The Future of Combining Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy with Immunotherapy: Evidence and Progress in Mouse Models

Combined ion beam irradiation platform and 3D fluorescence microscope for cellular cancer research

To improve particle radiotherapy, we need a better understanding of the biology of radiation effects, particularly in heavy ion radiation therapy, where global responses are observed despite energy deposition in only a subset of cells. Here, we integrated a high-speed swept confocally-aligned planar excitation (SCAPE) microscope into a focused ion beam irradiation platform to allow real-time 3D structural and functional imaging of living biological samples during and after irradiation. We demonstrate dynamic imaging of the acute effects of irradiation on 3D cultures of U87 human glioblastoma cells, revealing characteristic changes in cellular movement and intracellular calcium signaling following ionizing irradiation.

Pulmonary function and toxicities of proton versus photon for limited-stage small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare the oncological outcomes and toxicities of definitive proton beam therapy (PBT) and photon beam therapy in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 262 patients with newly diagnosed LS-SCLC who underwent definitive PBT (n = 20; proton group) or photon beam therapy (n = 242; photon group) with concurrent chemotherapy between January 2016 and February 2021 and compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), dose-volume parameters, and toxicities between the groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 24.5 months (range, 3.7 to 78.7). Baseline lung function was significantly worse and clinical target volume (CTV) was larger in the proton group (CTV: 296.6 vs. 215.3 mL; p = 0.080). The mean lung V10 was 37.7% ± 16.8% and 51.6% ± 24.5% in the proton and photon groups, respectively (p = 0.002). Two-year OS and PFS rates were 57.2% and 35.7% in the proton group and 65.3% and 40.8% in the photon group, respectively (p = 0.542 and 0.748, respectively). Grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis and esophagitis occurred in 5 (25.0%) and 7 (35.0%) PBT-treated patients and 66 (27.3%) and 40 (16.5%) photon beam therapy-treated patients, respectively (p = 0.826 and 0.062, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Although the proton group had poorer lung function and a larger CTV than that in the photon group, both groups exhibited comparable treatment outcomes and radiation-related toxicities in LS-SCLC. PBT may be a valuable therapeutic modality in patients with poor pulmonary function or extensive disease burden owing to its lung-sparing ability.

Are charged particles a good match for combination with immunotherapy? Current knowledge and perspectives

Charged particle radiotherapy, mainly using protons and carbon ions, provides physical characteristics allowing for a volume conformal irradiation and a reduction of the integral dose to normal tissue. Carbon ion therapy additionally features an increased biological effectiveness resulting in peculiar molecular effects. Immunotherapy, mostly performed with immune checkpoint inhibitors, is nowadays considered a pillar in cancer therapy. Based on the advantageous features of charged particle radiotherapy, we review pre-clinical evidence revealing a strong potential of its combination with immunotherapy. We argue that the combination therapy deserves further investigation with the aim of translation in clinics, where a few studies have been set up already.

Photon- and Proton-Mediated Biological Effects: What Has Been Learned?

The current understanding of the effects of radiation is gradually becoming broader. However, it still remains unclear why some patients respond to radiation with a pronounced positive response, while in some cases the disease progresses. This is the motivation for studying the effects of radiation therapy not only on tumor cells, but also on the tumor microenvironment, as well as studying the systemic effects of radiation. In this framework, we review the biological effects of two types of radiotherapy: photon and proton irradiations. Photon therapy is a commonly used type of radiation therapy due to its wide availability and long-term history, with understandable and predictable outcomes. Proton therapy is an emerging technology, already regarded as the method of choice for many cancers in adults and children, both dosimetrically and biologically. This review, written after the analysis of more than 100 relevant literary sources, describes the local effects of photon and proton therapy and shows the mechanisms of tumor cell damage, interaction with tumor microenvironment cells and effects on angiogenesis. After systematic analysis of the literature, we can conclude that proton therapy has potentially favorable toxicological profiles compared to photon irradiation, explained mainly by physical but also biological properties of protons. Despite the fact that radiobiological effects of protons and photons are generally similar, protons inflict reduced damage to healthy tissues surrounding the tumor and hence promote fewer adverse events, not only local, but also systemic.

