Complications from heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass

Novel fondaparinux protocol for anticoagulation therapy in adults with renal failure and suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a retrospective review of institutional protocol

INTRODUCTION

The literature recommends against the use of fondaparinux in patients with kidney failure and dialysis as it may, with repeated dosing, accumulate and put patients at risk of bleeding. The management of patients with thrombosis in the presence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia HIT requires the introduction of an alternative anticoagulant like bivalirudin or argatroban. When these drugs are not available, fondaparinux, remains the only alternative. In similar scenarios, there are few studies addressing how to administer it.  METHODS: We developed a protocol for fondaparinux in patients with renal failure where pharmacokinetic parameters are altered, and levels changed only after hemodialysis or in cases of residual renal activity. Patients received a full first dose except for high risk of bleeding. We targeted a peak anti-factor Xa activity level of 0.6-1.3 units/ml and changed the subsequent dose accordingly. Furthermore, we monitored the patients for signs of bleeding, a drop in hemoglobin level, or clinical signs of thrombosis.  DISCUSSION: We described 10 patients with kidney failure and suspected HIT taking fondaparinux. All the patients achieved therapeutic anti-factor Xa activity levels. However, one developed new-onset venous thromboembolism (VTE) despite therapeutic anti-factor Xa levels. Another patient experienced a bleeding episode. We believe that these two patients developed complications due to their medical conditions rather than the use of fondaparinux.

CONCLUSION

Fondaparinux can be safely used in kidney failure using our protocol. However, despite its safety profile and relative success, this case series was small. More robust studies need to be conducted prior to drawing conclusions.

Low ADAMTS-13 predicts adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening thrombotic complication after heparin exposure. However, the role of ADAMTS-13 and von Willebrand factor (VWF) in the disease process and outcomes of HIT is not known.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the potential role of ADAMTS-13 and VWF in hospitalized patients suspected with HIT.

METHODS

Associations of the HIT tests, ADAMTS-13 activity, and VWF antigen or activity with other clinical parameters and outcomes in the patients suspected with HIT were determined.

RESULTS

Of 261 patients, 87 (33.3%) were positive and 174 (66.7%) were negative for a HIT antibody determined by an enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Of these 87 EIA+ patients, 31 (35.6%) were also positive but 56 (64.4%) were negative for serotonin-releasing assay (SRA). There was no statistically significant difference among all three groups (i.e., EIA-, EIA+/SRA+, and EIA+/SRA-) as to their demographic features, reasons for admission to the hospital, type of procedures performed, and in-hospital mortality. Compared to those in the healthy controls, plasma ADAMTS-13 activity in patients suspected with HIT was significantly lower but plasma VWF antigen (VWFAg) and activity (VWFAc) in these patients were significantly higher. While there was no statistically significant difference among all three groups regarding plasma levels of ADAMTS-13 activity, VWFAg, and VWFAc, plasma levels of ADAMTS-13 activity <50% or the low ratios of ADAMTS-13 activity to VWFAg (or VWFAc) are highly predictive for a 90-day mortality rate, particularly in the EIA+SRA+ group.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that relative deficiency of plasma ADAMTS-13 activity in hospitalized patients suspected with HIT is common, which may contribute at least in part to the adverse outcomes in this patient population, particularly in those with true HIT.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia After Mitral Valve Replacement

Background: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare autoimmune reaction that involves a decrease in platelet count following heparin exposure and can be associated with life-threatening thrombosis. Because of their prolonged heparin exposure, patients undergoing cardiac surgery are at risk of HIT, with an incidence of 0.1% to 3%. Case Report: A 65-year-old male with severe mitral regurgitation and preoperative ejection fraction of 20% to 25% underwent mitral valve bioprosthetic replacement with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Heparin anticoagulation was started on postoperative day (POD) 1. Respiratory failure resulted in prolonged mechanical ventilation and heparinization without the ability to initiate warfarin. While the patient was on heparin, his platelet count declined on POD 2 and then steadily increased to above the preoperative level on POD 7. On POD 10, the patient's platelet count dramatically decreased, and on POD 13 he developed acute common femoral artery occlusion necessitating embolectomy. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography revealed heavy thrombus burden across the mitral bioprosthesis. HIT was confirmed with a positive heparin-induced platelet antibody and serotonin release assay. Heparin was stopped and argatroban initiated. The patient underwent reoperative bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement on POD 18 using bivalirudin intraoperatively. Despite resolution of HIT, the patient developed sepsis and died on POD 59. Conclusion: The diagnosis of HIT is challenging in patients who undergo cardiopulmonary bypass. Platelet counts often decrease 40% to 60% during the first 72 hours postoperatively, and the frequency of nonspecific anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibody formation is high. These findings can mask early signs of HIT and delay diagnosis.

