Post-transplant obliterative bronchiolitis and other late lung sequelae in human heart-lung transplantation

Effect of once-per-day tacrolimus versus twice-per-day ciclosporin on 3-year incidence of chronic lung allograft dysfunction after lung transplantation in Scandinavia (ScanCLAD): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Evidence is low regarding the choice of calcineurin inhibitor for immunosuppression after lung transplantation. We aimed to compare the use of tacrolimus once per day with ciclosporin twice per day according to the current definition of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) after lung transplantation.

METHODS

ScanCLAD is an investigator-initiated, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial in Scandinavia evaluating whether an immunosuppressive protocol based on anti-thymocyte globulin induction followed by tacrolimus (once per day), mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids reduces the incidence of CLAD after de novo lung transplantation compared with a protocol using ciclosporin (twice per day), mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. Patients aged 18-70 years who were scheduled to undergo double lung transplantation were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either oral ciclosporin (2-3 mg/kg before transplantation and 3 mg/kg [twice per day] from postoperative day 1) or oral tacrolimus (0·05-0·1 mg/kg before transplantation and 0·1-0·2 mg/kg from postoperative day 1). The primary endpoint was CLAD at 36 months post transplantation, determined by repeated lung function tests and adjudicated by an independent committee, and was assessed with a competing-risks analysis with death and re-transplantation as competing events. The primary outcome was assessed in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, defined as those who underwent transplantation and received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02936505) and EudraCT (2015-004137-27).

FINDINGS

Between Oct 21, 2016, and July 10, 2019, 383 patients were screened for eligibility. 249 patients underwent double lung transplantation and received at least one dose of study drug, and were thus included in the mITT population: 125 (50%) in the ciclosporin group and 124 (50%) in the tacrolimus group. The mITT population consisted of 138 (55%) men and 111 (45%) women, with a mean age of 55·2 years (SD 10·2), and no patients were lost to follow-up. In the mITT population, CLAD occurred in 48 patients (cumulative incidence 39% [95% CI 31-48]) in the ciclosporin group and 16 patients (13% [8-21]) in the tacrolimus group at 36 months post transplantation (hazard ratio [HR] 0·28 [95% CI 0·15-0·52], log-rank p<0·0001). Overall survival did not differ between groups at 3 years in the mITT population (74% [65-81] for ciclosporin vs 79% [70-85] for tacrolimus; HR 0·72 [95% CI 0·41-1·27], log-rank p=0·25). However, in the per protocol CLAD population (those in the mITT population who also had at least one post-baseline lung function test allowing assessment of CLAD), allograft survival was significantly better in the tacrolimus group (HR 0·49 [95% CI 0·26-0·91], log-rank p=0·021). Adverse events totalled 1516 in the ciclosporin group and 1459 in the tacrolimus group. The most frequent adverse events were infection (453 events), acute rejection (165 events), and anaemia (129 events) in the ciclosporin group, and infection (568 events), anaemia (108 events), and acute rejection (98 events) in the tacrolimus group. 112 (90%) patients in the ciclosporin group and 108 (87%) in the tacrolimus group had at least one serious adverse event.

INTERPRETATION

Immunosuppression based on use of tacrolimus once per day significantly reduced the incidence of CLAD compared with use of ciclosporin twice per day. These findings support the use of tacrolimus as the first choice of calcineurin inhibitor after lung transplantation.

FUNDING

Astellas, the ALF-agreement, Scandiatransplant Organization, and Heart Centre Research Committee, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.

Single vs Bilateral Lung Transplant in the Management of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation is recommended for select patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, a consensus has not been reached regarding the optimal choice of lung transplantation: single lung transplants (SLTs) vs bilateral lung transplants (BLTs). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SLT compared with BLT in managing end-stage COPD.

METHODS

Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus were searched for articles by 2 independent reviewers using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis system. The review was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42022343408).

RESULTS

Seven studies of 311 screened met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 10,652 patients with end-stage COPD, SLT (n = 6233), or BLT (n = 4419). Overall survival rates of BLT group were more favorable than SLT group at 1 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.43, I2 = 0%), 5 (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.35, 1.58, I2 = 23%), and 10 years (OR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.57, 1.87, I2 = 12%) as well as the hazard ratio (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.70, 0.76, I2 = 40%). Subgroup analysis on survival rates of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency also displayed a trend favoring BLT compared with SLT at 1 (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.24, 2.08, I2 = 28%), 5 (OR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.50, 2.26, I2 = 42%), and 10 years (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.59, 2.48, I2 = 47%) as well as the HR (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.35, 1.28, I2 = 82%).

CONCLUSION

Compared with SLT, BLT seems to demonstrate more favorable trends in survival rates for the management of end-stage COPD. Despite the promising results, the groups have significant heterogeneity in baseline characteristics. Further prospective studies with extended follow-up periods are needed to ascertain the efficacy of treatment.

Role of transforming growth factor-β in airway remodelling in bronchiolitis obliterans

Airway remodelling is the main pathological mechanism of bronchiolitis obliterans (BO). Several studies have found that transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) expression is increased in BO during airway remodelling, where it plays an important role in various biological processes by binding to its receptor complex to activate multiple signalling proteins and pathways. This review examines the role of TGF-β in airway remodelling in BO and its potential as a therapeutic target, highlighting the mechanisms of TGF-β activation and signalling, cellular targets of TGF-β actions, and research progress in TGF-β signalling and TGF-β-mediated processes.