National Effort to Re-Establish Heavy Ion Cancer Therapy in the United States

In this review, we attempt to make a case for the establishment of a limited number of heavy ion cancer research and treatment facilities in the United States. Based on the basic physics and biology research, conducted largely in Japan and Germany, and early phase clinical trials involving a relatively small number of patients, we believe that heavy ions have a considerably greater potential to enhance the therapeutic ratio for many cancer types compared to conventional X-ray and proton radiotherapy. Moreover, with ongoing technological developments and with research in physical, biological, immunological, and clinical aspects, it is quite plausible that cost effectiveness of radiotherapy with heavier ions can be substantially improved.

Particle radiotherapy and molecular therapies: mechanisms and strategies towards clinical applications

Immunotherapy and targeted therapy are now commonly used in clinical trials in combination with radiotherapy for several cancers. While results are promising and encouraging, the molecular mechanisms of the interaction between the drugs and radiation remain largely unknown. This is especially important when switching from conventional photon therapy to particle therapy using protons or heavier ions. Different dose deposition patterns and molecular radiobiology can in fact modify the interaction with drugs and their effectiveness. We will show here that whilst the main molecular players are the same after low and high linear energy transfer radiation exposure, significant differences are observed in post-exposure signalling pathways that may lead to different effects of the drugs. We will also emphasise that the problem of the timing between drug administration and radiation and the fractionation regime are critical issues that need to be addressed urgently to achieve optimal results in combined treatments with particle therapy.

Th balance related host genetic background affects the therapeutic effects of combining carbon-ion radiotherapy with dendritic cell immunotherapy

PURPOSE

The goal of this study is to clarify the underlying mechanisms of metastasis suppression by CiDC (carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) combined with immature dendritic cell (iDC) immunotherapy), which was previously shown to significantly suppress pulmonary metastasis in a NR-S1-bearing C3H/He mouse model.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Mouse carcinoma cell lines (LLC, LM8, Colon-26 and Colon-26MGS) were grafted into the right hind paw of syngeneic mice (C57BL/6J, C3H/He and BALB/c). Seven days later, the tumors on the mice were locally irradiated with carbon-ions (290 MeV/n, 6 cm SOBP, 1 or 2 Gy). At 1.5 days after irradiation, bone marrow-derived immature dendritic cells were administrated intravenously into a subset of the mice. The number of lung metastases was evaluated within three weeks after irradiation. In vitro cultured cancer cells were irradiated with carbon-ion (290 MeV/n, mono-energy, LET approximately 70 ∼ 80 keV/µm), and then co-cultured with iDCs for three days to determine the DC maturation.

RESULTS

CiDC effectively repressed distant lung metastases in cancer cell (LLC and LM8)-bearing C57BL/6J and C3H/He mouse models. However, Colon-26 and Colon-26MGS-bearing BALB/c models did not show enhancement of metastasis suppression by combination treatment. This was further evaluated by comparing LM8-bearing C3H/He and LLC-bearing C57BL/6J models with a Colon-26-bearing BALB/c model. In vitro co-culture assays demonstrated that all irradiated cell lines were able to activate C3H/He or C57BL/6J-derived iDCs into mature DCs, but not BALB/c-derived iDCs.

CONCLUSION

The genetic background of the host may have a strong impact on the potency of combination therapy. Future animal and clinical testing should evaluate host genetic factors when evaluating treatment efficacy.

Anti-PD-1/Anti-PD-L1 Drugs and Radiation Therapy: Combinations and Optimization Strategies

Simple Summary

Although immune checkpoint blockade has yielded unprecedented and durable responses in cancer patients, the efficacy of this treatment remains limited. Radiation therapy can induce immunogenic cell death that contributes to the local efficacy of irradiation. However, radiation-induced systemic responses are scarce. Studies combining radiation with checkpoint inhibitors suggest a synergistic potential of this strategy. In this review, we focused on parameters that can be optimized to enhance the anti-tumor immune response that results from this association, in order to achieve data on dose, fractionation, target volume, lymph nodes sparing, radiation particles, and other immunomodulatory agents. These factors should be considered in future trials for better clinical outcomes. To this end, we discussed the main preclinical and clinical data available to optimize the efficacy of the treatment combination.

