Proinflammatory mediators are thought to play a central role in its pathogenesis.

METHODS

An exploratory study was conducted to evaluate the predictive capacity of biomarkers for development of clinical pulmonary oedema in patients with severe falciparum malaria at two hospitals in Bangladesh. Plasma concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, tumour necrosis factor (TNF), soluble Receptor of Advanced Glycation End-products (sRAGE), surfactant protein-D (SP-D), club cell secretory protein (CC16), and Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) on admission were compared with healthy controls. Correlations between these biomarker and plasma lactate and Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP2) levels were evaluated. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to assess the predictive capacity for clinical pulmonary oedema of the biomarkers of interest.

RESULTS

Of 106 screened patients with falciparum malaria, 56 were classified as having severe malaria with a mortality rate of 29%. Nine (16%) patients developed clinical pulmonary oedema after admission. Plasma levels of the biomarkers of interest were higher in patients compared to healthy controls. IL-6, IL-8, TNF, sRAGE, and CC16 levels correlated well with plasma PfHRP2 levels (rs = 0.39; P = 0.004, rs = 0.43; P = 0.001, rs = 0.54; P < 0.001, rs = 0.44; P < 0.001, rs = 0.43; P = 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, IL-6 and IL-8 levels correlated well with plasma lactate levels (rs = 0.37; P = 0.005, rs = 0.47; P < 0.001, respectively). None of the biomarkers of interest had predictive capacity for development of clinical pulmonary oedema.

CONCLUSIONS

IL-6, IL-8, TNF, sRAGE, SP-D, CC16 and KL-6 cannot be used in predicting clinical pulmonary oedema in severe malaria patients.

Enhancing the estimation of PaCO2 from etCO2 during ventilation through non-invasive parameters in the ovine model

BACKGROUND

In mechanically ventilated neonates, the arterial partial pressure of CO 2 ( PaCO 2 ) is an important indicator for the adequacy of ventilation settings. Determining the PaCO 2 is commonly done using invasive blood gas analyses, which constitute risks for neonates and are typically only available infrequently. An accurate, reliable, and continuous estimation of PaCO 2 is of high interest for medical staff, giving the possibility of a closer monitoring and faster reactions to changes. We aim to present a non-invasive estimation method for PaCO 2 in neonates on the basis of end-tidal CO 2 ( etCO 2 ) with inclusion of different physiological and ventilation parameters. The estimation method should be more accurate than an estimation by unaltered etCO 2 measurements with regard to the mean absolute error and the standard deviation.

METHODS

Secondary data from 51 preterm lambs are used, due to its high comparability to preterm human data. We utilize robust linear regression on 863 PaCO 2 measurements below or equal to 75 mmHg from the first day of life. etCO 2 along with a set of ventilation settings and measurements as well as vital parameters are included in the regression. Included independent variables are chosen iteratively by highest Pearson correlation to the remaining estimation deviation.

RESULTS

The evaluation is carried out on 12 additional neonatal lambs with 246 PaCO 2 measurements below or equal to 75 mmHg from the first two days of life. The estimation method shows a mean absolute error of 3.80 mmHg with a 4.92 mmHg standard deviation of differences and a standard error of 0.31 mmHg in comparison to measured PaCO 2 by blood gas analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The estimation of PaCO 2 by the proposed equation is less biased than unaltered etCO 2 . The usage of this method in clinical practice or in applications like the automation of ventilation needs further investigation.

Prognostic significance of oxygen saturation/fraction of inspired oxygen 3 days after initiation of tocilizumab treatment in patients with COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Tocilizumab is effective in treating severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the specific time point it acts as a valid indicator of treatment efficacy remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the optimal day for assessing the prognostic value of the oxygen saturation/fraction of inspired oxygen (SpO2/FiO2) and ratio of respiratory rate-oxygenation (ROX) index in patients receiving tocilizumab for COVID-19.

METHODS

All patients admitted to our hospital from March 2020 to July 2021 who received tocilizumab for COVID-19 were retrospectively identified from hospital charts. Biodata, medical history, and laboratory tests results were obtained from medical records. The prognostic values of the SpO2/FiO2 and ROX index for predicting mortality were assessed. Cox proportional hazard and receiver operating characteristic curve models were utilized.

RESULTS

Of the 84 included patients, 34 died within 7 days after discharge. The patients who recovered had a mean age of 65 years and were younger than those who died. The multivariate analysis indicated that multiple comorbidities, cancer history, CURB-65 score, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, and lactate dehydrogenase levels were higher in those who died compared with those who survived. No significant differences were found in dyspnea or total bilirubin levels between the two groups. The SpO2/FiO2 at 3 days post-tocilizumab initiation was strongly associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The SpO2/FiO2 on day 3 post-tocilizumab initiation was a predictor of COVID-19 prognosis, which could be employed in determining clinical decisions. Prompt alternative interventions should be considered when this ratio does not improve.

The LIVERAID (LIVER And Infectious Diseases)-ICU score predicts in-hospital mortality in liver cirrhosis patients with infections in the intensive care unit

OBJECTIVES

The admission of patients with liver cirrhosis to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to infections is a frequent occurrence, often leading to complications such as hepatic encephalopathy, renal failure and circulatory collapse, significantly elevating mortality risks. Accurate and timely diagnosis and intervention are critical for improving therapeutic outcomes. In this context, medical scoring systems in ICUs are essential for precise diagnosis, severity assessment and appropriate therapeutic strategies. There are no specific models for the prediction of mortality in ICU patients with liver cirrhosis-associated infections. This study aims to develop an improved prognostic scoring system for predicting in-hospital mortality among liver cirrhosis patients with infections in the ICU. This scoring system is designed to enhance the predictive accuracy of in-hospital mortality complementing existing sepsis and liver-specific prognostic models.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted in 620 patients with liver cirrhosis, treated for infections in the ICU of a German university hospital during 2017-19. Advanced statistical techniques were employed to develop and validate the LIVERAID (LIVER And Infectious Diseases)-ICU score, a novel scoring system specifically tailored for liver cirrhosis patients in the ICU with infections. The development of the multivariable logistic regression model involved selecting variables with the highest prognostic efficacy, and its predictive performance was assessed using calibration plots and the concordance statistic (c-index) to evaluate both calibration and discrimination.

RESULTS

The LIVERAID-ICU score integrates Child-Pugh class, serum urea levels and respiratory metrics. It is designed for bedside calculation using basic clinical and laboratory data, with no need for additional tools. In the validation cohort, the LIVERAID-ICU score exhibited enhanced sensitivity and specificity (AUC=0.83) in forecasting in-hospital mortality of patients with liver cirrhosis-associated infections when compared with established scores like Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) (p=0.045), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) (p=0.097), Child (p<0.001) and CLIF consortium acute-on-chronic liver failure (CLIF-C ACLF) (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The newly developed LIVERAID-ICU score represents a robust, streamlined and easy tool for predicting in-hospital mortality in liver cirrhosis patients with infections, surpassing the predictive capabilities of established liver or sepsis scores like SOFA, MELD, Child and CLIF-C ACLF. The reliance of the LIVERAID-ICU score on fundamental clinical and laboratory data facilitates its global application in ICUs, enabling immediate application at the bedside for patients with liver cirrhosis during episodes of suspected or confirmed infections.

The SpO2/FiO2 Ratio Combined with Prognostic Scores for Pneumonia and COVID-19 Increases Their Accuracy in Predicting Mortality of COVID-19 Patients

Background: Identifying high-risk COVID-19 patients is critical for emergency department decision-making. Our study's primary objective was to identify new independent predictors of mortality and their predictive utility in combination with traditional pneumonia risk assessment scores and new risk scores for COVID-19 developed during the pandemic. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in two Italian University Hospitals. A multivariable logistic model was used to locate independent parameters associated with mortality. Results: Age, PaO2/FiO2, and SpO2/FiO2 ratios were found to be independent parameters associated with mortality. This study found that the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) was superior to many of the risk scores developed during the pandemic, for example, the International Severe Acute Respiratory Infection Consortium Coronavirus Clinical Characterisation Consortium (ISARIC 4C) (AUC 0.845 vs. 0.687, p < 0.001), and to many of the risk scores already in use, for example, the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) (AUC 0.845 vs. 0.589, p < 0.001). Furthermore, our study found that the Pneumonia Severity Index had a similar performance to other risk scores, such as CRB-65 (AUC 0.845 vs. 0.823, p = 0.294). Combining the PaO2/FiO2 or SpO2/FiO2 ratios with the risk scores analyzed improved the prognostic accuracy. Conclusions: Adding the SpO2/FiO2 ratio to the traditional, validated, and already internationally known pre-pandemic prognostic scores seems to be a valid and rapid alternative to the need for developing new prognostic scores. Future research should focus on integrating these markers into existing pneumonia scores to improve their prognostic accuracy.

Oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: guidelines from the SRLF-SFMU consensus conference

INTRODUCTION

Although largely used, the place of oxygen therapy and its devices in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (ARF) deserves to be clarified. The French Intensive Care Society (Société de Réanimation de Langue Française, SRLF) and the French Emergency Medicine Society (Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence, SFMU) organized a consensus conference on oxygen therapy in ARF (excluding acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema and hypercapnic exacerbation of chronic obstructive diseases) in December 2023.

METHODS

A committee without any conflict of interest (CoI) with the subject defined 7 generic questions and drew up a list of sub questions according to the population, intervention, comparison and outcomes (PICO) model. An independent work group reviewed the literature using predefined keywords. The quality of the data was assessed using the GRADE methodology. Fifteen experts in the field from both societies proposed their own answers in a public session and answered questions from the jury (a panel of 16 critical-care and emergency medicine physicians, nurses and physiotherapists without any CoI) and the public. The jury then met alone for 48 h to write its recommendations.

RESULTS

The jury provided 22 statements answering 11 questions: in patients with ARF (1) What are the criteria for initiating oxygen therapy? (2) What are the targets of oxygen saturation? (3) What is the role of blood gas analysis? (4) When should an arterial catheter be inserted? (5) Should standard oxygen therapy, high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) be preferred? (6) What are the indications for non-invasive ventilation (NIV)? (7) What are the indications for invasive mechanical ventilation? (8) Should awake prone position be used? (9) What is the role of physiotherapy? (10) Which criteria necessarily lead to ICU admission? (11) Which oxygenation device should be preferred for patients for whom a do-not-intubate decision has been made?

CONCLUSION

These recommendations should optimize the use of oxygen during ARF.