Comparison of Clinical Scoring Tools to Predict Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Cardiac Surgery

The 4Ts and HIT-Expert Probability (HEP) scoring tools for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) have not been validated in cardiac surgery patients, and the reported sensitivity and specificity of the Post-Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB) scoring tool vary widely in the 2 available analyses. It remains unclear which of the available scoring tools most accurately predicts HIT in this population. Forty-nine HIT-positive patients who underwent on-pump cardiac surgery within a 6-year period were loosely matched to 98 HIT-negative patients in a 1:2 case-control design. The 4Ts, HEP, and CPB scores were calculated for each patient. Sensitivity and specificity of each tool were calculated using standard cut-offs. The Youden method was utilized to determine optimal cut-offs within receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of each score, after which sensitivities and specificities were recalculated. Using standard cut-offs, the sensitivities for the CPB, HEP, and 4Ts scores were 100%, 93.9%, and 69.4%, respectively. Specificities were 51%, 49%, and 71.4%, respectively. The AUC of the scoring tool ROC curves were 0.961 for the CPB score, 0.773 for the HEP score, and 0.805 for the 4Ts score. Using the Youden method-derived optimal cut-off of  ≥3 points on the CPB score, sensitivity remained 100% with improved specificity to 88.9%. The CPB score is the preferred HIT clinical scoring tool in adult cardiac surgery patients, whereas the 4Ts score performed less effectively. A cut-off of ≥ 3 points on the CPB score could increase specificity while preserving high sensitivity, which should be validated in a prospective evaluation.

Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia for the Perioperative and Critical Care Clinician

Purpose of Review

This review will illustrate the importance of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the intraoperative and critical care settings.

Recent Findings

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) occurs more frequently in surgical patients compared with medical patients due to the inflammatory release of platelet factor 4 and perioperative heparin exposure. Recognition of this disease requires a high index of suspicion. Diagnostic tools and therapeutic strategies have been expanded and refined in recent years.

Summary

HIT is a condition where antibodies against the heparin/platelet factor 4 complex interact with platelet receptors to promote platelet activation, aggregation, and thrombus formation. Our review will focus on intraoperative and postoperative considerations related to HIT to help the clinician better manage this rare but often devastating hypercoagulable disease process.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia diagnostic testing after adult cardiac surgery: a single-centre experience and development

OBJECTIVES

To assess the incidence and outcome of heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia (HIT) in patients after cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and to review the time course of platelet counts and the use of different immunological diagnostic tests.

METHODS

All patients ≥18 years of age who underwent CPB from 2006 to 2015 and who were postoperatively admitted to our cardiac intensive care unit (ICU) were included in this retrospective study. Screening for heparin/platelet factor-4 antibodies was performed using an antibody test, which was later replaced with a screening test specific for IgG antibodies without IgA/IgM cross-reactivity. The enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the detection of antibodies of all immunoglobulin classes against heparin/PF4 complexes was replaced with an IgG-specific EIA. HIT was confirmed by a heparin-induced platelet aggregation test until 2014.

RESULTS

Among 4978 patients admitted between 2006 and 2015, 539 (11%) patients were evaluated for HIT. Patients were excluded because of age <18 years (n = 9), non-cardiac surgery without CPB (n = 10) or incomplete data (n = 3). Of the remaining 517 patients, 43 (8.3%) patients were HIT-positive. HIT incidence was 0.86%. The proportion of HIT-positive patients was similar in men and women (8.4% and 8.2%, respectively). Men and women with suspected HIT also had similar in-hospital mortality (odds ratio ≈ 1; P = 0.926).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of HIT was lower in our study than previously reported. Novel immunological tests have improved to specifically detect IgG antibodies. Furthermore, they are able to detect anti-protamine antibodies, which may be present in patients with high clinical probability of testing negative for HIT. Incidence and clinical relevance of heparin/protamine antibodies will be subjects of future investigation.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in the Critically Ill Patient

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is associated with clinically significant morbidity and mortality. Patients who are critically ill are commonly thrombocytopenic and exposed to heparin. Although HIT should be considered, it is not usually the cause of thrombocytopenia in the medical-surgical ICU population. A systematic approach to the patient who is critically ill who has thrombocytopenia according to clinical features, complemented by appropriate laboratory confirmation, should lead to a reduction in inappropriate laboratory testing and reduce the use of more expensive and less reliable anticoagulants. If the patient is deemed as being at intermediate or high risk for HIT or if HIT is confirmed by means of the serotonin-release assay, heparin should be stopped, heparin-bonded catheters should be removed, and a direct antithrombin or fondaparinux should be initiated to reduce the risk of thrombosis. Warfarin is absolutely contraindicated in the acute phase of HIT; if administered, its effects must be reversed by using vitamin K.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: natural history, diagnosis, and management

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an under-recognized, limb- and life-threatening complication of pharmacologic heparin administration. Antibody formation against heparin complexed to platelet factor 4 (PF4) is central to the pathogenesis of HIT. Heparin: PF4 antibodies promote platelet activation and aggregation as well as excess thrombin generation which may lead to clinical thrombosis. HIT should be suspected in patients who develop thrombocytopenia with or without associated arterial or venous thrombosis while on heparin. HIT is a clinical diagnosis. Specialized HIT assays should be interpreted with care. The cornerstone of HIT management is the discontinuation of all forms of heparin exposure and the institution of anticoagulation with an alternative agent. The direct thrombin inhibitors lepirudin and argatroban are currently available and approved for use in patients with HIT.