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been associated with long-term complete responses leading to improved overall survival in several cancer types. However, these novel immunotherapies are only effective in a small proportion of patients, and therapeutic resistance represents a major limitation in clinical practice. As with chemotherapy, there is substantial evidence that radiation therapy promotes anti-tumor immune responses that can enhance systemic responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this review, we discuss the main preclinical and clinical evidence on strategies that can lead to an enhanced response to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in combination with radiation therapy. We focused on central issues in optimizing radiation therapy, such as the optimal dose and fractionation for improving the therapeutic ratio, as well as the impact on immune and clinical responses of dose rate, target volume, lymph nodes irradiation, and type of radiation particle. We explored the addition of a third immunomodulatory agent to the combination such as other checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy, and treatment targeting the tumor microenvironment components. The strategies described in this review provide a lead for future clinical trials.

Carbon-ion Radiotherapy for Colorectal Cancer

Heavy-ion radiotherapy (RT) is a kind of particle RT, and carbon-ion beam constitutes the primary delivery method of heavy-ion RT. Unlike the conventional photon modalities, particle RT, in particular carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT), offers unique physical and biological advantages. Particle therapy allows for substantial dose delivery to tumors with minimal surrounding tissue damage. In addition, CIRT in particular possesses biological advantages such as inducing increased double-strand breaks in DNA structures, causing irreversible cell damage independently of cell cycle or oxygenation, more so than proton or photon. It can be expected that CIRT is effective on radioresistant cancers such as colorectal cancers (CRCs). We introduced the results of CIRT for local recurrent rectal cancer, lung metastasis, liver metastasis, and lymph node metastasis.

Charged Particle and Conventional Radiotherapy: Current Implications as Partner for Immunotherapy

Radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to interfere with inflammatory signals and to enhance tumor immunogenicity via, e.g., immunogenic cell death, thereby potentially augmenting the therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy. Conventional RT consists predominantly of high energy photon beams. Hypofractionated RT regimens administered, e.g., by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), are increasingly investigated in combination with cancer immunotherapy within clinical trials. Despite intensive preclinical studies, the optimal dose per fraction and dose schemes for elaboration of RT induced immunogenic potential remain inconclusive. Compared to the scenario of combined immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and RT, multimodal therapies utilizing other immunotherapy principles such as adoptive transfer of immune cells, vaccination strategies, targeted immune-cytokines and agonists are underrepresented in both preclinical and clinical settings. Despite the clinical success of ICI and RT combination, e.g., prolonging overall survival in locally advanced lung cancer, curative outcomes are still not achieved for most cancer entities studied. Charged particle RT (PRT) has gained interest as it may enhance tumor immunogenicity compared to conventional RT due to its unique biological and physical properties. However, whether PRT in combination with immune therapy will elicit superior antitumor effects both locally and systemically needs to be further investigated. In this review, the immunological effects of RT in the tumor microenvironment are summarized to understand their implications for immunotherapy combinations. Attention will be given to the various immunotherapeutic interventions that have been co-administered with RT so far. Furthermore, the theoretical basis and first evidences supporting a favorable immunogenicity profile of PRT will be examined.

