Is meta-analysis really meta-physics?

Postoperative Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced NSCLC: Implications for Shifting to Conformal, High-Risk Fields

BACKGROUND

To examine the effect of radiotherapy field size on survival outcomes and patterns of recurrence in patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 216 patients with T1-4 N1-2 NSCLC following surgery and PORT using whole mediastinum (WM) or high-risk (HR) nodal fields from 1998 to 2015. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted using Cox proportional hazards modeling for outcomes and logistic regression analysis for treatment toxicities.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 28 months (interquartile range [IQR] 13-75 months) and 38 months (IQR 19-73 months) for WM (n = 131) and HR (n = 84) groups, respectively. Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between groups (median OS: HR 49 vs. WM 32 months; P = .08). There was no difference in progression-free survival (PFS), freedom from locoregional recurrence (LRR), or freedom from distant metastasis (P > .2 for all). Field size was not associated with OS, PFS, or LRR (P > .40 for all). LRR rates were 20% for HR and 26% for WM groups (P = .30). There was no significant difference in patterns of initial site of LRR between groups (P > .1). WM fields (OR 3.73, P = .001) and concurrent chemotherapy (odds ratio 3.62, P = .001) were associated with grade ≥2 toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Locoregional control and survival rates were similar between PORT groups; an improved toxicity profile was observed in the HR group. Results from an ongoing prospective randomized clinical trial will provide further insight into the consequences of HR PORT fields.

Association Between Radiation Dose and Outcomes With Postoperative Radiotherapy for N0-N1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

To review trends in the use of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in the modern era for N0-N1 margin-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following surgical resection and evaluate the association between PORT dose and overall survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of nonmetastatic stage II and III N0-N1 margin-negative NSCLC surgically treated patients within the National Cancer Data Base from 2003 to 2011. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed for multivariable analyses of overall survival and PORT dose. Radiation modalities included nonconformal beam radiation, 3-dimensional conformal radiation (3D-CRT), and intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

RESULTS

We identified 2167 (6.7%) and 30,269 (93.3%) patients with surgically resected stage II or III N0-N1 margin-negative NSCLC who were treated with and without PORT, respectively. The proportion of patients treated with PORT (dose range, 45 to 74 Gy) decreased from 8.9% in 2003 to 2006 to 4.1% in 2010 to 2011. Among patients receiving PORT, the use of high-dose (60 to 74 Gy) PORT rose throughout the study period, starting at 34.8% in 2003 to 2006 and rising to 49.3% in 2010 to 2011.Overall, patients who received PORT had worse survival (hazards ratio=1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.40) compared with those not receiving PORT. This association was unchanged when limited to patients receiving modern treatment with 3-CRT or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (hazards ratio=1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.65).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PORT for N0-N1 margin-negative NSCLC decreased from 2003 to 2011. We found no evidence of benefit from PORT for resected N0-N1 margin-negative NSCLC, regardless of dose or technique. PORT should be approached with caution in this group of patients, regardless of radiotherapy technique.

Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Risk for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Grand Rounds Discussion From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

In November 2013, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association released a clinical practice guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in adults. The recommendation identifies 4 patient groups with strong evidence that the benefits of reduction in ASCVD events from statin therapy exceed adverse events. For these patients, initiating statin therapy of an appropriate intensity to reduce ASCVD risk and minimize adverse effects is recommended. A new risk estimator based on a pooled cohort equation is presented for estimating 10-year ASCVD risk. There is also a recommendation to engage in a clinician-patient discussion before initiating a statin, especially for primary prevention of ASCVD. This paper summarizes a discussion between a cardiologist and an internist about how each clinician would balance these factors and what treatment they would suggest for an individual patient.

Trends in the use of postoperative radiotherapy for resected non–small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

A 1998 meta-analysis of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) found that PORT did not improve outcomes. Yet practice guidelines differ in their recommendations with regard to PORT use. We examine temporal trends in PORT use before and after the 1998 meta-analysis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, we identified 22,953 patients with Stage I, II, or IIIA NSCLC who had resection between 1992 and 2002 in the United States and characterized each patient according to nodal status (N0, N1, or N2 disease). We measured use of PORT by calendar year. We examined the association between clinical and demographic characteristics and receipt of PORT using logistic regression.

RESULTS

For N0, N1, and N2 NSCLC, PORT use has declined. The proportion of patients with N0 disease receiving PORT declined from 8% in 1992 to 4% in 2002. For patients with N1 disease, PORT use declined from 51% in 1992 to 19% in 2002; and for patients with N2 disease, PORT use declined from 65% in 1992 to 37% in 2002.

CONCLUSION

In the context of uncertainty about what constitutes optimal adjuvant treatment for resected NSCLC, PORT use has substantially declined.

