Natural history and clinical features of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease

Quantifying surgical completeness in patients with aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease

BACKGROUND

Aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) in patients who have had sinus surgery remains a management challenge. Aspirin desensitization and biologics are additional treatment options. It remains unclear if patients require a more comprehensive surgery prior to implementing such additional therapies. The purpose of this study was to quantify prior surgery completeness in AERD patients at a tertiary rhinology practice.

METHODS

Paranasal sinus CT scans were reviewed by four academic rhinologists to assess surgery completeness. Using a published CT grading system, each sinus was graded on the completeness of surgery and middle turbinate reduction. A score out of 14 was calculated for each patient (7 per side).

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients with AERD out of 141 available were included. Mean inter-rater agreement across all sinuses was moderate (k = 0.42). The mean completeness score was 6.7/14. The following procedures were rated as complete (means): uncinectomy (L: 84%, R: 82%, k = 0.44), maxillary (L: 83%, R: 77%, k = 0.32), middle turbinate reduction (L: 45%, R: 46%, k = 0.31), anterior ethmoid (L: 35%, R: 39%, k = 0.51), sphenoid (L: 36%, R: 35%, k = 0.4), posterior ethmoid (L: 30%, R: 30%, k = 0.48), frontal (L: 22%, R: 21%, k = 0.46).

CONCLUSION

Prior surgery in AERD patients were mostly deemed incomplete. Uncinectomy and maxillary antrostomy are the most common procedures previously performed. It remains toe seen whether this would be considered 'adequate' surgery or more 'complete' surgery is required to achieve greater disease control.

What's New in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease: A Brief Review

Background

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a chronic condition characterized by the presence of asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, and sensitivity to aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Diagnosis is based on careful clinical history and physical examination, characteristic laboratory and radiographic findings, and, in unclear cases, aspirin challenge. Established treatment is founded on comprehensive endoscopic sinus surgery followed by topical steroids and aspirin desensitization. T2 biologics are now available for refractory cases.

Objective

To summarize the historic literature on AERD, its diagnosis and treatment options, as well as to review the most current publications on the topic and explore areas for future research.

Methods

A literature review utilizing the PubMed database was performed.

Results

Seminal journal articles regarding the diagnosis and treatment of AERD were reviewed with close attention to evidence-based protocols and knowledge gaps in the field as areas for future research.

Conclusion

AERD is a complex disease which requires careful diagnostic work-up and coordinated care between the allergist and rhinologist to facilitate optimal treatment outcomes.

Aspirin desensitization in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory exacerbated respiratory disease: The first prospective cohort in Chile

Background

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) is characterized by the Samter triad: chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, asthma, and nonallergic hypersensitivity to NSAIDs. Its diagnosis is based on a complete clinical history and an aspirin (ASA) challenge test. Medical treatments include biological drugs and ASA desensitization.

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the clinical response of patients with N-ERD undergoing functional endoscopic surgery (FES), followed by ASA desensitization and maintenance treatment, being the first prospective cohort study carried out in Chile.

Methods

We conducted 1-year follow-up of 12 patients with N-ERD treated with FES, desensitization, and maintenance with ASA. For each control, the medication score, sinonasal symptomatology (SNOT-22), PEF (peak expiratory flow), nasal polyposis (Lildholdt score), and the appearance of adverse effects were recorded. Computed tomography (CT) of the paranasal cavities was performed at baseline and at the 12-month follow-up to calculate the Lund-Mackay score.

Results

Patients presented a reduction of SNOT-22 after the FES, which was maintained at 12 months (p = 0.002); the symptoms that showed the greatest reduction were feeling embarrassed and nasal obstruction. The Lildholdt score was also significantly reduced (p = 0.001); in only three patients, the nasal polyps recurred, and all were small. The PEF showed a slight nonsignificant increase of 3.3%. In total, 75% of patients had an adverse effect, the most frequent being abdominal pain (66.7%), but none of the 12 patients required discontinuation of aspirin treatment in 1-year follow-up. The Lund-Mackay score had a significant reduction of 6.6 points (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

ASA desensitization is safe and effective in reducing upper and lower respiratory symptoms in patients with N-ERD and delays the reappearance of nasal polyps, although it is not exempt from adverse effects, with the vast majority being mild.

Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease Requiring Desensitization Prior to Planned Percutaneous Catheterization Intervention

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) consists of a triad of asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, and a hypersensitivity reaction to aspirin consisting of nasal congestion and broncho-constriction. This disease presents a conundrum in cardiac patients undergoing percutaneous catheterization intervention (PCI) who might require stent deployment due to the need for aspirin as part of the dual antiplatelet therapy required if a stent is placed. Here, we present the case of a patient who underwent a coronary angiogram showing two-vessel disease but had to undergo aspirin desensitization first before planned PCI as he had a history of severe aspirin allergy in the past.