Photon versus carbon ion irradiation: immunomodulatory effects exerted on murine tumor cell lines

While for photon radiation hypofractionation has been reported to induce enhanced immunomodulatory effects, little is known about the immunomodulatory potential of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT). We thus compared the radio-immunogenic effects of photon and carbon ion irradiation on two murine cancer cell lines of different tumor entities. We first calculated the biological equivalent doses of carbon ions corresponding to photon doses of 1, 3, 5, and 10 Gy of the murine breast cancer cell line EO771 and the OVA-expressing pancreatic cancer cell line PDA30364/OVA by clonogenic survival assays. We compared the potential of photon and carbon ion radiation to induce cell cycle arrest, altered surface expression of immunomodulatory molecules and changes in the susceptibility of cancer cells to cytotoxic T cell (CTL) mediated killing. Irradiation induced a dose-dependent G2/M arrest in both cell lines irrespective from the irradiation source applied. Likewise, surface expression of the immunomodulatory molecules PD-L1, CD73, H2-Db and H2-Kb was increased in a dose-dependent manner. Both radiation modalities enhanced the susceptibility of tumor cells to CTL lysis, which was more pronounced in EO771/Luci/OVA cells than in PDA30364/OVA cells. Overall, compared to photon radiation, the effects of carbon ion radiation appeared to be enhanced at higher dose range for EO771 cells and extenuated at lower dose range for PDA30364/OVA cells. Our data show for the first time that equivalent doses of carbon ion and photon irradiation exert similar immunomodulating effects on the cell lines of both tumor entities, highlighted by an enhanced susceptibility to CTL mediated cytolysis in vitro.

Radiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review of the current landscape and future prospects in the era of immunotherapy

Significant recent advances have occurred in the use of radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). In fact, the past few decades have seen both therapeutic gains and setbacks in the evolution of radiotherapy for LA-NSCLC. The PACIFIC trial has heralded a new era of immunotherapy and has raised important questions for future study, such as the future directions of radiation therapy for LA-NSCLC in the era of immunotherapy. Modern radiotherapy techniques such as three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) provide opportunities for improved target conformity and reduced normal-tissue exposure. However, the low-dose radiation volume brought by IMRT and its effects on the immune system deserve particular attention when combing radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Particle radiotherapy offers dosimetric advantages and exhibits great immunoregulatory potential. With the ongoing improvement in particle radiotherapy techniques and knowledge, the combination of immunotherapy and particle radiotherapy has tremendous potential to improve treatment outcomes. Of particular importance are questions on the optimal radiation schedule in the settings of radio-immunotherapy. Strategies for the reduction of the irradiated field such as involved-field irradiation (IFI) and omission of clinical target volume (CTV) hold promise for better preservation of immune function while not compromising locoregional and distant control. In addition, different dose-fractionation regimens can have diverse effects on the immune system. Thus, prospective trials are urgently needed to establish the optimal dose fractionation regimen. Moreover, personalized radiotherapy which allows the tailoring of radiation dose to each individual's genetic background and immune state is of critical importance in maximizing the benefit of radiation to patients with LA-NSCLC.

Carbon Ion Radiobiology

Simple Summary

Radiotherapy with carbon ions has been used for over 20 years in Asia and Europe and is now planned in the USA. The physics advantages of carbon ions compared to X-rays are similar to those of protons, but their radiobiological features are quite distinct and may lead to a breakthrough in the treatment of some cancers characterized by high mortality.

Abstract

Radiotherapy using accelerated charged particles is rapidly growing worldwide. About 85% of the cancer patients receiving particle therapy are irradiated with protons, which have physical advantages compared to X-rays but a similar biological response. In addition to the ballistic advantages, heavy ions present specific radiobiological features that can make them attractive for treating radioresistant, hypoxic tumors. An ideal heavy ion should have lower toxicity in the entrance channel (normal tissue) and be exquisitely effective in the target region (tumor). Carbon ions have been chosen because they represent the best combination in this direction. Normal tissue toxicities and second cancer risk are similar to those observed in conventional radiotherapy. In the target region, they have increased relative biological effectiveness and a reduced oxygen enhancement ratio compared to X-rays. Some radiobiological properties of densely ionizing carbon ions are so distinct from X-rays and protons that they can be considered as a different “drug” in oncology, and may elicit favorable responses such as an increased immune response and reduced angiogenesis and metastatic potential. The radiobiological properties of carbon ions should guide patient selection and treatment protocols to achieve optimal clinical results.