Imaging of the Patient with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the most common type of cancer and is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States for both men and women. Even though the 5-year survival rate of patients with lung cancer remains dismal at 14% for all cancer stages, treatments are improving and newer agents for lung cancer appear promising. Therefore, an accurate assessment of the extent of disease is critical to determine whether the patient is treated with surgical resection, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or a combination of these modalities. Radiologic imaging plays an important role in the staging evaluation of the patient; however, radiologists need to be aware that there are also important differences in what each specialist needs from imaging to provide appropriate treatment. This article reviews the role of imaging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, with an emphasis on the radiologic imaging findings relevant for each specialty.

Management of nonsinonasal neuroendocrine carcinomas of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

Nonsinonasal neuroendocrine carcinomas (NSNEC) of the head and neck are rare and pose a diagnostic and management challenge. The authors undertook a retrospective study to gain insights into the spectrum of clinicopathologic characteristics, patterns of failure, and optimal management of patients with this disease.

METHODS

The authors treated 23 adults with pathologically proven, nonmetastatic, primary NSNEC from 1984 to 2001. The majority (13 patients) had laryngeal origin with the following American Joint Committee on Cancer stage distribution: Stage I disease in 1 patient, Stage II disease in 2 patients, Stage III disease in 6 patients, and Stage IV disease in 14 patients. Nine patients underwent definitive surgery with or without postoperative radiation, and 14 patients received definitive radiotherapy. The median definitive radiation dose was 66 grays (Gy) (range, 44-72 Gy) using conventional fractionation. Fourteen patients received chemotherapy, with two to four cycles of induction platinum plus etoposide used most commonly.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time for surviving patients was 40 months (range, 15-89 months). The actuarial 2-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 53% and 33%, respectively; and the disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 41% and 25%, respectively. Both the 2-year OS rate (68% vs. 30%; P = 0.002) and the 2-year DFS rate (55% vs. 17%; P = 0.004) were improved with chemotherapy compared with local therapy alone. Seventy-five percent of patients with measurable disease had complete clinical responses to induction chemotherapy. There was 100% complete clinical response of tumor after radiotherapy. The actuarial 2-year local failure rate was 23%. Chemotherapy did not reduce local failure (P = 0.91). There was no regional failure. The 2-year and 5-year distant metastasis rates were 54% and 71%, respectively. The 2-year rates of metastases without and with chemotherapy were 79% and 39%, respectively (P = 0.006). The 2-year and 5-year rates of intracranial metastases were 25% and 44%, respectively, and the 2-year and 5-year rates of isolated brain metastases were 21% and 41%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these results, the authors' treatment strategy for patients with NSNEC is sequential chemotherapy and radiation. They recommend full-dose radiotherapy alone for patients with NSNEC who achieve a complete clinical response to induction chemotherapy. Newer chemotherapeutic regimens or additional adjuvant chemotherapy should be investigated for patients with NSNEC given the high rate of distant failure. Due to the very high rate of brain metastases among patients in the current study, the authors now consider incorporating prophylactic cranial irradiation into primary radiotherapy for individual patients who have complete clinical responses to induction chemotherapy.

Resected non-small cell lung cancer: need for adjuvant lymph node treatment? From hope to reality

Even if postoperative thoracic radiotherapy has been widely used as adjuvant treatment, the oncological community has poorly evaluated this treatment after complete surgical resection in lung cancer. The number of patients included in randomised trials has been less than 3000. The analysis of these trials showed rather a deleterious effect in terms of overall survival, suggesting a lethal late treatment-related toxicity in early stage I or II disease. In N2 disease, these effects have not been demonstrated but information is lacking to consider this treatment on an evidence-based medicine policy. We discuss here the available worldwide information on this subject. There is an urgent need for new trials in this topic.

Use of Postoperative Radiotherapy for Node-Positive non—small-Cell Lung Cancer

The appropriate patient selection for adjuvant radiotherapy after primary surgical therapy of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. Four thousand thirteen patients diagnosed from 1988-1995 in 9 registry areas of the Survival, Epidemiology, and End Results program who received primary surgical therapy for pathologic stage T1-3 N1/2 M0 NSCLC were identified. County-level and patient-specific variables associated with the use of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) were studied by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Prognostic factors for cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by Cox multivariate analysis. Overall, 58% of node-positive patients received PORT. Use of PORT was independently associated with younger age, more advanced nodal disease, no prior cancer, less extensive surgery than pneumonectomy, and patient residence close to a radiotherapy facility. In multivariate analysis of the entire node-positive population, there were no differences in OS or CSS with the use of PORT. In the patients with N2 disease, PORT was associated with improved OS (5-year OS: 16% without PORT, 22% with PORT; P = 0.001) and CSS (5-year CSS: 25% without PORT, 30% with PORT; P = 0.02). Additionally, patients with = 4 nodes involved also had an improved survival in association with PORT (5-year OS: 11% without PORT, 18% with PORT; P = 0.001; 5-year CSS: 17% without PORT, 25% with PORT; P = 0.009). Therefore, recognizing the inherent limitations of a retrospective, registry-based analysis, patients with more advanced nodal disease appear to have an improved survival with the use of PORT.