Aspirin desensitization in NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease and its outcomes in the clinical course of asthma: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

Background

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD) might benefit from aspirin desensitization (AD) as an alternative treatment to standard care. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding its role in bronchial symptoms and asthma exacerbations.

Objective

To analyze the clinical effects of AD in terms of lung function, systemic and inhaled steroid use, the frequency of acute asthma exacerbations, and adverse effects in patients with NERD and asthma.

Methodology

We identified randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and EBSCO. We also searched the RCT references for additional studies. Studies comparing AD to placebo in patients with a previous history of pulmonary symptoms triggered by ASA or other NSAIDs or with a positive provocation test to ASA were included.

Primary results

Five studies with 210 participants with NERD were included in this review. The study duration ranged from 3 to 6 months. Overall, the risk of bias across the included RCTs was low. We identified 3 studies evaluating lung function, 2 of which reported a significant improvement in FEV1 in the AD group after 6 months, while the other reported no difference among the treatments. Due to high heterogeneity, we did not pool the results. The remaining primary outcomes were reported only in a single study each, hindering their interpretation. Secondary outcomes revealed reduced symptom and medication scores in patients with AD.

Conclusions

Due to the small number of studies included in this systematic review, conclusions should be made with caution. AD shows a trend towards improving lung function (FEV1) following 6 months of treatment, although no conclusions can be made regarding the use of corticosteroids or the frequency of acute exacerbations. AD appears to reduce both symptom and medication scores. Additional RCTs are needed to fully assess the efficacy of AD in reducing bronchial symptoms in patients with NERD.

Toxicological Property of Acetaminophen: The Dark Side of a Safe Antipyretic/Analgesic Drug?

Acetaminophen (paracetamol, N-acetyl-p-aminophenol; APAP) is the most popular analgesic/antipyretic agent in the world. APAP has been regarded as a safer drug compared with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) particularly in terms of lower risks of renal dysfunction, gastrointestinal injury, and asthma/bronchospasm induction, even in high-risk patients such as the elderly, children, and pregnant women. On the other hand, the recent increasing use of APAP has raised concerns about its toxicity. In this article, we review recent pharmacological and toxicological findings about APAP from basic, clinical, and epidemiological studies, including spontaneous drug adverse events reporting system, especially focusing on drug-induced asthma and pre-and post-natal closure of ductus arteriosus. Hepatotoxicity is the greatest fault of APAP and the most frequent cause of drug-induced acute liver failure in Western countries. However, its precise mechanism remains unclear and no effective cure beyond N-acetylcysteine has been developed. Recent animal and cellular studies have demonstrated that some cellular events, such as c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway activation, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and mitochondrial oxidative stress may play important roles in the development of hepatitis. Herein, the molecular mechanisms of APAP hepatotoxicity are summarized. We also discuss the not-so-familiar "dark side" of APAP as an otherwise safe analgesic/antipyretic drug.

Recent Advances in Severe Asthma: From Phenotypes to Personalized Medicine

This review focuses on recent clinical and translational discoveries in severe and uncontrolled asthma that now enable phenotyping and personalized therapies in these patients. Although asthma is common in both children and adults and typically responds to standard therapies, a subset of individuals with asthma experience severe and/or persistent symptoms despite appropriate therapies. Airflow obstruction leading to frequent symptoms requiring higher levels of controller therapy is the cardinal feature of severe asthma, but the underlying molecular mechanisms, or endotypes, are diverse and variable between individuals. Two major risk factors that contribute to severe asthma are genetics and environmental exposures that modulate immune responses, and although these often interact in complex manners that are not fully understood, certain endotypes converge in severe asthma. A number of studies have evaluated various features of patients with severe asthma and classified patients into phenotypes with clinical relevance. This phenotyping is now incorporated into clinical practice and can be used to guide advanced biological therapies that target specific molecules and inflammatory pathways that contribute to asthma pathogenesis.

Phenotypes Determined by Cluster Analysis in Moderate to Severe Bronchial Asthma

BACKGROUND

Bronchial asthma is a heterogeneous disease that includes various subtypes. They may share similar clinical characteristics, but probably have different pathological mechanisms.

AIM

To identify phenotypes using cluster analysis in moderate to severe bronchial asthma and to compare differences in clinical, physiological, immunological and inflammatory data between the clusters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty adult patients with moderate to severe bronchial asthma out of exacerbation were included. All underwent clinical assessment, anthropometric measurements, skin prick testing, standard spirometry and measurement fraction of exhaled nitric oxide. Blood eosinophilic count, serum total IgE and periostin levels were determined. Two-step cluster approach, hierarchical clustering method and k-mean analysis were used for identification of the clusters.