Corticosteroid Therapy Duration and Dosage According to the Timing of Treatment Initiation for Post-COVID-19 Organizing Pneumonia

COVID-19 can lead to pulmonary complications, including organizing pneumonia. Steroids are essential in treating post-COVID-19 organizing pneumonia. However, research on the clinical benefits of initiating steroid treatment early for this condition is limited. To investigate the steroid initiation time in its association with treatment duration and corticosteroid dose for treating post-COVID-19 organizing pneumonia, we analyzed the data of 91 patients with post-COVID-19 organizing pneumonia at Chonnam National University Hospital between October 2020 and December 2022. Patients were categorized into early and late groups based on time from COVID-19 diagnosis to steroid initiation time for organizing pneumonia. The mean time interval between COVID-19 infection and steroid initiation time for treating organizing pneumonia, was 18.4±8.6 days. Within the early treatment group (treatment initiated <18.4 days after COVID-19), which included 55 patients, the mean duration of steroid treatment was 43.1±18.3days. In contrast, the late treatment group (initiated ≥18.4 days after COVID-19), which consisted of 36 patients, had a longer mean duration of steroid treatment 59.1±22.6 days) (p<0.01). Regarding corticosteroid dosing, the early treatment group had an average dosage of 0.5±0.3 mg/kg/day, in contrast to the late group, which averaged 0.8±0.3 mg/kg/day (p<0.01). Regression analysis showed steroid initiation time significantly influenced treatment duration (β=0.80 , p<0.01) and dosage (β=0.03, p<0.01). The clinical benefits of early steroid treatment for post-COVID-19 organizing pneumonia may lie in its association with reduced steroid treatment duration and dosage.

The Impact of Common Variations in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Calculation on Sepsis Measurement Using Sepsis-3 Criteria: A Retrospective Analysis Using Electronic Health Record Data

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of different methods of calculating Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores using electronic health record data on the incidence, outcomes, agreement, and predictive validity of Sepsis-3 criteria.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Five Massachusetts hospitals.

PATIENTS

Hospitalized adults, 2015 to 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We defined sepsis as a suspected infection (culture obtained and antibiotic administered) with a concurrent increase in SOFA score by greater than or equal to 2 points (Sepsis-3 criteria). Our reference SOFA implementation strategy imputed normal values for missing data, used Pa o2 /F io2 ratios for respiratory scores, and assumed normal baseline SOFA scores for community-onset sepsis. We then implemented SOFA scores using different missing data imputation strategies (averaging worst values from preceding and following days vs. carrying forward nonmissing values), imputing respiratory scores using Sp o2 /F io2 ratios, and incorporating comorbidities and prehospital laboratory data into baseline SOFA scores. Among 1,064,459 hospitalizations, 297,512 (27.9%) had suspected infection and 141,052 (13.3%) had sepsis with an in-hospital mortality rate of 10.3% using the reference SOFA method. The percentage of patients missing SOFA components for at least 1 day in the infection window was highest for Pa o2 /F io2 ratios (98.6%), followed by Sp o2 /F io2 ratios (73.5%), bilirubin (68.5%), and Glasgow Coma Scale scores (57.2%). Different missing data imputation strategies yielded near-perfect agreement in identifying sepsis (kappa 0.99). However, using Sp o2 /F io2 imputations yielded higher sepsis incidence (18.3%), lower mortality (8.1%), and slightly lower predictive validity for mortality (area under the receiver operating curves [AUROC] 0.76 vs. 0.78). For community-onset sepsis, incorporating comorbidities and historical laboratory data into baseline SOFA score estimates yielded lower sepsis incidence (6.9% vs. 11.6%), higher mortality (13.4% vs. 9.6%), and higher predictive validity (AUROC 0.79 vs. 0.75) relative to the reference SOFA implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Common variations in calculating respiratory and baseline SOFA scores, but not in handling missing data, lead to substantial differences in observed incidence, mortality, agreement, and predictive validity of Sepsis-3 criteria.

Midline catheters for blood gas and acid/base monitoring in critical patients: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Arterial lines and central venous catheter (CVC) allow to monitor patients' acid-base status and gas exchange. Their placement and maintenance may however be burdened by severe complications. Midline Catheters (MC) are peripheral venous accesses that are less invasive and easier to insert compared to CVC and arterial lines.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was performed including stabilized critical patients with clinical indication to midline positioning before intensive care unit (ICU) discharge. The primary aim was to assess if venous sampling from MCs can be a reliable alternative to CVC for pH and CO2 monitoring. The secondary aim was to evaluate the correlation between samplings from MC, CVC and arterial line with regards to pH, carbon dioxide tension (pCO2), lactates and electrolytes. Three samples from CVC, arterial line and MC were collected simultaneously. Agreement and correlation of the studied parameters between different sampling sites were explored.

RESULTS

40 patients were included in the analysis. A good agreement for pH and pCO2 was recorded between MC and CVC: mean differences were 0.001 (95% CI -0.006 to 0.007) and 0.7 (-0.1 to 1.5), percentage error 0.4% and 11.2%, respectively. Correlation between MC and both central venous and arterial samples for pH, pCO2, lactates and electrolytes was found to be moderate-to-strong (Pearson's R coefficient range 0.59-0.99, p < 0.001 for all these parameters).

CONCLUSIONS

In stabilized critical patients, midline catheters represent a reliable alternative to CVC and arterial lines to monitor acid-base disturbances, CO2 levels and electrolytes. The present findings add to the known advantages of MC, which might be considered a first-line vascular access for non-critical or stabilized patients who do not require infusion of vesicant or irritant drugs.

Obesity associated with improved mortality of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe COVID-19 pneumonia

INTRODUCTION

Determining a patient's candidacy for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in severe COVID-19 pneumonia is a critical aspect of efficient healthcare delivery. A body mass index (BMI) ≥40 is considered a relative contraindication for ECMO by the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). We sought to determine the impact of obesity on the survival of patients with COVID-19 on ECMO.

METHODS

This project was a retrospective review of a multicenter US database from January 2020 to December 2021. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality after ECMO initiation, with a comparison between patients classified into body mass index categories (<30, 30-39.9, and ≥40). Secondary outcomes included ventilator days, intensive care days, and complications.

RESULTS

We completed records review on 359 patients, with 90 patients excluded because of missing data. The overall mortality for the 269 patients was 37.5%. Patients with a BMI <30 had higher odds of mortality compared to all patients with BMI >30 (OR 1.98; p = 0.013), those with BMI 30-39.9 (OR 1.84; p = 0.036), and BMI ≥40 (OR 2.33; p = 0.024). There were no differences between BMI groups for ECMO duration; length of stay (LOS); or rate of bloodstream infection, stroke, or blood transfusion. Age, ECMO duration, and modified-Elixhauser index were not independent risk factors for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients receiving ECMO for severe COVID-19, neither obesity (BMI >30) nor morbid obesity (BMI >40) were associated with in-hospital mortality. These results are consistent with previous reports and held true after adjusting for age and comorbidities. Our data suggest further examination of the recommendations to withhold ECMO in patients who are obese.

The effect of pleural drainage on pulse oximetry in a post-operative thoracic surgery population

BACKGROUND

Pleural effusions in post-operative thoracic surgery patients are common. Effusions can result in prolonged hospitalizations or readmissions, with prior studies suggesting mixed effects of pleural drainage on hypoxia. We aimed to define the impact of pleural drainage on pulse oximetry (SpO2) in post-thoracic surgery patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study of post-operative thoracic surgery patients undergoing pleural drainage was performed. SpO2 and supplemental oxygen (FiO2) values were recorded at pre- and post-procedure. The primary outcome was difference in pre-procedural and post-procedural SpO2.

RESULTS

We identified 95 patients with a mean age of 65 (SD - 13.8) years undergoing 122 pleural drainage procedures. Mean drainage volume was 619 (SD-423) mL and the majority of procedures (88.5 %) included a drainage of <1000 mL. SpO2 was associated with an increase from 94.0 % (SD-2.6) to 97.3 % (SD-2.0) at 24-h (p < 0.0001). FiO2 was associated with a decrease from 0.31 (SD-0.15) to 0.29 (SD-0.12) at 24-h (p = 0.0081). SpO2/FiO2 was associated with an increase from 344.5 (SD-99.0) to 371.9 (SD-94.7) at 24-h post-procedure (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pleural drainage within post-operative thoracic surgery patients offers statistically significant improvements in oxygen saturation by peripheral pulse oximetry and oxygen supplementation; however the clinical significance of these changes remains unclear. Pleural drainage itself may be requested for numerous reasons, including diagnostic (fevers, leukocytosis, etc.) or therapeutic (worsening dyspnea) evaluation. However, pleural drainage may offer minimal clinical impact on pulse oximetry in post-operative thoracic surgery patients.

One-lung ventilation with fixed and variable tidal volumes on oxygenation and pulmonary outcomes: A randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

Test the hypothesis that one-lung ventilation with variable tidal volume improves intraoperative oxygenation and reduces postoperative pulmonary complications after lung resection.

BACKGROUND

Constant tidal volume and respiratory rate ventilation can lead to atelectasis. Animal and human ARDS studies indicate that oxygenation improves with variable tidal volumes. Since one-lung ventilation shares characteristics with ARDS, we tested the hypothesis that one-lung ventilation with variable tidal volume improves intraoperative oxygenation and reduces postoperative pulmonary complications after lung resection.

DESIGN

Randomized trial.

SETTING

Operating rooms and a post-anesthesia care unit.

PATIENTS

Adults having elective open or video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection surgery with general anesthesia were randomly assigned to intraoperative ventilation with fixed (n = 70) or with variable (n = 70) tidal volumes.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients assigned to fixed ventilation had a tidal volume of 6 ml/kgPBW, whereas those assigned to variable ventilation had tidal volumes ranging from 6 ml/kg PBW ± 33% which varied randomly at 5-min intervals.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was intraoperative oxygenation; secondary outcomes were postoperative pulmonary complications, mortality within 90 days of surgery, heart rate, and SpO2/FiO2 ratio.

RESULTS

Data from 128 patients were analyzed with 65 assigned to fixed-tidal volume ventilation and 63 to variable-tidal volume ventilation. The time-weighted average PaO2 during one-lung ventilation was 176 (86) mmHg in patients ventilated with fixed-tidal volume and 147 (72) mmHg in the patients ventilated with variable-tidal volume, a difference that was statistically significant (p < 0.01) but less than our pre-defined clinically meaningful threshold of 50 mmHg. At least one composite complication occurred in 11 (17%) of patients ventilated with variable-tidal volume and in 17 (26%) of patients assigned to fixed-tidal volume ventilation, with a relative risk of 0.67 (95% CI 0.34-1.31, p = 0.24). Atelectasis in the ventilated lung was less common with variable-tidal volumes (4.7%) than fixed-tidal volumes (20%) in the initial three postoperative days, with a relative risk of 0.24 (95% CI 0.01-0.8, p = 0.02), but there were no significant late postoperative differences. No other secondary outcomes were both statistically significant and clinically meaningful.

