Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: From Evidence to Application

Pediatric arterial thrombosis: A single-institution cohort study of patient characteristics and thrombosis outcomes

BACKGROUND

Arterial thrombosis (AT) is an increasingly recognized complication in pediatrics. Consensus clinical practice guidelines suggest immediate removal of the indwelling arterial catheter and a short course (5-7 days) of anticoagulation. The optimal duration and modality of antithrombotic therapy in children are yet to be determined.

AIMS

Describe treatment patterns and outcomes in pediatric patients with AT and explore predictors for complete thrombus resolution or long-term complications.

METHODS

Single-institution retrospective study. Patients were identified by ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for the diagnosis of AT or reports of AT on ultrasound from January 1, 2012, to October 1, 2022. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were used.

RESULTS

101 patients were included. The median age was 2.2 months. The most common underlying diagnoses were congenital heart disease (39.6%) and infection (22.8%). A majority of patients had symptomatic thrombosis in an extremity, and 78% were catheter-associated. 81% of patients received anticoagulation with a median duration of 35 days. Out of the 70 patients who were treated with anticoagulation alone and had a follow-up imaging, 70% had complete resolution after 90 days of anticoagulation. No clear predictors of complete resolution were identified. Eighteen patients had long-term sequelae secondary to arterial insufficiency. Those with infection-associated AT were more likely to have long-term complications. The major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding rate was 11%.

CONCLUSION

Duration of anticoagulation was widely variable, and 70% of patients achieved complete resolution by 90 days of anticoagulation. A significant proportion of patients developed long-term sequelae secondary to arterial insufficiency. Sepsis/infection at the time of diagnosis with AT was more likely to be associated with long-term complications.

Interventions for implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients at risk for venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. While numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that the appropriate use of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients at risk for VTE is safe, effective, and cost-effective, thromboprophylaxis remains underused or inappropriately used. Our previous review suggested that system-wide interventions, such as education, alerts, and multifaceted interventions were more effective at improving the prescribing of thromboprophylaxis than relying on individual providers' behaviors. However, 47 of the 55 included studies in our previous review were observational in design. Thus, an update to our systematic review, focused on the higher level of evidence of RCTs only, was warranted.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of system-wide interventions designed to increase the implementation of thromboprophylaxis and decrease the incidence of VTE in hospitalized adult medical and surgical patients at risk for VTE, focusing on RCTs only.

SEARCH METHODS

Our research librarian conducted a systematic literature search of MEDLINE Ovid, and subsequently translated it to CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase Ovid, BIOSIS Previews Ovid, CINAHL, Web of Science, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE; in the Cochrane Library), NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED; in the Cochrane Library), LILACS, and clinicaltrials.gov from inception to 7 January 2017. We also screened reference lists of relevant review articles. We identified 12,920 potentially relevant records.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all types of RCTs, with random or quasi-random methods of allocation of interventions, which either randomized individuals (e.g. parallel group, cross-over, or factorial design RCTs), or groups of individuals (cluster RCTs (CRTs)), which aimed to increase the use of prophylaxis or appropriate prophylaxis, or decrease the occurrence of VTE in hospitalized adult patients. We excluded observational studies, studies in which the intervention was simply distribution of published guidelines, and studies whose interventions were not clearly described. Studies could be in any language.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We collected data on the following outcomes: the number of participants who received prophylaxis or appropriate prophylaxis (as defined by study authors), the occurrence of any VTE (symptomatic or asymptomatic), mortality, and safety outcomes, such as bleeding. We categorized the interventions into alerts (computer or human alerts), multifaceted interventions (combination of interventions that could include an alert component), educational interventions (e.g. grand rounds, courses), and preprinted orders (written predefined orders completed by the physician on paper or electronically). We meta-analyzed data across RCTs using a random-effects model. For CRTs, we pooled effect estimates (risk difference (RD) and risk ratio (RR), with 95% confidence interval (CI), adjusted for clustering, when possible. We pooled results if three or more trials were available for a particular intervention. We assessed the certainty of the evidence according to the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

From the 12,920 records identified by our search, we included 13 RCTs (N = 35,997 participants) in our qualitative analysis and 11 RCTs (N = 33,207 participants) in our meta-analyses.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

Alerts were associated with an increase in the proportion of participants who received prophylaxis (RD 21%, 95% CI 15% to 27%; three studies; 5057 participants; I² = 75%; low-certainty evidence). The substantial statistical heterogeneity may be in part explained by patient types, type of hospital, and type of alert. Subgroup analyses were not feasible due to the small number of studies included in the meta-analysis.Multifaceted interventions were associated with a small increase in the proportion of participants who received prophylaxis (cluster-adjusted RD 4%, 95% CI 2% to 6%; five studies; 9198 participants; I² = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence). Multifaceted interventions with an alert component were found to be more effective than multifaceted interventions that did not include an alert, although there were not enough studies to conduct a pooled analysis.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Alerts were associated with an increase in the proportion of participants who received appropriate prophylaxis (RD 16%, 95% CI 12% to 20%; three studies; 1820 participants; I² = 0; moderate-certainty evidence). Alerts were also associated with a reduction in the rate of symptomatic VTE at three months (RR 64%, 95% CI 47% to 86%; three studies; 5353 participants; I² = 15%; low-certainty evidence). Computer alerts were associated with a reduction in the rate of symptomatic VTE, although there were not enough studies to pool computer alerts and human alerts results separately.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We reviewed RCTs that implemented a variety of system-wide strategies aimed at improving thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients. We found increased prescription of prophylaxis associated with alerts and multifaceted interventions, and increased prescription of appropriate prophylaxis associated with alerts. While multifaceted interventions were found to be less effective than alerts, a multifaceted intervention with an alert was more effective than one without an alert. Alerts, particularly computer alerts, were associated with a reduction in symptomatic VTE at three months, although there were not enough studies to pool computer alerts and human alerts results separately.Our analysis was underpowered to assess the effect on mortality and safety outcomes, such as bleeding.The incomplete reporting of relevant study design features did not allow complete assessment of the certainty of the evidence. However, the certainty of the evidence for improvement in outcomes was judged to be better than for our previous review (low- to moderate-certainty evidence, compared to very low-certainty evidence for most outcomes). The results of our updated review will help physicians, hospital administrators, and policy makers make practical decisions about adopting specific system-wide measures to improve prescription of thromboprophylaxis, and ultimately prevent VTE in hospitalized patients.

Early chemoprophylaxis is associated with decreased venous thromboembolism risk without concomitant increase in intraspinal hematoma expansion after traumatic spinal cord injury

BACKGROUND

After traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), there is increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but chemoprophylaxis (PPX) may cause expansion of intraspinal hematoma (ISH).

METHODS

Single-center retrospective study of adult trauma patients from 2012 to 2015 with SCI.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

VTE diagnosis, death, or discharge within 48 hours. Patients were dichotomized based on early (≤48 hours) heparinoid and/or aspirin PPX. Intraspinal hematoma expansion was diagnosed intraoperatively or by follow-up radiology. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards to estimate the effect of PPX on risk of VTE and ISH expansion controlling for age, injury severity score (ISS), complete SCI, and mechanism as static covariates and operative spine procedure as a time-varying covariate.