RESULTS

We have identified four clusters. Cluster 1 (n=14) - late-onset, non-atopic asthma with impaired lung function, Cluster 2 (n=13) - late-onset, atopic asthma, Cluster 3 (n=6) - late-onset, aspirin sensitivity, eosinophilic asthma, and Cluster 4 (n=7) - early-onset, atopic asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is the first in Bulgaria in which cluster analysis is applied to asthmatic patients. We identified four clusters. The variables with greatest force for differentiation in our study were: age of asthma onset, duration of diseases, atopy, smoking, blood eosinophils, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs hypersensitivity, baseline FEV1/FVC and symptoms severity. Our results support the concept of heterogeneity of bronchial asthma and demonstrate that cluster analysis can be an useful tool for phenotyping of disease and personalized approach to the treatment of patients.

Atrial septal defect in adults is associated with airway hyperresponsiveness

OBJECTIVE

The association between secundum atrial septal defects (ASD) and asthma-like dyspnea with consequent long-term pulmonary inhalant use, is poorly understood in adult ASD patients. Airway hyperresponsiveness is suggested to be the underlying mechanism of cardiac asthma from mitral valve disease and ischemic cardiomyopathy. We hypothesized that airway hyperresponsiveness may also be found in adult ASD patients. Our aim was to study airway responsiveness in adult ASD patients before percutaneous closure and at short-and long-term postprocedural follow-up.

METHODS

This prospective study included 31 ASD patients (65% female, mean age 49 ± 15y) who underwent spirometry and bronchoprovocation testing pre-and six-month postprocedurally, with additional bronchoprovocation at 2-year follow-up. Airway hyperresponsiveness was defined as ≥20% fall of forced expiratory volume in 1-second (FEV₁ ) following <8.0 mg/mL of inhaled methacholine.

RESULTS

Airway hyperresponsiveness was found in 19/30 patients (63%[95%CI 45%-81%]; post hoc statistical power = 89%). Asthma-like symptoms wheezing, chest tightness, and cough were more frequently reported in airway hyperresponsive patients. Airway responsiveness was not influenced by successful percutaneous ASD closure, corresponding to persistence of asthma-like symptoms postclosure. Regardless of airway responsiveness, postprocedural right-sided reverse remodeling significantly improved dyspnea and pulmonary function.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to report a high prevalence of airway hyperresponsiveness in a cohort of unrepaired adult ASD patients, and confirms the association between asthma-like symptoms and ASD in adults. Attention to symptoms and pulmonary function should be given during clinical follow-up of adult ASD patients, both before and long after repair.

Assessing asthma in the otolaryngologist's office

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To familiarize otolaryngologists and other practitioners with basic diagnosis and treatment of asthma in adults and children based on current literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

Increased fractional excretion of nitrous oxide and sputum eosinophils have been identified in asthmatic patients being evaluated for chronic cough and appear to be more sensitive in diagnosis than traditional spirometry. Both sublingual and subcutaneous immunotherapy modalities are effective in decreasing symptoms and medication use in patients with allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma.

SUMMARY

Undiagnosed comorbid asthma is prevalent among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and allergic rhinitis and control of all diseases processes greatly improves quality of life. Office spirometry is a helpful tool in the evaluation and management of asthma. Otolaryngologists should be able to recognize undiagnosed or poorly controlled asthma, initiate and improve medical therapy, and treat rhinosinusitis to improve asthma control.

Aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease: Current topics and trends

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease is a chronic and treatment-resistant disease, characterized by the presence of eosinophilic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyposis, bronchial asthma, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs hypersensitivity. Alterations in arachidonic acid metabolism may induce an imbalance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory substances, expressed as an overproduction of cysteinyl leukotrienes and an underproduction of prostaglandin E2. Although eosinophils play a key role, recent studies have shown the importance of other cells and molecules in the development of the disease like mast cells, basophils, lymphocytes, platelets, neutrophils, macrophages, epithelial respiratory cells, IL-33 and thymic stromal lymphopoietin, making each of them promissory diagnostic and treatment targets. In this review, we summarize the most important clinical aspects of the disease, including the current topics about diagnosis and treatment, like provocation challenges and aspirin desensitization. We also discuss recent findings in the pathogenesis of the disease, as well as future trends in diagnosis and treatment, including monoclonal antibodies and a low salicylate diet as a treatment option.

Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease

Patients with severe asthma and concomitant chronic rhinosinusitis often have severe, refractory upper and lower airway inflammation. This inflammation has been proposed to be similar throughout the upper and lower airways leading to the unified airways concept. This article reviews chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps, and the subgroup with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, while focusing on the relationship with asthma. Additionally, diagnosis and treatment with current and newer therapies are discussed.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms in TNF are associated with susceptibility to aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease but not to cytokine levels: a study in Mexican mestizo population

AIM

To evaluate the association of three single nucleotide polymorphisms in TNF and one in LTA in Mexican patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) and the correlation of those single nucleotide polymorphisms with serum levels of TNF-α.