CONCLUSION

One-lung ventilation with variable tidal volume does not meaningfully improve intraoperative oxygenation, and does not reduce postoperative pulmonary complications.

Immune dysregulation is an important factor in the underlying complications in Influenza infection. ApoH, IL-8 and IL-15 as markers of prognosis

Introduction

Influenza virus infection can cause a range of clinical symptoms, including respiratory failure (RF) and even death. The mechanisms responsible for the most severe forms of the disease are not yet well understood. The objective is to assess the initial immune response upon admission and its potential impact on infection progression.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study of patients with influenza virus infection who required admission to a tertiary hospital in the 2017/18 and 2018/19 flu seasons. Immune markers, surrogate markers of neutrophil activation, and blood levels of DNase I and Apolipoprotein-H (ApoH) were determined in the first serum sample available during hospital care. Patients were followed until hospital discharge or death. Initially, 792 patients were included. From this group, 107 patients with poor evolution were selected, and a random control group was matched by day of admission.

Results

Patients with poor outcomes had significantly reduced ApoH levels, a soluble protein that regulate both complement and coagulation pathways. In multivariate analysis, low plasma levels of ApoH (OR:5.43; 2.21-13.4), high levels of C- reactive protein (OR:2.73: 1.28-5.4), hyperferritinemia (OR:2.83; 1.28-5.4) and smoking (OR:3.41; 1.04-11.16), were significantly associated with a worse prognosis. RF was independently associated with low levels of ApoH (OR: 5.12; 2.02-1.94), while high levels of IL15 behaved as a protective factor (OR:0.30; 0.12-0.71).

Discussion

Therefore, in hospitalized influenza patients, a dysregulated early immune response is associated with a worse outcome. Adequate plasma levels of ApoH are protective against severe influenza and RF and High levels of IL15 protect against RF.

Prognostic value of the oxygenation index measured during mechanical ventilation and weaning. A retrospective cohort study

The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of the ratio of oxygen saturation (ROX) index calculated during mechanical ventilation (MV) and the weaning period in evaluating readiness to weaning and the success of the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), extubation, and mortality. We also compared the results of the ROX index calculated with partial arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2%), and probe oxygen saturation (SpO2%). In this retrospective cohort study, the ROX index was calculated by SpO2%, PaO2, and SaO2% separately using the ROX index formula (PaO2 or SaO2 or SpO2 /FiO2)/respiratory rate. ROX was calculated during the first three days of MV treatment and the weaning period daily (SBT). Positive end-expiratory pressure and peak inspiratory pressure values were also recorded during these measurements. These ROX values were used to analyze whether they predict weaning readiness, SBT, extubation failure (EF), and mortality. The study included 107 mechanically ventilated patients. Weaning could be tried in 64 (60%) of the 107 patients; 44 (69%) of the 64 patients succeeded, and extubation was performed. 19 (43%) of 44 patients had EF. ROX values calculated with PaO2 during MV and SBT predicted readiness to wean, EF, and mortality better than ROX values calculated with SaO2 and SpO2. ROX values calculated with PaO2 during the third day of MV had the highest sensitivity and specificity for EF (sensitivity: 81%, specificity: 70% for the ROX<11 value). The results of this study suggest that the calculation of ROX index, not only with SpO2% but also with arterial blood gas PaO2 and SaO2% values, may be helpful in predicting the weaning readiness evaluation, SBT, and extubation success and mortality. Further studies with more patients are necessary to verify and standardize these results.

Total face mask with neurally adjusted ventilatory assist as a rescue therapy in infants with severe bronchiolitis

Severe bronchiolitis patients are often supported with non-invasive ventilation (NIV). In case of NIV failure, we recently started to use non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist ventilation (NIV-NAVA) with a total face mask interface (TFM) and report now our experience with this modality of respiratory support. Retrospective study was made from October 2022 to May 2023 at the Geneva University Hospital Paediatric Intensive Care Unit. Inclusion criteria were children, aged from 0 to 6 months, with severe bronchiolitis with initial NIV failure and switch to NIV-NAVA-TFM. From 49 children with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-induced bronchiolitis requiring any form of respiratory support, 10 (median age 61 days (IQR 44-73) failing CPAP or NIV underwent rescue treatment with NIV-NAVA using a TFM. Patients were switched to TFM-NIV-NAVA 8 h (IQR 3-22) after admission for 24.5 h (IQR 13-60). After initiation of TFM-NIV-NAVA, oxygenation improved significantly as early as 1 h after initiation, whereas transcutaneous CO2 values remained stable. None of the patients needed to be intubated and there was no episode of TFM discontinuation due to interface discomfort or other unwanted side effects. Sedation was used in all patients with high proportion of intravenous dexmedetomidine. Median ventilatory assistance duration was 2.5 days (IQR 2-4) and median PICU stay was 4.5 (IQR 3-6).   Conclusion: In infants with severe RSV-induced bronchiolitis, respiratory support with TFM-NIV-NAVA seems to be feasible as a rescue therapy and might be considered in selected patients. What is Known: • Bronchiolitic patients with NIV support failure may require invasive mechanical ventilation. • Interface related complications, especially facial sores, can be a cause of NIV failure. What is New: • Total face mask with non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (TFM-NIV-NAVA) seems feasible as a rescue therapy in deteriorating patients with CPAP or NIV failure. • TFM-NIV-NAVA can improve oxygenation rapidly in patients with aggravating hypoxemia and seems to be well tolerated.

Respiratory support with standard low-flow oxygen therapy, high-flow oxygen therapy or continuous positive airway pressure in adults with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure in a resource-limited setting: protocol for a randomised, open-label, clinical trial - the Acute Respiratory Intervention StudiEs in Africa (ARISE-AFRICA) study

RATIONALE

Acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF) is associated with high mortality in sub-Saharan Africa. This is at least in part due to critical care-related resource constraints including limited access to invasive mechanical ventilation and/or highly skilled acute care workers. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula (HFNC) may prove useful to reduce intubation, and therefore, improve survival outcomes among critically ill patients, particularly in resource-limited settings, but data in such settings are lacking. The aim of this study is to determine whether CPAP or HFNC as compared with standard oxygen therapy, could reduce mortality among adults presenting with AHRF in a resource-limited setting.

METHODS

This is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled, stepped wedge trial, in which patients presenting with AHRF in Uganda will be randomly assigned to standard oxygen therapy delivered through a face mask, HFNC oxygen or CPAP. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality at 28 days. Secondary outcomes include the number of patients with criteria for intubation at day 7, the number of patients intubated at day 28, ventilator-free days at day 28 and tolerance of each respiratory support.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has obtained ethical approval from the Research and Ethics Committee, School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University as well as the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology. Patients will be included after informed consent. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04693403.

PROTOCOL VERSION

8 September 2023; version 5.

No Effect of Methylnaltrexone on Acute Pancreatitis Severity: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

Opioids used to manage severe pain in acute pancreatitis (AP) might exacerbate the disease through effects on gastrointestinal and immune functions. Methylnaltrexone, a peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist, may counteract these effects without changing analgesia.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial included adult patients with AP and systemic inflammatory response syndrome at 4 Danish centers. Patients were randomized to receive 5 days of continuous intravenous methylnaltrexone (0.15 mg/kg/d) or placebo added to the standard of care. The primary end point was the Pancreatitis Activity Scoring System score after 48 hours of treatment. Main secondary outcomes included pain scores, opioid use, disease severity, and mortality.

RESULTS

In total, 105 patients (54% men) were randomized to methylnaltrexone (n = 51) or placebo (n = 54). After 48 hours, the Pancreatitis Activity Scoring System score was 134.3 points in the methylnaltrexone group and 130.5 points in the placebo group (difference 3.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] -40.1 to 47.6; P = 0.87). At 48 hours, we found no differences between the groups in pain severity (0.0, 95% CI -0.8 to 0.9; P = 0.94), pain interference (-0.3, 95% CI -1.4 to 0.8; P = 0.55), and morphine equivalent doses (6.5 mg, 95% CI -2.1 to 15.2; P = 0.14). Methylnaltrexone also did not affect the risk of severe disease (8%, 95% CI -11 to 28; P = 0.38) and mortality (6%, 95% CI -1 to 12; P = 0.11). The medication was well tolerated.

DISCUSSION

Methylnaltrexone treatment did not achieve superiority over placebo for reducing the severity of AP.

Intravenous Opioid Administration During Mechanical Ventilation and Use After Hospital Discharge

Importance

Guidelines recommend an analgesia-first strategy for sedation during mechanical ventilation, but associations between opioids provided during mechanical ventilation and posthospitalization opioid-related outcomes are unclear.

Objective

To evaluate associations between an intravenous opioid dose received during mechanical ventilation and postdischarge opioid-related outcomes in medical (nonsurgical) patients.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study evaluated adults receiving mechanical ventilation lasting 24 hours or more for acute respiratory failure and surviving hospitalization. Participants from 21 Kaiser Permanente Northern California hospitals from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2019, were included. Data were analyzed from October 1, 2020, to October 31, 2023.

Exposures

Terciles of median daily intravenous fentanyl equivalents during mechanical ventilation.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the first filled opioid prescription in 1 year after discharge. Secondary outcomes included persistent opioid use and opioid-associated complications. Secondary analyses tested for interaction between opioid doses during mechanical ventilation, prior opioid use, and posthospitalization opioid use. Estimates were based on multivariable-adjusted time-to-event analyses, with death as a competing risk, and censored for hospice or palliative care referral, rehospitalization with receipt of opioid, or loss of Kaiser Permanente plan membership.

Results

The study included 6746 patients across 21 hospitals (median age, 67 years [IQR, 57-76 years]; 53.0% male). Of the participants, 3114 (46.2%) filled an opioid prescription in the year prior to admission. The median daily fentanyl equivalent during mechanical ventilation was 200 μg (IQR, 40-1000 μg), with terciles of 0 to 67 μg, more than 67 to 700 μg, and more than 700 μg. Compared with patients who did not receive opioids during mechanical ventilation (n = 1013), a higher daily opioid dose was associated with opioid prescriptions in the year after discharge (n = 2942 outcomes; tercile 1: adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.85-1.17], tercile 2: AHR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.03-1.40], and tercile 3: AHR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.07-1.47]). Higher doses of opioids during mechanical ventilation were also associated with persistent opioid use after hospitalization (n = 1410 outcomes; tercile 3 vs no opioids: odds ratio, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.14-1.83]). No interaction was observed between opioid dose during mechanical ventilation, prior opioid use, and posthospitalization opioid use.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this retrospective cohort study of patients receiving mechanical ventilation, opioids administered during mechanical ventilation were associated with opioid prescriptions following hospital discharge. Additional studies to evaluate risks and benefits of strategies using lower opioid doses are warranted.