Reduction of Lung Metastases in a Mouse Osteosarcoma Model Treated With Carbon Ions and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

PURPOSE

The combination of radiation therapy and immunotherapy is recognized as a very promising strategy for metastatic cancer treatment. The purpose of this work is to compare the effectiveness of x-ray and high-energy carbon ion therapy in combination with checkpoint inhibitors in a murine model.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We used an osteosarcoma mouse model irradiated with either carbon ions or x-rays in combination with 2 immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4). LM8 osteosarcoma cells were injected in both hind limbs of female C3H/He mice 7 days before exposure to carbon ions or x-rays. In experimental groups receiving irradiation, only the tumor on the left limb was exposed, whereas the tumor on the right limb served as an abscopal mimic. Checkpoint inhibitors were injected intraperitoneally 1 day before exposure as well as concomitant to and after exposure. Tumor growth was measured regularly up to day 21 after exposure, when mice were sacrificed. Both tumors as well as lungs were extracted.

RESULTS

A reduced growth of the abscopal tumor was most pronounced after the combined protocol of carbon ions and the immune checkpoint inhibitors administered sequentially. Radiation or checkpoint inhibitors alone were not sufficient to reduce the growth of the abscopal tumors. Carbon ions alone reduced the number of lung metastases more efficiently than x-rays, and in combination with immunotherapy both radiation types essentially suppressed the metastasis, with carbon ions being again more efficient. Investigation of the infiltration of immune cells in the abscopal tumors of animals treated with combination revealed an increase in CD8+ cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of checkpoint inhibitors with high-energy carbon ion radiation therapy can be an effective strategy for the treatment of advanced tumors.

Optimizing Radiation Therapy to Boost Systemic Immune Responses in Breast Cancer: A Critical Review for Breast Radiation Oncologists

Immunotherapy using immune checkpoint blockade has revolutionized the treatment of many types of cancer. Radiation therapy (RT)-particularly when delivered at high doses using newer techniques-may be capable of generating systemic antitumor effects when combined with immunotherapy in breast cancer. These systemic effects might be due to the local immune-priming effects of RT resulting in the expansion and circulation of effector immune cells to distant sites. Although this concept merits further exploration, several challenges need to be overcome. One is an understanding of how the heterogeneity of breast cancers may relate to tumor immunogenicity. Another concerns the need to develop knowledge and expertise in delivery, sequencing, and timing of RT with immunotherapy. Clinical trials addressing these issues are under way. We here review and discuss the particular opportunities and issues regarding this topic, including the design of informative clinical and translational studies.

Carbon ion radiation therapy in breast cancer: a new frontier

PURPOSE

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women, with many efforts aimed at reducing acute and late toxicity given the generally favorable clinical outcomes with the current standard of care. Carbon ion radiation therapy is an emerging technique that may reduce dose to adjacent organs at risk while allowing dose escalation to the target. Given the efficacy of the standard treatments for breast cancer, there have been few prospective studies to date investigating carbon ion radiation therapy in breast cancer.

METHODS

PubMed/Medline, Ebsco, Cochrane, and Scopus were systematically reviewed using the search terms "carbon ion" and "breast" in November 2019. Out of the 76 articles screened, 26 articles were included.

RESULTS

This comprehensive review describes the physical and biological properties of carbon ion radiation therapy, with an emphasis on how these properties can be applied in the setting of breast cancer. Studies investigating the role of carbon ion radiation therapy in early stage breast cancers are reviewed. Additionally, the use of carbon ion radiation therapy in locally advanced disease, recurrent disease, and radiation-induced angiosarcoma are discussed.

CONCLUSION

Although the data is limited, the early clinical results are promising. Further clinical trials are needed, especially in the setting of locally advanced and recurrent disease, to fully define the potential role of carbon ion radiation therapy in the treatment of breast cancer.