[Chronic lung allograft dysfunction in 2022, past and updates]

INTRODUCTION

While short-term results of lung transplantation have improved considerably, long-term survival remains below that achieved for other solid organ transplants.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE

The main cause of late mortality is chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), which affects nearly half of the recipients 5 years after transplantation. Immunological and non-immune risk factors have been identified. These factors activate the innate and adaptive immune system, leading to lesional and altered wound-healing processes, which result in fibrosis affecting the small airways or interstitial tissue. Several phenotypes of CLAD have been identified based on respiratory function and imaging pattern. Aside from retransplantation, which is possible for only small number of patients, no treatment can reverse the CLAD process.

PERSPECTIVES

Current therapeutic research is focused on anti-fibrotic treatments and photopheresis. Basic research has identified numerous biomarkers that could prove to be relevant as therapeutic targets.

CONCLUSION

While the pathophysiological mechanisms of CLAD are better understood than before, a major therapeutic challenge remains.

Efficacy and safety of total lymphoid irradiation in different chronic lung allograft dysfunction phenotypes

Total lymphoid irradiation (TLI) is an alternative treatment for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). However, data regarding its efficacy and tolerance are scarce. This study included patients with CLAD treated with TLI at our center between 2011 and 2018. Clinical characteristics before and after TLI and related complications were analyzed. Forty patients with CLAD (twenty-nine bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome [BOS], nine restrictive allograft syndrome [RAS], and two mixed) were included. Significant attenuation of the forced expiratory volume in 1-sec (FEV₁ ) decline slope was observed in all phenotypes, in both the BOS and RAS. The median FEV₁ 12, 6, and 3 months pre-TLI were as follows: 1980 (IQR 1720-2560), 1665 (IQR 1300-2340) and 1300 (IQR 1040-1740) ml (p < .001), while the median FEV₁ at 3, 6, and 12 months post-TLI was 1110 (IQR 810-1440), 1130 (IQR 860-1470), and 1115 (IQR 865-1490) ml (p = .769). No dropouts due to radiation toxicity were observed. The mean survival according to the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPS) >70 or ≤70 at baseline was 1837 (IQR 259-2522) versus 298 (IQR 128-554) days (p < .0001), respectively. In conclusion, TLI may stop FEV₁ decline in both BOS and RAS. Moreover, a good KPS score may be an important prognostic factor.

Lymphocytic Airway Inflammation in Lung Allografts

Lung transplant remains a key therapeutic option for patients with end stage lung disease but short- and long-term survival lag other solid organ transplants. Early ischemia-reperfusion injury in the form of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and acute cellular rejection are risk factors for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), a syndrome of airway and parenchymal fibrosis that is the major barrier to long term survival. An increasing body of research suggests lymphocytic airway inflammation plays a significant role in these important clinical syndromes. Cytotoxic T cells are observed in airway rejection, and transcriptional analysis of airways reveal common cytotoxic gene patterns across solid organ transplant rejection. Natural killer (NK) cells have also been implicated in the early allograft damage response to PGD, acute rejection, cytomegalovirus, and CLAD. This review will examine the roles of lymphocytic airway inflammation across the lifespan of the allograft, including: 1) The contribution of innate lymphocytes to PGD and the impact of PGD on the adaptive immune response. 2) Acute cellular rejection pathologies and the limitations in identifying airway inflammation by transbronchial biopsy. 3) Potentiators of airway inflammation and heterologous immunity, such as respiratory infections, aspiration, and the airway microbiome. 4) Airway contributions to CLAD pathogenesis, including epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), club cell loss, and the evolution from constrictive bronchiolitis to parenchymal fibrosis. 5) Protective mechanisms of fibrosis involving regulatory T cells. In summary, this review will examine our current understanding of the complex interplay between the transplanted airway epithelium, lymphocytic airway infiltration, and rejection pathologies.

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: current management and future directions

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) may develop after either lung or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), with similarities in histopathological features and clinical manifestations. However, there are differences in the contributory factors and clinical trajectories between the two conditions. BOS after HSCT occurs due to systemic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), whereas BOS after lung transplantation is limited to the lung allograft. BOS diagnosis after HSCT is more challenging, as the lung function decline may occur due to extrapulmonary GVHD, causing sclerosis or inflammation in the fascia or muscles of the respiratory girdle. Treatment is generally empirical with no established effective therapies. This review provides rare insights and commonalities of both conditions, that are not well elaborated elsewhere in contemporary literature, and highlights the importance of cross disciplinary learning from experts in other transplant modalities. Treatment algorithms for each condition are presented, based on the published literature and consensus clinical opinion. Immunosuppression should be optimised, and other conditions or contributory factors treated where possible. When initial treatment fails, the ultimate therapeutic option is lung transplantation (or re-transplantation in the case of BOS after lung transplantation) in carefully selected candidates. Novel therapies under investigation include aerosolised liposomal cyclosporine, Janus kinase inhibitors, antifibrotic therapies, and (in patients with BOS after lung transplantation) B-cell–directed therapies. Effective novel treatments that have a tangible impact on survival and thereby avoid the need for lung transplantation or re-transplantation are urgently required.

Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is a syndrome of progressive lung function decline, subcategorized into obstructive, restrictive, and mixed phenotypes. The trajectory of CLAD is variable depending on the phenotype, with restrictive and mixed phenotypes having more rapid progression and lower survival. The mechanisms driving CLAD development remain unclear, though allograft injury during primary graft dysfunction, acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and infections trigger immune responses with long-lasting effects that can lead to CLAD months or years later. Currently, retransplantation is the only effective treatment.

Involvement of IL-26 in bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome but not in acute rejection after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

 The main long-term complication after lung transplantation is bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), a deadly condition in which neutrophils may play a critical pathophysiological role. Recent studies show that the cytokine interleukin IL-26 can facilitate neutrophil recruitment in response to pro-inflammatory stimuli in the airways. In this pilot study, we characterized the local involvement of IL-26 during BOS and acute rejection (AR) in human patients.

METHOD

 From a biobank containing bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples from 148 lung transplant recipients (LTR), clinically-matched patient pairs were identified to minimize the influence of clinical confounders. We identified ten pairs (BOS/non-BOS) with BAL samples harvested on three occasions for our longitudinal investigation and 12 pairs of patients with and without AR. The pairs were matched for age, gender, preoperative diagnosis, type of and time after surgery. Extracellular IL-26 protein was quantified in cell-free BAL samples using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Intracellular IL-26 protein in BAL cells was determined using immunocytochemistry (ICC) and flow cytometry.

RESULTS

 The median extracellular concentration of IL-26 protein was markedly increased in BAL samples from patients with BOS (p < 0.0001) but not in samples from patients with AR. Intracellular IL-26 protein was confirmed in alveolar macrophages and lymphocytes (through ICC and flow cytometry) among BAL cells obtained from BOS patients.

CONCLUSIONS

 Local IL-26 seems to be involved in BOS but not AR, and macrophages as well as lymphocytes constitute cellular sources in this clinical setting. The enhancement of extracellular IL-26 protein in LTRs with BOS warrants further investigation of its potential as a target for diagnosing, monitoring, and treating BOS.

Beyond Bronchiolitis Obliterans: In-Depth Histopathologic Characterization of Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome after Lung Transplantation

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is considered an airway-centered disease, with bronchiolitis obliterans (BO) as pathologic hallmark. However, the histologic spectrum of pure clinical BOS remains poorly characterized. We provide the first in-depth histopathologic description of well-characterized BOS patients and patients without chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), defined according to the recent consensus guidelines. Explant lung tissue from 52 clinically-defined BOS and 26 non-CLAD patients (collected 1993-2018) was analyzed for histologic parameters, including but not limited to airway lesions, vasculopathy and fibrosis. In BOS, BO lesions were evident in 38 (73%) patients and varied from concentric sub-epithelial fibrotic BO to inflammatory BO, while 10/14 patients without BO displayed 'vanishing airways', defined by a discordance between arteries and airways. Chronic vascular abnormalities were detected in 22 (42%) patients. Ashcroft fibrosis scores revealed a median of 43% (IQR: 23-69) of normal lung parenchyma per patient; 26% (IQR: 18-37) of minimal alveolar fibrous thickening; and 11% (IQR: 4-18) of moderate alveolar thickening without architectural damage. Patchy areas of definite fibrotic damage to the lung structure (i.e., Ashcroft score ≥5) were present in 28 (54%) patients. Fibrosis was classified as bronchocentric (n = 21/28, 75%), paraseptal (n = 17/28, 61%) and subpleural (n = 15/28, 54%). In non-CLAD patients, BO lesions were absent, chronic vascular abnormalities present in 1 (4%) patient and mean Ashcroft scores were significantly lower compared to BOS (p = 0.0038) with 78% (IQR: 64-88) normally preserved lung parenchyma. BOS explant lungs revealed evidence of various histopathologic findings, including vasculopathy and fibrotic changes, which may contribute to the pathophysiology of BOS.

Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction: Evolving Concepts and Therapies

The primary factor that limits long-term survival after lung transplantation is chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). CLAD also impairs quality of life and increases the costs of medical care. Our understanding of CLAD continues to evolve. Consensus definitions of CLAD and the major CLAD phenotypes were recently updated and clarified, but it remains to be seen whether the current definitions will lead to advances in management or impact care. Understanding the potential differences in pathogenesis for each CLAD phenotype may lead to novel therapeutic strategies, including precision medicine. Recognition of CLAD risk factors may lead to earlier interventions to mitigate risk, or to avoid risk factors all together, to prevent the development of CLAD. Unfortunately, currently available therapies for CLAD are usually not effective. However, novel therapeutics aimed at both prevention and treatment are currently under investigation. We provide an overview of the updates to CLAD-related terminology, clinical phenotypes and their diagnosis, natural history, pathogenesis, and potential strategies to treat and prevent CLAD.