Basic host response parameters to classify mortality risk in COVID-19 and community-acquired pneumonia

Improved phenotyping in pneumonia is necessary to strengthen risk assessment. Via a feasible and multidimensional approach with basic parameters, we aimed to evaluate the effect of host response at admission on severity stratification in COVID-19 and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Three COVID-19 and one CAP multicenter cohorts including hospitalized patients were recruited. Three easily available variables reflecting different pathophysiologic mechanisms-immune, inflammation, and respiratory-were selected (absolute lymphocyte count [ALC], C-reactive protein [CRP] and, SpO2/FiO2). In-hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission were analyzed as outcomes. A multivariable, penalized maximum likelihood logistic regression was performed with ALC (< 724 lymphocytes/mm3), CRP (> 60 mg/L), and, SpO2/FiO2 (< 450). A total of 1452, 1222 and 462 patients were included in the three COVID-19 and 1292 in the CAP cohort for the analysis. Mortality ranged between 4 and 32% (0 to 3 abnormal biomarkers) and 0-9% in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and CAP, respectively. In the first COVID-19 cohort, adjusted for age and sex, we observed an increased odds ratio for in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 with elevated biomarkers altered (OR 1.8, 3, and 6.3 with 1, 2, and 3 abnormal biomarkers, respectively). The model had an AUROC of 0.83. Comparable findings were found for ICU admission, with an AUROC of 0.76. These results were confirmed in the other COVID-19 cohorts Similar OR trends were reported in the CAP cohort; however, results were not statistically significant. Assessing the host response via accessible biomarkers is a simple and rapidly applicable approach for pneumonia.

Evaluation of a Lung Ultrasound Score in Hospitalized Adult Patients with COVID-19 in Barcelona, Spain

Background/Objectives: During the COVID-19 pandemic and the burden on hospital resources, the rapid categorization of high-risk COVID-19 patients became essential, and lung ultrasound (LUS) emerged as an alternative to chest computed tomography, offering speed, non-ionizing, repeatable, and bedside assessments. Various LUS score systems have been used, yet there is no consensus on an optimal severity cut-off. We assessed the performance of a 12-zone LUS score to identify adult COVID-19 patients with severe lung involvement using oxygen saturation (SpO2)/fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio as a reference standard to define the best cut-off for predicting adverse outcomes. Methods: We conducted a single-centre prospective study (August 2020-April 2021) at Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain. Upon admission to the general ward or intensive care unit (ICU), clinicians performed LUS in adult patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia. Severe lung involvement was defined as a SpO2/FiO2 ratio <315. The LUS score ranged from 0 to 36 based on the aeration patterns. Results: 248 patients were included. The admission LUS score showed moderate performance in identifying a SpO2/FiO2 ratio <315 (area under the ROC curve: 0.71; 95%CI 0.64-0.77). After adjustment for COVID-19 risk factors, an admission LUS score ≥17 was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death (OR 5.31; 95%CI: 1.38-20.4), ICU admission (OR 3.50; 95%CI: 1.37-8.94) and need for IMV (OR 3.31; 95%CI: 1.19-9.13). Conclusions: Although the admission LUS score had limited performance in identifying severe lung involvement, a cut-off ≥17 score was associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. and could play a role in the rapid categorization of COVID-19 pneumonia patients, anticipating the need for advanced care.

Novel Oxygenation and Saturation Indices for Mortality Prediction in COVID-19 ARDS Patients: The Impact of Driving Pressure and Mechanical Power

Background: The oxygenation index (OI) and oxygen saturation index (OSI) are proven mortality predictors in pediatric and adult patients, traditionally using mean airway pressure (Pmean). We introduce novel indices, replacing Pmean with DP (ΔPinsp), MPdyn, and MPtot, assessing their potential for predicting COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) mortality, comparing them to traditional indices. Methods: We studied 361 adult COVID-19 ARDS patients for 7 days, collecting ΔPinsp, MPdyn, and MPtot, OI-ΔPinsp, OI-MPdyn, OI-MPtot, OSI-ΔPinsp, OSI-MPdyn, and OSI-MPtot. We compared these in surviving and non-surviving patients over the first 7 intensive care unit (ICU) days using Mann-Whitney U test. Logistic regression receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis assessed AUC and CI values for ICU mortality on day three. We determined cut-off values using Youden's method and conducted multivariate Cox regression on parameter limits. Results: All indices showed significant differences between surviving and non-surviving patients on the third day of ICU care. The AUC values of OI-ΔPinsp were significantly higher than those of P/F and OI-Pmean (P values .0002 and <.0001, respectively). Similarly, AUC and CI values of OSI-ΔPinsp and OSI-MPdyn were significantly higher than those of SpO2/FiO2 and OSI-Pmean values (OSI-ΔPinsp: P < .0001, OSI-MPdyn: P values .047 and .028, respectively). OI-ΔPinsp, OSI-ΔPinsp, OI-MPdyn, OSI-MPdyn, OI-MPtot, and OSI-MPtot had AUC values of 0.72, 0.71, 0.69, 0.68, 0.66, and 0.64, respectively, with cut-off values associated with hazard ratios and P values of 7.06 (HR = 1.84, P = .002), 8.04 (HR = 2.00, P ≤ .0001), 7.12 (HR = 1.68, P = .001), 5.76 (HR = 1.70, P ≤ .0001), 10.43 (HR = 1.52, P = .006), and 10.68 (HR = 1.66, P = .001), respectively. Conclusions: Critical values of all indices were associated to higher ICU mortality rates and extended mechanical ventilation durations. The OI-ΔPinsp, OSI-ΔPinsp, and OSI-MPdyn indices displayed the strongest predictive capabilities for ICU mortality. These novel indices offer valuable insights for intensivists in the clinical management and decision-making process for ARDS patients.

Can Noninvasive Oxygen Saturation Index Match Invasive Oxygenation Index to Monitor Respiratory Disease in Critically Ill Children?-A Prospective Study

Respiratory illnesses are common indications for mechanical ventilation in children. The adequacy of ventilatory support for oxygenation is measured using arterial blood gas analysis and calculation of oxygenation index (OI). Due to invasive nature of arterial blood sampling needed to calculate OI, several researchers have replaced blood gas-derived partial pressure of oxygen values with oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ) obtained from pulse oximetry. This noninvasive index called oxygen saturation index (OSI) is found to be useful in neonates. Studies in pediatric population are lacking. In this prospective study on mechanically ventilated children, both OI and OSI were determined and compared against alveolar-arterial oxygen difference (AaDO 2 ). A total of 29 children were studied. Both OSI and OI had good correlation of 0.787 and 0.792 with AaDO 2 , respectively. OSI of 7.3 and 9.4 had good sensitivity and specificity for AaDO 2 cutoffs of 344 and 498, which represents moderate and severe respiratory illness, respectively. The correlation coefficients of both OSI and OI are similar against AaDO 2 . OSI can be used instead of OI for constant monitoring of children on mechanical ventilation. Arterial blood gas analysis and calculation of OI can be reserved for situations where SpO 2 measurement is unreliable.

SCARLET (Supplemental Citicoline Administration to Reduce Lung injury Efficacy Trial): study protocol for a single-site, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, and randomized Phase 1/2 trial of i.v. citicoline (CDP-choline) in hospitalized SARS CoV-2-infected patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure

BACKGROUND

The SARS CoV-2 pandemic has resulted in more than 1.1 million deaths in the USA alone. Therapeutic options for critically ill patients with COVID-19 are limited. Prior studies showed that post-infection treatment of influenza A virus-infected mice with the liponucleotide CDP-choline, which is an essential precursor for de novo phosphatidylcholine synthesis, improved gas exchange and reduced pulmonary inflammation without altering viral replication. In unpublished studies, we found that treatment of SARS CoV-2-infected K18-hACE2-transgenic mice with CDP-choline prevented development of hypoxemia. We hypothesize that administration of citicoline (the pharmaceutical form of CDP-choline) will be safe in hospitalized SARS CoV-2-infected patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (HARF) and that we will obtain preliminary evidence of clinical benefit to support a larger Phase 3 trial using one or more citicoline doses.

METHODS

We will conduct a single-site, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, and randomized Phase 1/2 dose-ranging and safety study of Somazina® citicoline solution for injection in consented adults of any sex, gender, age, or ethnicity hospitalized for SARS CoV-2-associated HARF. The trial is named "SCARLET" (Supplemental Citicoline Administration to Reduce Lung injury Efficacy Trial). We hypothesize that SCARLET will show that i.v. citicoline is safe at one or more of three doses (0.5, 2.5, or 5 mg/kg, every 12 h for 5 days) in hospitalized SARS CoV-2-infected patients with HARF (20 per dose) and provide preliminary evidence that i.v. citicoline improves pulmonary outcomes in this population. The primary efficacy outcome will be the SpO2:FiO2 ratio on study day 3. Exploratory outcomes include Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, dead space ventilation index, and lung compliance. Citicoline effects on a panel of COVID-relevant lung and blood biomarkers will also be determined.

DISCUSSION

Citicoline has many characteristics that would be advantageous to any candidate COVID-19 therapeutic, including safety, low-cost, favorable chemical characteristics, and potentially pathogen-agnostic efficacy. Successful demonstration that citicoline is beneficial in severely ill patients with SARS CoV-2-induced HARF could transform management of severely ill COVID patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov on 5/31/2023 (NCT05881135).

TRIAL STATUS

Currently enrolling.

Recent advances in cardiorespiratory monitoring in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients

BACKGROUND

Recent advances on cardiorespiratory monitoring applied in ARDS patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation and noninvasive ventilatory support are available in the literature and may have potential prognostic implication in ARDS treatment.

MAIN BODY

The measurement of oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry is a valid, low-cost, noninvasive alternative for assessing arterial oxygenation. Caution must be taken in patients with darker skin pigmentation, who may experience a greater incidence of occult hypoxemia. Dead space surrogates, which are easy to calculate, have important prognostic implications. The mechanical power, which can be automatically computed by intensive care ventilators, is an important parameter correlated with ventilator-induced lung injury and outcome. In patients undergoing noninvasive ventilatory support, the use of esophageal pressure can measure inspiratory effort, avoiding possible delays in endotracheal intubation. Fluid responsiveness can also be evaluated using dynamic indices in patients ventilated at low tidal volumes (< 8 mL/kg). In patients ventilated at high levels of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), the PEEP test represents a valid alternative to passive leg raising. There is growing evidence on alternative parameters for evaluating fluid responsiveness, such as central venous oxygen saturation variations, inferior vena cava diameter variations and capillary refill time.