RESULTS

Five hundred one patients with SCI were dichotomized into early PPX (n = 260 [52%]) and no early PPX (n = 241 [48%]). Early PPX patients were less likely blunt injured (91% vs 97%) and had fewer operative spine interventions (65% vs 80%), but age (median, 43 vs 49 years), ISS (median 24 vs 21), admission ISH (47% vs 44%), and VTE (5% vs 9%) were similar. Cox analysis found that early heparinoids was associated with reduced VTE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.84) and reduced pulmonary embolism (PE) (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.69). The estimated number needed to treat with heparinoids was 10 to prevent one VTE and 13 to prevent one PE at 30 days. Early aspirin was not associated with reduced VTE or PE. Seven patients (1%) had ISH expansion, of which four were on PPX at the time of expansion. Using heparinoid and aspirin as time-varying covariates, neither heparinoids (HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 0.32-11.41) nor aspirin (HR, 3.67; 95% CI, 0.64-20.88) was associated with ISH expansion.

CONCLUSION

Early heparinoid therapy was associated with decreased VTE and PE risk in SCI patients without concomitant increase in ISH expansion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, level IV.

ACC/AHA Special Report: Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation Strategies: A Summary of Systematic Reviews by the NHLBI Implementation Science Work Group: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

In 2008, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute convened an Implementation Science Work Group to assess evidence-based strategies for effectively implementing clinical practice guidelines. This was part of a larger effort to update existing clinical practice guidelines on cholesterol, blood pressure, and overweight/obesity.

OBJECTIVES

Review evidence from the published implementation science literature and identify effective or promising strategies to enhance the adoption and implementation of clinical practice guidelines.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted on 4 critical questions, each focusing on the adoption and effectiveness of 4 intervention strategies: (1) reminders, (2) educational outreach visits, (3) audit and feedback, and (4) provider incentives. A scoping review of the Rx for Change database of systematic reviews was used to identify promising guideline implementation interventions aimed at providers. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed a priori for each question, and the published literature was initially searched up to 2012, and then updated with a supplemental search to 2015. Two independent reviewers screened the returned citations to identify relevant reviews and rated the quality of each included review.

RESULTS

Audit and feedback and educational outreach visits were generally effective in improving both process of care (15 of 21 reviews and 12 of 13 reviews, respectively) and clinical outcomes (7 of 12 reviews and 3 of 5 reviews, respectively). Provider incentives showed mixed effectiveness for improving both process of care (3 of 4 reviews) and clinical outcomes (3 reviews equally distributed between generally effective, mixed, and generally ineffective). Reminders showed mixed effectiveness for improving process of care outcomes (27 reviews with 11 mixed and 3 generally ineffective results) and were generally ineffective for clinical outcomes (18 reviews with 6 mixed and 9 generally ineffective results). Educational outreach visits (2 of 2 reviews), reminders (3 of 4 reviews), and provider incentives (1 of 1 review) were generally effective for cost reduction. Educational outreach visits (1 of 1 review) and provider incentives (1 of 1 review) were also generally effective for cost-effectiveness outcomes. Barriers to clinician adoption or adherence to guidelines included time constraints (8 reviews/overviews); limited staffing resources (2 overviews); timing (5 reviews/overviews); clinician skepticism (5 reviews/overviews); clinician knowledge of guidelines (4 reviews/overviews); and higher age of the clinician (1 overview). Facilitating factors included guideline characteristics such as format, resources, and end-user involvement (6 reviews/overviews); involving stakeholders (5 reviews/overviews); leadership support (5 reviews/overviews); scope of implementation (5 reviews/overviews); organizational culture such as multidisciplinary teams and low-baseline adherence (9 reviews/overviews); and electronic guidelines systems (3 reviews).

CONCLUSION

The strategies of audit and feedback and educational outreach visits were generally effective in improving both process of care and clinical outcomes. Reminders and provider incentives showed mixed effectiveness, or were generally ineffective. No general conclusion could be reached about cost effectiveness, because of limitations in the evidence. Important gaps exist in the evidence on effectiveness of implementation interventions, especially regarding clinical outcomes, cost effectiveness and contextual issues affecting successful implementation.

Evaluation of the Practice Pattern of Medical Patients’ VTE Prophylaxis With a Standard Risk Assessment Model Form

Hospitalized acutely ill patients face high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) unless appropriate thromboprophylaxis is applied. This study aimed to determine VTE prophylaxis practices for inpatients in Turkey and to evaluate the impact of physicians’ training via a modified “Standard Medical Patients’ VTE Risk Assessment Model (MERAM).” A total of 607 inpatients included in this national multicenter noninterventional observational registry were evaluated in terms of demographics, VTE risk, and preventive measures at 2 consecutive cross-sectional visits. Physicians were asked to complete a questionnaire on current VTE method risk assessment and other models including MERAM. The VTE prophylaxis rates significantly increased from 49.4% to 62.4% between visits ( P < .05). The lack of risk evaluation decreased from 74.6% to 19.5% ( P < .001). Percentage of physicians using prophylaxis and use of MERAM increased between visits. Physician training proved effective for providing general “awareness” of VTE prophylaxis and led to higher rates of risk assessment model-based appropriate VTE prophylaxis.

Guideline adherence in antithrombotic treatment after concomitant ablation surgery in atrial fibrillation patients

OBJECTIVES

We investigated real-life oral anticoagulation (OAC) treatment after surgical ablation and examined its adherence to current recommendations. We also explored factors related to OAC use preoperatively and at follow-up.

METHODS

One hundred and fifteen patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were evaluated during 12-month follow-up after surgery. Patients were divided into two categories according to the congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes and prior stroke [or transient ischaemic attack or thromboembolism] (CHADS2) score: 60 patients were assigned to the high-risk group (CHADS2 score ≥2) and 55 to the low-risk group (CHADS2 score ≤1). OAC use was defined as guideline adherent, undertreatment or overtreatment.

RESULTS

Baseline overall guideline adherence was 62%. OAC was underprescribed in high-risk patients and overprescribed in low-risk patients (both, P < 0.001). The only factor associated with OAC use after logistic regression analysis were age >75 years (P = 0.01) and preoperative AF > paroxysmal (P = 0.013). Overall guideline adherence at 12-month follow-up showed a trend towards a better adherence in the sinus rhythm (SR) subgroup (74% vs 55%, P = 0.02). OAC was underprescribed in high-risk patients and overprescribed in low-risk patients (both P < 0.001). After logistic regression analysis, preoperative OAC use (P = 0.007) and other indications for OAC (P = 0.01) were predictors of anticoagulation treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-life OAC prescription in AF patients showed a moderate guideline adherence, with high-risk patients being undertreated and low-risk patients being overtreated. These findings stress the importance that antithrombotic treatment in patients undergoing AF surgery needs to be critically re-evaluated.