Charged particle radiobiology beamline using tandem accelerator-based MeV protons and carbon ions: a pilot study on the track-end radiation quality, variable biological effectiveness and Bayesian beam dosimetry

For in vitro cell irradiation using tandem accelerator-based MeV protons and carbon ions, by TOPAS simulation, a pilot study of performance evaluation is presented on a collimation beamline for 3 MeV protons and 10 MeV carbon ions from a 2  ×  3 MV tandem accelerator. Based on the elements and source parameters, a collimated beam of 2.8 MeV protons or 2.5 MeV carbon ions, with 5.175 mm or 5.166 mm full width tenth maximum (FWTM), respectively, can be delivered to the target cell dish. TOPAS simulations and/or deterministic algorithms present a Bragg curve of linear energy transfer (LET) (10-70 keV μm^-1) along a 138 μm range of the proton beam, and a declining LET of the carbon beam (900-100 keV μm^-1) within 4 μm range. Based on the biophysical models for relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons, TOPAS RBE scorers presents a set of depth-variation curves of the proton RBE (for V79 and DU145 cells), linearly related to the Bragg curve of the proton LET. Based on the microdosimetric-kinetic (MK) theory, in the 4 μm range for a monolayer cell thickness, the mean RBEα (V79 cells) of the carbon ion beam is estimated as 3.612 (late S phase) and 1.737 (G ₁/S phase) for the mean LET of 492 keV μm^-1. For practical irradiations, a tunable proton RBE can be acquired by changing the thickness of the cell dish. For the low-energy high-fluence (rate) beams, indirect beam measurements are proposed to detect the proton-beam induced scattering/recoil protons from a beam-intercepting Mylar film, and the carbon-beam induced backscattered electrons from a gold-deposited Havar-foil beam window. Statistical dosimetry for the indirect measurement is established, using a Bayesian model based on the preset number of detection counts, by which the mean value of the whole-dish dose can be prescribed and the uncertainty introduced in the survival data can be corrected.

Harnessing radiation to improve immunotherapy: better with particles?

The combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy is one of the most promising strategies for cancer treatment. Recent clinical results support the pre-clinical experiments pointing to a benefit for the combined treatment in metastatic patients. Charged particle therapy (using protons or heavier ions) is considered one of the most advanced radiotherapy techniques, but its cost remains higher than conventional X-ray therapy. The most important question to be addressed to justify a more widespread use of particle therapy is whether they can be more effective than X-rays in combination with immunotherapy. Protons and heavy ions have physical advantages compared to X-rays that lead to a reduced damage to the immune cells, that are required for an effective immune response. Moreover, densely ionizing radiation may have biological advantages, due to different cell death pathways and release of cytokine mediators of inflammation. We will discuss results in esophageal cancer patients showing that charged particles can reduce the damage to blood lymphocytes compared to X-rays, and preliminary in vitro studies pointing to an increased release of immune-stimulating cytokines after heavy ion exposure. Pre-clinical and clinical studies are ongoing to test these hypotheses.

Rationale for combination of radiation therapy and immune checkpoint blockers to improve cancer treatment

Radiation therapy for cancer is considered to be immunosuppressive. However, the cellular response after radiation therapy may stimulate or suppress an immune response. The effect may vary with the tumor type and occasionally tumor regressions have been observed outside the irradiated volume, both in animal studies and in the clinic. A renewed interest in the role of immunity for the observed effect of radiation came with the current recognized role of immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) for control of selected cancer types. We therefore here review preclinical studies and clinical reports on the interaction of ICBs and radiation as a basis for further clinical trials. Some tumor types where the combination of these modalities seems especially promising are also proposed.