PATIENTS & METHODS

Case-control study including 133 patients with AERD, 135 patients with asthma (aspirin-tolerant asthmatics) and 182 healthy subjects.

RESULTS

GA genotype of rs1800629 in TNF was found to be associated with the risk of developing AERD (p < 0.05; odds ratio = 2.36) and by dominant model (p < 0.05; odds ratio = 2.51). Furthermore, there was a difference in the serum levels between the aspirin-tolerant asthmatics group and the other groups (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The GA genotype of rs1800629 is associated with genetic susceptibility to AERD, but it does not correlate to protein serum levels.

Current complications and treatment of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease

INTRODUCTION

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease is defined by the clinical tetrad of aspirin sensitivity, nasal polyps, asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis. Patients experience acute upper and lower airway reactions with exposure to aspirin and other cyclooxygenase-1 inhibiting medications. However, airway inflammation and disease progression occur even in the absence of exposure to these medications, often leading to aggressive polyp formation and need for systemic corticosteroids to treat exacerbations in asthma and rhinosinusitis. Areas covered: This review focuses on the direct and indirect complications of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease. Current and potential management strategies are discussed with emphasis on aspirin desensitization. Expert commentary: Aspirin desensitization remains the gold standard of treatment. Demonstrated benefits of desensitization include improved symptom scores, reduction in use of systemic corticosteroids, slowing of polyp regrowth, and tolerance of aspirin and other NSAIDs for various therapeutic purposes. Continued investigation into the pathogenic mechanisms of AERD is likely to yield new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease and current treatment modalities

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) refers to the combination of asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, and acute upper and lower respiratory tract reactions to the ingestion of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid, ASA) and other cyclooxygenase-1 inhibiting non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. AERD affects 0.3-0.9 % of the general population. AERD generally occurs due to abnormalities in mediators and expression of arachidonic acid biosynthesis. Local IgE responses to staphylococcal enterotoxins may also be responsible for eosinophilic activation in the nasal polyp tissues of AERD patients. Clinical features of AERD include the onset of nasal congestion with anosmia, progressing to chronic pansinusitis and nasal polyps that regrow rapidly after surgery. Aspirin desensitization, Leukotriene-modifying agents, biologic agents, management of asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis, and nasal polyposis are recommended as treatment modalities. Immunotherapy is prescribed only to those AERD patients who experience clear seasonal or perennial allergy symptoms in addition to the symptoms attributable to chronic nasal polyposis. There are also investigational and dietary therapies. In this review, the important aspects of AERD will be presented, along with a literature survey.

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease: characteristics and management strategies

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease is a clinical entity comprising chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, asthma and intolerance to COX-1 inhibiting drugs. The pathogenesis is not completely understood at this point, but abnormal arachidonic acid metabolism is a key feature in this syndrome. The diagnosis is confirmed only by direct drug challenge. Aspirin desensitization followed by daily aspirin therapy is a useful treatment option in these patients. In this review article are discussed the important characteristics and treatment of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease.

Aspirin hypersensitivity in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis: frequency and contributing factors

BACKGROUND

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a syndrome frequently seen in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). However, there are few studies on evaluating the prevalence of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]) hypersensitivity in patients with CRSwNP using the oral aspirin challenge (OAC) test. This cross-sectional study was designed to determine the frequency of ASA hypersensitivity and factors associated with it in patients with CRSwNP in Tehran, Iran.

METHODS

Adult patients with CRSwNP who were presented to the asthma and allergy clinic were recruited for the study. After confirming CRS and NP, OAC was performed to evaluate/confirm the diagnosis of ASA hypersensitivity. Atopic evaluation was performed using skin-prick test, nasal smear, blood eosinophil count, and serum total IgE.

RESULTS

Eighty Iranian patients (43 women and 37 men) with CRSwNP were enrolled (mean age, 38.9 ± 10.7 years). OAC was performed in all of the patients and 39 patients (48.8%) had a positive reaction; among them, 14 (35.8%) had a self-reported history of ASA hypersensitivity. Concomitant asthma, previous polyp surgery, high polyp score, and ASA hypersensitivity history were all associated with positive OAC (p < 0.05). Presence of AERD was not associated with age, stage of asthma, blood eosinophilia, nasal smear eosinophilia, and atopy.

CONCLUSION

ASA hypersensitivity is common in patients with CRSwNP in Tehran, Iran. Patients at risk for AERD should be evaluated for the presence of ASA hypersensitivity with ASA provocation challenge test to confirm the diagnosis.