Interventions for implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical and surgical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show that using thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients at risk for VTE is safe, effective and cost-effective. Despite this, prophylactic therapies for VTE are underutilized. System-wide interventions may be more effective to improve the use of VTE prophylaxis than relying on individual providers' prescribing behaviors.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of interventions designed to increase the implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized adult medical and surgical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), assessed in terms of: 1. Increase in the proportion of patients who receive prophylaxis and appropriate prophylaxis 2. Reduction in risk of symptomatic VTE3. Reduction in risk of asymptomatic VTE4. Safety of the intervention.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator (TSC) searched the Group's Specialised Register (last searched July 2010) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library) 2010, Issue 3. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases (19 April 2010) as well as the reference lists of relevant review articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all studies whose interventions aimed to increase the use of prophylaxis and/or appropriate prophylaxis, decrease the proportion of symptomatic VTE, or decrease the proportion of asymptomatic VTE in hospitalized adult patients. We excluded studies that simply distributed published guidelines and studies whose interventions were not clearly described.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We collected the following outcomes: the proportion of patients who received prophylaxis (RP), the proportion of patients who received appropriate prophylaxis (RAP) (primary outcomes), and the occurrence of symptomatic VTE, asymptomatic VTE, and safety outcomes such as bleeding. We categorized interventions into education, alerts, and multifaceted interventions. We meta-analyzed RCTs and non-randomized studies (NRS) separately by random effects meta-analysis, and assessed heterogeneity using the I(2)statistic and subgroup analyses. Before analysis, we decided that results would be pooled if three or more studies were available for a particular intervention. We assessed publication bias using funnel plots and cumulative meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 55 studies. One of these reported data in patient-days and could not be quantitatively analyzed with the others. The 54 remaining studies (8 RCTs and 46 NRS) eligible for inclusion in our quantitative synthesis enrolled a total of 78,343 participants. Among RCTs, there were sufficient data to pool results for one primary outcome (received prophylaxis) for the 'alert' intervention. Alerts, such as computerized reminders or stickers on patients' charts, were associated with a risk difference (RD) of 13%, signifying an increase in the proportion of patients who received prophylaxis (95% confidence interval (CI) 1% to 25%). Among NRS, there were sufficient data to pool both primary outcomes for each intervention type. Pooled risk differences for received prophylaxis ranged from 8% to 17%, and for received appropriate prophylaxis ranged from 11% to 19%. Education and alerts were associated with statistically significant increases in prescription of appropriate prophylaxis, and multifaceted interventions were associated with statistically significant increases in prescription of any prophylaxis and appropriate prophylaxis. Multifaceted interventions had the largest pooled effects. I(2) results showed substantial statistical heterogeneity which was in part explained by patient types and type of hospital. A subgroup analysis showed that multifaceted interventions which included an alert may be more effective at improving rates of prophylaxis and appropriate prophylaxis than those without an alert. Results for VTE and safety outcomes did not show substantial benefits or harms, although most studies were underpowered to assess these outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We reviewed a large number of studies which implemented a variety of system-wide strategies aimed to improve thromboprophylaxis rates in many settings and patient populations. We found statistically significant improvements in prescription of prophylaxis associated with alerts (RCTs) and multifaceted interventions (RCTs and NRS), and improvements in prescription of appropriate prophylaxis in NRS with the use of education, alerts and multifaceted interventions. Multifaceted interventions with an alert component may be the most effective. Demonstrated sources of heterogeneity included patient types and type of hospital. The results of our review will help physicians, nurses, pharmacists, hospital administrators and policy makers make practical decisions about local adoption of specific system-wide measures to improve prevention of VTE, an important public health issue. We did not find a significant benefit for VTE outcomes; however, earlier RCTs assessing the efficacy of thromboprophylaxis which were powered to address these outcomes have demonstrated the benefit of prophylactic therapies and a favourable balance of benefits versus the increased risk of bleeding events.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients on chronic anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is an integral component in the management of large volume renal stone disease either as monotherapy or in combination with shock wave lithotripsy. Stone disease in patients on chronic anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy, however, poses a difficult scenario. Bleeding is a major concern for any patient undergoing PCNL. We retrospectively analyzed our series of patients with renal calculi who were on chronic anticoagulant therapy and who underwent PCNL. We reviewed the case records of patients undergoing PCNL during the period from January 2005 to December 2011. We analyzed the changes in preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin, serum creatinine, and clotting parameters, as well as intraoperative and postoperative bleeding and thromboembolic complications. During the 5-year study period, a total of 36 patients (30 males and 6 females) with a mean age of 46.33±9.96 years (range, 29-61 years) who were on chronic anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy underwent PCNL for urolithiasis. The mean size of the stone was 6.40±1.98 cm² (range, 2.8-9 cm²). The mean operating time was 62.08±10.10 min. The bleeding was successfully managed in all patients and the anticoagulant/antiplatelet agents were restarted after an appropriate duration. The mean rise in serum creatinine at discharge was 0.05±0.03 mg/dl and the mean fall in serum hemoglobin was 1.63±0.77 g/dl. At 3 months after surgery, the stone-free rate was 100%. With careful preoperative care and regulation of anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy and appropriate intraoperative management, PCNL can be performed safely and successfully in properly selected patients with renal calculi who are on chronic anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy.

Prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

This guideline addressed VTE prevention in hospitalized medical patients, outpatients with cancer, the chronically immobilized, long-distance travelers, and those with asymptomatic thrombophilia.

METHODS

This guideline follows methods described in Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines in this supplement.

RESULTS

For acutely ill hospitalized medical patients at increased risk of thrombosis, we recommend anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), low-dose unfractionated heparin (LDUH) bid, LDUH tid, or fondaparinux (Grade 1B) and suggest against extending the duration of thromboprophylaxis beyond the period of patient immobilization or acute hospital stay (Grade 2B). For acutely ill hospitalized medical patients at low risk of thrombosis, we recommend against the use of pharmacologic prophylaxis or mechanical prophylaxis (Grade 1B). For acutely ill hospitalized medical patients at increased risk of thrombosis who are bleeding or are at high risk for major bleeding, we suggest mechanical thromboprophylaxis with graduated compression stockings (GCS) (Grade 2C) or intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) (Grade 2C). For critically ill patients, we suggest using LMWH or LDUH thromboprophylaxis (Grade 2C). For critically ill patients who are bleeding or are at high risk for major bleeding, we suggest mechanical thromboprophylaxis with GCS and/or IPC at least until the bleeding risk decreases (Grade 2C). In outpatients with cancer who have no additional risk factors for VTE we suggest against routine prophylaxis with LMWH or LDUH (Grade 2B) and recommend against the prophylactic use of vitamin K antagonists (Grade 1B).

CONCLUSIONS

Decisions regarding prophylaxis in nonsurgical patients should be made after consideration of risk factors for both thrombosis and bleeding, clinical context, and patients' values and preferences.

A simple reminder system improves venous thromboembolism prophylaxis rates and reduces thrombotic events for hospitalized patients1

BACKGROUND

Compliance with venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is poor.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine whether a simple electronic reminder applicable to all hospitalized patients would increase prophylaxis rates and reduce VTE rates.