Nonclinical evaluation of novel cationically modified polysaccharide antidotes for unfractionated heparin

Protamine, the only registered antidote of unfractionated heparin (UFH), may produce a number of adverse effects, such as anaphylactic shock or serious hypotension. We aimed to develop an alternative UFH antidote as efficient as protamine, but safer and easier to produce. As a starting material, we have chosen generally non-toxic, biocompatible, widely available, inexpensive, and easy to functionalize polysaccharides. Our approach was to synthesize, purify and characterize cationic derivatives of dextran, hydroxypropylcellulose, pullulan and γ-cyclodextrin, then to screen them for potential heparin-reversal activity using an in vitro assay and finally examine efficacy and safety of the most active polymers in Wistar rat and BALB/c mouse models of experimentally induced arterial and venous thrombosis. Efficacy studies included the measurement of thrombus formation, activated partial thromboplastin time, bleeding time, and anti-factor Xa activity; safety studies included the measurement of hemodynamic, hematologic and immunologic parameters. Linear, high molecular weight dextran substituted with glycidyltrimethylammonium chloride groups at a ratio of 0.65 per glucose unit (Dex40-GTMAC3) is the most potent and the safest UFH inhibitor showing activity comparable to that of protamine while possessing lower immunogenicity. Cationic polysaccharides of various structures neutralize UFH. Dex40-GTMAC3 is a promising and potentially better UFH antidote than protamine.

Anticoagulation with bivalirudin during deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a well-recognized complication of anticoagulation with heparin. We present the case of a patient with recent heparin-induced thrombocytopenia who subsequently needed surgery on an emergency basis for acute type A aortic dissection. This article reports the successful use of bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, as an alternative to heparin throughout cardiopulmonary bypass and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. We contend that bivalirudin is a safe alternative to heparin when performing surgery for aortic dissection and should be considered as an option for use in patients who present with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Emphasis on the Role of PF4 in the Incidence, Pathophysiology and Treatment of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia

Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4) associated with polyanionic glycosaminoglycan drugs or displayed on vascular cell membranes. These antibodies are elicited by multimolecular complexes that can occur when heparin is administered in clinical settings associated with abundant PF4. Heparin binding alters native PF4 and elicits immune recognition and response. While the presence of heparin is integral to immunogenesis, the HIT antibody binding site is within PF4. Thus HIT antibodies develop and function to cause thrombocytopenia and/or thrombosis only in the presence of PF4. Future emphasis on understanding the biology, turnover and regulation of PF4 may lead to insights into the prevention and treatment of HIT.

Treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an antibody-mediated adverse drug reaction that can lead to devastating thromboembolic complications, including pulmonary embolism, ischemic limb necrosis necessitating limb amputation, acute myocardial infarction, and stroke.

METHODS

The methods of this guideline follow the Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines in this supplement.

RESULTS

Among the key recommendations for this article are the following: For patients receiving heparin in whom clinicians consider the risk of HIT to be > 1%, we suggest that platelet count monitoring be performed every 2 or 3 days from day 4 to day 14 (or until heparin is stopped, whichever occurs first) (Grade 2C). For patients receiving heparin in whom clinicians consider the risk of HIT to be < 1%, we suggest that platelet counts not be monitored (Grade 2C). In patients with HIT with thrombosis (HITT) or isolated HIT who have normal renal function, we suggest the use of argatroban or lepirudin or danaparoid over other nonheparin anticoagulants (Grade 2C). In patients with HITT and renal insufficiency, we suggest the use of argatroban over other nonheparin anticoagulants (Grade 2C). In patients with acute HIT or subacute HIT who require urgent cardiac surgery, we suggest the use of bivalirudin over other nonheparin anticoagulants or heparin plus antiplatelet agents (Grade 2C).

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies evaluating the role of fondaparinux and the new oral anticoagulants in the treatment of HIT are needed.

Desirudin: a review of the pharmacology and clinical application for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis

Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) are an emerging class of anticoagulants in routine clinical practice, although they have been under investigation for quite some time. Desirudin (Iprivask®, Canyon Pharmaceuticals™) is a recombinant hirudin derivative that directly inhibits free and fibrin-bound thrombin. Desirudin was the first DTI approved for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis in Europe (Revasc®) and is the newest injectable DTI commercially available in the USA. Desirudin is one of the few nonheparin subcutaneous drugs that has demonstrable efficacy for DVT prophylaxis. Subcutaneous desirudin has been shown to be more effective than both subcutaneous unfractionated heparin and enoxaparin, with comparable bleeding rates in the prevention of DVT in patients undergoing elective hip replacement. Desirudin also offers the advantage of a fixed dosing regimen while being less immunogenic than unfractionated heparin. However, owing to its pharmacokinetic properties, patients with renal dysfunction require dosing modifications. The favorable profile shown with desirudin thus far will allow its clinical use to grow and will promote further investigation into broadening its clinical applications.