Radiation injury of the lung after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to describe the CT patterns of radiation injury in the lungs of patients who have undergone three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiation therapy (CRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over a 36-month period, the chest CT scans of 19 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who were treated with 3D CRT were reviewed. CT scans were evaluated for findings of radiation injury (ground-glass opacities, consolidation, bronchiectasis, and volume loss). The presence, extent, and distribution of these findings were reached by consensus.

RESULTS

Radiation pneumonitis limited to a small area immediately around the tumor was present in all patients who were imaged within 3 months after completion of the treatment (n = 7). Radiation-induced fibrosis occurred in all patients (n = 19). Three distinct patterns of fibrosis were consistently present, and these were classified as modified conventional, masslike, and scarlike. Modified conventional fibrosis (consolidation, volume loss, and bronchiectasis similar to, but less extensive than, conventional radiation fibrosis) was seen in five patients. Masslike fibrosis (focal consolidation with traction bronchiectasis limited to the site of the original tumor) was seen in eight patients. Scarlike fibrosis (linear opacity in the region of the original tumor associated with moderate to severe volume loss) was seen in six patients.

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy results in three patterns of radiation fibrosis that differ from the conventional radiation-induced lung injury. Knowledge of the full spectrum of these manifestations is useful in the correct interpretation of CT scans after 3D CRT.

Risk of death from intercurrent disease is not excessively increased by modern postoperative radiotherapy for high-risk resected non-small-cell lung carcinoma

PURPOSE

Some studies report a high risk of death from intercurrent disease (DID) after postoperative radiotherapy (XRT) for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study determines the risk of DID after modern-technique postoperative XRT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 202 patients were treated with surgery and postoperative XRT for NSCLC. Most patients (97%) had pathologic stage II or III disease. Many patients (41%) had positive/close/uncertain resection margins. The median XRT dose was 55 Gy with fraction size of 1.8 to 2 Gy. The risk of DID was calculated actuarially and included patients who died of unknown/uncertain causes. Median follow-up was 24 months for all patients and 62 months for survivors.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients (12.5%) died from intercurrent disease, 16 from confirmed noncancer causes and nine from unknown causes. The 4-year actuarial rate of DID was 13.5%. This is minimally increased compared with the expected rate for a matched population (approximately 10% at 4 years). On multivariate analysis, age and radiotherapy dose were borderline significant factors associated with a higher risk of DID (P =.06). The crude risk of DID for patients receiving less than 54 Gy was 2% (4-year actuarial risk 0%) versus 17% for XRT dose > or = 54 Gy. The 4-year actuarial overall survival was 34%; local control was 84%; and freedom from distant metastases was 37%.

CONCLUSION

Modern postoperative XRT for NSCLC does not excessively increase the risk of intercurrent deaths. Further study of postoperative XRT, particularly when using more sophisticated treatment planning and reasonable total doses, for carefully selected high-risk resected NSCLC is warranted.

Non-small cell lung cancer: prognostic factors in patients treated with surgery and postoperative radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To determine survival outcomes, to identify adverse prognostic factors for relapse, and to compare American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with surgery and postoperative radiation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1980 and 1995, 211 patients with NSCLC underwent surgery and postoperative radiation therapy. Surgery consisted of wedge resection (12.5%), lobectomy (67.8%), or pneumonectomy (19.7%). Pathologic stages (1992 AJCC) included I (n = 22), II (n = 70), IIIA (n = 104), and IIIB (n = 12). Indications for radiation therapy included compromised margins (n = 81) and/or positive mediastinal nodes (n = 55). Prognostic factors were identified by using univariate and multivariate models.

RESULTS

Overall 3-year survival for patients with stage I, II, and IIIA cancer was 58.9%, 44.1%, and 43.2%, respectively. Older age (P = .008), male sex (P = .021), large primary tumor (P = .004), and multiple positive mediastinal nodes (P = .046) were associated with worse rates of survival. Actuarial risk of local-regional relapse (36 patients) was 21.4% at 3 years. In a multivariate model, use of wedge resection (P = .001), positive margins (P = .010), and larger pathologic tumor (P = .059) were risk factors for local-regional recurrence. Actuarial rate of distant failure was 55.2% at 3 years.

CONCLUSION

Local-regional control can be achieved with surgery and radiation therapy in approximately 80% of patients; however, the rate of distant metastasis remains unacceptably high. Other variables, such as multiple positive nodes, may serve to identify patients at higher risk for relapse and poorer survival. Methods for improving treatment outcomes in these patients should be pursued.