METHODS

An electronic reminder was added to the electronic medical record admission note used by all services in our hospital. Prophylaxis, VTE and bleeding rates before and after implementation were compared. Data were analyzed with sas version 9.1.

RESULTS

Among all adult medical and surgical patients admitted to our hospital during the time periods studied, 42.8% (1236/2888) before and 60.0% (1410/2350) after the reminder was added received appropriate prophylaxis as per American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines (P < 0.001). The difference reached significance for both medical (51.0% vs. 68.9%; P < 0.001) and surgical (48.0% vs. 61.0%; P < 0.001) services. Fewer patients were diagnosed with VTE after our reminder was added (1.1% vs. 0.3%; P = 0.001), and there was a trend towards fewer bleeds (1.1% vs. 0.6%; P = 0.09). The presence of the reminder was an independent predictor for prophylaxis being given (odds ratio [OR] 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70-2.18; P < 0.001), and was independently associated with a decreased risk for VTE (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.14-0.64; P = 0.003) after adjustment for other VTE risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Adding an electronic reminder to the admission note improved prophylaxis rates and reduced VTE rates across services. The system is easily reproducible and applicable to other facilities. The improvement obtained was modest, so additional measures will probably be needed to optimize prophylaxis rates.

Barriers and potential solutions toward optimal prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis for hospitalized medical patients: a survey of healthcare professionals

OBJECTIVE

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis remains underused in hospitalized medical patients despite strong recommendations that at-risk patients should receive prophylaxis. To understand this gap between knowledge and practice, we surveyed clinicians' perceptions about the importance of DVT prophylaxis, barriers to guideline implementation, and interventions to optimize prophylaxis.

METHODS

Paper- and electronic mail-based surveys were sent to 1553 internists, nurses, pharmacists, and physiotherapists in Ontario, Canada. Responses were scored on 7-point Likert scales. An important barrier to optimal DVT prophylaxis was 1 with a mean score ≥5, and interventions with high potential success or feasibility were those with mean scores ≥5.

RESULTS

DVT prophylaxis was perceived as important by all clinician groups but this did not appear to translate into knowledge about underutilization of current DVT prophylaxis strategies. Physicians and pharmacists recognized the underuse of DVT prophylaxis in medical patients, while nurses and physiotherapists tended to perceive prophylaxis strategies as appropriate. Lack of clear indications and contraindications for prophylaxis and concerns about bleeding risks were perceived as important barriers. Preprinted orders were considered the most potentially successful and feasible way to optimize prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable barrier to optimal DVT prophylaxis utilization may be that those healthcare providers best able to conduct a daily assessment of patients' need for prophylaxis underrecognize the problem that prophylaxis is underutilized in this population. Interventions to bridge the gap between knowledge and practice should consider preprinted orders outlining DVT risk factors, and educating front-line care providers prior to implementation of a top-down approach.

Adherence to guideline-directed venous thromboembolism prophylaxis among medical and surgical inpatients at 33 academic medical centers in the United States

This study's purpose was to describe compliance with established venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis guidelines in medical and surgical inpatients at US academic medical centers (AMCs). Data were collected for a 2007 University HealthSystem Consortium Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolism (DVT/PE) Benchmarking Project that explored VTE in AMCs. Prophylaxis was considered appropriate based on 2004 American College of Chest Physicians guidelines. A total of 33 AMCs from 30 states participated. In all, 48% of patients received guideline-directed prophylaxis-59% were medical and 41% were surgical patients. VTE history was more common among medical patients with guideline-directed prophylaxis. Surgical patients admitted from the emergency department and with higher illness severity were more likely to receive appropriate prophylaxis. Despite guidelines, VTE prophylaxis remains underutilized in these US AMCs, particularly among surgical patients. Because AMCs provide the majority of physician training and should reflect and set care standards, this appears to be an opportunity for practice and quality improvement and for education.

Endovascular treatment of a haemodynamically unstable massive pulmonary embolism using fibrinolysis and fragmentation. Experience with 111 patients in a single centre. Why don't we follow ACCP recommendations?

INTRODUCTION

Fibrinolysis is recommended in several consensus documents for the treatment of a haemodynamically unstable massive pulmonary embolism (HUMPE).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 111 patients were treated in a single centre from January 2001 to December 2009. They were 55 males and 56 females diagnosed with HUMPE (systolic arterial pressure>90 mmHg) with at least two of the following criteria: Miller index>0, ventricular dysfunction, and need of vasoactive drugs. Local fibrinolysis with urokinase was performed in all cases, and fragmentation with a pig-tail catheter in the majority of them. An inferior vena cava (IVC) filter was implanted in 94 patients as a prophylactic measure.

RESULTS

Technical success was 100%. The Miller index improved from 0.7 ± 0.12, pre-treatment, to 0.09 ± 0.16. The mean pulmonary arterial pressure fell from 39.93 ± 7.0 mmHg to 20.47 ± 3.3 mmHg in the 30-90 days review. Of the 94 patients with IVC filters implanted, 79% were withdrawn satisfactorily. Seven patients died: 3 due to their neoplasia, 3 due to right cardiac failure at 1, 7 and 30 days, and another died of a brain haemorrhage in the first 24 hours. There were complications in 12.6% of the cases, of which 4.5% were major.

CONCLUSION

Local fibrinolysis with fragmentation achieves a rapid return to normal of the pulmonary pressure and is a safe and effective method for the treatment of HUMPE.

Translating venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention evidence into practice: a multidisciplinary evidence implementation project

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important patient safety issue resulting in significant mortality, morbidity, and health care resource expenditure. Despite the widespread availability of best practice guidelines on VTE prevention, we found that only 49% of our patients were receiving appropriate prophylaxis.

AIM

To improve health care professionals' compliance with evidence-based guidelines for VTE prevention in hospitalised patients.

DESIGN

A practice improvement methodology was employed to identify, diagnosis, and overcome practice problems. Pre- and post-intervention audits were used to evaluate performance measures.

SETTING

The study was conducted from September 2008 until August 2009 and took place in a 250-bed acute-care private hospital in metropolitan Sydney, Australia.

INTERVENTION

A change plan was developed that attempted to match organisational barriers to VTE guideline uptake with evidence-based implementation strategies. The strategies used included audit and feedback, documentation aids, staff education initiatives, collaboratively developed hospital VTE prevention policy, alert stickers, and other reminders.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients receiving appropriate VTE prophylaxis increased by 19% from 49% to 68% (p= 0.02). Surgical patient prophylaxis increased by 21% from 61% to 82% (p = 0.02) while medical patient prophylaxis increased by 26% from 19% to 45% (p= 0.05). The proportion of patients with a documented VTE risk assessment increased from 0% to 35% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention resulted in a 19% overall improvement in prophylaxis rates, which is a significant achievement for any behavioural change intervention. There is, however, still a significant discrepancy between surgical and medical patient prophylaxis rates, which clearly warrants further attention.