Coronary arterial bypass surgery with beating heart in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: Usage of thrombin inhibitor (Lepirudin; r-hirudin)

One of the most important adverse drug reactions that physicians encounter is the life-threatening prothrombotic syndrome known as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). In patients with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and coronary arterial disease, alternative anticoagulatory regimens are needed during cardiac surgery for prevention of thrombosis. Treatment options for such patients now generally include the use of alternative anticoagulants such as lepirudin, bivalirudin, argatroban or danaparoid. In this article, we present a case where heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was properly performed coronary arterial bypass grafting by using lepirudin. (This sentence is confusing)

[Postoperative period in cardiac surgery: don't forget heparin induced thrombocytopenia!]

Type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) has a low incidence in cardiac surgery, but its mortality once declared is high. Its clinical recognition can be difficult with these patients who usually have thrombocytopenia in postoperative period and who are predisposed to develop HIT prematurely. Thromboses in this context must be specific, and treatment, which is nowadays well codified, must be begun without waiting for biologic results. Besides, specificity of Elisa's test is weakened in this population since there is a high rate of serum conversion; yet, its preoperative realization associated with pre-test probability scoring for HIT, can turn out useful.

Hydrodynamic Evaluation of a Minimally Invasive Heart Valve in an Isolated Aortic Root Using a Modified In Vitro Model

Implantation methods for commercially available heart valve prostheses require open-chest access to the heart to perform the suturing process. In order to alleviate this complicated surgical implant technique, a “stent-valve” design was developed that will provide a less cumbersome implantation method and therefore a less invasive access to the heart. The purpose of this study is to verify its hydrodynamic performance and migration characteristics to assess its feasibility for use as a replacement heart valve. Hydrodynamic evaluation of the novel stent-valve combination device was carried out using a Vivitro left heart simulator and by setting up a comparison with the same 19 mm trileaflet valve under a traditional implantation (suture) method. To assess implantation ability under normal physiological conditions, porcine aortic root tissue was mounted into the left heart simulator to replace the original glass sinus. A comparison experiment was conducted to study the change in the total compliance and resistance of the testing system using the modified Windkessel model. For the range of test conditions investigated, the stent-valve combination device produced an average pressure gradient of 41.2 mm Hg(±19.6 mm Hg), an average effective orifice area (EOA) of 1.06 cm2(±0.08 cm2), and an average regurgitation percentage of 4.5% (±3.3%), while the sutured valve produced an average pressure gradient of 48.7 mm Hg(±17.4 mm Hg), an average EOA of 0.88 cm2(±0.14 cm2), and an average regurgitation percentage of 0.8% (±0.4%). The total compliance and resistance of the system was 0.37 ml/mm Hg(±0.01 ml/mm Hg) and 1.1 mm Hg/ml/s(±0.29 mm Hg/ml/s), with the original Windkessel model, and 0.33 ml/mm Hg(±0.01 ml/mm Hg) and 1.1 mm Hg/ml/s(±0.24 mm Hg/ml/s) for the system with the aortic tissue. The stent-valve combination device has demonstrated favorable hydrodynamic performance when compared with the same trileaflet valve under the traditional suturing method, and the arterial stent makes it possible to secure the valve at its required position without migration.

[Cardiac surgery in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT II)]

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) might be life-threatening in patients undergoing open heart surgery, due to thromboembolic events, thrombocytopenia and bleeding. If cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is necessary, anticoagulation therapy will be based on usage of danaparoid or direct thrombin inhibitors. Female patient was switched from per oral anticoagulant therapy to low molecular heparin therapy preparing for reredo mitral valve replacement due to endocarditis and artificial valve thrombosis. In next 10 days, thrombocytopenia was obvious (Tr 302,000 mm3 to 11,000 mm3) , and diagnoses of HIT were done. Anticoagulant therapy was continued with danaparoid, 750 IU/12 h sc. During the surgery, reredo mitral valve replacement and aortocoronary bypass on anterior descending coronary artery, blood salvage technique with rhirudin (intravenous bolus 0.4 mg/kg, in CPB prajming solution 0.4 mg/kg and continuous infusion during CPB 0.15 mg/kg/h) during cardiopulmonary bypass was used. Active coagulation time and +++ were monitored, without any sign of micro thrombosis in circuit. Postoperatively, per oral anticoagulation therapy was initiated with prolonged postoperative treatment due to basic disease, endocarditis. Patient was discharged from hospital on 21st postoperative day without any complication.

Phlegmasia Cerulea Dolens in a Patient with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Objective:

To report a case of the venous obstructive condition known as phlegmasia cerulea dolens (PCD) in the presence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT).

Case Summary:

A 50-year-old white female presented to the emergency department with a 2-day history of a bluish discoloration of her toes and hands accompanied by chest pain and shortness of breath. The evident edema, tenderness on palpation, and cyanosis of the extremities were suggestive of PCD. She had been hospitalized approximately one month previously due to a fibular fracture and again within the past 2 weeks for intractable abdominal pain and nausea. During her current hospital stay, she was diagnosed with multiple venous thromboembolisms (VTEs); at the time of admission, an unfractionated heparin (UFH) drip was initiated to treat her VTEs. Due to a decreased platelet count on admission, a platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody assay was performed and found to be positive. After discontinuation of UFH, her platelet count slowly returned to normal range.