Evaluation of a Home Monitoring Application for Follow Up after Lung Transplantation-A Pilot Study

Home spirometry after lung transplantation is common practice, to monitor graft function. However, there is little experience with online home monitoring applications with direct data transfer to the hospital. We evaluated the feasibility and patient experiences with a new online home monitoring application, integrated with a Bluetooth-enabled spirometer and real-time data transfer. Consecutive lung transplant recipients were asked to evaluate this home monitoring application for three months in a pilot study. Home spirometry measurements were compared with in-hospital lung function tests (the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC)) at the end of the study. Ten patients participated. The home and hospital spirometry measurements showed a high correlation, for both the FEV1 (r = 0.99, p < 0.01) and FVC (r = 0.99, p < 0.01). The adherence and patient satisfaction were high, and the patients preferred the home monitoring application over the current home spirometer, with a difference of 1.4 ± 1.5 points on a scale from 0 to 10 (p = 0.02). Online home monitoring with direct data transfer is feasible and reliable after lung transplantation and results in high patient satisfaction. Whether the implementation of online home monitoring enables the earlier detection of lung function decline and improves patient and graft outcomes will be the subject of future research.

Azithromycin Partially Mitigates Dysregulated Repair of Lung Allograft Small Airway Epithelium

BACKGROUND

Dysregulated airway epithelial repair following injury is a proposed mechanism driving posttransplant bronchiolitis obliterans (BO), and its clinical correlate bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). This study compared gene and cellular characteristics of injury and repair in large (LAEC) and small (SAEC) airway epithelial cells of transplant patients.

METHODS

Subjects were recruited at the time of routine bronchoscopy posttransplantation and included patients with and without BOS. Airway epithelial cells were obtained from bronchial and bronchiolar brushing performed under radiological guidance from these patients. In addition, bronchial brushings were also obtained from healthy control subjects comprising of adolescents admitted for elective surgery for nonrespiratory-related conditions. Primary cultures were established, monolayers wounded, and repair assessed (±) azithromycin (1 µg/mL). In addition, proliferative capacity as well as markers of injury and dysregulated repair were also assessed.

RESULTS

SAEC had a significantly dysregulated repair process postinjury, despite having a higher proliferative capacity than large airway epithelial cells. Addition of azithromycin significantly induced repair in these cells; however, full restitution was not achieved. Expression of several genes associated with epithelial barrier repair (matrix metalloproteinase 7, matrix metalloproteinase 3, the integrins β6 and β8, and β-catenin) were significantly different in epithelial cells obtained from patients with BOS compared to transplant patients without BOS and controls, suggesting an intrinsic defect.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic airway injury and dysregulated repair programs are evident in airway epithelium obtained from patients with BOS, particularly with SAEC. We also show that azithromycin partially mitigates this pathology.

When tissue is the issue: A histological review of chronic lung allograft dysfunction

Although chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains the major life-limiting factor following lung transplantation, much of its pathophysiology remains unknown. The discovery that CLAD can manifest both clinically and morphologically in vastly different ways led to the definition of distinct subtypes of CLAD. In this review, recent advances in our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of the different phenotypes of CLAD will be discussed with a particular focus on tissue-based and molecular studies. An overview of the current knowledge on the mechanisms of the airway-centered bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, as well as the airway and alveolar injuries in the restrictive allograft syndrome and also the vascular compartment in chronic antibody-mediated rejection is provided. Specific attention is also given to morphological and molecular markers for early CLAD diagnosis or histological changes associated with subsequent CLAD development. Evidence for a possible overlap between different forms of CLAD is presented and discussed. In the end, "tissue remains the (main) issue," as we are still limited in our knowledge about the actual triggers and specific mechanisms of all late forms of posttransplant graft failure, a shortcoming that needs to be addressed in order to further improve the outcome of lung transplant recipients.

Circulating exosomes with lung self-antigens as a biomarker for chronic lung allograft dysfunction: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Exosomes isolated from plasma of lung transplant recipients (LTxRs) with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) contain human leukocyte antigens and lung self-antigens (SAgs), K-alpha 1 tubulin (Kα1T) and collagen type V (Col-V). The aim was to determine the use of circulating exosomes with lung SAgs as a biomarker for BOS.

METHODS

Circulating exosomes were isolated retrospectively from plasma from LTxRs at diagnosis of BOS and at 6 and 12 months before the diagnosis (n = 41) and from stable time-matched controls (n = 30) at 2 transplant centers by ultracentrifugation. Exosomes were validated using Nanosight, and lung SAgs (Kα1T and Col-V) were detected by immunoblot and semiquantitated using ImageJ software.

RESULTS

Circulating exosomes from BOS and stable LTxRs demonstrated 61- to 181-nm vesicles with markers Alix and CD9. Exosomes from LTxRs with BOS (n = 21) showed increased levels of lung SAgs compared with stable (n = 10). A validation study using 2 separate cohorts of LTxRs with BOS and stable time-matched controls from 2 centers also demonstrated significantly increased lung SAgs-containing exosomes at 6 and 12 months before BOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Circulating exosomes isolated from LTxRs with BOS demonstrated increased levels of lung SAgs (Kα1T and Col-V) 12 months before the diagnosis (100% specificity and 90% sensitivity), indicating that circulating exosomes with lung SAgs can be used as a non-invasive biomarker for identifying LTxRs at risk for BOS.