A Novel Prospective Study Assessing the Combination of Photodynamic Therapy and Proton Radiation Therapy: Safety and Outcomes When Treating Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma remains difficult to treat, with high failure rates despite optimal therapy. We present a novel prospective trial combining proton therapy (PT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) and the largest-ever mesothelioma PT experience (n = 10). PDT photosensitizers included porfimer sodium (2 mg·kg-1 ; 24 h drug-light interval) or 2-[1-hexyloxyethyl]-2-devinyl pyropheophorbide-a (HPPH) (4 mg·m-2 ;48 h) with wavelengths of 630 nm to 60J·cm-2 and 665 nm to 15-45J·cm-2 , respectively. With a median age of 69 years, patients were predominantly male (90%) with epithelioid histology (100%) and stage III-IV disease (100%). PT was delivered to a median of 55.0 CGE/1.8-2.0 CGE (range 50-75 CGE) adjuvantly (n = 8) or as salvage therapy (n = 2) following extended pleurectomy/decortication (ePD)/PDT. Two-year local control was 90%, with distant and regional failure rates of 50% and 30%, respectively. All patients received chemotherapy, and four received immunotherapy. Surgical complications included atrial fibrillation (n = 3), pneumonia (n = 2), and deep vein thrombosis (n = 2). Median survival from PT completion was 19.5 months (30.3 months from diagnosis), and 1- and 2-year survival rates were 58% and 29%. No patient experienced CTCAEv4 grade ≥2 acute or late toxicity. Our prolonged survival in very advanced-stage patients compares favorably to survival for PT without PDT and photon therapy with PDT, suggesting possible spatial or systemic cooperativity and immune effect.

Immunomodulation of the Tumor Microenvironment: Turn Foe Into Friend

Immunotherapy, where the patient's own immune system is exploited to eliminate tumor cells, has become one of the most prominent new cancer treatment options in the last decade. The main hurdle for classical cancer vaccines is the need to identify tumor- and patient specific antigens to include in the vaccine. Therefore, in situ vaccination represents an alternative and promising approach. This type of immunotherapy involves the direct intratumoral administration of different immunomodulatory agents and uses the tumor itself as the source of antigen. The ultimate aim is to convert an immunodormant tumor microenvironment into an immunostimulatory one, enabling the immune system to eradicate all tumor lesions in the body. In this review we will give an overview of different strategies, which can be exploited for the immunomodulation of the tumor microenvironment and their emerging role in the treatment of cancer patients.

Radiotherapy and immune response: the systemic effects of a local treatment

Technological developments have allowed improvements in radiotherapy delivery, with higher precision and better sparing of normal tissue. For many years, it has been well known that ionizing radiation has not only local action but also systemic effects by triggering many molecular signaling pathways. There is still a lack of knowledge of this issue. This review focuses on the current literature about the effects of ionizing radiation on the immune system, either suppressing or stimulating the host reactions against the tumor, and the factors that interact with these responses, such as the radiation dose and dose / fraction effects in the tumor microenvironment and vasculature. In addition, some implications of these effects in cancer treatment, mainly in combined strategies, are addressed from the perspective of their interactions with the more advanced technology currently available, such as heavy ion therapy and nanotechnology.

Combining Heavy-Ion Therapy with Immunotherapy: An Update on Recent Developments

Clinical trials and case reports of cancer therapies combining radiation therapy with immunotherapy have at times demonstrated total reduction or elimination of metastatic disease. While virtually all trials focus on the use of immunotherapy combined with conventional photon irradiation, the dose-distributive benefits of particles, in particular the distinct biological effects of heavy ions, have unknown potential vis-a-vis systemic disease response. Here, we review recent developments and evidence with a focus on the potential for heavy-ion combination therapy.

Molecular Signaling in Response to Charged Particle Exposures and its Importance in Particle Therapy

Energetic, charged particles elicit an orchestrated DNA damage response (DDR) during their traversal through healthy tissues and tumors. Complex DNA damage formation, after exposure to high linear energy transfer (LET) charged particles, results in DNA repair foci formation, which begins within seconds. More protein modifications occur after high-LET, compared with low-LET, irradiation. Charged-particle exposure activates several transcription factors that are cytoprotective or cytodestructive, or that upregulate cytokine and chemokine expression, and are involved in bystander signaling. Molecular signaling for a survival or death decision in different tumor types and healthy tissues should be studied as prerequisite for shaping sensitizing and protective strategies. Long-term signaling and gene expression changes were found in various tissues of animals exposed to charged particles, and elucidation of their role in chronic and late effects of charged-particle therapy will help to develop effective preventive measures.