Discussion:

The pathogenesis of HIT is due to formation of antibodies against the complex of heparin and PF4. HIT is characterized by a reduction in the platelet count approximately 4–14 days after the initiation of heparin therapy plus a paradoxical prothrombotic state. The typical diagnostic clues are a drop in platelet count of 50% from baseline with the initiation of heparin and a positive assay for heparin-PF4-immunoglobulin G. This condition may result in PCD, which presents as the triad of pain, edema, and cyanosis. This condition often results in venous or arterial thrombus formation. The treatment for PCD includes immediate discontinuation of heparin products and anticoagulation with a direct thrombin inhibitor.

Conclusions:

Thromboembolic complications such as PCD are often observed as a presenting feature of HIT. To avoid these potentially limb- and life-threatening complications, clinicians must be vigilant in their monitoring of platelets and clinical signs and symptoms of HIT while patients are on heparin therapy.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Unfractionated heparin is widely used for numerous clinical situations. A well-known adverse effect of heparin exposure is thrombocytopenia. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a clinicopathologic syndrome that can be associated with severe complications and significant mortality. The pathophysiology of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia includes an immune-mediated reaction to heparin that activates platelets and results in an acquired hypercoagulability. Diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia should incorporate clinical signs and symptoms and laboratory testing for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies. Therapy should include discontinuation of heparin, initiation of a direct thrombin inhibitor, and eventually therapy with warfarin (only after the platelet count is at least 100 x 10(9)/L).

[Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia]

Heparins are in widespread use as anticoagulants for the prophylaxis and therapy of thromboembolisms. A dangerous side-effect is heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT type II) with the paradox of thromboembolic venous and arterial vascular occlusions. HIT type II is an immunological disease which results in activation of platelets and plasma coagulation. The main symptom is an acute onset of thrombocytopenia with a fall in thrombocytes to less than 50% of the initial value with or without newly arising thromboembolic complications between days 5 and 14 after the start of heparin therapy. Surgery patients are more often affected by subclinical antibody formation as well as by symptomatic HIT type II than clinical patients. In this review we will discuss the difficult diagnosis and the differential diagnosis with special emphasis on postoperative intensive care patients, as well as preventive measures and management on occurrence of HIT type II and associated thrombotic complications.

Clinical Presentation, Temporal Relationship, and Outcome in Thirty-Three Patients With Type 2 Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia After Cardiotomy

BACKGROUND

Type 2 heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is an uncommon but often fatal complication of heparin, frequently difficult to diagnose after cardiac surgery. In this series, we record the clinical presentation, temporal relationship, and treatment outcome of patients diagnosed with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia postoperatively.

METHODS

Thirty-three consecutive patients (1.1%) with a diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia established by a greater than 50% drop in platelet count with or without a thrombotic event and a positive platelet factor-4 assay were reviewed. We recorded the clinical presentation, the time to presentation, treatment, and outcome (thrombosis, mortality). Univariate analysis was performed on 13 preoperative, operative, and postoperative variables.

RESULTS

The cohort was at increased mortality risk as a result of age (69.4 years), reduced cardiac function (46.8%), nonbypass operations (57.6%), emergency surgery (21.2%), and implantation of three assist devices. The mean time to suspect heparin-induced thrombocytopenia postoperatively was 5.4 days, with 22 cases (66.6%) occurring within 5 days. All patients had previous (within 3 months) exposure to heparin, and 66.6% had ongoing treatment with heparin before surgery. Overall mortality was 33%; thrombotic complications occurred in 15 patients (45.5%), with a mortality of 7 (46.6%) despite immediate cessation of heparin and treatment with a nonheparin analog. Thrombocytopenia without thrombosis occurred in 18 patients (54.5%), but a subgroup of 5 patients with nonthrombotic complications accounted for the 4 (22.2%) deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia after cardiac surgery is uncommon but may occur within 5 days of surgery, further complicating diagnosis and treatment. Thrombotic complications result in a high mortality despite treatment with a nonheparin analog, and a subgroup of patients with thrombocytopenia fared poorly.

Antithrombotic therapy in cardiac surgery

PURPOSE

To review the perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy in cardiac surgery, including the management of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and off-pump surgery.

METHODS

A review of the relevant English literature over the period 1975-2005 was undertaken, in addition to a review of international practices in antithrombotic therapy in cardiac surgery.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Cardiopulmonary bypass is required in most procedures and makes anticoagulation mandatory. Anticoagulation is, usually, achieved with unfractionnated heparin (UFH). Unfractionated heparin is monitored by point-of-care (POC) testing, such as the activated clotting time or the determination of heparin concentration. The target values of both tests remain empirical, with no clearly validated thresholds. The target value needs to be adjusted according to the POC test, given significant variations between devices and activators. After CABG, the need for antiplatelet therapy is well demonstrated, in order to limit the risk of postoperative death or ischemic events, and improve venous graft patency. Immediately after valvular surgery, antithrombotic therapy should take into account the specific risk carried by each patient and by each prosthetic device. The risk of venous thromboembolism, though poorly defined, is also present in the postoperative period and may require additional attention. Given the frequent exposure to UFH, occurrence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is not infrequent in these patients and requires careful individual management.