Noninvasive methods for detection of chronic lung allograft dysfunction in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation (LTx) is the only therapeutic option for end-stage lung diseases. Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), which manifests as airflow restriction and/or obstruction, is the primary factor limiting the long-term survival of patients after surgery. According to histopathological and radiographic findings, CLAD comprises two phenotypes, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and restrictive allograft syndrome. Half of all lung recipients will develop CLAD in 5 years, and this rate may increase up to 75% 10 years after surgery owing to the paucity in accurate and effective early detection and treatment methods. Recently, many studies have presented noninvasive methods for detecting CLAD and improving diagnosis and intervention. However, the significance of accurately detecting CLAD remains controversial. We reviewed published studies that have presented noninvasive methods for detecting CLAD to highlight the current knowledge on clinical symptoms, spirometry, imaging examinations, and other methods to detect the disease.

Emerging biomarkers in chronic lung allograft dysfunction

Introduction: Lung transplantation remains an important treatment for patients with end stage lung disease. Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains the greatest limiting factor for long term survival. As the diagnosis of CLAD is based on pulmonary function tests, significant lung injury is required before a diagnosis is feasible, likely when irreversible damage has already occurred. Therefore, research is ongoing for early CLAD recognition, with biomarkers making up a substantial amount of this research.Areas covered: The purpose of this review is to describe available biomarkers, focusing on those which aid in predicting CLAD and distinguishing between different CLAD phenotypes. We describe biomarkers presenting in bronchial alveolar lavage (BAL) as well as circulating in peripheral blood, both of which offer an appealing alternative to lung biopsy.Expert opinion: Development of CLAD involves complex, multiple immune and nonimmune mechanisms. Therefore, evaluation of potential CLAD biomarkers serves a dual purpose: clinically, the goal remains early detection and identification of patients at increased risk. Simultaneously, biomarkers offer insight into the different mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of CLAD, leading to the development of possible interventions. The ultimate goal is the development of both preventive and early intervention strategies for CLAD to improve the overall survival of our lung transplant recipients.

An update on chronic lung allograft dysfunction

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains a significant challenge and the major determinant of morbidity and mortality post lung transplantation (LTx). The definition of CLAD has evolved significantly over the last ten years, reflecting better understanding of pathophysiology and different phenotypes. While there is an agreed consensus approach to CLAD, questions remain regarding the limitations of lung function parameters as well as the role of imaging and histopathology. Here we present a current snapshot of the definition of CLAD, its evolution and future directions.

The role of the immune system in lung transplantation: towards improved long-term results

Over the past 35 years, lung transplantation has evolved from an experimental treatment to the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage lung disease. Beyond the immediate period after lung transplantation, rejection and infection are the leading causes of death. The risk of rejection after lung transplantation is generally higher than after other solid organ transplants, and this necessitates more intensive immunosuppression. However, this more intensive treatment does not reduce the risk of rejection sufficiently, and rejection is one of the most common complications after transplantation. There are multiple forms of rejection including acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. These have posed a vexing problem for clinicians, patients, and the field of lung transplantation. Confounding matters is the inherent effect of more intensive immunosuppression on the risk of infections. Indeed, infections pose a direct problem resulting in morbidity and mortality and increase the risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction in the ensuing weeks and months. There are complex interactions between microbes and the immune response that are the subject of ongoing studies. This review focuses on the role of the immune system in lung transplantation and highlights different forms of rejection and the impact of infections on outcomes.

The impact of non-HLA antibodies on outcomes after lung transplantation and implications for therapeutic approaches

The role of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to mismatched human leukocyte antigens (HLA) in lung allograft rejection has been recognized over the past 20 years. During this time, there has been growing experience and recognition of an important role for non-HLA antibodies in lung allograft rejection. Multiple self-antigens have been identified that elicit autoimmune responses including collagen V, K-α 1 tubulin, angiotensin type 1 receptor, and endothelin type A receptor, but it is likely that other antigens elicit similar responses. The paradigm for the pathogenesis of these autoimmune responses consists of exposure of sequestered self-antigens followed by loss of peripheral tolerance, which then promotes allograft rejection. Studies have focused mainly on the impact of autoimmune responses on the development of Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome or its mouse model surrogate. However, there are emerging data that illustrate that non-HLA antibodies can induce acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after lung transplantation. Treatment has focused on antibody-depletion protocols, but experience is limited to cohort studies and appropriate controlled trials have not been conducted. It is noteworthy that depletion of non-HLA antibodies has been associated with favorable clinical outcomes. Clearly, additional studies are needed to identify the optimal therapeutic approaches to non-HLA antibodies in clinical practice.

Diagnosis, Pathophysiology and Experimental Models of Chronic Lung Allograft Rejection

Chronic rejection is the Achilles heel of modern lung transplantation, characterized by a slow, progressive decline in allograft function. Clinically, this manifests as obstructive disease, restrictive disease, or a mixture of the 2 depending on the underlying pathology. The 2 major phenotypes of chronic rejection include bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and restrictive allograft syndrome. The last decade of research has revealed that each of these phenotypes has a unique underlying pathophysiology which may require a distinct treatment regimen for optimal control. Insights into the intricate alloimmune pathways contributing to chronic rejection have been gained from both large and small animal models, suggesting directions for future research. In this review, we explore the pathological hallmarks of chronic rejection, recent insights gained from both clinical and basic science research, and the current state of animal models of chronic lung rejection.

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome-free survival after lung transplantation: An International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Thoracic Transplant Registry analysis

BACKGROUND

Lung transplant (LTx) recipients have low long-term survival and a high incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). However, few long-term, multicenter, and precise estimates of BOS-free survival (a composite outcome of death or BOS) incidence exist.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study of primary LTx recipients (1994-2011) reported to the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation Thoracic Transplant Registry assessed outcomes through 2012. For the composite primary outcome of BOS-free survival, we used Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards regression, censoring for loss to follow-up, end of study, and re-LTx. Although standard Thoracic Transplant Registry analyses censor at the last consecutive annual complete BOS status report, our analyses allowed for partially missing BOS data.

RESULTS

Due to BOS reporting standards, 99.1% of the cohort received LTx in North America. During 79,896 person-years of follow-up, single LTx (6,599 of 15,268 [43%]) and bilateral LTx (8,699 of 15,268 [57%]) recipients had a median BOS-free survival of 3.16 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.99-3.30 years) and 3.58 years (95% CI, 3.53-3.72 years), respectively. Almost 90% of the single and bilateral LTx recipients developed the composite outcome within 10 years of transplantation. Standard Registry analyses "overestimated" median BOS-free survival by 0.42 years and "underestimated" the median survival after BOS by about a half-year for both single and bilateral LTx (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Most LTx recipients die or develop BOS within 4 years, and very few remain alive and free from BOS at 10 years post-LTx. Less inclusive Thoracic Transplant Registry analytic methods tend to overestimate BOS-free survival. The Registry would benefit from improved international reporting of BOS and other chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) events.

Bilateral versus single lung transplantation: are two lungs better than one?

There is a long-standing debate over whether single or bilateral lung transplant provides better short and long-term clinical outcomes. We performed a detailed PubMed search on relevant clinical research publications on single (SLT) and bilateral lung transplantation (BLT). We included studies that were published before and after the implementation of the lung allocation score (LAS). We reviewed disease-specific short- and long-term outcomes associated with each transplantation technique. The majority of published studies are retrospective cohort studies that use institutional data or large patient registries. Outcomes associated with transplantation technique vary by disease specific indication, age, and patient severity. Over the past decade, the relative proportion of bilateral lung transplantation has increased. Increasing adoption of bilateral lung transplant likely reflects the general acceptance of several advantages associated with the technique. However, making a clear, evidence-based decision is difficult in light of the fact that there has never been and probably never will be a randomized trial. Our institutional preference is bilateral lung transplant. However, consideration for the technique should still be made on a case-by-case basis.

Lung Function Trajectory in Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant

RATIONALE

The natural history of lung function in patients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant is poorly characterized. Understanding the trajectory of lung function is necessary for prompt clinical recognition and treatment and also for the rational design of prospective studies.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the longitudinal trajectory of lung function parameters, including FEV₁, in patients with BOS after hematopoietic cell transplant.

METHODS

Subjects with BOS defined by National Institutes of Health consensus guidelines criteria from a recent multicenter prospective trial of combination treatment with fluticasone, azithromycin and montelukast and a retrospective cohort from Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center were included. Longitudinal change in FEV₁ for each patient was calculated on the basis of available pulmonary function tests in three periods: pre-BOS, from BOS diagnosis to 6 months, and 6-18 months after diagnosis. The effect of treatment on FEV₁ trajectory was analyzed by univariate and multivariate linear regression. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The FEV₁ percent predicted value at diagnosis was 46% (interquartile range, 35-57%) for trial participants and 53% (interquartile range, 41-64%) for the retrospective cohort. There was a concomitant mild reduction in FVC, as well as a marked reduction in forced expiratory flow, midexpiratory phase, at diagnosis. While there was individual heterogeneity, the overall FEV₁ trajectory was characterized by a marked decline within 6 months prior to BOS diagnosis, followed by stability of FEV₁ early after diagnosis and a slow rate of decline beyond 6 months. The effect of the trial medications on FEV₁ trajectory after BOS diagnosis was a mean rate of change of 0.92% predicted per month (95% confidence interval, -0.53 to 2.37) compared with the retrospective cohort, but this was not statistically significant. Two-year overall survival rates were 76% and 72% for the study participants and the retrospective cohort patients, respectively. Earlier time to diagnosis after hematopoietic cell transplant and severity of FVC at diagnosis were significantly associated with reduced survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The FEV₁ trajectory in patients with BOS after hematopoietic cell transplant in a contemporary era of management follows a predominant pattern of rapid FEV₁ decline in the 6 months prior to diagnosis, followed by FEV₁ stabilization after diagnosis.

Update in Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the major limitation to posttransplant survival. This review highlights the evolving definition of CLAD, risk factors, treatment, and expected outcomes after the development of CLAD.

Cytotoxicity of Natural Killer Cells Activated Through NKG2D Contributes to the Development of Bronchiolitis Obliterans in a Murine Heterotopic Tracheal Transplant Model

Bronchiolitis obliterans after lung transplantation is a major cause of postoperative mortality in which T cell-mediated immunity is known to play an important role. However, the exact contribution of natural killer (NK) cells, which have functions similar to CD8⁺ T cells, has not been defined. Here, we assessed the role of NK cells in murine bronchiolitis obliterans through heterotopic tracheal transplantations and found a greater percentage of NK cells in allografts than in isografts. Depletion of NK cells using an anti-NK1.1 antibody attenuated bronchiolitis obliterans in transplant recipients compared with controls. In terms of NK cell effector functions, an improvement in bronchiolitis obliterans was observed in perforin-KO recipient mice compared to wild type (WT). Furthermore, we found upregulation of NKG2D-ligand in allografts and demonstrated the significance of this using grafts expressing Rae-1, a murine NKG2D-ligand, which induced severe bronchiolitis obliterans in WT and Rag-1 KO recipients. This effect was ameliorated by injection of anti-NKG2D blocking antibody. Together, these results suggest that cytotoxicity resulting from activation of NK cells through NKG2D leads to the development of murine bronchiolitis obliterans.

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction phenotypes and treatment

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains a major hurdle limiting long-term survival post lung transplantation. Given the clinical heterogeneity of CLAD, recently two phenotypes of CLAD have been defined [bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) vs. restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS) or restrictive CLAD (rCLAD)]. BOS is characterized by an obstructive pulmonary function, air trapping on CT and obliterative bronchiolitis (OB) on histopathology, while RAS/rCLAD patients show a restrictive pulmonary function, persistent pleuro-parenchymal infiltrates on CT and pleuroparenchymal fibro-elastosis on biopsies. Importantly, the patients with RAS/rCLAD have a severely limited survival post diagnosis of 6-18 months compared to 3-5 years after BOS diagnosis. In this review, we will review historical evidence for this heterogeneity and we will highlight the clinical, radiological, histopathological characteristics of both phenotypes, as well as their risk factors. Treatment of CLAD remains troublesome, nevertheless, we will give an overview of different treatment strategies that have been tried with some success. Adequate phenotyping remains difficult but is clearly needed for both clinical and scientific purposes.

Mast cell phenotypes in the allograft after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

The burden of mast cell (MC) infiltration and their phenotypes, MC-tryptase (MCT ) and MC-tryptase/chymase (MCTC ), after lung transplantation (LT) has not been evaluated in human studies.

METHODS

We reviewed 20 transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) specimen from patients with early normal allograft (<6 months post-LT, n=5), late normal allograft (>6 months, n=5), A2 or worse acute cellular rejection (ACR, n=5), and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD, n=5). Slides were immunostained for tryptase and chymase. Total MC, MCT , MCTC and MCTC to-MCT ratio were compared between the four groups using a generalized linear mixed model.

RESULTS

Irrespective of clinicopathologic diagnosis, MC burden tends to increase with time (r(2) =.56, P=.009). MCTC phenotype was significantly increased in the CLAD group (8.2±4.9 cells per HPF) in comparison with the other three groups (early normal: 1.6±1.7, P=.0026; late normal: 2.5±2.3, P=.048; ACR: 2.7±3.5, P=.021). Further, the ratio of MCTC to MCT was significantly increased in CLAD group as compared to the other three groups (P<.001 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

The burden of MC may increase in the allograft as function of time. Patients with CLAD have an increased relative and absolute burden of MCTC phenotype MC. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate the potential pathologic role of MCTC in allograft dysfunction.

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction: evolving practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) was recently introduced as an overarching term covering different phenotypes of chronic allograft dysfunction, including obstructive CLAD (bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome), restrictive CLAD (restrictive allograft syndrome) and graft dysfunction due to causes not related to chronic rejection. In the present review, we will highlight the latest insights and current controversies regarding the new CLAD terminology, underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms, diagnostic approach and possible treatment options.

RECENT FINDINGS

Different pathophysiological mechanisms are clearly involved in clinically distinct phenotypes of chronic rejection, as is reflected by differences in histology, allograft function and imaging. Therefore, not all CLAD patients may equally benefit from specific therapies.

SUMMARY

The recent introduction of CLAD importantly changed the clinical practice in lung transplant recipients. Given the relative low accuracy of the current diagnostic tools, future research should focus on specific biomarkers, more sensitive pulmonary function parameters and imaging techniques for timely CLAD diagnosis and phenotyping. Personalized or targeted therapeutic options for adequate prevention and treatment of CLAD are required.

Current views on chronic rejection after lung transplantation

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) was recently introduced as an overarching term mainly to classify patients with chronic rejection after lung transplantation, although other conditions may also qualify for CLAD. Initially, only the development of a persistent and obstructive pulmonary function defect, clinically identified as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), was considered as chronic rejection, if no other cause could be identified. It became clear in recent years that some patients do not qualify for this definition, although they developed a chronic and persistent decrease in FEV1 , without another identifiable cause. As the pulmonary function decline in these patients was rather restrictive, this was called restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS). In the present review, we will further elaborate on these two CLAD phenotypes, with specific attention to the diagnostic criteria, the role of pathology and imaging, the risk factors, outcome, and the possible treatment options.

Restrictive chronic lung allograft dysfunction: Where are we now?