Association analysis of member RAS oncogene family gene polymorphisms with aspirin intolerance in asthmatic patients

Member RAS oncogene family (RAB1A), a member of the RAS oncogene family, cycles between inactive GDP-bound and active GTP-bound forms regulating vesicle transport in exocytosis. Thus, functional alterations of the RAB1A gene may contribute to aspirin intolerance in asthmatic sufferers. To investigate the relationship between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the RAB1A gene and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), asthmatics (n=1197) were categorized into AERD and aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA). All subjects were diagnosed as asthma on the basis of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines. AERD was defined as asthmatics showing 15% or greater decreases in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) or naso-ocular reactions by the oral acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) challenge (OAC) test. In total, eight SNPs were genotyped. Logistic regression analysis identified that the minor allele frequency of +14444 T>G and +41170 C>G was significantly higher in the AERD group (n=181) than in the ATA group (n=1016) (p=0.0003-0.03). Linear regression analysis revealed a strong association between the SNPs and the aspirin-induced decrease in FEV(1) (p=0.0004-0.004). The RAB1A gene may play a role in the development of AERD in asthmatics and the genetic polymorphisms of the gene have the potential to be used as an indicator of this disease.

Identifying asthma triggers

Asthma has many triggers including rhinosinusitis; allergy; irritants; medications (aspirin in aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease); and obesity. Paradoxic vocal fold dysfunction mimics asthma and may be present along with asthma. This article reviews each of these triggers, outlining methods of recognizing the trigger and then its management. In many patients more than one trigger may be present. Full appreciation of the complexity of these relationships and targeted therapy to the trigger is needed to best care for the patient with asthma.

Eosinophil activation and novel mediators in the aspirin-induced nasal response in AERD

BACKGROUND

Eosinophil activation is the key feature of upper and lower airway inflammation in aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the mechanism of eosinophil activation and identify novel inflammatory mediators using proteomics.

METHODS

Thirty-two asthmatic subjects were enrolled: 18 AERD patients who showed positive responses to the lysine-aspirin nasal provocation test (L-ASA NPT) and 14 aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA) patients who showed negative responses to the L-ASA NPT (control group). Nasal lavage fluid (NLF) was collected before (baseline), at 10, 30 and 60 min (early response), and at 3 h (late response) after the L-ASA NPT. Eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and cysteinyl leucotriene (CysLT) levels were measured using an ImmunoCAP system and ELISA respectively. To identify proteins involved in AERD, comparative proteomics was applied using NLFs collected before and after L-ASA NPTs in AERD patients. The clinical relevance of identified novel proteins was evaluated by ELISA using NLFs from the AERD and ATA groups.

RESULTS

Eosinophil cationic protein and CysLT levels both increased significantly during the early response in AERD. ECP levels increased until the late response in AERD, while CysLT levels were not significantly increased during the late response. Proteomic analysis showed up-regulation of apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1), α2-macroglobulin (α2M) and ceruloplasmin (CP), with significant increases in NLF of AERD patients, which was significantly higher in AERD patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Significant correlations were noted between ECP and CysLT, ApoA1, α2M and CP levels during the early response in AERD patients.

CONCLUSION

Eosinophil activation occurred in early and late responses after L-ASA NPT in upper airway mucosa of AERD patients, where ApoA1, α2M and CP as well as CysLT may be involved in eosinophilic inflammation.

Clinical Management of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Hypersensitivity

Hypersensitivity diseases caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents are relatively common in the population. This article summarizes the present understanding on the various allergic and nonallergic clinical pictures produced through hypersensitivity to these drugs using the pathogenic classification of hypersensitivity reactions recently proposed by the Nomenclature Committee of the World Allergy Organization to guide clinicians in the diagnosis and management of patients with these conditions.

Staphylococcus aureus and Chronic Airway Disease

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is correlated with the development of persistent severe inflammatory disease of the upper airway including chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. This inflammation of the upper airways is characterized by a T-helper 2-driven disease: interleukin-5 is significantly increased and local production of immunoglobulin E is observed. S. aureus and its enterotoxins are deregulating the tissue inflammation at different levels: structural cells and the innate and adaptive immune system. Knowing the triggers of the pathomechanisms involved will greatly help us to find new therapeutic approaches to resolve this chronic inflammatory process.

Aspirin-intolerant asthma in the Korean population: prevalence and characteristics based on a questionnaire survey

BACKGROUND

Aspirin-intolerant asthma is a unique clinical syndrome characterized by acute bronchoconstriction following the administration of aspirin and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the prevalence and investigated the demographic and clinical characteristics of adult patients with aspirin-intolerant asthma in Korea.

METHODS

Using an adult asthma cohort (COREA) from 11 university hospitals in Korea, we analyzed the prevalence of aspirin-intolerant asthma, defined as a positive response to the question: "Have you ever experienced dyspnea and cough after taking an aspirin or any NSAID (cold medicine)?" Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between patients with aspirin-intolerant asthma and aspirin-tolerant asthma.