CONCLUSIONS

Antithrombotic therapy is an essential component of cardiac surgery. Yet, with the exception of antiplatelet agents in CABG patients, antithrombotic therapy is often based on the clinical experience of medical teams more than on an evidence-based assessment of the literature.

Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in cardiovascular patients

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an antibody-mediated syndrome associated with heparin exposure, a falling platelet count and a high risk of thrombosis. Cardiovascular patients are at increased risk of HIT due to wide use of heparin in this population. Should HIT be suspected, heparin must be avoided in most situations, and anticoagulation with an alternative anticoagulant should be instituted. Preferred agents include the direct thrombin inhibitors argatroban and lepirudin, whilst bivalirudin or desirudin (other direct thrombin inhibitors) can be used in some situations. The indirect thrombin inhibitors, danaparoid and fondaparinux, can also be considered at times. These agents and their use in cardiac patients, including patients with acute coronary syndrome, percutaneous coronary interventions, acute ST elevation myocardial infarction or cardiac surgery, will be reviewed.

Co-existence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in a postoperative cardiac surgery patient

Up to 50% of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery will develop antibodies against the heparin-platelet factor 4 complex, and a small percentage of those will go on to develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura has also been reported post-coronary artery bypass surgery. In this case report, we describe a patient who developed both heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura post-coronary artery bypass surgery. This patient had clinical features consistent with both entities, and the clinical picture could not be explained by either heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura alone. It is hypothesized that these two entities may be related in this patient population, and this case report emphasizes the challenges in the diagnosis of thrombocytopenia in this patient population.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Complicating Support by the Berlin Heart

Since 1992, miniaturized pulsatile air-driven ventricular assist devices (VADs), "Berlin Heart," have been used at many institutions (36 cases in North America in 19 different institutions) for pediatric use. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT II) is a significant complication rarely reported in the setting of adult VAD support; no similar report exists concerning pediatric VAD support. We report on a 13-month-old, 8.1 kg girl who required LVAD support for cardiogenic shock of unclear etiology. The patient had a history of multiple surgical repairs for correction of complex congenital heart disease consisting of a series of left heart obstructive lesions (Shone's complex). Despite aggressive ventilatory and inotropic support, the patient continued to deteriorate and subsequently required extracorporeal life support. After 7 days of conventional venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, a 10 ml Berlin Heart VAD was implanted. After implantation, the patient developed persistent low-grade fever of unclear etiology, gradual thrombocytopenia, and deterioration of renal function. On postimplant day 10, the pump required replacement because of concerns about an inlet valve thrombus; the explanted device demonstrated a nearly occlusive clot not appreciable from external inspection. Simultaneously, HIT II was diagnosed as a result of hematology workup for persistent thrombocytopenia. We discuss the unique challenges posed by HIT II complicating pediatric VAD support and in relation to the heparin coating of the device.

Anticoagulation management and cardiac surgery in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the gold standard for anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Of patients undergoing CPB operations, 25% to 50% develop heparin-dependent antibodies during the postoperative period, typically between day 5 and 10, if UFH is continued during the postoperative course. In 1% to 3% of all patients undergoing CPB operation with UFH anticoagulation, these antibodies activate platelets causing a prothrombotic disorder, known as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), which can lead to life-threatening thromboembolic complications. If urgent cardiac operation with the use of CPB in patients with positive antibody titer is required, different anticoagulatory approaches are available, such as lepirudin, bivalirudin, and danaparoid or UFH in combination with platelet antagonists, such as epoprostenol or tirofiban. In patients with previous HIT but no detectable antibodies, UFH alone can be used only during CPB, but alternative anticoagulation has to be used pre- and postoperatively.

Drug Insight: bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention-risks, measures and impact of anticoagulant treatment options

In Europe, the use of interventional cardiology, including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), is increasing rapidly. The use of anticoagulation agents in PCI procedures is essential, but despite technical improvements, a significant associated bleeding risk still exists: more than 5% of patients are estimated to require transfusion, and around a further 13% experience minor bleeding. The methods used to detect and measure blood loss following PCI, however, vary widely between institutions and clinical trials. The risk of bleeding is influenced by therapeutic options and patient-specific characteristics, such as age, anemia and previous exposure to anticoagulants. Bleeding is associated with death, and also with less severe conditions such as thrombocytopenia, anemia, and hematoma, which have major impacts on patients' welfare and length of hospital stay, and on hospital budgets. Unfractionated heparin is the most widely used anticoagulant during PCI. Heparin, antiplatelet agents and other anticoagulants, however, have limitations that make it difficult to achieve a level of anticoagulation that prevents ischemic events without promoting bleeding. The use of low-molecular-weight heparin and the addition of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors offer improved outcomes, but safer and more effective therapeutic agents are still required. New anticoagulants, including direct thrombin inhibitors such as bivalirudin, show similar levels of efficacy to heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, but with fewer hemorrhagic complications, and might advance clinical practice. This review evaluates the impact of PCI-related bleeding on patients' outcomes and hospital resources, examines methods for the detection and measurement of bleeding, and appraises the therapeutic options--particularly the newer agents--available to minimize hemorrhagic complications.