CONCLUSION

Careful cardiorespiratory monitoring in patients affected by ARDS is crucial to improve prognosis and to tailor treatment via mechanical ventilatory support.

Correlation of oxygenation indices in invasive mechanical ventilated adult patients

BACKGROUND

Mechanical ventilation is essential for managing acute respiratory failure, but traditional methods of assessing oxygenation, like the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, pose challenges due to invasiveness and cost.

OBJECTIVE

This single-centre prospective observational study aimed to assess the potential of the non-invasive Oxygen Saturation Index (OSI), utilising SpO2 measurements, to diagnose hypoxemia in mechanically ventilated adults. The study sought to establish correlations between OSI, oxygenation index (OI), PaO2/FiO2 ratio and SpO2/FiO2 ratio.

METHODS

From August 2022 to July 2023, data was collected from 1055 mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Statistical analysis included correlation tests, receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis and cut-off value determination for hypoxemia diagnosis.

RESULTS

We found that the P/F ratio had a statistically significant negative correlation with OI (correlation coefficient -0.832, P value: 0.000 in hypoxemic group and correlation coefficient -0.888, P value: 0.000 in the non-hypoxemic group), and OSI (correlation coefficient -0.746, P value: 0.000 in hypoxemic group and correlation coefficient -0.629, P value: 0.000 in non-hypoxemic group) and has a positive correlation with P/F ratio (correlation coefficient 0.92, P value: 0.000 in hypoxemic group and correlation coefficient -0.67, P value: 0.000 in non-hypoxemic group). OI and OSI had a statistically significant correlation (correlation coefficient 0.955, P value: 0.000 in hypoxemic group and correlation coefficient 0.815, P value: 0.000 in non-hypoxemic group). on ROC analysis P/F ratio was the most accurate in predicting hypoxia followed by OI and OSI. with a cut-off value, of OI being 7.07, and that for OSI being 3.90, at an 80% sensitivity level to diagnose hypoxemia.

CONCLUSION

OSI can serve as a dependable surrogate for OI, simplifying ARDS severity assessment. The P/F ratio is the most accurate predictor of hypoxia. Further research, especially in larger multicentre studies, is needed to validate these findings and explore the long-term clinical implications of using OSI for oxygenation monitoring in mechanically ventilated patients.

Prediction of acute lung injury assessed by chest computed tomography, oxygen saturation/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, and serum lactate dehydrogenase in patients with COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

In treating acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), clinicians choose respiratory therapies such as low-flow nasal cannula oxygenation, high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation, or mechanical ventilation after assessment of the patient's condition. Chest computed tomography (CT) imaging contributes significantly to diagnosing COVID-19 pneumonia. However, the costs and potential harm to patients from radiation exposure need to be considered. This study was performed to predict the quantitative extent of COVID-19 acute lung injury using clinical indicators such as an oxygenation index and blood test results.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 192 patients with COVID-19 AHRF. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine correlations between the lung infiltration volume (LIV) and other pathophysiological or biochemical laboratory parameters.

RESULTS

Among 13 clinical parameters, we identified the oxygen saturation/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (SF ratio) and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LD) concentration as factors associated with the LIV. In the binary classification of an LIV of ≥20 % or not and with the borderline LD = 2.2 × [SF ratio]-182.4, the accuracy, precision, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.828, 0.818, 23.400, and 0.870, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that acute lung injury due to COVID-19 pneumonia can be estimated using the SF ratio and LD concentration without a CT scan. These findings may provide significant clinical benefit by allowing clinicians to predict acute lung injury levels using simple, minimally invasive assessment of oxygenation capacity and biochemical blood tests.

Post-pandemic acute respiratory distress syndrome: A New Global Definition with extension to lower-resource regions

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), first described in 1967, is characterized by acute respiratory failure causing profound hypoxemia, decreased pulmonary compliance, and bilateral CXR infiltrates. After several descriptions, the Berlin definition was adopted in 2012, which established three categories of severity according to hypoxemia (mild, moderate and severe), specified temporal aspects for diagnosis, and incorporated the use of non-invasive ventilation. The COVID-19 pandemic led to changes in ARDS management, focusing on continuous monitoring of oxygenation and on utilization of high-flow oxygen therapy and lung ultrasound. In 2021, a New Global Definition based on the Berlin definition of ARDS was proposed, which included a category for non-intubated patients, considered the use of SpO2, and established no particular requirement for oxygenation support in regions with limited resources. Although debates persist, the continuous evolution seeks to adapt to clinical and epidemiological needs, and to the search of personalized treatments.

Development and External Validation of Models to Predict Persistent Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure for Clinical Trial Enrichment

OBJECTIVES

Improving the efficiency of clinical trials in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (HRF) depends on enrichment strategies that minimize enrollment of patients who quickly resolve with existing care and focus on patients at high risk for persistent HRF. We aimed to develop parsimonious models predicting risk of persistent HRF using routine data from ICU admission and select research immune biomarkers.

DESIGN

Prospective cohorts for derivation ( n = 630) and external validation ( n = 511).

SETTING

Medical and surgical ICUs at two U.S. medical centers.

PATIENTS

Adults with acute HRF defined as new invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and hypoxemia on the first calendar day after ICU admission.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We evaluated discrimination, calibration, and practical utility of models predicting persistent HRF risk (defined as ongoing IMV and hypoxemia on the third calendar day after admission): 1) a clinical model with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) selecting Pa o2 /F io2 , vasopressors, mean arterial pressure, bicarbonate, and acute respiratory distress syndrome as predictors; 2) a model adding interleukin-6 (IL-6) to clinical predictors; and 3) a comparator model with Pa o2 /F io2 alone, representing an existing strategy for enrichment. Forty-nine percent and 69% of patients had persistent HRF in derivation and validation sets, respectively. In validation, both LASSO (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.64-0.73) and LASSO + IL-6 (0.71; 95% CI, 0.66-0.76) models had better discrimination than Pa o2 /F io2 (0.64; 95% CI, 0.59-0.69). Both models underestimated risk in lower risk deciles, but exhibited better calibration at relevant risk thresholds. Evaluating practical utility, both LASSO and LASSO + IL-6 models exhibited greater net benefit in decision curve analysis, and greater sample size savings in enrichment analysis, compared with Pa o2 /F io2 . The added utility of LASSO + IL-6 model over LASSO was modest.

CONCLUSIONS

Parsimonious, interpretable models that predict persistent HRF may improve enrichment of trials testing HRF-targeted therapies and warrant future validation.

Ozanimod Therapy in Patients With COVID-19 Requiring Oxygen Support: A Randomized Open-Label Pilot Trial

BACKGROUND

Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor ligands (SRLs) dampen immunopathologic damages in models of viral pneumonia.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is it feasible to administer an SRL therapy, here ozanimod (OZA), to acutely ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The prospective randomized open-label COVID-19 Ozanimod Intervention (COZI) pilot trial was conducted in three Canadian hospitals. Patients admitted for COVID-19 requiring oxygen were eligible. Randomization was stratified for risk factors of poor outcome and oxygen needs at inclusion. Participants were allocated to standard of care or to standard of care plus OZA. OZA (oral, once daily, incremental dosage) was administered for a maximum of 14 days. Primary end point investigated for size effect and variance over time was the assessment of safety and efficacy, evaluated by the daily score on the World Health Organization-adapted six-point ordinal scale for clinical improvement analyzed under the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were randomized to the standard of care arm, and 20 were randomized to the OZA arm from September 2020 to February 2022. Evaluation of efficacy showed nonsignificant reductions of median (interquartile range) duration of respiratory support (6 [3-10] vs 9 [4-12] days; P = .34), median duration of hospitalization (9 [6-12] vs 10 [6-18] days; P = .20), and median time to clinical improvement (4 [3-7] vs 7 [3-11] days; P = .12) for OZA compared with standard of care, respectively. Heart rate was significantly lower with OZA (65 [ 63-67] vs 71 [69-72] beats/min; P < .0001). However, QT and PR intervals were not affected. No severe adverse drug reaction was reported.

INTERPRETATION

To our knowledge, SRL utility in severe pneumonia has never been tested in patients. This study shows for the first time that this new pharmacologic agent may safely be administered to patients hospitalized for viral pneumonia, with potential clinical benefits. Bradycardia was frequent but well tolerated.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04405102; URL: www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov.

Corticosteroids to Reduce Inflammation in Severe Pancreatitis (CRISP) protocol and statistical analysis plan: a prospective, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Acute pancreatitis is a common disease which, in its severe form, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Currently, there is no specific therapy known to attenuate organ failure in severe pancreatitis and treatment consists primarily of supportive care. Corticosteroids have been shown to be beneficial in disease processes associated with systemic inflammation and could potentially improve outcomes in severe acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

The Corticosteroids to Reduce Inflammation in Severe Pancreatitis (CRISP) trial is a multi-centre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial that aims to determine the impact of corticosteroids versus placebo on organ injury in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Patients are randomized to receive 100 mg of hydrocortisone parenterally versus matching placebo every 8 h for 3 days. Clinical and laboratory data are collected at the time of study enrollment, at 24, 48 and 72 h. The primary end-point for the trial is the difference in 72-h change in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score between hydrocortisone and placebo groups. Additional key secondary outcomes include ventilator free days and 28-day mortality.

DISCUSSION

This study will add to the evidence base in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. The results will inform clinical practice and future studies in the field. Trial registration number The trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05160506). It was posted on December 16th, 2021. The study protocol was approved by the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Committee on Clinical Investigation (CCI) (protocol 2021 P-000803).

Association between the ROX index and mortality in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although ROX index is frequently used to assess the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula treatment in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) patients, the relationship between the ROX index and the mortality remains unclear. Therefore, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the ability of the ROX index to predict mortality risk in patients with AHRF.

METHOD

Patients diagnosed with AHRF were extracted from the MIMIC-IV database and divided into four groups based on the ROX index quartiles. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality, while in-hospital mortality and follow-up mortality were secondary outcomes. To investigate the association between ROX index and mortality in AHRF patients, restricted cubic spline curve and COX proportional risk regression were utilized.