Clinical burden of venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. VTE is a common disorder, with an estimated annual incidence of approximately 5-12 persons per 10,000. The prognosis for patients who develop VTE is exacerbated by the risk of recurrent VTE, post-thrombotic syndrome and chronic pulmonary hypertension as a long-term complication of PE.

SCOPE

To assess the clinical burden of VTE a literature search was carried out to identify references published between 1997 and 2008 using Medline, the Cochrane Library and the Health Economic Evaluations Database.

FINDINGS

VTE is a frequent clinical problem, both in the general population, in hospitalised patients and in particular in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery, after trauma, or those with malignancy, and related complications are frequent. VTE imposes significant consequences on patients and on the healthcare systems that support them - extending hospital stays and precipitating additional hospitalisations. Limitations of the review are that the sources quoted may not adequately reflect all publications and all perspectives on the topic.

CONCLUSIONS

Even among high-risk groups it is not possible to identify individuals who will go on to develop VTE, and, therefore, thromboprophylaxis is a recommended component of the management of high-risk patients. Ensuring patients receive safe, effective, easily administered antithrombotic therapy both in hospital and post-discharge, for a sufficient length of time, should be central to any strategy to reduce incident or recurrent VTE and minimise the risk of long-term complications.

Improving venous thromboembolism performance: a comprehensive guide for physicians and hospitalists

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major potentially preventable cause of hospital deaths and is associated with a substantial clinical and economic burden in the United States. Despite the availability of effective thromboprophylactic agents and evidence-based management guidelines, VTE prophylaxis is commonly underused and inappropriately prescribed in real-world practice. Several US organizations have developed quality improvement initiatives to close the gap between guideline recommendations and clinical practice, and thus reduce VTE-associated morbidity and mortality. The Surgical Care Improvement Project and the National Quality Forum, in collaboration with The Joint Commission, have developed performance measures to allow assessment of the quality and appropriateness of VTE prevention practices. A number of potential barriers to optimal VTE performance exist, including underestimation of the risks posed by VTE, overestimation of the risk of bleeding complications, and a lack of familiarity with clinical guidelines. Hospitals are urged to develop an institution-wide policy to improve VTE prevention and employ several quality-improvement initiatives to overcome barriers and optimize prescribing practices. In particular, multiple integrated, active strategies are required to raise awareness of the need for appropriate VTE prophylaxis. Hospital-wide education, risk-assessment tools, electronic alerts, computerized decision-support systems, together with audit and feedback mechanisms, are valuable tools that can be used to promote the use of performance measures to drive improvement of VTE prophylaxis and clinical outcomes.

Results of ENDORSE-2-HUNGARIA study. Repeated assessment of the prevalence of venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in acute hospital care setting

2006-ban az ENDORSE (nemzetközi epidemiológiai nap a vénás trombózis és embólia szempontjából veszélyeztetett betegek felmérésére az akut kórházi ellátásban) nemzetközi, obszervációs, keresztmetszeti vizsgálat célja a kórházban fekvő, vénás thromboembolia veszélyének kitett betegek prevalenciájának, valamint a hatásos profilaxisban részesülők arányának meghatározása volt. A 32 ország 358 véletlenszerűen beválasztott kórházában végzett globális regiszterben kilenc magyar vizsgálóhely vett részt. A magyarországi eredmények szerint a sebészeti betegek irányelvnek megfelelő profilaxisa felülmúlta a nemzetközi átlagot, de a belgyógyászati profilaxis jelentős mértékben alulmaradt. A trombózismegelőzés összehasonlítására két év és két hónap után hazánkban elvégezték az ENDORSE-2-HUNGARIA vizsgálatot. Mindkét felmérésben az American College of Chest Physicians 2004-es evidenciákon alapuló irányelvei szerint értékelték a trombózisrizikót, és megvizsgálták, hogy a betegek megkapták-e az irányelveknek megfelelő profilaxist. Az egynapos ENDORSE-2-HUNGARIA vizsgálatot a már felmért hét kórház mellett két újonnan beválasztott kórházban ismételték meg. A kórlapok alapján összesen 886 betegnél vizsgálták meg a vénásthromboembolia-kockázat fennállását. Vénás thromboembolia szempontjából a betegek 59,0%-a volt veszélyeztetett (N=523/886), közülük a sebészeti betegek 100%-a (N=327), a belgyógyászatiak 35,1%-a (N=196). A teljes trombóziskockázatú populációnak 67,9%-a (N=355) részesült az ACCP-irányelvek szerinti profilaxisban. Az ajánlásnak megfelelő profilaxist a sebészeti betegek közül 84,4% (N=276), a belgyógyászati betegek közül 40,3% (N=79) kapta meg. Összehasonlítottuk a 2006-os és 2009-es ENDORSE-adatokat. A hatásos profilaxisban részesült trombózisrizikójú sebészeti betegek aránya nem változott szignifikánsan, a belgyógyászati betegeknél 43,9%-os szignifikáns (p=0,002) növekedést találtunk, ami bizonyítja a két vizsgálat közötti idő alatt a tényeket bemutató és a belgyógyászati profilaxis növelésére fókuszáló előadások sikerét. Az ENDORSE-2-HUNGARIA eredményei szerint 2009-ben a vénástrombózis-kockázatú belgyógyászati betegek 59,7%-a, a sebészeti betegek 15,6%-a védtelen maradt a trombózissal szemben. További erőfeszítéseket kell tehát tennünk azért, hogy még több hospitalizált beteg részesüljön profilaxisban. Az egészségügyi dolgozók körében tovább kell növelni a hospitalizált belgyógyászati betegek trombóziskockázatának ismeretét, és törekednünk kell arra, hogy még szélesebb körben alkalmazzák a profilaxist.

Designing and implementing effective venous thromboembolism prevention protocols: lessons from collaborative efforts

Hospital acquired venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major source of morbidity and mortality, yet proven prevention measures are often underutilized. The lack of a validated VTE risk assessment model, difficulty integrating VTE risk assessment and prevention protocols into the routine process of care, and the lack of standardized metrics for VTE prophylaxis have all been barriers. Recently, a VTE risk assessment/prevention protocol has been validated, leading to portable strategies achieving breakthrough levels of adequate prophylaxis in a variety of inpatient settings. VTE prevention protocol design and implementation strategies have been collected in implementation guides available from the Society of Hospital Medicine and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. These guides were the centerpieces of national collaborative efforts to improve VTE involving over 150 medical centers, honing the approach to accelerate improvement described in this article. Embedding a VTE prevention protocol into admission, transfer, and perioperative order sets is a key strategy. A VTE prevention protocol is defined as a VTE risk assessment with no more than three levels of risk, tightly linked to recommended prophylaxis for each level. A balance between the need to provide protocol guidance and the need for efficiency and ease-of-use by the clinician must be maintained. The power of this protocol driven approach is bolstered by a quality improvement framework, multidisciplinary teams, ongoing monitoring of the process, and real time identification and mitigation of non-adherents via a technique that measures progress and prompts concurrent intervention, an approach we call “measure-vention.”