RESULTS

Aspirin-intolerant asthma was reported in 68 (5.8%) of 1173 adult asthmatics (age 15-84). Patients with aspirin-intolerant asthma had a lower mean age (43.9 ± 13.4 vs. 49.0 ± 15.6, P = 0.003) and a higher prevalence of rhinosinusitis (77.9% vs. 61.7%, P = 0.012) and atopic dermatitis (16.2% vs. 5.7%, P = 0.001) than aspirin-tolerant asthma patients. There were no significant differences in lung function, asthma severity or the use of asthma controllers. However, aspirin-intolerant asthma was associated with greater use of healthcare services over a lifetime and over the past 12 months. Aspirin-intolerant asthma was significantly associated with emergency room visits over the past 12 months (P = 0.029, OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.08-4.42).

CONCLUSION

Based on histories, the prevalence of aspirin-intolerant asthma is 5.8% among adult asthma patients in Korea. Aspirin-intolerant asthma is associated with lower age, higher prevalence of rhinosinusitis and atopic dermatitis, and more frequent exacerbations.

[Aspirin desensitization: therapy options in patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease]

Aspirin desensitization has established itself as an additional therapy option in the treatment of aspirin- exacerbated respiratory disease, recurrent chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps. Inpatient treatment is strongly recommended due to the risk of life-threatening side effects. In addition, the necessary requirements, indications and contraindications should be carefully considered from a medicolegal perspective. A maintenance dose of 300 (-500) mg ASS is currently recommended. Indications include persisting symptoms despite intensive medical care and/or recurrent nasal polyps, leading to recurrent sinus operations and/or the need to take systemic corticosteroids in order to control nasal symptoms or asthma. If ASS intake is interrupted for more than 48 h, aspirin desensitization should be resumed to prevent renewed intolerance reactions.

Nonallergic drug hypersensitivity reactions

BACKGROUND

Nonallergic drug hypersensitivities, also referred to as pseudoallergic or anaphylactoid reactions, have clinical manifestations that are often indistinguishable from allergic reactions.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed search using the terms 'drug allergy, drug hypersensitivity, pseudoallergies, anaphylaxis and nonallergic drug reactions' and reviewed 511 publications dated between 1970 and 2012. A total of 160 papers that were relevant to the most common nonallergic drug hypersensitivity reactions were selected for discussion.

RESULTS

Nonallergic drug hypersensitivities do not involve either IgE-mediated (type 1) or delayed (type 4) hypersensitivity. Nonallergic hypersensitivities are commonly referred to as pseudoallergic or idiosyncratic reactions. The common nonallergic drug hypersensitivities are secondary to chemotherapeutic drugs, radiocontrast agents, vancomycin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, local anesthetic reactions and opiates. Protocols for skin testing of radiocontrast, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, local anesthetics and chemotherapeutic agents have been developed, though most have not been validated or standardized. Other diagnostic tests include in vitro-specific IgE tests, and the current 'gold' standard is usually an oral challenge or bronchoprovocation test. In the case of aspirin, even though it is not believed to be IgE-mediated, a 'desensitization' protocol has been developed and utilized successfully, although the mechanism of this desensitization is unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic methods exist to distinguish allergic from nonallergic drug hypersensitivity reactions. The best option in nonallergic drug hypersensitivity is avoidance. If that is not possible, premedication protocols have been developed, although the success of premedication varies amongst drugs and patients.

Diagnostic value of clinical parameters in the prediction of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease in asthma

Purpose

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) has attracted a great deal of attention because of its association with increased asthma severity. However, oral aspirin challenge (OAC) to diagnose AERD is a time-consuming procedure, and some patients experience serious complications. Thus, we evaluated diagnostic values of non-invasive clinical parameters to predict AERD in asthmatic patients.

Methods

A total of 836 Korean subjects were recruited from an asthma cohort. They underwent OAC, and clinical parameters including the history of aspirin hypersensitivity, nasal polyposis, and chronic sinusitis of aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA) and AERD asthmatic patients were compared.

Results

Significant differences (P<0.01) were found in eight parameters: age at diagnosis, body mass index, FEV1%, PC20, history of urticaria, nasal polyps, chronic sinusitis, and history of aspirin hypersensitivity. After logistic regression analysis based on the eight clinical parameters, nasal polyps, history of aspirin intolerance, sinusitis, and log [PC20 methacholine] remained significantly associated with AERD (P<0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of the history of aspirin hypersensitivity to predict AERD were 64.7% and 92.0%, respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 56.9% and 94.1%, respectively. Overall, the accuracy of the test was 88.2%. The accuracy of the tests for nasal polyps and chronic sinusitis were 67.3% and 60.4%, respectively.

Conclusions

Among clinical parameters associated with AERD, the history of aspirin hypersensitivity has the best positive and negative predictive values for the oral aspirin challenge test. Because the false-positive and -negative rates were still high, additional non-invasive methods are needed to reduce the rate of false outcomes.