RESULT

A non-linear association (L-shaped) has been observed between the ROX index and mortality rate. When the ROX index is below 8.28, there is a notable decline in the 28-day mortality risk of patients as the ROX index increases (HR per SD, 0.858 [95%CI 0.794-0.928] P < 0.001). When the ROX index is above 8.28, no significant association was found between the ROX index and 28-day mortality. In contrast to the Q1 group, the mortality rates in the Q2, Q3, and Q4 groups had a substantial reduction (Q1 vs. Q2: HR, 0.749 [0.590-0.950] P = 0.017; Q3: HR, 0.711 [0.558-0.906] P = 0.006; Q4: HR, 0.641 [0.495-0.830] P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The ROX index serves as a valuable predictor of mortality risk in adult patients with AHRF, and that a lower ROX index is substantially associated with an increase in mortality.

A Game Changer for ARDS? Unraveling the Potential of the SF Ratio

Rangappa R. A Game Changer for ARDS? Unraveling the Potential of the SF Ratio. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(3):191-192.

A Prospective Observational Study Comparing Oxygen Saturation/Fraction of Inspired Oxygen Ratio with Partial Pressure of Oxygen in Arterial Blood/Fraction of Inspired Oxygen Ratio among Critically Ill Patients Requiring Different Modes of Oxygen Supplementation in Intensive Care Unit

Background

Intensive care unit (ICU) patients face a significant rise in mortality rates due to acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). The diagnosis of AHRF is based on the PF ratio, but it has limitations in resource-constrained settings. Instead, the Kigali modification suggests using the oxygen saturation/fraction of inspired oxygen (SF) ratio. This study aims to correlate SF ratio and arterial oxygen pressure (PF) ratio in critically ill adults with hypoxemic respiratory failure, who required O2 therapy through different modes of oxygen supplementation.

Materials and methods

In an ICU, a prospective observational study included 125 adult AHRF patients receiving oxygen therapy, with data collected on FiO2, PaO2, and SpO2. The SF ratio and PF ratio were calculated, and their correlation was assessed using statistical analysis. The receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to assess the diagnostic precision of the SF ratio in identifying AHRF.

Results

Data from a total of 250 samples were collected. The study showed a positive correlation (r = 0.622) between the SF ratio and the PF ratio. The SF threshold values of 252 and 321 were established for PF values of 200 and 300, respectively, featuring a sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 95%. Furthermore, it is worth noting that the PF ratio and SF ratio are interchangeable, regardless of the type of oxygen therapy, as the median values of both the PF ratio and SF ratio displayed statistical significance (p < 0.01) in both acidosis and alkalosis conditions.

Conclusion

For patients with AHRF, the noninvasive SF ratio can effectively serve as a substitute for the invasive PF ratio across all oxygen supplementation modes.

How to cite this article

Alur TR, Iyer SS, Shah JN, Kulkarni S, Jedge P, Patil V. A Prospective Observational Study Comparing Oxygen Saturation/Fraction of Inspired Oxygen Ratio with Partial Pressure of Oxygen in Arterial Blood/Fraction of Inspired Oxygen Ratio among Critically Ill Patients Requiring Different Modes of Oxygen Supplementation in Intensive Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024; 28(3):251-255.

Unraveling the impact of nitric oxide, almitrine, and their combination in COVID-19 (at the edge of sepsis) patients: a systematic review

Introduction: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a large number of critically ill and severe COVID-19 patients meet the diagnostic criteria for sepsis and even septic shock. The treatments for COVID-19 patients with sepsis are still very limited. For sepsis, improving ventilation is one of the main treatments. Nitric oxide (NO) and almitrine have been reported to improve oxygenation in patients with "classical" sepsis. Here, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NO, almitrine, and the combination of both for COVID-19 (at the edge of sepsis) patients. Method: A systematic search was performed on Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, Wanfang Data, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Randomized clinical trials, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, case-control studies, case series, and case reports in COVID-19 patients with suspected or confirmed sepsis were performed. Study characteristics, patient demographics, interventions, and outcomes were extracted from eligible articles. Results: A total of 35 studies representing 1,701 patients met eligibility criteria. Inhaled NO did not affect the mortality (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.33-2.8, I2 = 81%, very low certainty), hospital length of stay (SMD 0.62, 95% CI 0.04-1.17, I2 = 83%, very low certainty), and intubation needs (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.34-1.93, I2 = 56%, very low certainty) of patients with COVID-19 (at the edge of sepsis). Meanwhile, almitrine did not affect the mortality (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.17-1.13, low certainty), hospital length of stay (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.29-0.29, low certainty), intubation needs (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.5-1.79, low certainty), and SAEs (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.63-2.15, low certainty). Compared with pre-administration, the PaO2/FiO2 of patients with NO (SMD-0.87, 95% CI -1.08-0.66, I2 = 0%, very low certainty), almitrine (SMD-0.73, 95% CI-1.06-0.4, I2 = 1%, very low certainty), and the combination of both (SMD-0.94, 95% CI-1.71-0.16, I2 = 47%, very low certainty) increased significantly. Conclusion: Inhaled NO, almitrine, and the combination of the two drugs improved oxygenation significantly, but did not affect the patients' mortality, hospitalization duration, and intubation needs. Almitrine did not significantly increase the patients' SAEs. Well-designed high-quality studies are needed for establishing a stronger quality of evidence. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=367667, identifier CRD42022367667.

Lung ultrasound-guided best positive end-expiratory pressure in neonatal anesthesia: a proposed randomized, controlled study

BACKGROUND

Atelectasis is a common complication in neonatal anesthesia. Lung ultrasound (LUS) can be used intraoperatively to evaluate and recognize atelectatic lung areas. Hypotheses for the study are: (1) The use of LUS to guide choice of best positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can lead to reduction of FiO2 to achieve same saturations of oxygen (SpO2). (2) In a less de-recruited lung, there will be less postoperative pulmonary complications. (3) Static respiratory system compliance could be different. (4) Hemodynamic parameters and amount of fluids infused or need for vasopressors intraoperatively could be different.

METHODS

We propose a randomized controlled trial that compares standard PEEP settings with LUS-guided PEEP choice in patients under 2 months of age undergoing general anesthesia.

RESULTS

The primary aim is to determine whether LUS-guided PEEP choice in neonatal anesthesia, compared to standard PEEP choice, can lead to reduction of FiO2 applied to the ventilatory setting in order to maintain same SpO2s. Secondary aims are to determine whether patients treated with LUS-guided PEEP will develop less postoperative pulmonary complications, will have a significant difference in hemodynamic parameters and amount of fluids or vasopressors infused, and in static respiratory system compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

We expect a significant reduction of FiO2 in LUS-guided ventilation.

IMPACT

Lung atelectasis is extremely common in neonatal anesthesia, because of the physiology of the neonatal lung and chest wall and leads to hypoxemia, being a lung area with a perfusion/ventilation mismatch. Raising inspired fraction of oxygen can overcome temporarily hypoxemia but oxygen is a toxic compound for newborns. Lung ultrasound (LUS) can detect atelectasis at bedside and be used to optimize ventilator settings including choice of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims at demonstrating that LUS-guided choice of best PEEP during neonatal anesthesia can lead to reduction of inspired fractions of oxygen to keep same peripheral saturations SpO2.

EMERGENCE OF A TECHNOLOGY-DEPENDENT PHENOTYPE OF PEDIATRIC SEPSIS IN A LARGE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL

ABSTRACT

Objective: To investigate whether pediatric sepsis phenotypes are stable in time. Methods: Retrospective cohort study examining children with suspected sepsis admitted to a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit at a large freestanding children's hospital during two distinct periods: 2010-2014 (early cohort) and 2018-2020 (late cohort). K-means consensus clustering was used to derive types separately in the cohorts. Variables included ensured representation of all organ systems. Results: One thousand ninety-one subjects were in the early cohort and 737 subjects in the late cohort. Clustering analysis yielded four phenotypes in the early cohort and five in the late cohort. Four types were in both: type A (34% of early cohort, 25% of late cohort), mild sepsis, with minimal organ dysfunction and low mortality; type B (25%, 22%), primary respiratory failure; type C (25%, 18%), liver dysfunction, coagulopathy, and higher measures of systemic inflammation; type D (16%, 17%), severe multiorgan dysfunction, with high degrees of cardiorespiratory support, renal dysfunction, and highest mortality. Type E was only detected in the late cohort (19%) and was notable for respiratory failure less severe than B or D, mild hypothermia, and high proportion of diagnoses and technological dependence associated with medical complexity. Despite low mortality, this type had the longest PICU length of stay. Conclusions: This single center study identified four pediatric sepsis phenotypes in an earlier epoch but five in a later epoch, with the new type having a large proportion of characteristics associated with medical complexity, particularly technology dependence. Personalized sepsis therapies need to account for this expanding patient population.

Comparing 11 early warning scores and three shock indices in early sepsis prediction in the emergency department

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the discriminatory performance of 11 vital sign-based early warning scores (EWSs) and three shock indices in early sepsis prediction in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study on consecutive adult patients with an infection over 3 months in a public ED in Hong Kong. The primary outcome was sepsis (Sepsis-3 definition) within 48 h of ED presentation. Using c-statistics and the DeLong test, we compared 11 EWSs, including the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2), Modified Early Warning Score, and Worthing Physiological Scoring System (WPS), etc., and three shock indices (the shock index [SI], modified shock index [MSI], and diastolic shock index [DSI]), with Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) in predicting the primary outcome, intensive care unit admission, and mortality at different time points.

RESULTS

We analyzed 601 patients, of whom 166 (27.6%) developed sepsis. NEWS2 had the highest point estimate (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.75, 95%CI 0.70-0.79) and was significantly better than SIRS, qSOFA, other EWSs and shock indices, except WPS, at predicting the primary outcome. However, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of NEWS2 ≥ 5 for the prediction of sepsis were 0.45 (95%CI 0.37-0.52) and 0.88 (95%CI 0.85-0.91), respectively. The discriminatory performance of all EWSs and shock indices declined when used to predict mortality at a more remote time point.

CONCLUSION

NEWS2 compared favorably with other EWSs and shock indices in early sepsis prediction but its low sensitivity at the usual cut-off point requires further modification for sepsis screening.