Towards evidence-based treatment of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome

Thrombosis in the presence of persistently positive tests for antiphospholipid antibodies is termed thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). At present, ‘standard’ secondary thromboprophylaxis in thrombotic APS is treatment with moderate intensity oral anticoagulants for life after a first venous thrombosis and with high intensity oral anticoagulation after non-embolic ischaemic stroke. These recommendations differ from those applied in the general population, where a restricted period of anticoagulation is common practice after venous thrombosis and antiplatelet drugs are the first choice after ischaemic stroke. From an extensive literature review we conclude that the available data are insufficient to apply a different strategy for secondary thromboprophylaxis in patients with thrombotic APS than the one that holds for the general population.

Thromboprophylaxis in the intensive care unit: focus on medical-surgical patients

Critically ill patients in the medical-surgical intensive care unit are at high risk for deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, which comprise venous thromboembolism. Herein, we describe the prevalence, incidence, risk factors, clinical consequences, prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients, and compliance with thromboprophylaxis. We focus primarily on medical-surgical intensive care unit patients, who represent the largest subgroup of critically ill patients. Despite the large and growing number of critically ill patients in our aging society, their high risk for venous thromboembolism, and the morbidity and mortality associated with this complication of critical illness, relatively few rigorous studies are available. Large, well-designed, randomized trials of thromboprophylaxis, powered to detect differences in patient-important outcomes, are required to advance our understanding and care of these vulnerable patients. Furthermore, because thromboprophylaxis is a common error of omission in hospitalized patients, redoubled efforts are needed to ensure that it is used in practice.

Barriers to the optimal use of anticoagulants after orthopaedic surgery

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and the consequent morbidity and mortality associated with this condition continue to be a problem following orthopaedic surgery. The vast majority of patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery receive some form of thromboprophylaxis. However, the use of inappropriate thromboprophylaxis is an important factor which may explain why the clinical burden of VTE is still considerable. Barriers to the use of appropriate thromboprophylaxis include the belief by some surgeons that pharmacological thromboprophylaxis increases the risk of bleeding and the asymptomatic nature of deep vein thrombosis. In addition, in patients at risk of VTE, thromboprophylaxis should be given beyond the standard duration recommended in international or national guidelines, and many surgeons have concerns about adherence and adverse events in the outpatient setting. Furthermore, currently available anticoagulants have drawbacks, including the need for monitoring, or a subcutaneous route of administration. The introduction and implementation of multi-faceted and integrated approaches to thromboprophylaxis could improve adherence with current guidelines, extend appropriate thromboprophylaxis according to risk factors, and improve patient outcomes in this setting. In addition, the development of new anticoagulants with more convenient administration regimens and no need for monitoring may help to achieve these objectives.

Apixaban or enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement

BACKGROUND

The optimal strategy for thromboprophylaxis after major joint replacement has not been established. Low-molecular-weight heparins such as enoxaparin predominantly target factor Xa but to some extent also inhibit thrombin. Apixaban, a specific factor Xa inhibitor, may provide effective thromboprophylaxis with a low risk of bleeding and improved ease of use.

METHODS

In a double-blind, double-dummy study, we randomly assigned patients undergoing total knee replacement to receive 2.5 mg of apixaban orally twice daily or 30 mg of enoxaparin subcutaneously every 12 hours. Both medications were started 12 to 24 hours after surgery and continued for 10 to 14 days. Bilateral venography was then performed. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of asymptomatic and symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, nonfatal pulmonary embolism, and death from any cause during treatment. Patients were followed for 60 days after anticoagulation therapy was stopped.

RESULTS

A total of 3195 patients underwent randomization, with 1599 assigned to the apixaban group and 1596 to the enoxaparin group; 908 subjects were not eligible for the efficacy analysis. The overall rate of primary events was much lower than anticipated. The rate of the primary efficacy outcome was 9.0% with apixaban as compared with 8.8% with enoxaparin (relative risk, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.32). The composite incidence of major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was 2.9% with apixaban and 4.3% with enoxaparin (P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with enoxaparin for efficacy of thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement, apixaban did not meet the prespecified statistical criteria for noninferiority, but its use was associated with lower rates of clinically relevant bleeding and it had a similar adverse-event profile. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00371683.)

Prevention of venous thromboembolism: a key patient safety priority

It is more than 50 years since the first publication of a study showing that symptomatic and fatal venous thromboembolism could be reduced with the use of thromboprophylaxis. Furthermore, it is 23 years since the first evidence-based guidelines recommended routine use of thromboprophylaxis for most hospitalized patients. However, despite the overwhelming evidence that thromboprophylaxis safely and inexpensively reduces thromboembolic complications associated with acute illness and surgery, there continue to be large gaps in the provision of this key patient safety intervention and even larger gaps in the provision of optimal thromboprophylaxis. The implementation of quality improvement strategies, both at the national level and in local hospitals, are able to increase awareness of thromboembolic risks, to increase adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines, and to decrease both clinically important thromboembolic events and hospital costs. Therefore, the objective is for every hospitalized patient to receive appropriate thromboprophylaxis based on their thromboembolic and bleeding risks.

Audit of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized oncology patients

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant problem in oncology patients. VTE prophylaxis is underutilized in hospitalized medical patients, but there are few data for the appropriateness and frequency of its use in the oncology subgroup. We aimed to document local practice.

METHODS

A cross-sectional chart review of all hospitalized patients cared for by the Christchurch Hospital Oncology Service was carried out during two defined 4-week periods. Assessment for indications and contraindications to prophylactic anticoagulation was based on the 2004 American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based consensus guidelines.

RESULTS

Of 113 admissions to the oncology service, 38 (33.6%) had indications for prophylactic anticoagulation. However, 23 of these also had contraindications, leaving only 15 (13%) admissions where prophylactic anticoagulation was deemed appropriate. Only one was appropriately given prophylactic anticoagulation.

CONCLUSION

Only a minority of hospitalized oncology patients are appropriate for prophylactic anticoagulation. Where it is suitable, however, it is poorly utilized locally. Local promotion of VTE prophylaxis and further study of this subgroup of hospitalized medical patients may improve uptake of this practice and attenuate morbidity from VTE.