Safety of Combined Immunotherapy and Thoracic Radiation Therapy: Analysis of 3 Single-Institutional Phase I/II Trials

PURPOSE

The safety of combined immunotherapy and thoracic radiation therapy (iRT) has been understudied. We evaluated toxicities in patients receiving iRT from 3 single-institutional phase 1/2 trials.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Clinical/treatment characteristics and toxicities (per the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0) were extracted. For purposes of this analysis, groupings were made into (1) patients receiving immunotherapy plus stereotactic body radiation therapy (50 Gy/4 fractions or 60 Gy/10 fractions), (2) immunotherapy plus 45 Gy/15 fractions, and (3) twice-daily chemoimmunoradiotherapy (45 Gy in twice-daily fractions).

RESULTS

None of the 60 patients undergoing immunotherapy plus stereotactic body radiation therapy (50 Gy, n = 49; 60 Gy, n = 11) experienced grade ≥4 events. There were 34 instances of any grade 3 event (in 15 total patients), with 9 pulmonary specific grade 3 events (in 4 patients). In the patients receiving 45 Gy/15 fractions (small cell lung cancers, n = 26; non-small cell lung cancers, n = 27), there were 2 grade 4 events (in the same patient), along with 17 grade 3 toxicities experienced by 10 total patients (2 pulmonary specific). Lastly, in the twice-daily cohort (n = 22), there were 5 grade 4 events (3 of which occurred in 1 patient) and 16 grade 3 toxicities occurring in 8 total patients (half of which were hematologic).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of combined iRT is safe in the short term. Toxicities did not appreciably associate with demographics or dosimetry.

Intravenous dendritic cell administration enhances suppression of lung metastasis induced by carbon-ion irradiation

Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is an advanced radiotherapy and has achieved good local control, even in tumors that are resistant to conventional photon beam radiotherapy (PBRT). However, distant metastasis control is an important issue. Recently, the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy has attracted the attention. In immunotherapy, dendritic cells (DCs) play a pivotal role in the anti-tumor immune system. However, the mechanisms underlying the combination therapy of DCs and radiotherapy have been unclear. In the present study, we evaluated anti-metastatic effects of this combination therapy, focused on the irradiation type and the route of DC administration, using a mouse model. C3H/He mice bearing NR-S1 cells were treated with CIRT or PBRT, using biologically equivalent doses. Subsequently, DCs were administered intratumorally (IT) or intravenously (IV). IV and IT DC administrations combined with CIRT to the local tumor, but not alone, significantly suppressed pulmonary metastasis, whereas the combination of DCs with PBRT suppressed metastasis at a relatively higher dose. Additionally, the anti-metastatic effect was greater in IV DC administration compared with in IT DC administration in both CIRT and PBRT. The expression levels of CD40 and IL-12 in DCs were significantly increased after co-culturing with CIRT-treated NR-S1 cells. In addition, IV administration of those co-cultured DCs significantly suppressed pulmonary metastasis. Furthermore, ecto-calreticulin levels from CIRT-treated NR-S1 cells significantly increased compared with those of a PBRT-treated tumor. Taken together, these results suggest that local CIRT combined with IV DCs augments an immunogenicity of the tumor cells by ecto-calreticulin expression and the maturation of DCs to stimulate anti-tumor immunity to decrease lung metastases.

The Immunoregulatory Potential of Particle Radiation in Cancer Therapy

Cancer treatment, today, consists of surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, and most recently immunotherapy. Combination immunotherapy-radiotherapy (CIR) has experienced a surge in public attention due to numerous clinical publications outlining the reduction or elimination of metastatic disease, following treatment with specifically ipilimumab and radiotherapy. The mechanism behind CIR, however, remains unclear, though it is hypothesized that radiation transforms the tumor into an in situ vaccine which immunotherapy modulates into a larger immune response. To date, the majority of attention has focused on rotating out immunotherapeutics with conventional radiation; however, the unique biological and physical benefits of particle irradiation may prove superior in generation of systemic effect. Here, we review recent advances in CIR, with a particular focus on the usage of charged particles to induce or enhance response to cancerous disease.