Thrombocytopenia in Cardiovascular Patients

Thrombocytopenia is a common problem in cardiovascular patients, but the etiology and management of this condition may be different than those in other populations. Around the time that percutaneous coronary interventions are performed, the drugs most commonly associated with thrombocytopenia are the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors and heparin. Thienopyridines only rarely cause thrombocytopenia. Patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes may be exposed to prolonged heparin infusions, GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors, and thienopyridines. After open-heart surgery, as opposed to other surgical procedures, the platelet count falls, primarily due to platelet damage and destruction in the bypass circuit and hemodilution. Heparin is the most common drug to be implicated in thrombocytopenia in ICU patients. Determining the etiology for the low platelet count is important for the implementation of appropriate management. The use of a direct thrombin inhibitor in treatment should be considered early if a diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is possible.

Diagnostic score for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia after cardiopulmonary bypass

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) occurs in nearly 3% of patients treated with heparin after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). HIT carries a risk of severe thrombotic complications, and must be diagnosed rapidly. To identify simple criteria for estimating the probability of HIT after CPB, we retrospectively analyzed the files of 84 patients with suspected HIT after CPB and we analyzed the usefulness of several variables collected at the time of HIT suspicion to estimate HIT probability. HIT was confirmed in 35 cases and ruled out in 49 cases, on the basis of a platelet increment after heparin withdrawal, detection of heparin-dependent antibodies, and absence of other clear cause of thrombocytopenia. A biphasic platelet count from CPB to the first day of suspected HIT, an interval of >/= 5 days from CPB to the first day of suspected HIT, and a CPB duration of Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Aged
• Antibodies/blood
• Cardiopulmonary Bypass/adverse effects
• Diagnosis, Differential
• Female
• Heparin/adverse effects
• Heparin/immunology
• Humans
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Platelet Count
• Predictive Value of Tests
• Probability
• Retrospective Studies
• Risk Factors
• Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced
• Thrombocytopenia/diagnosis

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

A Lillo-Le Louët Centre Régional de Pharmacovigilance and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Hôpital Europeen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, France.
P Boutouyrie
M Alhenc-Gelas
C Le Beller
I Gautier
M Aiach
D Lasne

Collapse

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in pediatric cardiac surgery: an emerging cause of morbidity and mortality

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is immunogenic, and heparin-dependent antibodies can be demonstrated 5 to 10 days postoperatively in 25% to 50% of adult postcardiac surgery patients. In a minority of these cases (1% to 3% if UFH is continued longer than 1 week) these antibodies strongly activate platelets, causing thrombocytopenia and massive thrombin generation (HIT syndrome). HIT is an intensely procoagulant disorder, and in adult cardiac surgery patients carries both significant thrombotic morbidity (38% to 81%) and mortality (28%). Despite the ubiquitous use of UFH in pediatric intensive care units, and the repeated and sustained exposures to UFH in neonates and young children with congenital heart disease, HIT has been infrequently recognized and reported in this patient population. However, emerging experience at our institution and elsewhere suggests that HIT is significantly under-recognized in pediatric congenital heart disease patients, and may in fact have an incidence and associated thrombotic morbidity and mortality in this patient group comparable to that seen in adult cardiac surgery patients. This article will review HIT in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease and emphasize the special challenges posed in clinical recognition, laboratory diagnosis, and treatment of HIT in this patient group. We will also outline our experience with the off-label use of the direct thrombin inhibitor, argatroban, in pediatric patients with HIT.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia presenting with thrombosis of multiple saphenous vein grafts and myocardial infarction

We report herein a patient with coronary artery disease that developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia after coronary artery bypass graft with resulting thrombosis of multiple saphenous vein grafts and myocardial infarction after heparin exposure. The patient required lepirudin and a cardiac catheterization with placement of stents.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and cardiac surgery

Unfractionated heparin given during cardiopulmonary bypass is remarkably immunogenic, as 25% to 50% of postcardiac surgery patients develop heparin-dependent antibodies during the next 5 to 10 days. Sometimes, these antibodies strongly activate platelets and coagulation, thereby causing the prothrombotic disorder, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is 1% to 3% if unfractionated heparin is continued beyond the first postoperative week. When cardiac surgery is urgently needed for a patient with acute or subacute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, options include an alternative anticoagulant (bivalirudin, lepirudin, or danaparoid) or combining unfractionated heparin with a platelet antagonist (epoprostenol or tirofiban). As heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies are transient, unfractionated heparin alone is appropriate in a patient with previous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia whose antibodies have disappeared.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and cardiac surgery