A New Global Definition of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Background: Since publication of the 2012 Berlin definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), several developments have supported the need for an expansion of the definition, including the use of high-flow nasal oxygen, the expansion of the use of pulse oximetry in place of arterial blood gases, the use of ultrasound for chest imaging, and the need for applicability in resource-limited settings. Methods: A consensus conference of 32 critical care ARDS experts was convened, had six virtual meetings (June 2021 to March 2022), and subsequently obtained input from members of several critical care societies. The goal was to develop a definition that would 1) identify patients with the currently accepted conceptual framework for ARDS, 2) facilitate rapid ARDS diagnosis for clinical care and research, 3) be applicable in resource-limited settings, 4) be useful for testing specific therapies, and 5) be practical for communication to patients and caregivers. Results: The committee made four main recommendations: 1) include high-flow nasal oxygen with a minimum flow rate of ⩾30 L/min; 2) use PaO2:FiO2 ⩽ 300 mm Hg or oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry SpO2:FiO2 ⩽ 315 (if oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry is ⩽97%) to identify hypoxemia; 3) retain bilateral opacities for imaging criteria but add ultrasound as an imaging modality, especially in resource-limited areas; and 4) in resource-limited settings, do not require positive end-expiratory pressure, oxygen flow rate, or specific respiratory support devices. Conclusions: We propose a new global definition of ARDS that builds on the Berlin definition. The recommendations also identify areas for future research, including the need for prospective assessments of the feasibility, reliability, and prognostic validity of the proposed global definition.

Ventilatory Management of Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Due to SARS-CoV-2

The emergence of the new SARS-CoV-2 in December 2019 caused a worldwide pandemic of the resultant disease, COVID-19. There was a massive surge in admissions to intensive care units (ICU), notably of patients with hypoxaemic acute respiratory failure. In these patients, optimal oxygen therapy was crucial. In this article, we discuss tracheal intubation to provide mechanical ventilation in patients with hypoxaemic acute respiratory failure due to SARS-CoV-2. We first describe the pathophysiology of respiratory anomalies leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to infection with SARS-CoV-2, and then briefly review management, focusing particularly on the ventilation strategy. Overall, the ventilatory management of ARDS due to SARS-CoV-2 infection is largely the same as that applied in ARDS from other causes, and lung-protective ventilation is recommended. The difference lies in the initial clinical presentation, with profound hypoxaemia often observed concomitantly with near-normal pulmonary compliance.

Effectiveness of tocilizumab in hospitalized moderate-to-severe COVID-19 patients: a real-life study

BACKGROUND

To assess the clinical effectiveness of Tocilizumab (TCZ) in moderate-to-severe hospitalized COVID-19 patients and factors associated with clinical response.

METHODS

Five hundred eight inpatients with moderate-to-severe SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled. TCZ effect in addition to standard medical therapy was evaluated in terms of death during hospital stay. Unadjusted and adjusted risk of mortality for TCZ treated patients versus TCZ untreated ones was estimated using robust Cox regression model. We considered the combination of TCZ and ICU as time-dependent exposure and created a model using duplication method to assess the TCZ effect in very severe COVID-19 patients.

RESULTS

TCZ reduced death during hospital stay in the unadjusted model (HR 0.54, 95%CI 0.33-0.88) and also in the adjusted model, although with loss of statistical significance (HR 0.72, 0.43-1.20). Better effectiveness was observed in patients with low SpO2/FiO2 ratio (HR 0.35, 0.21-0.61 vs. 1.61, 0.54-4.82, P<0.05), and, without statistical significance, in patients with high CRP (HR 0.51, 0.30-0.87 vs. 0.41, 0.12-1.37, P=NS) and high IL-6 (HR 0.49, 0.29-0.82 vs. 1.00, 0.28-3.55, P=NS). TCZ was effective in patients not admitted to ICU, both in the unadjusted (HR 0.33, 0.14-0.74) and in the adjusted (HR 0.39, 0.17-0.91) model but no benefit was observed in critical ICU-admitted patients both in the unadjusted (HR 0.66, 0.37-1.15) and in the adjusted model (HR 0.95, 0.54-1.68).

CONCLUSIONS

Our real-life study suggests clinical efficacy of TCZ in moderate-to-severe COVID-19 patients but not in end-stage disease. Thus, to enhance TCZ effectiveness, patients should be selected before grave compromise of clinical conditions.

Discordance Between Invasive and NonInvasive Oxygen Saturation in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients

OBJECTIVES

To investigate discordance in oxy-hemoglobin saturation measured both by pulse oximetry (SpO2) and arterial blood gas (ABG, SaO2) among critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19(+)) patients compared to COVID-19(-) patients.

METHODS

Paired SpO2 and SaO2 readings were collected retrospectively from consecutive adult admissions to four critical care units in the United States between March and May 2020. The primary outcome was the rate of discordance (|SaO2-SpO2|>4%) in COVID-19(+) versus COVID-19(-) patients. The odds each cohort could have been incorrectly categorized as having a PaO2/FiO2 above or below 150 by their SpO2: Fractional inhaled oxygen ratio (pulse oximetry-derived oxyhemoglobin saturation:fraction of inspired oxygen ratio [SF]) was examined. A multivariate regression analysis assessed confounding by clinical differences between cohorts including pH, body temperature, renal replacement therapy at time of blood draw, and self-identified race.

RESULTS

There were 263 patients (173 COVID-19(+)) included. The rate of saturation discordance between SaO2 and SpO2 in COVID-19(+) patients was higher than in COVID-19(-) patients (27.9% vs 16.7%, odds ratio [OR] 1.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11 to 2.27). The average difference between SaO2 and SpO2 for COVID-19(+) patients was -1.24% (limits of agreement, -13.6 to 11.1) versus -0.11 [-10.3 to 10.1] for COVID-19(-) patients. COVID-19(+) patients had higher odds (OR: 2.61, 95% CI: 1.14-5.98) of having an SF that misclassified that patient as having a PaO2:FiO2 ratio above or below 150. There was not an association between discordance and the confounders of pH, body temperature, or renal replacement therapy at time of blood draw. After controlling for self-identified race, the association between COVID-19 status and discordance was lost.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulse oximetry was discordant with ABG more often in critically ill COVID-19(+) than COVID-19(-) patients. However, these findings appear to be driven by racial differences between cohorts.

Prognostic value of oxygen saturation index trajectory phenotypes on ICU mortality in mechanically ventilated patients: a multi-database retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Heterogeneity among critically ill patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) treatment could result in high mortality rates. Currently, there are no well-established indicators to help identify patients with a poor prognosis in advance, which limits physicians' ability to provide personalized treatment. This study aimed to investigate the association of oxygen saturation index (OSI) trajectory phenotypes with intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and ventilation-free days (VFDs) from a dynamic and longitudinal perspective.

METHODS

A group-based trajectory model was used to identify the OSI-trajectory phenotypes. Associations between the OSI-trajectory phenotypes and ICU mortality were analyzed using doubly robust analyses. Then, a predictive model was constructed to distinguish patients with poor prognosis phenotypes.

RESULTS

Four OSI-trajectory phenotypes were identified in 3378 patients: low-level stable, ascending, descending, and high-level stable. Patients with the high-level stable phenotype had the highest mortality and fewest VFDs. The doubly robust estimation, after adjusting for unbalanced covariates in a model using the XGBoost method for generating propensity scores, revealed that both high-level stable and ascending phenotypes were associated with higher mortality rates (odds ratio [OR]: 1.422, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.246-1.623; OR: 1.097, 95% CI 1.027-1.172, respectively), while the descending phenotype showed similar ICU mortality rates to the low-level stable phenotype (odds ratio [OR] 0.986, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.940-1.035). The predictive model could help identify patients with ascending or high-level stable phenotypes at an early stage (area under the curve [AUC] in the training dataset: 0.851 [0.827-0.875]; AUC in the validation dataset: 0.743 [0.709-0.777]).

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic OSI-trajectory phenotypes were closely related to the mortality of ICU patients requiring IMV treatment and might be a useful prognostic indicator in critically ill patients.

Interesting effects of interleukins and immune cells on acute respiratory distress syndrome

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a medical condition characterized by widespread inflammation in the lungs with consequent proportional loss of gas exchange function. ARDS is linked with severe pulmonary or systemic infection. Several factors, including secretory cytokines, immune cells, and lung epithelial and endothelial cells, play a role in the development and progression of this disease. The present study is based on Pubmed database information (1987-2022) using the words "Acute respiratory distress syndrome", "Interleukin", "Cytokines" and "Immune cells". Cytokines and immune cells play an important role in this disease, with particular emphasis on the balance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory factors. Neutrophils are one of several important mediators of Inflammation, lung tissue destruction, and malfunction during ARDS. Some immune cells, such as macrophages and eosinophils, play a dual role in releasing inflammatory mediators, recruitment inflammatory cells and the progression of ARDS, or releasing anti-inflammatory mediators, clearing the lung of inflammatory cells, and helping to improve the disease. Different interleukins play a role in the development or inhibition of ARDS by helping to activate various signaling pathways, helping to secrete other inflammatory or anti-inflammatory interleukins, and playing a role in the production and balance between immune cells involved in ARDS. As a result, immune cells and, inflammatory cytokines, especially interleukins play an important role in the pathogenesis of this disease Therefore, understanding the relevant mechanisms will help in the proper diagnosis and treatment of this disease.

High Incidence of Metastatic Infections in Panton-Valentine Leucocidin-Negative, Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: An 11-Year Retrospective Study in Japan

Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL)-negative community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) was originally disseminated in Japan and has since replaced healthcare-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA). However, the clinical characteristics of CA-MRSA bacteremia (CA-MRSAB) compared with those of HA-MRSA bacteremia (HA-MRSAB) are unknown. We aim to clarify differences and investigate associations between the clinical manifestations and virulence genes associated with plasma-biofilm formation in PVL-negative CA-MRSA. From 2011 to 2021, when CA-MRSA dramatically replaced HA-MRSA, 79 MRSA strains were collected from blood cultures and analyzed via SCCmec typing and targeted virulence gene (lukSF-PV, cna, and fnbB) detection. The incidence of metastatic infection was significantly higher in CA-MRSAB than in HA-MRSAB. PVL genes were all negative, although cna and fnbB were positive in 55.6% (20/36) and 50% (18/36) of CA-MRSA strains and 3.7% (1/27) and 7.4% (2/27) of HA-MRSA strains, respectively. cna and fnbB carriage were not associated with the development of metastatic infections in MRSAB; however, the bacteremia duration was significantly longer in CA-MRSAB harboring cna. CA-MRSAB may be more likely to cause metastatic infections than HA-MRSAB. Since CA-MRSA is dominant in Japan, suspected metastatic infection foci should be identified by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and echocardiography when treating MRSAB.

Prediction of unfavorable outcomes in community-acquired bacteremia by SIRS, SOFA and qSOFA scores

BACKGROUND

Sepsis diagnostic and prognostic scoring systems have changed over time. It remains uncertain which scoring system is the best predictor of unfavorable outcomes. We aimed to evaluate prediction of community-acquired bacteremia (CAB) outcomes using on-admission systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA).