[Resistance to curative treatment by unfractionned heparin]

Unfractionated heparin has been used as antithrombotic therapy for many years. Its main effect is attributed to the activation of antithrombin (AT), the heparin/AT complex inactivating both factor IIa (thrombin) and factor Xa. Resistance to unfractionated heparin with clinical or biological expression is uncommon. The occurrence of venous or arterial thrombosis or the extension of thrombosis in a patient receiving unfractionated heparin, should always raise suspicion of either AT deficiency or type 2 heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT type 2). HIT type 2 is not a true heparin resistance but an immune complication that requires heparin discontinuation and the use of alternative anticoagulants. Biological heparin resistance is suspected in the presence of a normal or not prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time despite the administration of increasing dose of heparin. Measurement of anti-Xa activity is useful to adjust heparin treatment. Isolated biological heparin resistance is encountered in several physiological and pathological situations including inflammatory and infectious disorders, pregnancy and thrombocytosis. It also occurs in acquired antithrombin deficiency of nephrotic syndrome, l-asparaginase treatment or cardiopulmonary bypass. Biological heparin resistance is relatively common, but clinically significant resistance to heparin is rare and should always raise suspicion of either AT deficiency or type 2 heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

An update on the management of Chagas cardiomyopathy

Chagas disease, caused by the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, infects nearly 18 million people in Latin America and mainly affects the heart, causing heart failure, arrhythmias, heart block, thromboembolism, stroke and death. In this review, the clinical diagnosis and management of Chagas cardiomyopathy are discussed. Particular emphasis is placed on the clinical staging of patients and the use of various diagnostic tests that may be useful in individualizing treatment of the two most relevant clinical syndromes, that is, heart failure and arrhythmias. The relevance of specific treatments are discussed, stressing the important role of parasite persistence in disease pathogenesis. We also discuss new therapy modalities that may have a role in the treatment of Chagas cardiomyopathy.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Acutely Ill Hospitalized Medical Patients

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based guidelines recommend that acutely ill hospitalized medical patients who are at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) should receive prophylaxis. Our aim was to characterize the clinical practices for VTE prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients enrolled in the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE).

METHODS

IMPROVE is an ongoing, multinational, observational study. Participating hospitals enroll the first 10 consecutive eligible acutely ill medical patients each month. Patient management is determined by the treating physicians. An analysis of data on VTE prophylaxis practices is presented.

RESULTS

From July 2002 to September 30, 2006, 15,156 patients were enrolled from 52 hospitals in 12 countries, of whom 50% received in-hospital pharmacologic and/or mechanical VTE prophylaxis. In the United States and other participating countries, 52% and 43% of patients, respectively, should have received prophylaxis according to guideline recommendations from the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP). Only approximately 60% of patients who either met the ACCP criteria for requiring prophylaxis or were eligible for enrollment in randomized clinical trials that have shown the benefits of pharmacologic prophylaxis actually received prophylaxis. Practices varied considerably. Intermittent pneumatic compression was the most common form of medical prophylaxis utilized in the United States, although it was used very rarely in other countries (22% vs 0.2%, respectively). Unfractionated heparin was the most frequent pharmacologic approach used in the United States (21% of patients), with low-molecular-weight heparin used most frequently in other participating countries (40%). There was also variable use of elastic stockings in the United States and other participating countries (3% vs 7%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that physicians' practices for providing VTE prophylaxis to acutely ill hospitalized medical patients are suboptimal and highlight the need for improved implementation of existing evidence-based guidelines in hospitals.

Management of venous thromboembolism in the elderly

In this review the authors discuss the use of oral and parenteral anticoagulants for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the elderly. The use of anticoagulant agents in VTE prophylaxis and treatment in the elderly is complicated by an increase with age in the presence of multiple risk factors and co-morbidities that may increase the risk of both VTE and bleeding. Age itself is identified as an independent risk factor for thromboembolism. VTE is underdiagnosed in the elderly population, and routine prophylaxis frequently falls short of the levels required according to level of risk. Although appropriate anticoagulation of at-risk patients offers a means of reducing the significant VTE burden in this population, concerns have been raised over the use of anticoagulants in a patient group in whom multiple risk factors are common. Bleeding in the elderly can be exacerbated by reduced renal clearance and hypersensitivity to oral anticoagulants that may lead to over-anticoagulation. Although bleeding due to anticoagulant therapy is a serious issue in the elderly, it is often overemphasized, given the therapeutic value otherwise observed in treating this patient group. Warfarin is still used in VTE prophylaxis after orthopaedic surgery and for long-term VTE treatment. Unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have been shown to be safe and effective in the prophylaxis of VTE, and are now being shown to be as effective as warfarin in the initial and long-term treatment of VTE. LMWHs confer the advantage over unfractionated heparin of subcutaneous once-daily administration with no requirement for laboratory monitoring of their anticoagulant effect, which allows for the convenience of outpatient therapy. New anticoagulants that may be of potential benefit in this patient population include fondaparinux sodium, but clinical experience of this drug in the elderly remains limited.

Guideline implementation fails to improve thrombolytic administration

BACKGROUND

International randomised controlled trials conducted over the last two decades have consistently demonstrated improved mortality and morbidity resulting from thrombolytic therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Subsequently, evidence-based guidelines have been designed and implemented to optimize thrombolytic delivery. The effect of evidence-based clinical guidelines on clinical practice is heavily influenced by strategies used to develop, disseminate and implement those guidelines.

AIMS

This study evaluated the impact of a collaborative, multifaceted implementation strategy for AMI management guidelines on thrombolytic usage in the Loddon Mallee Region, Victoria, Australia.

INTERVENTION

The multi-faceted implementation strategy included an inter-disciplinary team representing all treating venues contributing to the content of the "Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction" followed by education sessions that coincided with the dissemination of the guidelines.

METHODS

A retrospective medical records audit 12 weeks before and 12 weeks after the intervention was used to evaluate the impact on proportion of those patients eligible and receiving a thrombolytic and door-to-needle time. Variables of treating venue, age, gender, type of AMI, and type of transport to hospital were also measured to determine their impact on results.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

A retrospective audit of 170 medical records found that the intervention appeared to have had no impact on the proportion of patients eligible and receiving a thrombolytic (74.2% vs. 62.5%: p=0.275), and door-to-needle time (67.7 min vs. 60.5 min: p=0.759). Venue specific influences produced a variety of patterns in thrombolytic delivery that require further exploration. This suggests that a single solution approach across multiple venues will have limited impact.

Warfarin prescribing in atrial fibrillation: the impact of physician, patient, and hospital characteristics

PURPOSE

The study investigated the determinants of warfarin use in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

We assembled a retrospective cohort of community-dwelling elderly patients (aged > or = 66 years) with AF using linked administrative databases. We identified the physicians responsible for the ambulatory care of these patients using physician service claims and compared patients who did and did not have an identifiable provider. For those patients with an identifiable provider, we assessed the association between patient, physician, and hospital factors and warfarin use.

RESULTS

Our cohort consisted of 140,185 patients, of whom 116,200 (83%) had an identifiable cardiac provider. Patients without a provider were significantly more likely to have comorbid conditions that increase their risk of warfarin-associated bleeding. After adjustment for clinical factors, patients without a provider were significantly less likely to receive warfarin (odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval: 0.36-0.38). Of patients with providers, 50,551 patients (43.5%) received warfarin within 180 days after hospital discharge. Warfarin use was positively associated with AF-associated stroke risk factors (eg, prior stroke, congestive heart failure) and negatively associated with warfarin-associated bleeding risk factors (eg, history of intracerebral hemorrhage). After controlling for patient and hospital factors, patients cared for by noncardiologist physicians with cardiology consultation were more likely to receive warfarin then patients treated in noncollaborative environments.

CONCLUSIONS

Warfarin continues to be substantially underprescribed to patients who are at high risk for AF-associated cardioembolic stroke. Our findings highlight the need for targeted quality improvement interventions and suggest preferred models of AF care involving routine collaboration between cardiologists and other physicians.