Unfractionated heparin given during cardiopulmonary bypass is remarkably immunogenic, as 25% to 50% of postcardiac surgery patients develop heparin-dependent antibodies during the next 5 to 10 days. Sometimes, these antibodies strongly activate platelets and coagulation, thereby causing the prothrombotic disorder, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is 1% to 3% if unfractionated heparin is continued throughout the postoperative period. When cardiac surgery is urgently needed for a patient with acute or subacute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, options include an alternative anticoagulant (bivalirudin, lepirudin, or danaparoid) or combining unfractionated heparin with a platelet antagonist (epoprostenol or tirofiban). As heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies are transient, unfractionated heparin alone is appropriate in a patient with previous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia whose antibodies have disappeared.

Biological and clinical features of low-molecular-weight heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a common adverse effect of unfractionated heparin (UFH) therapy. In contrast, only a few patients have been reported with HIT following low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy (LMW-HIT). To define the clinical and biological characteristics of LMW-HIT, 180 patients treated for suspected HIT at 15 French centres were investigated. Clinical history was recorded and HIT was confirmed in 59 patients with positive serotonin release assay results: 57 of them had high levels of antibodies (Abs) to heparin-platelet factor 4 complexes (H/PF4) and two had Abs to interleukin 8. Eleven patients were treated exclusively with LMWH (LMW-HIT) and 48 with UFH either alone (UF-HIT, n = 34) or combined with LMWH (UF/LMW-HIT, n = 14). The LMW-HIT and UF-HIT groups were similar with respect to sex, age, platelet count before heparin therapy, frequency of bleeding and occurrence of disseminated intravascular coagulation. The interval to onset of HIT was longer in LMW-HIT patients compared with UF-HIT patients (P = 0.03). Severe thrombocytopenia (platelets < 15 x 10(9)/l) was more frequent in the LMW-HIT group (P = 0.04). Thrombosis occurred in three of 11 LMW-HIT patients, i.e. as frequently as in UF-HIT patients. LMW-HIT is potentially severe and may be observed after longer heparin treatment compared with UF-HIT. It is highly recommended, therefore, that platelet counts be monitored carefully whenever LMWH is administered.

Successful use of Argatroban as a heparin substitute during cardiopulmonary bypass: heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in a high-risk cardiac surgical patient

Whereas heparin is the most widely used intravenous anticoagulant in the US for the treatment of thromboembolic disease and is a seminal adjunct to many clinical procedures, its use can cause serious adverse events. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) has emerged as one of the most frequently seen complications of heparin therapy and can be a life-threatening immunohematological challenge for patients requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with obligatory heparin exposure. Unfortunately, lack of convenient monitoring techniques and the presence of HIT and other comorbidities in the complex patient frequently limits or precludes the use of most alternatives to heparin anticoagulation during CPB. This case report describes the successful use of the celite activated clotting time and high-dose thrombin time, while using the direct thrombin inhibitor Argatroban as an alternative to heparin anticoagulation during CPB in a high-risk patient presenting with type II HIT, end-stage renal failure, and ischemic cardiomyopathy with ventricular fibrillatory arrest.

Heparin versus danaparoid in off-pump coronary bypass grafting: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is increasing, and the thrombin inhibitor danaparoid could be a useful alternative. The objective of the present study was to compare danaparoid and heparin in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing heparin (bolus of 1 mg/kg) with danaparoid (bolus of 40 U/kg), 71 patients underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with one of the study drugs. The amount of blood lost, the number of homologous blood products transfused, the troponin T levels, and the amount of anti-Xa activity were monitored.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients underwent 2.6 +/- 0.7 bypasses with danaparoid, and 37 patients underwent 2.5 +/- 0.9 grafts with heparin (P =.8). Postoperative blood losses averaged 1394 +/- 1033 mL in patients receiving danaparoid and 1130 +/- 868 mL in patients receiving heparin (P =.2). The number of homologous blood products transfused averaged 3.6 +/- 7 units in patients receiving danaparoid and 1.9 +/- 4.4 units in patients receiving heparin (P =.2). The number of patients requiring homologous blood transfusion was higher in patients receiving danaparoid (18/34 [53%]) than in patients receiving heparin (10/37 [27%], P =.03). Serum anti-Xa activity averaged 1.6 +/- 0.6 U/mL in patients receiving danaparoid and 1.9 +/- 0.8 U/mL in patients receiving heparin 30 minutes after injection of the drugs (P =.1) and 0.3 +/- 0.1 and 0.04 +/- 0.08 U/mL, respectively, 12 hours after coronary artery bypass grafting (P =.001). Troponin serum levels were similar 48 hours after coronary artery bypass grafting (0.5 +/- 0.6 and 0.4 +/- 0.6 microg/L, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Although off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with danaparoid versus heparin increases the number of patients exposed to homologous blood transfusion (relative risk, 2; 95% confidence limits, 1-4), off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with danaparoid is a valuable alternative to heparin in patients with thrombocytopenia requiring surgical intervention.