METHODS

We present a retrospective observational cohort study of consecutive adult patients hospitalized with CAB over ten years. SIRS, qSOFA and SOFA scores calculated on admission were dichotomized as ≥2 or 0-1. Raw and adjusted incidence of a composite unfavorable outcome (death, septic shock, invasive mechanical ventilation, extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation, renal replacement therapy) over 35 days were compared.

RESULTS

Among 1930 patients, 1221 (63.3%) had SIRS, 196 (10.2%) had qSOFA, and 1117 (57.9%) had SOFA≥2. Respective raw and adjusted probabilities of the outcome were similar. Incidence for qSOFA≥2 was high (41.3%) and still considerable for qSOFA 0-1 (5.4%). SOFA≥2 indicated higher risk than SIRS≥2 (14.7% vs. 12.4%), while SOFA 0-1 indicated lower risk than SIRS 0-1 (1.2% vs. 3.1%). This relationship between SOFA and SIRS was also observed in patients with qSOFA 0-1.

CONCLUSIONS

qSOFA≥2 was associated with highest probability of unfavorable outcome, but dichotomized SOFA was more precise at high vs. low-risk distinction. Consecutive use of dichotomized qSOFA and SOFA on admission of adults with CAB enables fast and reliable identification of patients at high (qSOFA≥2, risk ~≥35%), moderate (qSOFA 0-1, SOFA≥2, risk ~10%), and low risk (qSOFA 0-1, SOFA 0-1, risk 1-2%) of subsequent unfavorable events.

Development and validation of a prediction model for evaluating extubation readiness in preterm infants

Successful early extubation has advantages not only in terms of short-term respiratory morbidities and survival but also in terms of long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. However, no consensus exists regarding the optimal protocol or guidelines for extubation readiness in preterm infants. Therefore, the decision to extubate preterm infants was almost entirely at the attending physician's discretion. We identified robust and quantitative predictors of success or failure of the first planned extubation attempt before 36 weeks of post-menstrual age in preterm infants (<32 weeks gestational age) and developed a prediction model for evaluating extubation readiness using these predictors. Extubation success was defined as the absence of reintubation within 72 h after extubation. This observational cohort study used data from preterm infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital in South Korea between July 2003 and June 2019 to identify predictors and develop and test a predictive model for extubation readiness. Data from preterm infants included in the Medical Informative Medicine for Intensive Care (MIMIC-III) database between 2001 and 2008 were used for external validation. From a machine learning model using predictors such as demographics, periodic vital signs, ventilator settings, and respiratory indices, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and average precision of our model were 0.805 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.802-0.809) and 0.917, respectively in the internal validation and 0.715 (95% CI, 0.713-0.717) and 0.838, respectively in the external validation. Our prediction model (NExt-Predictor) demonstrated high performance in assessing extubation readiness in both internal and external validations.

Obesity is Unlikely to be an Impediment to First-Pass Success During the Intubation of Critically Ill Patients

Background: Obesity has been described as a potential risk factor for difficult intubation among critically ill patients. Our primary aim was to further elucidate the association between obesity and first-pass success. Our secondary aim was to determine whether the use of hyper-angulated video laryngoscopy improves first-pass success compared to direct laryngoscopy when utilized for the intubation of critically ill obese patients. Study Design and Methods: A retrospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing endotracheal intubation outside of the operating room or emergency department between January 30, 2016 and May 1, 2020 at 3 campuses of an academic hospital system in the Bronx, NY. Our primary outcome was first-pass success of intubation. A multivariate logistic analysis was utilized to compare obesity status with first-pass success. Results: We identified 3791 critically ill patients who underwent endotracheal intubation of which 1417 were obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30). The incidence of hyper-angulated video laryngoscopy increased over the study period. A total of 46.6% of obese patients underwent intubation with hyper-angulated video laryngoscopy as compared to 35.1% of the nonobese group. First-pass success was 79.2% among the entire cohort. Obesity status did not appear to be associated with first-pass success (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 090-1.27; P = .47). Hyper-angulated video laryngoscopy did not seem to improve first-pass success among obese patients as compared to nonobese patients (adjusted OR 1.21, 95% CI: 0.85-1.71; P = .29). These findings persisted even after redefining the obesity cutoff as BMI ≥ 40 and excluding patients intubated during cardiac arrests. Conclusion: We did not detect an association between obesity and first-pass success. Hyper-angulated video laryngoscopy did not appear offer additional benefit over direct laryngoscopy during the intubation of critically ill obese patients.

Intravenous aviptadil and remdesivir for treatment of COVID-19-associated hypoxaemic respiratory failure in the USA (TESICO): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

There is a clinical need for therapeutics for COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure whose 60-day mortality remains at 30-50%. Aviptadil, a lung-protective neuropeptide, and remdesivir, a nucleotide prodrug of an adenosine analog, were compared with placebo among patients with COVID-19 acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure.

METHODS

TESICO was a randomised trial of aviptadil and remdesivir versus placebo at 28 sites in the USA. Hospitalised adult patients were eligible for the study if they had acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure due to confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and were within 4 days of the onset of respiratory failure. Participants could be randomly assigned to both study treatments in a 2 × 2 factorial design or to just one of the agents. Participants were randomly assigned with a web-based application. For each site, randomisation was stratified by disease severity (high-flow nasal oxygen or non-invasive ventilation vs invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]), and four strata were defined by remdesivir and aviptadil eligibility, as follows: (1) eligible for randomisation to aviptadil and remdesivir in the 2 × 2 factorial design; participants were equally randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to intravenous aviptadil plus remdesivir, aviptadil plus remdesivir matched placebo, aviptadil matched placebo plus remdesvir, or aviptadil placebo plus remdesivir placebo; (2) eligible for randomisation to aviptadil only because remdesivir was started before randomisation; (3) eligible for randomisation to aviptadil only because remdesivir was contraindicated; and (4) eligible for randomisation to remdesivir only because aviptadil was contraindicated. For participants in strata 2-4, randomisation was 1:1 to the active agent or matched placebo. Aviptadil was administered as a daily 12-h infusion for 3 days, targeting 600 pmol/kg on infusion day 1, 1200 pmol/kg on day 2, and 1800 pmol/kg on day 3. Remdesivir was administered as a 200 mg loading dose, followed by 100 mg daily maintenance doses for up to a 10-day total course. For participants assigned to placebo for either agent, matched saline placebo was administered in identical volumes. For both treatment comparisons, the primary outcome, assessed at day 90, was a six-category ordinal outcome: (1) at home (defined as the type of residence before hospitalisation) and off oxygen (recovered) for at least 77 days, (2) at home and off oxygen for 49-76 days, (3) at home and off oxygen for 1-48 days, (4) not hospitalised but either on supplemental oxygen or not at home, (5) hospitalised or in hospice care, or (6) dead. Mortality up to day 90 was a key secondary outcome. The independent data and safety monitoring board recommended stopping the aviptadil trial on May 25, 2022, for futility. On June 9, 2022, the sponsor stopped the trial of remdesivir due to slow enrolment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04843761.

FINDINGS

Between April 21, 2021, and May 24, 2022, we enrolled 473 participants in the study. For the aviptadil comparison, 471 participants were randomly assigned to aviptadil or matched placebo. The modified intention-to-treat population comprised 461 participants who received at least a partial infusion of aviptadil (231 participants) or aviptadil matched placebo (230 participants). For the remdesivir comparison, 87 participants were randomly assigned to remdesivir or matched placebo and all received some infusion of remdesivir (44 participants) or remdesivir matched placebo (43 participants). 85 participants were included in the modified intention-to-treat analyses for both agents (ie, those enrolled in the 2 x 2 factorial). For the aviptadil versus placebo comparison, the median age was 57 years (IQR 46-66), 178 (39%) of 461 participants were female, and 246 (53%) were Black, Hispanic, Asian or other (vs 215 [47%] White participants). 431 (94%) of 461 participants were in an intensive care unit at baseline, with 271 (59%) receiving high-flow nasal oxygen or non-invasive ventiliation, 185 (40%) receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, and five (1%) receiving ECMO. The odds ratio (OR) for being in a better category of the primary efficacy endpoint for aviptadil versus placebo at day 90, from a model stratified by baseline disease severity, was 1·11 (95% CI 0·80-1·55; p=0·54). Up to day 90, 86 participants in the aviptadil group and 83 in the placebo group died. The cumulative percentage who died up to day 90 was 38% in the aviptadil group and 36% in the placebo group (hazard ratio 1·04, 95% CI 0·77-1·41; p=0·78). The primary safety outcome of death, serious adverse events, organ failure, serious infection, or grade 3 or 4 adverse events up to day 5 occurred in 146 (63%) of 231 patients in the aviptadil group compared with 129 (56%) of 230 participants in the placebo group (OR 1·40, 95% CI 0·94-2·08; p=0·10).

INTERPRETATION

Among patients with COVID-19-associated acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure, aviptadil did not significantly improve clinical outcomes up to day 90 when compared with placebo. The smaller than planned sample size for the remdesivir trial did not permit definitive conclusions regarding safety or efficacy.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health.

Reliability of the respiratory rate and oxygenation index for successful high-flow nasal cannula support in coronavirus disease pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is an important non-invasive respiratory support in acute respiratory failure, including coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pneumonia. Although the respiratory rate and oxygenation (ROX) index is a simple and useful predictor for HFNC failure and mortality, there is limited evidence for its use in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. We aimed to evaluate the ROX index as a predictor for HFNC failure in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. We also evaluated the ROX index as a predictor for 28-day mortality.

METHODS

In this single-center, retrospective, cohort study, 248 patients older than 18 years of age with COVID-19 pneumonia received HFNC therapy for acute respiratory failure. The ROX index was evaluated within 4 h from the start of HFNC therapy. Past medical history, laboratory data, and the ROX index were evaluated as predictors for HFNC failure and 28-day mortality.

RESULTS

The ROX index < 4.88 showed a significantly high risk ratio for HFNC failure (2.13 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.47 - 3.08], p < 0.001). The ROX index < 4.88 was significantly associated with 28-day mortality (p = 0.049) in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia receiving HFNC therapy. Age, chronic hypertension, high lactate dehydrogenase level, and low ROX index showed significantly high risk ratio for HFNC failure. C-reactive protein level and low ROX index were predictors of 28-day morality.

CONCLUSION

The ROX index is a useful predictor for HFNC success and 28-day mortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia receiving HFNC therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

An independent ethics committee approved the study (Research Ethics Review Committee of Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital [number: zn220303; date: February 21, 2022]), which was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice.