1
|
Berentschot JC, Martine Bek L, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, van den Berg-Emons RJG, Ribbers GM, Aerts JGJV, Hellemons ME. Acute COVID-19 treatment is not associated with health problems 2 years after hospitalization. Int J Infect Dis 2024; 142:106966. [PMID: 38367953 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2024.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Various mechanisms, such as immune dysregulation, viral reservoir, and auto-immunity, are hypothesized to underlie the pathogenesis of long-term health problems after hospitalization for COVID-19. We aimed to assess the effect of in-hospital COVID-19 treatments on prominent long-term health problems. METHODS In this prospective multicenter cohort study, we enrolled patients (age ≥18 years) who had been hospitalized for COVID-19 in the Netherlands between July 2020 and October 2021. We retrospectively collected data on in-hospital COVID-19 treatments, including steroid, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral treatments. Patients completed questionnaires on self-reported recovery, dyspnea, fatigue, cognitive failures, and health-related quality of life and performed the 6-minute walk test at the 2-year follow-up visit. RESULTS Five hundred two patients with COVID-19 were included, all were discharged from the hospital between March 2020 and June 2021. The median age at admission was 60.0 (IQR 53.0-68.0) years and 350 (69.7%) patients were male. At hospital admission, 5/405 (1.2%) of the patients had been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Among all 502 patients, the majority (248 [49.4%]) received steroids only, 57 (11.4%) anti-inflammatory treatment, 78 (15.5%) antiviral treatment, and 119 (23.7%) none during hospitalization. Long-term health problems were common in all groups. We found that in-hospital treatments were not significantly associated with health problems at 2 years after hospital discharge, nor after adjusting for confounders. CONCLUSION Many patients with COVID-19 suffer from long-term health problems 2 years after hospital discharge. Acute treatment for COVID-19 is not associated with long-term health problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia C Berentschot
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - L Martine Bek
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Majanka H Heijenbrok-Kal
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Rijndam Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rita J G van den Berg-Emons
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard M Ribbers
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Rijndam Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Merel E Hellemons
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Kooten JP, Dietz MV, Dubbink HJ, Verhoef C, Aerts JGJV, Madsen EVE, von der Thüsen JH. Genomic characterization and detection of potential therapeutic targets for peritoneal mesothelioma in current practice. Clin Exp Med 2024; 24:80. [PMID: 38642130 PMCID: PMC11032274 DOI: 10.1007/s10238-024-01342-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
Peritoneal mesothelioma (PeM) is an aggressive tumor with limited treatment options. The current study aimed to evaluate the value of next generation sequencing (NGS) of PeM samples in current practice. Foundation Medicine F1CDx NGS was performed on 20 tumor samples. This platform assesses 360 commonly somatically mutated genes in solid tumors and provides a genomic signature. Based on the detected mutations, potentially effective targeted therapies were identified. NGS was successful in 19 cases. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was low in 10 cases, and 11 cases were microsatellite stable. In the other cases, TMB and microsatellite status could not be determined. BRCA1 associated protein 1 (BAP1) mutations were found in 32% of cases, cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B (CDKN2A/B) and neurofibromin 2 (NF2) mutations in 16%, and ataxia-telangiectasia mutated serine/threonine kinase (ATM) in 11%. Based on mutations in the latter two genes, potential targeted therapies are available for approximately a quarter of cases (i.e., protein kinase inhibitors for three NF2 mutated tumors, and polyADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors for two ATM mutated tumors). Extensive NGS analysis of PeM samples resulted in the identification of potentially effective targeted therapies for about one in four patients. Although these therapies are currently not available for patients with PeM, ongoing developments might result in new treatment options in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Job P van Kooten
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michelle V Dietz
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eva V E Madsen
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ernst SM, van Marion R, Atmodimedjo PN, de Jonge E, Mathijssen RHJ, Paats MS, de Bruijn P, Koolen SL, von der Thüsen JH, Aerts JGJV, van Schaik RHN, Dubbink HJ, Dingemans AMC. Clinical Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Advanced KRAS G12C-Mutated NSCLC Treated With Sotorasib. J Thorac Oncol 2024:S1556-0864(24)00165-5. [PMID: 38615940 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2024.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For patients with KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC who are treated with sotorasib, there is a lack of biomarkers to guide treatment decisions. We therefore investigated the clinical utility of pretreatment and on-treatment circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and treatment-emergent alterations on disease progression. METHODS Patients with KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC treated with sotorasib were prospectively enrolled in our biomarker study (NCT05221372). Plasma samples were collected before sotorasib treatment, at first-response evaluation and at disease progression. The TruSight Oncology 500 panel was used for ctDNA and variant allele frequency analysis. Tumor response and progression-free survival were assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. RESULTS Pretreatment KRASG12C ctDNA was detected in 50 of 66 patients (76%). Patients with detectable KRASG12C had inferior progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 2.13 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-4.30], p = 0.031) and overall survival (HR 2.61 [95% CI: 1.16-5.91], p = 0.017). At first-response evaluation (n = 40), 29 patients (73%) had a molecular response. Molecular nonresponders had inferior overall survival (HR 3.58 [95% CI: 1.65-7.74], p = 0.00059). The disease control rate was significantly higher in those with a molecular response (97% versus 64%, p = 0.015). KRAS amplifications were identified as recurrent treatment-emergent alterations. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest detectable pretreatment KRASG12C ctDNA as a marker for poor prognosis and on-treatment ctDNA clearance as a marker for treatment response. We identified KRAS amplifications as a potential recurring resistance mechanism to sotorasib. Identifying patients with superior prognosis could aid in optimizing time of treatment initiation, and identifying patients at risk of early progression could allow for earlier treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie M Ernst
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald van Marion
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peggy N Atmodimedjo
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evert de Jonge
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marthe S Paats
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter de Bruijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stijn L Koolen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan H von der Thüsen
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ron H N van Schaik
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrikus J Dubbink
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne-Marie C Dingemans
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Martin MV, Aguilar-Rosas S, Franke K, Pieterse M, van Langelaar J, Schreurs RR, Bijlsma MF, Besselink MG, Koster J, Timens W, Khasraw M, Ashley DM, Keir ST, Ottensmeier CH, King EV, Verheij J, Waasdorp C, Valk PJM, Engels SA, Oostenbach E, van Dinter JT, Hofman DA, Mok JY, van Esch WJE, Wilmink H, Monkhorst K, Verheul HMW, Poel D, Hiltermann TJN, van Kempen LC, Groen HJ, Aerts JGJV, van Heesch S, Lowenberg B, Plasterk R, Kloosterman WP. The neo-open reading frame peptides that comprise the tumor framome are a rich source of neoantigens for cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol Res 2024:742916. [PMID: 38573707 DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-23-0158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
Identification of immunogenic cancer neoantigens as targets for therapy is challenging. Here, we integrate cancer whole genome and long-read transcript sequencing to identify the collection of novel open reading frame peptides (NOPs) expressed in tumors, termed the framome. NOPs represent tumor-specific peptides that are different from wild-type proteins and may be strongly immunogenic. We describe an uncharacterized class of hidden NOPs, which derive from structural genomic variants involving an upstream protein coding gene driving expression and translation of non-coding regions of the genome downstream of a rearrangement breakpoint. NOPs represent a vast amount of possible neoantigens particularly in tumors with many (complex) structural genomic variants and a low number of missense mutations. We show that NOPs are immunogenic and epitopes derived from NOPs can bind to MHC class I molecules. Finally, we provide evidence for the presence of memory T-cells specific for hidden NOPs in lung cancer patient peripheral blood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Katka Franke
- CureVac Netherlands B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Maarten F Bijlsma
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Jan Koster
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NH, Netherlands
| | - Wim Timens
- University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Emma V King
- University Hospitals Dorset, Poole, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Sem Ag Engels
- The Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Ellen Oostenbach
- The Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jip T van Dinter
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Damon A Hofman
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Juk Yee Mok
- Sanquin Reagents, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Kim Monkhorst
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Dennis Poel
- Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - T Jeroen N Hiltermann
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Léon C van Kempen
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, I am not in the U.S. or Canada, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mfumbilwa ZA, Simons MJHG, Ramaekers B, Retèl VP, Mankor JM, Groen HJM, Aerts JGJV, Joore M, Wilschut JA, Coupé VMH. Exploring the Cost Effectiveness of a Whole-Genome Sequencing-Based Biomarker for Treatment Selection in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer Ineligible for Targeted Therapy. Pharmacoeconomics 2024; 42:419-434. [PMID: 38194023 PMCID: PMC10937799 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01344-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to perform an early cost-effectiveness analysis of using a whole-genome sequencing-based tumor mutation burden (WGS-TMB), instead of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), for immunotherapy treatment selection in patients with non-squamous advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer ineligible for targeted therapy, from a Dutch healthcare perspective. METHODS A decision-model simulating individual patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer was used to evaluate diagnostic strategies to select first-line immunotherapy only or the immunotherapy plus chemotherapy combination. Treatment was selected using PD-L1 [A, current practice], WGS-TMB [B], and both PD-L1 and WGS-TMB [C]. Strategies D, E, and F take into account a patient's disease burden, in addition to PD-L1, WGS-TMB, and both PD-L1 and WGS-TMB, respectively. Disease burden was defined as a fast-growing tumor, a high number of metastases, and/or weight loss. A threshold of 10 mutations per mega-base was used to classify patients into TMB-high and TMB-low groups. Outcomes were discounted quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and healthcare costs measured from the start of first-line treatment to death. Healthcare costs includes drug acquisition, follow-up costs, and molecular diagnostic tests (i.e., standard diagnostic techniques and/or WGS for strategies involving TMB). Results were reported using the net monetary benefit at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €80,000/QALY. Additional scenario and threshold analyses were performed. RESULTS Strategy B had the lowest QALYs (1.84) and lowest healthcare costs (€120,800). The highest QALYs and healthcare costs were 2.00 and €140,400 in strategy F. In the base-case analysis, strategy A was cost effective with the highest net monetary benefit (€27,300), followed by strategy B (€26,700). Strategy B was cost effective when the cost of WGS testing was decreased by at least 24% or when immunotherapy results in an additional 0.5 year of life gained or more for TMB high compared with TMB low. Strategies C and F, which combined TMB and PD-L1 had the highest net monetary benefit (≥ €76,900) when the cost of WGS testing, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy acquisition were simultaneously reduced by at least 47%, 39%, and 43%, respectively. Furthermore, strategy C resulted in the highest net monetary benefit (≥ €39,900) in a scenario where patients with both PD-L1 low and TMB low were treated with chemotherapy instead of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The use of WGS-TMB is not cost effective compared to PD-L1 for immunotherapy treatment selection in non-squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the Netherlands. WGS-TMB could become cost effective provided there is a reduction in the cost of WGS testing or there is an increase in the predictive value of WGS-TMB for immunotherapy effectiveness. Alternatively, a combination strategy of PD-L1 testing with WGS-TMB would be cost effective if used to support the choice to withhold immunotherapy in patients with a low expected benefit of immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zakile A Mfumbilwa
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Disease Modelling and Health Care Evaluation, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Methodology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania
| | - Martijn J H G Simons
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bram Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Valesca P Retèl
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne M Mankor
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harry J M Groen
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Manuela Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke A Wilschut
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Disease Modelling and Health Care Evaluation, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Methodology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Veerle M H Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Disease Modelling and Health Care Evaluation, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Public Health, Methodology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ernst SM, Hofman MM, van der Horst TE, Paats MS, Heijboer FWJ, Aerts JGJV, Dumoulin DW, Cornelissen R, von der Thüsen JH, de Bruijn P, Hoop EOD, Mathijssen RHJ, Koolen SLW, Dingemans AMC. Hepatotoxicity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with sotorasib after prior immunotherapy: a comprehensive clinical and pharmacokinetic analysis. EBioMedicine 2024; 102:105074. [PMID: 38507877 PMCID: PMC10960098 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sotorasib given after immunotherapy could put patients at increased risk of hepatotoxicity. Therefore, there is a need to gain insight into the potential correlation between anti-PD-(L)1 treatment, anti-PD-(L)1 concentrations, sotorasib concentrations, and the incidence of hepatotoxicity during sotorasib. METHODS Patients with KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC treated with sotorasib were prospectively enrolled in our biomarker cohort study (NCT05221372). Plasma samples were collected prior and during sotorasib treatment for anti-PD-1 and sotorasib concentrations. ALT/AST/ALP/GGT increases were collected prospectively and graded according to CTCAEv5.0. Severe hepatotoxicity was defined as grade ≥3 ALT/AST/ALP/GGT increase. FINDINGS Of the 91 included patients, 80 (88%) received prior anti-PD-(L)1. Prior anti-PD-(L)1 and prior immune-related hepatotoxicity were associated with a higher incidence of severe hepatotoxicity (35% versus 0%, p = 0.016 and 75% versus 31%, p = 0.019, respectively). Patients with an interval of ≤6 weeks between anti-PD-(L)1 and sotorasib (n = 18) had a significantly higher incidence of severe hepatotoxicity than those with a 6-12 week (n = 24) and ≥12 week (n = 38) interval (83% versus 33% versus 13%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Sotorasib trough concentrations did not differ significantly between those with or without severe hepatotoxicity (106 versus 126 ng/mL, p = 0.16). Pembrolizumab concentrations were higher in those with severe hepatotoxicity versus those without (25.6 versus 6.1 μg/mL, p < 0.0001). INTERPRETATION In this preliminary prospective study, sotorasib after PD-(L)1 blockade was associated with severe hepatotoxicity, especially in patients with a short interval between treatments, prior immune-related hepatitis and higher anti-PD-1 plasma concentrations. Our results suggest a minimum interval of 6 weeks between anti-PD-(L)1 and sotorasib to minimize the risk of hepatotoxicity. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie M Ernst
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike M Hofman
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands
| | - Tessa E van der Horst
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands
| | - Marthe S Paats
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands
| | - Frank W J Heijboer
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands
| | - Daphne W Dumoulin
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands
| | - Robin Cornelissen
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands
| | - Jan H von der Thüsen
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands
| | - Peter de Bruijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands
| | - Esther Oomen-de Hoop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands
| | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands
| | - Stijn L W Koolen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands; Department of Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands
| | - Anne-Marie C Dingemans
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Berentschot JC, de Ridder WA, Bek LM, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Braunstahl GJ, Remerie SC, Stuip Y, Ribbers GM, Aerts JGJV, Ista E, Hellemons ME, van den Berg-Emons RJG. Patients' evaluation of aftercare following hospitalization for COVID-19: satisfaction and unmet needs. Respir Res 2024; 25:145. [PMID: 38553722 PMCID: PMC10981299 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-024-02748-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient experiences with COVID-19 aftercare remain largely unknown. We evaluated COVID-19 aftercare from a patient perspective one year after hospitalization, assessing satisfaction and its associated factors, and unmet needs. METHODS The Satisfaction with COVID-19 Aftercare Questionnaire (SCAQ) was developed as part of a multicenter prospective cohort study and administered one year after hospital discharge. The SCAQ assesses (1) patient satisfaction, comprising information provision, rehabilitation, follow-up by hospitals and general practitioners (GPs), the most important aftercare topics, and overall satisfaction, and (2) unmet needs. RESULTS 487/561 (87%) COVID-19 patients completed the SCAQ, all had been discharged from the hospital between March 2020 and May 2021. Among responders, the median age of patients was 60 (IQR 54-67) years, 338 (69%) were male, and the median length of stay in the hospital was 13 (6-27) days. Patients were least satisfied with information on who could be contacted with questions when health problems arise (59% satisfied or very satisfied). Many patients (75%) received rehabilitation, most frequently community-based (70%). Across the different community-based therapies, ≥ 60% of patients were satisfied with shared-decision making and ≥ 70% with the received therapy; a majority (≥ 79%) indicated a preference for receiving the same therapy again if needed. Regarding follow-up by hospitals, 86% of patients received this follow-up, most frequently visiting a pulmonologist (96%), being generally satisfied with the received aftercare. Aftercare from GPs was received by 39% of patients, with 88% being satisfied with the GP's availability and 79% with referral to appropriate aftercare providers. Patients (> 50%) considered information-related items most important in aftercare. Overall, patients rated their satisfaction with aftercare 8/10 (7-9) points. Those who received medical rehabilitation (versus no rehabilitation, adjusted beta 0.61 [95%CI 0.11 to 1.11], p = 0.02) or aftercare by a hospital medical specialist (1.1 [0.46 to 1.64], p < 0.001) or GP (0.39 [0.053 to 0.72], p = 0.023) reported significantly higher satisfaction than those without such aftercare. Unmet needs were reported by 35% of patients, with lack of information (20%) and lack of additional aftercare and/or involvement of their GP (19%) being the most frequently reported. CONCLUSION Despite the forced quick development of COVID-19 aftercare, patients were generally satisfied. Follow-up by healthcare professionals and information provision is important to meet patients' aftercare needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia C Berentschot
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Willemijn A de Ridder
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Hand and Wrist Center, Xpert Clinics, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Center for Hand Therapy, Xpert Handtherapie, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - L Martine Bek
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Majanka H Heijenbrok-Kal
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Rijndam Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gert-Jan Braunstahl
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Yvonne Stuip
- Zorghoek Bergschenhoek, Bergschenhoek, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard M Ribbers
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Rijndam Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erwin Ista
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nursing Science, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Departments of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Division of Pediatric Intensive Care, Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Merel E Hellemons
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rita J G van den Berg-Emons
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dammeijer F, Dumoulin DW, Aerts JGJV. Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Bispecific Antibodies: Using Nunchucks to Fight an Old Adversary. J Thorac Oncol 2024; 19:366-369. [PMID: 38453322 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Floris Dammeijer
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daphne W Dumoulin
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van Eijck CWF, Strijk G, Vietsch EE, van der Sijde F, Verheij M, Mustafa DAM, Vink M, Aerts JGJV, van Eijck CHJ, Willemsen M. FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy modulates the peripheral immune landscape in pancreatic cancer: Implications for combination therapies and early response prediction. Eur J Cancer 2024; 196:113440. [PMID: 37988843 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy has improved outcomes for pancreatic cancer patients, but poor long-term survival outcomes and high toxicity remain challenges. This study investigates the impact of FOLFIRINOX on plasma proteins and peripheral immune cells to guide immune-based combination therapies and, ideally, to identify a potential biomarker to predict early disease progression during FOLFIRINOX. METHODS Blood samples were collected from 86 pancreatic cancer patients before and two weeks after the first FOLFIRINOX cycle and subjected to comprehensive immune cell and proteome profiling. Principal Component Analysis and Linear Mixed Effect Regression models were used for data analysis. FOLFIRINOX efficacy was radiologically evaluated after the fourth cycle. RESULTS One cycle of FOLFIRINOX diminished tumour-cell-related pathways and enhanced pathways related to immune activation, illustrated by an increase in pro-inflammatory IL-18, IL-15, and TNFRSF4. Similarly, FOLFIRINOX promoted the activation of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells, the proliferation of NK(T), and the activation of antigen-presenting cells. Furthermore, high pre-treatment levels of VEGFA and PRDX3 and an elevation in FCRL3 levels after one cycle predicted early progression under FOLFIRINOX. Finally, patients with progressive disease exhibited high levels of inhibitory markers on B cells and CD8 + T cells, while responding patients exhibited high levels of activation markers on CD4 + and CD8 + T cell subsets. CONCLUSION FOLFIRINOX has immunomodulatory effects, providing a foundation for clinical trials exploring immune-based combination therapies that harness the immune system to treat pancreatic cancer. In addition, several plasma proteins hold potential as circulating predictive biomarkers for early prediction of FOLFIRINOX response in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casper W F van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gaby Strijk
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eveline E Vietsch
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Fleur van der Sijde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike Verheij
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dana A M Mustafa
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Madelief Vink
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marcella Willemsen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Belderbos RA, Corneth OBJ, Dumoulin D, Hendriks RW, Aerts JGJV, Willemsen M. Atypical B cells (CD21-CD27-IgD-) correlate with lack of response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy in NSCLC. Eur J Cancer 2024; 196:113428. [PMID: 38039777 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Checkpoint inhibitor (CI) therapy has revolutionized treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, a proportion of patients do not respond to CI therapy for unknown reasons. Although the current paradigm in anti-tumor immunity evolves around T cells, the presence of tertiary lymphoid structures and memory B cells has been positively correlated with response to CI therapy in NSCLC. In addition, double negative (DN) (CD27- IgD-) B cells have been shown to be abundant in NSCLC compared to healthy lung tissue and inversely correlate with the intratumoral presence of memory B cells. Nonetheless, no study has correlated DN B cells to survival in NSCLC. METHODS In this study, we evaluated the presence and phenotype of B cells in peripheral blood with flow cytometry of patients with NSCLC and mesothelioma before receiving CI therapy and correlated these with clinical outcome. RESULTS Non-responding patients showed decreased frequencies of B cells, yet increased frequencies of antigen-experienced CD21- DN (Atypical) B cells compared to responding patients and HC, which was confirmed in patients with mesothelioma treated with CI therapy. CONCLUSIONS These data show that the frequency of CD21- DN B cells correlates with lack of response to CI therapy in thoracic malignancies. The mechanism by which CD21- DN B cells hamper CI therapy remains unknown. Our findings support the hypothesis that CD21- DN B cells resemble phenotypically identical exhausted B cells that are seen in chronic infection or function as antigen presenting cells that induce regulatory T cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R A Belderbos
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | - D Dumoulin
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R W Hendriks
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, the Netherlands
| | - J G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - M Willemsen
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dumoulin DW, Douma LH, Hofman MM, van der Noort V, Cornelissen R, de Gooijer CJ, Burgers JA, Aerts JGJV. Nivolumab and ipilimumab in the real-world setting in patients with mesothelioma. Lung Cancer 2024; 187:107440. [PMID: 38104353 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Nivolumab (anti-PD-1) plus ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) is a new first-line treatment combination for patients with pleural mesothelioma. Nivolumab-ipilimumab improved the survival, however, 30.3% of the patients suffered from grade 3-4 treatment related adverse events (TRAE's) and TRAE's led to discontinuation in 23.0% of all patients. Here, we present the first real-world data of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with malignant mesothelioma treated in two mesothelioma expert centers. METHODS Clinical data of patients with mesothelioma treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab were prospectively collected. Clinical parameters were obtained every visit, CT scans were evaluated every 12 weeks and adverse events were assessed continuously during the treatment. Data on grade 2-5 TRAE's and activity (overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were reported. RESULTS Between January 2021 and August 2022, 184 patients were treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. The median follow-up was 12.1 months (95 %CI 11.1 - 13.1). Grade 3-4 TRAEs were seen in 27.7 % of the patients and 25.0 % discontinued immunotherapy treatment early because of TRAE's. ORR was 21.7 % (95 % CI 15.7-27.7), median DOR was 5.7 months (IQR 3.2-8.7) and DCR at 12 weeks 56.0 % (95 % CI 48.8-63.2). The mPFS was 5.5 months (95 %CI 4.1-6.9), mOS was 14.1 months (95 % CI 11.1-18.2). CONCLUSIONS Nivolumab plus ipilimumab had an equal efficacy in a real-world comparable population but also a high risk of TRAE's, leading to discontinuation of treatment in 25% of the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D W Dumoulin
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - L H Douma
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M M Hofman
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - V van der Noort
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R Cornelissen
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C J de Gooijer
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J A Burgers
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kwee AKAL, Luijk B, de Jong PA, Groen HJM, Aerts JGJV, Charbonnier JP, Vliegenthart R, Mohamed Hoesein FAA. Bronchiectasis is associated with lower lung function in lung cancer screening participants. Eur Radiol 2023:10.1007/s00330-023-10361-4. [PMID: 37950082 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10361-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Bronchiectasis is a frequent incidental finding on chest computed tomography (CT), but its relevance in lung cancer screening is not fully understood. We investigated the association between bronchiectasis and respiratory symptoms, pulmonary function, and emphysema in lung cancer screening participants with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS We included 3260 (ex-)smokers from the Dutch-Belgian lung cancer screening trial (NELSON). Bronchiectasis was scored by chest radiologists. The relationship with pulmonary function (FEV1%predicted, FEV1/FVC), respiratory complaints (cough, dyspnea, wheezing, mucus hypersecretion), and CT-quantified emphysema (15th percentile) was examined with independent t-tests and multivariate regression. RESULTS Bronchiectasis was present in 5.4% (n = 175/3260). There was no difference in prevalence between subjects with and without COPD (68/1121 [5.9%] vs. 109/2139 [5.1%]; p = .368). COPD subjects with bronchiectasis had a lower FEV1%predicted (76.2% vs. 85.0%; p < .001), lower FEV1/FVC (0.58 vs. 0.62; p < .001), and more emphysema (- 938 HU vs. - 930 HU; p = .001) than COPD subjects without bronchiectasis. In COPD subjects, bronchiectasis was independently associated with a lower FEV1%predicted (B = - 7.7; CI [- 12.3, - 3.3]), lower FEV1/FVC (B = - 2.5; CI [- 4.3, - 0.8]), more cough (OR 2.4; CI [1.3, 4.3]), more mucus hypersecretion (OR 1.8; CI [1.0, 3.1]) and more dyspnea (OR 2.3; CI [1.3, 3.9]). In those without COPD (n = 2139), bronchiectasis was associated with more cough, mucus hypersecretion, and wheezing, but not with deteriorating lung function. CONCLUSION Bronchiectasis was present in 5.4% of our lung cancer screening participants and was associated with more respiratory symptoms and, in those with COPD, with lower lung function and more emphysema. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT In a lung cancer screening population, bronchiectasis has a prevalence of 5.4% with a mainly mild severity. This finding is of little clinical relevance unless mild COPD is also present. In those subjects, bronchiectasis was associated with a lower lung function, more respiratory symptoms, and more emphysema. KEY POINTS • Bronchiectasis was found in 5.4% of lung cancer screening participants, consisting of (ex-)smokers with and without mild COPD. • In those with mild COPD, bronchiectasis was associated with a lower lung function, more respiratory symptoms, and more emphysema. • Incidental findings of mild bronchiectasis are not very relevant in a lung cancer screening population, unless COPD is also present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia K A L Kwee
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Bart Luijk
- Department of Pulmonology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pim A de Jong
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Harry J M Groen
- Department of Pulmonology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Berentschot JC, Drexhage HA, Aynekulu Mersha DG, Wijkhuijs AJM, GeurtsvanKessel CH, Koopmans MPG, Voermans JJC, Hendriks RW, Nagtzaam NMA, de Bie M, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Bek LM, Ribbers GM, van den Berg-Emons RJG, Aerts JGJV, Dik WA, Hellemons ME. Immunological profiling in long COVID: overall low grade inflammation and T-lymphocyte senescence and increased monocyte activation correlating with increasing fatigue severity. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1254899. [PMID: 37881427 PMCID: PMC10597688 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1254899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Many patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection develop long COVID with fatigue as one of the most disabling symptoms. We performed clinical and immune profiling of fatigued and non-fatigued long COVID patients and age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). Methods Long COVID symptoms were assessed using patient-reported outcome measures, including the fatigue assessment scale (FAS, scores ≥22 denote fatigue), and followed up to one year after hospital discharge. We assessed inflammation-related genes in circulating monocytes, serum levels of inflammation-regulating cytokines, and leukocyte and lymphocyte subsets, including major monocyte subsets and senescent T-lymphocytes, at 3-6 months post-discharge. Results We included 37 fatigued and 36 non-fatigued long COVID patients and 42 HCs. Fatigued long COVID patients represented a more severe clinical profile than non-fatigued patients, with many concurrent symptoms (median 9 [IQR 5.0-10.0] vs 3 [1.0-5.0] symptoms, p<0.001), and signs of cognitive failure (41%) and depression (>24%). Immune abnormalities that were found in the entire group of long COVID patients were low grade inflammation (increased inflammatory gene expression in monocytes, increased serum pro-inflammatory cytokines) and signs of T-lymphocyte senescence (increased exhausted CD8+ TEMRA-lymphocytes). Immune profiles did not significantly differ between fatigued and non-fatigued long COVID groups. However, the severity of fatigue (total FAS score) significantly correlated with increases of intermediate and non-classical monocytes, upregulated gene levels of CCL2, CCL7, and SERPINB2 in monocytes, increases in serum Galectin-9, and higher CD8+ T-lymphocyte counts. Conclusion Long COVID with fatigue is associated with many concurrent and persistent symptoms lasting up to one year after hospitalization. Increased fatigue severity associated with stronger signs of monocyte activation in long COVID patients and potentially point in the direction of monocyte-endothelial interaction. These abnormalities were present against a background of immune abnormalities common to the entire group of long COVID patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia C. Berentschot
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hemmo A. Drexhage
- Department of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Marion P. G. Koopmans
- Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jolanda J. C. Voermans
- Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Rudi W. Hendriks
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nicole M. A. Nagtzaam
- Laboratory Medical Immunology, Department of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Bie
- Laboratory Medical Immunology, Department of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Majanka H. Heijenbrok-Kal
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Rijndam Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - L. Martine Bek
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Gerard M. Ribbers
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Rijndam Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Joachim G. J. V. Aerts
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Willem A. Dik
- Laboratory Medical Immunology, Department of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Merel E. Hellemons
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bek LM, Berentschot JC, Hellemons ME, Remerie SC, van Bommel J, Aerts JGJV, Ribbers GM, van den Berg-Emons HJG, Heijenbrok-Kal MH. Return to work and health-related quality of life up to 1 year in patients hospitalized for COVID-19: the CO-FLOW study. BMC Med 2023; 21:380. [PMID: 37784149 PMCID: PMC10546751 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03083-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, evidence about the long-term consequences of COVID-19 on return to work and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is limited. We evaluated return to work and its associations with baseline characteristics and physical and mental recovery over time in patients up to 1 year after hospitalization for COVID-19. Secondly, we aimed to evaluate the association between return to work and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS CO-FLOW, a multicenter prospective cohort study, enrolled adult participants hospitalized for COVID-19, aged ≥ 18 years within 6 months after hospital discharge. Return to work and HRQoL were collected at 3, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge using the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, respectively. Data were collected between July 1, 2020, and September 1, 2022. Generalized estimating equations with repeated measurements were used to assess outcomes over time. RESULTS In the CO-FLOW study, 371 participants were employed pre-hospitalization. At 3, 6, and 12 months post-discharge, 50% (170/342), 29% (92/317), and 15% (44/295) of participants had not returned to work, and 21% (71/342), 21% (65/317), and 16% (48/295) only partially, respectively. ICU admission (adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.17 (0.10 to 0.30), p < 0.001), persistent fatigue (0.93 (0.90 to 0.97), p < 0.001), female sex (0.57 (0.36 to 0.90), p = 0.017), and older age (0.96 (0.93 to 0.98), p < 0.001) were independently associated with no return to work. ICU patients required a longer time to return to work than non-ICU patients. Patients who did not return or partially returned to work reported lower scores on all domains of HRQoL than those who fully returned. CONCLUSIONS One year after hospitalization for COVID-19, only 69% of patients fully returned to work, whereas 15% did not return and 16% partially returned to work. No or partial return to work was associated with reduced HRQoL. This study suggests that long-term vocational support might be needed to facilitate return to work. TRIAL REGISTRATION World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform NL8710.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Bek
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - J C Berentschot
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M E Hellemons
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S C Remerie
- Rijndam Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J van Bommel
- Department of Adult Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J G J V Aerts
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G M Ribbers
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Rijndam Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H J G van den Berg-Emons
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M H Heijenbrok-Kal
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Rijndam Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wijbenga N, Muller MM, Hoek RAS, Mathot BJ, Seghers L, Aerts JGJV, de Winter BCM, Bos D, Manintveld OC, Hellemons ME. Diagnostic accuracy of eNose 'breathprints' for therapeutic drug monitoring of Tacrolimus trough levels in lung transplantation. J Breath Res 2023; 17:046010. [PMID: 37582348 DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/acf066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
In order to prevent long-term immunity-related complications after lung transplantation, close monitoring of immunosuppressant levels using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is paramount. Novel electronic nose (eNose) technology may be a non-invasive alternative to the current invasive procedures for TDM. We investigated the diagnostic and categorization capacity of eNose breathprints for Tacrolimus trough blood plasma levels (TACtrough) in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). We performed eNose measurements in stable LTR attending the outpatient clinic. We evaluated (1) the correlation between eNose measurements and TACtrough, (2) the diagnostic capacity of eNose technology for TACtrough, and (3) the accuracy of eNose technology for categorization of TACtroughinto three clinically relevant categories (low: <7µg ml-1, medium: 7-10µg ml-1, and high: >10µg ml-1). A total of 186 measurements from 86 LTR were included. There was a weak but statistically significant correlation (r= 0.21,p= 0.004) between the eNose measurements and TACtrough. The root mean squared error of prediction for the diagnostic capacity was 3.186 in the training and 3.131 in the validation set. The accuracy of categorization ranged between 45%-63% for the training set and 52%-69% in the validation set. There is a weak correlation between eNose breathprints and TACtroughin LTR. However, the diagnostic as well as categorization capacity for TACtroughusing eNose breathprints is too inaccurate to be applicable in TDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nynke Wijbenga
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein M Muller
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Educational program Technical Medicine; Leiden University Medical Center, Delft University of Technology & Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier A S Hoek
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas J Mathot
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonard Seghers
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brenda C M de Winter
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Bos
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier C Manintveld
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Merel E Hellemons
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dumoulin DW, Aarts MJ, De Ruysscher D, Aerts JGJV, Dingemans AMC. Trends in the epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer: a Dutch nationwide population-based study over 1989-2020. Eur J Cancer 2023; 191:112985. [PMID: 37524025 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.112985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study describes the evolving characteristics of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) from 1989 to 2020 in the Netherlands to analyse how the population of patients with SCLC has changed in the last decades, hypothesising that this might explain the little progress made in SCLC. METHODS Patients with SCLC diagnosed from 1989 to 2020 were selected from the Dutch cancer registry. Incidence, patient and disease characteristics, treatments, and overall survival (OS) were analysed. Joinpoint analyses were used to test annual percentage changes for statistical significance. RESULTS A total of 52,527 patients were diagnosed with SCLC. The absolute numbers of patients with SCLC remained equal over the years; however, the incidence rates decreased from 15.01 to 8.93 per 100,000 person-years. The proportion of women increased from 22% to 50%, and those aged ≥75 years increased from 20% to 25%. The latter coincided with a higher proportion receiving only the best supportive care (BSC) over the years (18-24%). The use of surgery in stage I increased from 2% to 37%. The proportion of patients diagnosed with stage IV increased from 46% to 70% due to better staging. The OS improved for all stages, with a 2-year OS rate for stage IV doubling from 3% to 6%. CONCLUSION The incidence of SCLC has significantly decreased over the last 30 years, with an increasing proportion of elderly and women. The male-female ratio became similar, and the OS improved. As a consequence of more elderly and probably more vulnerable patients, more patients received only the BSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne W Dumoulin
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Mieke J Aarts
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Department of Research and Development, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne-Marie C Dingemans
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dietz MV, Quintelier KLA, van Kooten JP, de Boer NL, Vink M, Brandt-Kerkhof ARM, Verhoef C, Saeys Y, Aerts JGJV, Willemsen M, Van Gassen S, Madsen EVE. Adjuvant dendritic cell-based immunotherapy after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a phase II clinical trial. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:e007070. [PMID: 37536940 PMCID: PMC10401259 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) improves survival outcomes, but recurrence rates remain high. Dendritic cell-based immunotherapy (DCBI) showed promising results in patients with pleural mesothelioma. The primary aim of this trial was to determine feasibility of adjuvant DCBI after CRS-HIPEC. METHODS This open-label, single-center, phase II clinical trial, performed in the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam, the Netherlands, included patients with epithelioid MPM. 4-6 weeks before CRS-HIPEC leukapheresis was performed. 8-10 weeks after surgery, DCBI was administered three times biweekly. Feasibility was defined as administration of at least three adjuvant vaccinations in 75% of patients. Comprehensive immune cell profiling was performed on peripheral blood samples prior to and during treatment. RESULTS All patients who received CRS-HIPEC (n=16) were successfully treated with adjuvant DCBI. No severe toxicity related to DCBI was observed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12 months (IQR 5-23) and median overall survival was not reached. DCBI was associated with increased proliferation of circulating natural killer cells and CD4+ T-helper (Th) cells. Co-stimulatory molecules, including ICOS, HLA-DR, and CD28 were upregulated predominantly on memory or proliferating Th-cells and minimally on CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) after treatment. However, an increase in CD8+ terminally differentiated effector memory (Temra) cells positively correlated with PFS, whereas co-expression of ICOS and Ki67 on CTLs trended towards a positive correlation. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant DCBI after CRS-HIPEC in patients with MPM was feasible and safe, and showed promising survival outcomes. DCBI had an immune modulatory effect on lymphoid cells and induced memory T-cell activation. Moreover, an increase of CD8+ Temra cells was more pronounced in patients with longer PFS. These data provide rationale for future combination treatment strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NTR7060; Dutch Trial Register (NTR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle V Dietz
- Department of Surgical oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katrien L A Quintelier
- Data Mining and Modeling for Biomedicine Group, VIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research Elewaut Unit Molecular Immunology and Inflammatory Unit, Gent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Job P van Kooten
- Department of Surgical oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nadine L de Boer
- Department of Surgical oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Madelief Vink
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yvan Saeys
- Data Mining and Modeling for Biomedicine Group, VIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research Elewaut Unit Molecular Immunology and Inflammatory Unit, Gent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Marcella Willemsen
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Sofie Van Gassen
- Data Mining and Modeling for Biomedicine Group, VIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research Elewaut Unit Molecular Immunology and Inflammatory Unit, Gent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Eva V E Madsen
- Department of Surgical oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
van der Veer T, de Koning Gans JM, Braunstahl GJ, Pieters ALP, van den Berg JMW, Hoek RAS, Kamphuis LSJ, Bakker M, Dubois AVF, Aerts JGJV, van der Eerden MM. The effect of beclomethasone-formoterol versus placebo on chronic cough in patients with non-CF bronchiectasis: the FORZA randomised controlled trial. Eur Respir J 2023; 61:2300186. [PMID: 37263749 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00186-2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tjeerd van der Veer
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Shared first authorship
| | - Johanna Margaretha de Koning Gans
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Shared first authorship
| | - Gerrit J Braunstahl
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Rogier A S Hoek
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Bravis Hospital, Bergen op Zoom, The Netherlands
| | - Lieke S J Kamphuis
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marleen Bakker
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alain V F Dubois
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Admiraal De Ruyter Ziekenhuis, Goes, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ten Berge DMHJ, Damhuis RAM, Aerts JGJV, Dingemans AMC. Real-world treatment patterns and survival of patients with ROS1 rearranged stage IV non-squamous NSCLC in the Netherlands. Lung Cancer 2023; 181:107253. [PMID: 37236088 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rearrangement of c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) is a rare gene alteration in patients with stage IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Molecular testing for ROS1 is recommended to enable primary treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Aim of this study was to describe real-world treatment patterns and survival for patients with ROS1 in the Netherlands. METHODS All non-squamous NSCLC stage IV patients, diagnosed 2015-2019, were identified from the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry (N = 19,871). For patients with ROS1 rearrangements (ROS1+ ) who received first line TKI, additional information about progression and second-line treatment was retrieved by active follow-up. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimators. RESULTS A total of 67 patients (0.43%) were diagnosed with a ROS1+ NSCLC. Systemic treatment was administered in 75% which was most often TKI (n = 34) followed by chemotherapy (n = 14). Two-year OS for patients receiving upfront TKI versus other systemic treatment was 53% (95% CI 35-68) and 50% (95% CI 25-71), respectively. For patients receiving TKI, median OS was 24.3 months. Survival was inferior in case of brain metastasis (BM) at diagnosis (5.2 months). One in five patients receiving TKI as a first line treatment had BM at diagnosis, of the remaining 22 another 9 developed BM during follow up. PFS was also inferior for patients with BM at diagnosis with a median PFS of 4.3 months versus 9.0 without BM. CONCLUSION In this real-world population of ROS1+ NSCLC patients, only half received primary treatment with TKI. Overall survival and PFS during TKI were disappointing, mainly related to brain metastasis. TKI treatment with agents that have intra-cranial activity may be beneficial in this patient population and our results confirm the importance of performing an MRI of the brain as part of the standard diagnostic work up in patients with ROS1+ NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deirdre M H J Ten Berge
- Dept. of Radiology, ADRZ, 's-Gravenpolderseweg 114, 4462 RA Goes, the Netherlands; Dept. of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald A M Damhuis
- Dept. of Research and Development, Netherlands Cancer Registry, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Dept. of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne-Marie C Dingemans
- Dept. of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Steendam CMJ, Ernst SM, Badrising SK, Paats MS, Aerts JGJV, de Langen AJ, Dingemans AMC. Chemotherapy for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC after progression on EGFR-TKI's: Exploration of efficacy of unselected treatment in a multicenter cohort study. Lung Cancer 2023; 181:107248. [PMID: 37216839 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung (NSCLC) chemotherapy remains standard of care after progression on EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). With the development of anti-angiogenic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors the landscape of systemic regimens has changed significantly. This cohort study aims to evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy regimens after progression on EGFR-TKI in a European population. MATERIAL AND METHODS All consecutive patients treated with chemotherapy after progression on EGFR-TKI for EGFR-mutated NSCLC, were identified in two tertiary centers in the Netherlands. Data on best response, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were extracted from medical records. RESULTS In total, 171 lines of chemotherapy were identified: platinum/pemetrexed (PP, n = 95), carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab/atezolizumab (CPBA, n = 32), paclitaxel/bevacizumab (PB, n = 36) and carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab (CPB, n = 8). Of the 171 lines, 106 were given as first-line after EGFR-TKI. Median PFS did not differ significantly between the first-line regimens (p = 0.50), with the highest PFS in PP (5.2 months [95% CI 4.5-5.9]) and CPBA (5.9 months [95% CI 3.8-80]). The majority of the PB group (n = 32) received this regimen in a second- or later line with a median PFS of 4.9 months (95% CI 3.3-6.6). First-line regimens had a median OS of 15.3 months (95% CI 11.6-18.9) with no significant difference between regimens (p = 0.85). CONCLUSION After progression on EGFR-TKI, patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC show substantial benefit on different chemotherapy regimens. In particular, favorable outcomes were seen in patients treated with PP and CPBA as first-line chemotherapy, and PB in further lines of chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christi M J Steendam
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sophie M Ernst
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sushil K Badrising
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marthe S Paats
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Adrianus J de Langen
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Anne-Marie C Dingemans
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cantini L, Paoloni F, Pecci F, Spagnolo F, Genova C, Tanda ET, Aerts S, Rebuzzi SE, Fornarini G, Zoratto F, Fancelli S, Lupi A, Della Corte CM, Parisi A, Bennati C, Ortega C, Atzori F, Piovano PL, Orciuolo C, De Tursi M, Ghidini M, Botticelli A, Scagnoli S, Belluomini L, Leporati R, Veccia A, Di Giacomo AM, Festino L, Cortinovis D, Acquati M, Filetti M, Giusti R, Tucci M, Sergi MC, Garutti M, Puglisi F, Manglaviti S, Citarella F, Santoni M, Rijavec E, Lo Russo G, Santini D, Addeo A, Antonuzzo L, Indini A, Rocchi MBL, Cortellini A, Grossi F, Ascierto PA, Aerts JGJV, Berardi R. Safety of Extended interval Dosing Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: a multicentre cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023:7115841. [PMID: 37042716 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-life spectrum and survival implications of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients treated with extended interval dosing (ED) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are unknown. METHODS Characteristics of 812 consecutive solid cancer patients who received at least one cycle of ED monotherapy (pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6W or nivolumab 480 mg Q4W) after switching from canonical interval dosing (CD, pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W or nivolumab 240 mg Q2W) or upfront were retrieved. Primary objective was to compare irAEs patterns within the same population (before and after switch to ED). irAEs spectrum in patients treated upfront with ED and association between irAEs and overall survival (OS) were also described. RESULTS 550 (68%) patients started ICIs with CD and switched to ED. During CD, 225 pts (41%) developed any grade and 17 (3%) G3/G4 irAEs; after switching to ED, any grade and G3/G4 irAEs were experienced by 155 (36%) and 20 (5%) patients. Switching to ED was associated with a lower probability of any grade irAEs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.64-0.99; p=.047), while no difference for G3/G4 events was noted (aOR: 1.55; 95% CI: 0.81-2.94; p=.18). Among patients who started upfront with ED (n = 232, 32%), 107 (41%) developed any grade and 14 (5%) G3/G4 irAEs during ED. Patients with irAEs during ED had improved OS (aHR: 0.53; 95% CI 0.34-0.82; p=.004 after switching; aHR: 0.57; 95% CI 0.35-0.93; p=.025 upfront). CONCLUSIONS Switching ICI treatment from CD and ED did not increase the incidence of irAEs and represents a safe option also outside clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Cantini
- Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Labcorp Drug Development Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Francesco Paoloni
- Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Federica Pecci
- Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Francesco Spagnolo
- Medical Oncology Unit 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Carlo Genova
- Academic Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Italy
| | - Enrica Teresa Tanda
- Medical Oncology Unit 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Sophie Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sara Elena Rebuzzi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Italy
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fornarini
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Sara Fancelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Clinical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessio Lupi
- Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Parisi
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Chiara Bennati
- S Maria delle Croci Hospital, AUSL della Romagna, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Cinzia Ortega
- Oncology, Asl Cn2, Ospedale Michele e Pietro Ferrero, Verduno, Italy
| | - Francesco Atzori
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Pier Luigi Piovano
- Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera "SS. Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo", Alessandria, Italy
| | | | - Michele De Tursi
- Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy
| | - Michele Ghidini
- Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Andrea Botticelli
- Medical Oncology Unit A, Policlinico Umberto I, Radiological, Oncological, Pathological Sciences Department Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo Belluomini
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Rita Leporati
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Antonello Veccia
- Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Largo Medaglie d'Oro 1, Trento, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Di Giacomo
- University of Siena, Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Lucia Festino
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Marco Filetti
- Phase 1 Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Marco Tucci
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Sergi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy
| | - Mattia Garutti
- CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Fabio Puglisi
- CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Sara Manglaviti
- Thoracic Unit, Medical Oncology Department 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Citarella
- Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Erika Rijavec
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, asst Settelaghi, Varese, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lo Russo
- Thoracic Unit, Medical Oncology Department 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- UOC Oncologia Medica Territoriale, Sapienza Università, Polo Pontino, Rome, Italy
| | - Alfredo Addeo
- Oncology department, University Hospital Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lorenzo Antonuzzo
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Clinical Oncology Unit, and Medical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Alice Indini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, asst Settelaghi, Varese, Italy
| | | | - Alessio Cortellini
- Division of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Francesco Grossi
- Medical oncology Unit, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, asst Settelaghi, University of insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Paolo Antonio Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
van Kooten JP, de Gooijer CJ, von der Thüsen JH, Brandt-Kerkhof ARM, Albers AGJ, Lahaye MJ, Monkhorst K, Burgers JA, Aerts JGJV, Verhoef C, Madsen EVE. Impact of centralization of care for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: A historical cohort study from the Dutch mesothelioma expert centers. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:611-618. [PMID: 36610896 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive cancer that has a poor prognosis. An earlier population-based study found that the majority of Dutch patients do not receive anti-cancer treatment. In 2015, Dutch Malignant Mesothelioma care was centralized in two expert centers. We reviewed treatment patterns at these centers, to assess the impact of centralization of MPM care in the Netherlands. METHODS Data from all patients referred to the Dutch MPM expert centers from 2014 to 2020, were retrospectively collected. Descriptive statistics regarding referrals, patient and tumor characteristics, and treatment patterns were provided. Population-based incidence rates were provided by the Netherlands Cancer Registry. RESULTS From 2014 to 2020, 78 patients were referred to the Dutch Mesothelioma expert centers, of whom 32 were female (41%). From 2014 to 2017, 27 patients were referred, whereas 51 patients were referred from 2018 to 2020. This represents about 24% and 61% of the estimated population incidence, respectively. Treatment patterns were comparable between both periods. Between 2014 and 2018, 33% of patients underwent surgery, 44% systemic therapy, and 22% received best supportive care (BSC), while this was 29%, 37%, and 33% respectively from 2018 to 2020. CONCLUSION Centralization of care for patients with MPM resulted in an increase of annual referrals to the Dutch mesothelioma expert centers. While population-based incidence did not change during the study period, the absolute number of patients receiving treatment at our centers did increase. This might be considered a first important step towards better treatment for patients with this fatal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Job P van Kooten
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Cornedine J de Gooijer
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Alexandra R M Brandt-Kerkhof
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arend G J Albers
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kim Monkhorst
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jacobus A Burgers
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eva V E Madsen
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wijbenga N, Hoek RAS, Mathot BJ, Seghers L, Moor CC, Aerts JGJV, Bos D, Manintveld OC, Hellemons ME. Diagnostic performance of electronic nose technology in chronic lung allograft dysfunction. J Heart Lung Transplant 2023; 42:236-245. [PMID: 36283951 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a need for reliable biomarkers for the diagnosis of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). In this light, we investigated the diagnostic value of exhaled breath analysis using an electronic nose (eNose) for CLAD, CLAD phenotype, and CLAD stage in lung transplant recipients (LTR). METHODS We performed eNose measurements in LTR with and without CLAD, visiting the outpatient clinic. Through supervised machine learning, the diagnostic value of eNose for CLAD was assessed in a random training and validation set. Next, we investigated the diagnostic value of the eNose measurements combined with known risk factors for CLAD. Model performance was evaluated using ROC-analysis. RESULTS We included 152 LTR (median age 60 years, 49% females), of whom 38 with CLAD. eNose-based classification of patients with and without CLAD provided an AUC of 0.86 in the training set, and 0.82 in the validation set. After adding established risk factors for CLAD (age, gender, type of transplantation, time after transplantation and prior occurrence of acute cellular rejection) to a model with the eNose data, the discriminative ability of the model improved to an AUC of 0.94 (p = 0.02) in the training set and 0.94 (p = 0.04) in the validation set. Discrimination between BOS and RAS was good (AUC 0.95). Discriminative ability for other phenotypes (AUCs ranging 0.50-0.92) or CLAD stages (AUC 0.56) was limited. CONCLUSION Exhaled breath analysis using eNose is a promising novel biomarker for enabling diagnosis and phenotyping CLAD. eNose technology could be a valuable addition to the diagnostic armamentarium for suspected graft failure in LTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nynke Wijbenga
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier A S Hoek
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas J Mathot
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonard Seghers
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Catharina C Moor
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Bos
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier C Manintveld
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Merel E Hellemons
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ernst SM, Mankor JM, van Riet J, von der Thüsen JH, Dubbink HJ, Aerts JGJV, de Langen AJ, Smit EF, Dingemans AMC, Monkhorst K. Tobacco Smoking-Related Mutational Signatures in Classifying Smoking-Associated and Nonsmoking-Associated NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 2022; 18:487-498. [PMID: 36528243 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.11.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient-reported smoking history is frequently used as a stratification factor in NSCLC-directed clinical research. Nevertheless, this classification does not fully reflect the mutational processes in a tumor. Next-generation sequencing can identify mutational signatures associated with tobacco smoking, such as single-base signature 4 and indel-based signature 3. This provides an opportunity to redefine the classification of smoking- and nonsmoking-associated NSCLC on the basis of individual genomic tumor characteristics and could contribute to reducing the lung cancer stigma. METHODS Whole genome sequencing data and clinical records were obtained from three prospective cohorts of metastatic NSCLC (N = 316). Relative contributions and absolute counts of single-base signature 4 and indel-based signature 3 were combined with relative contributions of age-related signatures to divide the cohort into smoking-associated ("smoking high") and nonsmoking-associated ("smoking low") clusters. RESULTS The smoking high (n = 169) and smoking low (n = 147) clusters differed considerably in tumor mutational burden, signature contribution, and mutational landscape. This signature-based classification overlapped considerably with smoking history. Yet, 26% of patients with an active smoking history were included in the smoking low cluster, of which 52% harbored an EGFR/ALK/RET/ROS1 alteration, and 4% of patients without smoking history were included in the smoking high cluster. These discordant samples had similar genomic contexts to the rest of their respective cluster. CONCLUSIONS A substantial subset of metastatic NSCLC is differently classified into smoking- and nonsmoking-associated tumors on the basis of smoking-related mutational signatures than on the basis of smoking history. This signature-based classification more accurately classifies patients on the basis of genome-wide context and should therefore be considered as a stratification factor in clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie M Ernst
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne M Mankor
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Job van Riet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan H von der Thüsen
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrikus J Dubbink
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adrianus J de Langen
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Egbert F Smit
- Department of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Anne-Marie C Dingemans
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Kim Monkhorst
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Malmberg R, Zietse M, Dumoulin DW, Hendrikx JJMA, Aerts JGJV, van der Veldt AAM, Koch BCP, Sleijfer S, van Leeuwen RWF. Alternative dosing strategies for immune checkpoint inhibitors to improve cost-effectiveness: a special focus on nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:e552-e561. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00554-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
26
|
Owusuaa C, van der Padt-Pruijsten A, Drooger JC, Heijns JB, Dietvorst AM, Janssens-van Vliet ECJ, Nieboer D, Aerts JGJV, van der Heide A, van der Rijt CCD. Development of a Clinical Prediction Model for 1-Year Mortality in Patients With Advanced Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2244350. [PMID: 36449290 PMCID: PMC9713606 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE To optimize palliative care in patients with cancer who are in their last year of life, timely and accurate prognostication is needed. However, available instruments for prognostication, such as the surprise question ("Would I be surprised if this patient died in the next year?") and various prediction models using clinical variables, are not well validated or lack discriminative ability. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a prediction model to calculate the 1-year risk of death among patients with advanced cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This multicenter prospective prognostic study was performed in the general oncology inpatient and outpatient clinics of 6 hospitals in the Netherlands. A total of 867 patients were enrolled between June 2 and November 22, 2017, and followed up for 1 year. The primary analyses were performed from October 9 to 25, 2019, with the most recent analyses performed from June 19 to 22, 2022. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to develop a prediction model including 3 categories of candidate predictors: clinician responses to the surprise question, patient clinical characteristics, and patient laboratory values. Data on race and ethnicity were not collected because most patients were expected to be of White race and Dutch ethnicity, and race and ethnicity were not considered as prognostic factors. The models' discriminative ability was assessed using internal-external validation by study hospital and measured using the C statistic. Patients 18 years and older with locally advanced or metastatic cancer were eligible. Patients with hematologic cancer were excluded. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The risk of death by 1 year. RESULTS Among 867 patients, the median age was 66 years (IQR, 56-72 years), and 411 individuals (47.4%) were male. The 1-year mortality rate was 41.6% (361 patients). Three prediction models with increasing complexity were developed: (1) a simple model including the surprise question, (2) a clinical model including the surprise question and clinical characteristics (age, cancer type prognosis, visceral metastases, brain metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, weight loss, pain, and dyspnea), and (3) an extended model including the surprise question, clinical characteristics, and laboratory values (hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, and serum albumin). The pooled C statistic was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.67-0.71) for the simple model, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.73-0.78) for the clinical model, and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.76-0.80) for the extended model. A nomogram and web-based calculator were developed to support clinicians in adequately caring for patients with advanced cancer. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, a prediction model including the surprise question, clinical characteristics, and laboratory values had better discriminative ability in predicting death among patients with advanced cancer than models including the surprise question, clinical characteristics, or laboratory values alone. The nomogram and web-based calculator developed for this study can be used by clinicians to identify patients who may benefit from palliative care and advance care planning. Further exploration of the feasibility and external validity of the model is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Owusuaa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jan C. Drooger
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joan B. Heijns
- Department of Internal Medicine, Amphia, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Anne-Marie Dietvorst
- Department of Internal Medicine, Van Weel Bethesda Hospital, Dirksland, the Netherlands
| | | | - Daan Nieboer
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joachim G. J. V. Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Agnes van der Heide
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Basak EA, Vermeer NS, de Joode K, Hurkmans DP, Velthuis DEM, Oomen-de Hoop E, Schreurs MWJ, Bins S, Koolen SLW, Debets R, van der Veldt AAM, Aerts JGJV, Joosse A, Mathijssen RHJ. Associations between patient and disease characteristics and severe adverse events during immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment: An observational study. Eur J Cancer 2022; 174:113-120. [PMID: 35988409 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
AIM With increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) more patients will develop severe and potentially life-threatening immune-related adverse events (irAEs). So far, predictive models for the occurrence of grade ≥3 irAEs are lacking. Therefore, we analysed associations between patient and disease characteristics, and the occurrence of grade ≥3 irAEs. METHODS Patients with cancer who were treated with anti-PD-1 (+/-anti-CTLA-4) between July 2015 and February 2020, and who were prospectively included in the MULTOMAB-trial, were eligible for this cohort study. Time to and occurrence of grade ≥3 irAEs according to CTCAE v5.0 were retrospectively registered. The associations between patient and disease characteristics and irAE occurrence were analysed using the competing risk cox-regression model of Fine and Gray. Analyses were performed separately in patients treated with monotherapy (anti-PD-1) and combination therapy (anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4). Subgroup analyses were performed in tumour types with the highest number of patients; melanoma and NSCLC. RESULTS Out of 641 patients, 106 patients (17%) experienced grade ≥3 irAEs. None of the analysed factors were associated with grade ≥3 irAE occurrence in the monotherapy (n = 550) or the combination therapy (n = 91) groups, nor in the subgroup analyses. Of interest, none of the patients with NSCLC with a WHO performance status of 0 (n = 34) experienced grade ≥3 irAEs. Most common NSCLC histology types were adenocarcinoma (n = 99/55%) and squamous cell carcinoma (n = 39/22%). CONCLUDING STATEMENT This study shows that patient and disease characteristics are not able to predict the occurrence of serious AEs in patients treated with ICIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwin A Basak
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Niels S Vermeer
- Dept. of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karlijn de Joode
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daan P Hurkmans
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dorian E M Velthuis
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esther Oomen-de Hoop
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marco W J Schreurs
- Dept. of Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sander Bins
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stijn L W Koolen
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Dept. of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Reno Debets
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Dept. of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Dept. of Pulmonology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arjen Joosse
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Veerman GDM, Hurkmans DP, Paats MS, Oomen-de Hoop E, van der Leest CH, van Thiel ERE, Aerts JGJV, van Leeuwen RW, Dingemans AMC, Mathijssen RHJ. Influence of esomeprazole on the bioavailability of afatinib: A pharmacokinetic cross-over study in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Biomed Pharmacother 2022; 155:113695. [PMID: 36126454 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Afatinib is an oral small-molecule kinase inhibitor (SMKI) approved for treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) driver mutation. Although oral administration is convenient, most SMKIs experience pH-dependent solubility. A drug-drug interaction between afatinib and proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) has, however, never been studied in humans. Hence, we performed a randomized, three-period cross-over study. Afatinib (30 mg or 40 mg) was administered without PPI (period A), concomitantly with esomeprazole (period B) and three hours after esomeprazole intake (period C). Primary objective was the area under the curve (AUC0-24 h) comparing period A to period B and period A to period C. Secondary objectives were other pharmacokinetic parameters and toxicity. Linear mixed effect modelling was performed for differences in AUC0-24 h and Cmax between periods A and B and periods A and C. In 18 evaluable NSCLC patients, concomitant use of 40 mg esomeprazole decreased the steady-state afatinib AUC0-24 h with 10.2% (95% CI -29.2 to +14.0%; p = 0.564) compared to afatinib administration without PPI. Esomeprazole intake three hours prior to afatinib did not significantly influence afatinib AUC0-24 h (-0.6%; 95% CI -14.9 to +16.1%; p = 1.0). No differences in toxicity were observed. To conclude, esomeprazole did not change the exposure to afatinib in patients with NSCLC. Since there is no clinically relevant drug-drug interaction, esomeprazole can safely be co-administered with afatinib. This is important for clinical practice, because other EGFR-SMKIs (e.g. erlotinib and gefitinib) do experience clinically relevant drug-drug interactions with acid-suppressive agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G D Marijn Veerman
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Daan P Hurkmans
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marthe S Paats
- Dept. of Pulmonology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esther Oomen-de Hoop
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Eric R E van Thiel
- Dept. of Pulmonology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Roelof W van Leeuwen
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Dept. of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Galjart B, Höppener DJ, Aerts JGJV, Bangma CH, Verhoef C, Grünhagen DJ. Follow-up strategy and survival for five common cancers: A meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2022; 174:185-199. [PMID: 36037595 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of intensive follow-up after curative intent treatment for five common solid tumours, in terms of survival and treatment of recurrences. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted, identifying comparative studies on follow-up for colorectal, lung, breast, upper gastro-intestinal and prostate cancer. Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS), and treatment of recurrences. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted, with particular focus on studies at low risk of bias. RESULTS Fourteen out of 63 studies were considered to be at low risk of bias (8 colorectal, 4 breast, 0 lung, 1 upper gastro-intestinal, 1 prostate). These studies showed no significant impact of intensive follow-up on OS (hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval) for colorectal (0.99; 0.92-1.06), breast 1.06 (0.92-1.23), upper gastro-intestinal (0.78; 0.51-1.19) and prostate cancer (1.00; 0.86-1.16). No impact on CSS (hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval) was found for colorectal cancer (0.94; 0.77-1.16). CSS was not reported for other cancer types. Intensive follow-up increased the rate of curative treatment (relative risk; 95% confidence interval) for colorectal cancer recurrences (1.30; 1.05-1.61), but not for upper gastro-intestinal cancer recurrences (0.92; 0.47-1.81). For the other cancer types, no data on treatment of recurrences was available in low risk studies. CONCLUSION For colorectal and breast cancer, high quality studies do not suggest an impact of intensive follow-up strategies on survival. Colorectal cancer recurrences are more often treated locally after intensive follow-up. For other cancer types evaluated, limited high quality research on follow-up is available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boris Galjart
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Diederik J Höppener
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christiaan H Bangma
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bek LM, Berentschot JC, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Huijts S, van Genderen ME, Vlake JH, van Bommel J, Aerts JGJV, Ribbers GM, van den Berg-Emons H(RJ, Hellemons ME. Symptoms persisting after hospitalization for COVID-19: 12 months interim results of the COFLOW study. ERJ Open Res 2022; 8:00355-2022. [PMID: 36284829 PMCID: PMC9421428 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00355-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction A large proportion of patients experience a wide range of sequelae after acute COVID-19, especially after severe illness. The long-term health sequelae need to be assessed. Our objective was to longitudinally assess persistence of symptoms and clusters of symptoms up to 12 months after hospitalisation for COVID-19 and to assess determinants of the main persistent symptoms. Methods In this multicenter prospective cohort study patients with COVID-19 are followed up for 2 years with measurements at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after hospital discharge. Here, we present interim results regarding persistent symptoms up to 12 months. Results We included 492 patients; mean±sd age was 60.2±10.7 years, 335 (68.1%) were males, median length of hospital stay was 11 (6.0–27.0) days. At 3 months after discharge 97.0% of the patients had at least one persisting symptom, this declined to 95.5% and 92.0% at 6 and 12 months, respectively (p=0.010). Muscle weakness, exertional dyspnoea, fatigue, and memory and concentration problems were the most prevalent symptoms with rates over 50% during follow-up. Over time, muscle weakness, hair loss and exertional dyspnoea decreased significantly (p<0.001), while other symptoms such as fatigue, concentration and memory problems, anosmia and ageusia persisted. Symptoms from the physical and respiratory cluster declined significantly over time, in contrast to the fatigue and cognitive symptom clusters. Conclusion The majority of patients experienced COVID-19 sequelae up to 12 months after severe infection. Whereas physical and respiratory symptoms showed slow gradual decline, fatigue and cognitive symptoms did not evidently resolve over time. Over 90% of patients experience #COVID19-related sequelae up to 12 months after hospitalisation. Whereas physical and respiratory symptoms show slow gradual decline, fatigue and cognitive symptoms do not evidently resolve over time.https://bit.ly/3z9I1xK
Collapse
|
31
|
Dumoulin DW, Cantini L, Cornelissen R, Vink M, Klaase L, Sloof K, Tebayna N, Mankor JM, Baart SJ, Hendriks R, Dingemans AMC, Willemsen M, Aerts JGJV. Lurbinectedin shows clinical activity and immune-modulatory functions in patients with pre-treated small cell lung cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma. Eur J Cancer 2022; 172:357-366. [PMID: 35834843 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Lurbinectedin is a promising new drug being investigated in pre-treated patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) or malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Its clinical activity in the real-world setting has not been investigated yet. PATIENTS AND METHODS Clinical data of patients with SCLC and MPM who were treated with lurbinectedin were prospectively collected. Comprehensive immune cell profiling by flow cytometry was performed on screening and treating peripheral blood samples. RESULTS A total of 95 patients (43 SCLC and 52 MPM) were treated, mostly as ≥3-line of therapy. In the SCLC cohort, a median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 1.5 months (95% CI: 1.4-3.0), and median overall survival was 7.0 months (95% CI: 4.7-not reached). Objective radiological response and disease control rate after 12 weeks were 16% and 28%, respectively. In the MPM cohort, median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% CI: 1.4-4.2), and median overall survival was 7.2 months (95% CI: 5.9-not reached). Disease control rate after 12 weeks was 29%, whereas no partial responses were registered. No new safety signals were observed. Lurbinectedin treatment was significantly associated with the depletion of circulating classical monocytes, which correlated with a better PFS in patients with SCLC. Lurbinectedin increased the proliferation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (SCLC) and natural killer and natural killer T cells (SCLC and MPM) and altered co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory receptor expression on circulating lymphocytes. CONCLUSION Lurbinectedin has a manageable safety profile and shows clinical activity in pre-treated patients with SCLC and MPM. Its immune-modulatory functions make lurbinectedin a potential platform for immunotherapy combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne W Dumoulin
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Luca Cantini
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, AOU Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Italy
| | - Robin Cornelissen
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Madelief Vink
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Larissa Klaase
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kick Sloof
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nura Tebayna
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joanne M Mankor
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sara J Baart
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rudi Hendriks
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne-Marie C Dingemans
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marcella Willemsen
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
van Kooten JP, Dietz MV, Guchelaar NAD, Brandt-Kerkhof ARM, Koolen SLW, Burger JWA, Mathijssen RHJ, Verhoef C, Aerts JGJV, Madsen EVE. Intraperitoneal paclitaxel for patients with primary malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a phase I/II dose escalation and safety study-INTERACT MESO. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062907. [PMID: 35732399 PMCID: PMC9226944 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare, aggressive tumour arising primarily from the peritoneum. The only potentially curative treatment is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). However, the majority of patients are not eligible to undergo this treatment. The benefit of systemic treatment for these patients is limited at the cost of considerable morbidity. Hence, there is a need for appropriate palliative treatment options for patients with MPM. As MPM rarely disseminates outside the abdominal cavity, these patients might benefit from local treatment. A higher, more effective dose of chemotherapy can directly be delivered at the site of the disease. Systemic uptake will be limited, likely resulting in less toxicity. The aim of the INTERACT MESO trial is to determine the maximum tolerable dose of intraperitoneal paclitaxel monotherapy in patients with MPM. Secondary endpoints are to assess safety and toxicity, feasibility and the pharmacokinetic profile of this treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The INTERACT MESO trial is a prospective, open-label, single-centre, phase I study with a classic three-plus-three dose escalation design. The study population consists of adult patients with primary MPM, without extra-abdominal disease, who are not eligible to undergo CRS-HIPEC. According to standard of care work-up for CRS-HIPEC, patients will undergo diagnostic laparoscopy to determine the feasibility of CRS-HIPEC. In case CRS-HIPEC is not considered feasible, a peritoneal port-a-cath (PAC) system will be placed. Through this PAC, 8-16 weekly cycles of intraperitoneal chemotherapy will be administered. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO, The Hague, The Netherlands) and the Medical Research Ethics Committee (METC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands) have granted permission to carry out this study protocol. The results of this trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NL9718. EudraCT: 2021-003637-11.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Job P van Kooten
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michelle V Dietz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niels A D Guchelaar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Stijn L W Koolen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva V E Madsen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lau SP, van 't Land FR, van der Burg SH, Homs MYV, Lolkema MP, Aerts JGJV, van Eijck CHJ. Safety and tumour-specific immunological responses of combined dendritic cell vaccination and anti-CD40 agonistic antibody treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: protocol for a phase I, open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation study (REACtiVe-2 trial). BMJ Open 2022; 12:e060431. [PMID: 35710239 PMCID: PMC9207896 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The prognosis of patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is dismal and conventional chemotherapy treatment delivers limited survival improvement. Immunotherapy may complement our current treatment strategies. We previously demonstrated that the combination of an allogeneic tumour-lysate dendritic cell (DC) vaccine with an anti-CD40 agonistic antibody resulted in robust antitumour responses with survival benefit in a murine PDAC model. In the Rotterdam PancrEAtic Cancer Vaccination-2 trial, we aim to translate our findings into patients. This study will determine the safety of DC/anti-CD40 agonistic antibody combination treatment, and treatment-induced tumour-specific immunological responses. METHODS AND ANALYSIS In this open-label, single-centre (Erasmus Univsersity Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands), single-arm, phase I dose finding study, adult patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer with progressive disease after FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy will receive monocyte-derived DCs loaded with an allogeneic tumour lysate in conjunction with a CD40 agonistic antibody. This combination-immunotherapy regimen will be administered three times every 2 weeks, and booster treatments will be given after 3 and 6 months following the third injection. A minimum of 12 and a maximum of 18 patients will be included. The primary endpoint is safety and tolerability of the combination immunotherapy. To determine the maximum tolerated dose, DCs will be given at a fixed dosage and anti-CD40 agonist in a traditional 3+3 dose-escalation design. Secondary endpoints include radiographic response according to the RECIST (V.1.1) and iRECIST criteria, and the detection of antitumour specific immune responses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO; NL76592.000.21) and the Medical Ethics Committee (METC; MEC-2021-0566) of the Erasmus M.C. University Medical Center Rotterdam approved the conduct of the trial. Written informed consent will be required for all participants. The results of the trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NL9723.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sai Ping Lau
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sjoerd H van der Burg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn P Lolkema
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Nakshbandi G, Moor CC, Nossent EJ, Geelhoed JJM, Baart SJ, Boerrigter BG, Aerts JGJV, Nijman SFM, Santema HY, Hellemons ME, Wijsenbeek MS. Home monitoring of lung function, symptoms and quality of life after admission with COVID-19 infection: The HOMECOMIN' study. Respirology 2022; 27:501-509. [PMID: 35441433 PMCID: PMC9115460 DOI: 10.1111/resp.14262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Background and objective To develop targeted and efficient follow‐up programmes for patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), structured and detailed insights in recovery trajectory are required. We aimed to gain detailed insights in long‐term recovery after COVID‐19 infection, using an online home monitoring programme including home spirometry. Moreover, we evaluated patient experiences with the home monitoring programme. Methods In this prospective multicentre study, we included adults hospitalized due to COVID‐19 with radiological abnormalities. For 6 months after discharge, patients collected weekly home spirometry and pulse oximetry measurements, and reported visual analogue scales on cough, dyspnoea and fatigue. Patients completed the fatigue assessment scale (FAS), global rating of change (GRC), EuroQol‐5D‐5L (EQ‐5D‐5L) and online tool for the assessment of burden of COVID‐19 (ABCoV tool). Mixed models were used to analyse the results. Results A total of 133 patients were included in this study (70.1% male, mean age 60 years [SD 10.54]). Patients had a mean baseline forced vital capacity of 3.25 L (95% CI: 2.99–3.44 L), which increased linearly in 6 months with 19.1% (Δ0.62 L, p < 0.005). Patients reported substantial fatigue with no improvement over time. Nevertheless, health status improved significantly. After 6 months, patients scored their general well‐being almost similar as before COVID‐19. Overall, patients considered home spirometry useful and not burdensome. Conclusion Six months after hospital admission for COVID‐19, patients' lung function and quality of life were still improving, although fatigue persisted. Home monitoring enables detailed follow‐up for patients with COVID‐19 at low burden for patients and for the healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gizal Nakshbandi
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Catharina C Moor
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther J Nossent
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J J Miranda Geelhoed
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sara J Baart
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart G Boerrigter
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzan F M Nijman
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Helger Y Santema
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Merel E Hellemons
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marlies S Wijsenbeek
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kindler HL, Novello S, Bearz A, Ceresoli GL, Aerts JGJV, Spicer J, Taylor P, Nackaerts K, Greystoke A, Jennens R, Calabrò L, Burgers JA, Santoro A, Cedrés S, Serwatowski P, Ponce S, Van Meerbeeck JP, Nowak AK, Blumenschein G, Siegel JM, Kasten L, Köchert K, Walter AO, Childs BH, Elbi C, Hassan R, Fennell DA. Anetumab ravtansine versus vinorelbine in patients with relapsed, mesothelin-positive malignant pleural mesothelioma (ARCS-M): a randomised, open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:540-552. [PMID: 35358455 PMCID: PMC10512125 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00061-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few treatment options exist for second-line treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. We aimed to assess the antibody-drug conjugate anetumab ravtansine versus vinorelbine in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease overexpressing mesothelin who had progressed on first-line platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. METHODS In this phase 2, randomised, open-label study, done at 76 hospitals in 14 countries, we enrolled adults (aged ≥18 years) with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic malignant pleural mesothelioma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and who had progressed on first-line platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. Participants were prospectively screened for mesothelin overexpression (defined as 2+ or 3+ mesothelin membrane staining intensity on at least 30% of viable tumour cells by immunohistochemistry) and were randomly assigned (2:1), using an interactive voice and web response system provided by the sponsor, to receive intravenous anetumab ravtansine (6·5 mg/kg on day 1 of each 21-day cycle) or intravenous vinorelbine (30 mg/m2 once every week) until progression, toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival according to blinded central radiology review, assessed in the intention-to-treat population, with safety assessed in all participants who received any study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02610140, and is now completed. FINDINGS Between Dec 3, 2015, and May 31, 2017, 589 patients were enrolled and 248 mesothelin-overexpressing patients were randomly allocated to the two treatment groups (166 patients were randomly assigned to receive anetumab ravtansine and 82 patients were randomly assigned to receive vinorelbine). 105 (63%) of 166 patients treated with anetumab ravtansine (median follow-up 4·0 months [IQR 1·4-5·5]) versus 43 (52%) of 82 patients treated with vinorelbine (3·9 months [1·4-5·4]) had disease progression or died (median progression-free survival 4·3 months [95% CI 4·1-5·2] vs 4·5 months [4·1-5·8]; hazard ratio 1·22 [0·85-1·74]; log-rank p=0·86). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (one [1%] of 163 patients for anetumab ravtansine vs 28 [39%] of 72 patients for vinorelbine), pneumonia (seven [4%] vs five [7%]), neutrophil count decrease (two [1%] vs 12 [17%]), and dyspnoea (nine [6%] vs three [4%]). Serious drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 12 (7%) patients treated with anetumab ravtansine and 11 (15%) patients treated with vinorelbine. Ten (6%) treatment-emergent deaths occurred with anetumab ravtansine: pneumonia (three [2%]), dyspnoea (two [1%]), sepsis (two [1%]), atrial fibrillation (one [1%]), physical deterioration (one [1%]), hepatic failure (one [1%]), mesothelioma (one [1%]), and renal failure (one [1%]; one patient had 3 events). One (1%) treatment-emergent death occurred in the vinorelbine group (pneumonia). INTERPRETATION Anetumab ravtansine showed a manageable safety profile and was not superior to vinorelbine. Further studies are needed to define active treatments in relapsed mesothelin-expressing malignant pleural mesothelioma. FUNDING Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hedy L Kindler
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Silvia Novello
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandra Bearz
- Department of Medical Oncology and Immune-Related Cancers, CRO-IRCCS Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Aviano, Italy
| | - Giovanni L Ceresoli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Unit, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - James Spicer
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Taylor
- Department of Medical Oncology, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Kristiaan Nackaerts
- Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alastair Greystoke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ross Jennens
- Epworth Cancer Services Clinical Institute, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, VIC, Australia
| | - Luana Calabrò
- Department of Oncology, Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Jacobus A Burgers
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Armando Santoro
- Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Susana Cedrés
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Piotr Serwatowski
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Santiago Ponce
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jan P Van Meerbeeck
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Antwerp University and University Hospital and European Reference Network for Rare or Low Prevalence Complex Disease (ERN-LUNG), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Anna K Nowak
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, Institute for Respiratory Health, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - George Blumenschein
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jonathan M Siegel
- Clinical Statistics Oncology, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Whippany, NJ, USA
| | - Linda Kasten
- Statistics, Syneos Health Clinical Solutions, Morrisville, NC, USA
| | - Karl Köchert
- Biomarker and Data Insights, Bayer AG Pharma, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annette O Walter
- Translational Medicine Oncology, Bayer AG Pharma, Berlin, Germany
| | - Barrett H Childs
- Oncology Development, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Whippany, NJ, USA
| | - Cem Elbi
- Global Clinical Development, Oncology, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Whippany, NJ, USA
| | - Raffit Hassan
- Department of Thoracic and GI Malignancies, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Dean A Fennell
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester and University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cantini L, Laniado I, Murthy V, Sterman D, Aerts JGJV. Immunotherapy for mesothelioma: Moving beyond single immune check point inhibition. Lung Cancer 2022; 165:91-101. [PMID: 35114509 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive neoplasm with low survival rates. Platinum-based chemotherapy has represented the cornerstone of treatment for over a decade, prompting the investigation of new therapeutic strategies both in the early stage of the disease and in the advanced setting. The advent of immune check-point inhibitors (ICIs) has recently revamped the enthusiasm for using immunotherapy also in MPM. However, results from first clinical trials using single immune check-point inhibition have been conflicting, and this may be mainly attributed to the lack of specific biomarkers as well as to intra- and inter- patient heterogeneity. The phase III Checkmate743 firstly demonstrated the superiority of an ICI combination (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) over chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of unresectable MPM, leading to FDA approval of this regimen and showing that moving beyond single immune check point inhibition might be a successful strategy to overcome resistance in the majority of MPM patients. In this review, we describe the emerging immunotherapy strategies for the treatment of MPM. We also discuss how refining the approach in pre-clinical studies towards a more holistic perspective (which takes into account not only genetic but also pathophysiological vulnerabilities) and strengthening multi-institutional collaboration in clinical trials is finally helping the clinical development of immunotherapy in MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Cantini
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, AOU Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Italy
| | - Isaac Laniado
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, New York University (NYU), School of Medicine/NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Vivek Murthy
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, New York University (NYU), School of Medicine/NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Daniel Sterman
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, New York University (NYU), School of Medicine/NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
van Kooten JP, Belderbos RA, von der Thüsen JH, Aarts MJ, Verhoef C, Burgers JA, Baas P, Aalbers AGJ, Maat APWM, Aerts JGJV, Cornelissen R, Madsen EVE. Incidence, treatment and survival of malignant pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma: a population-based study. Thorax 2022; 77:1260-1267. [PMID: 35149582 DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is an aggressive cancer that primarily arises from the pleura (MPM) or peritoneum (MPeM), mostly due to asbestos exposure. This study reviewed the Dutch population-based incidence, treatment and survival since the national ban on asbestos in 1993. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with MPM or MPeM diagnosed from 1993 to 2018 were selected from the Dutch cancer registry. Annual percentage change (APC) was calculated for (age-specific and sex-specific) revised European standardised incidence rates (RESR). Treatment pattern and Kaplan-Meier overall survival analyses were performed. RESULTS In total, 12 168 patients were included in the study. For male patients younger than 80 years, the MM incidence significantly decreased in the last decade (APC ranging between -9.4% and -1.8%, p<0.01). Among both male and female patients aged over 80 years, the incidence significantly increased during the entire study period (APC 3.3% and 4.6%, respectively, p<0.01). From 2003 onwards, the use of systemic chemotherapy increased especially for MPM (from 9.3% to 39.4%). Overall, 62.2% of patients received no antitumour treatment. The most common reasons for not undergoing antitumour treatment were patient preference (42%) and performance status (25.6%). The median overall survival improved from 7.3 (1993-2003) to 8.9 (2004-2011) and 9.3 months from 2012 to 2018 (p<0.001). CONCLUSION The peak of MM incidence was reached around 2010 in the Netherlands, and currently the incidence is declining in most age groups. The use of systemic chemotherapy increased from 2003, which likely resulted in improved overall survival over time. The majority of patients do not receive treatment though and prognosis is still poor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Job P van Kooten
- Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert A Belderbos
- Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mieke J Aarts
- Department of Research and Development, Dutch Association of Comprehensive Cancer Centers, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobus A Burgers
- Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Baas
- Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arend G J Aalbers
- Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Robin Cornelissen
- Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva V E Madsen
- Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Cortellini A, Giusti R, Filetti M, Citarella F, Adamo V, Santini D, Buti S, Nigro O, Cantini L, Di Maio M, Aerts JGJV, Bria E, Bertolini F, Ferrara MG, Ghidini M, Grossi F, Guida A, Berardi R, Morabito A, Genova C, Mazzoni F, Antonuzzo L, Gelibter A, Marchetti P, Chiari R, Macerelli M, Rastelli F, Della Gravara L, Gori S, Tuzi A, De Tursi M, Di Marino P, Mansueto G, Pecci F, Zoratto F, Ricciardi S, Migliorino MR, Passiglia F, Metro G, Spinelli GP, Banna GL, Friedlaender A, Addeo A, Ficorella C, Porzio G, Tiseo M, Russano M, Russo A, Pinato DJ. High familial burden of cancer correlates with improved outcome from immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC independent of somatic DNA damage response gene status. J Hematol Oncol 2022; 15:9. [PMID: 35062993 PMCID: PMC8780322 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-022-01226-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Family history of cancer (FHC) is a hallmark of cancer risk and an independent predictor of outcome, albeit with uncertain biologic foundations. We previously showed that FHC-high patients experienced prolonged overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) following PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. To validate our findings in patients with NSCLC, we evaluated two multicenter cohorts of patients with metastatic NSCLC receiving either first-line pembrolizumab or chemotherapy. From each cohort, 607 patients were randomly case–control matched accounting for FHC, age, performance status, and disease burden. Compared to FHC-low/negative, FHC-high patients experienced longer OS (HR 0.67 [95% CI 0.46–0.95], p = 0.0281), PFS (HR 0.65 [95% CI 0.48–0.89]; p = 0.0074) and higher disease control rates (DCR, 86.4% vs 67.5%, p = 0.0096), within the pembrolizumab cohort. No significant associations were found between FHC and OS/PFS/DCR within the chemotherapy cohort. We explored the association between FHC and somatic DNA damage response (DDR) gene alterations as underlying mechanism to our findings in a parallel cohort of 118 NSCLC, 16.9% of whom were FHC-high. The prevalence of ≥ 1 somatic DDR gene mutation was 20% and 24.5% (p = 0.6684) in FHC-high vs. FHC-low/negative, with no differences in tumor mutational burden (6.0 vs. 7.6 Mut/Mb, p = 0.6018) and tumor cell PD-L1 expression. FHC-high status identifies NSCLC patients with improved outcomes from pembrolizumab but not chemotherapy, independent of somatic DDR gene status. Prospective studies evaluating FHC alongside germline genetic testing are warranted.
Collapse
|
39
|
Banna GL, Tiseo M, Cortinovis DL, Facchinetti F, Aerts JGJV, Baldessari C, Giusti R, Bria E, Grossi F, Berardi R, Morabito A, Catino A, Genova C, Mazzoni F, Gelibter A, Rastelli F, Macerelli M, Chiari R, Gori S, Mansueto G, Citarella F, Cantini L, Rijavec E, Bertolini F, Cappuzzo F, De Toma A, Friedlaender A, Metro G, Pensieri MV, Porzio G, Ficorella C, Pinato DJ, Cortellini A, Addeo A. Host immune-inflammatory markers to unravel the heterogeneous outcome and assessment of patients with PD-L1 ≥50% metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and poor performance status receiving first-line immunotherapy. Thorac Cancer 2021; 13:483-488. [PMID: 34939342 PMCID: PMC8807213 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with programmed cell death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) ≥50% metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) and ECOG performance status (PS) of 2 treated with first‐line immunotherapy have heterogeneous clinical assessment and outcomes. Methods To explore the role of immune‐inflammatory surrogates by the validated lung immuno‐oncology prognostic score (LIPS) score, including the neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the pretreatment use of steroids, alongside other prognostic variables. A retrospective analysis of 128 patients with PS2 and PD‐L1 ≥50% mNSCLC treated between April 2018 and September 2019 with first‐line pembrolizumab in a real‐world setting was performed. Results With a median follow‐up of 15.3 months, the 1‐year overall survival (OS) and median progression‐free survival (PFS) were 32.3% (95% CI: 30.9–33.9) and 3.3 months (95% CI: 1.8–4.7), respectively. The NLR, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and pretreatment steroids results were the only significant prognostic factors on the univariate analysis and independent prognostic factors by the multivariate analysis on both OS and PFS. The LIPS score, including the NLR and pretreatment steroids, identified 29 (23%) favourable‐risk patients, with 0 factors, 1‐year OS of 67.6% and median PFS of 8.2 months; 57 (45%) intermediate‐risk patients, with 1 factor, 1‐year OS 32.1% and median PFS 2.7 months; 42 (33%) poor‐risk patients, with both factors, 1‐year OS of 10.7% and median PFS of 1.2 months. Conclusions The assessment of pre‐existing imbalance of the host immune response by combined blood and clinical immune‐inflammatory markers may represent a way to unravel the heterogeneous outcome and assessment of patients with mNSCLC and poor PS in the immune‐oncology setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marcello Tiseo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.,Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Facchinetti
- Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Biomarqueurs Prédictifs et Nouvelles Stratégies Thérapeutiques en Oncologie, Villejuif, France
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cinzia Baldessari
- Dipartimento di Oncologia ed Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Emilio Bria
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Grossi
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Oncology Clinic, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti Di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Morabito
- Thoracic Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori 'Fondazione G Pascale', IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Annamaria Catino
- Thoracic Oncology Unit, Clinical Cancer Center IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Carlo Genova
- Lung Cancer Unit; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesca Mazzoni
- Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Alain Gelibter
- Medical Oncology (B), Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Marianna Macerelli
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Santa Maria Della Misericordia, Udine, Italy
| | - Rita Chiari
- Medical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Padova Sud "Madre Teresa Di Calcutta", Monselice, Italy
| | - Stefania Gori
- Oncology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Negrar, Italy
| | | | | | - Luca Cantini
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Oncology Clinic, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti Di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Erika Rijavec
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Bertolini
- Dipartimento di Oncologia ed Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Federico Cappuzzo
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro De Toma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Alex Friedlaender
- Oncology Department, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Giulio Metro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Maria Vittoria Pensieri
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | | | - Corrado Ficorella
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.,Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - David J Pinato
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.,Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale "A. Avogadro", Novara, Italy
| | - Alessio Cortellini
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Alfredo Addeo
- Oncology Department, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Simons MJHG, Retèl VP, Ramaekers BLT, Butter R, Mankor JM, Paats MS, Aerts JGJV, Mfumbilwa ZA, Roepman P, Coupé VMH, Uyl-de Groot CA, van Harten WH, Joore MA. Early Cost Effectiveness of Whole-Genome Sequencing as a Clinical Diagnostic Test for Patients with Inoperable Stage IIIB,C/IV Non-squamous Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer. Pharmacoeconomics 2021; 39:1429-1442. [PMID: 34405371 PMCID: PMC8599348 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01073-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbours many genetic aberrations that can be targeted with systemic treatments. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) can simultaneously detect these (and possibly new) molecular targets. However, the exact added clinical value of WGS is unknown. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine the early cost effectiveness of using WGS in diagnostic strategies compared with currently used molecular diagnostics for patients with inoperable stage IIIB,C/IV non-squamous NSCLC from a Dutch healthcare perspective. METHODS A decision tree represented the diagnostic pathway, and a cohort state transition model represented disease progression. Three diagnostic strategies were modelled: standard of care (SoC) alone, WGS as a diagnostic test, and SoC followed by WGS. Treatment effectiveness was based on a systematic review. Probabilistic cost-effectiveness analyses were performed, and threshold analyses (using €80,000 per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY]) was used to explore the early cost effectiveness of WGS. RESULTS WGS as a diagnostic test resulted in more QALYs (0.002) and costs (€1534 [incremental net monetary benefit -€1349]), and SoC followed by WGS resulted in fewer QALYs (-0.002) and more costs (€1059 [-€1194]) compared with SoC alone. WGS as a diagnostic test was only cost effective if it was priced at €2000 per patient and identified 2.7% more actionable patients than SoC alone. Treating these additional identified patients with new treatments costing >€4069 per month decreased the probability of cost effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis suggests that providing WGS as a diagnostic test is cost effective compared with SoC followed by WGS and SoC alone if costs for WGS decrease and additional patients with actionable targets are identified. This cost-effectiveness model can be used to incorporate new findings iteratively and to support ongoing decision making regarding the use of WGS in this rapidly evolving field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn J H G Simons
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Maastricht University, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Valesca P Retèl
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Hallenweg 5, 7522 NH, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Maastricht University, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier Butter
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne M Mankor
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marthe S Paats
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Zakile A Mfumbilwa
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center-Location VUmc, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Roepman
- Hartwig Medical Foundation, Science Park 408, 1098 XH, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Veerle M H Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center-Location VUmc, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carin A Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management/Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wim H van Harten
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Hallenweg 5, 7522 NH, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Maastricht University, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Belderbos RA, Maat APWM, Baart SJ, Madsen EVE, Bogers AJJC, Cornelissen R, Aerts JGJV, Mahtab EAF, von der Thüsen JH. Ki67 (MIB-1) as a Prognostic Marker for Clinical Decision Making Before Extended Pleurectomy Decortication in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. JTO Clin Res Rep 2021; 2:100155. [PMID: 34590009 PMCID: PMC8474452 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2021.100155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Revised: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The role of surgery for early stage malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains controversial. Current expert opinion is only to treat patients surgically as part of multimodality therapy. It is still challenging to identify patients who will not benefit from surgery. We specifically evaluated tumor-related parameters in combination with clinical parameters to identify prognostic markers for survival. Methods Clinical data of 27 consecutive patients with MPM treated with extended pleurectomy and decortication within a multimodality approach were collected and analyzed. Several tumor (immuno-)histopathologic characteristics were determined on resected tumor material, among which MTAP and Ki67 (MIB-1). Univariable and multivariable analyses served to correlate clinical and tumor-related parameters to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results The median PFS (mPFS) was 15.3, and the median OS (mOS) was 26.5 months. Patients with a Ki67 score greater than 10% had a significantly shorter PFS (mPFS = 8.81 versus 25.35 mo, p = 0.001) and OS (mOS 19.7 versus 44.5 mo, p = 0.002) than those with a Ki67 score less than or equal to 10. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for Ki67 revealed an area under the curve of 0.756 with a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 71% for a cutoff of 10% for Ki67. Patients with loss of MTAP had a significantly shorter mPFS (9 versus 21.1 mo, p = 0.014) and mOS (19.7 versus 42.6 mo, p = 0.047) than those without MTAP loss. Conclusions In our study, Ki67 was prognostic for OS and PFS in patients with MPM treated with extended pleurectomy/decortication in a multimodality approach. Determination of Ki67 before surgery combined with specific clinical parameters could assist in clinical decision making by identifying patients, with high Ki67, who are unlikely to benefit from surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Belderbos
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander P W M Maat
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sara J Baart
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eva V E Madsen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ad J J C Bogers
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robin Cornelissen
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Edris A F Mahtab
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hurkmans DP, Verdegaal EME, Hogan SA, de Wijn R, Hovestad L, van den Heuvel DMA, Ruijtenbeek R, Welters MJP, van Brakel M, Basak EA, Pinedo HM, Lamers CHJ, van de Werken HJG, Groten JP, Debets R, Levesque MP, Dummer R, Kapiteijn E, Mathijssen RHJ, Aerts JGJV, van der Burg SH. Blood-based kinase activity profiling: a potential predictor of response to immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 8:jitc-2020-001607. [PMID: 33427690 PMCID: PMC7757459 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Many cancer patients do not obtain clinical benefit from immune checkpoint inhibition. Checkpoint blockade targets T cells, suggesting that tyrosine kinase activity profiling of baseline peripheral blood mononuclear cells may predict clinical outcome. Methods Here a total of 160 patients with advanced melanoma or non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA-4) or anti-programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD-1), were divided into five discovery and cross-validation cohorts. The kinase activity profile was generated by analyzing phosphorylation of peripheral blood mononuclear cell lysates in a microarray comprising of 144 peptides derived from sites that are substrates for protein tyrosine kinases. Binary grouping into patients with or without clinical benefit was based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1. Predictive models were trained using partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), performance of the models was evaluated by estimating the correct classification rate (CCR) using cross-validation. Results The kinase phosphorylation signatures segregated responders from non-responders by differences in canonical pathways governing T-cell migration, infiltration and co-stimulation. PLS-DA resulted in a CCR of 100% and 93% in the anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD1 melanoma discovery cohorts, respectively. Cross-validation cohorts to estimate the accuracy of the predictive models showed CCRs of 83% for anti-CTLA-4 and 78% or 68% for anti-PD-1 in melanoma or NSCLC, respectively. Conclusion Blood-based kinase activity profiling for response prediction to immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma and NSCLC revealed increased kinase activity in pathways associated with T-cell function and led to a classification model with a highly accurate classification rate in cross-validation groups. The predictive value of kinase activity profiling is prospectively verified in an ongoing trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daan P Hurkmans
- Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands .,Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Els M E Verdegaal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncode Institute, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sabrina A Hogan
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Rik de Wijn
- PamGene International B.V, HH 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Lies Hovestad
- PamGene International B.V, HH 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rob Ruijtenbeek
- PamGene International B.V, HH 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Marij J P Welters
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncode Institute, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mandy van Brakel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Edwin A Basak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cor H J Lamers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harmen J G van de Werken
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Computational Biology Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John P Groten
- PamGene International B.V, HH 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Reno Debets
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Reinhard Dummer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ellen Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd H van der Burg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncode Institute, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
van der Sar IG, Wijbenga N, Nakshbandi G, Aerts JGJV, Manintveld OC, Wijsenbeek MS, Hellemons ME, Moor CC. The smell of lung disease: a review of the current status of electronic nose technology. Respir Res 2021; 22:246. [PMID: 34535144 PMCID: PMC8448171 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-021-01835-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
There is a need for timely, accurate diagnosis, and personalised management in lung diseases. Exhaled breath reflects inflammatory and metabolic processes in the human body, especially in the lungs. The analysis of exhaled breath using electronic nose (eNose) technology has gained increasing attention in the past years. This technique has great potential to be used in clinical practice as a real-time non-invasive diagnostic tool, and for monitoring disease course and therapeutic effects. To date, multiple eNoses have been developed and evaluated in clinical studies across a wide spectrum of lung diseases, mainly for diagnostic purposes. Heterogeneity in study design, analysis techniques, and differences between eNose devices currently hamper generalization and comparison of study results. Moreover, many pilot studies have been performed, while validation and implementation studies are scarce. These studies are needed before implementation in clinical practice can be realised. This review summarises the technical aspects of available eNose devices and the available evidence for clinical application of eNose technology in different lung diseases. Furthermore, recommendations for future research to pave the way for clinical implementation of eNose technology are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I G van der Sar
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N Wijbenga
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G Nakshbandi
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J G J V Aerts
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - O C Manintveld
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M S Wijsenbeek
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M E Hellemons
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C C Moor
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Vroman H, Balzaretti G, Belderbos RA, Klarenbeek PL, van Nimwegen M, Bezemer K, Cornelissen R, Niewold ITG, van Schaik BD, van Kampen AH, Aerts JGJV, de Vries N, Hendriks RW. T cell receptor repertoire characteristics both before and following immunotherapy correlate with clinical response in mesothelioma. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 8:jitc-2019-000251. [PMID: 32234848 PMCID: PMC7174074 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a highly lethal malignancy in need for new treatment options. Although immunotherapies have been shown to boost a tumor-specific immune response, not all patients respond and prognostic biomarkers are scarce. In this study, we determined the peripheral blood T cell receptor β (TCRβ) chain repertoire of nine MPM patients before and 5 weeks after the start of dendritic cell (DC)-based immunotherapy. Materials and methods We separately profiled PD1+ and PD1−CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, as well as Tregs and analyzed 70 000 TCRβ sequences per patient. Results Strikingly, limited TCRβ repertoire diversity and high average clone sizes in total CD3+ T cells before the start of immunotherapy were associated with a better clinical response. To explore the differences in TCRβ repertoire prior-DC-therapy and post-DC-therapy, for each patient the TCRβ clones present in the total CD3+ T cell fractions were classified into five categories, based on therapy-associated frequency changes: expanding, decreasing, stable, newly appearing and disappearing clones. Subsequently, the presence of these five groups of clones was analyzed in the individual sorted T cell fractions. DC-therapy primarily induced TCRβ repertoire changes in the PD1+CD4+ and PD1+CD8+ T cell fractions. In particular, in the PD1+CD8+ T cell subpopulation we found high frequencies of expanding, decreasing and newly appearing clones. Conversion from a PD1− to a PD1+ phenotype was significantly more frequent in CD8+ T cells than in CD4+ T cells. Hereby, the number of expanding PD1+CD8+ T cell clones—and not expanding PD1+CD4+ T cell clones following immunotherapy positively correlated with overall survival, progression-free survival and reduction of tumor volume. Conclusion We conclude that the clinical response to DC-mediated immunotherapy is dependent on both the pre-existing TCRβ repertoire of total CD3+ T cells and on therapy-induced changes, in particular expanding PD1+CD8+ T cell clones. Therefore, TCRβ repertoire profiling in sorted T cell subsets could serve as predictive biomarker for the selection of MPM patients that benefit from immunotherapy. Trial registration number NCT02395679.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heleen Vroman
- Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Giulia Balzaretti
- Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Amsterdam UMC - Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam UMC - Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert A Belderbos
- Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul L Klarenbeek
- Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Amsterdam UMC - Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam UMC - Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Koen Bezemer
- Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robin Cornelissen
- Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ilse T G Niewold
- Laboratory of Genome Analysis, Amsterdam UMC - Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niek de Vries
- Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Amsterdam UMC - Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rudi W Hendriks
- Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Bek LM, Berentschot JC, Hellemons ME, Huijts SM, Aerts JGJV, van Bommel J, van Genderen ME, Gommers DAMPJ, Ribbers GM, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, van den Berg-Emons RJG. CO-FLOW: COvid-19 Follow-up care paths and Long-term Outcomes Within the Dutch health care system: study protocol of a multicenter prospective cohort study following patients 2 years after hospital discharge. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:847. [PMID: 34419032 PMCID: PMC8379596 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06813-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND First studies indicate that up to 6 months after hospital discharge, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes severe physical, cognitive, and psychological impairments, which may affect participation and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). After hospitalization for COVID-19, a number of patients are referred to medical rehabilitation centers or skilled nursing facilities for further treatment, while others go home with or without aftercare. The aftercare paths include 1] community-based rehabilitation; 2] in- and outpatient medical rehabilitation; 3] inpatient rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities; and 4] sheltered care (inpatient). These aftercare paths and the trajectories of recovery after COVID-19 urgently need long-term in-depth evaluation to optimize and personalize treatment. CO-FLOW aims, by following the outcomes and aftercare paths of all COVID-19 patients after hospital discharge, to systematically study over a 2-year period: 1] trajectories of physical, cognitive, and psychological recovery; 2] patient flows, healthcare utilization, patient satisfaction with aftercare, and barriers/facilitators regarding aftercare as experienced by healthcare professionals; 3] effects of physical, cognitive, and psychological outcomes on participation and HRQoL; and 4] predictors for long-term recovery, health care utilization, and patient satisfaction with aftercare. METHODS CO-FLOW is a multicenter prospective cohort study in the mid-west of the Netherlands with a 2-year follow-up period. Measurements comprise non-invasive clinical tests and patient reported outcome measures from a combined rehabilitation, pulmonary, and intensive care perspective. Measurements are performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after hospital discharge and, if applicable, at rehabilitation discharge. CO-FLOW aims to include at least 500 patients who survived hospitalization for COVID-19, aged ≥18 years. DISCUSSION CO-FLOW will provide in-depth knowledge on the long-term sequelae of COVID-19 and the quality of current aftercare paths for patients who survived hospitalization. This knowledge is a prerequisite to facilitate the right care in the right place for COVID-19 and comparable future infectious diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION The Netherlands Trial Register (NTR), https://www.trialregister.nl . Registered: 12-06-2020, CO-FLOW trialregister no. NL8710.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Martine Bek
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Julia C Berentschot
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Merel E Hellemons
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne M Huijts
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jasper van Bommel
- Department of Adult Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michel E van Genderen
- Department of Adult Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik A M P J Gommers
- Department of Adult Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard M Ribbers
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Rijndam Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Majanka H Heijenbrok-Kal
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Rijndam Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rita J G van den Berg-Emons
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
de Rouw N, Derijks HJ, Hilbrands LB, Boosman RJ, Piet B, Koolen SLW, Burgers JA, Dingemans AMC, van den Heuvel MM, Hendriks LEL, Aerts JGJV, Croes S, Mathijssen RHJ, Huitema ADR, Burger DM, Biesma B, Ter Heine R. Hyperhydration with cisplatin does not influence pemetrexed exposure. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 88:871-876. [PMID: 34374116 PMCID: PMC9290918 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Pemetrexed is a cytotoxic drug for first‐line treatment of lung cancer. It is often combined with other anticancer drugs such as cisplatin or carboplatin. In clinical practice, hyperhydration regimens are applied to overcome cisplatin‐related nephrotoxicity. As pemetrexed is almost completely eliminated from the body by the kidneys, hyperhydration can result in augmented clearance. Furthermore, administration of large quantities of fluid may increase the volume of distribution of pemetrexed. Pharmacokinetics and, thus, efficacy and toxicity may be influenced by hyperhydration. This has not yet been properly studied. We performed a population pharmacokinetic analysis to assess hyperhydration as a covariate for pemetrexed clearance and for volume of distribution A relevant change was defined as >25% increase in clearance or volume of distribution. In our extensive dataset of 133 individuals, we found that hyperhydration did not significantly or relevantly explain variability in pemetrexed clearance (unchanged, P = .196) or volume of distribution (+7% change, P = .002), despite a power of >99% to detect a relevant change. Therefore, dose adjustments of pemetrexed are not required during hyperhydration with cisplatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikki de Rouw
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Hieronymus J Derijks
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Luuk B Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - René J Boosman
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Berber Piet
- Department of Pulmonology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Stijn L W Koolen
- Department of Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jacobus A Burgers
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Lizza E L Hendriks
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Sander Croes
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alwin D R Huitema
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacology, Princes Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - David M Burger
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Bonne Biesma
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Rob Ter Heine
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Boosman RJ, Dorlo TPC, de Rouw N, Burgers JA, Dingemans AMC, van den Heuvel MM, Hendriks LEL, Biesma B, Aerts JGJV, Croes S, Mathijssen RHJ, Huitema ADR, Ter Heine R. Toxicity of pemetrexed during renal impairment explained-Implications for safe treatment. Int J Cancer 2021; 149:1576-1584. [PMID: 34181276 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Pemetrexed is an important component of first line treatment in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. However, a limitation is the contraindication in patients with renal impairment due to hematological toxicity. Currently, it is unknown how to safely dose pemetrexed in these patients. The aim of our study was to elucidate the relationship between pemetrexed exposure and toxicity to support the development of a safe dosing regimen in patients with renal impairment. A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis was performed based on phase II study results in three patients with renal dysfunction, supplemented with data from 106 patients in early clinical studies. Findings were externally validated with data of different pemetrexed dosing regimens. Alternative dosing regimens were evaluated using the developed model. We found that pemetrexed toxicity was driven by the time above a toxicity threshold concentration. The threshold for vitamin-supplemented patients was 0.110 mg/mL (95% CI: 0.092-0.146 mg/mL). It was observed that in patients with renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]: <45 mL/min) the approved dose of 500 mg/m2 would yield a high probability of severe neutropenia in the range of 51.0% to 92.6%. A pemetrexed dose of 20 mg for patients (eGFR: 20 mL/min) is shown to be neutropenic-equivalent to the approved dose in patients with adequate renal function (eGFR: 90 mL/min), but would result in an approximately 13-fold lower area under the concentration-time curve. The pemetrexed exposure-toxicity relationship is explained by a toxicity threshold and substantially different from previously thought. Without prophylaxis for toxicity, it is unlikely that a therapeutic dose can be safely administered to patients with renal impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- René J Boosman
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas P C Dorlo
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nikki de Rouw
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobus A Burgers
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne-Marie C Dingemans
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lizza E L Hendriks
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bonne Biesma
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sander Croes
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alwin D R Huitema
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rob Ter Heine
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Cantini L, Pecci F, Dammeijer F, Aerts JGJV, Berardi R. Re: Comments on 'High-intensity statins are associated with improved clinical activity of programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors in malignant pleural mesothelioma and advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients'. Eur J Cancer 2021; 153:267-269. [PMID: 34154882 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Cantini
- Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, AOU Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Italy; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Federica Pecci
- Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, AOU Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Italy
| | - Floris Dammeijer
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, AOU Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hurkmans DP, Basak EA, Schepers N, Oomen-De Hoop E, Van der Leest CH, El Bouazzaoui S, Bins S, Koolen SLW, Sleijfer S, Van der Veldt AAM, Debets R, Van Schaik RHN, Aerts JGJV, Mathijssen RHJ. Granzyme B is correlated with clinical outcome after PD-1 blockade in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 8:jitc-2020-000586. [PMID: 32461348 PMCID: PMC7254154 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A minority of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) benefit from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Ineffective effector function of activated T and NK cells may lead to reduced tumor cell death, even when these activated effector cells are released from their immune checkpoint brake. Hence, in this study we aimed to assess the association of baseline serum granzyme B, as well as germline variation of the GZMB gene, with clinical outcome to programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade. Methods A total of 347 patients with stage IV NSCLC who started nivolumab treatment between June 2013 and June 2017 were prospectively included. Baseline serum and whole blood was available, allowing for protein quantification and targeted DNA sequencing. Clinical outcome was based on best overall response (BOR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, V.1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results Patients with low serum levels of granzyme B had worse PFS (HR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.12 to 3.43; p=0.018) and worse OS (HR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.12 to 3.87; p=0.021) than patients with high baseline serum levels. To validate the findings, germline variation of GZMB rs8192917 was assessed. Patients with homozygous and heterozygous variants of GZMB rs8192917 had worse BOR (OR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.01 to 2.52; p=0.044) and worse PFS (HR: 1.38; 95% CI:1.02 to 1.87; p=0.036) than wild types. Conclusions A low baseline serum level of granzyme B and germline variation of GZMB was associated with worse clinical outcome in NSCLC, emphasizing the relevance and additional value of monitoring germline genetic variations which mirror cytotoxic functions of T cells in ICI therapy. Trail registration number Dutch Trial Registry (NL6828).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daan P Hurkmans
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands .,Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Edwin A Basak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nina Schepers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Oomen-De Hoop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Samira El Bouazzaoui
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander Bins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stijn L W Koolen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Departmemt of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Sleijfer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid A M Van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Reno Debets
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ron H N Van Schaik
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Hurkmans DP, Sassen SDT, de Joode K, Putter L, Basak EA, Wijkhuijs AJM, Joerger M, Debets R, Koch BCP, Van der Leest CH, Schreurs MWJ, van der Veldt AAM, Aerts JGJV, Mathijssen RHJ, Koolen SLW. Prospective real-world study on the pharmacokinetics of pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumors. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:jitc-2021-002344. [PMID: 34088739 PMCID: PMC8183294 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dosing schemes of pembrolizumab (anti-programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody) are solely based on pharmacokinetic (PK) modelling derived from phase I-III trials. The current study aimed to determine factors affecting PK and its relationship with clinical outcome in the real-world setting. METHODS Advanced-stage cancer patients, who were treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy (2 mg/kg Q3W or 200 mg flat Q3W), were prospectively included for serial sampling to obtain trough concentrations. A PK model was generated, covariate effects assessed and internally validated by a bootstrap procedure. PK parameters were related to overall survival (OS) and the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). RESULTS 588 serum samples derived from 122 patients with (non-)small-cell lung cancer ([N]SCLC), malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), melanoma and urothelial cell cancer (UCC) were analyzed. Median follow-up was 2.2 years. A one-compartment PK model was generated: body surface area (BSA) and serum albumin had a significant effect on drug clearance (CL; covariate estimate 1.46 and -1.43, respectively), and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) on the distribution volume(Vd; 0.34). A significant inverse CL-OS relationship was determined for NSCLC (HR:1.69; 95%CI1.07-2.68; p=0.024) and MPM (HR: 3.29; 95% CI 1.08 to 10.09; p=0.037), after correction for prognostic factors, which could not confirmed for melanoma (p=0.22) or UCC (p=0.34). No relationship could be determined between CL and grade >3 irAEs (p=0.70). CONCLUSIONS High interpatient variability of pembrolizumab PK is determined by BSA and serum albumin (on CL) and LDH (on Vd). A strong inverse CL-OS relationship was demonstrated for NSCLC and MPM, which could not be observed for melanoma and UCC. The findings suggest that personalized dosing should be prospectively explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daan P Hurkmans
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands .,Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan D T Sassen
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karlijn de Joode
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisanne Putter
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Edwin A Basak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Markus Joerger
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, The Netherlands
| | - Reno Debets
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Birgit C P Koch
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marco W J Schreurs
- Department of Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stijn L W Koolen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|