The time delay between drug intake and bronchospasm for nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs sensitive patients

A study was performed to assess the time between drug intake and drug induced hypersensitivity reaction for patients sensitive to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) in clinical patient history and after oral provocation tests. Drug hypersensitivity ENDA questionnaires were filled for the patients with suspected sensitivity to NSAID. Oral provocation tests were performed with suspected NSAID according to the ENDA/EAACI recommendations. There were 76 patients with history of hypersensitivity reactions after use of NSAID enrolled in the study. Recorded were 154 hypersensitivity reactions to NSAID in the clinical history. In the clinical history median time of immediate reactions (76 cases, 81%) between drug intake and bronchospasm was 20 minutes [15-30 minutes]. Median time of nonimmediate reactions (18 cases, 19%) was 120 minutes [120-390 minutes]. There were 50 oral provocation tests performed, 14 of them (28%) were positive. Median time between drug intake and immediate reactions (8; 57% of cases) was 22.5 minutes [20-30 minutes] and median time of nonimmediate reactions (6; 43% of cases) was 167.5 minutes [125-206.25 minutes]. Time delay between drug intake and bronchospasm in the clinical history and after oral provocation test was not statistically different.

Soft tissue injections in the athlete

BACKGROUND

Injections into or adjacent to soft tissue structures, including muscle, tendon, bursa, and fascia, for pain relief and an earlier return to play have become common in the field of sports medicine.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical review.

RESULTS

Corticosteroids, local anesthetics, and ketorolac tromethamine (Toradol) are the most commonly used injectable agents in athletes. The use of these injectable agents have proven efficacy in some disorders, whereas the clinical benefit for others remain questionable. All soft tissue injections performed for pain control and/or an anti-inflammatory effect have potentially serious side effects, which must be considered, especially in the pregame setting.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary concern regarding corticosteroid and local anesthetic injections is an increased risk of tendon rupture associated with the direct injection into the tendon. Intramuscular Toradol injections provide significant analgesia, as well as an anti-inflammatory effect via its inhibitory effect on the cyclooxygenase pathway. The risk of bleeding associated with Toradol use is recognized but not accurately quantified.

Asthma: a syndrome composed of heterogeneous diseases

OBJECTIVE

To review the concept that asthma comprises distinct heterogeneous inflammatory disorders characterized by patients showing different phenotypes with distinct genetic components, environmental causes, and immunopathologic signa-

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE and PubMed databases from 1950 to the present time were searched for relevant articles and references regarding the heterogeneity of asthma.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles that described the various phenotypes of asthma were used for this review.

RESULTS

Asthma is unlikely to be a single disease but rather a series of complex, overlapping individual diseases or phenotypes, each defined by its unique interaction between genetic and environmental factors. These conditions include syndromes characterized by allergen-exacerbated, nonallergic, and aspirin-exacerbated factors along with syndromes best distinguished by their pathologic findings (eosinophilic, neutrophilic, pauci-granulocytic), response to therapy (corticosteroid resistant), and natural history (remodeling prone). Additional phenotypes will almost certainly be identified as advances in genetics and other profiling methods are made and will be accompanied by the availability of clear biomarkers for distinguishing among them.

CONCLUSIONS

Responses to asthma medications vary considerably among patients, likely reflecting, at least in part, the differing sensitivities of the various asthma phenotypes. Selecting the best possible treatment course in individual patients will be aided by clearly identifying the different phenotypes. Physicians need to recognize this when making decisions to adjust treatment to improve asthma control.

Aspirin challenge and desensitization for aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease: a practice paper

Aspirin desensitization is indicated for patients who have aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease and whose asthma and/or rhinosinusitis is suboptimally controlled with inhaled corticosteroids and leukotriene-modifying drugs. In this practice paper, the general requirements for aspirin desensitization are presented, the locations where desensitizations can be safely performed are outlined, prechallenge patient preparation is discussed, an oral aspirin challenge protocol is presented, treatment of adverse reactions is reviewed, and maintenance of aspirin desensitization is discussed.

Effect of leukotriene modifier drugs on the safety of oral aspirin challenges

BACKGROUND

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease can be diagnosed with oral aspirin challenges and treated with aspirin desensitization.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether controller medications, particularly leukotriene modifier drugs, taken during oral aspirin challenges can reduce the risk of severe asthmatic responses.

METHODS

The medical records of 676 patients who had undergone oral aspirin challenges, followed by aspirin desensitization, were reviewed. Asthmatic responses were stratified based on severity of bronchospastic response or lack of response. The effect of pretreatment with controller medications on the outcome of oral aspirin challenges was measured.