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains a frequent and troublesome complication after lung transplantation. Apart from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), a restrictive phenotype of CLAD (rCLAD) has recently been recognized, which occurs in approximately 30% of CLAD patients. The main characteristics of rCLAD include a restrictive pulmonary function pattern with a persistent decline in lung function (FEV1, FVC and TLC), persistent parenchymal infiltrates and (sub)pleural thickening on chest CT scan, as well as pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis and obliterative bronchiolitis on histopathologic examination. Once diagnosed, median survival is only 6 to 18 months compared with 3 to 5 years with BOS. In this perspective we review the historic evidence for rCLAD and describe the different diagnostic criteria and prognosis. Furthermore, we elaborate on the typical radiologic and histopathologic presentations of rCLAD and highlight risk factors and mechanisms. Last, we summarize some opportunities for further research including the urgent need for adequate therapy. In this perspective we not only assess the current knowledge, but also clarify the existing gaps in understanding this increasingly recognized complication after lung transplantation.

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome is not specific for bronchiolitis obliterans in pediatric lung transplant

BACKGROUND

Bronchiolitis obliterans (BO) is the leading cause of mortality beyond the first year after pediatric lung transplant, but the performance of an open lung biopsy is often required for diagnosis. Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is a clinical diagnosis based on spirometric data that is the accepted standard for staging chronic allograft dysfunction.

METHODS

We determined the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of BOS for predicting BO in children. A chart review was conducted on 139 open lung biopsies and 43 lung explants performed at our center from 1990 through June 2010 in pediatric recipients of lung transplants. Results were excluded from analysis if insufficient data existed to calculate a stable BOS stage before biopsy/explant.

RESULTS

The criteria for inclusion in the study were met by 67 open lung biopsies and 31 lung explants. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of BOS for predicting BO were 91.0%, 25.8%, 72.6%, and 57.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that early declines in lung function are sensitive, but not specific, for BO. The low specificity of BOS for identifying BO illustrates the challenge facing clinicians in determining the etiology of pulmonary decline after lung transplant.

An international ISHLT/ATS/ERS clinical practice guideline: diagnosis and management of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is a major complication of lung transplantation that is associated with poor survival. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, American Thoracic Society, and European Respiratory Society convened a committee of international experts to describe and/or provide recommendations for 1) the definition of BOS, 2) the risk factors for developing BOS, 3) the diagnosis of BOS, and 4) the management and prevention of BOS. A pragmatic evidence synthesis was performed to identify all unique citations related to BOS published from 1980 through to March, 2013. The expert committee discussed the available research evidence upon which the updated definition of BOS, identified risk factors and recommendations are based. The committee followed the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to develop specific clinical recommendations. The term BOS should be used to describe a delayed allograft dysfunction with persistent decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s that is not caused by other known and potentially reversible causes of post-transplant loss of lung function. The committee formulated specific recommendations about the use of systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, azithromycin and about re-transplantation in patients with suspected and confirmed BOS. The diagnosis of BOS requires the careful exclusion of other post-transplant complications that can cause delayed lung allograft dysfunction, and several risk factors have been identified that have a significant association with the onset of BOS. Currently available therapies have not been proven to result in significant benefit in the prevention or treatment of BOS. Adequately designed and executed randomised controlled trials that properly measure and report all patient-important outcomes are needed to identify optimal therapies for established BOS and effective strategies for its prevention.

A new classification system for chronic lung allograft dysfunction

Although survival after lung transplantation has improved significantly during the last decade, chronic rejection is thought to be the major cause of late mortality. The physiologic hallmark of chronic rejection has been a persistent fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second associated with an obstructive ventilatory defect, for which the term bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) was defined to allow a uniformity of description and grading of severity throughout the world. Although BOS was generally thought to be irreversible, recent evidence suggests that some patients with BOS may respond to azithromycin with > 10% improvement in their forced expiratory volume in 1 second. In addition, a restrictive form of chronic rejection has recently been described that does not fit the strict definition of BOS as an obstructive defect. Hence, the term chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) has been introduced to cover all forms of graft dysfunction, but CLAD has yet to be defined. We propose a definition of CLAD and a flow chart that may facilitate recognition of the different phenotypes of CLAD that can complicate the clinical course of lung transplant recipients.

Interstitial pneumonitis and the risk of chronic allograft rejection in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The presence of interstitial pneumonitis (IP) on surveillance lung biopsy specimens in lung transplant recipients is poorly described, and its impact on posttransplant outcomes is not established. The following study assessed the association of posttransplant IP with the development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS).

METHODS

We examined all recipients of primary cadaveric lung transplants at our institution between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2007 (N = 145). Patients had bronchoscopies with BAL, and transbronchial biopsies performed for surveillance during posttransplant months 1, 3, 6, and 12 as well as when clinically indicated. Patients were given a diagnosis of IP if, in the absence of active infection and organizing pneumonia, they showed evidence of interstitial inflammation and fibrosis on two or more biopsy specimens.

RESULTS

IP was a significant predictor of BOS (OR, 7.84; 95% CI, 2.84-21.67; P < .0001) and was significantly associated with time to development of BOS (hazard ratio, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.93-7.39; P = .0001) within the first 6 years posttransplant. The presence of IP did not correlate with a significantly higher risk of mortality or time to death. There was no association between the presence of IP and the development of or time to acute rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of IP on lung transplant biopsy specimens suggests an increased risk for BOS, which is independent of the presence of acute cellular rejection.