Antiplatelet agents and perioperative bleeding

PURPOSE

To briefly review the risks, in patients presenting for surgery, associated with the available antiplatelet agents, and to present the principles that should guide the evaluation of these risks and how to manage them.

METHODS

A narrative review of the current medical literature in English and French.

MAIN FINDINGS

Antiplatelet agents [mainly acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel and glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors] are used increasingly to prevent arterial thrombosis. Clinicians are confronted with the hemorrhagic risk associated with the continuation of antiplatelet agents throughout surgery or, conversely, with the thrombotic risk associated with their discontinuation. Most experts recommend surgery while maintaining acetylsalicylic acid for most vascular procedures and in several additional settings where the bleeding risk has been shown (or is likely) to be low. It is commonly recommended that clopidogrel be stopped five days before surgery to allow replacement of half the platelet pool. This approach has been associated with thrombotic events in patients waiting for urgent myocardial revascularization. In this context, aprotinin may reduce blood losses and transfusion requirements. Withdrawal of the competitive GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors at the beginning of surgery will decrease the risk of bleeding, less so for abciximab owing to its avid binding to platelet receptors. Platelets should not be transfused prophylactically, but only to those few patients with abnormal bleeding thought to be related to the persisting effect of antiplatelet therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Unfortunately, data regarding the management of antiplatelet agent-treated patients undergoing surgery, especially non-cardiovascular, are scarce. Further clinical trials must be conducted to guide the clinical management of these patients.

Multicenter evaluation of the use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients in Canada

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients has been shown to be safe and effective. Underutilization of this patient safety practice may result in avoidable mortality and morbidity.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine the proportion of hospitalized, acutely ill medical patients across Canada who were eligible to receive thromboprophylaxis and to evaluate the frequency, determinants and appropriateness of its use.

PATIENTS/METHODS

CURVE is a national, multicenter chart audit of 29 Canadian hospitals. Data were collected on consecutive patients admitted to hospital for an acute medical illness during a defined 3-week study period. Information on demographic and clinical characteristics, risk factors for VTE and bleeding and use of VTE prophylaxis were recorded. The indications for and appropriateness of VTE prophylaxis were assessed using pre-specified criteria based on international consensus guidelines. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify determinants of prophylaxis use.

RESULTS

Of the 4124 medical admissions screened over the study period, 1894 patients (46%) were eligible for study inclusion. The most common specified admitting diagnoses were severe infection (28%), COPD exacerbation or respiratory failure (12%), malignancy (9%) and congestive heart failure (8%). Thromboprophylaxis was indicated in 1702 (90%) study patients. Overall, some form of prophylaxis was administered to 23% of all patients. However, only 16% received appropriate thromboprophylaxis. Factors independently associated with greater use of prophylaxis included internist (vs. other specialty) as attending physician (OR 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.03, 1.71]), university-associated (vs. community) hospital (OR 1.46, 95% CI [1.03, 2.07]), immobilization (per day) (OR 1.60, 95% CI [1.45, 1.77]), presence of >or=1 VTE risk factors (OR=1.78, 95% CI [1.35, 2.34]) and duration of hospitalization (per day of stay) (OR 1.05, 95% CI [1.03, 1.07]), however, use of prophylaxis was unacceptably low in all groups. Patients with cancer had a significantly reduced likelihood of receiving prophylaxis (OR=0.40, 95% CI [0.24, 0.68]). Presence of risk factors for bleeding did not influence the use or choice of prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

Most patients hospitalized for medical illness had indications for thromboprophylaxis, yet only 16% received appropriate prophylaxis. Efforts should be made to elucidate the reasons that underlie the very low rate of thromboprophylaxis in medical patients and to develop and test strategies to improve implementation of this patient safety practice.

Minimizing errors of omission: Behavioural rEenforcement of Heparin to Avert Venous Emboli: The BEHAVE Study*

OBJECTIVE

To improve patient safety by increasing heparin thromboprophylaxis for medical-surgical intensive care unit patients using a multiple-method approach to evidence-based guideline development and implementation.

DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal observational study.

SETTING

Medical-surgical intensive care unit.

PARTICIPANTS

Multidisciplinary clinicians caring for critically ill patients in a 15-bed medical-surgical closed intensive care unit.

INTERVENTIONS

Phase 1 was a 3-month baseline period during which we documented anticoagulation and mechanical thromboprophylaxis. Phase 2 was a 1-yr period in which we implemented a thromboprophylaxis guideline using a) interactive multidisciplinary educational in-services; b) verbal reminders to the intensive care unit team; c) computerized daily nurse recording of thromboprophylaxis; d) weekly graphic feedback to individual intensivists on guideline adherence; and e) publicly displayed graphic feedback on group performance. Phase 3 was a 3-month follow-up period 10 months later, during which we documented thromboprophylaxis. Computerized daily nurse recording of thromboprophylaxis continued in this period.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Intensive care unit and hospital mortality rates were similar across phases, although patients in phase 2 had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores than patients in phases 1 and 3. The proportion (median % [interquartile range]) of intensive care unit patient-days of heparin thromboprophylaxis in phases 1, 2, and 3 was 60.0 (0, 100), 90.9 (50, 100), and 100.0 (60, 100), respectively (p=.01). The proportion (median % [interquartile range]) of days during which heparin thromboprophylaxis was omitted in error in phases 1, 2, and 3 was 20 (0, 53.8), 0 (0, 6.3), and 0 (0, 0), respectively (p<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

After development and implementation of an evidence-based thromboprophylaxis guideline, we found significantly more patients receiving heparin thromboprophylaxis. Guideline adherence was maintained 1 yr later. Further research is needed on which are the most effective strategies to implement patient safety initiatives in the intensive care unit.

Prevention of perioperative venous thromboembolism and coronary events: differential responsiveness to an intervention program to improve guidelines adherence

INTRODUCTION

Prevention of venous thromboembolism and coronary events (with beta-blockers) during and after surgery is at the top of a list of safety practices for hospitalized patients, recommended by the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ). We wished to determine and improve adherence to clinical guidelines for these topics in our institution. PATIENTS, MATERIAL, AND METHODS: A prospective survey was conducted over several weeks on operated patients in a 1200-beds medical center (a teaching, community and referral hospital in Jerusalem, Israel). Eligibility for and actual administration of prophylactic treatment with anticoagulant and beta-blockers were determined. Following an intervention program, which included staff meetings, development of local protocols, and academic detailing by a nurse, the survey was repeated.

RESULTS

In general, adherence to recommended anticoagulation prophylaxis was low, found in only 29% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 23-36] of eligible patients. After the intervention, adequate anticoagulation increased to 50% (95% CI = 40-59) of eligible patients (P < 0.001). Initiation of beta-blockers in preventing perioperative cardiac events was very low (0%, 95% CI = 0-5%) and did not increase after intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to guidelines for prevention of surgical complications was found to be low in our institution. A multifaceted intervention significantly increased use of prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism but not for coronary events. This differential response suggests that the success of a quality improvement project strongly depends on topic content and its phase of acceptance.