RESULTS

Leukotriene modifier drugs had the most significant effect in protecting the lower airways from severe reactions (P = .004). The protective effect of leukotriene modifier drugs was observed in patients already taking systemic corticosteroids, where the addition of leukotriene modifier drugs significantly shifted the response toward a milder asthmatic response (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Protection from significant aspirin-induced bronchospasm during oral aspirin challenge can be accomplished with leukotriene modifier drugs. The use of a combination of inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting beta-agonists, systemic corticosteroids, and leukotriene modifier drugs stabilized underlying airways in preparation for a reasonably safe and accurate oral aspirin challenge. However, only pretreatment with leukotriene modifier drugs enhanced the safety of oral aspirin challenge in patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease by significantly decreasing the degree of asthmatic responses. Therefore, outpatient oral aspirin challenges in most well-selected patients appear to be a reasonable decision.

Epidemiology of hypersensitivity drug reactions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hypersensitivity drug reactions are but one of the many different types of adverse drug reactions. They may be potentially life-threatening, prolong hospitalization, affect drug prescribing patterns of physicians and result in socioeconomic costs. This review summarizes current knowledge on the incidence, prevalence, mortality and risk factors for these reactions in different populations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Hypersensitivity reactions represent about one third of all adverse drug reactions. Adverse drug reactions affect 10-20% of hospitalized patients and more than 7% of the general population. Severe reactions including anaphylaxis, drug hypersensitivity syndromes, Stevens Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis are also associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although several risk factors have been identified, their clinical importance has not been fully understood. Future progress in immunogenetics and pharmacogenetics may help identify populations at risk for specific types of reactions.

SUMMARY

Well designed epidemiological studies on hypersensitivity drug reactions are lacking as most studies have been on adverse drug reactions. Such studies will be helpful in identifying patients at risk of developing such reactions, in particular severe reactions, and implementing early preventive measures.

A teenager with severe asthma exacerbation following ibuprofen

Aspirin-sensitive asthma, aspirin-intolerant asthma, aspirin- (or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug [NSAID]) exacerbated respiratory disease are terms for a disorder commonly described as affecting adults aged > 30y. With this perception, ibuprofen was administered for postoperative pain management to a 17-year-old boy with allergic rhinitis and previous severe asthma (at a time when well controlled), who then had a severe asthma exacerbation. Analysis of the literature in response to this case highlights four points: 1) NSAID-exacerbated asthma is not only a disorder of adults; it occurs in up to of 2% in asthmatic children, approaching probably 30% in older children with severe asthma and nasal disease. 2) The asthmatic reaction is dose-dependent and can occur with sub-therapeutic doses. Oral NSAID/aspirin challenge should be conducted in an environment where a severe asthma exacerbation can be appropriately managed. 3) The therapeutic use of non-selective [COX-1 preferential] NSAIDs should be avoided when sensitivity is known or suspected in adults and teenagers with severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis or nasal polyps. Use of these agents in younger children with mild episodic wheeze is probably safe. 4) Paracetamol use is probably safe, but aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease may occur with clinical doses in a subgroup of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease patients. COX-2 selective inhibitors are probably safe, although this is controversial. Opioids and tramadol are suitable analgesic alternatives for patients with known or suspected susceptibility.

Aspirin and NSAID sensitivity

Aspirin and the older nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) that block cyclo-oxygenase-1 (COX-1) induce asthma attacks in patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease and urticaria in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria. Weak inhibitors of COX-1, such as acetaminophen and salsalate, crossreact also but only with high doses of the drugs. Partial inhibitors of both COX-1 and COX-2, such as nimesulide and meloxicam, also cross-react but only at high drug doses. COX-2 inhibitors do not cross-react; however, all NSAIDs, including the selective COX-2 inhibitors, can sensitize patients and induce urticaria or anaphylaxis on next exposure to the drug.

Hypersensitivity to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in childhood

Although largely investigated in adults, the issue of hypersensitivity to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in childhood is unsettled due to lack of sufficient data. The purpose of this study is to examine the clinical syndromes of hypersensitivity to NSAIDs in children and adolescents. We performed a review of relevant papers on cutaneous and respiratory adverse reactions triggered by NSAIDs in pediatric patients, and a recount of our own experience in 43 well-characterized NSAID-sensitive children with cutaneous reactions who were submitted to controlled oral challenges with NSAIDs and the new inhibitors of the enzyme isoform cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). Although it has been suggested that allergic and pseudoallergic reactions to NSAIDs in children occur rarely, their prevalence remains largely unknown due to the scarcity of studies. About 23% of NSAID-sensitive patients seen in our institutions are young patients aged 8-18 yr who more frequently develop facial angioedema as their main clinical manifestation. Most patients are atopic and show reactions to more than one drug (cross-reactors). Drugs that inhibit COX-2 with higher specificity than classic NSAIDs are better tolerated in young NSAID-hypersensitive patients.